HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLD2025-01250 - BLD CD Environmental Health Review - 11/19/2025 m m ca =
aiOC z5' z0) m
v
N v�a, aoa m CD_to O.�NOC) (D -0 CI) SDI
CD 'a �� m z-- D
'p vf, no m W0 d 3 a O
ED Qco 'cZ ° gym 'a
= ma> va, � � v, co
Cr N 0 0 g X
� �c _ ;- <
rt in M
a m //CL N 0
EOr > CD v0 cr)(o (�DO ydo W N
V1 • -^fD
WX -( Q "" = cp . co a ? ° m CU
V • — iov x _,
PCrn N m < o (III ao3 0 O
0 ~C
i m ,A N � m �, O' 3 co * O O
sic �j, ,` co j (D (Q CQ O rill.
G ^^ " A\ o lii
HI
EU ,V"Ii X ~may
�, r � 0 — n e
0. cs 0 y r _. 3 m O. 4
n 3 - L
0
3. /y
ea �D 0) 0� d
n •
^ �_ �o�v1, / io'
�\• y
11) ID ii q �oi 33- W 13
a�O se'cAi, w�
CT o
ain O .03c,. k.•
o► 4 /.e' **
1-
/ , 14114011)
sa 5 C30•\• \ /\ . ,
, r
rt14 , 3
\ `� % •�
MIME \ r
\ co
a 8 co
tC
N —1 \ •. \ O, s. as
o in C N N
,� in O a ) ► x -s o N
a) O ao��o�` 0N m o
13 O O o
(D -s �� O \ N 3 1 n o
<. S ao\ o� �a Ss a tin c1 a
t0 i0 ,p 2 �6 +p r
E • o'� v! �'
sa. �o Q• w O. pis. a 3
ems'ID CD c{o . at = o
11 n 'SD
(to 7r
rt
CP S -T
.gyp d ���°A X imp-
0 A
0
CT ? 3 co
-h cD 0 l—i
r o01
tr
13
to
o �J g
N0IC8 `
N 1�
z
rt,,,
YI
ITO"
�� o
9)
C
G
EH Setbacks
A.) Drainfield/Reserve requires 10'setback from footing/foundations
B.)Septic tank(s)requires 5'setback from all footing/foundations EH APPROVED
C.)No foundation/Perimeter Drains within 30ft,downgradient of
Drainfield/Reserve area Rhonda Thompson 11/19/2025
D.)No Cut Bank(s)(greater than 5ft and over 45 degrees)within
50ft,down gradient of Drainfield/Reserve area
E.)Use approved mitigation from section C1-9 of the department of
ecology's"Criteria For Sewage Works Design,"when sewer .
transport lines are within 10ft of water supply lines.
/ / \
/ / \
/ / \
/
�r— R1p0, / NEIGHBORING �\
�
/ WELL
I -- R75'
I I
I I
I
I 1 /
\ /
oQ— \ /
G� \\ DESIGNATED RESERVE //
4(./
Q' \\ \ (20X35, 700SF, TYPE 5 SOILS) //
\ / /
Q /
N— \ / . / /
�-' I1 ,.,. EXISTING SEPTIC TANK '/ //
O I
111110.,. I► \,\ ` ,,,
I - - - /
—
411 • PROPOSED ADDITION
T H 1 ►� 3;5s',)>,>
/ .
•
EXISTING DF \ — • - -
(AS PER WORK
BY AAA; 10/1/25)
l• •
EXISTING HOME /.
W/ DECK TO BE ", \
REMODELED • •
7,1 APPROXIMATE
\ ("0,
SHORELINE
•
PROJECT SUMMARY:
SITE EVALUATION FOR PROPOSED
ADDITION. EXISTING SEPTIC WAS
INSPECTED AND LOCATED BY AAA SEPTIC,
SEE FILED REPORT. MOST PROBABLE OSS
REPAIR IS SHOWN AS A DESIGNATED •
r'+',
RESERVE. REPAIR WOULD LIKELY •
,,. t�
REQUIRE PRE-TREATMENT, MEETING �.,61
TABLE 10 REPAIR CONDITIONS IF WELL "cN
o� w.� '.
SETBACK COULD NOT BE MAINTAINED. �;, • III%i .. .
t
CAUTIONED CUSTOMER OF VEHICULAR A,,,,.
? c�o�zs
TRAFFIC IN DRAINFIELD AREAS. "`I IL01IS`�'
1 `yY. 5
CUSTOMER: ERIC CAMPBELL TEST HOLE 1 TEST HOLE 2 TEST HOLE 3
N
440., 0-15" SI LOAM NA NA ril
PARCEL: 2 2 1 2 7 - 5 0 - 0 1 0 1 4 TH @ 15"
ALPINE SEPTIC SITE: 210 ORCHARD BEACH DR
—DESIGN—
ALEX L PAYSSE,DESIGNER SHEET: SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 30' DISCLAIMER: THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. REFERENCES INCLUDE:APPLICANT/COUNTY PROVIDED PLATS OR
3089 E MASON BENSON RD SURVEYS. FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND COUNTY GIS. DESIGN INTENDED FOR SEPTIC PURPOSES ONLY.
GRAPEVIEW WA 98546 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT MAY BE SUBJECT TO OTHER DEPARTMENT/AGENCY REVIEW. DESIGNER NOT
360-507-1546 0 0.5 11 12 RESPONSIBLE FOR SETBACKS UNRELATED TO SEPTIC COMPONENTS.
S L'EL, Pi 2 ,