HomeMy WebLinkAboutPAR Application - 3/7/2000 - MASON COUNTY
SHORELINE PRE-INSPECTION APPLICATION
PLEASE PRINT
1 $42.00 Fee Required
1. Owner: Applicant: \ 1t'S 5 Oc 1 1€c-
Site Address: Applicant Address: t
1-0
Owner Address: City: Si-CC St Zip i
City: St Zip Phone: ( ) aC)(0- i 3_- (9 y"- -
Phone: ( )
2. Parcel No. 22-31 b q- 30-7 L ( Legal Description: + t€' 5 A-f- 6 oV
•
3. Purpose of Pre-Inspection: init,R4 ikri,/
4. Use of Building:
5. Is there any type of water on or adjacent to property?: saltwater lake
river pond wetland seasonal runoff other
Directions to Site:
If the information is incomplete, then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from
deficiencies in the original application. Pre-inspection reports remain valid only until
development changes occur in the vicinity which affect the lot evaluated in this inspection.
Applicant Signature: Date:
Return application to: Department of Community Development,Planning Division
426 W. Cedar/P.O. Box 578
Shelton, WA 98584
(360) 427-9670/1-800-562-5628
gPlease include a $42.00 check or money order payable to Mason County Treasurer
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Accepted by: Date:
GARY YANDO,DIRECTOR
_04 STATFO
o a° 7 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
u
o T i PLANNING -SOLID WASTE -UTILITIES
Z� N Y Y BLDG. I • 411 N. 5TH ST. • P.O. BOX 578
of SHELTON,WA 98584 • (360)427-9670
1864
March 7, 2000
James and Jody Tief
5653 34th Avenue SW
Seattle WA 98126
RE: PARCEL # 22310-79-9071lBlacksmith Lake property
f Y, 7( 8 of 5C,'vej L6/17 ( 13 5u4U (4(
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Tief:
From our telephone conversation about your property at Blacksmith Lake in February 28,
2000, we discussed the proposed location of the well adjacent to your home in relation to the
90 foot buffer and setback from this lake. You described that the well will be on the lake side
of the home but still very close to the 90 foot distance from the lake shoreline.
Due to the constraints that you face on the property with the location of the septic system, the
proposed site of the well can still meet the intent of the buffer and building setback from
Blacksmith Lake. The Department asks that:
A) the minimum of further clearing of vegetation take place to position the well, in order to
keep as much vegetation buffer in place; and
B) the wastage material that is removed during the whole drilling process be confined in a
small area (such as a small pit) so that this material and the liquid are not broadcast into the
vegetation or allowed to flow towards the waterbody.
Please communicate this information to the well contractor, as these are best management
practices for development across Mason County.
Thank you for your close attention in the development of your property along Blacksmith
Lake. For further questions, you may contact me by telephone at (360) 427-9670 ext. 365.
Sincerely,
keYeeet-t_
lan Borden, Senior Planner
Recycled
GARY YANDO,DIRECTOR
• roc4 STATFo M° 7 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
= PLANNING -SOLID WASTE-UTILITIES
zo Y BLDG. I • 411 N. 5TH ST. • P.O. BOX 578
o N Yf +o SHELTON,WA 98584 • (360) 427-9670
7864
February 4, 2000
James and Jody Tief
5653 34th Avenue SW
Seattle WA 98126
RE: PARCEL # 22310-79-9071/Blacksmith Lake property
Dear Mr. Mrs. Tief:
From our site visit on your property at Blacksmith Lake in September 1999, we discussed the
proposed location of your home in relation to the standard 100 buffer from this lake. We
examined the location of the septic system and needed setback and attenuation areas, and
compared what area remains to locate the structures on your property.
The Mason County Resource Ordinance Section 17.01.110 (Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Areas) provides the buffers and setbacks for development adjacent to small lakes and streams.
A subsection on buffers in these areas (D2 - provisions to decrease buffers) does allow a
reduction of as much as 25 percent of the vegetation buffer as long as certain conditions are
taken into consideration.
In this case, the buffer is reduced from 100 feet to 75 feet and the 15 foot building setback is
added from that point, for a total of 90 feet distance from the lake edge to the residence. This
could be done by:
a) no reduction of habitat quality of the buffer that is maintained;
•
1 b) enhancing the degraded buffer or replanting of the disturbed buffer that is set aside; and
c) retention of existing native vegetation on other portions of the site that provides equivalent
1 or greater habitat value to offset the loss of the reduced buffer.
We can discuss this at the site visit going over the building stake out and see how your
proposal can meet these considerations. For further questions, you may contact me by
telephone at (360) 427-9670 ext. 365.
Since ly,
A4b,preee ....._
Allan Borden, Senior Planner
Recycled 4
EH Building Permit Requirements
VERIFICATION OF RECEIPT
This verifies that Environmental Health Buildin.6P ,'�, t Requirements
(Revision 11/10/92) was received by: ',�,i . /�/,',4'��1 'i --
on -r. L' ,
ame Date
Revised 11/10/92
Page 6
.223/0•79. 9o75i