Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPI2004-00276 - SPI Inspections - 2/2/2005 Pao" STgT � MASON COUNTY C DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ° s N Planning Division o y ti P O Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584 (360)427-9670 1864 Site Inspection February 02, 2005 JOSEPH MARSHALL 878 RHODE ISLAND SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107 Case No.: SP12004-00276 Parcel No.: 320021190064 Project Description: DETERMINE GEO TECH AND SETBACK FOR FUTURE SFR Dear Applicant: Pursuant to your application, a site pre-inspection (SPI)was performed on your property. Below you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values. In some cases, setbacks for development from shorelines, steep slopes, streams, and wetlands must be included in your specific proposal; these setbacks are included as part of the comments listed below. This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject property. Please contact me at(360) 427-9670,ext. 365 if you have questions. Sincerely, Allan Borden Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department 2/2/2005 1 of 2 SP12004-00276 Site Inspection 2/2/2005 Case No.: SP12004-00276 Comments: Inspection for Joseph Marshall / Steve Berndt on Oct. 18, 2004: The purpose of the pre-inspection was to evaluate issues related to the construction of a new single family residence on a 1.0 acre parcel off of Gosser Rd. The parcel has been cleared of many of the evergreen and some of the deciduous trees, and the site development area remains open at this time. There is a no drainage channel observed on the parcel and the slope is 10 to 12 percent towards the northwest from the site area. Geotech Report / Landslide hazards: There are no steep slopes on the subject property and no special geologic study is needed for development review. The zoning designation for the site is Rural Residential 5. Standard building setbacks for this zoning are a 25 foot front yard setback on the west side, and 20 foot side and rear yard setback lot, on the remaining sides (lot line setbacks). For the subject o , the side yard setback would be 20 ft. and attention should be made that the new structures meet this setback. These setbacks are measured from structures above grade such as roof overhangs (roof gutters), and other structures / appurtenances, including balconies, decks, heat pumps etc. Shoreline / stream setbacks: No shorelines or streams were observed during site inspection. Staff noted the applicant should make sure that the proposed residence is adequately setback from the proposed septic drainfield and well locations as specified by Mason County Environmental Health. General process: Future site development must include a site plan, showing all setbacks from property lines, slopes and other improvements, will be needed for building permit application submittal. Specific standards for future development contained in County Codes may be found at the County website address http://www.co.mason.wa.us. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Thank you. 2/2/2005 2 of 2 SP12004-00276 MASON CO NTY PLANNING DEPT. PRE-INSPECTION APPLICATION PLEASE PRINT $205.00 Fee Required 1. Owner: 16sEPd Mi44P,_e.14 A-Ljam Applicant: Tb56 P14 �V I�t123N�LZ Site Address: Applicant Address: 87 Sf I wgr)>G 2s-4N D Owner Address: 1 7<e ki{ooE :F4 snip City: 5ArJ Figaryus4-a St _Cyt Zip q41 y-7 City: 5Ar" 'PRAr►ue_isz, > St CA- Zip a"7 Phone:_( y1S ) 310 - 9 2.1., day Pho __yis) 3Io 92-4q day Phone;___ evening 2. Parcel No. 3 20 0 Z -�(_- g006!d Parcel No. - - Email Address: ��d e yyN 1z a comGAs-r, NE-F Legal Description: Planner: Q SMP Comp. Plan tZ Z; Type of Use Water Body t' 6 is L- 3. Purp se of Pre-Inspection : Z22EO:1 ?H ka 4. Use of Buil mg: 161F2. 5. Do any of the following exist on or adjacent to property?: slope 0i", saltwater ( lake ( ) river pond ( ) wetland ( ) seasonal runoff( ) other ( ) stream ( ) seasonal creek ( ) Directions to Site: JA Wy 3 Noe<n-1 TU i4 6 A-TE R D. Tui2ro R it G1tT To G E,R YZp TURni 1k16wr Tv 714E EnuA 5SGY2 (R.p Tu12w LEFT an) TIR1VJN;Tr. IRD, AruO 6U Tp THE CK)D Dt: R6Ab If the information is incomplete, then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the original application. Pre-inspection reports remain valid only until development changes occur in the vicinity which affect the lot evaluated in this inspection, or the laws regulating development of the site change after the time of inspection. Applicant Signature: Date: G' 3t� If you would like to be on site during inspection, please check here: C �~ 7 � Return application to: Department of Community Development, Planning Division t-- P.O. Box279 RECEIVED Shelton, WA 98584 (360) 427-9670 SEP 3 0 2004 Please include a $205.00 check or money order payable to Mason County Treasurer 426 W. CEDAR ST. When completed, this form becomes part of the p el file. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Accepted by: Date: Please illustrate below the proposed building site in lation t water &property lines: SRG/Word/MyDowmentsrTypedStuK/Pre inspeCion MORE ON BACK SIDE e Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation to water and property lines: Departmental Review (For Office Use Only) Planning Department Findings: Revised 12-26-2003 SRG 1 J e v • G�J ��v 325.10 FT.: THENCE S 0-10'41' E 144 FT.: THENCE S 42°39'51' W 190.81 FT.. MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF P a ° o��'4' 0p���,P SA10 GOVERNMENT LOT 2 THENCE S 88'41'56' E. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE. 647.20 FT., MORE OR LESS. TO THE ,� SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 2: THENCE N 0*10'4I' W, ALONG THE EAST LIN£ OF SAID LOT 2. A DISTANCE o'rq- 1p °ti 4' OF 169.28 FT. TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. (V�) �6 \h \9 / TOGETHER WITH ANY ACCRETED LANDS, IF ANY. •0 e a EXCEPTING FROM ALL THE FOREGOING RIGHT OF WAY FOR GOSSER COUNTY ROAD NO. 23790 AND ALSO 2 6 pS, EXCEPTING PRIVATE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY AS RECORDED UNDER MASON COUNTY AUC'ITORS FILE NO. 543162. LOT r,ogG( / Q0�9p 100' RAD. I G° /PROPERTY LINE ANGLE POINT �I2\1•�'S°,L EXISTING WELL //, G�©p EXISTING N 61.46'34' W 7.05 FT. OF CALC. PER 6 ` \ p / DRAINFIELD F, SHORT PLAT CENTERLINE OF EASEMENT 2 1 p\ lk / a\ NO. 2273 l a 40' PRIVATE ROAD /10 \ EASEMENT PER` /',O'10• /J 96,�s/. v N BB°4/'07' W 5.0/ ` a P Q ( N 88'4/ 56 W AF NO 543162 NBC /q3, `'. 9j, R 325.l0 J / d° 2j, o o $ /. E LOT 3 // .00 AC. J o, 1 1 2 •ASS 29 66 / ` o = 3 3c A?e.4Y�5a°\°6 / Q✓�1�L�3 FNp o w // ff z cc O h� • °° C b 403 /F 2 "Q A V ��� v vNj '8 ppp��'S55 15\ R 2?y 44 C'Vij. Q Q N LOT 2 // 7W w m O Q O 10if K Sc I \9°0 h 100' R. ci �iOP SED 100' RAD. ® N I 9 p e e o 100' RAD. '� w 0 SCALE /LOT 4 so loo \ 1 5 1.00 AC. p'1lkf 9A I S\ 30 FT. PR IV,TE ESM' INGRESS, 7�\ � 2 !\ �• 15ll�E EGRESS AND T I L I T I£S. o �3/6.65 �197.91 l�- 7 �59 88-06 N 8B°40 33 W 132.6\ /647.22 - ( N 88°4/'56' W 647.20it ) SE COR. GOV'T. 'c 39b , 38 ' 170 oflkLIklUb y 0 r y" T�L _ I I o � nc i r*t,IE5s AND VriWTIES r„ loop D RoZ2Lzw- f © Y0�33''N/ ' 4 7, 'r'LQ 1 ?L A YJ fq i a SPAa0041— 9/3610`t " via Ml vi{ vF U J Mason Count Permit stance Center y St rL sn��` ' Planning Intake Checklist Owners Namely' t Date: I S _v S Project: Reviewed By: Commerci yelopment: YES O Comments: Planner:(23 RAM TSC CMM Site Plan: u— North Arrow er Property Dimensions:_ �_X a 7 �I e'Streets and Driveways Shown. Road name: V O S SOV k0o m e t is o g ��,�,,., .,.�etbacks e Wel}4��on, Septic and Drain-field Shown with setbacks jal Identify all surface water(streams,ponds, shoreline,wetlands, etc.) R 0 Gr'—Topography(slopes) E J /o�_ p-'11pro osed Structure Setbac DirectionLSetback : F: W / R: ►- / o() S I: S / gS S2: �jJtility and Drainage Easements: es No (if yes enter condition#5022) ❑/Other Easements Yl Q ❑ Accessory Appurtenances cc UgrP eff MrN ee e a W condition#0010) Ac 020) Standard Conditions to be added to all Building permits that planning reviews: #5019 and#0700 Are thgr�nrmpediments that may restrict access to your site? (dogs/gates) Shoreline and Planning Info Setbacks: Shoreline: iV V Slope: Shoreline Designation: Comprehensive Plan: Rural Zonin Not Applicable ❑ Agricultural R—RR 2.5 U 10 20 ❑ Urban ❑ In-holding ❑ RMF ❑ Rural ❑ LTCFL ❑ RC 1 2 3 ❑ Conservancy B-Iural ❑ RI ❑ Natural ❑ RAC ❑ RNR ❑ Unknown ❑ RCC-Hamlet ❑ RT ❑ Urban Growth Area ❑ MPR ❑ Unknown ❑ Unknown q/3 Water Body(type of water if unnamed): c7 Imo¢-- �Q c SEPA: Yes io Unknown 5� (sAAA Flood Plain: YES N Unkno a # Aquifer Recharge: YES NO o Map# Tags/Cases: 0 0 RLC/SPI Case: 1 Year Dev. Moratorium: Y E ,le Nest Tag: YES ther O Addressing: Check box if need ❑ Reviewed by: Revised: 11-05-04 I:\PLANNING\CHARELL&RENEE\PLANNING INTAKE