The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989-1991 - SPI Inspections - 7/29/1991 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT of GENERAL SERVICES P.O. BOX 186 SHELTON, WASHINGTON 98584 427-9670 DATE ISSUED PERMIT NO. OWNER piAME MAIL ADDRESS T`� CITY&STATE ZIP PHONE DIRECTIONS TO JOB SITE PARCEL LEGAL NUMBER 2 .t r:;2r DESCR. J NAME MAIL ADDRESS CITY&STATE LICENSE NO. ZIP PHONE CONTRACTOR USE OF BUILDING CLASS OF NEW ADDITION 7[ACTERATION REPAIR MOVE REMOVE WORK DESCRIBE WORK BEDROOMS DECKS CARPORT NOTICE SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR BATHROOMS TOTALSQ.FT. GARAGE CONDITIONING. NO.OF STORIES BASEMENT ATTACHED THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR TOTAL SQ.FT. FIREPLACE DETACHED ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. PERMANENT SHORELINE SEASONAL OWNERS AFFIDAVIT CONTRACTORS AFFIDAVIT I CERTIFY THAT I AM EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACTORS I CERTIFY THAT I AM A CURRENTLY REGISTERED CONTRACTOR IN THE STATE OF REGISTRATION LAW RCW 18,27, AND AM AWARE OF THE MASON COUNTY ORDINANCE WASHINGTON AND I AM AWARE OF THE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS REGULATING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR WHICH THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED AND THAT ALL WORK DONE WILL BE WORK FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS ISSUED AND ALL WORK DONE WILL BE IN IN CONFORMANCE THEREWITH, NO CHANGES SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT FIRST CONFORMANCE THEREWITH.NO CHANGES SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING OBTAINING APPROVAL FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. APPROVAL FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. X OWNER DATE X BY DATE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DEPARTMENT YES PPROVENo DEPARTMENT YES NO BUILDING VALUATION HEALTH PUBLIC WORKS FEE PLANNING FIRE BUILDING PERMIT D.O.T. BUILDING PLAN CHECK SPECIAL CONDITIONS BUILDING GROUP PRE-INSPECTION SHORELINE f WOODSTOVE PLUMBING MECHANICAL STATE BUILDING FEE STATE SURCHARGE APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY I PLANS CHECK BY APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE PERMIT VALIDATION TOTAL BY CASH CK MO MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT of GENERAL SERVICES Courthouse Annex I N. Fourth & W. Cedar P.O. Box 186 Shelton, Washington 98584 (206) 427-9670 building environmental health maintenance landfill parks&recreation fair/convention center planning sewer&water Terry W . McNabb August 21 , 1989 11624 - 106th Ave . NE Kirkland , WA . 98034 Dear Mr . McNabb, I conducted a pre-inspection of the property , Tract 1 of Lot 5 Tidelands , Parcel #322352200010 , on August 11 , 1989 . Following are my comments regarding this piece of property as a site for a single family residence . -The shoreline designation for this property is Urban Residential according to the Shoreline Master Program . All structures greater than 30 inches in height must be a minimum of 15 feet landward of the existing bulkhead ( OHWM ) or the common line , whichever is stricter ; in this case , the 15 feet . This leaves a minimum amount of space to build a residence , as I had measured approximately 15 feet landward from the bulkhead to be where the steep slope begins . It is feasible to build on a slope if a structural engineer has designed the building plans according to a soil analysis of the property . ( The structural engineer must be certified in the state of Washington . ) -In the Urban designation side yard setbacks are a minimum of 5 feet . This is from the furthest protruding point of any structure greater than 30 inches in height to the side property lines . There is also a side yard setback of 5 feet from the highway right-of- way and from recorded easements . -It is possible to add on to the existing residence or remodel , but all new construction must comply with the current regulations . -A bulkhead may be constructed at the toe of the bank adjacent to the unimproved shoreline . Depending on the value of the bulkhead , a Shoreline Permit may be required before construction would be authorized . Bulkheads shall be constructed as close to the toe of the bank as possible, but in no case shall be constructed more than 6 feet waterward from the toe of the bank ( OHWM) . This would be considered as landfill and is prohibited by the Shoreline Master Program . -The septic system and well criteria should also be considered during your review of this property ( setbacks from water , etc . ) . The property appears to be insufficient for the construction of a reasonably sized residential structure that would meet all the requirements of the Shoreline Master Program. Shoreline Variances are options available to property owners to vary the regulations of the Shoreline Master Program. However , application does not grant approval and a hardship needs to be shown . If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance , please call . Sincerely, Lenore Marken , Planner Dept . of General Services o � � � ouL� D Terry & Zola McNabb 11624-106th Ave. N.E. �iJL 16 1989 Kirkland, WA 98034 206 823-2630 7/13/89 caFNERAL SERVICES Lenore Marken Mason County Dept. of General Services P.O. Box 186 Shelton, WA 98584 Re: Pre Inspect Request Hood Canal Waterfront K/A Tract 1 of Lot 5 Tidelands , Parcel 322352200010 (Best Address Known: 12571 N. Shore, 12 5/10 and 71/100 miles from Belfair, Wa. , Sewell G. & Betty Thomas My wife and I are interested in building a single family residence on a portion of the above described waterfront property. We are discussing with Betty Thomas , that portion, East (toward Belfair) of the existing cement , land filled, Qr bulkhead. We note that there may be insurmountable restrictions regarding the respective 172 ' of unimproved (n shoreline. We hope this is not the conclusion, however in the event that it is , we would still be interested in discussing the possibility of our building on the "east" portion of the existing, land filled, bulkhead. - Please our us give best g y efforts estimate of where and -_- what can be built utilizing approximately 75 ' of existing ' bulkhead. Attached is a site plan to the best of my ability. Your assistance in helping us understand what the realistic, legal and density possibilities are, would be greatly appreciated. Feel free to contact Zola or myself should you have any questions . Requested $25. 00 check is enclosed. Sincerely, Terry W. McNabb Enclosures �' it ' al x�V d..- 1,, ��/�f�fikJ MASON COUNTY 4 DEPARTMENT of GENERAL SERVICES Mason County Bldg. III 426 W. Cedar P.O. Box 186 Shelton, Washington 98584 (206) 427-9670 3.�a �' �� o�� building environmental health fire marshall parks & recreation fair/convention center planning July 29 , 1991 Mary Ann White 1916 Olympic Hwy. North Shelton, WA 95884 Subject : Shoreline request for pre-inspection. Sec. 35 , Twn 22N, R 3W. Tract 1 of Gov' t Lot 5 + TL' s . North Shore Hood Canal . Dear Ms . White : Per your request, a site inspection was conducted of the above property. The following is a summary of the planning department' s findings : The structure as it now stands would be considered "existing nonconforming" for the following reasons . Firstly, the shore yard setback now stands at 13 . 5 feet . The required minimum at the site is 15 feet . Secondly, the required side yard setback is 5 feet; and on the west property line the storage area seems to encroach this setback as well . Of course, a survey would be the only way to determine "proof-positive" that such is the case. The fact that the residence is "existing nonconforming" prohibits any further expansion of that structure, so long as the setbacks are not met . If alterations were made, such that the setbacks were met; then expansion could be allowed. The only other possibility is the pursuance of a shoreline variance. If a variance were approved for the encroachment of the two setbacks then expansion could be allowed so long as the expansion didn' t worsen the nonconformities (i .e . encroached further into these varied setbacks) . I cannot judge on whether or not such a permit would be approved, as it is not my decision. Rather it is up to the Shoreline Advisory Board, and ultimately the County Commissioners to make that decision. In addition, the new construction on the lot should not, in total with the existing structures , exceed a 60 percent site coverage . In other words, the total area of all impervious surfaces on the lot shall not exceed 60 percent of the total area of the lot excluding submerged lands . A gravel parking area would not be included in the definition of impervious surface . Building a new residence in place of the old would be permitted, so long as shore yard (15 feet) and side yard (5 feet) setbacks were met . Also, residence structures should not exceed 35 feet in � r continued . . . height . In addition, any excavation into the existing slope on the property, would be reviewed carefully for stability of remaining slopes . The Mason County Department of Public Works would have a special concern, considering the possible effects on North Shore Road. Repair of the existing boat launch structure is allowable under our "normal repair and maintenance" clause of the Mason County Shoreline Master Program. This clause allows for the repair or replacement of structures without requirement of a shoreline substantial development permit . However, such reconstruction is not exempt from obtaining a Mason County Building permit, SEPA review, and Hydraulic Project Approval ( . . . as provided by the Washington Department of Fisheries) . In the future, if the bulkhead becomes in need of repair the same "normal repair and maintenance" clause applies again; and thusly the same permits are required. If you have any questions regarding the information provided; please feel free to contact this office at 427-9670 . Sincerel . � Steve NicJols, shor-er.-:zr planner Department of General Services CC: Sewell G Thomas 1114 Corbet Drive Bremerton, WA 98312