The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutExcavation Along Property Line - BLD Letters / Memos - 4/10/2013 P9o� CoGN MASON COUNTY (360)427-9670 Shelton ext.352 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (360)275-4467 Belfair ext. 352 W BUILDING• PLANNING•FIRE MARSHAL (360) 482-5269 Elma ext. 352 - Mason County Bldg. III, 426 West Cedar Street 1854 PO Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 www.co.mason.wa.us February 15, 2013 Stephen Ates 60 NE Lake Dr. Tahuya, WA 98588 NOTICE OF COMPLAINT ENFORCEMENT CASE FILE NUMBERS: ENF2009-00112 and ENF2011-00024 PARCELNUMBER: 22330-50-00162 SITE ADDRESS: 60 NE Lake Dr. Tahuya Dear Mr. Ates, This letter is intended to address several issues on the subject property and to have you take certain actions to resolve the violation of the stated development standard. In addressing a still active enforcement case (ENF2009-00112) on your property, Planning Department enforcement staff worked with you in resolving the removal of trees in the vegetation buffer of Haven Lake in late October 2009. The solution to the tree removal concern (a Mason Co. Resource Ordinance standard) was the replanting of six trees (each a minimum of three-years old) along the Haven Lake shoreline (with technical assistance from Mason Conservation District). In regard to the needed tree replanting: On October 25, 2012 and January 29, 2013, Staff inspected the above-referenced property regarding this complaint and found that no new trees were ever replanted and no notification to Planning Department staff that the trees were planted was made, as noted in the ENF2009-00112 case file. A new complaint (ENF2011-00024) was received by the Mason County Department of Community Development. The complaint referred to a) the needed replanting of trees along the lake shoreline and b) the removal of soil along the north property line that causes a cut and steep slope between the properties. When the site was inspected in April 2011, Planning Department staff concluded that no grading permit was needed but some short retaining wall may be necessary at the toe of the cut to stabilize the sloped bank. When observed in October 2012 during permit review, the same area was cut further to prepare for the location of a new garage (permit number BLD2012- 00774). It was expected that a certain amount of backfill would be placed at the exposed toe of bank after a short retaining wall was located near the north property line. An inspection on January 29, 2013 noted that the new building roof gutters with downspouts were located 5 to 7 feet from the north property line and ended in exposed pipes that appear to direct roof runoff downhill towards the lake. This water runoff, primarily from gutters and downspout, will cause soil erosion and sedimentation in Haven Lake. This letter brings to your attention these issues and seeks resolution to the problems that they likely will cause. In regard to the runoff from roof gutters and parking area: The garage on the subject property is located right at the common property line to the north, and this garage has a gutter and downspout Ates Lake Dr buffer alteration and runoff letter.doc system that is exposed and directed towards the lake to the east, with no attempt to convey area and roof runoff safely on the property. Mason County Code 14.48.140 regarding small parcel runoff and erosion control states that adjacent properties and waterbodies shall be protected from sediment deposition and water runoff when development takes place or is proposed. A reasonable solution to address problems caused by the roof and area runoff would be to provide an adequate downspout that would convey the collected runoff from the garage to a sub-surface pipe and then to an existing 12-inch conveyance pipe(capturing runoff adjacent to Lake Dr.) or to a catchbasin that is connected to this conveyance pipe. Planning and Public Works Department staff could assist in helping work out such a proposal that would have minimal impacts to the waters of Haven Lake. A proposal like this would be a cooperative solution to a problem shared by the landowners along this portion of Lake Dr. and the Haven Lake shoreline. Staff would reouest that you perform these corrective actions to address the stated problems in this letter by April 3, 2013 for the roof runoff and tree replanting issues. If you have questions regarding the issues stated and the compliance requirements, please contact me at(360) 427-9670 ext 365. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Allan Borden Senior Planner Ates Lake Dr buffer alteration and runoff letter.doc Permit#:P� MASON COUNTY 1401�'--LOO5BUILDING III 426 W, CEDAR SHELTON, WASHINGTON 98584 (360) 427-9670 CORRECTION NOTICE Job Location 'Doe- - /Qa h' b -e,.— /55?k This structure has been inspected by Mason County Building Department and the following VIOLATION of County Laws and Ordinances has been found: Items listed below must be corrected to gain compliance l C-� A04k1/_ OL CAy I 7-0 S �� You are hereby notified that the above corrections shall be made BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH ANY FURTHER WORK ❑ Call for re-inspection when corrections are made before continuing ❑ please contact our office ❑ Make corrections, items will be checked on next inspection regarding possible structural ❑ OK to damage incurred by recent "natural/man made" ❑This is not a complete inspection disasters.This is NOT Date Department CORRECTION NOTICE. Inspector J10 * NPT `P19 *V THIS T `-Omff Case Activity Listing Case #: BLD2012-00774 (�oA.W Lakt -Fa Au aJP2 BLDA010 Application Received 10/10/2012 10/10/2012 None DONE BLDB 110 Building Plan Review 10/10/2012 10/23/2012 None DONE REVIEW COMPLETED,SENT TO CASE MANAGER. BLDB130 Planning Review 10/18/2012 10/26/2012 None DONE AHB Noted proposed location at site inspection;behind view line along Haven Lake. AHB BLDB200 Environmental Health Review 10/10/2012 10/26/2012 None DONE SIGNED OFF TM FOR AMANDA,PAPER COPY OF APPROVAL WAS SENT OVER BLDA 100 Approved for Issuance 10/29/2012 None DONE CALLED STEVE..LMOM PERMIT IS READY TO BE PICKED UP,ALSO GAVE THEM THE REMAINING AMOUNT DUE. BLDA500 Issue Building Permit 11/2/2012 None DONE BLDA540 Print Inspection Card 11/2/2012 None DONE BLDC110 Footing Inspection ection 11/2/2012 11/5/2012 None PASS TFR BLDC115 Foundation Wall Inspection 11/5/2012 11/7/2012 None PASS BLDC125 Framing Inspection 12/4/2012 12/7/2012 None FAIL LDK 1.install 1000#STRAP FOR PFP ON RT SIDE AT EDGE ON GARAGE DOOR. 2.NAIL PFP 3"OC PER DETAILS. BLDC155 Final Inspection-Passed 12/17/2012 12/19/2012 None PASS LDK - G 'oral nu wU r1 ha5sr 1a,, 51��ws use 11 !�rll (a53) 7o-��Sv. 1 �P �, �� 1 � a 7 %2's� ��z r-m a 75'eAJIA6W /t/ec0414 or &cea vatLd /ua Co�'�ice.�i 44,ct ca- hold a s/. ��^ dam► 4V of /�� f!'5 O►" 5-}-r��u�o�Q., t�i+..w.- -� �- Gta �a-o w�osPi �(J�r-+-Kola L,l�� -(p � a�G��vu'+�.tt) ® s rT `/Z rK ca e u�i-ml G<<s �'- "'�y Grp 1-0 o(A o r a Case Activity Listing2/15/2013 �� ' Case #: ENF2009-00112 1 o:oa:ooAM IM, Assigned Done Activity Description Date I Date 2 Date 3 Hold Disp To By Updated Updated By ENFA010 Complaint Received 8/17/2009 None 8/17/2009 SME ENFA900 Telephone Call 9/17/2009 None DONE CMRC 9/18/2009 CMRC Explained that dangers trees require an arborist report. Will need to replant six new native trees,each a minimum three years old. Also pay the$255 enforcment fee. ENFA900 Telephone Call 9/28/2009 None DONE CMRC 9/28/2009 CMRC Owner left message that some of the stumps had already been there,didn't remove eight trees. I left message saying I will send him photos of the eight I'm refering to,and then he can tell me which ones he had cut down. ENFA100 Additional Information 9/28/2009 None DONE CMRC 9/28/2009 CMRC Steven, I've attached the photos of the stumps that I took photos of. If you can,please print,circle the ones you removed,scan and send back. Or take photos to show the ones that you removed,and e-mail back. Thank you, Christine Clark,R.S. Department of Community Development (360)427-9670 xt.577 ENFA100 Additional Information 10/20/2009 None DONE CMRC 10/20/2009 CMRC Steve, Thank you for the info. Instead of saying that you removed eight trees,it is only going to be five. So you will need to replant six new native trees,each a minimum three years old,per one removed. I recommend planting them where they will not need to be removed later on. For now I need you to get back with me once you know when you will be purchasing and replanting them. Please let me know if you have further questions. Thanks! Christine Clark,R.S. Department of Community Development (360)427-9670 xt.577 Page I of 2 CsseActivity..rpt 2013 Case Activity Listing 102/15 2/�5// AM Case#: ENF2009-00112 lip, Assigned Done Activity Description Date I Date 2 Date 3 Hold Disp To By Updated Updated By ENFA100 Additional Information 10/27/2009 None DONE CMRC 10/27/2009 CMRC Great. Get back in touch with me once you've had them out there,and you know what the time line is going to be. Thank you, Christine Clark,R.S. Department of Community Development (360)427-9670 xt.577 >>>steve ates<builderates@gmail.com> 10/27/2009 1:21 PM>>> Thank you,I have contacted Mason Conservation District and was told that someone would be coming to my home within two weeks to help me with the trees as far as what is available. Page 2 of 2 CaseActivity-rpt 7,7 � 1 1 'I h l it er r, R S Y,�►� rv� ( ��t` �I 1 .•s f y •n� Y t'Sf_'t i Ii� I Ilk, r�Z(.n�11� r�,r r� l•.��' .S +• Ar y�+'saa`'., �, ,... i}'1 }w'u .1"'h`, y ... 1�'t �° J 1--� ✓..�� u�� r s� fir`` ' f' ° ;... Amp- Ar ��'r '�iT�.�4f-�`S P.af.F_�� _�.�. _�..•..e � �'�w1L e��._ �R9�:Y` �'�- ter.. � � _ .. -.,_ .��`d .1•_L i fly ~ter- 4N x Page 1 of 1 S� x l � v r ✓ tip` - r�f�1 •Iy�i� i �� V •t ,_ �;. �� :� Lm :►±ter vPY�. 1 lf` s i k1 Y: • +tt. erKo �- C� r3 W v 1131ym!p 8003 , I N 4 N o v I I b I 1 �� ONLLSp 9�R� � I I DNI1SIaXl1L1S 1 I I >s l I I I i I I ► r FM Havens y ' .1 m il \ LIL U IL4 C4 14 ct I — v 1 } r I e079 q I I II I I I I oI � I � 1 I I � I � � I I