HomeMy WebLinkAboutDDR2007-00310 Hearing - DDR Letters / Memos - 1/3/2008 P6°N co
MASON COUNTY
� rp Shelton (360) 427-9670
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Belfair (360) 275-4467
Planning
Mason County Bldg. 1 411 N.5th Elma (360) 482-5269
P.O.Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584
1854
TO BE KEPT IN THE
PARCEL FILE
January 3, 2008
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION
Case Number: Special Use Permit, #DDR2007-00310
Applicant: Thomas Crosswhite
Notice is hereby given that Thomas Crosswhite, applicant and owner for the above
referenced Special Use Permit, has been granted approval of the project. The Decision
was dated 12/27/07 and approves the permit by the Hearing Examiner per the
recommended conditions in the staff report.
The request for the Special use Permit was approved pursuant to the Mason County
Development Regulations specifically for the accessory dwelling unit.
If you have any questions or require clarification on this issue please contact Grace
Miller, Planner with the Mason County Department of Community Development at (360)
427-9670, x 360. You may apply for your Building Permit at any time at the Permit
Assistance Center.
This is a final decision. No further appeals to the County are available. Appeals may be
made to the appropriate state administrative agency or superior court pursuant to RCW
36.70C. It is the appellant's responsibility to meet all legal requirements of any appeal
process.
TO BE KEPT IN THE _
PARCEL FILE
R E C E I '-
1 DEC 3 1 2007
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR MASO C
MCCD - PLAW7'
Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner - --
3
RE: Thomas Crosswhite
4 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS
5 Special Use Permit OF LAW AND FINAL DECISION
#DDR2007-00310
6
7 INTRODUCTION
8 The Applicant has applied for a special use permit for an accessory dwelling unit
9 ("ADU").The Hearing Examiner approves the application subject to conditions.
10 ORAL TESTIMONY
11 See transcript.
12
13 EXHIBITS
14 See"Exhibits" attached to the November 29, 2007 staff report.
15
FINDINGS OF FACT
16
Procedural:
17
18 1. Applicant. The Applicant is Thomas Crosswhite.
19 2. Hearing. The Hearing Examiner conducted a hearing on the application
on December 11, 2007 at 1:00 p.m., in the Mason County Board of Commissioners
20 Meeting Chambers.
21 Substantive:
22
3. Site/Proposal Description. The applicant seeks a special use permit to
23 designate an existing 900 square foot dwelling an ADU. The proposed ADU is
located upon a two-acre lot. A primary dwelling of 3,552 square feet is planned for
24 the lot.
25 4. Characteristics of the Area. The site is located in an area designated as In-
holding Lands and Long Term Commercial Forest. Residential Development is
SUP for ADU P. 1 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
{PA0682644.DOC;1/13009.900000/)
located to the north, south and east. Forest lands are located to the immediate west.
l All surrounding lots are greater than two acres in size.
5. Adverse Impacts of Proposed Use. There are no adverse impacts
3 discernable from the record. There was no public testimony against the project. The
large lots and forest lands that characterize the area buffer any adverse impacts
4 created by the added density. Septic and building permit requirements will take care
of health and safety issues. The ADU and primary residence will be connected to an
5 approved water system.
6
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
7
Procedural:
8
9 1. Authority of Hearing Examiner. MCC 15.03.050(J) provides the Hearing
Examiner with the authority to review and act upon special use permit applications.
10
Substantive:
11
12 2. Zoning Designation. The subject site is designated In-Holding Lands.
13 3• Review Criteria and Application. MCC 1.03.029 governs ADUs in rural
lands. MCC 1.03.029 not only sets forth criteria for ADU approval, but also provides
14 that the same is subject to a special use permit. As noted above, the Hearing
Examiner reviews and acts upon special use permit applications pursuant to MCC
15 15.03.050(J). The review criteria for a special use permit application are governed by
16 MCC 1.05.044, which are quoted and addressed below.
17 SPECIAL USE PERMIT
18 MCC 1.05.044(A): That the proposed use is not detrimental to public health, safety
19 and welfare.
20 4. As determined in the findings of fact, no potential detrimental effect has
been identified for the project as conditioned.
21
MCC 1.05.044(B): That the proposed use is consistent and compatible with the
22 intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
23 5. The Housing chapter of the Comprehensive Plan (Chapter V) promotes
24 affordable housing and innovative housing techniques to further affordable housing.
ADUs further these policies.
25
MCC 1.05.044(C): That the proposed use will not introduce hazardous conditions
at the site that cannot be mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent
properties in the community at large.
SUP for ADU p. 2 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
t PA0682644.DOC;1/13009.900000/)
1 6. As indicated in the staff report, hazardous conditions are not expected as zi
2 result of the proposal. Septic regulations will adequately address sanitary waste.
MCC 1.05.044(D): That the proposed use is served by adequate public facilities
which are in place, or planned as a condition of approval or as an identified item in
4 the County's Capital Facilities Plan.
5 7. An approved water source is already available for the ADU and the
6 proposed primary residence. The property is currently under review for septic. It is
unclear whether the septic under review is for the ADU or the proposed primary
7 residence. According to staff, the ADU is preexisting with an existing septic .
Therefore, the septic under review is for the proposed primary residence. The
8 currently existing septic system meets County standards. The project will be
9 conditioned on County approved septic prior to issuance of building permits.
10 MCC 1.05.044(E): That the proposed use will not have a significant impact upon
existing uses on adjacent lands.
I1
8. As noted in the Findings of Fact, there are relatively large lots surrounding
12 the proposal buffers against any significant impacts created by the added density. As
also noted previously, septic and building permit requirements will adequately
1 address any other adverse impacts that could affect adjoining properties.
14
MCC 1.05.044(F): If located outside the urban growth area, that the proposed use
15 will not result in the need to extend the urban services.
16 9. There will be no need to extend urban services. Water and sanitary waste
17 will be addressed as previously discussed.
18 MISCELLANEOUS CRITERIA FOR ALL HEARING EXAMINER REVIEW
19 MCC 15.09.055(C): Required Review: The Hearing Examiner shall review
proposed development according to the following criteria:
20
21 1. The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets
the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code, especially Titles 6, 8, and 16.
22 2. Development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is
in the public interest.
23 3. Development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or
neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within the
74 Comprehensive Plan.
2a 10. As noted previously, the project is consistent with the Mason County
Comprehensive Plan. As conditioned, the project will generate no significant adverse
impacts and, therefore, does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is in
SUP for ADU p. 3 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
(PAO682644.DOC;1/13009.900000/)
the public interest (since it promotes affordable housing). The proposal will involve
1 building and septic permits (apparently already issued for the ADU), which will
ensure consistency with Mason County development standards. As noted in the staff
report, the project is also consistent with MCC 1.03.029, which imposes specific
3 requirements for accessory dwelling units. The project does not involve any
subdivision of land and is not subject to any subdivision standards. The project is
4 exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act. An accessory
dwelling unit is not anticipated to violate level of service standards for park or
5 transportation facilities.
6 DECISION
7
The Hearing Examiner approves the requested Special Use Permit subject to the
8 conditions recommended by staff and the following:
9 1. The applicant shall acquire septic and water approval for the ADU, consistent
10 with applicable standards, prior to issuance of building permits (it is
acknowledged that this may have already been done for the ADU—it is unclear in
l 1 the staff report whether references to septic and water are for the primary
dwelling or ADU).
12
13
Dated this 27th day of Decemb , 2007.
�--
14
Phil A. Olbrechts
15 Mason County Hearing Examiner
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SUP for ADU p. 4 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
1 PA0682644.DOC;1/13009.900000/}
or�
TO BE KEPT IN THE
Mason County
Department of Planning
Building I * 411 N. 5th Street * P.O. Box 279
Shelton, Washington 98584 * (360) 427-9670
November 29, 2007
TO: Mason County Hearings Examiner
FROM: Planning Staff— Charles Mead McCoy III — chuckm@co.mason.wa.us
RE: Special Use Permit (DDR2007-00310) for placement of an Accessory Dwelling
Unit
STAFF REPORT
I. Introduction. This report evaluates a proposal for the designation of an existing
dwelling as an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) of approximately 900 square feet. The
proposed primary dwelling to be built on the parcel will be approximately 3,552 square
feet in its overall footprint area when completed. If approved, the newly constructed
primary residence will be located 150 feet from the existing dwelling(Attachment 2).
References to County Ordinances are as approved. Staff recommends approval of
the Special Use Permit as conditioned.
II. Applicant. Thomas Crosswhite.
III. Property Location. NE 201 Ranch Drive, Belfair, WA 98528. Parcel # 22329-
34-90020.
IV. Project Description. The proposal is to construct a 3.552 square foot primary
dwelling and designate the existing 900 square foot dwelling as an accessory dwelling
unit on the parcel. The distance between the existing residence and the proposal new
single-family residence is approximately 150 feet. See site plan (Attachment 2).
V. Evaluations.
A. Characteristics of the site. The lot is approximately 2.00 acres in size and
is surrounded by residential development to the east and west on lots of
generally larger areial size. The surrounding property to the north, south and
east is designated as In-holding Lands. Property immediately to the west is
designated a Long Term Commercial Forest. On site development includes a
single-family residence (900 sq. ft.) a well, and septic system.
B. Characteristics of the area. The site is located in an area designated as
In-holding Lands and Long Term Commercial Forest. Residential development is
located to the north, south and east. Long Term Commercial Forest land is
located to the immediate west of the subject parcel. There should be little impact
CROSSMITE DDR2007-00310 Page 1 of 4
to the neighboring parcels with this proposed ADU due to parcel sizes generally
greater than 2 acres in the immediate residential development area.
C. Shoreline Designation. Not Applicable.
D. Comprehensive Plan Designation / Zoning. The Mason County
Comprehensive Plan designation for the site is In-holding Lands.
VI. SEPA Compliance. Project is SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(i).
VII. Other Permits/Approvals. The proposal will require Mason County Building
Permit for the residential (ADU) construction. Environmental Health Department will
need to approve the septic system and well prior to building permit issuance. A Notice
of Application and Public Hearing (Attachment 3) was posted in the Shelton-Mason
County Journal. Notice was posted on site and mailed to neighboring properties. No
comments have been received to date.
Vill. Analysis. This proposal requires a Special Use Permit due to the requirements
of the Mason County Development Regulations, dated February 28, 2006, section
1.03.029.
Applicable Development Regulations as listed under section 1.03.029 A. are:
A. The ADU shall be subject to a special use permit, unless in the shoreline
jurisdiction it is subject to a shoreline permit.
Applicant has applied for a Special Use Permit.
B. The owner of the ADU must reside on the lot in either the principal
residence or ADU.
The owner resides in the principal residence and a relative will reside in
the ADU.
C. The ADU shall be located within 150 feet of the principal residence or
shall be a conversion of an existing detached structure (i.e. garage).
The proposed ADU is 150 feet from the principal residence as scaled from
the submitted site plan.
D. The ADU shall not exceed 80% of the square footage of the
habitable area of the primary residence or 1,000 square feet, whichever is
smaller.
E. All setback requirements must be met by the ADU.
The proposed ADU is 924 square feet. The primary residence is 1,566
square feet. Eighty percent of that size would be 1,252 square feet. The
proposed ADU meets the size requirements.
F. All applicable health district standards for water and sewer must be met
by the ADU.
The ADU will be connected to an approved two-party water system
(permit WEL2007-00059). The Environmental Health Department is
currently reviewing the septic system. The building permit will not be
issued prior to this approval to ensure the proposal meets all health
district standards.
G. No recreational vehicles shall be allowed as ADUs.
CROSSWHITE DDR2007-00310 Page 2 of 4
The proposed ADU is a manufactured home and not a recreational
vehicle.
H. Only one ADU is allowed on any property.
Only one ADU is requested.
I. An additional off-street parking space must be provided for the ADU.
Additional parking has been provided for as indicated on the site plan.
Staff Response: The ADU as proposed meets all of the above criteria A — I.
Applicable Special Use review criteria: See the applicant's answers to these
criteria, marked (Attachment 1).
A. Will the proposed use be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare?
Staff Response: The placement of the ADU meets all county setbacks and
assures adequate off street parking. No potential detrimental effects have been
identified. The ADU will be connected to an approved water system (WEL2007-
00059) and the septic system is currently under review by the Environmental
Health Department and a permit will not be issued until this system meets all
health district standards.
B. Will the proposed use be consistent and compatible with the intent of the
Comprehensive Plan?
Staff Response: There do not appear to be any conflicts with the County
Comprehensive Plan. Section H-109 states "Mason County should provide for
accessory dwelling units in any district which is otherwise restricted for use only
to single family dwellings."Mason County Code Rural Residential 5 zoning does
allow for one accessory dwelling unit per parcel. The applicant resides on the
parcel.
C. Will the proposed use introduce hazardous conditions at the site that cannot be
mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and the
community at large?
Staff Response: No hazardous conditions would be expected as a result of the
proposal. All construction will be to County code and per the submitted site plan
meets all required setbacks.
D. Is the proposed use served by adequate public facilities, which are in place, or
planned as a condition of approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital
Facilities Plan?
Staff Response: The ADU will be connected to an approved water system
(WEL2007-00059) and the Environmental Health Department is currently
reviewing the septic system. A building permit will not be issued until this system
meets all health district standards. The existing driveway accesses the
proposed ADU and parking space is identified on the site plan.
E. Will the proposed use have a significant impact upon existing uses on adjacent
lands?
Staff Response: It appears there will be no significant impact upon existing,
adjacent land uses. Adjacent land uses are residential. Adjoining parcels tend to
be larger in area than the subject parcel. No comments have been received from
neighboring properties.
CROSSWHITE DDR2007-00310 Page 3 of 4
F. If located outside an Urban Growth Area, will the proposal result in the need to
extend urban services?
Staff Response: The addition of a single-family residence would not result in a
need to extend urban services. The current residence is accessed via NE Ranch
Road (county road).
IX. General Review Criteria Mason County Code 15.09.055(C)
A. The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, and
meets the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code, especially
Title 6, 8, and 16.
The proposal does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal
meets the requirements of Title 6. The ADU will be connected to an approved
water system (WEL2007-00059) and the septic system is currently under
review by the Environmental Health Department. A building permit will not be
issued until this system meets all health district standards. Regarding Title 8,
the proposal does not lie within any critical area or its buffer. The proposal is
SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(i). Title 16 does not apply.
B. Development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is
in the public interest.
The proposed ADU will be constructed to current county code, meets all
required setbacks and will meet all health district standards prior to building
permit issuance in order to address public health, safety and welfare issues.
C. Development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or
neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within
the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed residence will not lower the level of service of transportation
and/or neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established
within the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed is for a single-family residence
within In-holding Lands.
X. Conclusions. As designed, the project is consistent with the Mason County
Development Regulations. Staff recommends approval with conditions.
XI. Conditions.
1.The owner shall reside in either the principal residence or the ADU.
2.Approved per dimensions and setbacks on submitted site plan. Setbacks are
measured from the furthest projection of the structure.
XII. Choices of Action.
1. Approval of the SUP request.
2. Denial of the SUP request.
3. Conditional approval of the SUP request.
4. Postpone the decision for further information.
CROSSWHITE DDR2007-00310 Page 4 of 4
MASON COUNTY F�.( or-�
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELMSEMPT IN Tr i
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PARCEL FILE
A Special Use is one that possesses unique characteristics due to size, nature, intensity of use,
technological processes involved, demands upon public services, relationship to surrounding
lands, or other factors. The purpose of this application is to provide for adequate oversight and
review of such development proposals, in order to assure that such uses are developed in
harmony with surrounding land uses, and in a manner consistent with the intent of the
Development Regulations for Mason County; Ordinance No. 82-96. Acceptance of this
application by Mason County does not guarantee approval of request.
Applicant name Tb,00 &5 Crosswy \*e— Telephone# 751 333`J
Mailing address
�.. 0 y?-T po Lo ft 9 IYsa 81
Site address
Tax Parcel # a S
Legal Description
1 1 sP :ll ),99a PTry TV- a s k hs a
Type of Special Use--Permit: Communications Tower
Accessory Dwelling Unit
Oversize Construction
Other
On a separate piece of paper,please state your reasons for requesting a Special Use
Permit. Be sure to address the following six criteria,your request will be evaluated based on
these criteria.
1) Will the proposed use be detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare?
2) Will the proposed use be consistent and compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive
Plan?
3) Will the proposed use introduce hazardous conditions, at the site, that can not be
mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and the community
at large?
4) Is the proposed use served by adequate public facilities, which are in place, planned as a
condition of approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital Facilities Plan?
Special Use Permit: $1,010.00 - Hearings Examiner: $540.00
Applicant will affso—Fe-Bli ed for all advertising costs. 7-ceptance of this application,by Mason County does not guarantee
approval.
I:\PLANNING\C&RPAC\SPECIALUSE.PER REVISED:4/27/05
N - 1 PAC-i*- ZAEFS
5) Will the proposed use have a significant impact upon existing uses on adjacent lands?
6) If located outside of an Urban Growth Area, will the proposal result in the need to extend
urban services?
7) Please provide a site plan that includes the following:
Zindicate Scale and North Arrow
Property line dimensions,easements,and right-of-ways.
The location of all existing and proposed structures.Include square footage of existing and proposed
structures.
Setback distance,in feet from all property lines and structures.
Existing and proposed road access to and from the site.
ittrs'—
Location of on-site sewage tanks and drainfields.
Location of drinking water supply. Include location on the proposed site and surrounding parcels.
Steep bluffs,wetlands,streams,and bodies of water
I Location of fire hydrants and emergency vehicle access roads,including grade.
Surface and storm water run-off routes.
Applicant(s) signatu>! '�
Special Use Permit: $1,010.00 - Hearings Examiner: $540.00
Applicant will also be billed for all advertising costs.Acceptance of this application,by Mason County does not guarantee
approval.
1:\PLANNING\C&RPAC\SPECIALUSE.PER REVISED:04/27/05
Publication cost is the responsibility of the applicant. Final permit processing will not occur until
advertising fees have been paid to the newspaper by the applicant. The Shelton-Mason County
Journal will bill the applicant directly.
I /WE understand that I /WE must sign and date the attached acknowledgment indicating and that I /
WE understand that is MY / OUR responsibility. I /WE must submit the signed page as part of
application in order for it to be considered as complete.
0
DATE
bOm�
OWNER
APPLICANT
LIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
WITHIN 300 FEET OF YOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARIES
Addresses are to be obtained from the Mason County Assessor's Office, Bldg. 1, Second Floor.
ROy 1U� 1e�e�1� rZ(7�e� d J4� �� ✓1SoVl lZv`as �-t aC�c-NnO(AA 2'�oI(fa
170 NE Z ;Z C-A () NF
�I
i
I
i
i
i
i
i
�I
I
( � I
i
I'
i
I�
I
i
II
i
I�
. I
i
Thomas Crosswhite
PO Box 482
Belfair, WA 98528
Tax Parcel #22329-34-90020
Special Use Permit:
Accessory Dwelling Unit
In reference to questions 1 -6,the answers are "No". I am requesting a Special Use
Permit to establish an Accessory Dwelling Unit and to build a primary home.
N
Nc aoi ,�,4,v� pz
�,�cc� /UD• Zz3ZQ -���1�c Z� •
SET RE BAR 6 CAP LS 40520 RJBERT G. 6 BA.RBARA A. HOLLAND NORTHEAST CORNEP
FOUND ,RE BAR 0.2' N 6 1.6' W� 22329-75-00030 OF FENCE IS 4.85'
(ACT ACCEPTED) S 88'10 08 484.49' NORTH OF PROPERTY LINE.\
" 1 1
253.55' 114.44'
o rn ✓/ r - NORTHEAST
/ CAR PORT ` NEA VE
SOUTHIOF 3.9 , 1
ry IsP e� p.^ CO�E LINE. �`
e C o
s
n . 7�IOBILE
o PARCEL 1 ,, H0
GA m
ti
�^ea 37143.63 SQ. Ft. (2.0007 Acres) 4' SPLILn
T
0
_ ;n 8• RAIL FENCE �+, . :.•�
o � �
1 < <
o Ni 87 36 E 527.06"
� --- - - -- - - i
30.74
STATE FOREST SEPV:�E "' 4916. 5.0
�u
22329-00-50000 m PUMP WELL
o POLE HOUSE \ HEAD i
TREE ranar,F ` (ZT, '
Notice of Application for A Special Use Permit required
under Mason County Development Regulations and
Notice of Public Hearing
Notice is hereby given that Thomas Crosswhite, who is the applicant for the
following proposal, has filed an application for a Special Use Permit.
The request for a Special Use Permit as required under Mason County
Development Regulations Ord. No. 82-96 is for an existing single-family
residence that is proposed to be designated as a Accessory Dwelling Unit of
approximately 900 square feet. The single-family home that is proposed as the
primary residence on the parcel would be approximately 3,552 square feet. The
property location is at NE 201 Ranch Dricve, Belfair 98528. Parcel No. 22329-
34-90020.
Date of complete application: October 8, 2007.
The proposed development is reviewed as a Special Use Permit under the
Mason County Development Regulations and Hearing Examiner approval.
A PUBLIC HEARING will be held by the Mason County Hearing Examiner on
the proposed project on Tuesday, December 11, 2007 at 1:00 p.m. in the
County Commissioners Chambers, Bldg. I, 411 N. 5" Street, Shelton, WA.
Please contact Charles Mead McCoy III of the Mason County Department of
Community Development at (360) 427-9670, ext. 294, with any questions or
comments on this development and Special Use Permit Application.
H:\ADU-Special use Permit\Crosswhite\Crosswhite public notice.doc.ram
LIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
WITHIN 300 FEET OF YOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARIES
Addresses are to be obtained from the Mason County Assessor's Office, Bldg. 1, Second Floor.
Roy /V e-f+ 0c, ekV1 S 0 n 1Za .-t c� 6cenbu.c` �o(�u
s�o Nc— Z CAo fLou,CN,
`rGAA►tkyu
i
I
i'
I
i
I
I
l
i
I� 'I
� I
lil it
I i
I
i;
I
Notice of Application for A Special Use Permit required
under Mason County Development Regulations and
Notice of Public Hearing
Notice is hereby given that Thomas Crosswhite, who is the applicant for the
following proposal, has filed an application for a Special Use Permit.
The request for a Special Use Permit as required under Mason County
Development Regulations Ord. No. 82-96 is for an existing single-family
residence that is proposed to be designated as a Accessory Dwelling Unit of
approximately 900 square feet. The single-family home that is proposed as the
primary residence on the parcel would be approximately 3,552 square feet. The
property location is at NE 201 Ranch Dricve, Belfair 98528. Parcel No. 22329-
34-90020.
Date of complete application: October 8, 2007.
The proposed development is reviewed as a Special Use Permit under the
Mason County Development Regulations and Hearing Examiner approval.
A PUBLIC HEARING will be held by the Mason County Hearing Examiner on
the proposed project on Tuesday, December 11, 2007 at 1:00 p.m. in the
County Commissioners Chambers, Bldg. I, 411 N. 5`h Street, Shelton, WA.
Please contact Charles Mead McCoy III of the Mason County Department of
Community Development at (360) 427-9670, ext. 294, with any questions or
comments on this development and Special Use Permit Application.
HAAADU-Special use Permit\Crosswhite\Crosswhite public notice.doc.ram
Please
-41L i
To:
Dge Sort to Ale:
r 21
Notice of Application for A Special Use
Permit required under Mason County Affidavit of Publication
Development Regulations and Notice of
Public Hearing
Notice is hereby given that Thomas
Crosswhite,who is the applicant for the fol STATE OF WASHINGTOty' I SS.
lowing proposal,has filed an application for a COUNTY OF MASON
Special Use Permit.
The request for a Special Use Permit as Julie G.Orme being first duly sworn
required under Mason County Development
Regulations Ord. No. 82-96 is for an exist- on oath deposes and says that she is the clerk
ing single-family residence that is proposed of the SHELTON-MASON COUNTY JOURNAL, a weekly newspaper. That
to be designated as a Accessory Dwelling said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six
Unit -f approximately t is square feet.The months prior to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to, published in
single-family home that is proposed as the P P
primary residence on the parcel would be ap- the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in SHELTON,Mason
proximately 3,552 square feet.The property County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an
location is at NE 201 Ranch Drive, Belfair office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That
98528.Parcel No.2232934-90020. the said SHELTON-MASON COUNTY JOURNAL was on the 9th day of
Date of complete application: October 8, August, 1941, approved as a legal newspaper by the Superior Court of said
2007. Mason County.
The proposed development is reviewed
as a Special Use Permit under the Mason That the annexed is a true co
County Development Regulations and Hear PY of a Notice of Appl.For A Special Use
ing Examiner approval.
A PUBLIC HEARING will be held by the Permit and Notice of Public Hearing-Thomas Crosswhite
Mason County Hearing Examiner on the pro-
posed project on Tuesday, December 11,
2007 at 1:00 p.m. in the County Commis- as it was published in regular issues and not in supplement form of said
sioners Chambers,Bldg.1,411 N.5th Street,
Shelton, e c newspaper once each week for period of two
Please contact Charles Mead McCoy III
of the Mason County Department of Com- consecutive weeks,commencing on the
munity Development at (360) 427-9670, ext.
294,with any questions or comments on this 22nd day of November' 2007 and ending on the
development and Special Use Permit Appli-
cation. 11/22 29 2t 29th day of November 2007 both dates inclusive,
and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of
the said period.That the full amount of the fee charged for the
foregoing publication is the sum of$ 76.00
SIEIq'�� ,,���/ Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of
oR;snliiloq /ISy��� November 12007
G NOTq? L3)L 01— A��w
_ Notary Public in an for the State of Washington
N� . UBCIC Residing at Shelton,Washington
O ? :
'05:20�*\' ',O\\��� My commission expires I ,20
///,����iH;NG�xx1�