Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMEP2015-00048 - MEP Permit / Conditions - 2/10/2016 ypN"STgTFo� MASON COUNTY �P C Ao N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division ? 0T Z N v Y 426 W Cedar St, Shelton, WA 98584 1864 (360)427-9670 MASON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT February 10, 2016 GARY GESSEL 5716 81 ST Parcel Number(s): 221075000032 Expiration Date. 2/10/2018 12:00:OOA Date Issued: 2/10/2016 Case Number: MEP2015-00048 Project Description: PROPOSING TO BUILD A NEW SFR, ADDING AN UPLAND RETAINING WALL 4' TALLABOVE EXISTING VEGETATION LINE The following critical areas are present on this property: Long-Term Commercial Forest XX FWHCA Ch. 17.10.060; Ch. 17.01.110; Mineral Resource Lands Frequently Flooded Areas Ch. 17.01.066; Ch. 17.01.090; Inholding Lands Landslide Hazard Areas Ch. 17.01.062; Ch. 17.01.100; Wetlands Seismic Hazard Areas Ch. 17.01.070; Ch. 17.01.102; Critical Aquifer Recharge Erosion Hazard Areas Ch. 17.01.080; Ch. 17.01.104. This permit, with conditions, is granted pursuant to the Mason County Resource Ordinance (Chapter 17.01 MCC.) Nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, or regulations applicable to this project. This permit may be rescinded if the permitee fails to complete the project as proposed or fails to comply with the standards of this ordinance. Authorized Local Government Official Date Conditions: 2/10/2016 Page 1 of 2 MEP2015-00048 MASON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT 2/10/2016 Case No.: MEP2015-00048 1.) Proper erosion and sediment control practices must be used on the construction site and adjacent areas to prevent upland sediments from entering shoreline waters. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent soil from being carried into surface water by stormwater runoff. Sand, silt, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered pollutants. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutapollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW, Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. Any work in or adjacent to waterways that will adversely affect water quality must receive specific prior authorization from the Department of Ecology pursuant to WAC 173-201A-110. A short-term water quality standards modification may be issued if the proponent agrees to a number of specific construction practices and techniques designed to minimize water quality impacts. All areas disturbed or newly created by construction activities must be revegetated using bioengineering techniques, clean durable riprap, or some other equivalent type of protection against erosion when other measures are not practical. 2.) Approved per dimensions and setbacks on submitted site plan. No permit or exemption authorizing construction shall extend for a term of more than five years. If actual construction of a development for which a permit has been granted has not begun within two years after approval, the Review Authority, the Mason County Planning Department, shall review the Mason Environmental Permit(MEP)and upon showing good cause, may extend the initial two year period by one year. No permit shall be extended unless the applicant has requested such review and extension prior to the exporation date. LW21::A41qen­' 4 2 /6/(� Signature Date OWNER -CREPRESENTATIV - CONTRACT Print Name ` Circle one to in 2/10/2016 Page 2 of 2 MEP2015-00048 1 MASON ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT($630 or($380 v other permit) Mason County Permit Center Use: ❑ CONDITIONAL USE($1520) MEP v(u ) _ �} ❑ HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN REVIEW($445) Date Rcvd MASON COUNTY RECEIVED DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mason County Resource Ordinance(Chapter 17.01 MCC) DEC 222015 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT APPLICATION 126 W. CEDAR ST. The purpose of the Resource Ordinance is to protect Mason County's natural resource lands and critical areas and is under the authority of Chapters 36.32,36.70A,39.34,58.17, 76.09,84.33,84.34 and 90.58 RCW. PLEASE PRINT 1.PROPERTY OWNER Name: 6W ., I 1 &-L Mailing Address: 57/6 8/ 5T q i � � JOW U)*+ CW%� Work Phone: Email Address: -�C Home/Cell Phone: Fax#: If an agent is acting for the property owner during the permit process, complete#2. 2.AUTHORIZED AGENT Name: 12066-d 4&^1AA/ Mailing Address:41085, ,4)6,J Work Phone: _� YU 3 ?6-7 Email Address: Home/Cell Phone: Fax# 340 W b 3 73-7 3.PROJECT SITE Site Address: yga ; 41C Of AMR4 6Q_}ff j/ qa-XV& Parcel#: 2Z 10 S-6 - O&y 3 2_ Legal Description-AYOW xen-r, IA, "?a Directions to Site: Attach a site plan showing the following: Lot Dimensions,Flood Zones,Existing Structures,Fences, Water Lines,Driveways,Drainage Plans,Shorelines,Septic System,Topography,Proposed Improvements,Easements,North Arrow,and Scale. Also draw a separate topography diagram. i(*ofim wmN lkx elopmcmTAC.M!1' f'agc 1 of% R;+v i,:d l;m:2010 4 _ A 1 4: State which section requires permit: ❑ Long Term Commercial Forest,Chapter 17.10.060 ❑ Frequently Flooded Areas,Chapter 17.01.090 ❑ Mineral Resource Lands,Chapter 17.01.066 ❑ Landslide Hazard Area,Chapter 17.01.100 ❑ Aquifer Recharge Area,Chapter 17.01.080 ❑ Seismic Hazard Areas,Chapter 17.01.102 ❑ Erosion Hazard Area,Chapter 17.01.104 ❑ Fish&Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas,Chapter ❑ In-Holding Lands,Chapter 17.01.062 17.01.110 Wetlands,Chapter 17.01.070 5. Identify current use of the property with existing improvements: CV!?1t -ar v)& /S 04e.4A'r, ?ft44J/A6 AW 4A)Gk-':' 6. Identify and describe the proposed project,including the type of materials to be used,construction methods, principle dimensions,and other pertinent information(attach additional sheets,if needed): U j 44AJ D &--T fn1 INN, All �EbE��le�i tt NE 7. Describe why the action requiring this permit cannot be avoided. ALce&D -rP &ateif COphlad St"i eAe ,. 8. Will there be an alteration of a wetland and/or wetland vegetation area(circle one)? Yes No 9. Identify any surface water on or adjacent to property(circle one): Saltwater ik Stream Pond Wetland Drainage Ditch 10. Identify existing septic/sewer connection(circle one): If septic is located on project site,include records. ,Connected to Sep Connected to Community Septic 11. Identify existing water supply(circle one): Public Water Supply Well 11. Type of Job(circle one): Add Alteration Repair Demolition Other: Print Name Signature Date ►.'Community pevelopment\PAC`,MEP Page 2 of 2 Revised June 2010 MASON LAKE 'NO PERIMETER DRAINS 30' i \ DOWNSLOPE OF DRAINFIELD � � s ell i i PROPOSED \ \ SEPTIC TANK& PUMP TANK EXISTING KEEP 504 FROM WELL SHORELINE \ � � s PROPOSED 4 BED DRAT NFI ELD RESERVE BETWEEN v EXISTING v �15 WELL EXISTING WELL V� cusrohM GARY CEO SCALE:NO PIONEER DIC=GIlVG, INC. PAKCM#22W--0000M TM HOLE t TM HOLE 2 SEPTIC DESIGNS DRAWING Aar PLAN 0-60 cis oho as m F.MASON wwN RD. GLVV EW,WA 9WA6 DMGNM, R ORKT PAYM ROOKS-60 ROOTS-60 OMa-36044264$M FAX-3W427-2M DATE AUCM17 20L5 Typical Gravity Wall Section Top block Grade to drain surface water Selback=1 %"(41 mm) away from wall (5*batter angle on wall) Non-woven geotexdle fabric (ff specified by Engineer based on sibs soil conditions) I I-RETAINED SOIL L I L Middle block(I yPIM) Block widths vary with design inulyd Solid bottom block Block widths vary with design im, brain Leveling pad This drawing is for reference only.Determination of the suitability and/or manner of use of any details contained in this document Is the sole responsibility of the design engineer of record.Final project designs,Including all construction details,shall be prepared by a licensed professional engineer using the actual conditions of the proposed site. OaAWNHY: 7 JRJ TMF_ Typical APPROVEO UY: JRJ Typical Gravity Wall Detail REDIRDCK® 0WJ US 31 SOUTH,CHARLEVOIX,MI 49720 0ATF_- 06-22-2015 (8N)2Z!44Wext30l0 * en"rlrq@redk0Ck.MM I of 1 FILF I Typical FSHEEr. I of 1 RIM I Typical Gravity Wall Detail 062215.dwg 2 1 Grace Miller - Re: FW: MEP2015-00048 From: Grace Miller To: Gary Gessel; Roger Denny Subject: Re: FW: MEP2015-00048 Yes, that is correct. Than you. >>> Gary Gessel <garygessel@gmail.com> 3/21/2016 8:21 PM >>> Roger, Grace, thanks very much for the clarification.As I understand it, if the home is on the common line, we have 15' beyond the common line towards the lake to landscape. Since, however, we pulled the residence back up the hill from the common line, as I understand it, we still have 15' beyond the common line for our own choice of landscaping.Assuming the distance from the residence to the common line is, say, 20 feet, then that would provide 35' of landscaping behind the home.Is that all correct?Thanks for checking. Gary Gessel On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Roger Denny <dhi3767@msn.com> wrote: Clarification from Grace Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:30:53 -0700 From: Gbm@co.mason.wa.us To: dhi3767@msn.com Subject: RE: MEP2015-00048 Yes, you have 15' for landscaping, lawn, patio, etc,then it should be native vegetation from that point down to the lake, and on both sides of the retaining wall. 615 West Alder Street Shelton, WA 98584 >>> Roger Denny <dhi3767@msn.com> 3/21/2016 3:21 PM >>> Grace, If the residence is on the common line then we have 15' in front of that before the replanting needs to start ? Roger Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:56:51 -0700 From: Gbm@co.mason.wa.us To: dhi3767@msn.com Subject: Re: MEP2015-00048 Roger, The buffer area begins at the ordinary high water mark of the lake and extends uphill to within 15' of the new residence.You should restore the shoreline within the vegetated buffer area, parallel to the lake.I do not have the permit in front of me but as I recall, the plan submitted recommended at least one new tree be planted in this buffer. The native salal and huckleberry should be retained and/or replaced with same native vegetation. So you will begin at the ordinary high water mark and extend uphill to at least 15' from the residence with native tree and shrubs and groundcover such as were there before the large trees were cut. Let me know if you need further clarification or I am not answering question.Thank you. about:blank 3/22/2016 Grace 615 West Alder Street Shelton, WA 98584 >>> Roger Denny <dhi3767@msn.com> 3/21/2016 8:12 AM >>> Grace, Gary Gessel, MEP2015-00048, Habitat Management Plan, BLD2015-00662. I am needing clarification on set back requirements and buffer area. I understand the 4' retaining wall needs to be constructed above existing vegetation line. The common building line is less than the required 100' buffer, how far behind the retaining wall are we required to restore as per the report ? Thanks, Roger about:blank 3/22/2016 2 f 1 Grace Miller-RE: MEP2015-00048 From: Roger Denny<dhi3767@msn.com> To: MC-Grace Miller<gbm@co.mason.wa.us> Date: 3/21/2016 3:32 PM Subject: RE: MEP2015-00048 thank you Grace � c �;w:_�21©` - 50-OW3a �t tit�f°ao15-ao0 y8 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:30:53 -0700 DO8"toPie: 3& From: Gbm@co.mason.wa.us To: dhi3767@msn.com Subject: RE: MEP2015-00048 Yes you have 15 for landscaping, lawn, atio, etc, then it should be native vegetation from that point , Yp g down to the lake, and on both sides of the retaining wall. 615 West Alder Street Shelton, WA 98584 >>> Roger Denny<dhi3767@msn.com> 3/21/2016 3:21 PM >>> Grace, If the residence is on the common line then we have 15' in front of that before the replanting needs to start ? Roger Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:56:51 -0700 From: Gbm@co.mason.wa.us To: dhi3767@msn.com Subject: Re: MEP2015-00048 Roger, The buffer area begins at the ordinary high water mark of the lake and extends uphill to within 15' of the new residence. You should restore the shoreline within the vegetated buffer area, parallel to the lake. I do not have the permit in front of me but as I recall, the plan submitted recommended at least one new tree be planted in this buffer. The native salal and huckleberry should be retained and/or replaced with same native vegetation. So you will begin at the ordinary high water mark and extend uphill to at least 15' from the residence with native tree and shrubs and groundcover such as were there before the large trees were cut. Let me know if you need further clarification or I am not answering question. Thank you. Grace file:///C:/Users/gbm/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/56F01409Masonmai1100167376E1372FD 1/GW_00001.... 3/21/2016 r I 615 West Alder Street Shelton, WA 98584 >>> Roger Denny <dhi3767@msn.com> 3/21/2016 8:12 AM >>> Grace, Gary Gessel, MEP2015-00048, Habitat Management Plan, BLD2015-00662. I am needing clarification on set back requirements and buffer area. I understand the 4' retaining wall needs to be constructed above existing vegetation line. The common building line is less than the required 100' buffer, how far behind the retaining wall are we required to restore as per the report ? Thanks, Roger file:///C:/Users/gbm/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/56F01409Masonmail100167376E1372FD1/GW 00001.... 3/21/2016