The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHMP - HMP Habitat Managment Plan - 1/30/2009 y THE WETLAND CORPS Wetland Delineation • Habitat Management Plans • Riparian Restoration - Mitigation • Biological Evaluation ZIMNY HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN Parcel# 121185000004 East Rauchert Road Mason County,Washington Prepared for: Timothy Zimny PO Box 4135 South Colby,WA 98384 Prepared by: Heather Lane and Lee Boad January 2009 PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com THE WETLAND CORPS �f Wetland Delineation - Habitat Management Plans - Riparian Restoration - Mitigation • Biological Evaluation ZIMNY HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................1 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ...............................................................................................2 3.0 APPLICABLE SETBACKS..................................................................................................3 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT AND SPECIES.................................................................3 5.0 ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS ....................................................................................................5 6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES.................................................................................................7 7.0 MONITORING ...................................................................................................................10 8.0 SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................10 Figures Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map Figure 2. Site Plan Figure 3. National Wetland Inventory Map Figure 4. Mason County Soil Survey Map Figure 5. Department of Natural Resources Water Resource Map PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com boy THE WETLAND CORPS -� Wetland Delineation • Habitat Management Plans • Riparian Restoration • Mitigation - Biological Evaluation January,2009 Page 1 ZIMNY HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN Grapeview, Washington 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The details of a Habitat Management Plan requested by Tim Zimny for the property located off of Rauschert Road (Parcel No. 121185000004) are discussed in full in this report. The site is found in the NW 1/4 of Section 18 Township 21 North, Range 1 West(See Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map). The purpose of this Habitat Management Plan (HMP) is to address potential impacts resulting from the proposed construction of a portion of an SFR to encroach within the regulated shoreline buffer associated with Case Inlet. The Common Line Setback for this property would provide a shoreline buffer of 22-feet; however, Mason County requires an undisturbed buffer of no less than 35 feet (20-foot buffer with 15-foot building setback). Given the existing septic and drainfield location occupying the northern portion of the property, the proposed building will have to be pushed south of the septic and drainfield, encroaching into the 35-foot shoreline buffer. The proposed SFR 11 be 30.-feet from the shoreline at the nearest point, and the attached deck will extend to," feet from the shoreline. This is the furthest distance from the shoreline that is feasible given the nature of the proposal, size and configuration of the lot, and septic requirements. The objectives of this HMP are as follows: ■ To evaluate the potential adverse effects to critical area functions as well as fish and wildlife habitat resulting from the construction of an SFR within the regulated buffer of a shoreline (Case Inlet) within the parcel. The SFR will be placed 30 feet from the OHWM of the shoreline and the uncovered deck will extend tfeet from the shoreline. Emphasis is placed on the possible loss of habitat for any listed species found to be residing in the vicinity of the parcel. ■ To identify possible mitigation measures that could be implemented to offset the adverse effects resulting from the proposed project. PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com ,e�7k(y Zimny HMP P� y January,2009 Page 2 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The ownership is approximately one-quarter acre in size, roughly rectangular in shape, and is oriented north to south. Case Inlet is located south of the property and residential lots of similar size and shape border the parcel to the east and west. East Rauschert Road borders the parcel to the north. The northern half of the parcel is dominated by a dense community of scotchbroom, which abruptly transitions to a lawn area extending south to the steep shoreline bank. The lawn area contains several mature fruit trees, but lacks any native vegetation. The steep bank grades down to the OHWM of Case Inlet, and is occupied by a dense vegetative community of ivy and himilayan blackberry, with lesser amounts of rhododendron, and Oregon grape. With the exception of the steep bank to the shoreline, topography within the parcel slopes is relatively flat, sloping at a low gradient southerly toward the shoreline. Le- J �J ti 1- Photo 1. Southern portion of the property,containing the steep bank down to the shoreline of Case Inlet. PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com �`k y Zimny HMP /0J January,2009 Page 3 s . A y t Photo 2. Northern portion of the property occupied by scotchbroom,transitioning to lawn area and fruit trees. 3.0 APPLICABLE SETBACKS The project site is within the jurisdiction of Mason County. Ordinance 17.01.110 identifies Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas adopted by Mason County. The applicable setback for this project is as follows: Habitat Type Buffer Building Setback from Buffer Saltwater Shoreline (Case Inlet) 20' 15' 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT AND SPECIES 4.1 Puget Sound Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytsha)-Threatened Listed as threatened since March 24, 1999 adult Puget Sound Chinook spawn in several rivers and streams flowing into Puget Sound. The shoreline of Case Inlet is listed as a Final Designation on the Northwest Region Critical Habitat Designations for West Coast Salmon and Steelhead in Washington - August 2005. No work is proposed within the shoreline. The proposed project will not require any shoreline modification or native vegetation removal within the shoreline buffer. Therefore, the proposed project is not expected to have impacts on Puget Sound Chinook. This is primarily due to absence of spawning habitat within the project site and the fact that no shoreline modification or native vegetation removal within the shoreline buffer is proposed. 4.2 Bull Trout(Salvelinus malma)-Threatened Bull trout typically inhabit very cold, clear headwater streams at high elevations that are supported by snowmelt. For spawning and early rearing, bull trout require loose, clear gravel, PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com � y Zimny HMP January,2009 Page 4 relatively free of fine sediments. The nearest population of bull trout occurs as three subpopulations in the Skokomish Basin. No bull trout habitat is in proximity to or will be affected by the proposed project. 4.3 Puget Sound Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss)-Threatened Listed as Threatened since May 2007, Puget Sound Stealhead spawn in several streams throughout Puget Sound. Spawning usually occurs in moderate to steep gradient sections of streams, usually in heads of riffles or the tails of pools where hydraulic conditions are conducive anterior portions rtions of islands are also used. Spawn to mtragravel flow. Side channels and the timing for summer steelhead runs typically ranges from mid May through October while winter run steelhead are present from December through May. Adequate cover from predation, water temperature, and spawning gravel are important factors for instream habitat, while little is currently known about specific marine habitat requirements. As no modifications to any aquatic habitat are necessary for this project, no adverse impacts to Puget Sound Steelhead are predicted. There will be no functional riparian habitat displaced. 4.4 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)-Threatened Habitat areas associated with Bald Eagle include uneven aged coniferous stands with some old- growth components. Nests are typically constructed in larger trees with dead or broken tops providing an unobstructed view of nearby water. Snags and trees with exposed lateral limbs, or dead tops are used as perches and defense stations. There are no documented Bald Eagle nesting sites in the vicinity of the project area. Currently there are no trees within the shoreline buffer that have potential to be utilized by bald eagle. The proposed project will not require the removal of any native overstory components, with the exception of the fruit trees. Native vegetation plantings defined in Section 6.5 are recommended to enhance the portion of the shoreline buffer outside of the development zone, and are expected to eventually provide habitat features important to the Bald Eagle in the future. With recommended mitigation, this project is not expected to adversely impact the use of the site or surrounding area by bald eagles. 4.5 Marbled Murrelet(Brachyramphus marmoratus)-Threatened Marbled Murrelets are typically associated with coastal habitats and nest in old-growth forests. Murrelets may fly as far as 50 miles inland to nest, however the average distance is roughly 5- miles from nest to sea. It is only during the summer breeding months that they are commonly found inland. During non-nesting seasons they live at sea. Murrelets require tall mossy trees in coniferous old growth forests with cavities on thick branches where they can construct a cup nest 20-40 meters above the forest floor. Murreletts have been documented laying eggs on rocky ground habitats only when a sufl icient forest is unavailable. There are no documented nesting sites surrounding the project site. No potential nesting trees are within the project area. This project is not expected to adversely PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com Zimny HMP January,2009 Page 5 impact Marbled Murrelet given there are no documented nesting sites or potential nesting trees in the vicinity of the project area. 4.6 Northern Spotted Owl(Strix occidentalis caurina)- Threatened Spotted owls require a large amount of land for their nesting and hunting grounds; pairs may occupy up to 58 sq. km. They are territorial and do not migrate, but they may shift their ranges slightly in response to seasonal changes Suitable spotted owl habitat includes trees relatively large in diameter, multi-layered forest canopy with a moderate to high canopy closure in overstory, midstory, and understory, large, tall, live trees with cavities, broken tops, mistletoe, or platforms of branches capable of holding accumulated organic matter suitable for use as a nest. Dead standing trees and fallen decayed trees supporting abundant populations of prey species are critical to spotted owl populations. Currently there are no spotted owl nesting sites documented in proximity to the project site. No trees are proposed to be removed that represent typical Spotted Owl habitat. As spotted owls are currently not present, and the project area does not represent typical spotted owl habitat, no impacts to spotted owl or associated habitat are expected result from the proposed project. 5.0 ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS The project lies within the regulated buffer of a saltwater shoreline. Project scale in the protected area is as follows: Development Type Habitat Type Project scale SFR with deck Saltwater shoreline(Case Inlet)buffer 800 sq. ft. 5.1 Vegetation Disturbance The building footprint is located in a portion of the property that is occupied by an area maintained with lawn and fruit trees. The proposed project will not require the removal of native vegetation within the shoreline buffer. Invasive species removal and native vegetation plantings described in Section 6.2 and 6.3 are recommended to preserve and enhance vegetation abundance and diversity within portion of the shoreline buffer outside of the development zone. PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com Zilllny'rime January, 2009 Page 6 M1 _ T s Photo r lon of SFR& deck. 5.2 Designated Critical Habitat for Salmonids The shoreline of Case Inlet is listed as a Final Designation on the Northwest Region Critical Habitat Designations for West Coast Salmon and Steelhead in Washington - August 2005. However, none of the proposed actions are likely to destroy or adversely modify designated critical habitat. Actions described in this plan are not expected to jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species. 5.3 Noise Pollution A slight increase in noise from construction activities is likely to occur during daylight construction hours. No nesting sites are located within the radii of concern that would be impacted by noise associated with the establishment of the SFR. 5.4 Temporary Increase in Sediment and Turbidity During Construction The proposed work has the potential to temporarily increase turbidity and suspended sediment within the project area. Best Management Practices have been recommended in Section 6.4 to avoid adverse effects associated with sediment and turbidity during construction. 5.5 Light and Glare The proposed project will result in an increase in light and glare commonly associated with residential construction and land use. However, species that currently utilize available habitat along this portion of Case Inlet are likely adapted to light and glare based on the high density of residential development along the shoreline. Therefore, an increase in light and glare is not likely to have a substantial impact on any wildlife that may be utilizing the parcel. PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com gcy Zimny HMP S January,2009 ( Page 7 6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES 6.1 Avoidance Mitigation The proposed project avoids the shoreline buffer and aquatic habitat by positioning the SFR and deck the furthest from the shoreline that is feasible while meeting project objectives and septic and drainfield requirements. rsc�b�' 6.2 Minimization Mitigation The proposed project minimizes impacts to the shoreline buffer by limiting the square footage of the building foot re feet and the attached deck to 600 square feet. The print of the SFR to 960 square deck is m the shoreline at the nearest point and the proposed proposed,SFR is located 30 feet from located11 feet from the shoreline at the nearest point, this is the furthest distance from the shoreline that the size and configuration of the lot will allow while meeting project objectives and septic requirements. 6.3 Enhancement Recommendations The total displacement of shoreline buffer for this project entails 800 square feet, while the remainder of the project is outside of the 35-foot building setback. To compensate for the proposed work within the buffer, it is recommended that the bank that is between the shoreline and the proposed development be removed of invasive species and planted with native vegetation. The total area recommended for native planting occupies 800 square feet, and will be identified as the Enhancement Zone. ,y A s Photo 4. Enhancement Zone(top of bank,facing south). PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com Zimny HMP January,2009 Page 8 f. f . . x�Cr Photo 5. Side of bank(facing north),occupied by ivy and blackberry to be removed and replanted with native species. The Enhancement Zone is currently dominated by several species of ivy and himilayan blackberry, each are invasive species and should be removed prior to the recommended native plantings. Although primarily dominated by invasive species, the Enhancement Zone contains lesser amounts of native species such as Oregon grape and rhododendron, which should be excluded from the vegetation removal. The invasive species that exist in the disturbed zone should be removed by cutting or pulling of the root balls, and can be done using a small excavator. Following the blackberry and ivy removal and the implementation of restorative planting recommended below, persistent cutting during the growing season is sufficient to offset the rhizomes of invasive species if they continue to become a problem. Following the invasive species removal, it is recommended that temporary erosion control groundcover or netting be placed along the slope to provide soil stability while newly installed plants become established. The Enhancement Zone will be enhanced with native species listed below. Both tree and shrub species are listed, however, in order to preserve a view corridor future development it is recommended that tree species only be planted along the east and west 10-foot margins of the enhancement zone. The following species and pot sizes to be installed from are outlined below: Trees: western red cedar(Thuja plicata)- 2 gallon Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii)- 2 gallon Shrubs: Oregon grape (Mahonia nervosa)- 1 gallon salal(Gaultheria shallon)— 1 gallon PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com �y Zimny HMP January,2009 Page 9 evergreen huckleberry(Vaccinium ovatum) - gallon nootka rose (Rosa nutkana)— i gallon salmonberry(Rubus.spectabilis)— 1 gallon Pacific Willow(Salix lusida)— 1 gallon Hooker willow(Salix hookeriana)— 1 gallon Scouler willow(Salix scouleriana)— I gallon Sitka willow(Salix sitchepsis)— 1 gallon beaked hazelnut(Corylus cornuta)— I gallon Indian plum(Oemleria cerasiformi.$)— 1 gallon oceanspray(Holodiscus discolor)— 1 gallon Pacific ninebark (Physocarpus capitatus)— 1 gallon California black currant(gibes bracteosum)— I gallon western thimbleberry(Rubus parviflorus)— I gallon red elderberry(.Sambucus racemosa)— 1 gallon Ferns: sword fern (Polystichum munitum)— 1 gallon Native Planting Guidelines It is recommended that plantings be installed within the identified mitigation zone to achieve the following densities. A minimum of 1 tree species and five shrub or fern species from the above list are recommended. trees- 10' on center shrubs-5' on center ferns-4' on center These densities will provide a moderately dense, structurally diverse plant community within the mitigation zone. To fulfill the recommended density, the Enhancement Zone will be planted with four trees, 28 shrubs and 18 ferns. It is recommended that installation be done as single trees and or clusters of three shrubs, on approximate 10-foot centers. Finally, sword fern will be randomly installed throughout the planting row on average four-foot centers. The portion of the mitigation zone between the house and shoreline need not be planted with overstory trees for the purpose of preserving a view corridor. Typically, planting should occur during winter dormancy. The optimum time for planting is during February and March, however, the need to complete the project in a timely manner may call for planting to occur outside optimum time periods. No machinery earthwork will be necessary to implement this mitigation plan; planting holes for specified vegetation installation will be hand dug. No additional clearing or grading should be necessary for buffer enhancement. All installed vegetation shall be marked with colored flagging to facilitate monitoring inspections. The monitoring program is described below to insure project effectiveness. Invasive Species PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618,Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com E�,y Zimny HMP January,2009 Page 10 Invasive species such as Himalayan blackberry, reed canary grass, Japanese knotweed, and English Ivy may continue to invade the mitigation zone. These species are stubborn competitors for light and nutrients and limit success of native plants. Invasive species should be removed from the mitigation zone should they invade. Herbicides should not be used to achieve this due to the proximity to the shoreline. Persistent cutting during the growing season is sufficient to offset the rhizomes of invasive species if they become a problem. Once native species become established, invasive species should be less of an issue. 6.4 Best Management Practices Recommended Best Management Practices for this project are as follows: • Perform excavation and site preparation work during dry weather. • Install silt fencing near the shoreline to prevent erosion and siltation of waters. Silt fencing can be removed following project completion and installation of temporary erosion control. • Minimize amount of erodible soils at any given time to the maximum extent feasible. • Check all equipment daily for leaks. Refueling and lubrication of equipment should occur off site. Do not store any fuel, lubricants,chemicals, or hazardous substances outside overnight within the project area. • Clearly mark grading and excavation limits with orange flagging or construction fencing. • Do not apply any chemicals when there is a possibility of rain. • Comply with all permits and requirements of governing authority. 7.0 MONITORING Monitoring of the site will begin the first fall following project completion and maintained on a annual basis. The information gathered will provide the following: 1) condition of reintroduced plant species; 2) the use of the site by wildlife species; 3) any disturbance caused by the development and its effect on the protected zone and associated aquatic habitat; 4) any occurrence of exotic species within the mitigation zone; 5) any corrective measures that may be deemed necessary to provide desired conditions. This monitoring will be in effect for the duration of three years. The information gathered will be provided in an annual report and submitted to the Director of Mason County Department of Community Development. 8.0 SUMMARY This report addresses the establishment of a single family residence and deck that will encroach into an area occupying 800 square feet within the regulated buffer of a saltwater shoreline (Case Inlet). The total proposed development entails the SFR occupying 960 square feet, attached deck occupying 600 square and an attached garage occupying 900 square feet. The proposed SFR will,�3 f be located 30 feet from the OHWM of Case Inlet, and the uncovered deck will extend to J-53eet from the OHWM of Case Inlet. Given the existing septic and drainfield location coupled with the size and configuration of the parcel, this is the furthest distance from the shoreline that is PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com Zimny HMP f--A y January,2009 ty Page 11 feasible while meeting project objectives. Best Management Practices are recommended to minimize negative impacts to the shoreline and aquatic habitat during project implementation. No native vegetation will need to be removed to meet project objectives. Mitigation recommendations include invasive species removal and native plant enhancement of 800 square feet of shoreline buffer that is situated along a bank between the proposed development and the shoreline. No impacts to water quality or aquatic habitat are predicted. Mitigation Measures, and Best Management Practices, have been identified to avoid, minimize, and mitigate for impacts associated with proposed construction. We trust this information is sufficient for your needs at this time. Thank you for choosing The Wetland Corps as your environmental consultant. If you have any questions feel free to call. Respectfully submitted, Lee Boad Senior Ecologist Heather Lane Staff Wetland&Natural Resource Specialist PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com kX y 413 REFERENCES Audobon WatchList. http;//audobon2.org/webapp/watchlist/viewSpecies. Knutson, K.L., and V.L. Naef. 1997. Management recommendations for Washington's priority habitats: riparian. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia. 181 pp- Native Plants for Kitsap County. ftp://kcwppub3.co.kitsap.wa.us/pw/sw/Native Policy of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Western Washington Treaty Tribes Concerning Wild Salmonids. Adopted by Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission,1997. Washington State Department of Ecology; William Symington Lake Habitat Analysis. 1998. PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com Y o E ECKERT RD O ? + 10 w C a. C s �O Qh >- R 4 PEV'EW L SOP Ric)) kr Z O Approximate Parcel 3 p W � Location W ._, N 1 i p f FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP Project Name: Zimny Project Location: Grapeview,WA Project: TWC09-W10 ` Client: Tim Zimny THE WETLAND CORPS Date: 1/09 Map Legend + CONUS Cities N -' C CONUS States t00K Lower AB Wetland Polygons Estusrrne and Marine Oeefswafer kstuorine and Marine Wetland f reshwabr Emergent Wetfand 1 reshwater forested'Shrub Wetland Washington freshwater Pond �•'' Lake �;I I t�L,•� Other Rlverine ,• Va*n ,,....,. .. ' rs'�, Approximate �" ' y � Parcel Location � 0 E2USN ryA�r4 , }`fit t t u t +r, .,�r✓' t r i h ,tit•', , j ,i It •rig, 0 5 {� •} , r .} t '�vgr,y r } k,. t'; 'ii�,��,+., �4 5Q'�,+�' }!°r ��'r x'Vvt vi ,,t''✓✓'�Y/ Mrs l 'n' I{,I r '# •Y', {{,'k},,r r� ..fin_. 5�,1� 'A r. n t • , b �•r EIUBL:; yp+r i \' J8 '•i ; u 5�h 'S t' t •t'\'•' ' 1: ti✓ ht�{t r 5 r•' . r r 1 '.A}k .,r J„ ',t . .r 4f '�tO;WY.55 ,f A1ep:ienter,q7' 18 AO'h. 122' 51 21''aV Figure 3 National Wetland Inventory Map Figure adapted from NWI Section 18 Township 21 North Range 1 West Mapper website FIGURE 3 NWI MAP Project Name: Zimny Project Location: Grapeview,WA Project: TWC09-W10 Client: Tim Zimny 7WW'77 Date: 1/09 THE WETLAND CORPS Note: No wetland mapped in project vicinity. �xy O Approximate Parcel Location Onsite Soil Conditions based on Mason County Soil Survey Subject Site Soils: Indianola sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes (Ie).- In the Indianola series are excessively drained, droughty brown soils of the uplands. They have developed on hummocky and rolling ridges from glacial drift that consisted of loose, porous sand. The sand came mainly from acid igneous rocks. The annual rainfall ranges from 50 to 70 inches, and the native vegetation is mainly Douglas-fir. Indianola soils occur in the eastern half of the county in association with the Alderwood and the Everett soils. They are unlike the Everett soils in that they are not gravelly. They differ from the Alderwood soils in not being gravelly and in having a sand, rather than a cemented, substratum. Indianola soils' are more nearly like the Lystair soils in the -western part of the county. They differ front those soils mainly in having brown and yellowish-brown colors and less basic igneous material in the parent. drift. The Lystair soils are brown and reddish yellow, and they occur in an area of higher rainfall. A more detailed soil description can be found in Appendix B Mason Soil Survey Text. FIGURE 4 SOIL SURVEY Project Name: Zimny Project Location: Grapeview,WA ` Project: TWC09-W10 THE IN FTL._--�N D CORPS Client: Tim Zimny Date: 1/09 Note: Hydric soils not present in project vicinity. 417 Approximate parcel location Q 170 06 1703508 4 , ,3 S Puget Sound 4 +702586 +702588 ++,702584 no 1000 It SOILS Hvdtic Soils MANSFORTATION STREAMS Highly Unstable Stream Water Type 1-5(Eas:ade; ��Paved Road Hiehlc Erodible ��•Unstab:e ,N•�Unp, ed Road Stream Type I nknonv ;East:de} 3:ghh&adLbte f _] ,AO'Road(Surface Lhil tlo��lt) Stream Water Type:-5�;tt'e::.tde; No Data or Gn el Pits 'All Abandoned Road Stream Type Unknown(Wes:side; „ � Orphaned Road Trail FIGURE 5 DNR STREAM MAP Project Name: Zimny Project Location: Grapeview,WA Project: TWC09-W10 Client: Tim Zimny TH F 'k%'LTL--"k-N D CORPS Date: 1/09 Note: Type F Stream mapped>400' from parcel location. �X y i8 Existing Drainfield& East Rauschert Reserve Road Existing Sand Filter Proposed Garage Proposed Proposed Driveway CCD Enhancement one .:. (800 sa. 15'building se00 tba. �22'.. N 20'buffe. Parcel i2T�a5o� Case Inlet Saltwater Shoreline 20' buffer+ 15' building setback o so' FIGURE 2. SITE MAP Project Name: Zimny Project Location: Grapeview,WA THE WETLAND CORPS Project: TWC09-W10 Client: Tim Zimny Date: 1/09