Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSHR2012-00002 Hearing - SHR Permit / Conditions - 5/2/2012 May 2, 2012 Notice of Decision Case: SHR2012-00002 Applicant: James and Judith Rowson. Notice is hereby given that James and Judith Rowson, who are the applicant for the above-referenced Mason County Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, have been granted that Shoreline Permit. The request was reviewed on April 10, 2012 by the Mason County Hearing Examiner and approved with conditions pursuant to the Mason County Title 17.50 Shoreline Master Program Use Regulations, specifically for a proposed Residential Development / Accessory Dwelling Unit. The proposal was exempt from SEPA review per WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(i). This is a final County decision. No further appeals to the County are available. Appeal may be made to Superior Court or the appropriate administrative agency as regulations apply. It is the appellant's responsibility to meet all legal requirements of any appeal process. Time Limit for Action. Per the Mason County Code Title 15 - Development Code - No permit authorizing construction shall extend for a term of more than five years. If actual construction of a development for which a permit has been granted has not begun within two years after the approval, the Hearing Examiner shall review the permit and upon a showing of good cause, may extend the initial two year period by permit for one year. Otherwise, the permit terminates; PROVIDED that no permit shall be extended unless the applicant has requested such review and extension before the Hearing Examiner PRIOR to the expiration date. Work on approved project must begin by May 2014. This permit expires May 2017. If you have questions or require clarification on these issues, please contact Allan Borden, Senior Planner with Mason County Dept. of Community Development at 360-427-9670 x365. RECEIVED MAY 01 2012 1 ,BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR MASON COUNTY PLANNING EPT� 2 Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner 3 RE: James and Judith Rowson 4 5 Shoreline Substantial FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS Development Permit OF LAW AND FINAL DECISION 6 #SHR2012-00002 7 8 INTRODUCTION 9 The Applicants have applied for a shoreline substantial development permit for an accessory living dwelling unit ("ADU", also referenced as an accessory living 10 quarter, "ALQ"). The Examiner approves the application with conditions. 11 ORAL TESTIMONY 12 13 Allan Borden, Mason County senior planner, summarized the staff report. He clarified that the primary residence was going to be built upon a garage behind the 14 currently existing accessory dwelling unit. He also noted that his staff report at page 3 should be revised to provide that the primary residence would be no less than 1040 15 square feet. He also noted that both the primary residence and ADU would only have one bedroom each to comply with septic system requirements. He noted that there 16 would be no view impacts to the house to the east because the primary residence will 17 be located too far landward to block any lake view. 18 EXHIBITS 19 All documents identified in the "Case Index" attached to the March 28, 2012 staff 20 report are admitted into the record. 21 FINDINGS OF FACT 22 Procedural: 23 1. Applicant. The Applicants are James and Judith Rowson. 24 2. Hearing. The Hearing Examiner conducted a hearing on the application 25 on April 10, 2012, at 1:00 p.m., in the Mason County Board of Commissioners Meeting Chambers. Administrative Appeal P. 1 Findings, Conclusions and Decision {PA0828887.DOC;1\13009.900000\} r 1 Substantive: 2 3. Site/Proposal Description. The Applicants propose to change the status of an existing 832 square foot seasonal residence into an ALQ by the construction of a 3 1020 square foot primary residence. The project site is a waterfront lot located on the south shore of Wooten Lake. The lot currently contains a septic system and a well. 4 The lot is 20,080 square feet in area. According to the staff report the ALQ and 5 proposed primary residence meet all setback requirements and there is no evidence to the contrary. The owner of the lot will reside in the primary residence. 6 4. Characteristics of the Area. Most of the nearby waterfront lots are already 7 developed with single-family homes. From the aerial photograph,Ex. 5,it appears all surrounding uses are residential. 8 9 5. Adverse Impacts of Proposed Use. There are no adverse impacts discernible from or reasonably inferred from the record. As shown in the aerial 10 photograph, Ex. 3, the existing ALQ is located landward of the home to the west and trees block the ALQ from the home to the east such that the ALQ doesn't create any 11 adverse view impacts to adjoining properties. There do not appear to be any critical areas that would be adversely affected by the proposed increase in density for the lot. 12 The staff report notes that adequate public services and parks and transportation 13 facilities serve the proposal and there is no evidence to the contrary. 14 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 15 Procedural: 16 1. Authority of Hearing Examiner. MCC 15.03.050(J) provides the 17 Examiner with the authority to review and act upon shoreline substantial development permit applications. 18 19 Substantive: 20 2. Zoning and Shoreline Master Program Designation. The area is zoned as Rural Residential 20 or RR-20. The Shoreline Master Program environmental 21 designation is Rural. 22 3. Review Criteria and Application. MCC 1.03.029 governs ALQs in rural 23 lands. Under MCC 1.03.029, ALQs in rural lands shall be subject to a special use permit unless they are located in the shoreline jurisdiction, in which case they are 24 subject to a shoreline permit. The proposed ALQ is within 200 feet of the shoreline of Case Inlet, and therefore, shall be reviewed per the Shoreline Master Program 25 policies and use regulations. The review criteria for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit application are governed by Mason County Comprehensive Plan, Chapter IX; Accessory living quarters, and under Mason County Code Administrative Appeal p. 2 Findings,Conclusions and Decision {PA0828887.DOC;1\13009.900000\} 17.50.060 Section entitled Residential Development - Accessory Living Quarters. f 1 These criteria, in addition to miscellaneous criteria for all Hearing Examiner 2 decisions, are quoted and addressed below. 3 MASON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, Chapter IX: Accessory Living Quarters. Accessory living quarters for the use of the guests, employees, or 4 immediate family members should be allowed as a substantial development when minimal impact would occur to surrounding areas. The cumulative impact of like 5 structures on neighboring properties must be considered. 6 4. As conditioned, the Applicants will only be allowed to use the ALQ for 7 guests, employees or immediate family members. Given the small scale of the ALQ and the large heavily wooded lots of the area, the cumulative impacts of allowing 8 ALQs on other shoreline lots would not be significantly adverse. 9 MCC 17.50.060 - Use regulations for accessory living quarters. Accessory living 10 quarters are defined in this chapter as separate living quarters attached or detached from the primary residence which contains less habitable area than the primary 11 residence. They are subject to the following criteria: (1) Only one accessory living quarter per lot. (2) Strict compliance with current sewage setback and design 12 standards as per WAC 248-76-090. (3) Minimal impact on surrounding properties from view blockage, traffic, parking and drainage. (4) Compliance with setback 13 criteria. (5) Accessory living quarters shall require a substantial development 14 permit and shall not exceed 1,000 square feet. 15 5. The criterion quoted above is met. The proposal will result in no more than one ALQ on the subject lot. The project is compliant with sewer setbacks as 16 verified by staff and noted in the staff report. As determined in the Findings of Fact, there are no significant adverse view impacts associated with the proposal. As 17 verified by staff and noted in the staff report the project meets the shoreline setback 18 requirements. 19 One problematical issue identified by staff is the size of the proposed primary residence. The exhibits suggest that the Applicants propose a 1020 square foot 20 primary residence, which would result in the ALQ having an area that exceeds 80% 21 of the primary residence area. As conditioned, the primary residence will have to be at least 1040 square feet of habitable area to ensure that the ALQ meets the 80% 22 requirement. 23 MISCELLANEOUS CRITERIA FOR ALL HEARING EXAMINER REVIEW 24 MCC 15.09.055(C): Required Review: The Hearing Examiner shall review 25 proposed development according to the following criteria: Administrative Appeal p. 3 Findings, Conclusions and Decision {PA0828887.DOC;1\13009.900000\} 1. The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets t' 1 the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code, especially Title 6, 8, and 16. 2 2. Development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is 3 in the public interest. 4 3. Development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within the 5 Comprehensive Plan. 6 6. As indicated in the staff report, the project is consistent with the Mason 7 County Comprehensive Plan. It will not lower the level of service for transportation or park facilities. In addition to requirements already addressed in the above 8 Conclusions of Law, the project, as conditioned, appears to be consistent with other applicable requirements of the Mason County Code. It meets the requirements and 9 the intent of Title 6, 8 and 16 and, as discussed below, it meets the requirements of 10 MCC 17.03.029. As discussed in the findings of fact, as conditioned the project does not create any significant adverse impacts. Consequently, the project does not impact 11 the public health, safety and welfare. 12 MCC 17.03.029 Accessory dwelling unit requirement. 13 In rural lands, accessory dwelling units (ADU) must meet the following requirements: 14 1. The ADU shall be subject to a special use permit, unless in the shoreline 15 jurisdiction, it is subject to a shoreline permit; 16 2. The owner of the ADU must reside on the lot in either the principal 17 residence or ADU; 18 3. The ADU shall be located within one hundred fifty feet of the principal residence or shall be a conversion of an existing detached structure (i.e. garage); 19 4. The ADU shall not exceed eighty percent of the square footage of the 20 habitable area of the primary residence or one thousand feet, whichever is smaller; 21 S. All setback requirements must be met by the ADU; 22 6. All applicable health district standards for water and sewer must be met 23 by the ADU; 24 7. No recreational vehicles shall be allowed as ADU,• 25 8. Only one ADU is allowed on any property; Administrative Appeal p. 4 Findings, Conclusions and Decision {PA0828887.DOC;1\13009.900000\} 9. An additional off-street parking space must be provided for the ADU. 1 2 7. The project, as conditioned, is in compliance with MCC 17.03.029. The application is for a shoreline permit. The owners of the lot will reside on the subject 3 parcel. The principal residence will be located 25 to 30 feet from the ALQ. The ALQ is less than 1,000 square feet in size and will be less than 80% of the area of the 4 principal residence. As previously determined the ALQ meets all setback requirements and as conditioned will meet all applicable health district standards for 5 water and sewer. This will be on the only ADU on the property. There is also 6 sufficient parking on the lot to accommodate a parking space for the ALQ. . 7 DECISION 8 The requested Substantial Shoreline Development Permit is approved subject to the 9 following conditions: 10 1. Use of the ALQ shall be limited to guests, employees, or immediate family members of the occupants of the primary residence. 11 2. The ALQ shall comply with all applicable sewage design standards as per 12 WAC 248-76-090. 13 3. The primary residence shall have at least 1,040 square feet of habitable area. 14 15 Dated this 25th day of April,2012. 16 17 Phi A. Olbrechts 18 Mason County Hearing Examiner 19 APPEAL 20 This decision is final and may be appealed to the Shoreline Hearings Board as 21 governed by Chapter 90.58 RCW. 22 CHANGE IN VALUATION 23 Notice is given pursuant to RCW 36.70B.130 that property owners who are affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes 24 notwithstanding any program of revaluation. 25 Administrative Appeal p. 5 Findings, Conclusions and Decision {PA0828887.DOC;1\13009.900000\} CASEINDEX James & Judith Rowson Accessory Dwelling Unit Shoreline Permit SHR2012-00002 Exhibit# Date Description 1 March 28, 2012 Staff Report 2 February 1, 2012 Shoreline Permit Application and Site Plan 3 February 21, 2012 Proposal Vicinity 4 February 21, 2012 Site Location 5 February 21, 2012 Site Aerial with parcel numbers 6 February 17, 2012 Notice of Application 7 March 29, 2012 Affidavit of Posting Rowson ADU SHR2012-00002 case index.doc SHR2012-00002 Pagel of4 Written by AHB on 3/28/2012 Mason County FAt (,1" Department of Planning Building I * 411 N. 5th Street * P.O.Bog 279 Shelton,Washington 98584 TO: Mason County Hearing Examiner FROM: Mason County Department of Community Development STAFF: Allan Borden—Senior Planner; 360.427.9670 x 365 RE: Mason County Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for an Accessory Living Unit(SHR2012-00002). HEARING DATE: April 10,2012 STAFF REPORT I. Introduction: This report evaluates an application for an Accessory Living Unit or Accessory Living Quarters on the south shore of Wooten Lake. Such development within 200 feet of any shoreline require a Shoreline Substantial Development permit under the Mason County Shoreline Master Program. Staff finds the proposal is consistent with the review criteria from the Mason County Shoreline Master Program and Mason County Development Regulations. II. Applicant: James and Judith Rowson. III. Authorized Representative: self IV. Property Location: 561 NE Mountain View Dr. Tahuya, WA. The site is within the SE '/4 of Section 19, Township 23 N.,Range 02 W., W.M.; Parcel#22319-50-00034. V. Project Description: The proposal (Exhibit 2) is to construct a primary residence(nearly 1020 sq. ft. footprint in size) in the near future and review the existing 832 sq. ft. seasonal residence (built in 1986)as an Accessory Dwelling Unit. Rural Residential 20 zoning limits any lot less than 20 acres to having one dwelling, unless the second has been permitted as an Accessory Dwelling Unit. This application serves to make this existing seasonal dwelling a legal conforming Accessory Dwelling Unit. VI. Evaluations: A. Characteristics of the area. Located on the south shore of Wooten Lake,most of the nearby waterfront lots are already developed as residential uses and the lots are of varying sizes and shapes(Exhibits 3 &4). The shoreline properties have decks and/or docks on the lake side of the residence, and many of the properties have detached garages situated along access driveways. B. Characteristics of the site. This lakefront lot is level in the southern area and has a 10 percent slope in the north half (Exhibit 2 plans). The property currently contains one small residential dwelling,no garage, a septic drainfield system, and a well. The proposed primary residence is located approximately 90 feet from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM) of Wooten Lake, in SHR2012-00002 Page 2 of 4 Written by AHB on 3/28/2012 an area that is parking area and undeveloped(Exhibit 5); the existing residence requested to • be the Accessory Dwelling Unit is the closer distance of 40 feet from the lake. C. Shoreline Desi irk. Urban. D. Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning. The Mason County Comprehensive Plan designation for the site is Rural and the zoning is Rural Residential 20. VH. SEPA Compliance: The project is SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11-800 (1)(b)(i). VIII. Other Permits/Approvals: The proposal also requires a Mason County Building Permit, which is not yet submitted,pending the decision of this Shoreline Permit request. IX. Public Notice: A Notice of Application and Public Hearing (Exhibit 6) was posted in the post office and on site on March 26, 2012. It was mailed to neighboring property owners on March 21,2012 and published for two weeks in Shelton Mason County Journal on February 23 and March 1,2012 (Exhibit 7). No comments to the Public Notice have been received. X. Analysis. A. Mason County Code,Title 17.50 Zoning Shoreline Master Program Use Regulations: Accessory living quarters are defined as"Separate living quarters, attached or detached from the primary residence, which contain less habitable area than the primary residence which are used by guests, employees, or immediate family members of the occupant of the primary residence;provided no accessory living quarters shall be rented or leased, and are subject to all Health department requirements." They are subject to the following criteria: 1. Only one accessory living quarters per lot. In an urban environment, a lot must be 1-1/2 the size required for a single family residence which totals 18,750 square feet. Staff Response: This would be the only accessory living quarters on the lot(Exhibit 2). The lot is approximately 28,080 sq.ft. area and exceeds the minimum size requirement. 2. Strict compliance with current sewage setback and design standards per WAC 248-76-090. Staff Response:Mason County Environmental Health review standards require structures to be 5 feet or more from the septic tank and 10 feet or more from the septic drainfield for consistency with WAC 248-76-090 and the proposed primary structure will be sited accordingly. The septic design shall have the capacity to serve the sewage treatment of both residences. 3. Minimal impact on surrounding properties from view blockage,traffic,parking and drainage. Staff Response: Since the existing seasonal residence is sited 50 feet from the shoreline and is limited to one story, and the proposed primary residence is 25 feet behind the accessory residence, the proposal should have minimal to no impact on views (Exhibit 2 plans). The parcel is relatively large and contains sufficient parking area adjacent to and within the garage,proposed structures should not impact traffic or off-site parking. SHR2012-00002 Page 3 of 4 Written by AHB on 3/28/2012 4. Compliance with setback criteria. Staff Response: The existing seasonal residence and proposed two-story primary residence shall meet the side,front, and rear setback requirements. 5. Accessory living quarters shall require a Substantial Development Permit and shall not exceed 1,000 square feet. Staff Response: The 832 sq.ft. existing residence proposed as the accessory dwelling unit meets this size requirement. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application for which this Hearing is being held is enclosed as Exhibit 2. B. Mason County Development Regulations This proposal requires a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit or Special Use Permit per the requirements of the Mason County Development Regulations on Accessory Dwelling Units, M.C.C. 17.03.029. The applicable Development Regulations standards are: A. The Accessory Dwelling Unit shall be subject to a special use permit,unless in the shoreline jurisdiction it is subject to a shoreline permit. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit review is the subject of this public hearing. B. The owner of the Accessory Dwelling Unit must reside on the lot in either the principal residence or Accessory Dwelling Unit. The owner is residing in the principal residence on the property. C. The Accessory Dwelling Unit shall be located within 150 feet of the principal residence or shall be a conversion of an existing detached structure(i.e. garage). The primary residence and garage (a new structure) will be 25 to 30 feet behind the accessory dwelling unit situated at 50 feet from the Wooten Lake shoreline. D. The Accessory Dwelling Unit shall not exceed 80% of the square footage of the habitable area of the primary residence or 1,000 square feet, whichever is smaller. The size of the Accessory Dwelling Unit is 832 sq.ft. in habitable area; the primary residence shall be no greater than 1,040 sq.ft. in habitable area. E. All setback requirements must be met by the Accessory Dwelling Unit. The existing seasonal residence structure is 15 feet from the northeast and 12 feet from the northwest property lines. F. All applicable health district standards for water and sewer must be met by the Accessory Dwelling Unit. The proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit will have one bedroom and one bathroom and proper water and sewer connections. G. No recreational vehicles shall be allowed as Accessory Dwelling Units. No recreational vehicle will provide the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit structure. H. Only one Accessory Dwelling Unit is allowed on any property. The proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit will be the only Accessory Dwelling Unit structure on the property. I. An additional off-street parking space must be provided for the Accessory Dwelling Unit. The parking area for the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit will next to and behind the existing structure. The Accessory Dwelling Unit as proposed(832 sq. ft, living area and the proposed primary residence meet all of the above criteria A —I. SHR2012-00002 Page 4 of 4 Written by AHB on 3/28/2012 C. Comprehensive Plan Review: Type III review for permit applications require that the Hearing Examiner evaluate the proposal for consistency with the County's Development Code, adopted plans and regulations. The Hearing Examiner shall review the proposal according to the following criteria: A. The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code, especially Title 6, 8 and 16. Staff Response: The Comprehensive Plan encourages development of Accessory Dwelling Units as well as affordable housing. Rural Residential 20 zoning does allow for one accessory dwelling unit per parcel. The development of the primary residence along with the existing seasonal residence shall meet proper Public Health sewage and water standards. Section 17.03.029 of the Mason County Development Regulations contains nine parameters (A-I) that and Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU) must meet. This proposal meets all nine requirements. B. The development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is in the public interest. Staff Response: The development of the primary residence along with the existing seasonal residence as proposed with adequate services on the subject parcel should not impact the public health, safety or welfare, and the proposal is not contrary to the public interest. C. The development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Response: The proposed primary residence and accessory dwelling unit will not significantly affect public transportation or traffic conditions in the vicinity of Wooten Lake. M. Conclusions. As proposed, the project has been subject to the standards of the Mason County's Development Regulations, Code, Shoreline Master Program, and Comprehensive Plan. Staff finds the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the Accessory Living Unit is consistent with the review criteria from the Mason County Shoreline Master Program and Mason County Development Regulations,with the condition that an approved septic system and adequate water connection be provided to the proposed development prior to construction of the Accessory Living Unit. XH. Choices of Action. A. Approval of the request. B. Denial of the request. C. Conditional approval of the request. D. Postpone the decision for further information. MASON COUNTY [`l�[-�1 it DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Courthouse Annex P.O.Box 279,Shelton,WA 98584 (360)427-9670 N �H�ORELINE PERMIT APPLICATION PERMIT NO. ` SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT J�`' SHORELINE VARIANCE DATE RECEIVED Kt` — SHORELINE CONDITIONAL USE SHORELINE EXEMPTION The Washington State Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58) requires that substantial developments within designated shorelines of the state comply with its administrative procedures(WAC 173-14)and the provisions of the Mason County Shoreline Management Master Program.The purpose of this Act and local program is to protect the state's shoreline resources. The program requires that substantial development(any development of which the total cost or fair market value exceeds $5,000.00 or materially interferes with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the State be reviewed with the goals,polices,and performance standards established in the Master Program. Answer all questions completely. Attach any additional information that my further describe the proposed development. Incomplete applications will be returned. APPLICANT: cJ�I p'r-5 Dwsaq _) ADDRESS: �3.-73 /V(6 66ee ze—a3 )d`✓n 3�emer+on 'street, yUc�. gX3rl z(city) Q (state) (zip)) TELEPHONE: 3&0—6 [�— (3o (home) (>snsateesj l( j .�y� AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: n'i e— I ADDRESS: (street) (city) (ate) (zip) TELEPHONE: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: General location(include property�addd /dress,,water body and associated wetlands--identify` the name of the shoreline): 5661 N'G / t ou,,/I(aI n Y tel�W ah -a)0✓q Legal description (include section, township, and range to the nearest quarter, quarter section or latitude and longitude to the nearest minute. Projects located in open water areas away from land shall provide a longitude location)—include all parcel numbers: Lo+ 3�- woogen La ke. i rr�c+s OWNERSHIP: Contract Applicant�_ Owner Lessee Purchaser (Identify) Other Owner: (street) (city) (state) (zip) DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTON Development(identify and describe the proposed project,including the type of materials to be used,construction methods,principle dimensions,and other pertinent information): L it//f'1Q 6 nacre daYS on s&c- . Mae- C;c,ll'i'c� 4' c t,4 -f d veu l a C I-e5a- 4D iod),Qerqu ►I�'1 P� : j)eck, ID X f SS uplafrleV(f�. Use(identify current use of property with exist improvements: e pt re5&Y1h6t1 +ruciure Reason for r uesting development: d ACKOWLEDGEMENT I hereby declare,to the best of my knowledge and belief,the forgoing information and all attached information is tff and c=r`eej. (applicant or authorized representative date) I....................0.4..............a.................................a......... TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL Identify and describe existing features of the site and surrounding area If proposed structures will exceed a height of 35 feet above the existing grade level,indicate the location of any residential units that will have an obstructive view: If a Conditional Use or Variance is requested,make reference to the appropriate section in the Master Program: REVISED: 06-25-03 Page 1 of 2 Allan Borden - RE: Wooten Lake Property Pre-Inspection From: <jim@rowsonfamily.com> To: "Allan Borden" <Ahb@co.mason.wa.us> Date: 3/4/2012 10:00 PM Subject: RE: Wooten Lake Property Pre-Inspection Alan C&t (Rowson - Wooten Lake 561 Mountain View) We filed for our Substantial Development permit for this property - and it has been advertised. During this past week, we staked the corners of our prospective building and had a contractor and land clearer look at the proposed site. The consensus, is the original proposed location will require a land cut and perhaps be close to the existing septic drainfield. They suggest we move our proposed new house, closer to our existing cabin, to lesson the grade (and cut) and to move further from our septic drainfield. Potentially move the new house to as close as approximately 25 feet from our existing cabin (not counting the deck) In our permit application we indicated a distance of 36-46 from our existing cabin. Given our stage of permit, what might we have to do to change the permit request to have the new building move to 25+- feet of our existing cabin - essentially to move the new building more to the portion of our lot that is fairly flat and has been used to park our cars. And second item, what would happen if we changed the footprint from 30x32 (960 ground floor footprint) to 30x34 (1020 ground floor footprint) (and delete the lakeside 2 foot cantilever). Thanks for your assistance in this matter. Jim Rowson 360-692-1304 PARCEL PLAN JAMES & JUDITH ROWSON BLDG. PERMIT SECTION 19, T23N, R02W W.M. NORTH SCALE„ 1„=60' ,440O APPROX. EX. ,-- 01 � SHORELINE , SHORELINE PER �20 MASON CO. ' RECORDS 56,-'' EXISTING IMSE 0y i i 22319-50-00035,' ' PROPOSED FiOUSE o ' ' 0 0 22319�50-00034 22319-50 -00033 ;^. EX. WELL�'• / 0 i i i �I` r SITE PLAN JAMES & JUDITH ROWSON BLDG. PERMIT NORTH SCALE" V'=30' 00 P / EX REBA RICA P L-Av. REBARICA P 1-000' EX BLDG EX SEPTIC TANK 822 SF,' \\15 EX HUB & TACK, TYPICAL 'Al 20'x2O' EX MA G.—NAILS PARKING &Q S,<, PAD R, S ND STORY ONLY (DASHED) ROOF OUTLINE %n\ REBAR / AP (DOTTED) ICAP \\', / \V, le �e JAMES ROWSON FRED BARRETT / DEBRA JACOBS 2373 NE BREEZEWOOD LN. 201 E COUNTRY CLUB DR. BREMERTON WA 98311 ALLYN WA 98524 STANLET/ CAROL LYNN JACOBS MICHAEL & GAIL LAWSON PMB 144 STE G TH 23969 NE STATE ROUTE 3 2553 34 AVE. W BELFAIR WA 98528 SEATTLE WA 98199 EDWARD KIDRICK WILLIAM & MAFALDA BIDDIX 1018 K ST. 520 NE MOUNTAIN VIEW DR. CENTRALIA WA 98531 TAHUYA WA 98588 STATE OF WASHINGTON ROLF & MARCIA ONARHEIM DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES 10161 ASHLEY CIRCLE NW P.O. BOX 47016 [LANDS DIVISION] SILVERDALE WA 98383 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7016 HOWARD & MILLIE PATTERSON DONALD & VIRGINIA BENNETT C/O KEN PATTERSON C/O BRETT BENNETT 2031 S. 8TH ST. 34625 38TH AVE. S. TACOMA WA 98405 AUBURN WA 98001 T23 P-I I.P� I rLJ <4 ;I T.?;�R2 2 �� I 24 56> o ! EFA OR ,ZA c i 111 j yE T,q yUYASP UR y 233 w I N '� Ix T23 n2 I O I T23 R2 30 g O j 20 T23NR2W T23 R2 ; T23 P2 Z 2 I T23 P.2 21 I 25 10 U I 1 27 I I N W DFLOWER WAY Lu 2 I t I i I m _.—_ —�_----1 — -— -- — -- Z P23 P2 I NUYA RD 2 i �Q I T23 RD 12` 22 R.2 .. `�J I 2 i c •(r Q, I 722 P.2 - „ OWCAP DR --- - , y�- / T22NR2W 7-1 W T22 F.�, I -22 RI2 S3 T=? R2 Puget Sound i R2 I T22'F;2 121 F� �T { = T22NR2W ���f �v 12 T2 ^f'_ � ODE DR ?ti 5 -� 0 C2 J� g©w5an 1 inch =4,000 feet acce,%;cyq l� evt W E 1 inch - 0.76 miles bd�iw a jA S LAKE CND T23 R. o T23 R3W UJ in; w M T23NR NE FORD uj 51 LU Qf T23 R2 gk LU l\ f\ NGam"?-� 7, aeu)-z �J ��c.�Sc — 1 inch feet aCce,75ffL,1 inch=1,O00 0.19 miles vl S k /1// •Y sage Y +tea 1 t• 4.. �,, Y r 'IF ti 1111 � • + C jL 11// �` -` !t ` , •��.• ... + • ,^ * �f5-.r4•,;rat • fit "�]�� r mow' � � - � //1.1• •3� �� s +''. _ �i •�: � �FEE.--, •� ,�� �"yr, t, �ni � • ..r 14 • a • {•� a `k. mot'''` r l' • � �_ :�� • 41 off PIZ 1� �! .r4• •1 1 r 11 11 .f�a* �` y �+� I� v -�� � '� �j _ .y,�, MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division P.O. Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 (360) 427-9670 SHR2012-00002 NOTICE OF SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT. Notice is hereby given that James and Judith Rowson, who are the owners of the described property below, have filed an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the development of: With the proposed construction of a new garage with second-floor primary residence on a Wooten Lake property, this request is the review of an existing 832 sq. ft. seasonal residence as an accessory dwelling unit on the subject property. This one-story residence is a two bedroom, one bath home built in 1986 on the 28,080 sq. ft. (0.64 acre) lakefront property. Parcel Number: 22319-50-00034. Site Address: 561 NE Mountain View Dr., Tahuya WA. Location of Project: Along the south side of Wooten Lake 10 miles west of Belfair; within the southeast 11/4 of Section 19, Township 23 N., Range 2 W. in Mason County Washington. Said proposed development is subject to shoreline management permit review(M.C.C. 17.50) and associated Mason County Development Regulations standards. Any person desiring to express their view or to be notified of the action taken on the application should notify in writing of their interest to: MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PO BOX 279 SHELTON, WA 98584 The comment period is at least 21 days from the final date of publication given pursuant to WAC 173- 14-020. The final date of publication,posting or mailing of notice is March 1, 2012. The proposal is exempt from environmental review; per WAC 197-11-800(1)(c). Written comments will be accepted up to the date of the Hearings Examiner public hearing Tuesday April 10, 2012 at 1:00 PM. Contact this office at (360) 427-9670, ext. 365 for further information. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ���Sc►� S�Ct�21.�����ao� ) ss. COUNTY OF MASON ) I, do hereby certify that I posted copies of the attached M' tf 'public places as follows: one at (f � one at one at l� In witness whereof, the party has signed this Affidavit of Posting Notice this Z-/ day of �� . , 20 �! C ✓� ;' By; Address: L/ 1 •� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF MASON ) Subscribed and sworn to me this 2 day of ex— , 20/,Z. Notary Public for the State of Wa" ington T--------.------------------• k-, SUSAN M. ELLINGSON Residing at NOTARY PUBLIC Commission Expires STATE OF WASHINGTON My Commission Expires Apr.30,2015 1 L...............