HomeMy WebLinkAboutSWG2000-00220 - SWG Design - 1/1/2000 a a3a3 ��s-tscato
Design Review Clic"St �do-l7
T L Designer:
R klv Permit Y: SWG
Applicant: _ r
u
0 Is dia rifield placed in the area of the"ss-tholes? 1
Z,3
Cl Is soil application rate the same? Q•
❑ Is the number of bedrooms the same?
infiltration area the same? &4,.3 x
a= 19r� 9 C
1s reserve area adequate? FF��g is installation in soil depth correct? I a. "�" a2. ^a'�" N S S U rrlrt• d'
/X Is vertical sepamtion adegwle for system design? a
�'Do tydcs have risers to the surface a nd atul ,Oro
or pump soreen? Is the pump tank 1.75 x daily flow?
n�1 titn t rn t-M
/.D Are observation pods and cletmouts adequate?
�IJJ _ ble casing needed
0 Are hmiwntal w1bae watdoq perN lines,earemenfs. bw
(wells,surf -
a notice to title ?
Q�tt1,tL�'Lt7� ZOn2. � �,,� blr rrt -r5 4v
®Ls a variance or waiver requested�� ¢WPP4 T lWroAAPM,"�' [,l,✓�U,c7M� Blk'r
❑ Is lateral length correct? 11;iC I and
0 Is orifice number corm? x-aal.ar-IB' �
0 Is g p m (@ total pressure head)correct?(rotaI or if ces s 0.59 at 3116, OR tot
6�P k (41 . 21.ob
❑ Is prefered manifold confie,.arlo¢used?Are checke valves needed and
used..
❑ Is total pressure head(tdh)correct? 1p-I" O�
Transport pipe frictions head calculations(HarEn William Formula):
r ss F=A(B/c7 F=transport Pipe f icrion head
r1� A =transport pipe length in feet
8 =pump total pressure head(gpm Pump capacity)
as gis,a
C=K for transport pipe diameter/schedule
Ora
11 Elevation between pump and uppermost Orifice
+Residual head in feet(2 feet for 3116••orifices, 5 feet for 118"orifices)
S
/ +Transport pipe f ic¢on head
d N +0.6 oof LICILOV loss in distribution stem
I (a < q =feet total discharge head(TDN)