The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSPI2015-00030 - SPI Inspections - 10/9/2015 o S7gTF MASON COUNTY �P5 c DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT O A 0, (AN Planning Division o Y Y 426 W Cedar St, Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 1864 Site Inspection October 09, 2015 IRENA S REYNOLDS-HANSON TO BE KEPT IN THE P O BOX 1311 SILVERDALE WA98383-1311 PARCEL FILE Case No.: SP12015-00030 pry 223o`f:_7,7,Rc t 3 J Parcel No.: 223047790131 Project Description: PLANNING PRE-SITE INSPECTION TO DETERMINE SETBACKS FOR NEW SFR Dear Applicant: Pursuant to your application, a site pre-inspection (SPI) was performed on your property. Below you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values. In some cases, setbacks for development from shorelines, steep slopes, streams, and wetlands must be included in your specific proposal; these setbacks are included as part of the comments listed below. This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject property. Please contact me at (360)427-9670, ext. 365 if you have questions. Sincerely, Allan Borden Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department 10/9/2015 Page 1 of 3 SP12015-00030 Site Inspection 10/9/2015 Case No.: SP12015-00030 Comments: Inspection for William and Irena Reynolds-Hanson on April 30, 2015: Lot Description: The property [PN: 22304-77-90131] in the Erickson Lake, is on the west side of Tahuya Blacksmith Rd. A slope at less than 15 percent is oriented towards the west and the wetland and buffer area. The nearby wetland extends farther south and north. The parcel has native plant cover adjacent to the wet area and near the road. This 1.57-acre parcel site has been cleared in the west where a residence, drainfield and yard may be located. The applicant wishes to develop a new residence associated with the driveway. These findings state regulations in effect at the time of inspection, unless noted otherwise. Development Regulations standards: The site is in the Rural Residential 5 zone. Building setbacks are 25-foot front yard setback, and 20-foot side property line and rear yard setbacks. These setbacks are measured from structures above grade such as roof overhangs, stairs, balconies, decks, heat pumps, storage buildings, and fuel tanks. An administrative variance may be requested to reduce these setback distances from property lines, to as low as 5 feet (side yard) or 10 feet (front yard), if the shape or features of the property constrain development from the proper setbacks. This process requires application and review at the time of the building permit submittal. Resource Ordinance Standards: _N_ Slope or Landslide hazards: Slopes less than 15 percent adjacent to or within 300 feet of a proposed project were observed. The applicant does not need a geologic special report during development review. _N_ Shoreline setbacks: The Mason County Mason County Resource Ordinance Wetland setbacks applied to the site; if the Shoreline Master Program applied to the site (a wetland, not a lake), the area shoreline designation would be Urban Environment. _N_ Stream setbacks: No typed stream is in the vicinity and the proposed development is greater than 200 feet from the stream management area covered by Fish and Wildlife Habitat 10/9/2015 Page 2 of 3 SP12015-00030 Site Inspection 10/9/2015 Case No.: SP12015-00030 Conservation Areas Chapter (17.01.110) of the Mason County Resource Ordinance standards. _Y_ Wetland critical area: Planning staff confirmed that certain wetlands and associated connecting drainages, are located on the subject parcel. These critical areas are regulated under Mason County's Wetlands Chapter 17.01.070 of the Mason County Resource Ordinance. These wetlands are situated at the western portions of the parcel and extend to south and north. The wetlands are likely Category III wetlands with moderate plant diversity and stream flow into and out of the subject wetland. Development near the wetlands shall have the suitable vegetative buffer, and buildings must be set back an additional 15 feet from the outer edge of that buffer. _Y_ The wetland and a narrow portion (60 feet) of the vegetation buffer are currently intact with some trails existing through them. For view improvement, some tree limbs in the buffer may be trimmed on a limited basis in accordance with the Wetland chapter standards. _Y NO FURTHER CLEARING should take place within the 90 feet closest to the wetland. When planning the location of all proposed improvements or removing further vegetation for development, consider the proper buffer and setback from the wetland edge in that site plan. Staff noted a possible locations of a residence building in relation to the existing site clearing and driveway. The residence to the south (from the roof eave of the 8 ft. deep deck) is situated 90 feet from the edge of the wetland shore. The subject property has vegetation area cleared to the same 90-ft. depth. A residence proposed at that 90-foot distance or greater from the edge of wetland would meet the wetland standards for development. You would need to confirm with the Health Department what their septic system standards are to make sure about the adequacy of supplying a septic system and drainfield area(s). General process: Future site development must include a site plan, showing all setbacks from property lines, slopes, and existing and proposed improvements; this site plan will be needed for the building permit application and review. 10/9/2015 Page 3 of 3 SP12015-00030 SPI 20 5 ? t ACCEPTED BY—CA" MASON COUNTY 7 PLANNING DEPT. PRE-INSPECTION APPLICATI PLEASE PRINT $255.00 Fee Required 1. Site Address; Lh E f A 6 M4 Ey r C - Qdh W, ►b aK Owner: ' d I mnc' 9a_Akgo -) Applicant: iarr, ae A l re✓i a 1 anS 00 Owner Address122 VT&_Vi"r,..-9)LAt rnA 4?J g41✓Applicant Addressrl 2z►7-o-kA c5rn► �l E City ;J - St�ZiV2&22,_ City: zf_k�4►r St A— Zip C195 Phone: (-Slab)3(c�.-1�45� day Phone: (3Loq 9y day Phone: (SJyD) evening Phone: (31.b) 3'1 -7 S a-7- evening Email Address: ��t y>!h CZ JeB iP QMa _ r Dm Email Address:alh)zzj ly� 2. Parcel Ws D 13 0 - -7`J _ q0 l 3 I Legal Description: Sef, a.li.. 3mLx+ -TQ 136 o� S(ivV 13/ qo Lora o� SiD j`�43 3. Purpose of Pre-Inspection: !7 d-ca"m n� Se 6o C) S 4r a,l'J 1 vLA tie 51 d P nt a) fie, �� rLtiL 4. Use of building: Tri rA&!2 t �M L �r ab 0Lo nA 5�l yejV e 5. Do any of the following exist on or adjacent to property?: slope saltwater( lake (�e) river( ) pond ( ) wetland 6e) seasonal runoff( ) other( ) stream ( ) seasonal creek ( ) Directions to Site: k2 NYl t 12 Sool k dh T t,L4�a - a`Q L1r-,rY7 till Pok n nflk O F T 22) i o l�u tock —(� k Syr,, If the information is incomplete, then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the original application. Pre-inspection reports remain valid only until development changes occur in the vicinity,which affect the lot evaluated in this inspection,or the laws regulating development of the site change after the time of inspection. Applicant Signature: Date: 14P►'7� If you would like to be on site during inspection,please check here: (-,.), h a*0-C lallG lived, T;WX-J' '(W Return application to: Department of Community Development, Planning Division �✓�d /S P.O. BOX 279 Shelton, WA 98584 Please include a$255.00 check or money order payable to Mason County Treasurer. MORE ON BACK SIDE C:\Users\BLR—I.MAS\AppData\Local\Temp\XPgrpwise\2012 Planning Pre-Inspection.doc L 1VLL 7V 111UJU 4LV VVIV YY LL1V�Jl VrlV JVU VU11LL111�J1LV L111V14 L1V11 LV V11L1VLL1 41V4J`J1V�lV J, JLL V4L11 J, 141�V J, Y1 VL1411LLJ, VLV.J existing improvements, as well as property lines. APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED WITHOUT ADEQUATE ILLUSTRATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT. C�P e.ar-ecl ct ram.. i3C. 4 7 � - � lac.�s ywtG� Departmental Review (For Office Use Only) Planning De art s: gment Findin L,(,& 9 at-4 ,. ova C:\Users\BLR--LMAS\AppData\Local\Temp\XPgrpwise\2012 Planning Pre-Inspection.doc e., ------------ far 7AWR�scaAsaxr - T .FcgriC. ua�n"'•, aI A5Wcf1`.+. ti ., orlptioa " o =nth b2af of the D,,thB.St quarter of the northeast quarter of the ow-t r of Section hy-Tcxns,dp 23 North; Range 2'West, mx$ Ooa S, b atan. IDw�. Unva ate�4a.tth Road. v < Also 3csaa as Mra.-t.3 of =7m rammed De-ember 31, 29871 3n 9olu"lj l or SEs Pa.'e-1�3, 33em=CSo--tFs '• � t Auditor's"Ile Ro. 5=1e7eria {estltisate Diate=: i 1.1-lss� i carLit9'Lhat 1aoa dams pticim ltta iaR7 sr.3.8 si ta's,a�a-t ff6di r"v' 1 �� s1 Lh['�ps� mi 4,Wl 11m377--346 Tt Y� r �pp�''��r � •-�:,riz,zs•. :•s 3�4}'�:x�� c .? r t f Y VICINITY MAP N SHORT r PLAT — SCALE*2 LZ- CR)�'KSoiJ LRKE - cba E r+c WA LaW furaaYb� -- 824 Sa.261h St Tacoma WA BB4p6 p5ona II72•id3t t //` DAT E.B. G9 ON F 'E J� SCALE .l09 Nd. OPT L OTHER PARCELS.NO REPRESENTAnON IS MADE AS TO ACCURACY AND THE i COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR i ANY LOSS OCCURINfs BY REASON'OF RELIANCE THEREON. Case Activity Listing 5/15/2019 10:15:55AM Case#: SPI2015-00030 APR 1 1 2019 Parcel#: 223047790131 (Moto DG4&i0o6: PLANNING PRE-SITE INSPECTION TO DETERMINE SETBACKS FOR NEW SFR Assigned Done Activity Description Date I Date 2 Date 3 Hold Disp To By Updated Updated By SPIA600 SPI Letter- Id Review 10/9/2015 None DONE A1113 AHB 10/9/2015 AI113 Inspection for William eynolds-Hanson on April 30,2015: Lot Description: rty[PN:22304-77-901311 in the Erickson Lake,is on the west side of Tahuya Blacksmith Rd. A slope at less than 15 percent is oriented towards the west and the wetland and buffer area. Th wetland extends farther south and north. The parcel has native plant cover adjacent to the wet area and near the road. This 1.57-acre parcel site has been cleared in the west where a residence,dr d yard may be located. The applicant wishes to develop a new residence associated with the driveway. These findings state regulations in effect at the time of inspection,unless noted otherwise. Develop t Regulations standards: _Y_ The site is in the Rural Residential 5 zone. Building setbacks are 25-foot front yard setback,and 20-foot side property line and rear yard setbacks. These setbacks are measured from structures above grade such as roof overhangs,stairs,balconies,decks,heat pumps,storage buildings,and fuel tanks. _Y_ An administrative variance may be requested to reduce these setback distances from property lines,to as low as 5 feet(side yard)or 10 feet(front yard),if the shape or features of the property constrain development from the proper setbacks. This process requires application and review at the time of the building permit submittal. Resource Ordinance Standards: N Slope or Landslide hazards:Slopes less than 15 percent adjacent to or within 300 feet of a proposed project were observed. The applicant does not need a geologic special report during development %_eview. _N_ Shoreline setbacks: The Mason County Mason County Resource Ordinance Wetland setbacks applied to the site;if the Shoreline Master Program applied to the site(a wetland,not a lake),the area shoreline designation would be Urban Environment. _N_Stream setbacks: No typed stream is in the vicinity and the proposed development is greater than 200 feet from the stream management area covered by Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Chapter(17.01.110)of the Mason County Resource Ordinance standards. _Y_ Wetland critical area: Planning staff confirmed that certain wetlands and associated connecting drainages,are located on the subject parcel. These critical areas are regulated under Mason County's Wetlands Chapter 17.01.070 of the Mason County Resource Ordinance. These wetlands are situated at the western portions of the parcel and extend to south and north. The wetlands are likely Category III wetlands with moderate plant diversity and stream flow into and out of the subject wetland.Development near the wetlands shall have the suitable vegetative buffer,and buildings must be set back an additional 15 feet from the outer edge of that buffer. _Y The wetland and a narrow portion(60 feet)of the vegetation buffer are currently intact with some trails existing through them. For view improvement,some tree limbs in the buffer may be trimmed on a limited basis in accordance with the Wetland chapter standards. _Y NO FURTHER CLEARING should take place within the 90 feet closest to the wetland. When planning the location of all proposed improvements or removing further vegetation for development, consider the proper buffer and setback from the wetland edge in that site plan. Staff noted a possible locations of a residence building in relation to the existing site clearing and driveway. The residence to the south(from the roof eave of the 8 ft.deep deck)is situated 90 feet from the edge of the wetland shore. The subject property has vegetation area cleared to the same 90-11.depth. A residence proposed at that 90-foot distance or greater from the edge of wetland would meet the wetland standards for development. Page 2 of 3 CaseActivity..rpt 19 Case Activity Listing :1 : M 10:1555A55M t Case#: SPI2015-00030 Parcel#: 223047790131 Description: PLANNING PRE-SITE INSPECTION TO DETERMINE SETBACKS FOR NEW SFR Assigned Done Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Hold Disp TO By Updated Updated By You would need to confirm with the Health Department what their septic system standards are to make sure about the adequacy of supplying a septic system and drainfield area(s). General process: Future site development must include a site plan,showing all setbacks from property lines,slopes,and existing and proposed improvements;this site plan will be needed for the building permit application and review. Page 3 of 3 CaseActivity..rpt