HomeMy WebLinkAboutSHR2015-00002 Landslide Repair Hearing - SHR Letters / Memos - 4/2/2015 STATE O�
c c �
9
m
W - x
O
]889 a y
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY RECEIVED
PO Box 47775 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 • (360) 407-6300
JUN 2 3 2015
426 W. CEDAR STI
June 18, 2015
Flsase
Washington State Department of Transportation FIL-LE
Attn: Jeff Sawyer
5720 Capitol Blvd. S
Tumwater, WA 98501
Re: Mason County Permit SHR2015-00002 -Approved i: : a1�.dp—�oD000
WSDOT-Applicant
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit(SDP)
b[.1
Dear Mr. Sawyer:
On June 16, 2015,the Department of Ecology received notice that Mason County approved your
application for an SDP. Your permit is to repair U.S. Highway 101 and stabilize the slope on the
Hood Canal side by building a retaining wall. The project will occur within shoreline jurisdiction
of Hood Canal.
By law, local governments must review all SDPs for compliance with:
• The Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW)
• Ecology's Substantial Development Permit approval criteria (Chapter 173-27-150 WAC)
• The Mason County Local Shoreline Master Program.
Local governments, after reviewing SDPs for compliance, are required to submit them to
Ecology. Your approved SDP has been received by Ecology.
What Happens Next?
Before you begin activities authorized by this permit, the law requires you wait at least 21 days
from June 16, 2015, the "date of filing." This waiting period allows anyone (including you)who
disagrees with any aspect of this permit to appeal the decision to the state Shorelines Hearings
Board. You must wait for the conclusion of an appeal before you can begin the activities
authorized by this permit.
We recommend contacting the Shorelines Hearings Board at (360) 664-9160 before beginning
permit activities to ensure that no appeal has been filed. Information on appeals is also posted at
http://www.eluho.wa.gov/Decision/Search Cases. Select "Shorelines Hearings Board" from the
drop down menu labeled "Board" and enter "Search." The most current appeal will appear on
top.
b i�i
If you want to appeal this decision, you can find appeal instructions (Chapter 461-08 WAC) at
the Shorelines Hearings Board website above. They are also posted on the website of the
Washington State Legislature at: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac.
Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to this shoreline permit.
If you have any questions about this letter, please contact me at(360) 407-6221.
Si e
Rick Mraz, Shore
line Spe 'alist'alistShorelands and En ' ental Assistance Program
cc: Grace Miller, Mason County
arer�o
R �•
o�R 2
o
•9��1 1889�pY
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
PO Box 47775•Olympia,Washington 98504-7775• (360)407-6300
June 18, 2015
Washington State Department of Transportation
Attn: Jeff Sawyer
5720 Capitol Blvd. S
Tumwater,WA 98501
Re: Mason County Permit SHR2015-00002-Approved
WSDOT-Applicant
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit(SDP)
Dear Mr. Sawyer:
On June 16,2015,the Department of Ecology received notice that Mason County approved your
application for an SDP. Your permit is to repair U.S. Highway 101 and stabilize the slope on the
Hood Canal side by building a retaining wall. The project will occur within shoreline jurisdiction
of Hood Canal.
By law,local governments must review all SDPs for compliance with:
• The Shoreline Management Act(Chapter 90.58 RCW)
• Ecology's Substantial Development Permit approval criteria(Chapter 173-27-150 WAC)
• The Mason County Local Shoreline Master Program.
Local governments,after reviewing SDPs for compliance,are required to submit them to
Ecology. Your approved SDP has been received by Ecology.
What Happens Next?
Before you begin activities authorized by this permit,the law requires you wait at least 21 days
I from June 16,2015,the"date of filing." This waiting period allows anyone(including you)who
disagrees with any aspect of this permit to appeal the decision to the state Shorelines Hearings
Board. You must wait for the conclusion of an appeal before you can begin the activities
authorized by this permit.
We recommend contacting the Shorelines Hearings Board at(360)664-9160 before beginning
permit activities to ensure that no appeal has been filed.Information on appeals is also posted at
hU://www.eluho.wa.gov/Decision/Search Cases. Select"Shorelines Hearings Board" from the
drop down menu labeled "Board"and enter"Search."The most current appeal will appear on
top.
If you want to appeal this decision, you can find appeal instructions(Chapter 461-08 WAC) at
the Shorelines Hearings Board website above. They are also posted on the website of the
Washington State Legislature at: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac.
Other federal,state, and local permits may be required in addition to this shoreline permit.
If you have any questions about this letter,please contact me at (360)407-6221.
Si e ,
Rick Mraz, Shoreline Spe ialist
Shorelands and En ' ental Assistance Program
cc: Grace Miller,Mason County
°p
MASON COUNTY (360) 427-9670 Shelton ext.352
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (360) 275-4467 Belfair ext. 352
BUILDING• PLANNING•FIRE MARSHAL (360) 482-5269 Elma ext. 352
Mason County Bldg. III, 426 West Cedar Street
Shelton, WA 98584 www.co.mason.wa.us
June 11, 2015
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION
Case Number: SHR2015-00002—Shoreline Substantial Development for WSDOT.
Notice is hereby given that the Washington State Dept of Transportation, applicant for
the above referenced shoreline permit,has been granted conditional approval to repair US
101 and stabilization of its slope on the Hood Canal side by building a retaining wall.
If you have any questions or require clarification on this issue, please contact Grace
Miller, Planner with the Mason County Department of Community Development at(360)
427-9670,x 360.
'i decision...iuis approval of the Shoreline_S.ubsumLial DeveiopmeniFeiLL.._-___.._
by the Mason County Hearing Examiner is final and subject to appeal to the Washington
State Shoreline Hearings Board as governed by Chapter 90.58 RCW. Appeal deadlines
are short and procedures strictly construed. Anyone wishing to file an appeal of this
decision should consult with an attorney to ensure that all procedural requirements are
satisfied.
Shoreline Management Act
Permit Data Sheet and Transmittal Letter to WA DOE
FROM: TO:
Mason County Planning WA Department of Ecology
P.O. Box 279
SW Regional office
Shelton, WA 98584 ATTN: Shoreline Permit Reviewer
P.O. Box 47775
Olympia, WA 98504
Submittal Date: (,eL11111/� Date Received by GA:
TYPE OF PERMIT: (indicate all that apply)
ASubstantial Development ❑ Variance ❑ Other:
❑ Conditional Use ❑ Revision
LOCAL GOVERNMENT DECISION:
❑ Approval Conditional Approval ❑ Denial
Planner Name: (-;Y/LBQ hiller- Phone: C&,,)
Notice of Application Date: V7/iS Final Decision Date:
APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE (if primary contact):
Name: 6;5 poi - Ate; -ram �,, ,,,, Name:
Mailing Address: 5�� (, ,��,� Brvp.5, Mailing Address:
�Guruu�- GU,4 98So/
Phone: (3& 7 576-67W Phone: -(3&o�570-67y9
Email Evaos3l Email: A e-'sdo-14. wa.go✓
PROPERTY OWNER: A Same as Applicant ❑ Other:
PROPERTY LOCATION: (Section, Township, and Range to the nearest Y4 % Section; Latitude and Longitude;
and a street address where available)
/ti,v 3 iu .5 o— �-1wod6xo..Q srdc !�4l5 /oi. 6 /2 '7�VA)avn{ Af 3k/.
y7. 5fs `�075- /V
Tax Parcel Number: 3, yia_oo-G,oot Shoreline Designation:
Waterbody: ,moo(' Shoreline of Statewide Significance? Yes ❑ No
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: oa 4fS col rod
r
I:PLAN NING\PAC\FORMS\ShorelineTransmittal 6/2010
Shoreline Management Act
Permit Data Sheet and Transmittal Letter to WA AG
FROM: TO:
Mason County Planning WA State Attorney General - Ecology Division
P.O. Box 279 P.O. Box 40100
Shelton, WA 98584 Olympia, WA98504
Submittal Date: Date Received by GA:
TYPE OF PERMIT: (indicate all that apply)
XSubstantial Development ❑ Variance ❑ Other:
❑ Conditional Use ❑ Revision
LOCAL GOVERNMENT DECISION:
❑ Approval Conditional Approval ❑ Denial
Planner Name: c, (tpDe/ Phone:(3u 0 ercf
Notice of Application Date: Final Decision Date:
APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE (if primary contact):
Name: e r/ b-r - Name: -sue aQu���r�►-
Mailing Address: Mailing Address:
�kM •-, w,d y�sa�
Phone: 1 �70- (�70� Phone: r3&o)
Email: Evo--sD do,L. 4,4- qPt/, Email 6 5daf. .go✓
PROPERTY OWNER: ksame as Applicant ❑ Other:
PROPERTY LOCATION: (Section, Township, and Range to the nearest %4 % Section; Latitude and Longitude;
and a street address where available)
SIP 3�cP. S cn/food C�n.l sc;�c U5 to/.
rr,w s�lM
`(7. 58-g070r N' � �► l t-3. oo y$SS CJ-
Tax Parcel Number: 3,-7H1a-0y-&ao0 Shoreline Designation:
Waterbody: 416d OA.lj Shoreline of Statewide Significance? Yes ❑ No
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: )6uoa h foi
1 PLAN NING\PAC\FORMS\ShorelineTransmittal 6/2010
1
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR MASON COUNTY
4 RE: Washington State Department FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS
of Transportation OF LAW AND FINAL DECISION
Shoreline Substantial
6 Development/
7 (SHR2015-00002)
8
q INTRODUCTION
l0 The applicant has requested approval of a shoreline substantial development permit
for the repair of US 101 and stabilization of its slope on the Hood Canal side by
1 1 building a retaining wall. The purpose of the project is to construct permanent repairs
12 to roadway damage caused by a landslide at MP 316.5. The proposal is approved
subject to conditions.
11
14 TESTIMONY
15 Grace Miller summarized the staff report. Ms. Miller clarified there would be no
16 work in the water and that the proposal is located more than 100 feet from the
waterline.
17
David Evans, WSDOT representative, noted that the reason the biological assessment
18 won't be completed until after completion of the project is that the biological
assessment is being done under an emergency action and that WSDOT has already
l received emergency conservation measures from federal agencies that exceed the best
-'0 management practices applicable to the project. Mr. Evans agreed to submit a copy
of the conservation measures. The conservation measures include protection of
1 marbled murrelet by prohibiting construction during feeding times.
22 Kevin Dahl, project engineer, confirmed that repairs will extend a little beyond the
23
existing road footprint.
24
EXHIBITS
SSDP P. 1 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
Exhibits 1-8 identified in the last page of the staff report were admitted during the
I hearing. Post-hearing an email from David Evans to Grace Miller regarding
2 conservation measures dated June 1,2015 was admitted as Ex.9.
3 FINDINGS OF FACT
Procedural:
4
1. Applicant. The applicant is the Washington State Department of
5 Transportation.
6 2. Hearing. The Hearing Examiner conducted a hearing on the subject
7 application on May 25, 2014, at or about 1:00 p.m., in the Mason County
Commissioners Meeting Room.
8
Substantive:
9
10 3. Site/Proiect Description. The applicant has requested approval of a
shoreline substantial development permit for the repair of US 101 roadway and
11 stabilization of the slope on the Hood Canal side by building a retaining wall. The
purpose of the project is to construct permanent repairs to a landslide at MP 316.5.
12
Highway 101 at MP 316.5 runs parallel to Hood Canal and is approximately 100 to
13 120 feet away from the water body. All work will be within 200 feet of Hood Canal.
14 The property has been and will continue to be used as a transportation corridor for
public and private vehicles. It is located within a rural, forested area with steep
15 slopes.The steepest slope is approximately 45%.
16 The landslide that caused the need for repairs occurred on December 10, 2014 during
17
an extreme weather event. Temporary emergency repair work included signage and
barrier installation to restrict travel to one lane, erosion control measures and
18 conducting geotechnical investigation. Permanent repairs will include removal of
slide debris, tree removal, construction of a soldier pile retaining wall and
19 reconstructing the roadway slope and northbound lane and shoulder.
20 The retaining wall will be located approximately 100 to 120 feet from the OHWM.
21 The fill material behind the wall will be permeable ballast which is crushed rock - 2
1/2" minus, approximately 100 CY. Re-establishing the roadway will consist of
22 approximately 60 CY of crushed surfacing base course - 1 1/4" minus and
approximately 50 CY of asphalt.
23
Design steps taken to avoid or minimize impacts to the environment include the
24 following:
25 1)No in-water work will occur as part of this project.
SSDP p. 2 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
2) Proper use of Best Management Practices will ensure that no related pollutants,
sediment or debris enter waters of the State
3) Consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Services and United States Fish &
Wildlife Service will ensure that project activities do not jeopardize listed species or
destroy, or adversely affect designated critical habitat.
4) Conservation measures outlined in the Biological Assessments will be included in
4 the construction contract. This project has been declared an emergency action.
Therefore, the Biological Assessment will not be complete until after the project is
completed. The project is not scheduled to be complete until after October 1,2015.At
6 this time, the biological assessment will begin and be completed before November 1,
2015.
7
4. Characteristics of the Area. The adjacent properties are used for
8 recreation such as bicycling, fishing and camping. Robinswold Girl Scout Camp is
adjacent to the project site. An access road through the Girl Scout Camp Robinswold
9 is located between the Highway and Hood Canal, below the slide area. The buildings
10 associated with the camp are located to the northeast of the project limits.
1 1 5. Adverse Impacts. There are no significant adverse impacts associated
with the proposal. The design steps already incorporated into the proposal as outlined
1=' in Finding of Fact No. 3 are sufficient to mitigate any adverse impacts to
13 environmental resources and properties in the vicinity. The most pertinent area of
concern is impacts to fish and wildlife, as the applicant has not yet completed a
14 biological assessment and it may not be completed until after the project is
completed. For this reason, the. conditions of approval will require that the applicant
1 comply with any conservation measures suggested or required by the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service during their ESA
16 consultation on the proposal. Beyond that issue, since no work waterward of the
shoreline is proposed and the applicant proposes to use best management practices,
17 no adverse impacts to water quality are anticipated. Impacts to existing vegetation
18 will be modest and the conditions of approval require the restoration of any removed
vegetation. No other adverse impacts are reasonably evident from the administrative
9 record.
20
21 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
22 Procedural:
23 1. Authority of Hearing Examiner. MCC 15.03.050(9) authorizes the
Examiner to review and issue a final decision regarding shoreline substantial
-4 development permit applications..
Substantive:
SSDP p. 3 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
2. Shoreline Designation. The shoreline designation of the project site is
1 Conservancy.
2 3. General Review Criteria for Shoreline Substantial Develoument Permit.
3 The applicant is required to obtain a shoreline substantial development permit for any
substantial development within the shoreline jurisdiction. Applications for shoreline
4 substantial development permits must be consistent with the Shoreline Master
Program for Mason County ("MCSMP"), and the policies and procedures of Chapter
5 90.58 RCW, the Shoreline Management Act ("SMA"). MCC 15.09.055(0(2)(C). A
6 "substantial development" is any development of which the total cost for market
value exceeds $6,416 or any development that materially interferes with any normal
7 public use of the water or shorelines of the state. MCC 17.50.040. As noted in the
staff report, the proposal will exceed $$6,416 in cost. This proposal is reviewed
8 under the SMP Section for Transportation Facilities. The applicable review criteria
9 are quoted below and applied through corresponding conclusions of law.
10 Transportation Facilities Policy No. 1: Roads should be located on stable soils,
back from a water channel using routes that avoid slumps, wetlands, and natural
11 drainage areas. When this is not possible, corrective stabilization measures should be
used.
12
4. The repair work is for an existing road that cannot be re-located. The
13 proposed retaining wall serves as a corrective stabilization measure authorized by the
14 policy quoted above. The proposal is consistent with the policy.
15 Transportation Facilities Policy No. 2: Major highways, freeways and railways
should be located away from shorelands.
16
17 5. The work will be done for an existing road that cannot be relocated. As the policy
is a "should" as opposed to a "shall", the circumstances of the proposed work justify
18 its location within shorelands.
19 Transportation Facilities Policy No. 3: Road locations should be planned to fit the
topography so that minimum alterations of natural conditions will be necessary.
20
21 6. The road repair with retaining wall has been designed and will be maintained to
prevent erosion and to permit the natural movement of ground water.
22
Transportation Facilities Policy No. 6: Roads located in wetland areas should be
23 designed and maintained to prevent erosion and to permit the natural movement of
ground water.
24
25 7. It is unclear if the road is located in a "wetland area". Given that the staff report
does not identify any wetlands at the project site and there is nothing in the record to
SSDP p.4 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
suggest the presence of wetlands, it is determined that no wetlands are at the project
1 site.
Transportation Facilities Policy No. 7: Location of roads and railroads should not
require the rerouting of stream and river channels.
4 8. No rerouting of stream or river channels is proposed.
Transportation Facilities Policy No. 8: Roads should be designed, constructed and
6 maintained to minimize erosion and to permit natural movement of ground water and
floodwaters to the extent practical.
7
9. Staff have determined that the road and retaining wall have been designed
8 and will be maintained to minimize erosion and to permit natural movement of
ground water to the extent practical and there is no evidence to the contrary. Best
management practices proposed by the applicant will prevent erosion during
I construction.
I I Transportation Facilities Policy No. 9: All debris, overburden and other waste
materials from construction should be disposed of in such a way as to prevent their
1-' entry by erosion from drainage, high water, or other means into any surface water
1 body.
14 10. As conditioned.
I 'Transportation Facilities Policy No. 14: All transportation facilities in shoreline
areas should be located, designed, constructed and maintained to cause the least
I possible adverse impacts on the land and water environments, should respect the
natural character of the shoreline and should make every effort to preserve wildlife,
17 aquatic life and their habitats.
18
11. As determined in FOF No. 5, the proposal creates no significant adverse
19 impacts and is conditioned and proposed to avoid any impacts to the shoreline
resources.
20
1 Transportation Facilities Use Regulation No. 1: Application for roads and
railroads must adequately address the following:
22 ' Need must be shown for a shoreline location and that no reasonable upland
alternative exists.
23 • The construction is designed to protect the adjacent shoreline against erosion,
uncontrolled or polluting drainage and other factors detrimental to the environment
-'4 both during and after construction.
25 • That the project will be planned to fit the existing topography as much as possible,
thus minimizing alterations to the natural environment.
SSDP P. 5 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
That all debris, overburden and other waste materials from construction will be
disposed of in such a way as to prevent their entry by erosion from drainage into any
water body.
12. There is a strong need and no reasonable alternative for the repair work as it
addresses a problem on an existing road. Best management practices will prevent
4 erosion during construction and completion of the retaining wall is designed to
prevent future erosion. The conditions of approval require restoration of damaged
vegetation, ensuring that alterations to the existing environmental are minimized.
6 The conditions of approval require all construction waste material to be disposed of in
a manner to prevent their entry into Hood Canal. The criterion is met.
7
Transportation Facilities Use Regulation No. 8: All excavation materials and soils
8 exposed to erosion by all phases of road, bridge and culvert work shall be stabilized
and protected by seeding, mulching or other effective means both during and after
9 construction.
10
13. Best Management Practices will be utilized to control stormwater from
entering waters of the state. The practices are approved by the Washington State
Department of Ecology and are from the latest version of the Washington State
12 Department of Transportation's Highway Runoff Manual.
1) Transportation Facilities Use Regulation No. 9: When permitted to parallel
14 shorelines, roads shall be set back a sufficient distance from the ordinary high water
mark to leave a.usable.shoreline area for shoreline recreation or access.
14. The proposed repairs are to an existing road that was likely placed at its
16 present location prior to Use Regulation No. 9 and therefore qualifies as a valid
nonconforming use. WAC 173-27-080(2) authorizes repairs of nonconforming
17 structures provided that the degree of nonconformity is not increased. Although the
18 proposed repairs will extend a nominal amount beyond the existing road footprint,
this small amount should have no impact on any usable area for shoreline recreation
19 or access.
1> Transportation Facilities Use Regulation No. 10: Storm water runoff shall be
,1 controlled to reduce suspended solids and other pollutants before entering any
surface water body.
22
15. Staff have determined that stormwater treatment will be installed to
23 control runoff; reduce suspended solids and other pollutants from entering any surface
-14 water body.No impacts to adjacent water bodies are anticipated.
25
DECISION
SSDP p. 6 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
I The shoreline substantial development permit application for SR 101 repair work
(SHR2015-00002)is approved subject to the following conditions:
1) All debris, overburden and other waste materials from construction will be
disposed of in such a manner as to prevent their entry by erosion from drainage
4 into any water body.
2) No in-water work will occur as part of this project.
3) Proper use of Best Management Practices will ensure that no related pollutants,
6 sediment or debris enter waters of the State.
4) Consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Services and United States Fish
7 & Wildlife Services will ensure that project activities do not jeopardize listed
species or destroy, or adversely affect, designated critical habitat. The applicants
8 will comply with all conservation measures recommended by the Services in
anticipation resulting from the consultation.
9 5) All work will be done during daylight hours.
6) All roadside impacted by project work shall be restored in kind. Disturbed native
vegetation will be replaced with native vegetation.
11
DATED this 11th of June, 2015.
I?
14
l�
Phi A.01h=hts
I , Mason County Hearing Examiner
16
17 Appeal Right and Valuation Notices
18 This shoreline substantial development permit decision is final and subject to appeal to
the Washington State Shoreline Hearings Board as governed by Chapter 90.58 RCW.
19 Appeal deadlines are short and procedures strictly construed. Anyone wishing to file
20 an appeal of this decision should consult with an attorney to ensure that all procedural
requirements are satisfied.
21
Affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes
22 notwithstanding any program of revaluation.
23
?4
SSDP p. 7 Findings, Conclusions and Decision
I
May 15 2015 EXHIBIT 1
TO:Mason County Hearing Examiner
FROM: Planning staff,Grace Miller
RE: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit request by Washington State Department of Transportation
to construct permanent repairs to a landslide.
Case No.SHR2015-00002.
STAFF REPORT
I. INTRODUCTION. This report evaluates an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development
Permit for the repair of US 101 roadway and stabilization of the slope on the Hood Canal side by
building a retaining wall.The purpose of the project is to construct permanent repairs to a
landslide at MP 316.5.
II. APPLICANT. The applicant is the Washington State Department of Transportation.Their
representatives are Scott Boutilier,Dave Evans and Jeff Sawyer.
III. LOCATION. The property is located at MP 316.5 on the Hood Canal side of US 101.
IV. LEGAL DESCRIPTION. NW 1/4 of Section 12,Twn 24 N,R 3 W.Latitude 47.584075 N,
Longitude 123.004855 W.Parcel No.32412-00-60000.
V. EVALUATION.
A. Characteristics of the site and area:Highway 101 at MP 316.5 runs parallel to Hood Canal and is
approximately 100 to 120 feet away from the water body.All work will be within 200 feet of Hood
Canal.The property has been and will continue to be used as a transportation corridor for public and
private vehicles.It is located within a rural,forested area with steep slopes.The steepest slope is
approx 45%.The adjacent properties are used for recreation such as bicycling,fishing and camping.
Robinswold Girl Scout Camp is adjacent to the project site.An access road through the Girl Scout
Camp Robinswold is located between the Highway and Hood Canal,below the slide area.The
buildings associated with the camp are located to the northeast of the project limits.
B. Shoreline Designation.The shoreline designation is Conservancy and Hood Canal is a Shoreline of
Statewide Significance.
C. Comprehensive Plan.The Comprehensive Plan designation is Rural.
D. SEPA COMPLIANCE.A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued by the Washington State
Department of Transportation on March 11,2015.
E. ZONING: The property is Zoned as Rural Tourist.
F. OTHER PERMITS.A Shoreline Exemption was issued by Mason County in January for Emergency
Repairs.No other county permits are required
V1. ANALYSIS.This project will entail the construction of permanent repairs to US 101 near Beacon
Point on Hood Canal.Damage was sustained by a landslide at this location on December 10,2014
during an extreme weather event.Temporary emergency repair work included signage and barrier
1
installation to restrict travel to one lane,erosion control measures and conducting geotechnical
investigation.Permanent repairs will include removal of slide debris,tree removal,construction of a soldier
pile retaining wall and reconstructing the roadway slope and northbound lane and shoulder.
The retaining wall will be located approximately 100 to 120 feet from the OHWM.The fill material behind
the wall will be permeable ballast which is crushed rock-2 1/2"minus,approximately 100 CY.Re-
establishing the roadway will consist of approximately 60 CY of crushed surfacing base course- 1 1/4"
minus and approximately 50 CY of asphalt.
Design steps taken to avoid or minimize impacts to the environment include the following:
1)No in-water work will occur as part of this project.
2)Proper use of Best Management Practices will ensure that no related pollutants,sediment or debris enter
waters of the State
3)Consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Services and United States Fish&Wildlife Service will
ensure that project activities do not jeopardize listed species or destroy,or adversely affect designated
critical habitat.
4)Conservation measures outlined in the Biological Assessments will be included in the construction
contract. This project has been declared an emergency action.Therefore,the Biological Assessment will
not be complete until after the project is completed.The project is not scheduled to be complete until after
October 1,2015.At this time,the biological assessment will begin and be completed before November 1,
2015.
Alternating signal controlled traffic with minor delays will be utilized as a detour during construction.
The proposal takes place within the jurisdiction of a Type I Water and shall be reviewed under the Mason
County Shoreline Master Program Policies and Use Regulations.The Shoreline Environmental Designation
is Conservancy and a Shoreline of Statewide Significance. Per the Mason County Development Code
15.09.055 A.1,this proposal requires a Substantial Development Permit due to the cost exceeding$6416 as
well as being beyond the scope of"normal maintenance and repair"as defined under WAC 173-27-
040(2)(b).This SDP proposal is reviewed under the Mason County Code,Shoreline Master Program
(SMP)Chapter 17.50.060 Transportation Facilities.
A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW:
Type III Review for permit applications require that the Hearing Examiner evaluate the proposal for
consistency with the County's Development Code,adopted plans and regulations.The Hearing Examiner
shall review the proposal according to the following criteria:
1)The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the requirements and intent
of the Mason County Code,especially Title 6,8 and 16.
2)The development does not impact the public health,safety and welfare and is in the public interest.
3)The development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or neighborhood park
facilities below the minimum standards established within the Comprehensive Plan and meets the
requirements and intent of the Mason County Code.
The project does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the requirements and intent of the
Mason County Code.The project does positively impact public safety and is in the public interest. The
level of service to public transportation and the parks will be improved.
2
B. SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM REVIEW:
The proposal requires a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit because the value exceeds W16.00.
The Transportation Chapter of the Shoreline Master Program was used in the review of the project.The
applicable Policies and Use Regulations of the Chapter follow:
TRANSPORTATION POLICIES:
1. Roads should be located on stable soils,back from a water channel using routes that avoid slumps,
wetlands,and natural drainage areas.When this is not possible,corrective stabilization measures
should be used.
The highway is located on unstable soils and cannot be relocated Therefore, the proposed retaining wall is
proposed as the corrective stabilization measure.
3. Road locations should be planned to fit the topography so that minimum alterations of natural
conditions will be necessary.
The work is necessary to complete the project as designed to WSDOT standards..
6.Roads located within wetland areas should be designed and maintained to prevent erosion and to permit
the natural movement of ground water.
The road repair with retaining wall has been designed and will be maintained to prevent erosion and to
permit the natural movement ofground water.
8. Roads should be designed,constructed and maintained to minimize erosion and to permit natural
movement of ground water and floodwaters to the extent practical.
The road and retaining wall have been designed and will be maintained to minimize erosion and to permit
natural movement of ground water to the extent practical.
9. All debris,overburden and other waste materials from construction should be disposed of in such a
way as to prevent their entry by erosion from drainage,high water,or other means into any surface
water body.
All debris, overburden and waste material from construction will be disposed of appropriately.
12. All transportation facilities in shoreline areas should be located,designed,constructed and maintained
to cause the least possible adverse impacts on the land and water environments,should respect the
natural character of the shoreline and should make every effort to preserve wildlife,aquatic life and
their habitats.
By constructing the new retaining wall on the slide area, the highway is being protected and meets this
policy.
TRANSPORTATION USE REGULATIONS:
1.Application for roads and railroads must adequately address the following:
-The construction is designed to protect the adjacent shoreline against erosion,uncontrolled or polluting
drainage and other factors detrimental to the environment both during and after construction.
-That the project will be planned to fit the existing topography as much as possible,thus minimizing the
alterations to the natural environment.
That all debris,overburden and other waste materials from construction will be disposed of in such a way
as to prevent their entry by erosion from drainage into any water body.
The proposed retaining wall will maintain the highway location for public safety and erosion control will
be implemented during and after construction. Disturbed areas will be replanted with native vegetation.
3
8.All excavation materials and soils exposed to erosion by all phases of road,bridge and culvert work
shall be stabilized and protected by seeding,mulching or other effective means both during and after
construction.
Best Management Practices will be utilized to control stormwater from entering waters of the state.
Methods are approved by the Washington State Department of Ecology and are from the latest version of
the Washington State Department of Transportation's Highway Runoff Manual.
10. Stormwater runoff shall be controlled to reduce suspended solids and other pollutants before entering
any surface water body.
Stormwater treatment will be installed to control runoff,reduce suspended solids and other pollutants from
entering any surface water body.No impacts to adjacent water bodies are anticipated.
The project meets all of the policies and use regulations of the Transportation Chapter.To date,no written
comments have been received regarding the application.As conditioned,the proposal is consistent with the
Policies and Use Regulations of the Mason County Shoreline Master Program and the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff recommends conditional approval of the permit with the following conditions:
1) All debris,overburden and other waste materials from construction will be disposed of in such a
manner as to prevent their entry by erosion from drainage into any water body.
2) No in-water work will occur as part of this project.
3) Proper use of Best Management Practices will ensure that no related pollutants,sediment or debris
enter waters of the State.
4) Consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Services and United States Fish&Wildlife Services
will ensure that project activities do not jeopardize listed species or destroy,or adversely affect,
designated critical habitat.
5) All work will be done during daylight hours.
6) All roadside impacted by project work shall be restored in kind.Disturbed native vegetation will be
replaced with native vegetation.
VII. CHOICE OF ACTION.
1) Approval of Shoreline Substantial Development Permit#SHR2015-00002.
2) Approve with conditions..
3) Deny permit(reapplication or resubmittal is permitted).
4) Remand for further proceedings and/or evidentiary hearing in accordance with Section 15.09.090 of
Title 15.
4
WDOT HWY 101 Retaining Wall
SIM0015-00002
LIST OF EXHIBITS:
1. Staff Report.
2. Shoreline Permit Application.
3. Vicinity Map and Drawings.
4. Photos.
5. Public Notice.
6. JARPA.
7. DNS issued by WSDOT.
8. Emergency Exemption.
RECEIVED EIVED
' A
MASON COUNTY PR o 2 2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 426 W. CEDAR ST.
Building III—426 west Cedar Street
P.O.Box 279,Shelton,WA 98584
(360)427-9670—Ext.352
SHORELINE PERMIT APPLICATION
5�I?2�1 S-G1aoo2
PERMIT NO.: SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT: X
SHORELINE VARIANCE*:
DATE RECEIVED:4-2'.-),b i5 SHORELINE CONDITIONAL USE*:
SHORELINE EXEMPTION:
The Washington State Shoreline Management Act(RCW 90.58)requires that substantial developments within
designated shorelines of the state comply with its administrative procedures(WAC 173-14)and the provisions of the
Mason County Shoreline Management Master Program.The purpose of this Act and local program is to protect the
state's shoreline resources.The program requires that substantial development(any development of which the total
cost or fair market value exceeds$5,718.00 or materially interferes with the normal public use of the water or
shorelines of the State be reviewed with the goals,polices,and performance standards established in the Master
Program.
Answer all questions completely.Attach any additional information that my further describe the proposed
development.Incomplete applications will be returned.
Shoreline Variances and Conditional uses have additional pages that shall be attached to this application.
APPLICANT: W SDOT
ADDRESS: 5720 Capitol Blvd. S.
(street)
Tumwater WA 98501
(city) (state) (zip)
TELEPHONE: 360-570-6701 360-357-2601
(work) (fax)
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: Jeff Sawyer
ADDRESS: Same as above
(street)
(city) (state) (zip)
TELEPHONE:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
General location(include property address,water body and associated wetlands—identify the name of the shoreline):
US 101 at milepost 316.5, near Beacon Point on Hood Canal
shoreline 2011 app.doc
Legal description(include section,township,and range to the nearest quarter,quarter section or latitude and
longitude to the nearest minute.Projects located in open water areas away from land shall provide a longitude
location)—include all parcel numbers:
NW 1/4 S12, T24N, R3W WM
47.584075 N Latitude /-123.004855 W Lonutitude
OWNERSHIP: Contract
Applicant Owner Lessee Purchaser (Identify) Other
Owner:
WSDOT
(street)
(city) (state) (zip)
DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTON
Development(identify and describe the proposed project,including the type of materials to be used,construction
methods,principle dimensions,and other pertinent information):
This project will construct permanent repairs to a landslide at NIP 316.5 on US 101.
Please see attached JARPA for more detail.
Identify current use of property with exist improvements:
WSDOT: US 101 - Transportation Corridor
Reason for requesting development:
Repair of US 101 to improve public safety.
ACKOWLEDGEMENT
I hereby declare,to the best of my knowledge and belief,the forgoing information and all attached information is true
and correct.
(applicant or authorized representative) (date)
shoreline 2011 app.doc
�e3
T. 24 N., R. 3 WE, W.M. WSDOT
OLYMPIC REGION
-------------------------------------------------- ........----
_.._.
z;
�010 , r
,V.,' rot % 19
t 0.�
31
a � _
of ! _.i
Vl � SIN I N
——— M JEFFE_RSO_N_CO OLYMPIC NATL FOREST I
MASON .— .— —�.� .— T 25 N -- i
~i CO i� T 24 N �-L-•- - cv-•-•-•-•-•.........JEFIFERSON CO•-• ♦G/O
MASON.C,O. -•-•� ^j i
,•1�s�4 A I A"bf
f I �•� PM.
j t
-- _- - - _...__.. . --i--...._..._ __ ...__._.. --.. �__- __ ..-.__.. ___.- - i♦ I N
10 0 10 20 30 40 MILES
10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 KILOMETERS
O
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
! 10 11 ( Geographic Services,Cartography'GIS
12 BEGIN PROJECT; O BASE MAP JULY 2000
t •
MP 316.45
9
Lake i
ItArmslrotV
LLIL. j
END PROJECT; f
{
MP 316.53 % t
f
15 14 f 13 �// ' ' ■{ uaeRr
1 { ` PFIM;OT RO
w i
t � i 17 q 16 ,
Wa�efi a ♦ { �eFRr i 15 14
f i RO
t ,
Anderson i
_ - _•_- _------.__ran._. Cove f i ?
--
t
i 23
{ 22 CreeK i 0 1500 3000
t / ` SCALE IN FEET
y
t / 19 � { 26 t
i i i 21 I ,
i L' i 22 { 23
FILE NAME G:ILOCATIONMMC 2201MP 316 SLIDEIDMC 2201CAD1 Ba9eFIIesIDMC220 SF ALdgn Plot 1
TIME 3:25:32 PM U010M STATH
NO. FED.AID PROJ.NO. US 101 EMERGENCY SLIDE P "" "°
DATE 1nor2ols � VM1
PLOTTED BY vwlllro JO AS CIA IN MASON COUNTY, MP 316.5 VIC.
DES GNED BY B JAMIESON Je„�e� DMC220
ENTERED BY R MLLIAMS Washington State BEACON POINT LANDSLIDE SREET
CHECKED BY J YOUNG CONTRACT No ;. 7V M NO Department of Transportation -
REGI NAL K DAYTON DMC 220 VICINTY MAP SME�E S
REGIONAL ADM. K DAYTON �lu.l�u. O"� �*E
.wL-pMN DATE BY P.E dTAMP.OJ( P.E.STAMP ep%
T. 24 N., R. 3 W., W.M.
END PROJECT
US 101 MP 316.45
STA. A 12+20.00 =
RIW STA. 606+57.41 (.31' RT)
BEGIN PROJECT I
US 101 MP 316.53
STA. A 8+00.00 P.O.C. =
R/W STA. 602+37.01 (.76' LT)
-'-----eh----------------'------- ----------- ---
8 9 605 US 101 12
------ter-------�---- --- -—-—-—-—-—-— -----�—
A A LINE
---E'---------------------------------
70
—60
LEGEND
RIGHT OF WAY OP cP OP- OVERHEAD POWER
------ EDGE OF SHOULDER DITCH BOTTOM e
—————— EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY > FLOW LINE
—I—I—I GUARDRAIL __- CONCRETE CULVERT
I—�F�a
A CONTROL POINT PIEZOMETER 0 20 40
SCALE IN FEET
FILE NAME G:1L0CATIOMDMC 2201MP 316 SLIDEIDMC 22MCAD1_BaseFllesXCMC220 SF AL.dgn PIot4
TIME 3:27:50 PM 4��10
wN STATE FED.AID PROJ.NO. PUN REP No
— --- --
o. US 101 EMERGENCY SLIDE DATE ylliro was IN MASON COUNTYMP 316.5 VIC. UP1
PLOTTED BY wllliroDMC220
DESIGNED BY B JAMIESON roe NUMBER
ENTERED BY R WILLIAMS - - - Washington State BEACON POINT LANDSLIDE SHEET
CHECKED BY J YOUNG Cc) i T NO. LO Tl.N ND. Department of Transportatiol
PROJ.ENGR. R _BHALLa - UTILITY PLAN SHEE S
GATE DATE
REGIONAL ADM. K DAYTON - REVISION DATE BY E.eSTAMP Sox P.e.TAMP Sox
BEGIN PROJECT END PROJECT
US 101 MP 316.53 US 101 MP 316.45
STA. A 8+00.00 P.O.C. = STA. A 12+20.00 =
R1W STA. 602+37.01 (.76' LT) R/W STA. 606+57.41 (.31' RT)
---- -
_ ---- ------- -- — '" �10-------------- - _ __.-- - EXISTING CULVERT
--------- _ --' ---- ---------- --- --- - F.L.EL. 76.475
- - ------------ '
------ ------ - ------
" _ ------- - ---- _- - _--- -_too- _ ',• --,,,� �`. -- - ___
--- _------ --- - ------ _ ---1� _
too------- -- - _ - -.----- -- - _ - - $ ---- -
----------------
_ ---------------------------- ---- -- ------ --------------- _' -' - - �` _ - __--------
-- "-sue -----__._ -- - --- ---- ----- - -oe------ -m'" ----- ", ------- -- - -------
--------- - --------------------====-_- - - - - -
--- -- - -
US 101 10 605 11 12
„
A LINE
END RETAINING WALL
80-------=_= ---- -- -------------------_ ---�----- -- - - - ------------- - -- - -------- -------------------
--------------
RW 603+35.0'- ----_- - - -- - -- - = '-------' --- .: - --- --- EX/S77NG�Rll60
30'RT -_ ------ - _ _ ____ ___ - --_. - --- _ - '��; _ RW 606+1
BEGIN RETAINING-W�c - -- -_- - __ -_____ -- - - ---_ - ----- :S I+ - 30RT
A 9+55 18.5'RT _ -=-- -so--- --- ----- - - --so?` ,_z - - -
----- - ---- --- =5-
-- ----- - -- -
------------
RW 603+35.0 - ----- --- ---- —_ _____
65'RT --- - --__ _ -- - - -- --_- - --- - --- _- -'- EXISTING CULVERT
TEMPORARY ------- -------- _---_-- - ---- -- "" =__ ===?o_ -=-` == - _-___=__-; �F. L. 68.890
CONSTRUCTIO ----_---- --_-----__-- --- ____EASEMENT -- ------ ------ -' -so;:___ - -
------------------ ---- -------------- - ------ ---------------------=--=--- - - ___ -- RW 606+10.0
-- - ---- - 80'RT
RW LINE 604+05.0 ------- -' ('
30'RT RW 604+05.0 - '� -------- _ ------- ----
65'RT _____ _____________________ I ---------------------------------
RW 604+05.0 ----- ------- -- - ---------------- -- '
60'RT ------------------------+o---------------
0 20 40
SCALE IN FEET
FILE NAME G:ILOCATIOWXL4760 -US 101 S of Beacon Point Road1MP 316 SLIDE\DMC 22MCAM BaseFIIesMMC220 SF AL.dgn Plot 8
TIME 12:53:42 PM REaXW STATE
DATE 2/26/2015 No. FED.AID PROJ.NO. us 101
PU,N REF 110
PLOTTED BY McmastM 10 WASH I MAP
2.2 MILES SOUTH OF BEACON PT ROAD WSD1
DESIGNED BY B JAMIESON JOB NUMBER
ENTERED BY R WILLIAMS Washington State EMERGENCY SLOPE STABILIZATION SHEET
CHECKED BY J YOUNG CONTRACT NO. LOCAMN NO. Department of Transportation
PRO. BHALL
REGI AL R DAYTO DATE — DAM WALL SITE DATA SHEETS
REGIONAL ADM. K DAYTON REVISION DATE BY PesTANP sox P.E.s*ANP eox
�C3 .
: : : : . . : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
f
:
1i --------T-- ! . . . . . . . . . . .
—la
t
I A LINE I i i Q PROPOSED RETAINING n I �o I . . L� E -
. . . . XISTING PROFILE: _ . . . . E . .o (18.5T.� . : : : ' : : : : : :
gg- --- ' '
S _._._._ _ -- _.-- ---. --._ --- — _ - --- -
WALL PROFILE 'iR I q
. . . oo . . -:-.- . . . . . . . . ;-: . .- - .- :I i._ - . . . . Ln�+` ! ----- - - - g� _.
i . . c' J I . . . ti : : : : , : : : : t : ' : : : : : .p ! . . ( i ! C� i Z. . . . . . .71
Is ! i .�-: :- - -__#_:--____�_�_��-- �� t . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-176
i :
7 5 - -- - — - — -- -- - — -�- -- --
i -i - . . . , . . . . . . . . I�TIN :GR6 D
-----;-7$ t- ; . . . . _ . . . ; . . . . ! 3 . . . . --- - --- _ _- . . . . . . . . . . ! . I OFILE 18: 'RT.
! . . . . I . . . . . . . . ! . . . . I . . . . ! . . . . i . . ! . . . . ! . . . . . __�__-.. . . _._T_. . .
: . : . . . . ` . . . . I . . . . 1 ; . . . . ; . . . . I . . . . :. ; . . . . I . . . . I . . . . . . . . j.. . ... .
i
y. . . . . . I . . . ' t !
I ,
-. . _. . . :- . . --. . ; i�
I I . . . . _ . . . . : . : : : . . . . . : : ' � f . . . . ` . . I . . . . . . . I
9+��: : : ' ` 10t00l ' 10 SA1 ' : : . : 11+00 : : . . . ! . . . . ' . . . . :11+50 : . '.12+00 . .
: : : : : : ! : : : : , : t : : : � : : : s:a1t�� r:
,
i . . .
' SCALE: . . . � . . ----- i ----- --;--- - 4 :--- --- - ----- - -- —_.- --- - _ __ __ -_—.__.`---�--
I � i
! i t
I . . . . r- I ! . . . . . . .
HORIZ.1 1"='20.. . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . j . . . .
. . . . VERT. '1 '-: 10:'
:
i
FILE NAME G:lLOCATON\XL4760 -US 101 S of Beacon Polnt Road',MP 316 SLIDEIDMC 22MCADi_Base Fi,esIDMC220 SF AL.dgn P,01 1
TIME 7 42:03 AM L1O
sT*Te
DATE 2/2412015 — - - ---- FED.AID PROJ.NO. US 101 ►us ser.la.
PLOTTED BY McmastM - — - WAS
---- - 2.2 MILES SOUTH OF BEACON PT ROAD
DESIGNED BY B JAMIESON jce llunea
ENTERED BY R WILLIAMS "— - -- Washington State EMERGENCY SLOPE STABILIZATION
— Department of Transportation
CHECKED BY J YOUNG rov�n uo o-e-,o vo
_ ------ -- WALL PROFILE
oF
PROJ.ENGR. R BHALLA �� _ „r uiar•
REGIONAL ADM. K DAYTON REVISION DATE BY OLa r p0I Pc r.vr eox
�� �y,�• M '�•• �• .• ���(�. ,s 1 °raj' s � �.r.N i` . _ �" '•. ;� �#t.,
Y
f'
• �BF
F
r^
J �s ,; •'+G.r�'. Imo. �� :' •� � + „;� ;.,
y
r
♦ I 4
- n
yy
It ✓ f I K,•
' 3• _ s
's -
t.
a' 31
t
V*w
t:
y" x>
a
OK
r
.p., A•
, � ..
�,-»
-f-ti
4
_
s.
s
r;
r
' .: •.e. •,� tie. C,.. �®. '. �• .:, /.. .""P ...
r Y
s mow.
s
_
r R
P , -
v e n
F ,
` 3
w
.� � \ �•�. Lam.\".
4
. l,�,i! _ �, ,�: a ,�., . � �, `� �• ~ . . °,�
sTaTfMASON COUNTY
o n oc �, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
0 s U Planning Division
N
N Y Y 426 W Cedar St, Shelton, WA 98584
0 �o (360)427-9670
1864
SHR2015-00002 NOTICE OF SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT
Notice is hereby given that WA ST DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION, who is the owner of the described property,
has filed an application for a Shoreline Management Permit for the development of:
Sub. Dev.
Construct permanent repairs to a landslide at MP 316.5 on US 101. The project will repair the
roadway and stabilize the slope on the Hood Canal side by building a retaining wall. The work
consists of removal of slide debris, constructing a retaining wall (soldier pile wall) 18.5 feet east of
the existing US 101 centerline, with a length of 225 feet and reconstructing 1,000 LF of northbound
US 101.
Site Address: N US HIGHWAY 101 HOODSPORT
Parcel Number: 324120060000
Location of Project: MILE MARKER 316.5 BEACON POINT LANDSLIDE
Within: SE (quarter section)&dction: 12 Township: 24 N Range: 3 W, W.M.
in , Mason County Washington.
Said development is proposed within HOOD CANAL and/or its associated wetlands. Any person desiring to express
their view or to be notified of the action taken on the application should notify:
MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
426 W Cedar St
SHELTON,WA 98584
in writing of their interest. The comment period is at least 30 days from the final date of publication given pursuant to
WAC 173-14-020. The final date of publication, posting, or mailing of notice is 5/7/2015.
Written comments will be accepted up to the date of the hearing.
A public hearing will be held on this permit request. Contact this office at(360)427-9670, ext. 360 with any questions.
The hearing will be held on May 27, 2015 at 1:00 pm within the Commissioners Chambers of Building 1, 411 N 5th St,
Shelton WA.
If Special accommodations are needed, please contactAriahe Paysse, 427-9670, ext 282. From the Belfair area please
dial 275-4467; from elma area please dial 482-5269
��y1 L7
A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on 3/11/2015'under WAC 197-11-340.
SHR2015-00002 Page 1 of 1
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
COUNTY OF MASON )
do hereby certify that I posted 3 copies of
the attached
on a'T"' day of 206' in 3 public places as follows:
one at � �/ �l/ _ Ll it Na A A,.rA
one at m t-o" ,oasl � .d norl�l,�k.,.l pu y to,
one at 5 on CsM.,o lZab���.��lg� s 4 ,�1 L
In witness whereof, the party has signed this Affidavit of Posting Notice this�7' day
of P �8 , 20__L_.
By:
Address: _ � �v�.�.� S---�S4�
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
COUNTY OF MASON )
Subscribed and sworn to me this day of 20�
t---------------------------1
BONNIE L. CAP ; C&��
NOTARY PUBLIC I o ary Publi t e fat of Washington
STATE OF WASHINGTON Residing at
Mycomm"onEXPIMSjune6.2018 Commission Expires
MA4
�ouol5 -D0O0 a
LIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' MAILING ADDRESSES �Spe
WITHIN 300 FEET OF YOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARIES
Addresses are to be obtained from the Mason County Assessor's Office, Bldg. 1, Second Floor.
ff jc(mot�v► (A)5 17 DT
"R 3oX q7q`0
To 73-0x q oo(01
5ca.4tx WA R91o4-q5/,01
AG GEI ED (,-
Date received: AM o � 201
US Army Corps �
WASHINGTON STATE Sof eawgneers -
Searoe Distract ' ' I r �' 1
Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Agency reference#: JhiX2 �
t ,
Application (DARPA) Form1,2 Tax Parcel#(s):
32�r���000C�
USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN THE WHITE SPACES BELOW.
---------------------------------------
Part 1—Project Identification
1. Project Name (A name for your project that you create. Examples: Smith's Dock or Seabrook Lane Development) (help]
US 101, 2.2 Miles South of Beacon Point Rd. — Emergency Slope Stabilization
Part 2—Applicant
The person and/or organization responsible for the project. i ]
2a. Name (Last, First, Middle)
Sawyer, Jeff B.
2b. Organization (If applicable)
Washington State Department of Transportation
2c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box)
P.O. Box 47440
2d. City, State, Zip
Olympia, WA , 98504-7440
2e. Phone(1) A Phone(2) 2g. Fax 2h. E-mail
(360) 570-6701 (360) 790-9646 (360)357-2601 sawyerj@wsdot.wa.gov
Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact
Additional forms may be required for the following permits:
• If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authorization through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of
Engineers for application information(206)764-3495.
• If your project might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Act,you will need to fill out a Specific Project Information Form(SPIF)or
prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at
ham://www.nws.usace.army.mdih//www.nws.usace.army.mil/k, rks/R�ulatory/PerrnitGuidebook/Endangere(ISpecies aspx.
• Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits. If you need a Shoreline permit,contact the appropriate city or county
government to make sure they accept the JARPA.
2To access an online JARPA form with[help]screens,go to
httD://www epermltbnq.wa.gov/slte�, .rcecenterjarpalarpa form/9984jarpa formform/9984ijarpa form aspx.
For other help,contact the Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance at(800)917-0043 or nelpa�ora.wa.gov.
JARPA Revision 2012.2 Page 1 of 12
Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note: Authorized agent(s) must sign 11 b of this
application.) [ i
3a. Name (Last, First, Middle)
Dave Evans
3b. Organization (If applicable)
WSDOT
3c. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box)
P.O. Box 47440
3d. City, State, Zip
Olympia, WA , 98504-7440
3e. Phone(1) 3f. Phone(2) 3g. Fax 3h. E-mail
(360)570-6738 ( ) ( ) evansd@wsdot.wa.gov
Part 4—Property Owner(s)
Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies)where the project will occur. Consider both
upland and aquatic ownership because the upland owners may not own the adjacent aquatic land. [
® Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.)
❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.)
❑ There are multiple upland property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for
each additional property owner.
❑ Your project is on Department of Natural Resources (DNR)-managed aquatic lands. If you don't know,
contact the DNR at (360) 902-1100 to determine aquatic land ownership. If yes, complete JARPA Attachment E
to apply for the Aquatic Use Authorization.
4a. Name (Last, First, Middle)
N/A
4b. Organization (If applicable)
N/A
4c. Mailing Address (Street or Po Box)
N/A
4d. City, State, Zip
N/A
4e. Phone(1) 4f. Phone(2) 4g. Fax 4h. E-mail
N/A ( ) ( )
Part 5—Project Location(s)
Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. [nel
JARPA Revision 2012.2 Page 2 of 12
❑ There are multiple project locations (e.g. linear projects). Complete the section below and use
Attachment B for each additional project location.
5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Check all that apply.) el
❑ Private
❑ Federal
® Publicly owned (state,county, city, special districts like schools, ports, etc.)
❑ Tribal
❑ Department of Natural Resources (DNR)— managed aquatic lands (Complete JARPA Attachment E)
5b. Street Address (Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address, provide other location information in 5p.)
US Highway 101, Mile Post (MP) 316.5
5c. City, State, Zip(If the project is not in a city or town, provide the name of the nearest city or town.) hel ]
Lilliwaup, WA 98555
5d. County
Mason
5e. Provide the section, township, and range for the project location. [ ]
% Section Section Township Range
NW 12 24 North 3 West
5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. [hel
• Example:47.03922 N lat./-122.89142 W long. (Use decimal degrees-NAD 83)
47.584075 N Latitude / -123.004855 W Longtitude
5g. List the tax parcel number(s) for the project location. [bpipj
• The local county assessor's office can provide this information.
N/A- US 101 is a transportation corridor.
5h. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. (If you need more space, use JARPA Attachment C.) [hell?]
Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel # (if known)
Totem Girl Scout Council PO Box 900961
................................................................._......................_._......_......__...._._........... ___._...............
(Robinswold Girl Scout Camp) Seattle WA 98109-9561 32412-00-63000
DARPA Revision 2012.2 Page 3 of 12
5L List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. [help]
None
5j. List all waterbodies (other than wetlands) on or adjacent to the project location. ,eie]
Hood Canal is 100 to 120 feet east of the project area.
5k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year floodplain? [help]
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Don't know
51. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. hei ]
Woody vegetation consists of western hemlock, western red cedar, and big leaf maple. Dominant shrubs
are elderberry, Indian plum, and salmonberry. Herbaceous vegetation consists of sword fern, grasses
and native forbs.
5m. Describe how the property is currently used.
US 101 is currently used as a transportation corridor for commercial and private motor vehicles.
5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. [ham]
Adjacent properties are currently used for recreation (camping, hiking, fishing and hunting).
5o. Describe the structures (above and below ground) on the property, including their purpose(s) and current
condition.
N/A— There are no structures within the project limits.
5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map. [r z]
Drive north from the city of Shelton WA, through Potlatch, Hoodsport, to the town of Lilliwaup on US
101. The project is located approx. 10 miles north of Lilliwaup WA. At MP 316.5.
Part 6—Project Description
6a. Briefly summarize the overall project. You can provide more detail in 6b.
The project will repair the US 101 roadway and stabilize the slope on the Hood Canal side of the roadway
by building a retaining wall. The work consists of removal of slide debris, constructing a retaining wall
(soldier pile wall) 18.5 feet east of the existing US 101 centerline, with a length of 225 feet and
reconstructing 1,000 LF of northbound US 101.
The wall will be constructed of steel piling placed on approximately 6 foot centers into the existing soils
by drilling a 24 to 30 inch diameter shaft. Piling shafts will be approx. 80 - 85 feet deep. Wood lagging
will be installed between the steel piles to provide the wall face. Excavation will be required at the face
wall to a daylight point downslope to achieve the installation of the wood lagging at the final bottom of
the wall profile. Temporary widening of US 101 in the southbound lane will be required to accommodate
a one lane alternating signalized detour.
JARPA Revision 2012.2 Page 4 of 12
6b.
Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perform it. [re-1]
The purpose of this project is to repair the US 101 northbound lane. The slope located east of US 101 at
MP 316.5 has failed due to significant rain events causing the slide. In order to repair US 101 the slope
needs to be re-enforced by building a retaining wall.
6c. Indicate the project category. (Check all that apply) [help]
❑ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Institutional ® Transportation ❑ Recreational
❑ Maintenance ❑ Environmental Enhancement
6d. Indicate the major elements of your project. (Check all that apply) [r-i! ]
❑ Aquaculture ❑ Culvert ❑ Float ® Retaining Wall
❑ Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam /Weir ❑ Floating Home (upland)
❑ Boat House ❑ Dike / Levee /Jetty ❑ Geotechnical Survey ® Road
❑ Boat Launch ❑ Ditch ❑ Land Clearing ❑ Scientific
Measurement Device
❑ Boat Lift ❑ Dock / Pier ❑ Marina / Moorage
❑ Stairs
❑ Bridge ❑ Dredging ❑ Mining
❑ Bulkhead ❑ Stormwater facility
❑ Fence ❑ Outfall Structure
❑ Swimming Pool
❑ Buoy ❑ Ferry Terminal ❑ Piling/Dolphin
❑ Utility Line
❑ Channel Modification ❑ Fishway ❑ Raft
❑ Other:
6e. Describe how you plan to construct each project element checked in 6d. Include specific construction
methods and equipment to be used. [help]
• Identify where each element will occur in relation to'the nearest waterbody.
• Indicate which activities are within the 100-year floodplain.
This project has no activities within a 100 year floodplain.
Temporary emergency repair work already in place consists of signage and barrier installation to restrict
travel to one lane, erosion control measures and conducting a geotechnical investigation.
A culvert will be temporarily placed in the ditch line for 400 feet on the west side of US 101 to allow for
widening the southbound lane to the required 15 foot lane width.
Initial repair work will remove slide debris from the existing slope which will be accessed from the
bottom of the slope utilizing an existing dirt road which is owned by the Robbinswold Girl Scout Camp.
A short additional road may be constructed off of this dirt road to access the slide area in order to
construct the retaining wall and /or new slope protection.
The damaged asphalt will then be removed from the US 101 northbound lane, WSDOT approved fill and
gravel for compaction will be replaced and new asphalt applied.
JARPA Revision 2012.2 Page 5 of 12
6f. What are the anticipated start and end dates for project construction? (Month/Year)
• If the project will be constructed in phases or stages, use JARPA_A_ ttac_hment D to list the start and end dates of each phase or
stage.
Start date: Summer 2015 End date: Fall 2015 ❑ See JARPA Attachment D
6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. [hel,;]
$ 1,500,000
6h. Will any portion of the project receive federal funding? [ ]
• If yes, list each agency providing funds.
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know FHWA
Part 7—Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation
❑ Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area.
(If there are none, skip to Part 8.) [help]
7a. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. [bet ]
® Not applicable
7b. Will the project impact wetlands? hel
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Don't know
7c. Will the project impact wetland buffers? heI
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Don't know
7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? help]
• If Yes, submit the report, including data sheets,with the JARPA package.
❑ Yes ® No
7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating
System? [hel
• If Yes, submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package.
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Don't know
7f. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands? hel
• If Yes, submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g.
• If No, or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required.
JARPA Revision 2012.2 Page 6 of 12
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not applicable
7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was
used to design the plan. [ ,
N/A
7h. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each wetland impacted, the extent and duration of the
impact, and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigation plan with a
similar table, you can state (below) where we can find this information in the plan. [
Activity (fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland
drain, excavate, Name' type and area (sq. of impact3 mitigation mitigation area
flood, etc.) rating ft. or type (sq. ft. or
category' Acres) acres)
N/A
If no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as"Wetland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents,such
as a wetland delineation report.
2 Ecology wetland category based on current Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland
rating forms with the JARPA package.
3 Indicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the activity. Enter"permanent'if applicable.
a
Creation(C), Re-establishment/Rehabilitation(R), Enhancement(E), Preservation(P),Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B)
Page number(s) for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available:
7i. For all filling activities identified in 7h, describe the source and nature of the fill material, the amount in cubic
yards that will be used, and how and where it will be placed into the wetland.
N/A
7j. For all excavating activities identified in 7h, describe the excavation method, type and amount of material in
cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed.
N/A
Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation
In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) hei
® Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.)
8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment.
❑ Not applicable
JARPA Revision 2012.2 Page 7 of 12
Highway 101 at MP 316.5 runs parallel to hood canal and is approximately 100 to 120 feet away from the
water body. All work will be within 200 feet of Hood Canal.
On the north end of the project there is a culvert conveying drainage underneath US 101 from the west
to the east. This culvert will be straddled by piling installed for the soldier pile wall. Wood lagging will
be installed over the top of the culvert, but will not impact the culvert.
Best Management Practices will be utilized to control storm water from entering waters of the state.
Methods are approved by the Washington State Department of Ecology and are from the latest version
of the Washington State Department of Transportation's Highway Runoff Manual.
No impacts to adjacent water bodies are anticipated.
8b. Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody?
❑ Yes ® No
8c. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's adverse impacts to non-wetland
waterbodies?
• If Yes, submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 8d.
• If No, or Not applicable, explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required.
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Not applicable
No mitigation will be required as there will be no impacts to waterbodies.
8d. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used
to design the plan.
• If you already completed 7g you do not need to restate your answer here.
N/A
8e. Summarize impact(s) to each waterbody in the table below. h[ eld
Activity (clear, Waterbody Impact Duration Amount of material Area (sq. ft. or
dredge, fill, pile name' location of impact3 (cubic yards) to be linear ft.) of
drive, etc.) placed in or waterbody
removed from directly affected
waterbod
N/A
If no official name for the waterbody exists,create a unique name(such as"Stream 1")The name should be consistent with other documents provided.
2 Indicate whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent, provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and
indicate whether the impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain.
3Indicate the days,months or years the waterbody will be measurably impacted by the work. Enter"permanent"if applicable.
8f. For all activities identified in 8e, describe the source and nature of the fill material, amount (in cubic yards)
you will use, and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody.
N/A
8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified in 8e, describe the method for excavating or dredging,
type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. [r,Nq
N/A
Part 9—Additional Information
Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of
this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question.
JARPA Revision 2012.2 Page 8 of 12
A<<
9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. help]
Agency Name Contact Name Phone Most Recent
Date of Contact
Mason County Grace Miller ( 360 )426-9670 x 360 Feb. 2015
91b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 of this JARPA on the Washington
Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? [
• If Yes, list the parameter(s)below.
• If you don't know, use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at:
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/303d. i
❑ Yes ® No
9c. What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code (HUC) is the project in? [help]
• Go to htti)://ctub.epa.gov/surf/locate/index.cfm to help identify the HUC.
17110018
9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number (WRIA#) is the project in?
• Go to http://www.ecy.wa.gov/services/gis/mays/wria/wria.htm to find the WRIA#.
16 Skokomish - Dosewallips
9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for
turbidity? h[ glp]
• Go to http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wglswgs/criteha.htmi for the standards.
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not applicable
9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what is the local shoreline environment
designation?
• If you don't know, contact the local planning department.
• For more information,go to: htty:i/www.ecy.wa.gowprograms,sea,smailaws rules/173-26/211 designations.htmi
❑ Rural ❑ Urban ❑ Natural ❑ Aquatic ❑ Conservancy ® Other - Residential
9g. What is the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Type? belpi
• Go to http://www.dnr.wa.qov/BusinessPermits/Topics/ForestPracticesApplications/Pages/fp watertyping.aspx for the Forest Practices
Water Typing System.
❑ Shoreline ❑ Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial ❑ Non-Fish Seasonal DNR listed as Unknown
9h. Will this project be designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual?
[,,,,I
• If No, provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet.
❑ Yes ® No
Name of manual: WSDOT Highway Runoff Manual M31-16.04 (April 2014)
9i. Does the project site have known contaminated sediment?
• If Yes, please describe below.
JARPA Revision 2012.2 Page 9 of 12
❑ Yes ® No
9j. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below.
The property has been and continues to be used as a transportation corridor for public and private vehicles.
9k. Has a cultural resource (archaeological) survey been performed on the project area? hem
• If Yes, attach it to your JARPA package.
® Yes ❑ No
91. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project
area or might be affected by the proposed work. [
Federal Endangered Species Act listed:
• Bull Trout (Threatened)
• Streak Horned Lark (Threatened)
• Puget Sound Steelhead (Threatened)
•Yellow Billed Cuckoo (Threatened)
9m. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and
Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. [help]
• Hardshell Clam Beds
• Oyster Beds
• Dungeness Crabs
Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits
Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for.
• Online Project Questionnaire at http://apps.ecy.wa.gov/opas/.
• Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance at (800) 917-0043 or helpCcD-ora.wa.gov.
• For a list of addresses to send your JARPA to, click on agency addresses for completed JARPA.
10a. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). (check all that apply.) hem
• For more information about SEPA,go to www.ecy.wa.Qov/programs/sea/sepa/e-review.html.
® A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application.
❑ A SEPA determination is pending with (lead agency). The expected decision date is
❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Check the box below in 10b.) [
❑ This project Is exempt (choose type of exemption below).
❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (WAC) is it exempt?
❑ Other:
❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law.
JARPA Revision 2012.2 Page 10 of 12
ZJ
10b. Indicate the permits you area pplying for. (Check all that apply.) [help]
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Local Government Shoreline permits:
® Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance
❑ Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): Mason County
Other City/County permits:
❑ Floodplain Development Permit ❑ Critical Areas Ordinance
STATE GOVERNMENT
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife:
❑ Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption —Attach Exemption Form
Effective July 10, 2012, you must submit a check for $150 to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife,
unless your project qualifies for an exemption or alternative payment method below. Do not send cash.
Check the appropriate boxes:
❑ $150 check enclosed. Check #
Attach check made payable to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
❑ Charge to billing account under agreement with WDFW. Agreement#
❑ My project is exempt from the application fee. (Check appropriate exemption)
❑ HPA processing is conducted by applicant-funded WDFW staff.
Agreement #
❑ Mineral prospecting and mining.
❑ Project occurs on farm and agricultural land.
(Attach a copy of current land use classification recorded with the county auditor, or other proof of current land use.)
❑ Project is a modification of an existing HPA originally applied for, prior to July 10, 2012.
HPA #
Washington Department of Natural Resources:
❑ Aquatic Use Authorization
Complete JARPA Attachment E and submit a check for$25 payable to the Washington Department of Natural Resources.
Do not send cash.
Washington Department of Ecology:
❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
United States Department of the Army permits (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers):
❑ Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) ❑ Section 10 (work in navigable waters)
United States Coast Guard permits:
❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects)
JARPA Revision 2012.2 Page 11 of 12
Part 11—Authorizing Signatures
Signatures are required before submitting the JARPA package. The JARPA package includes the JARPA form,
project plans, photos, etc. bLid
11a. Applicant Signature (required) [ ]
I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete,
and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work
only after I have received all necessary permits.
I hereby authorize the agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this
application. (initial)
By initialing here, I state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the
permitting agencies ent�roperty where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work
related to the project. (initial)
Applicant Printed Name Applic nt ignature Date
11 b. Authorized Agent Signature [help]
I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete,
and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work
o ):fterall necessary permits have been issued.
Authorized Agent Printed Name Authorized Agent Signature Date
11 c. Property Owner Signature (if not applicant) [
Not required if project is on existing rights-of-way or easements.
I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site
or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the
landowner.
Property Owner Printed Name Property Owner Signature Date
18 U.S.0§1001 provides that:Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly
falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious, or fraudulent statements or
representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or
entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both.
If you require this document in another format, contact the Governor's Office for Regulatory Innovation and Assistance (ORIA)at(800)
917-0043. People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. People with a speech disability can call(877)833-6341.
ORIA publication number: ENV-019-09 rev. 08/2013
JARPA Revision 2012.2 Page 12 of 12
Ex 7
Adft State Environmentai Policy Act
�',� Washington State
-I' Department of Transportation DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal:
US 101, 2.2 Miles South of Beacon Point Road— Emergency Slope Stabilization
project will conduct permanent repairs near Beacon Point on Hood Canal.
Damage was sustained by a landslide at this location on December 10, 2014
during an extreme weather event.Temporary emergency repair work included
signage and barrier installation to restrict travel to one lane, erosion control
measures and conducting geotechnical investigation. Permanent repairs will
include removal of slide debris, tree removal, construction of a soldier pile
retaining wall and reconstructing the roadway slope and northbound lane and
shoulder.
Proponent: Washington State_Department of Transportation
Location of proposal: The project is located on US 101 at NIP 316.5 in Mason County
Lead Agency: Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympic Region
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required
under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is
available to the public on request.
X This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); The lead
agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days
from the date of signature below. Comments must be
submitted by: g,
Responsible Official: Jeff Sawyer
Position/Title: Environmental & Hydraulic Manager
Olympic Region
Phone: 360-570-6701
Address: PO Box 47440
Olympia WA 98504-7440
Date: ► l ZOI5 Signature:
Washington State Olympic Region
Department of Transportation Environmental&Hydraulic Services
5720 Capitol Blvd
Lynn Peterson Tumwater,WA 98501
Secretary of Transportation P.O. Box 47440
Olympia,WA 98504-7440
March 11, 2015
360-570-6700/Fax 360-357-2601
The Shelton-Mason County Journal TTY: 1-800-833-6388
www.wsdot.wa.gov
Attn: Legal Desk
Post Office Box 430
Shelton, WA 98584
Subject: US Highway 101 /2.2 Miles South of Beacon Point Rd.—Emergency
Slope Stabilization
Milepost 316.50
Determination of Non-significance
Dear Legal Editor:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires the Department of Transportation to
initiate a public notice on all environmental actions. This allows the public an opportunity
for comment on the proposed projects. We have elected the public notice procedure of
publishing a copy of the DNS in your paper because of its general circulation in the project
vicinity.
Please publish the enclosed DNS once, during one week, as a PAID LEGAL NOTICE. For
accounting purposes, please refer to XL4760, account number 123669 and send the invoice
and affidavit of publication to:
Washington State Department of Transportation
Olympic Region
PO Box 47440
Olympia WA 98504-7440
Attn: Jeff Sawyer
360-570-6701
If you need further information, please contact Dave Evans at 360-570-6738.
Sincerely,
W to "
Jeff Sawyer
Environmental & Hydraulic Manager
Olympic Region
JBS:sb:ip
Enclosure: DNS
cc: Ricky Bhalla
SF03112015 (7160)
A
WfasNngton State
` Department of Transportation
1
'}A
State Environmental Policy Act • Environmental Checklist
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies
to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. The purpose of this
checklist is to provide information about the proposal to interested parties, to help identify impacts of the
proposal (and to avoid or reduce impacts from the proposal, if possible) and to help the lead agency
decide whether an Environmental Impact Statement is required. The checklist questions apply to all parts
of the proposal, even if they are planned over a period of time. Attached is additional information that
will help describe the proposal or its environmental effects.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
US 101, Vic. MP 316.5- Emergency Slide Repair
2. Name of applicant and lead agency:
Washington State Department of Transportation
Olympic Region
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Ricky Bhalla Jeff Sawyer
Project Engineer Region Environmental Manager
PO Box 47440 PO Box 47417
Olympia, WA 98504-7440 MS WA-48 Olympia, WA 98504-7417
Telephone: (360)538-8502 Telephone: (360) 570-6701
Fax: (360)533-9449 Fax: (360) 357-2601
4. Date checklist prepared:
February 2015
5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Construction is anticipated to occur during spring 2015 and is estimated to last
3 to 5 weeks.
6. Are there any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal?If yes, explain.
No
7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
• National Environmental Policy Act—Documented Categorical Exclusion
• A Biological Assessment for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
• A Biological Assessment for National Marine Fish Services
• Documentation of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act
8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by the proposal? If yes, explain.
No
9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for the proposal, if
known.
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit from Mason County.
10. Give brief, complete description of the project including (but not limited to) its size,
general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding
of its scope and nature. There are several questions in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of the proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on
this page.
The proposed project in Mason County will repair the US 101 roadway and
stabilize the slope on the Hood Canal side of the roadway by building a retaining
wall. The work consists of removal of slide debris, constructing a soldier pile
retaining wall and embankment, and reconstructing approximately 100 LF of
the NB lane.
11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the
precise location of the proposed project, including a street address, if any, and
section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site
plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available.
This project is located on US Highway 101 between Mile Post 316.40 and Mile
Post 316.60 in Mason County, Township 24 North, Range 3 West, West 1/2 of
Section 12, Willamette Meridian. This project lies adjacent to the Hood Canal
between the communities of Brinnon and Lilliwaup.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous,
other:
Rural, forested area, with steep slopes.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Steepest slope on the site is approx. 45%.
-2 -
EV
T
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel,
peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and
note any prime farmland.
Project is located within the Hoodsport stony, and sandy loam soils. No
prime farmland.
d. Are there surface indications of history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
Yes. This area has a history of landslides.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Approx. 1,300 CY of fill will be used to construct the new retaining wall.
Material will come from a WSDOT approved source.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe.
Some erosion may occur during construction, which will be minimized by
creating a Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control plan (TESL), and using
Best Management Practices (BMP's).
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
No added impervious surfaces for this project.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if
any:
Erosion will be controlled by preparation and implementation of a
Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) Plan utilizing Best
Management Practices. BMP's may include silt fence, check dams, and inlet
protection. All exposed slopes will be mulched, fertilized and re-seeded.
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(for example:
dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate
quantities if known.
There will be hydrocarbon exhaust emissions from excavators, dump trucks,
loaders, compaction equipment, sweepers, pickup trucks, and delivery trucks
during construction activities. Air quality is expected to return to normal
after construction.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal?
If so, generally describe.
No
- 3 -
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
Water or other BMP's will be used to control dust if necessary.
3. WATER
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on, or in, the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state
what stream or river it flows into.
Hood Canal is located 100 - 150 ft. east of project.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans.
Yes. All work is within 200 feet of Hood Canal.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
None
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give
general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
A culvert will be placed in the ditch and gravel placed on top in order to
widen the west side of US 101 southbound lane to the required 15 ft.
width for a temporary construction purposes.
S) Does the proposal lie within a 100 year floodplain? If so, note location on
the site plan.
No
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
This project will not discharge waste materials into surface waters.
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if
known.
No
-4-
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic
tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial,
containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general
size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be
served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are
expected to serve.
This project will not discharge waste material into the ground.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff(including stormwater) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water
flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Highway stormwater will enter the roadside ditches and the steep ravine
sides. This water will flow eastward under US Highway 101 to Hood
Canal.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe.
Petroleum products will be on the project site during construction.
However, a spill prevention control and countermeasures plan will be
developed and BMP's will be developed for spill prevention and control
during construction.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water
impacts, if any:
All runoff will be treated in accordance with the WSDOT Highway
Runoff Manual and Best Management Practices.
4. PLANTS
a. Underline types of vegetation found on the site:
DECIDUOUS TREE: Alder, Maple,Aspen,Vine Maple, Cottonwood, Willow,
other:
EVERGREEN TREE: Fir, Cedar, Pine, Hemlock, other:
SHRUBS: Elderberry, Serviceberry, Scotch Broom, Red Huckleberry,
Mahonia, Salal, Spirea, other:
Grass
Pasture
Crop or grain
WET SOIL PLANTS: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, Skunk cabbage, other:
WATER PLANTS: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other:
Other types of vegetation:
-5-
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Approximately one half dozen conifers up to 42 inches in diameter breast
height, plus, small non-merchantable trees, bushes, shrubs, grass and other
low level plants will be removed.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Federal Endangered Species Act listed:
• Bull Trout
• Streak Horned Lark
• Puget Sound Steelhead
• Yellow Billed Cuckoo
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
At project completion all disturbed areas will be replanted and seeded.
5. ANIMALS
a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or
are known to be on or near the site:
BIRDS: Hawk, Heron, Eagle, Songbirds, other:
MAMMALS: Deer, Bear, Elk, beaver, other:
FISH: Bass, Salmon, Trout, Herring, Shellfish, other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Puget Sound Bull Trout, Marbled Murrelet, Northern Spotted Owl, Chinook
Salmon, Chum Salmon and Steelhead.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Yes, Western Washington is part of the Pacific Flyway for Migratory
Waterfowl.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Proper use of Best Management Practices will insure that no pollutants or
sediment will enter fish bearing waters of the state. Biological assessments
will be completed and all appropriate minimization measures will be written
into the contract. Timing restrictions for Marbled Murrelet may be imposed.
- 6-
�x7
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to
meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for
heating, manufacturing, etc.
None—Not Applicable
b. Would the project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe.
No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if
any:
None—Not Applicable
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that would occur
as a result of this proposal? If so, describe:
There exists the risk of spills, fires, etc. associated with traffic accidents.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Fire, Police, and Emergency Medical Services
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Standard construction safety practices will be in effect during
construction.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect the project (for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
Traffic noise from US Highway 101 exists in this area, but will not affect
the project.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from
the site.
Noise levels may rise slightly during the daylight hours during
construction. Levels should return to normal after completion of the
project.
-7-
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
All work will be done during daytime (10 hour work shifts, 0700 to 1700
hours).
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Transportation corridor. Adjacent properties are used for recreation.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No
c. Describe any structures on the site.
N/A
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Rural Tourist
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Shoreline of Statewide Significance for Hood Canal
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the
site?
Conservancy
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"area? If
so, specify.
No
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
None
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None
k Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
None—N/A
- 8 -
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
All roadside impacted by project work shall be restored in kind. For
example, replace disturbed native vegetation with native vegetation.
9. HOUSING
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
None—N/A
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing.
None—N/A
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None—N/A
10. AESTHETICS
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;
what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed?
There are no proposed structures within the project limits other than the
slope protection.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
The permanent slope protection will be down slope, east of the highway,
below the road surface elevation.
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mainly occur?
None
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
No. There is no added permanent lighting planned for this project site.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
-9-
None—N/A
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
All roadside impacted by project work shall be restored in kind.
12. RECREATION
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
Bicycling, fishing in Hood Canal and camping. Robinswold Girl Scout Camp
is adjacent to the project site. US 101 in this area, is a tourist transportation
corridor.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project, if any:
Impacts to Robinswold Girl Scout Camp will be temporary in nature, due to
the construction. Traffic will be maintained through the use of a one lane,
alternating signal controlled traffic system.
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally
describe.
Buildings eligible for the National Register of Historic Places associated with
the Robinswold Girl Scout Camp are located to the northeast of the project
limits.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
No other landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific or
cultural importance are on or adjacent to the project site.
Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
Robinswold Girl Scout Camp buildings will not be impacted by this project.
14. TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any:
US Highway 101 travels through the project site. There is no existing street
system to access.
- 10-
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance
to the nearest transit stop?
No, nearest Mason County Transit stop is approximately 3 miles to the south
at the Brinnon Store. 15 minute minor delays may occur.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would
the project eliminate?
None
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing
roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate
whether public or private).
No
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity oJ) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
None
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
Alternating signal controlled traffic with minor delays will be utilized as a
detour during construction.
15. PUBLIC SERVICE
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example:
fire protection,police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally
describe.
No
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
One-way alternating signal controlled traffic with minor delays.
16. UTILITIES
a. Underline the utilities currently available at the site: Electricity, water, natural
gas, refuse service, Telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
Power, telephone and fiber optic lines are aerial within the project limits.
No relocations will be required.
- 11 -
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed.
None
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true an complete to the best of my knowledge.
Signature:
Jeff a er
Olympic R7:2
' Environmental Manager
Date Submitted: 3 1 O
- 12-
T. 24 N., R. 3 W., W.M. WSDOT
OLYMPIC REGION
of �.
-------w
z1
fI •c01^� � __ , i
36 31 /
G� 1 MIN /
f / IEPPER90N -
----- JEFFERSON CO OLYMPIC NATL FOREST i I .P,g�
MASON CO ; `- '�'- --�.T z5 N _._�_-- „ � TNton_._._._._. JEFFERSON _CO � -
I T Cove ._._._- Gal \ I
' 24 N MASON C® �• v ® t
•'. \V
V•0'��u i 2
i — PIER
i I , 0, 1
........—._...._..L.
----
------------------------_ • A'
;, 10 0 10 20 30 40 MILES
SLIDE LOCATION 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 KILOMETERS
' MP 316.45 '
i I
O WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
i IB 1 I Geographic Services,
2000
h�✓GIS
12 BEGIN PROJECT; O BASE MAP JULY
MP 316.41 % O
'Lake 8 i 9
!Armstrong
END PROJECT;
S
- - -•--------___
MP 316.50
I
i
_ _ - - - ----------i
15 } 14 i 13 '
Ni
I • ALEERT
PFLpyp' RD
wog I i 17 t 16 i
et�� i Id Ir i 15 i 14
i
boor
:
----•—- E -...F cDREs i
j Anderson erson-- - ............ . - -.... g-.•- ...._ Cove
NAn '
s
I
18
i
- - i
23
22
�d CfeeK 0 1500 3000 i
19 R0 20 SCALE IN FEET i
21 22
23
FILE NAME G:ICONTRACnDMC 220 US 101 MP 316.5 Emer enev SIIde1CAD1Vlc.Map.d n
TIME
DATE 121214
9:J29 AM REGION STATE FED.AID PROJ.NO. Plot 1
7APUS 101 EMERGENCY SLIDE
llirc PLAN REP NO
PLOTTED BY williro 10 As IN MASON COUNTY VM1
DESIGNED BY B JAMIESON
JOR NUMBER
ENTERED BY R WILLIAMS Washington State MP 316.45 SHEET
CHECKED BY S HARDY CONTRACT NO, LOCATION NO. Department of Transportation
1
PROJ.ENGR. R BHALLA OF
REGIONAL ADM. K DAYTON REVISION DM C 220 DATE Mrs VICINTY MAP sN7rs
DATE BY P.E.$TAM ROx P E.STAMP BOK
T. 24 N., R. 3 W., W.M. 07
END PROJECT
US 101 MP 316.45
STA. A 12+20.00 =
R/W STA. 606+57.41 (.31' RT)
BEGIN PROJECT II
US 101 MP 316.53
STA. A 8+00.00 P.O.C. =
R/W STA. 602+37.01 (.76' LT)
-OP--OP--OP--OP--OP--OP--OP--OP -OP--OP-(P)-OP--OP--0P--OP--OP- -OP--OP--OF--OP--OP--OP--OP--OP--OP- -OP--OP--OP--GP-- P}-OP--OP-- --OP--OP--OP--
_
„ -�
_________________________ __ _________________ ___________________________________ ________________________________ _________________________ ____________________
8 9 10 605 US 101 11 12
------�; -------�----- ------- - -—-—-—- - - - - -----�—
® A LINE
---1J-------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
_
70
60
LEGEND
RIGHT OF WAY OP——OP——OP- OVERHEAD POWER
------------------ EDGE OF SHOULDER DITCH BOTTOM e
—————— EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY j - - - FLOW LINE
-I—I-II— GUARDRAIL �___ ____________' CONCRETE CULVERT
G CONTROL POINT PIEZOMETER 0 20 40
SCALE IN FEET
FILE NAME G:ILOCATIONIDMC 2201MP 316 SLIDEIDMC 2201CAD1 BaseFIIeslDMC220 SF AL.don �, Plot 4
TIME 3:27:50 PM "N'r STATE FED.AID PROJ.NO. Pu.. t
DATE 112012015 �._• US 101 EMERGENCY SLIDE
PLOTTED BY williro -- 10 As DMC220 ��, IN MASON COUNTY, MP 316.5 VIC. UP1
DESIGNED BY B JAMIESON JOB NUMBER
ENTERED BY R WILLIAMS Washington State BEACON POINT LANDSLIDE SKEET
CHECKED BY J YOUNG WNTBACT NO. LOCATION NO. Department of Transportation OF
PROD.ENGR. R BHALLA REGIONAL ADM. K DAYTON REVISION DATE BY P.E STANP BOX ,A P.E.STAMP BOX O R UTILITY PLAN SHEETS
BEGIN PROJECT END PROJECT r
US 101 MP 316.53 US 101 MP 316.45
STA. A 8+00.00 P.O.C. = STA. A 12+20.00 =
RlV1/ STA. 602+37.01 (.76' LT) R/W STA. 606+57.41 (.31' RT)
- ----------- _
---------- "- _.1110- "__--- - - - EXISTING CULVERT
-. -- _ ---------- -- - ' - „� F.L. EL. 76.475 _
---------- - _ --- _ _ ----- - - _ _ -
-100
- _
90---_-------------------- _ ``.', ' .q0 _•• -- ---- --------
-- -- --_--------- ----- ,:---- ------- -------- - _ -
_-__ --- - - -- --.-_;....___•__ ••- _•--_-s �' -�=---------'___" ' _--__--�' ______— ____________
_----�_- - __-----_- ---- ______ _--_- ---___ --- ------------------------------------
9 US 101 10 605 11 12 '
• %, A LINE
END RETAINING WALL
- -------=-=--=---�� _�------ ----- '-----_______----------._=_====-=r--- ------------------- --- ------------_-_ __eo --- ' -__'; --- ------so A 1+80 18.5'RT
e________________ _ _ _ _ __ ___ -____70._ - � .
_-____-____ 80--______——�_____- - ____ _ ,a
RW W3+35.0---_ .Qo-- -_- ` ---._- EXISTING RNV
30'RT -_ �_-— _ -_ _'` 6v' -- _ --- - `• " - - RW 606+10.0
BEGIN RETAINING-Wf1- -________ 30'RT
A 9+55 18 ------ -SO- - _ -
RW 603+35.0 ---- - --- ----- "---_---p' __-=
65'RT _-_ _ _b_. - _ _____ EXISTING CULVERT
- ----- ----- ------ ---- --- ---- -_ao;_ - __:= _= - _ ==--=-
CONSTRUCTIO ---- ---------- _- --- ---- --- _ - - " _ - __--
EASEMENT ---- ------------- ----- --------------- '
---------- --- ---- ---------- ---- ----- --==__ =- .'`' RW 606+ 00
_ - - _ 80'RT
RW LINE 604+05.0 - ,
30'RT RW 604+05.0 ---- - -------- ---
65'RT '
RW 604+05.0 -— --------------------------------- ,
80'RT -
-----------------------
+°---------------
0 20 40
SCALE IN FEET
FILE NAME G:ILOCATIONVCL4760 -us 101 s of Beacon Potnt Road1MP 316 SLIDEIDMC 22MCAD1 BaseFIIeslDMC220 SF AL.dgn Plot 8
TIME 12:53:42 PM E.I. ITATE DATE zlzwzols US 101 a FED.AID PROJ.NO. PUN REF�•�.•
PLOTTED BY McmastM 10 WASHSAP 2.2 MILES SOUTH OF BEACON PT ROAD WSD1
DESIGNED BY B JAMIESON .we"weep
ENTERED BY R WILLIAMS Washington State EMERGENCY SLOPE STABILIZATION SHEET
CHECKED BY J YOUNG Co_K a ea LOCATION 40. Department of Transportat,on 1 of
PROJ.ENGR. R BHALLA oA� oATE WALL SITE DATA SHEETS
REGIONAL ADM. K DAYTON REVISION DATE BY PE.STAMP eox P.E STAMP eox
. . . . . . . . . .
:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . -I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 f ,
. . . .
--f
# . .
��� . . . . . . . . . . . .
. • • j
JI - ---- --- —-- -� --- - -— — — --
i I J.
. . , . . .Q a, �► LINE. . ; . . . . . . . : : : : :Q : : :PROPOSED_ RETAINING na . : : : : : : : . : : : : : . . Q:c . . . : : : . . . .
—
. . . .
. . ; : EXISTING ', PROFILE: : : : : ' : .0 t WALL: PROFILE (18.5'RT.� . . . . 00
--- -- -- 4 — ----- 1-- �' — gam- -
00
ln i
{ r . . . . { { . . . . . . . . . . p : : : : : .
p00 : � Gl . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . Z. �j. . . . . . . . : : : :
_. pp . . . . u.Q _j.
j . . ' 1 . . . J , I
--------------
. . . U V `__ _ _-- --t __�___.-_i--� -- r —_ - _ - -- --- - -- - - ro - --
CK.
�. .-- , r , —_�—_�—_---------- -- -- -- -- -- ---_---«---- -.------. - --------__—._6 .—.
} . . . . ISTING: :GROUN[I . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
�p-t--- ---- - -- - _.. - --- -- -- - ---- --- - - ---' - ROFILE _(18:5�RT.)
r= __ 0
-_-- I I ,
D.
; . . ; . . .
69
9+50: : : ' : 10+00 : : : : : : 11#00 : : . . . . I . . . . : :1150 : : 72+00 : :
. I . . -
i
. ELF . 6 < 1 (PIVXT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SCALE: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HORIZ. 1"=.20' . .
. . . . . .
V E RT. 1"=. 10' : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : i : : : :
i
FILE NAME G:ILOCATION%XL4760 -US 101 S of Beacon Point Road\MP 316 SLIDEMMC 2201CAD1_BaseFiles�DidC220 SF AL.dgn
TIME 7:42:D3 AM - RE=. ST"T= FED.AID PROJ.NO. US 101 >T „ REF
..a
DATE 2124!2015 10 AS
PLOTTED BY McmastM — 2.2 MILES SOUTH OF BEACON PT ROAD
DESIGNED BY B_JAMIESON a women
ENTERED BY R WILLIAMS _ --- -_ - Washington State EMERGENCY SLOPE STABILIZATION �FET
CHECKED BY J YOUN_G_ _ _ _ —_ _— x u+wa �osaiov vo Department of Transportation of
WALL PROFILE
PROJ.ENGR. R BHALLA -
REGIONAL ADM. K l)AYTON REVISION DATE BY -"E '•`
•E3T:•t'T FG.t �E 5*.1'f'fiOn
~•t t -.l `�i! 1 n,•� � � T�+$ .fit ir+
Jr y LEGEND
���;,+ .t �Iy �Y��tin{• s rfa r _•?C'`y_.ti ti:
T h�
- -' •}' Milepost Markers
U.S. Highway
Local Roads
r
Representation: dnr-100Kquads_Rep
316 16
101 101 Rule 1
GEOLOGIC UNIT NAME
{ ► 'fit t W-ter
'• `f �' as cis wo- wtr nQuaternary deposits,Landslides
t ,r;
Quaternary deposits,Glacial Till
1: .r
Eocene volcanic rocks
,N,, . �'i u 17
_• . :it-� �.. '.�;:v. .. ,:� ,
` tr'•`'yr'. � ►, �•.,ii"+-r•�.r., : 315'
Prehistoric Landslide Head Scarp
f��N /.1,f•
Qgt ,ogt -.
R? 316
' r r
�.. }
;Y- 101 rr
^r,. _ ��_' 'f '{ - �•� . �� 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
FEET
Mr
N 1 inch=2000 feet 1:24,000
vwtr
+ - +; ram" ;f '�• ,# ^_7 tilt• +_~ •�� t
1•.} 7 ,e n 4� r�� y JOB# STATE ROUTE 101 MILEPOST(S) 316
^L i _ ; ,� ;�( ,�_ .SL{;Vr ��• FIGURE 1: Prehistoric Landslide
r- + 317 0 s { • t ,� s`r .{:a r � SR 101 MP 316
DIGITAL ORTHOQUAD,LIDAR&
GEOLOGY MAPS
.•., x'� T• •,tA91111k Washington State Department of Transportation
It
•' � ': `` }'- Mr GEOTECHNICAL DIVISION
• it •.� 'k� �• !t f r�gd�1 ' •�; PREPARED BY MarcFiSh DATE November
File LCCafYM`.M.+O'�eoprgV�ty�rpc'�Fr 1orMP 716Ge<'.k+gy=a -
�oN ST4TF0 MASON COUNTY
�P C -rr_ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
o A o �N Planning Division
v =
pT z 426 W Cedar St, Shelton, WA 98584
r
7 N Y y (360)427-9670
OJ �O
1864
Exemption from Shoreline Management Act
Case No.: SHX2015-00001 Substantial Development Permit Requirement
The Proposal By: WA ST DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DAVID EVANS
P O BOX 47440
OLYMPIA, WA 98504-7440
To undertake the following development:
PROJECT WILL REPAIR THE ROADWAY AND STABILIZE THE SLOPE ON THE CANAL SIDE OF US
HIGHWAY 101 BY BUILDING A RETAINING WALL. WORK CONSISTS OF REMOVAL OF SLIDE
DEBRIS, CONSTRUCTING A RETAINING WALL AND EMBANKMENT AND RECONSTRUCTING
APPROXIMATELY 100 FT OF THE NORTHBOUND LANE.
Within HOOD CANAL and/or its associated wetlands is exempt from the requirement of substantial development
because the development is categorized under WAC 173-27-040(2) as being category
D-emergencv construction
Please contact Grace Miller at ext 360 if you have any questions.
Issued: 1/16/2015
Expires: 1/16/2017 Authorized Local Government Official
cc: APPLICANT W&W USACOE WDOE TRIBAL COUNCIL - 5k,IZI-ISO'bc-
5 .00001 a �
RECEIVED
JAN 15 2015
US 101, MP 316.5 Vic. Beacon Point Landslide— Emergence Repal26 W. CEDAR ST.
Level 1 Information
Needed from Project Manager to Complete Environmental Review
Summary (ERS)—Required for Design Concurrence
To begin the environmental documentation process, submit a formal written request
memorandum to EHS Office for environmental &hydraulic services that contains the
following Level One information.
Please answer or provide information for each and every question. Provide as much
detail and accuracy that is available:
l. Name and phone number of Contact Person.
Jeff Young, Design Team Leader,phone(360) 538-8522
Bonnie Jamieson,Designer,phone(360) 538-8510
2. Project Title,WIN'and PIN numbers.
US 101 MP 316.5 Beacon Point Landslide—Emergency Repair
Pin and Win: NIA
3. Work Order Number,Group Number,and Control Section.
(Charge codes to be used by EHS Office).
W.O. #: DMC 220/Gr#: 01 >C.S. C22101
4. Is there the potential for any federal funding?
Yes, 86.5%federal funding.
5. Project Type(P1-Pavements,P2- Structures, etc.)
Emergency slide repair.
6. Project Limits(area within which all work will occur);include_mileposts,
Counties, Cities,Township,Range and Section(s).
US 101, MP 316.45 to 316.50 in Mason County,2.57 miles north of Eldon, in
Township 24 North,Range 3 West, Section 12,WM.
7. Give a summary of the project and the scope of work that it entails.
This project will repair the roadway and stabilizing the slope on the canal side of
US 101 by building a retaining wall.. The work consists of removal of slide debris,
constructing a retaining wall and embankment, and reconstructing approximately
100 if of the NB lane.
8. Will the approximate amount of disturbed area equal 1 acre or more? (Include
clearing&grubbing,pavement removal to bare soil, etc.)
COMPLETED JAN 12.2015 1
C-A
It is assumed the area of disturbed soils will not exceed the area of the slide which
is approximately 8000 SF which equal 0.18 Ac.
9. What is the approximate added impervious area?
(less than 2000 ftO) (less than 5000 f O)(greater than 10,000 fto).
Less than 2000 SF,repairing the roadway will not add any impervious surface.
10. Describe the source of storm water runoff
a. Are the culverts larger or smaller then 48"?
No culverts will be impacted.
b. Where does it outfall? (include quantities,if known).
N/A
c. Will there be new impervious surface, and will it be treated by this system
or a new system?
The new impervious surface is considered replaced impervious surface.
No stormwater treatment will be incorporated in this project.
11. Provide preliminary description of any work in streams,rivers or water bodies.
None.
12. Provide preliminary description of any work within 300 feet of any water body.
(Include name of water body). Also designate which of this work is within 200
feet of a water body(include name of water body).
All work is within 200 ft of the Hood Canal.
Will there be any temporary or permanent ditch impacts during the project?
(Example: guardrail terminals,culvert extensions/replacements,re-grading ditches,
access roads,widening).
Yes, the roadway will likely be widened to the west,temporarily placing a culvert
in the ditch-line and covering it so the temporary traffic can have the temporary
required 15 ft lane width.
13. Describe the types and amount of vegetation to be removed. Attach the Roadside
Restoration worksheet.
Native scrub brush, such as ferns and salial bush will be removed during clearing
and grubbing.
14.Do you have knowledge of any wetlands in the area? Describe any anticipated
impacts to wetlands from the project.
No, I do not have knowledge of any nearby wetlands.
15. Is geotechnical work(drilling)planned? [This may trigger additional
documentation/permitting tasks such as BA,wetland delineation, etc.]
COMPLETED JAN 12, 2015 2
air
The Geotechnical Office has already performed the necessary drilling at the site.
No further drilling is anticipated.
lb.Will any structures be removed? (Buildings, etc.)
No.
17.Are there any known or suspected historic structures,areas, archaeological
resources,or traditional cultural places, etc?
No.
18. Will the project potentially disturb any previously undisturbed areas? [Drilling or
excavation in native soils may trigger additional cultural resources/archaeological
review.]
Yes,the area adjacent to the slide will be disturbed to construct access to remove
the slide debris and construct a permanent retaining wall to stabilize the roadway.
19.Are there any known old gas stations, or other locations with suspected hazardous
materials or waste?
No.
20. Are there any parks,wildlife refuges, recreation areas, etc.,that will be impacted?
The slide debris is on property owned by Girl Scouts of Western Washington.
21. Provide information or knowledge of any previous commitments in the project
area.
I have no knowledge of any previous commitments.
22. Provide a vicinity map and any preliminary plans that you have for information.
Attached is the vicinity map and conceptual roadway sections depicting;the
existing condition, excavation and debris removal, and final embankment and
roadway construction. Additional plan sheets are being developed.
23. Provide total cost of project and percentage of Federal contribution.
The project costs has not been yet been determined. The federal funding
contribution is 86.5 percent.
COMPLETED JAN 12,2015 3
T. 24 N., R. 3 W., W.M. WSDOT 6
OLYMPIC REGION
U Q i • i
a
36 F
31 r i
JEFFL+RSO_N CO OLYMPIC NATL FOREST i
MASON CO ._ T z�rNi
C01° MASON CO
.Q P
A.
I
10 0 10 20 30 40 MILES
SLIDE LOCATION 2 10 0 10 220 30 40 60 60 KILOMETERS
MP 316.45 '
i 7 O WASHINOTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
10 I1I BEGIN PROJECT Gr sMe 1 /cis
12 O BASEMJULY 200ID
MP 316.41 % p
�ra0 i i
�... ._.._... - --.._.. - END PROJECT;
_-------. I
- ...--- —....__. .. —
.......--- MP 316.50
7
-
J I
15 Iq 13 i
% �)-
ALI,
I
17 IB 15 14
%
em
18
I _...........
• _... II
23
22
0� ,�`',��' ' • �0 I Cr6� 0 1500 3000
19 28 21 SCALE IN FEET
22 23
FILE NAME G:\CGNTRACTIDMC 220 US 101 IIP 316.5 Emmem S&MIGAINA& Plot 1
TIME _9_30ae AM `�°" •'•" FED.AID PROJ.NO.
DATE 12/2912014 ^ US 101 EMERGENCY SLIDE —^�
PLOTTED BY 'Amy. tD As -'/ IN MASON COUNTY W
DESIGNED BY B JAMIESON --
ENTERED BY R WILLIAMS Washington State MP 316.45
_ Department of Transportation
CHECKED BY b HARDY mmwer �eun^^w t
PROJ.ENOR. R BHALLA DMC 220 --- VICINTY MAP
REGIONAL ADM. K DAYTON RVIRO N DATE SY '� °"' •^••�
a
VS 161 MQ 3►G•5 - UfkC,, VotN—i, f ANASLI�E
EXI ST�N6 Go r3A�t�on1 �sTAT[ora "ji6o�
ICU
HAI
taL VS lu1
70
60 _
� LooyE
LMN *E
DE6R�S
S�
4e
G'A.AL
Je
Gl?6 ScO.vT
RaA
(e
(oo Qo $e 7e bo (u 2e 30 40 ,re 60 7o b e qo 1.0 14 Iit'd µooD G/�roA1_
US �o� M� 3�6•s- %Uvror+ ?okNZ Lq�uosu�G
EKGF1�ATtor� L+F RaAOWM�I O6&RISI AND 6M8ANLMfNT FeJN�{hl1N
��t-Krlaru 3+6a�
�14
QR
rlAlwc
VS 2.01
RP
I
I
76
aoA b4 Ay
FILL
le/
40 Df�sEA
[LALI A(
TILL
3a
gEDICxk
IRL SCovr
RonD
Roob CANAL
0 -_.__..Y._�.-_...r...,...._.....I.,..__...._T-».._...__�..�___I���...(._._.�,�.._�._._{.^.._._.'_/.__'__1""'"'""f'""'_"T'."'l-."""1"".'Y.;_"i"•__.....r-......_,-�..-........-Ty....-.._..1.,..........-.. "'f""'1"�'�'•1
100 h� go 70 60 Sa 40 30 'in 10 � 10 ZO 30 +R 5'0 60 y0 YO 10 IOU 110 l2u l30
—V
VS J 01 MP 316.S _ 3E Aga., Qo1N-r LAmUst.-ibC
WkKE o& WRAPPED IV-AzE f wE gcEu SLge 5%lr--
WrTh 2:0 xbPE AZ.4c (:A kjAgt2Alt C�Sth4row SrG►,
IIo
Q(�vEMf r+T
~"`�.. � SEGt�on1 GRyNEh wi F¢aE'-OB•k+Nl-K QnCK tc'lu.
�i. �r SNG?' SNevGOCM RAIb�'YP?�
�Q � �—�� RFdNPN.CEn Si,ofe '
i 6a�tF��tC�•R 4Er.+5A-�
4"0 ,
�1> 'QE N SE •
T1L
�LaAD
'U
Ioo 4� Sa 70 6o so 4o so zo to 0 10 Zo Da ko 3-0 60 90 go 1. rce Ire lae tso lZ lca
Page I of 2
Grace Miller- RE: US 101 Mile post 316.5 (Beacon Point) Slide
From: Grace Miller
To: David Evans
Subject RE: US 101 Mile post 316.5 (Beacon Point)Slide
Thank you, David.I will pass the information on to the Hearing Examiner.
>>> "Evans, David" <EvansD@wsdot.wa.gov> 6/1/2015 2:55 PM >>>
Grace, I have had a chance to talk with our Biology program manager, and, it turns out I did misspeak at the
hearing. We have no written conservation measures from USFWS.The timing restriction I referred to during
the hearing was conveyed to us through a verbal consultation with USFWS. I have attached an e-mail that we
received after that consultation that references the restrictions. I hope this helps, and, I hope you don't need
me to do any jail time for a false (inadvertently)deposition.
David C Evans
Senior Environmental Engineer
Environmental and Hydraulics Services
Olympic Region
(360) 570-6738
Fax: (360) 570-6697
5720 Capitol Blvd SE
Tumwater, WA 98501-5592
PO Box 47440, Olympia WA 98504-7440
From: Grace Miller [mailto:Gbm@co.mason.wa.us]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 8:37 AM
To: Evans, David
Subject: Re: US 101 Mile post 316.5 (Beacon Point) Slide
Thank you, David. That will be fine.
426 West Cedar Street
Shelton,WA 98584
>>> "Evans, David" <EvansD@wsdot.wa.gov> 5/27/2015 3:19 PM >>>
Grace, I may have misspoken at the hearing when I said we had conservation measures from USFWS and NMFS
in hand. I'm not finding any in our files,and, unfortunately, the Biologists who are working on this project are
out of town at a conference, and won't return until next week. I will follow up with them then and get in touch
with you. I apologize for misspeaking, and hope I haven't caused any problems. If you or the hearing examiner
have any questions, please call me at the number below.
Thank you.
David C Evans
about:blank 6/1/2015
Page 2 of 2
Senior Environmental Engineer
Environmental and Hydraulics Services
Olympic Region
(360) 570-6738
Fax: (360) 570-6697
5720 Capitol Blvd SE
Tumwater, WA 98501-5592
PO Box 47440, Olympia WA 98504-7440
I
L
about:blank 6/1/2015
Pagel of 3
ex
q
Grace Miller-FW: US 101 316.5 Emergency Repair
From: "Ward, Carl"<WardC@wsdot.wa.gov>
To: "Evans,David"<EvansD@wsdot.wa.gov>
Date: 6/1/2015 11:59 AM
Subject: FW:US 101 316.5 Emergency Repair
Close as we have to written conservation recommendation in the emergency consultation (remove trees prior to
April 15t, which we did).
From: Gower, Eric
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 11:56 AM
To: Ward, Carl
Subject: FW: US 101 316.5 Emergency Repair
FYI
From: Durham, Leslie rmailto:leslie durham@fws.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 3:04 PM
To: Gower, Eric
Subject: Re: US 101 316.5 Emergency Repair
Thanks for the update.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Gower, Eric <GowerEAwsdot.wa.gov> wrote:
Hi Leslie,
Two trees were removed yesterday. Both trees were not murrelet nest trees. No more trees are intended to be
removed for the project. Once the project office relays the remaining information you have requested I will get
that to you ASAP.
Eric Gower
WSDOT
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
6639 Capitol Blvd. SW Suite 302
Tumwater, WA 98512
(360) 570-6709
gowere@wsdot.wa.gov
From: Durham, Leslie [mailto:leslie durham@fws.gov]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 9:11 AM
To: Gower, Eric
Cc: Bakeman, Mark
file:/HC:/Users/gbm/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/556C72A2Masonmai1100167376E 134B981556C72A2M... 6/1/2015
Page 2 of 3
Subject: Re: US 101 316.5 Emergency Repair
Mark,
Let me know if I've missed anything you are tracking at HQ for the PBO (see email below).
Thanks.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Durham, Leslie <leslie durham2fws.g_ov> wrote:
Eric,
Mark Bakeman and I are verifying whether we can claim take authorized under the WSDOT
Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) and I will get back with you as soon as Mark and I
account for all the projects coming in at the same time.
If we can use the PBO, you can submit the PBA as a reference BA and do a supplement for
murrelet.
Regardless of whether the emergency can be processed under the PBO or not, I will need the
below information to complete consultation (PBO or after-the-fact consultation). I will ask
Mark to review the below list to see if I've missed anything regarding the track we are
tracking for the PBO, but I thought you might need the above info ASAP.
Within the action area:
1) Number of potential marbled murrelet nest trees to be removed from murrelet nesting
suitable habitat.
2 Number of non-potential nest trees 19-inch dbh and greater to be removed from murrelet
P
nesting (suitable) habitat
3) Area of understory vegetation and trees from 14-inch dbh to less than 19-inch dbh to be
removed within 150 feet of murrelet suitable nest trees
4) Area of understory vegetation (includes trees less than 14-inches dbh) to be removed
from murrelet nestingsuitable habitat.
( )
5) Area of suitable habitat within 60 meters (65 yards) of project activity that will be
exposed to elevated noise levels from use of heavy equipment and chainsaws and visual
stimuli sufficient to cause disruption (LAA) to nesting murrelets during the nesting season
(April 1 - Sept. 22).
6) Area of suitable habitat between 60 meters (65 yards) and 0.25 mile of project activity
that will be exposed to elevated noise levels from use of heavy equipment and chainsaws
sufficient to cause disturbance (NLAA) to nesting murrelets (NLAA) during the nesting season
(April 1 - Sept 22).
Please keep in mind that the take limits we are tracking for the PBO (above) are based upon
the implementation of a daily limited operating period (two hours after sunrise and two
file:///C:/Users/gbm/AppData/LocaUTemp/XPgrpwise/556C72A2Masonmaill 00167376E li4B981556C72A2M... 6/1/2015
Page 3 of 3
hours before sunset.
Also, as we've discussed, any nest trees that need to be removed must be taken down prior
to the murrelet nesting season (April 1) in order to use the programmatic.
One more question: is the vegetation removal adjacent to murrelet suitable habitat within
50 feet of the existing roadway clear zone?
If you have any questions let me know. Thanks.
Leslie Durham
WSDOT Liaison
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Washington Fish and Wildlife Office
Lacey. Washington 98503
360-753-9532
leslie durham(a fws.gov
Leslie Durham
WSDOT Liaison
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Washington Fish and Wildlife Office
Lacey, Washington 98503
360-753-9532
leslie durhamgfws.gov
Leslie Durham
WSDOT Liaison
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Washington Fish and Wildlife Office
Lacey, Washington 98503
360-753-9532
leslie durham a2fws.gov
file:///C:/Users/gbm/AppData/t..ocal/Temp/XPgrpwise/556C72A2Masoninai1100167376E 134B981556C72A2M... 6/1/2015
Page 1 of 1
Grace Miller-US 101 Mile post 316.5(Beacon Point)Slide EX
From: "Evans,David"<EvansD@wsdot.wa.gov>
To: "Grace Miller(gbm@co.mason.wa.us)"<gbm@co.mason.wa.us>
Date: 5/27/2015 3:20 PM
Subject: US 101 Mile post 316.5 (Beacon Point)Slide
Grace, I may have misspoken at the hearing when I said we had conservation measures from USFWS and NMFS
in hand. I'm not finding any in our files, and, unfortunately, the Biologists who are working on this project are
out of town at a conference, and won't return until next week. I will follow up with them then and get in touch
with you. I apologize for misspeaking, and hope I haven't caused any problems. If you or the hearing examiner
have any questions, please call me at the number below.
Thank you.
David C Evans
Senior Environmental Engineer
Environmental and Hydraulics Services
Olympic Region
(360) 570-6738
Fax: (360) 570-6697
5720 Capitol Blvd SE
Tumwater, WA 98501-5592
PO Box 47440, Olympia WA 98504-7440
file:///C:/Users/gbm/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/5565EOAFMasonmai1100167376E 134B021/G W_00001... 5/28/2015
I