The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHMP Habitat Managment Plan - 3/30/2008 Habitat Management Plan PROJECT SITE: XXX N Canal Hide Away Hoodsport, WA 98548 Frepared for: Mr. Michael McGraw P.O. BOX 429 Onalaska, WA 98570 Prepared By: AGUA TIERRA LAND AND WATER SERVICES, INC (AGUA TIERRA) Rivers Wetlands Lakes Marine Shorelines Slopes a design— build firm specializing in environmental critical areas Assess - Permit - Design - Restore - Build March 2008 Serving Clients inAGUA TIERRA NorthwestPacific Provincesand 9. 0 INTRODUCTION At the request of Michael McGraw, Agua Tierra Land& Water Services, Inc.(Agua Tierra)prepared this Habitat Management Plan(HMP)in compliance with Mason County Resource Ordinance 8.52.170 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas(FWHCA). This report presents the results of our work. 1.1 LOCATION The project location is noted below and supporting figures appear as Attachments. • Address: Lot between 191 & 181 N Canal Hide Away, Hoodsport, WA 98548 • County/Parcel: Mason/323305106007 • Public Land survey: Township 23N, Range 3W, Section 30 • Parcel Size: <0.5 Acres 1.2 PROPOSED LAND MODIFICATION PROJECT We understand the proposed work to include the following land use modifications: • Construction of a single family residence • Construction of a retaining wall per geotechnical report recommendations • Installation of 1 septic tank and drainage field • Installation of steps to beach Due to site constraints all development is proposed to occur within the FWHCA. ' 1 REGULATORY AUTHORITY ison County regulates Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas per Section 8.52.170. Standard buffer widths and building setbacks are listed below.(The applicable resource area for this site is shown in a bold box below). Habitat Type(Permanent Habitat Type(Interim Standard Building Setback from Water Typing System) Water Typing System) Buffer R Buffer 11 T e-S Stream Type-1 Stream 150 15 T -F Stream Type-2&3 Stream 150 15 Type SP Stream** 200 15 Type-Np Stream Type-4 Stream 100 15 Type-Ns Stream Type-5 Stream 75 15 Type-1 Saltwater and Lake T e-S Water Shorelines over 20 acres 100 0 Type-1 Conservancy Shorelines Saltwater and Lake T e-S+Water Shorelines over 20 acres 100 15 **SP stream is proposed for consideration if any specific streams are identified that are significant in terms of anadromous fish and recommended to be protected by a larger buffer. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION: GENERAL The parcel includes the following existing human built features: • Bulkhead • Septic tanks AGUA TIERRA LAND&6TER SERVICESjlNC. 506 Edison Street SE,Suite 100 • Olympia,WA 98501 • T:(360)754-3755 • F:(360)754 3431 mvw.aguaderra.net Field inspection was conducted on January 22"d, 2008. The parcel is undeveloped land.The eastern property line forms the shoreline of Hood Canal(designated as a Type-S Shoreline in the Mason County Shoreline Masters Program). The eastern portion of the property, which is the widest and only buildable portion of the property, is generally flat except for ie last approximate 10 feet closest to the bulkhead and the Hood Canal.The property is bisected by an easement(20 feet ide)running north—south through the center of the property.From the easement the property slopes upward to the west. The parcel is generally triangular in shape.The longest axis is east-west.The north-south dimension of the parcel narrows incrementally toward the western end. Supporting maps and figures appear as Attachments. 2.1 FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT CONSERVATION AREAS Hood Canal a Type 1 (S)marine shoreline and its associated buffer are located along the eastern edge of the property. 2.2 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY The net slope of the property is downward to the east and the Hood Canal shoreline. The western portion of the site includes the steepest grade(70%). The eastern portion of the site is flat to gently sloping downward to the east. At about 10 feet from the bulkhead and shoreline the slope increases to approximately 15%. Eastward(waterward)of the bulkhead the shoreline gently slopes to the water. 2.3 EXISTING SOILS Soils for the study area are mapped on the website: websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov. Mapping shows soil series: • Hoodsport gravelly sandy loam, 30 to 45%slopes 2.4 EXISTING VEGETATION The site has been heavily managed. As such,the building site is primarily barren with the exception of three Douglas firs (DBH>15 in). The slope area is dominated by non-native vegetation. tive vegetation includes:Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii)and sword fern(Polystichum munitum). Non-native vegetation includes: Aaron's beard(Hypericum calycinum) and Scotch broom(Cytisus scoparius). ".5 SURROUNDING LAND USES .urrent surrounding land use is residential. 3.0 APPLICABLE SETBACKS Mason County stated in a letter dated 07/26/2007 that the building set backs in the critical areas ordinance can not be met at this location.The letter states that any new construction will require a variance and must be at least 15 feet from the bulkhead. The proposed site plans satisfy this requirement. 4.0 REASONABLE USE AND AVOIDANCE Property shape and an on-site slope hazard area create design challenges and limit buildable area. Given the site constraints the applicant identified the proposed building site as the most practicable location. The proposed building site is within the buffer of Type S Marine Shoreline.Due to the size and shape of the parcel and critical area restrictions, impacts to the buffer appear to be unavoidable. The project is surrounded by areas that have already been impacted from prior permitted,though now nonconforming land uses. The project should have minimal additional impacts to the FWHCA buffer in this area. 5.0 WDFW SPECIES INFORMATION A check list for Species of Importance That May Occur in Mason County is included in the Attachments.No species of importance were observed during fieldwork. we dcw tair\sto-ge(d)\AT_GLOBAL\_AT PRO]ECfS1HMP_Mll'_RESTORE\HAB-MNGMNT-PLANS\MASON\McCra -08\McGmw_HMP(2).doc 2 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW)Priority Species and Habitats database documents the following species and habitats within one mile of the project site(Please contact Agua Tierra for further information on exact species locations): Washington Department Of Fish And Wildlife Priority Species Re ,rted Within One Mile Of SuNect Parcel. S cies Proximity to situ"/Location ifs ific Osprey >0.25 mi. Band-tailed pigeon <0.25 mi. Dungeness Crab <0.25 mi./Hood Canal Pandalid Shrimp >0.25 mi./Hood Canal Pacific Oyster <0.25 mi./Hood Canal Hardshell Inter-tidal Clam <0.25 mi./Hood Canal Hardshell Subtidal Clam >0.25 mi./Hood Canal Subtidal Geoduck >0.25 mi./Hood Canal Fall Chum >0.25 mi./Unnamed stream,Hood Canal Summer Chum >0.25 mi./Unnamed stream,Hood Canal Coho Salmon >0.25 mi./Unnamed stream,Hood Canal Resident Coastal Cutthroat >0.25 mi./Unnamed stream,Hood Canal Estuarine Zone >0.5 mi./Lilliwaup Bay Wetlands >0.5 mi./Lilliwaup Bay OSPREY osprey nest(identified in 1993)is located approximately 0.5 miles from the project area.No impacts are proposed that would affect suitable osprey habitat.The project is not expected to adversely impact ospreys. 5.2 BAND-TAILED PIGEON concentration of band-tailed pigeons is located approximately 0.25 miles from the project area.No impacts are roposed that would affect suitable band-tailed pigeon habitat.The project is not expected to adversely impact band-tailed pigeons. 5.3 DUNGENESS CRAB AND PANDALID SHRIIVIP Dungeness crab and pandalid shrimp occur offshore of the project area.No in-water or over-water work is associated with this project.The proposed project is not expected to have any adverse impact on Dungeness crab or pandalid shrimp or their habitat. 5.4 OYSTER,CLAM,AND GEODUCK Pacific oyster,Hardshell Intertidal Clam,and Subtidal Geoduck occur offshore of the project area.No in-water or over- water work is associated with this project.The proposed project is not expected to have any adverse impact on Pacific oysters,Hardshell Intertidal Clam,or Subtidal Geoduck or their habitat. 5.5 SALMONID HABITAT No in-water or over-water work is associated with this project.The proposed project is not expected to adversely impact Fall Chum, Summer Chum,Puget Sound Coho,or Resident Cutthroat Trout,their forage species, or their spawning habitat. 5.6 WETLANDS AND ESTUARIES tlands and estuarine zones were identified within a mile of the subject parcel.During field work no wetland conditions indicators were present on-site or in the surrounding area.There will be no direct impacts to either wetlands or estuarine zone from the purposed project. vcdowmtanAmocap(d)\AT GLOBAL\_AT PROJECTS\HMP_MIT_RESTOREW B-MNGMNT PLANS\MA.SON\McC"w-OBUNcGmw_HMP(2).&c 3 6.0 PROPOSED PROJECT IMPACTS The impacted portion of the FWHCA Shoreline buffers measures approximately 1650ft2. The entire project area is located within the FWHCA buffer. Specific anticipated impacts are listed below. egetation Disturbance Vegetation disturbance will be minimal and consists of the following: removal of two of the three existing Douglas fir's on site; removal of these trees in necessary to utilize the buildable area. Lawn/grass will also be disturbed. ;oil Disturbance Approximately 1650ft2 of soil will be disturbed within the FWHCA buffer. Disturbances will include compaction, addition of impervious surfaces,removal of topsoil, and construction runoff. Noise/Light/Human Activity Disturbance Impacts include: • Temporary construction related noise/activity during daylight hours. • The surrounding areas are residential and so increased disturbance by human activities will be minimal. Water Quality The project should not adversely impact the water quality of the Hood Canal if the recommended mitigation measures are followed. 7.0 MITIGATION MEASURES 7.1 IMPACT AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION MEASURES In order to minimize and/or avoid indirect impacts during construction we recommend: • Best Management Practices(BMP)for erosion control(Attachment); and • Maintain a minimum 10 foot no entry zone between the project area and the bulkhead. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS The following mitigation strategy is proposed: • Soil enhancement; and • Install native vegetation within Mitigation Area. .3 MITIGATION AREA The Mitigation Area is located on-site and measures approximately 975ft2.The area is immediately east of an existing bulkhead. Its location is between the proposed impact area and the protected resource to maximize its benefit; 1:1 mitigation areas were not practicable due to site conditions/constraints. A proposed site plan,planting details, and other supporting figures appear as Attachments. 7.4 OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Specific objective and performance standards are listed in the table below. Mitigation Objectives and Performance Standards" Item# Objective Performance Standard/s Enhance 975 Ft2 of degraded soils to a . Remove soils to a depth of 9 in. depth of 18". • Install 9 in.of organic rich soils 1 Blend native and organic soils to a depth of 18 in.to form a uniform soil base for native plantings Install 975 Ft2 of native vegetation. Professionally install plants at the following densities: 2 0 Trees: 1 per 100 Ft2. • Shrubs&Groundcover: 110/ 1000 Ft2. Restoration plantings are: • Minimum 80%survive/thrive each year. 30 Established • Plants achieve healthy,competitive and maintenance • Self sufficient. free condition. • Weeds controlled by native plants. rvcdow taQ\stocagc(d)\AT_GLOBAU_AT PROJECTSuiMP_M1T_RFSTORE4 AB-MNGMNT-PLANS\MASOMMcGma -08`A1cGmw_HMP(2).doc 4 7.5 SOIL ENHANCEMENT The Soil Enhancement Area is located on-site within the Mitigation Area. 6 NATIVE PLANTINGS ecommended native plant species and quantities for Restoration and/or Mitigation Areas are listed below and are organized by designated site location(Area#).Noted quantities are an estimate. Actual final numbers will vary. Quantities were estimated based on: • Estimated project impact area; • Prescribed planting densities; and • Correction factor/s estimated for existing or retained and salvaged plants. PLANT MATERIALS TABLE FOR: MITIGATION AREA Treatment Strata Species On Center Min Qty Notes Area Spacing Size ID (Ft) Tree Douglas fir 10 2 gal 9 Pseudotsuga menziesii Shrub Nootka rose 5 7 (Rosa nutkana) Shrub Kinnikinnick 5 8 (Arctostaphylos uva-ursi) Ground Woodland Strawberry 5 7 Cover (Fragaria vesca) - Ground American dunegrass 5 8 Cover (Elymus mollis) inting densities(spacing)will eventually provide a moderately dense, structurally diverse plant community in the _,atment area.Any existing native plants retained within the treatment area may be counted towards the specified overall planting densities. All installed vegetation shall be marked with colored flagging to facilitate monitoring inspections.Any non-native(weed)vegetation should be removed. .7 NATIVE PLANT INSTALLATION METHODS Ylease refer to Naive Plant Installation Instructions and detail drawings in Attachments. 8.0 MONITORING The County requires performance monitoring when appropriate or necessary to ensure effectiveness. Monitoring enables early adjustments to installed work, if required,to insure project success and provide for amendments to the HMP. Ordinance requires the applicant to provide performance monitoring by a qualified biologist or like professional. • The applicant is required to submit an annual and/or final report to the County. • Duration(number of years)of monitoring anticipated: 3 Years. Monitoring shall include annual inspection and reporting sufficient to reflect site conditions and progress toward achievement of performance standards identified in the table above:Mitigation Objectives and Performance Standards. '-Tv dow stair\storage(d)\AT_GLOBAL\_AT PROJECT W"_MIT_RES"rORE\HAB-MNGMNT-PLANSVAASON\McCr.-08\McCr _HMP(2).doc 5 9.0 SCHEDULE The following timeline is designed to achieve the best chances of mitigation success. SCHEDULE FOR HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN Item# Mitigation Action Possible Project Timing 1 Project construction Spring—Summer 2008 2 Layout Mitigation Area boundaries with staking Fall 2008(by Dec 1) (plants and other habitat features) 3* Install native plants in Mitigation Area Dormancy 08/09(By March 1) 4* 1"year monitoring report October 2009 5* 2 nd year monitoring report October 2010 6* T year monitoring report October 2011 * Schedule site visit with Agua Tierra Biologist 10.0 STANDARD DISCLOSURE STATEMENT:BIOLOGICAL SERVICES This report is based on a reconnaissance inspection of existing site conditions.No scientific measurements,tests or calculations were performed. The findings and report are limited to the normal standard of care of the industry. If construction is planned and/or implemented using these documents as a reference,no warranty is made by Agua Tierra concerning conformity of the construction to the conclusions and recommendations of this report unless the plans are prepared and/or reviewed, and the construction work inspected by a representative of Agua Tierra. Agua Tierra's work included: • Review of existing ecological conditions at the project site; • Review of the client's reported/proposed project plans; • Review of potential habitat impacts from the proposed project; and • Recommendations for Best Management Practice's(BMP's)and mitigation measures to minimize any noted potential adverse habitat impacts. commendations were made based on background information provided and/or reported by the client, observed on site by Agua Tierra, and provided by natural resource agency staff and/or databases.Conditions not known to exist are not reflected in the report.The observations, interpretations, and conclusions herein are based on generally accepted assessment and/or design practices commensurate with the scope,budget,and schedule of this work. In addition, :onditions may change at the site due to human influences,floods,groundwater regime changes, or other fa.tors.This warranty is in lieu of all others,either expressed or implied. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by Agua Tierra's clients,the client's authorized representative/s,and regulatory agencies.It may be used by others only with the expressed written permission of Agua Tierra.The report has not been prepared for use by other individuals, entities, or other sites. Final acceptance, concurrence,and approval of findings included in this report are the responsibility of regulatory agencies. --l udownstair\uoragc(d)\AT_GLOBAL\_A-I PROJECTS\HMP_MIT_RESTORE\HAB-MNGMNT-PLANS\MASON\McCra -08\McG�_HMP(2).doc 6 I 11.0 CONCLUSION AND SCHEDULE This project proposes for 1650ft2 of development within the FWHCA buffer of a Type S Conservancy Marine Shoreline. A mitigation area of 975ft2 has been recommended to mitigate for impacts to the FWHCA buffer.Minimization measures A Best Management Practices(BMP's)have also been identified to avoid,minimize,and mitigate for anticipated lverse impacts. If the project and mitigation measures are implemented as described we believe this project can be completed while causing no-net loss to the Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas on site. The following recommended schedule is offered for completing the HMP process. MASTER SCHEDULE FOR HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN Item# - Action Possible Timing 1 Submit a copy of this report to Mason County Early Spring 2008 2 Project construction Spring—Summer 2008 3 Layout Mitigation Area boundaries with staking Fall 2008(by Dec 1) (plants and other habitat features) 4* Install native plants in Mitigation Area Dormancy 08/09(Between Dec 1 and March 1) 5 Submit an As-Built Plan to Mason County Within 30-days following installation 6 Schedule Agua Tierra for annual monitoring visit Annually in September 7* 1St year monitoring report October 2009 8* 2 nil year monitoring report October 2010 9* 3rd year monitoring report October 2011 * Schedule site visit with Agua Tierra Biologist Submitted By: Reviewed By: Jennifer ertou,B.S. hrjsti romuth, Sc.,C.E. Restoration Specialist Project Manager --ado—tairkaoragc(d)WT_GLOBAU_AT PROJECTS\HMP_M1T_RESTOREIHAB-MNGMNT-PLANS�MASON\McGr -08U1cGraw_HMP(2).doc 7 12.0 REFERENCES Hitchcock, C.Leo and Cron uist,Arthur. 1973. Flora ofthe Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press. Seattle, WA. Knutson,K. Lea and Naef,Virginia L. 1997.Management Recommendations for Washington's Priority Habitats: Riparian. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.Olympia,WA. Mason County. 2005.Mason County Resource Ordinance#17-02 Attachment B 17.01.110 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. Adopted January 10,2005. Shelton,Washington. National Marine Fisheries Service(NMFS). 1999.A Habitat Approach:Implementation of Section 7 under the Endangered Species Act for Actions Affecting the Habitat of Anadromous Salmonids. Northwest Region. National Marine Fisheries Services.2000.Puget Sound ESUListed Threatened. Federal Register.Vol. 65 No.32.Feb. 16,2000. Rienman,Bruce E.and Mclntypre,John D. 1993. Demographic and habitat requirements for conservation of bull trout. Gen.Tech.Rep.INT-302. Ogden,UT: U.S.Department of Agriculture,Forest Service,Intermountain Research Station. 38 p. Roderick,Elizabeth and Milner,Ruth. 1991.Management Recommendations for Washington's Priority Habitats and Species. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Seabird Bycatch Project. 2002.Marbled Murrelet Information Page. Internet address: h!W://www.iftlish.orwbvcatch3.htm dmaster,Mark. 1987. The Bald Eagle.Universe Books.New York,New York. U.S.Army Corps of Engineers.2000.Listed Fish Species Life Histories for Washington State. Regulatory Branch of Seattle District. Seattle,WA. ISDA Soil Conservation Service. 1960.Soil Survey:Mason County, Washington. U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS). 999.Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants;Determination of Threatened Status for Bull Trout in the Coterminous United States;Final Rule. Federal Register:November 1, 1999(Volume 64,Number 210).Internet address:http://endangered.fws.gov/r/fr99670.htm1. U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS). 1998.Bull Trout Interim Conservation Guidance. Lacey,Washington. Washington Department of Fisheries. 1975.A Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization. Vo.2 Coastal. "c—vadowmtnaluolage(OAT_GLOBAL\_AT PROIECIS\HMP MIT RF_S MREIHAB-MNGMNT-PL.ANS\MASON\McGraw-08\McChaw_HMP(2)Aoc 8 ATTACHMENTS • Regional /Vicinity Map • Street Map • Parcel & / Topographic Map • Aerial Photo • Soils Map • Habitat Management Site Plan AGUA TIERRA LAND AND WATER SERVICES,INC. 506 EDISON STREET,SE,SUITE 100 OLYMPIA,WA 98501 TEL.(360)754-3755 k- LAND&WATER SERVICES'.INC. FAX(360)754-3431 I 'L 0 29 " s tF — , , lip? r k4�y I4t fif Ijdt�" /�1r# " "El t � i , E 16 175 -187 r �v 1 N r . 5464 V �'i� L ! ,rl r ��'" t�� !Tq _ VI f' 1114 e t � � e } F dA- r BPADtb * M PROJECT AREA =0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 mi M=17.495 G=-0.083 FIGURE: Regional /Vicinity Map SOURCE: www.topozone.com AGUA TIERRA LAND AND WATER SERVICES, INC. 506 EDISON STREET,SE,SUITE 100 * EnrbAOLYMPIA,WA 98501 TEL.(360)754-3755 LAND&WATER SERVICES.INC. FAX(360)754-3431 17Q r µ_ r C_r3eeirz � � 1 xi it PROJECT AREA =0 FIGURE: Street Map SOURCE: www.mapquest.com AGUA TIERRA LAND AND WATER SERVICES,INC. 506 EDISON STREET,SE,SUITE 100 OLYMPIA,WA 98501 TEL.(360)754-3755 LAND &WATER SERVICES.INC. FAX(360)754-3431 ry ^�/4e W u «r - O PROJECT AREA =0 FIGURE: Parcel &Topographic Map SOURCE: http://mapmason.co.mason.wa.us/website/mason/viewer.htm AGUA TIERRA LAND AND WATER SERVICES,INC. 506 EDISON STREET,SE,SUITE 100 OLYMPIA,WA 98501 TEL.(360)754-3755 LAND&WATER SERVICES.INC. FAX 360 754-3431 Zt P; y Sn PROJECT AREA = 0 FIGURE: Aerial Photo SOURCE: http://mapmason.co.mason.wa.us/website/mason/viewer.htm II _ AGUA TIERRA LAND AND WATER SERVICES, INC. 506 EDISON STREET,SE,SUITE 100 !, OLYMPIA,WA 98501 kGUA TEL.(360)754-3755 • FAX(360)754-3431 k ti- 1p Zu_ {3 x` Yi r t$ I Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Description Hf Hoodsport gravelly sand loam, 30 to 45 percent slopes PROJECT AREA =0 FIGURE: web Soil Survey Map SOURCE: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey u RV aY v F T RACT 71 o BLOCKS Pc..�► ' o L l LL,t WAuFALLS � q , Lo y i 44 / ViDGM OF qoTo �►� ��'` off' ,��k �, , LEGEND FOR: K-MITIGATION/RESTORATION PLANS • HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLANS • OAK INVENTORY ..{ APPROXIMATE SCALE:FEET w NC)RTH W M L <n O 1ECT SITE 0 30 60 Mitigation Area, Approximately 1 TS OWNER: Mike McGraw ESS: XXX North Canal Hide Away,Lilliwaup,WA 98548 a0 ENT ACTING ON BEHALF OF OWNER: PARCEL#/S: 323305106007 COUNTY: Mason \\ TOWNSHIP: 23 RANGE: 03W SECTION: 30 Z Z Y LLJ O �o ` co ¢ w UNR .��. REGULATED WETLAND '_ '_ UNREGULATED WETLAND O o U ¢ � • !' RESTORATION AREA# CONS TRUCTIONAREA DEVELOPED O MITIGATION AREA 4 IMPACTO�STAUCTION AREA O NO ENTRY ZONE SEPTIC DRAINFIELD&SETBACK 2, N� t�ST— STREAM (0) OAK&DRIP LINE fl � 1 —WL—WL— WETLAND EDGE —S 6=S B— STREAM BUFFER \ Ol5 .O O 7 -SC .SC� SLOPE CREST — •WB •WB WETLAND BUFFER COMMON LINE —BS—BS— SLOPE BUFFER \ d ^ Z OHWM— ORIDNARY HIGH WATER BUILDING SETBACK \�'� i• O—MHHW— MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER \ LO 6 RPtt TBM/REFERENCE POINT �s if^^ N rn PREVAILING REGULATORYAGFIJCYAFS \� \ O G) Q s O LOCAL(LEAD AGENCY): Mason ZA� ��./ ' Stairs n STATE: VEG 0M FEDERAL: Ld 3 PROTECTED NATURAL RESOURCE DATA �ioc�AJ RESOURCE CLASS PROTECTED BUFFER OR TYPE WIDTH NOTES Qh L f,�t�+V` v T 239A � \W � (n 3 TLAND 9 A u V) T a_ q PROPOSED SEPTIC DR/UN SYSTEM p µ-Via' E _ S LL►^ /► STREAM/RIVER F �\\` bl � ZZ ��1U 1 (<20 CFS) NP Wes` 11u 3} Z Ol U Q W r NS J S ° STREAM/RIVER F DEVELOPED ARE)k @ (>20 CFS) NP 0x NS ALTERNATE LAKE OHWM LIW T OF LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA jXZ MARINE MHHW 100 �_: O U O.W.OAKS ILU W F- O U O LOPE LL 0_ J AGUA TIERRA DOES NOT PROVIDE LAND SURVEYING, BASE MAP SOURCE FROM:(CHECK BOX) ❑CLIENT INFORMATION ❑COUNTY RECORDS ❑SURVEYOR DIGITAL COPY ❑HAND SKETCH MAP MAPPING METHOD FOR THIS PROJECT WAS:(CHECK BOX). U o ❑COMPASS AND TAPE Z GPS POINTS —W O TOTAL STATION Uj H LAND SURVEYOR; W 1)�U� NATURAL RESOURCE SPECIALIST FIELDWORK DATES Q LLI Jennifer Overton 01/22/08 W rn GENERAL NOTES �w o,� W�WC� � 1T M � 1 E MASTER LEGEND SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL EXPLANATIONS L (2)THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. ANY REFERENCE TO PROPERTY LINENS IS/ARE ASSUMED r Z<-rr 4� � APPROXIMATE AND REPORTED BY CLIENT/OWNER. 3 (3)THIS DRAWING IS PART OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION/MITIGATION PLAN Q Z 0 C o 0 PREPARED BY AGUA TIERRA LAND AND WATER SERVICES INC.(AQUA TIERRA) Q 0 a m (�[]W�---- ❑ 4)OTHER RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS INCLUDE(ANY CHECKED): V<o�w El []NONEWETLAND DELINEATION❑HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN❑STREAM TYPE Z'D O F-LL OHWM DETERMINATION NONE (5, -- EPTIC INFORMATION WAS FURNISHED BY OWNER/CLIENT. — REQUIRED MAP INFORMATION CRITICAL AREAS BOUNDARIES AND BUFFERS WETLANDS,STREAMS,RIVERS,LAKES,MARINE SHORELINES,SLOPES,AND OAK TREES \ EXISTING AND PROPOSED HUMAN FEATURES BUILDINGS.UTILITIES,DRIVEWAYS.IMPERVIOUS SURFACES,PROPERTY OUTLINE. a-,,ie toCad\DesktDp\TEMPLATES_Tn BKSW-awklgl.dw9,2121/20083:34.56 PM