Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEP99-00118 Modified Repair Bulkhead - SEP Determinations - 8/13/2001 �pN.STgTFo� MASON COUNTY M �P C 4 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4 O � o N ? Planning Division " Y Y P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 1864 (360)427-9670 SEP99-00118 MODIFIED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-340) Description of Proposal: The engineered plan is to repair behind the existing bulkhead and add drainage to help prevent future failure of bulkhead. An ramp will be built above the OHWM to access the bulkhead. It will be removed as soon as the project is completed. Proponent: LILLIWAUP FALLS GENERATING COM Location of Proposal: ............... Parcel Number: 323192203000 /�a'�j�� -ac{ - 0003 Legal Description: E1/2 NW NW Directions to Site: Below falls at Lilliwaup Creek, adjacent to residence on property, site is located at end of Lilliwaup St, Section 19, T 23N R 3 W. Lead Agency: Mason County The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverser impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. T information is available to the public upon request. Please contact ((1/ « (L%Z at ext. S17 with any questions. Modification: There is no comment period forthis Modified DNS. - i3 -o/ Signature of Responsible Official Date W bo STATE O� cam O2 Oy STATE OF WASHINGTON R E C E I V F 6 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY N011 P.O. Box 47775 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 • (360) 407-6300 MCC November 1, 2001 d W- -J Ms. Grace Miller Responsible Official Mason County Department of Community Development Planning Division PO Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 Dear Ms. Miller: We received the revised determination of nonsignificance to repair behind the existing bulkhead and add drainage to help prevent future failure of the bulkhead, and build a ramp above the OHWM to access the bulkhead,which will be removed upon project completion (Case No. SEP99-00118)located at the end of Lilliwaup Street as proposed by Lilliwaup Falls Generating Company. Although there is no comment period, we would like to note the following concerns: Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent soil from being carried into surface water by stormwater runoff. Sand, silt, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered pollutants. If you have any questions or would like to respond to this comment,please call Ms.Kerry Carroll (Water Quality) at(360)407-6294 or with any other questions regarding this proposal I can be reached at(360)407-6787. j OS* cerely, ari Rokstad SEPA Coordinator Southwest Regional Office KR:aw(01-5451) cc: Kerry Carroll, SWRO/WQ RG Forestry Consultant • P.O.Box 681 • HoWsport,WA 98548 R.G. Forestry Consultant August 21,2001 RE: Gary Reed Project Lilliwaup Falls Parcel#4244 n 2 7 93,,,w To Mason County Planning Department: The owner has an existing house with an existing bulkhead in need of repair. The property has a fish hatchery,which is run by"Long Live The Kings"and National Marine Fisheries. There is also a hydro-electric plant on the property. The area in front of the house has a lawn sloping to the bulkhead with a walkway. The reason for access from the gravel bar and ramping to bulkhead,is to preserve the vegetation on the hillside and minimizing impact to the vegetative buffer zone. Access from the gravel bar would decrease the potential for erosion on the hillside by not disturbing the hill. Also building small ramp above OHWM would minimize impact to buffer zone. There is only five plant species where the ramp location would be. There are blackberry,salmonberry, wild cherry,ivy,and indian plum which just need to be trimmed. By building the ramp all the large trees would be protected and not disturbed. The project is on Lilliwaup Creek and the area we need to work on is now a dry gravel bar. Erosion measures are silt fencing and small pump for ground water seepage. Also to do the project in the dry season to keep sediment out of creek. This project would reduce the potential hazard of bulkhead failure and erosion from the entering Lilliwaup Creek also to minimize the impact to the creek by fixing the bulkhead reducing the impact of sediment for the fisheries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l ~ • RG Forestry Consultant • P.O.Box 681 HoWsNrt,WA 98548 July 31,2001 RECEIVED Mason County Planning 426 W. Cedar AUG 0 1 2001 P.O. Box 186 MCCD - p Shelton,WA 98584 CANNING RE: Gary Reed Project, Lilliwaup ADDENUM SEPA 99-0118 Dear Sir or Madam: The purpose of this project is to do maintenance on existing bulkhead,which has suffered damage from hydroelectric loading behind the bulkhead. The engineered plan is to repair behind bulkhead and also add drainage to help prevent future failure of bulkhead. The bulkhead does protect a house and if failed, would add sediment to Lilliwaup Creek and possible damage to the fish hatchery administered by Long Live The Kings and Natural Marine Fisheries. We have been in contact with Jim Fraser of Wash. State Fish and Wildlife about access and building a ramp above OHWM. The access will be from the gravel bar. Accessing from the slope would damage the vegetative buffer and would increase the risk of erosion. We are trying to minimize the impact on the vegetation by this access. This route is the same as when we did the rock protection in front of the bulkhead. The ramp will be removed as soon as the project is completed and will be seeded and replanted with native plants. By not doing anything,the risk of failure would be high if we had a large storm event. We encourage the agencies to visit the site and see for themselves. Plants now on site are blackberry,wild cherry,salmonberry,and some large trees on the slope,which we would like to protect. The erosion measure will be silt fencing in front of the work area. Also pumps to keep any ground water seepage and to help keep sediment out of the water. Sincerely, G Ron Gold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . August 21, 2001 Page 2 The vegetation that would need to be removed is some blackberry,salmonberry,and ivy. The wild cherry and indian plum need to be trimmed back. When the project is completed replant with native plants such as western red cedar and salmonberry. Then straw would be placed right after removal of ramp. This access would be the most sound environmental method and still do the work. The area of the ramp,40 feet long and 8 to 10 feet wide, is the area needed for access and no digging will be done.Just rock will be placed on the ground and build the ramp. Sincerely, f6,),x, ,-Z(� Ron Gold R.G. Forestry Consultant Section A — A End wall Bulkhead Footing ±32' \ \ Rip-rap ramp (6'-8' wide) to be constructed then removed after \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , ♦ \ completion of excavation behind bulkhead \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Existing ground line / Previously placed rip-rap / Gravel bar Ordinary High Water Line (OHWL) Owner and Location: Scale R Gar Reed G. Forestry Consultant Temporary y 1 -5 PO Bog 681,Hoodspom WA 98548 Access Ram PO Box 227 0 5' p Lilliwoup, WA 98555 10' (360)426-9540 (360) 877-9501 Drawn by TRS 5i22/00 N Hydro-power Plant Driveway Residence Access Road Rip-rap Access Ramp to be Built (Will be removed at Aquaduct completion of project) Area of Excavation walkway Large Trees A A 9 D Previously placed Rip-rap Gravel Bar h2 �� �jCd-Ii`O J Concrete Bulkhead \ Lilliwaup Creek OHWL � Bridge Old concrete weir Owner and Location: Scale 1"=35' R.G. Forestry Consultant Temporary Gary Reed p Y PO Box 227 P.O. Box 681, HoodspoM WA Access Ramp Lilliwaup, WA 98555 0 35' 70' 360-426-9540 (360) 877-9501 Drawn by TRS 5/21/00 N DF = Douglas fir RC = Western Red cedar DC = Deodar cedar Hydro-power Plant 7 Driveway Large Trees Residence Access Road Aquaduct Northern Bedstraw Sword fern Gin er Area of Excavation walkwa Lawn DF Indian plum Bracken fern y Blackberry Holl Starflower Lawn Lawn A II Ivy A RC DC Salmonberr DF DF Previously placed Gravel Bar Rip-rap Concrete Bulkhead Lilliwaup Creek OHWL Bridge Rip-rap Access Ramp to be Old concrete weir Built (Will be removed at completion of project) Temporary owner and Location: Scale 1"=35 ' Forestry RG. Consultant Gary Reed P.O. Bog 681, Hoodspon,WA Access Ramp PO Box 227 Habitat Consevation Area Lilliwaup, WA 98555 0 35' 70' 360-426-9540 (360) 877-9501 Drawn by TRS 8/15/01 TH P-g1916LAN S­ MIDST Be BUST MEET ALL RED ON 11HE JOB SITE N �Otq INSPECTION. �gAt4w fn:ON yriuls.' COVES a THEc_._L . A U zi i L3E .,. , Hydro-power Plant UIV : +'=� IED FO1 „ ION- M,AS ILDING INSPECTOR Driveway S C TO G[ Residence Access Road Rip-rap Access Ramp to be Built (Will be removed at Aquaduct completion of project) Area of Excavation walkway Large Trees /// A A I `�h n Previously placed L-1 . Rip-rap Gravel Bar �.lf l.:L•f Concrete Bulkhead \ Lilliwaup Creek 'OHWI Bridge Old concrete weir Owner and Location: Scale 1"=35 ' R_G. Forestry Consultant Temporary y Gary Reed PO Box 227 P.O. Boa 681, Hoodsport, WA Access Ramp Lilliwoup, WA 98555 0 35' 70' 360-426-9540 (360) 877-9501 Drawn by TRS 5/21/00 &APO uu nnadmw MUSrME1E1 Att C9 M fir,► HIMIGTON STATE CONS Section A A fHE8E OLANS MUST BE 01q TOt J013 SITE -5(,VP, 41,'NtA?!` 10N. End wall APPROVED MAS ILDING INSPECTOR Bulkhead 1G, SUB ECT TO APPRO 0fl M ,14UB ECT T�AP Footing ±32' V Rip-rap romp (6'-8' wide) to be . . . . . . constructed then removed after completion of excavation behind bulkhead J Existing ground line Previously placed Gravel bar Ordinary High Water rip-rap Line (OHWL) Owner and Location: Scale R-G. Forestry Consultant y Temporary Gar Reed PO Box 681,Hoodspom WA 98548 Access Ramp PO Box 227 0 5' Lilliwaup, WA 98555 (360)426-9540 1 (360) 877-9501 1 Dnwn by TRS 5/22/00 J 0 N E S RanGEO Em 0 0 j /!/ \� - \\ GFO7EC7wICAE C0161J1T1YRS BULKHEAD N 25.22 FLU\ - (206)2�4IM No \ �\ J 0 N E S 103.XN,'TiE MAOJ STREET j / 11,, SFA PTIL MA%10A 2257 167 r.5p tirGF Cb,rt NSf / EFgJMDSPI w! N6 9` 9 62 10.31 CONC EDGE '.i.i � y • Y ''.� _ i .- /'/ LLIwCi 7FOGEr uR<r 8l0 1 �2J.]6 a a • _ _ __ _ - EOGCCP�'RIPin �- i-� 6Jl F OwC EL ipWAA Gr+rnf 9 / A 2 -- K+AlM1PRA N p�j�\\ _ % /•� r.-i '�.� r __. _� ,-' .--� 1O13 co cc.SPl. - -clio"I10NllSPt wr •\ l r Y i J •_ �- 1115 1979 TES ♦ r ! Ct SrOf wirwr-cN('wAl fNLWi✓wAl( \ ! ` 7 5.05 JR.. w , W 01-4 i5 5. / cf8hp tJ]O �. Al -7 33.'J li v aar / al. rp.06 acrLN�igEidS'+ 1 JPc:n �.1010 7 rL.ORP rIFSr O r e /,/ r G•//__i -i .-' �- -_.'I_ T,P;cnm . �'NCBAF R^CAY r2 ' / EpG[CRKr jr tJ2 r296 !011F .-C CRK- ///FF C G KWAL �0.1,1 TOPC ('.1 TppRCKWALL > E✓CAK t_:3 ti l> r .-RUSPCCOff"W 115 - a ENOCCWCWa - 10 rt ..-w0 jL1E.BrPFAP a a Y \ \ a ! r 2 GS IASO T lc KL CLCw- •1679 a \ ADS -r CAF rv5r .wAff-' L G, QGRK 10&]CCM�APv A GS Y'Sr� \ J76 •0.6 ♦ W �M. v : , 0 W fVp.k P� rIS2] ` 1 QA SE.TG-•.M. 4-NC>" Fr. fE J� /. 16.8i 1.7 t213mLMAm !o o . .. �CW'w TAT WcWS%w 'a ?G µLCRCSI S�AKBAN Ir`P rIICSi _ -- - , ., ✓ //�� 1I�`I/ BA f7C_Lejrs SECTION LINE --•.wAtt-(NCS I L WY 0. e• { �a Rw a P �\ \ a rG ss } to JP ! T=- ; -j•' � \\�F SEE RETAINING WALL BSEc w�u a STABILIZATION DETAILS r 9J9 7]A Y { / e P E CRY �, 4!% N7gSF LIMIT OF NEW -- . s6CE,*L IxBA. CONSTRUCTION B a-rvau _ 07 B I 5 r5- A __y,A SEf.'+.�..�.LL IpF Fr. e• 1 - JJ I?13 aPTMC+C R.PRR AP IC.VC-STAI J�OJ 2MAP9F _.10 B.J9 �' /"-' �..• `\r 31"ID-. T.'CrIC-5" H _` . Y_-- CLOAR, L J ��1 1P•.♦ � 7 14 Y STEPS I Y o a ! toy is EO 5_^ 1650 .:J.7� 2s r 3. \ •`475t r 9 +PLE '0 254 / I1l;CPK C2.J CS K201 \ ® 'l23,2 aFCv Y`1 12 Flo jlW' rJ rox acrRr-' r"<�a.. 1'3" '. reF rualfnsm BprpCi .`0.. -,w.xEc.::sr 1 LL.10 \\ \ 1 258k'l1Lit-CIWFI�•A �- 3 v ..._ } J6CEJAP , .B. Cp+C 75)�r -- 1 OPNtNLWAL »4t_.'✓` gyp.:♦ :a39 1,6:•. Iy CCpECK 6'S2 -!X -_. --_ 'O 51 XBC Cr• OSP 0 2 219 BDECK f•SGRAABAR •`_�� `� \\ I-NC GAT K PENC CiR 2r.piBOEG.r.12 7-0Y RR Gi A2 70.73 IAW Vll S - "6'✓_ ARIDCC✓ _,AD - ( R O 20 7A iYC CAMP \ 1 i 7059 21.In �Ip�l r9.2 -+9._ 11 Fn-M�pr,E ,2T L h in ....///. �\ ELiGECFR -ABUT fiCPR �nL -t a t, tai l ra a �•�i ' .rwWALLA" 9 ✓' ..�! ` K9.Tr-- {.NK .- H�U SE rRPrlw.u-J1 A.FT �E,n -VV T Vr0 lc, RK. rR.eE �� FDO STOCKPILING AREA -F{H? STOCKPILING 0 20 40 - ie N uwcK ` \ 80 A27 EXCAVATED SOIL i -"I PQL Gq - ----} .- - a .2 OF`FAS 9y A` j3�h "tea *C*-IIAI fi o-z,--u� SITE PLAN - E L i REED RESIDENCE JULY 24, 2001 I RL:HrBa �� IasoeH c r.r,cAVAR ro BA4 O!:wu(Ml ri4A1FA MAN p'OEPMJ F 9rpvT aL[O,IS(rp'IL1rBHr5) l�( ---- T a RnroK rc Rms..o OCADab r MVFHRLD rn«uc.wm.. vet 1.__ s us swDM rur pa,rDr swrn ro tRGa,nn sAs Ar so,lov or r,uvA,ruv. A.1AV pA4 a<[iUwpOR 9M MG M pOPTt 1H MroaO[I9Y YlY •�r ]RAfL OLOSMBRpO AI B..Y O•rY'wTpl Lp1 EYa IOMlgtq,Hw, p.r[,vCr GRAf([pAOtLRL-Ib0p1 9-OJ.,I(�-F EYGwpVI!M MYt M.SpX/C!M)M_ LCSarO C.,vGHa ,R,,,rts rYSHvc rvrGra tCOWlr r4.t If0 Ii CSSINc AOPr N(JT[' i r49DvE GpuaYrn gYIApR ��,r..« 91f.to-..noB A.0[�v.nv.v I:DT:.: pa, ICtAwY.pAtEi Yi AF+ODYrAR OVLr —[YGVA B.M SB« RriA,YI:C WtS A/4 YRDYWH OAI T. •/-,par .%� � r,:,9OU v SA.eDGi.Yv.vq(�wpw pL rvs,p.c coraee —rxAwlol gat r/-xsr ii I: rsioaa,r r uroowr _..-..- .---- i1Rlr F 41G Rfl19 i41.14.G w! A IA MR F R f ftN R[ !W[IR RL1.5L x' Ex1wpw r/) itcu+YY.A!!.«.rAR/ c (I: A4°EJ , a . �r.HAa.rr conuasN[BM/ rwr r aru,00mc caran9.s/tJVM/ t-6�ilyE pr pyE r00AVD -OOSTFG M RAO 8AM STAE4ItYF E451F9 Rw RAP eAA.r s.Asf,r,wv NOTE: SEE BASE WALL CONSTRUCnON OETA& FOR MORE INFORMATION n STAGE I-INITIAL EXCAVATION STAGE 11-BASE WALL EXCAVATION LYawD Opx31[4� , rtDwMf<SIAD,.�v:sT:iKnM 9v,`.rp,,O resl.ec mBn4a—\ R[rANFG 1,ALL .SM fLDGr:Rfw.t Pvr3.r(H! B.v«4L0 iRM RRMFG Rpll srorxnm Lxuwra m«ABOK rov Dr a.rz..� fi xpr Eroc°,°wum4.:9oa r n vro.pov� (/potr O1-94� (11pY b/-94 hAMA44 ARLA itOODtn -' -I - Ip94lEJ J r iB�� I ,ursBil 19D 14 — Q04Y� NOTE: L�p.ar 4rsaa BYIwo rrs nosnrc crupHz SEE INCREASED WALL HEIGHT DETAIL 'r'AF"w•'� FOR MORE INFORMA PON Yr�oc A,Awc - a rcxu Al or.waR.av,nes '• auaY� .r,wM or.rL {i 9 m'ac -' P44t pApapl nr—.Hu �zro.a,s \ Jt wD a� g r,e.W IIOI..s Y nJ �/Yi Aro t'0AII pAO IY OR YYts' to \ a e.T.r s,.puznw urL a __ `rsswc s wv O _ pWR sTRpMZHw O.� Cti[MOG,fD.afROW]m vIXRM�DPUA4n6- A'CM<rG A To K PI% RO�pIG.RD - I Ilui rortLAr wfw{� •'ww� 0 BC AOKD BYy O/O4Lp p Y Itaaw— go 6 .Iv---� 10 4 APVROKO Br LVGxL/+ , 0 n STAGE III-BASE WALL CONSTRUCTION DETAIL 4�AGE IV-INCREASED WALL HEIGHT AT SELECTED LOCATIONS(IF REQUIRED) J 0 N E S P0LGk ■■ 4 4 ` PanGE® �fs:,,,,AL r�:.^ •7-T.--�I vareow,Ewa mtwLTAwrs Ewr[„yt0L SEATTLU.WA9981005 J 0 N E S p06)]6J-0])D IOJSOD KA1NSTRWT smrIt WASVIO[ R06)624JW RETAINING WALL STABILIZATION REED RESIDENCE JULY 24,2001 SEP99.0118 MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning-Landfill-Utilities MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-350) Description of Proposal : PLACE LARGE ROCKS IN FRONT OF EXISTING CONCRETE BANK PROTECTION WALL LOCATED AT OHWM OF LILLIWAUP CREEK AS REPAIR TO PROTECT DAMAGED WALL AT TIMES OF HIGH WATER. Proponent : LILLIWAUP FALLS GENERATING COMPANY Location of Proposal : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PARCEL#:42 14 e 4 2 n ...,.. %/5 3 1 -" a4 &00 d, E1/2 NW NW Below falls at Lilliwaup Creek, adjacent to residence on property, site is located at end of Lilliwaup St, Section 19, T 23N R 3 W. Lead Agency: MASON COUNTY The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. This information is available to the public upon request. MITIGATION MEASURES ARE ATTACHED. Please contact ?�41A (Ira- at ext. Rq LJ with any questions . This DNS is issued under 197-11-350 (2) , the Lead Agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 08/2'04/99 . 23 DATE: 08/)N0/99 a qq Signatu e responsible official Date Responsible Official : Gary Yando (� c Director of Community Development Lit /E' J�v1-E'�2 y�c'S 426 W. Cedar, PO BOX 578 Shelton, WA 98584 D E�— (360) 427-9670 MIT—DNS, rev: 08/23/96 AA r Z-I C IJT Conditions of this Case are listed below: Case No.:SEP99-0118 1 Application pp cation is for repair to concrete bank protection per attached narrative, plans and checklist. Applicant acknowledges that repair plan may need to be modified based on agency comment, and county requirement that project have minimum impact on stream hydrology and habitat. As part of applicants work developing plans with contractor, applicant is to explore options which have the minimum possible impact on stream. This exploration should result in a revised plan. 2) Proposal requires certification from an engineer licensed in the state of washington, which assures the public and Mason County that this project will not negatively impact the stream hydrology or flooding downstream of this project. 3) Temporary erosion control features shall be in place prior to the start of construction and remain in place until the site has stabilized. Upland areas disturbed by this project shall be revegetated and maintained until reveg. has been established. 4) Proposal shall comply with all aspects of the Shoreline Management Act and the local Shoreline Master Program. Lilliwaup Falls Generating Co. P.O. Box 227 Lilliwaup, WA 98555 To whom it may concern: It has recently been brought to my attention that a concrete bulkhead on the Lilliwaup Trust property is in need of repair. The bulkhead acts as a retaining wall to a steep yard that also supports a large house. The bulkhead is made of concrete that was poured sometime in the 1930's. Two professional contractors have inspected the wall and made observations that some immediate attention is needed to repair the bulkhead. There are large cracks and pieces of the wall missing that will allow water to wash away the dirt behind the wall. Currently there are sink holes on the back side of the wall and other areas where the yard has fallen up to a foot or more. At normal winter flows the river will cover the lower portion of the wall and at times of significant floods three quarters of the wall will be subjected to the rivers current. The contractors suggest that we place large rocks along the wall to lessen the flow of current directly impacting the bulkhead. The rocks will have to be installed by a medium sized excavator or another piece of heavy equipment. There is limited access to the area where the rocks need to be placed. Most likely the machery will have to drive on the gravel bar adjasent to Lilliwaup Creek. If the work is done prior to the end of August there will be no negative effects to aquatic life or water quality. However if no work where to be done to the bulkhead small amounts of soil from behind the bulkhead will certainly leak in to Lilliwaup Creek this fall, winter and spring. The worst case senerio would be for the wall to fail completely and deposit large amounts of soil in to Lilliwaup Creek. Work would then have to be done during the salmon and steelhead migration to stabilize the area. I personally feel that if the work were to occur this summer there would be less environmental impact to the surrounding area. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me at(360)877- 9501. Sincerely, Rob Allen I ras �, , lz < 1-1 Cl- n ) rA� t A-5 I D64� 4n L�rc� +@, Ire Pr©+e-o�' Roc 'r ....E X� � 6rokve_j bc. r a i i 1 ;;Vo IVA 9 "OA vva i -A77 �r • _ _ 8 to- 1.1. t2 Ap ff AB. AS ------------ Y 21 22 23 .: 4 :r Y f - - AL 32_ n . 341 ct c• • 'J•A+ 17��• Me, bourne s2 ___ -B _t1 12 �O 0- ;a a _4- - - 22 ._2A- 1 . . .25. 30 -- 25- a: µAVt . 3 .34 55.. l�jo�ra 1.;11. W c, N �funf Gr e- k FG , Tap Prop pS� Pa JGr N ' SheHaty S MASON CO. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 1 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed pro.ect, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: 6c4,r 3. Address and pho e number of applicant and contact person: lyo� 3 v-a A �e.., c-v e4 91 E3io 1 4. ate checklist prepared: 5"� g 5. Agency requesting checklist: 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): cjlls ��'7 y 7. Do you have any plans for future expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes explain. N 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NOA/ 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. �jo DPP? i Ce-, � 10 M's ''*' -to- toe)"Ir It) . 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your e_proposal, if known. A h MASON CO. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 2 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) w� wow f k e �-o p 1G e. I ai r ey e_ rc e-ks re-01"C e- 41-, e oi_ c c.► ram,` , , 4 1C4 i 5 12. What is the location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the. agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications 1L related to this checklist. PC4 y V C 3 1 T p 44..�r-) a 3, S e c- CO n B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. EARTH: a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, olling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? ;Z'r 35 % act C. What general types of soils A foundt on{ther7 sire (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. T1 e_ c_tr ec4, w �, e � e � �, e. prv� e'e.t �'S � d MASON CO. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 3 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. r e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. ct r V C,., r U c.lk 4 Gv t ) y4rcJs . thy. r caCk'5 c.V ! I f c a.� ►e � a .v, et l0c-al 1`0c-k bL4e, ry , f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. e r S 'c vi L4,� i pro L)e g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project constructions (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NCN h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: �- V 2. AIR: a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. Tie vrl em e 16eel-, 4,VI l / 1 T 'rc III f e_ 1?,eAvy n-1,0Y4-' 17 ► MASON CO. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 4 b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NO C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any- NoAle L✓ ► 0 Az `. 3. WATER: a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. ``1 �.reG is 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 1/e$, P fah S 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be place in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that ,)ruld be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. C/ l 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No MASON CO. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 5 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. y e--5 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. N b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. JV p 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example, Domestic sewage: industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural, etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N4 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. A/0 MASON CO. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 6 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Ne) pj 4. PLANTS: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: TA e 5,')e, i S e o J i f''e 14her m c,c.� ® redeciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs _ grass pasture crop or grain _wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NO n e C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. A10ne__ d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if an N� �. •�. , b e_ 4 e, ewe: MASON CO. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 7 5: ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other . . . . . . . . . . . mammals: Ldeer,.'bear., k, beaver, other . . . . . . . . . . . . . fish: bass, on rout herring, shellfish, other . . . . . . b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Non e C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserved or enhance wildlife, if any: No." e. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. A/oh*v, c, ' r'/ l h c_ b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. ND C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: MASON CO. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 8 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH: a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NO 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Nor, e 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: A/ b. Noise. 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? nca vy etLA ; "�1 1 Me e. hvr' 5 e. b&4 f t )1e ct A 'GG Ch t to Y�' Dw •�� rs L� i 1� b� t �tY e nnu h c.� wc� � � Yt � / k Ali. v e. -� 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site 7-j? e— t7 w '.s e t,,-, v e c �,. �� Yr i` �`t Y�0 r►-n k f hk - Sy-7e3s Ao" rS 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise im acts, if any- /� G to • , i r' ;J C 17 "��e�' 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? AVM eS G re �Je. C" IJI � S�s Gold' G c en, prober i ►•es , MASON CO. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 9 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Ak) C. Describe any structures on the site. �wv 1-101,ri e 6, h yclo e. r-)e he,icAer- y , d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? cl 11 kyw t v Y1 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? 44 n xH D w" h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. A/p i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? C)1'1 e Pe, r 6 o r i al" r r ,'rf� h v r r� l j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? /Vdhe_ k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: MASON CO. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 10 I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if an e , 9. HOUSING: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. �/On b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Nor e C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if an p 9 p :Y No j-' -e- 10. AESTHETICS: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The ram ,. i 1 Jae. )-i b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NO IC C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: MASON CO. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 11 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NIC b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N 0 C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal: /V o rr e d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. RECREATION: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Al e;..#1 e b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None-- c,� ; 1 ,b e e e► , MASON CO. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 12 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. IV O b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. A/V O '_ C. Proposed measures to reduce or control im'acts, if any: No r�,� �4 �� /b l i e r e e_P 14. TRANSPORTATION: A. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. nre- o4,(, rie "e-4 ky �Ae_ /1ropc ] l 0 C,W..-?�f, b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. A) � C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? //0 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). MASON CO. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 13 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. or g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Non 15. PUBLIC SERVICES: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public service (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe:�� b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Alone— cv f ) f be. 16. UTILITIES: MASON CO. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Page 14 a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: Cctricit atural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanita.y sewer, septic syste other- b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed: Non L.,-) C. Signature: The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: (2z Date Submitted: