Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIS97-00651 Sprinkler System - MIS Permit / Conditions - 10/3/1997 MASON COUNTY Mason County Bldg, III 426 W, Cedar RO, Box 186 Shelton, Washington 98584 M I S C E L L A N E O U S F- i_ c-s 1'v'i i - FOR I N6PEC i i ONb UALL 427-Ub i o MIS97-0651 PARCEL :41924000000O PLAT : DIV : BLK : LOT : JOB ADDRESS : 780 W STATE ROUTE 108 SHELTON APPLICANT : SKOOKUM LUMBER 426-9721 OWNER : SKOOKUM LUMBER 426-9721 LEGAL : SECTION N RR RIM EX NE114 S1114 PROJECT DESCRIPTION : SPRINKLER SYSTEM PROJECT LOCATION : EXIT HWY 101 AT STATE ROUTE 108 PROCEED WEST ON SR 108 APPROX . ONE MILE LOOK FOR COMPANY SIGN ON NORTH SIDE OF RD . PROCEED UP GRAVEL ROAD TO JOB SITE PROJECT NOTES : TYPE AMOUNT BY DATE RECEIPT SPSY $ 35 .00 KS 10/03/97 228 1-7 TOTAL : 35 .00 OWNER OR AGENT DATE NIS_PRIIT, rev; 04/01192 COMPLIANCE TO ATTACHED CONDITIONS IS REQUIRED MASON COUNTY Mason County Bldg. III 426 W. Cedar RO. Box 186 Shelton, Washington 98584 PERM I T CONU I -T 1 0 rq Case No . : MIS97-0651 For : SKOOKUM LUMBER Page : 1 1 ) 1 . HYDROSTATIC TEST AND PIPING ISNEPCTION REQUIRED . CONATCT THE MASON COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 360-427-9670 EXT . 273 . 2 . IF THE SPRINKLER HEADS IN THIS AREA ARE SUBJECT TO IMPACT DAMAGE , PROVIDE PROTECTIVE RAGES . C t MASON COUNTY BLDG S 4277790 P, 02 I i `• I MASON COUNTY FIRE S { r�Iason Counsy elc� ra are w.cedar O P Y P.O.Box I" shNmn.Wag*vglon"GU c206)427-%70 0005 ENFORCEMENT FIRE INSPECTIONS FIRE INVESTIGATION PUBLIC EDUHEA 10N PERMIT NO. m.T59'A-0(0 MASON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM PERMIT APPLICATION i i NQTEt This application must be completed and accompanied. by a minimum of three (3) copies of plans, ,specifications and applicable calculations per Mason County Fire Protection Standards and brought to the office of the Mason County Fire Marshal. This is 'not a permit, and failure to submit all necessary information will cause a delay and/or rejection of your submittal. When a permit has been issued, you will be notified. j ' PLEASE PRINT i J #1 OWNER 06 l(� L)1✓1 _L-, V M BIZ PHONE Z ' 7 2— 1 I SITE ADDRESS - 7 0 \Ajr5'T 4W`� -0-F FIRE DIST. CITY �j 14C---Lrt0 /1 ZIP DIRECTIONS TO JOB SITE I j C • ; ' OWNER MAILING ADDRESS o5r 41%4 E I CITY STATE ZIP LINK TITLE HOLDER i ADDRESS ' - CITY , #2 CONTRACTOR 5 tj PS, CONTRACTOR REG #G K N = � ADDRESS L 2 i S C t� I- AvLsSo - MCP. DATE 1 IL ; CITY L gIjT STATE IA,IA- ZIP_OLP 0 3Z� I #3 PARCEL # LEGAL DESCRIPTION I '. #4 BLDG. SQ. FT EXISTING/PROPOSED) , 1ST FL / 2ND / 3RD / BAS 2 DECK �— #BR #BATH OARAGM CARPORT / ENCL ATTIC: Y N OTHxR SQ FT J� j USE OF BUILDING #5 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: i ' SPRINKLER: WET DRY � STANDPIPE: WET DRY � AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM CORRIDOR SMOKES ' � 1 HOOD & DUCT 'DRY CEIDU CAL WET CHEMICAL HALON J NEW SYSTXK 1&0DIFICATION 7-NMM)1R OF NSW DEVVICES � MONITORING STATION PHONE . If'35 OCT 19 193 10:z? 4277?98 PPEE•002 MASON COUNTY BLDG E 4277798 P.0" FILE COPY I i #6 DOES YOUR SUBMITTAL INCLUDES 1. DIMENSIONS, SCALE, NORTH ARROW? YES !' NO i 2 . FLOOR PLAN AND CROSS SECTIONAL ELEVATION? YES r! NO_ 3 . ALL CONCEALED SPACES (LABELED COMBUSTXBLS AND NON-COMBUSTIBLE) ? YES NO 4. ALL AREAS ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF NEW WALLS? YE57- 176- 5. CUT SgSBTS OR REFERENCES FOR ALL N-SW DEVICES? YRS � -NO N � 6. LOCATION/DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING DEVICES YES O—_ 7. BATTERY CALCULATIONS FOR FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS? YES NOZ 8. RISER/WIRINC3 DIAGRAM FOR FIRS ALARM SYSTEMS? YZS NO 9 . HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR SPRnmrgn SYSTEMS? YES X6—V' I NOTEt WORK MAY PROCEED ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH A VALID FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM PERMIT ISSUED BY THE MASON COUNTY FIRR MARSHAL. A VALID PERMIT AND AN APPROVED SET OF PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND MUST REMAIN THERE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION IS DONE BY THE MASON COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL. FAILURE TO OBTAIN A VALID PERMIT PRIOR TO WORKING ON A-FIRS PROTECTION SYSTEM AND/OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE THESE PLANS Y .. AND PERMIT FOR THB 'MASON COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL MAY RESULT IN A CITATION AND FINS. i } O�PNER3 AFFIDAVIT I certify that I am exempt from the requirements of the Contrac- tors Registration Law RCW 18.27, and am aware of the Mason County ordinance requirements for which this permit is issued and that all work Will be done in conformance therewith. No changes will be made without first obtaining approval from the Mason County Fire Marshal. I� OWNER DATE Y CONTRA TORS AFFIDAVIT I I certify that I an a currently registered contractor in the State i of Washington and I am aware of the ordinance requirements regiilating the work for which the permit is issued and all work done will be in conformance therewith. No changes will be made without f rst obt ining approval from the Mason County Fire Marsh BY DATE (� A OtT 19 193 10:27 4277798 PAGE.003� MASON COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL Mason County Bldg. III 426 W. Cedar P.O. Box 186 Shelton,Washington 98584 (360)427-9670 CODE ENFORCEMENT FIRE INSPECTIONS FIRE INVESTIGATION PUBLIC EDUCATION February 24, 1997 TO: Grinnell Fire Protection Ken Baker FROM: Dave Salzer Fire Marshal SUBJ: Skookum Mill Sprinkler Test It is my understanding that the mill owners wish to put the Trim Saw Line in operation as soon as possible. To accommodate this, I would expect the following conditions to exist: 1 . The dry sprinkler system will be hydro-tested tested and flow tested. 2. The sprinkler system will be monitored to the panel and to an approved central receiving station. The following conditions shall be monitored: Water Flow, Low Air, all tampers supervised. 3. All manual pull stations in the Trim Saw Building will be operational and connected to the fire alarm panel and zoned to the central receiving station. 4. The fire department connection and adjacent hydrant will be in place and servicable. A question: It is my understanding that the fire pump will not be installed for this test, and that water flow will come from gravity pressure only. If this is the case, can we expect to meet a :60 trip time for the dry system? My availability to test this system is as follows: 2/25 Afternoon only. 2/26 After 3 PM 2/27 Any time 2/28 Not in office r . ` it I will need some time to contact FD 4 to assist in the test, so please advise a time as soon as possible. FEB 27 197 11:20 FR GR1N,NE'_L FIRE PROT 206 959 57—5 TO 13EC4275426 P.03/03 PERAT90N ❑PNEUMATIC �L]E1fCTRIC HYDRAULIC uylsNO PIF1N Slip SEO "TINu IA YES z-oMSv , OPT EM A OLDELtGL A N PREACTICN I F,T VALVES IS T H Fs AN ONO urr Y JACH ERA EA G{R L'IT MAXIMUM 0 �AAKE MODELI SUPERV!S10N LOSS ALAAM 1 OPEJiI1TE vuvwE REIEJLSS OPERATE RELFI+SE I r rei Mrn MI t L trvN Iw w YES NU MIN I h,,.,w tr .Onw sum ww +.M aa�Q 156 am I ryab�rt trr rw raw t y' ,n,ey otd�p..ups.hrl rrtyal T>t57 1r rr ns w Wf r.nui a1r}�wtw CYiiC+n tw rll So_A"Vq two! � � M"� vesc»,PTIoN tir.rrrn Av rr yi T�...I,�►�•,.....run.aw. r r.r rt...r t•'.ss w a t r•+1 ti 24 tti...a r.r tti terwy Y r.m.l Awe W rw.ww. M+ Ay • =�,, N wanaKj.PIPING HYDAW IF N A R ! N�RY PIPING PNFLIMATICALLY TESTrK) YES OUPMDJT OPERATES PROPER!Y YSS Y' U T{F`f TN R1N cL�ti SS'S'EM h i O AN RFl SOC U 13C)r 7E C OFJRNAT.vES GF SOOKJM ZRUC.ATIE,9FI W OR OTHER XAPIRCShT�CHEMJGAi.3 WERE NCT USED FOR TEST- NG SYSTEM QR STJPw iG LEkXST DYES NO, { SIDUALTR 49E rV 7 /E IN i-ff Tam [DRAIN ! CONPIECTION OPEN WIDE PSI ST S,UpPX Y TES CONNECTSCN; PSI UN EIiGA MAIN LBAO'.N ONN „T N Q SY P.S R.1; HF 17 9 E CUNNE TION M:G SPRINKLER PIP"a EXPLAIN RIMED rY COP!OFTHS U POPM NO.7�1�UOTNEALI SHEDSYINSTALLEAOFUNCEFl K3RCUNO SPMINK12R PIPING NUMBER REY VED BLANK TESTING NLMB USEJ3 L TICK GASKETS IWELP PtPIFvu Y NO I YES. Y U TI 'AS TH? RINK NTRA CR THA WE` !NG PR OUR ;,AMPLY (]YES ❑NC THE REOU`IREMF.NTS OP AT LEAST AWS 0I0.9,LEVEL.AX3 DC YOU CF..MFY THAT THE'A'El-CING W LS PERFCRMEO SY WFAMCAS CLAL�R D IN �yms ONO WELDING IGCMPLANCE WCT1i THE RIIOUtFIEMENTS OF AT LEAST AMfS-1o.5.LEVI A 4 00 YOU CZ^-TIFY THAT WGIDLNG WAS CAf1RIE0 OLff IN COWhIANCIE WITH A {o 'MCNTED QUAUTy=Nrrc,-PgOCE,OURE TO INSUFM I-KAT ALL DISCS A ! jRfiTFiZVW.TKAT CPSNIP40S IN PIPING ARE SMOOTH.THAT SLAG ANO OTHER IWELOING AESiflLJE ARE REMOVED.AND THAT THE INTERNAL DIAdAEYERS bF YES NO ---iPPPW.l ARE NOT PENETRATED 7:UTOUTS IW YOU IFY }iAT Y ll HAV A ON L LIRE SERE ,�4AT AL1 1]YES CJNo D{SCS1 CIIfCUTS fDISC31 AAE REIEVEDT YES��NO o IOCES AW PZ(JUIRk A FUNX.-TIONIA'_FL TEST OF RESIDFLNTA..S NKLlsri57 yss G]CIO FLOWTE.ST V.p �nONAL GLOW-EST RESULTS SAT15FAC1OR'rT _N40, 4 CATA NAMEPLATE AYES ❑h10 1N H A". TROLVAL i<J� REMARKS FAOTOR LJ � i;Zw Rtre.c.-�- NT P Q-�"�E�C'C t o t.1 �'�s'i"�M.S Gu f �te.t►a f.J��t 3� 1-1=-- _ WI 89 8Y N D) p{� �►C W F [J/t' TiT F N� i �� SIGUATuFtEs IT =^ OpQINKLER R. JA7E FflR AP AllTH I:.Ew THAT E IN N t I ItI T TNI SYS M WAS IN IN ACCORD WITH RCw 1&lee ANO THE RULES ADOPTED BY THE YJASHINGTON ADbUNSTF ATIVE CODE A3 AC MIN C1:PJED 3( IT CERTIFICATION ESTATE PMMARSKAL �K� �.A G L.0�� t7Dw -1f- 1� C AT EPTiRICATE FIEGISTRArON P__ .ZOkj AI ric« Till WA SACK Mr TOTAL PRGE.03 ** ia;s3V►�^,1 r 03NAdO 61 NOI OHNNQO 1§31 S1d 10a 46Mi 3Wi1 riO90 QidnSYMN N 1 + f OQO ON i s3A 1 '03 1 'MVI I Ed N1Y'I 15=1 /^W-ndOd1 I 131=Is emawd wry linsswigi SbnBSmid NCi1tJ NN= ONLLW34i0 QivtradC I C21m--F 7d 1MCW d11d1 yfr !laym 1231 nwH1 341141 Awa Wtib'�t f lYM 1 f ON1YIk'3S 1 130 W 1 kYW I N W 3A1YA 440 I I I I I I I I � I I I !lO14�IaNl S NSYti 13COM1 , xrw IAO'i k!o NOIL'3dNNCOt lhlfjflJldl-!1 RAWA sZLYdsdO 013mu W(1!N(xyw SOIA30 MY'd1' V nuT IT III SVOLIM d0"Al 40Nuud 3dld/O 1fa1A1 QNW adsd I I I I i i I I I I I I I I I Skd?'1�NItllS I 1 E)Nllw :,1::xvno MIS 9dn4vtripe w noon axYw 3ti� bl d l I I 'Ol i 1 #q VA r SON101t!18 5311ddRs I MILSAS dG Noclvaal ON SsA .__ YC1 YddN L ON� SiAr7 SNOtlnCn ISN130NYN31NWACNVRWYJ Z ONa Sd1. SNOLLOMUSM S.LN3HOdW0 1 O NOLSAS ' SNOLLohIilSNI ON S3 � 3SIW9Wd all DNIMOTOd'9R1 22 S I 3AYH • Nfrl'1dX3'ON sM "N3WdIn03 M3N SM1 d0 a3MT131.Nrv74 CW at'Y0 ONY r3A7YA 10Ld1NC:dfl N 12 S3A T", N Il 1 99,N W tf103 5WH C 3D!lY40 NI N sY1.1 SNOt1YlAD0 Nwida'ON-C CN[] S-aJ'm Ct3AObddd SI 03Sn.LN3ndif103 4NYld N S3ASWId Q31c3 t VftodN00 t2IYM�12 ssawoay 1 N IA !! AB a lj�ro 'V I`A H®�.�1 �1 I �.rrl� ' n� O Q'111'1%-A Ya I Wan Wf'd �� `?���1 w n-1 1/`i 7)7 DO� 5 iWVN A.Lki')� •saousulpjo rvaq A cuawennbai s,As 0W;ns au:ADlddo u: ydww o3 a.nIMI JO'd1V9uW WNjom good lvimsw Aims;Act i tavAuoossupEs wlllpAus sso+pnjud Aoakou ut sHuvv!Is t,a'Apinuassxdsu s,rsuwe•W poc •iapjn slu Jo=snum pus' ,--Lmo'sasiyoysns Ouu+ojddSxi ps»dud oq If"ssldo0 •ss,ustwssaidau Woo Aq pouBR puslno Wt19 sq IMM stouysr '001"a+*ai AIlsuet pwuos»d t,j=vjtvoo uaioq aoutios uI 401 watvis pus papsmm oq II*I =fi$9p Ih'•aAnsluacauds,%,JsuMo LM Aq passaus"puo•An*uo$*JOsJ s,u4*snuao MAq opt++oq IMW coat putt u sus'V"po uopstdwoo vac ��- .� lfli(1 Q1oOt ONIdId ONn0kM3A08H M0d 1ti0d3V 1S3.L `�'1VIUR.LVW SHOJOVULNG a�troe AtloslA�v, �3 N11j �al� V �o1�do s,YHsavw 3d�d 3�.s 'v��Nrksv. 92bScZb09�L 01 :SS'S 6S8 902 iDNd 3HIA 113kv ,IdJ dd 6i :Ii �,6, �2 99d r- International Conference of Building Officials REGIONAL OFFICE: 2122-112th AVENUE, N.E.,SUITE B-300 • BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 • (206)451-9541 BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFFICES OF CHAIRMAN j anuary 15, 1997 JERRY J.BARBERA,P.E. THOMAS R.THOMPSON,C.B.O. SENIOR MANAGER BUILDING OFFICIAL CHARLES J.WILLIAMS,P.E.,S.E. BROOMFIELD,COLORADO Plan Review No.: 7666 SENIOR STAFF ENGINEER FIRST VICE-CHAIRMAN Project:D Skookum Lumber FAX(206)637-8939 ASS ALAN P.STANT VELOPMENT Address: 780 W Hwy 108 jjbarberC ix.netcom.com SIERVICES DIRECTOR PHOENIX,ARIZONA SPRINKLER PLAN REVIEW SECOND VICE-CHAIRMAN KENNETH G.LARSEN,C.B.O. DIRECTOR OF BUILDING AND HOUSING CHULA VISTA,CALIFORNIA _ Dave Salzer IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIRMAN RON PERKEREWICZ,C.B.O. iu�.iratua.aa� "+r ''^� PP1111 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mason County COUNTY OF KITSAP P.O. Box 186 " PORT ORCHARD,WASHINGTON N I n 16 1%7 THOMAS C.ANDERSON Shelton,WA 98584 L/Pu BUILDING OFFICIAL HOPKINS,MINNESOTA FREDS.CULLUM Dear Mr. Salzer: 7.NERP_ SERVICES BUILDING OFFICIAL BURLINGAME,CALIFORNIA PAUL T.EDGERTON We have reviewed the automatic sprinkler system plans and calculations submitted by MANAGER,BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT Grinnell Fire Protection and stamped/sealed by Dan McLuen for the above named VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON facility. The dry pipe sprinkler system has been designed to provide a density of ROGER A.EVANSBUILDING SERVICES .30/2 438 sq. ft. based upon an Extra Hazard Group 1 occupancy. The plan set consists DIRECTOR OF BUILDING SERVICES � SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH of drawing FP1, 2,3,5,6, and 7. Our comments are: FRED HERMAN CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL PALO ALTO,CALIFORNIA 1. The fire pump suction line appears to be arranged In such a manner that creates CODES ADMINISTRATOR an air pocket between the 12" suction main and the suction flange to the fire pump. In LAKEWOOD,COLORADO accordance with NFPA 20 section 2-9.6 (a),the suction pipe should be laid carefully to RONALD L NIENABER,C.B.O. DIRECTOR OF INSPECTIONS avoid air leaks and air pockets, either of which may seriously affect the operation of the MAPLE GROVE,MINNESOTA pump The suction piping should be revised to avoid creating air pockets in the suction JOHN E.PIERCE,C.B.O. BUILDING OFFICIAL line. PLANO,TEXAS LARRY W.RICHARDS,C.B.O. BUILDING SAFETY DIRECTOR 2. NFPA 20 2-13.10 requires the relief valve to discharge back into the reservoir, GLENDALE,ARIZONA if tl:e supply to the fire pump is from a suction reservoir of limited capacity. Although RAIMAR W.SCHULLER,C.B.O. DIRECTOR,BUILDING DEPARTMENT no details have been provided of the suction reservoir,the Building/Fire official should NEWPORT BEACH,CALIFORNIA determine if the relief valve discharge should be piped back into the tank or remain as RON K.WATTS,C.B.O. CHIEF OF BUILDING INSPECTIONS submitted. BUILDING SAFETY DIVISION ANCHORAGE,ALASKA DONALD L WOLFE,PE. 3. The fire pump including controller,fuel supply and all other components should DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ,,7� �7� 7�TC COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, be furnished and installed]n accordance with NFPA PA 20. ALHAMBRA,CAUFORNIA PRESIDENT 4. Verification should be made that the existing tank supplying suction conforms JON S.TRAW.P.E. to the requirements of NFPA 22. 5 The sprinkler deflector shown as T' below the bottom of the steel"Z"purlin(15 I/2" to roof deck) should be shown no more than 6" below the bottom of the"Z"purlin Home Page:hnp://www.icbo.org Main Office: 5360 Workman Mill Road 0 Whittier,California 90601-2298 0 (310)699-0541 Plan Review No.: 7666 Dave Salzer,Mason County January 15, 1997 Page 2 to comply with NFPA 13 4-4.1.4.2. Sprinkler deflectors can be 22" below the ceiling/roof deck provided they are within 1"to 6" of the bottom of the purlin. 6. A sprinkler head should be shown protecting the interior of the dry pipe valve enclosure. 7. The 8" supply to the dry pipe valve is shown located in a space that appears to be unheated Notes on sheet 5 of 7 indicates that this piping is"heat traced". NFPA 13 4-5.4.1.2 requires that supply pipes that pass through areas exposed to freezing be protected against freezing with insulated coverings, frost proof casings, or other reliable means capable of maintaining a minimum temperature of 40OF. Verification should be made that the"heat tracing"protecting the supply pipe is U.L listed for this use. It is recommended that the protection of the piping from freezing be supervised so that notification is provided if there is a failure in the protection. 8. Plans indicate the air capacity of the dry system exceeds 1,066 gallons. Section 3-2.3.1 of UBC Standard 9-1 limits the capacity of dry systems to 750 gallons unless the system is designed such that water is delivered to the inspector test connection in not more than 60 seconds, starting at the normal air pressure on the system. It is recommended that the system be redesigned and additional dry systems added to reduce any one system capacity to no greater than 750 gallons. Failure to successfully pass the 60 second test for the dry pipe system may result in the requirement for substantial revisions to the system,after initial installation,to comply with UBC 9-1/NFPA 13 requirements. 9. Notes on sheet 2 of 7 indicate that the"Existing Planer/Trim Saw"building located to the east of this building is not a part of this contract. No sprinklers are shown in this building. It should be noted that the basis for the design requirements of NFPA 13 is that sprinklers are installed throughout the premises. This is to prevent fire from starting in unsprinklered portions of a building and spreading to the sprinklered areas and overpowering the sprinkler system. Unless standard fire barriers are provided to separate the sprinklered from the unsprinklered areas, sprinklers should be provided in the "Existing Planer/Trim Saw"building area. See comment#8 above regarding the air capacity of the system. Additional sprinklers if provided for this area should be supplied from a separate dry system unless the total air capacity of the system does not exceed 750 gallons. 10. Line hanger detail#5 should be corrected to show the connection of the side beam bracket to the"Z"purlin to be a 3/8" bolt and nut to comply with NFPA 13 2-6.4.6. 11. NFPA 13 4-5.4.3.5.10 does not allow the use of C-type clamps(including beam and large flange clamps), with or without retaining straps to be used to attach sway bracing to the building structure. Both E.Q. brace#1 and#2 details on sheet 2 of 7 indicate that the sway braces are attached to the structure with beam clamps. Unless these clamps are specifically tested and listed for use as sway braces(documentation should be provided)they should be replaced with connections to the structure that meet NFPA 13. 12. Sheet 2 of 7 shows two open sprinklers protecting an opening between the existing and rebuilt buildings at grid line"A". Sheet 6 of 7, detail C shows a detail of a two head"water curtain"riser. The Plan Review No.: 7666 Dave Salzer,Mason County January 15, 1997 Page 3 arrangement of this system does not appear to conform to the requirements of NFPA 13. NFPA 13 requires that valves and devices controlling sprinklers be listed for that specific use. It does not appear that the 1 '/2' solenoid valve connected to the fire alarm panel meets the requirements of NFPA 13. The galvanized piping running underground to the Fire Department Connection should be coated and wrapped,with joints field-coated and wrapped after assembly in accordance with NFPA 24 for corrosion protection. 14. The fire pump and fire pump equipment should be supervised in accordance with NFPA 20. Our headquarters accounting department in Whittier, California will send you an invoice for this plan reviewing service based on 4 hours of professional time($300). Per your request, we are returning all copies of check prints to the designer. The designer should revise the plans as advised above,include a separate response sheet, and return the revised plans to you for a final check. 0 y yours, OL Charles J. Williams, S.E. Seattle Conference Services Senior Staff Engineer Pkw cc: Don McLuen, Grinnell Fire Protection Enclosure s GRINNELL FIRE PROTECTION 1215 CENTRAL AVENUE S - SUITE 128 APPROVED KENT, WA 98032 IRE M,11i 44 HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR SKOOKUM LUMBER - PLANERMILL REBUILD - SOUTH END CALL. 780 W.HWY 108 SHELTON,WA FILE NUMBER: 41.3086356 DATE: 11-12-96 -DESIGN DATA- OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: EXTRA HAZARD GRP. I DENSITY: .30 gpm/sq. ft . AREA OF APPLICATION: 2438 sq. ft . COVERAGE PER SPRINKLER: 100 sq. ft . MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SPRINKLERS CALCULATED: 26 sprinklers TOTAL SPRINKLER WATER FLOW REQUIRED: 892 . 0 gpm TOTAL WATER REQUIRED (including hose) : 1392 . 0 gpm FLOW AND PRESSURE (@ BOR) : 892 . 0 gpm @ 86 . 2 psi SPRINKLER ORIFICE SIZE: 17/32 inch NAME OF CONTRACTOR: GRINNELL FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN/LAYOUT BY: A. CHANG AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: MASON COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION NUMBER: GRINNFP137LE CALCULATIONS BY HASS COMPUTER PROGRAM (LICENSE # 4 C1324J ) HRS SYSTEMS, INC. ATLANTA, GA f SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 1 Date : 12/09/1996 SKOOLMBR.SDF JOB TITLE: SKOOKUM LUMBER - PLANER MILL REBUILT WATER SUPPLY DATA SOURCE STATIC RESID. FLOW AVAIL. TOTAL REQ'D NODE PRESS . PRESS . @ PRESS . @ DEMAND PRESS . TAG (PSI) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) SRC (N/A) 75 . 0 (N/A) 75 .0 1392 . 0 65 . 9 AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS : TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE 1392 . 0 GPM TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 400 .0 GPM OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES 100 . 0 GPM TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS 892 .0 GPM NODE ANALYSIS DATA NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) 1 15 .2 K= 8 . 00 14 .1 30 . 0 2 14 . 0 K= 8 .00 14 . 9 30 .9 3 12 .5 K= 8 . 00 16 . 6 32 . 6 4 11 . 5 K= 8 . 00 19 .5 35 .3 5 10 . 2 K= 8 . 00 24 .4 39 .5 6 15 .2 K= 8 . 00 14 . 1 30 . 1 7 14 . 0 K= 8 .00 15 .0 30 . 9 8 12 . 5 K= 8 . 00 16 .7 32 . 7 9 11 . 5 K= 8 . 00 19 .6 35 .4 10 10 . 2 K= 8 . 00 24 . 5 39 . 6 11 15 .2 K= 8 . 00 12 . 8 28 . 6 12 14 . 0 K= 8 . 00 13 . 6 29 .5 13 12 . 5 K= 8 . 00 15 .3 31 .3 14 11 . 5 K= 8 . 00 17 .9 33 . 9 15 10 .2 K= 8 . 00 26 .6 41 .2 16 15 .2 K= 8 . 00 13 .2 29 . 1 17 14 . 0 K= 8 . 00 14 .1 30 .0 18 12 . 5 K= 8 . 00 15 .8 31 . 8 19 11 .5 K= 8 . 00 18 .5 34 .4 20 10 .2 K= 8 . 00 27 .3 41 . 8 21 15 .2 K= 8 . 00 15 .7 31 . 7 22 14 . 0 K= 8 .00 16 . 6 32 . 5 23 12 . 5 K= 8 .00 18 .4 34 .3 24 11 . 5 K= 8 . 00 21 .5 37 . 1 25 10 .2 K= 8 . 00 26 .9 41 . 5 26 10 . 2 K= 8 . 00 33 .4 46 . 2 27 8 . 8 - - - - 29 .3 - - - 28 8 . 8 - - - - 29 .4 - - - 29 8 . 8 - - - - 29 . 8 - - - 30 8 .8 - - - - 30 .7 - - - 31 8 .8 - - - - 32 .1 - - - 32 8 . 8 - - - - 34 .4 - - - 33 21 . 8 - - - - 66 . 0 - - - 34 21 . 8 - - - - 68 . 1 - - SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 2 Date : 12/09/1996 SKOOLMBR. SDF JOB TITLE: SKOOKUM LUMBER - PLANER MILL REBUILT NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) 35 21 . 8 - - - - 72 . 6 - - - TR 20 . 0 - - - - 74 . 7 - - - BR 0 . 0 HOSE STREAM 86 .2 100 . 0 POC 0 . 0 - - - - 86 . 8 - - - SRC 50 . 0 SOURCE 65 . 9 992 . 0 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 3 Date : 12/09/1996 SKOOLMBR.SDF JOB TITLE: SKOOKUM LUMBER - PLANER MILL REBUILT PIPE DATA PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS . END ELEV. NOZ . PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe : 1 -30 .0 1 . 682 PL 7 . 62 PF 0 .3 1 15 .2 8 .0 14 .1 30 . 0 4 .3 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .5 2 14 .0 8 . 0 14 . 9 30 . 9 0 .039 TL 7 .62 PV 0 . 1 Pipe: 2 -60 . 9 1 .682 PL 7 .62 PF 1 .1 2 14 . 0 8 .0 14 . 9 30 . 9 8 . 8 100 FTG ---- PE 0 . 6 3 12 .5 8 .0 16 . 6 32 .6 0 .143 TL 7 .62 PV 0 .5 Pipe: 3 -93 .5 1 .682 PL 7 .62 PF 2 .4 3 12 .5 8 .0 16 . 6 32 .6 13 .5 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .4 4 11 .5 8 . 0 19 . 5 35 .3 0 . 317 TL 7 . 62 PV 1 .2 Pipe: 4 -128 .8 1 . 682 PL 7 .62 PF 4 .4 4 11 .5 8 . 0 19 . 5 35 .3 18 . 6 100 FTG ---- PE 0 . 5 5 10 .2 8 . 0 24 .4 39 .5 0 .574 TL 7 .62 PV 2 .3 Pipe : 5 -168 .4 2 . 154 PL 1 . 83 PF 4 .2 5 10 .2 8 . 0 24 .4 39 .5 14 .8 100 FTG ET PE 0 .6 27 8 .8 0 . 0 29 .3 0 . 0 0 .282 TL 14 . 92 PV 1 . 5 Pipe: 6 -30 .1 1 .682 PL 7 . 62 PF 0 . 3 6 15 . 2 8 . 0 14 . 1 30 . 1 4 . 3 100 FTG ---- PE 0 . 5 7 14 .0 8 . 0 15 . 0 30 . 9 0 .039 TL 7 . 62 PV 0 . 1 Pipe: 7 -61 . 0 1 . 682 PL 7 . 62 PF 1 . 1 7 14 . 0 8 .0 15 . 0 30 . 9 8 .8 100 FTG ---- PE 0 . 6 8 12 .5 8 . 0 16 . 7 32 . 7 0 . 144 TL 7 . 62 PV 0 .5 Pipe: 8 -93 . 7 1 . 682 PL 7 . 62 PF 2 .4 8 12 .5 8 . 0 16 . 7 32 . 7 13 . 5 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .4 9 11 .5 8 . 0 19 . 6 35 .4 0 .319 TL 7 .62 PV 1 .2 Pipe : 9 -129 . 1 1 . 682 PL 7 . 62 PF 4 .4 9 11 . 5 8 . 0 19 . 6 35 .4 18 .6 100 FTG ---- PE 0 . 5 10 10 .2 8 .0 24 .5 39 . 6 0 .576 TL 7 .62 PV 2 .3 Pipe: 10 -168 .7 2 .154 PL 1 .83 PF 4 .2 10 10 .2 8 .0 24 .5 39 . 6 14 . 9 100 FTG ET PE 0 . 6 28 8 .8 0 .0 29 .4 0 . 0 0 .283 TL 14 . 92 PV 1 .5 Pipe: 11 -28 . 6 1 . 682 PL 7 . 62 PF 0 .3 11 15 .2 8 . 0 12 . 8 28 . 6 4 . 1 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .5 12 14 .0 8 . 0 13 . 6 29 .5 0 . 036 TL 7 . 62 PV 0 . 1 Pipe: 12 -58 .2 1 . 682 PL 7 . 62 PF 1 . 0 12 14 .0 8 . 0 13 . 6 29 .5 8 .4 100 FTG ---- PE 0 . 6 13 12 .5 8 .0 15 .3 31 .3 0 . 132 TL 7 .62 PV 0 .5 Pipe: 13 -89 .4 1 . 682 PL 7 .62 PF 2 .2 13 12 .5 8 . 0 15 .3 31 .3 12 .9 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .4 14 11 .5 8 .0 17 . 9 33 .9 0 .292 TL 7 .62 PV 1 . 1 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 4 Date : 12/09/1996 SKOOLMBR.SDF JOB TITLE: SKOOKUM LUMBER - PLANER MILL REBUILT PIPE DATA (cont . ) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS . END ELEV. NOZ . PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 14 -123 .3 1 . 682 PL 8 .20 PF 8 . 1 14 11 .5 8 . 0 17 . 9 33 . 9 17 . 8 100 FTG 2E PE 0 .5 15 10 .2 8 . 0 26 . 6 41 . 2 0 .529 TL 15 . 27 PV 2 . 1 Pipe: 15 -164 .5 2 .154 PL 0 .87 PF 2 . 6 15 10 .2 8 . 0 26 .6 41 .2 14 .5 100 FTG T PE 0 . 6 29 8 .8 0 . 0 29 . 8 0 .0 0 .270 TL 9 .59 PV 1 .4 Pipe: 16 -29 .1 1 . 682 PL 7 .62 PF 0 .3 16 15 .2 8 .0 13 .2 29 . 1 4 .2 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .5 17 14 . 0 8 . 0 14 . 1 30 . 0 0 . 037 TL 7 . 62 PV 0 . 1 Pipe : 17 -59 . 1 1 . 682 PL 7 . 62 PF 1 . 0 17 14 .0 8 . 0 14 .1 30 . 0 8 . 5 100 FTG ---- PE 0 . 6 18 12 .5 8 . 0 15 . 8 31 .8 0 . 136 TL 7 .62 PV 0 .5 Pipe : 18 -90 . 9 1 . 682 PL 7 . 62 PF 2 .3 18 12 .5 8 . 0 15 . 8 31 . 8 13 . 1 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .4 19 11 .5 8 . 0 18 . 5 34 .4 0 . 301 TL 7 . 62 PV 1 . 2 Pipe: 19 -125 .3 1 . 682 PL 8 .20 PF 8 .3 19 11 .5 8 . 0 18 . 5 34 .4 18 . 1 100 FTG 2E PE 0 .5 20 10 .2 8 . 0 27 .3 41 . 8 0 .545 TL 15 .27 PV 2 .2 Pipe: 20 -167 . 1 2 . 154 PL 0 . 87 PF 2 . 7 20 10 .2 8 . 0 27 .3 41 . 8 14 .7 100 FTG T PE 0 . 6 30 8 . 8 0 . 0 30 . 7 0 . 0 0 .278 TL 9 . 59 PV 1 . 5 Pipe: 21 -31 . 7 1 . 682 PL 7 . 62 PF 0 .3 21 15 .2 8 .0 15 . 7 31 . 7 4 . 6 100 FTG ---- PE 0 . 5 22 14 . 0 8 . 0 16 .6 32 .5 0 . 043 TL 7 . 62 PV 0 . 1 Pipe : 22 -64 . 2 1 . 682 PL 7 . 62 PF 1 . 2 22 14 .0 8 . 0 16 .6 32 .5 9 .3 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .6 23 12 .5 8 . 0 18 .4 34 .3 0 . 158 TL 7 . 62 PV 0 . 6 Pipe: 23 -98 . 6 1 . 682 PL 7 . 62 PF 2 .7 23 12 .5 8 . 0 18 .4 34 .3 14 .2 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .4 24 11 .5 8 . 0 21 .5 37 . 1 0 .350 TL 7 . 62 PV 1 .4 Pipe: 24 -135 .7 1 . 682 PL 7 . 62 PF 4 . 8 24 11 .5 8 .0 21 .5 37 . 1 19 .6 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .5 25 10 . 2 8 . 0 26 . 9 41 . 5 0 . 631 TL 7 . 62 PV 2 . 6 Pipe: 25 -177 . 1 2 . 154 PL 1 . 83 PF 4 . 6 25 10 .2 8 .0 26 .9 41 .5 15 . 6 100 FTG ET PE 0 . 6 31 8 .8 0 .0 32 .1 0 . 0 0 . 310 TL 14 . 92 PV 1 . 6 Pipe: 26 -46 .2 2 .154 PL 1 . 83 PF 0 .4 26 10 .2 8 . 0 33 .4 46 . 2 4 . 1 100 FTG ET PE 0 . 6 32 8 . 8 0 . 0 34 .4 0 . 0 0 . 026 TL 14 . 92 PV 0 .1 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 5 Date: 12/09/1996 SKOOLMBR.SDF JOB TITLE: SKOOKUM LUMBER - PLANER MILL REBUILT PIPE DATA (cont . ) PIPE TAG Q (GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS . END ELEV. NOZ . PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L. /FT (PSI) Pipe: 28 -168 .4 4 .357 PL 12 .50 PF 0 .1 27 8 . 8 0 .0 29 .3 0 .0 3 .6 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .0 28 8 . 8 0 .0 29 .4 0 . 0 0 . 009 TL 12 .50 PV 0 .1 Pipe: 29 -337 . 1 4 .357 PL 12 . 50 PF 0 .4 28 8 . 8 0 .0 29 .4 0 .0 7 .3 100 FTG ---- PE 0 . 0 29 8 . 8 0 . 0 29 . 8 0 .0 0 .033 TL 12 .50 PV 0 .4 Pipe: 30 -501 .6 4 .352 PL 12 .50 PF 0 .9 29 8 . 8 0 .0 29 . 8 0 .0 10 . 8 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .0 30 8 . 8 0 .0 30 .7 0 .0 0 . 069 TL 12 . 50 PV 0 . 8 Pipe: 31 -668 .7 4 .352 PL 12 .50 PF 1 .5 30 8 . 8 0 . 0 30 . 7 0 . 0 14 .4 100 FTG ---- PE 0 . 0 31 8 . 8 0 . 0 32 . 1 0 . 0 0 .118 TL 12 .50 PV 1 .4 Pipe : 32 -845 . 8 4 .352 PL 12 . 50 PF 2 . 3 31 8 .8 0 .0 32 . 1 0 . 0 18 .2 100 FTG ---- PE 0 . 0 32 8 .8 0 . 0 34 .4 0 . 0 0 .182 TL 12 . 50 PV 2 . 2 Pipe: 33 -892 . 0 4 .352 PL 133 . 00 PF 37 .2 32 8 . 8 0 . 0 34 .4 0 . 0 19 .2 100 FTG 3ET PE -5 . 6 33 21 .8 0 . 0 66 . 0 0 . 0 0 .201 TL 185 . 14 PV 2 .5 Pipe : 34 -892 . 0 6 . 357 PL 40 . 00 PF 2 . 1 33 21 . 8 0 .0 66 . 0 0 . 0 9 . 0 100 FTG T PE 0 . 0 34 21 . 8 0 . 0 68 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 032 TL 66 . 92 PV 0 .5 Pipe: 35 -892 . 0 6 . 357 PL 102 . 16 PF 4 . 5 34 21 . 8 0 . 0 68 . 1 0 . 0 9 . 0 100 FTG ET PE 0 . 0 35 21 .8 0 . 0 72 .6 0 .0 0 .032 TL 141 . 64 PV 0 .5 Pipe: 36 -892 . 0 6 .357 PL 2 .16 PF 1 . 3 35 21 . 8 0 . 0 72 .6 0 .0 9 . 0 100 FTG ET PE 0 . 8 TR 20 .0 0 . 0 74 . 7 0 . 0 0 . 032 TL 41 . 64 PV 0 .5 Pipe: 37 -892 . 0 6 . 357 PL 24 . 00 PF 2 .9 TR 20 .0 0 . 0 74 . 7 0 .0 9 . 0 100 FTG ECBD PE 8 .7 BR 0 . 0 H.S . 86 .2 100 . 0 0 .032 TL 91 . 30 PV 0 .5 Pipe: 38 -992 . 0 8 . 510 PL 50 . 00 PF 0 . 6 BR 0 . 0 H.S . 86 .2 100 . 0 5 . 6 140 FTG TG PE 0 . 0 POC 0 . 0 0 . 0 86 . 8 0 . 0 0 .005 TL 117 . 13 PV 0 .2 Pipe: 39 -992 . 0 12 .580 PL 865 . 00 PF 0 . 8 POC 0 . 0 0 .0 86 . 8 0 . 0 2 . 6 140 FTG ETG PE -21 .7 SRC 50 .0 SRCE 65 .9 (N/A) 0 .001 TL1015 . 09 PV 0 .0 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 6 Date: 12/09/1996 SKOOLMBR.SDF JOB TITLE : SKOOKUM LUMBER - PLANER MILL REBUILT NOTES : (1) Calculations were performed by the HASS 6 . 1 .0 computer program under license no. 4 C1324J granted by HRS Systems, Inc. 2193 Ranchwood Dr. , N.E. Atlanta, GA 30345 (2) The system has been balanced to provide an average imbalance at each node of 0 . 001 gpm and a maximum imbalance at any node of 0 . 053 gpm. (3) Velocity pressures are printed for information only, and are not used in balancing the system. Maximum water velocity is 19 . 6 ft/sec at pipe 24 . (4) PIPE FITTINGS TABLE Pipe 1 N TANDARD.PIP e Table Name: S PAGE: * MATERIAL: S40 HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly A1mChk DPVly 1 . 682 4 . 95 9 . 90 2 .47 11 . 14 7 .42 1 .24 12 .37 12 .37 2 . 154 6 . 11 12 . 22 3 . 67 13 .45 7 .33 1 .22 12 .22 12 .22 4 . 352 14 . 61 29 . 22 8 . 77 32 .14 17 .53 2 . 92 29 . 22 14 . 61 4 .357 14 .69 29 . 39 8 . 82 32 .32 17 .63 2 .94 29 .39 14 . 69 6 .357 17 . 60 37 . 72 11 . 32 40 .23 12 .57 3 . 77 35 .21 23 . 89 8 . 510 23 .30 45 .30 16 . 83 58 . 24 15 .53 5 . 18 45 .30 34 .94 12 . 580 32 . 76 72 . 81 21 . 84 78 . 88 25 .48 7 .28 59 .46 42 .47 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 7 Date : 12/09/1996 SKOOLMBR.SDF JOB TITLE: SKOOKUM LUMBER - PLANER MILL REBUILT WATER SUPPLY CURVE 84+ 77+ 70+ X 63+ P 56+ R E S S 49+ U R E 42+ P S I 35+ 28+ 21+ 14+ LEGEND " „ X = Required Water Supply " 65 . 90 psi @ 1392 . 0 gpm " 7+ " 0 = Available Water Supply 75 .00 psi @ 1392 . 0 gpm " 0++-+---+----+-----+------+--------+--------+---------+-----------+ 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 FLOW (GPM) GRINNELL FIRE PROTECTION 1215 CENTRAL AVENUE S - SUITE 128 KENT, WA 98032 HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR SKOOKUM LUMBER - EXISTING BUILDING SPRINKLER ADDITIONG 780 W.HWY 108 SHELTON,WA FILE NUMBER: 41 . 3086356 DATE : 11-12-96 -DESIGN DATA- OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: EXTRA HAZARD GRP. I DENSITY: . 30 gpm/sq. ft . AREA OF APPLICATION: 2385 sq. ft . COVERAGE PER SPRINKLER: 100 sq. ft . MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SPRINKLERS CALCULATED: 27 sprinklers TOTAL SPRINKLER WATER FLOW REQUIRED : 1122 . 3 gpm TOTAL WATER REQUIRED (including hose) : 1622 . 3 gpm FLOW AND PRESSURE (@ BOR) : 1122 . 3 gpm @ 83 . 7 psi SPRINKLER ORIFICE SIZE : 17/32 inch NAME OF CONTRACTOR: GRINNELL FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN/LAYOUT BY: A. CHANG AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: MASON COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION NUMBER: GRINNFP137LE CALCULATIONS BY HASS COMPUTER PROGRAM (LICENSE # 4 C1324J ) HRS SYSTEMS, INC. ATLANTA, GA I SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 1 Date : 12/09/1996 SKOLMBR2 .SDF JOB TITLE : SKOOKUM LUMBER - EXISTING BUILDING SPRINKLER ADDITION WATER SUPPLY DATA SOURCE STATIC RESID. FLOW AVAIL. TOTAL REQ'D NODE PRESS . PRESS . @ PRESS . @ DEMAND PRESS . TAG (PSI) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) (GPM) (PSI) SRC (N/A) 75 . 0 (N/A) 75 . 0 1622 . 3 64 . 0 AGGREGATE FLOW ANALYSIS : TOTAL FLOW AT SOURCE 1622 . 3 GPM TOTAL HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCE AT SOURCE 400 . 0 GPM OTHER HOSE STREAM ALLOWANCES 100 . 0 GPM TOTAL DISCHARGE FROM ACTIVE SPRINKLERS 1122 . 3 GPM NODE ANALYSIS DATA NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) 41 19 . 5 K= 8 . 00 46 . 8 54 . 7 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 2 Date: 12/09/1996 SKOLMBR2 .SDF JOB TITLE: SKOOKUM LUMBER - EXISTING BUILDING SPRINKLER ADDITION NODE TAG ELEVATION NODE TYPE PRESSURE DISCHARGE (FT) (PSI) (GPM) 42 20 .3 K= 8 . 00 39 .6 50 .3 43 21 .2 K= 8 . 00 37 .4 48 .9 44 21 .3 K= 8 . 00 11 .3 26 .9 45 20 . 8 K= 8 .00 12 .1 27 .8 46 20 .3 K= 8 . 00 14 .4 30 .4 47 19 . 8 K= 8 . 00 19 .4 35 .2 48 19 .3 K= 8 .00 28 .7 42 . 9 49 18 .8 K= 8 .00 38 .5 49 .7 50 19 . 5 K= 8 .00 46 .9 54 . 8 51 20 .3 K= 8 .00 39 .7 50 .4 52 21 .2 K= 8 . 00 37 .4 49 .0 53 21 .3 K= 8 . 00 13 .3 29 .2 54 20 . 8 K= 8 .00 14 .2 30 .2 55 20 .3 K= 8 . 00 16 . 9 32 .9 56 19 .8 K= 8 . 00 22 . 6 38 .1 57 19 .3 K= 8 . 00 33 .4 46 .2 58 18 . 8 K= 8 . 00 41 . 5 51 . 6 59 19 .5 K= 8 .00 49 .6 56 .4 60 20 .3 K= 8 . 00 42 . 0 51 .8 61 21 .2 K= 8 .00 39 .7 50 .4 62 21 .3 K= 8 .00 11 .5 27 . 1 63 20 .8 K= 8 . 00 12 .3 28 .1 64 20 .3 K= 8 .00 14 .7 30 .6 65 19 . 8 K= 8 . 00 19 . 7 35 .5 66 19 .3 K= 8 . 00 29 .1 43 .2 67 18 . 8 K= 8 .00 39 . 1 50 . 0 68 19 . 3 - - - - 51 .3 - - - 69 19 .3 - - - - 51 .4 - - - 70 19 . 3 - - - - 51 .4 - - - 71 18 . 8 - - - - 42 .4 - - - 72 18 . 8 - - - - 42 .0 - - - 73 18 . 8 - - - - 43 .1 - - - 74 18 . 8 - - - - 58 .1 - - - 75 18 . 8 - - - - 58 .2 - - - 76 18 . 8 - - - - 58 .5 - - - 77 16 .7 - - - - 48 .0 - - - 78 16 .7 - - - - 48 . 1 - - - 79 16 . 7 - - - - 48 .7 - - - 33 21 . 8 - - - - 67 .4 - - - 34 21 . 8 - - - - 68 . 1 - - - 35 21 . 8 - - - - 69 .4 - - - TR 20 .0 - - - - 70 .6 - - - BR 0 . 0 HOSE STREAM 83 .7 100 .0 POC 0 . 0 - - - - 84 . 5 - - - SRC 50 . 0 SOURCE 64 . 0 1222 . 3 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 3 Date : 12/09/1996 SKOLMBR2 .SDF JOB TITLE: SKOOKUM LUMBER - EXISTING BUILDING SPRINKLER ADDITION PIPE DATA PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS . END ELEV. NOZ . PT DISC. VEL(FPS) HW (C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 41 154 .0 1 .687 PL 2 .00 PF 4 .4 68 19 .3 0 . 0 51 .3 0 . 0 22 . 1 100 FTG E PE -0 .1 41 19 .5 8 .0 46 .8 54 . 7 0 .787 TL 5 . 58 PV 3 .3 Pipe : 42 99 . 2 1 .452 PL 9 .50 PF 6 . 9 41 19 .5 8 .0 46 . 8 54 . 7 19 .2 100 FTG ---- PE -0 .4 42 20 .3 8 . 0 39 . 6 50 .3 0 . 725 TL 9 .50 PV 2 . 5 Pipe: 43 48 . 9 1 .452 PL 9 .50 PF 1 . 9 42 20 .3 8 . 0 39 . 6 50 .3 9 .5 100 FTG ---- PE -0 .4 43 21 .2 8 . 0 37 .4 48 . 9 0 . 196 TL 9 . 50 PV 0 . 6 Pipe : 44 -26 . 9 1 .452 PL 8 .75 PF 0 .6 44 21 .3 8 .0 11 .3 26 .9 5 .2 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .2 45 20 .8 8 . 0 12 .1 27 .8 0 . 065 TL 8 .75 PV 0 .2 Pipe: 45 -54 . 7 1 .452 PL 8 .75 PF 2 .1 45 20 .8 8 .0 12 .1 27 . 8 10 .6 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .2 46 20 .3 8 .0 14 .4 30 .4 0 .241 TL 8 . 75 PV 0 . 8 Pipe : 46 -85 . 1 1 .452 PL 8 . 75 PF 4 . 8 46 20 .3 8 .0 14 .4 30 .4 16 . 5 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .2 47 19 . 8 8 .0 19 .4 35 .2 0 .546 TL 8 . 75 PV 1 . 8 Pipe: 47 -120 .4 1 .452 PL 8 . 75 PF 9 . 1 47 19 .8 8 .0 19 .4 35 .2 23 .3 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .2 48 19 .3 8 . 0 28 .7 42 . 9 1 .036 TL 8 . 75 PV 3 .7 Pipe: 48 -163 .2 1 . 687 PL 8 . 25 PF 13 . 5 48 19 .3 8 . 0 28 . 7 42 .9 23 .4 100 FTG T PE 0 .2 71 18 .8 0 . 0 42 .4 0 .0 0 . 876 TL 15 .42 PV 3 .7 Pipe: 49 49 . 7 1 .104 PL 0 .50 PF 3 .9 71 18 . 8 0 . 0 42 .4 0 . 0 16 . 6 100 FTG T PE 0 . 0 49 18 .8 8 .0 38 .5 49 . 7 0 .765 TL 5 . 08 PV 1 . 9 Pipe: 50 154 .2 1 . 687 PL 2 . 00 PF 4 .4 69 19 .3 0 . 0 51 .4 0 . 0 22 . 1 100 FTG E PE -0 . 1 50 19 .5 8 .0 46 . 9 54 . 8 0 . 788 TL 5 .58 PV 3 .3 Pipe : 51 99 . 3 1 .452 PL 9 . 50 PF 6 . 9 50 19 .5 8 .0 46 . 9 54 .8 19 .2 100 FTG ---- PE -0 .4 51 20 .3 8 .0 39 . 7 50 .4 0 . 726 TL 9 . 50 PV 2 .5 Pipe: 52 49 . 0 1 .452 PL 9 . 50 PF 1 . 9 51 20 .3 8 . 0 39 .7 50 .4 9 .5 100 FTG ---- PE -0 .4 52 21 .2 8 .0 37 .4 49 .0 0 .196 TL 9 .50 PV 0 .6 Pipe: 53 -29 .2 1 .452 PL 8 . 75 PF 0 . 7 53 21 .3 8 . 0 13 .3 29 .2 5 . 7 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .2 54 20 . 8 8 . 0 14 .2 30 .2 0 . 075 TL 8 .75 PV 0 .2 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 4 Date: 12/09/1996 SKOLMBR2 .SDF JOB TITLE: SKOOKUM LUMBER - EXISTING BUILDING SPRINKLER ADDITION PIPE DATA (cont . ) PIPE TAG Q (GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS . END ELEV. NOZ . PT DISC. VEL (FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe : 54 -59 .4 1 .452 PL 8 .75 PF 2 . 5 54 20 .8 8 . 0 14 .2 30 .2 11 . 5 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .2 55 20 .3 8 .0 16 . 9 32 .9 0 .280 TL 8 . 75 PV 0 . 9 Pipe: 55 -92 .3 1 .452 PL 8 .75 PF 5 .5 55 20 .3 8 .0 16 .9 32 . 9 17 .9 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .2 56 19 . 8 8 .0 22 .6 38 . 1 0 .633 TL 8 . 75 PV 2 .2 Pipe: 56 -130 . 3 1 .452 PL 8 . 75 PF 10 .5 56 19 . 8 8 .0 22 . 6 38 .1 25 .3 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .2 57 19 .3 8 .0 33 .4 46 .2 1 .200 TL 8 . 75 PV 4 .3 Pipe: 57 -176 . 6 1 .687 PL 8 . 25 PF 8 .4 57 19 .3 8 .0 33 .4 46 .2 25 . 3 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .2 72 18 .8 0 .0 42 . 0 0 .0 1 .013 TL 8 .25 PV 4 .3 Pipe: 58 51 .6 1 . 104 PL 0 .50 PF 0 .4 72 18 . 8 0 .0 42 .0 0 .0 17 .3 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .0 58 18 . 8 8 .0 41 .5 51 . 6 0 . 820 TL 0 .50 PV 2 . 0 Pipe : 59 158 . 6 1 . 687 PL 2 . 00 PF 1 .7 70 19 .3 0 .0 51 .4 0 . 0 22 . 8 100 FTG ---- PE -0 . 1 59 19 .5 8 .0 49 . 6 56 .4 0 .831 TL 2 .00 PV 3 . 5 Pipe: 60 102 .2 1 .452 PL 9 . 50 PF 7 .3 59 19 .5 8 .0 49 .6 56 .4 19 .8 100 FTG ---- PE -0 .4 60 20 . 3 8 . 0 42 .0 51 .8 0 . 766 TL 9 .50 PV 2 . 6 Pipe: 61 50 .4 1 .452 PL 9 .50 PF 2 .0 60 20 .3 8 . 0 42 . 0 51 . 8 9 . 8 100 FTG ---- PE -0 .4 61 21 .2 8 . 0 39 . 7 50 .4 0 .207 TL 9 . 50 PV 0 . 6 Pipe : 62 -27 . 1 1 .452 PL 8 . 75 PF 0 . 6 62 21 .3 8 .0 11 .5 27 . 1 5 .3 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .2 63 20 . 8 8 . 0 12 . 3 28 . 1 0 . 066 TL 8 . 75 PV 0 . 2 Pipe : 63 -55 .2 1 .452 PL 8 . 75 PF 2 . 1 63 20 . 8 8 . 0 12 .3 28 .1 10 . 7 100 FTG ---- PE 0 . 2 64 20 .3 8 . 0 14 .7 30 . 6 0 .245 TL 8 .75 PV 0 . 8 Pipe : 64 -85 . 8 1 .452 PL 8 .75 PF 4 . 8 64 20 .3 8 . 0 14 . 7 30 .6 16 . 6 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .2 65 19 . 8 8 .0 19 . 7 35 .5 0 . 554 TL 8 . 75 PV 1 . 9 Pipe : 65 -121 .3 1 .452 PL 8 . 75 PF 9 .2 65 19 . 8 8 . 0 19 . 7 35 .5 23 . 5 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .2 66 19 .3 8 . 0 29 .1 43 .2 1 . 051 TL 8 . 75 PV 3 . 7 Pipe: 66 -164 . 5 1 . 687 PL 8 . 25 PF 13 . 7 66 19 .3 8 . 0 29 . 1 43 .2 23 . 6 100 FTG T PE 0 .2 73 18 . 8 0 . 0 43 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 889 TL 15 .42 PV 3 . 8 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 5 Date: 12/09/1996 SKOLMBR2 .SDF JOB TITLE: SKOOKUM LUMBER - EXISTING BUILDING SPRINKLER ADDITION PIPE DATA (cont . ) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS . END ELEV. NOZ . PT DISC. VEL (FPS) HW(C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 67 50 . 0 1 . 104 PL 0 .50 PF 3 . 9 73 18 . 8 0 .0 43 .1 0 .0 16 .8 100 FTG T PE 0 .0 67 18 .8 8 . 0 39 .1 50 . 0 0 .775 TL 5 .08 PV 1 . 9 Pipe: 68 -154 .0 1 . 687 PL 1 . 16 PF 6 . 6 68 19 .3 0 . 0 51 .3 0 . 0 22 . 1 100 FTG T PE 0 .2 74 18 .8 0 . 0 58 .1 0 . 0 0 .787 TL 8 .33 PV 3 .3 Pipe: 69 -154 .2 1 .687 PL 1 . 10 PF 6 .5 69 19 .3 0 .0 51 .4 0 . 0 22 .1 100 FTG T PE 0 .2 75 18 . 8 0 . 0 58 .2 0 . 0 0 . 788 TL 8 .27 PV 3 .3 Pipe: 70 -158 .6 1 . 687 PL 1 . 08 PF 6 . 9 70 19 .3 0 .0 51 .4 0 . 0 22 . 8 100 FTG T PE 0 .2 76 18 .8 0 .0 58 .5 0 .0 0 .831 TL 8 .25 PV 3 .5 Pipe: 71 -212 . 9 2 .154 PL 1 . 83 PF 4 .6 71 18 .8 0 .0 42 .4 0 . 0 18 . 7 100 FTG T PE 0 .9 77 16 .7 0 . 0 48 .0 0 .0 0 .436 TL 10 .55 PV 2 .4 Pipe: 72 -228 . 1 2 . 154 PL 1 .83 PF 5 .2 72 18 . 8 0 . 0 42 . 0 0 . 0 20 . 1 100 FTG T PE 0 .9 78 16 .7 0 .0 48 . 1 0 .0 0 .495 TL 10 .55 PV 2 .7 Pipe: 73 -214 . 6 2 .154 PL 1 . 83 PF 4 .7 73 18 . 8 0 . 0 43 .1 0 . 0 18 . 9 100 FTG T PE 0 .9 79 16 . 7 0 . 0 48 . 7 0 . 0 0 .442 TL 10 .55 PV 2 .4 Pipe: 74 -154 . 0 4 .352 PL 10 .25 PF 0 .1 74 18 . 8 0 . 0 58 . 1 0 . 0 3 .3 100 FTG ---- PE 0 . 0 75 18 . 8 0 . 0 58 .2 0 .0 0 . 008 TL 10 .25 PV 0 . 1 Pipe: 75 -308 .1 4 .352 PL 10 .25 PF 0 . 3 75 18 . 8 0 . 0 58 . 2 0 . 0 6 .6 100 FTG ---- PE 0 . 0 76 18 . 8 0 . 0 58 . 5 0 . 0 0 . 028 TL 10 .25 PV 0 .3 Pipe: 76 -466 . 7 4 .352 PL 86 . 50 PF 10 .3 76 18 . 8 0 . 0 58 .5 0 . 0 10 . 1 100 FTG 4E2T PE -1 . 3 33 21 . 8 0 . 0 67 .4 0 . 0 0 . 061 TL 169 .92 PV 0 . 7 Pipe: 77 -212 . 9 4 .352 PL 10 . 25 PF 0 . 1 77 16 .7 0 .0 48 .0 0 . 0 4 . 6 100 FTG ---- PE 0 .0 78 16 .7 0 . 0 48 . 1 0 .0 0 .014 TL 10 . 25 PV 0 .1 Pipe: 78 -441 .0 4 . 352 PL 10 .25 PF 0 . 6 78 16 .7 0 . 0 48 . 1 0 . 0 9 . 5 100 FTG ---- PE 0 . 0 79 16 . 7 0 .0 48 . 7 0 .0 0 .055 TL 10 . 25 PV 0 .6 Pipe: 79 -655 . 6 4 .352 PL 101 . 83 PF 23 .4 79 16 .7 0 .0 48 .7 0 . 0 14 . 1 100 FTG 4E3T PE -1 .4 TR 20 . 0 0 . 0 70 . 6 0 .0 0 . 114 TL 206 .11 PV 1 .3 I SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 6 Date: 12/09/1996 SKOLMBR2 .SDF JOB TITLE: SKOOKUM LUMBER - EXISTING BUILDING SPRINKLER ADDITION PIPE DATA (cont . ) PIPE TAG Q(GPM) DIA(IN) LENGTH PRESS . END ELEV. NOZ. PT DISC. VEL (FPS) HW (C) (FT) SUM. NODES (FT) (K) (PSI) (GPM) F.L./FT (PSI) Pipe: 34 -466 . 7 6 . 357 PL 38 .50 PF 0 .6 33 21 .8 0 . 0 67 .4 0 .0 4 .7 100 FTG T PE 0 .0 34 21 .8 0 . 0 68 . 1 0 . 0 0 .010 TL 65 .42 PV 0 . 1 Pipe : 35 -466 .7 6 .357 PL 103 . 00 PF 1 .4 34 21 . 8 0 .0 68 . 1 0 . 0 4 .7 100 FTG ET PE 0 .0 35 21 .8 0 . 0 69 .4 0 .0 0 .010 TL 142 .48 PV 0 . 1 Pipe: 36 -466 .7 6 .357 PL 2 . 80 PF 0 .4 35 21 .8 0 .0 69 .4 0 . 0 4 .7 100 FTG ET PE 0 .8 TR 20 .0 0 . 0 70 .6 0 .0 0 .010 TL 42 .28 PV 0 .1 Pipe: 37 -1122 .3 6 .357 PL 23 . 00 PF 4 .4 TR 20 .0 0 . 0 70 . 6 0 . 0 11 .3 100 FTG ECBD PE 8 .7 BR 0 .0 H.S . 83 . 7 100 . 0 0 .049 TL 90 .30 PV 0 .9 Pipe: 38 -1222 . 3 8 .510 PL 50 .00 PF 0 .9 BR 0 .0 H.S . 83 .7 100 .0 6 . 9 140 FTG TG PE 0 . 0 POC 0 .0 0 . 0 84 . 5 0 .0 0 . 007 TL 117 . 13 PV 0 . 3 Pipe: 39 -1222 . 3 12 .580 PL 865 . 00 PF 1 . 1 POC 0 .0 0 . 0 84 .5 0 . 0 3 .2 140 FTG ETG PE -21 . 7 SRC 50 .0 SRCE 64 . 0 (N/A) 0 .001 TL1015 .09 PV 0 .1 NOTES : (1) Calculations were performed by the HASS 6 . 1 .0 computer program under license no. 4 C1324J granted by HRS Systems, Inc . 2193 Ranchwood Dr. , N.E . Atlanta, GA 30345 (2) The system has been balanced to provide an average imbalance at each node of 0 .002 gpm and a maximum imbalance at any node of 0 . 090 gpm. (3) Velocity pressures are printed for information only, and are not used in balancing the system. Maximum water velocity is 25 .3 ft/sec at pipe 57 . SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 7 Date : 12/09/1996 SKOLMBR2 .SDF JOB TITLE : SKOOKUM LUMBER - EXISTING BUILDING SPRINKLER ADDITION (4) PIPE FITTINGS TABLE Pipe Table Name : STANDARD. PIP PAGE : * MATERIAL: S40 HWC: 120 Diameter Equivalent Fitting Lengths in Feet (in) E T L C B G A D Ell Tee LngEll ChkVly BfyVly GatVly A1mChk DPVly 1 . 104 2 . 57 6 . 41 2 . 57 6 . 41 7 . 70 1 . 28 12 . 83 12 . 83 1 . 452 3 . 84 7 . 69 2 . 56 8 . 97 7 . 69 1 . 28 12 . 81 12 . 81 1 . 687 5 . 02 10 . 04 2 .51 11 . 30 7 . 53 1 . 26 12 . 55 12 . 55 2 . 154 6 . 11 12 . 22 3 . 67 13 . 45 7 . 33 1 . 22 12 . 22 12 . 22 4 . 352 14 . 61 29 .22 8 . 77 32 . 14 17 . 53 2 . 92 29 . 22 14 . 61 6 . 357 17 . 60 37 . 72 11 . 32 40 . 23 12 . 57 3 . 77 35 . 21 23 . 89 8 . 510 23 . 30 45 . 30 16 . 83 58 . 24 15 . 53 5 . 18 45 . 30 34 . 94 12 . 580 32 . 76 72 . 81 21 . 84 78 . 88 25 .48 7 . 28 59 .46 42 .47 SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 8 Date : 12/09/1996 SKOLMBR2 . SDF JOB TITLE: SKOOKUM LUMBER - EXISTING BUILDING SPRINKLER ADDITION WATER SUPPLY CURVE 84+ 77+ 70+ X 63+ P 56+ R E S S 49+ U R E 42+ P S I 35+ 28+ 21+ 14+ LEGEND " n X = Required Water Supply " 63 . 98 psi @ 1622 . 3 gpm " 7+ " 0 = Available Water Supply " 75 . 00 psi @ 1622 . 3 gpm " „ 0++-+---+----+-----+------+- -------+--------+------- --+-----------+ 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 FLOW (GPM) 20-52 CENTRIFUGAL FIRE PUMPS PUMP ACCEPTANCE TEST DATA Refer to —P&PF(A) 512.12&DS3-7N 1 PROPERTY OF INDEX NO. DIST.OFFICE ) 5 u ADDRESS TESTED BY DATE , CITY STATE PLACO CODE SUBJECT t CONFERRED WITH SHAFT MANUFACTURER APP ROVED SHOP OR SERIAL NO. MODEL OR TYPE PUMP HORIZONTAL ❑VERTICAL C F / �;` YES ❑NO RATED P RATED HEAD-FT.(psi) RA12 RPM SUCTION FROM TANK SIZE TANK EIGHT STATIC MANUFACTURER APPROVED r VERTICAL,^ SHOP OR SERIAL NO. IF DIST DISEH. RIGHT- VERTICAL GALPIt TO FT ANGLE ❑ YES -'tYPE WOER PUMP G GEAR DRIVE MODEL ORJWE PERFORMANCE ❑ NO VEL FT ❑SMOOTH ❑ROUGH MANUFACTURER APPROVED SHOP qR SERIAL NO. ODE OR TYPE RATED H.P. RATED RPM [/]YES❑NO t�.:.��. I� - t n r"�!� DRIVER ELECTRIC RATED VOLT. OPERATING VOLT. RATED F.L.AMPS AMPS AT 150% PHASE CYCLES SERVICE FACTOR ❑ MOTOR [;�,DIESEL ENG NE ❑GASOLINE GAS STEAM PRESS.ENGINE ❑ ENGINE ❑ TURBINE ❑ BUILT IN INDEPENDENT❑ INDEPENDENT ❑NSTEAM PRESS UFACTURER APPROVED START psi STOP? psi JOCKEY PUMP CONTROLLER '` I [�YES ❑NO ❑ MANUAL ❑'rPRESS DROP aMANUAL Q YES ON SHOP OR O SERIAL NO. MODEL OR TYPE psi i. - L - y _,, -AUTO ❑WATER FLOW ❑ AUTO ❑ NO OFF `I' psi SPEED DISCHARGE SUCTION NET HEAD EAMS GALLONSPERCENT OF T M Of STEAM PRESSURE RPM PRESSURE PRESSURE pSl ��STER PITOT RATED V6LTSPSI PSI PRESSURE PER MINUTE CAPACITY WAk L pg1 THROTTLE CHEST ISgo I(o 40 75 R /2 // 70 ^� 6" I r In gad marked H in suction column are heads above atmosphere,those marked(-)are Iifts. For vertical shaft pumps omit suction pressure and net head read'nps. "0 180 160 1i` 11 140 140 N 120 [Jt.U 120 1 C a 100 I 100. ; m � i 80 m CL 60, 60 LLAe I 401 I 40 20� 20 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 Percent rated capacity Plot discharge pressure and net head curves for honzontal shaft pump.For vertical shah pump.plot dischar ge pressure curve.For electric-driven pump,plot ampere curve also. 105(9 77)ENGINEERING PRINTED IN USA (Courtesy of Factory Mutual Research Corp.) Figure A-11.2.6.3(t) Pump acceptance test data. / 1996 Edition