HomeMy WebLinkAboutGEO Geological Review - 11/16/2022 Gcotechnical Report
Griffin Single Family Residence
E Lakewood Drive, Belfair
Parcel No. 22212-75-90094
Mason County, Washington
November 16, 2022
Project #22293
Prepared For.
Nathaniel Griffin
Jessica Griffin
Prepared By:
Envirotech Engineering
PO Box 984
Belfair, Washington 98528
Phone: 360-275-9374
pVV CLYDE Sr P
w ` C
f_
.,4 y 43043
O frgrt4E ��
O`°LErG 1111612022
, ahad , n�amsaa,
MASON COUNTY Submittal Checklist
COMMUNITY StRVICGS Geotechnical Report
Instructions:
This checklist must be submitted with a Geotechnical Recon and completed.signed,and stamped by the licensed
pmtessional(s)who prepared the Geotechnical Report lot review by Mason Ccunly pursuant to Me Mason County
Resource entrances. It an Item Is found not applicable,the ration should explain the basis for the conclusion.
Note:Unless apacdicsV do ume ded.this report does rwlpmvde compturice 0 Me International Residentiat Code
sectors R403.1.7for folmostiars on,orad(acent 0 slaves,Section A403.I.B for expansive suits orsection 1808.71
of the IntamatiorulBuiMing Code Sedion for Foundations on or adjacent to slopes.
Applicant/Owner Nathaniel and JOSILigii rriffn Parcel A 22212.75.90094
Site Address %%%E Lakewood Drive -
(1) (a) A discussion of general geologic conditions in the vicinity of the proposed developmem.
Located on page(s) 5
(b) A discussion of specific soil types,
Located on page(s) 6
(C) A discussion of ground water conditions,
Located on page(s) 7
(d) A discussion of the upslope geomorphology,
Located on page(s) 3
(e) A discussion of the Location of upland waterbodies and wetlands.
Located on page(s) 3
(ti A discussion of history of landslide activity in the vicinity,as available in the referenced maps and
records.
Located on page(s) 8
(2) Asite plan which identifies the important development and geologic features.
Located on Map(s) Site Plan_aooeM'x A
(3) Locations and logs of exploratory holes or probes.
Located on Mato(s) Site Plan antl Soil Laos(Appendix 81
(4) The area of the proposed development,the boundaries of the hazard.and associated buffers and
setbacks shall be delineated(top,both sides,and toe)on a geologic map of the site.
Located on Map(s) Site Plan
(5) A minimum of onto cross section at a scale which adequately depicts the subsurface profile,and
which incorporates the details of proposed grade changes.
Located on Map(s) Soil Profile(Appendix Bt
(6) A description and results of slope stability analyses performed for both static and seismic loading
conditions.Anaysls should examine worst case failures.The analysis should include Me Simplified
Bishop's Method of Circles. The minimum static safety factor is 1.5,the minimum seismic safety
factor is I A,and the quasi-static analysis coelt cients should be a value of 015.
Located on page(s) 9 Page I of 38
S—I-d sun,C—S——,
(7) (a) Appropriate restrictions on placemem of drainage features,
Located on pages) 17
of Appropriate restrictions on placement of septic drain fields.
Located on pa io(s) 18
(c) Appropriate Moir ions on placement of compacted inns and footings.
Located on pages) 15
(0) Recommended burlets from the landslide hazard areas shorefne Muffs and Me tops of other S"es.
Located an page($) 18
(a) Recommended setbacks from Me landslide hazard areas ShorNkro Muff$and the tope of other slopo$-
l.ocated on page(s) 17
(8f Recommendations for the preparation of a detailed clearing and grading plan which Specifically identifies
vegetation to be removed,a Schedule for vegetation removal and replanting,and the method of vegetation
removal.
Located on pages) 18
(9) Recommendations for the preparation of a detailed temporary erosion control plan which identifies the specific
mitigating measures to be Implemented during conslnwtbn In protect the slope Imm erosion,tandsldes and
harmful mnslnKlion methods.
Located on pages) 10
(10) An analysis of both on-sae and off-site Impacts of the Proposed development.
Located on pages) 12
(11) Specifications of final development conditions such as,vegetative management,drainage.erosion control,and
buffer widths.
Located on pages) 17-18
(12) Recommendations for the preparation of structural mitigation or details of other proposed mitigation.
Located on pages) 14
(13) A site map drawn to sae showing the properly boundaries,scale,north avow,and the location and nature
or existing and proposed development on the site.
Located on Map(s) Site Plan
1,Michael Staten,hereby cerMty undo penalty of perjury that I am a civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington
with specialized knowledge of geotechnicaVgedogical engineering or a geologist or engineering geologist licensed in
the State of Washington with special knowledge of the beef conditions.I also cer ity that the Geotechn'cal
CLye[ar Report,dated November 161 2022 and entitled Griffin Singh
c� 01 wash„ ar Family Residence,meets all the requirements of the Mason
County Resource Ordinance,Geologically Hazardous Areas
Section,is complete and true,that the assessment
4 ♦ 43WS o- demonstrates conclusively that the risks posed by the landslide
o,�FsrroS&Eros hazard can be mitigated through the Included geolechnical
1111612022 design recommendations,and that all hazards are mitigated in
Disclaimer:Mason County does not such a manner as to prevent harm to property and pudic
certify the quality of the wor*done in health and safety.
this Geotechnical Report.
Page 2 of 2
scamee wancams`am,er
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUC"ON—. I
1.1 PRO2EL7INFORIIATION...................._............................_..........................................................._I
ISPURI'O.SE OF IYVLSTIGATION AND SC MOF WORK...............................................................I
2.0 SURFACE CONDITIONS.-..»•-•--- 3
LlGt TRALOMERVATIOM.................................................._......»....................................................3
2.2 TOPOGRAPDV......................................__.............................._........»..........._...._......._._......ti3
2.2.1 Urs7ope GeawlPholagF.................._...«.___.......___........._................._..._...._..........._...«3
73 SUEFACR DIULNAGE........-.......................................................................__..._..............._..»._...3
2.3.1 VPIkPe Water 8odin............_............................_.................
......»..._....._...._......_..___.3
2.4 SLOPE AM EROSION OBSERVATIONS...............................................».........6................._.........4
3.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION._......
...... - 3
11 FIELD NIETIIODS.SAMPLING AND FIELD 2ffiDNG...................................................................5
32 GL%ERAL GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS...................................................................6.6...................._.._5
33 SPELTFTC St10SORFACE CONDIITOM-..........................___.......................4..........................._.6
3.11 Grorndu ff.......................................................__..___»....._..........
.._..._..»�_�««.....7
4.0 ENGINEERING ANALYSES AND CONCLUSIONS O
4.1 SLOPESTARILIW.....................................................................................6.........._..._...._«.._.._8
4.1.1 Slope Stablity Ana1ysis......_....._.._................................................___._.._._._. .9
4.2 EROSION....................................._.........................................................................
__._»»_.»_IO
43 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS AM LIQUEFACIIO.N................................_..................6..................10
4.3.1 aquefaction......................................................................._.............__..«..«_.»_........._.._II
4A LANDSLWE,EROSION AM SEISMIC HAZARDS CONCLUROM.................._.........0..............
I I
4S LATERAL EARTH PRESSURFS....................................................................._.......-------_.�.._.._I I
4AON-SITE ANTI OFFSITE LNPALTS............................_........................................---------..------12
5.1 BInwLNGFOONOAT1ONRECOMMENDATTG!8..............._.........................._..__.._..__......_.._.13
5.1.1 BearvR Capacit3...._...._......................................_......_.___......_..__._.».___......._13
S.1.1 Setdenm t............_........__........................_....._---------------------._ .._..............14
5.13 Comm,SWMoro-Grode.........................................._......................................................14
5.2 EARTMVORRCONSIRFR.'1TONRWOMMEMATIONS................................................................14
5.2.1 Psrnradon......_................................................................................._......._.......___..._..---14
5.2.2 Ptacenent and Compaction ofNedyeSalk adBwgNnnl FJO................_.__.�_.....15
5.2.3 Retaining Wall BaekfX...................................._............................_............___._._..._.....t6
5.2.4 Wet Weather Considerahlow............................».._....»..._____._.._....._.._.._..._....._....16
5.2.5 Building Pads.................................._......«........._............_........_.......----------_-------.._.....16
53 BUDDLNG AND FOon.NGSEDIACRR............_.............«..........._...........«..........._.._.........._..........17
5ASURFACEANDSURSURFACEDRAMAGE..........................................................................«.........17
5.5 VEGETATION BUFFER AND CO*- WERADOM..................................-----_--------------...................IR
5.6 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL................................_........--------_...............is
5.7 SE InC DRU.NFIPLDG...........................................................................................__««..._..........18
5.8 STRUCTURALMmGATiON............................................................................................................19
9R
GO CLOSURE--------
Appendix A-Site Plan
Appendix B-Sail Information
Appendix C-Slope Stability
Appendix D-Erosion Control
so.tnoa�.nnc.ms��x
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Lnvirolech Rngmeering (Envirotech) has completed a geaechnicai investigation for a planned
single family residence located at XXX R Lakewood Drive,identified as parcel number 22212-75-
90094, Mason County, Washinghm. Sim the vicinity map on the following page for a general
depiction of the site location.
An initial geotechnical evaluation of the project was conducted by Envinaech on October 28,2022.
it was determined that slopes in excess of 40%with a vertical relief of at least 10 feet were present
within 300 feet of the planned development. Based on this site characteristic, the proposed
development will require a gemechnical report pursuant to Landslide Humid Areas of Mason
County Resource Ordinance (MCRO) 8.52.140. During the site visit by Envirutech, surface and
subsurface conditions were assessed. After completion of the field work and applicable project
research, Envirotecb prepared this geotchnical report which, at a minimum, conforms to the
applicable MCRO.
As presented herein,this report includes information pertaining to the project in this Introduction
Section;observations of the property and surrounding terrain in the Surface Conditions Section;
field methods and soil descriptions in the Subsurface Investigation Section; supporting
documentation with relation to slope stability, erosion, seismic considerations, and lateral earth
pressures in the Engineering Analyses and Conclusions Section; and, recommendations for
foundation, settlement, earthwork construction, retaining walls, erosion control, drainage, and
vegetation in the Engineering Recommendations Section.
1.1 Project Information
Information pertaining to the planned development of the project was provided by the proponent
of the property-The planned development consists of a 1-or 2-story single family residence,new
on-sim septic system,and other ancillary features typical of this type of development.Approximate
building footprint and other proposed features with relation to existing site conditions are illustrated
on the Site Map provided in Appendix A of this report.
1.2 purpose of Investigation and Scope of Work
The purpose of this geatechnical investigation is to assess geological hazards, and evaluate the
Project in order to provide ge xi chnical recommendations that should be implemented during
development.The investigation included characterizing the general project surface and subsurface
conditions,and evaluating the suitability of the soils to support the planned site activities.
In order to fulfill the purpose of investigation,the gemechnical program completed for the proposed
improvements of the project include:
• Review project information provided by the project owner and/or owner's representative;
• Conduct a site visit to document the site conditions that may influence the construction and
performance of the proposed improvements of the project;
• Define general subsurface conditions of the site by observing subsoils within test pits and/
or cut banks,review geological maps for the general area,research published references
concerning slope stability. and review water well reports from existing wells near the
Envanoch Engineering God cchnical Report
PO Box 984 page I parcel 22212-75-90094
8elfair,Washington 98526 Mason County,Washington
Ph. 360,275-9374 November 16,2022
Scanned with CamScanner
project:
Coliret bulk samples,as applicable,at various depths and locations:
• perform soils testing to determine selected index and/or engineering pmperties of the site
soils;
• Complete an engineering analysis supported by the planned site alterations,and the surface
and subsurface conditions that were identified by the field investigation. soil testing,and
applicable pmject research:and,
• Establish conclusions based on findings. and make recommendation, for foundations,
drainage, slope stability,erosion control,earthwork construction requirements,and other
considerations.
;
Project
CO
Po
U N.S!ET-
BEACH
w U r
0 2000 Feet
Vicinity Mop from Mason County
Fnvirowh Engineering Cxatechnicai Report
PO Box 994 page 2 parcel 22212-75-90094
Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
Ph. 360-275-9374 November 16,2022
scanned with Camscennee
2A SURFACE CONDITIONS
Information pertaining to the existing surfs"conditions for the project was gathered on October
28, 2022 by a representative with Envirolech. During the site visit, the type of geotechnical
investigation was assessed,site features were documented that may influence construction,and site
features were examined that may be influenced by construction.This Surface Conditions Section
provides information on general observations, vegetation, topography, drainage and observed
slope/erosion conditions for the project and surrounding areas that may impact the Pmjmt.
2.1 General Observatlons
Currently, the property, is vacant with an existing driveway. Vegetation on and near the project
consists primarily of secondary growth ceders, maples and Other trees and shrubbery common to
this area of the Pacific Northwest.An aerial photo of the project and immediate vicinity is provided
on the following Page.
2.2 Topography
The topographic information provided in this section was extrapolated from a public lidar source,
and incorporated observations and field measurements. Where necessary, slope verification
included measuring slope lengths and inclinations with a cloth tape and inclinometer.See the Site
Plan in Appendix A in this report for an illustration of general topography with respect to the
planned development.
Critical ascending slopes,with grades exceeding 40%appear to be within 300 feet of the planned
development.The maximum critical slope is approximately 61%with a vertical relief of about 40
feet.
Descending grades arc generally located to the northeast of the planned development.These slopes
are relatively minor within 300 feet of the project,with no apparent slope grades of at least 15%.
22.1 Upslope Geomorphology
The upland area of the property and beyond is generally situated on a hillside of glacial
origin.
23 Surface Drainage
Runoff originating upslope of the development is mostly diverted away from the Property by
accommodating topography. Excessive scour, erosion or Other indications of past drainage
problems were not observed within the immediate vicinity of the planned development. A Pool
was observed towards the north end of the property near the slope toe.
23.1 Upslope Water Bodies
There ace..no apparent .water bodies or wetlands located upsloPe from the planned
development that would significantly influence the project.
Fnvinucch Engineering Geotechnical Report
PO Box 994 page 3 Parcel 22212.75.90094
Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
Ph. 360-275-9374 November 16,2022
S,aIld wan CamS'—"
2.4 Slope and Erosion Observations
The slope gradients near the project signal a potential landslide of erosion hazed area. Some
indicators that may suggest past slope movements include:
• Outwash of sediments new the bottom of the slope,
• Fissures,tension cracks,hummocky ground or stepped land masses on the face or top of
the slope,and parallel to the slope,
• Fine,saturated subsurface soils,
• Old landslide debris,
• Significant bowing to leaning trees,or,
• Slope sloughing or calving.
These slope instability indicators or other significant mass wasting on the property or within the
general vicinity of the project were not observed. Indications of past landslides,current unstable
slopes, deep-seated slope problems, or surficial slope failures were not observed during the site
visit.
A
u
0 220 Feel
Aerial Pluto from Mason County
Enviratech Engineering Oe°talotcal Report
PO Box 994 page 4 Parcel 22212-75-90094
Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
Ph. 360-275-9374
November 16,2022
Sl , dwan OamSwnne,
3.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
Information on subsurface conditions pertaining to the project was primarily gathered on October
28,2022 by a representative with Envirmech.Applicable information on field methods,sampling,
field testing, general geologic conditions, specific subsurface conditions, and results from soil
testing are presented in this section of the report. Appendix B of this report includes pertinent
information on subsurface conditions for the project,such as subsoil cross-seclion(s),test pit log(s),
and applicable water well report(s). Water well reports were utilized to estimate ground water
levels, and if sufficient, were used in identifying subsoil types. Applicable test pit locations are
depicted on the Site Plan provided in the appendix of this report.
3.1 Field Methods,Sampling and Field Testing
Information on subsurface conditions for the project was accomplished by examining soils within
test pits and/or nearby banks extending to depths of up to 6 feet below the natural ground surface.
Information on subsurface conditions also included reviewing geological maps representing the
general vicinity of the project,and water well reports originating from nearby properties.
Soil samples were not obtained from this project. Envirotech measured the relative density of the
neat-surface in-situ soils by gauging the resistance of hand tools. Within testing locations,field
testing results generally indicated loose to medium dense soils in the upper 48 inches, and very
dense soils from 48 inches to the depth of terminus.
3.2 General Geologic Conditions
In general, soils at the project are composed of materials from glacial advances. The geologic
conditions as presented in the"Geologic Map of Washington,"compiled by J.Eric Schuster,2002
indicates Quaternary sediments,Qs. Quaternary sediments are generally unconsolidated deposits,
and dominantly deposited from glacial drift, including alluvium deposits. This project is located
within the Puget Lowland.Typically,"lower tertiary sedimentary rocks unconformably overlie the
Crescent Formation."as revealed in the Geologic Map.Initial sedimentary rocks were formed from
shales,sandstones and coal deposits from riven.During the Qualemary period,the Puget Lowland
was covered by numerous ice sheets, with the most recent being the Fraser glacier with a peak of
approximately 14,000 years ago. Upon the glacial retreat, the landscape was formed by glacial
erosion glacial drift deposits.
The "Geologic Map of the Belfair 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Mason, Kitsap and Pierce Counties,
Washington" by Michael Pole", Katelin Alldritt, Nicholas 1. Heheman, Isablle Y. Sarikhan,and
Robert L. Logan,July 2009,provides the following caption(s)for the project area:
lei 1 �t::.. Ee! dlRi9n _ -,;
Q. Lblocene and mass�astirg deposits; Gravel,said,sift,day,and boulders h slide batyand toe;due to
We map scale,includes exposure of undert0V Wits in scarp WW
pdshxere arq&to rasded darts and grans;unsorted,generally base,
jumbled,and unsbatifed.
Envirotech Engineering Geotechnicai Report
PO Box 994 page 5 Parcel 22212-75-90094
Bclfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
Ph. 360-275.9374 November 16,2022
scanned rnm cams�nne,
N /
AProject
QIS r'
D
L Cedar Strn
ro
0
m Qgt �a
a
u 600 Feet l 3
' Geologiml Mop Department of Natural Resources Washington State
33 Specific Subsurface Conditions
Tlse following subsurface conditions are estimated descriptions of the project subgrade utilizing
information from the depth of penetration at all testing, sampling, observed and investigated
locations. Soils for this project were primarily described utilizing the Unified Soil Classification
System(USCS)and the Soil Conservation Service(SCS)descriptions.
The project is currently composed of native soils with indications of fill at the edge of a cleared
pad. Within test pit locations, soils within the upper 6 feet of natural ground were generally
observed to be poorly graded sand with some fine gravel(SP).
The relative densities of the soil within selected test pits are provided above in Section 3.1.
Expanded and specific subsurface descriptions, other than what is provided in this Section, are
provided in the soil logs located in Appendix B of this report.
According to the"Soil Survey of Mason Courtly;'by the United States Department of Agriculture,
Soil Conservation Service,the site soils are described as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam.Ab and
Ac,with 8%to 30%slopes.The soil designations are depicted in the aerial photograph below,and
descriptions are provided in Appendix B of this report.
Pnvim=h Engineering Oeoteehmcal Report
PO Box 994 page 6 parcel 22212-75-90094
Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
Ph. 360-275-9374
November 16,2022
Scannetl with CamScanner
100 810 MIa ma
r
Soil Surneyfrom USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
33.1 Groundwater
From the water well report(s)and knowledge of the general area,permanent groundwater
is at least 40 feet directly below the property at the building pad location.Surface seepage
or perched groundwater at shallow depths was not observed on-site, nor indicated on the
well reports.
Envirotech Engineering Oeotechnical Report
PO Box 994 page 7 Parcel 22212-75-90094
Belfair.Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
Ph. 360-275,9374 November 16,2022
Scanned with CamSeanner
4.0 ENGINEERING ANALYSES AND CONCLUSIONS
E}
The following section includes slope stability,erosion,seismic considerations,and impacts to both
on-site and off-site properties.
4.1 Slope Stability
Landslides are natural geologic processes, and structures new slopes possess an inherent risk of
adverse settlement,sliding or structural damage due to these processes. Geotechnical engineering
cannot eliminate these risks for any site with sloping grades because gravity is constantly inducing
strain on the sloping soil mass. Excessive wet weather and/or earthquakes will exacerbate these
strains. Geotechnical engineering considers excessive wet weather and 'design' earthquakes in
order to provide an acceptable factor of safety for developing on or new sloping terrain with relation
to current engineering protocol.These factors of safeties are based on engineering standards such
as defining engineering properties of the sail,topography, water conditions, seismic acceleration
and surcharges.Surface sloughing or other types of surficial slope movements usually do nee affect
the deep-seated structural capability of the slope.However,repeated surficial slope movements,if
not repaired,may present a threat to the structural integrity of the slope. if any slope movement
arises,the slope should be inspected by an engineer.Subsequently, maintenance may be required
in order to prevent the possibility of further surfucial or deep seated slope movements that may be
damaging to life and property.
According to the Coastal Zone Atlas of Mason County,Washington,the project is widen and new
tertain labeled 'Stable' and 'Intermediate' regarding potential landslide activity. Descriptions of
these mapping units may be found in the aforesaid Atlas.A Stability Map from the Coastal Zone
ii Atlas for the general area of this project is provided below:
N
A
Project .
�f
c
l �r
M `
Slope swlHhly
J LA w +4
$ ` E= roes
M,amdeave i
o F I w,musmve+ts
F ��
Map from Washingmn State Deparsmem of Ecaiagy
Envirotech Engineering 8 Ororechnical Repon
Page
PO Box 984 Parcel 22212-75-90094
&Ifair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
November 16,2022
Ph. 360-275-9374
scanned w,m Camseanner
According to the Resource Map from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources
(DNR), the project is not within terrain labeled 'highly unstable' relating to soils. DNR labeled
portions of this project as medium and high slope instability with relation to slopes. A Resource
Map from the DNR Porest Practices Application Review System is provided below:
ZANZ20 ;rllv
»
P
r� mjKl
'^7
_t .y m. v Sr
r.,
® raede,xe swot arstabraY I
■ Nigh 5lWe lnAab6ity j
® HON Eaxl k W6
® Hyd,kW
® n4hN UnaUMe SOCs
v
Resource Map from Washington State Department of Natural Resources
4.1.1 Slope Stability Analysis
The Simplified Bishop Method, utilizing 'STABLE' software, was used to analyze the
static stability of the site slopes. Seismic conditions were estimated utilizing worst case
scenario values from the static analysis,a quasi-static analysis coefficient of at least 0.15,
and applying the applicable values to STABLE software. Various radii and center points
of the circle were automatically selected,and produced factor of safeties in a graphical and
tabular format. Worst case scenario values were used in the slope stability analysis in
regard to topography, surcharges,water content,internal friction and cohesion of the site
soils. STABLE software has been repeatedly checked with manual calculations, and
consistently proved to be a very conservative program.The following soil properties were
used in the analysis, and are based on observed conditions, known geology, and/or
published parameters:
Soil unit weight: 132 pcf
Angle of internal friction: 30 degrees
Cohesion: 200 psf
Based on the slope stability analysis, unacceptable factors of safety could be present on
and near the critical slope,but do not reflect conditions where development is expected to
Envimtech Engineering Geotechnical Report
PO Box 994 page 9 Parcel 22212-75-90094
Belfair,Washington 98328 Mason County,Washington
Ph. 360-275-9374 November 16,2022
Scannetl with CamScanner
occur. For this project, at the location of the proposed development, minimum factor of
safeties for static and dynamic conditions were estimated to be at least 1.5 and 1.1,
respectively.See the slope stability information in Appendix C for a depiction of minimum
factors of safety away from the project.
4.2 Erosion
Based on the USCS description of the project soils, the surface snits are considered moderately
erodible.According to the Resource Map from the Washington State Dli as provided above,the
pmjetl is not within terrain labeled 'highly trouble.'This project is not within an erosion hazard
area as defined by the MCRO. Erosion hazard areas arc those with USDA SCS designations of
River Wash (Ra), Coastal Beaches (Cg), Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam on slopes 15% or
greater(Ac and Ad),Cloqualium Silt Loam on slopes 15%or greater(Cd),Harstine Gravelly Sandy
Loam on slopes 15%or greater(Hb),and Kitsap Silt Loam can slopes 15%or greater(Kc).
It is our opinion that minor erosion control recommendations provided in this report is sufficient
for the development of this project, and additional engineered erosion control plans are not
required. Temporary and permanent erosion control measures arc required for site development
Extents of temporary erosion control will mostly depend on the timeliness of construction,moisture
content of the soil,and amount of rainfall during consWctiom Soil erosion typical to the existing
site conditions and planned disturbance of the project include wind-borne silts during dry weather.
and sediment transport during prolonged wet weather. Sediment transport could be from
stormwater runaff or tracking off-site with construction equipment.
The Temporary and Permanent Erosion Cannot Section (Section 5.6) of this report consist of
specific erosion controls to be implemented. Additional erosion control information and
specifications may be found in the latest addition of the "Stommwater Management Manual for
Western Washington," prepared by the Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality
Program.
43 Seismic Considerations and Liquefaction
There are no known faults beneath this project. The nearest Class 'A' or Class 'B' fault to this
property is the Sunset Beach scarp—Tacoma fault,which is approximately 0 miles to the southeast
of this project.This information is based on the USGS Quaternary Fault and Fold Database for the
United States.
Potential landslides due to seismic hazards have been considered, and are addressed in the Slope
Stability Analysis Section provided earlier in this report.
Soils immediately below the expected foundation depth for this project are generally Type D,
corresponding to the International Building Code (IBC) and profiles. According to the IBC, the
regional seismic zone is 3 for this project. The estimated peak ground acceleration ranges from
0.50g to o.60g.This estimation is based on the United States Geological Survey(USGS)National
Seismic Hazard project in which there is an estimated 2%probability of exceedance within the next
50 years.
Enviraah Engineering Geotechnical Repon
PO Box 984 page 10 Parcel 22212-75-90094
Beifair.Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
Ph. 360-275-9374 November 16,2022
Scanned with camscenner
4.3.1 Liquefaction
The potential for liquefaction is believed to he low for this project.This is based,in pan,
on the subsurface conditions such as soil characteristics and the lack of a permanent
shallow water table. Subgrade characteristics that particularly rccontrib to o w probits lem
caused from liquefaction include submerged crmflned,pow y'Bon granular
gravel,sand,sill). Although gravel-and sill-sized soil panicles could be probkmatic,fire
and medium grained sands arc typically subjected to these types of seismic hazards. No
signiftcam saturated sand stratifications are anticipated to be within the upper 50 fat of
the subsoil for this project.
4A Landslide,Erosion and Seismic Hazards Conclusions
DNR indicated historic landslide activity new the project.Mapped slope conditions,as delineated
by the Departments of Ecology and/or Natural Resources, were considered in nor slope stability
assessment. Based on the proximity and severity of mapped dclineations with respect to the
proposed development,results of the aforesaid slope stability analysis,observed surface conditions,
and other pertinent information, it is our opinion that the proposed development may occur in
accordance with the recommendations in this geotahnical report.
45 Lateral Faith Pis ssnzes
Retaining walls may be utilized for this Project. The lateral earth pressures exerted through the
backfill of a retaining wall are dependent upon seven) factors including height of retained wit
behind the wall, type of wit that is retained, degree of backftll compaction, slope of backfili,
surcharges,hydrostatic pressures,earthquake pressures,and the direction and distance that the lop
of the wall moves.
An equivalent fluid unit weight used for structural design may be estimated n the product of the
backfsB wit unit weight and the earth pressure coefficient for at rest pressures. Retaining walls
should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of the
following:
At-Rest Active
Native Soils 49 pcf 32 pcf
Engineered Fill Soils 45 per 28 per
The values provided above shall be increased by I pcf for every 1 degree of backfillf natural slope
angle.These equivalent fluid unit weight values do not include lateral earth pressures induced by
earthquakes,groundwater,or surcharges from live loads.Earthquake pressures should he added to
the wall analysis,and treated as an inverted pressure triangle where the resultant pressure is hated
at 2/3 of the wall height,or other method approved by a structural engineer.The following resultant
earthquake pressures as a function of the wall height(H)may be utilized:
Envimwh Engineering GeotecMicai Report
PO Box 984 page 11 Parcel 22212-75-90094
Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
Ph. 360-275-9374 November IC 2022
scan�ea wnn camsoan�e,
At-RN AgiYa
Native Soils 15AIPPaf 9.8H'r(
Engineered Fill Soils 13.611'pa 9.2H'psf
Sec the Earthwork Construction Recommendations Section for details concerning the use of naive
soils,engineered fill and placement of backfill.
4.6 On-Site and Off-Site Impacts
From a geotechnical position, it is Enviraah's opinion that the subject property and adjacent
properties to the proposed development should not be significantly impacted if all
mcmmendatiots in this report as followed. This opinion is based on the expected site
development, existing topography,existing nearby development,land cover,and adhering to the
recommendations presented in this report. Future development or land disturbing activities on
neighboring properties or properties beyond adjacent parcels that we upslope and/or downslope
from the subject property could cause problems to the subject property. For this reason, future
development or land disturbance wsr the subject property should be evaluated by a ger echnical
engineer.
Envirotech Engineering Geowchaical Report
PO Box 994 page 12 Parce122212-75-90094
�+ Btl(au,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
P November 16,2022
Ph. 360-275-9373
Scanned with CemSeanner
5.0 ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS
The following sections present engineering recommendations for the proposed improvements of
the project.These recommendations have been made available based on the planned improvements
as outlined in the Introduction Section of this report;general observations including drainage and
topography as recapitulated in the Surface Conditions Section;soill geologic conditions that were
identified fmm the geotechnical investigation that is summarized in the Subsurface Investigation
Section;and,pmject research,analyses and conclusions as determined in the Engineering Amlysis
and Conclusions Section. Recommendations for the project that is provided herein, includes
pertinent information for building foundations,earthwork construction, building and/ or footing
setbacks,drainage,vegetation considerations,and erosion control.
5.1 Building Foundation Recommendations
Recommendations provided in this section account for the site development of a typical one-or
two-story, single family residential structure.the recommended allowable bearing capacities and
settlements as presented below, consider the probable type of construction as well M the field
investigation insults by implementing practical engineeringjudgment within published engineering
standards. Evaluations include classifying site soils based on observed field conditions and soil
testing fro this pmject. After deriving conservative relative densities, unit weights and angles of
internal friction of the in-situ soils,the Terrhagi ultimate bearing capacity equation was utilized for
determining foundation width and depth. Foundation parameters provided herein account for
typical structural pressures due to the planned type of development.A structural analysis is beyond
the scope of a geotechnical report, and a structural engineer may be required to design specific
foundations and other structural elements based on the soil investigation.Stepped foundations are
acceptable, if warranted for this project. Continuous, isolated, or stepped foundations shall be
horizontally level between the bottom of the foundation and the top of the bearing strata.The frost
penetration depth is not expected to"mad beyond 12 inches below the ground surface for this
project under normal circumstances and anticipated design features.
5.1.1 Bearing Capacity
Existing in-situ soils for this project indicates that the structure can be established on
shallow, continuous or isolated footings. Foundations shall be established on relatively
undisturbed native soil that is competent and unyielding. Alternatively, foundations may
be constructed on selective re-compacted native soil or compacted engineered fill as
described in the Earthwork Construction Recommendations Section of this report.
For a bearing capacity requirement of no more than 1500 psf, a minimum continuous
footing width of 15 incises shall be placed at a minimum of 18 inches below the existing
ground surface amp unyielding soils away from existing fill soils. For a columnar load of
no more than 2.5 tons,a circular or square isolated foundation diameter or width shall be
at least 24 inches. Foundation recommendations are made available based on adherence to
the remaining recommendations that are provided in this report. Alterations to the
aforementioned foundation recommendations may be completed upon a site inspection by
a geotechnical engineer after the foundation excavation is completed.
Envirotech Engineering Geotechnical Report
PO Box 984 page 13 Parcel 22212-75-900914
Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
Ph. 360-275-9374 November 16,2022
scanned with CamScanner
-4.1.2 Settlement
Total and differential settlement that a structure will undergo depends primarily on the
subsurface conditions. type of stmclure, amount and duration of pressure exerted by the
structure, reduction of pure water pressure, and in some instantts, the infiltration of fire
moisture. Based on the expected native soil conditions, anticipated development, and
constmction abides by the recommendations in this report,the assumed foundation system
may undergo a maximum of 1.0 inch total settlement. and a maximum differential
settlement of 0.75 inch.
5.1.3 Concrete Slabs-on-Grade
interior slabs, if utilized, should be supported on a minimum of 4 inches of compacted
coarse, granular material (Retained on U.S. Sieve 810 or greater) that is placed over
undisturbed, competent native subgrade or engineered rill per the Earthwork
Recommendations Section below.
The recommendations for interior concrete slabs-on-grade as presented herein are only
relevant for the geotechnical application of this project.Although beyond the scope of this
report, concrete slabs should also be designed for structural integrity and environmental
reliability. This includes vapor barriers or moisture control for mitigating excessive
moisture in the building.
51 Earthwork Construction Recommendations
Founding material for building foundations shall consist of undisturbed native soils to the specified
foundation depths. Compacted engineered fill,or selective re-compacted native soils may be used
to the extents provided in this Earthwork Construction Recommendations Section.The following
recommendations include excavations,subgmde preparation,type of fill,and placement of fill for
building foundations.
5.2.1 Excavation
Excavation is recommended to remove any excessive organic content or other deleterious
material, if present, beneath foundations and to achieve appropriate foundation depth.
Additional sub-excavation will be required for this project if the soils below the required
foundation depth are loose, saturated, not as described in this report, or otherwise
incompetent due to inappropriate land disturbing, or excessive water trapped within
foundation excavations prior to foundation concoction.All soils below the bottom of the
excavation shall be competent, and relatively undisturbed or property compacted fill. If
these soils are disturbed or deemed incompetent, re-compaction of these soils below the
anticipated footing depth is necessary. Excavations shall be completely dewatered,
compacted. and suitable before placement of additional native soil, engineered rill or
structural concrete.
Envimtecb Engineering Geotechnicai Report
PG Box 994 page 14 Parcel 22212-75-90094
Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
Ph. 360-275-9374 November 16.2022
$cg "h Cemawmer
5.2.2 Placement and Compaction of Native Solis and Engineered Fill
For engineered fill or disturbed native soils that will be utilized as fill material directly
beneath foundations, observation and/ or geotechnicai testing is required prior to
foundation comuuction. The following placement and compaction requirements an:
necessary.
For disturbed native soils or engineered fill beneath foundations, limits of compacted or
re-compacted fill shall extend laterally from the bottom edge of the foundation at a rate of
one horizontal foot for each foot of compacted or re-compacted fill depth beneath the
foundation.See the illustration below.
FOOTING
COMPACTED
HATING SOILS
Qi ENGINEERED t
ML 7� t
If— 61STIRDEO SUSGR40C
Both engineered fill and native Soils used as compacted fill should be free of roots and
other organics, rocks over 6 inches in size, or any other deleterious matter. Because of
moisture sensitivity, importing and compacting engineered fill may be more economical
than compacting disturbed native Soils. Engineered fill shall include having the soils
retained on the No. 4 sieve crashed (angular), and should consist of the following
gradation:
U.S.Standard Sieve %Finer wet ht)
6" 100
3" 60— 100
No.4 20—60
No.200 0-8
Table I
Particle Size Distribution of Engineered FBI
Compaction shall be achieved in compacted lifts not to exceed 6 inches for both native
soils and engineered fill,respectively. Each lift should be uniformly compacted to at least
95% of the modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557) and within 3% of
optimum moisture content. Each lift surface should be adequately maintained during
construction in order to achieve acceptable compaction and inter-lift bonding.
Temporary earth cuts and temporary(ill slopes exceeding 4 feet in height should be limited
to a slope of 2:1 (horizontal:vertical). Utility trenches or other confined excavations
exceeding 4 feet should conform to OSHA safety regulations.Permanent cut and fill slopes
shall be limited to a slope of 2:1.unless otherwise approved by an engineer.
Envimtech Engineering Geotochnical Report
PO Box 994 page 15 Parcel 22212-75-90094
Belfair,Washington 98328 Mason County,Washington
Ph. 360-275-9374 November 16,2022
saaaasm.thc.mS.n,.
5.2.3 Retaining Wall Racknll
Native soils maybe used as retaining wall backfill for this project if the total wall height is
4 feet or less and the recommendations below are followed.Native soils for retaining walls
exceeding 4 feel in height must be approved by the local authority or evaluated by an
engineer. Backfill may consist of engineered fill, as presented in this report, or borrow
material approved by a geotechnical engineer. Compaction of these materials shall be
achieved in compacted lifts of about 12 inches. Each lift should be uniformly compacted
to at least 85%, and no mo re than 90% of the modified Proctor maximum dry density
(ASTM D 1557). If pavement or building loads are planned to be located within retaining
wall backfill,then 90%compaction is required.In addition,heavy construction equipment
should be at a distance of at least A the wall height.Over-compaction and limiting heavy
construction equipment should be prevented to minimize the risk of excess lateral earth
pressure on the retaining structure. Envirotech recommends that retaining wall backfill is
compacted with light equipment such as a hand-held power tamper. If clean,coarse gravel
soils are utilized as engineered fill, and surcharges will not influence the retaining wall,
compaction may be achieved by reasonably densifying granular soils with construction
equipment.
5.2.4 Wet Weather Considerations
Due to the types of subsurface soils, additional provisions may be required during
prolonged wet weather.Every precaution should be made in order to prevent free moisture
from saturating the soils within excavations. If the bottom of excavations used for footing
placement changes form a moist and dense/hard characteristic as presented in this report
to muck or soft, saturated conditions, then these soils become unsuitable for foundation
bearing material. if this situation occurs,a geotechnical engincer should be notified, and
these soils should be completely removed and replaced with compacted engineered fill or
suitable native material as presented in this section.
5.2.5 Building Pads
Building pads for this project,if utilized,shall be constructed per the fill placement and
compaction recommendations as presented above. Both engineered fill and native soils
may be used for building pads. Building pad slopes shall be no steeper than 2:1 for both
compacted engineered fill and m-compacted native soils used as fill.Building pad fill shall
be-keyed,into the existing subgrade to a depth of at least 2 feet below the existing ground
surface.The term "keyed,"as used here, implies that the interface between the building
pad and subgrade is horizontally level.Alternatively,building pads may be keyed into the
subgrade to the above specified depth,and stepped.Stepped fill should be keyed into the
subgrade at a minimum width of 10 feet. All footings shall be located at least 5 feet away
from the top of the engineered fill slope.See the diagram below for a depiction of fill pads
for structural support.
Geoechnical Report
POO B
P Box ox 99 Engineering4 page 16 parcel 22212-75-90094
Italian,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
B November le,2022
lfi. 360-275-9374
sca��aa wnry camswnne.
toeKru ru
vn Cali baK
roue \.
tars
M 4WU MKe
rn.M
ifKM
53 Building and Footing Setbacks
Due to potential debris flow,the building location should have a minimum setback from the local
ascending slope tce equal to%the slope height.The toe of the ascending slope is delineated as a
grade break in ubichthe ascending slope is in excess of 40%.Envirotech recommends the building
setback to be at least 20 feet from the me of the nearby ascending slopes. See the Site Plan in
Appendix A for an illustration of the setbacks.
5A Surface and Subsurface Drainage
Positive drainage should be provided in the final design for all planned residential buildings.
Drainage shall include sloping the ground surface,driveways and sidewalks away from the project
saacmes.AB constructed surface and subsurface drains should be adequaWy maintained during
the life of the structure. If drainage problems occur during or after construction, additional
engineered water mitigation will be required immediately. This may include a combination of
swales,berms.drain pipes.infiltration facilities,or cadet protection in order to diver water away
from the structures to an appropriate protected discharge area. Leakage of water pipes, both
drainage and supply lines,shall be prevented at all times.
If impervious thresholds are exceeded M the prevailing agency code,then engineered stormwater
management plans are required for this project. The drainage engineer must coordinate with a
geolechnical engineer for input with relation to slope stability prior to submitting drainage plans.
If storawater management plans are not required for this project, then the following
recommendations should be followed.
For this project, we recommend that any drainage control per Mason County requirements is
acceptable if located outside buffers and setbacks.
Fnvirottch Engineering Cicotechnical Report
PO Box 994 page 17 Parcel 22212-75-90094
Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County.Washington
Ph. 360-27"374 November 16,2022
Scanned wlM1CaraScanne,
55 Vegetation Buffer and Considerations
Eor this project, we believe that a detailed clearing and grading plan is tun warranted unless the
prevailing agency thnisholda are exceeded,and basic vegetation management practices should be
adhered to.
Vegetation Buffer—Vegetation shall ma be removed from the face of the critical slope.However,
any me:deemed hazardous to life nr PmPeny shall be removed. if tree removal is necessary.then
stumps and mots shall remain in place, and the underbrush and will shall remain undisturbed as
much as possible.Any disturbed wil shall be graded and m-compacted in nrster to restore the terrain
similar to preexisting conditions and drainage patterns. See the Site Plan in Appendix A of this
report for a depiction of the vegetation buffer.
5.6 Temporary and Permanent Erosion Control
Erosion control during construction should include minimizing the removal of vegetation to the
Jim extem possible.Erosion control measures during construction may include stockpiling cleared
vegetation, silt fencing, intercepting swales, berms, straw bales, plastic cover or other standard
controls. Although other controls may be used,if adequate,silt fencing is presented in this report
as the first choice for temporary erosion control.Any erosion control should be located down-slope
and beyond the limits of construction and clearing of vegetation where surface water is expected to
Bow.If the loss of sediments appears to be greater than expected,or erosion control measures are
not functioning as needed,additional measures must be implemented immediately. See Appendix
D for sketches and general notes regarding selected erosion control measures. The Site Plan in
Appendix A depicts the recommended locations for erosion control facilities to be installed as
necessary.
Perntanem erosion control is necessary if substantial vegetation has not been established within
disturbed areas upon completion of the project.Temporary erosion control should remain in place
until permanent erosion control has been established. Permanent erosion control may include
promoting the growth of vegetation within the exposed areas by mulching,seeding or an equivalent
measure.Selected recommendations for permanent erosion control are provided in Appendix D.
Additional erosion control measures that should be performed include routine maintenance and
replacement,when necessary,of permanent erosion control,vegetation,drainage structures and/or
features.
5.7 Septic Drainffelds
Septic drainfields were considered in our geotechnical evaluation.This includes septic drainfields
with relation to the observed wit conditions, expected vegetation removal, and existing and
proposed topography.Based on the aforesaid parameters,the septic drainfields are not expected to
adversely influence critical slopes.This is also based on compliance with all recommendations in
this report.
Envirmcch Engineering Gemachntcal Report
PO Box 984 page 18 Pitted 22212-75-90094
Belfah,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
Ph. 360-275,9374 November 16,2022
scanned with camswnner
5.8 Structural Mitigation
With respect to landslide alleviation or slope improvements.Structural mitigation is no;ncce"A
for this.pmject. 711is determination is based on the anticipated improvements of the project.
engineering conclusions, and compliance with all recommendations provided in this report.
Envirotech Engineering Geotechnical Report
PO Box 994 page 19 Parcel 22212-75-90094
Bclfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
Ph. 3fi0.275-9374 November 16,2022
Scanned with c.mScanns,
6.0 CLOSURE
Based on the project information provided by the owner, the proposed development. and site
conditions as presented in this report.it is E tvimlech's opinion that additional gemeehnical studies
arc not required to further evaluate this project.
Due to the inherent natural variations of the and stratification and the nature of the geotechnical
subsurface exploration, there is always a possibility that soil conditions encountered during
construction are different than those described in this report it is not recommended that a qualified
engineer performs a site inspection during earthwork construction unless fill soils will influence
the impending foundation.However,if native,undisturbed subsurface conditions found on-site am
not as presented in this report,then a gemechnical engineer should be consulted.
This report presents geotechnical design guidelines,and is intended only for the owner,or owners'
representative,and location of project described herein.This report should not be used to dictate
construction procedures or relieve the contractor of his responsibility.
Any and all content of this gemechnicat report is only valid in conjunction with the compliance of
all recommendations provided in this report. Semantics throughout this report such as 'shall;
'should' and 'recommended' imply that the combuing design and/or specifications must be
adhered to in order to potentially protect life andl or property. Semantics such as 'suggested' or
'optional' refer that the associated design or specification may or may not be performed, but is
provided for optimal performance.The recommendations provided in this report are valid for the
proposed development at the issuance date of this report.Changes to the site other than the expected
development, changes to neighboring properties, changes to ordinances or regulatory codes, or
broadening of accepted geotechnical standards may affect the long-tern conclusions and
recommendations of this report.
The services described in this report were prepared under the responsible charge of Michael Staten,
a professional engineer with Envimtech-Michael Staten has appropriate education and experience
in the field of geonechnical engineering in order to assess landslide hazards,earthquake hazards,
and general soil mechanics.
please contact Michael Staten at 360-275-9374 if you have any questions,comments,or require
additional information.
Sincerely,
Envirotech Engineering /r,'.Ga C��a`—'
Michael Staten,P.E.
Jessica Smith,M.S. Geotechnical Engineer
Staff Geologist
Geotxhnical Repon
Envirorech Engineering parcel 22212-75-90094
PO Box 994 page 20
Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington
B November 16,2022
Ph. 360.275.9374
Scanned won Camscan�er
APPENDIX A
SITE PLAN
i
I
is�.moe wnn cam�nw
_ TIN| k\ �
, . ,
�
■ |
@ a « ! !
\ PARk
����
h / , g
APPENDIX R
SOIL INFORMATION
Scanned with CamSrB w
3a �~
a
K a
u �
S e
ail
TEST PIT LOG
TEST PIT NUMBER TP•1
PROJECT: SFR G8010pkel Assessment DATE OF LOG: IMIN2022
PROJECT NO: 22293 LOGGED BY: VACS
EXCAVATOR: WA
CLIENT: Gard DRILL RIG: Nan
LOCATION. P,,W22212-75-9D094 ELEVATION: WA
Mason Canty,Washington
FINAL DEPTH OF WATER: WA
INITIAL DEPTH OF WATER: WA sruon01r01EmA.MT
DEPTH SOLSTTRATA- USCS DESCRIPTION LL RDEM G
N am`
10 m W
AND TEST DATA
0 _.. _ _.._.
SP G a0eC Ry9� SAND
R v.M same Hie..
GRAVEL
u`
y�pt
0 J Yy
'2X .
6�.
a Evavation brtntbled et ePre�IM'
60 bet
i
e
8
0
ENVIROTECH ENGINEERING
N0 Gmaneebr Enm+l GederMkal E pvn g
>b erm.+�e Duos oy b re bme w eon nv b
yyalWlleaM�teen
W uYoq/n/Ywm]p'V Dq O0.pYDIA�A�-���
tp11{YY1�Im
Munn County,Washington
AC--MOmMuW grw*MV sbW➢towN 15 to M VKMnt slap"
��ww.t.,sa aar
e...� ob tmoaa
IM DADS PKO1am- '13 b N b W f
µD,DtirYy YYpbyul.'ISbSIegeKf
�rmlMgAH 1COb N00nf
f�YnyrEya/ea0on' flmiW asW1+�M b{Ww
Db Yi
.tb1A0ol Y'H Yir y aPb
liveaipv�'1�13 pnda
EAnMY2 M pbMm oQ:nrduR a+�m4 mQfae�d
SY mYrbt
pnmgln a MaDYwa
s.tY�o
t>nbmn�Ymf��mu0:6.a�trmmro+m(YKeamnmYq:Nme moa vee YcaMt
rD.r�men a,nn,O�y...nawe�.
rypea 0ft7 a W-Oy rmn
911-10"bYDr awYOY'M'v^Y/bY^
El,-DbasY
2 f-mbW �Wp —d/b
2C@-QbS9iaAK'�I9�KaPIDtlYbsn
RapbWsad4Dli1
Sbpr lSb wpnaY1
prfq b ntlif�!/Iibc Tl b'D itd�e+b JpYE m�+ni/
�tlYZIWc�tY�tl Glbal
cywyy���b�wdn(I(W:Vwt b+
A bYOd..&:AYwI13 bS7 idYs
gpDmydbo69'no,e
yw,sT dpva14�D
Arai+SYVMDMN.Ob60iMe¢ VwYloY/ape�2l btlxs)
bb`P� d..,ae.em r..ayw: w<•oedee
f�rdaPMN1'WmdaMa'(�+4+YA:M
t A vi>m>a
i �'w•D M+a unW CYPaw�'u��l wig>a
__awea.mn CanScenner
yqu,np..nw ur.ma�aM�+r r..lec»�taapw..awc '
y,rW,wraoa^
EtebpAW Me FeexXAWaWA�P4pN LOMMJa Fpaat
lyalX De ( ex%NJaxWAI.
9�dW(coox%i311YWA).1.LMteE DepVr SdW
(GWx%SMiWA)
G Np 11a dii, M l , UmWC D00i Sp-
(
GpyMq L Dap eft(O FWp M.
Iypw aW Mop: No
Mlmr CmnpCMnH
Ev
FWc.ddmap wd:S parpertl
IaMbma Eaten,bmea,maa�nes
LanCiarm pppVar IN��TM^Yme7:Ba ka'uw
Larcabnn paalian MraaA'm°^xio^eA:SAe abpe
pprmsbps Mrape:Cana]
Awn-abp aApa:Dpnrea
Nydrlp s09 MN} Np
rndpp o
iirteN pimep unit S pndnl
(.endpnn'Eakara.eamaa.t a
LeMbrm Mraall^a^s--bW7:TrtaE
Daa alWM:lXaur
Aaosa.,sA*0ii Ve anepa:unaer
NYNic aNnfvq: Na
FbrOva daWp uM:3 percerp
ler Ardn+n:Depnsabns
LeedV pa^W^MreeEp^ensbrai Dip
:
DpWn Cana
t�a��
ii : m
Adosa daps:Corrave
NYyya apr Miep:Yea
Noma
FMaxt pi, pww<:]percent
LaMMo:mpresaiom,amha9e+
(aMMen posh Mree4rvnensonep:Dip
DpnnaUpa shape:cpr .,linear
Aa .-akpe shape:Comave
IycWa .Vlip.' Yes
Data Source Information
S SorveYMea'. Mason Caunb,Waslwplon
Survey Ama Data'. Version at,Aup 31.M13a
ltYlax3
nrw Sal Sur.v paaax N]
ell` ea�...w e.vw x.nweowo•iry sm w.n
S amed v th CamScanner
^*^'"'^""^•' WATEIR WELL RJPORT
�Yaa .w<W � {f11t Of M.{NFEI�I wr r.w rWrl. —
Ip OY10.1t
z
m tncnoN a •$a+ w.>�=-- to Si <... 11._._2L-.....�.Y
�j !A r•Jip{fi B{f. �w .NrIWn ] 4rY[NwC Ilq FfLL l00wfJffO0Ml1[•T IfpK0lPNi offWTOM
p �l�•Wr 1rrYrYln M[I C r�rYr..nwW NMr W�.YMM1wtl.[M•^[�•r �w.rr
G NINw�N�<
M HI TYfC CF WOINI'f<•'+M M H
0 bs✓M [W[ 9 Oww _ O j
G •.ewtmuN l: n<rw v"1 IIIIM _
'� W OF¢Nfq•x yMVMw{ 6 Nr•H. .— '3 _.p
E w... 23.1
w COM1futTltN ecT••8 •1 with fYr>o vat{t .._201 35
cY+Ns•..c 6 o.�... p . 221.- I rn;
b r� IF • m.a.w. _ n.. ._n lay - ----�—
233
on Yr.[.....— �w .•
a - 1
wwYrM.tY i[.Y r.M
PMMIY.w -- •ru r. -- r
w Nm la t
prrsr.W.r.pi wtrn�LR s ,.
O •rv<YM<�WYI
9 1p iuliw I•.wsw•�w f •Mf c -
P! F•T91 IMr! ww�•..y`•r[nr•w
rr�-r.. f1.7 •.Y�YrJ•w ... '
ly v.o�nf�[ r.rwWx[o•.
C � rn[W Berl 1 w.l l{ ..+.HM It6i CONCI•UCrMf 111fiWC•T1i! N
� —�M..'Y..f��\M�w[M M �ryr u.W R[<MrWt1/MMW/.dY•V�M.
WvuY.M MMu...ti�•WN.rsuwHUYnY•[[e
8 Y[a.wNM
.'Wiw�Mrr waMwwNMraOfWwNrwHN
ti .r ++ •.w W .� Nw�W N.rt Wi Crslllo¢w—
fY••••YN.a+r�•Yrv.rYYnvr+[..ar rYC -3 Itrf. M1IlfIIpNnI SIEErS F t✓<C{Js•rtr1
Sca��ae wnn Ca��s<armer
APPENDIX C
SLOPE STABILITY
ka��edw�noa�u��
.nn
. w
j t .an
t . an
a . an
, se
soeo wan C.mSw oer
. 00
1 10
1 . 0
1 .
1 . 4
1 . 50
1 . 60
rj k 1 . 70
1 . 80
00
. 00
—1
Sce�—d wpm CamScaInll
AI'I'P:NINX 1)
1?RI)SII)N CONTROL
GCOE%TILE FABRIC
WRAP AROUND TRENCH
TO AT LEAST ENTIRE
BOTTDM OF TRENCH
BEFORE PLACING GRAVEL SS M
EDU[VAIE DR BETTER
12. DCEP. D' WIDE TRENCH
FILLED WITH 3/1' TO 1 1/2'i
WASHED GRAVEL OR VEGETATIpN !A rt
DIRREETIBM OF 1 C%ISTING
VAT" MOW r GROUND SURFACE
Y
CST FENCE — CROSS SECTION
N.T.S.
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
2,2' WEED) POST (TYP) AND WIRE MESH
OR EOIOVALENT OR BETTER
B 6 FT MAX O.C. � lrt �� urt
EXIST MI
SURFACE !
12• DEEP, e' VIDE Nrt
TRENCH FILLED WITH un
3/4' TO 1 1/2' —�
WASHED GRAVEL OR VEG
BOTTOM EXTENTS
OF c T EEBCE — ➢(TAIL
GEOTE%TILE F N.TS.
PR➢VIDE FULL WIDTH
➢DRESS/EGRESS
3/4 IN TO I I/2}Na
CRUSHED GRAVEL
MI AT 6 LV
MINIM
LACED CFPFH
VELL—w —D
SOILSIN
R.25 FT MIN
I
::;=-
STABD 17ED CONSTRUCTION ENTR84C
N.T.S.
5�an�ea wnn Camsca��ne�
lcPwaP RWPI mna aR.
IttRD NtR'I.IPy(Y�vgYD[L ./J�
POA.M,SM.t.(LP[P.r.K,dCR fD/14 K.YKS PON P tl rlK.tb.KmLOIP O[L.
KY naa A K oPaa+rt uw nareKlaL M a.d.clo. .VOP reTPL R.PRL°'uv mPfR
pClyL YgIpY eR601 Y RRI.T OVIR fKllfii .VPKe KOI eN itLW.T Pf6
ILy la<K.yp iOpT LM.¢,IK6R[i Y RVFti PPL R tVK[41[V6
fyr we Y.f3V.Rr Wvl.![t �QOa.r •M 1Re O fKL
V11.1LLR SSP cmyPI oP.xrnRRKMRi>ieflcNv n V¢+Mc�C1Ii Y d LYL..Vu mt�Kt�mmaai wi l.Haw a6uRcNDV'P n.SaFR.)VuLwSP¢K LSd rmiaM1T wP�.F u¢Plmm R.[..RInRIIN.eii C uuR4 lL..R RIMi M w.'♦p MKL Ap[�.IY 6O R�M PMiRrorz(NfP M}KRQ Tu�vfmf,R
F®M" ig P Gntl1St nwv•fIbFmMv nI Pr fw
% P=
V,a Fm ..nVR/Yr I[LtP¢rl K tlY rIMP.
MYK PP.[e.M bnTRKLDLW a v.SnR 6vCK 1
I
tKGM
MN v UM+u ice m�ici°lui. wLRiuri L Fi' ✓��'
y'LMSOP.RLOi I4II0 L1PKH.�1 TM WPIOLir¢ i.QPdP' 1 6WMf iRi01) .PKt4 iVlMlt
P.py.luLrpl.pt ast.0 R.i(/IMLe LtP n;RPf KrlRc ar[LMr Iv vRP SYKf w nrWCL
PPT MNS.rRliifl.l. N[M faIPIK.KLMR.4[I.UIVI tP OS®.
SdtO�WY l TPJ 501PM ID�M M.Y%¢LW.LL11mL M 0,t6.P.fRNry Ma+[Y MTTwR 16e IFM
41 RC¢K M.WK.R PFR=@�'KLS P t A PViIAM1 IY 6M'M
it�1R F.mim ..at wvDG KST 6IIR.P a.KMn¢ilPKv. M.K R vWlm m m
•b m iw.tO1pRA 1.¢.RI'gl R..YP6t Iw(R.A
i.¢I i[N 6 PKIO d M P6m..a L[IDfM10116 0.ML M1 KR>rMALTt YW ' M N
S 6lMf:.P FMIVR V6TJ.D w4i R..f.ON.T1Y il.lLilLe .K On1P IfLfM.K it F K
M IK P PO]M�KYRO MRiC M[IK..0030�PM.LT. RtNa 1t1K
P.dl.t�wIPiN.FC F tt111 P P PPQ R.M wKMm tlLt!¢.MN OMIIaY
P.[S1P IKllt OIILTvti[.PM'd F M ml.d'.3®efi Y✓tl1M...r..L iwW.LMfI Y M K
nlaPuec"iIR°OKruww�rv�v+a�i tI m�l�w umr n�o V°i`vaf�n °°n li
mtmP wlw¢IPa I vaL c KK wo.P,mra mwnw
.'b'dARYtr6 P6'dt.K M Orv00dSK 0C1O6 wL mPCK ILLRaI
t�TP aRVRt P M LVPr Mi P}wpi F4111.i}R a!
KL. nP+IM KT0¢ouw m+Ln.iuP w KLaPc,Krlx L wmwv uK.m PxaeP w.RPNOM1O A R v®
tiR➢fS1W pYtl..'14iNSR.[1C atl K KlY2...a 4m 1wNIaROP1�l't Y9 Ra42 R N.ltl K.wlL P YK
n Pfal POI.R.PLKe P.LL.K.i VIiX[PR6 KO6
M FOP 4Nl 0RRC1P1 KRMa1 P PRP R1[T4VaN1 GIt.1P dK M ePJIDR4MIG.A
YC O¢M!K. fP M PB6iLMr¢.M.L 0p0� Wt VrYP K[m IlL P 1K W4�PL�LLP
P�6 M.i LOL M1(W�0/LOIPKIPI P'LL R K9RmKL IP �t @PNr�LLP 9PLL R LP2R0 F a,VK[L
K KitTw¢.a m.W O ML PPID.w QVPMi ffl114 f4'LlRL 1PMPP
Niw Mro®�.NY Yvu ID—P SIM1t uY[uMM1wI.P 1Vffi SIN.K NO IP iNi IWIIT aC A 1®L.
r6Cip YrIVRr R P wm[ii M 6SYi4 P 1M1.[2vR'L M yVi[VOip Smi
6 PISAG V�rtO.Y 011R(AlS fPNT LwLL K IPpO 1?5py PNp 6 RIRO P vP4 a![Q�P d'
Pal IPvo w a v«R mYmc P v..vA.KlItP e..aPx a m:nu Y aowadc o.mrt mt alr.M.c
[NMf wyl iab�6 IAQtRO✓a/P VIDOI.'a 16dT gNrip P mfR tl IPI.KL w.la.'IY CM S.K.LPR
uPP Or•SR[6 PR 0 f iDN.fM.r a...LPw.L✓.LWP'
aavNP�PIXYl R 0IV6 N M 0.(T.rt�!P<la
t1II�O P LQIR®Y(/;y{yy I®v[Mpvurt POILfrM IP iN YM aRM%01M R 0vA Kl
P R P1601�Ilya®,SAI a Nla6R Krr¢! .LKIP ®M w.VM.YPW4 P M 1'K.OLM 1P.ML
VR �iPO a11Pi'RP NN V�i OI .�[Rva•� apTP4 O.IR SP.:TfII PWI.K d M1I[L RIOC
fOG�f iRPOP l.Yl.LDOOv!IPPL LIL NY al K ve[M O
RL.R[flVp.Lgyp gPty yP.pIQT9�ar KO Yw�OtNRY
I.S.lale�lim�1WtDI.K�Q 0P4 C!�
RI{y�ILIP61p P Sr.alat Kp9QT{.ID W.YPA 1Nt RF
Tma�ia.K i..K/ID�rM r..s.c mmW w tnn wPv tavm ur fn�m vvm r p.�ol
v r.i pp{^�.P lim r.a u!K�uu OROuur M.P W+
PN[0r v MP+K�nr.fop(N.POw P.Ki P ML�moOi P a1R
PPpKr RIWYO urKi P M.w.t ID R AYa PPL R�..Np n-pm A M.riaO r..^L
f➢61LU[iPl div.KL
""t°""w�sa m lava a¢°1V'm�le°n..e:.o PiLri il`°ma:cr°°�`N'rnI hi°viO'l.c.wn w.wY c
M Alta, RPWLS KN!1R N[M�M WPOL E!$t .IN adttM.KA 9NLLLt wF M�4.^Y"ie,9
00Lf.r6.KIDWIVL W lwll OSOItlh alF
..almw m u+i K�+m,ma�'PLMl+1p»L�o��.a�aoi�VWrPi.�P n�i avu c as[.ur twe
Ptyd)L FjR..wvp srRT.M v.NP..PL.K ol[P..wtA�tRn Vld fMID.IDS..t v.d
.IP tML rw A.1¢aort Groan rKUR P rlPaa..Su rtKi
T ro.x
�vr..mm fwc TM LwL K.a Lum P M Klww.m wwowl wPI.L
M PRT LWK e.T+.'P MSPItL[PM.F.KPM
YWN.mvREYYS�lfYli I.(MR w6 Kaiun.'Rm IPii 9FLl'Ki[dIPIL.
X..l.RI.TI IRl VRM.OKM hbOl OVMY.V 4di6.(YICID N
ORt R M IP..
fTPPR ILm I.PI[PKL R f.S1fKD VL.L 1'PYl[t P R VPei C6..<S.
PKL K YYID.x.NQI.T VIMt.N.RI P M RtW P M P6Y.W
.Plt@/pt d1P M WI4 M VYC KP WY R 61KNTl O
Y.[KA RWl K PWL.WI¢P fa��.t91 yK.f O IRP
ILSIA I.KI[POO./aR'
•iW Pwl R SNv.m.r@66 A M 61.t..P Mi vQi MaG M tM O M
YP VYD{ISPMmTIOQ. liOMaWPR IRP1f6M.aPSI'
L�4wL R LS.RD IMKa(
Scannatl wnM1 CariSranner