HomeMy WebLinkAboutMitigation and Monitoring Plan - PLN General - 6/30/2015 RECEIVED
JUL - 1 2015
26 W. CEDAR ST.
� 1�l r`cnnr�
a
Tahuya Basin & Channel Owners Association
Mitigation and Monitoring Plan
for
Excavator dredging and upland use impacts
June 30, 2015 426 w. CEDAR s�..
U1� �
PW-
quo-
MARINE SURVEYS Et ASSESSMENTS
521 Snagstead Way
Port Townsend WA 98368
(360) 385-4073
marine.surveys.incCogmait.com
r
s
A. Background
As a part of the agreement for the conditional approval of the maintenance dredge proposed in
this project, any impacts resulting from the land-based dredging and use of the upland areas will
be mitigated and monitored for recovery. A 500 ft. path will be used by an excavator with a 9ft
wide footprint, resulting in a 4,500 sift impact footprint.Please note that this is a conservative
estimate as the excavator rides on two 2 ft.wide tracks, meaning of its 9ft width, only 4ft is
actually in contact with the ground.Additionally there is already an established unpaved
road/trail that is mostly barren of vegetation,which will be used by the excavator, allowing the
excavator to avoid potentially impacted vegetation at the site.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) lists 4 forms of mitigation for
construction impacts in the regulatory floodplain; in order of preference,these are avoidance
(staying out of the floodplain), minimization(avoiding the most important habitats, in this case
the shoreline and riparian buffer zones), restoration(restoring or improving conditions on-site),
and compensation(improving habitats outside of the project site) (FEMA 2010). While the
current project,by its nature as a shoreline development,cannot avoid the floodplain, it can
successfully minimize impact and restore on-site habitat.
Like all mitigation, any project that has the potential to impact functions and values of an
important aquatic habitat,that project needs to provide for compensation and mitigation. In this
project,no values and functions are anticipated to be impacted;however, mitigation is proposed
to improve the current conditions on the site. In looking at long-term management strategies to
maintain the improved conditions,we looked to the Federal Compensatory Mitigation for Losses
of Aquatic Resources Final Rule(2008):
Compensation for impacts to aquatic resources in coastal watersheds (watersheds that
include a tidal water body)should also be located in a coastal watershed where
practicable. In general, the required compensatory mitigation should be located within
the same watershed as the impact site, and should be located where it is most likely to
successfully replace lost functions and services, taking into account such watershed scale
features as aquatic habitat diversity, habitat connectivity, relationships to hydrologic
sources (including the availability of water rights), trends in land use, ecological
benefits, and compatibility with adjacent land uses. When compensating for impacts to
marine resources, the location of the compensatory mitigation site should be chosen to
replace lost functions and services within the same marine ecological system (e.g., reef
complex, littoral drift cell). Compensation for impacts to aquatic resources in coastal
watersheds (watersheds that include a tidal water body)should also be located in a
coastal watershed where practicable.
B. Site Vegetation/ Conditions
Existing vegetation on top of bluff adjacent to shoreline: Douglas Fir(Pseudotsuga
menziessi), Western Red Cedar(Thuja plicata),Pacific Madrone(Arbutus enziesh), Salal
(Gaultheria shallon),Evergreen Huckleberry(Vaccinium ovatum), Dull Oregon Grape(Mahonia
nervosa), Sword Fern(Polystichum munitum), and Wild strawberry(Fragaria virginiana).Non-
Marine Surveys&Assessments Tahuya Mitigation and Monitoring Plan 2
native invasive species include: English Ivy(Hedera helix),Evergreen Blackberry(Rubus
laciniatus), and Scotch Broom(Cytisus scorparius).
C. Proposed Mitigation Plan
All efforts have been made to avoid and minimize potential impacts associated with the land-
based dredging and use of upland areas for access. The excavator will be potentially impact
4,500 sgft or 6%of the upland areas that is primarily an established unpaved road/trail mostly
barren of vegetation(Figures 4 through 6).No trees will be affected as a result of the proposed
action.For the minimal areas within the impact footage(4,500 sgft)that contain native
vegetation, monitoring for the recovery of these plants will occur to ensure complete recovery
and no-net-loss after the five year monitoring period. In order to mitigate for any unavoidable
impacts associated with this action,the proponents propose to remove dense bushes of the
invasive non-native Scotch Broom from all of the areas at this site(Figures 3 through 7),
approximately 68,000 sgft .
Coincidentally the Tahuya Basin &Channel Owners Association(TBCOA)has been voluntarily
removing the Scotch Broom at this site on an annual basis for several years now. However,this
will now be documented and monitored for mitigation purposes.Past park stewardship includes
various forms of removal beginning in 1984. From 1984 to 1988 residents controlled the Scotch
Broom by method of spraying. From 1988 to about 2005 a combination of cutting and spraying
was practiced. Beginning in 2005 to present,other residents joined in the removal efforts and
mostly did so by way of cutting or pulling. Spray has not been used in the last few years. In
addition to Scotch Broom control,the residents have planted many native plants and even got a
Mason County grant in 2010 to help purchase more plants(see Attachment A).They also
installed a pet/dog-waste bag dispenser and disposal station in order to help reduce pet waste
entering the shoreline waters and contaminating the shellfish beds(Figure 3).
D. Performance Standards
Performance standards are measurable criteria for determining if the goals and objectives of the
mitigation project are being achieved. If the proposed benchmarks are not achieved by
comparing the surveys to the mitigation goals,then contingency plans will need to be
implemented.
Performance Standard (Invasive removal): All areas where invasive plants were removed will
be surveyed visually and categorized with photo stations. This is to ensure that 0%(none) of the
targeted Invasive species(Scotch Broom)will be present and have not reestablished within each
monitoring year.
E. Monitoring Plan
An as-built drawing and report will be submitted to Mason County DCD as documentation of the
implementation of the approved invasive removal plan within one month of the removal process.
Once approved,the monitoring proposal is to maintain and monitor the survival of the native
plants,which will be uncovered, as well as removal of the invasive plants for five years.
The plan will include vegetation description and photo documentation from established photo
stations.A panoramic photo of the entire mitigation site will also be provided.Monitoring will
Marine Surveys&Assessments Tahuya Mitigation and Monitoring Plan 3
I
r
take place over a period of five years at the end of the growing season(late August or early
September)of each monitoring year.The performance standard will be monitored by measuring
plots in zones within the removal area that will be established and mapped on the as-built plan.
There will be photo points for each plot and they will be referenced on the as-built plan.Each
year the photo points that are established at each site will be used for comparison. Photos will be
taken at all points for all years as visual documentation of the performance standard progress, or
lack of.
In addition to photos at designated points,photo documentation must include a panoramic view
of the entire eradication area. Submitted photos must be formatted on standard 8 '/z"by I V
paper,dated with the date the photo was taken, and clearly labeled with the direction from which
the photo was taken.The photo location points must be identified on an appropriate drawing.
Collected data and photos will be compiled into an annual report each year and submitted to the
Mason County DCD by December of each monitoring year for five years. Each annual
monitoring report shall include written and photographic documentation on whether the
performance standard is being met. Monitoring results will determine whether or not
contingency measures will be needed.
Performance Standard (Invasive removal)
Year 1: Achieve 70%removal of targeting invasive species from mitigation areas
Year 2:Achieve 70%removal of targeting invasive species from mitigation areas
Year 3:Achieve 70%removal of targeting invasive species from mitigation areas
Year 4: Achieve 70%removal of targeting invasive species from mitigation areas
Year 5: Achieve 70%removal of targeting invasive species from mitigation areas
Although the TBCOA's goal is for the 100%removal of invasive Scotch Broom from the park,
based on their experience of performing this removal for the past several years a 70%removal
rate is more realistic. With that in mind, only 6%of the upland areas is proposed to be impacted,
which is significantly less area than the 70%area proposed for invasive Scotch Broom removal.
Therefore the mitigation goal is to removal 100%of the invasive Scotch Broom; however an
objective 70%invasive removal is the minimal amount required for each year's mitigation to be
considered a success.
F. Maintenance
Maintenance removal shall occur once a year before the Scotch Broom blooms within the
mitigation area so that existing native species can recolonize the area.
Marine Surveys&Assessments Tahuya Mitigation and Monitoring Plan 4
Figure 1. Aerial Photo of Project Area
�.S
Marine Surveys&Assessments Tahuya Mitigation and Monitoring Plan 5
r I
Figure 2. Proposed Impact and Mitigation Areas
°4«
ME
�x
I
�xy
}
avator Path
- pproximately �
500ft X 9ft
E
or
4 4,500 s ,� ... . °;
JOO\k*l
b �t
Marine Surveys&Assessments Tahuya Mitigation and Monitoring Plan 6
Figure 3.Entrance to Park and Doggy Bag Station
Ow
„�•,.
Marine Surveys&Assessments Tahuya Mitigation and Monitoring Plan 7
Figure 4. Path Through Park(approximately 12 ft wide)and Vegetation
r,
t.
IK
X F
Marine Surveys&Assessments Tahuya Mitigation and Monitoring Plan 8
Figure& ram Through Par and Vegetation (mos#y Scotch Broom)
\ /�:\ . ;�\�<
f
x y�: & �
f
�~<� <� <
1 �/
< K « « x
. . . � � . .. ..�\
Marine Surveys&Assessments TauaM+g§o and MoitEnPlan 9
Figure 6. Park Vegetation is mostly Scotch Broom
l#�
ti
4
Marine Surveys &Assessments Tahuya Mitigation and Monitoring Plan U
Figure 7.Proposed Path through Trees
v
f
�i
Marine Surveys&Assessments Tahuya Mitigation and Monitoring Plan 11
J
Figure 8.Upper Portion of Beach Access at Park
r }
y3, !
:A
1
. r!i „;;-�. iE'� �:ai��':1ib�>l?_rl�.,;,\+"`:...- •,�t.,�"ira`�.: 3tl��i'�'� ..:. _.i®
Marine Surveys&Assessments Tahuya Mitigation and Monitoring Plan 12
ATTACHMENT A
Report on: Mason Conservation District,Critical Area Buffer
Grant No.G0700296
May 29,2010
Cooperators: Linda Sollars and John Lincoln
Address: 22402—66 h Avenue West
Mountlake Terrace,WA 98043
Phone: 425-775-8192
Site of Property: 18891 NE Northshore Road,Tahuya,WA 98588
Nelson's Waterfront Tracts#2,Tracts 23,24,25,and 26
OVERVIEW OF SECTION 3,PART B: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
1)Conservation Cover(Code 327):Establishing and maintaining permanent vegetative cover to
protect soil and water resources.
Following the plan outlined by Stephanie Bishop,and using materials and plants
purchased by the Cooperators,as well as plants provided by the Hood Canal
Coordinating Council,we have planted as detailed in the site locations described below.
We have spent nearly every weekend at the site this spring and plan to be there every
weekend in June,late August,and September.We will be on site full-time during July
and the first half of August,and will be able to continue the watering plan at those times
(and later if needed).
2)Tree/Shrub Site Preparation(Code 490):Treatment of areas to improve site conditions for
establishing trees and/or shrubs.
In the areas where we planted shrubs,we used a combination of organic topsoil,compost,
and bark to try to create a favorable soil mix for the plants.This is described in more
detail in the site areas described below.
Grant No. G0700296—Sollars/Lincoln pg. 13 May 29,2010
3)Tree/Shrub Establishment(Code 612):Establishing woody plants by planting cuttings or
seedlings,direct seeding,or natural regeneration.
See the site areas detailed below for lists of plantings.
4)Mulching(Code 484):Apply plant residues,by-products,or other suitable materials produced
off-site to the land surface.
For mulching,we used mostly organic bark,augmented by organic compost that we
purchased and by a small amount of compost produced on-site.
PLANTINGS,BY SITE/LOCATIONS
Site 1: Shade Tolerant Site.
This is a shady area between a tool shed/workshop and the fence and roadway,the only shaded
area on the property. We have set up two adjacent areas:
a)A small sitting area near the tool shed,where we put in a few stepping stones,spaced 1-3 feet
apart,with the goal of having groundcover of moss,small native groundcovers,and coastal
strawberry between them.This area was started prior to the beginning of this project,and we have
not used any of the materials included in this grant for either site preparation or planting. It may
be worth noting that over the past year this area has been invaded heavily by clover,whether from
seeds in the soil we brought in,or deposited by the floods in 2007 and 2008(we suspect the
latter).Any advice on how to deal with the invading clover will be welcome.
b)Between the sitting area and the fence/roadway we have used the shade-tolerant plants
provided by the Hood Canal Coordinating Council,plus some we purchased. We used much of
the purchased bark,topsoil,and compost in this area(using a mixture of 1:2:1,which I thought
would approximate the native soil for many of the plants).This area is occasionally inundated by
high tides during the winter,so I thought the bark might help make the soil more acidic.We also
used the bark as mulch in this area,spreading it about 2"thick.
Grant No.G0700296—Sollars/Lincoln pg. 14 May 29,2010
The plants we set out in this area include several red flowering currents and red twig dogwood
provided by the Hood Canal Coordinating Council over the past 4 years.From the plant list for
this grant,we included Gaultheria shallon(salal),Viola sempervirens and Viola adunca,Oxalis
oregano,Western sword fern,one Comus nuttalli(Pacific dogwood—because I love it and am
hoping it will thrive),Blechum spicant(Deer fern),and Trillium ovatum.At this point(05/2010)
all seem to be doing well,except for the viola sempervirens,which seem very fragile.
Site 2: South fenceline.Plants in this area need to be drought,wind,and sun tolerant.
Our goals for this area are to provide a buffer for stream flood runoff water,to provide habitat for
local birds,and to create privacy. I did not plant multiples of plant species here because it has
been a very difficult area for plants in the past,and I wanted to experiment to see what would do
well.Once we find out what works here,we will trade out the plants that are not thriving. I do
want plants here that will either grow to only about 4-5 feet or can be kept trimmed to that height,
because there is a danger of disrupting the neighbors' view.
Native honeysuckle vine was suggested for the fence itself.We did not have much luck finding
plants,though we did find one at Woodbrook Nursery.We planted it along this fence,but it
doesn't seem to be doing very well(or else it is just very slow-growing).Other plants we put here
include an oceanspray,which seems to be doing very well,and red flowing current(doing well,
somewhat to my surprise),and a yellow-twig dogwood,doing so-so.I've considered snowberry
in this area,too,but am concerned about it spreading too much,so I have planted the snowberry
on the shoreline instead.
Site 3: Shoreline(faces west with peripheral views to south and north). Plants in this area
need to be salt,wind,and sun tolerant.
This area already contained some native roses(south corner);I'm not sure which species,but I
think they are nootka.I did not want to expand the roses across the entire shoreline,because we
use part of this area for swimming access,and we didn't want thorny plants there.I had started
some native dune grass which was doing well and spreading,and we augmented this with a few
more dunegrasses purchased under this grant.Other plants purchased with this grant were
Potentilla fruiticosa,Potentilla anserine,Ameria meritima(sea thrift),and Carex lyngbyei
(Lyngby's sedge).The Potentilla fuiticosa and America meritima were planted in early April and
are doing well,though the only available sea thrift was very small so there is still a question about
its survivial;the others were purchased this week so it's too early to tell how they will do.
The original planting plan called for a"no touch"zone directly in front of our cabin,at my
husband's request.He decided over the course of the project that planting below about the mean
high tide line was all right,so we put the new dunegrass in that area.
Grant No.G0700296—Sollars/Lincoln pg. 15 May 29,2010
Site 4: Northern fenceline(faces south and southwest).This area needs plants that are salt,
wind,and sun tolerant,though it does receive some shade from the house next door,so
conditions are not as harsh as on the southern fenceline.
I did very little planting here,mainly because we already have some Asian pear trees,climbing
roses,and other non-native plants along that fence.I did put the one madrona there;it was
provided by the Hood Canal Coordinating Council. It is doing well so far,and I will try to keep it
alive over the summer;but I haven't been very successful with madrona in this area before.I
chose to put it here rather than on the shoreline,because we need to be concerned about blocking
views of neighbors on both the south and north sides of us,and I already have some shore pines,
snowberry,and ocean spray started on the shoreline.
Site 5: Planting Bed.This bed was set up for native plants only(not counting the Bosnian
pine in a pot).The soil composition is mostly organic bark.This area was not included on
Stephanie's planting plan.
In this area I used rhododendrons(to replace some that were lost during the especially cold winter
of 2008-09,kinnikinnik,and salal.Originally I had a thriving snowberry bush there as well,but
decided it was getting too big and have moved it to the shoreline,where it does not grow as tall.
EXPENSES
A spreadsheet detailing our expenses is attached.In brief,it includes:
Organic bark,topsoil,and compost
Labor for aid in planting
Plants purchased in addition to those provided by the Hood Canal Coordinating Council.
Our original application included estimates for renting a rototiller to prepare the soil,but acting
on the advice included in the grant,we decided to plant all the plants individually,rather than
preparing large soil areas.
Grant No.G0700296—Sollars/Lincoln pg. 16 May 29,2010
Another reason our expenses were much lower than anticipated is that,given the harshness of the
environment, I decided I wanted to experiment with a few plants in the site areas rather than
investing in large numbers of plants that might fail.Once we find out which plants are easily
sustainable,I'll start increasing their numbers.
I am attaching scanned copies of the invoices for our purchases,and will send the originals with
the hardcopy.
NOTES:
Though the grant suggesting planting between January and April,we did not plant anything until
late March because of the threat of flooding from Rendsland Creek-which is about 1/8 mile from
our property and has caused extensive damage in the past.In addition,I extended the planting
into late May because of our extremely cold spring weather.
So that you can see the number of plants we used,I am attaching the Invoice from Woodbrook
Nursery for the plants supplied by the Hood Canal Coordinating council,as well as the invoice
for plants I purchased on my own.
We want to thank the Mason County Conservancy and Hood Canal Coodinating Council
(especially Stephanie Bishop and Sue Texeira)for this opportunity.Your grant has enabled us to
do improvements that we could not have afforded on our own,and has resulted in a much more
natural-looking landscape on our property. I hope that this small beginning,along with additional
plantings I make in the future will also help with wildlife habitat and control of runoff water.I'm
also hoping that my neighbors will be encouraged to add more native plants to their properties.
ATTACHMENT 1: EXPENSES(ALL EXPENSES HAVE BEEN PAID)
Mason Conservation Grant No. G0700296
Expenses Incurred by Linda Sollars and John Lincoln,
Landowners
Grant No.G0700296—Sollars/Lincoln pg. 17 May 29,2010
Item
Date Incurred Description Qty Unit Rate Total Totals
1/16/2010 Vern's Organic Topsoil & Rock Products
Wine Prep(compost) 0.5 yd $31.26 $15.63
Ukorse Bark 0.5 yd $27.00 $13.50
Total, incl. tax $31.64
3/30/2010 Stroh's Feed &Garden Supply
Bark/soil (topsoil) 0.5 yd $42.00 $21.00
Bark/soil (bark) 0.5 yd $27.95 $13.98
Total, incl. taxs $37.92
4/2/2010 Alaina Lincoln
Labor, planting 5 hr $20.00 $100.00 $100.00
4/2/2010 Van Restrepo
Labor, planting 4 hr $20.00 $80.00 $80.00
5/23/2010 Woodbrook Nursery
Plants $114.02 $114.02
Total Expenses Incurrent by Landowners $363.58
Grant No. G0700296—Sollars/Lincoln pg. 18 May 29, 2010
RECEIPTS: ALL HAVE BEEN PAID.
111612101011 WAM Sales Receipt#37191 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
blore. 1 STROW S FEED & GARDEN
Vern's Organic Topsoil&Rock Products SUPPLIES
72622 Bond Rd NE 3408 HUNT ST NW
Poulsho,\Ab98370 GIG HARBOR, WA 98335
360-77f 2764 (253>858-2051
wwwvemstopsorl corn
Description 1 City Price Ext Price C 0 P Y
LIFine Prep 06 $31`'6 $15.63 T 03/30/2010 10:26:45
Mlcorse Bark 05 $27.00 $13.50 T
21tem(s) Subtotal $229.13
Local Sales Tax 86%Tax +$2.51 Transaction # 8
RECEIPT TOTAL $31.64
Card Type: UISA
PaymentTakea $3164 -+ L Acc: ************5726
Credit Card $3164 CO sl Entry: Swiped
Visa is Invoice # 25364
Entry Martial Merchant#"' 16*lr Tota 1 : 37 . !D2
Thanks for shopping„nni us!
1f IN Reference No. : 00390282
I(IIIII IIIII II�II IIIII IIIII(III III Response: CAPTURE 4544E
37191
CUSTOMER COPY
THAW', 'VEIL-1
STR13H'S FEED
7y rApDEh4 --DPL I..
9:18AM 09
111111 #.3273
0.5@ 27.95
BARK/BQI1_ TI$13,98
0.5@ 42.00
BWY/SOIL TJ21.00
MDSE ST $14,98
TAXI $2.94
A.-- 7
Grant No. G0700296-Sollars/Lincoln pg. 19 May 29,2010
Woodbrook Nursery / Sales Receipt
Farm: 5919-78th Ave NW
Office:1620 59th Ave.NW Web Site Date Sale No.
Gig Harbor, WA 98335 wow.woalbrooknativeplantnurscry,com 5/28/2010 4756nn
253-265-6271,f 265-6471,c 225-1900
Sold To Ship To
Sollars.Linda
425.775.8192
Customer Phone
Sales person Payment Method Check No. Phone Number
aty Description Rate Amount
Blechum spicant,Deer Fem,I gal. 9.48 9.481'
3 Carex lyngbyei,Lyngb3's Sedge,3.5"pot 2.99 8.97T
4 Powntillaanserina,CinyuetoillSilvenveed,Igal. 7.98 31.92T
3 Viola adunca,Early Blue Violet,3.5'Pol 4.49 13.47T
5 Gaultheria shallon,Salal,1 gal. 7.48 37.40T
I Trillium ovatum,Western Trillium.I gal. 13.94 13.94T
Discount Coupon -10.00 -10.00
Subtotal $105.18
All Sales subject to Woodbrook Nursery's Terms Sales Tax (8.4%) sa a4
and conditions as stated on our websita Total
$I 14.02
Phone#
253.263.6271
Grant No. G0700296—Sollars/Lincoln pg.20 May 29, 2010
Invoice
2-Apr-10
Alaina Lincoln
3653-22nd West
Seattle,WA 98199
206-601-3210
Customer: Linda Sollars
Work Loc. 18891 NE Northshore Road Mailing Address: 22402-66th Ave.West
Tahuya,WA 98588 Mountlake Terrace,WA 98043
Date Description Hrs Rate Amount
4/1/2010 Landscaping/planting 5 $20.00 $100.00 X-- "
Total Due $100.00
' ojw-V/4
Invoice
2-Apr-10
Van Restrepo
23315-20th Ave,SE
Bothell,Wa 98023
206-965-0031
Customer. Linda Sollars
Work Loc: 18891 NE Northshore Road Mailing Address: 22042-66th Ave.West
Tahuya,WA 98588 Mountlake Terrace,WA 98042
Date Description Hm Rate Amount /
4/1/2010 Landscaping/planting 4 $20.00 $80.00 ,UAL�
Total Due $80.00 --
a Its '9- ofOO r0
Grant No. G0700296—Sollars/Lincoln pg. 22 May 29, 2010
1
Note:This Invoice was paid by HCCC• I have included it here so you
Woodbrook Nursery P� JCGG Invoice
Fa m: 5919-78th Ave NW
Office: 1620 59th Ave.NW Web Site DATE INVOICE NO.
GigHtubor, WA98335 www.woodbrooknativeplantnursefy 4/1/2010 202799a
253-265-6271,f 265-6471,c 225-1900
CUSTOMERINFO
BILL TO
Sue Texeira
Hood Canal Coordinating Council
PO Box 302
Union,WA 98592
360-801-0958
Customer Phone Customer Fax Customer Alt.Phone
P.O.NO. TERMS DUE DATE SHIP DATE FOB JOB NAME
4/1/2010 4/1/2010 Linda Sollars
ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION PRICE EACH AMOUNT
Gas 1 4 Gaultheria shallon,Salal,1 gal. 7.48 29.92T
ViS4 5 Viola scmpervircns,Evergreen Violet,4"pot 3.99 19.95T
OxO4" 2 Oxalis oregana. Oregon Oxalis.3.5"pot 3.99 7.98T
ArMI 1 Arbutus menzicsii,Pacific Madrone,I gal. THE 9.99 9.98T
LARGEST IHAVE
HoD2-6-1-08 1 Holodiscus discolor,Ocean Spray.2 gal. 13.98 13.98T
LOCI I Lonicera ciliosa,Trumpet Honeysuckle,I gal. SOLD 9.98 9.98T
OUT UNTIL NEXT CROP IS READY
PoM 1 3 Polystichum munitum,Western Sword Fern,I Gal. 8.48 25.44T
PoF1 2 Potentilla fruiticosa,Shrubby Cinquefoil.I gal. 8.98 17.96T
EIM4 8 Elymus mollis,American Dunegrass,3.5"pot-WE ARE 3.99 31.92T
OUT OF THE I GALLON BUT HAVE A LOT OF
NICE 3.5"POTTED PLANTS
ArMal- 3 Arnteria maritima.Sea Thrill.I gal. 7.98 23.94T
PoGI 0 Potentilla gracillis,Grateful Cinquefoil.1 gal. MAYBE 7.99 0.00T
SOLD OUT-BUT MIGHT BE ABLE TO GET SOME
FROM ANOTHER GROWER,OR WE MIGHT HAVE
POTTED SOME AND NOT ADDED TO INVENTORY-
WE WILL CHECK-CUSTOMER WANTS 3
Gast 2 Gaultheria shallon,Salal,I gal. 7.48 14.96T
ArU4-VJ 2 Arclostaphylos uva-ursi,Kinnikinnick,3.5'pot 2.99 5.98T
RhMI 3 Rhododendron macrophyllum,Pacific Rhododendron.1 9.98 29.94T
gal.
CoN5-6-1-09 I Corpus nuttalli.Pacific Dogwood,5 gal 35.98 35.98T
Taken in March
Sales Tar 8.40% 23.34
Thank you! We appreciate your busine.J
Subtotal $277.91
Order subject to all Woodbrook Nurser}1 tcrm>and conditions.
Total S3111.25
Grant No.G0700296—Sollars/Lincoln pg.21 May 29,2010