HomeMy WebLinkAboutBridge Abutment Assessment for BLD2008-00318 - BLD Engineering / Geo-tech Reports - 3/20/2008 116 Envirotech Engineering
March 20, 2008 74 NE Hurd Road,
Doug Neyhart Belfair, WA 98528
2297 Tahuya River Road
Tahuya,Washington
Reference: Bridge Abutment Assessment for property located at 2297 Tahuya River
Road in Tahuya,Washington
Dear Mr.Neyhart,
Envirotech Engineering (Envirotech) completed a site visit on March 14, 2008, followed by this structural
assessment of two existing reinforced concrete bridge abutments located at 2297 Tahuya River Road in
Tahuya,Washington. The abutments will hold a prefabricated bridge with an approximate span of 82 feet.
The bridge will have a dead load of about 46,000 pounds. The accompanying abutment details depict
construction information for this project.
The owner provided all construction information for the existing abutments. Envirotech verified abutment
dimensions and assessed soil conditions during the site visit. The structural analysis provided herein is
based on owner provided information and the aforementioned field verification by Envirotech. This
assessment is structural,and does not assess hydraulics or river dynamics.
Earth Pressures
Baclfill material:compacted SP, SW, SP-SM,or SW-SM
Assume Active earth pressures.
H= 10 ft height of wall
y„.= 140 psf soil unit weight
yw=62.4 psf water unit weight
�=32° angle of intemal friction
c= 100 psf cohesion
8=2/3�=21.3° angle of wall pressures
Ko= 1-sin+=0.31 at-rest earth pressure coefficient
Kh=3/4Ko=0.23 earthquake earth pressure coefficient
Resultant Pressures
R,= 1/2y,,,bWKo=224 psf Lateral earth pressure from soil
R. 1/2yJf=3120 psf Lateral earth pressure from water
P,=3/8y,,,0Kh=599 psf Lateral earth pressure from earthquakes
R,,=gHKo=307 psf Lateral earth pressure from surcharges
R=R,+Rw+R,+R,=4251 psf @ 3.83ft from the base of the wall
RH=R cos S=3960 psf Resultant horizontal earth pressure
Rv=R sin S= 1546 psf Resultant vertical earth pressure
Rv1=69 psf vertical component of resultant active earth pressure used to counteract
sliding
Rm= 176 psf horizontal component of resultant active earth pressure used to
counteract sliding
OFFICE: 360-275-9374 CELL: 360-689-6045
FAX: 360-275-4789
EMAIL: envirotech@geotechnicalinfo.com
Vertical Loads
Bridge dead weight=46,000 lb; 23,000 lb per abutment
Snow Load=25 psf; 12,300 lb per abutment
Live Load=45,000 lb per abutment
Sliding and Overturning
EWi=64101b sum of vertical weights on retaining wall
EWix;=26686 ft-lb sum of vertical moments on retaining wall
Rs,=(y,%+Rv+Rv,+Rv+-W)tan S+cB=5967 Resistance against sliding
RH=3960 Sliding forces
Rs,/RH>FS
1.51 > 1.5 o.k.against sliding
yWixi+Rvxv+Rv,xv, =32606 Resistance against overturning
Rhys= 15167 Overturning forces
(EWixi+Rvxv+Rv,xvl)/Sys-RH,yxl)>FS
o.k.against overturning
2.1> 1.5
Wall Analysis
f =3500 psi concrete compressive strength M„=wH2/6=21256 lb-ft Ultimate moment
fy=60 ksi yield stress of rebar X=0.Id=0.825 in
w= 1.4*R=5952 psf force of earth A.=Mj�fy(d-X)=0.404 si Steel area
t= 16 in wall thickness at base k=fyA� 0.85f =8.14 si Concrete area
H= 10 ft Ma=Aefy(d-X)=283 k-ft Nominal moment
d=8.25 in critical depth �M„=21.3 k-ft Design moment
As2=A,(M„/M„)=0.404 si New Steel Area
Use A.=0.404 si
Flexural Steel: #4 bars @ 5.8 in.O.C. required
Used Two#4 bars @ 6.0 in.O.C. o.L
A.=0.0018bt=0.3456 si
Temperature Steel:#4 bars @ 6.82 in.O.C.
Used Two#4 bars*6.0 in. O.C. o.k.
Wall Foundation
h=24 in footing thickness K=[q„(B-t)2]/8=75572 in-lb
B=84 in footing width Ao=M„/�fy(d-X)=0.0751 si
d= 19.88 in effective footing depth k=fyA� 0.85f;= 1.515 si
P„= 1.4D+1.7L+soil= 105461b/in factored loads X=Ao/2b=0.0631 in
q„=P„/B= 126 psi load per unit length A,=Md�fy(d-),)=0.0678 si
v„=(gjd)[(B-t)/2)-d] =89.23 psi shear stress A.(min)=0.0018bh=0.5184 si
2of3
concrete shear strength
v�=2(f�)'� = 100 psi
vo<0.85v, depth o.k.
use A.=0.5184 A
No of#6 bars per foot=1.17(Flexural);#6 bar spacing=10.23 in
Used#6 rebar at 6"spacing o.k.
AS =0.0018Bh=3.63 si spacing too close
A.(min)=0.0018 si
Spacing(max)=5h or 18 in= 18 in
Temperature Steel:#6 bars @ 18 in.O.C.
Used#6 rebar at 6"spacing o.k.
Bearing Capacity/Settlement
Qall=(cNc+(gamma)DNq+0.5(gamma)Bng)/F.S. allowable bearing capacity
=(100psf(35.5)+ 120pcf(0ft)(23.2)+0.5(120pcf)(7)(22.0))/3=4263 psf
q„= 1465 psf
Qall> q■ Bearing Capacity o.k.
These types of soils settle immediately upon loading,with virtually no consolidation or secondary settlements.
Total settlement is estimated to be less than 1.0 inch,with a differential settlement of less than 0.5 inch.This is
based on foundations constructed per the retaining wall design detail.
Settlement o.k.
Envirotech is pleased to submit this engineering analysis. If you have any questions or need additional
information,please contact Michael Staten at 360-275-9374.
Best Regards,
Envirotech Engineering
�j,CLYDF S
~G O WAsy��T9T�
0" ��r/STCR�
CSS�UNALENVl
EXPIRES JAN 10,20W
Michael Staten
Project Manager
3of3
i
82FTt
f R•r
12FTt a ' .e'• s. .
4 �''••• C '•' > .
4 v
44.. .,.
�! �
] �4
12'
7FT BRIDGE
ABUTMENT
(TYP)
PROJECT/ LOCATION
RETAINING WALL DESIGN
y CLY'o PLAN VIEW
DOUGw xj�T9� TAHUY1A, WASHINGTON ROAD
CONTRACTOR,
OUG NEYHART
,d 2297 TAHUYA RIVER ROAD
TAHUYA, WASHINGTON
0. 43W DRAWN BY, DATE,
S I NCS 03/20/08
ENGINEER, REVISIONS, t� CS DESIGNED BY, DATE,
ENVIRDTECH ENGINEERING 1 N r " SIGNAL Nichael Staten, P.E. 03/20/08
74 NE HURD ROAD SHEET
BELFAIR, WASHINGTON 98528
PHONE, (360) 275-"74 EXPIRES T Q 0
FAX, (360) 875-4789 SHEET I OF 2
I
16 IN--{ (2) 12'x12'xi6' BLOCKS, ONE ON EACH END OF
ABUTMENT FOR LATERAL SUPPORT OF BRIDGE, NOTES:
STRUCTURALLY TIED TO WALL WITH
STEEL REINFORCEMENT 1, RETAINING WALLS CALCULATED USING ACTIVE EARTH
PRESSURES. 0
2. RETAINING WALLS ARE LIMITED TO 10 FEET.
d, 3. SLOPING EARTH RETENTION (BACKFILL) IS NOT PERMITTED,
4, FOOTING SUBGRADES ARE DENSE UNDISTURBED SOIL.
5, ALL CONCRETE IS 7-SACK.
6. YIEL60
7. CON REINFORCEMENT
OVER STEEL FOR STEEL MUSTNBEHAI MINIMUMI OF 1.5
#4 REINFORCEMENT STEEL COMPACTED GRAVEL, ' INCHES FOR WALLS, AND 3 INCHES FOR FOOTINGS.
HORIZONTAL 2 6 IN O.C. ° SAND, SAND WITH SILT S. BRACES AND TIE-DOWNS, IF USED, SHOULD HAVE A
(TYP) e • :OR GRAVEL WITH SILT.•' CORROSIVE RESISTENT COATING,
BACKFILL 9,BACKFILL SHOULD BE COMPACTED TO A MEDIUM RELATIVE
DENSITY (80%-85%).
#4 REINFORCEMENT STEEL 10, ALL WORK IS EXPECTED TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
VERTICAL e 6 1N O,C, ' c PROPRIATE IBC, STATE AND LOCAL CODES.
(TYP) 11, ALTHOUGH NOT REQUIRED, 4' WEEP HOLES AT 4 FEET O,C,
ARE SUGGESTED,
CONCRETE RETAINING WALL
AND FOOTING, 3500 psi e
10,0 FT f
4 d Ills
3 FT MIN
24 I1 N
3/4' REINFORCEMENT STEEL
28 IN (VERTICAL) 8 6 IN O.C.
3/4' REINFORCEMENT STEEL PROJECT/ LOCATIODM
(TEMPERATURE) B 6' O.C,
RETAINING WALL DESIGN
(2) 30' STEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE �ti CLYI�FS
DOUGPILES BENEATH FOOTING. STRUCTURALY WAS J+ 2297 NEYHART
kj 9 2297 TAHUYA RIVER ROAD
7 FT TIED TO FOOTING �� TAHUYA, WASHINGTON
IOPTABUIMMUWAM-WrAM Q' O CONTRACTOR,
Z19UG NEYHART
NOTTO WAM 2297 TAHUYA RIVER ROAD
at i TAHUYA, WASHINGTON
43U45 DRAWN BYt DATEi
MCS 03/20/08
ENGINEER, REVISIONS, ss G DESIGNED BY, DATEt
SCRTPTEN T Te IQ Michael Staten P.E. 03/20/08
ENVIROTECH ENGINEERING ` NAL
74 NE HURD ROAD SHEET
BELFAIR, WASHINGTON 98528 coo F
PHONE, (360r275-9374 IR_S j QIF
FAX, (360) 275-4789 SHEET 2 OF 2