HomeMy WebLinkAboutSHX2008-00027 JARPA Shoreline SDP Exemption - SHX Permit / Conditions - 9/11/2008 Pyo A-srgTFo� MASON COUNTY
MO
c DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
� �
s U = Planning Division
i T c P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584
moo ti �,o~ (360)427-9670
1864
Exemption from Shoreline Management Act
Case No.: SHX2008-00027 Substantial Development Permit Requirement
The Proposal By: DOUG NEYHART
315 SENECA ST
SEATTLE,WA 98101
To undertake the following development:
New/Bridge Replacement projects to include bank armoring around the new bridge abutments
and along the shoreline.
Within and/or its associated wetlands is exempt from the requirement of substantial development because the
development is categorized under WAC 173-27-040(2) as being category
Please contact Bob Fink at ext 577 if you have a questions.
t
Issued: 8/28/2008
Expires: 8/28/2010 Authorized Local Government Official
cc: APPLICANT WDFW USACOE WDOE TRIBAL COUNCIL
f
s F
0
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
PO Box 47775• Olympia, Washington 98504-7775• (360)407-6300
September 11, 2008
Mason County Planning Dept.
Ms. Barbara Adkins, Program Manager
Mason County Community Development RECEIVED
P O Box 279
Shelton WA 98584
Subject: SHX2008-00027, Shoreline SDP Exemption, Mr. Doug Neyhart
Dear Ms. Adkins:
Thank you for providing us with a copy of the Exemption from Shoreline Management Act
Substantial Development Permit Requirement, SHX2008-00027,that you issued to Mr.Doug
Neyhart on August 28, 2008. However, we do not consider this adequate or appropriate
notification for an activity of this magnitude. The scope of activities authorized by this
exemption is unclear. The exemption which these activities may fall under has not been
specifically identified. It is not clear whether all the authorized activities are consistent with the
SMP and the SMA.
The exemption issued by your department contains one sentence—"New/Bridge Replacement
projects to include bank armoring around the new bridge abutments and along the shoreline."
The exemption also contains the following statement,which appears intended to justify the
exemption based on shoreline regulations—"Within and/or its associated wetlands is exempt
from the requirement of substantial development because the development is categorized under
WAC 173-27-040(2)as being category". Unfortunately, I am unable to discern the meaning of
that statement, and remain unclear as to your justification of this exemption.
WAC 173-27-050 requires that you notify us in writing of an exemption for any project that also
requires federal approval. Work within the banks of the Tahuya River(i.e., armoring)or
structures placed above the river(i.e., bridge) require review and approval from the US Army
Corps of Engineers. WAC 173-27-050(2) states—
"The letter shall indicate the specific exemption provision fiom WAC 173-27-040 that
is being applied to the development and provide a summary of the local government's
analysis of the consistency of the project with the master program and the act."
(emphasis added)
You have not met either of these requirements.
WAC 173-27-040 is also clear that all other requirements of the Shoreline Management Act
(Chapter 90.58 RCW)and your Shoreline Master Program must be met for any activity that is
exempt from a Substantial Development Permit. WAC 173-27-040(1)(b) states—
"An exemption from the substantial development permit process is not an exemption
from compliance with the act or the local master program, nor from any other regulatory
requirements. To be authorized, all uses and developments must be consistent with the
policies and provisions of the applicable master program and the Shoreline Management
Act. A development or use that is listed as a conditional use pursuant to the local master
program or is an unlisted use,must obtain a conditional use permit even though the
development or use does not require a substantial development permit. When a
development or use is proposed that does not comply with the bulk,dimensional and
performance standards of the master program, such development or use can only be
authorized by approval of a variance."
We have been given no information to demonstrate that the full extent of activities associated
with and authorized by this exemption will also be compliant with other requirements of the
SMA.
The Tahuya River is a critical shoreline resource and its relationship to Hood Canal only
increases its significance. We are sensitive to the needs of Mr.Neyhart and do not question the
necessity of replacing the bridge and protecting that structure and other appropriate uses in a
reasonable manner. Please provide us with a more complete description of the full range of
activities that you intend to authorize with this exemption.
I welcome the opportunity to talk with you more about this if you would like. Please call me at
360-407-7260,or email at plun461 c ecy.wa. ov, if you have questions or want to talk further.
Si
Peary J Lund
Permitting and Technical Assistance Manager
PJL:dn
cc: Doug Neyhart
Muffy Walker, USACOE
Bob Fink,Mason County
Tom Young, Assistant Attorney General
Paula Ehlers, Ecology
.►'�'oN �0°4r7A MASON COUNTY Shelton (360) 427-9670
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Belfair (360) 275-4467
Planning
_ Mason County Bldg. 1 411 N.5th Elma (360) 482-5269
P.O.Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 L
1854
August 12, 2008
Doug Neyhart, Member
Neyhart Tahuya Farms Real Estate Investment LLC
2297 Tahuya River Rd.
Tahuya, WA 98588
Subject: Administrative Determination Letter dated July 30, 2008 regarding
Parcels Numbers 32213-32-00050 and 32213-32-00040
Dear Mr. Neyhart,
Because of the State Supreme Court decision in Futurewise v. Washington Growth
Management Hearings Board issued July 3 0, and because of our discussion today with
your Attorney, Mr. Hoss, and yourself; I am withdrawing the above determination letter.
As was discussed, the county needs to sort through the implications of the court decision
with respect to your property. We will also use this time to consider the points you raised
in the discussion. I have acted today to withdraw the letter not as a final determination
that the letter was issued in error or that any particular point was in error,but to allow
time for its reconsideration without the necessity of your appeal of the letter tomorrow to
protect your interests.
If you have any questions or need clarification, you may contact me at(360) 427-9670
ext. 366.
Sincerely,
4—"�L '6 �c.i
Robert D. Fink
Planning Manager
Department of Community Development
\\CLUSTER1_HOME_SERVER\-IOME\RDF\WP\PROJECTS\2008pro\neyhart.doc
P6oN CO MASON COUNTY
Shelton (360) 427-9670
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Belfair (360) 275-4467
Planning
Mason County Bldg.1 411 N.5th Elma (360) 482-5269
P.O.Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584
>B54
September 26,2008
Mr.Perry Lund,Permitting and Technical Assistance Manager
Department of Ecology
Southwest Regional Office
PO Box 47775
Olympia,WA 98504
Re: Response letter for SHX2008-00027-Neyhart Tahuya Farms Bridge Project
Dear Mr. Lund,
In response to your letter dated August 28,2008,Mason County submits the following
additional information regarding the above shoreline exemption.
The Neyhart Tahuya Farms project was originally verbally approved as an emergency
repair in December 2007 immediately after that month's storm event. As understood,the
project was the replacement and/or repair of a bridge, abutments, approaches, and erosion
protection of the abutments.
The original conditions of approval consisted of 1)widening and raising the bridge so
that it is higher than the base flood event, and 2) applying for needed permits after the
fact. Staff believed at the time(without the benefit of drawn plans for the work, a site
inspection, nor other information normally required)that the required permits would
include a building permit, a shoreline exemption, and SEPA.
The situation just before the issuance of the exemption and building permit in August was
that the bridge had been rebuilt,but earthwork around the abutments and erosion control
work had not been completed. Applications had been made for a building permit,
shoreline exemption and SEPA review,but were deemed incomplete. A stop work order
had been issued by the county. Mitigation for the work had not been done. We had also
just received better plans.
Because of the unfinished work,the abutments appeared to be at risk from erosion and
vibration from use; and silt and other material were eroding into the Tahuya River. A site
inspection on August 21, 2008 identified these safety and pollution problems. Because of
f ,
Perry Lund
September 26, 2008
Page Two
conditions on site,county planner Ryan Crater recommended that the"Stop Work"order
be lifted and permits issued to allow immediate completion of the work necessary to
control erosion into the river and to protect the abutments
After further review of the permit application, an exemption as normal maintenance was
granted from a substantial development permit under WAC 173-27-40 (2)(b). Some or all
of the project might also be exempt under WAC 173-27-40(2)(e) as argued by the
applicant's representative,but it was unnecessary to reach that determination. Similarly,
because there was active erosion of the river bank causing pollution and threatening the
new bridge abutments as observed by Ryan Crater,the project may also have been
eligible for an emergency exemption, as first granted. However, again it was unnecessary
to reach that determination.
Mason County determined that due to the storm damage and altered site conditions,
development identical to the pre-existing development was not possible or desirable. This
was recognized in the original(December 2007)permit conditions. Therefore a
comparable structure, approach, and armoring were authorized.
Mason County also determined that the project did not need a conditional use permit or a
variance as the work/project was normal maintenance and the use as well as the non-
conforming aspects of the project were pre-existing..
The Neyhart Tahuya Farms Bridge building permit(BLD2008-00318)was conditioned
such that the project must be consistent with all applicable policies and provisions of the
Shoreline Management Act. A tentative site plan was submitted,but due to site
conditions a final site plan will be drawn up once the construction is completed. Final
review for consistency with all permit conditions will be reviewed during that time.
I have included the following information for your review:
1. Three site plans showing the approximate site conditions before the storm, after,
and the new replacement bridge.
2. First proposed site plan of new bridge from July 1, 2008.
3. Permit conditions for BLD2008-00318.
4. Final site plan of proposed new/replacement bridge. (Tentative—Pending an as
build inspection).
I r
Perry Lund
September 26,2008
Page Three
If you have any further questions,please contact me or Bob Fink at 360-427-9670 at Ext.
366.
Regards,
��
Robert D. Fink,AICP
Planning Manager
cam,�-an ,�
"`•�'
��
�'
���
���
��
C�' '�
� ��� y �
*IJ
brJ
0
00000,
1
4tw bcnn� �'/h c�✓��L o� .
Jul 01 08 05:44p Joel Neyhart 2066235111 p. 18
r,
i
Z2. 9 �"� ck��p fVE2 26l�D
PARC5t NOT 3z 213-32-00o�O
-Q Cl-
>z
i
ri0(�SC
1
i
pu�.p i
�oGsc
NoR�+�ti
SCAIE I"!lo'
�I C33
r� x
AQ TR,L= La wI!k
22 9:7 TA, cOY-P RJVE-12 RcAP sNo� f3�f`tv
F'A R Ce L N o.3 Z Z 1:?-22-0 Dc.�o
W pFrtU�: 3,5 p�Res
f
TOPOGRAPHY PROFIL :
�To 6
Q c Direction: Sc { Approval:roromce use
Building Permit numxxber: &L DZOD//b// `OCR 3�p �f� ' Building:
Owner/Applicant: �IOUG /U��Y119�� Date of Planning:
o o 0 � O application: Env.Health:
Parcel Number:' 3 Z1 Z00
i
I
7/LJ/4VV0
Conditions Associated With 5:12:29PM
Case #: BLD2008-00318
IP10
ertnit Condition Status updated
`item# Code Title Status Changed By Tag Date By
1) 1000 ENGINEER APPROVAL NOT ML 1, 8/28/2008 RT13
Owner will submit a letter from the Engineer of record to the Mason County Building Department approving
the structural adequacy and placement of prefabricated bridge,new bridge abutments,attachment to new
abutments,and bridge approachs. This letter will be required prior to final approval of permit. Submit letter to
Mason County Building Dept.Bldg.I11426 W.Cedar st.or mail to P.O.Box 186 Shelton WA 98584
X
2) 1000 "CUSTOM CONDITION NOT MET 4/18/2008 RTB
Engineer of record has approved existing abutments see abutment Engineering attached.
X
3) 1002 ADDRESS/ROAD SIGNING NOT MET 4/18/2008 RTB
Owner/Agent is responsible to post the assigned address and/or purchase and post private road signs in
accordance with Mason County Title 14.28.
X
4) 5003 ALL CONSTRUCTION NOT MET 4/18/2008 RTB
All construction must meet or exceed all local ordinances and the international codes requirements as adopted
and amended by Mason County and the State of Washington. Occupancy is limited to the approved and
permitted classification. Any non-approved change of use or occupancy would result in permit revocation.
X
5) 320 All Necessary Permit Required NOT MET 4/18/2008 RTB
All other necessary permits from Mason County,Washington State and/or Federal Agencies that are required
for this proposed development and construction must be obtained PRIOR TO SAME DEVELOPMENT AND
CONSTRUCTION.X
6) 5030 CHANGES TO APPROVED PLANS NOT MET 4/18/2008 RTB
All changes to"approved"building plans that effect compliance with the international codes as amended and
adopted,or any other Mason County ordinance or regulation,must be reviewed and approved by Mason
County prior to construction.
X
7) 5002 ENGINEERING OR ARCHITECTURE NOT MET 4/18/2008 RTB
Any changes in proposed construction shall be reviewed by the engineer or architect of record and submitted in
writing to the Mason County Building Department prior to construction. All engineering and/or architectural
documents are a part of the approved set of plans and shall remain attached thereto. If documents are removed,
approval will not be granted. In addition,a re-inspection fee(refer to current fee schedule,minimum 1 hour)
will be charged and shall be collected by the Building Department prior to any further inspections being
performed or approvals granted..
X
8) 5045 FIELD CORRECT NOT MET 4/18/2008 RTB
CONSTRUCTION PROCESS TO BE FIELD CORRECTED AS REQUIRED PER MASON COUNTY
BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND THE ADOPTED BUILDING CODE.
The construction of the permitted project is subject to inspections by the Mason County Building Department.
All construction must be in conformance with the international codes as amended and Adopted by Mason
County. Any corrections,changes or alterations required by a Mason County Building Inspector shall be made
prior to requesting additional inspections.
X
Page l of 4 CaseConditions..rpt
a. ¢yyx
y-'
�►1P"..�"� Air
r � .
•
4
K4. -.
) v� j
s
T _ _
i c
tr
• v - y.
.11y
} -6F
� . �• _.>y`_ •.� � - - - s- _ �Y _ - _- - - _ ��-! ^tip_ Y
Z,r
—
� -�
-t+
f' ��-
q, +,c
n -
-�r
RM 5 ..r
N
f
I � I
w �
KA {
z
71 1+4J Y£ 5< -
!i I
a
co
7457
1 4
i
rAHVYa
7
�b Cl
RIVER Cl
C-0 ROAD
N
11 ®
tv m
N
.A
a`
o —
a=
R 3 W _ —
R2W
� 11
I
MASON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTIY DEVELOPMENT
Courthouse Annex
P.O.Box 279,Shelton,WA 98594
(360)427-9670
SHORELINE PERMIT AULICATION
PERMIT NO. SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
SHORELINE VARIANCE
DATE RECEIVED SHORELINE CONDITIONAL USE
SHORELINE EXEMPTION
The Washington State Shoreline Management Act(RCW 90.58) requires that substantial devel within
es
designated shorelin of the state comply with its administrative procedures(WAC 173-14)and the pro�viao s of the
Mason County Shoreline Management Master Program The purpose of this Act and local program is to tect the
State's shoreline resources. The Program requires that substantial development(any development of which to total
cost or fair market value exceeds$5,000.00 or materially interferes with the normal public use of the��aber or
shorelines of the State be reviewed with the goals,polices,and performance standards established in the,Master
Program.
Answer an
.questions completely. Attach any additional information that my further describe the proposed
dcvelopmCuL Incomplete applications will be rettnned.
APPLICANT: V1 tN Tcs, J rWv-,4 L'V
ADDRESS: Z Z r 1 J -J ew
(city) ) (ap)
TELEPHONE:
(ho-) k(business)
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: I L 1 �VI i'i(1'tl S7G� r, j
ADDRESS: 1A1 A-,� F
( ) � � L F 26 ( ) ((zip))
TELEPHONE:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Tty 3`Z 00 000SfO
General location(include property address,water body and associated wedands—.identify the name of the I
shoreline): '� �`1 J�,(rA I •+��t! try/ I
I
Legal description(include section, township, and range to the nearest quarter, quarter section or lati4d. and
longitude to the nearest nmmutc. Projects located in open water areas away from land shall provide a ngitude
location)—include all parcel numbers:
�d aLlovL
OWNERSHIP:. Contract
Apphcaat /y, Owner Lessee Purchaser (Identify). Oder
owner. Lj 'l �'ry
I
(etreet) '
(may) (state).
1.'\PLANNDK3pHARELL&RENERtSHORM2WERbUrAPP REVISED:06.25-03 !
I c `
DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTON
Development(identify and describe the proposed project,including the type of materials to be used,construction
methods,principle dimensions,and other pertinent information):
C
Use(identify current use of property with exist improvements:
Clhl^i L VL
�LL� 0�7
i
Reason for requesting development
�L
ACKOVaMGEMENf
I hereby declare,to the best of my knowledge and belief,the forgoing information and all attached information is
true and correct.
(applicant or authorized representative) (date)
..............................................................................
TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL
Identify and describe existing features of the site and surrounding area:
i
If proposed structures will exceed a height of 35 feet above the existing grade level,indicate the location of auy
residential units that will have an obstructive view:
j
If a Conditional Use or Variance is requested,make reference to the appropriate section in the Master Program:
LAP HOREUNEPERMrr."P REVISED:06.25-03
THE SHORELINE PERMIT PROCESS
I
Publication cost is the responsibility of the applicant. Final permit processing will not occ�
until advertising fees have been paid to the newspaper by the applicant.The Shelton-Mason
County Journal will bill the applicant directly.
VWE understand that I/WE must sign and date the.attached acknowledgement indicating that
UWE understand that is MY/OUR responsibility. UWE must submit the signed page as paft of
this application in order for it to be considered as complete.
i
� �� • i
DATE i
O*NE�O
I
APPLI � J �
1I
i
' f
i
i
i
.f •
i
f
i
THE SHORELINE PERMIT PROCESS
LIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
i
WITHIN 300 FEET OF YOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARIES
FOR CONDMONAL USE AND VARIANCE
i
i
I
Addresses may be obtained from the Mason County Assessor's Office,Building I,Second Floor.
�0 6(q 3 �
i � �► � � w,q- q�Sg
►ivy-�✓
yyLq74
�� r.�. �^►e� �' d � � vim- `I � 3 I .Z
i
i
I
I
/�- EXISTING ROCK
EXISTING LARGE
WOOD TO REMAIN
IOFT PROPOSED
8'-10' RIP RAP
AS NEEDED
A
A PROPOSED
3 (MAX)
8'-10' RIP RAP
1
.,.. w R
26FT+ 26FT+
EXISTING BRIDGE
ABUTMENT (TYP)
A A
1.5FT PROPOSED } MAN TO
2'-3 1 MAN ROCK (TYP)
4
1 i
DOUG NEYHART
2297 TAHUYA RIVER ROAD
PROJECT/ LOCATION
1 I 3Fr BANK PROTECTION
1 TOP VIEW
I
TAHUYA, WASHINGTON
�--7.5FT --I CONTRACTOR,
DOUG NEYHART
2297 TAHUYA RIVER ROAD
SECTION A-A EDGE PROTECTION TAHUYA, WASHINGTON
NTS DRAWN BY, DATE,
ENGINEERS REV[SIONS,
MCS 06/26/08
TECH ENGINEERING
REV.DESCRIPTION v OATE
74 NE HURD ROAD DESIGNED BY, DATE-
Michael Staten, P.E. 06/26/08
NE
BELFAIR, WASHINGTON 98528 SHEET ^
PHONE- (360) 275-9374 -- LJ
FAX4 (360) 275-4789
SHEET 2 OF 2
EXISTING BRIDGE
•-79'
•} PROPOSED
8'-10' RIP RAP
., 1.5' MIN.
.,•
THICKNESS
2 (MIN)
-------------Q-----------
6' - 10'
EXISTING BRIDGE { AEXISTING BUTMENT BRIDGE
ABUTMENT (TYP)
rc 2'
--
PROPOSED MAN TO
2'-3' 1 MAN ROCK (TYP)
40'
PROJECT/ LOCATION,
BANK PROTECTION
SIDE VIEW
DOUG NEYHART
2297 TAHUYA RIVER ROAD
TAHUYA, WASHINGTON
CONTRACTOR,
DOUG NEYHART
2297 TAHUYA RIVER ROAD
TAHUYA, WASHINGTON
DRAWN BY, DATE
PB 06/26/08
ENGINEER, REVISIONS; DESIGNED BYE DATE,
ENVIROTECH ENGINEERING REV.DESCRIPTION --BY DATE Michael Staten, P.E. 06/26/08
74 NE HURD ROAD
BELFAIR, WASHINGTON 98528 SHEET
PHONE, (360) 275-9374
FAX: (360) 275-4789
SHEET 1 OF 2
I
Jul 23 08 02: 29p Joel Neyhart 2000235111 p. 2
� .. TM AGENCY USIid{1LY' •
J4�tnry rlefcreilco A: 1, �L mle Put 16 dt
,c;tgiriat�:�b,� _ �T_� __..___..---- __ (1�'e�l�sii>�,.u:(-a encyj �..�+ ./ _^ •
JOINT AQUATIC RESOURCES PERMIT APPLICATION FORM (JARPA)
(far use in Washington State)
t :1 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK INK. ��
TO FILL IN ELECTRONICALLY USE Ftt TO MOVE THROUGH THE FORM
❑ Application for a Fish Habitat Entrancement Project per requirements of ROW 77.55.290. You must submit a copy of this
completed JARPA application form and the (Fish I-labitat Enhancement JARPA Addition)to your local Government
Planning Department and Washington Department of fish &Wildlife Area Habitat Biologist on the same day.
MOTE: LOCAL GOVERNMENTS You must submit any comments on these projects to WDFW within 15 working days.
Based on the instructions provided,I am sending copies of this application to the following: (check all that apply)
❑ Local Government for shoreline: []Substantial Development []Conditional Use [-jVariance NExemption []Revision
[]Floodplain Management []Critical Areas Ordinance
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for HPA(Submit 3 copies to WDFW Region)
Washington Department of Ecology for 401 Water Quality Certification (to Regional Office-Federal Permit Unit)
[] Washington Department of Natural Resources for Aquatic Resources Use Authorization Notification
❑ Corps of Engineers for. ❑ Section 404 ❑ Section 10 permit
❑ Coast Guard for: ❑ General Bridge Act Permit ❑ Private Aids to Navigation(for non-bridge projects)
❑ For Department of Transportation projects only: This project will be designed to meet conditions of the most current
Ecology/Department of Transportation Water Quality Implementing Agreement
SECTION A-Use for all permits covered by Urls application. Be sure to ALSO complete Section C(Slgnature Block)for all
pennit applications.
1.APPLICANT
MAILING ADDRE S _
WORK PHONE ti1A1L ADDRESS_ HOME PHONE ' FAX#
If an agent Is acting for the appllcarrt during the perrnFt process, complete#2, Be sure agent signs Section C(Signature Block)
for all permit applications
2.AU-FHORiZED AGENT
MAILING ADDRESS ---WORK PHONE PHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS HOME PHONE FAX#
3.Relationship of applicant to property: OWNER ❑ PURCHASER ❑ LESSEE ❑
4. Name,address and phone number of property owner(s)if other than applicant:
5. Location (street address,n)eluding ci( county and zip code,where proposed activi exists or will occur)
Local government with juris c,tion (cit y or county)
WMD I� /�f f�' Tributary of WRIA
Waterbody you are working in tF
Is this walerbody on the 303(d)List- YES U NO
If YES,what parameter(s)?
**For 303d List, Shoreline designation
httpa/www.ocv.wa.cLovlproc}rams/wy1303dlinrlex.html �-- �
Zoning designation f,, y cv eFv
/+Sectlon Se lion Township age Go�:ernmen(Lot
�1
2 Z1 DNR stream type if known l(`�
Latitude and Longitude Fax Parcel Nurnberg
ECY 070-15(Rev. 11/04) JARPA Contact the State of Washlnyton Office of Requlatory Assistance for latest version or call 360/407-7037 or 80 019 1 7-004 3
l
Jul 23 08 02: 30p Joel Neyhart 2066235111 p. 3
6. Describe tho current use of the property,and structures oxisting on the property. Have you completed any portion of the proposed
activity on 11118 property? ❑ YES ❑ NO
For an portion of the proposed activity already.compteted on this property,Indicate month and year of completion.
Is the property agricultural land? YES ❑ NO Are you a USDA program participant? YES NO
7a. Describe the proposed work that needs aquatic permits: Complete plans and specifications should be provided for-4 work waterward
of the ordinary high water mark or line,including types of equipment to be used. If applying for a shoreline permit,describe all work
within and beyond 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark. If you have provided attached materials to describe your project,you still
must summarize the proposed work here. Attach a separate sheet if additional space Is needed.
te
PREPARATION OF DRAwtNGS: See sample drawings and guidance for completing the drawings. ONE SET OF ORIGINAL OR GOOD QUALITY REPRODUC113LE
DRAMMGS MUST eC ATTACHED. NOTE: Applicants are encouraged to submit photographs of the project site.but lliese DO NOT substitute for drawings. THE CORPS
OF ENGINEERS AND COAST GUARD REQUIRE DRAWINGS ON 8-1/2 X I I INCH SHEETS. LARGER DRAWINGS MAYBE REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES.
7b. Describe the purpose of the proposed work and why you want or need to perform it at the site.. Please explain any specific needs that
have Influenced design. �nU� �� �/f?i�J �� ,s°Z�(�!^..�•
7c. Describe the potential Impacts to characteristic uses of the water body.. These uses may include fish and aquatic life,water quality,
water supply,recreation and aesthetics. Identify proposed actions to'avoid,minimize,and mitigate detrimental impacts and provide
proper protection offish and aquatic life. Identify which guidance documents you have used. Attach a separate sheet if additional
space is needed.
7d. For in water construction work,will your project be in compliance with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity
WAC 173.201A-1101 YES NO See USEFUL DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS)
a. Will the project be constructed in stages? YES NO C]
Proposed starting date:
Estimated duration of activity:
9. Check if any temporary or permanent structures will be placed:
bd Waterward of the ordinary high water mark or line for fresh or ti al waters AND/OR
Waterward of the mean higher high water for tidal waters?
10.Will fill material(rock,fill,bulkhead;or other material)be placed:
Waterward of the ordinary high water mark or line for fresh waters?roe`/-ZOC- 2/'"T'C'T L�7Z
If YES,VOLUME_(cubic yards) /AREA (acres) Q � �j��dX 3�� _S/S s7Z,
[] Waterward of the mean higher high water for tidal waters?
If YES,VOLUME(cubic yards) /AREA (acres) /C
ECY 070-15(Rev. 11/04) JARPA Contact the State of Washington Office of Regulatory Assistance for latest version or call 360/407-7037 or 800/917.0043
Jul 23 08 02: 30p Joel Neyhart 20GG235111 p. 4
1. Will material be placed in wetlands? E} YES mo
• if YES:
A. Impacted area in acres:
B. Has a delineation been completed? If YES,please submit with application. ❑ YES [] NO
C_ Has a wetland report been prepared? If YES,please submit with application YES ❑ NO
D. Type and composition of fill material(e.g.,sand,etc.)
E. Material source:
F. List all soil series(type of soil)located at the project site,and indicate if they are on the county's list of hydric soils. Soils informatil
can be obtained from the nalurat Resources Conservation Service(NRCS).
G. WILL PROPOSED ACTIVITY CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS? ❑ YES FIO
If YES,IMPACTED AREA IS ACRES OF DRAINED WETLANDS.
NOTE:Ii your project will Impact greater than Y:of an acre of wetland,submit a mitigation plan to the Corps and Ecology for approval a"with the JARPA loan.
NOTE A 401 water quatlly certificalon will be required from Ecology in addition to an approved mitigation plan if your project impacts wetlands that are: a)greater than V.acre In size,
orb)tidal wetlands or wetlands adjaoent to tidal water. Please submit the JARPA form and mitigation plan b Ecoogy for an Individual 401 certification 10)orb)apptles.
12. Stormwater Compliance for Nationwide Permits Only: This project is(or will be)designed to meet ecology's most current
stormwater manual,or an Ecology approved local stormwater manual. ❑ YES X NO
If YES—Which manual will your project be designed to meet?
If NO--For clean water act Section 401 and 404 permits only—Please submit to Ecology for approval, along with this JARPA
application,documentation that demonstrates the stormwater runoff from your projector activity will comply with the water quality
standards.WAC 173.201(A)
13.Will excavation or dredging be required In water or wetlands? ❑. •YES NO
If YES:
A. Volume: (cubic yards)/area (acro)
B. Composition of material to be removed:
C. Disposal site for excavated material:
D. Method of dredging:
14. Has the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)been completed YES [] NO
SEPA Lead Agency:
SEPA Decision: DNS, MDNS,EIS,Adoption,Exemption Decision Date(end of comment period),
SUBMIT A COPY OF YOUR SEPA DECISION LETTER TO WDFW AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE APPLICATION
15. List other Applications,approvals or certifications from other federal,state or local agencies for any structures,construction discharge
or other activities described in the application(i.e.preliminary plat approval,health district approval,building permit,SEPA review,
federal energy regulatory commission license(FERC), Forest practices application,etc.). Also,indicate whether work has been
completed and indicate all existin j work on drawings. NOTE: For use with Corps Nationwide Permits,identify whether your project h;
or will need an NPDES permit for discharging wastewater and/or stormwater.
TYPEOFAPPROVAL ISSUING AGENCY IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION DATEAPPnOVED COIAPLETE
NO.
16. Has any agency denied approval for the activity you're applying for or for any activity directly related to the activity described herein?
❑ YES NO
if YES,explain:
ECY 070-15(Rev. 11l04) JARPA Contact the Stale of Washington Office of Re ulatM Assista ce for latest version or call 360/407-7037 or 8001917-004
Jul 23 08 02: 31p Joel Neyhart 2066235111 P. 5
SECTION 8- Use for Stiorettne and Corps of Engineers permits only;
�1 jptiT9t9,19991 Pf pr9 J1 ThjU Moro t5 lho feir mafitet YM110 of the t)roierrt,indlifiina MaIM015,labor,awhine re1)lals' etc.
f S �u -ov
17b.If a project or any portion of a project receives funding from a federal agency,that agency is responsible for ESA consultation. Please
indicate if you will receive federal funds and what federal agency is providing those funds. See instructions for information on ESA.'
FEDERAL FUNDING ❑ YES NO If YES,please list the federal agency.
18.Local government with jurisdiction:
19.For Corps,Coast Guard and DNR permits,provide names,addresses and telephone numbers of adjoining property owners,lessees,
etc. - Pfease note: Shoreline Management Compliance nlay require additional notice--consult your local government.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER
SECTION C-ThJs section AWST be corn Cfeted for an ernlit covered bz Oils a fication
20. Application is hereby made for a penult or permits to authorize the activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the
Information contained In this application,and that to the best of my knowledge and belief,such information is true,complete,and
accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the proposed activities. I hereby grant to(lie agencies to which
this applicatio made,the right to enter the above-described location to inspect the proposed,In-progress or completed work. i
agree to sta wo t3N Y after II cessary permits have been received.
� DATE
A /— /, /O/v'_'A�
SIGNATU OF PLICANTQ�
ATE
ztz" wx�
SIGNATURE Or AUTHORIZED AGENT
I HEREBY DESIGNATE M� TO ACT AS MY AGENT IN MATTERS RELATED TO THiS APPLICATION FOR
PERMIT(S). I UNDERSTAND THAT IF A FEDERAL PERMIT IS ISSUED, i MUST SIGN THE PERMIT.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER(EXCEPT PUBLIC ENTITY LANDOWNERS,E.G.DNR)
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGN5D BY THE APPLICANT AND THE AGENT,iF AN AUTIIOPIZED AGENT IS DESIGNATED.
18 U.S.0§1001 provides that: Whoever,in any mannerwithin the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly
falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or
representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing.sarne to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or
entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or Imprisoned not more than 5 years or both.
<A �la�tlr bf ttie ekistlrtg h�f `e T06�66e lype df: hor�ltiti,.;subh`2f ri 'rind'sire r>t,jak!';.lagotlh,�hia�sfx, „sW fyt,tl0�i!
`lalrt tloodW eft at h� `r ''ofi a ail r�tl er slot h'i' h`bnk ! w 6aIt�C vr`d k� rlai�i f iUeh"ssd; rave iriud cfa
on, Q. . , g _ 1 . f f a ., ,i g,. ►, r ':.:
roctk rj{irapr'pnd ex(8hi drid tyj3rA b�rbtti)t;hGladln�,If any). t ,
`g ls1 tf1 0� ; di lleGe tliyinth ialy tt thy, o 3s dul C uresiW angsu bove the�� ra a gradt:'level,
If`idiapt ;fFl�'� iYoklltiafe Ics�aifb. titt�,'rfWtiifiec of iesiElettlll.Fthtl�a;(j�?(%�if4� id pdtfttlal,�.ltttitwlll have dti b�i3(rtict�d:�lit3W:'
:U IF tlid apnlic'Itlon in'voives a¢oK�ii'tldnaf use or V.2riartce,set fdtih to ttltt that pdrttdOi.bf the matter pro.§ramvJjticb,pi'd dbs lhat�the"
;pt�posed usb rrtay tie 7 co dtlto061 ttse ¢r l)a the base bf a vaiidnl i3,trfltll y3iii4tf tI1@ var�arlct;Ig txalrtg soughll .
These Agencies are Equal Opportunity and Arrimialive Action employers.
For special.accommodation needs,please contact the appropriate agency in the instructions
ECY 070-15(Rev. 11104) JARPA Contact the State of Washington Office of Reaulatory Assistance for latest version or call 360/407-7037 or 800/917-0043
4
I
STATE a�
0
��
— m
=i o
�k' 1889�pY
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
PO Box 47775 a Olympia, Washington 98504-7775• (360)407-6300
September 11, 2008
Mason Counh'Planning po
SEP ' Dept.
Ms. Barbara Adkins,Program Manager 1 ft
Mason County Community Development RECEIVED
P O Box 279
Shelton WA 98584
Subject: SHX2008-00027, Shoreline SDP Exemption, Mr. Doug Neyhart
Dear Ms. Adkins:
Thank you for providing us with a copy of the Exemption from Shoreline Management Act
Substantial Development Permit Requirement, SHX2008-00027,that you issued to Mr. Doug
Neyhart on August 28,2008. However,we do not consider this adequate or appropriate
notification for an activity of this magnitude. The scope of activities authorized by this
exemption is unclear. The exemption which these activities may fall under has not been
specifically identified. It is not clear whether all the authorized activities are consistent with the
SMP and the SMA.
The exemption issued by your department contains one sentence—"New/Bridge Replacement
projects to include bank armoring around the new bridge abutments and along the shoreline."
The exemption also contains the following statement, which appears intended to justify the
exemption based on shoreline regulations—"Within and/or its associated wetlands is exempt
from the requirement of substantial development because the development is categorized under
WAC 173-27-040(2)as being category". Unfortunately, I am unable to discern the meaning of
that statement, and remain unclear as to your justification of this exemption.
WAC 173-27-050 requires that you notify us in writing of an exemption for any project that also
requires federal approval. Work within the banks of the Tahuya River(i.e., armoring)or
structures placed above the river(i.e.,bridge) require review and approval from the US Army
Corps of Engineers. WAC 173-27-050(2) states—
"The letter shall indicate the specific exemption provision from WAC 173-27-040 that
is being applied to the development and provide a summary of the local government's
analysis of the consistency of the project with the master program and the act."
(emphasis added)
1
You have not met either of these requirements.
WAC 173-27-040 is also clear that all other requirements of the Shoreline Management Act
(Chapter 90.58 RCW) and your Shoreline Master Program must be met for any activity that is
exempt from a Substantial Development Permit. WAC 173-27-040(l)(b)states—
"An exemption from the substantial development permit process is not an exemption
from compliance with the act or the local master program, nor from any other regulatory
requirements. To be authorized, all uses and developments must be consistent with the
policies and provisions of the applicable master program and the Shoreline Management
Act. A development or use that is listed as a conditional use pursuant to the local master
program or is an unlisted use, must obtain a conditional use permit even though the
development or use does not require a substantial development permit. When a
development or use is proposed that does not comply with the bulk,dimensional and
performance standards of the master program, such development or use can only be
authorized by approval of a variance."
We have been given no information to demonstrate that the full extent of activities associated
with and authorized by this exemption will also be compliant with other requirements of the
SMA.
The Tahuya River is a critical shoreline resource and its relationship to Hood Canal only
increases its significance. We are sensitive to the needs of Mr. Neyhart and do not question the
necessity of replacing the bridge and protecting that structure and other appropriate uses in a
reasonable manner. Please provide us with a more complete description of the full range of
activities that you intend to authorize with this exemption.
I welcome the opportunity to talk with you more about this if you would like. Please call me at
360-407-7260, or email at plun461 a,ecy.wa.go_v, if you have questions or want to talk further.
Si e y,.
Perry J Lund
Permitting and Technical Assistance Manager
PJL:dn
cc: Doug Neyhart
Muffy Walker, USACOE
Bob Fink, Mason County
Tom Young,Assistant Attorney General
Paula Ehlers, Ecology
� t
°e0 °pOh, MASON COUNTY Shelton (360) 427-9670
A
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Belfair (360) 275-4467
Planning
Mason County Bldg.1 411 N.5th Elma (360) 482-5269
P.O.Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584
1854
July 31, 2008
Neyhart Tahuya Farms LLC
2297 Tahuya River Rd
Tahuya, WA 98588
Re: Shoreline Permit application for SHX2008-00027 (Exemptions Status)
APPLICATION DENIED
Dear Mr. Neyhart
Your application for exemption status under the Mason County Shoreline Master
Program has been DENIED for the following reasons:
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
The proposed bridge is not exempt under WAC 173-27-040 (2) (e), Please see WAC 173-
27-040 (1)(a), (b), (c), and(d). As explained by the applicant, the total project(s) costs
exceed $ 50,001. The application must address the policies of the Mason County
Comprehensive Plan Shoreline Master Program and the Use Regulations of the MCSMP
17.50.060 for Transportation Facilities.
The bank protection is not exempt and requires a substantial development permit per the
Mason County Shoreline Master Program (MCSMP)Use Regulations 17.50 matrix. The
application must address the policies of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan
Shoreline Master Program and the Use Regulations of the MCSMP 17.50.060 for Flood
Protection and Shoreline Stabilization.
Shoreline Conditional Use Permit
Per the MCSMP Landfill &Transportation chapters a Conditional Use Permit is required. -
The application must address the policies of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan
Shoreline Master Program and the use regulations of the MCSMP 17.50.060 for Landfill
and Transportation Facilities. In addition, the application must also demonstrate the
proposal meets the requirements of 17.50.080 Conditional Uses.
Shoreline Variance Application
Per MCSMP 17.50.060 Transportation Facilities#2 "Bridge approach fills shall not
encroach in the floodway of any stream or river."Bridge approaches require a shoreline
variance.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 360-427-9670 at ext. 577.
Regards,
Ryan Crater
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Planning Department/Mason County
CO
Mason County
Department of Community Development
411 N. 5'
P.O. Box 279
— Shelton, WA 98584
1854
July 30, 2008
Doug Neyhart
2297 Tahuya River Rd
Tahuya, WA 98588
RE: Administrative Determination Letter
Proposed development: Bridge spanning Tahuya River Floodway with associated
bank armoring.
Parcel number: 32213-32-00050(Work also includes parcel#32213-32-00040)
Zoning:Agriculture Resource Lands
Shoreline Master Program Environmental Designation: Urban
Dear Mr. Neyhart,
After full review of the information you have provided thus far for the above project(s), I have
determined that several Planning Department regulations are applicable, which must be approved
before the project can proceed further. These requirements are in addition to the building permit
application you already submitted. Please be advised that applications for permits are not
guarantee of approval. The following are considered Type III reviews per the Mason County
Code 15.03.050 and require a public hearing with the Mason County Hearing Examiner.
It is important to note that you have not provided sufficient information or complete applications
with site plans and appropriate application fees. We have made several requests to obtain such
information, but have yet to receive full compliance. This letter outlines what is required for the
processing of your permit application, and shall serve as a final Administrative Determination.
Resource Ordinance (Mason Environmental Permit(MEP))
Per the Mason County Resource Ordinance (MCRO) Fish& Wildlife Habitat Conservation
Areas chapter, section 17.01.110 (G)(2)(a) a MEP is required. Per the MCRO section 17.01.110
(G)(e) a MEP and Habitat Management Plan(HMP) is required.
Mason County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
The location of the proposed project(s) are located within the mapped Tahuya River Floodway.
All proposed projects are subject to full compliance with this ordinance per Section 4.1-1.
Applicant must specifically address Sections 4.1-2 and 5.4.
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit
The proposed bridge is not exempt under WAC 173-27-040(2) (e),Please see WAC 173-27-040
(1)(a), (b), (c), and(d). As explained by the applicant,the total project(s)costs exceed$ 50,001.
The application must address the policies of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan Shoreline
Master Program and the Use Regulations of the MCSMP 17.50.060 for Transportation Facilities.
The bank protection is not exempt and requires a substantial development permit per the Mason
County Shoreline Master Program(MCSMP)Use Regulations 17.50 matrix. The application
must address the policies of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan Shoreline Master Program
and the Use Regulations of the MCSMP 17.50.060 for Flood Protection and Shoreline
Stabilization.
Shoreline Conditional Use Permit
Per the MCSMP Landfill&Transportation chapters a Conditional Use Permit is required. The
application must address the policies of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan Shoreline
Master Program and the use regulations of the MCSMP 17.50.060 for Landfill and
Transportation Facilities. In addition,the application must also demonstrate the proposal meets
the requirements of 17.50.080 Conditional Uses.
Shoreline Variance Application
Per MCSMP 17.50.060 Transportation Facilities#2 "Bridge approach fills shall not encroach in
the floodway of any stream or river."Bridge approaches require a shoreline variance.
Mason County Environmental Policy(SEPA)
Resubmit your Mason County Environmental Checklist with associated fee.
Applications and fees associated with the above information can be obtained from the Permit
Assistance Center(PAC) located in building 3. Your permit review will not move forward until
all applications and fees are submitted at the PAC.
This letter acknowledges that other permits may be required from other departments and/or
agencies. Mason County may request additional information upon submittal of the above
requested information.
I have attempted to include as much information as possible. You can find all of the referenced
regulations at www.co.mason.wa.us.
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. I can be reached at
360.427.9670.
Sincerely,
Ryan Crater,
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement Officer
cc. Rick Hoss, Hoss &Wilson-Hoss, LLP—Attorney at Law
Pam Bennett-Cumming, Mason County Planner
Kim Vanzwalenberg, WDOE - Shorelands Specialist
Gloria Rodgers, WDFW—Area Habitat Biologist
Marty Ereth, Skokomish Tribal Nation—Habitat Protection Biologist
Parcel File for both parcels listed above.
Ryan Crater- Re: Fwd: ENF2008-00021 Page 2
t
Gloria Rogers
Area Habitat Biologist
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
48 Devonshire Rd
Montesano, WA 98563
360-249-4628 x 249
>>> "Pam Bennett-Cumming" <PamBC@co.mason.wa.us> 3/13/2008 5:00 PM >>>
Wow! doesnt exactly look like he described it... but I knew it would
look bad,just not necessarily that gargantuan. I know he worked with
Gloria, and what I actually told him, since he told me he was able to
get a bridge THAT WEEKEND right after the flood, and his farm was cut
off from access and feed for the animals, was do what Gloria said about
putting the abutments back from the creek, and turn in the permits asap.
What I did NOT say was and if the bridge doesnt arrive, you dont have
to turn in permits yet. He needs to get started right now.
Not sure what the ecology blocks are for. He will definitely need
engineering for the bridge. He'll definitely need engineering (standard
procedure for a bridge project, even if a replacement of storm damage),
and if there is fill for the approaches, his engineer will have to show
that it doesn't increase the BFE for the floodway. The second I am
checking on....
Pam Bennett-Cumming, M.E.S
Senior Planner-Water Resource Planning
Mason County Department of Community Development
411 North 5th
PO Box 279
Shelton, WA 98584
phone: (360)427-9670 x287
fax: (360)427-8425
email: pambc@co.mason.wa.us
>>> Ryan Crater 3/13/2008 4:44 PM >>>
Pam and Jim see attached message.
Gloria -was an HPA issued for this work?
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Mason County Department of Community Development
411 North 5th
PO BOX 279
Shelton, WA 98584
Phone#360-427-9670 ext. 577
Fax#360-427-8425
---------------- --- ---`--
Ryan Crater- Re: Fwd: ENF2008-00021 Page 1
WZ008 -00000LI
From: "Gloria Rogers" <rogergsr@DFW.WA.GOV>
To: <JimSc@co.mason.wa.us>, <PamBC@co.mason.wa.us>,...
Date: 3/14/2008 3:51 pm
Subject: Re: Fwd: ENF2008-00021
Hello All,
On 12/19/2007, Debbie Carnevali reviewed the site. Deb helped me out
on the Tahuya and Union Rivers during the storm. She issued an
expedited HPA on 12/21/2007. The expiration date was 1/15/2008. She
made it very clear to Doug that he was to contact the county to obtain
all of your permits.
I just happened to be at Doug's looking at a different project on 3/10
and had the chance to see the bridge project. I was surprise to see the
project had not been completed. Doug was informed that he must now
obtain all permits prior to any further work since an emergency no
longer exists. I will not issue the HPA until the SEPA process has been
completed by the county.
As far as the footings go, the toe of the footing on the right bank
(RB)seemed pretty substantial (wide) but it looked like it had been
placed as required in the HPA. I can look again. He was and will be
required to remove the old bridge and footings. The concrete blocks
were to be repositioned. The new permit will have him remove the blocks
now with the bridge/footings and then reinstall them during the work
window. He was also talking about constructing a footing and/or placing
riprap in front of them,just to give you a heads up.
All the above mentioned material will be removed and placed on the land
above the limits of the flood water...not on the banks nor on the flat
in the bend of the river! Also, he does not think he can remove the RIB
footing. If it can not be lifted out, the footing may have to be
excavate down to the scour level then cut off.
Here is another heads up. DNR contacted me about a program to remove
the storm woody debris from agricultural lands. Doug has applied for
this help. Instead of burning all the woody material, I have suggested
the material be used to fill a scour hole just north of his training
track on the river's edge. Doug wanted to place riprap. This fix is
great for fish and is considered to be an bioengineering alternative to
riprap. A down stream log jam helped create the hole. Some of the
remaining logs will be swung around and the material placed behind them.
Some logs will be driven like piles to hold the material in place.
There is going to have to be a short turn around for this permit.
Equipment will be heading to Lewis County as soon as the muck dries out
a bit more, maybe as soon as three weeks. I have asked DNR to figure
out if they will be able to exempt the work otherwise we need to talk
and hopefully figure out something.
Due to past activities, the neighbors have been quite concerned with
the construction activities. You will probably receive some calls as
well.
Hope this information helps.
Ryan Crater RE: 25-blocks sticking out, right bank looking downstream Page 1 l
t
From: "Marty Ereth" <marty@Skokomish.org>
To: "Ryan Crater" <RyanC@co.mason.wa.us>
Date: 6/17/2008 3:39 pm
Subject: RE: 25- blocks sticking out, right bank looking downstream
CC: "Gloria Rogers" <rogergsr@DFW.WA.GOV>
Ryan,
would like to meet with you and Gloria on this case. However, my time
is extremely limited over the next few weeks. I don't have any time
available this week. Next week I have some time after about 2:30pm on
Monday only. I have full day meetings in Olympia on Tuesday, Wednesday
and Thursday. I may have some time next Friday available, depending on
if a DNR ID team can be moved from the 25th to the 27th. Even so,
should be available for a few hours on Friday but Monday afternoon is
probably our best bet for now. Thanks.
Marty Ereth
Habitat Biologist
Skokomish DNR
(360)877-2110 x451
marty@skokomish.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Crater[mailto:RyanC@co.mason.wa.us]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:27 PM
To: Marty Ereth
Subject: RE: 25- blocks sticking out, right bank looking downstream
Marty,
Would you like to meet regarding the Neyhart case? We are having some
trouble with this and would welcome any help you can provide.
Regards,
Ryan Crater
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Mason County Department of Community Development
411 North 5th
PO BOX 279
Shelton, WA 98584
Phone#360-427-9670 ext. 577
Fax#360-427-8425
>>> "Marty Ereth" <marty@Skokomish.org>6/12/2008 5:09 pm >>>
When did Doug put in the huge Eco block wall?
Marty
Ryan Crater- RE: 25- blocks sticking out, right bank looking downstream Page 1]
From: "Marty Ereth" <marty@Skokomish.org>
Date: 6/17/2008 3:33 pm
Subject: RE: 25- blocks sticking out, right bank looking downstream
Thanks for the update.
[NartyEreth
Habitat Biologist
SkokomiohONR
(3K60)877-2110x451
morty@skokonn/oh.org
-----Original Message---
Fronn: Ryan Cnoter[nnai|to:RyanC@co.maann.vvous]
Sent: Friday, June 13. 2U088:20AM �
To: Pam Bennett-Cumming; Gloria Rogers; kvnn461@aoyma.gov;
rhoou@hcbc.00m; nayhort@mon.com; Marty EraUh
Subject: RE: 25' blocks sticking out, right bank looking downstream
Marty
After reviewing the parcel file | see that there are no permits nr �
approvals from Mason County on file for the wall inquestion. | dnsee �
that sometime around 3-27'97aJARPA was submitted for some wall work
along with permits from the County. |n the files it shows o site plan
for o wall, but itio very different from what ioon site now and its
placed ina different location. Changes to site plans can only occur
upon approval from the County,which in this case none was given.
If Mr. Neyhart wants bo keep the current wall ha shall obtain permits or �
remove it. Unless Mr. Nayhart can provide evidence of permit approval
for the wall or specifically show where no permit review was needed from
the County the wall is o violation subject to enforcement action. �
With regards to the new bridgework, itis still under review for permit
coverage. A emergency approval and 8EPA exemption was originally given
for the work described by Mr. Neyhortto the County, but what wa see on �
the ground and the work still in the planning stages io far outside any |
|
approval or exemptions given by the County. Mr. Neyhart has yet bo �
provide the County with any firm site plans or the required
permit(o)/SEPA applications vve have oequeoted Unless Neyho�� � �
complies by July 7. 20O8 with what has been requested, | will bo
forwarding his case bu the Hearings Examiner and recommending fines.
Regards,
Ryan Crater
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Ryan Crater- Re: Neyhart
From: Barbara Robinson
To: Ryan Crater
Date: 8/14/2008 12:28:38 prn
Subject: Re: Neyhart
We can talk tomorrow....but it sounds like we aren't the only ones holding this up.
Barbara Robinson
Mason County CD Director
P.O. Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584
360-427-9670, Ext.603
>>> Ryan Crater 8/14/2008 11:35 AM >>>
Yep, that is how he works. Says he is waiting on you and has everything into
everybody else. Welcome to the Neyhart game.
I don't know what else I can say other than my final admin letter was pretty much what
he needs to do as I reviewed his projects. I consulted Ecology and Senior Planners
regarding the letter before I sent it, so I think it is pretty solid. I don't know what else I
can add other than my final opinion is my final admin letter.
>>> Barbara Robinson 8/14/2008 10:32 am >>>
Very interesting. Mr. Neyhart just called me and said that he sent the stuff to Gloria. I guess he may have a problem with a State
agency and not us. We need to go over all this with Bob tomorrow when he returns.
Barbara Robinson
Mason County CD Director
P.O. Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584
360-427-9670, Ext.603
>>> Ryan Crater 8/14/2008 10:26 AM >>>
Gloria from WDFW stated that Mr. Neyhart has yet to get all the necessary documents
in to start the HPA review process. Once she receives all requested document she will
have 45 days to review it, which would put him past the fish window. Gloria stated that
it is possible that he may not even be issued a HPA for the work considering the time it
takes to review the application.
Ryan Crater- RE: Fill and Dike work along the shoreline 1�
From: "Vanzwalenburg, Kim (ECY)"<kvan461 @ECY.WA.GOV>
To: "Ryan Crater" <RyanC@co.mason.wa.us>
Date: 8/20/2008 10:22 am
Subject: RE: Fill and Dike work along the shoreline
Ryan: Will you be going out to the site? I know there are always
issues regarding access but I'm willing to try to get on site with you.
Kim Van Zwalenburg
Shoreline Planner
Department of Ecology-Southwest Regional Office
PO Box 47775
Olympia, WA. 98504-7775
(360)407-6520; FAX (360)407-6305
e-mail: kvan461@ecy.wa.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Crater[mailto:RyanC@co.mason.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 10:15 AM
To: rhoss@hctc.com; neyhart@msn.com
Cc: Barbara Robinson; Robert Fink; Rogers, Gloria (DFW); Vanzwalenburg,
Kim (ECY); agouley@skokomish.org; Marty Ereth
Subject: Fill and Dike work along the shoreline
Mr. Neyhart,
have just been told that you are filling and diking along the Tahuya
River and have been doing so all last week and through the weekend.
This work requires shoreline permits and approvals. I will be creating
an enforcement case regarding this new complaint. You are hereby
ordered to Stop All Work associated with the filling and diking along
the Tahuya River. This Stop Work Order is not associated with the
Bridge Work as it is a new compliant.
Regards,
Ryan Crater
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Mason County Department of Community Development
411 North 5th
PO BOX 279
Shelton, WA 98584
Phone#360-427-9670 ext. 577
Fax#360-427-8425
Ryan Crater- RE Fill and Dike work along the shoreline 1LL
From: "Vanzwalenburg, Kim (ECY)"<kvan461 @ECY.WA.GOV>
To: "Ryan Crater" <RyanC@co.mason.wa.us>
Date: 8/20/2008 10:34 am
Subject: RE: Fill and Dike work along the shoreline
CC: "Lund, Perry(ECY)" <plun461 @ECY.WA.GOV>
I can do it Monday or Wednesday of next week. I am out of the office
the next two days
Kim Van Zwalenburg
Shoreline Planner
Department of Ecology-Southwest Regional Office
PO Box 47775
Olympia, WA. 98504-7775
(360)407-6520; FAX (360)407-6305
e-mail: kvan461 @ecy.wa.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Crater[ma ilto:Ryan C@co.mason.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 10:31 AM
To:Vanzwalenburg, Kim (ECY)
Subject: RE: Fill and Dike work along the shoreline
We can take a look from another property without having to go to Mr.
Neyharts. When would you have time to take a look?
>>> "Vanzwalenburg, Kim (ECY)" <kvan461@ECY.WA.GOV>8/20/2008 10:21 am
Ryan: Will you be going out to the site? I know there are always
issues regarding access but I'm willing to try to get on site with you.
Kim Van Zwalenburg
Shoreline Planner
Department of Ecology-Southwest Regional Office
PO Box 47775
Olympia, WA. 98504-7775
(360)407-6520; FAX (360)407-6305
e-mail: kvan461 @ecy.wa.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Crater[mailto:RyanC@co.mason.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 10:15 AM
To: rhoss@hctc.com; neyhart@msn.com
Cc: Barbara Robinson; Robert Fink; Rogers, Gloria (DFW); Vanzwalenburg,
Kim (ECY); agouley@skokomish.org; Marty Ereth
Subject: Fill and Dike work along the shoreline
Mr. Neyhart,
I have just been told that you are filling and diking along the Tahuya
River and have been doing so all last week and through the weekend.
This work requires shoreline permits and approvals. I will be creating
an enforcement case regarding this new complaint. You are hereby
ordered to Stop All Work associated with the filling and diking along
the Tahuya River. This Stop Work Order is not associated with the
Bridge Work as it is a new compliant.
Ryan Crater- RE: Fill and Dike work along the shoreline 2
Regards,
Ryan Crater
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Mason County Department of Community Development
411 North 5th
PO BOX 279
Shelton, WA 98584
Phone#360-427-9670 ext. 577
Fax#360-427-8425
1
Ryan Crater RE: Fill and Dike work along the shoreline 1
From: "Vanzwalenburg, Kim (ECY)" <kvan461@ECY.WA.GOV>
To: "Ryan Crater" <RyanC@co.mason.wa.us>
Date: 8/20/2008 10:41 am
Subject: RE: Fill and Dike work along the shoreline
Ryan: if wed works that would be the better day(Perry could then
participate). But I also recognize the need to respond promptly. Let
me know what works best for you.
Kim
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Crater[mailto:RyanC@co.mason.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 10:31 AM
To: Vanzwalenburg, Kim (ECY)
Subject: RE: Fill and Dike work along the shoreline
We can take a look from another property without having to go to Mr.
Neyharts. When would you have time to take a look?
>>>'Vanzwalenburg, Kim (ECY)"<kvan461 @ECY.WA.GOV>8/20/2008 10:21 am
Ryan: Will you be going out to the site? I know there are always
issues regarding access but I'm willing to try to get on site with you.
Kim Van Zwalenburg
Shoreline Planner
Department of Ecology- Southwest Regional Office
PO Box 47775
Olympia, WA. 98504-7775
(360)407-6520; FAX (360)407-6305
e-mail: kvan461 @ecy.wa.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Crater[ma ilto:Ryan C@co.mason.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday,August 20, 2008 10:15 AM
To: rhoss@hctc.com; neyhart@msn.com
Cc: Barbara Robinson; Robert Fink; Rogers, Gloria (DFW); Vanzwalenburg,
Kim (ECY); agouley@skokomish.org; Marty Ereth
Subject: Fill and Dike work along the shoreline
Mr. Neyhart,
have just been told that you are filling and diking along the Tahuya
River and have been doing so all last week and through the weekend.
This work requires shoreline permits and approvals. I will be creating
an enforcement case regarding this new complaint. You are hereby
ordered to Stop All Work associated with the filling and diking along
the Tahuya River. This Stop Work Order is not associated with the
Bridge Work as it is a new compliant.
Regards,
Ryan Crater
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Mason County Department of Community Development
Ryan Crater- Fwd-. Neyhart (Bank Work)
From: "Gloria Rogers" <rogergsr@DFW.WA.GOV>
To: "Ted Jackson" <jackstwj@DFW.WA.GOV>
Date: 8/20/2008 12:00 pm
Subject: Fwd: Neyhart(Bank Work)
CC: <ryanc@co.mason.wa.us>, "Bob Barnard" <BARNARJB...
Ted,
Mr. Heyhart may have several new violations. This one at the bridge
site and another on the north end of his property where he has been
diking. I'll forward that email next.
I'll be on vacation next week so Ryan Crater(Code Enforcement Mason
Co)will be your best contact as he has been involved in all of this
from the beginning. Ryan will be able to provide the background info,
photos, etc. It sounds like a meeting is planned at the site with the
county and DOE so they will be able to provide more info then. If
there are violations, 1 'll write up a violation report when I return.
Both WDFW and the county have been extensively assisting Mr. Neyhart
through the permitting process and plan development. This sure is
unfortunate if true.
Gloria
>>> Ryan Crater 8/20/2008 10:46:26 AM >>>
I have just been told Mr. Neyhart has already completed the additional
bank armoring work for the bridge over the last week and through the
weekend. I have showed the complainants the site plans and it appears
that additional work was done not shown on the plans. No permits were
issued and SEPA has not been completed.
Regards,
Ryan Crater
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Mason County Department of Community Development
411 North 5th
PO BOX 279
Shelton, WA 98584
Phone#360-427-9670 ext. 577
Fax#360-427-8425
Ryan Crater- Fwd: Fill and Dike work along the shoreline 1
From: "Gloria Rogers"<rogergsr@DFW.WA.GOV>
To: "Ted Jackson"<jackstwj@DFW.WA.GOV>
Date: 8/20/2008 12:01 pm
Subject: Fwd: Fill and Dike work along the shoreline
CC: <ryanc@co.mason.wa.us>, 'Bob Barnard" <BARNARJB...
Ted,
Here is the other potential violation.
Gloria
>>> Ryan Crater 8/20/2008 10:14:57 AM >>>
Mr. Neyhart,
I have just been told that you are filling and diking along the Tahuya
River and have been doing so all last week and through the weekend.
This work requires shoreline permits and approvals. I will be creating
an enforcement case regarding this new complaint. You are hereby
ordered to Stop All Work associated with the filling and diking along
the Tahuya River. This Stop Work Order is not associated with the
Bridge Work as it is a new compliant.
Regards,
Ryan Crater
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Mason County Department of Community Development
411 North 5th
PO BOX 279
Shelton, WA 98584
Phone#360-427-9670 ext. 577
Fax#360-427-8425
Ryan Crater- Re: Fwd: Neyhart (Bank Work)
From: "Ted Jackson" <jackstwj@DFW.WA.GOV>
To: "Jason Czebotar" <czeboicc@DFW.WA.GOV>, "Gloria...
Date: 8/20/2008 12:28 pm
Subject: Re: Fwd: Neyhart(Bank Work)
CC: <ryanc@co.mason.wa.us>, "Bob Barnard" <BARNARJB
Gloria,
Officer Czebotar is working on this.
>>> Gloria Rogers 08/20/2008 11:59 AM >>>
Ted,
Mr. Heyhart may have several new violations. This one at the bridge
site and another on the north end of his property where he has been
diking. I'll forward that email next.
I'll be on vacation next week so Ryan Crater(Code Enforcement Mason
Co)will be your best contact as he has been involved in all of this
from the beginning. Ryan will be able to provide the background info,
photos, etc. It sounds like a meeting is planned at the site with the
county and DOE so they will be able to provide more info then. If
there are violations, 1 '11 write up a violation report when I return.
Both WDFW and the county have been extensively assisting Mr. Neyhart
through the permitting process and plan development. This sure is
unfortunate if true.
Gloria
>>> Ryan Crater 8/20/2008 10:46:26 AM >>>
I have just been told Mr. Neyhart has already completed the additional
bank armoring work for the bridge over the last week and through the
weekend. I have showed the complainants the site plans and it appears
that additional work was done not shown on the plans. No permits were
issued and SEPA has not been completed.
Regards,
Ryan Crater
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Mason County Department of Community Development
411 North 5th
PO BOX 279
Shelton, WA 98584
Phone#360-427-9670 ext. 577
Fax#360-427-8425
Ryan Crater- RE: Neyhart(Bank Work) 1
From: "Rick Hoss" <rhoss@hctc.com>
To: "'Ryan Crater"' <RyanC@co.mason.wa.us>, <kloemd...
Date: 8/20/2008 3:16 pm
Subject: RE: Neyhart(Bank Work)
CC: "'Barbara Robinson"'<BarbarR.mail.Mason@co.mas...
Ryan,
No work whatsoever has been performed since Mr. Neyhart, member, met with
Mason County last week.
understood from Bob Fink's letter and email of August 12 that all
enforcement action has been suspended, and that your determination letter
was withdrawn.
Sincerely,
RICHARD T. HOSS
rhoss@hctc.com
HOSS &WILSON-HOSS, LLP
236 W. Birch St., Shelton, WA 98584
Off: (360)426-2999; Fax: (360)426-6715
NOTICES
CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED: This email message may contain legally
privileged and/or confidential information. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this
e-mail message and any attachment.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: In compliance with requirements imposed by the
IRS, we hereby notify you that, to the extent that this written
communication addresses tax matters, it is not intended and cannot be used
to avoid tax-related penalties under federal, state or local law.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Crater[mailto:RyanC@co.mason.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 10:46 AM
To: kloemdck@dfw.wa.gov; rhoss@hctc.com; neyhart@msn.com
Cc: Barbara Robinson; Robert Fink; Gloria Rogers; Kim;
agouley@skokomish.org; Marty Ereth
Subject: Neyhart(Bank Work)
I have just been told Mr. Neyhart has already completed the additional bank
armoring work for the bridge over the last week and through the weekend. I
have showed the complainants the site plans and it appears that additional
work was done not shown on the plans. No permits were issued and SEPA has
not been completed.
Regards,
Ryan Crater
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Ryan Crater- RE Ne hart Bank Work _ _ ._:— .. _ -_.. _ _ __ _ - -—___ 2.1 Y y )
Mason County Department of Community Development
411 North 5th
PO BOX 279
Shelton, WA 98584
Phone#360-427-9670 ext. 577
Fax#360-427-8425
Ryan Crater- RE: Neyhart 1
From: "Vern Rutter" <vernrutter@msn.com>
To: "'Ryan Crater"' <RyanC@co.mason.wa.us>
Date: 8/20/2008 3:29 pm
Subject: RE: Neyhart
CC: "Gary and Marie"<olema1 @aol.com>
Likewise, Ryan.
The guy with me was Gary Key.
Tomorrow is fine. They are expecting you. I have a meeting in town at 2:15
so I won't be able to be there.
Contact numbers:
Vern Rutter
275-5459
801-5179 (cell)
vernrutter@msn.com
Gary and Marie Key
275-0110
olemal@aol.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Crater[mailto:RyanC@co.mason.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 2:15 PM
To: vernrutter@msn.com
Subject: Neyhart
Vern,
It was nice meeting with you both today. I have already forgotten the other
guys name, so hopefully you can remind me.
have a meeting set up for Wed morning to look at the new diking and
filling work. Ecology will be coming along as well...so far Kim and Perry.
They will be meeting me at the office at 8:30 am, after that we will be
headed your way.
I am thinking, I would like to come take an initial look tomorrow in the
afternoon. Are you guys available?
There is a long history of past violations not being properly addressed. I
do apologize for that. I can tell you that the new violations will be
pursued to the greatest extent possible under the code. Hopefully we can
hold him accountable in 2008 for once.
will do my best on this case, but I can't do things on my own. The public
needs to show that they are concerned and want something done about it. I
know that this will be round 2 for you guys, so hopefully you still have
some steam left.
Regards,
Ryan
Ryan Crater- RE Neyhart (Bank Work)
From: Ryan Crater
To: Hoss, Rick; kloemdck@dfw.wa.gov; neyhart@msn.com
Date: 8/20/2008 3:54 pm
Subject: RE: Neyhart (Bank Work)
CC: agouley@skokomish.org; Ereth', 'Marty; Fink, ...
Rick,
Today I had two people come in and make a formal complaint regarding filling and
diking of the floodway. The new diking and filling of the floodway at the north end of
Mr. Neyarts parcel is a new and completely different complaint with a new enforcement
case number. I am pursuing this enforcement case under our SMP and flood ordinance.
The current status is "Under Investigation".
Regarding the bridge work:
Are you saying that the two complainants who stated that the work Mr. Neyhart
proposed has not been completed as of August 19, 2008 and that if I went to look
tomorrow your version would hold true?
Regards,
Ryan Crater
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Mason County Department of Community Development
411 North 5th
PO BOX 279
Shelton,WA 98584
Phone#360-427-9670 ext. 577
Fax# 360-427-8425
>>> "Rick Hoss" <rhossC@hctc.com> 8/20/2008 3:16 pm >>>
Ryan,
No work whatsoever has been performed since Mr. Neyhart, member, met with
Mason County last week.
I understood from Bob Fink's letter and email of August 12 that all
enforcement action has been suspended,and that your determination letter
was withdrawn.
Sincerely,
RICHARD T. HOSS
rhossOhctc.com
HOSS&WILSON-HOSS, LLP
236 W. Birch St.,Shelton,WA 98584
Off: (360)426-2999; Fax: (360)426-6715
I __
-- _ -._ _ - -- --- -.- - --
Ryan Crater- RE Neyhart(Bank Work) 2
NOTICES
CONFIDENTIAL&PRIVILEGED: This email message may contain legally
privileged and/or confidential information. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this
e-mail message and any attachment.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: In compliance with requirements imposed by the
IRS,we hereby notify you that,to the extent that this written
communication addresses tax matters,it is not intended and cannot be used
to avoid tax-related penalties under federal,state or local law.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Crater rmailto:RyanCC)co.mason.wa.usl
Sent: Wednesday,August 20, 2008 10:46 AM
To: kloemdck@dfw.wa.gov; rhoss@hctc.com; neyhart@msn.com
Cc: Barbara Robinson; Robert Fink; Gloria Rogers; Kim;
ago uley@skokomish.org; Marty Ereth
Subject: Neyhart(Bank Work)
I have just been told Mr. Neyhart has already completed the additional bank
armoring work for the bridge over the last week and through the weekend. I
have showed the complainants the site plans and it appears that additional
work was done not shown on the plans. No permits were issued and SEPA has
not been completed.
Regards,
Ryan Crater
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Mason County Department of Community Development
411 North 5th
PO BOX 279
Shelton,WA 98584
Phone#360-427-9670 ext. 577
Fax#360-427-8425
Ryan Crater- RE: Neyhart(Bank Work) 1
From: "Marty Ereth" <marty@Skokomish.org>
To: "Ryan Crater" <RyanC@co.mason.wa.us>, "Joseph P...
Date: 8/21/2008 10:46 am
Subject: RE: Neyhart(Bank Work)
CC: "Alex Gouley" <agouley@Skokomish.org>, "Randy L...
Thanks Ryan,
Back in the early to mid 1990's I copied Mason County DCD's entire file
on Neyhart Farms. Since then, I have added to it including the 1996
Settlement Agreement Doug and his attorney Rick Hoss made with the
Skokomish Tribe and DOE for violations of the Mason County Shoreline
Master Program. I also have a 1998 compliance check by DOE's Bill Young
(retired)saying for the most part, Doug was in compliance with the
Settlement Agreement at that time. Why does Mr. Hoss believe the SA is
no longer valid, because Doug violated it by applying for and receiving
an HPA from W DFW a few years later?
As you know, my last day is tomorrow so I can't spend time on this but I
an including others in this email in hopes that the Tribe will continue
to push Mason County policy makers to hold Neyhart accountable for
something. In reality, Doug's entire track and dike are within the
Tahuya River floodway. It was all floodplain and wetlands prior to Doug
diking and filling the island. It never would be permitted today and I
don't think was ever actually permitted by Mason County then. In my
opinion, at this point, the single most important thing we could do for
the Tahuya River is to purchase Neyhart Farms and allow Doug to use
those funds to purchase another farm away from water somewhere
(preferrably not in Hood Canal). After the property is secured, then
dike removal and restoration can begin. I have a lidar image of the
property which is pretty telling. I will send it to you when I find an
electronic version.
Marty
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Crater [mailto:Ryan C@co.mason.wa.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 9:15 AM
To: Marty Ereth
Cc:Alex Gouley
Subject: RE: Neyhart(Bank Work)
I am going to the site this afternoon as well as an offsite locating to
see the new compliant. You can come if you like. I am also going to
the site next Wed in the morning with Kim Van. and Perry Lund from
Ecology. You can come then too if you like.
Bob is viewing things different from me, Ecology, and other Planners and
has stated that Mr. Neyhart is possibly exempt from any shoreline
permits. I completely disagree with him on that and said the proper
place for this is a legal decision by our Hearings Examiner. I hope
that if he does call the project exempt that someone would appeal that
decision. If someone doesn't hold Mr. Neyhart accountable this time we
might just as well forget holding him accountable in the future.
I had a chance to view a photographic history of the Neyhart
property...I am almost at a loss of words after viewing it. As you may
Ryan Crater- RE Neyhart(Bank Work) 2
know since
1981 Mr. Neyhart has been diking, filling, and clearing the
floodway/wetland. He continues to activity dike and fill to this day
despite past court orders. Rick Hoss has stated that the court order
you showed me is no longer in effect.
Basically, I am the only one pushing for holding Mr. Neyhart accountable
at this point. I can't do this alone and desperately need help.
P P Y .P
If you give me your fax, I will fax you a copy.
Regards,
Ryan Crater
>>>"Marty Ereth" <marty@Skokomish.org> 8/21/2008 8:55 am >>>
Ryan,
Are you getting support from Bob Fink? Can you send us a copy of the
August 12th email and or letter that Mr. Hoss is referring to? As the
administrator is Bob making decisions or is he getting direction from
others?
Are you going to make a site visit soon to validate the complaints?
Marty
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Crater[mailto:RyanC@co.mason.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 3:54 PM
To: kloemdck@dfw.wa.gov; Rick Hoss; neyhart@msn.com
Cc: Barbara Robinson; Lynda Ring-Erickson; Robert Fink; Tim Sheldon;
'Gloria Rogers'; 'Kim'; Alex Gouley; Marty Ereth
Subject: RE: Neyhart(Bank Work)
Rick,
Today I had two people come in and make a formal complaint regarding
filling and diking of the floodway. The new diking and filling of the
floodway at the north end of Mr. Neyarts parcel is a new and completely
different complaint with a new enforcement case number. I am pursuing
this enforcement case under our SMP and flood ordinance. The current
status is"Under Investigation".
Regarding the bridge work:
Are you saying that the two complainants who stated that the work Mr.
Neyhart proposed has not been completed as of August 19, 2008 and that
if I went to look tomorrow your version would hold true?
Regards,
Ryan Crater
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Ryan Crater`RE: Fill and Dike work along the shoreline _ 2
411 North 5th
PO BOX 279
Shelton, WA 98584
Phone#360-427-9670 ext. 577
Fax#360-427-8425
Ryan Crater- RE: Neyhart 1
From: "Vern Rutter" <vernrutter@msn.com>
To: "'Ryan Crater"' <RyanC@co.mason.wa.us>
Date: 8/21/2008 7:29 am
Subject: RE: Neyhart
CC: "'Gary and Marie"'<olema1 @aol.com>
What did you expect? Which statements: pre-Neyhart vice current conditions
/circumstances; recent activities? You saw the pictures. I suspect
Neyhart is probably not being honest with his lawyer either.
Nevertheless, we're content to let the facts on the ground speak for
themselves. Should be pretty easy to see who is being truthful and who is
not.
We're thankful we had the opportunity to talk yesterday and that you're
looking.
Vern
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Crater[mai Ito:Ryan C@co.mason.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday,August 20, 2008 3:55 PM
To: Vern Rutter
Cc: Gary and Marie
Subject: RE: Neyhart
Rick just e-mailed me and said your statements are not true.
>>>"Vern Rutter"<vernrutter@msn.com>8/20/2008 3:30 pm >>>
Likewise, Ryan.
The guy with me was Gary Key.
Tomorrow is fine. They are expecting you. I have a meeting in town at 2:15
so I won't be able to be there.
Contact numbers:
Vern Rutter
275-5459
801-5179 (cell)
vernrutter@msn.com
Gary and Marie Key
275-0110
olemal@aol.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Crater[mailto:RyanC@co.mason.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 2:15 PM
To: vernrutter@msn.com
Subject: Neyhart
Vern,
It was nice meeting with you both today. I have already forgotten the other
� guys name, uu hopefully you can remind me.
| have a meeting set up for Wed morning ho look at the new diking and
filling work. Ecology will be coming along as well...no far Kim and Perry.
They will ba meeting meat the office at8:30 am, after that vve will ba
headed your way.
| am thinking. | would like tV come take an initial look tomorrow in the
afternoon. Are you guys available?
Thera is o long history wf past violations not being properly addressed. |
do apologize for that. | can tell you that the new violations will be
pursued to the greatest extent possible under the code. Hopefully wecan
� hold him accountable in2O08 for once.
| will domy best on this case, but | can't do things onmyown. The public
needs hu show that they are concerned and want something done about it. |
know that this will be round 2 for you guys, oo hopefully you still have
some steam left.
Regards,
Ryon
Ryan Crater- RE: Neyhart(Bank Work) 1
From: "Rick Hoss" <rhoss@hctc.com>
To: "'Ryan Crater"' <RyanC@co.mason.wa.us>, <kloemd...
Date: 8/21/2008 8:33 am
Subject: RE: Neyhart (Bank Work)
CC: "'Barbara Robinson"' <BarbarR@co.mason.wa.us>, ...
Ryan,
Below is Mr. Neyhart's, member, response I received late yesterday. His long
approved Farm Plan includes this work.
A reasonable person would view this latest contact as harassment.
May I suggest you look into your informants' motivation, as well as their
false information?Were you aware that several years ago, one of Mr.
Neyhart's neighbors brought a claim against Mr. Neyhart in Mason County
Superior Court?The result of that case was that Mr. Neyhart prevailed on
all counts, recovered his fees and costs, and one of the neighbors was
sentenced to the Mason County jail for perjury by Judge James B. Sawyer? I
suggest that your informants' motivation may in fact have nothing to do with
seeing that the Mason Co. Shoreline Master Program is complied with. May
also suggest you consider notifying the prosecutor's office about your
informants'latest false complaint?
"Rick:
have done no work around the bridge. No bank armoring as been done for
the bridge over the last week and
through the weekend .
The only work that we have been doing is working on are training track. We
have been grading it, so it will be
smooth so the horse will not trip. we use a wood drag and a metal Harrow
Rake on the track. when the horse are
jogging, we drag the track twice daily.Any holes in the track, we fill with
sandy materiel. We have been
ranking rocks off the track with rakes. The track has been in the same place
since, approx 1990.
WE have not worked on the river bank. The only work that was done on the
river bank was by the DNR., back
in April with a HPA., AND THE EMERGENCY PERMIT FROM THE COUNTY.
Rick that's it.
Doug."
Sincerely,
RICHARD T. HOSS
rhoss@hctc.com
HOSS &WILSON-HOSS, LLP
236 W. Birch St., Shelton, WA 98584
Off: (360)426-2999; Fax: (360)426-6715
NOTICES
CONFIDENTIAL& PRIVILEGED: This email message may contain legally
privileged and/or confidential information. If you have received this email
Ryan Crater- RE: Neyhart (Bank Work) 2
in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this
e-mail message and any attachment.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: In compliance with requirements imposed by the
IRS, we hereby notify you that, to the extent that this written
communication addresses tax matters, it is not intended and cannot be used
to avoid tax-related penalties under federal, state or local law.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Crater[ma ilto:Ryan C@co.mason.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 3:54 PM
To: kloemdck@dfw.wa.gov; Rick Hoss; neyhart@msn.com
Cc: Barbara Robinson; Lynda Ring-Erickson; Robert Fink; Tim Sheldon; 'Gloria
Rogers; 'Kim'; agouley@skokomish.org; 'Marty Ereth'
Subject: RE: Neyhart(Bank Work)
Rick,
Today I had two people come in and make a formal complaint regarding filling
and diking of the floodway. The new diking and filling of the floodway at
the north end of Mr. Neyarts parcel is a new and completely different
complaint with a new enforcement case number. I am pursuing this
enforcement case under our SMP and flood ordinance. The current status is
"Under Investigation".
Regarding the bridge work:
Are you saying that the two complainants who stated that the work Mr.
Neyhart proposed has not been completed as of August 19, 2008 and that if I
went to look tomorrow your version would hold true?
Regards,
Ryan Crater
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Mason County Department of Community Development
411 North 5th
PO BOX 279
Shelton, WA 98584
Phone#360-427-9670 ext. 577
Fax#360-427-8425
>>>"Rick Hoss" <rhoss@hctc.com> 8/20/2008 3:16 pm >>>
Ryan,
No work whatsoever has been performed since Mr. Neyhart, member, met with
Mason County last week.
understood from Bob Fink's letter and email of August 12 that all
enforcement action has been suspended, and that your determination letter
was withdrawn.
Ryan ate Crr- RE Neyhart(Bank Work) 3,
Sincerely,
RICHARD T. HOSS
rhoss@hctc.com
HOSS &WILSON-HOSS, LLP
236 W. Birch St., Shelton, WA 98584
Off: (360)426-2999; Fax: (360)426-6715
NOTICES
CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED: This email message may contain legally
privileged and/or confidential information. If you have received this email
in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this
e-mail message and any attachment.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: In compliance with requirements imposed by the
IRS,we hereby notify you that, to the extent that this written
communication addresses tax matters, it is not intended and cannot be used
to avoid tax-related penalties under federal, state or local law.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Crater[mailto:RyanC@co.mason.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 10:46 AM
To: kloemdck@dfw.wa.gov; rhoss@hctc.com; neyhart@msn.com
Cc: Barbara Robinson; Robert Fink; Gloria Rogers; Kim;
agouley@skokomish.org; Marty Ereth
Subject: Neyhart(Bank Work)
have just been told Mr. Neyhart has already completed the additional bank
armoring work for the bridge over the last week and through the weekend.
have showed the complainants the site plans and it appears that additional
work was done not shown on the plans. No permits were issued and SEPA has
not been completed.
Regards,
Ryan Crater
Land Use Planner/Code Enforcement
Mason County Department of Community Development
411 North 5th
PO BOX 279
Shelton, WA 98584
Phone#360-427-9670 ext. 577
Fax#360-427-8425