Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFPA2006-00020 - FPA Application - 7/17/2006 peoN co�� MASON COUNTY to .� Shelton (360) 427-9670 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Belfair (360) 275-4467 Planning Elma (360) 482-5269 Mason County Bldg.1 411 N.5th P.O.Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 85f Keith Schouviller 1310 E Mason Lake Road Shelton, WA 98584 February 3,2010 Re: FPA application 2006-00020 Dear Mr. Schouviller, I am in the process of cleaning up old cases that have been lingering for sometime and I can across your FPA application from 2006. According to County records I signed off on my portion of the review in July 2008, but that Public Works was unable to approve your stormwater plan as of December 2008. Please see the enclosed printout of the actions for your case. Do you still want to go forward with your application?If so,please call me to discuss getting your application to completion. Your case will automatically expire on August 4, 2010 if this situation as not been resolved by then. I can be reached at ext. 571 or by e- mail at mms(ako.masonma.us. Thank you. Sincerely, Michael MacSems FPA Planner .. ............. (12/1112008)..Charell Holcomb- Re: Pending..FPA's..............................................................................................................................................................Page 1 From: Fred Perryman To: Holcomb, Charell Date: 12/2/2008 12:19 PM Subject: Re: Pending FPA's Charell, FPA2006-00020 - The geo assessment on this one has been approved. We are waiting on an engineered Stormwater Site Plan meeting the requirements of the 1992 DOE stormwater manual and Mason County Title 14.48. FPA 2008-00001 Was already approved in conjunction with COM 2008-00032. 1 just put all the documentation in with the COM stuff. I went to the FPA in TM and approved it there as well. Will also send an IDC to Mlchael MacSems for this FPA. Hope this helps. Fred Fred Perryman Engineering Tech III 9 9 Mason County Public Works P.O. Box 1850 Shelton, WA 98584 (360) 427-9670, Ext. 625 fredp@co.mason.wa.us ( mailto:fredp@co.mason.wa.us ) >>> Charell Holcomb 12/2/2008 10:13 AM >>> Hi Fred - Just checking status on a couple of OLD FPA's that I have in my bin here. They are: FPA2006-00020 and FPA2008-00001 . Can you tell me anything? Charell FINDINGS OF FACT FPA Case#2006-00020 APPLICANT: Keith Schouviller APPLICATION DATE: July 10,2006 Mason County has reviewed the above referenced application for Class IV General Forest Practices and finds it in conformance with all applicable County land use regulations in effect at the time of application. FINDINGS The proposed FPA is compliant with the following conditions: The proponent has paid the prescribed fees. The proponent has filed a complete, signed application. A map has been received that complies with the requirements of 11.05.120: (I) Harvest boundaries and tree retention areas. (11) The approximate location of any structures. (III) The location of all existing and proposed streets,right-of-ways, easements, skid roads,haul roads, and landings within the proposal. (IV) The location of future land development including stormwater management facilities and vegetation to be retained for site landscaping, open space,wildlife habitat, screening, and/or buffers. (V) Site topography at contour intervals of 40 feet. (VI) Critical areas and critical area buffers regulated pursuant to the Critical Areas Ordinance. (VII) Drainage ways and culverts. (VIII) Site area targeted for further harvest including proposed timing. (IX) North arrow and scale shall be shown on all site plans. The scale shall be no smaller than one inch to 200 feet. That this FPA is in conformance with the following Mason County ordinances: 11.05 That the proposed FPA involves 10 acres. That the notifications required by 11.05.060 have been made if applicable. Note: Not applicable in this case. 1 L Mason County Resource Ordinance _X_That at the issuance of this permit will not result in a violation of the Mason County Resource Lands and Critical Areas Ordinance. The site was inspected by Michael MacSems of the Mason County Planning Department who determined that any critical area buffer and/or steep slope issues have been resolved. Project is setback 300 feet from wetland. A geo-trchnical assesment by Bradley- Noble was approved by MCPW. Geo-Technical Report/Assessment Review A Geo-Technical _X Assessment_Report (check one)was written by Bradley-Noble GeoTechnical Services and approved by MCPW on March 10, 2008. Washington State Department of Transportation _X_A DOT Access Permit is not required for this proposal. A DOT Access Permit is required for this proposal. Date Approved by DOT: N/A Shoreline Master Program That, if applicable, all activity under this application are in conformance with the Mason County Shoreline Master Program and has a shore line designation of N/A. State Environmental Policy Act This application for FPA# 2006-00020: _X_Has been reviewed for SEPA compliance under case#: SEP 2006-00110. Is SEPA exempt. _DNS X MDNS Stormwater Management This application was reviewed for stormwater and erosion control by John Sliva and approved on PENDING CONCLUSION In conclusion, this application for Class IV General Forest Practices is consistent with the above criteria and that the public uses and Mason County has fulfilled its statutory obligations. 2 RECOMMENDATIONS I, being the Manager of the Mason County Planning Department, hereby attest to and certify that appropriate provisions have been made for this Class IV General Forest Practices Application and hereby recommend approval. In addition these facts evidenced by the contents of the file for this Forest Practice Application. Signed, "�-4 /"-) 0 Robert Fink, Plarfting Manager Date r Mi Vhael MacSems, Subdivision Planner Date 3 r a �gON coa T MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mason County Bldg. III, 426 West Cedar Street _- - PO Box 186, Shelton,WA 98584 1854 www.co.mason.wa.us (360)427-9670 Belfair(360)275-4467 Elma(360)482-5269 FOREST PRACTICES APPLICATION/NOTIFICATION Type IV General This application should be accompanied with an Environmental Checklist(SEPA) as well as an activity map/site plan which addresses items listed below. TYPE OR PRINT IN INK: 1. Landowner,Timber Owner and Operator information. Legal Name of LANDOWNER Legal Name of TIMBER OWNER Legal Name of OPERATOR e.;Ih T. Ss���: ter see s khws- Mailing Address: Mailing Address: Mailing Address: /c3<D tf. 14A0V 4 4Ke City,State,Zip City,State,Zip City, State,Zip 5�61��ayv� GvA S8'Sg� . Phone 4tL6_ y7.0 Phone( ) Phone( ) Email: Email: Email: 2. Contact person information. Contact Person / Phone(360) eh.v441 C%NH M(��al Email: C C ti of ►•. otr Coca C r,va 3. If you are harvesting timber,enter the Forest Tax Reporting Account Number of the Timber Owner: 8�"OIoC-`JSY For tax reporting information or to receive a tax number,call the Department of Revenue at(800)548-8829. 4. Legal description where the forest practices will occur. Parcel Number Sub Division %.''/. Section Townshi 3Z 3q-7,3 0oo Z r w 3`h zt Ran >r1w t:U 3Y' Z- 00000 11 rr r, t - Z 00010 l' rr t. rr Lt t` 0&000 5. Answer each question as it applies to your proposed forest practice. a. No. [] Yes. Is the activity within an urban growth area? b. No. [] Yes. Is the activity within a public park? C. E4 No. [] Yes. Is the activity within 500 feet of a public park? Park name: d. [1]No. [] Yes. Is the activity located on lands platted after January 1, 1960? e. 'No. LA Yes. Is the activity within 200 feet of saltwater lake river/creek/stream pond wetland seasonal runoff X slopes which exceed 15%? f. What is the expected duration of FPA? Z Va�� Proposed start date: 46- 2wv-? Proposed end date: Pagel of 4 6. Are you cutting or removing timber? (]No. (X( Yes. Complete the table below and identify all timber harvest and salvage activity boundaries on the activity map. Acres Volume to be Steepest Slope in Unit# Harvest Type �Yarding Method net Harvested mb Harvest Unit l Como, 1Z. J ./✓ ••- Z 1 O v S 7. Are you constructing or abandoning roads? No. [) Yes. Complete the table below. Show locations and identify all road activities on the activity map. Total Length Steepest Side Slope Abandonment Date Type of Activity feet % Mo/Yr Road Construction Does Not Apply Temporary Road Construction Road Abandonment Work in or over typed water may require a Hydraulic Project Approval WA)from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). If you have questions concerning the HPA,visit the WDFW website at www.wdfa-.wa.govihabitat.htm. 8. Are you installing or replacing water-crossings? No. [] Yes. Complete the table below. Show locations and identify all proposed water-crossings on the activity map. Crossing Crossing Dimensions Crossing Crossing Dimensions Identifier Type width x length) Identifier Type width x length) 9. Mark the following activities that will be done in or over typed water. Activity in or over: Type I Stream Type II Stream Type III Stream Type IV Stream Type V Stream Removing culverts of bridges Equipment crossing Ground skidding Suspending cables Cable yarding Falling and bucking Other 10. Is any activity in a wetland or wetland buffer? K No. [] Yes. Complete the table below. Show locations and identify all wetlands and buffers on the activity map. Wetland Wetland Type Activity Type in Activity Type in Total Wetland Total Area Total Area Identifier (I,H,III,IV, Wetland Buffer Area(acres) Drained(acres) Filled(acres) other 11. Describe how the following are identified on the ground. • Harvest boundaries/unit comers: Er .477We-AAA; • Right-of-way limits and centerlines for road work,culverts and b id es: • Critical areas and critical area buffer boundaries: � Page 2 of 4 1 12. Have you reviewed this forest practices activity area to determine whether it may involve historic sites and/or Native American cultural resources? 36 No. [] Yes. 13. We affirm that the information contained herein is true,and understand that this proposed forest practice is subject to the Forest Practices Act and Rules and Mason County Forest Practices Conversion Ordinance as well as all other federal,state or local regulations. Compliance with the Forest Practices Act and Rules and the Mason County Forest Practices Conversion Ordinance does not ensure compliance with the Endangered Species Act or other federal state or local laws. Signature of NDO Signature of TIMBER OWNER Signature of OPERATOR (if different than landowner) (If different that landowner) Print name: /�E%`f� �. Sc ```V, Print name: Print name: Date: /'D 7 Date: Date: Additional information: (Optional) 5120 /�T�c� •►�►ew� . Per Mason County Ordinance 11.05,Section 11.05.120,a site map shall accompany this application which includes the following information. I Harvest boundaries and tree retention areas. H The approximate location of any structures. III The location of all existing and proposed streets,right-of-ways,easements,skid roads,haul roads,and landings within the proposal. IV The location of future land development including stormwater management facilities and vegetation to be retained for site landscaping,open space,wildlife habitat,screening,and/or buffers_ V Site topography at contour intervals of 40 feet. VI Critical areas and critical area buffers regulated pursuant to the Critical Areas Ordinance. VII Drainage ways and culverts. VIII Site area targeted for further harvest including proposed timing. IX North arrow and scale shall be shown on all site plans.The scale shall be no smaller than one inch to 2 100 feet. Staff asks that,at a minimum,the comers of the harvest units)be flagged for clear identification. Page 3 of 4 i Keith Schouviller Site Management Plan and Map 1 . Unite 1 . less than . 5 acres . is marked by Timber Harvest Flagging . Unit #2 - Harvest boundaries are shown on the map. The north line is a five year old clearcut with flagging . The east line is marked with Timber Harvest Boundary flagging. while the southwest line is access road with Timber Harvest flagging. Since the stand is being thinned . all residual trees are retention trees . 2 . See Map . old shed and barn on east side of Unit #1 . 3 . Major skid trail is located on map with landing in the northwest corner of .property . There are no proposed streets . Access for logging truck directly on to East Mason Lake County road NW corner of project . 4 . There is no scheduled future land development . The operation is a commercial thinning with a 40 % harvest of the understory and removal of some larger trees because of damage or spacing reasons . A wetlands or so called lake is over 350 feet to the east . No buffer required`. To the east of the timber sale boundary is a seasonal . rurioff area that only under the heaviest of 24 hour storms collects water . As stated in the geotech assessment dated March 19. 2007 by David C. .Strong, the water infiltrates the permeable outwash sands and gravels and shows up east in the seasonal runoff . There is no signs of any water ever being present on the surface in any form. Visiting the area on March 24, 2007 after 1 . 75 inches of rain (over 24 hours) and a total of 3 inches for the previous week . there wasn ' t standing water in the timber sale area. A small amount showed up in seasonal runoff area to the east . 5 . Site topography contours at 20' . Mason County' s GIS only shows 20' contours. 6. N/A 7 . There will be no drainage ways or culverts . Main skid trail will have water bars upon completion and seeded. 8. There are no plans of future harvesting or development under present ownership. Only if timber stand is damaged because of wind, ice or others would there be a another harvest . 9 . Scale on map is 1 " = 172 feet . Using the Mason County GSI ' s Map Mason Map Viewer this is the best I can do. The scale exceeds the 1= 200 ' _r FPA FEE: $200.00 with SEPA SEPA FEE: 0-9.99 Acres$510 $300.00 without SEPA 10 to 20 Acres$610 Over 20 Acres$765 10 to 20 Acres$610 EIS(DS)$2040+55/hr Departmental Review (For Office Use Only) Site visit: Date approved: -7 Pason'County Community Development I:PLANNINGTACTPABOC 05-02-2006 Page 4 of 4 MASON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS WORK ORDER Permit#: I�`� 7 C/j, G — u�G ` •� f`" � ' ..�,. Date: 3 23 MAR 13 2007 Requested by: Authorized by: n,ot,, ,SON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS . Type of Work: �eVt e� Public Works employee in charge: ►n SI)Vc,, CHARGE TO: lr Name: — PC, ►�t� Billing Address: Phone: 'KS) I WORK PERFORMED: Employee: Date: J-�t- Hours: 2 Hourly Rate: 36 JS` Total: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE INFO: Billed Date: Invoice #: Amount Billed Receipt # Date: Amount Paid 321 9999999 32133UOP�9010 ' / 321342100000 321342200000 321342100020 321342100010 • � 321341390081 321331000010 S S e Cv' S j Q- 321341390083 321342002000 321341390090 \ �'` F 321342400010 t � E •321330060010 321341390030 321330001000 ter' 21NR3W 321342300020r ,/'}' 321349999999' �2 3424,,0,rr0020+ �/ 321345000001 ✓,✓ r 321341390130 32 33409 002145000003 3.213 321343200000 321343100000 -321345000009 321345000011 w 321345000006E 321345000012.3�213_45000040 321343290030 �,.--�''� 321343100020 321345000039� 32�13` 4 0066 321343290040 321345000016..�� 321343100030 / 5 V 321349999999 321345000068 3213450000155000037 321345000067 321345000069 321343290050 !! I� 32134500n063 Y/ \\32134500 0 1 321343100000 321345000035 /i \1 X 321345000070 i II \321345000062 321343190060 321334100001, r P 321345000034_ ( � ° 321345000072 �—321345000060 321343190043 321345000046 "' 321345000073 321345000,r074 321347590104 321345000023 1 � �ife° 321343190041 321343100060 -} 32134500005 321343260000 321343190042 321345000625 32134-5000058/j 321343100040 321345000057 \\ 321347590091 "�-/ - 321345000075 321345000031 321345000056 i 321343100010 321345000030{321345000053 321345000055 321343200010 N \\ 321343100050 321343100070 321343100080 321345000050, 321343260000 321345000051-321345000052 321347590084 321334000000 321347500040 321343400020 I \ 321343000000 321343000000 321347500030 k 321347500020 FOREST PRACTICE MAP LEGEND Page I of I FOREST PRACTICE MAP LEGEND BOUNDARIES SOILS County Hydric Soils Township Highly Unstable Section Highly Erodible WATER BODIES Highly Unstable& Highly Erodible Open Water No Data or Gravel Pits Flats/Gravel Bars SLOPE Ice Medium Slope Instability Man Made Feature High Slope Instability Wet Area RAIN ON SNOW Unknown/Unclassified RS ....... Rain on Snow 000#000 STREAMS .SD Snow Dominant Stream Water Type S, F,Np,Ns OTHER Stream Type Unknown Sitka Spruce Zone Water Type Change WAU ELEVATION WRIA Contours, 40' interval Fire Shutdown Zones TRANSPORTATION Geographic Registration Ties Paved Road Unpaved Road Note to Applicant or other user: Road (Surface Unknown) In completing the Activity map use the symbols given in the FPA/N instructions(Page 4). If you add or Abandoned Road modify any symbols,describe them clearly on your map Orphaned Road or on an accompanying legend sheet. Water/Wetlands including their location and class may Trail be incorrectly displayed or not shown on this map. Applicants are encouraged to verify and correct streams, Railroad wetlands and possible watercourses.Site Indices are SITE CLASS based on the WA-DNR State Soil Survey.If the site index does not exist or indicates red alder, Site Class I noncommercial,or marginally commercial species,the following apply: If the whole RMZ width is within that Site Class 2 site index,use site class V. If the site index is only for a Site Class 3 portion of the RMZ width,then use the site index for conifer in the adjacent soil polygon.Disclaimer: i Site Class 4 Features shown on the Forest Practices Application Review System(FPARS)map represent data stored in Site Class 5 the Washington State Department of Natural Resources Marginal or Non-Commercial (DNR)Geographic Information Systems database.As Forest Production some of the data sets rely on outside sources of information,the DNR cannot accept responsibility for No Site Class Data errors or omissions,and therefore there are no Site Class for Red Alder warranties that accompany this material. http://www3.wadnr.gov/dnrapp5/website/fpars/bw—allmaplegend.htm 6/l/2006 (7/27/2006) Michael MacSems - RE: Schouviller FPA Page 1 From: "charles chambers" <cchamber1@comcast.net> To: "'Michael MacSems"' <Mms@co.mason.wa.us> Date: 7/25/2006 10:56 PM Subject: RE: Schouviller FPA I will need to talk with Schouviller about the below, but I can say. 1. The three flagging you are talking about on unit is the east line. Mr. S is having the property surveyed and that line might change a few feet one way or another. There are flagging on the west line, and that will be marked by the surveyor. The present ribbons in unit one was for a general location for your review. The third side of the triangle is the power line and is not a property line. Unit 2, there are pink "RMZ"flagging running east and west 91 feet north of the lake/wetlands. I didn't mark out the 125 feet as this puts one close to the house. With a thinning only a few trees were going to be removed in the 91 to 125 foot buffer. As long as we weren't going below the 91 feet and this was a thinning of less than 1/3 the stems, what is reason to mark the next 34 feet? The 125 feet can be marked. I can't talk for Mr. S, but I would think he would just pull out of the area requiring the geo-tech reports. The few trees wouldn't cover the cost. Are you telling me any slops greater than 15% under the county rules and regulations require the geo-tech or 300 feet? The 300 foot rule west of the house near the Mason Lake would rule out most of the thinning. I will talk with Mr. S and see if he wishes to continue or drop back to a DNR permit and live with the 6 years. I will be talking with you soon. I must admit this is an education. Thanks for your e-mail. CJC -----Original Message----- From: Michael MacSems [mailto:Mms@co.mason.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 6:44 PM To: Cchamberl@comcast.net Subject: Schouviller FPA Chuck Chambers cchamber1 @comcast.net July 25, 2006 Re: 32134-23-00020 et. al. Dear Mr. Chambers, Today I was able to visit the Schouviller site on Mikkelsen and Mason Lake Roads. My comments for both units are as follows: Unit 1: The only flagging that I could find for Unit 1 were the three pink ribbons i (7/27/2006) Michael MacSems - RE: Schouviller FPA Page 2 visible from Mikkelsen Road. I realize that this a small unit(1/3 ac), but I was unsure if these flags represented the west or the east line of the unit. If these flags represent the east line of the unit, than I have no concerns with the proposal. If these flags represent the west line of the unit, then I need to ask you to place some flagging on the east line of the cut. There is a depression to the northeast of the site and I would have concerns about stormwater and erosion control if the east line is anywhere near that feature. Unit 2: 1 can't issue a SEPA determination for Unit 2 until I have more information. Your application is telling me that you are proposing a 125 buffer from the lake/wetland, which is located to the north of the cut. However I could find no flagging for this buffer in the field. I need a scalable map (min 1" _ 200') of Unit 2 showing the wetland buffer as well as flagging in the field (also stormwater details). I measured a 25% slope between the wetland and the elevation of the road/driveway. Per section 17.01.100 of the Mason County Resource Lands and Critical Area ordinance(viewable on line), any cutting within 300'feet of slopes greater than 15% requires a geo-technical assessment(or a report if over 40%). West of the wetland the property contains a narrow east-west valley, some of which may contain slopes greater than 15%, although the valley tends to flatten out towards Mason Lake Road. In order to have this FPA approved, I need you and your client to do one of two things; either provide me with a geo-technical assessment consistent with 17.01.100.E.4 or modify your plan in order to eliminate any activity covered by this permit from within 300' of the slope. If you decide to do the geo-assessment, it will be forwarded to Public Work for review and approval at a cost of approximately$40 an hour. If you decide to redraw the unit, please keep in mind that trees within a tree length and a half of a structure are categorically exempt from needing a forest practices permit, but would still be subject to the Critical Areas Ordinance if within 125' of the wetland or 50' of the slope. Please call me at ext. 571 or e-mail me at: mms.co.mason.wa.us with any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Michael MacSems FPA&Subdivision Planner cc: Keith Schouviller P610 cot, MASON COUNTY Shelton (360) 427-9670 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Belfair (360) 275-4467 Planning Mason County Bldg. 1 411 N.5th Elma (360) 482-5269 P.O.Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 ehackehainbers CchamberI Acomcast.net July 25, 2006 Re: 32134-23-00020 et. al. Dear Mr. Chambers, Today I was able to visit the Schouviller site on Mikkelsen and Mason Lake Roads. My comments for both units are as follows: Unit 1: The only flagging that I could find for Unit 1 were the three pink ribbons visible from Mikkelsen Road. I realize that this a small unit(1/3 ac), but I was unsure if these flags represented the west or the east line of the unit. If these flags represent the east line of the unit,than I have no concerns with the proposal. If these flags represent the west line of the unit,then I need to ask you to place some flagging on the east line of the cut. There is a depression to the northeast of the site and I would have concerns about stormwater and erosion control if the east line is anywhere near that feature. Unit 2: I can't issue a SEPA determination for Unit 2 until I have more information. Your application is telling me that you are proposing a 125 buffer from the lake/wetland, which is located to the north of the cut. However I could find no flagging for this buffer in the field. I need a scalable map (min V=200')of Unit 2 showing the wetland buffer as well as flagging in the field (also stormwater details). I measured a 25% slope between the wetland and the elevation of the road/driveway. Per section 17.01.100 of the Mason County Resource Lands and Critical Area ordinance (viewable on line), any cutting within 300' feet of slopes greater than 15%requires a geo-technical assessment(or a report if over 40%). West of the wetland the property contains a narrow east-west valley, some of which may contain slopes greater than 15%, although the valley tends to flatten out towards Mason Lake Road. In order to have this FPA approved, I need you and your client to do one of two things; either provide me with a geo-technical assessment consistent with 17.01.100.E.4 or modify your plan in order to eliminate any activity covered by this permit from within 300' of the slope. If you decide to do the geo-assessment, it will be forwarded to Public Work for review and approval at a cost of approximately $40 an hour. If you decide to redraw the unit, please keep in mind that trees within a tree length and a half of a structure are categorically exempt from needing a forest practices permit, but would still be subject to the Critical Areas Ordinance if within 125' of the wetland or 50' of the slope. Please call me at ext. 571 or e-mail me at: mms.co.mason.wa.us with any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, OP Michael MacSems FPA& Subdivision Planner cc: Keith Schouviller (7/27/2006) Michael MacSems - Page 1 I From: "charles chambers" <cchamber1@comcast.net> To: "'Michael MacSems"' <Mms@co.mason.wa.us> Date: 7/26/2006 6:50 AM After sending you the e-mail last night, I checked unit 1 on the photo and the south line is marked with "Timber Sale Boundary" pink flagging and also the east line. The third side of the triangle is the power line. There is no west line; maybe you call the power line the NW line of unit 1. In regards to the Palmer FPA request, we might want to meet out there together and cut out some of the e-mailing. The Palmer property is flat along the south line and then there is a short 100 to 200 foot slope greater than 15%, then back to a lower bench. Are you telling me that the Palmers need to hire a geo-tech person for that small area?