HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEP2024-00030 Replace Pier, Ramp, Float, ATF Float - SEP Application - 8/29/2024 bocusign Envelope ID:E80CE7CC-8FF3-4F0A-80F0-B1 B3C1 9F4F5D
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Mason County Permit Center Use:
SEP 20I � OOI.5?�)O
0 Single Family DNS: $600.00 Parcel #: y ,C) 15()_CDC
❑ Other DNS: 0 to 9.99 acres: $730 Date Rcvd: RECEIVED
10 to 20 acres: $880
Over 20 acres: $1 100 AUG 2 9 2024
❑ DS/EIS: $5000 + $90 per hour
I ; W. Alder Street
Purpose of checklist:
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization
or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental
impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please
answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult
with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or
"does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown.
You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate
answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-
making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead Agencies:
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to
evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse
impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to
make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is
responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable
parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please
completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or
site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead
agency may exclude (for non-projects)questions in Part B - Environmental Elements—that do not
contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 1 of 14
Docusign Envelope ID:E80CE7CC-8FF3-4FOA-80FO-B1B3C19F4F5D
A. Background HELP
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Sullivan Pier, Ramp, and Float Replacement Project
2. Name of applicant: Larry Sullivan 20631 SE 162nd Way / Renton, WA 98059-9072
425-566-2580
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Integrated NW Construction, Inc/Sarah Kupers/60 N Lake Cushman Rd, Suite 109, Hoodsport, WA 98584!360-968-3441
psa@integratednwconstruction.com.
4. Date checklist prepared:
7/22/2024
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Mason County
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Upon receipt of all regulatory permits, work shall be conducted during the Lake Cushman draw-down
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
No
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
None
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Mason County - Shoreline Exemption, Building Permit
WDFW- HPA
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size
of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this
page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project
description.)
Install a replacement pier, ramp, float, and mooring buoy alternative on the Sullivan's Lake Cushman shoreline property.
The 4'x29' pier will be supported by(8) 6"diameter Schedule 80 piles, driven to refusal depth. The pier will be fully
grated with Eco-grate 62 to achieve 60% open area. A 3'x6' fully grated aluminum pre-fab ramp will span between the
pier and float. The 8'x20'float will be attached to (4) 6"diameter Schedule 80 guide piles, driven to refusal depth. This
float will be fully grated with Eco-grate 62 to achieve 60% open area. A float cradle will be installed to prevent the float
from resting on the bottom which includes 4 stub piles (6" diameter Schedule 80 piles, driven to refusal depth) and 6x8
AYC beams. The mooring buoy alternative will meet Tacoma Power requirements. The existing pier, ramp, (2)floats,
and all piles plus concrete footings will be fully removed prior to installation of replacement structure. This will be a
reduction in 137.33 SF of over-water coverage and development in the shoreline buffer.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 2 of 14
bocusign Envelope ID:E80CE7CC-8FF3-4FOA-80FO-B1B3C19F4F5D
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic
map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you
are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications
related to this checklist.
90 N Sundown Dr/ Hoodsport, WA 98548
Parcel#42318-50-00020
23N/4W/18
Legal Description: LAKE CUSHMAN #3
B. Environmental Elements HELP
1. Earth h( e
a. General description of the site:
(circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other gentle slope
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
14%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results
in removing any of these soils.
Glacial till, cobble, rock, dirt
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
No
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of
any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
No excavation, filling, or grading proposed. Replacement structure will be installed in same location as
existing structure.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
No, BMPs will be adhered to during construction, work will only be conducted in the dry during Lake
Cushman drawdown.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
None, replacement pier-ramp-float is reduction in overwater coverage, plus all overwater structures will be
grated with Eco-grate 62.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 3 of 14
Docusign Envelope ID:E80CE7CC-8FF3-4FOA-80FO-B1B3C19F4F5D
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
Standard waterfront BMPs shall be adhered to in addition to provisions outlined in the
HPA from WDFW.
2. Air h( elp
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction,
operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and
give approximate quantities if known.
Standard hand tools, circular saw, and excavator with machine mounted hydraulic driver will be used for
project construction.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
n/a
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
Use of hand tools (when feasible) will reduce emissions, also standard BMPs and permit provisions will be
adhered to minimize potential impacts. Project activities will result in no measurable change from existing
conditions.
3. Water [help]
a. Surface Water: hf elpl
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe
type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
Lake Cushman
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Work will be done during the Lake Cushman drawn-down, while the water is at least 5-feet
from the work site.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material.
No fill and no dredge material
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No, work window allows for dry work area
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
Yes
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 4 of 14
vocusign Envelope ID:E80CUCC-8FF34FOA-80FO-131B3C19F4F5D
b. Ground Water: hf e
1)Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so,
give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities
withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
No discharge of waste materials
c. Water runoff(including stormwater):
1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Any runoff would be from precipitation. BMPs and WDFW's HPA provisions shall be adhered
to during construction.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If
so, describe.
No
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage
pattern impacts, if any:
BMPs and WDFW's HPA provisions shall be adhered to during construction.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 5 of 14
Docusign Envelope ID:E80CE7CC-8FF3-1F0A-80F0-B1B3C19F4F5D
4. Plants Lhel
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site:
x deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
x evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
x shrubs
x grass
pasture
crop or grain
Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops.
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
No vegetation shall be removed, the proposed project is replacement PRF of an existing
structure in the same location
c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None known
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
None proposed, no native vegetation will be removed since replacement in-kind, and the
proposed replacement is a reduction in square footage.
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
None known
5. Animals hL el
a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site.
Examples include:
birds: awk ero ea a songbirds, other:
mammals: eer bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: ass salmo rou erring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Bull trout(Salvelinus confluentus),marbled murrelet(Brachyramphus marmoratus marmoratus)..Puget Sound
Chinook salmon(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), Dolly Varden(Salvelinus malma),Puget Sound Steelhead(Oncorhynchus mykiss).
yellow-billed cuckoo Coccyzus americanus),Northern spotted owl(Strix occidentalis),and Streaked horned lark
(Eremophila alpestris strigata).
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Fish migrate from Lake Cushman to the North Fork of the Skokomish River, but migration to or from Puget Sound
is not possible due to major anthropogenic blockages. Tacoma Power transports salmonids manually from Lake
Cushman to the Skokomish River.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 6 of 14
bocusign Envelope ID:E80CUCC-817F34FOA-80FO-131B3C19F4F5D
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
The proposed PRF would be constructed within the same footprint as the existing dock with a reduction in over-water area,
minimizing any potential loss of aquatic habitat. Preservation of dense forested vegetation in Action Area would minimize
any potential loss of terrestrial habitat, therefore preserving habitat for wildelife.
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
None known
6. Energy and Natural Resources [!]el
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
Electric for hand held power tools(only during construction of the Pier-Ramp-Float and removal of existing
structures.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe.
No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
None
7, Environmental Health hj elpl
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe.
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
None known
2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development
and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines
located within the project area and in the vicinity.
None known
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced
during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating
life of the project.
None
4) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Local emergency services in the event of a construction accident.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 7 of 14
Docusign Envelope ID:E80CE7CC-8FF3-4FOA-80FO-B1 B3C1 9F4F5D
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Majority of work will be preformed by hand with standard hand tools. No fueling of equipment in the work area (upland
staging area will be designated for equipment and materials storage).
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
None known to affect the project
2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site.
Short term construction noises, during daylight hours
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Effects minimized by limiting work to normal daily operations. Work will occur in the dry when Lake is
drawn down to attenuate aquatic effects from potential construction noise. Dense forest would attenuate
potential noise effects to the terrestrial environment.
8. Land and Shoreline Use heI
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?Will the proposal affect current
land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.
Adjacent properties are used recreationally with single family homes or cabins with docks. The proposed project
will not affect nearby or adjacent properties.
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe.
How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to
other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated,
how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or
nonforest use?
No
1)Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal
business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides,
tilling, and harvesting? If so, how:
No
c. Describe any structures on the site.
SFR and on-site septic system. Existing improvements include 8'x11'8"fixed pier with wood decking installed on
(4) posts encased in concrete, 3'x6' wooden ramp, and (2)8'x20' floats with wood decking on (8) piles and concrete
footings.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
Yes demo, remove, and dispose of existing pier/ramp/(2)floats, all fixed piles and positioning piles, concrete
footings/anchors, and two existing concrete anchors
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
RR5
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Unknown
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 8 of 14
Docusign Envelope ID: E80CE7CC-8FF3-4FOA-80FO-B1133C19F4F5D
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
Resedential
In. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify.
No
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
None, it is a dock replacement
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None, it is a dock replacement
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
n/a
L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any:
Both neighboring properties have existing shoreline improvements (pier-ramp-floats), and this is typical development
for the area. Replacement PRF is designed to current code requirements for WDFW, Mason County, and
Tacoma Power.
m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term
commercial significance, if any:
n/a
9. Housing h[ elpl
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid-
dle, or low-income housing.
None
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
n/a
10. Aesthetics h( el
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The bottom of the Pier will be 18" above the lake's surface when the lake is filled to ordinary
high (738').
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None, it is a dock replacement
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Design approved by Tacoma Power
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 9 of 14
Docusign Envelope ID:E80CE7CC-8FF3-4FOA-80FO-B1B3C19F4F5D
11. Light and Glare 1hel
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
None
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
No
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Eco-grate 62 — 50% light passage decking is non-reflective.
12. Recreation hf elpl
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Boating, swimming, kayaking, etc.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
n/a
13. Historic and cultural preservation thLeI
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years
old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so,
specifically describe.
None known
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation?
This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts,
or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies
conducted at the site to identify such resources.
None known
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources
on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of
archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc.
Coordination with Tacoma Power, who requires Cultural Resource Survey to be completed
prior to startig the project.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 10 of 14
Docusign Envelope ID:E80CE7CC-8FF3-4FOA-80FO-B1B3C19F4F5D
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance
to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required.
None
14. Transportation JLLel
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
State Routes 101 and 119. N Sundown Drive accesses the property driveway.
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally
describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
No
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal
have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate?
None
d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian,
bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
No
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No, the PRF will be located on residential Lake Cushman property.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would
be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation
models were used to make these estimates?
None
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and
forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe.
No
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
n/a
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 11 of 14
Docusign Envelope ID: E80CE7CC-8FF3-4FOA-80FO-B1B3C19F4F5D
15. Public Services fhelpi
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
No
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
None
16. Utilities hel
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
(ige-Htr-ic-i natural gas a e efuse service elephon sanitary sewer, e tic system
other
c. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed.
None
C. Signature ltELpj
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
bKoo.
Signature: LfA Z'a S� Y
A�a23ECC92FR1 E.
Name of signee Lawrence Sullivan Jr
Position and Agency/Organization
Date Submitted: 8/16/2024
D. Supplemental sheet for nonproject actions JtELEI
(IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction
with the list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of
activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or
at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in
general terms. n
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 12 of 14
Docusign Envelope ID: E80CE7CC-8FF3-4FOA-80FO-B1 B3C1 9F4F5D
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro-
duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks,
wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 13 of 14
Docusign Envelope ID:E80CE7CC-8FF3-4FOA-80FO-B1 B3C1 9F4F5D
6. How would the��p��ttrccoposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
%V6W VoTRlVi1 Ve preformed by hand with standard hand tools. No fueling of equipment in the work area
(upland
staging area will be designated for equipment and materials storage).
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
None, it is a dock replacement
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 14 of 14