The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBLD2024-00780 - BLD Small parcel storm water management - 6/19/2024 IRISGROUP civil engineers Stickle New Single-Family Residence Stormwater Control Plan Date Prepared 6/19/2024 Subject Property 160 NE Mahogany Ct Belfair,WA 98528 Mason County Tax Parcel#223097700260 Reviewing Agency Mason County,WA Project Engineer Nicholas D.Taylor, PE The Iris Group PLLC (360)890-8955 ntaylor@irisgroupconsulting.com "I hereby certify that this Stormwater Control Plan has been prepared by me or under my supervision and meets minimum standards of the 2019 Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington and normal standards of engineering practice. I hereby acknowledge and agree that the jurisdiction does not and will not assume liability for the sufficiency,suitability,or performance of drainage facilities designed by me." PS DAVID l WA yf zy cT\o 46113 �^ REG STCRE� FSS/0 AI�NG 6/19/2024 Table of Contents Section 1—Proposed Project Description.....................................................................................................................3 MinimumRequirements............................................................................................................................................3 MR#1—Preparation of Drainage Control Plans....................................................................................................3 MR#2—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention......................................................................................3 MR#3—Source Control of Pollution.....................................................................................................................3 MR#4—Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls.........................................................................3 MR#5—Onsite Stormwater Management............................................................................................................3 Section2—Existing Conditions......................................................................................................................................4 Section3—Soils Investigation .......................................................................................................................................4 Groundwater.........................................................................................................................................................4 Section 4—Wells and Septic Systems............................................................................................................................4 Section5—Fuel Tanks...................................................................................................................................................4 Section6—Subbasin Description ..................................................................................................................................4 Section7—Floodplain Analysis......................................................................................................................................4 Section 8—Aesthetic Considerations for Facilities........................................................................................................4 Section 9—Facility Selection and Sizing........................................................................................................................4 Section 10—Conveyance System ..................................................................................................................................4 Section 11—Offsite Analysis&Mitigation ....................................................................................................................5 Section 12—Covenants, Dedications, Easements,Agreements....................................................................................5 Section 13—Other Permits or Conditions Placed on the Project..................................................................................5 Attachments A.SWMM Figures B.Stormwater Site Plan C. NRCS Soils Report D. Existing Conditions Map 2of5 Section 1 — Proposed Project Description This Stormwater Control Plan (SCP)was completed in accordance with the 2019 Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington(SWMM).The SWMM was used to determine the applicable requirements for this project,including both the type of drainage plan and the core requirements. This proposed project falls under New Development,as the impervious site coverage is currently less than 35%. Project Description: The project includes construction of single-family residence,sidewalk,driveway,and a future garage on a 5.00-acre parcel in Belfair,Washington.See Attachment 8(Stormwater Site Plan)for proposed improvements. Proposed Improvements: Proposed hard surfaces include impervious roof, driveway,and sidewalk surfaces. No off-site improvements are proposed. See proposed surface coverage in Table 1. Area(SF) Total New Plus Replaced Hard Surface 3,603 Total Hard Surface After Project 3,603 New Pollution Generating Hard Surface 841 Proposed Effective Hard Surface 945 Disturbed Area 11,541 Table 1—Surface Coverage within Limits of Disturbance Minimum Requirements Per SMMWW Volume 1,figure 1-3.1,of which an annotated version is provided as Attachment to this report, Minimum Requirements#1-#5 apply to the new and replaced hard surfaces,as well as converted vegetation areas. MR #1— Preparation of Drainage Control Plans Preparation of this SCP meets the intent of Minimum Requirement#1. MR#2—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention The Stormwater Site Plan included as Attachment 8 shows erosion and sediment control best management practices(BMPs)such as a 100'vegetative buffer. MR #3—Source Control of Pollution A Pollution Source Control Program (PSCP)is not applicable,as there are no proposed sources of pollution. MR #4— Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls In the existing condition there is no significant outfall at which concentrated flow enters or leaves the site. There is no proposed outfall,as the in-situ soils are well drained and significant runoff from the site does not appear to occur in the natural condition. There is little to no offsite run-on to the development area. MR #5—Onsite Stormwater Management The project plans to meet this requirement with BMPs from List#1.Stormwater from disturbed surfaces will be managed with the following BMPs: Lawn and Landscaped Areas: The Post-Construction Soil Quality and Depth BMP will be applied to all disturbed pervious surfaces. 3of5 Roofs: Full Dispersion—2,762 SF of proposed roof surfaces will drain via roof drains to a proposed 38 LF dispersion trench that is sized at 10 LF per 700 SF of tributary roof surface. The trench will disperse to a 100'vegetative area. Other Hard Surfaces: Full Dispersion—Infeasible due to limited dispersion area uphill of the proposed structures. Bioretention—Infeasible due to a high groundwater table. Pervious Pavement-Infeasible due to a high groundwater table. Sheetflow Dispersion—104 SF of sidewalk surface will sheetflow to a 10'vegetative filter strip sized at 10 LF or filter strip per 20 LF of tributary hard surface. 841 SF of driveway surface will sheetflow to a 10'vegetative filter strip sized at 10 LF or filter strip per 20 LF of tributary hard surface. Section 2 — Existing Conditions The site is a vacant rural residential parcel as depicted on the Existing Conditions Map included as Attachment D. Existing grades are based on contour data from the Puget Sound LIDAR Consortium. Section 3 — Soils Investigation The NRCS Soils Report,Attachment C, indicates that site soils are Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes,which are Type B soils. Groundwater The NRCS Soils Report,Attachment C, indicates that groundwater is as shallow as 18" below ground surface. Section 4 — Wells and Septic Systems There are no known wells or septic systems on the site. Section 5 — Fuel Tanks There is no indication of existing above or below grade fuel tanks on the property. Section 6 — Subbasin Description There is no off-site drainage tributary to the project. Section 7 — Floodplain Analysis The site is not within a floodplain. Section 8 — Aesthetic Considerations for Facilities The proposed BMPs will be covered with grass. Section 9 — Facility Selection and Sizing See discussion under MR#5,above. Section 10 — Conveyance System There are no proposed onsite conveyance systems with the exception of prescriptively sized roof drain lines. 4of5 Section 11 — Offsite Analysis & Mitigation This section is not applicable as stormwater will not be discharged to an offsite conveyance. Section 12 — Covenants, Dedications, Easements, Agreements There are no proposed onsite facilities that would require dedications or agreements. Section 13 — Other Permits or Conditions Placed on the Project A building permit will be required for the project. There are currently no known conditions of approval. 5of5 Attachment A Does the entire project qualify as Flow Control exempt(per MR#7)? Yes �No Did the project developer choose to meet Does the project trigger NO the LID Performance Standard? only MRs#1 -#5?(Per (the project triggers Is the project outside the Project Thresholds in MRs#1 -#9) the UGA on a parcel NO Applicability of the that is 5 acres or larger? Minimum Requirements Yes Section). REQUIRED: For each surface,consider the BMPs Yes in the order listed in List#3 No for that type of surface. Use the first BMP that is Did the project considered feasible. developer choose to meet the LID Yes NOT REQUIRED: Performance Did the project Achievement of the LID Standard? developer choose to Performance Standard. No meet the LID Performance Standard? REQUIRED: For each Yes Yes surface,consider the No BMPs in the order listed in List#1 for that type of surface.Use the first BMP that is considered feasible. NOT REQUIRED: Achievement of the LID Performance Standard. 41 REQUIRED:Meet the LID REQUIRED: Meet the LID Performance REQUIRED:For each Performance Standard through Standard through the use of any Flow Control surface, consider the BMPs the use of any Flow Control BMP(s)in this manual. in the order listed in List#2 BMP(s)in this manual. for that type of surface.Use REQUIRED:Apply BMP T5.13 Post the first BMP that is REQUIRED:Apply BMP T5.13 Construction Soil Quality and Depth. considered feasible. Post-Construction Soil Quality and Depth. NOT REQUIRED:Applying the BMPs in Lists NOT REQUIRED: #1,#2,or#3. Achievement of the LID NOT REQUIRED:Applying the Performance Standard_ BMPs in Lists#1,#2,or#3. Flow Chart for Determining MR #5 Requirements DEPARTMENT OF Revised March 2019 ECOLOGYPlease see http.lAvww.ecy.wa.gov/copyright.hfml for copyright notice including permissions, State of Washington limitation of liability,and disclaimer. Attachment B 1 2 1 3 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 11 1 12 1 13 1 14 1 15 � ry m ° BUILDING FACE PIPE O.D. MIN. MIN. END CAP OR PLUG FLOW TO SECOND _ 2 A DOWNSPOUT ADAPTER DISPERSAL TRENCH m FINISHED GRADE INSERTED IN RISER CLEAN OUT WYE FROM PIPE IF NECESSARY ^m = 6"CLEANOUT WI PIPE MIN 6"PERFORATED PIPE Z „NE-MunsonB�y THREADED CAP LAID FLAT/LEVEL TYPE I CB 0' r 0(10 U TYPE 1 CB W/SOLID COVERWJLD A c A COVER(LOCKING) (LOCKING) Nl �� a0 aoy w 50'MAXt ❑ ,cuA Y B PLANTING BEDS TURF(LAWN)AREAS ❑ ■/ '•A\, f 6'45°BEND INFLUENT PIPE(MAX DESIGN W `V, 2"-4"ARBORIST i � �i i GRASS:SEED FLOW W.5 CFS PER TRENCH) 2 vv 0' WOOD CHIP -- i--� - i p` -------- OR SOD 8'45'WYE CLEAN OUT WYE FROM PIPE MULCH ------- - ------- 4't 8'BACKWARDS 4'90'BEND ------- -- ----- REDUCER TOWWYE a -------_- -------- FLOW TO OTHER BRANCHING In 3" _______ 1 3/4'OF CB'S AS NECESSARY SITE m COMPOST _- _-_ -_-_- _-_-______ COMPOST NOTCHED PLAN 18'O.C.'� INCORPORATED _-_ INCORPORATED GRADE BOARD NTS INTO SOIL TO ------- ------- INTO SOIL TO 2'X 2'NOTCHES __4 2" C 8•DEPTH -------------- 8' _-_--_-_-_-_-_-_ WDEPTH ,6•o.c- VICINITY MAP 0 \ B'SDR35 PVC 6'SDR35 PVC 4'SDR35 PVC ROOF I BOLTGALVS,SEED PIPE O.D. 2"GRADE BOARD NOT TO SCALE m SUBSOIL \ \ \ \ \ \ SUBSOIL SCARIFIED MAXI• SCARIFIED 4' //%\/ /%\/\ \ 4'BELOW ROOF DRAIN ROOF DRAIN DRAIN(rYP) 1'>aTE 4 MIN. M N. SEE NOTE 6 NOTCHES BELOW COMPOST /��//��//��//��//��/ 17 / / / / / COMPOST SebMr" -� SITE DATA AMENDED LAYER - AMENDED LAYER i �." PARCEL#: 223097700260 (12"BELOW SOIL (12•BELOW SOIL 1. 4•ROOF DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE SDR 35 PVC AND SHALL BE AT A MINIMUM 2%GRADE TO /jam//�/ /" / SITE ADDRESS: 160 NE MAHOGANY CT SURFACE) SURFACE) DRAIN TO DISCHARGE LOCATION. 'y;\/j��//��%/� F BELFAIR,WA 98528 j 2. 6'ROOF DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE SDR 35 PVC AND SHALL BE AT A MINIMUM 1%GRADE TO 2•x12 FILTER FABRIC TRENCH LINER GROSS ACREAGE: 5.00 AC(PER COUNTY DATA) DRAIN TO DISCHARGE LOCATION. Z GRADES ZONING: RURAL RESIDENTIAL 5 /// CLEAN(G5%FINES)]'-1�'WASHED ROCK Q W a 3. ALL DRAIN PIPE TRENCHING AND BACKFILL SHALL BE PER PIPE MANUFACTURER BOARD EXISTING USE: VACANT NOTTO POST CONSTRUCTION SOIL SPECIFICATIONS. Y//, MIN 6'PERFORATED PIPE LAID FLAT PRESIDING JURISDICTION: MASON COUNTY,WA J W Z $ D 3 4. ALL PIPE SHALL AT A MINIMUM BE CLEANED VIA FLUSHING PRIOR TO CONNECTION TO \{ NOTES: Y W W z g scaLLE QUALITY AND DEPTH DETAIL DISCHARGE LOCATION.ALL ADDITIONAL TESTING REQUIRED BY THE JURISDICTION SHALL SUPPORT 1. THIS TRENCH SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO V (� V gg BE COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ppgT PREVENT POINT DISC�HgACREGE�ApND/OR EROSION. SITE COVERAGE DATA(WITHIN LOD) ll- Zfn z�i 2.50 FEETHTO ONEOTHERD(100 FELETSA LONG • EXISTING HARD SURFACE: 0 SF (n 5. DRAIN FITTINGS SHALL BE SDR 35 PVC FITTINGS. W O FA 6. ROOF AND STORM DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE LAID STRAIGHT WITH NO VERTICAL SAGS OR FLOWLINEI. BENDS IN PIPE.HORIZONTAL BENDS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH WATERTIGHT w� 3.TRENCH AND GRADE BOARD MUST BE LEVEL. : EXISTING HARD SURFACE TO REMAIN: 0 SF YU' ALIGN TO FOLLOW CONTOURS OF SITE. REPLACED HARD SURFACE: 0 SF W FITTINGS. '• 4.VERTICALLY SLOTTED BOLT HOLES 2"SLOT NEW HARD SURFACE(ROOF): 2,658 SF Z 7. 45°WYE CLEANOUTS SHALL BE INSTALLED UPSTREAM OF ALL BENDS TOTALING GREATER LENGTH ALLOED FOR GRADE BOARD LEVEL '� ADJUSTMENT.W PROVIDE BACKING WASHERS AND NEW HARD SURFACE(OTHER): 945 SF THAN 45°DEFLECTION. 6' - �� / FASTEN SECURELY. TOTAL NEW PLUS REPLACED HARD SURFACE: 3,603 SF 8. CONNECT ALL DOWNSPOUTS TO ROOF DRAINS WITH SDR 35 PVC FITTINGS. MIN. SECTION A-A 5.SUPPORT POST SPACING AS REQUIRED BY SOIL TOTAL HARD SURFACE AFTER PROJECT: 3,603 SF 9. DO NOT CONNECT ROOF DRAIN PIPE TO FOOTING DRAIN PIPE. �S CONDITIONS TO ENSURE GRADE BOARD REMAINS LEVEL. NEW POLLUTION GENERATING HARD SURFACE: 841 SF _. E 10. CLEANOUTS SHALL BE INSTALLED EVERY 50'OF PIPE RUN. 6. 15%MAX UNLESS OTHERWISE EVALUATED AND • PROPOSED EFFECTIVE HARD SURFACE: 945 SF 11. ROOF DRAINS FROM DOWNSPOUTS TO HEADER PIPES SHALL BE 4".HEADER AND ALL APPROVED • DISTURBED AREA: 11,641 SF - _ OTHER ROOF DRAIN PIPES SHALL BE 6'MINIMUM. \ EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTTO ROOF DRAIN NOT TO DISPERSION_TRENCH EXISTING FEATURES ARE APPROXIMATELY AS DEPICTED IN MASON COUNTY SCALE DETAIL 2 SCALE DETAIL 1 GEODATA AND THE PUGET SOUND LIDAR CONSORTIUM.ALL EXISTING FEATURES AND TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN SHALL BE VERIFIED AT CONTRACTOR'S Z / EXPENSE PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.ANY AND ALL Q DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND THE J EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN HERE SHALL BE IDENTIFIED TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONTINUANCE OF ANY WORK. a- F i W CONSTRUCTION NOTES ` 1. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS UNKNOWN.CALL 811 h PERFORM i^ �4>8 PRIVATE AND PUBLIC UTILITY LOCATE PRIOR TO EXCAVATION V/ o/ - 2. POST CONSTRUCTION SOIL QUALITY AND DEPTH BMP DETAIL 3 SHALL BE N ` APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED PERVIOUS AREAS. LL 3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETING ALL WORK IN w ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATION. 4. THE CONSTRUCTED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL NOT BE OPERATED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION AND/OR ACCEPTANCE BY PROJECT ENGINEER. 5. ANY DEVIATIONS TO THIS PLAN WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED BY PROJECT G - \ ENGINEER UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY PROJECT ENGINEER AND PRESIDING JURISDICTION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION C 4 6. SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO DRAIN AWAY FROM ALL PROPOSED AND/ LL EXISTING STRUCTURES AT A MINIMUM OF 2%GRADE. 7. ALL WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE O LATEST VERSION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE,AND THE WSOOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION/PLANS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION. U r/✓ 150 KEY NOTES 1. EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY.USE AS STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. N F{ 2 2. EXISTING 100 VEGETATIVE BUFFER FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL. _ aaQ» r S- 3. PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE < ) y� 5. 22 WETLAND BUFFER SWETLANDOUNDARY ,IV 28 ui - to ( 25 / 8. 15'BUILDING SETBACK FROM WETLAND BUFFER DDS01 PROPOSED WATER LINE 8. PROPOSED WELL NOT o❑ _ ,y�pW .T '.:�1� T 9. PROPOSED UNDERGROUND POWER E •11' I L. \ I YZ 10. EXISTING ROAD EASEMENT Y NDT 24 L 11. PROPOSED SIDEWALK(104 SF) cli / -.. _ __-J � %/ t6 \ e \O� 12. PROPOSED FLOW DIRECTION ARROW.GRADE ACCORDINGLY(TYP) 13. PROPOSED VEGETATIVE DISPERSION AREA TREAT WITH DETAIL 3. A RCS 22 17 - �? 9_ %(.. ? 14. PROPOSED VEGETATIVE DISPERSION AREA.DO NOT DISTURB. wrc E '-- 20 1 21 _ ____ 15. PROPOSED FUTURE GARAGE ROOF SURFACE(798 SF) 06-19-2024 y 1 .1p 18. PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ROOF SURFACE(1,860 SF) 1 7. PROPOSED ROOF DRAIN CLEANOUT PER DETAIL 2(TYP) ,• 0 20 40 /. I I 1. \ 118. PROPOSED ROOF DRAIN HEADER PER DETAIL 2(TYP) Know what's BELOW SCALE - 1 1_ 19. PROPOSED 38 LF DISPERSION TRENCH PER DETAIL 1 Call 811 before you dig. 20. PROPOSED PRIMARY SEPTIC DRAINFIELD(DESIGN BY OTHERS) rn 1I I \ 21 PROPOSED RESERVE SEPTIC DRAINFIELD(DESIGN BY OTHERS) S pAVlp 22. PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK.(DESIGN BY OTHERS) P j o / II _ 23. 1W PROTECTIVE WELL RADIUS . .- ___ _ 24. PROPOSED VEGETATIVE DISPERSION AREA.ENSURE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM rJ sr �`�O ILL / STRUCTURES AND PAVEMENT. `^ 10 25. PROPOSED FLOW DIRECTION ARROW.GRADE TO FLOW ACCORDINGLY.(TYP) 26. PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVEWAY(841 SF) 46113 DNAL � - - -� 795 IJ _ - - - C1 W 1�1 LL Attachment C Custom Soil Resource Report Mason County, Washington Ab—Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2t626 Elevation: 50 to 800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 20 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 160 to 240 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition A/derwood and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Alderwood Setting Landform: Hills, ridges Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Nose slope, talf Down-slope shape: Convex, linear Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Glacial drift and/or glacial outwash over dense glaciomarine deposits Typical profile A -0 to 7 inches: gravelly sandy loam Bw1 - 7 to 21 inches: very gravelly sandy loam Bw2-21 to 30 inches: very gravelly sandy loam Bg-30 to 35 inches: very gravelly sandy loam 2Cd1 -35 to 43 inches: very gravelly sandy loam 2Cd2-43 to 59 inches: very gravelly sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 8 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 39 inches to densic material Drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Very low to moderately low(0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 18 to 37 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 2.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: F002XA004WA- Puget Lowlands Forest Forage suitability group: Limited Depth Soils (G002XN302WA), Limited Depth Soils(G002XF303WA), Limited Depth Soils (G002XS301 WA) 13 Custom Soil Resource Report Other vegetative classification: Limited Depth Soils (G002XN302WA), Limited Depth Soils(G002XF303WA), Limited Depth Soils (G002XS301 WA) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Indianola Percent of map unit. 5 percent Landform:Terraces, kames, eskers Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Hydric soil rating: No Everett Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Kames, moraines, eskers Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, footslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Base slope, crest Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex Hydric soil rating: No Shalcar Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: Depressions Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Concave Hydric soil rating: Yes Norma Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Drainageways, depressions Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip Down-slope shape: Linear, concave Across-slope shape: Concave Hydric soil rating: Yes Mg—Mukilteo peat, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2hm8 Elevation: 0 to 1,000 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 70 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 150 to 250 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained Map Unit Composition Mukilteo and similar soils: 100 percent 14 Attachment D • Ms 1-! 1 1•v:1 1••:1 H/1► 1•p1 1{.'�1��1�{�� •1�. 1 IY �. n 1. d "�. -1 1. :1 1. :� +. r i 44 r� r It ok tApex• eau�,��s,^. �,,,,�^�woad�r��a��o�o •',�, ► _ .- see a r ,•••1 1••:1 1•v:1 1.111 1.1.1 1.11 -�:,:, 1.1:1 1. 11 1. .� 1• •1 1. :, ,. :� ► 1 1 11 11 n-- Mason County WA GIS Web Map r ` . { ' f� Y �► r + x I 40 tee` � "'"� � '" �' Y-� ' rf�•. ':¢� � °'�� `�- •' Lf VIP all 6/3/2024, 11:41:43 AM 11,528 0 0.01 0.03 0.05 mi � County Boundary 0 0.02 0.04 0.08 km No Filled Site Address (Zoom in to 1:3,000) Source:Esri,Maxar,Earthstar Geographies,and the GIS User Community - Tax Parcels (Zoom in to 1:30,000) Mason County WA GIS Web Map Application Mason County disclaims accuracy,reliability,or timeliness of website info,not liable for losses from reliance on it.https://www.masoncountywa.gov/disclaimer.php