The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWSDOT Traffic Impact Analysis and Road Access - COM Letters / Memos - 10/16/2006 (8/21/2008) Charell Holcomb Fwd: SR 3 Avery Township Gregg Paisley Renaissance Faire & Extreme Sports FestivalPAgplit From: Betty Wing To: Barbara Robinson; Charell Holcomb Date: 7/30/2008 5:24 PM Subject: Fwd: SR 3 Avery Township Gregg Paisley Renaissance Faire & Extreme Sports Festival Applications: WS Please print this out and plan to discuss with Mr. Paisley at the pre-application conferences.Thank you. >>> "Hess,Alana" <HessA@wsdot.wa.gov> 7/30/2008 5:21 PM >>> Dear Ms. Wing: The Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT)has reviewed the applications for the proposed Renaissance Faire&Extreme Sports Festival events.These events are to be held on the property owned by Gregg E. &Elisa K. Paisley located in the 4900 block of SR 3 mile post 7.75, left vicinity.The Renaissance Faire is scheduled for August 30 and 31, 2008 with an expected attendance of 5,000 to 10,000.The Extreme Sports Event is scheduled for September 27, 2008 with an expected attendance of 1,000 to 2,000. WSDOT has serious safety and operational concerns with regards to the impacts to SR 3 that will result from these events.The Renaissance Faire is the most significant concern due to the expected attendance levels and in that it will be held on Labor Day weekend. We are requesting that the County require and condition the applicant and/or property owner to provide WSDOT with Traffic Control Plans for each of these events.These plans must be prepared by a licensed professional in accordance with WSDOT's requirements. In the case of the Renaissance Faire the plans are due to WSDOT for review no later than August 15, 2008.The due date for plan submittal for the Extreme Sports event will be September 12, 2008. All submittals should be sent to my attention. WSDOT will notify the State Patrol of these events.The County should expect contact by the State Patrol directly or through WSDOT and they may have requirements in addition to WSDOT's. We respectfully request that the County not issue the permits for either one of these events until the Traffic Controls Plans have been approved by WSDOT. Thank you for this opportunity for review and comment. Please contact me at your convenience should you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Alana Hess Development Review Engineer Olympic Region Development Services Washington State Dept of Transportation 5720 Capitol Blvd P.O. Box 47440 Olympia,Washington 98504-7440 (360)357-2725 (360) 357-2748 FAX hessa aewsdot.wa.gov (9/11/2008) Mark Core- Fwd: Avery Township - Corrected and Revised TCP's Page 1 From: Betty Wing To: Barbara Adkins; Mark Core; Pam Bennett-Cumming Date: 9/11/2008 10:18 AM Subject: Fwd: Avery Township - Corrected and Revised TCP's Attachments: Primary Traffic Control Plan.xls; Twin-Access Traffic Control Plan.xls I wanted you to see several a-mails I have received from Mr. Paisley. I told him that his biggest hurdle was working with State DOT to resolve his access issue. I wanted to make sure you were in the loop on this. Y P >>> "Gregg Paisley" <greggaaisleYOgmail.com> 9/11/2008 8:15 AM >>> Just an FYI so you know we are moving fast on this. ----------Forwarded message---------- From: John Heinley <icheinlevCaljameckengineering.com> Date: Thu,Sep 11, 2008 at 12:23 AM Subject: Avery Township-Corrected and Revised TCP's To: Dale Severson <seversdCcbwsdot.wa.gov> Cc: Alana Hess <hessaOwsdot.wa.gov>,Gregg Paisley <gregooaislevCalamail.com> Dale,attached is the corrected TCP in regards to WSDOT comments, and an alternative TCP for two access points. The second access point is approximately 500 feet NE of the existing access,slightly beyond the crest of a vertical curve. I think the twin-access strategy will work better. Note that I've reduced the stoppage time to a maximum of 3 minutes-and I don't think that traffic will need to be stopped for even that amount of time. The flaggers are mostly there for safety. Flagger D, in the middle,alerts approaching drivers if someone turning left is waiting for traffic to clear(that's why they're at the crest of the vertical curve). Flagger C can stop traffic during peak egress. Flagger B can stop traffic if a large left-turn queue builds up. I would anticipate the average stoppage time to be no more than 1 minute,even less-similar to a signal. If the Do Not Enter, by itself, is not sufficient for WSDOT then a Wrong Way sign can be added. However,the MUTCD doesn't require a Wrong Way sign. Thanks for taking a look at this. I'll be pretty busy at work tomorrow during the day, but if you have questions and want to leave a voice-mail if I can't answer my cell, please feel free. I'll get back to you as quickly as I can. John C. Heinley, P.E. JAMeCK Engineering (360) 790-9730 (9/19/2008) Mark Core- Re: Gregg Paisley's email to Betty Wing re marked up DOT traffic plan Page 2 Gregg On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Pam Bennett-Cumming <PamBC co.mason.wa.us>wrote: > Good morning, > Betty, thanks for forwarding me your email from Gregg Paisley(dated Sept > 11, 2008) with its attached marked up traffic plan. We are aware of this >document because we received it directly from DOT together with a letter on > September 2, 2008. A copy was also provided to Mr Paisley. DOT's concerns > (both from their letter, and County conversations with the agency)-were >conveyed to the Board in the September 2, 2008 briefing later that day. DOT > had also indicated they would not approve any temporary event should the > local government deny these events-because they wanted to work with the > County on issues of traffic safety. In addition -as you are aware, Fire > District 5 had very specific requirements for fire access, which they had >already conveyed to Mr Paisley directly. > My point is-this is not new information, the Board has already taken it > into account. At the Board's public meeting on September 9, the Board made > it clear that they took into account many different factors as they > considered their decision. Traffic and emergency access safety were two >aspects. Among other factors, they also indicated they considered > appropriateness of the activities considering the Rural Tourist Zoning, the > need, after considering the applications during review-to undergo review > Chapter 197-11 WAC, and the strong concern that there were still no > permanent facilities at the site. In fact they stated that Mr Paisley's > next priority should be to get these in place so other activities might be >able to be reviewed under applicable Mason County regulations in the future, >when supported by the appropriate infrastructure. > It seems to be very important that we work together to convey the Board's >decision -and their words to Mr. Paisley on what should be his next steps: >developing the site as he proposed. I am confident that he wants to take >those next steps. He has just now turned in a completely revised SEPA for > his proposed Rural Tourist Campground development, which is currently under > review. He has also just turned in a Forest Practices Application. The > Forest Practices Planner will be working closely with me so we can do >concurrent review. He also indicated to staff in a recent e-mail that he >wants to re-activate the four building permits he took out early last year > (which were canceled due to non-activity). > I also hope that Mr Paisley passes this email on to Mr. Trummert so he has >the accurate information on the status of Mr. Paisley's project. If I can >find an email for him, I will forward it myself. Pam B-C > Pam Bennett-Cumming, M.E.S > Senior Planner-Water Resource Planning > Mason County Department of Community Development >411 North 5th > PO Box 279 > Shelton, WA 98584 > phone: (360)427-9670 x287 R15/2008) Mark Core - Fwd: WSDOT "Approved as Noted"traffic control plan Page 1 From: Betty Wing To: Barbara Adkins; Mark Core; Monty Cobb; Pam Bennett-Cumming Date: 9/12/2008 8:53 AM Subject: Fwd: WSDOT "Approved as Noted" traffic control plan Attachments: WSDOT Approved as Noted 9-2-08.pdf Here we go again...I think we may need to schedule a meeting with Mr. Paisley to discuss the specifics of our decisions. He has sent me three e-mails in the last 24 hours and I expect more to come. Let me know what you think the next course of action should be. >>> "Gregg Paisley" <greggpaisley@gmail.com> 9/11/2008 9:32 PM >>> Dear Ms. Wing, Though it is possible the Commissioners were not made aware of this by staff,this attachment verifies what I was trying to tell everyone: On Sept 2, WSDOT sent MC Planning, my engineer, and me an *"Approved as Noted" *Traffic Control Plan. Note it is stamped "Approved as Noted"and signed by a WSDOT traffic engineer. i.e. We already had an approved WSDOT traffic control plan a week before the Commissioners Sept 9 meeting and MC Planning knew it, or should have known it. All that WSDOT was requiring was(by Sept 16th)for their notes be incorporated into a clean copy. We did that two days ago and also submitted additional plans to WSDOT for a possible second access. But it is a documented fact that we had an Approved WSDOT plan in hand at the moment the Commissioners denied our application, citing WSDOT as the primary reason. If our plans, with the noted revisions, were acceptable to WSDOT, why would they not be acceptable to Mason County? Thank you, Gregg Paisley P.S. Here is the header for the email from WSDOT that included this attachment. ------------------------------ *From:* Hess,Alana *Sent:*Tuesday, September 02, 2008 10:59 AM *To:* 'Pam Bennett-Cumming' *Cc:* Severson, Dale; 'bjw@co.mason.wa.us'; Robert Fink *Subject:* SR 3 Avery Township Traffic Impact Analysis&Traffic Control Plan: WSDOT's Comments *Importance:* High Dear Ms. Bennett-Cumming: Attached please find WSDOT's comments on the Traffic Impact Analysis(TIA) and interim event Traffic Control Plan for the Avery Township development. Thank you. Sincerely, Alana Hess Development Review Engineer Olympic Region Development Services Washington State Dept of Transportation 5720 Capitol Blvd ZD w �oc �I� Su��AcE, gAW c2r- EVEN Al VST (9/19/2008) Mark Core- Fwd: RE: SR 3 Avery Township Traffic Impact Analysis&Traffic Control Plan WSDOT's CommentRage 2 Hi All: The Mason County Commissioners have denied the applications for the 9/08 Extreme Sports Festival and the 10/08 Renaissance and Fantasy Faire events to be held the Avery Township/Gregg Paisley site (attached). If you receive any inquiries concerning the County's actions from Gregg Paisley or his consultant John Heinley I would recommend that you ask them to contact the County Commissioners Office. The County has the lead on this now- not us. I will be on vacation until Monday, 9/22 but the developer and his consultant have everything they need right now from us and due to the denials by the County any business they have with WSDOT can wait until my return. Thanks, Alana Hess Development Review Engineer Olympic Region Development Services Washington State Dept of Transportation 5720 Capitol Blvd P.O. Box 47440 Olympia, Washington 98504-7440 (360) 357-2725 (360) 357-2748 FAX hessaawsdot.wa.gov Page 1 of 1 Aver Township: outdoor went site ay ut for 2008 v :.::::. :::. i'AF ::: {.....{.::. ........:.::::::}:::::::i;•k't.:•:.:.,:::.:.>.:; .... .. ......,�,L.R:. :::.}:+:ii:::.:.::::.::n;#R#gR{....;9{........ .•:;;>:.}}� �::.::......4}. .:}::::�v,� }:.:.'...' $::::`%:.. s( ...?�...............tk..;:bb•�.•.o...,y. . .�:. t+t•?:Sr:S:::.�: ...9X.::: ..?.4..: �::?f:;:;:`:iY:$':%::i::::::....:....:::. :»?f {....::::..:::::::::::.::::..r .:?n:.n:. / n.•:}:.>:.;yc:RC$;%:�:�::.�:!?tL�, +:::::.:.: ;..:... ....'�#°,::$i$:;::�:cn5 ...b:::..:.;....;..::::. ::}i: vi:'i:.::4::.i}i::. .:.........n••:.y... .. Y.. .:"... }::V::.::•:::::}::r�. �:• :'i::$::it}:::}:•::::•.:$::..:•}}Rk4i}::•::$:.9Y. yy ::•%+'. •:::: ':;::::: ..} ::.:r::.::•:R.. w:�. �• :/:?#5::$::-. :;$..4p� ::,ppM. .: .. @+.;. ...b..F;�,:+'.ii}iXi �}:Ybh;:•• •• /.}J...$. ..f,. : .......... 1...•::.i.-.:.:::•:i::.iii'�,...... ;ir:.V..:?4 ....:x...]4:. .. ..:?,:h};'h:h.. ::} .. ..:::::}•......::.:}:: "i.f(.i: ....L�"\..h... .. ?h>::: ...:.. �q, ...`.^.5::•R+•}:•}::L3?}r+}n;;i}:.;.i:4>: "•:>•"•'}.,;:�X;'i;:::: ;i::L,{.::•. ....:....... .....4i?:::.}>i:..;.)f{;:.,}......?:4'?ti{q Rt. N.i•;h:. ... v. ..v .. .♦:T.I:[I {. .;.• •.?>.}....}:::.}: �. ::$o; :::.{:::.Jbtvvt•:.H::. v.A.................b.••:.�:::d:::::::.....: ...Y.%{R.. .r.Y.•;.;. jo -::. '::.:.... .;, .:i.: •::. .......�.n .:4:44. ...:....... ...r..::... .•....:.,w:::.�.';hi::v} ....... }�......... •ii}}}:4}iii}}:i?:4}:4:•}:-}::.v:::::::: :i:+ :-` ..:. �: .... :::.'R {;:R5Q..; ....�. •. :•v.�:::$:.4........n.. .. ...�::. ..:•:::.�•::::;;..�%;::.R. :•:.+�.•:. ) .fi:�::•i:'•:• :,i.'#t:i..{3?�••. ::: .�}.�.,�. ...:.:. ....b:.:..b.. ».».n... ... ............. .4. ... ..... .............. .:. ::i'>}:•;ii:::,Pi•:.•if:;.::::::•. .}•{y�: '.'>:�..:'.,�.w,..,..., .,.n�,.,,{,..: ... .�i'::.i:.i ::.iii:}}:. xr..�.: : ..:�:•i}:4:• •}:' v.v:• .:::.: .......t.:::vi n� l•}ii}}ti:{.....:{4:.0::...�:..+ -.4 l}:.. .. ..:...::.w.......:.....n ':.. ..., ,..... .{.... ..�&��,....n... .� .. n...... ........::4i},F,.:.�:i:$'i:i:%4%:?•iii::hi}{::+..... ....,: .h/.v:.: .�n�:.-..�.pp :�ifi . :::. :::::5 w:,�.. ..... �•.�::::.: .. : .}:".•:.. .�::ii}}i:"...$'•::.�:::•:::n4:v:::::n:v:, w:::RC. -.{.::n •: .... ....... ........ ... .:.:r.)$ .. ....... ..r .. :tyy. ..:::::.�:::v:•: ....... ... {,;.i;.i}}}R-: -i;{.::Lii: .iiii: 4i;h} :. ... �. � �{;� ^�L•. .:.;..';:.:, .gin:.. .....: .... .�p '::.:::: ...::::::::::::::::::::•4;.::..:::..`SQL}a LX. .:::::....::::''. {:....t. ::; N. :ii •:: ::.:::: .:::.}.49$F••} Sii:.: .i: •:%:::::;;::::�•..::;:. .s• .. •::?::}•.:::.......... �''2 q .} :.:.::. ........... ::v, {•... ...:::: .... :is \\ ::: ':?OC::ii: .. ........ p X4:4;•:4}} 30 i. >: :+:: .'.<.. '8L xE.�t'':.•i•Lk:�::i:::}•;ii••;>• ::• •:. yt,. t'#:?�: :a::y,,•:E'• . QL" 4 a :.:.. ••.. .:: \ :;'ACT �5'4L•:�$:v''%��:''t%•,. �i.iA•?: l . i y RL . p �ii::i i;ri"i::>r:%:4L£.;:, ....}iii is"•. .??:::..:.. W�, .i: ..::> .: 8 I 4;w p ; ....: •:� .,}:•. ...:... :::.::.... � :: {.;tii:'i '�' .... ... ........$.t ....._. .. .....\...n. ....}. .:; .iii. � i i,•% $: ....: �. O. ..:...:iii:••;;;.:;.:i:. ::,{.:i.. .. :. .!C {;::;ni..•'.'-';�';'-;-':;•�-'.•'. A! .; L :::::......... 4'... �' .'' ::, ,,. :;.i x{. ':,+ :,;.::;•;;•.: .... .: .. .;i'fti:�• < +T .:�;dr i4�ti;;i�i:::i.: { k :. :.:. .:. ::::o. ,+* �:.�..`,r ...ia$.' •• r,,`s ;.ao.,r .:fir:::' { } +ii' ':i4}''• �.•:•ti''•i},{: .i 4;4 •:;}i$#$%$ ;:;:,}}}:A.$i:.:: {}?R;9;:%':'t$::i$ X{ 30 S Y yLL b}i iY ,x. 1 .. - :.....:...........:... gyp. ::'.. y, .... � 4 t• i ........ ...... .:. .....':,:.:..... ;:...-,.:.;:•.:; .:• ''.. ....{S.. ..k%i'k`r%::;:';:isisit:r:'r.:i:;:;:?:i•. ;�:i:i#:i:ii;%;.-.q� , ` X �'.:i•. � - b;<, RA •. .,. .\,4 4 �P.'fi ...q. +P Ap�L 76IX -: i%i;:i::•'; . ...r. "•:•�\�+•}Xi. i}`::::;.i'�c:{::.:. .>:::'.ia:: :�t;::::i::R:R18�%::i:BPF:: ::: i::::72;'.L:'%::.+na&.::i:• .. .. r..... file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\CMH.ER704091\Local%20Settings\Temp\GWVi... 8/21/2008 Page 1 of 1 E hare11 Holcomb + 4 .,. ��.., Pu4 r.;3.S 1 �.::1'-4 r 3 ,, file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\CMH.ER70409I Tocal%20 S ettings\Temp\GWVi... 8/21/2008 Ado Washington State Olympic Region Headquarters MAP Department of Transportation 5720 Capitol Boulevard,Tumwater Douglas S. MacDonald P.O.Box 47440 Secretary of Transportation Olympia,WA 98504-7440 360-357.2600 Fax 360-357-2601 October 16,2006 M: 1-800-833-6388 www.wsdot.wo.gov Mr. Allan Borden Long Range Planner Mason County Department of Community Development P.O.Box 279 Shelton,Washington 98584 RE: SR 3,Mile Post 8.0,Right Vicinity Paisley Rezone&Campground Development County File No.: 06-06 EC File No.: 2006-216-M Dear Mr.Borden: The Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT)has reviewed the Notice of Application and supporting documents for the Paisley rezone and campground development located at 4911 East State Route 3. It is our understanding that this proposal is also currently being reviewed under a non-project action State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)Determination of NonSignificance. The applicant does not have a permitted access to SR 3 for the site property. WSDOT will require that the applicant apply for an Access Connection Permit. It also appears that the applicant is proposing improvements to SR 3. Any improvements to SR 3 will require review by WSDOT through the Developer Agreement process. Please have the applicant contact me concerning these requirements. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. We respectfully request that your office enter these comments into the SEPA and Planning Commission Hearing records. Should you have questions or require additional information,please contact me at your convenience. (" AAeview Engineer WSDOT,Olympic Region AH:kl cc: George Kovich, WSDOT Larry Deemer,WSDOT Brent Schiller,WSDOT TrWashington State Olympic Region Headquarters AIF Department of 'Transportation 5720 Capitol Boulevard,Tumwater Douglas B.MacDonald P.O.Box 47440 Secretar/of Transportation Olympia,WA 98504-7440 360-357.2600 Fax 360-357-2601 TTY: 1-800-833-6388 www.wsdol.wa.gov March 30, 2007 Mr. Gregg Paisley 4919 Lakeridge Drive East. Lake Tapps, WA 98391 RE: SR 3,Mile Post-7.78,Left Vicinity Paisley Campground &Resort EC File No.: 2006-216-M Dear Mr.Paisley: Thank you for contacting our office concerning your proposed campground and resort development located approximately five miles north of the City of Shelton and west of SR 3. The Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT)is requesting that you provide the following information on your proposed development: • The deed documents that demonstrate either that you own the property where the existing driveway is located or that you have easement from the adjacent property owner(s) for use of this driveway. The referenced driveway connects with SR 3 in the vicinity of mile post 7.78,left vicinity. A traffic trip generation and distribution report for the build-out of your proposal. Please be advised that WSDOT may request a Traffic Impact Analysis at a later date. • A sight distance analysis for your proposed access to SR 3. • A scalable site plan showing your proposed development and your easement or ownership for the proposed access to SR 3. I am also enclosing a copy of an Application for Access Connection in accordance with your request. Should you wish to complete and submit the application at this time please note the additional required submittals on page two of the application including a drainage report. Mr. Gregg Paisley March 30,2007 Page 2 Should you have questions or need additional information please contact me at your convenience. aiew Engineer WSDOT, Olympic Region AH:ps Enclosure cc: Allan Borden, Mason County Rebecca Hawkins, WSDOT Lowell McBee,WSDOT Larry Deemer, WSDOT Brent Schiller, WSDOT Gregg Paisley 4919 Lakeridge Drive East,Lake Tapps,WA 98391 253-709-1887 May 7,2007 Ms.Alana Hess WSDOT Olympic Region Headquarters 5720 Capitol Boulevard,Tumwater P.O.Box 47440 Olympia,WA 98504-7440 260-357-2600 RE: SR3,Mile 7.78 Paisley Campground&Resort EC File 2006-216-M Dear Ms.Hess, Thank you for your help with my project that connects with SR3. Enclosed find the remaining documents requested in your letter dated March 30,2007. To summarize your request: 1. You asked for the deed documents that show my ownership of the parcels and easement in question. I emailed these to you previously and copies are enclosed. 2. Enclosed is a traffic trip generation and distribution report,both for the single event in 2007 as well as projections for subsequent years to the extent such projections are possible. 3. Enclosed is a sight distance analysis. This shows a sight distance of 517 feet in the constrained direction(looking north towards the crest)and over 1500' in the unconstrained direction. 4. Enclosed are the details of that portion of the project currently undergoing permit review by Mason County. There are additional structures/land uses/attractions planned but future elements but these all require variances or special permits or quasi-judicial review or are subject to special technical review(e.g. geo tech). So it cannot be known at this time what will or won't be approved. 5. Additionally I have enclosed detailed measurements of the access connection as well as photos. I am very concerned about safe and efficient access to SR3 and I hope WSDOT will have ideas how I can best improve access. On the latter point,I should mention that though SR3 is my sole ingress and egress point at this time,I expect to eventually purchase adjacent parcels that might provide access to County roads (Greenview Lane)and additional access points to SR3 (perhaps one or two driveways to the north). I should know more later in the year, so it might be helpful to sit down with WSDOT and learn what best practices can be applied,both for the existing access and for possible future additional access points. In the meanwhile,I included three ideas that might ameliorate access problems and minimize traffic disruption. See the driveway drawing for details. I have submitted a permit application and enclosed a check. Here is my thinking as to possible next steps. These three facts are key: 1)There is only one,brief event in 2007 and it will generate negligible traffic(see details on trip generation report),2)the larger attractions(e.g. Shakespeare Theater,Jewel Auditorium,Farmers Market,Amphitheater,et al)that will generate the bulk of traffic in subsequent years haven't yet been submitted to the County for consideration and none will be ready before mid-2008,3)It is possible that I might acquire additional properties with road access as early as summer,2007. Consequently,perhaps WSDOT might wish to limit its involvement with my project in 2007 to simply helping me improve safety for this year's event(July Wh),perhaps by authorizing the easy improvements noted on the driveway drawing or whatever else you would like to see done. Then this fall,after I have a better handle on what 2008-forward.will look like for trip generation and for alternate access points,we can reconvene and agree on further modifications or improvements. Thanks again for your help and I look forward to working with WSDOT. Sincerely, Gregg Paisley Sight Distance Analysis Date: 4-30-07 Paisley Driveway Time of day: Noon Mile 7.78 State Route 3 Speed posted: 50 mph Shelton, WA 98584 Traffic controls present: No controls Intersection maneuver: N.A. Weather: Clear Horizontal curve: No Vertical curve: Yes 00 Major roadway width: 40' r` No. of lanes: 2 a� (X)r- Stopping distance recommended: 425 feet (X)m- Stopping distance measured: 517 feet c� 3 a� b a� a sl got (X)r-Recommended Stopping Sight Distance=425 feete� 1500'+Sight Distance (X)m-Measured Stopping Sight Distance=517 feet Shelton Allyn Conclusion: (X)m> (X)r. The measured sight distance of 517 feet is more than the recommended sight distance of 425 feet (2001 AASHTO). Sight distance for this section of roadway is adequate. Paisley Driveway way l Mile 3 s apprOx Shelton WA 98 1S/ Top °f 25' c Grade driveway 12' where it levels off Possible improvements: WSDOT fence 1. Eliminate left hand turn to all but residents. (approx at �� . ' 2. Widen mouth from 59' to 85' easement?) o 3. Create turn-in lane by widening shoulder 19' _ _ _ _ - — _ _ - _ 1 from 8' to 20' by replacing ditch with culvert under paved area. New turn-in lane could be 100' to 200' and still maintain 425' Not to scale I sight distance to last car in line. 12" Culvert 2 ' AIIIIIIIIIIIIIIS , i 59' _ N IF • • • o Cones & signage to prevent left turn, except for residents? N too Drainage Report Paisley Project, Mile 7.78, Shelton, WA 98584 The driveway shown below has been in existence and unaltered since State Route 3 was built in its present location. The driveway and adjacent banks are stable with no drainage problems. Due to the 15% slope, drainage is quickly and thoroughly accomplished with shallow ditches on each side of the driveway that flow down to the ditch on SR3. Even during the wettest weather(such as last year) water flows unnoticeably and without creating bog or mud areas. In winter, no standing water has been observed in the SR3 ditches, due to the slope of SR3 and infiltratable soil. If the driveway was modified as proposed on the enclosed driveway drawing, this would simply push the driveway ditch 25'north where it would retain its slope, shape, and drainage flow and characteristics. The newly-carved embankment would be replanted with native vegetation. If a turn-out lane is create as proposed over the SR3 ditch to the north of the driveway, then a curtain drain(connected to the culvert) could be installed where the widened shoulder meets the bank. This same curtain drain would be enlarged with rip rap where the driveway ditch reaches the bottom. r r i :.,:m i n t Trip Generation and Distribution Report Paisley Project, Milepost 7.78, Shelton, WA 98584 April 30, 2007 2007 through May, 2008 Between now and May, 2008, there is only one event scheduled, a kids music camp. It consists of four consecutive sessions, each lasting six days. It commences Saturday July 8`h and ends Sunday, August 4`h, 2007. The camp has been operating for 34 years at a different site. Every year 550—600 kids sign up. This year is already 70%booked and enrollment will close at 600. Parents drop kids off on a Sunday between noon and 6pm and pick them up the following Saturday between 9am and 3pm. Thus, for 2007 through May, 2008 there are only eight, six-hour windows where traffic will materially increase in the access connection driveway. In addition to the students/campers there are 60 instructors. They stay the entire month, filtering in the week ahead of camp and filtering out the week after. Trip Generation, 7th Edition, Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE), does not provide a land use comparable to this sort of camp. However, in this case the maximum number of attendees is precisely known, as is their arrival and departure windows, and carpooling/ busing habits. Attached is Table 1, showing anticipated traffic for the camp. Based on Table 1, the increase in traffic of SR3 will not be material, in part because the overall traffic generated by the music camp is small,but also because it occurs on a Saturday and Sunday. From the data below, it can be reasonably surmised that weekend traffic at mile 7.78 is 7% lower than weekday traffic, a reduction of 910 cars per weekend day or 1820 for the weekend. The total number of cars visiting the music camp will be approximately 120 per weekend day or 240 for the weekend. Thus, even with the increase in music camp traffic, overall traffic on SR3 will still be 6%below weekday averages. R068 is at milepost 28.68 on Highway 3 AVG SUN AVG SAT AVG FRI AG WEEKDAY AVG WEEKEND DAY ANNUAL AVG Day R089 BOTHWAYS 13887 16315 19506 17764 16549 17107 R089 NORTHBOUND 7430 8018 9538 8996 8322 8663 R089 SOUTHBOUND 6457 8297 9968 8768 8227 8445 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME ROUTE FUNCT TRUCK PERCENTAGES 2002 2003 2004 2005 003 006.57 AFTER JCT JOHNS PRAIRIE RD 1 13000* 13000 13000 13000 003 008.96 BEFORE JCT AGATE RD WYE CONN 1 12000* 12000 13000* 13000 June 2008—forward The project will be built in phases over the next five or so years. Each year,new structures, features, and attractions will be added. However, at this time it is impossible to accurately establish the timeline or development details (including the resultant traffic) since there are numerous County approval processes that must first be undertaken. In addition,the nature of the project is so unusual,both in its individual elements and taken as an eventual whole,that Trip Generation, 7th Edition, (ITE) provides no comparable land use categories. However,the following categories provide partial comparability. Resort Hotel (330). One part of the project that is today under review by the County and likely to be approved is the camp structures. There are 24 sleeping rooms being built for 2007 with another 24 for 2008. These 48 rooms will eventually also host corporate retreats, usually Monday—Friday,when camps(such as the 2007 music camp)are not in session.. So Land Use 330 bears some comparability, albeit marginal because of lack of amenities(e.g. cocktail lounge), old-world theme(no technology), and the fact that people will tend to remain on-site for the duration of their stay(typically 2—5 days)with little come-and-go in vehicles. Using Occupied Rooms as the variable and the minimum rates (defensible given lack of amenities, etc.) and average rates for Weekday/A.M. /P. M. Peak Hour of Generator: A.M. Peak Hour of Generator; 48 Rooms x minimum rate .34= 16.32 trips 48 Rooms x average rate .47 =22.56 trips P.M. Peak Hour of Generator: 48 Rooms x minimum rate .36= 17.28 trips 48 Rooms x average rate .59=28.32 trips Campground/RV Park(416). The only other part of the project that has been submitted to the County for review is a request to have 80— 150 primitive camping sites dispersed through the forest. This will come up for approval later in the year and may be ready by June 2008. There are no RVs involved and people must hike into their sites, thereby reducing likely come-and-go in vehicles, so it is reasonable to include the minimum rate along with the average rate. Taking 100 primitive camping sites as X. (Note: Land Use 416 trips should not be added to trips from Land Use 330 because most camping occurs on weekends while most corporate retreats occur on weekdays. Also, these trips should not be added to music camp trips(Table 1)because for the security of the kids general camping will not be allowed when camps are in session. , g P g p ) A.M. Peak Hour of Generator; 100 Occupied Camp Site x minimum rate .29=29 trips 100 Occupied Camp Site x average rate .32 =32 trips P.M. Peak Hour of Generator: 100 Occupied Camp Site x minimum rate .38 =38 trips 100 Occupied Camp Site x average rate .48 =48 trips Multipurpose Recreational Facility(435). No comparability: the project has none of the listed activities or elements. Live Theater(441). By 2009,it is expected that a live theater will be approved and constructed so this land use is included here. However,the trip generation rate is obviously too low for this project since the reference study was conducted in suburban NYC where mass transit is prevalent. Assuming an audience of 1000 as X: Weekday P.M. Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic: 1000 attendees x .02 =20 trips. Arena(460). By 2010 the project expects to have approved and constructed an indoor auditorium. However,the 40,000 square foot footprint that will be requested is 400% larger than what zoning allows so a variance will be sought. When and if approved, and actual square footage is known, a trip generation report will be produced for this land use. Amusement Park(480). By 2009,various pieces of the project, if approved,will resemble the ITE description of an amusement park and a trip generation report will be produced for this land use. Recreational Community Center Park(495). No comparability: this category is for YMCAs and the like. Table 1 Trip Generation, 2007-May 2008 Paisley project, mile 7.78, SR3, Shelton, WA 98584 AWDVTE, 2007 through May 2008* 25 Varies from week-to-week from 10 -40, 25 is typical Camp event**: total vehicles trips per day trips per hour Sunday, July 8, 2007 120 240 40 noon -6pm, weighted for carpooling and busing Saturday, July 14, 2007 120 240 40 9am - 3pm, weighted for carpooling and busing Sunday, July 15, 2007 120 240 40 noon -6pm, weighted for carpooling and busing Saturday, July 21, 2007 120 240 40 9am - 3pm, weighted for carpooling and busing Sunday, July 22, 2007 120 240 40 noon -6pm, weighted for carpooling and busing Saturday, July 28, 2007 120 240 40 gam - 3pm, weighted for carpooling and busing Sunday, July 29 2007 120 240 40 noon - 6pm, weighted for carpooling and busing Saturday, August 4, 2007 120 240 40 9am - 3pm, weighted for carpooling and busing * Instructor traffic is included here **These numbers assume full enrollment Page 1 of 3 Kell McAboy- Thanks for your response, here's comments... From: Gregg Paisley To: Date: 6/6/2007 12:47 AM Subject: Thanks for your response, here's comments... CC: , Dear Ms.Hess, Thanks again for your response. 1. I learned from Mason.County this morning that WSDOT has raised SEPA issues. Phase 1 of my project(1 kitchen/shower,2 bunkhouses, 39 parking spaces, 10,800 sf) is exempt from SEPA. In talking with the County today, they confirmed that my Phase 1 plans--the only plans under submission at this time--do not appear to trigger a SEPA review. As the WSDOT Development Services Manual, Section 3.1.09 states, the threshold for a SEPA review is by default the minimum flexible threshold unless a County,by resolution, opts for an increase up to the allowable maximum. Mason County has opted for the maximum threshold: Mason County Code: 8.16.020: Flexible thresholds for categorical exemptions. (a)Mason County establishes the following exempt levels for minor new construction under WAC 197-11-800(1)(b) based on local conditions: (3)For office, school, commercial, recreational, service or storage buildings in WAC 197- 11-800(1)(b) (iii): Up to twelve thousand feet and up to forty parking spaces. My current submissions are so close to the limit that it is inevitable that a SEPA review will be triggered when I submit additional building applications to the County,probably in 2008 or later. However, as stated in the letter that accompanied my access permit application: the attractions that will eventually generate the bulk of the traffic haven't been submitted to the County and approval of same is by no means certain if and when I do eventually submit them. 2. One factor that may have led WSDOT to assume I triggered the SEPA threshold is that I have 4 bunkhouses being reviewed. But the County knows,though WSDOT probably doesn't,that only 2 are slated for construction now and the other two are included on a"Stock Plan" application for future permitting. This is a County program that avoids redundant reviews of identical structures. In this case, the County is switching from IBC 2003 to IBC 2006 in July, so they required me to submit all bunkhouses together if I wished to take advantage of the Stock Plan program. But site plans on file with the County clearly note that only 2 bunkhouses will be constructed at this time. 3. Today I told the County I currently have a valid access permit under RCW 47.50.080(2),which reads "...Access connections to state highways identified on plats and subdivisions approved prior to July 1, 1991, shall be deemed to be permitted pursuant to chapter 202, Laws of 1991..." Further, WAC 468- 51-120 (1) "...All connection permits issued by the department prior to the effective date of this chapter remain valid until revoked..." Finally,WAC 468-51-030(1) states: "...Ifa property owner orpermit holder who has a valid connection permit wishes to change the character, use, or intensity of the property or development served by the connection, the department must be contacted to determine whether a new connection permit would be required...." To prove my assertion to the County that I already have a valid access permit I am sending them the same documentation(pre-1991 recorded easements and current deeds)previously submitted to WSDOT. 4. I initiated communication with WSDOT on this project in February, 2007, immediately after my file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\kelhn\Local%20S ettings\Temp\XPgrpwise\466604... 6/6/2007 Page 2 of 3 rezone was approved. I subsequently submitted an application dated May 7, 2007 to upgrade the access permit, should WSDOT deem an upgrade necessary. No actual change in use or traffic has yet occurred, no modifications to the access have been made, and I have submitted an application, so under RCWs& WACs there is no grounds for revoking the existing access permit. Therefore: I have now, and will continue to have, a valid access permit until such time as WSDOT proposes requirements, if any, to upgrade the permit and I carry out those requirements. At that time I will have an upgraded permit,with no gap in-between permits. If WSDOT does not agree with this contention,please say so and point me to the applicable RCWs/WACs. 5. Consequently,I request WSDOT now confirm to Mason County that I do indeed have a current access permit and that an upgraded permit is in process. I believe this will satisfy the County so they can release the hold on my permits caused by WSDOT actions. 6. I should reiterate that at this time I am seeking only a Category I permit(minor connection). i.e. I now have a Category I permit and wish to stay in Category I which tops out at 99 AWDVTE. That is the box I checked on the application and why I paid the appropriate$500 fee for Category I. 99 or less AWDVTE will meet my needs for at least the next 18 months and it is premature for me to forecast traffic beyond that. As noted in the Trip Generation Report: "...June 2008—forward: The project will be built in phases over the next five or so years. Each year, new structures,features, and attractions will be added. However, at this time it is impossible to accurately establish the timeline or development details (including the resultant traffic)since there are numerous County approval processes that must first be undertaken..." Thus it would be unwarranted for WSDOT to make any assumptions as to my future traffic or to propose to elevate my permit to Category II since no one knows what will or won't happen with Phase 2- and-beyond applications. 7. SR3 at my driveway is a Class 2 highw�y so all permits are,by law,Nonconforming. WAC 468-51- 100, (Nonconforming Connection Permits), states: " (1) Traffic volume. The maximum vehicular usage of the connection shall be specified in the permit..." So to make it easier on WSDOT,the County, and me by maximizing the threshold that triggers a revisit,I wish to amend my access permit application to request a Category I permit for 99 AWDVTE which of course will be legally binding on me under WAC. This is substantially above the 10 -40 (25 typical)current and anticipated AWDVTE levels but provides room to grow and to accommodate spike usage. Thereafter, any number of occurrences will cause us to revisit the access permit: Eventual additional County approvals in advance of build-out, acquisition of adjacent properties,unexpectedly high loads with existing facilities, etc. 8. You asked who prepared the Trip Generation Report, Sight Distance Analysis, et al. Under WAC 468-51-060, an engineer stamp is required for Category II &III traffic data but not for Category I, so I prepared the documents myself and any questions should be directed to me. Also, the reason I did not provide drainage calculations is that, if my neighbor's recollection is correct,WSDOT built my driveway as part of the SR3 relocation project. So please check WSDOT records for those calculations. I can do them for WSDOT if your records are incomplete or if I am in error as to the the history of the driveway. Also, I can calculate the additional flows if you wish me to improve/enlarge the driveway as proposed. Ms. Hess,your DSM 2.2.09 notes: "WSDOT has increased its commitment to work closely with...the general public." I can see from your efforts that you take that commitment seriously and, and as noted in a previous letter, you are a credit to your agency. You will find I too work hard to communicate, cooperate, and devise win/win solutions. With this project,beyond the relatively simple Category I application presently under review, I would welcome meeting(s)to lay out a game plan for the next few file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\kellm\Local%20Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\466604... 6/6/2007 Page 3 of 3 years to ensure that WSDOT and I both meet our objectives with my access connection. I am available at your convenience for a meeting. Thanks again, Gregg 253-709-1887 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\kellm\Local%20Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\466604... 6/6/2007 Washington State Olympic Region Headquarters MADepartment of Transportation 5720 Capitol Boulevard,Tumwater Douglas S. MacDonald P.O.Box 47440 Secretary of Transportation Olympia,WA 98504-7440 360-357-2600 Fax 360-357-2601 TTY: 1-800-833-6388 www.wsdot.wa.gov June 8, 2007 Mr. Gregg Paisley 4919 Lakeridge Drive East Lake Tapps, Washington 98391 RE: SR 3, Mile Post 7.78 Left Vicinity Avery Township Development EC File No.: 2006-216-M Dear Mr. Paisley: The Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT)received your Application for Access Connection on May 18,2007. This application is for access to SR 3 at the approximate mile post of 7.78 left vicinity for your proposed Avery Township Development. Please be advised that WSDOT will require additional information to continue processing your application. WSDOT is reviewing the documents you have submitted as proof of easement to SR 3 for ingress and egress. In addition,WSDOT will require that a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)be prepared for your proposal. The TIA should encompass the build-out of your development proposal and include event peak trip analysis. Please note that a Category I permit is not the proper classification for this access application therefore the TIA must be stamped and signed by a professional engineer. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely,. Alan Development Review Engineer WSDOT, Olympic Region AH:pr r licataon for Access Connection For Department Use Only Preapplication Conceptual View? i Nonconforming Connection? JI Variance? Category I - Minimum Connection Category 11 - Minor Connection Field (agricu(tural),forest lands,utility operation and $50.00 Less than 1,000 AWDVTE $1,000.00 maintenance � I� " 1,000 to 1,50C AWDVTE $1,50C.00 For each residential dwelling unit(up to 10 units) $50.00 J utilizing a single connection point Fee per additional connection point $250.00 Other,with 100 AWDVTE or less $500.00 I I Fee per additional connection point $50.00 Y.. Category III - Major Connection Category IV -Temporary Connection 1,500 to 2,500 AWDVTE $2,500.00 Base fee per connection $100.00 Over 2,500 AWDVTE $4,000.00 Fee per additional connection point — $1,000.00 LlIncludes Median Opening Proposed Use State Highway Number N iie Post County 1/4 of the 1/4 Section Township Range E/W _ Fees in the amount of are paid herewith to defray the basic administrative expense incident to the processing of this application according to VVAC 468-51,RCW Chapter 47.50,and/or RCW Chapter 47.32, and amendments thereto. The applicant further promises to pay additional amounts as shall be billed,if any, in reimbursement of the actual costs of the Department. Fee Total: The undersigned submits said application and accepts the conditions as set forth. Applicant, Owner(Print Full Name) Checks or Money Orders are to be made payable to Address "Washington State Department of Transportation" City State I Zip Code For Consultant Use Only Consulting Firm Teiepnone Number Address Applicant Authorized Signature City State Zip Code Print or Type Name Telephone Number Title Consultant's Representative Federal Tax ID No.or Soc. Sec. No. (Optional) Print or Type Name Title Dated this day of RAMPS-Appltcauon for Access connection-Page I Additional Information Required on Separate Sheets: A. Access Connection Permit (access, driveways, etc.): 1. Site plan showing access location and development of site (All except farm or private residence). 2. Vehicle trip generation (For commercial and multiple residence). 3. Land use restrictions or stipulations, if any, and agency involved. 4. Drainage Plan (With calculations required). 5. Landscape plan (If local agency requirement). 6. Current complete names, mailing addresses, and telephone numbers of the property owner(s), the developer(s), the appicant, the transportation and legal consultant(s) representing the applicant (if any), and the local government representative(s)responsible for processing the development's approval, Connection and roadway design documents-for Category II and II permits shall bear the seal and signature of a professional engineer, registered in accordance with RCW Chapter 18.43. For Department Use Only Engineer's/Supervisor's Report Reviewed in the field this day of Comments I I I Signature Engineer/Supervisor goaapc_4-4-6—1nr ArrpSR'(nnnodion-PBOe 2 If Is Washington State Olympic Region Headquarters Department of Transportation 5720 Capitol Boulevard,Tumwater Paula J. Hammond, P.E. P.O.Box 47440 Secretary of Transportation Olympia.WA 98504-7440 360-357-2600 Fax 360-357-2601 TTY: 1-800-833-6388 wwwmsdotma.gov September 2, 2008 Ms. Pam Bennett-Cumming,Senior Planner Mason County Community Development 411 North 5`h P.O. Box 279 Shelton, Washington 98584 TO BE KEPT IN THE RE: SR 3, Mile Post 7.75, Left Vicinity PARGLEL FILE Avery Township Development DS File No.: 2006-216-M Dear Ms. Bennett-Cumming: The Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT)has reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis(TIA)and interim event Traffic Control Plan for the Avery Township development. As indicated in our July 30,2008 correspondence WSDOT has significant concerns with regards to safety and operational impacts to SR 3 that will result from this development. This letter outlines WSDOT's requirements for the construction of necessary improvements to SR 3 to accommodate traffic to and from the developed site and for the interim traffic control plans for events scheduled in September and October 2008. Traffic Impact Analysis The TIA describes the development as a recreation destination and event resort. Total trip numbers,the timing of peak hour trips and distribution vary depending on use and event types and schedule. The following improvements to SR 3 should be constructed to accommodate this development: • Construction of a northbound left turn lane and southbound right turn lane on SR 3 are warranted. Associated illumination and access design will be required as part of these improvements. • Construction of these improvements must be done in accordance with WSDOT standards and specifications and will be subject to review and approval through the"Developer Agreement"process managed by our office. All improvements must be constructed by October 1, 2009. Ms. Pam Bennett-Cumming September 2, 2008 Page 2 Traffic Control Plan Traffic control is an interim and temporary means of managing traffic for events at this location and is subject to WSDOT review and approval on a case by case basis. The Traffic Control Plan(TCP)has been reviewed for use only with the September 27, 2008 Extreme Sports and October 4'h and 51h 2008 Renaissance Fair events. To implement the proposed TCP for these two events WSDOT will require the following: • Two lanes of traffic to and from the site to SR 3 must be established. Pull outs may not be used. The owner is responsible for obtaining any necessary easements,permissions and/or approvals from adjacent property owners. • The TCP must be revised as shown on the enclosed plan and re-submitted to WSDOT for review and approval. To enable sufficient review and approval time to accommodate the September 27, 2008 event schedule these revisions must be submitted to WSDOT no later than September 16`h,preferably sooner. • If two lanes of traffic cannot be established the TCP as revised must be implemented and a maximum of 100 vehicles may be at the site at any given time. Allowing more than 100 vehicles on the site with only a one lane access will result in significant delays and backups on SR 3. The owner will be responsible for ensuring this limit is not exceeded. • An insurance bond in the amount of$2 million for each event must he provided. We respectfully request the County's consideration and implementation of these requirements. Should you have questions or need additional information please contact Alana I less at 360-357-2725 or by email at hessa c,wsdot.wa.gov at your convenience. Sincerely, Dale C. Severson, P.E. Development Services Engineer WSDOT, Olympic Region DCS:pr Ali Enclosure 4 a w Ms. Pam Bennett-Cumming September 2,2008 Page 3 cc: Betty Wing,Mason County Bob Fink,Mason County Steve Bennett,WSDOT Lowell McBee,WSDOT Rob Peterson,WSDOT Dewayne Matlock,WSDOT Gerald Nelson,WSDOT Jim Norman, WSDOT Duke Stryker,WSDOT Larry Deemer,WSDOT Brent Schiller,WSDOT Alana Hess,WSDOT CMS SPtC-tnt_ EXPtL`I' W20_7,4 EVENT Avery Town 7ELAY5��tvent-Related Traffic Control Plan AW��o l!C )) 4) FLAG b i� Wl c-7A W 3-4 '�, srrt FLAGGER I BE PREPARED R4-1AHEAD 'T A FIV J� (symbol) �° I TO STOP DO NOT J J i�'2C.-7B Pnss ' FLAGGER AHEAD \fit 500 FEET (symbol) � �� R , s FLAGGER'B' 500 FEET Flaggers at crest of hill `.i00 FEET Phase B C D /� I STOP STOP SLOW f YP. II STOP SLOW STOP 500 FEET 3 Ill SLOW STOP STOP • T k;s gcc�rss f�«c) IMIAS �a:h 1,L_?V €,a►.l lams ru , W 14-3 FLAGGER'D' NO PASSING � 5 0.m,o F W 14-3 ZONE p c M'd`1 NO PASSING (pennant) �� if,% u\J �., ZONE FLAGGER'C' ��c �j` ' (Pennant) 500 FEET NOTES / FLAGGING OPERATIONS AT NIGHT WILL BE LIT AND WILL BE USED TO BRING ATTENTION TO SIGNS S00 FEET 4y ,fi� I /I�a...�t� ='<<j pl s t c A ,yuw rn a./19► a►Sl1►c n I el k 0-1 FLAGGER y HE TE D T N R t 500 FEET AHEAD O Y - F C E G T' ' (symbol) A 500 FEE 1 ❑ W3-4 V1/74_ R U T A O V D BE PREPARED 7A I AFF SE. CAT _ GC, z R4-1 TO STOP DO NOT FLAGGERS ON SR-3 ACT AS TRAFFIC SENSORS TU Z PASS FACILITATE FLOW INTO AND OUT OF ACCESS > Q 3 4a-rvlk+ 11// i!' — �Iq `�S rtlu+5.l; r�r►ain�air� v15 � 4jdC txs Q ; Con49J "J q41 {,rnc5. € s�• r t I (jfl. `�) F�L-rC��[Z �Af An •�-i�� r•u��a. �+Y� SR 3 � C a W26 7A 5}a j,r-M Entire 50.24 acres (4 parcels: 35 + 5 + 5 + 5.24 acres), showing 2007 construction phase for Camp compound (1 Kitchen / shower, 2 bunkhouses). Also shows primitive campsite locations for RV Park Permit application. �� "'�. S i .,� fir•� ��t: .' • , s • • • • OP Area within red line •,' ' • „ thinned for construction access. � ► ,,�, Majority ' will be * �` •1 restored to "• ." '� ' '� # ` natural state �,.� �W` or rain 1".V garden. All large trees ° K f left standing >* • except on � �ti�•,fi#. �' � � »� � ' � � . r M Q oad f N Bunk 2008 f �"�� -" 4'T„' '�- .:. � •� !` » Kitchen/ 1 ♦ti•►+� r T 1 1i showers * � Bunk 2008 a� � s lip Vault r !!3" toilets - septiclip tanks V46 Checklist Paisley Site Plan Scale OK? Yes(1 =40'on camp compound page) North Arrow? Yes Property line locations&dimensions? Yes Notes: Label abutting streets? Yes(None abut site, see vicinity map for SR3 connection) Shoreline/Surface water? OK(None within 300' of project) All buildings 35' from all property and parcel lines Wetlands/seasonal drainage? OK g (None within 300' of project) All buildings 35'feet apart Easements? Yes(See vicinity map) Show existing development? Yes (See Cam Compound page for details, to os, easements) Proposed building footprint?Yes(On Camp Compound page) Sewage disposal system? Yes(Locations below, details in Septic Application) Scale 1' = approx 80' Existing and proposed buffers?Yes(On camp compound page) Retaining walls? OK(None) (See other Camp Compound Site Plan for 1" = 40'scale) Slopes? OK(See topos,no slopes near project) Wells? Yes '° Waterfront project? OK(This is not a waterfront project) ,,';' N Driveways site access?Yes Stormwater run-of path? Yes Land modification/grading permits? OK(Not required) Group A well 330' 5 acre Parcel number: 32135 31 00081 35 acre Parcel number: 32135 3100000 • Allowable building area: 100' / (RTC zoning is 1:20) 76,230 sf available for building / 10,880 sf of structures shown 2 Handicap parking spaces / �`,� / /i�� /' �0 -1 O L43840sf 3840sf s 0 3840Sf 3840sf 20' all-weather fire road 0 N 674' O, 674' Septic 0 tanks ti ; & vault �� 5.24 acre Parcel number: j�� • toilets � 32135 34 00000 Allowable building area: o (RTC zoning is 1:20) 5 acre Parcel number: 20' all-Weather fire road 11,413 sf available for building 32135 34 00080 10,880 sf of structures shown n �._._._._._.� 321352400020 321352400010 Michael Banner Michael Kowalski 321352400000 321352400030 2311 Skyline Wayy 8110 Leschi Drive SW Mary Hicks Michael Fincher Anacortes,WA 98221-2959 Lakewood,WA 98498-5954 801 W Limber Loft Drive 10285 Estate Lane SE Wagons West,AZ 85705 Olalla,WA 98359-9610 321352390004 321351300000 Randy Ranson Menke Lumber Co,Inv Blvd 301 E Wallace Kneeland 1717 Marine View Drive Shelton,98584-2987 Tacoma,WA 98422-4192 300' Arnold Jacot 5291 E State Route 3 Shelton,WA 98584-8565 42 00000 31 00000 32 00000 Paisley Moran Timber,LLC s 8/60 4483 E State Route 3 Shelton,WA 98584.8562 Ron Ferris 450 380 E Hiawatha Blvd 31 00091 Shelton,WA 98584-7851 4300 Paisley 010 AIM _ Eric Jacot 43 0002 (— 5291 E State Route 3 Note: hOUses are 34 00000 34 00080 N Shelton,WA 98584-8565 Paisley Paisley o o ---shown ShOW In m m 43 90041 approximately correct locations 2b/G9 Michael O'Day 4771 E State Route 3 David Lundk'-A Shelton,WA 98584.8529 Joanne Konrade I PO Box 687 SW 33 00000 PO Box 1222 I WA 98584-068 Shelton WA 98584-0947 43 D0030 .54 0no50 s4 00060 21 00z 21 00218/9 43 00001 REV 3/4/98 ( ti 3x009 N 0 ^ 32002 21 00010 ( g NE-SE d` 430 OAKI AND RAY r. l. . 2:- SE-SE .44 E � s PA Paisley Site Plan August 18",2008 �.eI.: = F N AO buildings ere et I•=d 30'from naghbonng Properties not owned by Paisley All buildings eR at least 25'from other Paisley parcels ! t I f1,2 I All building we a last 20'span —wads: mad are all ma arc 20'wide with 12'deuana for emergency vehicles,0-12%grad Scale I"=100'e 1.ti ',,_ 'i�i ri;v;u 35 acre Parcel number: 32135 3100000 Allowable building area: Primitive camping (RTC zoning is 1:20) (80-100 ales sa0ered through worts in small is.—I clesaings(i.e.rro trees ova 4"win be cut) 76,230 of available for building 74,880 sf of structures shown 'a r ) m � •� :'• a Jewel 8 Pavilion \ 50,000 sf (allowable under able ratio but requires \ 1 ` +letta� S'o'• variance for singe- structure \ Sim) \ -'Z \ E u� r----------------- \\ a \ otgM Area of spindly \ ` _ 5 acre Parcel number. eumrgis.a . alders:Thin in \ 280 at r 32135 3100081 2009 to create rvew»1u _ - Allowable building area: overflow parking. Teano-Noo{,'a'aai'> (RTC zoning is 1:20) Requires SEPA/ Pumps lane``s.000 BPdf i \ ,•g. 10,890 at available for buildi 1 forest practices • try %'\ \ Gox80 10,850sf of structures show ' permit , IOD'sMry Zeoq •\a '!\ \ viI earea assorted small ✓ \\ 1 baild ng,totaling 2,150 at). _____________ _p�_� 1'—r� �� 1a�� I fCv %', � \i Concessions in fenU.'** %ea�QV.' \\ �., \t Ea4ioa wareal0---- 1 G ! 1200 at 4 ,P,p �t 5S$ w tb' 3g40 er / / 'J ® ' XoN�P 1 20'all weather fire road ® � r►. s P to•. r 4► P �r 4far 4m � aP.��,�, P WO v t APB do gQ 40x�16 JOx 9,ix 16 $ R 3840 s( 3840 at t 1 0 ((() J rn 1 \ g t 5 acre Parcel number: 32135 34 00080 Alowable building area: Parking area l:general \ ,1L 1, \ (RTC zoning is 1.20) i (See parking diagrams&worksheet) \ \ / 10,890 sf available for built \� 8,092 sf of structures stow 20'a0^eather fire% •\aka wr i �r��.% Stream crossing r � 5.24 acre Parcel number. 32135 34 00000 1320' \ , o Allowable building area: (RTC zoning is 1:20) .� 11,413 sf available for building R 10.880 sf of structures shown t �' a �- t d Fire Protection District 5 Central Mason County Emergency Services Fire Protection Rescue Emergency Medical EMERGENCY ireanife Safety TO BE KEPT I N THE Fire and Life Safety Fire protection 8<Rescue ��f(— C rN'e-Rer:are-A�/�i FIRE MEDIC PARCEL FILE Paramedic MlssiO Ment: Advanced Life Support and Ambulance Service "The protection of life, health,property and the September 9,2008 environment." To: Pam-Benett Cumming Commissioners Mason County Department of Community Development Tommy O.Taylor Chuck Huff From: Dave Salzer Pat McGanney Mason County FD 5 Chief Richard A. Knight Following are comments regarding the proposed Renaissance Fair project to cht&Rmason5.ora be located South of MP9 on SR 3 in Mason County: Assistant Chief's Tim McKern 1. The site is located at the end of an existing single-lane access road ac- commencing at SR 3 and terminating 1000+feet up slope. 501 @mason5.ora 2, The access road grade appears to exceed 14% in several areas. Dave Salzer ac- 3. There is no defined roadbed in place to serve the site and no 502@mason5.ora designated area for a fire apparatus turnaround is evident. Administrative The guidance document to support road improvements to this site is Title 14 Secretary Mason County Building Code, Chapter 14.17 Standards for Fire Apparatus Brenda Foley Access Roads. Brenda@mason5.or That document details the process for submitting plans, for road construction,including driving surface, bridges, and turnarounds at the Business: termination of the Fire Apparatus Access Road. Post Office Box 127 Allyn,Washington 98524 Given the challenges of the site for emergency vehicle access,we are (360) 426-5533 or (360)275-2889 requesting that the Fire Apparatus Access Road be a minimum of 20 feet Fax: wide throughout,with the inclusion of a Cul De Sac Turn Around as (360)275-9718 detailed in the Standards for Fire Apparatus Access Roads. Visit us at: www.mason5.org PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE SINCE 1953 1 � � , " tit PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE SINCE 1953 MASON COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL I � Mason County Bldg.III 426 W Cedar St PO BOX 186 Shelton,WA 98584 �i (360)427-9670 Ext.273 CODE ENFORCEMENT FIRE INSPECTIONS FIRE INVESTIGATION PUBLIC EDUCATION Cul De Sac Turn Around Area required for turn around located at a single residence. In this special case,the area could,for instance, consist of pasture adjacent to the building and will to continue to function as a viable turn around in adverse weather conditions(ie remains solid in any weather). Requirements for roads 20'in width and commerical sites Requirements for roads 12'in width R45 R25 R45 Driving surface R33 in this area is not required Driving surface in this area is not required R28 28 R4 40 2 Minimum 12 "TRgMgr- SPOArs FE5-nVj41- Vend ing Area Stage 44f: ® Exhibition Area .Y" rt� ® Concessions •` ; + � ® Sanitation ., Mason Counh "'�` low Concourse *' VIP& Emergency Parking air M f y 7 T`dr X 4`7)40 �M! inter/tacit � Y ' t Parking;Are 9t a .� �� r (7/3V/ 008) Barbara Robinson - Fwd. SR 3 Avery Township Gregg Paisley Renaissance Faire & Extreme Sports Festival Apootl. From: Betty Wing To: Barbara Robinson; Charell Holcomb Date: 7/30/2008 5:24 PM Subject: Fwd: SR 3 Avery Township Gregg Paisley Renaissance Faire & Extreme Sports Festival Applications: WS Please print this out and plan to discuss with Mr. Paisley at the pre-application conferences.Thank you. >>> "Hess,Alana" <HessACcbwsdot.wa.gov> 7/30/2008 5:21 PM >>> Dear Ms.Wing: The Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT) has reviewed the applications for the proposed Renaissance Faire&Extreme Sports Festival events.These events are to be held on the property owned by Gregg E. &Elisa K. Paisley located in the 4900 block of SR 3 mile post 7.75, left vicinity.The Renaissance Faire is scheduled for August 30 and 31, 2008 with an expected attendance of 5,000 to 10,000.The Extreme Sports Event is scheduled for September 27, 2008 with an expected attendance of 1,000 to 2,000. WSDOT has serious safety and operational concerns with regards to the impacts to SR 3 that will result from these events.The Renaissance Faire is the most significant concern due to the expected attendance levels and in that it will be held on Labor Day weekend.We are requesting that the County require and condition the applicant and/or property owner to provide WSDOT with Traffic Control Plans for each of these events.These plans must be prepared by a licensed professional in accordance with WSDOT's requirements. In the case of the Renaissance Faire the plans are due to WSDOT for review no later than August 15, 2008.The due date for plan submittal for the Extreme Sports event will be September 12, 2008.All submittals should be sent to my attention. WSDOT will notify the State Patrol of these events.The County should expect contact by the State Patrol directly or through WSDOT and they may have requirements in addition to WSDOT's. We respectfully request that the County not issue the permits for either one of these events until the Traffic Controls Plans have been approved by WSDOT. Thank you for this opportunity for review and comment. Please contact me at your convenience should you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Alana Hess Development Review Engineer Olympic Region Development Services Washington State Dept of Transportation 5720 Capitol Blvd P.O. Box 47440 Olympia,Washington 98504-7440 (360)357-2725 (360)357-2748 FAX hessa(&wsdot.wa.gov