HomeMy WebLinkAboutHPA Culvert - BLD Permit / Conditions - 10/22/1993 � �.�..{�
c �.�
•�t �\` �. y `]+yam � ��� ��%^ /ffi1�f��
1��.;��
f H/1� � t. � r i._
'�'`
.,r. ,�,
�� r
►�
��, � ��
`t! "l.. S
__> �.
.�,• ��
! _ .. .- /
�- .-Mt'�'rl, ,q r
,:}:�. .
,� "..
��y�I. !!
_ .3l
�,�. .�►,
,�. ,
_t � ,
�_
....� � ."� � sec._ � % �«'
' y �*' ... V`.
. �... '�" - •j.
i
y ��,�-�_.. :-� �r .�.' ,may!" .
r
• -.r.
`i x
��� � �h�r� �� � �� �a� 1 �'
1 i4 1
�. 1'.
� � i
�'.
�3 0
- A
f 23� y y.s aceya
9 s'/v t5b�
HYDRAULIC PROJECT DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE
APPROVAL 600 CAPITOL WAY N.
OLYMPIA WASHINGTON 98501-1D91
(R.C.W. 7 5 . 2 0 . 10 0) (206) 753-5897
(R.C.W. 7 5. 2 0. 10 3 )
0 October 19, 1993 "
(applicant should refer to this date in all correspondence) ED
PAGE 1 OF 4 PAGES 0 C T 2 2 1993
�0 APPLICANT NAME 18 CONTACT PHONE(S) CONTROL k4ow CO. PLANNING DEFT.
Eger, Richard 206 778-7485 01-88290-01
19 STREET OR RURAL ROUTE WRIA
8128 187th St SW ❑ 15
CITY STATE ZIP
Edmonds WA 98026 1481 15 07
12 WATER TRIBUTARY TORiver 11 TYPE OF PROJECT
Unnamed Tributary UnStream_& Culvert _
13 QUARTER SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE(E-W) COUNTY
SE 29 23N 01G: Mason SECTIONRcivvati.vi. - tJio-
-———————————————————————————— ——————————
lation Correction
TIME LIMITATIONS: 51THIS PROJECT MAY BEGIN AND MUST BE COMPLETED BY
October 19 1993 November 7 1993
THIS APPROVAL IS TO BE AVAILABLE ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES AND ITS PROVISIONS FOLLOWED BY THE
PERMITTEE AND OPERATOR PERFORMING THE WORK.
SEE IMPORTANT GENERAL PROVISIONS ON REVERSE SIDE THAT ARE ALSO PART
OF THIS APPROVAL.
GENERAL:
1. Work shall substantially conform to plans and specifications sub-
mitted to the Department of Wildlife with the Hydraulic Project
Application except as modified by this approval.
This approval is for the removal of approximately 80 feet of culvert
and for the relocation, restoration and mitigation of this stream
reach to reproject condition. This Approval also allows for the
removal of two culverts under the driveway to be replaced with one
culvert, the upstream end to be aligned with the relocated stream
reach directly upstream. There shall be no stream relocation down-
stream of the drivewa and no culvert placed on the east side of the
property adjacent to the post office parking lot.
The project shall be accomplished in two phases. The 80 feet of
culvert shall be removed and the channel relocated and restored
rior to the installation of the culvert under the driveway. A
emporary bypass shall be constructed, like a sandbag revetment or
similar device, at the downstream end of the relocated channel to
prevent stream flow from entering the work area when the culvert
is installed under the driveway.
The creek shall be relocated in a meandering channel as shown on the
ma (a) south of the cedar tree b 22 feet on the west end and
(b 5 feet from the Douglas fir ree on an angle towards a oint on
the unauthorized culvert ten feet from the end of the post o fice
SEPA: Exempt
HABITAT BIOLOGIST: Gloria Mitchell (206) 533-9335
AGENT:Mike Johnson, P-1
APPLICANT - FISHERIES - AGENT - INVESTIGATOR - REGION - OLYMPIA:
DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE DIRECTOR
w�
HYDRAULIC PROJECT
APPROVAL
4❑ October 19, 1993
(applicant should refer to this date in all correspondence)
PAGE 2 OF 4 PAGES
�0 APPLICANT NAME CONTROL NUMBER
Eger, Richard 01-88�. -01
culvert. The bends in the channel located between the post office
culvert and including the bend 45 feet from the Douglas fir tree
shall be greater than 110 degrees so as to create gentle bends.
The relocated channel shall have the capacity and channel shape ,
similar to re-proj]ect conditions. Stream width shall be a minimum
of five feet, not to exceed ten feet. Slope of the banks shall not
be reater than one foot of rise for every two feet of horizontal
dis ance. A minimum of 15 feet of horizontal distance shall be
retained in native trees shrubs, forbs and sedges as a streamside
buffer for erpetuit the gravel file located on site shall be
mixed with top soil �o provide an appropriate planting substrate
for the banks and to prevent water see age out of the stream. This
material may be urchased or found on he upland portion of .this
propert only �ive cubic yards may be used from the wetland area
adjacen to the work site. This approval does not authorize
dredging of the wetland.
2 . Within 72 hours of completing this project, contact Gloria Mitchell
at the Department of Wildlife regional office (206) 753-2600,
48-B Devonshire Road, Montesano, WA, 98563 .
EQUIPMENT LIMITATIONS:
3 . Drive mechanisms of wheeled or tracked equipment shall not enter
the wetted perimeter. Equipment shall be cleaned prior to beginnin
this project. Equi ment shall be properly maintained to prevent
petroleum products Trom entering the water.
OPERATION:
4 . All work shall be accomplished during a low flow period. All work
shall cease during periods of high flows or muddy working condition
that could result in the addition of sediment to the stream.
5. Erosion control methods shall be utilized to prevent siltation.
These may include, but are not limited to, straw bales filter fab-
ric, temporary sediment ponds, check dams, and immediate mulching
of exposed areas.
6. Extreme care shall be taken not to disturb, damager destroy any
of the existing trees, brush, shrubs, grasses or otheor streamside
vegetation.
7 . Under no circumstances is there to be created a block to stream
flow or fish passage.
8 . During construction the new channel shall be isolated from the
flowing stream by pugs at the upstream and downstream ends of
the new channel. The new channel shall be constructed in the dry.
The same process shall be used for the installation of the :Avert.
There shall be no excavation in flowing water. Since the culvert
closest to the post office parking lot needs to be removed prior to
construction of the final bend, a temporary bypass shall be con-
structed diverting the flow so the culvert can be removed. The
final bend then shall be constructed and the temporary bypass
removed and the site returned to pre-project conditions.
1
I
HYDRAULIC PROJECT
APPROVAL
0 October 19 , 1993
(applicant should refer to this date in all correspondence)
PAGE 3 OF 4 PAGES
f APPLICANT NAME CONTROL NUMBER
J Eger, Richard ❑ 01-88290-01
9 . Before water is diverted into the permanent new channel or into the
culvert, all bank protection or armoring shall be completed to pre-
vent erosion. On outside of bends, rocks of not less than one
person size and angular in shape shall be used to armor the bank.
10. Diversions of flow into a new channel shall be accomplished by:
�a� First removing the downstream plug;
b removing the upstream plug; and
kc) closing the :upstream end cf the old channel .
The same process shall be used for the installation of the culvert.
11. Filling of the old channel shall begin from the upstream closure
and the fill material com acted. Water discharging from the fill
shall not adversely impact fish life.
12 . The angle of the structure used to divert the water into the new
channel shall allow a smooth transition of water flow.
SITE RESTORATION:
13 . After completion of the permanent new channel and filling of the
old channel all stream banks shall be revegetated with native
plants adapted to stream banks, such as cottonwood alder willows,
redosier dogwood. Shrubs such as salmonberry shall be established
immediately above high water mark and spaced not more than
three-foot-square spacing thoughout the 15-foot steamside zone.
Trees shall be established every 10 linear feet. Forbs and sedges
shall be established throughout. Cuttings, seedlings or nursery
stock may be used. Plants shall be established before the end
of the next planting season or not later than May 31 , 1994 and shall
be maintained for two years to ensure the survival of 90% of all
plants evenly distributed throughout the streamside zone.
14 . All waste material such as construction debris, silt, excess dirt
or overburden and temporary fill used to provide access resulting
from this project are to be de�osited outside of the streamside zon
in the '.:plands, not In the Wet.and. NC i f� 1 1S a';thnr i ?cri }+v thi c
Approval. This waste material shall be planted with vegetative
cover to prevent future erosion.
MITIGATION:
15 . Prior to diverting the flow the new stream channel shall be
backfilled to a minimum depth of eight inches and shall be composed
of select well-mixed, rounded spawning gravel meeting the
specifications below:
15% 3" to 1-1/2" size range
45% 1-1/2" to 3/4" size range
40% 3/4" to 1/4" size range
or
100% 1-1/2" to 1/4" size range
(fine material less than 1/4" shall not exceed 3% total volume)
I j h y
HYDRAULIC PROJECT
APPROVAL
0 October 19, 1993
(applicant should refer to this date in all correspondence)
PAGE 4 OF 4 PAGES
APPLICANT NAME CONTROL NUMBER
�� Eger, Richard 01-882` 0-01
16. Rocks of not less than one foot in diameter shall be randomly
placed in the channel alternating between mid-channel and bank-
ward placement no further apart tFian a distance equal to the
channel width.
17 . Large, woody debris shall be anchored within the channel or
banks, as directed by the department representative.
18 . If fish may be endangered as a result of this project, all opera-
tions shall cease and contact the biologist listed in provision #2
LOCATION: On Hwy 3 between the Belfair Cafe and the Post Office.
cc: Jason Manassee, Mason County Planning Department
Deb Carnevali, WDW
,.. Ar4PLL of AcccN i ,,}3LE iu = 1 ' - L� I
c
G h G v-�
i oa Ale rti�,
N L f o p of S/ep"e
rr•
S - tt�w•w;a+4
Straer.� No,,r, \Lvlv {+Ia� dE'fPi( D tC.,C.o)ro„�o.+.
�-
-
t,yyL ...n;Qr
..� •1
SOW
o,n�r a�•IeGst .S'' rN,p,Jvnit — ._ :--
��"!��•,te.� A
------- _
--�" Tv o� Slope
Rvp� NaN.e
yScc: .A A
TOe� Tlop� - Top •-� slop/t
yi< #-re¢t --- 1G
14 21{eet----------------H
Are,°. 9 rr.de-
��.
SIeP�:+g 4rPreor4 rood r"^"""9 c✓lveri F)1
Surfpc¢� rJi�C1,�,:.L/o,.d Stnbil nt�nn
WAter S+4bi♦r3cfi+•. a"�Q �y1a.. d .•.nt¢riols .
4Lr4*sic —+r-01
a Mar .•.a•lcrIA(s
`mac t l o P2.•� �¢{eGf
5. Svr�o c¢ r. 1 er a is d
S'fr••,b2tQ5r»�,2n f �1ccfi� G.Iveri-4; gv j TL;r-(�,CC ArMor;.
I
o, C�S•jz c'•r c,..-r.o.,S
Cvl v¢! f 9ra`A.a.,t
Culvert e artwer
{ —�le�spec ;ce-F.ont a�a c'fiL, o��o. .strea invert
M a�er�als b Uf�r.
L Sec- c_CCGPE'roa�l. c���.eri-F�II�I Cu1veri Ue.-�atj I r ��
IT
_- Svr rp l L �r l
a dl ru•,�.�.r.�5 �c•GQ- Y'/�S�r"Foc¢, � - a r••+of�•,
Co(ICLt 'e•' Irec��t�N�CNrf�ofL ( road fVrIUCC ��o�, _�� \ \ S�r� la��i
Rros;q.. aY•d aiena(r e...d _ /
MCrteris(rG dS Cf I
Pe s'Pec�,'ca-J,�..r; i -�_'l"r '�•.� � ' CAI,rtrfi
S2c_ b D Ca -cc, road a-�
rcad tr , s acJ OCA e-
ervsrj).—ct
pir. a.,er+ater;AI spec
A FP Ivor.-} : /i i _ I
/addre•sS �% j
leyul Y4 : Sce. TASp:`...._ Rse:. C c..M•f y : �x�wpl by
w +
SCAT@
4 S
o
S
O
1A88 a
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
P.O. BOX 47600 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7600 • (206)459-6000
April 6, 1993
RECEIVED
Mr. Jason Manassee APR z 1993
Mason County Planning
Post Office Box 578
Shelton, WA 98584 MASON CO. PIAVINING DEPT.
Dear Mr. Manassee:
This letter is my summary of discussions held in the field with you on
March 18, 1993 in Belfair. Al Wald, of the Floodplain Section, Ann
Remsberg of the Wetland Section and I met with you to inspect two sites.
Site #1 was adjacent to the Belfair Post Office and consisted of a small
wetland associated with the creek. Both the wetland and the creek
channel had been partially filled. One of the creek channels had been
routed through a large plastic culvert. Another smaller channel had a
perforated pipe placed in it that may or may not transport water under
the fill to the larger channel adjacent to the wetland.
We determined that the wetland could not be called a wetland associated
with Hood Canal because it did not meet the tests of proximity and
influence. The creek is a tributary to the wetlands associated with Hood
Canal but is too far away and separated by a steep gradient between this
small wetland and the larger wetland complex.
Al commented that the perforated pipe was too small to carry the water
that had previously flowed through the small channel and was likely
causing a backwater effect. He recommended reopening the channel. He
also expressed concern about whether the large plastic culvert that is
taking the main channel flow is sized appropriately for high flow events.
Ann noted that the filling activity that occurred on this site may be a
violation of the Clean Water Act and an Army Corps of Engineers permit
may be needed for that work. Individual wetland fill permits are needed
for any amount of fill into wetlands that the Corps considers to be
adjacent to other waters. If the flow of the creek at that point is 5
cubic feet per second (cfs) or more, the Corps would most likely consider
those wetlands to be adjacent. Al noted that the flow could be close to
5 cfs. The Corps ought to be notified of this activity. The number for
their Seattle regulatory branch is (206) 764-3495.
Site #2 was the Jack Johnson site adjacent to the Byerly site. The
proposal apparently involves placing construction debris on approximately
one acre of upland directly adjacent to a wetland that is considered
associated with Hood Canal.
Mr. Jason Manassee
Page 2
April 7, 1993
Concerns expressed by Ann and Al included the need for a buffer of 50 to
100 feet between the wetland and the landfill. The larger buffer is
strongly recommended given the sandy soils present on the site that could
allow leachate to enter the wetland. Because the wetland is part of a
large, diverse wetland complex, there should be adequate buffers on at
least three sides.
If you have any questions related to this letter or our discussions on
these sites please feel free to call me at (206) 438-7449, Ann Remsberg
at (206) 493-9260 or Al Wald at 206) 438-7419.
SincerelyLn
14 --Kim Van urg
Shoreline Specialist
Shorelands & Coastal Zone
Management Program
KVZ:by
a:b-ltrl-MANASS
cc: Ann Remsberg, Ecology
Al Wald, Ecology