The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSPI2003-00109 - SPI Inspections - 10/14/2004 S°N.STAr, MASON COUNTY r Pn1 oc � DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT S N Planning Division 7 N y ° P O Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584 0� <'°Y (360)427-9670 1864 Site Inspection July 02, 2003 MELODY OLELS 70 E ALDER PL E SHELTON WA 98584 Case No.: SP12003-00109 Parcel No.: 321307590133 Project Description: IS LAND BUILDABLE Dear Applicant: Pursuant to your application, a site pre-inspection (SPI)was performed on your property. Below you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values. In some cases, setbacks for development from shorelines, steep slopes, streams, and wetlands must be included in your specific proposal; these setbacks are included as part of the comments listed below. This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject property. Please contact me at(360) 427-9670, ext.286 if you have questions. Sincerely, 2 i Scott Longanecker Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department 7/2/2003 1 of 3 SP12003-00109 Site Inspection 7/2/2003 Case No.: SP12003-00109 Comments: Pre-inspection for Olels: Rural Residential 5 zoning designation. Standard building setbacks for this zoning are a 25 foot front yard setback, and 20 foot side and rear yard setback. The exception to this is for lots less than one acre and under 100 feet in width. In this case side yard setbacks are equal to 10% of the lot width, but no less than 5 feet. These setbacks are measured from portions of structures over 30 inches above grade such as roof overhangs, and any structure, including heat pumps etc. Other setbacks can apply when critical areas are present such as streams, wetlands, steep slopes etc. Based upon the lot widths (which vary) the sideyard setback would range from 15 - 20 feet depending on the location of the structure. Streams / wetlands: A small wetland area exists near the front of the lot. A determination will need to be made regarding the jurisdictional status and buffer requirements of this wetland area. If it is necessary to work in the buffer to place an access road etc. it is possible to do this through a Mason Environmental Permit process which would evaluate the possible impacts and mitigate for those impacts. Enclosed are the Mason County Wetlands ordinance, wetland consultant list and Mason Environmental Permit application. Also find the County fee ordinance to find applicable permit and review fees. Slopes: Due to slopes adjacent to or within 300 feet of the project a Geological Assessment will need to be done to address slope stability and the other requirements of the enclosed landslide hazard chapter 17.01.100 section E. 4. The report must state that the hazards of the landslide area can be overcome in such a manner as to prevent harm to property and public health and safety, and must also assure the project will cause no significant environmental impact. See Mason County Code 17.01.100, E7. The Geo. Assessment should also address placement of the on-site septic system in relation to slopes, and provide recommedations. Under ordinance 17.01.100 a minimum 50 foot natural vegetated buffer is required from landslide hazard areas (back from the top of slope). This can be reduced based upon the recommendations contained within a geological assessment. It may also be determined by the project engineer, geologist or geo-technical engineer that the area does not meet the definition of a landslide hazard area, in which case a buffer from slopes would not be necessary. 7/2/2003 2 of 3 SP12003-00109 Site Inspection 7/2/2003 Case No.: SP12003-00109 Please review your Geological Assessment prior to submission to ensure that it contains the information required in section E. 4. of the enclosed ordinance (highlighted section). Missing information will result in further delays in the review process. You may want to provide a copy of these requirements to your licensed engineer or geologist. If any grading / excavation is proposed in or near slopes a grading plan will be needed to show any proposed topographical changes, cuts, retaining walls etc. No other critical areas were identified on site. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Thank you. 7/2/2003 3 of 3 SP12003-00109 MASON COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. PRE-INSPECTION APPLICATION 'PLEASE PR;NT $200.00 Fee Required 1. Owner:_ Applicant: m� I0 Alt, Site Address: Applicant Address: —f tAI� I Owner Address: City: ,ke'1+na St WF �- Zip City:_ St Zip Phone:_( q)In l7) gu'-01 chi z— day Phone:_) day Phone:_( evening 2. Parcel No. 3 Parcel No. - Legal Description: L—O+ C ( Planner: GBM RVYJ�rType JnSA� t v l I"YI aC� W A A/Pr-SMP Comp. Pl of Use Water Body 1 p 3. Purpose of Pre- nspection : 1-0Azt!?"Y-Yi-,i v,.I- I l ►'�d� S 4. Use of Building: Q�- 5. Do any of the following exist on or adjacent to property?: slope saltwater❑ lake ❑ river❑ pond ❑'' wetland ❑ seasonal runoff❑ other❑ stream ❑ seasonal creek❑ Directions to Site: OY\ r 0 G Ic nJen If the information is incomplete, then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the original application. Pre-inspection reports remain valid only until development changes occur in the vicinity which affect the lot evaluated in this inspection, or the laws regulating development of the site change after the time of inspection. Applicant Signature: Cy)2 Date: 1,1 1 d 3 If you would like to be on site during inspection,please check here: Return application to: Department of Community Development, Planning Division P.O. Box 279 Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 Please include a $200.00 check or money order payable to Mason County Treasurer When completed, this form becomes part of the parcel file. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Accepted by: Date: Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation to water&property lines: SRGNVoid/MyOo ertsRypedStuff/Pr Impectbn 10-2-2002 Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation to water and property lines: Departmental Review (For Office Use Only) Planning Department Findings: t syfllih... °.)HORT PLAT OF PORT ION E Va OF THE SE 1/4 SEC. 30, T W P. 21 N, RGE, 3 W, W.M, MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON SEPT. 1979 - f e O �\• ad .; EASIrMENTg / 0 co L; i v 2� eti ti• Q . 2 Seller) rthel Richert P. 0. Aox 523 Shelton, We 98584 60 toot easements described under Auditor's Tile No. 366832, roea"m of Mason County, Washington. f` I This in not a survey, r)istances, courses and features are illustrative only. Tracts shall not be used for on-site sewage disposal or dwell!." tructure wlthowt written LRICHERTb the ' ROGER D. LOVITT S ASSOC, S.P.Po. eox els8NELTON, WA 99584 / C-100' eTe•�'s :;2,: MA AV STArt MASON COUNTY o P� A 0 c °N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT > s N Planning Division o Y y P O Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584 ° (360)427-9670 1864 Site Inspection October 14, 2004 STEVE DAGLE 1726 MONROE ST. SHELTON WA 98584 Case No.: SP12003-00109 TO BE KEPT IN THc Parcel No.: 321307590133 PARCEL FILE Project Description: IS LAND BUILDABLE Dear Applicant: 321 , % '7st 01 3 Pursuant to your application, a site pre-inspection (SPI)was performed on your property. Below you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values. In some cases, setbacks for development from shorelines, steep slopes, streams, and wetlands must be included in your specific proposal; these setbacks are included as part of the comments listed below. This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject property. Please contact me at(360) 427-9670, ext. 365 if you have questions. Sincerely, Allan Borden Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department 10/14/2004 1 of 2 SP12003-00109 Site Inspection 10/14/2004 Case No.: SP12003-00109 Comments: Additional site visit made on September 24, 2004: Allan Borden met Steve Dagle (prospective purchaser) on this property to substantiate the findings of the wetland evaluation for the property prepared by Agua Tierra Environmental Consulting on September 17, 2004. The conclusion of the consultant was l the subject wetland area met the characteristics of vegetation (sedge, spires, and willow), soil (Alderwood gavelly sandy loam histosol) and hydrology (saturation and water marks) to be rated as a Category III wetland; but could be exempted from regulation by Resource Ordinance standards due to its size (less than 2,500 sq. ft. area). Due to these facts and to the isolated nature of the subject wetland (a low area with no outlet), staff would confirm that development nearby this wetland would not require buffer and building setbacks; modifying the wetland size by filling would not require a permit. The current wetland area captures runoff from adjacent lands, especially from the road alignment, and this runoff will continue with no area to be stored. It is recommended that some pond or gravel filtration area be created in the vicinity of the current wetland to address this runoff as you developed the property. In this way the road would not be affected by possible runoff water accumulations. 10/14/2004 2 of 2 SP12003-00109