HomeMy WebLinkAboutHabitat Management Plan - HMP Habitat Managment Plan - 11/30/2006 THE WETLAND CORPS -m1_W7�
Wetland Delineation - Habitat Management Plans - Riparian Restoration • Mitigation • Biological Evaluation
LARAMIE HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Parcel#321275400105
Mason County,Washington
Prepared for:
John L. Laramie
8501 Baird Road NE
Olympia,Washington 98516
Prepared by:
Heather Lane and Lee Boad
November,2006
PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com
THE WETLAND CORPS _7W"T
Wetland Delineation • Habitat Management Plans - Riparian Restoration - Mitigation - Biological Evaluation
LARAMIE HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................1
2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ...............................................................................................1
3.0 APPLICABLE SETBACKS..................................................................................................2
4.0 DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT AND SPECIES.................................................................2
5.0 ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS....................................................................................................3
6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES.................................................................................................5
7.0 MONITORING ......................................................................................................................8
8.0 SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................8
Figures
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Site Plan
Figure 3. National Wetland Inventory Map
Figure 4. Department of Natural Resources Water Resource Map
PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com
THE WETLAND CORPS ISO T
Wetland Delineation - Habitat Management Plans - Riparian Restoration - Mitigation • Biological Evaluation
November,2006 Page 1
LARAMIE HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN
60 E. Peebles Court
Shelton,Washington
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The details of a Habitat Management Plan prepared for John L. Laramie for the above referenced
property (Parcel No. 321275400105) are discussed in full in this report. The site address is 60 E
Peebles Court, Shelton, Washington, 98588. The site is found in the SE 1/4 of Section 27
Township 21 North, Range 3 West (See Figure 1, Site Vicinity Map).
The purpose of this Habitat Management Plan (HMP) is to address potential impacts resulting
from the proposed construction of a 1192 square foot single-family residence (SFR) and 450
square foot access road within a lot encompassed by the regulated buffer of a fishbearing stream.
The stream meets criteria for a Type 3 stream, requiring 150 feet of undisturbed buffer with an
additional 15-foot building setback. The SFR is proposed 78 feet from the stream at the nearest
point. The septic system already exists onsite and is located on the northeast side of the lot. The
objectives of this HMP are as follows:
■ To evaluate the potential adverse effects to critical area functions as well as fish and wildlife
habitat resulting from the establishment of the SFR and access road within the Type 3 stream
buffer. Emphasis is placed on the possible loss of habitat for any listed species found to be
residing in the vicinity of the parcel.
■ To identify possible mitigation measures that could be implemented to offset the adverse effects
resulting from the establishment of the SFR and access road collectively occupying an area of
1642 square feet within the Type 3 stream buffer.
2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The ownership is less than one acre in size, roughly rectangular in shape, and oriented northwest
to southeast. The stream meanders within the southern portion of the parcel, with the associated
150-foot stream buffer encompassing the entire lot. The stream flows westerly through the
parcel, and drains into Cranberry Creek approximately 500 feet west of the ownership. The lot is
accessed by E Peebles Court to the north and is bordered to the west, east, and south by single-
family residential lots of similar size and shape.
A mobile home was removed from the portion of the parcel north of the stream several years ago.
This area has been maintained as an open area. Vegetation throughout the majority of the
northern portion of the parcel is comprised of herbaceous and shrub species including Scotch
PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com
Laramie HNil?
November, 2006
Page 2
broom, Himalayan blackberry, and lawngrasses. Vegetation south of the stream has been left
well in tact and contains an overstory of primarily Douglas fir with an understory comprised of
salal and sword fern. Topography within the lot is generally flat, with a low gradient slope
toward the type 3 stream.
3.0 APPLICABLE SETBACKS
The project site is within the jurisdiction of Mason County. Ordinance 17.01.110 identifies Fish
and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas adopted by Mason County.
The applicable setback for this project is as follows:
Habitat Type Buffer Building Setback from Buffer
Type 3 Stream 150' 15'
4.0 DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT AND SPECIES
4.1 Puget Sound Chinook(Oncorhynchus tshawytsha)-Threatened
Listed as threatened since March 24, 1999 adult Puget Sound Chinook spawn in several rivers
and streams flowing into Puget Sound. The type 3 fishbearing stream is a tributary to Cranberry
Creek. Cranberry Creek was recently excluded form NOAA's Fisheries Northwest Region
Critical Habitat Designations for West Coast Salmon and Steelhead in Washington in August,
2005. Although the stream may be accessible to Puget Sound Chinook, suitable habitat is not
present due to the limited size and lack of sufficient flow during the spawning period. This
project is not likely to have adverse impacts on Puget Sound Chinook due to the lack of suitable
habitat and proposed mitigation. No impacts to water quality are predicted with proposed
mitigation.
4.2 Bull Trout(Salvelinus malma)-Threatened
Bull trout typically inhabit very cold, clear headwater streams at high elevations that are
supported by snowmelt. For spawning and early rearing, bull trout require loose, clear gravel,
relatively free of fine sediments.
Although the substrate may be suitable for Bull Trout spawning, the lower elevation and
relatively high temperature of the type 3 stream is not suitable habitat for Bull Trout. Given the
lack of suitable habitat and no documented occurrence the proposed project is not likely to have
any adverse impacts on bull trout.
4.3 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)- Threatened
Habitat areas associated with Bald Eagle include uneven aged coniferous stands with some old-
growth components. Nests are typically constructed in larger trees with dead or broken tops
providing an unobstructed view of nearby water. Snags and trees with exposed lateral limbs, or
dead tops are used as perches and defense stations.
PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com
Laramie HMP
November,2006
Page 3
There are no documented Bald Eagle nesting sites in the vicinity of the project area. The area
proposed for the SFR and access road is devoid of any overstory components. Recommended
overstory plantings recommended in Section 6.3 should improve the potential for use of the site
by Bald Eagle in the future by enhancing overstory habitat within the site. As no important
habitat features are to be removed,this project will have no adverse impacts on bald eagles.
4.4 Marbled Murrelet(Brachyramphus marmoratus)-Threatened
Marbled Murrelets are typically associated with coastal habitats and nest in old-growth forests.
Murrelets may fly as far as 50 miles inland to nest, however the average distance is roughly 5-
miles from nest to sea. It is only during the summer breeding months that they are commonly
found inland. During non-nesting seasons they live at sea. Murrelets require tall mossy trees in
coniferous old growth forests with cavities on thick branches where they can construct a cup nest
20-40 meters above the forest floor.
Murreletts have been documented laying eggs on rocky ground habitats only when a sufficient
forest is unavailable. There are no documented nesting sites surrounding the project site. No
potential nesting trees are within the project area. This project will likely have no adverse impact
on Marbled Murrelet given there are no documented nesting sites or potential nesting trees in the
vicinity of the project area.
5.0 ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS
The project lies within the regulated buffer of a Type 3 stream. Project scale in the protected area
is as follows:
Development Type Habitat Type Project scale
Single Family Residence Type 3 Stream Buffer 1192 sq. ft.
Gravel Access Road Type 3 Stream Buffer 450 sq. ft
Total Type 3 Stream Buffer 1642 sq. ft.
PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com
Laramie HMP'
November, 2006
Page 4
i`
r
k � 1
,.�.
Photo 1. Proposed building site.
5.1 Vegetation Disturbance
The access road and SFR are proposed in a portion of the lot that has been maintained as an open
area interspersed with Scotch broom and Himalayan blackberry. No native vegetation will be
removed for the proposed project. With recommended planting of native vegetation described in
Section 6.3, the project will likely have a net benefit of vegetation abundance and diversity
within the lot.
5.2 Designated Critical Habitat for Salmonids
Designated Critical Habitat for Salmonids is not within the vicinity of the project area.
Therefore, none of the proposed actions are likely to destroy or adversely modify designated
critical habitat. Actions described in this plan are not expected to jeopardize the continued
existence of any listed species.
5.3 Noise Pollution
A slight increase in noise from construction activities is likely to occur during daylight
construction hours. No nesting sites are located within the radii of concern that would be
impacted by noise associated with the establishment of the SFR and access road.
5.4 Temporary Increase in Sediment and Turbidity During Construction
The proposed work has the potential to temporarily increase turbidity and suspended sediment
within the project area. Best Management Practices have been recommended in Section 6.2 to
minimize the adverse effects to sediment supply and turbidity during project implementation.
5.5 Light and Glare
PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com
Laramie HMI'
November,2006
Page 5
The proposed project will result in an increase in light and glare commonly associated with
residential construction and land use. The majority of wildlife activity likely occurs south of the
stream, where the vegetative buffer has been left in tact. The vegetative buffer to be enhanced
between the proposed project and the stream is expected to shield the majority of the stream from
increased light and glare. No impacts to the use of the site by wildlife species is likely to result
from light and glare associated with this project.
6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES
6.1 Preservation of Critically Important Plants
The remainder of the Type 3 stream buffer, outside of the proposed SFR and access road, will be
preserved and remain in tact or enhanced with native vegetation. The proposed SFR is located
78 feet from the stream at the nearest point, this is the greatest possible distance from the stream
given the limited size of the lot.
6.2 Best Management Practices
Recommended Best Management Practices for this project are as follows:
• Perform excavation and site preparation work during dry weather.
• Install silt fencing between the work area and the stream to prevent erosion and siltation of
waters.
• Minimize amount of erodible soils at any given time to the maximum extent feasible.
• Check all equipment daily for leaks. Refueling and lubrication of equipment should occur
off site. Do not store any fuel, lubricants, chemicals, or hazardous substances outside
overnight within the project area.
• Do not apply any chemicals when there is a possibility of rain.
• Comply with all permits and requirements of governing authority.
6.3 Enhancement Recommendations
It is recommended that a 50-foot strip of the stream buffer, parallel to the stream, between the
SFR and the Type 3 stream be enhanced with native vegetation. The enhancement of a
moderately dense forested and shrub community within the suggested portion of the open area is
likely to improve wildlife utilization and riparian function of the site. The area selected as the
mitigation zone occupies an area of approximately 4,500 square feet.
Native Plantings
To offset impacts associated with the establishment of the SFR and access road and the displaced
stream buffer, it is recommended that the mitigation zone be enhanced with native plants. The
following species are recommended:
Trees: western red cedar(Thuja plicata)
Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii)
Shrubs: Oregon grape (Mahonia nervosa)
PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com
Laramie HMP
November,2006
Page 6
salal (Gaultheria shallon)
evergreen huckleberry (Vaccinium ovatum)
nootka rose(Rosa nutkana)
salmonberry(Rubus spectabilis)
Pacific Willow(Salix lusida)
Hooker willow(Salix hookeriana)
Scouler willow(Salix scouleriana)
Sitka willow(Salix sitchensis)
beaked hazelnut(Corylus cornuta)
Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis)
oceanspray(Holodiscus discolor)
Pacific ninebark (Physocarpus capitatus)
California black currant(gibes bracteosum)
western thimbleberry(Rubus parviflorus)
red elderberry(Sambucus racemosa)
Ferns: sword fern(Polystichum munitum)
Groundcover: kinnikinnik (Arcostaphylus uva-ursi)
coastal strawberry(Fragaria chiloensis)
Native Planting Guidelines
It is recommended that plantings be installed within the identified mitigation zone to achieve the
following densities. A minimum of 1 tree species, five shrub species and one groundcover
species from the above list are recommended.
trees- 10' on center
shrubs-5' on center
ferns- 3' on center
herbaceous groundcover—6 inches on center
These densities will provide a moderately dense, structurally diverse plant community within the
mitigation zone.
PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com
Laramie HMI'
November,2006
Page 7
w ,
y
S4. .' ..- .98i � .� � �N y ✓✓ ua .. LAY'-.��m�� tiYf
R Photo 2. Mitigation zone.
Typically, planting should occur during winter dormancy. The optimum time for planting is
during February and March, however, the need to complete the project in a timely manner may
call for planting to occur outside optimum time periods. A monitoring program is recommended
to insure project effectiveness.
5.2 Invasive Species Removal & Prevention
Within the stream buffer, Scotch broom and Himalayan blackberry are interspersed within the
open area. Himalayan blackberry and Scotch broom are invasive shrubs that threaten the health
and success of native plants. In addition to the enhancement recommendations described above,
it is recommended that the Himalayan blackberry be removed from the stream buffer to avoid
further invasion and allow native vegetation to persist more abundantly. This may be done either
manually or with the use of heavy equipment. Herbicides should not be used due to the
proximity to the stream. The Bradley Method is one common approach to manually removing
invasive species (Fuller and Barbe, 1985). This approach consists of hand removal starting in
areas of lesser weed infestation, and working in toward the worst stands.
Invasive species such as Himalayan blackberry, Scotch broom, Canadian thistle, fireweed, reed
canary grass, Japanese knotweed, and English Ivy may invade the buffer and mitigation zone.
These species are stubborn competitors for light and nutrients and limit success of native plants.
Invasive species should be removed from the buffer should they invade. Persistent cutting during
the growing season is sufficient to offset the rhizomes of invasive species if they become a
problem.
PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com
Laramie HW '
November, 2006
Page 8
7.0 MONITORING
Monitoring of the site will begin the first fall following native species plantings and maintained
on a seasonal basis. The information gathered will provide the following: 1) condition of
reintroduced plant species; 2) the use of the site by wildlife species; 3) any disturbance caused by
the development and its effect on the protected zone and associated aquatic habitat; 4) any
occurrence of exotic species within the mitigation zone; 5) any corrective measures that may be
deemed necessary to provide desired conditions. This monitoring will be in effect for the
duration of three years. The information gathered will be provided in an annual report and
submitted to the Director of Mason County Department of Community Development.
8.0 SUMMARY
This report addresses the effects of the establishment of a SFR and access road, occupying a total
building footprint of 1642 square feet within the regulated buffer of a Type 3 stream. Best
Management Practices are recommended to insure no negative impacts to the stream. Mitigation
recommendations include native plant enhancement of 4500 square feet of open area in
proximity to the stream, and invasive species removal within the entire stream buffer within the
lot. No impacts to water quality or stream habitat are predicted.
Mitigation Measures, and Best Management Practices, have been identified to avoid, minimize,
and mitigate for impacts associated with proposed construction.
We trust this information is sufficient for your needs at this time. Thank you for choosing The
Wetland Corps as your environmental consultant. If you have any questions feel free to call.
Respectfully submitted,
Lee Boad
Senior Ecologist
I3eather Lane
Staff Wetland &Natural Resource Specialist
PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com
REFERENCES
Audobon WatchList. http;//audobon2.org/webapp/watchlist/viewSpecies.
Fuller, T.C. and G.D. Barbe. 1985. The Bradley Method of eliminating exotic plants from natural
reserves. Fremontia 13(2):24-26.
Knutson, K.L., and V.L. Naef. 1997. Management recommendations for Washington's priority
habitats: riparian. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia. 181 pp.
Native Plants for Kitsap County. ftp://kcwppub3.co.kitsap.wa.us/pw/sw/Native
Policy of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Western Washington Treaty Tribes
Concerning Wild Salmonids. Adopted by Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission,1997.
Washington State Department of Ecology; William Symington Lake Habitat Analysis. 1998.
PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: boad40@peoplepc.com
topotone
agytyi*!)- W -Mark fi• ! - ( //,� i
v_ ►kqn t, t ♦ Yf -
ilk
BaMrt
Aff
A.
14,
vnbelry.._ Lake .ta-L
-- - _ .P slit
25
N
Mason Lake Drive
i r ,
J
JJ r
y
1 x♦
Approximate Parcel
low--- ;. Location
.
�`. '-: 77 :l�
_AR714:�a'�✓n
FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP
Project Name: Laramie HMP
Location: Lake Limerick,Washington
Project: TWCO6-W310
Client: John Laramie
TfH WETLAND CORPS Date: 11/06
T1 e Wetland Corps Figure 2
Laramie Habt at Managemertt plan Ste Map
Parcel#3212'75400105
e04eh 5eptic
30'
150' 202'
proposed Access load y proposed 5ingle Famd�
00, x 6)
Mitigation Zone
8' a
4,500 s ft) fype 3 Sveam I�
scale: I 30'-0''
NIXPF0514 A
}t
iie• n , P5541C
4�PEM1C' PSS!EIMCH PF04A' A PF04C�
N PSS!E7�1C
Map Legend f
1C ' PU®Hi j
b GONUSCities 0 PF1
CONU8 States 100K
Lower 48 Wledand Po1Y9orm PFOG ¢,
Eatoar+ne and Marine Uespwatrr so PEh41 H
PF(l1 C sto
�..
Wow,"and Marine WSQand �i
.,, �y
Freshwate.Bmar sat Wetland€ t t.
'�.., f reshwatar Forestedl8hrub Wetland ,r - ��•
Freshwate.Pond ti
PUBfNH P A 8 4 H
take EL;d PF01 GFi:
Other - M! Ssll� 43�.#1.1_.�i 3
�� tiirerine L1FfIUf1
Digital
s➢..� 12AB4H 11UBhIFt;
L1UBI : P551i4C } SEP
PF05C•
L2USCH
Approximate
Parcel Location
PER91A
00"
P F0411 C
'�'PSS'IA
!�tapper
adapted from NWI Figure 3 National Wetland Inventory Map website Section 27 Township 21 N Range 03W
FIGURE 3 NWI MAP
Project Name: Laramie HMP
Location: Lake Limerick,Washington
Project: TWC06-W310
—' — Client: John Laramie
TTH WETLAND CORPS Date: 11/06
Note: No mapped wetlands in project vicinity
1 26 +702028 120 1702122
e
9 Lake Limerick _.
28 006 02100
20-
1702102
y Approximate
parcel
location
+701 6 +7 088 701180 17011
no d d f
STRE_k\IS
SOILS
Stream Water Type 1->4:a:.mde
- l H•;dtic Sails
�N Stream T±pe:Jsnorm yEas!side; HizWv Unstable
Stream Water Type;-'(lFe.;sid>_; Hialilr Erodible
l! Stream T•.:-e Unknorm(We:side) 4h1 Uu-tabie&
Ha-z Erodible
Water Tape Change � No Data or Gravel Pits
FIGURE 4 DNR STREAM MAP
Project Name: Laramie HMP
Location: Lake Limerick,Washington
- VTIr— Project: TWC06-W310
Client: John Laramie
THE 11TTLAND CORY�S Date: 11/06
Note: Mapped"F"stream in project vicinity.