The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSPI2006-00220 - SPI Inspections - 8/31/2006 ON STATE MASON COUNTY o Py A o N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT > S N Planning Division IP o Y ti P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 �0 (360)427-9670 1864 Site Inspection August 31, 2006 TO BE KEPT IN THE JAMES MARTIN PARCEL FILE 441 E BALMORAL WAY SHELTON WA 98584 Case No.: SP12006-00220 - 321 Z-1 Parcel No.: 321275300166 Project Description: Feasibility Dear Applicant: Pursuant to your application, a site pre-inspection (SPI)was performed on your property. Below you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values. In some cases, setbacks for development from shorelines, steep slopes, streams, and wetlands must be included in your specific proposal; these setbacks are included as part of the comments listed below. This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject property. Please contact me at(360) 427-9670, ext. 363 if you have questions. Sincerely, Kell McAbov Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department 8/31/2006 1 of 3 SP12006-00220 Site Inspection 8/31/2006 Case No.: SP12006-00220 Comments: Pre-inspection for James Martin to determine the feasibility of building a single-family residence on this lot in relation to Cranberry Creek, a Type 1 water body regulated by the Mason County Shoreline Master Program and Resource Ordinance. Zoning: The zoning designation for the site is Rural Residential 5 (RR5). Standard setbacks for this zoning are a 25-foot front yard setback and a 20-foot setback for side and back yards. The front yard refers to the lot line adjacent to the property access, including access easements. The setbacks are measured from structures above grade such as roof overhangs (roof gutters), and other structures/appurtenances, including heat pumps etc. When the lot width is less than 100 feet, setbacks would equal 10% of the lot width. An administrative variance can be applied for to get a reduction in the required setbacks (minimum of 5 feet for sides, minimum of 10 feet for front and rear) if the lot meets certain criteria. Other setbacks can apply when critical areas are present, see below. Height limit per Mason County Development Regulations 1.04.224.0 is 35 feet. Geological/landslide hazards: Any slope higher than 10 feet, over 15% (8.5 degrees) grade and within 300 feet of proposed development will require a Geotechnical Assessment to evaluate slope stability on and near the site. The assessment must meet the requirements of the Mason County Resource Ordinance (MCRO) section 17.01.100 EA. The assessment must also state that the hazards of the landslide area can be overcome in such a manner as to prevent harm to property and public health and safety, and must also assure the project will cause no significant environmental impact. See MCRO 17.01.100, E7. A Geotechnical Report may be needed if through a Geotechnical Assessment it is determined necessary, or if slopes are in excess of 40% (21.8 degrees) See MCRO 17.01,100 E. This lot has slopes in excess of 40% (approximately 47% as measured in the field) and would therefore require a Geotechnical Report submitted with any future building application. Streams: Cranberry Creek runs southerly through and near the rear property line to the east. Cranberry Creek is a Type I stream and requires a 150' buffer plus a 15' building setback for a total of 165' per Mason County Resource Ordinance 17.01.110 Table 3. The steep slopes and heavy vegetation made it difficult to measure accurately in the field. However, using aerial photos and 8/31/2006 2 of 3 SP12006-00220 Site Inspection 8/31/2006 Case No.: SP12006-00220 measuring from the stream to a point 165' toward the front property line, it appears as though there may be another 50' of property to the edge of the road easement. It is possible that a residence can be placed in this location without the necessitation of a Resource Ordinance Variance. Please note that this does not take into account the location of septic/drainfield. A Mason Environmental Permit will be required to place any septic components within the 150' creek buffer. General process: Proposals for future site development must include a site plan showing all building setbacks from property lines, easements and any critical areas (slopes greater than 15%, streams, wetlands, shorelines & floodplains) for building permit application submittal. Specific development standards contained in County Codes may be found at the County web address http://www.co.mason.wa.us. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Thank you. 8/31/2006 3 of 3 SP12006-00220 a • t • Or MASON COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. PRE-INSPECTION APPLICATION $205 PL!?ASc PRINT Fee Required 'I-7 1. Owner: � � ��G Applicant: Site Address: �� jS� l{,�� . ;� Applicant Address: Owner Address: City: St Zip City: St Zip SY Phone:( day Phone:( ) day - Phone:(____) evening Planner: Email Address: SMP G _Co .Plan AA&Aype of Use S Water Body 2. Parcel No. - - Parcel No. Legal Description: } 3. Purpose of Pre-In pection: o S SLU)MttlD 4. Use of building: `�gt. 5. Do any of the following exist on or adjacent to property?: slope( saltwater( ) lake ) river pond( ) wetland( ) seasonal runoff( ) other stream W seasonal creek( ) Directions to Site: If the information is incomplete, then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the original application. Pre-inspection reports remain valid only until development changes occur in the vicinity which affect the lot evaluated in this inspection, or the laws regulating development of the site change after the time of inspection. Applicant Signature: Date: Is f Ijyou would like to be on site during inspection,please check here: __ Return application to: Department of Community Development, Planning Division P.O. Box 186 C� Shelton,WA 98584 (360)427-9670 Please include a$205.00 check or money order payable to Mason County Treasurer When completed, this form becomes part of the parcel file. p� FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Accepted by: Date: D MORE ON BACK SIDE IAPLANNINGWAOPRE-INSPECTION Revised: 01/17/06 Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation to critical areas (slopes, streams, lakes, wetlands, etc.) existing improvements, as well as property lines. APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED WITHOUT ADEQUATE ILUSTRATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT.' Departmental Review (For Office Use Only) Planning Department Findings: P o-o� ZAP A � 1<Y L t s•t (� rt n n l0 7�'H4 vL �w��ts�►��jJ S Pt !mil w�aoGo /56 S25/20141` 0 Case Activity Lisiting ' . 5,3aa 8:57:33AM lip; Case#: SPI2006-00220=t� w, M ql'P;,(l•�d�coo.ve nd�d y�, 3�►�l— 55 —00 c(a rP Q Assigned Done Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Hold Disp To By Updated Updated By SPIA010 Application Received 8/17/2006 8/17/2006 None DONE KKK 8/17/2006 KKK SPIA100 Site Inspection 8/17/2006 8/31/2006 None DONE KJM KJM 8/31/2006 KJM given to Kell on 8/17/2006.ahb Site inspected by KJM on 8/31/06.See field notes. SPIA600 SPI Letter-Field Review 8/31/2006 None DONE KJM 8/31/2006 KJM Pre-inspection fo James Martin o determine the feasibility of building a single-family residence on this lot in relation to Cranberry Creek,a Type I water body regulated by the Mason County Shoreline Master Program an esource Ordinance. Zoning:The zoning designation for the site is Rural Residential 5(RR5).Standard setbacks for this zoning are a 25-foot front yard setback and '-f of set ck r s' __,... y ds.The front yard refers to the lot line adjacent to the property access,including access easements.The setbacks are measured from structures above grade such as roof rh s(rclof gu ers, h t tures/appurtenances, including heat pumps etc.When the lot width is less than 100 feet,setbacks would equal 10%of the lot width. ; �R�i An administrative variance can be applied for to get a reduction in the required setbacks(minimum of 5 feet for sides,minimum of 10 feet for frt an rear if th lot — rtain eria Other setbacks can apply when critical areas are present,see below. V Height limit per Mason County Development Regulations 1.04.224.0 is 35 feet. R Geological/landslide hazards:An slope higher than 10 feet,over 15% 8.5 degrees)grade and within 300 feet of proposed development will re ire a eothni luate slope stability on Y P g ( g )g P P P �� P tY and near the site.The assessment must meet the requirements of the Mason County Resource Ordinance(MCRO)section 17.01.100 EA. The assessment must also state that the hazards of the landslide area can be overcome in such a manner as to prevent harm to property and public health and safety,and must also assure the project will cause no significant environmental impact.See MCRO 17.01.100,ET A Geotechnical Report may be needed if through a Geotechnical Assessment it is determined necessary,or if slopes are in excess of 40%(21.8 degrees)See MCRO 17.01.100 E. This lot has slopes in excess of 40%(approximately 47%as measured in the field)and would therefore require a Geotechnical Report submitted with any future building application. Streams:Cranberry Creek runs southerly through and near the rear property line to the east.Cranberry Creek is a Type I stream and requires a 150'buffer plus a 15'building setback for a total of 165'per Mason County Resource Ordinance 17.01.110 Table 3. The steep slopes and heavy vegetation made it difficult to measure accurately in the field.However,using aerial photos and measuring from the stream to a point 165'toward the front property line,it appears as though there may be another 50'of property to the edge of the road easement.It is possible that a residence can be placed in this location without the necessitation of a Resource Ordinance Variance.Please note that this does not take into account the location of septic/drainfield. A Mason Environmental Permit will be required to place any septic components within the 150'creek buffer. General process:Proposals for future site development must include a site plan showing all building setbacks from property lines,easements and any critical areas(slopes greater than 15%,streams,wetlands, shorelines&floodplains)for building permit application submittal. Specific development standards contained in County Codes may be found at the County web address http://www.co.mason.wa.us. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Thank you. t 0/q Cv-rx,t`4c q 90 —Fs 3 P-;L- Page 1 of 1 CaseActivity..rpt God �, N'vvf-41 Zis'-q �vti►,n ;.�o ►4 7"-4 5l� r�.61.��.�� 9/25/2 Cas n _ 0.14 vt u.� , ase #: SWG2014-00138 _ —� `-"'`�' sl�- wa,e �C,C�Sv 9:00:48AM C L�7 3 a 1 a-t-15--->-oa►4-7 27 15(13 131 ?L41hG 0-1, 4 r C". moo rQZr Assigned Done ki Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Hold Disp To By Updated Updated By SWGB200 Design Review 7/15/2014 None FAIL ALL' 7/23/2014 ALI' See Letter SWGA100 Permit Received 7/15/2014 7/15/2014 None DONE KKK 7/15/2014 KKK SWGA200 Design Received 7/15/2014 7/15/2014 None DONE KKK 7/15/2014 KKK SWGB100 Septic Permit Review 7/15/2014 7/15/2014 None DONE ALP ALP 7/23/2014 ALP Gravelly Sandy Loam to 36 in. Gravelly Loamy Sand to 35 in. SWGB106 Design Review Cover Letter 7/23/2014 None DONE ALP 7/23/2014 ALP Jim, You have not shown Cranberry Creek on the plot plan. You will need to verify setbacks from Planning Department and resubmit a new plot plan showing creek location and drainfield meeting the required setbacks. Also,your design package is missing a cross-section for the Septic and Pump tank. Please include 3-4 copies of all changes. If you have any questions you can call me. Grace Miller is the planner in that area,her extension is 360. SWGA750 Documents Received 8/14/2014 None DONE ALP 8/14/2014 ALP Rec'd one set of revised plot plan showing creek,this was done by installer. SWGB106 Design Review Cover Letter 8/14/2014 None DONE ALP 8/14/2014 ALP Jim,I received your updated plot plan. There is no stamp on these plans or cross-sections for the tanks like we discussed. Also as said in first letter,please provide 3 copies of all drawings. SWGA750 Documents Received 8/20/2014 None DONE ALP 8/20/2014 ALP Revised drawings submitted SWGB200 Design Review 8/20/2014 8/20/2014 None FAIL ALP 8/20/2014 ALP see letter Page 1 of 2 CaseActivity..rpt a Case Activity Listing 9/25/2Q14 9:00:48AM Case#: SWG2014-00138 lip, Assigned Done Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Hold Disp To By Updated Updated By SWGB106 Design Review Cover Letter 8/20/2014 None DONE ALP 8/20/2014 ALP Jim, I have received your new plot plans. It does not meet planning requirements or the Onsite 100 ft setback.I have spoken with Grace Miller and she is requiring a Planning Pre-inspection for this lot due to the septic system components in relation to cranberry creek. This inspection should also help the applicant with any future building permit. If primary or reserve is to be located within the 100 ft setback a waiver will be required. SWGA200 Design Received 9/16/2014 9/16/2014 None DONE ALP 9/17/2014 ALP Rec'd updated site plan. After talking with Jim Hunter,he had not visited the site prior to creek issues. He says he has now fully anchored in creek and all components meets the 100 ft planning setback. SWGB200 Design Review 9/17/2014 9/17/2014 None PASS ALP 9/17/2014 ALP see cover letter for conditions SWGB106 Design Review Cover Letter 9/17/2014 None DONE ALP 9/17/2014 ALP Pump tanks over 1000 gallons require two access openings. Trenches no deeper than 7"on downslope side/11"on upslope side. All components(including tanks and primary/reserve areas)must be located outside 100 ft setback from cranberry creek(as per planning GMiller). Page 2 of 2 CaseActivity..rpt PLOT PLAN Mailing Address �-- Home #_ Q)(od) y3a.-qTJ�N Work # `'aS a5\ tom Cell # aS3 aso - 30s � Property Location L T K� \,01 k . . 1 Cv Legal Address TS R 5ec Tax Lot # me�� County, State of THE INFORMATION ON THIS PLOT PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED AND REVIEWED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER WHO BY SIGNING BELOW:1)ACKNOWLEDGES AND ACCEPTS FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS.2)IS RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SITE TAKE PLACE IIJ CONFORMANCE WITH THIS PLAN:3)WILL SCALE V ESTABLISH ALL THE CORNER IRON5,LOT LINES AND CODE-REQUIRED SETBACKS REQUIRED OF = THIS PROPERTY.ANY CHANGE(S)TO THIS PLAN MUST BE PRE-APPROVED BY THE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES WITH JURISDICTION. THE MORTGAGE LENDER AND THE CONTRACTOR AND DOCUMENTED. p) 1� � ) 0 OWNER SIGNATURE DATE OWNER SI6NATURE DATE Aa o 5c) I P sC 1 . I� SL ,• 1 i , p 0 0 / fY N (N IN K ° Q Op 101 701�701\•01 901�i01 !01`MI MM 011 111 all till 911 tll LII al •11 NI lil Al NI fil NI NI / La/I `N Y '• 00 f fR p1 f ( Yr OfG I Pill, SaN �•. dt' 1 o / to aw ui` .a ou a °a oa fa °a 2 o ynt al � al «I La NI ml I Cp�mIZ K1t0914a+��w�°^a°"�t••t ,J ¢ rqr $��R ls' a a•w a +� �, /e Iy o��1t let w N L Y Ifl //It a 0YN � � � 4 •[Y rrt e • < p(I`^ AO ul ,al w to 3 w� 9a 06 au Ng y�` a4L, � t yO p e Of 0� N; • O/ t 4 P 41 3 V Q ry 1 �� 0,1 Ne � •LI M • � S 4 ��N14 (a.°°a oq io e7 d Otl°4 P yiY o p ••L p 4 O4 �ue1 �/ag ' b�CI 4 04`� Nip j� ° ]N 4 Q•all p1 fY7i° 4' oy if1 4 (7 a �� a• f r'e O � q otia a>a ro od w a o u 4 <,oN ax o �aw N 9os 4 ° `� •.�yn �+1 7 q' ld a1 � 4 tY L O L • 0ti4� al e tot •e4 q d °N 4 ti�t0i �'a Q `r S" Y `r 1. °r<' a �•c °'�J♦< rq, ° o� � S,LJ r a� � ` ' s�.. O ? N,c• »,.' °a, i q ,N°'" `� s�es ; °� � ~ u „ � . _• •�. x yr tl :C I(o1 - _ O 'f E a � ra'ss�' °.> '' 41 °� t. / r.Yy O ° E y �r Y y'1 t, y<'» •� 'p�,,' a "*' LI o �d'`a •7 D.° � � r. Ef :� E �' � �. Ir' `•�.+ V` .. p "v a � �;N 0. °<p "ti �° t. ,I'I y i .?+n• s <4 el- � o n ail, o u9' �oe4 (d 6 • °,•N � ��.lu. rye. 0a's • tt/ • '' �y � � . 1 � L .� y _ c Y. ase tag^ �I O o fm • A O j qQ'. y Z r Ir a t � C, ° 9 °2 pau o•a O$Lt � �. • Y• '� � a" ! �.• Y y. .ew ." } w. !i IP DID 2 �.•�tl � � or� >to � J$« q 4 �. ti 1>t �.. .e • � •� Q � "! t a ',a ,a La'4 A� a.••.' �.°` � � a 1�� 1C. �,I �e'�'"' � •wl ?µ �' 4rN�< Iq, o /rlr•a » ac a trzQd4 , s e i sy 4� y 1��- I o ee LI 64 j �, D A Q T M O O Q D R>" i • �� 7 Q rbe �` g' a � � +'� �=-. •y fos � ,. llil �• "� nY ?d O c1• Pf, 4' .e fr<k .� ps• K. r ' F r .,. . � a.. <`� Y 4 set pr +r,. r 0 r ao`[. ° oen } a= ' -- <d � Z i'"t. ."" u'ol de•s' �4" y R� < $ -fir• I �`_ J _ ♦ • , lei +? * �_;: !`va o` _ ti .a ,. a s<I _ �- &e ! �' ', 3 f = r e �Wv\��J\J I/'�'E `/ � /N)' °< s`,s � ` �` �e ort h �•e L l l { rp.' ;rb. , Ye. r/L M ApR N a C• tie � �� t9° i�. c,. I �4j,elf °.sc Q _ ° � a T'—�� sr.• /°•O' �N°. roi.° aro. Y o c - 2 N - � a` x _ •. P O ♦ TpO•a �• Y _E �e/ro.x'v/b.�° /m.p'° x /N � "'`\ f< � i • <..4 t/. f L O Q Ou,.4 Y M E R O A DHp �� All y <5 s c; pYl 7'�• ?ct i g D• �— •4 1 �J "JI woZl♦a+�I�,' QI� �I < R _ e A 't S F� t� C Nol,t A