Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGeoTech Report Review for Slope Investigation Report - PLN General - 8/6/1996 MASON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER Swit ,WuImptm 96M81 DATE: August 6, 1996 INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS TO: Randy Neff, DCD -Planner FROM: Alan A. Tahja, P/W- Co. Hydr. Engr. SUBJ: Geo-Tech Report Review NAME: Manke Lumber Co. SP - Theler's Home& Garden Trcts MDNS 96-101 Randy, The Geo-Tech assessment prepared for Manke Lumber Company's proposed short plat in the Theler Home& Garden Tracts in Belfair appears to adequately address stability issues relating to this property. The recommendations made by Mr. Hal Parks should be made conditions of approval for this proposal. Sin erely, Al An A. Tahja File: H:\WP\GEO\REVIEWS\MNKE-BLF.AIR August 5, 1996 To: Jerry Hauth/Alan Tahja From: Randy Neff 1661;12 RE: Geo-tech Assessment for Manke Lumber Co. Jerry & Alan: D.C.D. received this geo-tech assessment for the Manke Short Plat. Would you please review and comment on this assessment. Thanks for all your help. SQ 'V480N COUNTY go ND r SLOPE INVESTIGATION REPORT BELFAIR SHORTPLAT Parcel # 123325000085 For Manke Lumber Company Shelton WA By Geotechnical Testing Laboratory July, 1996 r G EOTECHNICAL TESTING LABORATORY MANKE LUMBER CO. INC. 926 FAIRMOUNT AVE. SHELTON, WA 98584 Attn: Harry Rydell Re: Manke Subdivision Mason Co.,WA Gentlemen: This letter presents the results of our slope stability and soils investigation regarding the above referenced site in Belfair, Washington. Tile existing site comprises two lots, identified as Lot A and Lot B. The relief on Lot A was gentle with a I vertical to 4 horizontal angle; Lot B has a I vertical to I horizontal angle, with a stream near the base of the slope. No buildings currently occupy either site. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION PROGRAM The subsurface exploration program consisted of a reconnaissance and observation of the lots. Information from our files was reviewed. Hal Parks,Engineering Geologist, collected soil samples from soil log holes previously dug on the lots. The soil strata observed on the slope profiles were from spot locations across the site and on the slope. The soil on the site was uniform and consistent. It is mapped by the USDA Soil Conservation Service as an Everett Gravely Loamy Sand. SITE CONDITIONS Lot A: The slope began at the road access and gently progressed toward the west and was covered with large trees and low shrubs. This type of vegetation produces excellent protection against erosion on the immediate bank. Partially decayed leaves and other organic material covered the native soil. A gentle slope continued off the property and beyond the scope of this study. Runoff is slight because of the rapid internal drainage of the soil. No evidence of rotational movement or deep seated instability was observed. Lot B. From the access road to the crest of the slope,this lot is relatively level. This level area is the most propitious spot for the building of a home. Tile lot drops suddenly to a small stream at the bottom of a well-defined drainage channel. Tile entire lot was covered with trees and brush. Most of the water from the upper terrace drains away from the slope to the east. All surface runoff from the crest of the slope and eastward runs toward the gully. All runoff enters the ground and at discharge areas, the flows tend to swing normally in the direction of the surface flow. An access road runs between the two lots(see map). The best location for a home on Lot B was assumed to be on the terrace above and back from the crest. From this area,a new home could be built with no special engineering considerations except setback distance. A home located 40 feet from the crest would not destabilize the slope along the gully. A close examination of the crest of the gully in regard to the subject lots showed no signs of cracking and slumping. It is our opinion that the slopes are sound, but we recommend that any building built on lot B observe a setback of 40 ft. from the crest of the slope and any building built on lot A follow the(DAYLIGHT)principle mentioned in the following paragraph. Low shrubbery and vegetation should be encouraged to grow on the bank to mitigate erosion. Should the owner of a particular lot desire to build closer than 50 ft. to the crest, an engineering geologist should be consulted to insure stability of the home and the slope. 1001 1 Blomberg Street SW, Olympia, WA 98512 GEOTECHNICAL TESTING LABOR ATORY HILLSIDE FOUNDATIONS DAYLIGHT DIMENSION Structures built on sloping sites offer a number of potential problems. Fig. I illustrates a basic consideration for what is called the"daylight"dimension, which is the horizontal distance from the bottom of the footing to the adjacent ground surface. Many building codes require a minimum distance for this dimension in order to assure some safety against the pushing out of the footing in the downslope direction. Logically, the limit for this distance depends on the type of soil and the angle of the slope of the ground surface. For low slope angles,a reasonable daylight dimension is assured simply because of the usual requirements for the minimum depth of the bottom of the footing below the surface in a vertical direction. As the slope increases,the daylight dimension is less assured and should be limited to some minimum distance. A depth of 32 inches will provide the critical exposure necessary. A common problem with hillside construction is that shown in Fig.2,where recontouring of the construction site results in a portion of the building being placed on some significant depth of fill. If possible,all of the footings should be carried down to a depth below the fill. If structural fill is used and placed with reasonable compaction, it may be possible to rest the footings in the fill,provided that this is done only with inspection and supervision by a qualified soils consultant. RECOMMENDATIONS: All material excavated from the site cannot be dumped on the site without adequate subgrade preparation at the spoil location and proper fencing and runoff controls. All spoils soil must be compacted to 90%MDD as per ASTM D 1557 and protected from erosion. Footing drains must be installed around the footing or basement and the invert of the drain shall be lower than the bottom of the footing. In the footing area,the foundation for any homes must be placed in the firm native soil. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on our interpretation of site conditions as they presently exist,anticipated future construction activities,and the expectation that our exploratory efforts adequately define the subsurface conditions throughout the site. In the event that the scope or location of the project should change,or subsurface conditions different from those encountered during our study be observed or suspected,we should be advised. At that time,a review of the changed conditions will be made and alternative or remedial recommendations given as requested. f�Sincerely 1)1" Harold Parks, Engineering Geologist 1001 1 Blomberg Street SW,Olympia, WA 98512 G EOTECIINICAL TESTING LABORATORY duyliyill r J (=1GUIlL 1 Gilticul ux(�usutc cuncliliu>tiI lux tt Lillsitto �'uuling. I IJ I-1GUilE 2 11rul)lenls of lwulldatiutls un graded hillside sites. 10011 Blomberg Slreet SW, Olympia, WA 98512 Phone#: (206)754-4612 Fax #: (206)754-4848 1 ' Slope Analysis for Cohesionless Soils angle: 42 Unit Weight: 134.2 Critical Slope Angle,Saturated: 25.7 Saturated Saturated Unsaturated Unsaturale X Y Z Height Horizontal Slope Total Total Total Total Section Total Section 'Total Grid Grid Elevation Change Distance Slope Angle florizonta Change Slope Angle (3> 13> > > Line Line Feet Feet Feet % p Feet Feet % 11 Critical Critical Lot A 0 104 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 Lot A 1 105.25 1.25 10 12.5% 7.1 10 1.25 12.5% 7.1 Safe Safe Safe Safe Lot A 2 106.5 1.25 8 15.6% 8.9 18 2.5 13.9% 7.9 Safe Safe Safe Safe Lot A 3 107.75 1.25 7 17.9% 10.1 25 3.75 15.0% 8.5 Safe Safe Safe Safe Lot A 4 109 1.25 6 20.8% 11.8 31 5 16.1% 9.2 Safe Safe Safe Safe Lot A 5 110.25 1.25 5 25.0% 14.0 36 6.25 17.4% 9.8 Safe Safe Safe Safe Lot A 6 111.5 1.25 5 25.0% 14.0 41 7.5 18.3%" 10.4 Sale Safe Safe Safe Lot A 7 112.75 1.25 5 25.0% 14.0 46 8.75 19.0% 10.8 Safe Safe Safe Safe Lot A 8 • 114 1.25 5 25.0% 14.0 51 10 19.6% 11.1 Safe Safe Safe Safe Lot A 9 115.25 1.25 5 25.0% 14.0 56 11.25 20.1% 11.4 Safe Safe Safe Safe Lot A 10 116.5 1.25 5 25.0% 14.0 b 1 12.5 20.5% 11.6 Safe Safe Safe Safe Lot A 11 117.75 1.25 5 25.0% 14.0 66 13.75 20.8% 11.8 Safe Safe Safe Safe Lot A 12 119 1.25 5 25.0% 14.0 71 15 21.1% 11.9 Safe Safe Safe Safe Lot A 13 120.25 1.25 5 25.0% 14.0 76 16.25 21.4% 12.1 Safe Safe Safe Safe Lot A 14 121.5 1.25 5 25.0% 14.0 81 17.5 21.6% 12.2 Safe Safe Safe Safe Lot A 15 122.75 1.25 5 25.0% 14.0 86 18.75 21.8% 12.3 Safe Safe Safe Safe Lot A 16 123 0.25 25 1.0% 0.6 1 I 1 19 17.1% 9.7 Sale Safe Safe Safe Slope Graph 211 1N I I 16 14 -- - - - 12 --- -- c 0 10 S -- d _---- -- II 11 20 40 60 SO 100 120 horizontal Distance aauels!n lgluonpoH Ozl 001 OS 09 0r Oz u 0 — r -- --- 9 - 8 t� -- --- -- --- Ol m 0 -- — ---—— - Z I ------ -- ——-- -- --- - VI 91 -- Oz Nd-f)adolS aJeS Dies aJeS ales L'6 %I'LI 61 111 9'0 %0'1 SZ 5VO £ZI 91 V 1ty1 ajes ales ajes aJeS £'ZI %8'[Z 9L'81 98 O'tI %0'SZ S SZ'I SL'ZZI SI V 1-1 OJBS ales Ojos aJgS Z'ZI %9'1z 911 18 O'b1 %0'SZ S SZ'I S'IZI 61 V 1-I OJOS ales Ojos Dies 171 %V I z Sz'91 9L 0'Yl %0'Sz S SZ'I 9VOZI £I V xYi RIBS Dies Ojos RIeS 611 %I'1Z Sl IL 01'I %0'SZ S 9z'1 611 ZI V w'I aJeS gigs ajgS ajgS 8'11 %8'OZ SCSI 99 0'bI %0'SZ S Sz'I SL-L)1 I V wl Ojos ajgS Ojos ajes 9'I1 %S'0Z S'ZI 19 0'tI %0'SZ S SZ'1 9'911 01 VIoI Dies ales aJeS aJeS r'l 1 %IN SZ'l l 99 0'Yl %0'9Z S Sz'I 9z'511 6 V Io'I aJeS ales ales gigs 1*11 %9'6[ 01 IS 0'41 %0'SZ S SZ'I rll 8 vP1 Ojos aJBS Ojos Digs 8'01 %0'61 5C8 9r 0'171 %0'SZ S Sz'I SL'ZI I L V w'I aJeS ales aJeS OJBS Vol %£'81 S'L Ib 0111 %0'SZ S 9Z'1 5'111 9 V1('I aJeS aJeS Ojos aJeS 8'6 %r'LI 9z'9 9£ O'N %0'Sz S SZ'I 5Z'011 S Vlo'1 airs 01 us aJgs aJeS Z'6 %I,91 S 1£ 8,11 %8'0Z 9 SZ'I 601 r V IKYl Ojos aJeS Ojos Ojos 91 %O"SI SC£ SZ 1'01 %6L1 L SZ'I 9CL01 £ V)O'I gigs aJBS glas RIeS 61 %6'£1 S'Z 81 68 %9'9I 8 5Z'1 9,901 Z Vl(Y1 aJgS aJgS OJBS aJgS I'L %S'ZI Sz'I 01 I'L %S'zl Ol Sz'I SZ'901 I V)WI 0 0 0 0 OI 0 0 0 r01 0 V I(YI laa!l!r� Igar1laJ d % 133A lead d I % WA WA 1333 aul-I mn i <if <4) <fj <4j )IVUV adnlS a8uey:) eluonjoH a18uV adolS aimga a8ueg3 uo!lg.+alg Puq PIJ9 leloy uo!laas 1110,E uo!laas Ig1g.L Io1o.L IKIg.L I1110.L adolS Islw►zl+oH l48!aH Z A X aleanlesuf1 palearrlesunpapunleSpalernleS L SZ .pal-nlgS lalBuV ado1S 1-11!Nj Z'r£1 :111$13M llu(I zq :al2ue spoS ssaiuoisauoD aoj sisSiruV adolS N aaaaasaaatoaaaaaaa ''e. (p Elevation e u Q1 _ •\ to A w N .- :• � 00 J CT to A W N .- C S n �[ rh I rn m To N w w w w w .,, w ., w•w w W W w w � � � r.+ 0 C A 7 j-• _ b e mph r OC N C ? O � O N A A A A A A A A A A A A N M OD N N N N N N N � o e � e e a o o e o o e o e e o A �• ~r C1 .. O � �+ N N N N N N N N N N N N r Y W �• V1 W W W W W W W W W W W W to � J w 7 N N N W pppp N • JO S N LAN r O pp♦W C� b N C7% lA lJi A N C C p W O ypja+' w O S A A A w w W W N N N r _ �x1 + "'3 r'• A N 'O ..'1 W O V A r OC to N W C i d 0-0 70 e'; � TTCwwV CA m �./ ft J 00 00 J V �i .C1 CT lA A A W p ?0 J O 7 O 1 10 to r J W ^ �O C O V O to W 00 G G C 7 c t GEOTECHNICAL TESTING LABORATORY SITE PLAN 0 = 1—BEAM PER SURVEY BOOK 17, PAGE 220 ' LOEBSACK\JOHNSON 0 r �• �\ S 8938'E5"E 1:88.61(n..Cor.Fr. A to RR 304.21 h 72.09� / 609.:9(LOVITT PIPE 70 RYCELL PIPE) 0 403.01 !, 7 el Ct \ 11084.40(NW. COR.TR. B R1 RR R\*) C' I DI 11 CLINE B j ETIVEF.N IATS :• 1 A , B ISTENTER OF EASEMENT o �0,`�%EASEMENT"PER PEAL u A�`F1'(\ C1 ESTATE CONTRACT, AFN 1 C5 292818 "OR. 1.07, A TO C\L ESML) A S 8912'26" W 198.3E(I—BEAM It)RP. R\W) Q_ ___ _ 361.20(C\L ESML P, W.COR. A 10 R\W) r 61.13 r'— 321.11(R\W TO CONC. MO") '�V CON. NON, N B6'49'22'is,6.35 S 89'12.26-W 2634.05(I—BEAM TO SEC.COR.) TNSON I V. BEESON OF+—BEAM A(ANKE FAMILY RESOURCES BK,17• P..20 SURVEYS SEE BOOK 17 OF SURVEYS , P S E9'10.18' W 663.58(SW co,. ir. A to ,\,�a, FOR BASIS OF BEAR, I NGS AND CONTROL . :,:•'r ONE N 10011 Blomberg Street SW, Olympia, WA 98512 1'lione#: (206)754-4612 Fax#; (206)754-4848 Rps"SL(9oZ):#xad ZT 9"gL(9oZ) :#ouogd ZT986 NM`eidru%`MS aaaa�S2aaryaro1F[TTooT :..........................-----... ql .. .� ul i+.r,_ ? Tv C�"i11 avT ` r:'j`t�..tilt��FJ .�.#?:; • '�: ::.''�,�f�J ..;3�..,`. ,,.}.,....../... w � PN` r�l � ; � � � .• ;. � .art � �p ,..� �;z �sr�r t ;�• , { .fir i.r r .,:' �t qM• i••a 124, � sr r �. � . '�,�• r, -, i'� �+fti:/, tt°C"e �r + rt r =rY'� 4 t� "N {f'it��r is ) "C tt s� t �' i ac i •i /ppp i S.y tit 1 Ix,yl rr i�x�/T; �r�,tir9"`' )as[in . • ,�•ur ,rll {r A��,I },�t.$�;s.�yr •�. t'�' # k` t � ��7,vlkx����. �J'.Y! t�. r .,14- �i��}.. r �,Mrr h.,.. { • t •r FY1j6' 41ji_..4tfr •. `+"^ !•�'.;� z,� �� {aY�*iJ 9P1T.,y,•,,.f`'M' .. �,-.• I it r s�� � �V -' ;�L'r .,.r � ti, - � ., „��'cr .Y• r Kiw t;�� ��•Iir�♦< rvt. � it tt ; �8 `il: ni rf'.{�..r Y "��"i-yf!• J�,S' •�k t•Y 'Iy� �• };ilf � 7 '. 1•Jr v.. � �rr1 �� r ,s: ' r� t t, Aft'�- �r aJ ,n.v � l�t `�' }r !� " �'{•.: tl ` ' 'c, r r�....+n1 . 'r ! 3n � v Ke �� ''� F`iir s: •♦Ri-rl l: /r• �; i t-� i ♦ +",. ��ys�_���;1 � ',2 $ �2�:�5,+�. '+aa<,eRw S�"�.. •`a I IC�.T.IF sta 1°�!,��r a�i�i�t/ ?, ?!J� ��:- � +•. f �f � r��I r )it}r:•'ds r 1 a •� c . .y x �I'j Y it I � 1 � Y !' �J �ro s+it•),,'I ,/ rtil j �)a atf { J ir� .� i r. �i �.t . MIT i• �,k4 Y Jae: �.'Y Y+ v . 1+'• r "t��y.J.r.,� �}�-.i� �u� jPr'��i�','�'i,,w��+�..:��`. .Zi ��iW!y� �i t ,'4 d3:d •� �Iti �Y4 t I- �, .. •i' .tom 'ya•�'i••�•.I i it'G �� {} 1 a. r 1�.� �j� r 17 �6�,r1,••. �!' "rt t/.ra t r Ar^► *T:I Z {fit• i L -�.s. i tC` C >�1.+��U, �� `{ e41.�,hd ��t y� t(�..r fj. • �� .-.�+.,_��, il�r �r1F ��� �� .•�R ' .l•.�F,i�ip/rf4Y " � y��r� •li���Y .) .��+••• �.- ��M/ ..ua' „ti _`"+r iF• :.if)Ilf:'•'a �+F''r�+:! d- .. r.: i. ,, An. 1�.y ",Dfcft •��`[ • •R✓'' ':ilY'•{ly' �i .y.�:ll ,.i rJ� • .. >. � r�� t/f�11 �r �;f � ��� 7 �, J 3•s�+ :�Ityi}r' j I Y -�•.,�•Jf ?ti'QI3s�.. t., R_w=�ii++ �r '�� ('a?' �� r ,°'I . � ++,' a b t`..PRy_k•. '� .r .r,;:•F,�14. 1v .r4"/�. { ls�lli•-�rq •a.•'lI_A!jyI �Q f�j` � r'c- -i.'f�r`.a1'!r'. '�,. ,. rt>?*.,-[, [./?ay.� t �•%e� � .',t�a�r/-�T�/5. 4 'rt.tais: Y "r^ 6 �$, f "�i i✓il' ..��, F. .i•t 3ri�' �* ��j `�M F t t�i�� .,�;CY �`j'� � g T Ir I�j � i j � a t� h,,.,�•�)R.,b��Cy�{�y3r;� ,rh���R;��, r ,l'1'0 J•Ji'J J'.� {•'`r M", a' •1v i.7 ti:4!lan`ry�'r 3/ • ,;f S;%G�j.u, ?�•i1 : s �. � �� '+� II'{•y .•IJ�. ' Y•'�. 1r r' t+ '},!_P .t. •� - , _ 1♦--• ... u i ral+ �14�•' � � y -r . �� rI`• �d r,` t •ttl..� ,�,a.�i +'k144 �f. r r r 'i J � ..I.il� �i. !�r��,.,ry('•Wv�3=i� .ttc'tai��•r r el�,h.�` y;t�' 011 1;q�� i � tqc—•e'•' � fi ,; -ul � ': ''SSA= 3 F7" �.. � � •.1 't �' � '�•���'""�i'ia�?.f��p'��l Ky„`l `I'1',�y!'t�``_ � T's #,-'I .-• .: `�+ %�%N, I rid1� }�`' J��``••�'a..i .?. J°'c �,ry -+�' P9'• "��f �y u `� ?I' '•P � ,a.�; J,d`+-�.St. .JI• .�� �,•. :n .n4�: r,. ('+: � 1 .r'J'' T• �.�� afl ,// r-iei/_ r�,: >7 �ti 'Er "A.7��C ,• U -, r�' •\�tr�. � C1 't� `•1\\i 'rf% -t r `v,i �li.J �' �c: 'Mi •ql S' e Q� `1 r X�fCFw' �.• . :j ' +"r,a,EF' fr:;. ' '+i' ' •Q 1. .•4�t,..,;1 ,J y� 2 /WV'r5 arc�"�•dWi i '� �,+>'� �>;. .t - �.<r (Q�6� +;����' f• � .'a�� ts4. .,'��� ( ki� +e �' r��' A�• 1�¢1�'i�.11`{1w I��S! ��+J� ��' " �1 -.,�.s�y, ;r'• r. /�'� �r �3+•.,� �•; Srz ��..�y� .?' rf� o � rtr!^ •`. ! r't: >;� �' a3'•`�� 3. �a� v fd}rG F �v 't ;w. , { zr• ''.fh.A' l eu p/• i n--`:} 8� Jf' - rt•:: l�� ) tt:; () ja i+, ''h c,a• •rt }}� a� r.- , :'1lll• S ' L y ar ry/� s,�Pr ei�J� ,t } v� �y +•S,'• F'V �,��n I - ��t, ' ' � . .I��p ,.,l) ��� tY•r• Rj".�1.r�. i4 Yl� rr' • TM � ► Jay +i •iis r�� jAl�! *.,r� H3 r`r��'�., : 7r • li j ^' � �a •+� �(�1 ! r t ._<J •"'a;t. ,tnl 'a� �� . a� W Lr/!7r r "Sbt ' i vy.., i{• •. i........... . ..... ................... .. ..... s. i S..� (l ♦ w ril OS 'I` 31NIIIDanoaf)