The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEP2015-00034 Apartments 5 parcels - SEP Determinations - 6/12/2015 MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division 426 W Cedar St, Shelton, WA 98584 ot$l (360)427-9670 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-350) SEP2015-00034 Description of Proposal: Belscott Development: five parcels proposed as developed area (2.73 ac.) with 48 apartments built in two phases and 91 parking stalls provided; and 4.44 ac. to be in open space with type F stream and category 1 wetland buffers and enhancement established as mitigation through Mason Co. environmental permit. Proponent: MJ SCOTT ENTERPRISES LLC Site Address (If Assigned): 23541 NE STATE ROUTE 3 BELFAIR Directions to Site: Belfair WA at 23541 NE State Route 3 Parcel Number: 123294300100 Legal Description: PCL 2 OF BLA#04-45 PTN SW SE S 30/2 Lead Agency: Mason County The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. This information is available to the public upon request. MITIGATED MEASURES ARE ATTACHED. Please contact Allan Borden at ext. 365 with any questions. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The Lead Agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date shown below, when the determination is final. Comments must be submitted to Dept. of Community Development, P.O. Box 279, Shelton WA 98584 by 6/26/2015. Appeal of this determination must be filed within a 14-day period following this final determin ;ti date, per Mason County Code Chapter 15.11 Appeals. /61 Authorized Local Government Official Date SEP2015-00034 Page 1 of 2 e .ENE BELFAIR STr Rg A k4 J i _ e �J ti e MEDICAL CENTER RD "' <t L. 41 ode Source E�s`ri. Dia�aIG bLe G�;Eye �abe i USDA USGS 4tEX Ge't napping.Atr, a�d>i n� IGP s sstopo and 11 t IS Us `rUs Communitq N S�?� C S� • Oct -� Lf f� S c-6tt be ve-t( 1 inch = 200 feet �-�-� s-1a,� 12-fe 1 inch = 0 miles s RECEIVED MASON COUNTY DCD MAY 0 7 2015 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FOR THE BELSCOTT DEVELOPMENT 426 W. CEDAR ST. IN BELFAIR, WA. SUBMITTED MAY 25 2015 A. background Note: The appendix includes the drawings shown in the document as 11"x17" drawings. If the reader is having trouble reading the figures in the checklist document please refer to the drawings in the appendix. 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Belscott Development 2. Name of applicant: MJ Scott Enterprises LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Judy Scott, NE 131 McKnight Road, Belfair, WA. 98528 Phone 360-275-6255. Contact person: Pat McCullough, PE 210 NE Cherokee Beach Rd. NE, Belfair, WA 98528 Phone 360-275-7384 4. Date checklist prepared: March 31, 2015 5. Agency requesting checklist: Mason County DCD 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): This project will be developed in two phases. (See accompanying graphics and description of the proposed project.) Phase One of the redevelopment project will include the construction of the most southern apartments (buildings 1 and 2) along with 49 parking spaces and the associated infrastructure. Phase Two of the redevelopment project will include construction of the most northern apartment buildings (buildings 3 and 4) along with 42 parking spaces and the associated infrastructure. See Figure 3. The current schedule is for Phase One to be constructed in 2016 and Phase Two to be constructed in 2017. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A habitat management plan, drainage Page 1 of 24 report, and soils report have been prepared. These documents have been included in the Appendix. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. SR 3/Belfair Area Widening Safety Improvement Project - MP 25.36 to MP 26.86 DNS. (1.72 miles) This document relates to the WSDOT easement and storm drainage that crosses the property. The project applicant will be applying for an HPA from the Department of Fish and Wildlife. A JARPA will be prepared to obtain the required permits to restore Mindy Creek. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Mason County: Land Modification Permit, Environmental Permit, Land Modification Permit, and Building Permit. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife: HPA Washington State Department of Ecology: Section 404 Water Quality Certification Permit and a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. Section 401 Water Quality Certification Permit— USCOE. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Description of the Project: The project will include the redevelopment of 5 parcels of land owned by MJ Scott Enterprises LLC. The total land area is 7.17 acres of which 2.73 acres is going to be redeveloped and 4.44 acres will remain in open space. See Figure 1. WSDOT recently purchased 1.3 acres of the property for a SR 3 storm water detention and treatment ponds. The WSDOT property is not included in the property area calculations and in not a part of this project. Page 2 of 24 `I 1 +�,. R ISM A�,i, 4.1 " v. .. SITE M f f .w a.. VICINITYA(AP . i PFP777ISIJIh871GT W7- I •ff SWS.YCTlOY2R1MNIJK Rf W,IM/ LAT. r27.ORCKL0NP-f2TI377W FAVPB"YAREA.7.f7AG OEMR PAHEARFA.276AG CaVSERVA7A7Y-44WAG ,,,. . . ADYSCOUPACPS71 E3 R DWR P MEW PROPER YSTAII MS SGILE 7�T FIGURE 1: MJ SCOTT LLC PROPERTIES The site currently includes four businesses: Aqua Viva Church (200 members), Evergreen Electric, Cannabis Care Foundation, and a metal building sales group. Mindy Creek bisects the property. Approximately 914 feet of Mindy Creek flows across the property. One hundred and four feet of the stream flows through a 36" culvert. See Figure 2. Figure 2 also illustrates the existing conditions on the site and the proposed demolition plan. Structures 2, 5, and 6 shown on the aerial image were temporary structures and have been removed since the aerial photo was taken. Page 3 of 24 DENW77IOy wMNTTTts 1.DEmnusH/1 sTR(crwaEs- 14,000 SOLPIREFREr <,> _- -: 2 RafO E3)COOSOWREFEEr OFAVP WLT SURFACINGAAV 24,00V SF OF1"ER✓"JS GRt VEL SLOMACING 3 RSWOVE a0'of 36'CAAo CL L PERT 4 [AFL OCA 7E 133 FEET OFMINDY '•.£ ` �I CJWE7x 70 MEAFWCHANNEL 5 REMOVE 7wLAsr00FEErOF �' • _ • `.�.f` � .\ THE EXISTING 24'STORM DRAIN 7MrCROSSES MEPRa-JirY. RESTCW47ACWAE/RYS 1. OFAFW FISHHAW ATCANAPAM N77N �d ^ti LARGE*VQ0YLI9WS 10 :{ - SPANNING GRAVE.AND RFS71A4'r. :" 2 PLANT 7NENEWSTREAM awAAV UAOEA89LISHPM FUB/JA rATANAGIGBI®NTPLAIK 3RESTOR FAADROIANT34OW SF OF NE7LAA08GFF6P. P I.coNS7RUCr3S7oFt'WA£ GRAVEL 7R1$AV OEMA D 5 i BUFFERAR S4 ti r e U �P J 0 01=� .RADYSOGT"ROPEYt711E'S - I�Pa0puE1VT PLANAND - + .: ldES7LYtA TX. A&-MICS SCALE 1--W FIGURE 2: PROPOSED DEMOLITION FOR THE SITE It is proposed to redevelop the site by demolishing all 11 of the permanent and temporary structures, removing 37,000 square feet of asphaltic surfaces and 24,000 square feet of gravel driveways, and moving 213 feet of existing Mindy Creek into to 314 feet of new "fish friendly" stream channel. The proposed redevelopment the property is shown in FIGURE 3 Page 4 of 24 RESTORE 314'OFM/NDY CREEK INSTALL 12' WIDEBOTTOMLESS BOX CUL VERTAT WSDOr, 77 MAINTENANCE CROSSING. 00.1 "DOT 12'WIDE"DOT �2. 0 PROPERTY Z' '- r�iiTfii i77„�777 TI / ACCESS EASEMENT __ FOR STORM REVISED LOCG477ON r y DRAINAGEPOND SHOWN -n T _ F 000, m I PROPOSED 1 STORMDR41N 0 ;( /o � YJ y (2015) 4'HIGH r /l� l� G "g SEGMENTAL CONCRETE O J%/f g��i�/ :`��.._ .,: f 0 a % ` WALL(7YPl r. / OF _ "0° \ / &7STNG 24'CMP S70RM DRAIN- �� 8'rO°1r RELOGiTIONSHOWN cn m y9Aggoq�>� f 6' . n S z f o lb ti ✓UDYSC07TPROPERJ7ES REDVELOPMENT S17ELAYOUT PLAN B PRO✓ECTPHASING SCALE.'1'=60' v v m o_ N A The redevelopment of the property will include 48 apartment units, the restoration of 30,000 SF of wetland buffer, and 314 feet of Mindy Creek. The apartment statistics for the redevelopment project is shown in Figure 4 below. Apartment Statistics JURISDICTION: MASON COUNTY MINIMUM PARKING REQUIRED(PER ZONING CODE} 1 BED UNITS 12 UNITS x 1.5 STALL/UNIT = 18 STALLS ZONING: MIXED USE(MU) 2&3 BED UNITS 36 UNITS x 2 STALLS/UMT = 72 STALLS LOT AREA APPROX. 8.5 ACRES(;369,393 S.F.)GROSSYWIM PARKING REOWED: WETLAND: 153,005 S.F. PARKING PROMDED: ��(jfSTREAIJ SUFFER: 112665 S.F. OPEN STANDARD) 68 STALLS DEVELOPABLE LOT AREA 103,723 S.F.(24 OPEN COMP D D 91 S3 STALLS((25.27%) UNIT) AC) TALLS MINIMUM OF 1 OUT OF EVERY 50 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED TO BE PARCEL NUMBERS: 12329-43-01M 12329-43-0110 ACCESSIBLE(H/C) 1 2329-03 01 20,12329-43-0140 91/50= 1.8 OR 2 STALLS REQUIRED 12329-43-0160 2 ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED ALLOWED DENSITY: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS APPROACH OPEN ACTIVE SPACE: PROPOSED DENSITY: 48 UNITS DEVELOPABLE AREA: 103,723 SF(2.4 AC) 15%OF SITE REQUIRED PROPOSED UNIT MIX 103,723 SF x.15-15,55B SF ACTIVE AREA REQUIRED A 1 BED/1 BATH 12 25X (1)TYPE A 16,150 SF OPEN AREA PROVDED+3,482 SF OF NATURE TRAIL B 2 BED/2 BATH 18 38% (1)TYPE A C 2 BED/2 BATH 6 12% D 3 BED/2 BATH 12 25% (1)TYPE A TOTAL 48 100% (3)TYPE A ACCE55HE UNITS FIGURE 4: APARTMENT STATISTICS 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See Figure 1 for the site vicinity map, location, and latitude and longitude. The legal descriptions for the 5 parcels are as follows: Parcel 12329-43-00100 — PCL 2 of BLA #04-45 Parcel 12329-43-00120— PCL 3 of BLA#04-45 Parcel 12329-43-00140 —TR 14 of the SW of SE of Section 29, TWN 23N, R1 W Parcel 12329-43-00110 — TR 11 of the SW of SE Parcel 12329-43-00160 — PCL 1 of BLS #04-45 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS hL el 1. Earth a. General description of the site hf e (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: See FIGURE 5 for site topography. — — -�--- --— — Page 6 of 24 .-.._ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY MANHOLE INVERTS FOR „. ax su.an BELSCOTT - - - - i• --�----- -_ — --- 1.•�araiar na,nnAsn f� IN 1.•w,.a n.s n/ar...an SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W.M. Reona an CIA S' SW,rk' � � OY[MwNy�t/11a11,a,aM roro rarrl a MM V�ICairip1puor i" oawi wc+ - / aM•aVM�V avo corn J/a' ar.a/a siu a .•Rw rarr �as rRre %•� mrtArc am caaar ��a A1N' „a�irM�s o® �a 4 W-b M/ rR..rd Qo u�a aaa,al 4WM IA.O tnYn N�CW . . . tAVM � aaiilr NOTES: TIa • . - _. _- � __ �__-_, y Hawn /_ rJ rl lF Mml tnllrl a0at • -J � jr#`R 1 Q Mallalq alalr M q!aY • _ - pp Y 1[naia vial walVti I.1 - �/.f.is � IMQL M 11111�1 andW ,,Qaaam,�ws'w • �✓ + ��' — o.iri LEGEND: N �uam.aron ns w ° iamosswv narrv. a � . • iorr r aui r y i8'ECJ,C4� T', a T 4op' flF o amrta aawi art . 1 1 —•�•—.� — a@ is • ni xiRNr dY �� "Q Y wAia ntlawu r •saa q wrzR wr xsi � 1 oa rrw w O ?,-'A■ N� _ / \ n s��a�wy awo On my au.M wins[ 1 a >nor avwwcRn.r wmo✓ru wwnl " � Born Ras awuo.°°wvPROJECT ° BENCHMARKPoo -_•„-°w°i"°a""'a .-w,aprt ` 1e �lw.irr r iw • J• / � p�s,aa slwaax - = �i w1°•Oi.xw�"nm�. � ''a _ �� rrmiraa> -•- mr wcArt iou ari rnn rwo a a°wts mllm / aas/i i- ' ! iowo rum •, ,. ,.. - Ld an ioua'r•M raro rua / sx a�a NOTE �dl o®ut na IaUM s ar,a ,,. � omnaao,r n rronnn w a®ut : aou��wa sw�'an�n'�xi ru a wpm s --__.-- 1— arr>r, fr Mahem.Pri.ASa�sA TES ara.r .aY iaorroa rww wr am rw.raO41i�^rl� i a r N t0 N V O N A b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? There are slopes up to 8% on the site at various locations in the conservation area. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. The site has been filled with sandy, gravelly soil to a depth of between 18 inches and 4 feet over the years to accommodate development. The underlying souls are a light brown, silty sand. See FIGURE 6 and the soils report in the Appendix. Ground water in March of 2015 was found at approximately four feet depth. Several soil borings were made on the site. A soft layer of soil was found to exist between 6 feet and 12 feet below the surface. It is proposed to use the structural fill hauled to the site to preconsolidate the areas where the apartment buildings will be constructed. Approximately 2,800 cubic yards of imported fill will be used to preconsolidate the building sites. x " s x 4 g± d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. A grading plan has been prepared and included below as Figure 7. Sections through the property redevelopment are shown n Figure 5. The excavation and fill quantities for the project will be: Excavation = 2,600 CY, Imported Structural Fill = 2,800 CY, Waste Soil to Haul = 2,200 CY. The source of the fill wills the Zephyrs pit on North Shore Road. Page 8 of 24 113'OF 4'H/GH SEGMENTAL CONCRETE WALL / r PROPERTY = lb450'OF4'H/GH / "cj" \ SEGMENTAL _=', _ /f lb a" � ,�� y CONCRETE , / f f WALL Z Of �' �' "� < NOTE.'NO GRADING-—� WILL BEALL OWED IN THE KSTZAND BUFFER / tj B �E-J-q o ° ! EXCEPTFOR TRAIL. BUILDING AREA (4J=15,0010 SF APPROX/MATEEAR7HKVRK QUAN7777ES 40000 SFLOTAKD DR/VEAREA= Z IMPORTED STRUCTURAL FILL=2,&VO CY ,� �' EXC4VA77ON-2,600 CY HAUL OFF WAS7FSOIL=2,200 CY POROUS CONCRETE(AVE.7-THICM=9W CY m q�a-0 . e tics c ROCK STOR4GE SUBGRADE(9'THICK)=1,111 CY / c SPA WNING GRA VEL=100CY ``� AADYSGOTTPROPBUY REDEVELOPMENT GrrADMPLAN&QU44T M SCALE'fl-W v o� CD �o 0 N A � Y yti E ' SECTION A - A (BLUILDING NO. 2 - SOUTH END) Susie: 1-20'HORIZONTAL SECTION C - C (BLUILDING NO. n -NORTH) 1 VERTICAL SCALE: 1-20'HORIZONTAL 1'-V VERTICAL C \N P.."pe VU L rn SECTION B - B (BLUILDING NO. 3 - MIDDLE) - II SCALE: 1-20'HORIZONTAL S/EHAN AVIKSQOTTH4Ci�SPTES 1's5'VERTICAL SCXE•Y=` /'34AE48p�6YT SEC IOW AV?OU&&V S?E FIGURE 8: SECTIONS THROUGH THE PROPERTY f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion could occur and the soils could migrate to the wetland buffer and Mindy Creek. Best Management Practices will be employed to prevent soils from leaving the construction areas. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Of the 2.73 acres buildings will cover 15,000 square feet and sidewalks will cover 5,147 square feet. The percentage of site coverage by impervious surfaces will be 17%. Note that the parking lots will be surfaced with porous concrete surfaces. See the drainage report that has been prepared for this project. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: BMP's will be implemented per the Washington State Department of Ecology's Storm Water Management Manual for Western Washington (latest edition) to control erosion. A National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit application will be prepared and will include a pollution control plan for the site. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. — _—_ -- — --- Page 10 of 24 This project is a high density residential redevelopment. The apartments will not include wood fire places. No unusual air quality emissions will emanate from the project. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Mindy Creek has the potential to provide 2,800 feet of salmon spawning the rearing habitat if is restored. Mindy Creek is spring fed stream that flows between 1 and 3 cubic feet per second year around. Currently Mindy Creek is blocked by a culvert downstream on the Pacific Northwest Salmon property. There are plans in the works to remove downstream fish passage barriers that should open up the entire stream for salmon habitat. If the stream through the property is restored Mindy Creek will provide excellent salmon spawning and rearing habitat up to the Mitchell Lumber site which is 300 feet upstream (north) of the project site. 104 feet of the stream on the site flows through two 36" diameter CMP culvert pipes that are not fish passable. An asphalt parking lot covers 80 feet of the 36" culvert. This project proposes to move the stream to a fish friendly habitat channel and remove the culverts located on the property. It also proposes to establish and restore buffers along the stream by planting them to maintain shade. See Figure 9, 10, AND 11. Page 11 of 24 g Y MINDY CREEK UPSTREAM OF THE SITE MINDY CREEK OUTLET ONTO THE SITE 4 MINDY CREEK THROUGH THE SIT MINDY CREEK-INLET TO 80' CULVERT FIGURE 9: MINDY CREEK IMAGES Page 12 of 24 . �'"�'.. 3.�+ �•il, � '� a �� d:� �t1i. E B � y{► ef ro ��... ',�s�. a 4 < . e,.�/.r �"'f""`�� ♦ z la SCALE: F-4W RJDY SCOTT PROPERTIES OFF SITE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FIGURE 10: THE MINDY CREEK WATERSHEDS ABOVE THE PROJECT AREA Page 13 of 24 T j'v" =., �S�NY�a FOR ME AVR7NAAWYCAE9fWA?ZW" -ou SH6D DRA04461EARS4.DlACRES AAWW AA/AFALL=CO/A�Cl�fES m ` "7• 2 YEAR RA/AFAUEYENT•St7AVICAES M4A0VAWNF0RSIRFAM=R30 FNHFLOW-24 CM ROWDIGIM-f0'YELOCIIY-aNFPS ?YEIRFLOW-d CF$D "H-236;YF1OC?1'-Q6FPS f00YEARPLow-24cMDa-m-jr,VEZOC?1'=O.DFPS Z _ CONS7RW F n*OPOOL AA0508AY ME NEWSMISW CMAMIR.MrALL 7 GR0th0A.`S OFLAR(JEWOWYOMS C7 c MaT7OPROAVADEbY MAL "E� S7RE"..MrALL RAAVW 3 MW m O c A SOUDERS m7AICAMS7E 0 EMEAM m \ F�- ` O� D CCAFYZJt77Y. •�, 1 r c A m / MINDYCREAWAWTOR WNPLAN PM STA 24 {D SC+�LE.'fQ' E%15nNC GROUND EL VI 28Z1141'M1DE BD%CULVERT 14 2'SPAWNING u'N GRAVEL 2 Z i 12' OPEN CD 'S G, i BOTTohxESSBOXCULVERT D AMWYCREEKRE ORAT/O/VPRarXE ATWWOTACCESSRaWCROSSING Z SCAALE'flwW CL 12' WSDOT SCAALE.•f%f0' 7' MIN. & ACCESS RD. m1 VAR VAR 4' VARIES 7' 15' & VARIES 12' T 9 co 6%TO 12% SLOPE VARIES AMEMOPUBW Z AO4DY0TaWRE'Si 7VPAnV0V TYPICAL STREAM CROSSSECT/ON PLML PfiOAKEMDSEWYOW4 SCALE.'fWO' co v7 m A O_ N la 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. See Figure 11. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. We will excavate 927 cubic yards to build 315 feet of the new Mindy Creek channel. Most of the excavation will result from the creation of the flood plain next to Mindy Creek. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. The project is on public water and sewer. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage-, industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . -, agricultural-, etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so. describe. This is a redevelopment project. The existing development includes 37,000 square feet of asphalt surfaces, 24,000 square feet of 90% impervious compacted gravel surfacing, and 14,000 square feet of impervious roof area. There is no existing on site drainage system so of these surfaces drain directly to Mindy Creek and the surrounding wetlands. A drainage report for the project has been prepared that uses the most recent version of the Storm Water Management Manual for Western Washington for guidance. The storm water manual strongly encourages the use of pervious surfaces for parking lots where the underlying soils can infiltrate the runoff. For this redevelopment project there is 40,000 square feet of parking lot, 15,000 Page 15 of 24 square feet of building, 5,200 square feet of concrete sidewalks, and 16,200 square feet of landscaped areas. This project will result in a considerable net reduction of storm water runoff from the site. We have proposed using porous concrete for the new parking lots. Runoff from the landscape area, if any, will be directed to areas where it can soak into the ground and the "clean" roof runoff from the buildings will flow directly into the proposed restored stream buffers where it will provide moisture to the plants. There is a Mason County/WSDOT 24" storm drain line that crosses the property. (There is no recorded easement) Only 12 acres of the watershed the eventually drain to this system after SR 3 is widened in 2015. All of the SR 3 roadway storm water runoff will be detained and treated by WSDOT. See Figure 10. We have no plans to detain or treat the remaining off site drainage from this watershed. That is Mason County's responsibility. We will reconstruct the lower section of the existing 24 inch storm drain line to circumvent the proposed apartment building No. 3. See Figure 12. Page 16 of 24 wworsrvAwsV"w / Nk AT/ON OF THE wpR /J EWPROPoSED WSOOT STORMWATERDETENT/ON 1 AND TREATMENTPOND. 11 7-7-1 1 m�, 1 / Sra�b&"/NAGFAAQTE. ocrsrx�x C ALL PAVED AREA$EXCEPT "%. /� w"Y x SIDEWALKS, WILL BE / ".400, N m PAVEDWITHPOROUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT. /N ROOF DRAINA GE WILL BE c�wnavcw 5 l ` / o !� �0 �\ �s rM MEW DETAINED AND THEN coca TKW c r 77c$7Q w (n DISCHARGED DIREM Y asaEs sr DRAINAGE CHANNELS. / r -`' ••� ",) ' �Y \ wSDOr,�TW Sn>W � o � TrssarysaaLLwr�s DE BTCYdw ss*ER // / „� '— / ` YU W rW STC W DRAW wAsFTr �. --- cocAnay. -� 9 �Eigo a e u Q M07F-, Dk WATERLA'IE ASStAW 1-W WAM?AETER TO GAMER REAPS TO MW e SEMGE 70SE*E RA"& JUDYSCOTTPROPERTIES REDEVELOPMENT WATER,SEWER,DRAINAGE LAYOUT SO4 1+aW v m 0 N A 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. Yes. Most of the stormwater runoff from the site will be infiltrated into the soil. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: See 3.C.1 above. 4. Plants a. Check the types of vegetation found on the redevelopment site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X other types of vegetation. Blackberry vines b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Three large trees may have to be removed up in the back of the existing church to allow for the restoration of Mindy Creek. b. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. The site is above the summer chum range in Mindy Creek. Steelhead salmon are not currently present at the site but could be when the stream is restored. There are no bull trout in Mindy Creek. The Marbled Murrelet may forage in the area but none have been observed at the redevelopment site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: We propose 15,200 square feet of landscaping with native plants. We will be planting the 30,000 square feet of the restored buffer area and 6,000 square feet of the restored stream corridor with native shrubbery and trees. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Blackberries over the old septic drainfields. They will be removed. 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Page 18 of 24 mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None - Not in the area we are going to redevelop. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No — not the area we are going to redevelop. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: We will be restoring 315 feet of Mindy Creek and 30,000 square feet of Wetland Buffer. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The apartments will be heated with electricity. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building design will meet current state building code energy requirements. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. None. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. The normal emergency services required for high density residential. Urgent Care (Harrison Hospital) is across SR 3 from the property and the Emergency Services are two miles south on Old Belfair Highway at the fire station. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. Page 19 of 24 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The property is slightly downhill of SR 3 that has up to 18,000 cars a day traffic. The apartment units will be sound proofed to reduce disturbance from outside noise. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. There will be the typical noise from construction. This is a commercial neighborhood zoned for multiuse. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Noise reduction features in the apartment units. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. The current use of the properties is primarily commercial. There are two small residential rental units. c. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? No. d. Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No. c. Describe any structures on the site. See Figure 1 and Figure 2. There is a church on the property that used to be the Belfair Cafe (7,200 square feet). There are four residential type buildings, two of which are currently used for business. Two are rentals. There are several temporary sheds and two garage structures. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, see Figure 2. All existing structures will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Mixed Use f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Urban Growth Area g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NA h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? The 4.5 acres of conservation area on the property that includes the wetlands and the wetland buffer. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 110 Page 20 of 24 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? The existing businesses, church, and renters will have to move. They have all been notified and will find substitute accommodations over the next two years. They will have to opportunity to rent an apartment in the proposed new apartment buildings. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any-, None —this redevelopment will target low to moderate income families and provide much needed housing in the town of Belfair. L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The new development will be a great improvement over the urban blight appearance of the existing development on the site. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any- NA 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. The redevelopment of the property will provide 48 - 1, 2, and 3 bedroom apartment units. See Figure 4. The monthly rents requested will target low to moderate income families. The near location of the apartments to shopping, medical and other urban services is ideal for low to moderate income families. b. Approximately how many units. if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Two low income dwelling units will demolished. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: The primary goal of the project is to improve the housing choices and inventory for low to middle income families in the Belfair area. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The apartments will be three stories with a building height of approximately 35 feet. The highest building will be 31 feet above SR 3 roadway level. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The view of the wetland and the forest to the west SR 3 will be obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The apartment complex will be of high quality construction, fully landscaped, and include concrete parking lots and sidewalks. The facility will be gated and have low level site lighting for safety. 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None— Low level, down directed, non-glare site lighting will be installed around the parking lots and sidewalks. ------------- ------------- Page 21 of 24 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Use 20' high, down directed area lighting throughout the project. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Theler Wetlands is within '/2 mile of the property. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NA 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state.. or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. No b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. None. The site is an existing developed commercial property that has been used for residential and business purposes for over 50 years. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. None. This is a redevelopment project. The proposed grading of the site specifies filling most of the site. There is less than 1 foot excavation into the native soils on the site in the some of the new building footing areas. Two feet of fill will be removed from the stream restoration area. The stream channel will penetrate approximately 2 feet into the native soil below the existing fill. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The Page 22 of 24 property exits on State Route 3. SR 3 is in the midst of major widening improvement. Construction of a center turn lane and sidewalks from McDonalds to Sweet Water Creek will occur during 2015 and 2016. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. Transit Stop is just down the SR 3 at the Romance Hill intersection (at Urgent Care) c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? There are currently between a 104 and 110 parking spaces on the site — mostly unstripped. The proposed redevelopment will include 90 parking spaces. There will be a reduction of between 14 to 20 parking spaces. The property redevelopment will eliminate 11 parking spaces that front directly on to SR 3 that are currently a safety hazard. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The SR 3 widening project is a WSDOT sponsored project and is under construction. The proposed redevelopment of the properties will reduce the access points to SR 3 from 4 to 2. The access openings onto SR 3 will be reduced from 127 feet to 44 feet. The new property access openings will be directly across from existing openings on the east side of SR 3 which will reduce turning conflicts and driver confusion. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so; generally describe. We expect the residents to use the Mason County transit system. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? We estimate that the average daily traffic generated by the redeveloped property will be 98 units x 5.5 trips per unit daily = 539 trips. Peak hour will be approximately 10% of those trips or 54 trips. The existing daily trip generation on the site is estimated to be: Church 150 trips (Wed, Sat, and Sun.), commercial - 7000 SF x 50 trips per 1000 SF = 385 trips. Total 535 trips. Peak Hour Trips for the redeveloped site will be approximately the same as the existing. WSDOT has provided traffic information for SR 3 collected in 2013 and 2015. This data shows that the average daily traffic volumes at the property are around 18,000 cars a day on Friday. PM peak hour traffic on Friday is around 1,800 cars per hour (north and south bound). At those volumes the Level of Service on SR 3 is LOS D. Plans are in the works to design and construct the Belfair Bypass. The environmental studies have been completed and the legislature has included the funding for the project in the latest gas tax increase proposal. The Belfair Bypass studies have estimated that traffic on SR 3 will be reduced by 7,000 cars a day when the new roadway is in full operation. -- -- --- ----Page 23 of 24 g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. The proposal will improve traffic on SR 3 by reducing the number of access points to the highway. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Remove the 11 parking spaces in front of the church and reduce the access points to SR 3 from 4 to 2. If the property were to be redeveloped as a Burger King site or for some other high traffic commercial site, the traffic impacts to SR 3 could be substantial. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Fire Protection: Sprinklers will be installed in the buildings for fire protection and we will provide a fire hydrant within 400 feet of all the buildings. Additional police protection will be required. (The site will be gated) The sheriff's office is '/4 mile south of the site. Belfair Elementary will be within walking distance— on the new sidewalks — a mile south of the site. Urgent Care medical is within 500 feet of the site on the other side of SR 3. This is a very convenient site for providing the limited public services that exist in Belfair urban area. e. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system: The Belfair Water District will provide water service and Mason County Wastewater Utilities will provide sewer service. Both of these providers need additional customers to help finance recent capital improvements. Power will be provided by PUD No. 3 who recently upgraded their service line through Belfair. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. See Figure 13. C. Signature HELP The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its ecision Signature: 41 C r— Name of signee <O i� Position and Agency/Or ani ation Date Submitted: Page 24 of 24