HomeMy WebLinkAboutRLC99-0085 - RLC Inspections - 7/30/1999 GARY YANDO,]DIRECTOR
igTp
P 'N
M� �v
o A v = DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVEL OPMENT
i o T = PLANNING-SOLID WASTE- UTILITIES
N Y y BLDG. I 9 411 N. 51H ST. • P.O. BOX 578
1864 SHELTON,WA 98584 • (360) 427-9670
FINDINGS FOR
MASON ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT
DATE: July 30, 1999
PERMIT NO. : RLC99-0085
PROPOSED ACTION: Restore section of Type V stream per attached
narrative and plans, including relocation,
reconstruction and revegetation of stream and
buffer, placement of washed gravel within
stream bed, installation of instream
structures to facilitate stream stability and
promote pool and riffle habitats, locate 40
foot length stream crossing culvert to access
property to south of stream.
APPLICANT: Lester Krueger, Rick Krueger is agent.
PROPERTY: Parcel no. : 12332-50-t06r2
pool
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT:
NOTE: This Mason Environmental Permit specifically addresses
restoration .of damage to a Type V stream and buffer, and does not
provide review for any form or process of development on this site,
except that existing development is referenced in relation to
setback requirements. In addition, the permit process does not
constitute review or approval of proposed stream crossing access
widths required for development proposals, but rather addresses the
necessity for the proposed crossing culvert to provide the
necessary conveyance capacity for the stream.
a) The project site contains a Type V stream which flows westerly
through the site to the vicinity of Highway 3 , then in a northerly
direction parallel to the highway. Upstream of the project area
the stream flows through a steep-sided forested canyon which
provides a higher quality buffer to the aquatic habitat. The
buffer requirements for a Type V stream are 25 feet per Mason
County Resource Ordinance Aquatic Management Area Chapter
17. 01 . 110 . Prior to stream and buffer disturbance, the buffer on
the north side of the stream was somewhat degraded in the proposed
restoration area.
Recvded }
b) The access road to a subdivision has recently been developed on
the property (Canal Heights Drive) . As part of the road
construction process, both the stream and its buffer were modified
without permit authority from Mason County. The stream was
diverted into a roadside ditch, and culverted under the road to the
ditch on the other side. Per Enforcement Chapter 17. 01.200 of
Mason County Resource Ordinance, restoration is required.
Environmental review and permitting for the restoration occur
through the Mason Environmental Permit process and SEPA review. In
addition, Hydraulic Project approval from the Department of Fish
and Wildlife is also necessary. The applicant has been provided
with a DARPA form to submit to WDFW.
c) Mason County Resource Ordinance Chapter 17 . 01 .200 . I provides
for the restoration of critical areas disturbed by work undertaken
without the applicable permits . The applicant has submitted a
Mason Environmental Permit and SEPA checklist for review of this
restoration project. A restoration proposal, including timeline,
has been prepared for the applicant by Applied Environmental
Services Inc. (attached) . The restoration proposal also includes
a 40-foot long culvert crossing to provide continued access across
the creek.
A discussion of the restoration proposed by the applicant follows,
and a copy is attached. It is important to note here that any
proposed restoration and stream buffer must occur outside the
required road right-of-way minimum width for this plat road (right-
of-way/easement width is 60 feet) , and outside any additional width
required by Public Works. This information is noted in the
conditions, and has been marked on the attached plans.
The restoration plan provides for planted stream buffers, and re-
creation and relocation of the stream. The stream position will be
shifted south away from the new Canal Heights Drive to provide for
a 10-foot wide vegetation area north of the stream. In
compensation for this narrower buffer, an increased buffer area of
50 feet will be provided in the area to the east, where the canyon
is steeper and forested (see sheet 6 of 6 attached) . On the south
side of the stream restoration area, a 25-foot buffer is proposed.
The stream bed will be washed gravel, slope will be restored to a
more natural condition, and woody structures will be installed
instream to facilitate stream stability and promote pools and
riffles . A pool will be constructed near Highway 3 to provide for
dissipation of hydraulic energy, prior to the stream changing
direction. Revegetation is addressed in the planting plan (sheet
2 of 6 attached) , and the timeline for planting is addressed in AES
letter dated June 11, 1999 (attached) .
To date no monitoring plan has been submitted. Provisions for
submission of a monitoring plan are addressed within the conditions
of this permit.
SEPA COMMENTS: Steve Kalinowski of Washington State Department of
Fish and Wildlife has notified planning staff that Hydraulic
Project approval no. : 00-E2335-01 addresses WDFW review of the
restoration project.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS:
The right-of-way for Canal Heights Drive is 60 feet. It is
anticipated that development of the entire right-of-way and the
addition of a deceleration lane will be needed in this area, due to
this road' s use. Prior to commencing restoration activities, the
applicant is to contact Public Works Engineering Services Manager
Rich Geiger for details as to any additional right of way width
requirements .
In addition, Public Works provided the following information:
1 . The culverts to be installed both in the ditch line and the
relocated stream shall be designed to pass the flows expected per
the drainage report submitted by Mike Wnek, P.E. , and per the HPA.
2 . The responsibility to complete this project shall be borne by
the applicant alone. This road right-of-way shall not be adopted
into the Mason County Road System until the applicant has completed
this project per permit requirements or has posted bond to assure
project completion.
Questions regarding Public Works comments should be directed to
Rich Geiger at (360) 427-9670 extension 531.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH) :
Restoration of a stream and its buffer does not require review by
the Environmental Health Department.
FIRE MARSHALL:
The Fire Marshall comments on stream restoration projects when
access issues are involved, however this restoration project permit
does not address any development proposal . That would need to
undergo the standard Fire Marshall review process .
COUNTY BUILDING OFFICIAL:
Size of culvert to be approved by Mason County Public Works
Department. No building permit is necessary for installation.
CONCLUSIONS:
The submitted Mason Environmental Permit, SEPA checklist and
restoration proposal have been reviewed. Additional information
has been added to the proposal plans to clarify that the proposed
buffers and stream shall be outside of the 60-foot road
easement/right-of-way and any additional right-of-way required by
Public Works . Comments relating to the proposal are provided
within this document, and attached. It appears that the
restoration proposal, as modified to ensure buffers are outside the
60-foot easement/right-of-way, will generally meet the provisions
of Enforcement Chapter 17. 01.200 of the Mason County Resource
Ordinance, with the conditions attached. These conditions are
attached so that the applicant will assure the public of Mason
County that impacts are addressed for this restoration project .
vl�� S-,5-5P/7
Gary Ya do, D ector (date)
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
P Bennett-bihiming, Land Use Planner (date)
attachments : Mason Environmental Permit Conditions for RLC99-0085
Conditions of this Case are listed below:
Case No.:RLC99-0085
1) Project involves work in and adjacent to a Type V stream. In
addition to county requirements for this project, applicant shall
apply to Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and
receive Hydraulic Project Approval for project prior to start of
work. x
2) Stream and buffer restoration shall be carried out according to
modified plan, design and proposed timeline by Applied
Environmental Services, Inc in letter dated Tuesday May 4, 1999
and letter dated Friday June 11 , 1999. Modifications on plans
address requirement to provide for stream and buffer location
outside minimum 60 ft easements/rights-of-ways. Winter site
stabilization recommendations set forth in June 11 , 1999 letter
are required as a condition of the Mason Environmental Permit
being currently reviewed for this project.
x
3) Temporary erosion control measures such as silt fences, straw
bales, straw mulch, shal be installed and in place in all areas
prior to the start of all site disturbance activities related to
this project. x
4) All upland areas disturbed or created by site disturbance and
restoration activities shall be seeded, vegetated, or given some
other equivalent type of protection against erosion. Restoration
plan developed by Applied Environmental Services shall guide in
choice of vegetation, and site stabilization with coconut fiber
matting. x
5) Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to
waters of the State of Washington is in violation of Chapter 90.48
RCW, Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201 A, WAter Quality
Standards for surface waters of the State of Washington, and is
subject to enforcement action by Department of Ecology.
x
6) Proposed 40-foot stream culvert shall pass flows expected per
drainage report submitted b Mike Wn k P.E. and per HPA.
9 p Y e
x
7) Prior to start of project, applicant shall submit site monitoring
plan to Mason County Department of Community Development for
review and approval. Monitoring plan shall be designed to meet
the requirements of Resource Ordinance Chapter 17.01 .200 1.2.
x