HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEP2001-00051 - SEP Determinations - 2/25/2000 n0 — (e 000
Washington State Olympic Region Headquarters
-„ Department of Transportation 5720 Capitol Boulevard,Tumwater
Sid Morrison P.O. Box 47440
Secretary of Transportation Olympia,WA 98504-7440
(360)357-2600
Fax(360)357-2601
February 25, 2000
Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, Washington 98504-7703
Re: SEPA Register
Dear SEPA Reviewer:
Attached is a copy of the Determination of Non-Significance for your information and
publication in the SEPA Register, in accordance with WAC 197-11-340(2).
Project: SR 3, SR 106 to MP 26.70
Should you have any questions or need further information, please contact Lynn Hakes at
(360) 357-2674 or Tom Whitney at (360) 357-2749.
Sincerely,
C1 r r'
Kenneth M. Stone
Olympic Region Environmental Manager
KMS:lsh:ps
Attachments: SEPA Checklist
Determination of Nonsignificance
cc w/attachments: Allen Borden, Mason County
Amity Trowbridge, Project Engineer
Chris Byrnes, WDFW
Suquamish Tribe
Skokomish Tribe
sf 02250002(184)
• I Z�3 Z -ao- �,a oo 0
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
Description of proposal: This project proposes to resurface SR 3 from its intersection with SR
106 (milepost [MP] 24.91) to SR 3 MP 26.70 and replace a deficient culvert headwall at MP
25.32 (Sweetwater Creek).
Proponent: Washington State Department of Transportation
Location of proposal: SR 3, MP 24.91 to MP 26.70, Sections 29 and 32, T23N, R1W, W.M. in
Mason County.
Lead Agency: Washington State Department of Transportation
Olympic Region
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement(EIS) is not required
under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is
available to the public on request.
_ There is no comment period for this DNS.
X This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); The lead
agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days
from the date of signature below. Comments must be
submitted by: "i i QO
Responsible Official: Kenneth M. Stone
Position/Title: Region Environmental Manager
Olympic Region
Phone: (360)357-2660
Address: PO Box 47440
Ol mpia, WA 98504-7440
Signature: Date: Z Z5 Qb
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW,requires all governmental
agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. The
purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts for
your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help
the agency decide whether an EIS is required. The checklist questions apply to all parts of the
proposal, even if they are planned over a period of time. Attach any additional information that
will help describe the proposal or its environmental effects. Be prepared to explain answers or
provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
SR 3,MP 24.91 to MP 26.70, SR 106 to MP 26.70
2. Name of applicant:
Washington State Department of Transportation
Olympic Region
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Amity Trowbridge Kenneth M. Stone
Port Orchard Project Office Region Environmental Manager
8293 Spring Creek Road PO Box 47440
Port Orchard, WA 98366 Olympia,WA 98504-7440
Telephone: (360) 874-3000 Telephone: (360) 357-2660
Fax: (360) 874-3003 Fax: (360)357-2739
4. Date checklist prepared:
February 2000
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Washington State Department of Transportation
Olympic Region
6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable):
Construction period: Late June or early July 2000, 25 working days
7. Are there any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to
or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Biological Assessment and
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)Biological Assessment
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of
other proposals directly affecting the property covered by the proposal? If yes,
explain.
No.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for the proposal, if
known.
Hydraulic Project Approval from Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife
Use of a Nationwide Permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers
11. Give brief, complete description of the project including(but not limited to) its
size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature. There are several questions in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of the proposal. You do not need
to repeat those answers on this page.
This project proposes to resurface SR 3 from MP 24.91 to MP 26.70 and
replace an inadequate wooden headwall around a culvert at MP 25.32 which
conveys Sweetwater Creek beneath SR 3. The resurfacing will be a
pavement overlay with no additional impervious surfacing. The headwall
will consist of a 1350 mm (approx. 54 inch) inside diameter, 1550 mm
(approx. 61 inch) outside diameter catch basin placed at the outfall of the
existing culvert in the stream. A 600 mm (approx. 24 inch) culvert pipe,
approximately 4 meters in length,will attach to the catch basin and direct the
water in the stream bed following the existing channel.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of the proposed project, including a street address, if any, and
section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,
site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available.
This project is located on SR 3 at MP 24.91 to MP 26.70, Sections 29 and 32,
T23N, R1 W, W.M. in Mason County near and within the town of Belfair ..
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site(circle one): Flat, rolling,hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other:
2
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
15%
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel,
peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and
note any prime farmland.
According to the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation
Service Soil Survey of Mason County, the soils in this project area are
Everett gravelly, sandy loam.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
None observed.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Approximately 3 cubic meters of material from the stream bed and 11
cubic meters from the stream bank will be excavated for installation of the
catch basin structure and culvert extension. Approximately 14 cubic meters
of quarry spalls and 7 cubic meters of rip rap will be placed on the road
embankment slope, stream bank and over the catch basin and culvert. The
quarry spalls and rip rap will be from a WSDOT approved source.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe.
Erosion could occur during the work performed to extend the culvert and
replace the headwall. An erosion control plan is being developed.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
There are no plans included in this project to increase impervious surface.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if
any:
Temporary erosion will be controlled utilizing a temporary erosion and
sediment control plan and Best Management Practices (BMPs) in accordance
with the WSDOT Highway Runoff Manual.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example:
dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the
project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if
known.
3
Emissions from construction equipment may occur for the duration of the
project. Upon its completion, this project will not produce emissions to the
air.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal?
If so, generally describe.
None.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
Construction of this project will comply with Olympic Air Pollution
Control Authority Regulation 1.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on, or in, the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state
what stream or river it flows into.
Sweetwater Creek flows under SR 3. This stream is classified as type
3 water, and is a tributary to the Union River.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)
the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Yes. A headwall around the culvert conveying Sweetwater Creek
under SR 3 is constructed of wood and inadequate to hold the
roadway slope. This project proposes to resurface SR 3 from MP
24.91 to MP 26.70 and replace an inadequate wooden headwall
around a culvert at MP 25.32 which conveys Sweetwater Creek
beneath SR 3. The resurfacing will be a pavement overlay with no
additional impervious surfacing. The headwall will consist of a 1350
mm inside diameter, 1550 outside diameter, catch basin placed at the
outfall of the existing culvert in the stream. A 600 min culvert pipe
will attach to the catch basin and direct the water in the stream bed
following the existing channel. Rip rap and quarry spalls will be
placed on the roadway slope, stream bank, and over the catch basin
and culvert extension. SR 3 within 200 feet of Sweetwater Creek will
be resurfaced as a part of this project.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site
that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
Approximately 3 cubic meters of material from the stream bed will be
excavated for installation of the catch basin structure and culvert
extension. Rip rap and quarry spalls will be used to armor the stream
bank, and this material will extend below the ordinary high water mark
and to about 0.3 meter below the stream bed elevation to prevent the
4
original stream bank material from eroding from beneath it.
Approximately 7.6 cubic meters of quarry spalls, 2.3 cubic meters of
rip rap and 0.3 cubic meters of streambed gravel will be placed below
the ordinary high water mark of the stream. See plans for location.
The quarry spalls and rip rap will be from a WSDOT approved source.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
The flow of Sweetwater Creek, anticipated to be low during the
summer construction period planned, will be halted so the work
installing the catch basin and culvert extension can be done in a dry
streambed. This may be accomplished by one of the following means:
1. Plug culvert at inlet, pump water over roadway and into stream
bed downstream of the in-stream construction activity.
2. Plug culvert at inlet and let the flow pool in the stream bed on the
east side of the roadway during in stream construction period
(estimated to be approximately one hour).
3. Plug culvert at inlet, and allow the water of the creek to flow to the
next cross culvert during the in stream construction period.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location
on the site plan.
No.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge.
No.
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if
known.
No.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following chemicals ; agricultural; etc.).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or
humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
None.
5
C. Water Runoff(including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
This project will not increase impervious surface, and will not
increase runoff.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe.
There exists the potential for fuel spills or leaks from construction
equipment. A spill control plan will be implemented as a part of this
contract.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water
impacts, if any:
A temporary erosion control plan has been developed, and a spill
control plan will be implemented as a part of this contract. Water
quality will be maintained in accordance with WSDOT's
Implementing Agreement with the Department of Ecology.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site.
_X_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other.
evergreen tree: fir, red cedar, pine, other.
_ shrubs
rass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other:reed
canary grass, willow, ladyfern, horsetails,coltsfoot, water parsley
_X_ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil,
_X_ other: salmonberry, elderberry, sword fern,blackberry
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Approximately 20 square meters of vegetation will be removed by the excavation
or covered by the placement of the quarry spalls and rip rap. The vegetation
impacted will be grasses, blackberries, horsetails, very small maple tree
seedlings, etc.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
A US Fish and Wildlife Programmatic Biological Assessment was completed.
No threatened or endangered plant species are in the project vicinity.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
6
There are no plans to replant the area covered with quarry spalls and rip rap.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are
known to be on or near the site:
BIRDS: hawk, heron, ea e, songbirds, other.
MAMMALS: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
FISH: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
A USFWS Programmatic Biological Assessment determined that there would
be no effect on the Bald Eagle. A NMFS Biological Assessment is being
prepared to determine what, if any, effect the project will have on Hood
Canal Chum and Puget Sound Chinook Salmon.
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Yes,Western Washington is part of the Pacific Flyway. Salmon
migrate up Sweetwater Creek to the site of this project.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
A USFWS Programmatic Biological Assessment determined that there would
be no effect on the Bald Eagle. A NMFS Biological Assessment is being
prepared to determine what, if any, effect the project will have on Hood
Canal Chum and Puget Sound Chinook Salmon.
The culvert extension will include baffles which are designed to help the
migrating salmon to navigate this structure. The structure will be designed
in accordance with the conditions of the Hydraulic Project Approval issued
by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to
meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for
heating, manufacturing, etc.
None.
b. Would the project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe.
No.
7
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if
any:
None.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that would occur as
a result of this proposal? If so, describe:
There exists the risk of fuel spills from the construction equipment. A spill
control plan will be implemented as a part of this contract.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Fire, police and ambulance.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if
any:
A spill responder will be designated and a spill control plan will be
implemented as a part of this contract.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect the project(for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
Traffic noise from SR 3 exists in this area.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site.
Construction activities may increase the noise levels temporarily.
After construction, noise level will return to normal.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties:
The site, State Route 3, will be repaved. Due to the length of the
paving project, the adjacent property ranges from undeveloped to
commercial in its use.
8
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No.
C. Describe any structures on the site.
There is a 24 inch concrete culvert and inadequate headwall
constructed of wood and metal pipe.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
The wood and metal pipe headwall will be removed.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
No zoning in Mason County.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Urban Growth Area
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of
the site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, specify.
Sweetwater Creek is considered environmentally sensitive as a salmon
bearing stream.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
None.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
This project will not displace any people.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
N/A
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
WSDOT environmental and design staff has consulted with Mason
County Planning staff at the project site to review acceptability of
the planned work.
9
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing.
N/A
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing.
N/A
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any:
N/A
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what
is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The culvert and catch basin are the only structures included in this project.
The culvert is 600 mm in diameter and the catch basin will be approximately
2.3 meters high.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any:
None.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mainly occur?
None.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
N/A
C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
N/A
10
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
A school playground, a casino, and the Theler Center which includes
nature trails are in the vicinity of the project area. None would be impacted
by this project.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
No.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project, if any:
N/A
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
None known.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
The Dalby Waterwheel, installed by an historic Hood Canal family in the
1920's, is located on the opposite side of SR 3 from the headwall which will
be replaced. This project will not impact this historic waterwheel.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
As currently designed, the project will not affect any known cultural
resources. However, in the event archaeological or cultural objects
are encountered they will not be further disturbed until consultation
with an archaeologist determines whether the material is to be salvaged.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access
to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any:
The site is adjacent to SR 3.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance
to the nearest transit stop?
Mason Transit bus service serves SR 3 through the town of Belfair. It has
two scheduled stops near the location of the headwall daily.
11
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would
the project eliminate?
None.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing
roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate
whether public or private).
No.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe. ,r
No.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
None.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
A traffic control plan will be implemented during construction.
15. Public Service
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally
describe.
No.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
N/A
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, water, natural gas, refuse
service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other:
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed.
None.
12
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Signature: /F)�l6;L
Region Environmental Manager
Olympic Region
Date Submitted: ZI Z S1Ob
13
F �
Ld
f
cr
Z
LS
N
---------------
------------
LLI
- - -MIL -- - - - - - - - - - - - — � � �
_ 1 I
n
uj
G
w
I
a
0
o
J ________________--___________—Y----------_T-----------__T_—---------
LEGEND
---------------
DRAINAGE NOTE: SEE SHEETS DD4-DD5 to ! m DRAINAGE ITEM GUANTITES
• J M J
t0 W W
�— - - --------------- NOTE.
STREAMBED - - Y m '- - SQ3 - - m+ O E
o v N THE FIRST NUMBER OF THE "CODE" BELOW a z
�; APP}tQ1tCM•' a; �; REFERS TO THE SHEET NO. OR THE SHEET a
o v m vi REFERENCE--- NO. SHOWING THE CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING CULVERT - - n n FEATURE. THESECONDNUMBERREFERSTO cai
------- �---- - -- --- --tv-�- ------ ------ .------ - J -----------Y-------------- '---'------- HE CONSTRUCTION FEAT URE FOUND ON THAT
SHEET
c� x
4 T.-. 4 W U Z
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN W ? a N
=O H Y
i
U Vl 2 �
G EXISTING GAS LINE _ �a a
2.81 n N U J O
EXISTING UTILITY POLE - ---------- --- -- ----"
- - - i
�_ _ __ ___,____ CODE LOCATION M M3 EA. M3
D-1
EXISTING VALVE BOX CONC. CUL;v. PIPE D-z
600 MM DIAM. D-3
---
STATE FED.AID PROJ.NO.
DESIGNED BY
10 WASH D
ENTERED BY Washington State SR 167 TO M.P. 26.70
CHECKED BY Jw"unit DWAPepartment of Transportation SHEET
PROJ. ENGR.
REGIONAL ADM. carnucT no. of
DATE DATE REVISION BY DRAINAGE DETAILS 5M4T5
-------- -------------------- - -------------------- -------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- ------------------------------
r a
a
w
s
a
z
o:
w
� 1.0 M
z 1
w 1
1 1
1 a
w 11 111 O FLATTER STREAVBLD
1 1
100 MM MAXIMUM
eS
69
1 1 —
11
1-2 MAN ROCK QUARRY SPACES
00 o Oro ���
O C�oO�O�oo�
SECTION AA
1-2 MAN ROCK y
CULVERT EXTENSION
ti SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET
o NOTE D-1
500 500
O
1 300
QUARRY SPALLS I
OUTLET DETAIL
NOTES:
1. THE CULVERT ENDS SHALL BE BEVELED TO MATCH
THE EMBANKMENT OR DITCH SLOPE WITHOUT EXCEEDING
N T S THE LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.
2. FIELD CUT OF CULVERT ENDS IS PERMITTED WHEN APPROVED
BY THE ENGINEER.
�°i TAT FED.AID PROJ.NO.
DESIGNED BY 10 MASH SR 167 T6 M.P. 26.70 D
ENTERED BY OPTION 1 � Washington State
CHECKED BY '0"""'"E" A Department of TransportationSHEET
PROJ. ENGR. 2
c�
REGIONAL ADM. cou*w*00•
DRAINAGE DETAILS 4
DATE DATE REVISION BY SHEETS
169
cr
z
w
tN
61)
64
W
E
Q
Z
W
J Ql
— O
WCl
— 1
to `1 al
6R �� W
1� .q oR SCHEDULE A CULY. PIPE
'A , 11 0 F ATTER
1 � p
— — — — -- — — ------------- STREAMBED
— — — — — — ———————
— CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 O
c:l11 I1 Opc� O°°l1r, �O SEE STANDARD PLAN B-lo
_ _ o OQ OOO�/o O���7� OQ `N QUARRY SPALLS
— �O �00� �OQVO�O��
rn O
0
0
d 1-2 MAN ROCK
TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN
NOTE D-2
CULVERT EXTENSION
NOTE D-3
SECTION BB
NTS
NE610M STATEFED.AID PROJ.NO.
No.
DESIGNED BY 10 WASH D
ENTERED BY OPTION 2 � Washington State SR 167 TO M.P. 26.70
CHECKED BY 'ob NuNKR VrAlF Department of Transportation S"EE'
PROJ. ENCR. — 3
REGIONAL ADM. CONTNAc1 No.
DRAINAGE DETAILS 4
DATE DATE REVISION BY s�Er,s
L
s �
- - - - 1 1 4--
w 1 1
1 w uj
Z 11 1
J 1 1
1 0
L, 1 1
11 1 ———__— STREAMBED
1 _ _
1
Lu
MODIFIED WINGWALL
o BAFFLES
1 11 ���, CjQI Ylf Jgj�o� � SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET
0 al�)BC5 0 0�t"8b o�
00000000 1-2 MAN ROCK
° SECTION CC
MODIFIED WINGWALL
SEE STANOARO PLAN B-9
BAFFLES STEEL GUSSETS MAY
BE REQUIRED FOR
STRUCTURAL SUPPORT
a
BAFFLE (MIN. 5 mm.
STEEL PLATE) THREADED ROD
ANCHORED IN
CONCRETE AS PER
MANUFACTURERS SPECS.
BAFFLE DETAIL
NTS
1EG0M STATE FED.AID PROJ.NO.
rB.
DESIGNED BY 10 WASH D
ENTERED BY OPTION 3 ���//, Washington State SR 167 TO M.P. 26. 70
CHECKED BY JOB MN6ER wI/ Department of Transportation SKEET
PROJ. ENGR. 4
REGIONAL ADM. CONTR'CT RO. OF
DRAINAGE DETAILS 4
GATE DATE REVISION BY
SHEETS
JPEG image 640x480 pixels file:///OI/Project Data/Projects by SR N...003/SR 3 Paver and HeadwalVMVC-074F.JP
403
I PA
;,W.TF04 44
r
Y^
_ r
Here- are, the p1CA"re_S 0-j7 the headcva// we- hopL fa rc/°/Qc,.
C.5 U �o4r,� o f' the 52 3 �o4v�nq P rc�/cc�, Th�'S is /oca ��ct
G� m./eposrt 25.34, e- yoL, C✓an /,-CCU *Nor .jGrlwary
(q,•oo a4 -the F>r0fcc4- Si4e duff)) U5
— Lyn n
Fr P1VF1)
JAN 0 6 20M
MASON CO,PLANNING DEPT.
1 of 1 1/4/2000 3:32 PM
i
0
00
k�
,r..
y
u€
Ml
eA
per
_ ..11
vt-
ti
.! N
�Al VA
cr
€,
E {Y
w
F
A
N
O
O C)
w b
w �
3 b
�Nti�"'Ql
W10 P2,rA& 4kk6-�AP-(W , Vf b r-/k/ tetel
ool&�
WD 1A ,�eaA ,fij
�e
'L
w
T 23 N ,
.,, R 1 W
Ln
� I
I
CLALLAM �m 7TO SR 16 I
`� ----- -----� a �� 9 MILES i
n
a •�"`li JEFFERSON
h
JMASON�o� ....a�� 4J Lake 2`1
U- �r j��ORAYS M)MARBORI
Z �
rm �
d.� 8
o �......�:; 1 30 2
END PROJECT
,o PIERCE
sroN M.P.26.70
el 1Ir
o CD
--------------------
�(%==i ------------- . .
.....
-------
CC
31
END 32 BEGIN PROJECT
Lynch Cove M.P.24.91
BELFAIR - TUHUYA RD 300
33
•........ T 23 N
T 22 N --------------------
106 O 4
6
5
0 400 800 1200 1 600 2000 TO SR 101
22 MILES
SCALE IN METERS TO SHELTON
25 MILES
"`, °" STAr FEO.AID PROJ.NO.
DESIGNED BY SERVICE CENTER
ENTERED BY 10 WASH SR 3 M.P. 24.91 TO 26.70
CHECKED BY ,m sum* � Washington State I
PROJ. ENGR. ???? A Department of Transportation :,rtET
or
REGIONAL ADM. CMTMT wo.
DATE DATEMREVISION VICINITY MAP
SHEEEE
TS
e: \rick\junk\maps.dgn Feb. 02, 1998 09:56:04 �__ PLOT?
w \
z o SOLID METAL COVER
w
cr \ n
a m GRAVEL BORROW
— — _ -- — — — — — o o Q QUARRY SPALLS
J J
300 mm DEPTH
_ o = a.
c
w N2.65 M ~ SCHEDULE A CULVERT PIPE BEVELED END SECTION
600 mm DIA. SEE STANDARD PLAN B-7o
'Ea _ _
— — — — — — — 12+300 "�- D"1 EXISTING STREAMBED
aw LIGHT LOOSE
i? :r# °I RIPRAP
—W — — — EXISTING LOCATION OF BAFFLE
LJ
. ;..;:..r•:
_ _ — _ _
_W — w . � _0— 200 mm. A.C. WATER MAIN 0.3 M
vi — W — ;r - -G- -G— 4.1
"W EXISTING CULVERT J J 3:I OR FLATTER
S W W W
GJti VG Y ^� EXISTING W000 HEADWALL ; STREAMBED GRAVEL,
QUARRY SPACESr��y _ � .�
SEE DETAILS THIS SHEET _� SWEETWq N m 0.3M DEPTH
�- . TER ORES GRAVEL BACKF I LL FOR �+
SEE SPECIAL PROVISION
K PIPE ZONE BEDDING - - "RIPRAP"
SEE SPECIAL PROVISION W W
oc 300 m BETWEEN EARTH � "GENERAL PIP
INSTALLATION
BANK AND CATCH BASIN REQUIREMENTS"
EXISTING, 75 mm, GAS MAIN
4A FISH BAFFLE (TO BE RELOCATED BY OTHERS)
SEE DETAILS, SHEET ????
BEVELED ENO SECTION
SECTION B- B
r-! SEE STANDARD PLAN B-7a NOT TO SCALE
r
LICHT LOOSE RIPRAP
d
PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE O
Q
a QUARRY SPALLS
w w 300 mm DEPTH
0 0
w �
c� o
DRAINAGE ITEM QUANTITES NOT LuLn
NOTE:
THE FIRST NLRrSER OF THE COCE" EELOY a _ca STANDARD PLAN o-le n
REFERS TIC THE =H:ET NO. OR THE SHEET
k Er En EP!CC mO. Sr:Oi.ING THE CONSTRUCTION ' SEE STANGAnC PLAN S-(z ��'§.�
\(�\\� IV--. CREEKBED
`HEi-ON. THE SEDONC NUMBER ND ON TO > Y THE CONST4UCTIGN FEATURE FOUND ON THAT :HEFT, � ,,� � -'• SEE ST4ti'-�,;RC PLAN 5-2
��
C 4, =c STANDARD PLAN 5-?a \ /
a n m< s J =Ec 574NGAzr FLAN 5-I1
EXISTING GROUND
_ - W
G. SEE SPEC!4L PROVISION
„ATCH EASINS, ANG
GRY.:E;L i SECTION C- C
�_
J-- _i}• It-J17 ("76 LT ' - NOT TO SCALE
STc. -_-'--C= (LT., TG STA. i2'_le ' 4.
127 _ (LT.1 TJ 57�. C.O
HENo. ISTATE FED.AID PROJ.NO.
DESIGNED BY
ENTERED BY 10 WASH SR 3 DD 1
CHECKED BYPRQJ Joe NUMUR � Washington State SR 106 TO MP 26.70
REGI ENGR. CIA Department of Transportation SHEET
REGIONAL ADM. caNT!ucT Ho.DATE DATE REVISION 6Y DRAINAGE DETAILS 1 36 6
SHEETS