The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGRD99-00019 - GRD Application - 8/12/2001 PERMIT NO.: GRD I OoI l MASON COUNTY LAND MODIFICATION PERMIT APPLICATION a 426 W.Cedar/P.O.Box 186,Shelton,WA 98584 Shelton 360 427-9670 Belfair 360 275-4467 Elma 360 482-5269 Seattle 206 464-6968 APPLICANT INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Owner .:-.vco 11 ✓L S Contractor Name Z Mailing Add ess /!-0 1&*?1,4 10 Mailing Address _eo_4k) -.3,11 City State /,0 Zip Code -?8ZY9 City dL/ - 7 State /,)4 Zip Code ��1-7 Phone Other Ph.( 80/ ../f4j Ph 27f-JfVd Other Ph. Lien/Title Holder S; an fide Contractor Reg. # Nocyl� O, Address Expiration ENGINEER INFORMATION Name Phone ( ) Address State Zip Code PARCEL INFORMATION-12 digit Tax Parcel No. 53 ov/'7/ / Fire District Legal Description i_ 21 C LD 077 1)/_(R $ Site Address(include street name and city ? -? L/}yLs�a.^ !4 WB `,; L J/1 9 J3.IfIL Directions to site: Will timber be cut and sold in parcel preparation? (Yes/No) Is your property within 200' of the following: Body of Water(Name) Saltwater Lake River/Creek Pond Wetland Seasonal Runoff Stream Slopes or Bluffs Soft compressible soils TYPE OF JOB - Excavation ,&_Filling Grading Total size of area DUX /GY3 Size of area to be cleared on slopes over 10% Estimated amount of cubic yards .104)skj., Describe Work VL-L 140 r, e t At LAND MODIFICATION INFORMATION I/ j�� YES NO Will fill be brought on site? If yes, source — ❑ Will excavated materials be taken off site? If yes, destination 3rg ag1 air ❑ Does fill contain potential hazardous materials? ❑ Has a soils report been completed on site? If yes, include copy. ❑ �C Will proposal result in redirection of any surface water runoff onto adjacent properties? ❑ Will proposed work alter where storm water or ground water enters or exits the site? ❑ Will quality, quantity or velocity of storm/ground water be altered? ❑ Will runoff be collected/controlled by interceptors, curtain drains or other collection devices? ❑ Will the land be replanted upon completion? ❑ ❑ Will the proposal result in slopes steeper than those currently on site? ❑ ❑ Is the site within 200' of a designated shoreline? ❑ ❑ NOTICE: THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL&VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS OR IF CONSTRUCTION WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER THE WORK IS COMMENCED. PROOF OF CONTINUATION OF WORK IS BY MEANS OF A PROGRESS INSPECTION. The owner or agent on owner's behalf,represents that the information provided is accurate and grants employees of Mason County access to the above described property and structures for review and inspection of this project. Acknowledgment of such is by signature below: OWNER AFFIDAVIT-I certify that I am exempt from the requirements of CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT-I certify that I am currently registered as a the Contractor Registration Law RCW 18.27 and am aware of the contractor in the State of Washington and that I am aware of the ordinance requirements for which this permit is issued and that all work ordinance requirements regulating the work for which this permit Is issued will be done in conformance therewith. No changes shall be made without and all work shall be done in conformance therewith. No changes shall first obtaini g prova. be made without first obtaining approval. X Date !' 11,/A4 X Date FOR OFFICIAL USE BEYOND THIS POINT Accepted by Date Submittal Amount Due Receipt No. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW APPROVED DENIED CONDITION CODES Building Department 9-1 �. Planning Department Public Works Department Fire Marshal FEES Grading Permit Fee Site Inspection Plan Review Fee Other Public Works Fee Pre-Paid at Submittal ( ) Violation Fee TOTAL FEES MASON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER Shelton,Washington 98584 DATE: August 24, 1999 INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS TO: Randy Neff, Planner - DCD Dana Herron, Building Inspector - PAC FROM: Rich Geiger, Engineering Services Manager - PW SUBJ: REVIEW OF GRID 99-0019, SCOTT REEVES I have reviewed the preliminary soils reconnaissance report and have visited this site. I recommend construction of the home's foundation be permitted, subject to the following condition: Currently, the cut slope is dry and appears stable. Should the cut slope show any signs of excessive sloughing or other distress or should an unusual weather or seismic event occur before the concrete toe wall is constructed, the contractor shall stop work immediately and contact the geo-technical engineer. I understand there is concern that this report does not meet County standards for a geotechnical report. However, the engineer has specified that a concrete toe wall sha!! be constructed. I do expect that acceptable calculations for such a wall will contain all the information required in a geotechnical report. I will need to review these calculations before I can recommend construction approval for the concrete toe wall and the house framing. If you have any questions, call me at extension 531. RICHARQ4. G IGER, E. August 24, 1999 To: Gary Yando From: Randy Neff RE: Reeves Permit GRD99-0019 Gary: I have some concerns as to how this permit started let alone what has happened so far. It seems that Terry Ryan when out to the site to inspect for the footings and found that the applicant/agent had removed as significant amount of soil . Terry determined that a grading permit should be required. It seems that a error was made by someone who review the original building permit for planning and didn't condition the permit by the Critical Resourse Ord. So no geo-tech stuff was required. Well, once Terry Ryan required the grading permit, I went out to the site. It was upon returning to the office I stopped by to see Tami Griffey to talk to her about the permit. That is when I received a copy of the geo-tech stuff by Rola Bought, P.E. I then sent the geo-tech to Jerry Hauth, Alan Tahja, Rich Geiger. I scheduled with Rich to review the site on Aug. 19 to expite the permit. Rich review the site and also looked at the geo-tech information submitted by the applicant to building. As of today I have not received the IDC from Rich about the site visit or the geo-tech stuff . Now it seems that the building dept. want to issue the building permit for the site, which is understandable since that is their job. I have had some discussion with Jerry Hauth as to the geo-tech stuff and he feels that the geo-tech stuff is ok with him. My concern is that the geo-tech stuff does not meet the policy and should there for be returned to the applicant and the building permit be put on hold, until the engineer has developed the geo-tech stuff to the standards identified in the geo-tech policy dated Oct. 5, 1998 . I have attached to this note the building permit, the geo-tech stuff and am awaiting a bulkhead designed to protech the proposed home. Please get with me when you can. I have several other issue to discuss with you, which are the harvesting of the timber within the buffer areas for aquatic management areas . Denial of a pier/dock permit at Lake Cushman and i Z - 1 10'easment + i ti lea r 5'e J I I 11 1 1 D Way OTIo�Fa-Oapr�Mecxc'1'aw 1 y Vx46tlainNoW 1 1 Dvain MW U t 1 10'easment "7 3 i Lo - ( August 19 , 1999 To: Jerry Hauth/Alan Tahja From: Randy Neff �� RE: Grading Permit# GRD99-0019 Well, we have another Boughan geo-tech report to review. Please help me. Thanks, I have pictures of the site if you wish to review. Case Activity Listing 6/17/2002]0:43:13AM T I D E M A R K Case#: BLD99-00406 Assigned Done Activity Description Date I Date 2 ., Date 3 11old- Dis To ... . B,.,. ` P. Y :Updated Updated By BLDA011 WARNING!! SEE PARCEL FLAG 6/4/1999 6/4/1999 None DONE KS 6/4/1999 KS PAID BLDA500 (F) Issue building permit 6/4/1999 None DONE KS 6/4/1999 KS BLDC110 Footing inspection 8/6/1999 8/6/1999 8/6/1999 None FAIL TFR 8/9/1999 KW 1.NO SITE PLAN ON SITE. 2. STRING PROPERTY LNES.3. PLACEMENT OF FOOTING DOESN'T MEET MIN UBC SETBACKS FROM ASCENDING SLOPES H/2 4.APPLY FOR GRADING PERMIT. 5. SEE CONDITION 49 ON PERMITS.DO NOT POUR. BLDA900 Telephone call 8/10/1999 None DONE TFR 8/10/1999 TFR talked with mr.reeves-tolri him we would require a eng.assesment of slope stability and how he would recomond handel u.b.c.set back from accending slopes ie one large retaining wall or a series of small retaining wall . BLDC110 Footing inspection 8/24/1999 8/24/1999 8/24/1999 None FAIL TFR 8/25/1999 KW ON AUG 12, 1999 RANDY NEFF AND RICH GEIGER FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVE19PMENT AND MASON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WERE ON SITE TO REVIEW THE ENGINEERING REPORT AND SITE CONDITIONS AS SUBMITTED BY CONSOLIDATED ENGINEERING, ROLLA B BOUGHAN.AT THE TIME OF THE INSPECTION,IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE SITE IS WITHIN A CRITICAL AREA AND THAT THE ENGINEERING REPORT SUBMITTED WAS INSUFFIECIENT.NO FURTHER WORK CAN COMMENCE ON THIS SITE UNTIL APPROVED BY THE ABOVE LISTED DEPARTMENTS AND PERSONNEL.PLEASE CONTACT RANDY NEFF AT 427-9670 EXT 363 DEPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RICH GEIGER OF MASON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS AT 427-9670 EXT 531 PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY ADDITIONAL WORK. BLDC200 MH Setup inspection 9/17/1999 9/20/1999 9/20/1999 None FAIL TFR 9/20/1999 KW 1.COMPLETE DRAIN LINE CROSS OVER AT 1 ST TO 2ND I NIT.2. INSULATE WATER CROSS OVER . 71WNSTALL nal inspection 9/30/1999 10/4/1999 None FAIL TFR 10/ 4/1 KED D30 DAY CONDITIONAL TO SEPTIC APPROVAL WHICH IS SCHEDULED FOR TOMORROW AND PROPERTY LINE AGREEMENT W/NEIGHBOR..2.LOOK IN INSTRUCTION USUALLY A RECESSED PORCHES THE SKIRTING IN TO FOLLOW LINE OF HOUSE BECAUSE OF WATER ABILITY TO ENTER CRAWL SPACE. FIX ONE BLOCK HIGH ALONG OUT LINE OF BUILDING AND PROVIDE WEEP HOLES TO EXTERIOR. BLDA560 Permit Cancelled None UUNt KW 12/7/2001 KLW BLDC050 Pre-site Inspection 5/19/1999 5/20/1999 None PEND TLG 5/19/1999 TLG Page 2 of 3 CaseActivity.tpt Case Activity Listing 6/17/200210:43:10AM T I D E M A R K Case #: BLD99-00406 COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC. OEM, 1,i 3G D BLDA010 Application received 5/14/1999 5/19/1999 None DONE KW 8/24/1999 REN BLDB135 Addressing 5/19/1999 5/20/1999 None DONE GMM 5/20/1999 GMM BLDB138 Planning Pre-Review 5/20/1999 5/20/1999 None DONE MMS 5/20/1999 MMS BLDB110 Building Plan Review 5/19/1999 5/24/1999 None DONE TLG 5/24/1999 TLG BLDB210 Water Adequacy 5/24/1999 5/24/1999 None HOLD CEB 5/24/1999 CEB need DOH water adequacy BLDB200 Environmental Health Review 5/19/1999 5/24/1999 None DONE CEB 5/24/1999 CEB plot map and bedrooms match.see condition BLDB210 Water Adequacy 5/27/1999 5/27/1999 None DONE CEB 5/27/1999 CEB RECEIVED WATER ADEQUACY FROM DOH BLDB134 RLC Review 6/3/1999 None DONE AHB 6/3/1999 AHB SLOPES ON PROPERTY BUT NOT VERY HIGH AND NO VISIBLE SIGNS OF FAILURES. BLDB130 Planning Review 5/20/1999 6/3/1999 None DONE AHB 8/24/1999 REN GMA COMPLIANCE REVIEW ALLOWED, AHB SEPTIC SYSTEM NEAR ROAD LEVEL; HOUSE TO BE ON TERRACE ABOVE SEPTIC AREA.AHB The geo-tech information provided by Rolla B.Boughan does not meet the Mason County Resource Ord.#77-93,nor the policy for landslides dated Oct.5, 1998. Mason County Public Works has signed off on the geo-tech saying that they will have Rolla B.Boughan develope the policy requirement for the retaining wall at a later date. The applicant has removed the material for the home site,that is allowed under the UBC for single family residences. I have been asked to approve the grading permit, but I have concerns for the future occupants of the structure that is to be placed on this site. BLDA100 Approved For Issuance 6/3/1999 None DONE KS 6/4/1999 KS Page 1 of 3 CaseActiNity-rpt �� Case Activity Listing 16/26/2002 09:40PM T I D E M A R K Case #: ENF2002-00134 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Assigned Done «' rviEy. Description' ' Disp To By Updated Updated By ENFA010 Complaint Received 6/7/2002 None PASS TLG 6/17/2002 TLC; ENFB020 Site Investigation/Stop Work 6/7/2002 None PASS TR 6/17/2002 TLG Photos taken. Stop work over 30"tall. Note guardrail openings are 6" ENFA900 Telephone Call 6/12/2002 None DONE TLG 6/17/2002 TLG Anita called and left a message re:stop work order. ENFA900 Telephone Call 6/17/2002 None DONE TLG 6/17/2002 TLG Called Anita back. She said it was included on permit. I pulled the permit and read to her the conditions that she signed regarding what was required and what needed permits. During the discussion she said her permit was still open for the MH. Permit was cancelled by expiration on 12-06-01 and informed her that the last inspection which was prior to that was only for 30 day occupancy. Told her that she also needs to renew MH permit and get a final. I said I would send her a notice of violation and permit package that would inform her of everything that needs to be done.I will mail it on 6-19-02. Scott Reeves is no longer involved in this project as they divorced and she now owns the house ENFB006 Notification of Owner 6/18/2002 None DONE TLG 6/17/2002 TLG Notice of violation. Reduce,remove or permit deck by 7-18-02. After permit is issued or deck is removed/reduced,call for final on expired MH permit by paying$52.30 per inspection or renew at 1/2 original cost. ENFA900 Telephone Call 6/26/2002 None DONE TLG 6/26/2002 TLG Anita called and said ex-husband has included house in bankruptcy. She doesn't know if she will have to move or can keep it and therefore,she doesn't want to spend the$on the deck permit if she has to move. I agreed to allow her to do a$52.30 temp occ for 180 days on BLD99-00406. I also agreed to allow her to submit the atf deck permit without submittal fees on or by July 18th as originally ordered. I explained that all the fees would be due when it is ready and since the bankrupcy ends on July 31,the deck permit won't be ready until about then anyway.If she moves out,we will post the MH for non-occ and require new occupant to take care of deck issues Page 1 of I CaseActivity..ipt Case Activity Listing 6/17/2002 �T I D E M A R K Case #: BLD99-00406 10:43:1 OAM COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC. Assigned DonC. D%V Datel Dae2 Date3Hold Disp fo By Updated BLDA201 STOP WORK ISSUED 9/27/1999 None DONL 131 W 9;27i 1999 Met with Jodi and Steve this morning.EH plans to post Mr.keeeves home and the neighbors with stop work unti I property line dispute is settled. Please do not do final and allo\��occupancy unti I� approval from EH. bjw e�6ek-� wns acbol? -d- y�e Az lam` 1 Page 3 of 3 CaseActivity..rpt Page No. 1 CASE HISTORY FOR CASE NO.: GRD99-0019 �J SCOTT REEVES NE630 LARSON BLVD BELFAIR 08/26/99 `1�Jacdate Action Description Req/ Schd/ End/ Action Note Upd Code Sent Done Done � Da t By ------- ------------------------------ -------- - - �---------- - - ---- - GRDA010 Application received 08/10/99 / / 08/12/99 DONE KW 08/12/99 KW GRDA011 WARNING!! SEE PARCEL FLAG / / / / / / 08/12/99 KW GRDA040 RLC Checklist Review / / / / / / 08/12/99 KW GRDA100 Building review 08/12/99 / / / / To Terry Ryan for review PEND TR O8/13/99 TLG GRDA110 Planning review 08/16/99 08/17/99 08/24/99 Went to the site 17 August and am DONE REN O8/24/99 REN sending out letter to the applicant that a geo-tech report must be done for the grading. The geo-tech report should address the grading plan building, septic and access to the lot. Will hold permit until these issues have been addressed in geo-tech report. Will be taking Rich Geiger to the site on Aug. 19. Received a geo-tech something from Tami Griffey. The geo-tech something was done by Rolla Broughan, P.E.. The geo-tech report that I received does not meet the geo-tech policy dated October 5, 1998. Mason County Public Works doesn't have any problems with the geo-tech something done by Mr. Broughan. I have been instructed to approve this grading permit, since the geo-tech report seems to be adequate per everyone standards except the geo-tech policy dated October 5, 1998. Please see the RLC that was done on this site, per Alan Border. GRDA135 Addressing 08/12/99 / / 08/13/99 DONE TW 08/13/99 TW GRDA910 Meeting / / / / 08/24/99 Meeting with Randy Neff, Rich Geiger, DONE DH O8/24/99 DWH Tami Griffey, Terry R., Applicant has approval to pour the footing for the home only. Slope needs to be resolved prior to setting the home on site. Engineering is required for the retaining wall even though it does not exceed eight feet in height. GRDA915 Existing Records-See Case Mgr. / / / / / / 08/12/99 KW Page No. 1 CASE HISTORY FOR CASE NO.: GRD99-0019 SCOTT REEVES NE630 LARSON BLVD BELFAIR 08/31/99 Action Description Req/ Schd/ End/ Action Notes Disp By Update Upd Code Sent Done Done Date By GRDA010 Application received 08/10/99 / / 08/12/99 DONE KW O8/12/99 KW GRDA011 WARNING! ! SEE PARCEL FLAG / / / / 08/31/99 DONE DH 08/31/99 DWH GRDA040 RLC Checklist Review / / / / / / 08/12/99 KW GRDA100 Building review 08/12/99 / / / / Terry Ryan for review PEND TR O8/31/99 DWH GRDA109 Exempt from permitting process / / / / 08/ 9 grading is exempt from the permit DONE DH O8/31/99 DWH process per section 3306.2 subsection 2. Grading is performed under permit .Is 99-052 nd bld99- 6 GRDA110 Planning review 08/16/99 08/17/99 08/24/99 We o the sit August a DO REN 08/24/99 REN sending out letter to the applicant that a geo-tech report must be done for the grading. The geo-tech report should address the grading plan, building, septic and access to the lot. Will hold permit until these issues have been addressed in geo-tech report. Will be taking Rich Geiger to the site on Aug. 19. Received a geo-tech something from Tami Griffey. The geo-tech something was done by Rolla Broughan, P.E.. The geo-tech report that I received does not meet the geo-tech policy dated October 5, 1998. Mason County Public Works doesn't have any problems with the geo-tech something done by Mr. Broughan. I have been instructed to approve this grading permit, since the geo-tech report seems to be adequate per everyone standards except the geo-tech policy dated October 5, 1998. Please see the RLC that was done on this site, per Alan Border. GRDA135 Addressing 08/12/99 / / 08/13/99 DONE TW 08/13/99 TW GRDA910 Meeting / / / / 08/24/99 Meeting with Randy Neff, Rich Geiger, DONE DH 08/24/99 DWH Tami Griffey, Terry R., Applicant has approval to pour the footing for the home only. Slope needs to be resolved prior to setting the home on site. Engineering is required for the retaining wall even though it does not exceed eight feet in height. GRDA915 Existing Records-See Case Mgr. / / / / / / 08/12/99 KW MASON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER Shelton,Washington 98584 DATE: August 24, 1999 INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS TO: Randy Neff, Planner - DCD Dana Herron, Building Inspector- PAC FROM: Rich Geiger, Engineering Services Manager - PW SUBJ: REVIEW OF GRD 99-0019, SCOTT REEVES I have reviewed the preliminary soils reconnaissance report and have visited this site. I recommend construction of the home's foundation be permitted, subject to the following condition: Currently, the cut slope is dry and appears stable. Should the cut slope show any signs of excessive sloughing or other distress or should an unusual weather or seismic event occur before the concrete toe wall is constructed, the contractor shall stop work immediately and contact the geo-technical engineer. I understand there is concern that this report does not meet County standards for a geotechnical report. However, the engineer has specified that a concrete toe wall shall be constructed. I do expect that acceptable calculations for such a wall will contain all the information required in a geotechnical report. I will need to review these calculations before I can recommend construction approval for the concrete toe wall and the house framing. If you have any questions, call me at extension 531. RICHAR J. G EflGE'R,�.E. CONSOLIDATED ENGINEERING CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - SOILS - PLANNING - August 16, 1999 Ms. Anita Reeves 630 Larson Blvd. Belfair,. WA H A N D C A R R Y LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (To be added by Owners) RE: Preliminary Walk-over Soils Reconnaissance of Lot at Above Address Dear Ms. Reeves; The undersigned Geo-technical Engineer, along with Cindy Forbes, Geo-technician, visited the site of the lot described above on August 15 to evaluate the effect of the recent excavation cut for your new house foundations. The upper portion of the lot is gently sloping but the cut face is nearly vertical (80' to the horizontal by readings on a "Wedge Smart Level".) The cut face is about 23 ft. in height by direct measurement. I noticed the soil exposed on the slope was a typical glacial till soil with most of the fractions classified as silt and medium sand with gravel inclusions. Photographs illustrating the soils types were taken for our file and record-. Slopes and details such as vegetation were also photographed for our file. The nearly vertical cliff at the rear of the home site is a stable conglomerate soil of sand and silt with gravel inclusions. Another project I detIagned and inspected the construction thereof in this vycinity with a similar Geo-technical problem was stabilized by a concrete toe-wall. This installation has been in place about 12 years and our re-inspection on August 15th proved this approach to assuring stability to be highly successful. THE MATERIAL IN THE NEARLY VERTICAL CUT AT THE REAR OF THE HOME SITE IS A FINE SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVEL INCLUSIONS UP TO 6 INCHES IN DIAMETER. IN MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION THIS MATERIAL IS A CEMENTED CONGLOMERATE AND WILL BE STABLE IN THIS NEARLY VERTICAL CUT. A short about 8 ft. in ht. toe-wall for retention of slough should be designed ( ) g g and constructed shortly after the house foundations are placed. Yours truly, O��of.f. Asy BO •S• R.B. Boughan, P.E. C 'V .o l Geo-technical & Soils/Foundation Engineer Q� 0008913 9Fors ° ENCLS - as listed �SS�4NAl. EXPIRES S— C P.O. Box 2321 • Bremerton, WA 98310 • (360) 479-5598 • FAX (360) 792-0534