The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGRD2007-00024 2 Pads and Parking Lot - GRD Permit / Conditions - 9/23/2009 Inspection Line(360)127-7262 MASON COUNTY DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Phone: (360)427-9670,ext.352 Mason County Bldg. 3 426 W. Cedar P.O. Box 186 IrP4 Shelton, WA 98584 LAND MODIFICATION BUILDING PERMIT GRD2007-00024 OWNER: JOHN BYERLY FOR R.W.J.J. INC. CONTRACTOR: ZEPHYRS INC. 360.275.2861 LICENSE: ZEPHYL`033C0 EXP: 2/25/2009 RECEIVED: 8/23/2007 ENGINEER: LICENSE: EXP: ISSUED: 1/20/2009 SITE ADDRESS: 23295 NE STATE ROUTE 3 BELFAIR EXPIRES: PARCEL NUMBER: 123325000019 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SAM B. THELER'S HOME & GAR TRS PCL 8 OF BL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DIRECTIONS TO SITE: Create 2 commercial building pads & new parking lot on existing platted NE SR 3 to address. lots. Inspection Area: Fill?: Yes Comp. Plan Desig.: Urban Growth Grading?: Yes IRO Desig.: Cutting?: Yes Shoreline Desig.: Not Applicable Area Graded: 2.00 Acres SEPA?: Yes Cubic Yards: 9,660.00 FEES Type By Date Amount Receipt Planning Review Fee KKK 8/23/2007 $280.00 B12007000 Grading Permit Fee ARC 12/1/2008 $325.00 S22o09000 Grading Plan Check Fee ARC 12/1/2008 $49.25 S22o09000 Building State Fee ARC 12/1/2008 $4.50 S220o90o0 Public Works Review CMH 1/15/2009 $2,064.00 S22oo9000 Public Works Review CMH 1/15/2009 $575.00 S22009000 Public Works Review CMH 1/15/2009 $305.00 S22o090o0 Total $3,602.75 GRD2007-00024 Please referto the following page(s)for conditions of this permit. 1 of 4 CONDITIONS FOR GRD2007-00024 '1)'` A covenant for Operation and Maintenance of the stormwater features will need to be filed with the county and a copy sent to Public weorks for our records 2) The submitted report that describes that wetland complex on site must be followed and no intrusion into the wetland is permited. No filling or grading n Xn permited i w Ia 3) Owner/Agent i responsible to post the assigned address and/or purchase and post private road signs in accordance with Mason County Title 14.28. A. 4) All other necessary permits from Mason County, Washington State and/or Federal Agencies that are required for this proposed development and construction must be obtained PRIOR TO SAME DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION. X_=�� 5) ALL CLEARING,CUTTING, GRADING, EXCAVATING, TERRACING, FILLING AND SIMILIAR WORK WILL BE REGULATED BY THE REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO THE MASON COUNTY GRADING PERMIT STANDARDS ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION 141-96 and MASON COUNTY ?DE, TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.44. All fills shall be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density.X 7) Retaining walls needed to support a surcharges h as structures, roads, or to support slopes, shall require a separate building permit and approval prior to construction of the retaining wall. X_ �p� 8) Cut and fill slopes shall be setback from site boundaries in accordance with Section 14.44.190. X 9) ALL SURFACE WATER AND POTENTIAL RUNOFF WILL BE CONTROLLED ON SITE AND SHALL NOT ADVERSLY AFFECT ANY ADJACENT PROPERTIES NOR INCREASE THE V OCITY FLOW ENTERING OR ABUTTING TO ANY STATE OR COUNTY CULVERTING/DITCHING SYSTEM OR ROAD WAYx 10) Temporary rosi�on control measures must be implemented to prevent water quality degradation of adjacent waters or wetlands. X 11) Should buildings be placed on the fill site in the future, a licensed civil engineer should design engineered foundations. Foundations will have to be verified as �ying placed on native material or be designed accordingly for the conditions of the site. X / GRD2007-00024 Please refer to the following page(s)for conditions of this permit. 2 of 4 12) This permit is limited to grading activities only and does not grant approval for any other improvements. Separate plumbing and building permits are required for additional work. Work associated with submitted plans outside of the scope of the grading activities will be reviewed under the separate ' submitted permits. Work shall not commence on those improvements until the permit has been approved and issued. .t x�d` 13) Applicant shall adhere to all conditions/recommendations of hydraulic report and plans prepared by Skillings & Connolly. Best Management Practices must be employed as needed. Adequate erosion and sediment control features need to be implemented during land distrubing activities to protect neighboring properties and State waters from adverse stormwater runoff impacts. The migration or relase of silty water or mud from the applicant's property will be considered a violation of C my and State water quality protection regulations. x /,w,, ;c c. This permit becomes null and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days,or if construction or work is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work is commenced. Evidence of continuation of work is a progress inspection within the 180 day period. Final inspection must be approved before building can be occupied. OWNER OR AGENT: DATE: GRD2007-00024 Please referto the following page(s)for conditions of this permit. 3 of 4 o CONCRETE MECHANICAL MANUFACTURED HOME o0 Np Date By m o Footings ISetbacks Gas piping Ribbons �7 o Interor Date By Interior-Date By Date B r Y N Exterior Date By Exterior-Date B Set-uP -n INSULATION 0 Point Load!Isolated Footings Date By BG/SLAB INSULATION - � Date By Data By FIRE DEPARTMENT Foundation Walls Floors Date By L Date By Date By DECKS �- FRAMING Walls Date By Z Date By Data By PROPANE TANKS n PLUMBING vault Data By L Date By OTHER __.�__.._ O Groundwork Attic Z Type: Data By Dace mm- By Date By D.W.v DRYWALL type: Int.Brace Wall Date By Date By Date By FINAL INSPECTION 0 v Water Line Fire Seporation N � O m Date By Date By Date Z� �� ByT1 V Pass or Request Inspect. c Type of Insp. Fail Date Date Dane By Comments rK) � Cn U) a U 3 0 .A COMPACTION aZaZ & Associates , Inc . REPORTNO.: 35212 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING AND INSPECTION DATE: /, d � CONTRACTOR: PROJECT#: /6 /�� PERMIT NO: � (V6. 1 GRP ." ""002q PROJECT: �� /� �� F INSPECTOR: 1/ u Z+S LOCATION: 1 �� JURISDICTION: KRAZAN PROJECT MANAGER: WEATHER: l'�� TEMP: ❑ WASHINGTON DENSOMETER ❑ SANDCONE Z NUCLEAR TEST ❑ OTHER LOCATION MAP N ❑ Paved Areas (circle one): Sub/Agg /Asphalt ,❑ Building Pad (s) ❑ Other ❑ Trenches (circle one): Sewer/Water/Storm Drain/Utly rol Curve Unified Soils Classification Max Dry Opt Density Moisture Lf $nM_0 ,��tvP L / -7 "1a Test Elevation Location(Comments) Curve Mode& Density Moist Percent Required Depth % Compaction ,t , .,V „ 335. t, go �ti f • Z Map Location: Curve Test Method: This testing does not preclude the possibility that the soil or hot-mix asphalt may be loosened by future construction activities or rainfall events.The compaction tests were performed at the approximate ❑Attached Daily Avg.Std sz�J i locations and elevations shown and indicate relative compaction at those locations. Horizontal and Count Densities J T vertical limits of the compacted area were determined by others.Our firm does not guarantee earthwork Daily Avg.Stcl �a or paving construction, nor does our work relieve the contractor's responsibility to conform to the Count moisture o approved project plans and specifications. Gauge# 170162, To the best of my knowledge,the abov AS WAS NOT performed in accordance with the approved plans,specifications,and regulatory requirements. Superintendent/Representative: Technician: Serving the Western United States This field report indicates our inspector's observation and testing results based on the site condition and contractor's activities.This information is subject to review prior to final submittal. By signing this report,our inspector does not accept responsibility for validity of results.Some information on this report has been provided by others on site. Revision 2 1502 Compactions Report.doc Effective Date:I M 5/07 i The information provided in this report is prepared for the exclusive use of the client.This report may not be reproduced in any format without the written permission of the client and Krazan&Associates. FIELD REPORT NO: 111244 ``V*ILZa1 & Associates, Inc . GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING AND INSPECTION DATE: 1) U'7- CONTRACTOR: One v PROJECT#: 090w JURISDICTION: ,AKOA/ 70. PROJECT: L-,(j1t .l.�.�vi y PERMIT#: 1 D b7 00 A LOCATION: 40 -71,fl/a INSPECTOR: l?`S KRAZAN PROJECT MANAGER: WEATHER: eo/tGyq2 TEMP:7DG aN 5 j- c -�y r� C"d l P�.� ova 6-q,& IO Act S o VIP 4- oA c lPS 1 m 42y9-� -f1 lC- fl.I Q A/cp Equipment/Asset Number(s): 7,,e-o Y/P/- 3 �// 3 2- To the best of my knowledge,the abov Ws /WAS NOT performed in accordance with the approved plans,specifications,and regulatory requirements. Superintendent/Representative: Technician: This report indicates our inspector's observation and testing results based on the site condition and contractor's activit' his information is subject to review prior to final submittal.By signing this report,our inspector does not accept responsibility for validity of the results.Some information on this report may have been provided by others on site. The information provided on this report is prepared for the exclusive use of the client.This report may not be reproduced in any format without the written permission of the client and Krazan&Assoc. Offices Serving the Western United States Bothell (425) 485-5519 Gresham (503) 665-3574 Poulsbo (360) 598-2126 Puyallup (253) 939-2500 DAILY FIELD REPORT 2009.doc EFFECTIVE:4/22/2009 IL _ I