Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFarm Conservation Plan Letters - HMP Habitat Managment Plan - 11/2/2011 1 4 - Page I of I Grace Miller - letter to proceed immediately From: Grace Miller To: tracy@safeboats.com Subject: letter to proceed immediately CC: kworkman@cahnrs.wsu.edu Tracy, Attached please find letter authorizing you to proceed immediately with your Conservation Farm Plan. We appreciate your continued cooperation and assistance in this matter. Thank you. Grace Miller about:blank 11/2/2011 h Y . Psov Coo. MASON COUNTY Shelton (360) 427-9670 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Belfair (360) 275-4467 Planning Mason County Bldg.1 411 N.5th Elma (360) 482-5269 P.O.Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 >BSf November 2, 2011 Tracy and Daniel Johnson 880 E Spencer Lake RD Shelton, WA 98584 RE: Parcel No. 22131-43-04040 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Johnson: The Planning Department has received Kirsten's letter, dated 10/31/11, summarizing the current status of the fencing and work that has taken place on your property per your approved Conservation Farm Plan. The Planning Department considers the alleged complaint as invalid and resolved at this time. You may proceed with the work including fencing within the buffer of the creek at this time. Thank you for your cooperation in resolving this matter. We appreciate your continued efforts in restoring and protecting the riparian buffer of Malaney Creek. Sincerely, A-�' race G Miller, Planner DEPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CC: Kirsten Workman, Mason Conservation District - • . Page 1 of 1 Grace Miller-johnson letter From: "Workman, Kirsten" <kworkman@cahnrs.wsu.edu> To: "gbm@co.mason.wa.us" <gbm@co.mason.wa.us> Date: 11/1/2011 3:11 PM Subject: johnson letter CC: "tracy@safeboats.com" <tracy@safeboats.com> Attachments: Johnson Letter to County 10-31-2011.docx Grace, I have attached my letter regarding the Johnson property. If you could either write a letter in response or even just send an email,I think that would be sufficient. They are ready to commence work this weekend,but would like assurance from you that they are okay to do that. Thanks, Kirsten C. Workman Small Farm Extension Educator WSU Mason County Extension In Partnership with Mason Conservation District 450 W. Business Park Road Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9436 x14 (MCD) (360) 427-9670 x 685 (WSU) kworkman a-)wsu.edu http://county.wsu.edu/mason/agriculture www.masoncd.org --------------------------------- Extension programs and employment are available to all without discrimination. Evidence of non-compliance may be reported through your local Extension office. file://C:\Documents and Settings\gbm\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4El3OOC 13Mason... 11/1/2011 A Mason Conservation District 450 W Business Park Road • Shelton, WA 98584 Phone: (360) 427-9436 • FAX: (360) 427-4396 October 31, 2011 Grace Miller Community Development,Planning Mason County PO Box 279 Shelton, WA 98584 RE: Parcel#22131-43-04010; Johnson, Tracy&Daniel Ms. Miller, I am writing this letter in response to our conversations regarding a complaint against the above mentioned property and property owners related to agricultural practices within the critical area buffer along Malaney Creek. I am the Mason Conservation District(MCD) staff member who originally drafted the Conservation Farm Plan for the property at the request of Ms. Johnson(formerly Tracy Raymond). That plan was completed in August 2003. 1 believe Ms. Johnson has provided you with a copy of that plan. In addition to that plan, Shannon Kirby(former MCD staff)worked with Ms. Johnson in 2008 to explore a program for restoring the riparian habitat along Malaney Creek. Tracy and Daniel have been implementing their Conservation Farm Plan since it was drafted and have implemented several practices on their farm to protect natural resources. They have installed and improved a substantial amount of fencing on the property to keep their livestock away from riparian areas and off wet pastures in the winter. In fact,that is what they were in the process of doing when they receive a certified letter from you addressing a complaint received about work affecting the creek. I went out to the property this morning to inspect the situation. It is my opinion that the source of the complaint was misinformation. According to our telephone conversation, it seems the complainant referenced some fencing construction crossing the creek and concern that the Johnsons may be crossing their animals through the water. In fact,just the opposite is true. They had been stretching fence during installation, which required them to temporarily pull the fence across the creek to obtain proper tension while attaching it to the corner brace posts. Once the fence was stretched tight and stapled to the post,they cut the fence to length. During my visit, I observed the area in question, and I have no doubt that this was the case. There is a A completed fence on the other side of the creek, so there would be no way for their animals to cross there, as they would be blocked by the other fence. In addition, the Johnsons had already staked out a secondary fence,with an even bigger setback from the creek to exclude horses from wetter soils adjacent to the creek during the winter months. They have also completed and improved fences since 2003 to widen the previous riparian buffers. In addition to their fencing projects,they have plans to replace vegetation that has been removed by some very active beavers in the area. As a result of the complaint in September,the Johnsons have stopped work on their riparian fence, which has resulted in less than optimal conditions for their fall/winter rotational grazing and confinement. They needed to put their horses on an already grazed pasture,thereby grazing the grass shorter than they had hoped and shorter than we recommend in the Pasture section of their farm plan. As weather has degraded,they have had to completely relocate the animals to someone else's property with no shelter available, instead of housing their animals in the existing barn and winter pasture pending completion of the fence in question. It is my recommendation that they are allowed to continue their fencing project as soon as possible, so that they may continue to protect water quality while managing their animals on their own property. They are far below the animal numbers their property and soils can support in terms of stocking rates. Not only are the Johnsons cooperators with the MCD, but they are doing this work at their own expense and per their approved Conservation Farm Plan. I have worked with many properties in Mason County that run horses, and the Johnsons are far and above exemplary in their practices and protecting water quality and natural resources. If all livestock owners were as conscientious as the Johnsons, our county's water quality could be vastly improved. They are excited to continue working on the fence to complete it before winter weather arrives in earnest. I ask that we allow the Johnsons to commence that work immediately. Sincerely, 1:�A Y�, Kirsten Workman Small Farms Educator/Conservation Farm Planner Mason Conservation District MASON CONSERVATION DISTRICT ' S 450 W.Business Park Road �PITNEV 60WE5 Shelton,WA 98584 z ,P 000.44° • UU03304232 NUU U2 2U1 7 M.MI ED FROM ZfPP COG=98584 GQv Meso u n Con ('a m m PeN �D P 0 aa� 2-1 q S h,e1 tprn, w/- q(eg `F r 111111111111111difillilli fill 11 • Page 1 of 2 Grace Miller-Re: conservation plan From: Tracy Johnson <tracy@safeboats.com> To: Grace Miller<Gbm@co.mason.wa.us> Date: 10/17/2011 2:38 PM Subject: Re: conservation plan perfect! thank you! Tracy Johnson I Procurement/Sales Specialist) SAFE Boats International office 360.674.7161 x1142 fax 360.674.2353 1 www.safeboats.com On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Grace Miller<Gbm@co.mason.wa.us> wrote: Hi Tracy, Just copied off your e-mails and Plan from end of last week. I will take a look at the Plan by tomorrow. I was not in office last Thursday or Friday. Plan to get back with you by tomorrow morning. Thank you. Grace Miller >>> Tracy Johnson <tracy(absafeboats.com> 10/17/2011 2:27 PM >>> Hi Grace... just checking in. Where are we at with this? Tracy Johnson Procurement/Sales Specialist) SAFE Boats International I office 360.674.7161 x1142 fax 360.674.2353 www.safeboats.com On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:07 PM,Tracy Johnson <tracy@safeboats.com> wrote: HI Grace.. Just checking to make sure you got the conservation plan. Kirsten Workman contacted me via email and stated she would try to contact you as well. Have a good weekend! Tracy Johnson Procurement/Sales Specialist) SAFE Boats International I office 360.674.7161 x1142 I fax 360.674.2353 www.safeboats.com On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Tracy Johnson <tracy(dsafeboats.com> wrote: Good Morning Grace, My conservation plan is attached. We were planning on removing the last section of old fence thats tangled in the trees and brush along the riparian area of malaney creek on field 3 this weekend and replacing is with new fence and adding 10-15' more feet of set back. Should we hold on this project? And if we need to hold when will we know if we can proceed or not? Thanks for your help. Let me know if you need anything else. Tracy Johnson I Procurement/Sales Specialist) SAFE Boats International I office 360.674.7161 x1142 fax 360.674.2353 1 www.safeboats.com On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Grace Miller <Gbm(aco.mason.wa.us> wrote: Yes, you can e-mail it to me. file://C:\Documents and Settings\gbm\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E9C3DE3Maso... 10/17/2011 • Page 2 of 2 >>> Tracy Johnson <tra(;y@safeboats.com> 10/12/2011 2:30 PM >>> can I scan the document to you? Tracy Johnson I Procurement/Sales Specialist] SAFE Boats International I office 360.674.7161 x1142 fax 360.674.2353 1 www.safeboats.com 1 On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Grace Miller <Gbm@co.mason.wa.us> wrote: Tracy, Please mail the plan to: Planning Dept., ATT: Grace Miller, PO BOX 279, Shelton, WA 98584. Yes, a complaint was received. Thank you. Grace >>> Tracy Johnson <tracy0)safeboats.com> 10/12/2011 1:17 PM >>> sure can...ill get a copy out to you. Also I sent an email to Kirsten Workman at the conservation district. She is the one who drew up the plan. We originally drew up the plan back in 2003. And then reveiwed it in 2008 along with the CREP agency which is the federal program for riparian conservation. I think my husband has a lot of questions because when we had the federal people out to the farm they seemed more relaxed about where the fence was as long as the animals were out of the water. But to qualify for their CREP program I think we had to be 30' back or something. I guess im curious, did someone send in a complaint? whats the address to send a copy of the conservation farm plan to? Tracy Johnson I Procurement/Sales Specialist] SAFE Boats International I office 360.674.7161 x1142 I fax 360.674.2353 1 www.safeboats.com On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Grace Miller <GbmCcbco.mason.wa.us> wrote: Tracy, Thank you for your telephone message. May I have a copy of the Conservation Plan that you have so that I can review it for our records? Grace Miller, Planner Ii i I i 3 file://CADocuments and Settings\gbm\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E9C3DE3Maso... 10/17/2011 r ' . . Page I of 2 Grace Miller - Re: conservation plan From: Tracy Johnson<tracygsafeboats.com> To: Grace Miller<Gbm@co.mason.wa.us> Date: 10/13/2011 8:48 AM Subject: Re: conservation plan Attachments: 10-13-201 I.pdf Good Morning Grace, My conservation plan is attached. We were planning on removing the last section of old fence thats tangled in the trees and brush along the riparian area of malaney creek on field 3 this weekend and replacing is with new fence and adding 10-15' more feet of set back. Should we hold on this project? And if we need to hold when will we know if we can proceed or not? Thanks for your help. Let me know if you need anything else. Tracy Johnson I Procurement/Sales Specialist) SAFE Boats International I office 360.674.7161 x1142 fax 360.674.2353 1 www.safeboats.com On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Grace Miller<Gbmgco.mason.wa.us> wrote: Yes, you can e-mail it to me. >>> Tracy Johnson <tracy0d)safeboats.com> 10/12/20112:30 PM >>> can I scan the document to you? Tracy Johnson I Procurement/Sales Specialist) SAFE Boats International I office 360.674.7161 x1142 I fax 360.674.2353 1 www.safeboats.com On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Grace Miller <Gbm(a)co.mason.wa.us> wrote: Tracy, Please mail the plan to: Planning Dept., ATT: Grace Miller, PO BOX 279, Shelton, WA 98584. Yes, a complaint was received. Thank you. Grace >>> Tracy Johnson <tracy0)safeboats.com> 10/12/2011 1:17 PM >>> sure can...ill get a copy out to you. Also I sent an email to Kirsten Workman at the conservation district. She is the one who drew up the plan. We originally drew up the plan back in 2003. And then reveiwed it in 2008 along with the CREP agency which is the federal program for riparian conservation. I think my husband has a lot of questions because when we had the federal people out to the farm they seemed more relaxed about where the fence was as long as the animals were out of the water. But to qualify for their CREP program I think we had to be 30' back or something. I guess im curious, did someone send in a complaint? whats the address to send a copy of the conservation farm plan to? Tracy Johnson I Procurement/Sales Specialist) SAFE Boats International I office 360.674.7161 x1142 I fax file:HC:\Documents and Settings\gbm\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E96A5FOMason... 10/17/2011 Page 2 of 2 360.674.2353 1 www.safeboats.com On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Grace Miller <Gbm@co.mason.wa.us> wrote: Tracy, Thank you for your telephone message. May I have a copy of the Conservation Plan that you have so that I can review it for our records? Grace Miller, Planner file://C:\Documents and Settings\gbm\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E96A5FOMason... 10/17/2011 Page 1 of 1 Grace Miller - conservation plan From: Grace Miller To: tract'@safeboats.com Subject: conservation plan Tracy, Thank you for your telephone message. May I have a copy of the Conservation Plan that you have so that I can review it for our records? Grace Miller, Planner y(�33-�7g3 �P o� L'�.jSoeve- � �C � l� � ctc Lvov-7 about:blank 10/12/2011 Page 1 of 1 Grace Miller - Re: conservation plan From: Grace Miller To: Tracy Johnson Subject: Re: conservation plan Tracy, You please mail it to: Planning Dept., ATT: Grace Miller, PO BOX 279, Shelton., WA 98584. Yes, a complaint was received. Thank you. Grace >>> Tracy Johnson <tracy@safeboats.com> 10/12/2011 1:17 PM >>> sure can...ill get a copy out to you. Also I sent an email to Kirsten Workman at the conservation district. She is the one who drew up the plan. We originally drew up_ e plan back in 2003. --" a I guess im curious, did someone send in a complaint? whats the address to send a copy of the conservation farm plan to? Tracy Johnson I Procurement/Sales Specialist) SAFE Boats International I office 360.674.7161 x1142 I fax 360.674.2353 1 www.safeboats.com On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Grace Miller <GbmC&co.mason.wa.us> wrote: Tracy, Thank you for your telephone message. May I have a copy of the Conservation Plan that you have so that I can review it for our records? Grace Miller, Planner about:blank 10/12/2011 �p60N co MASON COUNTY Shelton (360) 427-9670 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Belfair (360) 275-4467 Planning Elma (360) 482-5269 Mason County Bldg. 1 411 N.5th P.O.Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 1854 September 29, 2011 Tracy and Daniel Johnson 880 E Spencer Lake RD Shelton, WA 98584 RE: Parcel No. 22131-43-04040, work occurring within Malaney Creek buffer. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Johnson: It has come to the Planning Department's attention that work has been occurring on your property that may be in violation of the Mason County Resource Ordinance Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area Chapter Section 17.01.110. A copy of the regulations is enclosed for your information. This letter is meant to inform you that the development that is occurring on your property is subject to regulations and enforcement action by the Mason County Planning Department. Malaney Creek and its buffer are regulated by the Mason County Resource Ordinance as a Type F stream. The area within 200' of Malaney Creek and its wetlands is within the jurisdiction and subject to the requirements for development under the Mason County Resource Ordinance. There is a minimum 150' buffer and an additional 15' (for a total of 165') building setback from Malaney Creek. Therefore, no structures, including fences, may be constructed within 165' of the creek. Vegetation removal within the 150' buffer is limited to invasive species only. Native vegetation removal is not permitted unless approved through the Planning Department with either written approval, a Mason Environmental Permit and possibly a Habitat Management Plan prior to its removal. Please see Section "F" of the enclosed FWHCA Chapter for Activities Which Do Not Require a Mason Environmental Permit. Please also see Section "G" for "Development AND Activities Requiring a Mason Environmental Permit in Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Or Their Buffers". The fence that has been installed within the creek and its buffer is considered to be a violation of the Resource Ordinance per Section 17.01.110 G(1)(b)and 0). The fence must meet the minimum building setback of 165' from the creek unless there is an approved Conservation Plan with the local Conservation District and it is approved by the Planning Department prior to construction of the fence or any structures. In addition, destruction and alteration of the buffer by vegetation removal is not permitted without prior authorization from the Planning Department. Buffers shall be maintained in their natural condition, except as provided elsewhere in the ordinance (Sections F & G). Section G (1)(b) of the Ordinance states that "A Habitat Management Plan shall be prepared for the destruction or alteration of FWHCA's or their buffers through clearing, harvesting, shading, intentional burning, vegetation removal (terrestrial, freshwater, or marine), or planting of vegetation that would alter the character of the FWHCA or buffer, unless part of a project which has been permitted pursuant to this section or for which no permit is required." A Habitat Management Plan and application for a Mason Environmental has not been submitted, to date, for the activity occurring on the property. Section G(1)0) of the ordinance states that "Agricultural Restrictions: All new and existing agricultural activities within any FWHCA or its buffer, unless exempted as provided in subsection 17.01.110.F.3" If you have a current conservation plan which conforms with the standards and specifications of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, please provide it to our department for review and approval. If the Conservation Plan is approved by the Planning Department, the fencing may be allowed within the buffer. Please contact our office as soon as possible with a plan for removal of the fence over the stream and a planting plan for restoration of the buffer area that has been impacted. Please give me a call at (360) 427-9670, ext 360 to discuss this matter further. Sincer ly, JUV Grace Miller, Planner DEPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY r-ENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A..Bl ature item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ddresseE so that we can return the card to you. B. Received by(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address ifferent fro "m 1? ❑Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address love.",. &No TRACY & DANIEL.JOHNSON 880 E SPENCER LAKE RD SHELTON WA 98584 3. ServioeType rtified Mail ❑ Expr Mail �e ❑ Registered urn Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes ?. Article Number 7005 0390 0004 9504 6556 (rransfer from service fabE 3S Form 3811.February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt lltrlr f '"' `' 102595-02-M-154f UNITED STATE§ ,USTAL.` ICk4tie ,.. first-Clasp Mail Bost sg&41 tees ld 'ITV E A T:.1.k"- K • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box• Mason County Community Development P.0. Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 v C i V t U 2011 Y16 W. CEDAR ST. iififf1ff1uff1fit118 oil 111111111111151111111 or nest site), as identified through the WDFW PHS data base, tribal and other local fish and wildlife databases or knowledge, a preliminary review by a qualified fish and wildlife professional shall be provided to the county which shall determine if a FWHCA or its buffer is within the area of the development. 1. a. aterial eerr permitted-PUT-Saant to is e b. The destruction or alteration of FWHCA's or their buffers through clearing, harvesting, shading, intentional burning, vegetation removal (terrestrial, freshwater, or marine), or planting of vegetation that would alter the character of the FWHCA or buffer, unless part of a project which has been permitted pursuant to this section or for which no permit is required. C. New Construction and Major New Development. 1. New residential construction and major new development is not permitted within FWHCA or its buffer, except for the activities listed in this subsection G, or as approved through a variance or reasonable use exception as provided in subsection K. 2. Appurtenant structures not needing building permits, associated with residential development and located in the FWHCA or buffer may be permitted.A proposal shall meet the additional review standards of the Mason County Shoreline Master Program, Resource Ordinance, and other development ordinances. 3. Saltwater Activities: Accessory uses to existing or new development, such as a saltwater pier, dock, or float; boat ramp, boat lift, stairways, and stair-towers will need to meet the additional review standards of the Mason County Shoreline Master Program, Resource Ordinance, and I other development ordinances. All activities in tidal/saltwater submerged lands shall avoid impacts to eelgrass and kelp beds to the maximum extent. If eel grass or kelp is known or suspected in the vicinity, then an aquatic vegetation survey is required to identify the location of eelgrass or kelp. Unavoidable impacts to these sensitive marine areas shall be addressed in a Habitat Management Plan that presents an acceptable mitigation program.Appendix B has best management practices for docks and floats. The design and siting of these projects should not adversely impact water quality of receiving waters such as wetlands, streams, rivers, Hood Canal or Puget Sound. In addition, project design should meet or exceed any storm water design requirements to avoid any risk of decertification of shellfish beds or impacts to baitfish (herring, smelt, sand lance, candlefish ,etc.)spawning areas. d. Stream Relocation. Stream relocations are discouraged except for the purpose of fisheries restoration and require a Habitat Management Plan. Stream relocation shall only be permitted when adhering to the following minimum performance standards and when consistent with Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Hydraulic Project Approval i. The channel, bank and buffer areas shall be replanted with native vegetation that replicates a natural, undisturbed riparian condition; and, ii. For those shorelands and waters designated as Frequently Flooded Areas pursuant to Section 17.01.090, a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington shall provide information demonstrating that the equivalent base flood storage volume and function will be maintained. iii. Relocated stream channels shall be designed to meet or exceed the functions and values of the stream to be relocated as determined by the monitoring in the Habitat Management Plan. Mason County Resource Ordinance 72 Revised June 16,2009 1. a. The remodel, repair, or change of use of an existing building shall be approved within its existing footprint, plus or minus ten percent as long as the modification does not increase any intrusion into the FWHCA or its buffer. b. Reconstruction of structures destroyed by fire or other means shall be approved, provided that the planned reconstruction occurs within the previous structural footprint and completed application is made within two years of the destruction. The ten percent expansion set forth in 1 a. may also be applied. c. To further reduce the impacts of existing development, the footprint of existing structures approved by permit within the FWHCA or its buffer may be combined into one footprint area equal to or lesser than the original area, provided that: (1) the combined footprint proposed shall be located in the site of legally established residences and garages most distant from or less intrusive to the FWHCA or buffer, and the other structures nearer to the FWHCA shall be removed from the FWHCA or buffer; and (2) the square footage area of the structure in the combined footprint may not be increased more than 20 percent of the total square footage area of the original structures. The ten percent expansion of footprint set forth in 1 a. does not apply. For the purpose of this section,footprint does not include uncovered decks and patios. 2. Maintenance and use of existing landscaped areas within the buffer area. An existing landscaped area is one which is defined by mowed grass, flower beds, orchard trees, non- native shrubs, and non-native trees. Maintenance and use includes mowing,weeding, trimming, replacement of vegetation types, placing landscape walls no more than 2 feet in height, excavating or placing top soil or compost not exceeding 6 inches in depth or 10 cubic yards in total, placing play equipment(swings, slides, temporary plastic above- ground pools, but not including tree houses or other play houses), and picnic tables and chairs. Maintenance does not include the removal of native trees over 6 inches in diameter at 4 foot height. Exposure of more than 200 square feet of soil at any one time requires stormwater precautions so that no contaminated run off reaches the river, wetland, stream, or lake. If such maintenance or use in the buffer area is abandoned or discontinued for greater than three (3)years, activities must conform to the provisions of Section 17.01.11O.G.1. NNW All new and existing agricultural activities within any FWHCA and or its buffer complying with a current conservation plan that conforms with the standards and specifications of the Natural Resources Conservation Service and is submitted to and approved by the Administrator: or ODerating in conformity with a permit of a state agency, r 4. Buffer alterations for view corridors are allowed with emphasis placed on limbing and with selective timber removal minimized to the extent possible. Proposed alterations shall be the minimum to afford views within the buffer and shall minimize shrub vegetation removal and ground disturbance while maintaining the large mature trees. Under this provision, no more than 10 percent of trees in the buffer less than six inches in diameter at breast height may be cut without specific authorization from Mason County, which may allow removal up to 20 percent. View corridor improvement actions which include the cutting of trees larger than six inches in diameter at breast height will require Mason County approval prior to cutting, replacement with native tree and/or shrub plant species, and are limited to 15 percent of such trees in the buffer. The cutting down of more than 15 percent of such trees requires a Mason Environmental Permit from Mason County. 5. The felling of danger trees within buffers provided the following conditions are met: a. When it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Mason County Director of Community Development or his or her designee("Department") that an imminent threat exists to public health or safety, or the safety of private or public property. Landowner shall provide to the Department a written statement describing tree location, danger it poses, and proposed mitigation. Mason County Resource Ordinance . 70 Revised June 16,2009 provisions may include projected level of service requirements. iv. Construction time limits shall be determined in consultation with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife in order to ensure species and habitat protection. 2. A Habitat Management Plan (HMP)will not be required the following activities which comply with the development standards below, except as specified: a. Stream Crossings All stream crossings should be discouraged and alternatives should be explored. Any private or public road expansion or construction which is proposed and must cross streams classified within this Ordinance, shall comply with the following minimum development standards: i. Bridges or arch/bottomless culverts shall be required for all Type S or F streams(which have anadromous fish habitat). Fish passage shall be provided, if necessary to address man-made obstructions on site. Other alternatives may be allowed upon a showing that, for the site under review, the alternatives would be less disruptive to the habitat or that the necessary building foundations were not feasible. Submittal of a Habitat Management Plan which demonstrates that the alternatives would not result in significant impacts to the Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area (FWHCA) may be required if the information necessary to determine if the permit requirements contained in subsection I. 5. has been met. The plan must demonstrate that salmon habitat will be replaced at a minimum 1:1 ratio. ii. Crossings shall not occur in salmonid spawning areas unless no other reasonable crossing site exists. For new development proposals, if existing crossings are determined to adversely impact salmon spawning or passage areas, new or upgraded crossings shall be located as determined necessary through coordination with the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Skokomish Tribe, the Quinault Tribe and/or the Squaxin Island Tribe; iii. Bridge piers or abutments shall not be placed either within the floodway or between the ordinary, high water marks unless no other reasonable alternative placement exists; iv. All stream crossings shall be required to pass 100 year projected flood flows, even in non-fish bearing Type Np or Ns streams. In addition, crossings for Type S or F should allow for downstream transport of large woody debris; V. Crossings shall serve multiple properties whenever possible. vi. Where there is no reasonable alternative to providing a culvert, the culvert, shall be the minimum length necessary to accommodate the permitted activity. b. Land Divisions In order to implement the purpose of this section and the County Comprehensive Plan, to accommodate design innovation, creativity, and flexibility, and to achieve a level of environmental protection that would not be possible by typical lot-by-lot development, the use of the Performance Subdivision process (Title 16 Mason County Subdivision Ordinance) is strongly encouraged. Divisions of land(Subdivisions, Short Subdivisions, Large Lot Subdivisions)shall comply with the following development standards: i. In order to avoid the creation of non-conforming lots, each new lot shall contain at least one building site that meets the requirements of this Ordinance, including buffer requirements for habitat conservation areas. This site must also have access and a sewage disposal system location that are suitable for development and do not adversely impact the Mason County Resource Ordinance 74 Revised June 16,2009 CONSERVATION PLAN Tracy Raymond Mason Conservation District Tracy Raymond CONSERVATION PLAN August 2003 OVERVIEW Tracy Raymond purchased this property on Spencer Lake Road in Mason County rough_ly,three years ago. It has been in her family for several decades, however, as they homesteaded the property. In addition, Ms. Raymond has an additional 180 acres adjacent to this property that is part of her father's estate. The property consists of a homestead, several pasture areas, a barn, a wood recycling yard, and a forested area. In addition, Malaney Creek dissects the property from east to west. Currently the Raymonds have two goats, however, more animals will be acquired in the future. The property is approximately 14 acres in size and is in Section 31, Township 21 North, Range 2 West. Land use and soil maps have been prepared for the farm and are located in the planning folder. OBJECTIVES The primary objective for the Raymond farm is to establish new pasture areas for livestock and maintain the current pastures, while minimizing impact on the surface and ground water quality. As a result, they would like to implement several Best Management Practices. These would include: fencing, pasture establishment/management, prescribed grazing, and others. A livestock management plan and a pasture management plan fit within the landowner's objectives for the continued improvement of the production capability of the property. RESOURCE INVENTORY General * The average annual rainfall in this area is 51.5 inches. * The average annual air temperature is about 51.8 degrees F. Agricultural Buildinas Barn Equipment Tractor Cultural Resources According to the Washington State Register of Cultural Resources obtained from the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, there are no known historical or cultural resources mapped in this section. However, because -2- many sites are not recorded, in the event of a cultural or historical resource discovery during practice implementation, work should be stopped until the site can be evaluated. Soils This property is mapped as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (Ab) and Semiahmoo muck (Sb). Refer to the soils map located in the farm planning folder for soils by field. A brief description follows: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (Ab) 5 to 95 percent slopes Soils with an impermeable layer (glacial till, clay layers or bedrock), which restricts water holding capacity, soil drainage, and rooting depth. Stocking rate Initial stocking rate for soils producing at listed potential: Sg 1 cow or 1 horse or 5 sheep per 1.5 to 2.0 acres for the grazing season Management Limitations (Alderwood Soils) Soil compaction and plant root and crown damage due to grazing when the soil is saturated. The impervious layer in the soil causes a high subsurface water table to develop rapidly during the rainy season. The water table is generally a concern between November and March, although the depth to the water table during this period will fluctuate depending on rainfall. High water table will be less of a problem on soils with greater than 3 percent slope, as downslope surface runoff and internal soil drainage will get the water offsite more quickly. There is generally significantly diminishing forage production during June and almost no production July through September. This is due to the limited water holding capacity of the soil profile caused by the impervious soil layer. This causes these soils to dry out much earlier than bottomland soils or soils without a restrictive layer. Management Advantages (Alderwood Soils) Often this is a good site for spring and fall pasture, because sloping soils drain the water more rapidly and livestock can graze early and late forage growth with minimal soil compaction. These soils are typically oThey store sufficient water to extend plant growth through most of the summer drought period. These soils usually have a s ,,� °°;�`�;`_� �_ �..-:. nnn r ^hwn tha cnil ci 1rfar^c fn 2 1—'j --- Q pes are typically 0 to 2 percent. -3- Stocking rate Initial stocking rate for soils producing at listed potential: Sg 1 cow or 1 horse or 5 sheep per 1.5 acres for the grazing season NOTE!: Grazing season on these soils is 6 months rather than 8 months because of trafficability (soil saturation). Management Limitations (Semiahmoo Soils) The use period of these soils is severely limited by saturated soils which occur at the beginning and end of the growing season, as well as throughout the winter. These soils may not be ready for traffic (either livestock or equipment) until 1 — 2 months after most other soils (April — June). ON a particular site, saturation will be influenced by topography, soil texture, and surrounding land uses, so each pasture must be evaluated individually to establish a use period that will not damage plants or soil. The delayed start of grazing or harvest results in overly mature forages. Intensive grazing and/or clipping will reduce the selective grazing that usually results in these situations. Management Advantages (Semiahmoo Soils) Because of the landscape location which receives runoff and subsurface flow combined with a good water holding capacity, the growing season extends through most of the summer drought period. Natural soil fertility is high. This combination of water and fertility leads to high yields with minimal additional inputs. This soil makes excellent summer pasture once soils are no longer saturated. Water Malaney Greek dissects the property, flowing from east to west. Spencer Lake is less than one half mile to the east. There are also some marshy areas southeast of the property. Animals There are currently two acts on the ro erty. Summary of animals used for computations in the plan: Animal Number Average Animal Type of Animals Weight (Lbs) Units* Goat 2 70 0.14 Total Animal Units = 0.14 *Animal Unit equals 1,000 lbs. body weight. -4- Field Inventory Pasture Production Field Acres Current Use Potential 01 1.0 Homestead N/A 02 2.1 Future pasture 2.0 Tons/acre/year 03 4.0 Barn & pasture 2.0 Tons/acre/year 04 2.2 Future pasture 2.0 Tans/acre/year 05 3.6 Wood recycling yard N/A 06 1.1 Forested/wildlife NIA Total 14.0 Ab 2.0 tons per acre per year pasture production potential Sb 6.0 tons per acre per year pasture production potential Plants Field 3 is in fair condition at present. It is vegetative pasture comprised of both the low and high growing species of grasses (with some legume). Field 2 has been cleared and is planned to be established as pasture, but currently has no vegetation growing on it whatsoever. Field 4 is also planned to be established as pasture. It has some vegetation, however, it needs improvement for it to be successful as forage for livestock Air There is a certain amount of odor associated with any agricultural operation. The landowners plan to make an effort to minimize the effects of odor leaving the farming operation. An example of such an effort is applying animal waste as fertilizer to pastures when prevailing winds are not blowing in the direction of adjacent home sites. FARM PRACTICES PASTURE ESTABLISHMENT The principle aoal of ndowners is to establish and maintain pastures. "Ll I ses, pasture estauffsnment is an approprTMt-, Y]CIULIUM -- = The following seeding recommendation will provide the basic knowledge necessary for the successful establishment of a new pasture. Seedbed Preparation Preparing a proper seedbed is extremely important to successfully establishing a new pasture. It is important to consider the overall objective when preparing the seedbed so it will be weed free, fine, firm, moist, level and well drained. Ideally, it would be best to grow an annual crop and reseed the next year. By growing an annual crop prior to reseeding you will more effectively rid your pasture of -5- broadleaf and grass weeds with strong roots, destroy mole runs and break down the compacted sod. Alternatives to growing an annual cover or clean up crop is to plow the pasture in late fall and leave tilled over winter. In the spring, work in a new seedbed by rotovating or plowing followed by dragging into a smooth, firm seedbed. It is important that all past plants be buried so they do not regrow. Usually it is more desirable to rotovate an old pasture prior to plowing in order to achieve more complete burial of old sod. If you cannot leave your pasture out of production for that period of time, you can try the following method. Graze your pasture down to about 1 inch at the end of summer to stress the sod plants. In early fail allow it to grow about 2 inches and then spray it with an herbicide. Let it sit for about two weeks to allow the herbicide to weaken the sod and weeds and then rotovate the pasture. It is important to destroy as much of the weed and old grass roots as possible. If a root and seed are in competition to grow, the root will win on all occasions. Compacted soil layers should be broken up before seeding_ Compaction restricts water percolation through the soil, resulting in soggy, ponded fields during the winter and spring. Seeding depth is critical. Grass and legume seeds are extremely small, and if buried too deep in the soil they will run out of energy before they reach the surface. Never seed deeper than '/4 inch. It's better to seed too shallow than too deep, even if it means broadcasting seed directly on the soil surface. A firm seedbed is also essential. It should be uniformly firm, well packed underneath with small clods of light mulch on the surface to prevent wind and water erosion. An averaged sized person should not leave a footprint penetrating more than '/2 inch. If the soil is too "fluffy", it will dry out quickly, and any small seedling perched on top of a soil clod will dry out and die. Packing the soil with a roller is best, but repeated harrowing or dragging before seeding (with a light harrowing afterwards) will also give acceptable results. Timing The most important factor to consider when determining the time of sowing is soil moisture. In well-drained soils, it is important to sow the seeds when the soil is moist and when there is time for the plants to establish before soils become dry or too cold for plant growth. This leaves early fail or spring for sowing. Spring sowing is more appropriate for slower growing grasses such as Orchard and Tall Fescue. The rising temperature and adequate moisture level are good but the new grass may not fully establish before the summer dry months. Spring is an excellent time to sow if irrigation is a possibility. Fertilization If the new seeding is on land which was originally forested, a soil test is especially important, because many nutrients and minerals will be out of balance for good grass -6- and legume growth. If no testis available, fertilize with a N:P:K:S fertilizer with a ratio of 3 : 1 : 2 : 1 and at a rate of no more than 70 units of nitrogen per acre. It is important to have a soil test done on the pasture in the fall or spring prior to planting. This soil test will identify any mineral deficiencies in your pasture. The essential elements are Nitrogen (N), Phosphorous (P), and Potassium (K). A soil test will also identify the need for lime if the soil is too acidic. Once the mineral needs of the soil are known, apply fertilizer at the recommended rate. Generally if the soil has a ply of 5.7 or less, it is beneficial to apply lime. The lime needs to be thoroughly mixed into the soil before cultivation and never with fertilizer. Apply lime at a rate of at least 5 tons per acre. A good rule of thumb for the establishment of grass pastures in lieu of a soil test is the application of 200 lbs. per acre of a fertilizer with the following N, P, K ratio: N 21%, P 7%, K 14% and 9% S (sulfur) Species selection Species selection is critical to the long-term success of the planting. If the species are not adapted to the intended use or to the site, the best seedbed preparation in the world will not make the seeding a success. Multiple species mixtures versus special mixes: while at least one species in a multiple species mixture (e.g. 7 — star") will always grow no matter what the conditions, these mixtures are also very hard to manage in grazing systems because the species usually have different palatabilities and gro\&Ing seasons. The visible result is patchy grazing, with some grasses being avoided while other species are overgrazed. Multiple-species mixtures can be managed successfully under intensive grazing management systems. The seeding mix recommended by a pasture specialist from the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) for Alderwood soils consists of: Orchard grass (Latar, Pennlate) 10 lb. (live seed) per acre 1 pick Tall Fescue (Fawn, Forager, Johnstone) 14 lb. (live seed) per acre TONE —and-- White Clover (Dutch) 3 lb. (live seed) per acre pick Birdsfoot Trefoil (lotus corniculatus) 5 lb. (live seed) per acre }ONE First Use The first grazing is critical in a new pasture for successful establishment of the plants. If grasses were planted late summerlearly fall, defer the first grazing until next spring. If they were planted in early spring, defer grazing until the ground is dry enough to support the livestock without them breaking through the new sod. -7- Before allowing the livestock out on the new pasture, test the root strength of the new plants. If you can pull up the grass, so can your livestock! It is important to establish a solid root system on the new plants before grazing. One way to eliminate the chance of pulling out the new grass is to mow the field for the first cut. Weed Control Weed control (including undesirable grasses) during and after seeding is critical to the success of a new seeding. Ignoring this step will result in a return to pre-seeding condition. The best method of weed control after seeding is clipping, as weeds generally grow faster than seedling grasses and legumes. Also, young grasses and legumes are often susceptible to herbicide damage. If herbicide will be used and broad-leaved weeds are the main problem, then it is a good idea to leave any legumes out of the original seeding and overseed them later. PASTURE MANAGEMENT In addition to establishing new pastures, the goal of the landowners is to maintain and improve existing pastures. Field 3 is currently a vegetative pasture. If the guidelines listed in the Pasture Maintenance section are followed, improvement should not be necessary. However, the information is included, as it contains valuable information if improvement becomes necessary. Pasture management (or improvement) can be accomplished through these four alternatives or combination of these practices. • Forage height management • Season of Use • Overseeding • Reseeding This plan will give the landowners some basic information, which may be utilized in their overall management plan to improve the forage production of the existing pastures and keep existing (or new) pastures producing to their potential. Forage Height Rotation. When livestock are left to graze on pastures for an extended period, grasses are not allowed adequate time for regrowth. This results in overgrazing. Overgrazed pastures produce less feed than intensively managed pastures, causing a higher reliance on commercial feed. They also have more bare soil, which leads to weed problems, increased soil erosion and compaction. It is difficult to reestablish the productivity of pastures after they have been severely overgrazed. Implement a pasture management system. It is important to have a pasture management system in place to optimize the productivity and utilization of forage and to minimize compaction of soils. The key to maintaining a vigorous, healthy stand of forage is to allow for adequate regrowth between harvest intervals. Adequate regrowth allows for the replenishment of root reserves, which are essential for initial -S- plant growth. Without adequate regrowth, plant vigor decreases, resulting in an increased likelihood of weed infestation and a lower ability to utilize manure nutrients. Rest periods vary from 7 to 10 days in the spring (when grasses are growing rapidly), to 21-28 days later in the summer—dependent on grass height. Develop a prescribed grazing system. Rotationally graze livestock based on plant (grass) height. To get optimal usage from the grass stands in the pasture, remove animals when grasses are 3--4" tall. Place animals back in pasture only when plant height reaches 5 — 8" tall. Remaining stubble height is the most important of these two measurements. This stubble height will leave enough green leaf surfaces for photosynthesis (fueling plant for regrowth) to continue without interruption. Clip (mow) pastures to maintain an even grass height for the entire pasture and harrow to spread manure evenly, if needed, after each grazing period. Harrowing will help spread the nutrients in the manure more uniformly across the field and helps control parasites by exposing them to air, sunlight, and predators. Season of Use. To avoid damage to plant root crowns and compaction of wet soils in the winter months caused by animal hoof action, any livestock on pasture should be removed when the soils are saturated, which for Alderwood soils is generally for long periods between November and March. 4verseeding Broadcast seeding in the fall can be an effective management tool to preserve the quality of the pastures. This can also be accomplished through the practice of allowing the grass to "seed out" at least one time per growing season, generally after the last rotation in the fall. Generally overseeding is most effective if over 25 percent of the pasture is bare of vegetation. Preparation Clipping and harrowing the pasture to be reseeded immediately after the last grazing period will facilitate the establishment of new seedlings. Fertilization Fertilization of recently overseeded areas should be delayed until the grass is fairly well established, as new weed seedlings are stiff competitors for nutrients. Species Selection Perennial ryegrass, orchard grass and tall fescue are all recommended species to be broadcast over established pastures. Specific recommendations should be requested based upon soil type and pasture condition. Weed Control The landowner Id try and keep the weed DODulation under control either by Clip ' gh clipping should a used first; as it is better for soil and water and tends to be more effective in the long run. -9- Reseeding Reseeding should always be the last option. It is expensive, and takes a pasture out of grazing production for most of a year. Additionally, the need to reseed is often a symptom of a need to change livestock management practices_ If management problems, such as the need for additional cross-fences and water troughs, or a change in stocking rate or season of use are not addressed first, the newly seeded pasture will soon look like what it replaced. Often, when these changes are made, the current pasture improves to the point where reseeding is no longer necessary. Soils with a gravelly or stony plow zone can be difficult or impossible to work and seed with conventional seedbed preparation practices. Seedbed preparation is critical to the success of the seeding. If weedy plants are not controlled, they will out compete the newly planted seedling grasses. Without effective seedbed preparation, the net effect will be a pasture very similar in species and production to the pretreatment condition, which would be a waste of the money and time invested in the reseeding. Species selection is also important. If the species is not adapted to the site, the best seedbed preparation in the world won't make the seeding a success. Generally, a mix of just one grass species and one legume is recommended, to cut down on patchy grazing of grasses caused by palatability differences. If multiple species are desired, make sure that the species of grass all have approximately the same growth schedule. It is very important to keep the animals off a new seeding until it is well established. Otherwise, the new seedlings can be damaged or killed. If the current pastures are cross-fenced into smaller units, then the herd shouldn't be short of forage while one of the new, smaller units is out of production. For specific seeding recommendations and information, please see the Pasture Establishment section. Hayland Management For maximum production and quality of green chop, silage, or hay, the grass should be cut just as the head emerges. The stubble height should be no lower than 2 inches. The best time to apply manure is just after harvest, because the manure (and nutrients) can reach the soil more efficiently if excess foliage is not in the way. Manure applied when plants are larger can stick to the leaves, causing problems when ensiling or possibly causing livestock to refuse to eat the hay. PASTURE MAINTENANCE - "IV Use either temporary or permanent fence to create multiple grazing units, ill facilitate moving livestock between pastures and allow adequate plant regrowth. Cross fencing and subsequent rotation will help achieve higher forage yields and more uniform forage use. New Zealand-type power fence, smooth - 10- wire, or woven wire fence will work, although barbed wire can cause injuries to horses. The power fence is probably most economical. It also offers more flexibility, as some of the cross-fences can be temporary, allowing exclusion of seasonally wet areas or areas designated for haying or reseeding operations. -- hat way, livestock will not concentrate in certain areas of the pasture, while other areas are unused, because the entire pasture will be ready to graze, and at the same growth state, at the same time. This also gives productive green pasture in August in wetter areas, which turn into weedy mud holes when included with a generally drier spring and fall pasture. Water Developments — Plenty of clean, fresh water is critical to livestock gains and general health. Generally, the best source of water in a field is a trough with water piped from a well or spring, as surface water often carries parasites and disease organisms from livestock or wildlife upstream. mar ram- A. b in L11 w he next best alternative when piped water is not available is to allow only restrict access to rivers or streams. If livestock only have a small access area for watering, the amount of manure and sediment in the water will be minimized, resulting in a healthier water supply both for the immediate herd and animals downstream. Additionally, bank erosion problems will be minimized, and streamside vegetation w" e otected, which will keep water cooler. Minerals — Salt should be provided in the field for livestock. The salt block or box should be up off the ground and under cover so that rain or dew does not dissolve it.. This will reduce waste and will kill vegetation, thus creating bare soil for weeds to grow on. The salt should be placed away from gates and watering areas to reduce livestock concentration areas and encourage the livestock to graze the pasture more uniformly. Other mineral supplements are often recommended. While specific mineral deficiencies are best diagnosed with a soil test, common supplemental minerals for livestock grazing western Washington pastures include magnesium and selenium. Harrowing — If the droppings are spread immediately after the animals are removed from a pasture, this usually is sufficient time for the manure to break down to the point where the animals will not avoid patches of the field during the next grazing period. Harrowing also has the additional benefits of spreading the nutrients in the manure more uniformly across the field and helps control parasites by exposing them to air, sunlight, and predators. Mowing — After a grazing period, the pasture should be clipped. If the pasture is not clipped, animals will concentrate on the plants grazed during the previous rotation, because the tender regrowth is more palatable. Over time, these plants will weaken - 11 - and die, leaving openings for invasion of weeds and less palatable and productive forages. Fertilization — Take soil samples to test for nutrient levels. If the test shows a lack of nutrients supplemental fertilization may be needed. An application of nitrogen in the spring is generally necessary for optimum forage production. This application can be either commercial fertilizer or manure, but commercial fertilizer is often more effective at this time of year because soils are cold and organic matter mineralization is slow. Refer to nutrient management guidelines for proper application periods for the particular soil. Apply lime as indicated on the soil test. Sulfur is often deficient in western Washington soils. Fall is the best time to test soil nitrate levels, as nitrate left in the soil after the growing season ends will be leached out of the soil by the following spring. "Report card" nitrate testing in the fall gives an evaluation of how well the previous summer's nitrogen applications balanced with plant needs and indicates if nitrogen levels need to be adjusted up or down the following year. Fertilization will increase both the production and the nutritive value of the forage for livestock, but too much fertilizer can build up toxic levels of certain minerals (such as nitrate and potassium) in forages. Excess nutrients can either leach from the site or run off with surface water flow. Often, the nutrients in the manure alone will meet the forage needs. Do not apply more fertilizer than the soil test results call for. A good rule of thumb for the maintenance of grass pastures in lieu of a soil test is the application of 200 lbs. per acre of a fertilizer with the following N, P, K ratio: N 21%, P I%, K 14% and 9% S (sulfur) Winter Use - When pastures are used year round, soils become compacted. Compacted soil causes water to flow over the surface of the land instead of soaking into the ground. This surface runoff can become contaminated with animal wastes and enter nearby streams and drainage's. Exclude livestock from the pastures during the wet season to avoid compacting soils and overgrazing forage. Weed Control — If the practices discussed in these sections are followed, weeds should not become an issue. This is the case because weeds favor the following conditions: • Selective, repeated and continuous grazing of the more palatable species in the pasture • Season-long grazing of a pasture without rest and regrowth periods • Not regularly mowing the ungrazed plants throughout the growing season to help equalize resource competition with the more platable plants • Soil compaction resulting from livestock or vehicle traffic on pastures when they are saturated - t2- • Acidic soil pH If these conditions occur, encroachment of weeds can occur. Weed control can be accomplished mechanically, chemically, or biologically, or with a combination of these methods. The recommendations for chemicals can (and do) change, so it is always best to contact the county WSU Cooperative Extension office or the chemical dealer when actually preparing to spray. PADDOCK/CONFINEMENT AREA MANAGEMENT A confinement area reduces undo pressure on the pastures during the winter. The use of this area will reduce surface compaction of soils within the pastures and prevent "post-holing" which is the result of animals walking across saturated soils. Existing situation Currently, the goats are kept in Field 3, which includes the barn. Due to the nature of the current livestock, there is no need for a confinement area at this time. Suggested practices The current situation is appropriate for the livestock currently on the Raymond o erty. Practices, which will add to the value and provide for animal well being while confining animals to a sacrifice area include: Keep livestock confined when soils are wet to decrease the chances of overgrazing pastures and reduce the extent of trampling damage. Apply pole peelings or hog fuel (a minimum of 12" thick) onto the ground in part of the confinement area to help absorb moisture, reduce muddiness and improve the footing of livestock. Through the natural process, hog fuel helps tie up nitrogen in livestock waste until microbe breakdown of the wood releases it later (i.e. when applied as compost). It may be necessary to reapply the coarse, woody material to areas that become muddy due to hoof action by livestock. Controlling mud will lessen fungal and bacterial problems in hooves. Rake and refill any areas that have been broken through by hooves. (More extensive solutions are available and can be designed.) Broadcast grass seed in the paddock in the spring to act as a cover crop. Paddocks then can be grazed according to prescribed grazing recommendations after grass is well established. A good grass species for this purpose is annual rye. - 13- WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Existing Situation Currently, the Raymonds are leaving manure in the Field 3. With the current operation, this is appropriate, s s i ue to tne proximity VMrface water pasture areas. Suggested practices: The implementation of a waste management system will protect water quality, minimize muddiness and fully utilize valuable nutrients available in manure. The ,.,following practices can minimize the affect of nutrient loss and reduce the potential for non-point source pollution: 4' is could be as sophisticated as a concrete slab covered by a roof or as simple as a pile covered with a heavy-duty waterproof tarp held in place with several tires. This system should be located on high ground and should be able to store enough manure as would be generated during the season when animals are confined. Choose a central location that will be easily accessible to all fields being used. Upon initial review (although it is contingent on a soil survey), the area adjacent to the new barn in Field 2, but also near Field 3 may be the best location. Information and specifications for various waste storage structures will be located in the farm plan folder. NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT Proper nutrient management balances nutrient (manure) application rates with forage nutrient needs. When balanced, water quality is protected. Several factors influence the actual amount of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium that are available for plant use from animal waste. They include: * Type of manure storage * Chemical changes in the manure * Method of manure application to the fields A healthy, high producing stand of forage has the ability to utilize larger amounts of nutrients, often creating a more positive nutrient balance. Ideally, the nutrients available in animal waste would equal the crop nutrient needs. Over-application of nutrients can cause a problem in ground and surface water quality. It can also affect the quality of forage being produced. With the Raymond's current operation, the following estimated amount of nutrients will be available as fertilizer after all losses are considered. These amounts include - 14- waste from the storage system and from grazing animals. These numbers will need to be recalculated once additional livestock are acquired. Nutrient Pounds Nitrogen 11 Phosphorous 3 Potassium 15 The amount of nutrients needed on the pastures when they are fully developed is as follows: Nutrient Founds Nitrogen 415 Phosphorous 66 Potassium 332 Because these estimates are based on average values for the entire United States, the amount of nutrients produced at the Raymond farm may be different. Manure tests and fall soil tests are needed to accurately measure the nutrients produced in the manure and used by the crop. Application schedules should be adjusted based on the test results. Suggested Practices: The following practices will enhance the value of your nutrient management system, once additional livestock are acquired. Compost manure in the storage structure and spread it on the pastures during the growing season for use as fertilizer. The correct timing and application rate of spreading manure can provide the nutrients required to preserve healthy pastures, while protecting water quality. The practice of composting manure kills worm eggs and reduces parasite infestation, flies and the chance of manure-laden runoff to drain from the property. It will result in a healthier living area for the livestock. Collected manure could also be used on the garden for fertilizer and mulch or sold/given to neighbors for the same use. Distribute manure droppings left on the fields by harrowing or dragging after the animals have been moved off the pasture. (see also Pasture Maintenance) Consider soil testing to refine the amount of fertilizer/manure to apply. (see also Pasture Maintenance) - 15- WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Wildlife management presently consists of those activities, which occur naturally due to the nature of the property and current vegetation types. In addition, Ms. Raymond has begun building a nature trail through the forested area in Field 6. It is her intention to keep this area forested. # -#erca-b"-,anic als out of... loll Wm t;;e riparian areas adjacent to the tn, ro° [ in wcarking with the local satmor; o@qW - n and' near her property, CONCLUSION This documentWen t a t3 tari,re which is directed toward accomplishing the landownersobjectives As`time and circumstances change this plan will be amended and updated accordingly. 16- CONSERVATION PLAN MAP Owner: Tracy Raymond Operator: Same County: Mason, WA Date: August 2003 Aproximate Acreage: 14 acres Assisted by: K. Workman Legal Description: S 31 T21 N R2W 439?0, : n . Z a IT v. i - _ --- _ -- -- Nk 0.08 0 0.08 0.16 Miles 1 = Homestead (1.0 acres) 4 = Future pasture (2.2 acres) N 2 = Future pasture (2.1 acres) 5 = Wood Recycling Yard (3.6 acres) 3 = Barn & exisiting pasture (4 acres) 6 = Forested/wildlife (1 .1 acres) SOILS MAP Owner: Tracy Raymond Operator: Same County: Mason, WA Date: August 2003 Aproximate Acreage: 14 acres Assisted by: K. Workman Legal Description: S 31 T21 N R2W �rFE fi _ i f j f f l M k' 0.08 0 0.08 0.16 Miles 6666661 Ab = Alderwood gravelly sandy loam N 5 to 15 percent slopes Sb = Semiahmoo muck 0 to 2 percent slopes A i 1 ' Case Number: G�6.1. E,20 11 o 7 Mason County Investigation Report Form Parcel Number: ?—Z 1 3 - _-_ 04 cl q0 Violation Site Address: C_ SX)ewe v- �'� U CA f I ti Property Owner(s): "/�(RS►1iVV�0V\C1C Mailing Address: Tenant/Contractor/Operator on site: _ Directions to Site: 'i� F G t S P VICE L-c,'A_k_ QcA Description of Concern: _ ��(G!�� r�NA, ✓ I eC% V ✓ 4i(L4 5 cv s 31-Z9 u_ s , Un er the provisions of the Public Disclosure Law, RCW 42.56.240, the complainant may indicate a desire for disclosure or non-disclosure of their identity. If non-disclosure is chosen, this portion of this form will not be released to the public unless this case is filed in court. If filed,your name will be disclosed if you are a witness in the case. Mason County investigates possible violations on a complaint basis only. Therefore,the name of the person filing the complaint should be provided. Please check one of the following: ❑ Please do not disclose my identity. I understand that disclosure may be required by court order or if this matter goes to court. ❑ You may disclose my identity. Name(please print): Phone: ( ) Address: Street City State Zip Signature of Complainant: Date: THIS SECTION FOR MASON COUNTY USE ONLY Complaint Received by: -� Date: 1/'16 / � I Complaint Received by: 06hone ❑7plannmg- it ❑ Web Site ❑ In Person Department of Concern: ❑ Building ❑ Fire ❑ Public Works Environmental Health: ❑ Solid ❑ On-site ❑ Wells ❑ Food ❑ Other Investigation Date and Findings: TQGUA NT5 1-6 ZA mil, r(LC i 11311( PsW) klaT )N<W5 I%l L-g Date Closed:�it Reason Closed: Initials: Case Activity Listing 11/3/2011 . 9:17:37AM Case #: ENF2011-00067 1 Assigned Done Activity Description Date 1 Date 2*, Date 3 Hold Disp To By Updated Updated 131, ENFA010 Complaint Received 9/19/2011 9/19/2011 None DON1: SME 9/19/2011 SME ENFA011 Additional Complaint Received 9/22/2011 None DONE GBM GBM 11/3/2011 GBM two complaints were received for same reason:ENF2011-00067(9/16/11 by MMS)and ENF2011-00073(9/29/11 by GBM). ENFA911 Miscellaneous Action 9/29/2011 9/29/2011 None DONE GBM GBM 10/12/2011 GBM Letter sent to Tracy and Daniel Johnson ENFA510 Letter attached. See documents 9/29/2011 None DONE GBM GBM 11/3/2011 GBM Planner,Grace Miller,sent letter to owners. ENFA900 Telephone Call 10/11/2011 None DONE GBM GBM 10/12/2011 GBM Tracy Johnson responded to my letter.There is a Conservation Plan for the work done. ENFA800 Documents Received 10/13/2011 None DONE GBM GBM 11/3/2011 GBM Conservation Fam Plan done in Aug.2003 was sent to Planning by owner. ENFA510 Letter attached. See documents 10/31/2011 None DONE GBM GBM 11/3/2011 GBM Compliance letter received from Conservation District. ENFC004 Complaint Resolved 11/2/2011 None DONE GBM GBM 11/3/2011 GBM Mason Conservation District letter,dated 10/31/11,stating the owners are in compliance with their Conservation Farm Plan and not in creek with fencing.See file. ENFC050 Complaint Closed 11/2/2011 None DONE GBM GBM 11/3/2011 GBM Planner,Grace Miller,sent letter to owners on 11/2/11 authorizing them to proceed with fencing and other work approved within their Farm Conservation Plan,approved by inspection with Conservation District on 10/31/11. Page 1 of I CaseActivity..rpt ftrraScan TaxSifter-Mason County Washington Page 1 of 1 is MASON COUNTY WASHINGTON TAXSIFTER SIMPLE SEARCH SALES SEARCH REET SIFTER COUNTY HOME PAGE CONTACT DISCLAIMER Melody Peterson Mason County Assessor PO Box 3 Shelton,WA 98584 Assessor Treasurer Appraisal MapSifter Parcel (Retired) Parcel#: 22131-43-04040 Owner Name: TRACY RAYMOND Land Use Code: 99- Undeveloped-Other Addressi: 880 E SPENCER LAKE RD Situs: Address2: Map Number: FS 09206:A City,State: SHELTON WA Status: Zip: 98584 Description: W1/2 SW SE S OF R/W Comment: 2011 Market Value 2011 Taxable Value 2011 Assessment Data _ - -- _---- - - -- - ._.. - - No data Found No data Found. No data Found. Ownership Owner's Nam__ Ownership% RAYMOND,TRACY 100% Sales History No Sales History Historical Valuation Info Year Billed Owner Land IImpr. Fi'r;rCran iaiue Total Exempt Taxable 2009 RAYMOND,TRACY $103,280 5o $0 $103,280 $0 $1,480 2008 RAYMOND,TRACY $103,280 50 $0 $103,280 $0 $1,455 2007 RAYMOND,TRACY $49,060 50 $0 $49,060 $0 $1,455 View Taxes Parcel Comments No Comments Available Property Images No images found. 1.0.4275.27397 TX_RollYear_Search:2012 http://property.co.mason.wa.us/Taxsifter/Assessor.aspx?keyld=2979830&parcelNumber=2... 9/26/2011 • INQUIRY BY NAME Name Cd RAYM8500 RAYMOND, TRACY 880 E SPENCER LAKE RD SHELTON, WA 98584 1 RP 22131 43 04040 W1/2 SW SE S OF R/W * 1, 500 T 9999 DL Inquiry Type VL Select Line # 00 -or- Search for Parcel END OF DATA CMD 7 for EOJ HELP key Allowed MIDde: "INQUIRY REAL PROPERTY Parcel # 22131 43 04040 Rng 2 Twp 21 Sec 31 Tax Yr 2011 Taxpayer # RAYM 8500 RAYMOND, TRACY T/P Chg Dt 6/22/2000 Title Owner # RAYM 8500 RAYMOND, TRACY T/P Chg By MEM Contract Owner # Loan # Plat/Condo Type Code Blk Lot Unit Dock Description W1/2 SW SE S OF R/W * Assoc M/H Chg Dt 4/06/2010 Chg By MDL Chg Rs CO FS 09206:A Tax Code 0179 1 402 P3 E5 L H1 Land Use 9999 DELETED Zoning Code Tax Stat DL DELETE/DL Reval 1 Chg Rs F/P? N Ac Land: Improved Unimproved Timberland Total Land Improvement Total AV Acres 1291 12 . 91 Taxable CU 1,500 1,500 11500 Market OS 103,280 103,280 103,280 New/C 0/AV Mob Home AV Sub Cd Inta Sr Cit Cd Reg Exmpt O/R Regular Taxable Lien Date AF # 1741057 As-Tx Yr 2001 2002 App # 14 Agr # 634 WINDOW INTO 22131 43 04010 Inquiry Type VL HELP Cmd Keys : 1, 2, 6, 7, 9, 11 221314001000 221313001000 221314001010 221313400000 221314304000 E SPENCER LAKE RD 221319999999 221314304020 221314303000 -21 R2 T21NR2W SI 221314304010 221314304020 221313400000 221314303010 221314304040 221314490020 F 221314304030 y9� �c 221314303020 \ 221314490040 A 221314490040 r W T20NR2W 220062000000 w' Z 220061001000 .•:- 220061001010 f r f( yf{ft X 91 u '. OFF � !} -S', -.�1�sR i." s • ' ,�. . . i7i�77t'L, � r.:,.w.g '• �� map „�- •;#` . !•. eY{" ',�.T �.fl � �.�`+i-j ii• �� �'� �;.* •t�. r a�?: � ~'t. {t,���. it's ��i��� ," f_ •I- � - '� � "�, R � �'� }_ ; '► �� a �i ���� 4.g- ,� ..t��S�• OL -•,��� j�'r 2 � � �R�s [��,,,, f.�jit l' _- ,,�y t��t• •�' } =I e2-_�' s ..�. ���� 4 Cry*y��' • - :.rs�r,+i r- f � ���y� �� ,r !� '. � .y � "'� - ( �' •€ �+'__ �• �-x :, tie-'g-� $ _ _ ; �¢ � - �- � -.: C' L 1. R An f t } "a4'-tom r� - � '"E ..r� � �j c, � R _�... ; !' _- -r _ �i< x .. y 1 1 `a� -_--•. .mid• �' cf - _'Y f j s F�i L � ��� •L ��` � r o 3 } '� .cam..{r � R -•g.`4ec '' ,3`dcigf. «.Jr:r,+y + �• v b� t t_ . ' ti`k4 x. t l R- � -�'• 3 T• �l �' �+�` p �r `� - �f E � _� �^1F k C4:•� .-.Tr � �, a<-�• � _��� �. - Wit• - '�� �i �'f';4 YJ ''� - ems- �'� Kial .� • i =ice .�" `• - - r s _ _�,�yy`�+�-� s ' + 4. •f pia., �-,i,y��•'L�C- �s Ps wu Wil - •ate :Y•' _ ,r. � �,i, •,t .ten{ . - 'R•_ ��'