The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRLC2002-00017 - RLC Inspections - 3/18/2002 �PCioN-cATFo� MASON COUNTY MC Planning Department o N = P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 z� N Y n (360)427-9670 0 aDY 1864 Resource Lands & Critical Area Site Evaluation March 18, 2002 PETER KLENAK 3710 GRAN DVIEW ST GIG HARBOR WA 98335 I Case No.: RLC2002-00017 Parcel No.: 123305000036 Project Description Set a replacement mobile home on the existing footprint of previous mobile home. Dear Applicant: As part of this department's review of your permit application, a Resource Lands and Critical Areas (RLC) site inspection was performed on your property. Below you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values. This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject property. Please contact me at (360) 427-9670, ext. if you have questions. +nre , Rick Mraz Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department 3/18/02 1 of 2 RLC2002-00017 Resource Lands & Critical Area Site Evaluation 3/18/02 Case No.: RLC2002-00017 Comments A field inspection of the subject property was conducted on 3/14/02 to evaluate critical areas issues relative to the replacement of a manufactured home. The parcel contains frontage on an unnamed type IV stream. The Mason County Resource Ordinance (RO) requires a 115' setback from type IV streams. Per the provisions of the RO, a development activity that proposes to encroach on the setback typically requires a variance supported by a Habitat Management Plan. However, exemptions exist in the RO for normal repair and maintenance (which has been interpreted to include total replacement of manufactured homes) provided that the new building footprint does not exceed the previous footprint by more than 10% A review of the parcel history indicates that the lot had been the source of past environmental health complaints. The site inspection noted that the original structures onsite had been demolished and removed. Many small pieces of debris remained onsite, imbedded in the ground and sidecast near the stream. No clear evidence was present to indicate the size of the original structures. During the site inspection, staff indicated that the site plan showing a proposed 40' setback from the stream was acceptable. No portion of the new construction should encroach closer than 40' from the edge of the stream. A review of the Mason County Assessor's database indicates that the original home was a 14' X 50' single-wide (700 sq. ft.) with a 63 sq. foot deck. Another 125 square foot "under roof' structure was also assessed. These structures total 888 square feet. This amount is well below the speculated coverage discussed during the site inspection. A strict interpretation of the County ordinance would allow only a 977 square foot replacement. Significant exceedence of this amount would require a variance from the Resource Ordinance and a supporting Habitat Management Plan (HMP) as outlined in the ordinance. If there are historical photos that demonstrate other structures on this property then the footprint limit may be raised. A copy of the Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas chapter of the Resource Ordinance is enclosed for your review. It contains details about the contents of a HMP and specific guidance as to the variance procedure. If you have questions or require clarification of these issues, please contact me. 3/18/02 2 of 2 RLC2002-00017 I 113 A 02 WFD 14;54 F.=i1 3604278425 `!A.io\ 0)U TI �Opl ev1K�v[V Uuviv I Y PLANNING DEPT. PRE-INSPECTION APPLICATION Pi EASE PRINT $70.00 Fee Roquired 1. Owner: _Apf04S_I _3'� Applicant: _- e 1- Site Address: QLj \( LT_d_ crz-_!3w riles,Applic nt A d ess: 3 C=e 4id-UI(ems,_- c �` Owner Address: v W`° ' C' P ��u 5 7 z _ City St� Zip 1 � City:�l�Stfc)gf-Zip- 1�$ = Phone: t — 7 7 Phone: ��l3.__-__.Y517- - _7 2. Parcel Kio. / 2- - Oev'3 Legal Descri tion: L11CT (� - Ic r`' 1 RECEIVED Yh r4�?iy ��1��— � d c�rr�� MAR 1 12002 c ti—y_r%�,�- 1 - 3 Purpose of Pre-lnspe�tion; E' _ 'e t4 M (P MCCD PLANNING �. Use of Building: L L Y / e-U�/_� ---- 5. Do any of the following exist on or adjacent to property?: slope saltwater lake river pond _ wetland seasonal runoff other _ stream ._�L_ seasonal creek X, Directiuns to Siw:Zz 42 If the infurmation is incomplere, then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the original application. Pre inspection reports remain valid only until development changes occur in the vicinity which affect the let evaluated in this inspection, or the laws re ulating development oft site change after the time of inspection. Applicant Signature: Date: O ;7 Return application to: Department cf Community Development,Planning Division P.O. Box 279 Shelton, WA 98584 (360) 427 9670 Please include a $70.00 check or money order payable to Mason County Treasurer When completed, this form becomes part of the parcel file. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Accepted by: � — _ Date: Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation to water & property lines: (� 3t,v Afj L£�� (1 0. 3�r g S� . 08. 00/02 WED 14:54 FAX 3604278.125 MASON COUNTY ono r1111iRIIsa 111u2sklata uealuw k1l" propasea Du+taing site in reiallon io water bt property lines: v� Departmental Review (For Office Use Only) Planning Department Findings: -- Ar _ - � -- - -