Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
VAR2021-00002 Mitchell Lumber Final Decision 2 parcels - VAR Letters / Memos - 11/4/2021
MASON COUNTY • COMMUNITY SERVICES Building,Planning,Environmental Health,Community Health November 4, 2021 NOTICE.OF FINAL DECISION Case.Number: VAR2021-00002—.Resource Ordinance Variance for Mitchell Lumber .Company. The representative is.James Mitchell. Notice is hereby given that Mitchell.Lumber Company, applicant for the above referenced variance permit,has been granted conditional approval for an access road through the buffer of a Type F stream and a Category III Wetland buffer. The Variance:is approved subject to the conditions listed within the Hearing Examiner's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Final Decision, dated Oct 27, 2021. If you have any-questions or require:clarification on this issue,please contact Grace. Miller,Planner with the Mason County Department of Community Development at(360) 427-9670,x 360. This is a final decision. This approval of the.Variance Permit by.the Mason County Hearing Examiner is final and may be appealed to Superior Court as.outlined in the Washington State Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW. Appeal deadlines are.. short and procedures strictly construed. Anyone wishing to file an appeal of this decision should consult with an attorney to'ensure that all procedural requirements are satisfied. Time Limit for Action. Per.the Mason County Code Title 15 -Development.Code _No permit authorizing construction shall'extend for a term of more than five years..If actual construction of a development for which a permit has been granted has not begun within two years after the approval (2/8/2023),the Hearing Examiner shall-review the permit and upon a showing of good cause,may extend the initial two year period by permit for one year. Otherwise,the permit terminates;PROVIDED that no permit,shall be extended unless the applicant has requested such review and extension before the Hearing Examiner PRIOR to the expiration date. Expiration Date.=November 4, 2023. J 1 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR MASON COUNTY 2 Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner 3 4 RE: Mitchell Lumber Company 5 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS Resource Ordinance Variance OF LAW AND FINAL DECISION 6 7 8 9 INTRODUCTION 10 The Applicant has applied for a variance to the County's Resource Ordinance to construct an access road for a lumber company through the buffer of a Type F (fish- 11 bearing) stream and a Category III wetland buffer at 81 NE Belfair ST, Belfair., WA. 12 The variance is approved subject to conditions. 13 ORAL TESTIMONY 14 Grace Miller, Mason County Senior Planner, summarized the proposal. She noted no public comments had been received on the project. 15 16 James Mitchell,Applicant,identified how the retaining walls limit on-site limit access. 17 EXHIBITS 18 All six exhibits identified in"Case Index"attached to the October 5,2021 Staff Report, were admitted at hearing into the record. 19 20 FINDINGS OF FACT 21 Procedural: 22 23 1. Applicants. The Applicant is James Mitchell. 24 2. Hearing. A hearing on the application was held on October 13,2021 at 1:00 25 pm via Zoom. Resource Ordinance Variance P. 1 Findings, Conclusions and Decision l 1 Substantive: 2 3. Site/Proposal Description. The Applicant has applied for a variance to the 3 County's Resource Ordinance to construct an access road for a lumber company through the 165-foot buffer/setback of a Type F (fish-bearing) stream and the 80 foot 4 buffer of Category III wetland buffer at 81 NE Belfair ST,Belfair.,WA. The estimated 5 impact is 2268 square feet of wetland buffer and 1463 square feet of stream buffer. The reason for the variance is to provide vehicular access the second half of Mitchell 6 Lumber's Company's property. The area of the requested variance is the most efficient topography to put in a small access road to go from the lower elevation of the existing 7 lumber yard to the higher elevations of the project site. The proposed access is the closest to a reasonable grade for truck and trailer travel. Everywhere else along the 8 existing lumber yard and new area is divided by a retaining wall. 9 The parcel is 3.54 acres in size The parcels are currently developed with single family 10 residence sand Mitchell Lumber Yard. Topography is level from NE State Route 3 to the west extent of Mitchell Lumber Yard and slopes down moderately from the 11 developed portion of the residential lots to the south. Much of the project site is' dominated by lawn grasses and ornamental shrubs. The southern corner is dominated 12 by red alder blackberry and emergent wetland species. 13 4. Characteristics of the Area. Surrounding development is commercial to the 14 east, residential to the north-and west, and undeveloped immediately south. 15 5. Adverse Impacts. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Specific issues related to the potential project impacts are addressed below. This project is SEPA 16 Exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b). 17 The Applicant prepared a mitigation plan by a qualified biologist designed to fully 18 mitigate the stream and wetland buffer encroachments. The project proposes to compensate for 2,268 square feet of impact 'to the wetland buffer enhancing 2,500 19 square feet of remaining wetland buffer-and 1,463 square feet of impact to the stream buffer by enhancing species in 1,600 square feet of remaining stream buffer. 20 Compensatory mitigation will further involve removal of invasive species and 21 installation of native plants in approximately 4,100 square feet. Upon removal of invasive species, the area will be seeded with a native riparian grass mix to prevent 22 bare soils from causing potential erosion. - r 23 The proposal is considered compatible with surrounding development because it involves a commercial use in an area zoned for commercial use. There will not be a 24 significant increase in traffic or noise from the expansion as it primarily is designed to 25 increase product capacity, not retail customer capacity. As shown in the Ex. 2 photograph, surrounding residential uses are on large heavily treed lots that are Resource Ordinance Variance p. 2 Findings, Conclusions and Decision sufficiently buffered by vegetation and distance to avoid compatibility impacts. The 1 design of the project will provide some traffic relief to Hwy 3 through Belfair as the 2 flow of trucks onto the property will be made more efficient. 3 6. Necessity of Variance. The current wetland and stream setbacks cut off access to 4 usable space,imposing undue hardship on the applicant's ability to grow their business and increase productivity. Any other route would require grading valuable area that is 5 needed for the expansion of the business .and would significantly decrease the 6 maximum productivity that expanding the lumber yard would allow them. The topography of the proposed access road is the only area that has a gradient transition 7 between the lower elevation existing lumber yard and the higher elevation property that is planned for development. With light grading of a hill that has already been 8 manipulated by previous occupants, this is the most reasonable place to put in a road so truck traffic can move from the existing property up to the new development. The 9 rest of the property is divided by a concrete retaining wall, ranging from four to six- 10 feet tall. Putting in access here would require intensive earthwork, severely impacting the useful square footage for facilities,product storage and daily operations.This would 11 significantly limit expansion into the site's full potential. 12 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 13 14 Procedural: 15 1. Authority of Hearing Examiner. MCC 15:03.050(I)provides the Examiner with the authority to review and act upon variance applications. 16 17 Substantive: 18 2. Zoning Designation. The parcel is zoned Mixed-Use Commercial within 19 the Belfair UGA. 20 3. Review Criteria and Application. The variance criteria for the Resource 21 Ordinance variance (request to modify stream and wetlands setbacks) are governed by MCC 15.09.057. Applicable criteria are quoted below in italics and applied via 22 corresponding conclusions of law. 23 MCC 15.09.057(1): The strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable use of the property 24 not otherwise prohibited by county regulations. 25 Resource Ordinance Variance p. 3 Findings, Conclusions and Decision 4. The criterion is met. The Applicant seeks to expand its business, which is 1 an allowed use in his zoning district and should therefore be considered a reasonable 2 use of the property. Strict application of the stream and shoreline buffers would unreasonably interfere with the Applicant's proposed expansion as detailed in Finding 3 of Fact No.6. 4 MCC 15.09.057(2): The hardship which serves as the basis for the granting of the variance is specifically related to the property of the Applicant, and is the result of 5 unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features in the 6 application of the County Regulations, and not,for example,from deed restrictions or the Applicant's own action. 7 5. The criterion is met. The hardship necessitating the variance is the Type F 8 stream and Category III wetland, both of which unreasonably interfere with the installation of an access road. 9 10 MCC 15.09.057(3): The design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the 11 environment. 12 6. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, the proposal is compatible with 13 surrounding use and will not adversely affect the environment or adjacent properties. 14 MCC 15.09.057(4): The variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area, and will be the minimum 15 necessary to afford relief. 16 7. The criterion is met. The variance enables reasonable use of commercially 17 zoned property, which is a privilege enjoyed by most other commercially zoned parcels. Consequently, it does not qualify as a special privilege. The relief sought is a 18 reasonable expansion of a business enterprise and the proposed variance is the minimum necessary to acquire that relief without having to engage in excessive grading 19 and unreasonable loss of commercial space as detailed in Finding of Fact No. 6. 20 MCC 15.09.057(5): The public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect. 21 8. The criterion is met. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, the variance 22 will not adversely affect the environment or adjoining uses while allowing for a reasonable use of the subject property. The public interest will suffer no substantial 23 detrimental effect. 24 MCC 15.09.057(6): No variance shall be granted unless the owner otherwise lacks a 25 reasonable use of the land. Such variance shall be consistent with the Mason County Comprehensive Plan, Development Regulations, Resource Ordinance and other Resource Ordinance Variance p. 4 Findings, Conclusions and Decision County ordinances, and with the Growth Management Act. Mere loss in value only 1 shall notjustify a variance. 2 9. The criterion is met. Without the variance the owner would be deprived of the 3 reasonable use of his property for the reasons identified in Finding of Fact No. 6. 4 Generic Permitting Criteria 5 6 MCC 15.09.055(C): Required Review: The Hearing Examiner shall review proposed development according to the following criteria: 7 1. The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets 8 the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code, especially Title 6, 8, and 16. 9 2. Development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is in 10 the public interest. 11 3. Development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within the 12 Comprehensive Plan. 13 10. The project complies with all of the County regulations specified in the 14 criteria above except for the regulations subject to the variance request.No subdivision of land is proposed, consistency with health regulations will be assured during building 15 permit review and the proposal is exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act. Since the proposal has no adverse impacts as mitigated, it does not impact the public 16 health, safety and welfare. Since the project promotes in-fill development and the use 17 of existing infrastructure, it is in the public interest to authorize the development. Staff have determined that the proposal will not lower level of service standards for 18 transportation and neighborhood park facilities. 19 DECISION rdarf 20 The variance application is approved for the Berne as proposed subject to the following 21 conditions: �/-1 22 1) No portion of the proposed development shall be closer to the stream buffer and wetlands than proposed by the submitted Site Plan. The Fish and Wildlife Habitat 23 Conservation Area and buffer cannot be converted to lawn or residential landscaping. Native trees, shrubs and groundcover, within the buffer, shall be retained and 24 maintained. 25 Resource Ordinance Variance p. 5 Findings, Conclusions and Decision 2) The Buffer Mitigation Plan that was prepared by Ecological Services, dated 1 3/18/2021; shall be implemented as proposed throughout all development of the site. 2 3) The owner shall be required to control erosion during construction. Any disturbed 3 areas should be restored to prevent erosion and other environmental.impacts. 4 4) The owner is to have,a Title Notification of Habitat Management Plan recorded with the Deed to the property in the Mason County Auditor's,office. The Title 5 Notification statement indicates that the property is subject to conditions, mitigation 6 and/or conservation measures as contained within the HMP submitted to the MC Dept of Community Development and approved under Resource Ordinance Variance 7 #VAR2021-00002. 8 5) A three-year Monitoring Plan of the stream buffer enhancement plan must be implemented. The information gathered by the applicant's biologist must be submitted 9 as an annual report to the Director of Mason County Dept of Community Development 10 for three years following the implementation of the Buffer Mitigation Enhancement Plan within stream buffer. 11 12 Dated this 27t' day of October 2020. 13 ` 14 s Phil A. Olbrechts 15 Mason County Hearing Examiner 16 APPEAL 17 18 The Resource Ordinance variance decision is final and may be appealed to superior court as outlined in the Washington State Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW. 19. CHANGE IN VALUATION 20 21 Notice is given pursuant to RCW 36.70B.130 that property owners who are affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes 22 notwithstanding any program of revaluation. 23 24 25 Resource Ordinance Variance p. 6 Findings, Conclusions and Decision October 12,2021 EXHIBIT 1 TO: Phil Olbrechts,Mason County Hearings Examiner FROM:Grace Miller, Senior Planner RE: Resource Ordinance Variance# request by James Mitchell. STAFF REPORT I. INTRODUCTION.The request is for a Variance'from the Mason County Resource Ordinance FWHCA Chapter for impacting a Type"F"stream buffer.for the expansion of Mitchell Lumber Company north onto adjacent property,including an access road from ST RT 3 and constructing warehouse space. Laura Westervelt of Ecological Land Services Inc.prepared the Wetland Delineation and the Buffer Mitigation Plan for the project. II. APPLICANT.The applicant is James Mitchell. III. PROPERTY LOCATION.The property is located at 81 NE Belfair ST,Belfair. Sec 29,Twn 23 N,R 1 W.Tracts 6&7 of SW SE,Parcel 2 of BLA#97-71. Parcel No. 12329-43-00060.A Boundary Line Adjustment,BLA#21-16,has been approved to combine three parcels into one. The total acreage now is 3.54 acres. IV. EVALUATION. PROPOSAL: The project is the expansion of Mitchell Lumber Company north,including an access road from 23681 NE ST RT 3 to 81 NE Belfair ST and constructing warehouse space. A Habitat Management Plan was prepared by Ecological Land Services,Inc.and is attached Exhibit 5. A. Characteristics of the site and area. Three parcels were combined into one through an approved Boundary Line Adjustment.The parcel is 3.54 acres in size The parcels are currently developed with single family residences and Mitchell Lumber Yard. Surrounding development is commercial to the east,residential to the north and west,and undeveloped immediately south.Topography is level from NE State Route 3 to the west extent of Mitchell Lumber Yard and slopes down moderately from the developed portion of the residential lots to the south.Much of the project site is dominated by lawn grasses and ornamental shrubs.The southern corner is dominated by red alder,blackberry and emergent wetland species. One forested,depressional wetland was identified and delineated in the southern comer of the project site The wetland is a Category III system and requires an 80-foot buffer.A Type F stream flows outside the east boundary of the project site and continues south.The channel requires a buffer of 150 feet,which extends into the southwest comer of the project site. B. Zoning:The property is zoned as Mixed-Use Commercial,within the Belfair UGA. A lumber company is an allowed use within this zoning. C The Comprehensive Plan Designation is Rural. D. SEPA Compliance.The proposal is SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11-800 (1)(iv)(v). E. Other Permits.The proposal also requires a Building Permit with Environmental Health Department approval.A Mason Environmental Permit has been applied for to allow development within the Wetland Buffer.The MEP application has been included within the exhibits. C:\Users\Gbm\Downloads\ROvarstaffMitchellLumber2l.doc.gbm F. Habitat Management Plan. The applicant has submitted both a Delineation Report(10/7/2020)and a Buffer Mitigation Plan(3/18/2021)that were prepared by Ecological Land Services.Inc.A copy of the Buffer Mitigation Plan and Wetland Delineation were sent to the Skokomish Tribe and the Dept of Fish and Wildlife on September 16,2021. No comments have been received to date.Best Management Practices,Conservation&Minimization Measures and a Mitigation Buffer Enhancement Plan have been identified by Ecological Land Services,Inc.to avoid,minimize and mitigate for impacts associated with the proposed construction. 1 V. ANALYSIS: A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW: Type III review for permit applications requires that the Hearing Examiner evaluate the proposal for consistency with the County's Development Code,adopted plans and regulations.The Hearing Examiner shall review the proposal according to the following criteria: 1)The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code,especially Title 6, 8 and 16. 2)The development does not impact the public health,safety and welfare and is in the public interest.3)The development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within the Comprehensive Plan and meets the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code. Staff findings conclude that the development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code.The development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is in the public interest.The development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or neighborhood park facilities. - The Mason County Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Chapter 17.01.110(D)(1)of the Resource Ordinance details buffers on Type F waters such as this.All type F streams require a 150'buffer with an additional 15'building setback.Therefore,a minimum 165' building setback is required for the development. A Buffer Mitigation Plan(HMP)was prepared by Laura Westervelt of Ecological Land Services on March 18,2021.The Buffer Mitigation Plan meets the requirements of the ordinance. VI. VARIANCE CRITERIA. The Mason County Resource Ordinance Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Chapter 17.01.110 details buffer requirements and the content of the Habitat Management Plan.The Variances from Standards Section 17.01.150(E)and the Mason County Code review standards_Section 15.09.057 provide that no- variance shall be granted unless the County makes findings of fact showing that the following circumstances exist: 1.The specific modifications from then terms of the Chapter required:There is a Type F stream with a 150' buffer and a 165' structure setback,and a Category III Wetland with a.80'buffer on the southern portion of the parcel.The Variance has been requested to allow for the expansion of Mitchell Lumber Company to include an access road through the current buffers.The estimated impact of 2268 square feet of wetland buffer and 1463 square feet of stream buffer.The applicants are prepared to compensate for the impacts to the wetland and stream buffers in accordance with Mason County Code Chapters 8.52.170 Fish&Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. 2.The reason for the variance is to be able to access the second half of Mitchell Lumber's Company's property.The area of the requested variance is the most efficient topography to put in a small access road to go from the lower elevation existing lumber yard to the higher elevation property that they are expanding into.It is the closest to a reasonable grade for truck and trailer travel.Everywhere else along the existing lumber yard and new area is divided by a retaining wall. C:\Users\Gbm\Downloads\ROvarstaffMitchellLumber2 l.doc.gbm No variance shall be granted unless the County makes findings of fact showing that certain circumstances exist. 3-a. That the strict application of the bulk,dimensional and performance standards preclude or significantly interferes with a reasonable use of the property not otherwise prohibited by County regulations. The current wetland and stream setbacks cut off access to usable space, imposing undue hardship on the applicant's ability to grow their business and increase productivity.Any other route would require grading valuable area that is needed for the expansion of the business and would significantly decrease the maximum productivity that expanding the lumber yard would allow them. 3-b. That the hardship which serves as a basis for the granting of the variance is specifically related to the property of the applicant and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape,size or natural features and the application of the County regulations and not,for example from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions. The current wetland and stream setbacks block the only reasonable position for a short access road(only a couple hundredfeet) and the irregular shape of the setbacks mean the area in question is isolated from the environments they are meant to protect by the existing business.Moving the setback would allow the business to grow efficiently. 3-c. That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the environment. The design of theproject willprovide some traffic relief to Hwy 3 through Belfair as the flow of trucks onto the property will be made more efficient. The design of the project will not significantly interfere with the surrounding businesses or residences. There will not be a significant increase in traffic or noise from the expansion as it primarily is designed to increase product capacity, not'retail customer capacity. 3-d. That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by other properties in the area and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief. The reduced setbacks will be used to put in a small access road to the northern half of the property. Previous occupants and neighbors have developed all the way to the wetland and continue to maintain lawns well within the wetland boundary.It would not give special access to Mitchell Lumber Company that other property owners do not already have and use. The included mitigation plan lays out how Mitchell Lumber Company will revitalize the remaining setback where previous occupants have damaged the environment and allowed for invasive outgrowth of the area. 3-e. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect. The applicant is dedicated to developing in a conscientious manor that will minimize impact on the wetlands and surrounding environment. The environmental mitigation plan will bring native vegetation back to the wetland, increasing the health of an important local biome. The growth of their business will increase the support to local businesses and homeowners This should keep more business and economy local that would otherwise have to necessarily leave the county. The public interest will benefit by the approval of this variance for the expansion 3-f. No variance shall be granted unless the owner otherwise lacks a reasonable use of the land. Such variance shall be consistent with the Mason County Comprehensive Plan,Development Regulations, Resource Ordinance and other County ordinances and with the Growth Management Act.Mere loss in value only shall not justify a variance. The topography of this location is the only area that has a gradient transition between the lower elevation existing lumberyard and the higher elevation property that is planned for development. With light grading of a hill that has already been manipulated by previous occupants, this is the most reasonable place to put C:\Users\Gbm\Downloads\ROvarstaffMitchellLumber2 l.doc.gbm in a road so truck traffic can move from the existing property up to the new development. The rest of the property is divided by a concrete retaining wall, ranging from four to six feet tall. Putting in access here would require intensive earthwork, severely impacting the useful square footage for facilities,product storage and daily operations. This would limit expansion from it's full potential. The site is within an area zoned for commercial uses such as a lumberyard. The lot is of suff cient size to accommodate this proposal. The currently allowed use of this portion of the property is less than reasonable given the critical area restrictions. The proposal is consistent with the Mason County Comprehensive Plan and the Growth Management Act. The project has been proposed to address all environmental impacts associated with development near the stream. The applicant lacks reasonable use of their property under the existing regulations. The public interest will suffer no detrimental effect because the proposed mitigation will substantially improve habitat along the Type F stream VII. CONCLUSION. Staff recommends conditional approval of the permit because the proposal meets the County criteria and regulations for approval of a Variance. The conditions require incorporation of the Buffer Mitigation Plan into the site development.The Buffer Mitigation Plan was developed for this proposal by Ecological Land Services Inc.and dated 3/18/2021. The following conditions are recommended to be placed on the permit: 1) No portion of the proposed development shall be closer to the stream buffer and wetlands than proposed by the submitted Site Plan.The Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area and buffer cannot be converted to lawn or residential landscaping.Native trees,shrubs and groundcover,within the buffer,shall be retained and maintained. 2) The Buffer Mitigation Plan that was prepared by Ecological Services,dated 3/18/2021,shall be implemented as proposed throughout all development of the site. 3) The owner shall be required to control erosion during construction.Any disturbed areas should be restored to prevent erosion and other environmental impacts. 4) The owner is to have a Title Notification of Habitat Management Plan recorded with the Deed to the property in the Mason County Auditor's office.The Title Notification statement indicates that the property is subject to conditions,mitigation and/or conservation measures as contained within the HMP submitted to the MC Dept of Community Development and approved under Resource Ordinance Variance#VAR2021-00002. 5) A three-year Monitoring Plan of the stream buffer enhancement plan must be implemented. The information gathered by the applicant's biologist must be submitted as an annual report to the Director of Mason County Dept of Community Dev_elopmentfor three-years following-the- -- - implementation of the Buffer Mitigation Enhancement Plan within stream buffer. CHOICE OF ACTION: 1. Approval of the Resource Ordinance Variance#VAR2021-00002. 2. Approval of Resource Ordinance Variance with conditions. 3. Deny Variance(reapplication or resubmittal is permitted.) 4. Remand for further proceedings and/or evidentiary hearing in accordance with Section 15.09.090 of Title 15. C:\Users\Gbm\Downloads\ROvarstaffMitchellLumber2 l.doc.gbm LIST OF EXHIBITS for Mitchell Lumber Variance request,VAR2021-00002: 1. Staff Report with List of Exhibits. 2. Variance Application. 3. Site plan and vicinity map. 4. Public Notice. 5. Buffer Mitigation Plan. 6. Wetland Delineation Report C:\Users\Gbm\Downloads\ROvarstaffMitchellLumber2 l.doc.gbm max. . Mason County Permit Getiter Use MASON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICESA . VAR z..o�1 aooy;�. Building,Planning,Environmental Health;'Comrnunity Health 615 W.Alder St.—Bldg'8,Shelton,Wa 98584 Q , < . .4 Phone:(360)427-9670 ext.352 ♦ Fax:(360)427-7798 �� k h Resource Ordinance Variance: $2,000 Habitat Management Plan Review: $300 If `ice Public Hearing: $2,330 Alder Street. Applicant will also be billed for advertising costs. Resource Ordinance Variance Ap-plication The purpose of this application is to allow the County to consider requests to vary or adapt certain numerical standards of the Resource Ordinance where the strict application would deprive property owners of reasonable use of their property. The minimum reasonable use for a residence, decks, and accessory structures in a residentially zoned area shall be defined by the lesser of 40 percent of the area of the lot or 2,550 square feet. A public hearing accompanies Variances and application for a Variance does not guarantee approval. or Applicant Name J any f.-5 '4 V►d Property Owners K��� e�►, '+� e I 1 ----/� c e i I _14 o`4 i,%s.....__.._4 LLC._......_..---__ Mailing Address PO 13 o X VV A 9 8 5 �t$ Phone 1 O`-2-7 5- -IySG Phone 36U- 2(os- 061y Email cnnAy @vr,� c�.elll�.�.��reo. cov►' Site Address .. . -� 1"a s� ��1`�0,,t Ill Q$5 Z$ _..___....._._.._—..._....._._—._........_..----.._.........-----.__._.._._ _._._.._..__._....._._____..._._.._.._.........._....__.___........._..—..-.-- Tax Parcel# i 2 3 Z ej$ 0 Legal Description _"r 1? 6 �1 o k 5 W IT L Z oV-- ILA 9 9- 1 Project Description 1 X PA&6i ay� o._....._..._.._�t...._d._��a.c rL .__._.._.__....t_0. .....:..._._..........;...wt. ._�...v.....��.:�.n�-.R.K-..._._....a .__.........._ p .._ Rev. Feb 2019 Page 1 of 4 ❑ Please provide a site plan that includes the following: 1. Indicate Scale and North Arrow. 2. Property line dimensions,easements,and right-of-ways. 3. The location of all existing and proposed structures. Include square footage of existing and proposed structures. 4. Setback distance,in feet from all property lines and structures. 5. Existing and proposed road access to and from the site. 6. Parking spaces. 7. Location of on-site sewage tanks and drainfields. 8. Location of drinking water supply.Include location on the proposed site and surrounding parcels. 9. Steep bluffs,wetlands,streams,and bodies of water. 10. Surface and storm water run-off routes. ❑ On a separate piece of paper(#of pages attached: ), please explain the reason for the Variance request and respond to the following: 1. Describe the specific modification from the terms of the Chapter required. \ 2. Describe the reasons for the variance. 3. No variance shall be granted unless the County makes findings of fact showing that certain circumstances exist. Please address each of the following standards and how the proposal pertains to these circumstances. a. That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable use of the property not otherwise prohibited by County regulations; b. That the hardship which serves as a basis for the granting of the variance is specifically related to the property of the applicant, and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of the County regulations, and not, for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions; c. That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the environment; d. That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area,and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief; e. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect; f. No variance shall be granted unless the owner otherwise lacks a reasonable use of the land. Such variance shall be consistent with the Mason County Comprehensive Plan, Development Regulations,Resource Ordinance and other county ordinances, and with the Growth Management Act. Mere loss in value only shall not justify a variance. Provide a list(preferably printed on mailing labels or legal sized ) of all envelopes) property owners' P P P tY mailing addresses within 300 feet of your parcel boundaries. Addresses are to be obtained from the Mason County Assessor's Office,Bldg. 1. Applicant(s) Signature Date Ca/112 Rev. Feb 2019 Page 2 of 4 Resource Ordinance Variance Application Mitchell Lumber Company The following answers correspond with the same numbered question from the variance application form. 1. There is a type F stream with a 150 ft buffer and 165 ft structure setback, and a Category III wetland with 80 ft buffer on the southern portion of parcel 123294300060(81 NE Belfair St). We request a variance to allow for the expansion of Mitchell Lumber Company onto parcels 1232900060 and 1232900050,including an access road through the current buffers. We estimate an impact of 2268 sq ft of wetland buffer and 1463 sq ft of stream buffer(as per our Buffer Mitigation Plan prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc). We are prepared to compensate for impacts to the wetland and stream buffers in accordance with Mason County Code Chapters 8.52.110 Wetlands and 8.52.170 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. 2. The reason for the variance is to be able to access the second half of Mitchell Lumber Company's property. The area of the requested variance is the most efficient topography to put in a small access road to go from the lower elevation existing lumber yard to the higher elevation property we are expanding into. It is the closest to a reasonable grade for truck and trailer travel, everywhere else along the existing lumber yard and new area is divided by a retaining wall. 3.a. The current wetland and stream setbacks cut off access to usable space, imposing undue hardship on our ability to grow our business and increase productivity. Any other route would require grading valuable area that is needed for the expansion of the business and would significantly decrease the maximum productivity that expanding the lumber yard would allow us. 3.b. The current wetland and stream setbacks block the only reasonable position for a short access road (only a couple hundred feet), and the irregular shape of the setbacks mean the area in question is isolated from the environments they are meant to protect by the existing business. Moving the setback would allow our business to grow efficiently. 3.c. The design of the project will provide some traffic relief to Hwy 3 through Belfair as the flow of trucks onto the property will be made more efficient. The design of the project will not significantly interfere with surrounding businesses or residences. There will not be a significant increase in traffic or noise from the expansion as it is primarily designed to increase product capacity, not retail customer capacity. 3.d. The reduced setbacks will be used to put in a small access road to the northern half of the property. Previous occupants and neighbors have developed all the way to the wetland and continue to maintain lawns well within the wetland boundary. It would not give special access to Mitchell Lumber Company that other property owners do not already have and use. The included mitigation plan lays out how Mitchell Lumber Company will revitalize the remaining setback where previous occupants have damaged the environment and allowed for invasive overgrowth of the area. 3.e. Mitchell Lumber Company is dedicated to developing in a conscientious manor that will minimize impact on the wetlands and surrounding environment. Our environmental mitigation plan will bring native vegetation back to the wetlands, increasing the health of an important local biome. Our growth will increase our support to local businesses and homeowners, and keep more business and economy local that would otherwise have to necessarily leave the county. The public interest will be benefited by the new boundary variance and our expansion. If. The topography of this location is the only area that has a gradient transition between the lower elevation existing lumber yard and the higher elevation property we plan to develop. With light grading of a hill that has already been manipulated be previous occupants,this is the most reasonable place to put in a road so truck traffic can move from the existing property up to the new development. The rest of the property is divided by a concrete retaining wall ranging from four to six feet tall. Putting in access here would require intensive earthwork, severely impacting our useful square footage for facilities, product storage, and daily operations, limiting our expansion from its full potential. 9/28/21,2:56 PM Mason County WA GIS Mason County WA G5 Masoti C(-,i!xiw Hk-)o, - 123294300050 NOW t Show search results for 12329... JW ., few ,. „ 0 0 0 0 .. D 'M` At POW low, j .. t � . 'rG Y � 4' f� ,•x A o .� ,y ► o r , , ., - . m 40 ILI Om https://gis.masoncountywa.gov/mason/?find=123294300050 1/1 NW CORNER BASIS OF BEARING NE CORNER NEV4-SW1/4-SETA BELFAIR ST N 8902612"W 660.86' NE1/4-SW1/4-SE1/4 S 89°25'12" E 276.55' 384.32' SEC. 19-23-1W co N 1°16-45" E LO 20.00' °.-° WEST LINE w i �, MERCER TRACT 243.18' 1 Lo / (AFN 109795) PER �, �, ROS 428209 cc,� Z PARCEL 2 r /��e z12329-43-000500 �°j co 15.54' U) a� ® 1p 120.50' 33.96'S 1-13 4, I S 89°33'40" E 410 w w;•'ry ?0 BASIS OF BEARING: Z o %h 78 N 89°25'12"W ALONG NORTH ILL _ a to r�8 LINE OF NE1/4-SW1/4-SE1/4 C) = PER AFN 674679 O w z ^a a PARCEL 1 30, �0' l�Je'. C lLt v 12329-43- 0 cn Z rn N OUT LINE TRACT PER 64°00•'�•w 9 7 PER ROS ^�W in o 12329 43-0 060 � 69� `� ® EXISTING STRUCTURE `D EAST LINE OF THE Font00 WEST 2 ACRES OF NE1/4-SW1/4-SE1/4 WestSound N 89°30'46"W Engineering, 130.60' GRAPHIC SCALEInC. 150' 100 50 100 4s7 �a SS, . \ 217 S.W.Wllldns Drive Port Orchard,Wa.98366 p� Phone(3W)876-3770 Fax(3W)876-0439 (IN FEET) 'W�...A�► E+nei: ! mn 1 inch= 100 feet N. 2925 3/9/2021 9:43 AM C:\Users\Emilio\Box\ELS\WA\Mason\Count \3251-Mitchell\3251.02-Mitchell Lumber Buffer Plan\3251.02-Fi ures CAD Onl \3251.02 MIT.dwq Emilio All k T CD r _ _.a.. , 4, .. •.;�' .. a v< -K - P,:.._ ,.r, y 7'{' .��h. �� , . o K _ CD Q. y CD 0 -T7 CD cn W CC v m C, (0 w o C/) � (n CA C ..+; .. hsv � °a m ro m ro 3 m CL -n C a N =r '- N 7 i (D t d .I .. � I < � c _ 11off z co CD `o 1 I ( 10 �. C rn mC --i Cl) -cn -n -n (n ,D -U Cn r n i a co m _ Co °' v v m 0 m c� Cj m zT ° Q - a W °c CC).� i 1 C C _ 0 n. W ` r Q CL 0 � a 3 -100 1 +Zt DATE: 3/9/21Figure 2 1157 3rd Ave.,suite 220A DWN: EF EXISTING CONDITIONS 0 100 200 Longview,WA 98632 REQ.BY: Mitchell Lumber Mitigation Phone:(360)5 78-13 71 PRJ.MGR:LW Mitchell Lumber SCALE IN FEET • Fax:(360)414-9305 CHK: Mason County,WA Ego qgi�I www.eco-land.com PROJECT NO: Section 29, Township 23N, Range 1 W,W.M. m Land Services A 3251.02 3/9/2021 9:43 AM C:\Users\Emilio\Box\ELS\WA\Mason\Count \3251-Mitchell\3251.02-Mitchell Lumber Buffer Plan\3251.02-Figures CAD Onl \3251.02 MIT.dwq Emilio Z s t CD F . o z ox m < l "�* CL m n p.' O� W i C 3Cr a :. Ate 3 �.� ipm _ N' N m i2 A = r r ► r r r ► ► r o- ► r r '►.► r r • i iI i X G) P y = _ m O g Nzr g'r �4 mW. o = 9 O = 3 DATE: 3/9/21 Figure 3 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220A DWN: EF PROPOSED CONDITIONS Longview,WA 98632 REQ.BY: Mitchell Lumber Mitigation z NOT TO SCALE Phone:(360)578-1371 PRJ.MGR:LW Mitchell Lumber ECO �'�' Fax:(360)414-9305 CHK: Mason County WA www.eco-land.com PROJECT NO: Section 29,Township 23N, Range 1 W, W.M. m Land Services 3251.02 3/9/2021 9:43 AM C:\Users\Emilio\Box\ELS\WA\Mason\Count \3251-Mitchel l\3251.02-Mitchell Lumber Buffer P1an\3251.02-Fi ures CAD Onl \3251.02 MIT.dw Emilio z d o ;� A gm m co ao ■■ �z o a o S C z 7 " �1 0 { 7 ?l. N o � O 7- Cn 7 N K W O CD 7 a V CD a cn � I j rn ; 3 Q (T Cr S O co M � ID N 5 DATE: 3/9/21 Figure 4 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220A DWN: EF MASON COUNTY CRITICAL AREAS 0 150 300 Longview,WA 98632 REQ.BY: Mitchell Lumber Mitigation zOM Phone:(360)578-1371 PRJ. MGR:LW Mitchell Lumber SCALE IN FEET Ec ;�' Fax:(360)414-9305 CHK: Mason County,WA G www.eco-land.com PROJECT NO: Section 29, Township 23N, Range 1 W,W.M. m Land Services 3251.02 3/9/2021 9:43 AM C:\Users\Emilio\Box\ELS\WA\Mason\Count \3251-Mitchell\3251.02-Mitchell Lumber Buffer Plan\3251.02-Fi ures CAD Onl \3251.02 MIT.dwq Emilio �Iz n m r. U1 fU o m -n C) ZJ r' c° CD M 0 0 (n cn � � a m oCD m � Z r q `Q (DD O m � O � to CD K CD u (n 4 Y Y m OCD C i a O * }° x N CD 90 a F ^ r' m a «, DATE: 3/9/21 Figure\5 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220A DWN: EF WDFW PRIORITY HABITAT AND SPECIES 0 200 400 Longview,WA 98632 REQ.BY: Mitchell Lumber Mitigation z Phone:(360)578-1371 PRJ. MGR:LW Mitchell Lumber SCALE IN FEET *999-� ' Fax:(360)414-9305 CHK:wwweco-land 29Mason County,WA . .com PROJECT NO: Section , Township 23N, Range 1 W, W.M. Land Services 3251.02 NE Belfair Street o aD ° @ ¢ 2 L (6 H I• , ° �--I � E �' A45. .. ;' Q)z J O N o + 7 ::3Q —( n Y f I 'L..• . .,•. a a LLUJ v �p N u, 1 .b . • .'rn Proposed ¢ — -= N c 3 :�`. Proposed �' Building g Cc ' Building — .2 F .. N .. M o i - Proposed. a° ° g U Via.. 75'^_r . m Proposed i _ o m' Building N J z o A N ° Mitchell °;w y (D 0 r Lumber Existing w CO2 W CON Building Z Y o M 15 Yard ooujaof. va aCO 1 aN ^� E Proposed Building o�M g m Replacing Current a.10 ^ o b v Structure LA 0 0 0 E Culvert " ,m > > m ls�, (Underground) _ _ _ C C X Kf J O li CL m ; Wetland A }; •_ ` CO f Category III in=, Depressional V c y ` Forested Seasonally Flooded W N Permanently LEGEND: C3 M , o Flowing Stream Site Boundary o (19,550 sf. onsite) ____ Parcel Boundary U o � --w•�� •• Wetland Boundary Approx.Wetland Boundary W Wetland Buffer LL o z W Stream with Flow Direction CO J oStream Buffer 15'Building and Impervious Setback o Proposed Building N Stream 0 Proposed Asphalt Type e F ® Proposed Wetland Buffer Impacts(2,268 sf.) � v 0 Proposed Stream Buffer Impacts(1,463 sf.) N Q NOTES : 1. Wetland,stream and test plots of located using handheld GPS with �' e N submeter accuracy. 2. Site Plan Provided by Mitchell Lumber Company. S r NE Belfair Street w `o a� � � Q CD .;. c 4� .a._. W a uJ -0 > E NO N 7CM .a L J a I�' : �� E �0 a W ; i .f a LLp:J CO .e rn Proposed Q- ._ 0 c 3 ; roe.'. Proposed Building 0� � 2 o a °•a tea- Building t- :f:� :. . a :�" N N f .f .°. �a.' O O N • A ch 4• f e. . . I 'I JA A. .4 . a; A. o o Proposed.°.. a" o 4 I •° `r.Building U 1= 75. . ° ry ° Proposed Building N ii , :d°D O o � N � z Mitchell °,; w } (D q Lumber Existing u; m co m 15 Yard Building Q Q W a U a N Proposed Building N M g m _ Replacing Current w a� b Structure aj E N� Culvert v�Lo v (Underground)83 - - - - _ _ _ 12 u, - - - - - — — - — — �+-jod° n L cD 0, 3 v Wetland A ° •� > Category III ® : T� 0�n Depressional OV f Seasonally tF ooded �• ® a> LEGEND: LL J N Permanently a Site Boundary Flowing Stream ---- Parcel Boundary o (19,550 sf. onsite) ` Wetland Boundary i - - - - - Approx.Wetland Boundary ---- ---- Wetland Buffer w a \ —•••� Stream with Flow Direction u- Stream Buffer m w X -——- 15'Building and Impervious Setback 0 m - ® Proposed Building CO o 0 Proposed Asphalt w Stream 0 Stream Buffer Mitigation Area(1,600 sf.) E2 Cn Type F 0 Wetland Buffer Mitigating Area(2,500 sf.) o W N NOTE(S): T. Wetland,stream and test plots located using handheld GPS with E cD cD submeter accuracy. 2. Site Plan Provided by Mitchell �°'—, Lumber Company. S Plant List d d Q Species Common Name I Size/Spacing Number Stream Buffer Plants Thuja plicata Western redcedar 1-gal Ion/15 feet on center 10 4 Lonlcerainvolucrata Blacktwinberry 1-gallon/6 feet on center 22 Physocarpuscopitatus Pacific ninebark 1-gallon/6 feet on center 20 Wetland Buffer Plants d 4� Piceasitchensis Sitka spruce 1-allon/15 feet on center 8 Q Pseudotsu amenzlesH Doulgas fir 1-gallon/15feet on center 5 Physocarpus capitatus Pacific ninebark 1-gallon/6 feet on center 30 C: Symphoricorposalbus Snowberry 1-gallon/6 feet oncerrter 30 Z.2 Q r Total 125 Q.al o Native Riparian Seed Mix 1 Ib. —1 .o - 'The mix includes 40%Blue Wikirye(£lymus glaucus),35%Native Red Fescue(Festuca rubra),10%Tufted Hairgrass oo a- 1E C Z (Deschampsia cespitosa),10%NW Mannagrass(Glycerin occidentafts),and 5%American Sloughgrass(Beckmannia 0)f.D a) J C CO syzigachne). Z -o — 0 N 0— E U Q w � Z .� cs �Sr Wetland Buffer J con ^,-�5 Planting Detail n C 6 • 'A Stream Buffer 0 Cl) / Planting Detail in o a Q \� a . N00 LL O • N J Z N O LL D_' o �' 6' M w (9 U t1) Co wN rZ -" M o o of 0- C) om 0- "� Qom^o E N N'a m_m O rV 00 Ql �3 ^v o E j 3 j ;mmar J m C X 47 / M 1 0 u- L n 6 o U n ton $Lolu M a) C LO04 9 M 1 c � 0 c 0 LEGEND: ~ NOTEJaL w Site Boundary 1. Wetland,stream and test plots u located using handheld GPS with o ? U) —--— Parcel Boundary CO w J submeter accuracy. J w o Wetland Boundary 2. Site Plan Provided by Mitchell Q Approx.Wetland Boundary Lumber Company. uvi 'o ---- --- Wetland Buffer w L ••� Stream with Flow Direction aD U Stream Buffer U —— —— 15'Building and Impervious Setback N Proposed Building M 0 Proposed Asphalt E N 0 Stream Buffer Mitigation Area(1,600 sf.) 0 N 0 7P,--'- Wetland Buffer Mitigating Area(2,500 sf.) 5 rn M �xy MASON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES Building,Planning,Environmental Health,Community Health Notice of Application and Public Hearing Notice is hereby given that James Mitchell,who is the applicant for the following proposal; has filed an application for a Resource Ordinance Variance(VAR2021-00002).The proposal is for the expansion of Mitchell Lumber Company north onto adjacent property, including an access road from 23681 NE ST RT 3 to 81 NE Belfair ST and constructing warehouse space.The access road will be located within approximately 1463 square feet of the buffer of a Type"F" stream.,The impact to the stream buffer will be mitigated for by the applicant as proposed within their HMP:.The applicant has also applied for an administrative review of a Mason Environmental Permit(MEP2021-00009)for the proposed work within the Wetland buffer. Location: 81.NE Belfair ST,Belfair,WA 98528 Parcel Numbers:12329-43-00060 Date of complete Application:July 28,2021 The proposed development is reviewed under the applicable chapters of the Resource Ordinance and Title 15.The proposal requires Mason County Hearing Examiner approval. Project is SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11-800(1)(iv)&(v). Any person desiring to express their view or to be notified of the action taken on the application should either join the virtual Public Hearing via Zoom on Wednesday.October 13,2021 at 1:00p.m.or mail comments or questions to Grace Miller, Planner,.Mason County Department of Community.Services, 615 W.Alder St.,Shelton,WA 98584 Or Email at gbm@masoncountywa.gov prior to the hearing. A PUBLIC HEARING-will beheld on Wednesday October 13,2021 at 1:00 p.m. by the Mason-County Hearing Examiner on the proposed project via Zoom. Directions on how to access the hearing will be located on the Mason-County website at https://www.co.mason.wa.*us/hearings-examiner/index.php under the,appropriately dated agenda,or you can call the Hearing Examiner Clerk at 360.427.9670 ext.. 365 for.assistance.Written and oral testimony will be accepted up to the close of the hearing. A decision on the application will be made within 120 days of the date of the complete application. MASON COUNTY • COMMUNITY SERVICES Building,Planning,Environmental Health,Community Health MEMORANDUM DATE: September 16,2021 TO: Julian Sammons and Dana Sarff,Skokomish Tribe Allison Cooke,WDFW. FROM: Grace Miller,Planner RE: Buffer Mitigation Plan for Resource Ordinance Variance Application(#VAR021-00002)and Mason Environmental Permit,(#MEP2021-00009)foryour review and comment.The applicant is James Mitchell.The proposal is for the construction of an access driveway within the buffer of a Type IV stream and wetland. NOTE:Please submit your comments by October 13,2021. Please find the enclosed Wetland Delineation Report and Buffer Mitigation Plan for your review and comment.The Mason County Resource Ordinance Fish&Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area Chapter 17.01.110 provides that habitat,management plans and biological evaluations.shall be reviewed by local Tribes,Washington State Dept of Fish and Wildlife and other applicable state/federal agencies.A 28-day comment period is provided for the Habitat Management Plan review. APPLICANT: James Mitchell. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC 29,Twn 23 N,R 1 W. PARCEL NUMBER: 12329-43-00060. ADDRESS: 81 NE Belfair ST,Belfair. Please let me know if you have any questions.Thank you. PUBLIC NOTICE ' RECEIVED Notice of Application and Public.Hear ing No#ice is hereby given that James Mitchell,who is the,applicant for the follow,- SEP 2 3 2021 ing proposal; has filed an application for a Resource Ordinance Varlance (VAR2021 .; -00002);The proposal Is for.tho expansion ! W. Alder Street of Mitchell _Lumber Company north onto ad- 615 �acent property, including-an access road I from 23681 NE ST RT 3 to 81 NE B61fait`•. ST and`cbonatruoting warehouse space.The, , access Toad will W located within appr6ki= ma,-- 1'469 square feet of the buffer of a Type,"P stream:The Impact.to the stream i buffer will be mitigated for by the applicant I as'proposed,within their HMP The:appli= cant has also applied for an administrative re",view of a.Mason En6irorimentai Permit. f- (MEP2021=00009j for the,proposed work i. wiN m the.Wetland:buffer Location.81 NE ; Beifair-ST,Belfair,WA 98528 Parcel Num- bers 12329-4--dods0 Date: of complete AppUcation: July 28, 201 The proposed development is reviewed under the appli= cable chapters of the Resource Ordinance S and;Tale 15 The proposal requires Mason County Hearing Examiner approval:Project is $EPA, exempt'per WAC 19M 1 800(1.} (Iv} & (v). Any person desiring to express their view,,or to be notified of the, action takem on the application should either join the virtual Public Hearing, via Zoom on Wednesday. October 13;,2021- at l,Oop:m. or mail Comment&or questions to Grace. Miller;Planner,Mason County Department of Community Services; 615 W:Alder St;, Shelton,WA 98684 Or Email at gbm@ma- son countywa you prior to the hearing..A `• ' PUB_LIC1HEARIN`G'will be held.onWednes j day,,•October, 13, 2021 at 1:00 p_m:by the Al Mason County Hearing Examiner on the proposed'propeet via Zoom: Directions on how'to,access the hearing will be`located on the Mason County wetisits at httpsJ% arin wwuv co mason we;us/ hegs=examiner/' i index php, under the appropriately dated 1 agenda,, or you can call,the Hearing Ex- aminer Clerk at,360.4279070 ext.365,for assistance.Written.and,oral testimony.will: ' be'accepted up to;the.close of the hearing: A decision-on,the;application,will be made within 'days.Of the date of the complete application: 1 3165$edtember 23� it LIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS'MAILING ADDRESSES WITHIN 300 FEET OF YOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARIES FOR PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION Addresses are to be obtained from the Mason County Assessor's Office, Bldg. 1, Second Floor. Po NX 310 �l-ifl 10!? ,jha-e,pn 1D min /97 � 13bx �9 Pr��ox�,3 a 1� ®R4& d l� aqy�5a ray- y Q m �c 14 qff333 ( � Val" e/� DIL h lei s C. MASON COUNTYMason County PerXnit Center Use P COMMUNITY SERVICES ' ME r � Building,P.lanning,fnviOnmental Health.;Comrtiu6itx Health Date Rcvd 615 W.Alder St.—Bldg.8,Shelton,Wa 98584 Phone:(360)427-9670 ext.352 ♦ Fax:(360)427-7798 31 15 MASON ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT:$115 ❑ MASON ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT WITH HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN:$1500 /, ❑ CONDITIONAL USE: $2000 A 6,' Mason County Resource Ordinance(Chapter 8.52 MCC) 5 u V, Alder s I ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT APPLICATION Street The purpose of the Resource Ordinance is to protect Mason County's natural resource lands and critical areas and is under the authority of Chapters 36.32,36.70A,39.34, 58.17,76.09, 84.33, 84.34 and 90.58 RCW. PLEASE PRINT 1.PROPERTY OWNER Name: KA I h /''1; g I Mailing Address: t `� o r•� 0 r ti✓A r1 3 I(7 Work Phone: �p_ s._ , y 1 48-7 Email Address: Suw�w�•rq � ca �@ - ev�a;l,i:orm Home/Cell Phone: S m e- Fax#: 13 (00 .l S_ 3 ® 5._ If an agent is acting for the property owner during the permit process, complete#2. 2.AUTHORIZED AGENT Name: -3 av-e—$ ' A Mailing Address: PO r3.)( —_3 1 O 10 5 u i r, "'VV A - S 5�t$ Work Phone: 3(.0, IDI7 5 w �t O-10 Email Address: ..,A Cd r111+1 e.l l 1�,,�•�, a�ctl, c ,,.. a Home/Cell Phone:3 Go_ 5 _ 1 Fax# ( o- �1,5 ti 2O 9 3.PROJECT SITE Site Address: 81 /V E , 1j�°,;r , VV A 9,85 2 8 Parcel#: ) - 43 - 00q �G Legal Description:i 23 (,+7 °� �� Sr= r-LL z 3 q o-;� 13 LA -* 1-1 y 1 Directions to Site: s �h 5 �'e ° N E K-P 14'a i, 64. Attach a site plan showing the following: Lot Dimensions,Flood Zones,Existing Structures,Fences, Water Lines,Driveways,Drainage Plans,Shorelines,Septic System,Topography,Proposed Improvements,Easements,North Arrow,and Scale. Also draw a separate topography diagram. Rev.March 1,2018 r 4. State which section requires permit: ❑ Long Term Commercial Forest,Chapter 8.52.060 ❑ Frequently Flooded Areas,Chapter 8.52.130 ❑ Mineral Resource Lands,Chapter 8.52.090 ❑ Geologically Hazardous Areas,Chapter 8.52.140 ❑ Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas,Chapter 8.52.120 ❑ Seismic Hazard Areas,Chapter 8.52.150 ❑ Erosion Hazard Area,Chapter 8.52.160 �Rr Fish&Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas,Chapter ❑ In-Holding Lands,Chapter 8.52.070 8.52.170 Wetlands,Chapter 8.52.110 5. Identify\\current use of the property with existing improvements: 1 1 Ek►S�Li v�y `^Se )5 CC iro,br a `r S�pr'a� L CAV1 Svl-+a�� wood X%/Orkihq 6. Identify and describe the proposed project,including the type of materials to be used,construction methods, principle dimensions,and other pertinent information(attach additional sheets,if needed): wt Q,4'a 59-�z�c4Zr-et� , 7. Describe why the action requiring this permit cannot be avoided. -1k enUi vY,n,mer left �i, � C.yey- GtGCeS� `(-a e trlarTllPrd�. [�La�T A our TW i Q- pvt(y c 56 ab l V W Iad�ea� �oPoRJ�.,4 h,N 1-0 Pu'), i r-- a LA'- Azee 66 ror, 8. Will there be an alteration of a wetland and/or wetland vegetation area(circle one)? Yes No 9. Identify any surface water on or adjacent to property(circle one): Saltwater Lake (itDream Pond Wetland Drainage Ditch 10. Identify existing septic/sewer connection(circle one): If septic is located on project site,include records. Connected to Septic Connected to Community Septic 11. Identify existing water supply(circle one): Public Water Supply Well 11. Type of Job(circle one): New Add, Alteration Repair Demolition Other: Print Name Sig ure Date Rev.March 1,2018 (C) Procedures. , �t (1) Responsibilities for the determination of wetland boundaries: (a) Formal determination of wetland'boundaries is the responsibility of the county. The responsibility to provide all necessary and accurate data to the county for its determination rests with the applicant. This information will include a field delineation by a qualified wetland professional applying the current approved federal wetland delineation manual and applicable regional supplements. When,in the opinion of the Director, sufficient information exists from the county's wetland inventory, or other sources,the requirement for a full or partial delineation may be waived. For instance, in some cases,the applicant may only be required to determine the wetland boundary, or portion thereof, of the wetland system. The Director shall determine when a permit application is required and what additional information may be necessary. Wetland delineations shall be performed in accordance with the procedures as specified in the current approved federal wetland delineation manual and applicable regional supplements. Evidence documenting the results of any boundary survey, or other submitted data,may be required by the Director. (b) Mason County,at a fee,when requested by the applicant,or the affected party,may perform the delineation in lieu of direct action by the applicant. Mason County may use hydrology, soils,plant species,and other data, and consult with biologists; hydrologists, soil scientists, or other experts,as needed,to perform the delineation. The county shall make a good faith effort to provide this service,consistent with budgetary constraints and available in-house expertise,for smaller projects and especially for those property owners with lesser financial capabilities. (c) Where Mason County performs a wetland boundary'determination at the request of the applicant,it shall be considered a final determination unless contested. " (d) Where the applicant has provided a determination of the wetland boundary,the Director shall verify the accuracy of,and may render adjustments to,the boundary delineation. ..(e) In the event the boundary delineation is contested by the applicant or affected party,the Department of Ecology, or a mutually agreed upon party, shall settle the dispute.. (1)1Vlason-Enirozimental-Permit Required Usesdeiivitie A Maso ;nyironmeataLPemftsall"be-obtaxned fxonithe-coatnedusing dlrwtpr t he�admi®rii even wetlan�.-or�r�"s=buf er for the Ilowin acti-Vitieeg (a The removal,excavation, grading, dredging, dumping, discharging, or filling of any material; or the draining or flooding of the site, except where undertaken for maintenance (but not construction)of drainage ditches or for emergency repair; (b)^2he construction of storrnwater`miinagement faeilities3 or(c) The driving of pilings; (d) The placing of obstructions; (e) The construction,reconstruction, demolition, or expansion of any structure; (Di .The destruction or alteration of wetlands and wetland buffer through clearing,harvesting, shading,intentional burning, or planting of vegetation that would alter the character of a designated wetland or buffer,provided that this subsection shall not apply to the following activities undertaken in a manner which minimizes impacts: MITCHELL LUMBER SITE PLAN NOTE: DOWNSPOUTS SHALL BE COLLECTED AND PIPED TO THE TYPE 1 CB's UPSTREAM OF THE INFILTRATION/DETENTION SYSTEM(CHAMBERMAXX). ROOF RUNOFF SHALL NOT BE COLLECTED IN THE TRENCH DRAINS. PROPOSED BUILDINGS ARE PRELIMINARY. FINAL BUILDING DESIGN TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS. PAVEMENT GRADES MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED BASED ON FINAL BUILDING \ \ \ } 1 f \� ., ' .`• "� \�4\�_�� DESIGN FINAL PERMEABLE PAVEMENT DESIGN TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS. PERMEABLE `\ PAVEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUFACTURER'S DESIGN/INSTALLATION �` -\ SPECIFICATIONS AND BMP T5.15 Existing / Store `~ 1 1 Employee Parking; 30 stlls / / \\� / // Existing a / \ / Warehouse 1 Permeable Pavement New 1,750 �qA� SF(35'x 50') \ Building Y FF=49.35 Ags� } / NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT I 1. i 4'/ 46, Cx� R E� EpUN•. \ 75 �fSL �a oR 1 I I i ( \ New 1,750 �s��,,���,�p6�•F�f � I I \SF(35'x 50') \� W • vp FW ` i t \\ Building FF=40.25 0. 1® 30'SCALE TRENCH DRAINTYPE SOLID CB \ \� ;\ � / Existing _ I I 1 / } } �\ 1• .___�__� —— RIN EL=48.46 \ > /d' o Covered Racks ( ( 1 }} I to�emalri -- II New7,5005F New2,400SF j �New1;755 } ; (40'x50, !(75'x 100') Loading I } SF(27'x 60') } I 11\ APPROVE Warehouse r i Canopy 1 Open Shed FFui1ding49.40 \S!~~ FF=49.40 1 s� FF=49.Z5 I I I I I� ` a o > TRENCH DRAIN I MASON COUNTY DC PLANNING !/1 ;-- RIM a=49.00 --. ....._._._� \� III j I I i SITE PLAN REQUIRED TO BE ON SITE \ \ �.-.. RMEf r1 C ANGES SUBJECT TO APPROVAL TYPE 1 CB ��l�" DISPERSAL TRENCH Date 50 By 150 lF TRENCH DRAIN — / (OLD CASTLE 6-14 OR EQUIV.) TYPE 2 46.0 \AS \\\ ► r WITH FLDGPRD+FILTER OR EQUIK� `RIM EL=48.440\ \ \\ CHAMBERMAXX INFILTRATION SYSTEM i 25.75'x 150'-5 CHAMBER ROWS 8 TITLE MITCHELL LUMBER oeswEaer .MJM WestSound SITE,GRADING;AND PAVING PLAN J. Engineering, Inc -- urwmeY MJMATB - - ENGINEERING.PLANNING AND SURVEYING zns.W.MkinsDriye Pod&d rd,Wa.98366 CLIENT Mitchell Holdings 4,LLC MCxeDer . MJM _ _ .. - Phone(360)876.3770 Fax(360)87W39 Qieosi� 1017SHOREOR 29 23N 1W E-maA rrse@wser4neP.ii cot hWhva msenguwering.mm 'asrw.u.e°� BRE4f( )0277, 10 SEC TWNR SCALE 1'=30' 22•x34 REV; DESCRIPTION DATE BY 05/11/2022 JOB No. 2925.2 SHi 3 OF 7 SHTS Ecological MITCHELL LUMBER EXPANSION Land Services March 18, 2021 Wd . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • C do- �� .,-x. •Alt A V'L Buffer Mitigation Plan Belfair, Washington Prepared for Mitchell Lumber Co PO Box 310 Belfair, WA 98528 360-275-2090 Prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. 1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220A • Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 • Project Number 3251.02 3l9/2021 9:43 AM C:\Users\Emilio\Box\ELS\WA\Mason\Count \3251-Mitchell\3251.02-Mitchell Lumber Buffer Plan\3251.02-Fi ures CAD Onl \3251.02 MIT.dwq Emilio ? z p w m -n r r ., 0 0 CZ co m ,: e CD r. c m n t y ;P: m x. ry.. U) iy r • + -+ U Q N O o a � n , TICD _......4 , - o. � m C y Ain P DATE: 3/9/21 Figure 5 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220A DWN: EF WDFW PRIORITY HABITAT AND SPECIES 0 200 400 Longview,WA 98632 REQ. BY: Mitchell Lumber Mitigation z Phone:(360)578-1 371 PRJ. MGR:LW Mitchell Lumber SCALE IN FEET *3939! � Fax:(360)414-9305 CHK: Mason County, WA www.eco-land.com PROJECT NO: Section 29, Township 23N, Range 1 W, W.M. m Land Services 3251.02 il 3/9/2021 9:43 AM C:\Users\Emilio\Box\ELS\WA\Mason\Count \3251-Mitchell\3251.02-Mitchell Lumber Buffer Plan\3251.02-Fi ures CAD Onl \3251.02 MlT.dwq Emilio Illt � ITI ; � '3" '3" '3"� v°, � E• � � � X � CD o m o c° o a �° m §- o * W o � v C a a m / 4 CD N CD Ro NeN c � U1 O n O O X, / 3 O V ' 3 ns c� m o N obi 3 � � m O _ T c d N 3 Ot 'm3 m � � � � 3 3I 7 3 M _ Q d p l A A A Z 3 03 • 0 � 41 � �'N m b —1 —• �D ye � I fi z r" 3 ip � y m M r R 3 m C o $ d d m m # d d m T. to > > > > 0 0 0 O 'o 0, (D r `� a2� mm�— C D) D tl CD n D) N n .�. .�.. ' C • o t1`G o > > > > > > CD ss � C- CD sm F !A '" 0) v m� tT to O O N O N O Z — C �p 3 Cal .t • • q N i-�•\ ILI DATE: 3/9/21 Figure 8 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220A DWN: EF PLANTING PLAN 0 30 60 Longview,WA 98632 REQ. BY: Mitchell Lumber Mitigation z Phone:(360)5 78-13 71 PRJ. MGR:LW Mitchell Lumber SCALE IN FEET ECG Og�Ca� Fax:(360)414-9305 CHK: Mason County,WA www.eco-land.com PROJECT NO: Section 29, Township 23N, Range 1 W,W.M. m Land Services 3251.02 Ecological Land Services MITCHELL LUMBER DELINEATION October 7, 2020 ECEIV 'JUN 0 1 2021 Alder roc:; , - 4 yr ' Delineation Report Belfair, Washington Prepared for Mitchell Lumber Co PO Box 310 Belfair, WA 98528 360-275-2090 Prepared by Ecological Land Services, Inc. 1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220A • Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 • Project Number 3251.01 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1 METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................................... 1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................... 1 VEGETATION............................................................................................................................. 2 SOILS...................................................................................................................................... 2 HYDROLOGY ............................................................................................................................. 3 NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY................................................................................................... 3 MASON COUNTY CRITICAL AREAS................................................................................................... 3 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................... 3 WETLAND CATEGORIZATION .............................................................................................................. 3 WATERTYPING................................................................................................................................ 4 CRITICAL AREA REGULATIONS.............................................................................................................4 BUFFER REDUCTION OPTIONS.............................................................................................................4 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................. 6 Table 1: Wetland Ratings Table 2. Required Buffer Widths FIGURES & PHOTOPLATES Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Site Map Figure 3 Soil Survey Figure 4 National Wetlands Inventory Figure 5 Mason County Critical Areas Figure 6 Wetland Rating Form-150'Offset Figure 7 Wetland Rating Form-1 KM Offset Figure 8 Wetland Rating Form-303(d) and TMDL Figure 9 Buffer Reduction Examples Photoplates Site Photos APPENDIX A Wetland Determination Data Forms APPENDIX B Western Washington Wetland Rating Forms Wetland A Mitchel Lumber Delineation Ecological Land Services,Inc. Delineation Report i October 5,2020 SIGNATURE PAGE The information and data in this report were compiled and prepared under the supervision and direction of the undersigned. Laura Westervelt Biologist Mitchel Lumber Delineation Ecological Land Services,Inc. Delineation Report ii October 5,2020 INTRODUCTION Ecological Land Services, Inc. (ELS) was contracted by the Mitchell Lumber Company to complete a wetland delineation and report for the property at 81 NE Belfair Road, Mason County Parcel Number 123294300060, in Belfair, Washington. The property is within a portion of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in Belfair, Washington (Figure 1). This report summarizes the findings of the wetland delineation and categorization according to the Mason County Code (MCC), Chapter 8.52.110 Wetlands and Chapter 8.52.170 for wetland categorization, water typing, and required buffer widths. METHODOLOGY The onsite wetland determination followed the Routine Determination Method according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region, Version 2.0 (U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, 2010). The Routine Determination Method examines three parameters—vegetation, soils, and hydrology—to determine if wetlands exist in a given area. Hydrology is critical in determining what is wetland, but is often difficult to assess because hydrologic conditions can change periodically (hourly, daily, or seasonally). Consequently, it is necessary to determine if hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soils are present, which would indicate that water is present for long enough duration to support a wetland plant community. By definition, wetlands are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands are regulated as "Waters of the United States" by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), as "Waters of the State" by the Washington Department of Ecology(Ecology), and locally by Mason County. To determine the wetland boundary onsite, ELS collected data on vegetation, soils, and hydrology. During the site visit on August 5, 2020, one wetland was identified onsite, and a stream channel was identified offsite to the east. Vegetation, hydrology, and soil data was collected at three test plots to verify the boundary (Appendix A). Consecutively numbered florescent flagging labeled "Wetland Delineation" were hung along the identified boundary. The boundaries were determined through breaks in topography, changes in vegetation, and changes in water regime. The offsite stream was identified using observations from the property lines. The centerline of the stream is estimated on the site map. Test plots and boundary flags were located using GPS to show their location on the site map (Figure 2). Two GPS points were taken on the stream centerline where it is closest to the property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The 1.52-acre property is located west of Mitchell Lumber Yard on the west side of State Route 3 in Belfair, Washington (Figure 1). It is a narrow, rectangular property accessed by a driveway Mitchell Lumber Delineation Ecological Land Services,Inc. Delineation Report 1 October5,2020 extending south from NE Belfair Street (Figure 2). There is an existing home and detached garage on the north half of the property (Photoplate 1). Topography slopes down from the developed portion of the property towards the wetland (Photoplate 2). The north half of the property is developed and dominated by lawn grasses and ornamental shrubs. The south half of the property is dominated by red alder (Alnus rubra), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), and emergent wetland species. One forested, depressional wetland was identified and delineated in the south half of the property (Figure 2) (Photoplate 3). Wetland A is situated in a topographic depression that continues offsite to the south and east. A Type F stream flows outside the east property line and continues south (Photoplate 4). VEGETATION The forested wetland is dominated by red alder (FAC), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis, FAC), Himalayan blackberry (FAC), and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens, FAC). Wetland A is partially vegetated by non-native shrubs and herbs. Upland vegetation in the forested portion of the property is dominated by red alder, western redcedar(Thujo plicata, FAC), red osier dogwood (Corpus sericea, FAC), and lady fern (Athyrium cyclosorum, FAC). The grassy portion of the property is dominated several common grass species and Himalayan blackberry. The dominant vegetation found onsite is recorded on the attached wetland determination data forms (Appendix A). The indicator status, following the common and scientific names, indicates how likely a species is to be found in wetlands. Listed from most likely to least likely to be found in wetlands, the indicator status categories are: ■ OBL(obligate wetland)—Almost always occur in wetlands. ■ FACW (facultative wetland)—Usually occur in wetlands, but may occur in non-wetlands. ■ FAC (facultative)—Occur in wetlands and non-wetlands. ■ FACU (facultative upland)—Usually occur in non-wetlands, but may occur in wetlands. ■ UPL(obligate upland)—Almost never occur in wetlands. ■ NI (no indicator)—Status not yet determined. SOILS As referenced on the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS 2020) website, the soil onsite is Saxon silt loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes (Sa) (Figure 3). Saxon soil is not classified as hydric (NRCS 2016). 'Saxon silt loam is a moderately well-drained soil with more than 80 inches to a restrictive layer. Areas mapped as hydric soils do not necessarily mean that an area is or is not a wetland—hydrology,hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soils must all be present to classify an area as a wetland. Mitchell Lumber Delineation Ecological Land Services,Inc. Delineation Report 2 October 5,2020 Soil data in Wetland A revealed a very dark brown (10YR 2/2) silt loam with dark yellowish-brown redoximorphic features present at 2 percent concentration in the surface layer. The lower layer revealed a dark greyish-brown (10YR 4/2) matrix with a 5 percent concentration of dark yellowish-brown redoximorphic features in the matrix. The profile met hydric soil indicator F3, Depleted Matrix, and therefore the hydric soil criterion is met. The upland soils evaluated onsite were composed of fine sandy to gravelly sandy loams with dark brown (10YR 3/2 to 10YR 3/4) matrix colors. None of the upland test plots met hydric indicators. HYDROLOGY Hydrology was observed in Wetland A during the August 5, 2020 site visit as saturation at 10 inches depth. Wetland A is a depressional system that floods and recedes throughout the year due to surface runoff from the surrounding upland and groundwater. A seasonally perched water table contributes to the hydrology of Wetland A. There was no evidence that the hydrology of the Type F stream is contributing primary hydrology to the wetland. The stream lies several feet lower in elevation than much of the wetland. The Type F stream was flowing during the late summer site visit, which indicates it is permanently flowing. The channel is over 10 feet wide and occurs on a grade lower than 16 percent, which supports the Type F designation. The stream flows southerly and eventually drains into the Hood Canal. NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map does not indicate the presence of wetlands on the property (Figure 4). It does indicate a large, forested wetland complex, which is associated with the Union River and Hood Canal, offsite to the west. The findings of the ELS site visit identified Wetland A in the south half of the property (Figure 2). 2 MASON COUNTY CRITICAL AREAS The Mason County Critical Areas map (MC 2020) does not indicate the presence of wetlands or streams on or near the property (Figure 5). ELS biologists identified Wetland A in the south half of the property. CONCLUSIONS WETLAND CATEGORIZATION Wetland A is in a shallow depression on the south side of the property. The wetland was rated according to Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington-2014 Update (Rating System) (Hruby 2014). The rating is summarized in Table 1 below. 2 The NWI maps should be used with discretion because they are used to gather general wetland information about a regional area and therefore are limited in accuracy for smaller areas because of their large scale. Mitchell Lumber Delineation Ecological Land Services,Inc. Delineation Report 3 October 5,2020 Table 1: Wetland Ratings Wetland HGM Class Vegetation 2014 Wetland Rating System Wetland Class Water Hydrologic Habitat Total Category Quality A Depressional Forested 7 6 5 18 III WATER TYPING The Type F was observed from the property lies to determine if it meets the parameters for a Type F water. The channel appeared to be greater than 10 feet in width where it was observed leaving the culvert beneath Mitchell Lumber Yard and where it nears the southeast property corner, which supports the Type F designation. In addition, the channel occurs on an approximately 1.4 percent grade, which also supports the Type F designation. CRITICAL AREA REGULATIONS The MCC Chapter 8.52.110 specifies wetland buffers based on the wetland category, the intensity of land use proposed, and the habitat scores. The land use is high intensity because the proposal will be commercial. MCC 8.52.170 specifies stream buffers based on the water type. The required buffer widths are summarized in Table 2 below. A 15-foot building and impervious surface setback is specified from the edge of the wetland and stream buffers. Both the stream and wetland buffers are functionally isolated by existing development to the north, Mitchell Lumber Yard (Figure 2). The area is commercially developed and does not serve to protect the wetland or stream. Table 2. Required Buffer Widths Critical Area Type/Category Habitat Score Required Buffer Wetland A Category III 5 (low) 80 feet Stream Type F -- 150 feet BUFFER REDUCTION OPTIONS MCC8.52.110(E)(c) and(d) offers avenues for reducing wetland buffers on constricted properties. These options include: • Buffer Averaging- allows reduction of the buffer in one area while increasing the buffer by the same amount in another area, provided certain criteria are met as listed in the code. However, the buffer may not be reduced below 75 percent of required width (XX feet). • Wetland Buffer Reduction—administrative reduction of high-intensity buffer widths o Low habitat scores (5 and less): reduce buffer to moderate-intensity buffers (60 feet in this case) To reduced wetland buffers beyond the above described measures, a variance would be required. In any case, buffer enhancement opportunities are abundant. The property is vegetated by Himalayan blackberry thickets that can be removed and revegetated with native plants as mitigation for buffer reductions. Therefore, the best option may be to impact the buffer and enhance the remaining portion. This option will require; Mitchell Lumber Delineation Ecological Land Services,Inc. Delineation Report 4 October 5,2020 • An as-built report to document the enhancement plan implementation. • Maintenance of the enhanced buffer area for 5 years, including removing invasives and replacing dead plants. • Monitoring for 5 years including annual monitoring reports to track the success of the enhancement plan. MCC 8.52.170(E) specifies provisions for reducing fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas (stream buffers). There are fewer options for reducing stream buffers, outlined below. • Reducing the setback—reduces 15-foot setback from buffer's edge o Requires variance review o Habitat Management Plan • Reducing the stream buffer o May also be allowed through a Habitat Management Plan (HMP) ■ HMP includes removal of invasive species and planting native species It is possible that a reduction of a Type F stream buffer could be performed like the option above, by impacting the buffer and enhancing the remainder. It is also possible such a proposal will require a variance, particularly when commercial development is proposed. It may be possible to determine an area of existing development that is functionally isolated from the vegetated portion of the buffer. Potential buffer reductions are indicated on Figure 9. The figure does not include setbacks from the buffers but does help visualize possible reductions. LIMITATIONS ELS bases this report's determinations on standard scientific methodology and best professional judgment. In our opinion, local, state, and federal regulatory agencies should agree with our determinations. However, the information contained in this report should be considered preliminary and used at your own risk until it has been reviewed and approved in writing by the appropriate regulatory agencies. ELS is not responsible for the impacts of any changes in environmental standards, practices, or regulations after the date of this report. Mitchell Lumber Delineation Ecological Land Services,Inc. Delineation Report 5 October 5,2020 REFERENCES Cowardin, L.M., C. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-78/31. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington D.C. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Hruby, T. August 2014. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington, 2014 Update. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #14-06-029. Olympia, Washington. Effective January 1, 2015. Mason County. Critical Areas Inventory Parcel Search Website. https://www.co.mason.wa.us/gis/. Website accessed October 2020. Mason County Code (MCC). 2017. Chapter 8.52.110 Wetlands and Chapter 8.52.170 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. Mason County, Washington. Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). 2020. WA632 Mason County Area. Online document <http://www.wa.nres.usda.gov/pnw soil/wa reports.html>. Website accessed October 2020. Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). 2016. Washington Hydric Soils List. <http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/main/soils/use/hydric/>. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0), ed. J.S. Wakeley, R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-08-13. Vicksburg, Mississippi: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2020. National Wetlands Inventory. Online document <http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html>. Website accessed October 2020. Mitchell Lumber Delineation Ecological Land Services,Inc. Delineation Report 6 October 5,2020 FIGURES & PHOTOPLATES �� ■AIR MEMO MEMEME 11, s1./E ■M■■■■ ' �•�1✓ 0■■■■© 51 OR �WIN WE .• 1 Figure 1i 1 ' , • •- Delineation 111 •111 PROJECTSCALE IN FEET E logical Fax:(360)414-9305 CHK- Mason County, VVA and Services www.eco-land.com � • Section . 23N, Range 1 10/7/2020 11:14 AM c:\Users\ri ht\Box\ELS\WA\Mason\Conn \3251-mitchell\3251.01-mitchell lumber ex ansion\3251.01-fi ures\3251.01 WRF.dwq ri ht ?t CD B 3 0 --I co cn D cn r c� o am p CD o m �_ o �2 00 r o� _ N O QZ 0- ca S_ Z 3 O (D "„ W CC O 7 (D r G W c Q v = (D cn (ID y rn _ L017 7l ((DD M � `< D (DO `� Q. O m CA < 11 (D c ' ❑ O Q N (D C Q I m I' Q � r (o•: � V c c _ v 3, ci _ Q (D (D zr � W r, a is 3. 1. y 9 1t DATE: 10/7/20 Figure 2 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220A DWN: JLL SITE MAP 0 100 200 Longview,WA 98632 REQ.BY: Mitchell Lumber Delineation z Phone:(360)578-1371 PRJ.MGR:LW Mitchell Lumber SCALE IN FEET Up ogical Fax:(360)414-9305 CHK: Mason County, WA www.eco-land.com PROJECT NO: Section 29, Township 23N, Range 1 W,W.M. m Land Services 3251.01 9/11/2020 2:03 PM c:\Users\ri ht\Box\ELS\WA\Mason\Count \3251-mitchell\3251.01-mitchell lumber ex ansion\3251.01-fi ures\3251.01 DL.dwq ri ht � z n. � m { o ` Q .. U) m o m a� , ^sf to a C = CD rnmcn r 7 X m m m .,: y 0 m G) 00 m y M �. 0 P, m n O Q Cn N i v * v A Cr m� v — ° a 0 — 0. (D (n t N cn a)CL CD PIP , C O m r p Or o ao ((DD O ri (n Z v' o - m 0 Q (D (7 (n / (D �. O CL t DATE: 9/11/20 Figure 3 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220A DWN: JLL SOIL SURVEY 0 200 400 Longview,WA 98632 REQ.BY: Mitchell Lumber Delineation z Phone:(360)578-1371 PRJ.MGR:LW Mitchell Lumber SCALE IN FEET • Fax:(360)414-9305 CHK: Mason County, WA Eco O9iiCa www.eco-land.com PROJECT NO: Section 29, Township 23N, Range 1 W,W.M. Land Services 3251.01 9/11/2020 2:03 PM c:\Users\ri ht\Box\ELS\WA\Mason\Count \3251-mitchell\3251.01-mitchell lumber ex ansion\3251.01-fi ures\3251.01 DL.dwq right Z r N 0 o (D rn (n y m miO 7n M ilk 'f o �_ r , •. W (D (D cn ' * CD v dj Q 1.>+ .. Q tr' CD (n • + Cn 90 rb Cn /'i r •. - r ".. O n Q (u , Vr Wr e DATE: 9/11/20 Figure 4 1157 3rd Ave.,suite 220A DWN: JLL NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY 0 400 800 Longview,WA 98632 REQ.BY: Mitchell Lumber Delineation Phone:(360)578-1371 PRJ.MGR:LW Mitchell Lumber SCALE IN FEET Fax:(360)414-9305 CHK: Mason County, WA Eco 3 ical www-eco-land-com PROJECT NO: Section 29, Township 23N, Range 1 W,W.M. m Land Services 3251.01 9/11/2020 2:03 PM c:\Users\ri ht\Box\ELS\WA\Mason\Count \3251-mitchell\3251.01-mitchell lumber ex ansion\3251.01-fig ures\3251.01 DL.dwq ri ht . Z A EP Km v N � 4 a End I I ? ■E .JEM Q f � S z ,� o S z e o a L o 0 3 s o o 7 G a o > a a r T S 3 v v � o CD n � n 2. Cn p w `!- 7 I C v r� N _fr C N Q Q rn L- y � �[710F]N 'a C C C rn 1, ° a o n0 0 ° :'Cr o' fi o ° a O a 2 " m ? n n u _ 4 = o N � 0 DATE: 9/11/20 Figure 5 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220A DWN: JLL MASON COUNTY CRITICAL AREAS 0 150 300 Longview,WA 98632 REQ.BY: Mitchell Lumber Delineation z Phone:(360)578-1371 PRJ.MGR:LW Mitchell Lumber SCALE IN FEET CCO O9�Ca� Fax:(360)414-9305 CHK: Mason County,WA G www.eco-land.com PROJECT NO: Section 29, Township 23N, Range 1 W,W.M. m Land Services 3251.01 10/7/2020 11:14 AM c:\Users\ri ht\Box\ELS\WA\Mason\Count \3251-mitchell\3251.01-mitchell lumber ex ansion\3251.01-fi ures\3251.01 WRF.dw ri ht , ! s`� x g �t .. . oILL (D o (D rt (D —n (D CL 1 CL Q 44 d (D (D I C 1 m ,L rD m � �,. _ .` (D � co 0 m c � . o' E a c cn v C 0- I( 2. m p W 0 c _ 0 I � v 3.ci a 6 3 t. v 0 1 — } - ZY ,, l�� W i Al DATE: 10/7/20 Figure 6 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220A DWN: JLL WETLAND RATING FIGURE-150'OFFSET 0 100 200 Longview,WA 98632 REO.BY: Mitchell Lumber Delineation Z Phone:(360)5 78-13 71 PRJ.MGR:LW Mitchell Lumber SCALE IN FEET • Fax:(360)414-9305 CHK: Mason County,WA Eco ogles www,eco-land.com PROJECT NO: Land Services 3251.01 Section 29, Township 23N, Range 1 W, W.M. m 10/7/2020 11:14 AM c:\Users\ri ht\Box\ELS\WA\Mason\Count \3251-mitchell\3251.01-mitchell lumber ex ansion\32 5 1.01-fig ures\3251.01 VVRF.dwq right 0 0 o D n cn r p Dy D10D 3 cu G) X, E + y x q 3 Co Z ' v C Q q L 6 �_ m C Q ©a U (D o cn v 0 CO � '-" o Q rt C I Q + Q Q r r o + M O C oSWU D Q =. C N (D A r �'• D D 0 + n C (D L Q o r C o iv (D . f Q a / M O I f LC: oW N •m ^� � C j � II II Q � (11 O W Q r Ul N C pp C Q (D = 7 a) N_ Q. rt rt I DATE: 10/7/20 Figure 7 1157 3rd Ave.,suite 220A DWN: JLL WETLAND RATING FIGURE-1 KM OFFSET 0 1200 2400 Longview,WA 98632 REQ.BY: Mitchell Lumber Delineation z Phone:(360)578-1371 PRJ.MGR:LW Mitchell Lumber SCALE IN FEET Eco �'Ca' Fax:(360)414-9305 CHK: Mason County,WA G www,eco-land.com PROJECT NO: Section 29, Township 23N, Range 1 W, W.M. R, Lend Services 3251.01 -)� ji 10/7/2020 11t11:14 AM c:\Users\ri ht\Box\ELS\WA\Mason\Count \3251-mitchell\3251.01-mitchell lumber ex ansion\3251.01-fi ures\3251.01 VVRF.dwq right 1 M 2� D t. D g v v v fy v v to0 -0 A %,.j t kbr)0r m m m m m (o (D CD m _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ° - ry A cn 71 D oo n o CD (D (D 1z O SCt °1F Rast N ME Roe�ei fiq x oc) onoc) cn vvv ,vvvQ (n (n (n M M n 3' z 0 0 0 0 0 0 F` N D o n o -A, m m 0- z NF 0 m o K m d m = d '@ cn y o o=i o 2. n o o 0 01 y = CD O. d fn O y °i o (D (D a- �' coi u1Di �� v y 3 D DATE: 10/7/20 Figure 8 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220A DWN: JLL WETLAND RATING FIGURE-303(D)AND TMDL MAPS 0 2000 4000 Longview,WA 98632 REQ.BY: Mitchell Lumber Delineation z Phone:(360)578-1371 PRJ.MGR:LW Mitchell Lumber SCALE IN FEET CCO Og' , ' Fax:(360)414-9305 CHK: Mason County, WA ` www.eco-land.com PROJECT NO: Section 29,Township 23N, Range 1 W,W.M. m Land Services 3251.01 10/7/2020 11:14 AM c:\Users\ri ht\Box\ELS\WA\Mason\Count \3251-mitchell\3251.01-mitchell lumber ex ansion\3251.01-fi ures\3251.01 VVRF.dwq right N z z ff7 v iPic' o .tit.a. I 3 Q`< n cn D -0 cn r r� Cl)(D �_ ro -a iv — m T, am v � o v m CD o � �, one r,p9 -o o 3 0 x O to o � cD v r r v �. W o Q 0 n v — (D � cn v Q 4 o m o v U> (D 6 cn o c �. v n n v ? TI Q o" a CT - o o v � Q v = D o o_ co o ` Q �. <" Q — C cD ti U) CD =„ � cD o v a, m 7 a, � a I C W C I n --I cn I n CD CD l c Cn co v i m a -n z cn rn Cr 1( to r � v It Jt + ��I •.� �� 'l 1 If Sit - ♦A� a �{ rI -a'a {`jam) �,/)•� i -'` - DATE: 10/7/20 Figure 9 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220A DWN: JLL BUFFER REDUCTION EXAMPLES 0 100 200 *9c Longview,WA 98632 REQ.BY: Mitchell Lumber Delineation z Phone:(360)578-1371 PRJ.MGR:LW Mitchell Lumber SCALE IN FEET Fax:(360)414-9305 CHK: Mason County,WA _ q www.eco-land.com PROJECT NO: Section 29, Township 23N, Range 1V\/,W.M. m Land Services 3251.01 tK Photo 1 was taken from the end of the existing driveway looking north towards NE Belfair Street. The driveway is paved ` and there is lawn on both sides. Photo 2 was taken from the same location as Photo 1 looking east at the existing house. The residence remains in tact. .a$ i Photo 3 was taken from the southwest corner of the developed portion of the property, looking north at the garage. The prop- erty slopes down south of the garage. i R `� Mi'O.•. o �yri - 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220A DATE:9/28/20 Photoplate 1 Longview,WA 98632 DWN: LHW Mitchell Lumber Expansion Phone: (360)578-1371 PRJ. MGR: LHW Mitchell Lumber Co Ecolory�CaI Fax: (360)414-9305 7 PROJ.#:3251.01 Mason County, Washington Land Services Photo 4 was taken from the same location as Photo 3 (Photoplate 1) looking south- east. Topography slopes down towards Wetland A in the forest. Himalayan blackberry thickets border the forest. The west edge of the lumber yard is visible in the background of the photo. Photo 5 was taken from the same location as Photo 4, looking south. The blackberry thicket and forested wetland turn southerly before meeting the west property line. There are unmown grasses between the blackberry thicket and the slope to the developed portion � - � of the property. Photo 6 was taken of the area where Test Plot 3 was conducted. It is located at the edge of the blackberry thicket pictured Ar'fls �r '. � �q'_ a 'p •� in Photo 5. The vegetation met hydro- . - s phytic criteria, however, hydric soil and hydrology criteria where not met and y the area was determined to be upland. OPQ`+ �y i� 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220A DATE:9/28/20 Photoplate 2 Longview,WA 98632 DWN: LHW Mitchell Lumber Expansion �1 Phone:(360)578-1371 PRJ. MGR: LHW Mitchell Lumber Co Ecclological Fax: (360)414-9305 g PROD.#:3251.01 Mason County, Washington Land Services �' 4 ~tom _ t �• Photo 7 was taken of the area where Test Plot 2 was conducted. It is located at the southwest corner of the lumber yard , and outside the northeast boundary of Wetland A. The vegetation met hydro- • phytic criteria, but the hydric soil and hydrology criteria were not met. ' \R-tit , t} Therefore, the area was determined to be upland. sue' ;'��►_ ! '!e ~ �,�+' x i��•rr 011 ` q �7; Photo 8 was taken of the area where Test Plot 1 was conducted. It is located in the s '�' * ' r� x northeast corner of Wetland A. It is characterized by Himalayan blackberry' r -:+. ,G t dfgf lOF4 �f,.��ae �ilMk .mow n �� _ ✓ salmonberry, lady fern, and hedge E',q _V� . t1 nettle. eu Photo 9 was taken from the boundary of Wet- . land A. The wetland is forested with red alder, salmonberry, lady fern, and t ,j ' !f ' reed canary grass. .c�_" S"i -• - 'mot 1 t JJayy - �� �' - .y► .1 '�. .r.•r -r'�► .:its �.. ;..` ,. 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220A DATE:9/28/20 Photoplate 3 Longview,WA98632 DWN: LHW Mitchell Lumber Expansion Phone: (360) 578-1371 PRJ. MGR: LHW Mitchell Lumber Co ECO'�al Fax: (360)414-9305 g . PROD.#:3251.01 Mason County, Washington Land Services , , r Photo 10 was taken of the culvert at the north- east corner of the wetland. This Type x� f F stream begins upslope and across Highway 3. It flows into a catch basin s on the east side of Highway 3 and is conveyed under the highway and under the lumber yard before daylighting at the corner of the lumber yard. It is a 4- foot metal culvert that appears to be on grade. Photo 11 was taken from the east property line where the Type F stream reaches very _r ,' close to the property. The channel is ' - =� .• over 10 feet wide in this area which supports the Type F designation. Y •if ►.e- ;yam �. ' r Photo 12 was taken from the same location as 3. Photo 11, looking south. The stream flows east and away from the property in this area. There was no evidence to indicate that hydrology from this * stream was contributing to the primary hydrology of Wetland A. 1157 3rd Ave.,Suite 220A DATE:9/28/20 Photoplate 4 Longview,WA98632 DWN: LHW Mitchell Lumber Expansion Phone:(360)578-1371 PR1. MGR: LHW Mitchell Lumber Co Fax:(360)414-9305ED'0 Cal PROJ.#:3251.01 Mason County, Washington Land Services W a WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Mitchell Lumber Expansion City/County: Belfair/Mason Sampling Date: 8-5-20 Applicant/Owner. Andy Mitchell State: WA Sampling Point: TP 1 Investigator(s): L.Westervelt&K.Lacey Section,Township,Range: S 29,T 23N.R 1 W WM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 5% Subregion(LRR): MLRA 2 Lat: 47.44989 Long: -122.829 Datum: NADV-83 Soil Map Unit Name: Sa-Saxon silt loam.5 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Yes ID No ❑ within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No. ❑ Remarks: The properties are located on the west side of State Route 3 in Belfair,Washington. Wetland A is in a depression south of the Mitchell Lumber property. A Type F stream exits a culvert at the south end of the property. Test Plot 1 is located at the northeast extent of Wetland A onsite and near the southwest comer of the lumber yard. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Tree Stratum(Plot size:30'diameter) Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: %Cover Species? Status 1. Alnus rubra 60 �es FAC Number of Dominant Species 2. Thuia plicata 20 Les FAC That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 6 (A) 3• Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) 50%=37.5,20%=15 80 =Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species Sapling/Shrub Stratum(Plot size:20'diameter) That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100 (A/B) 1. Comus sericea 40 Yes FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Rubus armeniacus 35 Yes FAC Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. Ilex epuifolium 5 no FACU OBL species x1= 4. FACW species x2= 5. FAC species x3= 50%=40,20%=16 80 =Total Cover FACU species x4= Herb Stratum(Plot size:10'diameter) UPL species x5= 1. Ranunculus repens 60 yes FAC Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Athyrium cyclosorum 20Les FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. Lysichitum americans 15 no OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Scirpus microcarous 10 no OBL ❑ 1—Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. Stachys chamissonis 5 no FACW ® 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. ❑ 3-Prevalence Index is<3.01 7. ❑ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting g data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ❑ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. — 0 0 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 50/o=55,20/o=22 110 Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:—0 1. _ 2 Hydrophytic Vegetation Yes ® No El = 20%_ =Total Cover Present? %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 Remarks: The hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met because there is greater than 50%dominance by FAC species. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 Project Site: Mitchell Lumber Expansion SOIL Sampling Point:TP 1 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR 2/2 98 10YR 3/6 2 C M si to 10-16 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M si to si silt to-[cam (Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix,RC=Root Channel Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol(Al) ❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck(A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) , ❑ Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ 'Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ® Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology be ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed ornust roble atic.ent, Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Solis Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: The soil profile meets hydric soil indicator F3,Depleted Matrix. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves(139) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves(139) ❑ High Water Table(A2) (except MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) (MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) ® Saturation(A3) ❑ Salt Crust(B11) ❑ Drainage Patterns(1310) ❑ Water Marks(B1) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits(132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑ Drift Deposits(63) ® Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust(134) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑ Iron Deposits(135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑ Stunted or Stresses Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches): 10 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: Hydrology was present during the site visit as saturation and oxidized rhizospheres. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Mitchell Lumber Expansion City/County: Belfair/Mason Sampling Date: 8-5-20 Applicant/Owner. Andy Mitchell State: WA Sampling Point: TP 2 Investigator(s): L.Westervelt&K.Lacey Section,Township,Range: S 29.T 23N.R 1 W WM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 5% Subregion(LRR): MLRA 2 Lat: 47.44989, Long: -122.829 Datum: NADV-83 Soil Map Unit Name: Sa-Saxon silt loam.5 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. HydrophyticVegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Yes ❑ No within a Wetland. Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: The properties are located on the west side of State Route 3 in Belfair,Washington. Wetland A is in a depression south of the Mitchell Lumber property. A Type F stream exits a culvert at the south end of the property. Test Plot 2 is located in the upland outside the northeast extent of Wetland A onsite and near the southwest corner of the lumber yard. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Tree Stratum(Plot size:30'diameter) Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: %Cover Species? Status 1. Alnus rubra 40 yes FAG Number of Dominant Species 4 (A) 2. Thuia plicata 10 yes FAC That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3• Total Number of Dominant 4 Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) 50%=25,20%=10 50 =Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species Sapling/Shrub Stratum(Plot size:20'diameter) That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 80 (A/B) 1. Comus sericea 60 yes FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Rubus spectabilis 15 no FAC Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. Ilex eauifolium 15 no FACU OBL species x1= 4. FACW species x2= 5. FAC species x3= 50%=45,20%=18 90 =Total Cover FACU species x4= Herb Stratum(Plot size:10'diameter) UPL species x5= 1. Athyrium filix-femina 10 yes FAC Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. ❑ 1—Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. ® 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6• ❑ 3-Prevalence Index is<3.0' 7. ❑ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ❑ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. _ 50%=5,20%=2 10 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:—) 1. Hedera helix 20 yes FACU 2 Hydrophytic ® ❑ 50%=10 Vegetation Yes No,20%=4 20 Total Cover Present? %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 75 Remarks: The hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met because there is greater than 50%dominance by FAC species. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 Project Site: Mitchell Lumber Expansion SOIL Sampling Point:TP 2 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loci Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR 3/2 100 rp sa to or-gravelly sa-sandy to-loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix,RC=Root Channel Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol(Al) ❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck(A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(FS) unless disturbed orproblematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: The soil profile meets none,of the hydric soil indicators. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves(139) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves(139) ❑ High Water Table(A2) (except MLRA 1,2,4A,and 413) (MLRA 1,2,4A,and 41B) ❑ Saturation(A3) ❑ Salt Crust(B11) ❑ Drainage Patterns(610) ❑ Water Marks(131) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates(1313) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits(132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑ Drift Deposits(133) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust(134) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑ Iron Deposits(135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑ Stunted or Stresses Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: Hydrology was not present during the site visit and there was no evidence to indicate wetland hydrology. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Mitchell Lumber Expansion City/County: Belfair/Mason Sampling Date: 8-5-20 Applicant/Owner.. Andy Mitchell State: WA Sampling Point: TP 3 Investigator(s): L.Westervelt&K.Lacey Section,Township,Range: S 29,T 23N.R 1 W WM Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 5% Subregion(LRR): MLRA 2 Let: 47.44989, Long: -122.829 Datum: NADV-83 Soil Map Unit Name: Sa-Saxon silt loam.5 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (if no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Yes ❑ No within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: The properties are located on the west side of State Route 3 in Belfair,Washington. Wetland A is in a depression south of the Mitchell Lumber property. A Type F stream exits a culvert at the south end of the property. Test Plot 3 is located in the upland west of the lumber yard. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Tree Stratum(Plot size:30'diameter) Absolute Dominant Indicator%Cover Species? Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1 Number of Dominant Species 2. That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 3. Total Number of Dominant 4• Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) 50%_—,20%_ =Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species Sapling/Shrub Stratum(Plot size:20'diameter) That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 60 (A/B) 1. Rubus armeniacus 50 Les FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species x1= 4. FACW species x2= 5. FAC species x3= 50%=25,20%=10 50 =Total Cover FACU species x4= Herb Stratum(Plot size:10'diameter) UP species x5= 1. Aorosfissp.* 55 ves FAC Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Ranunculus repens 40 ves FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. Fescue so.* 25 ves FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Holcus lanatus 15 no FAC ❑ 1—Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. ® 2-Dominance Test is>50% 8• ❑ 3-Prevalence Index is<3.0' 7. ❑ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 8• data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ❑ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. _ 50%=5,20%=2 145 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydre soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size: ) 1. Hedera helix 20 ves FACU 2 Hydrophytic 50%=10,20%=4 20 =Total Cover Vegetation Yes ® No ❑ Present? %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 75 Remarks: The hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met because there is greater than 50%dominance by FAC species. *Grasses were not identified to species and were assumed to be FAC. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 Project Site: Mitchell Lumber Expansion SOIL Sampling Point:TP 3 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loci Texture Remarks 0-14 10YR 3/4 100 fi sa Io 14-16 2.5Y 5/2 98 10YR 5/6 2 C M fi sa to fi-fine sa-sandy to-loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. zLocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix,RC=Root Channel Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol(Al) ❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck(A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or probl2matic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: The soil profile meets none of the hydric soil indicators. The depleted layer is too deep in the profile to be considered hydric. The depleted layer could be due to historic estuarine wetland in the area prior to the development of Belfair. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves(139) ❑ High Water Table(A2) (except MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) (MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) ❑ Saturation(A3) ❑ Salt Crust(B11) ❑ Drainage Patterns(1310) ❑ Water Marks(81) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates(1313) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑ Drift Deposits(63) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust(64) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(136) ❑ Stunted or Stresses Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: Hydrology was not present during the site visit and there was no evidence to indicate wetiand hydrology. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 P� q� z W a P� d� Wetland name or number: A RATING SUMMARY - Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID#): Mitchell Lumber Wetland Date of site visit: 8/5/20 Rated by: L.Westervelt Trained by Ecology? X Yes No Date of training: March 2017 HGM Class used for rating: Depressional Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_ Y X N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map: Google Earth OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY III (based on functions X or special characteristics__) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category.)-Total score=23-27 Score for each Category-II-Total score =20-22 function based on three X Category III-Total score = 16-19 ratin s Category IV-Total score =9-15 (order of ratings is not FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat important) Water Quality- 9= H,H,H Circle the appropriate ratings g= H,H,M Site Potential H M L H M L H M L 7= H,H,L Landscape Potential H M L H M L H M L 7= H,M,M Value H M L H M j H M L TOTAL 6= H,M,L Score Based on 6=M,M,M 7 6 5 18 5= H,L,L Ratings 5=M,M,L 4= M,L,L 3= LLL 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above X Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 1 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number: A Maps and figures required to answer questions correctly for Western Washington Depressional Wetlands Map.of: To answer questions: Figure# Cowardin plant classes D 1.3, H 1.1,H 1.4 2,6 Hydroperiods D 1.4, H 1.2 2,6 Location of outlet(can be added to map of hydroperiods) D 1.1, D 4.1 2,6 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland(can be added to anotherfigure) D 2.2, D 5.2 6 Map of the contributing basin D 4.3, D 5.3 7 1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1,H 2.2,H 2.3 7 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin(from Ecology website) D 3.1, D 3.2 8 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) D 3.3 8 Riverine Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure# Cowardin plant classes H 1.1,H 1.4. Hydroperiods H 1.2 Ponded depressions R 1.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland(can be added to anotherfigure) R 2.4 Plant cover of trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants R 1.2, R 4.2 Width of unit vs.width of stream(can be added to anotherfigure) R 4.1 Map of the contributing basin R 2.2, R 2.3, R 5.2 1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1,H 2.2,H 2.3 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin(from Ecology website) R 3.1 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) R 3.2, R 3.3 Lake Fringe Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure# Cowardin plant classes L 1.1, L 4.1,H 1.1,H 1.4 Plant cover of trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants L 1.2 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland(can be added to anotherfigure) L 2.2 1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1,H 2.2,H 2.3 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin(from Ecology website) L 3.1,L 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) L 3.3 Slope Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure# Cowardin plant classes H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperiods H 1.2 Plant cover of dense trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants S 1.3 Plant cover of dense,rigid trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants S 4.1 (can be added to figure above) . Boundary of 150 ft buffer(can be added to another figure) S 2.1,S 5.1 1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1,H 2.2,H 2.3 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin(from Ecology website) S 3.1,S 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) S 3.3 Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 2 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number Mitchell Lumber HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions!1 7;the criteria:described must apply, to the entire unit being,rated., If the hydrologic criteria listed in each,question do not apply to.the entire unit being rated,you Probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case,identify which hydrologic criteria_ in questions,177 apply.,and go to.Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? NO-go to 2 YES-the wetland class is Tidal Fringe-go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO-Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES-Freshwater Tidal Fringe Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverfne wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO -go to 3 YES-The wetland class is Flats Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at anytime of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; .At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). NO -go to 4 YES-The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can be verygradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface,as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. NO-go to 5 YES-The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually<3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The unit is in a valley, or stream channel,where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, _The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 3 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number Mitchell Lumber NO -go to 6 YES-The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO-go to 7 YES-The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched,but has no obvious natural outlet. NO-go to 8 YES-The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be-difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example,seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain,or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland,unit HGM class to being rated use in rating Slope+ Riverine Riverine Slope+ Depressional Depressional Slope+ Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream Depressional within boundary of depression Depressional +Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine+ Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other Treat as class of freshwater wetland ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 4 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number Mitchell Lumber DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1.Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: 1 Wetland is a depression or flat depression(QUESTION 7 on key)with no surface water leaving.it(no outlet). points=3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points=2 Wetland has an unconstricted,or slightly constricted,surface outlet that is permanently flowing points=1 Wetland is a flat depression(QUESTION 7 on key),whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points=1 D 1.2.The soil 2 in below the surface(or duff laver)is true clay or true organic(use NRCS definitions).Yes=4 No=0 0 D 1.3.Characteristics and distribution of persistent plants(Emergent,Scrub-shrub,and/or Forested Cowardin classes): 5 Wetland has persistent,ungrazed,plants>95%of area points=5 Wetland has persistent,ungrazed,plants>Y, of area points=3 Wetland has persistent,ungrazed plants>1/io of area points=1 Wetland has persistent,ungrazed plants<1/lo of area points=0 D 1.4.Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation: 2 This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months.See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is>Y.total area of wetland points=4 Area seasonally ponded is>X total area of wetland points=2 Area seasonally ponded is<X total area of wetland points=0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above 8 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16=H X 6-11=M _0-5=L Record the rating on the first page D 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1.Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes=1 No=0 1 D 2.2.Is>10%of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes=1 No=0 1 D 2.3.Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes=1 No=0 0 D 2.4.Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? 0 Source Yes=1 No=0 Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above 2 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 or 4=H X 1 or 2=M _0=L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the Water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly(i.e.,within 1 mi)to a stream,river,lake,or marine water that is on the 1 303(d)list? Yes=1 No=0 D 3.2.Is the wetland in a basin or sub-basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d)list? Yes=1 No=0 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality(answer YES 2 if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes=2 No=0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Value If score is: X 2-4=H _1=M _0=L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 5 Rating Form—Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number Mitchell Lumber DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions- Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1.Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: 1 Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it(no outlet) points=4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints=2 Wetland is a flat depression(QUESTION 7 on key),whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points=1 Wetland has an unconstricted,or slightly constricted,surface outlet that is permanently flowing points=0 D 4:2. Depth of storage during wet periods:Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet.For wetlands 3 with no outlet,measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry,the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points=7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to<3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points=5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to<2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points=3 The wetland is a"headwater"wetland points=3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points=1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft(6 in) I points=0 D 4.3.Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed:Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin 3 Contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points=5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points=3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points=0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points=5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above 7 Rating of Site Potential If score is: 12-16=H X 6-11=M 0-5=L Record the rating on the first page D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1.Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes=1 No=0 1 D 5.2.Is >10%of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes=1 No=0 1 D 5.3.Is more than 25%of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses(residential at 1 >1 residence/ac,urban,commercial,agriculture,etc.)? Yes=1 No=0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: X 3=H _1 or 2=M _0=L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0.Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1.The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems.Choose the description that best matches conditions around 0 the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points.Choose the highest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down-gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources(e.g.,houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub-basin that is immediately down-gradient of unit. points=2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub-basin farther down-gradient. points=1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub-basin. points=1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood.Explain why points=0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points=0 D 6.2.Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? 0 Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Rating of Value If score is:_2-4=H _1=M X 0=L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 6 Rating Form—Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number Mitchell Lumber These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM.ciassesN H�AB'IT�AT i=U.NCTIDNS - Indicators that site functions to rovide om orta t.habltat, �" - p ply - _ 03 H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1.Structure of plant community:Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class.Check the 1 Cowardin plant classes in the wetland.Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Y.ac or more than 10°a of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac.Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more:points=4 Emergent 3 structures:points=2 Scrub-shrub(areas where shrubs have>30%cover) 2 structures:points=1 X Forested(areas where trees have>30%cover) 1 structure:points=0 If the unit has a Forested class,check if.• X The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata(canopy,sub-canopy,shrubs,herbaceous,moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20%within the Forested polygon H 1.2.Hydroperiods 1 Check the types of water regimes(hydroperiods)present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10%of the wetland or%ac to count(see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present:points=3 X Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present:points=2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present:points=1 Saturated only 1 type present:points=0 X Permanently flowing stream or river in,or adjacent to,the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in,or adjacent to,the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3.Richness of plant species 1 Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftZ. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil,reed canarygrass,purple loosestrife,Canadian thistle If you counted:>19 species points=2 5-19 species points=1 <5 species points=0 H 1.4.Interspersion of habitats 0 Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes(described in H 1.1),or the classes and unvegetated areas(can include open water or mudflats)is high, moderate,low,or none.If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water,the rating is always high. ( D O O None=0 points Low=1 point Moderate=2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH=3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 13 Rating Form—Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number Mitchell Lumber H 1.5.Special habitat features: 3 Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. X Large,downed,woody debris within the wetland(>4 in diameter and 6 ft long). X Standing snags(dbh>4 in)within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft(2 m)and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft(1 m) over a stream(or ditch)in,or contiguous with the wetland,for at least 33 ft(10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30 degree slope)OR signs of recent beaver activity are present(cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) X At least A ac of thin-stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg-laying by amphibians) _Invasive plants cover less than 25%of the wetland area in every stratum of plants(see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above 6 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18=H _7-14=M X 0-6=L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1.Accessible habitat(include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). 0 Calculate: %undisturbed habitat 0 +[(%moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]0 =U %If total accessible habitat is: >1/3(33.3%)of 1 km Polygon points=3 20-33%of 1 km Polygon points=2 10-19%of 1 km Polygon points=1 <10%of 1 km Polygon points=0 H 2.2.Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. 3 Calculate: %undisturbed habitat 55.1 +[(%moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]4_4 = 59.5% Undisturbed habitat>50%of Polygon points=3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50%and in 1-3 patches points=2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50%and>3 patches points=1 Undisturbed habitat<10%of 1 km Polygon points=0 H 2.3.Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon:If 0 >50%of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points=(-2) 5 50%of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points=0 Total for H 2 Add the Points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:-4-6=H X 1-3=M _<1=L Record the rating on the first page s the habitat provided y the site valuable to society. H 3.1.Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws,regulations,or policies?Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points=2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m(see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species(any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan,in a Shoreline Master Plan,or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats(listed on next page)within 100 m points=1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above points=0 Rating of Value If score is:_2=H X 1=M _0=L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 14 Rating Form—Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number Mitchell Lumber WDFW Priority Habitats Priority habitats listed by WDFW(see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats,and the counties in which they can be found,in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.2008. Priority Habitat and Species List.Olympia,Washington. 177 pp.http://wdfw.wa.gov[publications/00.165/wdfw00165.pdf or access the list from here: http:/lwdfw.wa gov/conservation 1ph s/list/) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft(100 m)of the wetland unit: NOTE. This question is independentof the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac(0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife(full descriptions in WDFWPHSreport). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: Old-growth west of Cascade crest-Stands of at least 2 tree species,forming a multi- layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 8 trees/ac(20 trees/ha)>32 in(81 cm)dbh or>200 years of age.Mature forests-Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in(53 cm)dbh;crown cover maybe less than 100%;decay,decadence,numbers of snags,and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth;80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.158-see web link above). —X Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous,non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry_ prairie or a wet prairie(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161-see web link above). —X Instream: The combination of physical,biological,and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore,Open Coast Nearshore,and Puget Sound Nearshore.(full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report- see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity,recess,void,or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils,rock, ice,or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft(7.6 m)high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus:Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5-6.5 ft(0.15-2.0 m),composed of basalt,andesite, and/or sedimentary rock,including riprap slides and mine tailings.May be associated with cliffs. —X Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife.Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of>20 in(51 cm)in western Washington and are>6.5 ft(2 m)in height Priority logs are>12 in(30 cm)in diameter at the largest end,and>20 ft (6 m)long. Note:All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 15 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number Mitchell Lumber CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS WetlandTYp Cate ory. Check off any criteria that apply to thewetland 1Grcle the category_w,h`en:the appropriate criteria are met. V " SC 1.0.Estuarine wetlands Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? —The dominant water regime is tidal, —Vegetated,and —With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt Yes-Go to SC 1.1 No= of an estuarine wetland SC 1.1. Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge,National Park,National Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve,State Park or Educational,Environmental,or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? Yes=Category I No-Go to SC 1.2 Cat.I SC 1.2. Is the wetland:unit at least 1 ac in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? —The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching,filling,cultivation,grazing,and has less than 10%cover of non-native plant species. (If non-native species are Spartina,see page 25) Cat. —At least%of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub,forest,or un-grazed or un- mowed grassland. —The wetland has at least two of the following features:tidal channels,depressions with open water,or Cat.II contiguous freshwater wetlands. Yes=Category l No=Category II SC 2.0. Wetlands of High Conservation Value (WHCV) SC 2.1. Has the WA Department of Natural Resources updated their website to include the list ofnds of High Conservation Value? Yes-Go to SC 2.2 Qio Go to SC 2.3 Cat.I SC 2.2. Is the wetland listed on the WDNR database as a Wetland of High Conservation Value? Yes=Category l No=Not a WHCV SC 2.3. Is the wetland in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? http://wwwl.dnr.wa.g6v/nhp/refdesk/datasearch/wn howetlands.pdf Yes-Contact WNHP/WDNR and go to SC 2.4 No =Not a WHCV SC 2.4. Has WDNR identified the wetland within the S/T/R as a Wetland of High Conservation Va rid listed it on their website? Yes=Category I No=Not a WHCV SC 3.0.Bogs Does the wetland(or any part of the unit)meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs?Use the key ..below.If you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. SC 3.1. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soil horizons,either peats or mucks,tha mpose 16 in or more of the first 32 in of the soil profile? Yes-Go to SC 3.3 No Go to SC 3.2 SC 3.2. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soils,either peats or mucks,that are less an 16 in deep over bedrock,or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash,or that are floating op of a lake or pond? Yes-Go to SC 3.3 No Is not a bog SC 3.3. Does an area with peats or mucks have more than 70%cover of mosses at ground level,AN at least a 30% cover of plant species listed in Table 4? Yes=Is a Category I bog No- Go to SC 3.4 NOTE:If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory,you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16 in deep.If the pH is less than 5.0 and the plant species in Table 4 are present,the wetland is a bog. Cat. SC 3.4. Is an area with peats or mucks forested(>30%cover)with Sitka spruce,subalpine fir,western red cedar, western hemlock,lodgepole pine,quaking aspen, Engelmann spruce,or western white pine,AND any of the species(or combination of species)listed in Table 4 provide more than 30%of the cover under the canopy? Yes=Is a Category I bog No=Is not a bog Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 16 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number A SC 4.0. Forested Wetlands Does the wetland have at least 1 contiguous acre of forest that meets one of these criteria for the WA Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats?If you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. Old-growth forests(west of Cascade crest):Stands of at least two tree species,forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 8 trees/ac(20 trees/ha)that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height(dbh)of 32 in(81 cm)or more. —Mature forests(west of the Cascade Crest):Stands where the largest trees are 80-200 years old OR the species that.make up the canopy have an average diameter(dbh)exceeding 21 in(53 cm). Yes= Category I E)Not a forested wetland for this section Cat.I SC 5.0.Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? —The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from- marine waters by sandbanks,gravel banks,shingle,or,less frequently,rocks —The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains ponded water that is saline or brackish(>0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon(needseasured near the bottom) Cat.I Yes-Go to SC 5.1 kNaPot a wetland in a rcoastal lagoon SC 5.1.Does the wetland meet all of the followingthree conditions? —The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching,filling,cultivation,grazing),and has less than 20%cover of aggressive,opportunistic plant species(see list of species on p.100). Cat.II —At least%of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub,forest,or un-grazed or un- mowed grassland. —The wetland is larger than 1/10 ac(4350 ft2) Yes=Category.) No=Category II SC 6.0. Interdunal Wetlands Is the wetland west of the 1889 line(also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its habitat functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: Long Beach Peninsula:Lands west of SR 103 Gray]a nd-Westport:Lands west of SR 105 Cat Ocean Shores-Copalis:Lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 Yes-Go to SC 6.1 Onot an interdunal wetland for rating SC 6.1.Is the wetland 1 ac or larger and scores an 8 or 9 for the habitat functions on the form('rates H,H,H or H,H,M Cat.II for the three aspects of function)? Yes,=Category I No-Go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger,or is it'in a mosaic of wetlands that is 1 ac or larger? Yes=Category II No-Go to SC 6.3 Cat.III SC 6.3. Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 ac,or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 ac? Yes=Category.))) No=Category IV. Cat.IV Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics If you answered No for all types,enter"Not Applicable"on Summary Form Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 17 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 Wetland name or number This page left blank intentionally Wetland Rating System for Western WA:2014 Update 18 Rating Form-Effective January 1,2015 iotai. proposeu impervious area: 5S,41y sq rt (C) Metal building (dock shop): 2,400 sq ft Proposed structures: ft (D) Metal building (millwork): 1,750sq ft (A,l Metal building (warehouse):7,500 sq B 'Loadin canopy no walls 2 400 s ft (E) Three sided pole shed: 1,755 sq ft ( ) 9 Py ( ) q TO STATE RT 3 BELF,AI-R, ST ' ENTRY ONTO PROPERTY. 77 TR.R K AT� RU ROUT OI<.Ff RO �- 0"zia Nam,F Y - 1 _� �PR47 SCALE 1"=60' _-.I- _ 4..- L.._ •. W Employee parking Propossed rainage/storm water system a, - f, D structures being removed NEW Aa/ (-4100 sq ft) . -URF r, EXISTING WAREHOUSE -- — EXISTING _ STORE EXIS � D XISTrNc b� Ricks�FRFa SRHAL� Propossed si fe ce:•: CO FRFO URFAC-E Propossed rn) ater mocks drainfield + - TRUCK-ENTRY ON _ 6 Type F stream o- 6 wetland buffer 4J �� (buffer variance currently in j t review with the county) 1 stream buffer - (buffer variance currently in 'r. '' ■ review with county) �Q 131' �}' ----*Category III wetland (seasonally flooded depression) e NE Belfair Street o a) • •d ° 0 Q � k I+ d -}-I E F r 45' �°a � cz ;vZ (1) J pN O W .1 A... Proposed u U � U o fn j .b ' .rn P Q - c 3 + : .. Proposed Building a •.d -a- Building .I�� - _ F N N - - - --• -:d O N ' •.I I••.tr. • (n O •.� • I . •." FPOSge'd.°•. d I 0 o d ,- • J• .N . Proposed 0° Building N �' z N d • �.e Mitchell °' ~ Existing ..w m 2 w N N Lumber Building w z d Y o cn 15 Yard 000 nQ-of 0a Q , Qo m n o 0 Proposed Building N T"m mReplacing Current Y a� b o� Structure ' m m 7S Culvert (Underground) _ _ _ ' U C C X O _ _ _ _ fYl J o Li w o Wetland A LO $LUL, Category IIIDepressional ForestedSeasonally Flooded N Permanently �� LEGEND: C) Flowing Stream Site Boundary U (19,550 sf. onsite) ____ Parcel Boundary Wetland Boundary g q, a - - - - • Approx.Wetland Boundary W Q r --- Wetland Buffer "" coo Z —•••�- Stream with Flow Direction J w ' Stream Buffer v 0 4, ` cn 15' Building and Impervious Setback w Proposed Building Stream „ Proposed Asphalt Type F ® Proposed Wetland Buffer Impacts(2,268 sf.) 0 Proposed Stream Buffer Impacts(1,463 sf.) N Q NOTES : v 1. Wetland,stream and test plots ;i located using handheld GPS with W E submeter accuracy. 2. Site Plan Provided by Mitchell Lumber Company. 5 M f NE Belfair Street w o ro Q C: f•- . � j j � E r O •tlI d ..a-Q.." .• �- 0 �5 J O N ` J. 7 w + . .rn • Propose Q _' w c b Proposed Building C7 D 2i o a ••A' Building o .d 4° t 0 1 U 45! o . 4 ' '• ". '� +.<o Proposed ° .Building 4 o . ` .. a 76" rv . Proposed o L CY � o' Building N z o o ` . Mitchell M w r T Existing m w N N Lumber Building a z a _ c ° "' 15 Yard pp � o Ua a 1 aNm ^ o ; Proposed Building TO o Replacing Current Y a 00 b 00 07 N 3 ^ o Structure o Culvert ' -m m 160 (Underground) _ _ _ _ o b - - - - - - m•Oj o LL m N �� V Wetland A $LUL, ` M Category III v ; y Depressional Forested ® C LEGEND: Seasonally Flooded -� N `, Permanently Site BoundaryCD M Flowing Stream 9 ---- Parcel Boundary `° o (19,550 sf. onsite) It Wetland Boundary Approx.Wetland Boundary N Wetland Buffer w m Stream with Flow Direction LL w Stream Buffer C w X ,, -——- 15'Building and Impervious Setback m - r Proposed Building 'o_ Proposed Asphalt w Stream Stream Buffer Mitigation Area(1,600 sf.) Type F Wetland Buffer Mitigating Area(2,500 sf.) N Q NOTES : v 1. Wetland,stream and test plots a' located using handheld GPS with w E c� submeter accuracy. N 2. Site Plan Provided by Mitchell 5 Lumber Company. M Plantust 4 d Q Species Common Name I Size/Spacing Number f Stream Buffer Plants Thuja plicata western redcedar 1- allon/15 feet on center 10 4 } Lonicerainvolucrata Blacktwinberry 1-gallon/6 feet on center 22 Physocarpuscapltatus Pacific ninebark 1-gallon/6teet on center 20 Wetland Buffer Plant 4 Q Piceasitchensis Sitka s ruce 1- allon/15 feet on center g Q Pseudotsu o menzieSH Doul as fir 1-gallon/15 feet on center 5 Physocarpus capitatus Pacific ninebark 1-gallon/6 feet on center 30 O W Symphoricarposaibus Snowberry 1-gallon/6 feet on center 30 Z — Q � Total 125 0S Native Ri avian Seed Mix" 1 lb. J `The mix includes 40%Blue Wikirye(Flymusglaucus),35%Native Red Fescue(Festuca rubra),10%Tufted Hairgrass 00 a- E C Z (Deschampsla cespitasa),10%NW Mannagrass(Glyceria occidentalis),and 5%American Sloughgrass(Beckmannia 0)(D N - syzigachne). n Z - — O N o�— E �U a w LLZJ � L Wetland Buffer J (n 3 Planting Detail 6� N ® / o Stream Buffer M j Planting Detail c4 o \ a o �\ a . U t3: N � s 07 L.L O ��_ • (V J Z N o 6 M W 0 c~)in m w N Z M C: a �� o 0 Of d U d a -� _ Qom^o E QI �y 00 M M n00 I•l 0' N Ol � O _ �,Q Co� N O 83, > ; `° / a m O C X L ` M J t li a L. •- ch t / ` w U C e W� M � o t C +' O CU LEGEND: NOTE(S): w Site Boundary 1. Wetland,stream and test plots LL located using handheld GPS with o z ———— Parcel Boundary " —i submeter accuracy. wW o _ e a,•.-„- Wetland Boundary 2. Site Plan Provided by Mitchell U 00 - Approx.Wetland Boundary Lumber Company. to 'o E Wetland Buffer w i Stream with Flow Direction Stream Buffer o — — — — 15'Building and Impervious Setback Q Proposed Building N co 0 Proposed Asphalt w E N 0 Stream Buffer Mitigation Area (1,600 sf.) 0 0 Wetland Buffer Mitigating Area (2,500 sf.) s M I PanlFcr: COVER SHEET;EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS w i MITCHELL LUMBER DRAINAGE PLAN MITCHELL LUMBER DRAINAGE PLAN ! OWNER: TYPE.I CB. NOTE GRADE FLAT IM-SP.BP Tow.BB Ili IN:6X 17 MITCHELL HOLDINGS LLC NOTE:ALI CATCH RELFAIR STREET IE O''K.171) STABALLaD CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE BASIN TO HAVE A°2'12"1: 1 1017SHOREDRIVE CATCH BASIN INSERTS TYPG I C.B. H0.EMERTON.WASHN(ifON%SIG NOTE:DNLI:Y$ RIM:%.00 PHONE:OW)275-20X0 OTHERWISE NOTED, ,. ., 1E OUT:48.17 .- '+.,•y ALL PIPE TO BE 1. S O L I SC7iEWLG aO RIM:30.00 PVC. IS IN 0.17 PROPOSED SITE,ADDRESS: DATUM:NAVD 88 NOTE:EXISTING LAND IE OVf:4S.17 FP-31.00 STRUCTURE FF m TORE DEVELOPED HAS �`-F4� B HELFAIR,WASHNGi'ON9P52F S LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEEN CLEARED k..f'OPSMSEICL OP TYPE I B. .TYPE I C.B. X BLA RIM.50. '•RII.I;SOIV TYPE 1 CB. PIiNg3m7•u rroxlA F MIN:47.3 IF HE 440 RIM:S 7A r3I60M M OUT:4.3 IF OUT. IE IN :47.40 LE OUT:47.40 MRCYL 13Pw3amX� TYPE 1 C.B. ` PROPOSED IXTR9G PA D AREA r31�t6AT R569AJ UIw.Xu RIM:SO.ID y. STRUCTURr PARCEL Dlxwsaxm IF OJ:46.92 FF-51.00 7R81a7oP SW SE rcL±OF IE OUT: ..I CB_ _� SX9°YI •E31.96 ENGINEER: Bu roan PEM3mT;nIA .'TYPE xxI-If NADtanl IT SOLID PVC PIPE a PTR POS E �M�SD� \l - ENVIROTF.CII FNGINF.F.RINfi BIN.��I166 JI P.O.BOX 9M :'IBO�iI'4�JI S6P • E BELFAIR WA7N O N 9X52A 10• PHONE::( 012}937TYPEI C.B. 2'GRA SP RIM,, 8' BTATE x OLD STRUC TO REPLACE JE N :•N.46 O \' TER. 1E OUT:U.46 :50M / DRAWN BY: DATE: PROPOSED PAVED 'E 46.IY RJM;�� VI IRI DRIVEWAY .. TYPE 1 C. TYPE 1 C.B. 12`SOLID PVC PIPE. / R1K1:w.IP>4 MM' DESIGNED BY: DATE IS OUT:N.R4 IE 4 1 ..•\ RJM/MCS V12121 WETLAND BUFFER I CHWKED BY: DATE: h 50 MIN FLOWPATN MkRmi Sulm,P.E. VIN21 $ \ Yry SILT FENCE STREAM BUFFER *14 WETLANDBOUNDRV w2�•P/ H` C`_._. 1 LEGEND N S9"ID'46"W❑6 3(1 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY • PROPERTY CORNER / i •nI SOIL TEST PIT -� PROPERTY LINE REVISIONS: \� RNY UFSCRIPOON tlY UATE AVERAGE SLOPES SILT FENCE a Io 3a n VEGETATION BUFFER CALL BEFORE YOU DTG! BUILDING SETBACK INDEX OF SHEETS ESTIMATE OF QUANTITIES CALL 2 WORKING DAYS CLEARING LIMITS CUT -TOO CY BEFORE)'DO DIG! UI DRAINAGE.DIRFC71ON SHEET I OF 3 COVER SHFF.T;VICINITY MAP,EXISTING/ FILL -TOO CY UER PROPOSED CONDITIONS ROOF -11,400 SF SHEET SHEF.T20F3 DF.TAILSANDNOTF.S DRIVEWAY -41,029SF UNDERGROUND • ELEVATION LOCATION CENTER STEFT 3 OF 3 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL TOTAL IMPERVIOUS -55,129 SF CLEARING -1.27 AC WWW.C'ALLBEFUREYWDIGC051 SHEET I OF "O E THILIG 1IENENIATINADF.ENT : I A HHDGIG.nxv HIE SFWunNo BnfACIXO cmIRe RrWIRxNIN1a w.+u eE RR IaNm 4 ISLOSTAOIS. =MLL 'W x 1IIE UNIXGF nnIF x=xVLacMT Lrusn.w. WADm ILSBAIrRUSRfUAUREACING nrt US STnxn.SRVE KEmfAlev wrl Mfum.EVF1 OsfCnx ''( GCB wr51Rm N EE.CESSA.l:c MLtCHELL LUMBER �. nAc%nR:l °N II DRAINAGE PLAN �' O Ir BVPLOw Ixw ADH f Nw.L IOR mIS Ixxunx HF ER RR T A REA R� Rwu 1 — AO Tu[xK Ne•I>+ .. (MIpNAL QBANOIIT wYC DADS .RDR.nE u+DGQGw 5lrt xu.ORADE OWNER: m°Fi .. 1eO ocoxADATxmf n w (+ rLo OG- T.a v. .UR EYT SIY I.NL MLA RIfRI ArvI �- W ���"iEyU� i°owN rKn .IWNGfYMIAIA.DFS HA EDONSfIEEl RYDAr S ORAW1Fn xSI MI -aD"01'o1-I AXAILBf. MITCHELL HOLDINGS LLC .�DixFROY1AnEI[nixir.l NAT RTquISE THEUASTAXD.ANVE KfmLRluv wTl 1017SHOREDRIVE I°�Ou WLM1nI-HR BREMERTON.WASNRJGTON 911JI0 n4100 u10 I Mm IV 1'HONE.(JNI)2ti2090 11 A ERMANAGrMFMM FL-SIGNIFI=DEV ISo+ED nAnsNuull lwiu rR(wu. TRORRTr seLLrrx.Aixws -r AAxO wurvALc1TD n m. umf ID LA,TO V. wr EwxT mClwac AxDOlI SM..ADDRESS: a1 23W NE STATE ROM ROM 3 ROTES: _ y. BELFAIR.WATHINOTON 9933P ANDKT HOOK To sITR.G BUBDIM1GA ANn DRARUGF.FACT Ors M1(MpFA TOMAATAA NECESSARY ORA IRNN(I SIIALLNE �IA% fN4TNaRR RAN NWT Ijj� PLA .OIL Hm rH \YC,FTATf RRHOTES _ %x 4,MR.� Oi SI.—OF NUFD {11p. AWXIO WLLUV IOnTWRS Of Srtf. VRMLM»O'ITs lIS STANp.SIEVE+dmENBT WTI SDIIFA(ELr ORAVFL �'K\F TMSfXI a xntfADER RAVEL FLIRT IwAsrp ONI+nI�»mw STANGAS_1L,rAnoNA rM ROAp.xRu,cE.A»o xL»xxruou+snLrlwn sail roffrariHls 1.Aanul.itONCRE'sLsxALL BE CLAxA a AND—AAFNALT eAYIND HULL NXfORN TO— _ FlLTRSFn .111,GE-1,F. n19T.RARTi TR5N(N DETAILS AECIrICATIONSOUiu»EOmwADOTIAPAA. REPORT. N.T.S. SGSAx.wRrAA.I LnAxsL ANx xASNTS.ECxuxsf wAlExIAU AIuu xS wr_A,.,URDAN _II wAanrAwA ml.»x No VEGETATED FILTER STISIP DETAIL IAL SHALL eh KLAIOVED.RLPAttDAAULYDYA[ThA%ITO It—HGONOW rtS RSWERtt AEP'InUlltm9 N.I A. ENGINEER: .I—OGN SNx.I.DM.AAx%I1IHA ON ROIINnLO N A I ON—xAS.S TO SAND OWIVALEFIT JA Nm. ENlun(u DSIVUS L. ENVIROTFATI ENGINEERING OOx51RWrIOX sxgnNa+: _'cO.wACRO AwuLT P.O.BO%9M oOMllm.alOI.LUTAND mO[SnIAN SDmNENlA ITEDCOXSTRLOTS%.LVTSAXCL COniC A . A,AE1. BE-FAIR .WA SHINGTON"529 PHONE:()NI)21S931R s.f[i R _RS saes 4 P IAf S[.ua-AIIwRh+ai•fA DRAWN BY: DATE LS xxxO ODOCR \ DU Pj1 '" NTs. VI IRO J.HN S UI �..d 'T %,.� 'A DFS)GNEDBY: DATE: qE anu oI C IxEA usLff clENrtrsenxaucO. i OrH R M Pxt j I AN nI OOT nx cu.»ry I \ R3M/MCS W1w. AV ATF.—A AT rANL A -AWUE 11?!.. CHECKED BY: DATE: ON LE XIN4oO A TIS vEHCLf.AnL nA(. anI AMa Michel SMm,P.E. Y12R1 OR TO Tnr. DA. GAVAHTfw:T"AAIIf SAALI ilcxl vBll lr annl.R lr Nm. PATFS AZ RoreDULIE REs iXALLDtfd L<IwL11 p. L _r a ALTSRNATrvE ntFCAST MAE A B RIm AECTSIN __.... ........ ......... ......... ......... - ... ._.._..___....._.. ONE.I HASImfOR A•ImISRT AEATAHOLN.AR ADA5IMIM SERpx lVOeI B.OIIIOOe FOR YHE141P r I nBARE,iDIC«NFA i -, dFRECAS w 2Y .RRQwa Ph / AFCr IN Y `II —Po2EP9ed RI BAR u(H IS. �k^ ADDRESS REVISIONS: AMNF.WWHYTE RBV. OESl1R'DGN RY mu F>nAR CLLII WAY XkX NW-TA VIDA WAY ttRICAICN tlAADs oETAR PAULSHO WAAIILNIiTUN,9x1A iLMHnA RARLLI. ,OOI.Sdsaxns.OLHeI a¢H xASxImAF.RT: x.r.a CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! EIIREIRMH IAELnAs1 rtR CA YO ING DAYS ANWAY .Du_cMwx'. "s BEFORE FORE YOU DIG! nlRMpm eEIHNSXIa Ann sueR»Ufn alone L UE5 SHEEP UNDERGROUND 2 LOCATION CENTER OExPMLf.ATCN SAv SPlT W W W.CALLBF RE.YMDIG.COM N.TS. SHEET 2 Oi l TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: STABILIZED MNSTRIKTON ENTRANCE GENERAL PERMANENT EROSION AND I.IF EROSION CONTROL IS NOT WORKING AS EXPECTED,ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED. SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: 2.SHOULD TIIE TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS PROVE TO BE INADEQUATE 1.TEMPORARY STARILIZFD CONSTRUCTION INGRFSW EGRESS SHALL BE DURING CONSTRUCTION,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AODITIONAI.F.ROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES LIMITED TO ONE LOCATION,IF POSSIBLE,AND RE CONSTRUMD PER ME 1.GRAVEL SURFACE COARSE.SHOULD OF, MITCHELL LUMBER 3.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND DEVICES SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY AND IMMEDIATELY MAINTAINED. ADDITST LIZED COCKS ALL B ADDEDENTILA P E'ODICDETAIL PERIODICALLY THIS SHEET. PLACEDPLETIO SOON AS P)SSIOLE ADIN DRAINAGE PLAN UPON IF'NECESSARY. ADDITIONAL ROCK SHALL BE ADDED PERIODICALLY TO MAINTAIN CONIPLETIO SHALL HE ACC GRADING. 4.ALL TEMM( RY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND DEVICES SHALL BE LEFT IN PLACE UNTIL THE UPSLOPE PROPER FUNCTION OF THE PAD. TUPSOILING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IN AREAS HAVE BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. _1 THE WIDTH OF THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENIMNCIi SHALL BE ALL OTHER DENUDED AREAS AFTER THE USE 5.THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS,WHERE APPLICABLE.IN THE AMINIMUMOFMFEET WIDE WITH A 25 FT RADIUS.MWEVER.THISAREA OF'CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT IS NOT STORMWAI ER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON BY THE WASHINGTON STAIN DEPARTMENT OF OF ECOLOGY. SUALLBEINCREASED IF NECESSARY TO ACCOMODATE CONSTRUCTION NEEDEDONTHESE DISTURBEDAREAS. 6.1'HE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENT'RANCE,TEMP)RARY SEDIMENT PONDS AND SILT FENCING(IF NEEDED) BE EQUIPMENT ENTERING AND LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 2.PERANENT EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE I NSTALLED PRIOR TO OR AS THE FIRST STAGE OF PXO)ECTC'ONSTRUCTION,OTHER SEDIMF.NTCONTROL MEASURES SUCH AS 3.IF"TINT STABILIZED CONS]"RUCTION ENTRANCL PAD DOES NOT MAINTAINED AND ESTADI.ISIIFD PRIOR TO SEDIMENT TRAPS,BARRIERS AND OTHER ADEQUATELY REMOVE MILD FROM THE VEHICLE WHEELS,THE WHEELS THE REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY EROSION THE CONTRACTOR SMALL PROVIDE DUST CO CONTROL,IF CONSTRUCTED AS NECESSARY.SHALL ). NECESSARY,WRING THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTIONPROL'ESS. SHALL BE HOSED OFF BEFORE:LEAVING THE PROTECT SITE TI RE WASHING CONTROL FACILMES. OWNER: R.SE IMF.NTS FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.THAT IS TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS SHALL BE REMOVED AND CLEANED SHALL RE COMPLETED OVER QUARRY SPALLS ORC'RUSHI,DROMAND IMMEDIATELY,AND THOROUGHLY CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH DAY DURING CONSTRUCTION.WASHING SHALL NOT HE DONE. WASH WATER SHALL DRAIN TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR SILT FENCE, MITCHELL HOLDINGS LLC FOR ALL AREAS WHICH HAVE BEEN STRIPPED OF VEGETATION OR EXPERIENCED LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES,AND WHERE NO SILT FENCE. FURTHER WORK IS ANTICIPATED FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING THE LISTED CRITERIA BELOW,ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE BREMERTO DRIVE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH MULCHING,GRASS PUNTING OR OTHER APPROVED EROSION CONTROL TREATMENT TFl.LEGTHOCHEBA SHALL RIER TO AVOID NNE CONTINUOUS ROLL POINTSAND TO HREMERTON,WASHINGTON 911310 APPLICABLE TO TIIE TIME OF YEAR.GRASS SEEDING ALONE WILL ONLY BE ACCEPTABLE DURING THE MONTHS OF APRIL TIiF.LENGTH OF UHF.flARRIFR TO AVOID USE OF JOINTS.WHEN/DIMS ARE PHONE OM)2T5-2696 THRWGHSEPT EMBER.HOWEVER.SEEDING MAY PROCEED WHENEVER IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR.BUT NECESSARY,FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE SPLICED TOGETHER ONLY AT MUST ALSO BE AUGMENTED WITH MULCHING,NETTING OR OTHER APPROVED TREATMENT. SUPPORT POST,WITH A MINIMUM&INCH OVERLAP,AND SECURELY FASTENED AT BOTH ENDS TO THE POST. DRY SEASON(MAY I THRII SEPTEMBER 30)-THE CLEARING OF LAND,INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING VEGETATION OR 2,POSTS SI{ALL BE SPACED AMAXIMUM OF 6 FEET APART AND DRIVEN OTH ER GROUND COVER,MUST BE LIMITED TO ONLY AS MUCH LAND AS CAN RECEIVE AiTROPRIATF PROTECTIVE:COVER OR BE SECURELY INTO GROUND(MINIMUM OF JO INCHES). SITE ADDRESS: OTIERWISES'ARILIZED,AFTER HAVING BEEN CLEAREDOR OTHERWISE DISTURBED,BY NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 300E A I.ATRIENCIi SHALLOEEXCAVATF.DAPMOXIMATELY RINCNF.S WIDE AND I2 OWN YEAR.UNLESS IMMEDIATE STABILIZATION IS SPFfIFIF.D IN ME EROSION AND SEDIMENT MNTROLPUN,ALL ARIAS INCHES DEEP ALONG THE LINE OF P)S'IS AND UPSLOPE FROM THE BARRIER. 2I6BI NE STATE R(IIIfE ROlffE7 CLEARED OR OTHERWISE DISTURBED MUST BF.APPROPRIATELY STABILIZED THROUGH THE USE.OF MULCHING,NFTT1Nq PLASTIC PHIS TRENCH SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH WASHED GRAVEL. BF1.FAIR WASHINGTON 99529 SHEETING.EROSION BLANKETS,FREE.DRAINING MATERIAL ETC.,BY SEPTEMBER 30 OR SOONER PER THE.APPROVED PUN OF 4.WHEN STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC IS USED,A WIRE MESH ACTION. UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY,SEEDING,FERTILIZING AND MULCHING OF CLEARED OR OTHERWISE. SUPPORT FENCE SHALL BE FASTENED SECIIRELYTLEAS II INCHL LONG, IL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING THE FOLLOWING PERIODS:MARCH I TO MAY 15,AND AUGUST 15 TO CiCTOBER I. THE TSTS USING HEAVY DUTY WIRE STAPLES AT LEAST I INCH LONIP,Tif: SEEDING AFTER OCTOBER I WILL BE DONE WHEN PHYSICAL COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT IS IMMINENT AND TIE ENVIROMENTAL WIRESORH(Xi RINGS.THE WIRE SHALL EXTEND INOTIIETREKK:IIA CONDITIONS ARE CONDUCIVE.TO SATISFACTORY GROWTH.IN TIM EVENT THAT PF,RANENT STABILIZATION IS NOT POSSIBLE AN MINIMUM OF4 INCHES AND SHALL NOT EXTEND MORETHAN 24 INCHES ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF GROUNDCOVER.SUCH AS MULCHING, PLASTIC SHEETING.EROSION BLANKETS,ETC.MAST ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. BE INSTALLED BY NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 30. -.THE STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE STAPLED DR WIRED TO THE FENCE..AND 20 INCHES OF ME FABRIC SHALT,RE.EXTENDED INTO THE IN THE EVENT THAT CONSTRUCTION ACHVITIES OR OTHER SITE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES ARE DISCONTINUED FOR AT LEAST 4 TRF.NCH.THM:FABRIC SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 24 INCHES ABOVETHE CONSECUTIVE DAYS,THE OWNERICONMACIPOR SIIALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION Of ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE..FILTER FABRIC SHALL NOT BF.STAPLED TO CONTROL FACILTFS IMMEDIATELY AFTER STORM EVENTS.AND AT LEAST ONCE EVERY WEEK.THE OWNETL'CONTRACTOR SHALL EXISTING TRIES. ENGINEER: BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF ALL EROSION AN SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES. 6.WHEN EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC(MONOF'ILAMENT),AND CLOSER POST SPACING IS USED,THE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE MAY BE ELIMINATED. HNVIROTFCH ENGINEERING WET SEASON(OCTOBER I THOU APRIL 30)-ON SITES WHERE UNINTERUPTED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS IN PROGRESS,TIIE IN SUCH A CASE,TIE FILTER FABRIC IS STAPLED OR WIRED DIRECTLY TO THE PO.BOX 9M CLEARING OF LAND,INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING VEGETATION AND OTHER GROUND COVER,SHALL BE LIMITED TO AS POSTS WITH ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF ABOVE.NOTES APPLYING. BELFAIR,WASHINGTON 98529 MUCH LAND AREA AS CAN BE COVERED OR STABILIZED WO ION 24 HOURS IN THE EVENT A MAJOR STORM IS PREDICTED AND/OR ).FILTER FARRICFENCES SHALL NOT HE REMOVED BEFORE THE UPSLOPE. PHONE:OM)2)}93T4 EROSION AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT OFF-SITE IS OBSERVED, AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. R.FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH ALL CLEARED OR DISTURRF.D AREAS SHALL RECEIVE APPROPRIATF.PR(TTKTI VE COVER OR BE OTHERWISE.STABILIZED.SUCH AS RAINFALL AN D AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL.ANY MULCHING,NETTING.PLASTICSHEETING.EROSION BLANKETS,FREE DRAINING MATERIAL.ETC'..WITHIN 5 DAYS AFTER HAVING REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL HE MADE IMMEDIATELY. DRAWN BY: DATE: BEEN CLEARED OR OTHERWISE DISTURBED IF NUT BEING ACTIVELY WORKED.SILT FENCING,SEDIMENT TRAPS,SEDIMENFMNOS, 9.SILT FENCES WILL BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO ANY SLOPF.CONTOURS. ETC.,WILL NOT BE VIEWED AS ADEQUATE COVER IN AND OF THEMSELVES.IN TNF.EVF.NT THAT ANY LAND AREA NOT BEING 1RCONTIU UTING LENGTH TO PENCE WILL NOT BF.GREATER TT{AN IN FEET. IFIIl11 ACTIVELY WORKED REMAINS UNPROTECTE.DOR HAS NOT BEEN APPROPRIATELY STABILIZED 5 DAYS AFTER HAVING BEEN 11.DO NOT INSTALL BELOW AN OUTLET PIPE OR WEIR, ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ON THE SITE EXCEPT FOR APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ACTIVITY. 12.INSTALL DOWNSLOPE OF EXPOSED AREAS. DESIGNED BY: DATE SHALI.IMMEDIATELY CEASE UNTIL SUCH A TIME AS AFORF.MEN11ONFD LAND AREA HAS BEEN APPROPRIATELY PROTECTED OR 13.DO NOT DRIVE.OVER OR FILL OVER SILT FENCES. STABILIZED. mml TRF.N('IIiNG JUNINCS SEEDINGF(MDENUDEDAREAS I.FOR TRENCHES ON A DOWNSLOPE OF CHECKED BY: DATE: I.SEFOI SH(IULDBF.WNF,IMMEDIATELYAM..RFINALSHAPIW,,EXC'EPTDURMTHFPERIODOF MORENCHSHTHA .L BE OPENED ATONE mwe st-APE VI2/21 NOVEMBER I THROUGH MARCH 1.WHFN THE SUE SIKR)LD BE MOTCTF.D BY MULCTING OR PLASTIC OF TRENCH SHOULD BE OPENED AT ONE TIME, COV2.HE ORE EEDLTIENEM SEEDING PERIOD. 2.PLACE SONMEXCAVATED UP ILL SIDE OfFROM THE 2.BEFORE SEEDING,INSTALL NEEDED SURFACE RUNOFF CONTROL MEASURES SUCH AS GRADIENT TERRACES. TRE(TES ON THE SAFETY A SIDE OF THE 3.THE SEEDBED EP D B DDIKES.SHALL L BE F.S.I.F.VIT SPREADERS E S U SF.DIMFNT LASINS. TRENCH WHEN SAFETY AND SPACE ATNL SPEDBEDSHALLBE FIRM WNTHFAIRLY FINE SURFACE.FOLLOWING SURFACERWGIIENIN(i.PERFORM I"EC SHOULD ALLOW.A NOTE TOTHIS ALL OPERATIONS RE SHALL SS ORPSSHO SHOWN BELOW. W.THE SLOPE.. I:UN. SHOULD BE INCLUDED ON THE ES(' 4.SEF.DING MIXTURE SHALL BF.AS SHOWN BELOW.AND SMALL BF.APPIf.O AT THE RATF.OF 120IOlND3 PER PIA`! ACRE. 3.DIRF.CTTHETOSCHARGEOFDIWATERMG 5.SEED BEDS PLANTED BETWEEN MAY I AND O(TOBFR 31 WILL REQUIRE IRRIGATION ANDOTIM DFVICFS FROM TRENCHES OR OTHER AREAS MAINTENANCE AS NECESSARY T)FOSTER AND PROTECT THE ROOT STRUCTURE. SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY IMPACT 6.SEED OEM PLANTED BETWEEN NOVEMBER I AND APRIL 3%ARMORING OF ME:SEED BED WILL BE FLOWING STREAMS,DRAINAGE SYSTEMS r� NECESSARY,(e.R..GEOTEXTILES,JU'11 MAT,CLEAR PLASTIC:COVERING). (M OFF-SUE PROPERTY.DEWATERING � ).FFATILIZ,ERS ARP.TO BE USED ACCORDING TO SUPPLIERS'RECOMMENDATIONS.AMOUNTS SHOULD BE DEVICES SHALL NOT DISC[ TO MINIMIZED.ESPECIALLY ADJACENT TO WATER BODIES AND WETLANDS. SANITARY SEWERS, �mmRrT 9onA�AaRK 1;.\ USE THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED SEED MIXTURE FOR EROSION CONTROL OR A MASON COUNTY -1 A.1.1 •rWiMA ��wv R ivr)'c`• APPROVED ALTERNATE SEED MIXTURE r �I-+rr -{ urt ud«uw ran MOINRTONS MIRf1Y GERMINATION w.wnn ttarAaT NAME BYWEIGHT(%) M I%) d-xrnulu KF"NTIX'KY BLUEGRASS 16 R5 OR nAmt�H.[rArxai T x CREEPING RE EESCOE M 9R W 4Nn PERENNIAL RYE 30 93 90 oHr¢Xntd vAdRK. T.ABtt.¢in(ON'SAIX:TIDM PIRRANLT. TOPSOLLING 1.TO It,SHOULD BF USED FOR ANY GENUDF.D AREA WHERE DENSE.SOILS ART:EXPOSED. REVISIONS: 2.TO PSOIL SHOULD HE PACED ON SLUMS NM EXCEEDING 1 A ADDRESS KIN. UFS('RIMM tlY BAIB 3.STRIPPING AND STOCKPILING ON-SITE SOILS SHALL ONLY dvttry d rwHu nr TAX NW YbiA VIDA WAY RE PER-D IFT(NSOIL IS FRIABLE AND LOAMY. - • - T.TTRVXo rrurOR WASNI.N4TUH.9IUA PA CIYBB, 4.STRIPPNG SHALL BE CONFINED TO ME IMMEDIATE RPAVAuaTSRdnu Fl.ol`e6l.Onu-]am.00mlSay.)m5 ('ONSTRU(TON AREAS.A FOUR TO SIX INCH STRIPPING rlu.Fuanrl nAnvr T DEPTH IS COMMON.BUT DEPTH MAY VARY DEPENDING ON CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! THE PARTICULARSOIL.ALI.SURFACE RUNOFF CGN L rTria ona nnaavnrT! STRUCTURES SIIALL BE IN PLACE BEFORE STRIPPING. CALL 2 WORKING UAVS Txert BEFORE YOU DIG! �r J_ 911 UTILITIES SHIFTUNDERGRC 3 LOCAT7A 5 WWW.0 LC'EFOIt WWW.CALLBF.F(MEYWDIG.COM SHEET OF I PRDIECf: COVER SHEET;EXISTING/PROPOSED CONDITIONS MITCHELL LUMBER DRAINAGE PLAN MITCHELL LUMBER DRAINAGE PLAN F owl". T DEICB. NOTE:ORADfi FLAT IM•5gipy ro sB.aB u!IN:a.n MITCHELL HOLDINGS LLC NOTE:ALL CATCH BELFAIR STREET STABALll CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IE OUT:IS.1] BASIN TO HAVE S 'It'837'S 1017 SHORE DRIVE CATCH BASIN INSERTS TYPE I CB_ BREMERTON.WASHINGTGN"310 NO]'E:UNLESS i 1- RU150.00 PHONE.:(360)37}XB% OTHERWISE NOTED, M OUT:Itl.17 I ALLPIPP.TO BE6" TYPE ICD. a j SOLID SCHEDULE IO RINUMO0 ^ PVC. IEOUT 4] STRUCTURE SfIF.ADDRESS: NOTE:EXISTING LAND I¢OUT:/tl.17 STRUCTURfi PROPOSED;' DATUM:NAVD SS FF-5LW TRUCTURE W REUAIZ�INE5rASHINGTO "32R LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEEN ECLEARED¢D HAS �✓0 _ I �FP•5100 � BELFAIR,WASNINOTON 9R53N PARCEL 1132+•1]]b —FF.' B. IMTYPE I C.B. Z su ro•. n7wo-M 0.1M:SD. :R :W M B. w' E 1 C. PENMK;eu P-1.1n AF IP.IN:17.3 IE Ri`f/10 RIM:50A0 YHWN3 MOUT:1.3 IE OUL' IE IN:47.10 •'••. IE OUT:47.40 PAaCF.l 13L•M)AAtl50 lR iaP MI )0nc eu Kim: .B. PRR R ISTRIG PA DARER .-ne • RIM:50.B0 gI y. S'F-51.w PAaCF.L 11DeAlxMP IE M:�6.93 PF-51.00 IEOUT: SBV'SI "E 33.% ENGINEER SE PTLSOi �- PEIC.B. — -6AX�Rw:Ms -1 6oA3 13•SOI.ID PVCPIPE U. E �M�50.Ip . , n F.NVIROTECII ENGINEERING IF d¢�JI SAIy� PHONEBELFAIR,WASHINGN)N%33R TYPE 50.0 B. YOMV' SPRE / - Z/I+ PHONE:(JM)Y7}93]/ RIM:J0.00 -8' ,ELATE �`.. NEW STKU l0 RFPLACP. /' I U. TER S�T! OLD STRUCNk¢ /B IS OUT'OVf:NA6 _ � "�I9'PEIE.R. 50B0../ DRAWN BY: DATE PROPOSED PAVED — iE '46.13 ICM 9111^I DRIVEWAY - TYPE I C.B, TYPE I C.B. / R 50. KIM \� DESIGNED BY: DATE: is"SOLID PVC PIPE � 1¢IN 53 I � \ � IN:16:tl1 - IE OUf:N.M IE(kl>;1 I .\ RJM'MCS R/I'✓?t WETI.AND BUFFER ...` •I•'•••• CHECKED BY: DATE: i MwI—I S—P.E NIMI SB MIN FLOWPATH $ SILT FENCE M Q� ✓�..ry`� STR¢AM BUFFER A, W ETLAND BOUNDRY LEGEND H tl5^3ax•w 13E30 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY �,'• PROPERTY CORNER RR1 SOIL TEST PR —� PROPERTY LINE RFI]SIONS: \� rt1t3N BY Wl5 AVERAGE SLOPES SILT FENCE VEOFTATION BUFFER CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! ——— BUILDING SET INDEX OF SHEETS ESTIMATE OF QUANTITIES CALL z WORKING DAYS CLEARING LIMITS CU,I. LBO CY BEFORE 1'W DKi! sli \ SHEET I OF 3 COVER SHEET;VICINITY MAP,EXI,SMG, FILL. :IOOCY UT DRAINAGE.DIRECTION UTILITIES PROPOSED CONDITIONS ROOF �11.100 SF SHFIT SHFFT20F3 DETAILSANDNOTES DRIVEWAY -11,0395i UNDERGROUND • ELEVAl10N SHEET J OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 55,130 SF LOCATION CENTER: CLEARING -I27AC WWW.CALLBEFOREYOUDRi.COM SHEET IOF3 NOTF3 RJR__1WKARWNARrts .NR R IN" II Nv nP,RYWIATIrvO R[WIRY_vmB I.L xRR]I PisIM 61®[NM rttti MISrI.ND NSIxn q]KIIrONED SMFAfIxGwA LT.wN DD]w[I.O„ryPf "'RAND.ww RNNDu.r w1 r umvu .iTfD r q T II MITCHELL LUMBER a I cwf]IIL"cx]nrl DRAINAGE PLAN NRNNND O Y NP OR i =RNDND B'IAA EI � ROrF RY RG : 1�wE LOL 5 AnLxW nls.w�I,]1 rW. M^' SAND Lp11vA]FNi YMAL BADE �.�;N�s..;ts nE1NADATxN+YALrtm .s N]n 13 DWNPR: A'a I]ROPE I...A]Lsi Iuf"An" ' W.N.r KIII,xYW RYJaENn: Al rlfxwly EW RYDDr n] ca uvf]. ANAI].NY. MITCHELL HOLDINGS LLC nrn.ecl ]NGIINIrs Ir.urxA xurBE.Am ]NIYn Br NA«uP. ND rYR • IFDwI u..xi R[WIRF nB us HAND.sIevY vJNux xv RT.I 1017SHOREDRWE —INDIIIIINW I a N BREMERTON,W DJ ASHOTON MJIB [xrvFR M rjBA u MIONF.:IlA012ti2090 ]xR nIo YN DinA::ao EYLr:.ns`w`.]�Ri•wi:i'r"wniN�n'm'rifw'AL r.r.ERrr srEarKArx.l' r of lAIRITANIItANIlaAnOMTA J' RR umEur Nr NJnrt Arv"oR STIE ADDRESS: TFJI1rvAlLM ANm. - LRFaxw ^ 2JM1 RE STATE ROUTE ROUTE 1 slj;]AJs. oNRNRITO9 1R—Dlw. TLL ND AINA"E EAtTuea N ORDER TLrtNaAW. NN[cFSwrFD GRAvu NM rV'!D]NF '%RI.AK��}—R — .Ig fFn BELFAIR WASHfNOTONfLT2R -PLAN. FA „NJL NIx]N NIAll.xf Rx krA a J WNmNnuxt.nNR." Df A,-,-wPms. Lxt 2 vmFp RT.1 -,�A�� GRAVEL VEn sPREADA �� IIIANDARD YPM NKATpN3 r00.ROAD.B.]I]W:.AND'MUNICI AL CYId3T]InUCII(]N _ AsnutTPnvIxU9W1[OPRORNmTNF ftLiETI STRI! PI I..CIT.]MAMA- DIRTRSN)N TRF.y[N DETAIL' A. AJ.Nn ala VFDETATF.D rRTF0.3TMP DBTAR 0.ENMT. N.T.K uL nuuen RVROvtD.RLPU All'1u.NYAI n.D wrnluxnvu uxlalvA rtR PRDPERn arPF'IFtuTK.D N.ts.AA ENODREER: I.vITxA SInx.LO xf xax NnxfOlw uN�rvnunl t,nnlN.xNIAN,NI SAND fOUIVALRN]' J]]m. LAUN<L DRrv'w0.RITv mD r_mEw-T P.0.00Xm FNGINF.F.RMG lxxuTRUcrxw N!WIBxYI. 1.rvrN. A NT.11AR4A P.O.BOK9M ] H NE::(WASIIIN374 9R529 ar xRLurAx]s Omu n!Av 3[nuxHrs vn,]On.rII.�Axnaawl x I. 1 .ayyRg PHUNE:IJE0)T-li9JN r WhaNm InFJN.LLT[NNAANv I.v RNDNLrJN .YAuuTrL;IY RAD4 REr'OSIPALTED. A xe.(T u[.0 ..w]AU BE AAw]w DRAWN BY: DATE 0. VIIl11 ALDL Xl q _a RYwFr maxAnErvrf.nsx]N LxN.Ta"II nawR msTAxl yr n" � �`y%.. Isf sl s N n j AND_AI,A4O DEIGNED BY: DATE •.,, PR rlu ay.rYKIYNrtr A]AxaDFn. \\ R1MRdC5 V12f21 '. 'W 11 PPANS. %r+ML T //+IJLC :.f r1':' fIIFCKED BY: DATE ]x' / i i MkRRRIBrPA E.E V1221 1 UL N M. AIH AND, I I PNi •.pBt ARG ",NA'ILR f1TTFL1 P / I IN_ S X PgIT [FANIR III'NIN. RA—AND P.O[T.nU.Y3 I NIAI.BE Ya u]WFn. TxM+ .` �• • 8EC1 r]yE P.R'ARBARR .v ]BUI]rpP ______ _...—_ ........ -_.... .........__. __......... ......... _....... OlA•]w.NOM FO.R']@ARIr —AMOLRAR ADIIISTMI.M SKTIDN ......... T.oY)WIIDDPFW IYIffRRR +�cOq M SWIOq PJrI!.va UWG(r CORIRB 1 ( Sup9oIIPT KTNJn I —Afb 9.4 .].AR FxNsmF ADDRPSS REVISIONS: ARM FWRT]YTT REV, OE3L11TIKXx BY DATE •]eA.PALIIWAr P 1111*Al RN WIN TAIL PAUIJBOwASxLnGTUN.PRJA TV— PARfFI.OlYOI�N W-]BM.M?sol-]O]4lBM 'ATN"'INSERT. NTS CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! CALL2 WORKING DAYS FR41 E4nM11 LIA.WtA�NNs nx BEFORE YOU DIG! oil rvRwDm a'pxEurs Axn"nn'AnED ux]rn L UIS SNEFI. UNDDERGEROROUND LOCATION BF.FOR OPMRN.[YrtN WE:IPaI..T WWW.CALLBPFORF.YWDIG.CTMI SHEPT20FJ TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: STADILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE GENERAL PERMANENT EROSION AND I.IF EROSION CONTROL IS NOT WORKING AS EXPECTED.ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED. SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: 2.SHOULD THE TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS PROVE TO BE INADEQUATE I.TEMPORARY STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION INGRESS/EGRESS SHALL BE DURING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRA(-TOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES. LIMITF.DTOONELOCATION.IF POSSIBLE.,AND BECONSTRUCTEDPF:R THE I.(TRAVEL SURFACE COARSE.SHOULD BE MiTCHELL LUMBER 3.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND DEVICES SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY AND IMMEDIATELY MAINTAINED, 'STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE' DETAIL ON THIS SHEET. PLACED AS SCION AS"SIDLE UPON DRAINAGE PLAN IFNECESSARY. ADDITIONALROCKSHALL BEADDFDPFRIODICALLYTOMAINTAIN ('OMPLETION OF THE FINAL GRAIHNG. 4.ALLTEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMFNTCONTROL FACILITIES AND DEVICES SHALL BE LEFT IN PLACE.UNTIL THE UPSLOPE PROPER FUNCTION OF THE PAD. TOPSOILING SHALL BE ACXOMPLI511ED IN AREAS HAVE BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 2,THE WIDTH OF THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE ALL OTHER DENUDED AREAS AFTER THE USE 5.THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS,WHERE APPLICABLE.W THE AMINIMUMOFMFEE-TWIDEWITHA25FTRAUIUS.IIOWEVER,Ti1SAREA OF(ONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT IS NOT STURMWATM MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON BY THE WASHINGTON STATE.DEPARTMENTOF OF ECOLOGY. SHALL BE INCREASED IF NECESSARY TO ACCOMODATE CONSTRUCTION NEEDED ON THESE DISTURBED AREAS 6,THESTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE,TEMPORARY SEDIMENT PONDS AND SILT FENCING(IF NEEDED)SHALL BE EQUIPMENT ENTERING AND LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION SUE. 2.PERANENT EROSION CONTROL SHALL DE INSTALLED PRIOR TOOK AS THE.FIRST STAGE OF PROJECT C'ONSTRUCTHON.OTHER SFDIMENTCONTROL MEASURES SUCH AS 3.IF STABILIZED CONSIRUCI'ION ENTRANCE PAD DOES NOT MAINTAINED AND FSTABI.ARY PRIOR T) SEDIMENT TRAPS,BARRIERS AND OTHER BMPa SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS NECESSARY. ADEQUATELY REMOVE MUD FROM THE VEHICLE WHEELS,THE WHEELS COWItOTHE OVALOF TEMPORARY EROSION SHALL BE(HOSED OFF BEFORE LEAVING THE PROJECT SITE.THE WASHING C(N4TR(R.FACILITIES. OW ' 1.STHE EDIMENTS MOM SHALLCONSTVIDEDUST(ONTROL,IFAT IS TRACKED NECESSARY, PUBLIi THE ENTIRE SHALL OF,REMOVED PROCESS. SHALL BE COMPLETED OVER QUARRY SPALLS OR CRUSHED ROCK.AND IMMEDIATELY. TUE HOROUGHLY TEANEDON SITE TITHE END EACH TO DAY DURING ADWAYS CONSTRUCTION. WASHING SHALL AND CLEANED6.D WASH WATER SHALL DRAIN TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR SILT FENCE IMMEDIATELY.AND THOROUGHLY CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH DAY DURING CONSTRUCTION.WASf11NG SHALL NOT BE DONE MITCHELL HOLDINGS LLC FOR ALL AREAS WHICH HAVE BEEN STRIPPED OF'VEGETATION OR EXPERIENCED LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES,AND WHERE NO SILT FENCE. WIT SHORE DRIVE FURTHER WORK IS ANTICIPATED FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING THE LISTED CRITERIA BELOW.ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUSC BE IMMEDIATFLV STABILIZED WTI MULCHING.(;BASS PLANTING OR OTIIER APPROVED EROSION CONTROL TREATMENT 1.THE FABRIC SHALLHEHA HARRIER TO IN ACONTINTS,WH LLANDCUT TO BREMERTON,WASHINTON 9RJ10 APPLICABLE TO THE TIME OF YEAR.GRASS SEEDING ALONE WILL ONLY BE ACCEPTABLE DURING THE MONTHS OF APRIL THP.LENGTH OF THE,flARR1ER TO AVOID UST.OF JOINTS.WHEN JOINTS ARE PHONE:1361112t3-20V0 THROUGH SFJTEMBER-HOWEVER SEEDING MAY PROCEED WHENEVER IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF THE OWNERACONTRACTOR BUT NECESSARY,FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE SPLICED TOGETHER ONLY AT MUST ALSO BE AUGMENTED WITH MULCHING,NETTING OR OTHER APPROVED TREATMENT. SUPPORT POST.WITH A MINIMUM 6-INCH OVERLAP,AND SECURELY FASTENED AT BOTH ENDS TO THE POST, DRY SEASON(MAY I THRU SEPTEMBER M)-THE CLEARING OF LAND,INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING VEGETATION OR 2.POS IS SHALL HE SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 6 FEET APART AND DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND(MINIMUM OF M INCHES). SIIF.ADIMFSS: OTHER GROUND COVER,MUST BE LIMITED TO ONLY OR MUCH LAND IS CAN RECEIVE APPROPRIATE THAN SEPTEMBER BF. 1ATRENCH(SMALL BE EXCAVATED APPROXIMATELY R INCHES WIDE AND 12 GIVOTHEN ERWISESUNLESS IMMEDIATESTBI AFTER HAVING BEEN CLEARED IS SPECIFIED UPPED IN THE HEOSION AND,EYIMENT NO CRTROL PLAN,ALL AREAS INCHES DEEP ALONG THE LINE OF POSTS AND UPSLOPE FROM THE BARRIER. BELFNESTASHINGTTE ERf�IN CLEARED OR UNLESS USE DISTURBED MUST APPROPRIATELY STABILIZED ED THROUGH THE CONTROL MULCHING. ALL 'T1IISTRENCHSIIALLBEBACKFILLEUWTTIIWASIIEDCKAVEL BELFAIR,WASHINOTON 9RS2R CLEARED OR OTHERWISE.DISTl1RBED MAST BF.APPROPRIATELY STABILIZED THROUGH T{IF USF.OF MULCHING,NETTING,PLASTIC 4.WHEN STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC IS USED.A WIRE MESH SHEETING.EROSION BLANKETS,FREE DRAINING MATERIAL ETC.,BY SEPTEMBER 30 OR SOONER PER THE APPROVED PLAN OF SUPPORT FENCE SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY TO THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF ACTION.LINLF,SS OTHFRWISE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY.SEEDING.FERTLRIN'G AND MULCHING OF CLEARED OR OTHERWISE' THE P(1.STS USING HEAVY DUTY WIRE STAPLES AT LEAST I INCH LONG,TIE DISTURBED AREAS SMALL BE PERFORMS I DURING THE FOLLOWING PERIODS:MARCH I TO MAY 15,AND AUGUST 15 TO OCTOBER I. WIRES OR USING RINGS.THE WIRE SHALL EXTEND INTO THE T0.EN('ll A SEEDING AFTER OCTOBER I WILL BE DONE WHEN PHYSICAL COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT IS IMMINENT AND THE ENV IROMENTAL ('ONLOTIONS ARE CONDUCIVETO SATISFACTORY GROWTH.IN THE EVENT THAT PERANENT STABILIZATION IS NOT POSSIBL�.,AN MINIMUM OF'41NCHFS AND SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN±4INCHF.S ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF GROUND COVER,SUCH AS MULCHING.NETTING,PLASTIC SHEETING,EROSION BLANKETS,ETC,MUST ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE PE INSTALLED BY NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER M. i.THE STANDARD STRENGTH MITER FABRIC SHALL BE STAPLED OR WIRED THE FENCE.AND 20 INCHES OF THE FABRIC SHALL ITT.EXTENDED INTO THE IN TIIE EVENT THAT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES OR OTI IER SITE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES ARE DISCONTINUED FOR AT LEAST 4 TRE NCH.THE FABRIC SHALL NOT E%TFNDMORE THAN 24 INCHES ABOVE THE. CONSECUTIVEDAYS.THE OWNERICONTRAC'TOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE..FILTER FABRIC SHALT.NOT BF STAPLED TO CONTROL FACILTES IMMEDIATELY AFTER STORM EVENTS.AND AT LEAST ONCE..EVERY WEEK.THE O"Ml CONTRACTOR SHALL EXISTING TREES. ENGINEER: BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE.AND REPAIR OF ALL EROSION AN SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES. 6.WHEN EXTRA-STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC(MON(MTLAMENTI.AND CLOSER POST SPACING IS USED,THE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE MAY OF ELIMINATED. ENVIROTFCTI FNGINEFRING WET SEASON IOCTOBER I THRU APRIL 30)-ON SITES WHERE UNINTERUPTED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS IN PROGRESS,ME IN SUCH A CASE TIE FILTER FABRIC IS STAPLED OR WIRED DIRECTLY TO THE P.O.BOX 9M CLEARING OF LAND,INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING VEGETATION AND OTHER GROLIND COVER.SHALL BE LIMITED TO AS HOSTS WITH ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF ABOVE.NOTES APPLYING. BF,LFAIR,WASHINGTON M29 MUCHLAN U AREA AS CAN BE COVERED OR STABILIZED%ITHIN 24 HOURS IN THEEVMTA MAJOR STORM IS PREDICTED ANO/OR T.FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL NOT BE REMOVED BEFORE.THE UPSLOPE PHONE:(TINE?73-9374 EROSION AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT UFF-SITE'IS OBSERVED. AREA HAS BEEN PERMANEN I'LY STABILIZED. R.FILTER FABRIC FF.NCF.S SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH ALL CLEARED OR DISTURBED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE.APPROPRHAT:PROTECTIVE COVER OR BE OTHHERWISE STABILIZED.SUC{I AS RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL.ANY MULCHING.NETTING.PLAST MATERIAL-C SHEETING.EROSION BLANKETS,FREE DRAINING MATER ETC'..WITHIN 5 DAYS AFTER HAVING RF'UUIREU REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. DRAWN BY: DALE BE CLEARED OR OTHERWISE DISTURBED IF NOT BEING ACTIVELY WORKED.SILT FENCING.SEDIMENT TRAPS,SEDIMENT POND, 9.SILT FENCES WILL BE INSTALLED PAMLLF.L TO ANY SLOPE CONTOURS. F.TC.,WILL NOT RE VIEWED AS AOF.QUATF.COVER ON AND OF THEMSELVES.IN THE.EVENT THAT ANY LAND AREA NOT BEING 10.CONTRIB(RING LENGTH TO FENCE WILL NOT BE GREATER TIAN IN FEET. VI IRE ACTIVELY WORKED REMAINS UNPROTECTED OR HAS NOT BEEN APPROPRIATELY STABILILED 3 DAYS AFTER HAVING BEEN I'.IN NOTINSTALLBELOW ANOUTLETPIPE. WEIR. CLEARED.ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ON THP.SITE EXCEPT FOR APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ACTIVITY. I-.INSTALL DOWINSIDPP OF EXPOSED AREAS. DESIGNED BY: DATE: SEAL(.IMMEDIATELY CEASE UNTIL SUCH A TIME AS AFOREMENTIONED LAND AREA HAS BEEN APPROPRIATELY PROTECTED OR I3.CKONTDRWEOVERORFILL OVER SILT FENCES. STABILIZED. RIMIMCS MIME TRENCHING SEEDINGFORDENUDEDAREAS I.FOR TRENCHES ON A MOWNSL.OPE OF CHECKED BY' DAM MORE THAN SYw NO MORE THAN S FEET I.SF.FDI'4(i SHOULD BE DONE IMXHFDIATF.LYAPTF.RFMALSHAPNG.F.X('F.PIMRMGTHFPEROODOF OF TRENCH SHOULD BE OPENED AT ONE MSMN SUIm,P.E. VIM( NOVEMBER I THROUGH MARCH I.WHFN THE SOF SHOULD BE PROTECTED SY MULCT(MG OR PLASTIC THE COVERING UNTIL TI E NEXT SEEDING PERIOD. 2.PLACE EXCAVATEDMATF.RIALFROM 2.11E FORE SEEDING,MSI'ALL NEEDED SURFACE RUNOFF CONTROL MEASURES SUCH AS GRADIENT TERRACES, TRECTHES ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE tWERCF.PTOR DIKES,SWALES.LEVEL SPREADERS AND SEDIMENT BASMS. TRENC'II WHEN SAFETY AND SPACE 3.THE SEED DID SHALL BE FIRM WITH FAIRLY FINE.SURFACE,FOLLOWING SURFACE ROUGHENING.PERFORM CONSRAINTS ALLOW.A NOTE TO THIS ALL OPERATIONS ACCRDS(M PERPF.NDKOLAR TO TIE.SLOPE.. EFFECT SHOULD BE INCLUDED ON THE FSC' 4.SEEDING MIXTURE SHALL BE AS SHOWN BELOW.AND SHALL BE APPLIED AT THE RATE OF 120 POIMD PER PLAN. ACRE. 3.DIRFCTTHEDISCHARGEOFDF.WATRMG 5.SEED BED PLANTED BETWEEN MAY 1 AND OCTOBER 31 WILL RFQ(IIRF.IRRIGATION ANDOTHER DEVICES FROM TRT.NCHTS OR OTHER AREAS MAINTENANCE AS NECESSARY TO FUSnR AND PROTECT THE ROUT STRUCTU— SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY IMPACT 6.SEED BEDS PLANTED UETW EEN NOVEMBER I AND APRIL 30,ARMORING M THE SEEDBED WILL BE FLOWING STREAMS,DRAINAGE SYSTEMS NECESSARY.(c...GEOnX11LES.JUTEMAT.('LEAKPLA WCOVERIN L OR OFF-SITE PROPERTY.DEWATERING 7.FF,RTILIZ.F.RS ART.TO BE.USED ACCORDING TO SUPPLIERS'RECOMMENDATIONS.AMOUNTS SHOULD RE DEVICES SHALL NOT DISCI I ARGE TO F" MINIMIZED,ESPECIALLY ADJACENT TO WATER BODIES AND WETLAND. SANITARY SEWERS. USE THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED SEED MIXTURE TOR EROSION CONTROL OR A MASON COUNTY qen NA..Ox'. APPROVED ALTERNATE SEED MIXTURE. Fsv' urvnxVu lane PROPORTIONS PURITY(TERMINATION caamuxu.0 r. NAME BY WEIGHT(%) I%) (%) a xsnum KF.NTUCKY BLUEGRASS 30 RS RD xArlvc vvaEOn rxm T J CREEPING RED FESCUE 40 9R WI .sID PERENNIAL RYE 30 93 90 TOPSOLLMG oBmxrax vAMK x.Ta RTALL.IiFDMN Nisi ss� I.TDPSOD.SHOULDBP USFD FOR ANY DF.N ITEDAREA WHERE DENSE.SOILS ART.EXPOSED. ADDRESS REVISIONS: ].TOPSOIL SHOULD IiE PLACED ON SLOPES NOT EXCEEDING 21. ANMIPW MINT RNV. IMSCRIPINJN BY DAfE 3.STRIPPN(i AND STOCKPILING ON-SITE S(RLS SHALL ONLY nrrxgr xAr Ti XXX NW l—A VIDA WAY BF PERMITTED IF TOPM IL IS FRIABLE.AND LOAMY ml�o)r.1oo3 - r.PNf Wano wNr oa PARCLFfR)04`x6]a4 Bn.9GA 4 TO.STRIPPING SHALL BE CONFINED THE IMMEDIATE a9uvwexT all aETru _ .oO CONSTRUCTION AREAS,A FOUR TO SIX INCH STRIPPING nxx�awnxNMlnF'R'H Anon T CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! DEPTH IS COMMON.BUT DEPTH MAY VARY DEPENDING ON nM,ux T F PARTC li AR SOLI..ALL SURFACE RUNOFFCONTROL " unu.RPArt CALL 2 WORKING DAYS STRUCRIRLS SHALL BE IN PLACE BEFORE STRIPPING. IaP BEFORE YOU DIG! I' J UT -.{ UTILITIES SHEET 3 UNDERGROUND J x rx L(K'ATK/N CENTER W W W.CALLBFFOItEYOUDIG.COM SHEET 3 OF 3 v v a v v /vim^0 -� a a <I aC �Ja ACC C/.. • °_,a C `.a -• c ., t�� C a .. . e 1 e > `e o e J `e .. ..,e A -C �_ v v: J/ a e �:a e e e e =v e n . _R e e e - METAL BUILDING (DOORS,WINDOWS, e 41 / 4 MILLWORK) ;� in — — — a � / Qom, C C' • ----- co SU FACE - _-- c Co �FR F� R q, X Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Mitchell.Holdings LLC 23681 NE State Route 3 Parcel No. 12329-43-00020, -00050, -00060 Mason County, Washington August 11, 2021 Project#21155 Prepared For: Mitchell Holdings LLC 1017 Shore Drive Bremerton, Washington 98310 Prepared By: Envirotech Engineering PO Box 984 -.Belfair, Washington 98528 Phone: 360-275-9374 y CLYD c`��04\A SH/fin sl>�ti ? 43045` c, 8/11/21 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................................... 1 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS....................................................................................................................... 1 OFFSITE DRAINAGE TO THE PROPERTY PRIMARILY ORIGINATES FROM THE NORTH,EAST,AND WEST. EROSION WAS NOT OBSERVEDON THE PROPERTY....................................................................................... 1 ADJACENTAREAS......................................................................................................................................2 CRITICALAREAS........................................................................................................................................2 SOILS..........................................................................................................................................................2 EROSION PROBLEM AREAS.........................................................................................................................3 CONSTRUCTION PHASING...........................................................................................................................3 CONSTRUCTIONSCHEDULE........................................................................................................................3 2.0 SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION SWPPP ITEMS.................................................................................4 2.1 ELEMENT 1-PRESERVE VEGETATION/MARK CLEARING LIMITS........................................................4 2.2 ELEMENT 2-ESTABLISH CONSTRUCTION ACCESS...............................................................................4 2.3 ELEMENT 3-CONTROL FLOW RATES..................................................................................................4 2.4 ELEMENT 4-INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROLS.......................................................................................4 2.5 ELEMENT 5-STABILIZE SOILS.............................................................................................................5 2.6 ELEMENT 6-PROTECT SLOPES............................................................................................................5 2.7 ELEMENT 7-PROTECT DRAIN INLETS..................................................................................................5 2.8 ELEMENT 8-STABILIZE CHANNELS AND OUTLETS..............................................................................5 2.9 ELEMENT 9-CONTROL POLLUTANTS..................................................................................................5 2.10 ELEMENT 10-CONTROL DEWATERING..............................................................................................6 2.11 ELEMENT 11-MAINTAIN BMP'5.......................................................................................................6 2.12 ELEMENT 12-MANAGE THE.PROJECT...............................................................................................7 2.13 ELEMENT 13-PROTECT LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT BMP'S..........................................................7 1.0.Introduction Envirotech Engineering (Envirotech) has completed this construction stormwater .pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) in conjunction'with the-stormwater management plan for Mitchell Holdings LLC, located at 23681 NE State Route 3 (Parcel 12329-43-00020, -00050, -00060) in Mason County,Washington. Best Management Practices (BMP's) selected for this project includes a stabilized construction entrance and silt,fencing. It is our opinion that these selected BMP's adequate for preventing significant construction stormwater pollution from leaving the project site,and meets the intent of the Stormwater Manual. The following 13 items have been .addressed per the prevailing Stormwater Manual. Project Description Information pertaining to the development of this project was provided by the.proponent of the property. The proposed development includes a 4 warehouse structures, paved driveways and parking,and associated stormwater management facilities. It is anticipated that the access road/ driveways will encompass approximately 41029 sf in size, and the structures 14400 sq. ft, for a total proposed impervious surface area of 55429 sq. ft. the total proposed impervious surface area. The total land area that is.anticipated to be disturbed as a result of past clearing is approximately 1.27 acres. Cut and fill quantities were approximated to be 100 cubic yards (cy) and 100 cy, respectively. See the accompanying stormwater management plans for an illustration of current and proposed site features. Existing Site Conditions The property is accessed from NE State Route 3, and NE Belfair Street, both existing paved roadways in unincorporated.Mason County. The Project is currently developed, with clearing on- site. Vegetation is typical of the Pacific Northwest. NE State Route 3 runs .in an east west direction to the south of the property, and NE Belfair street runs in an east west direction to the north of the property.Beyond the property,mixed use development exists Descending slopes are mild within 300 of the planned development. Average slope grades are approximately 3%with a vertical relief of approximately 15 feet from the northern property line. Offsite drainage to the property primarily originates from.the north, east, and west. Erosion was not observed on the property. Envirotech Engineering SWPPP PO Box 994 page 1 _ Parcel 12329-43-00020,-00050,-00060 Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington Ph. 360-275-9374 'August 11,2021 Adjacent Areas The upslope watershed is relatively small,and has low to slightly sloping grades. Stormwater entering the site appears to be negligible. The natural drainage from the site appears to be directed to a wetland located directly to the south end of the property.Water from wetland travels approximately 1000 feet to Hood Canal. Critical Areas Other than the aforementioned moderate slopes located on the property, critical areas also include streams and wetllands. Soils Information on infiltration rates and soil conditions pertaining to the Project was accomplished by Envirotech. Selected information pertaining to the drainage aspect of the project is provided below. The following subsurface conditions are estimated descriptions of the Project subgrade utilizing information from the depth of penetration at all testing, sampling, observed and investigated locations. Soils for this project were described utilizing the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Using the USCS in conjunction with estimated relative densities and other anticipated engineering properties of the soil, susceptibility for potential landslides, erosion and seismic hazards may be assessed. Soils within the upper 3 feet of natural ground were observed to be moist, brown silts (ML). These soils were medium dense with low plasticity. According to the "Soil Survey of Mason County," by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, the site soils are described as Saxon Silt Loam, (Sa),with 5%- 15% slopes. --According-to-the-USDA—T-oxtural-Classification-System;the site soils area silt loam. Based on the fines content, erodibility of the site soils is considered to be medium. Based on the fines content and fraction of clay within the fines content, settleability of the site soils is expected to be fast. Permeability is expected to be moderate for this site due significance of moderate density, and fine-grained soils. From the water well report(s) and knowledge of the general area, permanent groundwater is at least 10 feet directly below the property at the building pad location. Envirotech Engineering SWPPP PO Box 984 page 2 Parcel 12329-43-00020,-00050,-00060 Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington Ph. 360-275-9374 August 11,2021 Erosion Problem Areas There are no identified or mapped erosion hazard areas for this property. The soil characteristics provide a low to moderate erodibility factor. Construction Phasing Construction phasing for this project is not expected.Upon finishing the access roads, developing. single family residences will be considered future projects. Construction Schedule Construction of the project may occur as early as September 2021.Wet season erosion control is not likely required for this project. However, wet season: construction constraints are not necessary for critical areas. Financial/Ownership Responsibilities If required by the approving agency, the property owner responsible for the initiation of bonds and/ or other financial securities for liability associated with erosion and sedimentation impacts is: Mitchell Holdings 1017 Shore Drive Bremerton,Washington 98310 (360)275-2090 Engineering Calculations Standard sediment ponds and traps were not utilized for this project.However, sedimentation due to construction runoff is anticipated to be retained on site. Significant diversions and waterways were not utilized for this project. The drainage report consists of calculations for 100yr-24hr and 6mo-24hr storm events. Runoff was shown to be contained on-site due to a 100yr-24hr event. Consequently, stormwater accumulated from a 2yr-24hr temporary erosion storm event will be easily accommodated. Envirotech Engineering SWPPP PO Box 984 page 3 Parcel 12329-43-00020,-00050,-00060 Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington Ph. 360-275-9374 August 11,2021 2.0 Specific Construction SWPPP Items The following 13 items have been addressed per the prevailing Stormwater Manual. 2.1 Element 1-Preserve Vegetation/Mark Clearing Limits Before beginning land disturbing activities, including clearing and grading, clearing limits, sensitive areas and their buffers shall be clearly delineated on-site. This includes delineating trees that are to be preserved within the construction area. Construction activities are not permitted beyond the designated clearing limits without prior approval. Retain the duff layer, native top soil, and natural vegetation in an undisturbed state to the maximum degree practicable. 2.2 Element 2-Establish Construction Access Construction access is designated as the ingress/ egress connecting to NE Belfair Street. One construction access is allowed for this project. Stabilize the construction access with rock per the stormwater plans in order to minimize tracking of sediments off-site.If the stabilized construction entrance proves ineffective,locate wheel wash or tire baths on-site.If sediment is tracked off-site, clean the affected roadway thoroughly at.the end of each day,.and more.frequent as necessary. Remove sediments by any means necessary, and transport the sediment to a controlled sediment disposal area. After sediment removal, conduct street washing, and control wash water by pumping back on-site, or otherwise prevent it from discharging into systems tributary to waters of the State. 2.3 Element 3-Control Flow Rates At all times, flow rates shall be controlled for this project. Natural drainage patterns shall be protected as much as possible during construction, and concentrated flow should not be permitted, unless directed to an engineered drainage facility. Protect downstream waterways and properties from associated discharge of turbid waters. 2.4 Element 4-Install Sediment Controls Sediment discharges from the project site must be minimized. Sediment controls deemed adequate for this project is temporary silt fencing, and shall be located downslope from all disturbed areas. If sediment control is not working as intended, additional controls such as sediment traps, hay bales,filters,or other standard controls will be necessary. Envirotech Engineering SWPPP PO Box 984 page 4 Parcel 12329-43-00020,-00050,-00060 . Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington Ph. 360-275-9374 August 11,2021 2.5 Element 5-Stabilize Soils Soil -stabilization is not necessary for this project. Temporary seeding and permanent soil stabilization requirements are provided in the erosion control section of the design drawings, Always minimize the area of exposed soils during construction, including disturbance on steep slopes. In addition, soil compaction should be minimized, and topsoil preserved as much as possible. Soils shall not remain exposed and unworked for more than 7 days during the dry season (May 1 —September 30),and more than 2 days during the wet season(October 1—April 30). 2.6 Element 6-Protect Slopes Slope protection is not required for this project. 2.7 Element 7-Protect Drain Inlets There are no existing drain inlets close to the project that would be influenced by the construction.Newly installed catch basins and other inlets, shall be protected from runoff siltation via silt.fence,inlet barriers,inserts, or other appropriate means. Clean or remove and replace inlet .protection devices when sediment has filled one-third of the available storage (unless a different standard is specified by the product manufacturer). 2.8 Element 8-Stabilize Channels and Outlets There are no Channels of Outlets planned for this project. 2.9 Element 9-Control Pollutants Pollution generated from construction must be controlled at all times. Control of pollutants other than sediments includes the following: • All pollutants other than sediments shall be handled and disposed of in a manner that does not cause contamination of stormwater. • Cover,.containment and protection from vandalism shall be provided for all chemicals, liquid products,petroleum products,and non-inert wastes present on the project site. • Maintenance and repair of heavy equipment and vehicles :involving .oil changes, hydraulic system drain down, solvent and de-greasing cleaning operations, fuel tank drain down and removal, and other activities which may result in discharge or spillage of pollutants to the ground or into stormwater runoff must be conducted using spill prevention measures, such as drip pans. Contaminated surfaces shall be cleaned immediately following Envirotech Engineering SWPPP PO Box 984 page 5 Parcel 12329-43-00020,-00050,-00060 Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington Ph. 360-275-9374 August 11,2021 any discharge or spill incident. Emergency repairs may be performed on-site using temporary plastic placed beneath and,if raining, over the vehicle. • Wheel wash or tire bath wastewater shall be discharged to a separate on-site treatment system or to the sanitary sewer,if available. • .Application of agricultural chemicals including fertilizers and pesticides shall be conducted in a manner, and at application rates that will not result in loss of chemical to stormwater runoff. Manufacturers' recommendations for application rates and procedures shall be followed. 2.10 Element 10=Control Dewatering Although dewatering will not be likely for this project, special provisions are required to be followed when dewatering. The outlet for dewatering shall be located in a position as to prevent sediments and pollution from leaving the site.This may be accomplished by pumping water into a sedimentation pond,or other standard control. 2.11 Element 11-Maintain BMP's All BMP's must be inspected and maintained in order to assure continued performance of their intended function. Remove all temporary erosion and sediment control BMP's within 30 days after achieving final site stabilization or after the temporary BMP's are. no longer needed. Inspection and maintenance for this project includes the following: Stabilized Construction Entrance The stabilized construction entrance shall be inspected at reasonable increments. Increased usage of the construction entrance warrants more frequent inspections. Additional rock shall be added periodically to maintain proper function of the pad. Silt Fence All silt fencing,if used,shall be inspected immediately after each rainfall and at least daily during prolonged rainfall.Any required repairs shall be made immediately. - —— — - —Permanent Ve etation Permanent vegetation shall initially be inspected regularly to insure establishment and healthy growth. Once established, vegetation may need to be periodically fertilized for continuous growth.Vegetation shall be re-established in areas,if necessary. While active construction is in process, all temporary erosion and sediment control facilities shall be inspected and immediately maintained if necessary per the requirements provided above. In the event that construction activities are discontinued for at least 4 consecutive.days, the owner shall be responsible for the inspection, and immediate maintenance if necessary, of all temporary Envirotech Engineering SWPPP PO Box 984 page 6 Parcel 12329-43-00020,-00050,-00060 Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington Ph. 360-275-9374. August 11,2021 erosion and sediment control facilities immediately after storm events, and at least once every 7 days. In addition to the aforementioned_ inspection and maintenance schedule, the owner shall install additional erosion and sediment control facilities if proposed erosion and sediment control measures prove to be inadequate. 2.12 Element 12-Manage the Project Inspection, maintenance, and financial liability of all temporary/ permanent erosion and sedimentation control facilities shall ultimately be the responsibility of the current_ property . owner. All construction facilities and BMP's shall be assured continued performance of their intended function. Since less than 1 acre is planned to be disturbed, a Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL) is not required. Currently, the designated manager for this project is: Mitchell Holdings 1017 Shore Drive Bremerton,Washington 98310 (360)275-2090 2.13 Element 13—Protect Low Impact Development BMP's Prevent compaction of vegetated flow paths delineated for this project, and other low impact development BMP's that may be associated with this project.This should be done by excluding construction equipment and foot traffic. Envirotech Engineering SWPPP PO Box 984 page 7 Parcel 12329-43-00020,-00050,-00060 Belfair,Washington 98528 Mason County,Washington Ph. 360-275-9374 August 11,2021 10/5/21,3:43 PM Calendar-Gbm@masoncountywa.gov Accept v ? Tentative v X Decline V (D Propose new time v Reply I v Charm v Categorize v 0 X Accepted on Tue 10/5/2021,3:41 PM Details HEX 10.13.21 When: Wed 10/13/2021 1:00p-.2:00p Where: https://us.02web.zoom.usfj/83491079490 Reminder Show as 15 minutes' Busy F—I Private' I Add an email reminder HEX Agenda 10.13.21A... v Staff Report EX1.doc EX2.pdf v EX3.pdf 24 KB 55 KB 2 MB 688 KB v Show all 7 attachments(14 MB) Download.all Mason County Community Dev is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Topic:HEX 10.13.21 Time:Oct 13,202101.00 PM Pacific Time(US and Canada) Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us//83491079490 Meetiri D)83191A�i�949Dt7 /r 6 6 qq Dial by your location +1 253 215 8782 US(Tacoma) +1 346 248 7799 US(Houston) +1 669 900 9128 US(San Jose) �Y +1 301 715 8592 US(Washington DC) +1 312 626 6799 US(Chicago) +1 646 558 8656 US(New York) J . https://owa.co.mason.wa.us/owa/#path=/calendar/view/Month 1/1 ]RESOURCE ORDINANCE VARUNCE CHECKLIST I Cava lely f Application received and logged: 11619-1 J Notice and HMP sent to WDFW and Tribe: Notice of application delivered to Journal: JNotice of application posted and mailed: J Notice of hearinndi ed to Journal: IlkNotice of hearinan mailed: Photos? ,, � SEPA?: NA Circulated on: _ Report to.HEX by: si I v4 ioff J HEX hearing date: (6 of Decision: 'Notice of Final Decision sent on: Appeal z , 1 u Notes & Comments: -� M . C:\Documents and Settings\gbm\Local Settings\Temp\RESOURCE ORDINANCE VARIANCE CHECKLIST.doc.ram l'f -I w1r, fwl;d SIV flop'` dAJ ID//Z1 Z� GU�ia!e COYQ �U WAC 197,11-800: Categorical exemptions. Page 1 of lu Categ:oiieal�exempfiiorms The proposed actions contained in Part Nine are categorically exempt from threshold determination and EIS requirements, subject to the rules and limitations on categorical exemptions contained in WAC 197-11-305. Note: The.statutory exemptions contained in chapter 43.21 C RCW are not included in Part Nine. Chapter 43.21C RCW should be reviewed in determining whether a proposed action not listed as categorically exempt in Part Nine is exempt by statute from threshold determination and EIS requirements. �( ),;MinDr _zconstruction -Flexible thresholds. (a) The exemptions in this subsection apply to all licenses required to undertake the construction in question. To be exempt under this subsection, the project must be equal to or smaller than the exempt level. For a specific proposal,.the exempt level in (b) of this subsection shall control, unless the city/county in which the project is located establishes an exempt level under(c) of this subsection. If the proposal is located in more than one city/county, the lower of the agencies' adopted levels shall control, regardless of which agency is the lead agency. The exemptions in this subsection apply except when the project: (i) Is undertaken wholly or partly on lands covered by water; (ii) Requires.a license governing discharges to water that is not exempt under RCW 43.21 C.0383; (iii) Requires a license governing emissions to air that is not exempt under RCW I 43.21 C.0381 or WAC 197-11-800 (7) or(8); or (iv) Requires a land use decision that is not exempt under WAC 197-11-800(6). (b) The following types..of construction shall be exempt: (i) The construction or location of four detached single family residential units. (ii) The construction or location of four multifamily residential units. (iii) The construction of a barn, loafing shed, farm equipment storage building, produce storage or packing structure, or similar agricultural structure, covering 10,000 square feet, and to be used only by the property owner or his or her agent in the conduct of farming the _ property. This exemption shall not apply to feed lots. (iu) The construction of an office, school, corn_ ercia , recreational, service or,storage building with 4,000 square feet of gross floor area, and with associated parking facilities designed for twenty automobiles. This exemption includes parking lots for twenty or fewer automobiles not associated with a structure. Any fill or excavation of 100 cubic yards throughout the total lifetime of the fill or e c do and n - oxrauafisn -fll,orgradgecessar��for=ateempt project-ire -i), �i- i. ,,or o etion shalinb"xerrrpt7 (c) Cities, towns or counties may raise'the exempt levels up to the maximum specified in (d) of this subsection by implementing ordinance or resolution. Such levels shall be specified in the agency's SEPA procedures (WAC 197-11-904). Separate maximum optional thresholds are established in (d) of this subsection applying to both incorporated areas and -unincorporated urban growth areas in fully planning jurisdictions under RCW 36.70A.040; other unincorporated areas in fully planning counties; and jurisdictions in all other counties. Agencies may adopt the maximum level or a level between the minimum and maximum level. 4/21/2017 http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=197-11-800 Name and Return Address: TITLE NOTIFICATION OF HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN Legal Description: Parcel Number: Permit(s)#: HMP Approved By: Planner Name Signature NOTICE: The property was the subject of a development proposal within a critical area or its buffer. This property is subject to conditions, mitigation, and/or conservation measures as contained within the Habitat Management Plan/Wetland Mitigation Plan submitted to the Mason County Department of Community Development and subject to the conditions for the permit(s) noted above. Restrictions on the use or alteration of the property may exist due to these conditions, which are to remain in perpetuity. A copy of the Habitat Management Plan/Wetland Mitigation Plan has been placed in the County parcel record file located at the Permit Assistance Center, Building Vill, 615 W. Alder Street, Shelton, WA, 98584. Grantor(s): Last(print) First MI Last(print) First MI Signature(s): Grantee: PUBLIC State of WASH NGTON ) I,the undersigned Notary Public,in and for the juris- )Ss. diction aforesaid,do hereby certify that County of ) whose name(s)is(are)signed to the foregoing (SEAL): instrument,appeared before me and personally acknowledged the same. GIVEN under my hand and seal this day of ,20_ My commission expires: PUBLIC-NOTICE ����,v�® Notice of Application and Public Hear- Wing Notice is hereby given that James Mitchell,who is the applicant for the follow- SEP 2 3 2021 ' G ing proposal, has filed-an application-for a Resource Ordinance Variance (VAR2021 1 -000021.The proposal is for the expansion 615 , Alder Street of Mitchell Lumber Company north`onto ad- -3 jacent property, including an access road from 23681 NE ST RT 3-to-81 NE Belfafr. ST and constructing warehouse space.The access road will be located within approxi- mately 1463 square feet of,the buffer of a Type"F"stream.The impact to the stream- buffer will be mitigated for by the applicant as'-proposed within their'HMP. The appli- cant has also applied for an administrative review of a Mason. Environmental'Permit IMEP2021-00009) for the proposed work within the Wetland-buffer. Location:81 NE Belfair,ST, Belfair, WA 98528 Parcel Num- bers: 12329-43-00060 Date 'of complete Application: July 28, 2021 The proposed- development is reviewed under the appli- cable chapters of the Resource Ordinance - and Title 15.The proposal requires Mason County Hearing Examiner approval.Project is SEPA exempt'per WAC 197-11'-800(1) " Ovj & (v): Any person.desiring to-express their view or to be notified of the action taken on the application should either join the virtual Public. Hearing via Zoom on Wednesday October 13,-2021 at 1:00p.m. 9 or mail comments or questions-to Grace .Miller, Planner, Mason County Department of Community Services, 615 W.Alder St., -Shelton,WA 98584 Or Email at gbm@ma= son couritywa .gov prior to the hearing .A. ' i PUBUC°HEARING will be held on Wednes= day October_13, 2021 at 1:60 p.m. by the Mason County'Hearing Examiner on the proposed_project via Zoom. Directions on t. hdW''to access,the hearing will be'located on.the 'Mason County website at,'httpsJ/ www co ason.wa us/ hearings-examiner/ index:php--under the appropriately dated_ agenda, or you can call the Hearing Ex- aminer'Clerk at 360.427:9670 ext. 365 for assistance. Written and oral testimony will, be'accepted-up to'the close of the hearing. A-decision on the'application'will be-made; within 120 days of the,date of the complete application.: 3165 September 23 1 t ��__� IJJ, U-1 9121/21,9:33 AM Mail-_Gbm@masoncountywa.gov FW: Legal Notice Mariah Frazier Mon 9/20/2021 2:25 PM. To:Grace Miller <Gbm@masoncountywa.gov>; Mariah Frazier Mason County Community Development Clerical/Addressing/Public Records. (360)427-9670 x365 NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: Mason County has migrated to anew domain as of August 21 2021. PLEASE ADD/UPDATE your records and address book with my new email address—mfrazier@masoncountywa.gov -----Original Message----- From: Shelton-Mason County Journal <jlegals@masoncounty.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 12:46.PM To: Mariah Frazier <MFrazier@masoncountywa.gov>;andy@mitchelllumberco.com Subject: Re: Legal Notice The legal number is 3165 and the total is $255. It reads: PUBLIC NOTICE Notice of Application and Public Hearing Notice is hereby.given that James Mitchell,who is the applicant for the following proposal, has filed an application for a Resource Ordinance Variance (VAR2021 -000021.The proposal is for the expansion of Mitchell Lumber Company north onto adjacent property, including an access road from 23681 NE ST RT 3 to 81 NE Belfair ST and constructing warehouse space.The access road will be located within approximately 1463 square feet of the buffer of a Type "F" stream.The impact to the stream buffer will be mitigated for by the applicant as proposed within their HMP The applicant has also applied for an administrative review of a Mason Environmental Permit(MEP2021-00009}for the proposed work within the Wetland buffer. Location: 81 NE Belfair ST, Belfair, WA 98528 Parcel Numbers:12329-43-00060 Date of complete Application:July 28,2021 The proposed development is reviewed under the applicable chapters of the Resource Ordinance and Title 15.The. proposal requires Mason County Hearing Examiner approval. Project is SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11-800(1)(iv) &(v}.Any person desiring to express their view or to be notified of the action taken on the application should either join the virtual Public Hearing via Zoom on Wednesday October 13, 2021 at 1:00p.m. or mail comments or questions to Grace Miller, Planner, Mason County. Department of Community Services, 615 W.Alder St., Shelton, WA 98584 Or Email at gbm@mason countywa .gov'prior to the hearing .A PUBLIC HEARING will be held on Wednesday October 13, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. by the Mason County Hearing Examiner on the proposed project via Zoom. Directions on how to access the hearing will be located on the Mason County website at https://www.co.mason.wa us/hearings-examiner/index.php under the appropriately dated agenda, or you can call the Hearing Examiner Clerk at 360.427.9670 ext. 365 for assistance.Written and oral testimony will be accepted up to the close of the hearing. A decision on the application will be made within 120 days of the date of the.complete application. 3165 September 23 1t Your legal number is your confirmation that we have received your public notice information.The total due for the run dates) scheduled is also noted. Above may appear a proof of your notice. If we do not hear from you by the deadline,we will assume it is correct. Deadline for public notices is each Monday by.5pm (or previous Friday when there is a holiday the following week). Publication is each htips://owa.co.mason.wa.us/owa/#path=/mail 1/3 9/21/21,9:33 AM Mail-Gbm@masoncountywa.gov Thursday. Payment prior to publication may be required.Credit card transactions in excess of$500 may be subject to a 3% convenience/processing fee. One (1) signed, notarized affidavit will be mailed to the purchaser within 5 business days of the final day of.publication;additional or replacement copies are charged $30 each. Please note:each public notice("legal') is processed in the order received. Identical public notices that are re-sent are subject to being run and billed an additional time; please do not re-attach your original public .notice in any future correspondence relating to it except upon our request. For quality control, limit to 1 (one) public notice, in Word format per email. If sent in more than one attachment, please confirm with clear instructions. Thank you, Legals Department Shelton-Mason County Journal PO Box 430, Shelton, WA 98584 360-426-4412 legais@masoncounty.com Est. 1886 •The adjudicated newspaper of record for Mason County. > On Sep 20, 2021, at 11:38 AM, Mariah Frazier <M Frazier@ masoncou ritywa.gov> wrote: > > Please publish the attached one (1)time: > Thursday, September 23, 2021 > Per the attached signed Publication Cost Agreement, please bill: > James Mitchell > PO.Box 310 > Belfair,WA 98528 > Mariah Frazier > Mason County Community Development > Clerical/Addressing/Public Records > (360)427-9670 x365 > NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: > Mason County has migrated to a new domain as of August 2,2021. > PLEASE ADD/UPDATE your records and address book with my new.email address—mfrazier@masoncountywa.gov https://owa.co.mason.wa.us/owa/#path=/mail 2/3 MASON COUNTY (360) 427-9670 Shelton ext.352 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (360) 275-4467 Belfair ext. 352 " BUILDING o PLANNING-.FIRE MARSHAL (360)482-5269 Elma ext.352 . —_- Mason County Bldg. 8, y`-I .rx ; ' 615 W.Alder Street Shelton,WA 98584 WWW.co.mason.Wa.us TO: MASON COUNTY JOURNAL FROM: MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: % Please publish the attached on the following day(s) �a -, ke �D�! Please keep the Affidavit of Publication for the Department of Community Development to pick up from your office and send _�copies to the following: T S9 Please charge: :5ra� a4 !& for the publication at: ,, Thank you, Mason County Planning Staff Publication Cost Agreement Publication cost is the responsibility of the applicant. Final permit processing will not occur until advertising fees have been paid to the newspaper by the applicant. The Shelton-Mason County Journal will bill the applicant directly. I/WE understand that I/WE must sign and date the attached acknowledgment indicating and that I/ WE understand that is MY / OUR responsibility. I / WE must submit the signed page as part of application in order for it to be considered as complete. Signature of Property Owner Date Print Name OR eel V.zk Tames /4,'-khk 11 Si a re of Applicant Date Print Name Rev. Feb 2019 Page 3 of 4 MASON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES Building,Planning,Environmental Health,Community Health Notice of Application and Public Hearing .. . Notice is hereby given that James Mitchell,who is the applicant for the following proposal, has filed an application for a Resource Ordinance Variance (VAR2021-00002).The proposal is for.the expansion of Mitchell Lumber Company north onto adjacent property, including an access road from 23681 NE ST RT 3 to 81 NE Belfair ST and constructing warehouse space.The access road will be located within approximately,1463 square feet of the buffer of a Type"F" stream.The impact to the stream buffer will be mitigated;for by the applicant as proposed within their HMP.. The applicant has also applied for an administrative review of a Mason Environmental Permit(MEP2021-00009)for the proposed work within the Wetland buffer. Location: .81.NE Belfair ST,Belfair,WA 98528 Parcel Numbers:12329-43-00060 Date of complete Application:July 28,2021. The proposed development is reviewed under the applicable chapters of the Resource Ordinance and Title 15.The proposal requires Mason County Hearing Examiner approval. Project is SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11-800(1)(iv) & (v). Any person desiring to express their view or to be notified of the action taken on the application should either join the virtual Public Hearing via Zoom on Wednesday October 13,2021 at 1:00p.m.or mail comments or questions to Grace Miller,,Planner, Mason County Department of Community Services;. 615 W.Alder St.,-Shelton,WA 98584 Or Email at gbm@masoncountywa.gov prior to the hearing... A PUBLIC HEARING will be held on Wednesday October 13,2021 at 1:06 p.m. by the Mason County Hearing Examiner on the proposed project via Zoom. Directions on how to access the hearing will be located on the Mason County website at https://www.co.mason.wa."us/hearings-examiner/index.php under the.appropriately dated agenda,or you can call the Hearing Examiner Clerk at 360.427.9670 ext. 365 for assistance.Written and oral testimony will be accepted up to the close of the hearing. A decision on the application will be made within 120 days of the date of the complete application. 9/16/21, 1:51 PM Mail-Gbm@masoncountywa.gov HMP Review for VAR2021-00002 Mariah Frazier Thu 9/16/2021 1.44 PM To:jsammons@skokomish.org <jsammons@skokomish.org>;dsarff@skokomish.org <dsarff@skokomish.org>;allison.cook@dfw.wa.gov <allison.cookCc dfw.wa.gov>; cc:Grace Miller<Gbm@masoncountywa.gov>;andy@mitchelllumberco.com <andy@mitchelllumberco.com>; 1 attachments(12 MB) VAR2021-00002.pdf; Happy Friday Eve, Please see attached documents regarding VAR2021-00002 Proponent: Mitchell Lumber Parcel: 12329-43-00060 If you have any questions, please direct them to Planner Grace Miller at gbm@masoncountywa.gov. Thank you, N(GwtaJV Fra,3� Mason County Community Development Clerical/Addressing/Public Records (360)427-9670 x365 NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: Mason County has migrated to a new domain as of August 2,2021. PLEASE ADD/UPDATE your records and address book with my new email address-mfrazier@masoncountywa.ggv https://owa.co.mason.wa.us/owa/#path=/mail 1/1 MASON COUNTY DCD SEPA Contact List �`sy `' $e tAW4 V : Q- to (check all that apply) on WIgly _: Skokomish Tribal Nation,Nat.Res.Dept. WA Department of Commerce , _UT N:Juliap Sammons reviewtearri@commerce.wa.gov 541 Tribal Center,Rd.,Skokomish Nation,98584 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers jsammons@skokomss" g SEPA Reviewer-Samantha Stanford -�dsarff@skodT9mioshorg. PO Box C-3755,Seattle,98124 �Skokomish'Tfi6aa—Mistoric Preservation Officer Samantha.M.Stanford@usace.army.mil ATTN:Kris Miller WA Dept:of Fish and Wiidlife 80 N Tribal Center Rd,Skokomish Nation,98584 SEPAdesk(0dfw.wa.gov sh!anayl@skokomish.org WA Dept.of Fish and Wildlife Quinault Indian Nation ATTN: Chris Waldbillig ATTN: Mark Mobbs - 450 Port Orchard Blvd,Suite 290 PO Box 189,Tahpla,98587 Port Orchard,WA 98366 mmbbb8@quineult.org Chris waldbillig@dfw wa gov� Squaxin Tribal Nation,Natural Res.Dept. iWAdDept.ofFrs�h andd Wildlifer$ z 2952 SE Old Olympic HWY,Shelton 98584 ATfN'! ,611%teinweg jdickison@squaxin.us �Habltat 131010g,st'! •I emarbet@squaxin.us _noll stemweg@dfw�wa gov�t_ _ e__i ' szaniewski@squaxin.us WA Dept.of Fish and Wildlife sdinubilo@squaxin.us ATTN: Darrin Masters The Confederated Tribe of the Chehalis 450 Port Orchard Blvd,Suite 290 ATTN:SEPA Reviewer=Glen Cbnne_lly Port Orchard,WA 98366 420 Hbwanut Rd.,Oakville;98568 Darrin.Masters@dfw.wa.gov gconnelly@chehalistribe.org pFish'a WA DNR,South Puget Sound Region r y All san'o k' 950 Farman Avenue N,Enumclaw,98022-9282 I( aItaBiolog���S`Puget%Sounds athed)j 4+ southpuget.region@dnr.wa.gov 1�,1x1WashlgtonStSE,OlympiaiW/A;+9850�1 , VITA DNR,Aquatic Resources Allison:cook@dfwcwagov"t;,:_ a PO BOX 47027,Olympia,98504=7027 arcl@dnr.wa.go'v. Q WA Dept,of Fish and Wildlife WA DNR,SEPA Center ATTN: Adam Brown ATTN:External Coordinator Habitat Biologist PO BOX 47015,Olympia,98504-7015 450 Port Orchard Blvd,Suite 290 sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov adam.brown@dfw.wa.gov Olympic Reg!6h Clean[Air Agency ATTN;Lauren Whybrew O F AED�,pe t o#T n"po atloni 2940-B Limited Ln NV1I,Olympia.98502 A,i)N Dale Severson i lauren.wby. @brcaa:org O1 Bo r474 0;, 10 ymup a 9i 95047„44UI Mason County Transit bRpSEPA;R1/1k-11V@wsdotwa goy;'% s ��_ :; ATTN:Danette Brannin City of Shelton 790 E Johns Prairie Rd,Shelton,98584 ATTN:Jason Dose dbrannin@masontransit.org 525 West Cote St.,Shelton 98584 Mason County PUD#1 jasond@ci.shelton.wa.us _ ATTN:Darin Hall 0Fort`oflSrrefton N 2197I Hwy,101 i Shelton,98584 ATfN Brando Palmer� darinh(greason-pud1.:org 21West'Sanderso iWayShe`Iton'98584) Q Mason County PUD#3 �HtandonP@poriofshelton com7 _ z__,_ ATTN:Kristin French Dep't of Archaeology&Historic Preservation kristin.french@masonpud3.org P.O.Box 48343,Olympia,98504-8343 0 WA•Deparfinent of;Ecology. SEPA.@W. 1dahp.wa.gov ErivironmerltahRevtewSection: 0 eTa"oe ma PyblravUtilities RG Pr p vlces�e ty1Ser , P.O BOX 47703,Olympia,98504-7703 �AT N�D Lehl n separegister@eiiy:wa:gov 3628 S35thSt,Tacoma; 9 9 31.92c . . WA Department of Health Mason Cty P.W.ATTN: ATTN:Joe Laxson joe.laxson@doh.wa.gov 0 Mason Cty E.H.ATTN: 1 , Other:/ 0 Mason Cty Bldg ATTN: Agent�C� n_School District: Q�+ U Applicant: -- �- ) � y MC DCD last updated on 3/17/20 ( �6� a�fMI�C�C,���t�o►�Ie�Co,� C O r