Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
DDR2013-00016 Hearing - DDR Letters / Memos - 6/20/2013
Mason County Department of Planning Building I * 411 N. 5th Street * P.O. Box 279 Shelton, Washington 98584 * (360) 427-9670 June 20, 2013 Notice of Decision Case: DDR2013-00016 Applicant: Iglesia Asamblea de Dios Agua Viva International. Notice is hereby given that Iglesia Asamblea de Dios Agua Viva International, who is the applicant for the above-referenced Mason County Special Use Permit, has been granted approval of that Special Use Permit. The request was reviewed on May 14, 2013 by the Mason County Hearing Examiner, with additional period for requested information, and approved with eight conditions, pursuant to the Mason County Title 17.05.044 Special Use Permit review criteria, specifically to construct a building exceeding 3,000 sq. ft. area on parcels in the Rural Residential 5 zone at 2 miles west of the Belfair Urban Growth Area. The proposal was reviewed through SEPA review per WAC 197-11-800 (1). This is a final County decision. No further appeals to the County are available. Appeal of this decision may be made to Superior Court or the appropriate administrative agency as regulations apply. It is the appellant's responsibility to meet all legal requirements of any appeal process. Time Limit for Action. Per the Mason County Code Title 15 - Development Code - No permit authorizing construction shall extend for a term of more than five years. If actual construction of a development for which a permit has been granted has not begun within two years after the approval, the Hearing Examiner shall review the permit and upon a showing of good cause, may extend the initial two year period by permit for one year. Otherwise, the permit terminates; PROVIDED that no permit shall be extended unless the applicant has requested such review and extension before the Hearing Examiner PRIOR to the expiration date. Work on approved project must begin by June 2015. This permit expires June 20, 2018. If you have questions or require clarification on these issues,please contact Allan Borden,Senior Planner with Mason County Dept. of Community Development at 360-427-9670 x365 I BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR MASON COUNTY 2 Phil Olbrechts,Hearing Examiner 3 4 RE: Iglesia Asamblea de Dios FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS Agua Viva International OF LAW AND FINAL DECISION 6 Special Use Permit #DDR2013-00016 7 8 INTRODUCTION 9 The applicant requests a special use permit to construct an'8,000 square foot church 10 on a 4.16 acre vacant parcel located at the intersection of SR 300 and Gladwin Road near Belfair, Washington. The application is approved subject to conditions. 11 12 ORAL TESTIMONY 13 Staff Testimony 14 Allan Borden, Mason County senior planner, testified that the proposal is for a new 15 church with 6,000sq ft. footprint. The parcel is 4.61 acres. The current access to the property is on the east end. SR 300 runs along the north of the property. The 16 properties to the north and west are residential and are part of the Lynch Cove Subdivision. The shoreline is to the south of Gladwin Road along Bradley Road 17 (seen in exhibit 5). The zoning is rural residential five which permits the building of 18 churches. SEPA review was triggered primarily due to the proposed parking area because the size of the building is less than the 12,000sq ft. threshold that requires 19 SEPA review. The SEPA conditions focused on erosion control and stormwater treatment. In addition to the special use permit, the church would have to apply for a 20 building permit and submit a stormwater site plan. A notice of application was submitted to the newspaper in the beginning of April, and public notices were posted. 21 Several comment letters were received, and these were included in the staff report. 22 The congregation will consist of approximately 150 people. The property will need to add a septic system because it is not served by a sewer line. Exhibit 3 includes a 23 letter from a water utility provider who has offered to serve the site. In regard to accesses, if the access is placed on Gladwin Beach Road it will be maintained by the 24 county, but if the access is placed on SR 300 it will be handled by the Department of Transportation. Currently, the proposal is for one access off of Gladwin Beach Road. 25 The staff report details how the proposal meets conditions for a special use permit. Staff found that there will be some impacts from this proposal, but these impacts are not significant. There are no hazardous conditions from this land use, and there are adequate public facilities. The site is currently vacant and undeveloped so the nature SUP P. 1 Findings, Conclusions and Decision of the property will change with the building of the church; however, this change is I not detrimental to the surrounding areas. Title 15 review criteria are met by the 2 proposal. Transportation levels will not be changed beyond the acceptable standards. Staff recommends approval with four conditions: (1) water main extension 3 agreement and connection with Lynch Cove system should be completed; (2) site plan should include vegetation and fencing to screen the church from neighboring 4 properties, (3) adequate parking to meet county standards, and (4) a stormwater plan completed. Some of the public concerns include the change of character of the rural 5 residential zone and wetland damage. Public comments suggested there is a stream 6 on the property; however, according to Mr. Borden, there are no surface water features. There may be winter saturation on the site. Other public comments are in 7 regard to traffic concerns. 8 In answer to hearing examiner question,Mr. Borden noted that there is not a left turn lane from SR 300 to North Gladwin Road. The Washington State Department of 9 Transportation ("WSDOT") was notified of the project during SEPA review. 10 WSDOT made no comments. Public Works received a copy of the proposal and also did not make any comments. Gladwin is not an arterial road. There is no on-street 11 parking along Gladwin Road. The Lynch Cove Subdivision does not have street parking due to narrow streets. The building will be at least 30ft from the property 12 line. The vegetation and parking lot will be reviewed as a commercial use. The county will ask for at least 5ft of vegetative screening during the building permit 13 process. Mason County uses the 2005 Washington State Department of Ecology 14 ("DOE") Stormwater Manual,which prohibits any increase in stormwater production. Staff is unaware of any critical areas on site. There are slopes along the northeast 15 portion of Gladwin Road. Staff assesses critical areas by reviewing the critical areas map. 16 17 Applicant Testimony 18 Richard Moore, a representative of the applicant, stated that the zoning regulations allow a church to be built at the site without special permits; however, the special use 19 permit is to allow a larger church. The church services occur on Sunday and Tuesday evenings from 6-8pm which is a low traffic time. Both time frames are past rush 20 hour. In regard to visibility,the building will be 300ft from Gladwin Road. In regard 21 to noise, this church culture (Guatemalan) is not a noisy one. In regard to distance from homes, the nearest home to the church is over 250ft. The homes to the 22 northwest, along the shoreline, are the closest homes to the church. In regard to landscaping,the church plans to retain as many trees and other vegetation as possible. 23 In regard to a daycare, the Guatemalan culture does not use churches as daycares. There is not a lawn area planned for the site. The services include worship and then a 24 shared meal, thus the need for the enlarged church building. Some vegetation will be 25 cleared to build the detention pond; however, the area is already very clear and composed mainly of brush. Most of the area is covered in sugar sand which collects water. No water will leave the site, and the retention pond will be engineered for a 500-year storm. In regard to parking overflow, the church will use five large vans for SUP p.2 Findings, Conclusions and Decision carpooling. They also have access to an acre of land in Belfair for overflow parking. I The church searched for three years within the Belfair urban community, but was 2 unable to find a suitable location. In regard to the access off of SR 300, the retention pond would not have to be moved to accommodate it. The entrance from SR 300 3 would be to the west of the church building. In regard to using the Lynch Cove Community Park, the church members do not plan to use the surrounding area 4 amenities. In regard to wetlands, there are wetlands 200ft away, on the other side of 5 the road from the planned building. 6 Public Testimony 7 Leslie Kabelac testified that she is speaking on behalf of the Lynch Cove Community Club. She is concerned with the traffic pattern. The churchgoers are likely to begin 8 making loops around the Lynch Cove neighborhood to reach SR 300 via Loma Lee Road and avoid traffic. This will lead them to the Lynch Cove Community Park and 9 disrupt the quiet of the neighborhood. She does not believe there is a solution to the 10 traffic problem. The private park belongs to the Lynch Cove Community, and the owners do not want it used by the church members. The property has a stream on it 11 which is part of the Shoreline Master Plan. Lynch Cove community residents are also concerned that the retention pond is too close to their private water tank. Finally, she 12 believes the church will be used for more than just two services a week. 13 Ms. Wilson stated that the traffic situation is a major concern for the Lynch Cove 14 residents. Recently, a man was hit and killed on SRO 300. The intersection of Lorna Lee Road and SR 300 has many accidents. Traffic continues to increase every year 15 because of increased tourism. The churchgoers will utilize the property during the periods of the year when the weather is nice and will disrupt the surrounding 16 community. Many trees will be removed to build the church. Additionally, there are wetlands very close to the site. The Lynch Cove Community water runs through the 1 subject site. This area is not appropriate for this use. 18 Ken Van Buskirk testified that he has lived in Belfair for 50 years and co-manages 19 the Davis Farm. Previously, he served as a board member on the Great Peninsula Conservancy. He is a current member of the Mason County Planning Commission. 20 He is in contact with the Parrot property that abuts the subject site. He questioned 21 whether or not the property had been sold to the church already. He also asked if a traffic impact analysis or timber analysis had been done. Mason County is currently 22 going through a Shoreline Management Act update. His largest concern is with traffic. SR 300 is one of the shortest routes in the state because of Belfair State Park. 23 Traffic from the state park is very high on the weekends. The level of service on Gladwin Road is low (there are few/unclear road markings). The speed limit on SR 24 300 is 45mph, and the intersection with Gladwin Road is dangerous. 25 According to Mr. VanBuskirk, Mr. Parrot attempted to get a road vacation at the end of SR 300, but was unsuccessful. In regard to environmental concerns, the property is very steep with 120-150ft tall trees. There is a culvert under SR 300 at the western SUP p. 3 Findings, Conclusions and Decision portion of the subject property. This culvert could be a perennial stream. The Mason I County Planning Commission is in the process of updating the Shoreline Master 2 Program. The draft map (exhibit 15) places half of the subject property as a conservation designation. Therefore, the property will have to undergo a shoreline 3 permit to build the church. He recommends the hearing examiner visit the site to better understand the traffic and environmental impacts. Moreover, he recommended 4 postponing a decision until Mr. Parrot's comments (exhibit 13) are reviewed by county staff. Additionally, Mason County has struggled to meet conditions placed on 5 past special use permits, thus simply placing these conditions on decisions does not 6 ensure implementation. 7 Kama Peck commented that her main concern is the ingress and egress area to the site. The visibility at the planned access site is very bad because Gladwin Road 8 curves right before the turnout. If the access was placed farther down Gladwin Road there would be less chance of accidents. 9 10 Staff Rebuttal 11 Allan Borden noted that the property is more than 200ft from the shoreline. The sale of the property is pending. No traffic impact analysis has been completed. The 12 wetlands across the street are category 1 wetlands. Category 1 wetlands require 200ft buffers. The proposed project is on the opposite end of the property, thus the buffers 13 do not intercept with the special use proposal. The current designation is 14 conservancy. If the activities are not in the SMA, then there is no shoreline permit necessary. In regard to moving the road access on Gladwin Road, Public Works or 15 WSDOT would have to grant a road access permit. It is possible for the hearing examiner to require consultation with WSDOT in regard to road accesses. Mr. 16 Borden will review the vegetative buffer requirement to ensure it provides adequate 17 screening. 18 Applicant Rebuttal 19 Richard Moore said that, in regard to accessing the church from SR 300,there are 30- 40ft on Gladwin Road before the entrance road begins. Additionally,the church has a 20 110ft driveway before the parking area. There is no potential for traffic back-up. The 21 only other point that the access could be placed is in the far west end which would encourage churchgoers to utilize Lorna Lee Road. There will be no additional 22 stormwater leaving the property. In regard to the recent death on SR 300, the accident was alcohol-related and not a common occurrence. A phase 1 study was 23 completed on the property to determine the environmental factors. The setback for the retention pond will be a minimum of 30ft for the property. Mr. Moore works as a 24 general contractor. He is unaware of any culvert on the property. 25 EXHIBITS SUP p. 4 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Exhibits 1-11 identified in the "Case Index" of the May 1, 2013 staff report were 1 admitted during the May 14, 2013 hearing. In addition, the following exhibits were 2 admitted during and after the hearing: 3 Exhibit 12 Petition opposed to construction of church 4 Exhibit 13 Road vicinity map of the proposal 5 Exhibit 14 Letter dated May 10,2013 from Parrots 6 Exhibit 15 Map 7 Exhibit 16 5/17/13 email from staff with attachments responding to hearing comments g Exhibit 17 5/20/13 email from Gary Parrot 9 Exhibit 18 5/20/13 email from Ken VanBuskirk 10 Exhibit 19 6/3/13 email from Allan Borden with applicant reply attached(including WSDOT comments as part of reply) 11 12 FINDINGS OF FACT 13 Procedural: 14 1. Applicant. The applicant is Iglesia Asamblea de Dios Agua Viva 15 International. 16 2. Hearing. The Hearing Examiner conducted a hearing on the subject application on May 14, 2013 at 1:00 p.m., in the Mason County Commissioners 17 Meeting Chambers. The record was left open for a written staff analysis of comments 18 received from the Parrots, said analysis due May 17, 2013. Public response to the staff analysis was due May 21, 2013 and the applicant final 19 reply to all these comments was due May 23, 2013. The examiner noted during the May 14 hearing that the applicant could request more time for their final reply if 20 necessary. The applicant subsequently requested that the reply deadline be extended to June 4, 2013 and that request was granted. No untimely comments were admitted 21 into the record. The examiner conducted a site visit without accompaniment on May 22 28, 2013. 23 Substantive: 24 3. Site/Proposal Description. Iglesia Asamblea de Dios Agua Viva International 25 Church is seeking approval of a special use permit to construct an 8,000 square foot church building for their congregation of 100 to 150 persons in the Belfair area along with parking on a 4.16 acre vacant parcel located at the intersection of SR 300 and Gladwin Road near Belfair, Washington. Access to the proposal will either be from SUP p. 5 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Gladwin Road or directly from SR 300 if an access permit is acquired from WSDOT. 1 WSDOT has favorably commented upon direct access to SR 300. See Ex. 19. General topography of the 4.16 acre parcel is flat(less than 5 percent) in the west and central areas and nearly 15 percent slopes along Gladwin Rd.; an access exists at the east end of the property (Exhibit #5). The building foundations from previous 4 construction efforts remain onsite. 5 4. Characteristics of Area. In the vicinity are Belfair State Park 2 miles to the west, 6 residences in Lynch Cove subdivision to the west and north, and a restaurant and tideland properties to the east. The property is located near North Shore Road,which 7 is the key transportation route in the area. Lynch Cove and Hood Canal are situated 200 feet to the east and southeast. M.1. 8 5. Adverse Impacts. As conditioned, there are no significant adverse impacts 9 associated with the proposed use. Neighboring residents and others have raised 10 several valid concerns with the proposal and many of those concerns will have to be addressed through additional project review as required in the conditions of approval. ! 11 issues are more specifically addressed individually below. 4 A. Traffic. The most significant issue associated with the project is traffic. N 12 uch of the traffic going to the church will have to make a left turn off of SR 300, 13 either onto Gladwin Road or directly onto the project parcel if the applicant succeeds in acquiring an access permit from WSDOT. Gladwin is a narrow and steep road with site distance problems as it curves away from SR 300. At hearing staff noted 14 a that WSDOT had been notified of the project but had not expressed any concerns. 15 The examiner requested that staff directly contact WSDOT again to see if they had any issues with the left turn. In response, WSDOT expressed several concerns 16 including site distance for the intersection and the location of the access point proposed along Gladwin Road. See Ex. 16. WSDOT recommended that the '0 17 intersection of Gladwin Road with SR 300 be realigned or in the alternative that the 18 applicant prepare a traffic study. Subsequently, WSDOT concluded that a direct access to the property from SR 300 would also be appropriate if an access permit is 19 acquired. See Ex. 19. The recommendations of WSDOT will be incorporated into the conditions of approval. 20 The examiner's site visit of the proposal revealed that Gladwin Road is narrow 21 with no shoulder. Despite this, the project doesn't involve any street frontage improvements and none are recommended by staff. Staff testified at the hearing that 22 the proposal had been submitted to the County public works department and that public works did not comment. It is unclear if public works actually reviewed the 23 project and this cannot be taken for granted given the concerns raised by WSDOT when they were approached more directly a second time for comment. ?At the least, 24 street widening along the frontage of the church property may be appropriate to 25 provide for safe two way travel during peak traffic generation hours for the church. The conditions of approval will require public works to specifically address the issue, authorizing the department to require a traffic study or other expert evaluation as it deems necessary to assure for safe and efficient traffic flow. It may be that public SUP p. 6 Findings,Conclusions and Decision works had planned on reviewing the proposal for frontage improvements during I building permit review, but the site plan submitted for the special use permit should 2 already identify these improvements as well as the parking so that the impacts of the project can be more precisely addressed. It is recommended that this level of detail 3 be provided in future special use permit site plans. The site plan submitted by the applicant comes dangerously close to failing the level of specificity required by MCC 4 17.04.227(c). Neighbors have also raised a concern about church patrons using the roads of the 5 adjoining neighborhood to access SR 300. In point of fact WSDOT concluded that if 6 the Gladwin/SR 300 intersection is not realigned that left turns from SR 300 would be prohibited and church patrons would have to use the neighborhood roads to access the 7 site. However, it must also be bome in mind that the neighborhood roads are public roads and the adjoining property owners do not have exclusive rights to their use. 8 The rights of the applicant to use those streets must be balanced against those of the neighbors and any restrictions on access should be reasonably imposed. In this 9 regard, the conditions of approval will require staff to investigate the reasonableness 10 and feasibility of limiting exit turns from the property to "left turn only" in order to avoid use of the neighborhood streets located southwest of the project site or taking 11 o 4 similar measures to limit neighborhood access. B. Critical Areas. Comments were received that the project site contains a 12 spring, a culverted stream, steep slopes, trees and endangered species. The degree to which these environmental resources (generally called "critical areas") must be 13 protected has been legislatively set in the County's Resource Ordinance, Chapter 8.52 14 MCC, which is applied via a separate environmental permit also regulated by Chapter 8.52. Staff have reviewed the project site and the comments submitted by concerned 15 citizens and have concluded that there are no protected critical areas on site, or at least that the proposal does not trigger any Resource Ordinance protection. Given staff 16 ex erience and expertise in administering the Resource Ordinance and the absence of any expert opinion o e contrary, the examiner must e e s 1 ere are no critical areas adverse y affected 18 by the ro o Nothing in this decision should be construed as preventing staff from c anging its mind on the need for an environmental permit should it come to a 19 different conclusion in the future. C. Stormwater. Concern was raised over stormwater impacts. This is 20 another instance where the County Commissioners have adopted a comprehensive set 21 of regulations that sets a legislative standard for acceptable impacts. Specifically, Mason County has adopted the 2005 DOE Stormwater Manual in Chapter 14.48 22 MCC, which prohibits any increases in offsite stormwater flows caused by the proposal and also sets standards for water treatment and quality. As noted by staff 23 during the hearing,the applicant is required to obtain a separate stormwater permit for its proposal and approval of this permit will assure compliance with the County's 24 stormwater standards. Mr. Parrot raises some valid points in Ex. 17 regarding the 25 existence of a restrictive layer and the presence of an aquifer recharge area. The conditions of approval will require the stormwater plan to address the test bore results identified by Mr. Parrot and shall formulate an analysis that reasonably assures staff that the stormwater controls will adequately protect any aquifer recharge area affected SUP p. 7 Findings. Conclusions and Decision by the proposal and that the proposal is otherwise compliant with the Resource 1 Ordinance as it applies to aquifer recharge areas. 2 D. Neighborhood Compatibility. Churches are authorized in the RR5 zone. The conditions of approval and County regulations require buffering and screening 3 from adjoining properties. The church itself will be located more than 300 feet from Gladwin Road. Nothing further can be reasonably required to assure compatibility 4 and as mitigated and designed the church is determined to be compatible with surrounding residential use. 5 E. Water Service. Concerns were raised by one neighbor on whether there 6 was adequate water to serve the proposal. Aquarius Utilities, LLC, which provides water service to the project, commented that it had ample capacity to serve the 7 proposal. See Ex. 3. It is determined that the proposal is served by adequate water. F. Septic. The staff report notes there is adequate area on the property to 8 locate a septic system large enough for the proposal. G. Trespass. Neighbors expressed concern that patrons of the proposed 9 church will trespass upon Lynch Cove Community Park, a private beach located west 10 of the proposal. There is no concrete evidence that this will actually occur. However, the conditions will provide that if the neighbors are able to establish within a year's 11 time that the proposal is contributing to trespass, the applicant shall work out a mitigation plan to prevent trespass by measures such as posting no trespass signs on 12 the private beach or other forms of notice to church patrons that the park is private and should not be accessed without permission. 13 H. Parkin. Staff have concluded that there is sufficient space on the 14 property to accommodate legislatively adopted parking requirements as codified in Mason County Code ("MCC") 17.08.090. Compliance with those standards 15 establishes that the proposal provides for adequate parking. The conditions of approval require compliance with the parking standards. 16 17 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 18 Procedural: 19 1. Authority of Hearing Examiner. MCC 15.03.050(10) and 17.05.042 20 provide the Examiner with the authority to review and act upon Special Use Permits. 21 Substantive: 22 23 2. Zonin . The area is zoned as Rural Residential 5. 24 3. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. There has been much discussion in this case about the applicability of the County's shoreline master program and even 25 suggestions that review of the subject application be delayed until changes to the master program have been completed. The permit under review is for a special use permit. The shoreline master program is administered through a separate permitting system and it is beyond the scope of this permit to determine whether or not a SUP p. 8 Findings, Conclusions and Decision shoreline permit is required or whether its criteria can be met If a shoreline permit is I required, the church could not be constructed without acquiring the permit. If 2 shoreline regulations did apply to this permit, delaying permit approval until the regulations are changed would not accomplish anything. This is because under this 3 state's judicially created vested rights doctrine, once a complete conditional use permit (and by extension, special use permit) is filed, the project vests to the regulations in 4 effect and subsequently enacted regulations do not apply. See Beach v. Board of Adjustment, 73 Wn.2d 343, 347 (1968); Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce County, 95 Wn. App. 5 883 (1999). Even if the decision were delayed until new shoreline regulations went 6 into effect, they still would not apply to the special use permit application. Finally, delay would also subject Mason County to liability under RCW 64.40.020, which 7 creates a cause of action for decisions that are not issued within mandatory deadlines. Chapter 36.70B RCW as implemented by County regulations, MCC 15.09.100, 8 require final decisions to be issued within 120 days of submission of a complete 9 application, subject to various `'clock stopping" exceptions. 10 4. Untimely Comments. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 2, at the close of the verbal portion of the hearing due dates were set for the submission of subsequent written 11 comments. Several comments were received after these due dates. Those comments were not admitted into the record because state law bars the consideration of untimely 12 submitted comments. This derives from the one hearing rule imposed by the Regulatory Reform Act, Chapter 36.70B RCW. In 1995 the state legislature adopted 13 the Regulatory Reform Act in order to streamline permitting procedures. One 14 recurring problem addressed by the regulations was the habit of municipal jurisdictions to indefinitely delay permit decisions through endless and repeated 15 permit hearings. It used to be a fairly common practice for municipalities to consider new evidence at the close of a hearing, thereby necessitating other hearings or further 16 evidentiary review. The Regulatory Reform Act now only allows one hearing per application. Once a hearing is closed, no new evidence can be admitted unless it 17 qualifies as "limited new evidence", which is widely interpreted by land use attorneys 18 as limited to new evidence a court could consider on judicial appeal under the Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW. The untimely comments submitted for this 19 case do not meet the exceptions of Chapter 36.70C RCW. 20 5. Review Criteria and Application. MCC 17.04.227(c) requires a special use permit 21 for churches in the RR5 zone that are more than 3,000 square feet in area. Applicable special use criteria are quoted below in italics and applied through corresponding 22 conclusions of law. 23 MCC 17.05.044 SPECIAL USE REVIEW CRITERIA: 24 (I) That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and 25 welfare. SUP P. 9 Findings, Conclusions and Decision 6. As determined in Finding of Fact No, 5, there are no adverse impacts 1 associated with the project so it is not detrimental to the public health, safety and 2 welfare. 3 (2) That the proposed use is consistent and compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. 4 6. The proposed use is consistent with and compatible with the intent of the 5 Comprehensive Plan for the reasons identified at pages 3-4 of the staff report, adopted 6 and incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. 7 (3) That the proposed use will not introduce hazardous conditions at the site that cannot be mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and 8 the community at large. 9 7. No hazardous conditions are expected, nor have any been identified as a 10 result of the proposal. 11 (4) That the proposed use is served by adequate public facilities which are in place, or planned as a condition of approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital 12 Facilities Plan. 13 8. As discussed in Finding of Fact No. 5, the proposal will be served by 14 adequate roads, water and sanitary waste disposal. There is nothing in the record to reasonably suggest that there are any other public facilities that could be potentially 15 inadequate. 16 (5) That the proposed use will not have a significant impact upon existing uses on 17 adjacent lands. 18 8. As noted in Finding of Fact No. 5, no significant impacts are expected to result from this proposal, including impacts on adjoining properties. 19 (6) If located outside an Urban Growth Area, that the proposed use will not result in 20 the need to extend urban services. 21 9. There will be no need to extend any urban services to the property. 22 I MISCELLANEOUS CRITERIA FOR ALL HEARING EXAMINER REVIEW: 23 MCC 15.09.055(C): Required Review: The Hearing Examiner shall review proposed 24 development according to the following criteria: 25 1. The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code, especially Title 6, 8, and 16. SUP P. 10 Findings, Conclusions and Decision 2. Development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is 1 in the public interest. 2 3. Development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within the Comprehensive Plan. 4 10. A determination of non-significance was issued for the proposal (Ex. 6), 5 satisfying the requirements of the Washington State Environmental Policy Act, as 6 codified in Title 6 MCC. No subdivision is involved (Title 16) and septic will be reviewed and approved by the County health department (Title 6 MCC). As 7 determined in Finding of Fact No. 5,the project will not create any significant adverse impacts so it does not adversely impact the public health, safety and welfare. Since it 8 provides a needed community service the proposal is in the public interest. Staff determined that the proposal does not lower the level of service for transportation or 9 park facilities and there is no evidence to the contrary. 10 DECISION 11 The application for a special use permit is approved subject to the following 12 conditions: SRL-�0 �ss Q. .e-d 1' 1. Access to the project shall be provided as recommended by comments submitted 14 by the Washington State Department of Transportation in Ex. 16 and Ex. 19, including the preparation of a traffic report if the applicant opts to maintain access 15 from Gladwin Street without realigning the Gladwin/SR 300 intersection. 16 2. Public wor shall review the proposal and requir eet frontage improvements �r as determine cessary for safe and efficie vehicle and pedestrian traffic as ALULAn 1 well as for consiste with County ro and development standards. If any 18 access is proposed to ublic works staff shall impose reasonable measures to avoid traffic fro ave est on to Gladwin Road through neighborhood roads, such prohibiting right r s cles exiting the project site. Staff may requir traffic report or other ert analysis at the expense of the 2 applicant as nec ary to acquire information to comply with this condition. 21 3. If area residents establish to the satisfaction of staff within a year of occupancy of 22 the church that church patrons are trespassing upon the Lynch Cove Community Park, staff may require the applicant to prepare and implement a mitigation plan 23 to reduce the trespass that may include reasonable measures such as posting no- trespass signs on the park, building a fence around the park, placing signs within 24 the church advising against trespass or some other measure that effectively 25 reduces the trespass. The applicant shall be required to consult with the park owners in formulating the mitigation plan. Permission from the beach owners shall of course be required for any measures that involve construction upon or alteration of the park property. SUP P. 11 Findings,Conclusions and Decision I `? 4. The stormwater plan shall contain an assessment of whether stormwater controls -' adequately protect water quality given the test boring information provided by Mr. Parrot in Ex. 14 and also that the retention pond will not contaminate the ' waters of the water tank referenced in the Kabelac testimony summarized in this 4 decision. If staff determines that the proposal does affect an aquifer protected by the Resource Ordinance, staff may require additional analysis by a qualified 5 individual at the expense of the applicant to assure that the proposal is consistent with the requirements of the County Resource Ordinance as it applies to aquifer 6 recharge areas. 7 8 5. a applicant shall secure a water main extension agreement, as part of the Lynch Cove Water System(WA No.49100U),with the provider Aquarius Utilities LLC, q to serve this church land use. 10 6. The site plan included in the construction of the church shall integrate vegetation plantings and fencing or fence panels along property lines and near structures to 11 screen the new development from adjacent properties. 12 7. Adequate parking areas shall be provided for this land use [1 stall per 4 seats or 13 per 50 sq.ft. of floor area for assembly not having fixed seats as required by MCC 17.08.090] located on the subject properties. 14 15 8. A stormwater plan shall be prepared in compliance with Chapter 14.48 MCC, as part of site planning to address the control and treatment of runoff from roof and 16 graded and parking surfaces during rainfall events. 17 Dated this 18th day of June,2013. 18 19 20 I'h� A.fllbrechts 21 Hearing Examiner 22 Mason County 23 APPEAL 24 The decision of the Hearing Examiner is final and may be appealed to superior court 25 as outlined by the Washington State Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW. CHANGE IN VALUATION SUP p. 12 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Notice is given pursuant to RCW 36.70B.130 that property owners who are affected 1 by this decision may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes 2 notwithstanding any program of revaluation. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SUP p. 13 Findings, Conclusions and Decision DU+ zol 13- � JOHN AND DEBORA SIMMONS WILLIAM M. & JOAN P. GRAHAM, TRUSTEES PO BOX 223 1925 NEVADA CT., APT. D OLALLA, WA 98359 V, LOS OSOS, CA. 93402 i CATHY BARTON JOHNCE LAWRENCE 51 NE LORNA LEE WAY PO BOX 1404 BELFAIR, WA' 98528 BELFAIR, WA 98528 V ROGER & ANGELA SAWICKI ✓ KARL MCNEILL PO BOX 1054 11 NE LORNA LEE WAY BELFAIR, WA 98528 BELFAIR, WA 98528 LESLIE & TAMMY JACKSON CHARLES & DENA MEIGS PO BOX 3152 PO BOX 2611 BELFAIR, WA 98528 BELFAIR, WA 98528 GEORGINE KINGSBURY CHRISTOPHER ACKERMAN 1730 CHILTON DR 70 NE BRYAN LANE ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 BELFAIR, WA 98528 COLEMAN DRIGGERS SECRETARY OF HOUSING 5150 CANDLEWOOD ST., STE 12C AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT LAKEWOOD, CA 90712 34 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA, RM 7015 SANTA ANNA, CA 92701 PAT'S LITTLE RED BARN KLINGEL WETLAND RESTORATION PROJECT PO BOX 1387 US - NRCS BELFAIR, WA 98528 1386 LUND AVE., SUITE 1 PORT ORCHARD, WA 98366 GARY PARROTT WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF WILDLIFE 81 NE GLADWIN RD 600 CAPITOL WAY N # GJ-11 BELFAIR, WA 98528 OLYMPIA, WA 98501 STATE OF WASHINGTON LYNCH COVE COMMUNITY CLUB DEPT. OF FISH AND WILDLIFE PO BOX 280 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA, WA 98501 BELFAIR, WA 98528 JOANN MILLER LARRY & EMILY MUIR, TRUSTEES 71 NE BRYANT LANE MUIR REV. LIVING TRUST 17605 SE 144 TH BELFAIR, WA 98528 ST RENTON, WA 98059 DOC ORIN RICKETT, ET UX DOUGLAS & RINA IMPEY JANAMARIE WHITE 31 NE BRYAN LANE 1916 NW SELBO RD. BELFAIR, WA 98528 BREMERTON, WA 98311 GUSTAVO & CARLA VILLATORO EULALIA TOMAS GONZALES 40 NE LARSON LAKE RD PO BOX 2375 BELFAIR, WA 98528 BELFAIR, WA 985258 BRYAN & STEPHANIE PETERSON WILLIAM & JANICE AIKMAN 8425 8T" PL SE, 304B 1653 VISTA RAMA DR E EVERETT, WA 98208 PORT ORCHARD, WA 98366 FRANK B. LONG TYHEEM SWEAT PO BOX 2443 100 NE LARSON LAKE RD BELFAIR, WA 98528 BELFAIR, WA 98528 MARK D. BROXTON TERRY & CHRISTINE WOODIN 9200 DRAGO COURT NW 237T" AVE SE SILVERDALE, WA 98383 MAPLE VALLEYL WA 98038 R.J. PEABODY INC. ALFRED & SOLVIEG LAWS PO BOX 565 3713S. 291 ST ST BURLEY, WA 98322 AUBURN, WA 98001 ROMA YATES JANEAN STALLMAN 5513 CRANEY CT SE 120 NE LARSON LAKE RD LACEY, WA 98503 BELFAIR, WA 98528 PAUL & ROSEMARIE MORSE JAMES WUORI 40 NE DRAGONFLY LANE 11110 SE 290TH ST BELFAIR, WA 98528 AUBURN, WA 98092 FREDRICK W. LOEFFLER LISA & ANDREW EVANS 1247 SE CARL PICKLE DR. PO BOX 3447 PORT ORCHARD, WA 98366 BELFAIR, WA 98528 PATRICIA CAUDILLO LORAN A. COOK II 750 S PACIFIC HWY 2 12325 TANGER LANE NW, #A3-204 RICKREALL, OR 97371 SILVERDALE, WA 98383 STATE OF WASHINGTON MAXIE & MARIE McCOWAN DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 210 NE LARSON LAKE RD STATE LAND DIVISION BELFAIR, WA 98528 PO BOX 47440 OLYMPIA, WA 98504-7440 ROBERT CHRISTENSEN ENTERPRISES, LLC MASON COUNTY PO BOX 1607 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. GIG HARBOR, WA 98335 ATTENTION: DAVE CLEVENGER RICHARD MOORE SOUTH SHORE CONSTRUCTION LESLEY KABELAC 230 E. HILLSIDE DR. 231 NE BRYAN LANE BELFAIR, WA 98528 BELFAIR, WA 98528 JOAQUIN MIGUEL v,44jN*(vk_ 160 NE SANTA MARIA LANE 7�a.��S ��� o BELFAIR, WA 98528 1 /"- Jam and Smudge Free Printing www.avery com AVERY® 51624D Use Avery®TEMPLATE 51620D t 1-800-GO-AVERY t S ROBERT CHRISTENSEN ENTERPRISES, LLC MASON COUNTY PO BOX 1607 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. GIG HARBOR, WA 98335 ATTENTION: DAVE CLEVENGER RICHARD MOORE LESLEY KABELAC SOUTH SHORE CONSTRUCTION 231 NE BRYAN LANE 230 E. HILLSIDE DR. BELFAIR, WA 98528 BELFAIR, WA 98528 JOAQUIN MIGUEL KEN VANBUSKIRK 160 NE SANTA MARIA LANE 61 NE DAVIS FARM ROAD BELFAIR, WA 98528 BELFAIR WA 98528 pz915 ®AIIb CV wo:)•AJane nnnnnn apidea a6ey:)as a;a a6eaanoggue uoissaidwi CASEINDEX Iglesia Asamblea de Dios Agua Viva International Special Use Permit DDR2013-000016 Exhibit# Date Description 1 May 1, 2013 Staff Report 2 March 12, 2013 Special Use Application, Layout Map and SupplementalInformation 3 February 20, 2013 Aquarius Utilities LLC letter of water availability for connection to Lynch Cove Water System 4 March 12, 2013 Project Vicinity 5 March 12, 2013 Site Aerial View 6 April 4, 2013 SEP2013-00021 threshold determination, conditions, and agency comments for project review. 7 March 28, 2013 Notice of Application 8 Aril 30 2013 Affidavit of Posting 9 April 9, 2013 William / Joan Graham comment letter 10 Aril 22, 2013 Lesley Kabelac comment letter 11 October 31, 2008 Site Assessment for Property Iglesia Asamblea Church SUP case index DDR2013-000016 Page 1 of Revised 5/01/13 Mason County Department of Planning Building I * 411 N. 5t6 Street * P.O. Box 279 Shelton,Washington 98584 * (360) 427-9670 TO: Mason County Hearings Examiner FROM: Planning Staff— Allan Borden - ahb@co.mason.wa.us RE: Special Use Permit(DDR2013-00016)to establish a new church on one parcel of Rural Residential 5 property 2 miles west of the Belfair WA. HEARING DATE: May 14, 2013 1:00 pm STAFF REPORT I. Project Description. This report evaluates establishing a new church( ,00 sq. ft.� footprint area; a portion of second floor area to increase size to 8,000 sq. ft. interior area) and associated parking and stormwater treat pond on one 4.16 ac.parcel of vacant Rural Residential 5 property 2 miles west of the Belfair WA. A Special Use Permit is necessary(Exhibit#2) as part of the public review required by the Mason County Development Regulations standards to evaluate the nature and scope of the church building size(greater than 3,000 sq. ft. size) and this proposed land use on Rural Residential 5 Lands in this area of Mason County. II. Applicant. Iglesia Asamblea de Dios Agua Viva International III. Property Location.At the northeast end of Gladwin Rd. at the intersection with State Route 300(North Shore Rd.), (Exhibit#4),one mile east of Belfair State Park;within the southwest '/4 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 31,Township 23 N.,Range 1 W. in Mason County Washington. [Parcel# 12331-32-00040]. IV. Evaluations. A. Characteristics of the site. General topography of the 4.16 ac. parcel is flat(less than 5 percent)in the west and central areas and nearly 15 percent slopes along Gladwin Rd.; an access exists at the east end of the property(Exhibit#5). The building foundations from previous construction efforts remain onsite. B. Characteristics of the area. In the vicinity are Belfair State Park 2 miles to the west, residences in Lynch Cove subdivision to the west and north, and the nearby restaurant and tideland properties to the east. The property is located near to North Shore Road, which is the key transportation route in the area. Lynch Cove and Hood Canal are situated 200 feet to the east and southeast. Iglesia Asamblea Church SUP staff report DDR2013-000016 Page 2 of 6 Revised 5101113 C. Shoreline Designation. Adjacent to the project area,the shoreline designation along Lynch Cove is Conservancy Environment. Typical land uses are open space and natural habitat values. D. Com rehensive Plan Desi ation/Zonin . The Mason County Comprehensive Plan n � � ty p designation for the site is Rural Lands two miles from the Belfair Urban Growth Area. The zoning is Rural Residential 5 and churches are permitted land uses. V. SEPA Compliance. This proposed land use is not SEPA exempt per WAC 197-11- 800.1(b),as the proposed building is less than 12,000 sq. ft. in size,but has a parking area for use by 45 or more vehicles (Exhibit#6). Comments focused on erosion control and proper stormwater treatment on the property. VI. Other Required Permits. A building permit will be required for each proposed structure or structure modification. A stormwater site plan will be required during the review of the development permits,the level of review detail will depend on the extent of associated parking area. VII. Public Notification of Hearing. The Notice of Application(Exhibit#7)was published in the Mason County Journal for two weeks on March 28 and April 4, 2013. On April 18, 2013 a Notice of Application was posted at three sites and at the local post office. This notice was mailed to neighboring property owners within 300 feet on April 4,2013. An Affidavit of Posting of these notices was completed on April 30, 2013 (Exhibit#8). Two letters were received to date. The Grahams(Exhibit#9) stated concerns about activities associated with churches; Ms. Kabelac(Exhibit#10)was concerned with water availability to the church land use,impacts to stormwater travelling off-site to the south towards Hood Canal, and the use of the nearby community park lands. VIII. Project Description. Iglesia Asamblea de Dios Agua Viva International Church is seeking to construct a church building for their congregation of 100 to 150 persons in the Belfair area. A parking area associated with their church services is also proposed. There is adequate area on the property to locate a septic system to treat the effluent generated by the church land use. The applicant has submitted with the application materials a letter from Aquarius Utilities LLC (Exhibit#3)that can confirm the availability of water service from the Lynch Cove Water System to the property for drinking water, for septic service, and for fire protection of the property. The proposed access to the property from Gladwin Rd. is at the east end of the property near the intersection with State Route 300. A road access permit from Mason County Public Works or WA Dept. of Transportation will needed to be secured. IX. Analysis. The following additional information is required for analyzing the proposal, preparing the necessary conditions, and providing consistency with dimensional and performance standards and relevant county regulations. A. Mason County Development Regulations, Section 17.04.227(c.) This special provisions section of the Rural Residential 5 zone states that proposed church buildings that are greater than 3,000 sq. ft. in size require a Special Use Permit application and submittal materials(Exhibit#2). Iglesia Asamblea Church SUP staff report DDR2013-000016 Page 3 of 6 Revised 5/01/13 Staff Response: As a 6,000 to 8,000 sq.ft building is proposed, the review of a Special Use Permit is required. A Special Use Permit application was submitted by Iglesia Asamblea de Dios Agua Viva International Church and includes supplemental information for consideration in their request (Exhibit#11). This environmental site assessment provides supportive information about the location, vicinity, improvements present, historic use of the property, and potential hazards to consider about the subject parcel. B. Applicable Special Use Review Criteria(MCDR 1.05.046): 1. Will the proposed use be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare? Staff Response:A county road(Gladwin Rd.) and State Highway 300 (North Shore Rd.) already exist on the south and north sides. Proper ingress and egress can be secured by a Mason County or WA. Dept. of Transportation Road Access Permit, taking into consideration sight distances along each road and the anticipated traffic generated from the change to church land use. The applicant will need to have a septic system designer validate that the proposed buildings and their intended uses will have no adverse effect on the proposed water system and on-site stormwater treatment system. Proposed buildings will need to be at least 25 feet from each front or road property line, as shown on the site plan in Exhibit#2. 2. Will the proposed use be consistent and compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan? Staff Response: The applicant states that this church building proposal is consistent with GAM policies supporting protection of the environment, existing land uses,future residential land uses and rural character away from the urban growth areas. The Comprehensive Plan policies below are used for review: Rural Residential within the Rural Area. RU500a Ensure that rural residential development preserves rural character,protects rural community identity, is compatible with surrounding land uses, and minimizes infrastructure needs. RU-501 New development in Rural Areas should be guided by performance standards and design guidelines to enhance rural character,protect critical areas, and tailor development to the characteristics of individual sites. RU-502 Residential uses in Rural Areas should be at densities that can be sustained by rural levels of service for water, wastewater, drainage,police,fire, and schools. RU-503 Utilities and services in Rural Areas should be provided at levels suitable to rural densities including on-site septic systems,private wells or community water systems, and roads with gravel shoulders and open roadside drainage. RU-506 Land use and proposed development along the shoreline, streams, or adjacent uplands should provide protection from any increases in stormwater runoff and non- point pollution which degrade water quality. Iglesia Asamblea Church SUP staff report DDR2013-000016 Page 4 of 6 Revised 5/01/13 RU-511 On-site sewage systems in Rural Areas should be maintained in a condition that will ensure longevity,protect public health, and prevent contamination of surface and ground waters. RU-512 Adjacent residential uses and non-residential uses in the Rural Area should be buffered or screened from each other. Existing uses will not be required to provide buffers or screens, except in the case of the expansion or intensification of use. The policies noted above reinforce that the location of this church proposal will not be contrary to the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and that development standards under the Rural Residential 5 zone will protect present and future land development in the vicinity. Several measures by the applicant will be implemented to attain a compatible development: connection to the Lynch Cove Water System is proposed; a large on-site septic system (to be designed) will be installed;stormwater drainage from the roofs and parking area will be treated in the proposed pond; the land use and buildings will be screened with adequate vegetation and fencing along the property perimeter. 3. Will the proposed use introduce hazardous conditions at the site that cannot be mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and the community at large? Staff Response: The applicant has stated that there will be no hazardous conditions or activities associated with the proposed project facilities, so no mitigation to protect nearby properties is needed. The site assessment provided by the applicant discusses the old foundations of past proposals, but these will be removed from the site. The proposed church land use will have associated parking areas to the south of the planned church structure, as well as suitable stormwater treatment and erosion control strategies. 4. Is the proposed use served by adequate public facilities, which are in place, or planned as a condition of approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital Facilities Plan? Staff Response: This proposed land use will be served by a public water system (as noted in the Aquarius Utilities LLC letter) and on-site septic treatment system to serve the church land use. Proposed development wild follow Mason County codes for construction and occupancy. Public transit(Mason Transit) is available to this site location. Fire District#2 station is three miles away in Belfair. No demand for services requiring new capital facilities project is anticipated with the proposal. 5. Will the proposed use have a significant impact upon existing uses on adjacent lands? Staff Response: The project as proposed will not have any significant impacts upon the existing use on adjacent lands. The surrounding land uses to the north and east are residential or commercial on medium-sized parcels (Exhibit#5); and residential on small-sized parcels to the west. Land uses to the south are open space and recreational land uses. The proposal layout can be screened by existing vegetation and topography and by additional plantings and fencing along the boundaries of the subject property. The anticipated traffic from the church is Iglesia Asamblea Church SUP staff report DDR2013-000016 Page 5 of 6 Revised 5/01/13 estimated to be a mild generator, mostly occurring on Sundays, and have no adverse traffic effects on local road usage. 6. If located outside an Urban Growth Area,will the proposal result in the need to extend urban services? Staff Response: The proposal is two miles to the west of the Belfair Urban Growth Area. The applicant states that the existing water connection and septic system will provide the needed services for this land use. The site is accessible to Sheriff and fire protection services. C. Applicable Title 15 Review Criteria: Per section 15.09.050 (C)(1-3),the Hearing Examiner shall review a proposed development according to the following criteria. 1. The development does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the requirements and intent of the Mason County Code, especially Title 6, 8, and 16. Staff Response: To address each Title: Title 6—Adequate septic and community water service shall be provided for this land use on the subject property. If the special use permit is approved, these services will need to support the public facility associated with the church building(s), and these services will be provided to proper state health standards. Title 8 - The proposal will be located outside of stream, shoreline, wetland, or landslide hazard critical areas and buffers as much as possible. If additional areas of land use are considered, state and county critical area standards must be integrated into the review of those proposals. Title 16—The proposed development is on one parcel, and no further subdivision of property is needed. 2. The development does not impact the public health, safety and welfare and is in the public interest. Staff Response: The proposed project will provide safe vehicle access to the property and the proper water and septic designed for the site and associated with the new church land use. Perimeter plantings near structures and fencing adjacent to property lines can screen the proposed buildings and land uses from adjacent residential land uses to the west, north, and east. 3. The development does not lower the level of service of transportation and/or neighborhood park facilities below the minimum standards established within the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Response: The anticipated traffic from the church is estimated to generate low to moderate amounts of vehicle traffic mostly during Sunday services, but not cause problems to adequate levels of transportation services. Neighborhood park facilities would not be required for this land use and the minimum standards established within the Comprehensive Plan will not be lowered. X. Project Analysis: Based upon these policies and regulations,the proposed land use and building size for a church conforms to the Mason County Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan. Iglesia Asamblea Church SUP staff report DDR2013-000016 Page 6 of 6 Revised 5/01/13 M. Conclusions. As proposed,the church proposal by Iglesia Asamblea de Dios Agua Viva International in the Rural Residential 5 zone is consistent with the Mason County Development Regulations. Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall secure a water main extension agreement, as part of the Lynch Cove Water System(WA No. 49100U),with the provider Aquarius Utilities LLC,to serve this church land use. 2) The site plan included in the construction of the church shall integrate vegetation plantings and fencing or fence panels along property lines and near structures to screen the new development from adjacent properties. 3) Adequate parking areas shall be provided for this land use [1 stall per 4 seats or per 50 sq. ft. of floor area for assembly not having fixed seats] located on the subject properties. 4) A stormwater plan shall be prepared in compliance with MCC14.48.150, as part of site planning to address the control and treatment of runoff from roof and graded and parking surfaces during rainfall events. XH. Choices of Action. A. Approve. B. Approve with condition. C. Deny with prejudice(reapplication or resubmittal is not allowed for one year). E. Remand for further proceedings and/or evidentiary hearing in accordance with Section 15.09.090 of Title 15. Iglesia Asamblea Church SUP staff report Microsoft Word-2012 Special Use Permit App-special_use_app.pdf http://www.co.mason.wa.us/forms/Community_Dev/special_use_ap... C-X 4 + � MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 426 W Cedar Street/P.O.Box 186,Shelton.WA 98584 360.427.9670 Ext.352 Mason Comity Permit Center Use: DDR lY Special Use Peamit: $1,135 Date Rcv,d. I Public Hearing: $2.005 or $670 for ADL's ..........._ Special Use Application A Special Use is one that possesses unique characteristics due to size, nature, intensity of use, technological processes involved, demands upon public services, relationship to surrounding lands, or other factors. The au Pose of this application is to provide for adequate oversight and review of such development proposals, in order to assure that such uses are developed in harmony with surrounding land uses, and in a manner consistent with the intent of the Development Regulations for Mason County; Ordinance No. 82-96. Acceptance of this application by Mason County does not guarantee approval of request. Type of Special Use Pei mit: ❑Communications Tower ❑Accessory Dwelling Unit Oversize Construction ❑ Other: Applicant Name I IQS1 cA Nv)- 1bUo, UR Property Owners cvwdt 1 `�CY�� ' -.� ^" r,`"I�l G�SU CA q� 1 C CW t Mailing Address _`�o.. 4.t.... V..Q ...r V\_Ctl... Xv............._....'16. z lftWl y- vi A "WSJ R Phollc 1%O)601- MI phone 2 Emall Site Address I Vn\ — 3 Z " V 00A C) l" no Tax Parcel# I Z')bt d 2 Legal Descri tion A WU icWk C)+ p 0J-2'y y"'VA'V 1 0-11 j 31-4 SJZ.CA'>n 3 1 tUuM� Y l W��,w.M. ;vq VvkASM Cx.7,M t- 1 ,mac N t W Of C� �✓' t . p v�au Sd g)cG tCA-V 5tt�-t t 1NA wa-Ly �i -,'ll''llI-C Cst-t-t 1 300) Project Description CUB�S�YQC,t'I DYI . t Q ,_�VV_ ,_ CI'�UK,1�1 buy , C too f-r--. vy� 1 GuF+-.cxmu fiw0 - 57tby oVn 0" COACOI5fi►n( acylS iV-A s\z.Q__mod Z(MA U l ���-s�c�x►fi�U 1. 5 Zvv� . _ I 1 of 3 3/8/2013 9:47 AM A-2012 Special Use Permit App- special_use_app.pdf http://www.co.mason.wa.us/forms/Community_pev/special_use_ap... Please provide a site plan that includes the following: 1. Indicate Scale and North Arrow. 2. Property line dimensions,easements.and right-of-ways. 3. The location of all existing and proposed structures.Include square footage of existing and proposed structures. 4. Setback distance,in feet from all property lines and structures. 5. Existing and proposed road access to and from the site. 6. Parking spaces. 7. Location of on-site sewage tanks and drainfields. 8. Location of drinking water supply.Include location on the proposed site and surrounding parcels. 9. Steep bluffs,wetlands,streaurs,and bodies of water. 1 . Surface and storm water run-off routes. On a separate piece of paper(#of pages: ,state your,reasons for requesting a Special Use Permit and be sure to address the following six criteria. Your request will be evaluated based on these criteria. 1. Will the proposed use be detrimental to public health,safety,and welfare? 2. Will the proposed use be consistent and compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan? 3. Will the proposed use introduce ha/-ardom conditions,at the site,that cannot be mitigated through appropriate measures to protect adjacent properties and the community at large? 4. Is the proposed use served by adequate public facilities,which are in place,plarmed as a condition of approval or as an identified item in the County's Capital Facilities Plan? 5. Will the proposed use have a sigirificant impact upon existing uses on adjacent lands? 6. If located outside of an Urban Growth Area,will the proposal result in the need to extend urban services? Provide a list(preferably printed on mailing labels or legal sized envelopes)of all property owners' mailing addresses within 300 feet of your parcel boundaries. Addresses are to be obtained from the Mason County Assessor's Office,Bldg. 1. r Applicant's Signatur Date 63111 .213 2 of 3 3/8/2013 9:47 AM The reason for this special use permit is for the construction of an oversize building for a church. We would like to build a church that is 60' x 100'. It is compatible with the comprehensive plan and we believe that there are no hazardous conditions. Measures will be taken to protect the community in question. This property is served by adequate public facilities that are presently in place. There will not be any significant impact upon existing uses of any adjacent lands. There is also no need to extend urban services. 34 Ex hibcf-t�3 Aquarius Utilities, LLC "At Your Service" �fi7-5) Diamond Point • Island Lake • Lynch Cove • Agate West February 20, 2013 Mr. Rich Moore South Shore Construction 230 E. Hillside Drive 0 4-2 6-1 3 A 0 9 : 3 0 R C V D Belfair, WA 98528 Re: Parcel #12331-32-00040 4 Acres, N.E. Gladwin Road Water Availability and Service Dear Mr. Moore: This will confirm your inquiry concerning water service from the Lynch Cove Water System. The subject property is a 4-acre wooded parcel situated between NE Gladwin Road and State Route 300 (see attached parcel map). This parcel is within our official service area as delineated in our 2008 Water System Plan Update, which was approved by the Washington Department of Health(see enclosed service area map). We also have a franchise with Mason County for the identical service area. The franchise confers on us the authority to operate, maintain,repair,upgrade and install water distribution facilities in the County roads within our designated service area. We recently completed a comprehensive improvement project for the Lynch Cove Water System which included new source, storage, electrical and piping facilities. As a result, the water system now has 4 wells pumping 275 gpm, 2 storage tanks holding 135,000 gallons, a booster pump station, and several miles of mostly 4-inch distribution pipe. The water system is approved for 304 connections and currently has 260 connections. The Lynch Cove Water System has ample capacity to serve the subject 4-acre parcel, regardless of the proposed use. Water quality is excellent, meeting all State and Federal standards. South of State Route 300, The Lynch Cove Water System serves all the lots of Beards Cove#1 plus several lots of an older waterfront subdivision(See attached drawing). Our water system(State I.D. #49100U) should not be confused with the Lower Lynch Cove Water System, a much smaller water system with service area limited to the plat of Lynch Cove#1. I have examined our records and inspected our facilities along Gladwin Road. The nearest connection point to the subject property is the end of our 4-inch water main at the Phone 360-779-1565 23411 Rhododendron Lane NIN Fax 360-779-4189 PO Box 1085 MyWaterCompany@,AOL.com Poulsbo, WA 98370 Aquarius Utilities, LLC ' ..;. "At Your Service" Diamond Point • Island Lake • Lynch Cove • Agate West intersection of NE Bryan Lane and NE Gladwin Road. The line pressure there is approximately 85 to 90 psi. A water main extension would be required to service the subject property. We would propose a 4-inch water main of C900 PVC pipe, installed in the south shoulder of NE Gladwin Road. The distance from Bryan Lane to a low point on the property 200 feet east of Lorna Lee Way is about 1460 feet. Use of 4-inch pipe size would be contingent on approval by Mason County. We have no objection to a qualified contractor installing the water main, provided our drawings and specifications are followed, and we are afforded the opportunity to inspect, test and certify the completed project. We have in-house engineering staff for design of the main extension. I understand that you are proposing to develop the property as a church campus, which would require fire protection. As you indicated, this would likely require an on-site storage tank and fire pump. Our distribution system could readily fill such a tank and keep it topped off as needed. The inlet would need to be metered, and means of controlling pressure fluctuations and flow rate in the supplying distribution piping would be necessary. You may be able to limit the volume of required fire storage by adhering to certain construction materials and methods, and by installing a fire sprinkler system. Water service for the church would be by a separate 1-inch metered connection, installed in the road right-of-way fronting the property. Based on the above assessment,Aquarius Utilities, LLC is ready and willing to supply the subject property with piped drinking water and water for fire storage, with the following conditions: (1) Execute a water main extension agreement; (2) Pay all service connection fees and other estimated costs up front; (3) If installing the water main with your own forces, follow our plans and specifications and facilitate our inspection of the work; and (4) Give favorable consideration to using our in-house engineering services for design, inspection and certification of the water main project. Phone 360-779-1565 23411 Rhododendron Lane NW 2 j Fax 360-779-4189 PO Box 1085 5 MyWaterCompany@,AOL.com Poulsbo, WA 98370 Aquarius Utilities, LLC �„ "At Your Service" 5 Diamond Point • Island Lake • Lynch Cove • Agate West ��bfFiR�tl At this preliminary stage, estimated costs for your project are summarized as follows: (1) Service connection fees: (a) Connection fee $950 (b) 1-inch service upgrade 500 (c) Facilities charge 2950 (d) Water availability letter 30 (e)Account set-up fee 30 Subtotal connection fees $4460 (2) Water main construction Not estimated (3) Engineering, inspection, cert. $2500 (4) Misc. permit costs To be determined I am also enclosing the following additional items for reference: (1) Rate sheet, listing and explaining all approved water rates and fees; and (2)Water quality report for the Lynch Cove Water System. If you have any questions about this water service proposal, please don't hesitate to call or e-mail me. Very truly yours, 44VV� G. Roats, P.E. General Manager Phone 360-779-1565 23411 Rhododendron Lane NIN 3/ Fax 360-779-4189 PO Box 1085 MyWaterCompany@,AOL.com Poulsbo, WA 98370 Page 1 of 1 wr .... � W it m ma//ma: tP httP P son-co.mason.wa.us/ou ut/mason_ARCIMS242452924522.png 2/11/2013 o may, -I z vi I Gl' yr Ld �� • �•••�� •p•: S G' •.4 _ I r I .I: t 13 �f• n� PAO T. I I' Q PAR • • J / 1 Z •�r- , J O /♦ /. �r i / nn.. F �V 1 f � / _ a Hoc � I s W �y2� O RO z NE FERN WAY- (LM RD SEA_. tO Z t Lev Z OQ vo - T23NR2W �N �ARs0Ne�-J� R1W �P � O�vP OJ,` Co NE LE yq vQQ� Ir Co =t� �VV D v ,a m 15 , m M uj z �2 GL lei NE SQUIRE LN •c,K RD NE P m w 2 O r O T22NR1W toOf Lu o N -T05 fa ie,4 IJ! 5 AjvQ Y vQ C kuA R' E l 1 inch = 2,000 feet 1 inch = 0 miles S �1 S saI!W p = youi 1aaI ON = uoui I f^ Iva Tw S So o e- W sr � ' ♦ { C7/ Y tirr A • �• �} � � _• �� N �_ tip., �� , "„�,-., •"� ' si�i`+r�:•_t•.\• �, �-' `•+Iwr•rl-., .9 �����.",�; . m� ---`�. � V fry . .1f c. Hwy -°''t• 7 N-STAr MASON COUNTY AL MD Fo DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT o A U N Planning Division N ° T n P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 1864 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-340) SEP2013-00021 Description of Proposal: Construction of a 8,000 sq. ft. church building (100 ft. by 60 ft. footprint area; some portion two-story) on 4.16 acre property and zoned Rural Residential 5 zone; parking area for 75 to 100 vehicles; stormwater treatment pond areas provided. Proponent: IGLESIA ASAMBLEA DE DIOS AGUA VIVP Location of Proposal: Parcel Number: 123313200040 Legal Description: TR 4 OF GOVT LOTS 3-4 Directions to site: State Route 300 to NE Gladwin Rd., Belfair WA Lead Agency: Mason County The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. This information is available to the public upon request. Please contact Allan Borden at ext. 365 with any questions. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The Lead Agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date shown below, when the determination is final. Comments must be submitted to Dept. of Community Development, P.O. Box 279, Shelton WA 98584 by 4/18/2013. Appeal of this determination must be filed within a 14-day period following this final determination date, per Mason County Code Chapter 15.11 Appeals. el Zc3 Authorized Local Government Official Date 14 4/4/2013 Conditions Associated With 9:37:41AM Case#: SEP2013-00021 Permit Condition Status Updated item# Code Title Status Changed BY Tag Date BY 1) 260 Erosion Control NOT MET 4/3/2013 ABB Site developers and individuals shall be required to control erosion during construction. Removal of vegetation should be minimized and any areas disturbed should be restored to prevent erosion and other environmental impacts. X 2) 320 Debris Removal NOT MET 4/3/2013 ABB Debris or deleterious material resulting from site preparation and construction shall be removed from the site area and shall not be allowed to enter waters of the State. X 3) 20 Stormwater Site Plan NOT MET 4/3/2013 ABB A Stormwater Site Plan(SSP)will be created and implemented prior to development,clearing,grading,or construction of any portion of the proposed development. X 4) 230 Storm Drainage Facilities NOT MET 4/3/2013 ABB Storm drainage facilities are required by the County for residential or commercial development projects. Facilities shall include,but not be restricted to vegetated swales,retention ponds and use of artificial or natural wetlands PROVIDED no adverse impacts to the receiving areas or wetlands would occur;these facilities may be subject to Mason County approval. X Page 1 of 1 CaseConditions..rjx STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47775•Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 •(360)407-6300 711 for Washington Relay Service •Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 April 18, 2013 Mr.Allan Borden Your address Mason County Department of Community Development is in the Planning Division ' PO Box 279 watershed Shelton,WA 98584 Dear Mr.Borden: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the Asamblea De Dios Internacional Agua Viva Church Construction project(SEP2013-00021) located on Gladwin Beach Road in Belfair as proposed by Joaquin Miguel,Asamblea De Dios Internacional Aqua Viva. The Department of Ecology(Ecology)reviewed the environmental checklist and has the following comment(s): T03UCS CLEANUP: Joyce Mercuri (360) 407-6260 If contamination is suspected, discovered, or occurs during construction,testing of the potentially contaminated media must be conducted. If contamination of soil or groundwater is readily apparent,or is revealed by testing,Ecology must be notified. Contact the Environmental Report Tracking System Coordinator at the Southwest Regional Office at (360)407-6300. For assistance and information about subsequent cleanup and to identify the type of testing that will be required, contact Joyce Mercun with Ecology's Toxic Cleanup program at the phone number given above. SEPA REVIEWER: Sonia Mendoza WATER QUALITY CONTACT: Deborah Cornett(360)407-7269 Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW,Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201A,Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading,or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or stormdrains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. After completion of this project,there is likelihood that stormwater runoff will contain increased levels of grease, oils, sediment, and other debris_..It is recommended that stormwater treatment devices be installed so that any discharge will be appropriately treated to remove these substances. During construction,all releases of oils,hydraulic fluids, fuels, other petroleum products, I paints, solvents,and other deleterious materials must be contained and removed in a manner April 18, 2013 Page 2 that will prevent their discharge to waters and soils of the state. The cleanup of spills should take precedence over other work on the site. Clearing limits and/or any easements or required buffers should be identified and marked in the field,prior to the start of any clearing, grading, or construction. Some suggested methods are staking and flagging or high visibility fencing. A permanent vegetative cover should be established on denuded areas at final grade if they are not otherwise permanently stabilized. Properties adjacent to the site of a land disturbance should be protected from sediment deposition through the use of buffers or other perimeter controls, such as filter fence or sediment basins. All temporary erosion control systems should be designed to contain the runoff from the developed two year, 24-hour design storm without eroding. Provision should be made to minimize the tracking of sediment by construction vehicles onto paved public roads. If sediment is deposited,it should be cleaned every day by shoveling or sweeping. Water cleaning should only be done after the area has been shoveled out or swept. Wash water from paint and wall finishing equipment should be disposed of in a way which will not adversely impact waters of the state. Untreated disposal of this wastewater is a violation of State Water Quality laws and statutes and, as such,would be subject to enforcement action. This project may require a construction stormwater permit(also known as National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) and State Waste Discharge General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction). This permit is required for projects which meet both of the following conditions: 1. One or more acres of soil surface area will be disturbed by construction activities. 2. The site already has offsite discharge to waters of the state or stormdrains or will have . offsite discharge during construction. An application with instructions can be downloaded from Ecology's website at: htt-D://www.ecv.wa.p,ov/t)rop,rams/wg/stormwater/construction/-Application. Construction site operators must apply for a permit at least 60 days prior to discharging stormwater. Ecology's comments are based upon information provided by the lead agency. As such,they may not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations that must be obtained or legal requirements that must be fulfilled in order to carry out the proposed action. If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments,please contact the appropriate reviewing staff listed above. Department of Ecology Southwest Regional Office (SM:13-1615) cc: Deborah Cornett,WQ Joyce Mercuri, TCP 1�IL+ Joyce Smith, HQ/WQ Joaquin Miguel,Asamblea De Dios Internacional Aqua Viva(Applicant) �Y� MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division P.O. Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 (360) 427-9670 DDR2013-00016 NOTICE OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT. Notice is hereby given that the Belfair Iglesia Asamblea De Dios Agua Viva Church, who is the owner of the described property below, has filed an application for a Special Use Permit for the development of: Construction of a 8,000 sq. ft. church building(100 ft. by 60 ft. footprint area) on 4.60 acre property and zoned Rural Residential 5 zone. To construct a building over 3,000 sq. ft. in size and large parking area in this zone, the applicant must receive approval through a Special Use Permit public review and hearing by the County Hearings Examiner. Parcel Number: 12331-32-00040 (4.16 ac.) Site Address: 20 NE Gladwin Rd., Belfair WA. Location of Project: At the corner of Gladwin Rd. and State Route 300 and 0.50 mile east of Belfair State Park; within the northwestst '/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 31, Township 23 N., Range 1 W. in Mason County Washington. Said proposed development is subject to Special Use Permit review(M.C.C. 17.05.040) and associated Mason County Development Regulations standards. Any person desiring to express their view or to be notified of the action taken on the application should notify in writing of their interest to: MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PO BOX 279 SHELTON, WA 98584 The comment period is at least 10 days from the final date of publication given pursuant to M.C.C. 15.07.030 (public notice). Final date of publication,posting or mailing of notice is April 4, 2013. Written comments will be accepted up to the date of the Hearings Examiner public hearing Tuesday May 14, 2013; 1:00 PM. Contact this office at(360)427-9670, ext. 365 for further information. This construction proposal is subject to environmental review per WAC 197-11-800(1)(c). A Determination of Non-Significance will be issued and subject to 14-day public comment period ending on April 17, 2013. Written comments will be accepted up to the above date of the Hearing Examiner public hearing. Contact this office at (360) 427-9670, ext. 365 for further information. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF.WASHINGTON ) ��l�la b ss. COUNTY OF MASON ) IAt Da rge4A. do hereby certify that I posted l copies of he attached S �C 05e- rey� ( -�- t No-tvt4 on day of (I ( 20 (3 in A public places.as follows: ��. one atW , one at O.ne at D, ��J �� �Lr PoSf ° a-� In witness whereof, the party has signed this Affidavit of posting Notice this day of Ili , 20J By: PC Z7� S�l� � ��.�. Address: It STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss• COUNTY OF MASON ) Subscribed and sworn to me this,4C� day of �/� �.� , 20�_ Notary Public �j• �/��'�� State of Washington DEBBERA COKER Notary Public for the State of Washington W COMMISSION EXPIRES 11/15/2014 Residing at Commission Expires II William & Joan Graham 1925-D Nevada Court Los Osos, CA 93402 505-903-3769 April 9, 2013 Mason County Department of Community Development Planning Division P.O. BOX 279 Shelton, WA 98584 RE: DDR2013-00016 As property owners in the Lynch Cove development we are adamantly opposed to granting the Special Use Permit for the purpose of an 8000 sq. ft. church on Parcel 12231-32-0040. The zoning for the area is for Residential Use and should be kept as such. A church is NOT compatible with the surrounding lands. A church belongs within the"city" limits of Belfair,not along the beautiful shores of Hood Canal. Comments made by representatives of the church such as"measures will be taken to protect the community in question"are vague. What protection does the church feel the community needs as a result of its being established on the proposed site? The church representatives further state that"there will not be any significant impact upon existing uses of any adjacent lands". In the present day, most church attendees arrive via automobile. Traffic on North Shore Road is already impacted during the busy summer season. A church will bring additional traffic problems. Churches no longer only hold services for a few hours on Sunday. In these times, services and church related activities are commonly held at all different times during the day, evening and weekends. Additionally, congregations presently take on more and more roles such as day care centers, senior citizen activities,youth recreation, social services,to name a few. Churches often hold outdoor activities for youth in which loud music is played. We are not against churches in general but do not feel the proposed location is the best one for this particular use. We urge the Planning Department to keep the current zoning for residential use in place and deny the special use permit application of the Iglesia Asamblea de Dios Agua Viva. The church would better serve the community on a site located more appropriately in the town center area of Belfair. �lnce ly, William Jo Graham APN: 336-5 -00016 RECEIVED AIPR 15 2913 426 W. CEDAR ST. 231 N E Bryan Lane Belfair,Wash 98528 Mason County Dept. Of Community Development Planning Division PO Box279 Shelton Wash 98584 Mr.Alan Borden I recently spoke to you about a Special Use Permit DDR2013-00016 that had been sent to the Lynch Cove Community. Because I did not receive a notice of this, I have some concerns. On the first page of the Notice Of Special Use permit it says construction of a 8,000 sq.ft.building. Then it says"to construct a building OVER 3,000 sq.ft. In size. How much OVER? Confusion continues,as,on the second page of the application,the Applicant Joaquin R(?) quotes the building as only 8,000 sq ft. Could you please clarify? In your Permit request you ask the Applicant to provide a site plan,including location of drinking water supply.The Applicant supplied you with a map where it notes a tiny square,well past 491 Gladwyn Beach Drive where it is written"public water connection".What is the source for the water? Is this a private well?How deep is it?Is it enough to supply two buildings,one 8,000 sq.ft.And another 3,000 or OVER sq.ft.?Will it affect our water table at our Lynch Cove Community well source on Bryan Lane?I am VERY confused when the Applicant states that"this property is served by adequate public facilities that are PRESENTLY in place". If this is true,can you please send me that information? If,in fact,the well must be drilled,will it pass County Code.15? Please send me any and All information and sources for this so-called water supply. Please refer to the County's Capitol Facilities Plan and to the impact this will have on the Lynch Cove Salt March Restoration. Lynch Cove Community Park belongs to the Lynch Cove Community. It is a Private park on the cove. A concern has been noted that with a large input of people coming into the community, it will force us to hire a full-time Attendant to keep control. Even then,it will affect the members safety as non-members seek access. Please clarify to me where the actual site is for the retaining pond. As it looks on the map presented,it looks like a drainage straight down to the canal. Is it the required 200 ft away? Thank You Lesley Kabelac IVET APR 2 2 L •ter h �+�LS t D-),1 TA SIT r- AUSFESSMENT Conducted On: MASMM COli-I STY TALC PARCEL BELFAIR, WASHING r®N ate. ' Z. /pro CO ( YJ: AT •. �"I .qt 4 f: •:� �� t a ,s March 13, 2013 Project No: 0213-01 Prepared for MICHAEL S WEN ENVIROTECH ENGINEERING EELFAIR, WA Phase !ESA Prepared By ADESA, LLC P.O. Box 1009 Tenino, WA 98589 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment ADESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report represents the findings of AQESA's Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed on Mason County Tax Parcel ;4:12331-32-00040 (Subject Property, Property) in Section 31, Township 23N, Range 1W. The Subject Property is located south of the intersection of NE State Route 300 and NE Cladwin goad, southwest of Belfair, WA, in an area of Hood Canal kneirin as Lynch Cove. The Property is undeveloped sorest land surrounded by the Lynch Cove residential development to the southwest and west, rural residential and Hood Canal to the east/northeast and the Pat's Little Red Barn Restaurant to the north. The irregular shaped, approximately 4.16 acre Subject Property is the proposed site for a nevJ church structure planned by the current owner, Robert Christensen Enterprises LLC. t. o- i N � m 2 I,. T w` w m P Z = C •1 0 4 f I' Ak •p0pq. v� . � = 4 7 Figure 1.0:2011 PJason Co.Piircel Map(SeAbrect Property Boondary in Red) ADESA has developed and performed this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment within the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-05, and in conformance with the Federal AN Rules. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in this report. The Phase I Site Assessment of Mason County Tax Parcel :ff-12331-32-00040, has revealed no evidence Recognized Environmental Conditions(REC). ii PO BOX 1009•Tenino,WA•98589 Phone.360-701-8797•Fax:360-264-2028•email: r flme.... r*•r yn�;}�""'m t, ':.::,, :.`7"r e -;.urr .,,i-awT;:T�"?'-�c''—"r--c. 544 r t, 1� .Kk'%'+ttw i.'Gz tfs•t w; i7 t ,s s^ `r( a�';,rlrl- r•?i; �' `;' 1:. ,�fi '�a �;,,. ,�Y - TV,�.(I{ 7"�f ::'.-"".��k�'4+}•`, .,3'>i'3tx P.tr.,`�A�t'"'�44IWjr°r,'iT ,4 1 ,i: +'F'21 r� t r ,a ``-t '•fix fTM"�`'"i 't}< 1.'k It r ra,`a 1V*, if€ r r r ! r,<. :.h,I ,tt �,.. ,.. { � .; trN•rx u4�+i„ I. r�.:r�"�±7�73'4U�j 4F' � Mi Mason County Address She Name City Zip Code Rank VCP? Call) fSID DNR MISSION CREEK SPS BELFAIR r 9025 40835029 BELFAIR 98528-9319 Detail Data: Record Type Date Basis NFA 813012012 NFA-Initiallnvestigatlon Mr.kkY, .t .Y-.;�h'2, 4' lI( •/: }' ai!,c 'y ,} 1. i :4': ; .tii:. 'J"T•A `F!`. �.4 nt l�.•tt 1tt. .T'. ��•�.'t A, IA,-•tt� �1&i.` '1$ $, i�i. �"'1 .v''i�,. t A l .i '!�' =;-.(f-n�,M...� l'.bi T tt yy$" .a:�,+ •�,r. 1`�.++?S»? ..IS:l 1d�r r .tt r ``'•3�V1 -?r'.;,�''M� 4„�� n r�l r..'f 'd PA..._Lrti t 49q,Yi4'4i ?x.3(,�7} 'hf w�.Mr.. 'z,, � :,Y•y.�•.f 4Pl'iA. ..(+�.lri 5S�1 'Na-4 'A'k4 ..4 � 'S R..s,r 1..�: ,�..•J�"`u:Jl '4, �,17 `>Tf'.1 ,p„+'.�;,ar .<M,�l ,.. :.r''i'Mi'� i(U,,�4.� 1 {S. t trot r H't .��h.,'��3��-�� ,.��n ,-�.�.'»x.=.... ^•h; .4�rf 1.7.:�"i �- :1�('-7,.,.;t ? :{: 1: iR�,N•. ,s 1 W c ,;., :d.>,Y ...�,i,. .�,. :�1�7e!_•.} et�,:,,;} Uc.�Y:'y..,,ti� fi .. ,I, }. I` .. -. 3, .f �!�- '�r 1' ( �"l 4-, '� l r�" ,.FY,•,l� ,.ki � S\ ,.,.:f tv,:,� lt� `.f: 7. :.��- 1 I :�- i'Y," ,!97� ..',t<.a�• } .a i'da.� •tii4�.�"z.., .S I�% `•„rt. A'U�t' ,, ";i 1,s�+':. .•+,k f;•7x.",t l r )) '.{rt.. >�`'r- �: ..f 1, 9,..t I n ,r�� oa ,el,n. ,J, -•�t c, .�a. �lw,.,✓ur •,P..' i*•; v �..- t ..L.' � r,„ a3. �,_F�('S. ..1 If�ar ,,w ta rf,f, J... .d .x+ tt�.4Exa to y".: 6, ,J",,,'� .:'Si � �} f�,1� �_r, a,I:. 1 .x, r.+ .,:�� .t-1 S.R,{_' 1' •�zr �� �:�" • sf.,,;, t. + �,u -Ki.. ., t wRs'�'r•fr f� "v<� t`. �k o.l; � r� zxr J ,,E�. ,�3^ .+�1. f a:. .,tt:� . .h�;i: S.. M sty T ,t, ,t 5>; u�r�tipp t' a,dta ,t,F7 'C t�9"��,,. n rr» 4 H'37 .,�a, r�, ,•i:=,•."�,xrt,s. � ..... ',4r+t, ,,:,,. .,. .'u _� �., � t+.. m..,,a. a�.. �?�, .�N . ..'t�.^t �w�4�.: 'r', �� :,4�nt ,� EMEF:Frirrt Map ERA Media:Air Single facility Facility cluster 31 2 ibiles Q 2013 Microsoft Corporation p MIO NAVTEQ QAND ~.epa.g wienv-�,3p/pri nbmp.hbil Facility'/Sits: RSA,, I-,_.:1r,-�NP4GSEN 89356253 Also known as: AddressDeS`fmal C'oordinases 380 HWY 300 NE Latitude:47.43607 BELFAIR WA 98528-0205 Longitude:-122.86753 Cecggaphic Information Ecology Region:SWRO Legislative District-.35 WRIA: 15 County_ Mason Congressional District:6 Tribal Land: No Ecology!mteracbons '" Underground Storage TOXICS (360)407-7224 3822 6/8/1998 3/22/2000 Tank Industrial Codes(Extsmal Lipks Boiaw) No NAICS information is available for this facility No SIC information is available for this facility site. site. Report generated on 03-15-2013 Facility/Site: WA DNR MISSION CREED. SPS 40635629 Also known as: Address Decimal Coordinates BELFAIR Latitude:47.438 BELFAIR WA 98528-9319 Longitude:-122.87597 Geographic information Ecology Region:SWRO Legislative District:35 WRIA: 15 County:Mason Congressional District:6 Tribal Land: No Ecology Interactions 4 pq ^tt"�+ ^ice .3£'. r P t 3"' a t,c, y� #�FI'x' Y a ' r 't?qs _ T�YY�° - „" -q �' P x '`e. ..x�-3. t `F. i'`; i:�f '� � s.pr`'F a "�z t`'+t '4" ..�*k, mod• r ka+, -'q a n, -`sC e `,�i LUST Facility TOXICS (360)407-7224 100502 4/16/1991 1/27/1992 Underground Storage TOXICS (360)407-7224 100502 3/18/1991 Tank Industrial Codes(External Links Selow No NAICS information is available for this facility No SIC information is available for this facility site. site. Report generated on 03-15-2013 5 • `t = Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 'sue= 'ADESA Mason County Tax Parse!#12331-32-00040 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Masan County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WORK................................................................... 1 1.1 LOCATION AND REAL ESTATE DESCRIPTION...................................................................... 1 1.2 UTILITIES INFORMATION........................................................................... .......... 1 ............... 1.3 RELATIONSHIP OF THE PURCHASE PRICE TO FAIR MARKET VALUE.................................... 1 1.4 SEARCH FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR USE LIMITATIONS.............................................. 1 1.5 PHYSICAL SETTING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND VICINITY.......................................... 1 1.6 SCOPE OF WORK.................................................................................................................3 2.0 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION...............................................................................3 3.0 INTERVIEWS......................................................................................................................7 4.0 REGULATORY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE REVIEW.............................8 5.0 SITE INSPECTION DETAILS..........................................................................................8 5.1 ADJACENTPROPERTY OBSERVATIONS............................................................... .... 10 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..........................................................10 7.0 QUALIFICATIONS, INVESTIGATION LIMITATIONS, AND USER RELIANCE..11 7.1 STATEMENT OF QUALIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL.......................................... 11 7.2 RELIANCE............................................................................................. .......-......... 11 7-3 INVESTIGATION LIMITATIONS........................................................•--...-............................ 11 8.0 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................13 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.0—2011 Mason County Aerial Photograph Figure 2.0—USGS Topographic Map Figure 3.0—Site Detail Map LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A- Regulatory Database Search Table Appendix B -Phase I ESA Questionnaire Appendix C-Site Inspection Photographs Appendix D-Historic Property Information and Supporting Documents PO BOX 1009-Tenino,WA-98589 Phone:360-701-8797-Far:360-264-2028-e7nail:�t :u;;=; l i r Phase I Environmental Site Assessment �'ADESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WORK This report represents the findings of ADESA's Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed on Mason County Tax Parcel #12331-32-00040 (Subject Property, Property). The Subject Property is located south of the intersection of NE State Route 300 and NE Gladwin Road, southwest of Belfair, WA, in an area of Hood Canal known as Lynch Cove. The Subject Property is the proposed site for a new church structure planned by the current owner, Robert Christensen Enterprises LLC. 1.1 LOCATION AND REAL ESTATE DESCRIPTION Mason County Tax Parcel #12331-32-00040 is located in Section 31, Township 23N, and Range 1W. The following abbreviated legal description was provided by the Mason County Assessor Office's online property database: #12331-32-00040—4.16 acres TR 4 OF GOUT LOTS 3-4 1.2 UTILITIES INFORMATION The Subject Property has never been developed with utilities. 1.3 RELATIONSHIP OF THE PURCHASE PRICE TO FAIR MARKET VALUE The current fair market value appraisal information was not available at the time of this report. Robert Christensen, Robert Christensen Enterprises, LLC, indicated in the attached pre-survey questionnaire that he is not aware of any detrimental environmental conditions that could reduce the value of the property. There are no indications that the price of the Property will be altered based on any known REC. 1.4 SEARCH FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR USE LIMITATIONS To assess the potential for environmental liens or activity use limitations on the Subject Property, ADESA researched information available at the Mason County Auditor's and Assessor's Office, Ecology's Environmental Covenant Registry and other pertinent regulatory databases listed in Appendix A of this report. During the course of this investigation, no environmental liens or use limitations were found in connection with the Subject Property other than those associated with the critical areas and their buffers. 1.5 PHYSICAL SETTING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND VICINITY The Subject Property is an irregular shaped, approximately 4.16 acre, undeveloped timber property. The Subject Property is located south of the intersection of NE State Route 300 and NE Gladwin Road, southwest of Belfair, WA, in an area of Hood Canal known as Lynch Cove. Based on information obtained from the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory online database, no wetlands have been identified on the Property. PO BOX 1009•Tenino,WA-98589 Phone:360-701-8797•Far:360-264-2028•email::r;+::,'ier:i;rtdiii+rie:.�:: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment ADESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 According to a 1994 USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps of the Belfair Quadrangle, the elevation of Subject Property ranges from 45 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) in the central portion of the Property to 15 feet AMSL along NE Gladwin Road. ' t1C�rrtf ,a t vtin r+u t y Figure 2.0: 9994 Photo-revised USGS Topographic Map(Property Baundary in Red) The Property lies within the Puget Sound Lowland,an elongate structural and topographic basin between the Cascade Range and Olympic Mountains. The area has been impacted by repeated complete and partial glaciations and crustal deformation related to the Cascadia subduction zone. In preparation for the development of the Properly, a subsurface geotechnical investigation was performed by Michael Staten, Envirotech Engineering, on February 25, 2013. Several test pits were dug to depths of 6.5-10 feet below the existing ground sup face to assess subsurface conditions. Mr. Staten provided the following description of the findings: "Soils within the upper 12 to 18 inches of natural ground were observed to be organic laden native soils. Most of the test pits on-site exhibited moist, brown and grey, loose to medium dense poorly graded sand (SP) with some gravel extending from near the ground surface to depths of at least 10 feet. Some areas of the property were observed to consist of approximately 3 feet of very moist, brown silt with sand(ML)soils overlying poorly graded sand (SP)." The soil types on the Subject Property have been identified through the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey. In order of prevalence, the dominate soil types on the Subject Property include: Indianola loamy sand, 5 to 15 percent slopes(lb). The Property does not contain areas within the 100 year flood plain as identified on FEMA Map Panel FM5301150135C, dated May, 1988. A copy of the FEMA Firmette is included in the Appendix of this report. PO BOX 1009•Tenino,WA•98589 Phone:360-701-8797•Fax:360-264-2028•email.,it 4(jcer7n'chultdrut-+ru.raclj Phase I Environmental Site Assessment tADESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 Based on USGS Professional Paper 1424-C, "Geologic Framework for the Puget Sound Aquifer System" (Jones, 1998), the surficial hydrogeologic unit in the area of the Property is composed of Vashon advance outwash deposits of the Pleistocene (Qva). The Qva unit consists of well- sorted, fine-grained sand with lenses of coarser sand and gravel;there may also be areas of silt and clay deposits, and non-giacial deposits. Well logs for the Lynch Cove water system wells located to the southeast, reviewed on the Washington State Department of Ecology's online well log database, the static water level of the shallow aquifer is estimated to be 33-50 feet below the ground surface (bgs). Perched, shallow water bearing zones, low permeability surface soils may present in areas of the Property; although the majority of the Property consists of medium brown sand. Based on the topography, the presumed groundwater flow is to the southeast towards the Lynch Cove of Hood Canal. 1.6 SCOPE OF WORK This ESA has been completed at the request of Envirotech Engineering and Robert Christensen Enterprises, LLC to satisfy the due diligence requirement necessary to qualify for the innocent purchaser defense to CERCLA environmental liability. Specifically, this means the practices that constitute all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property, consistent with good commercial or customary practice, to identify any current or historic Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC/HREC). The scope-of-work for this ESA adheres to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)All Appropriate Inquiry(AAI) Final Rule, 40 C.F.R. Part 312. • ASTM Standard E 1527-05 defines a REC as: "The presence or likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater or surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies." 2.0 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION Historical records including aerial photographs, topographic maps, Metsker maps, Sanborn maps, city directories and property records pertaining to the previous uses and development of the Subject Property were searched for, reviewed or obtained by ADESA from various sources including: • Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDQT) • Washington State Library • Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) • Washington State Department of Ecology(Ecology) 3 PO BOX 1009•Tenino,WA-98569 Phone:360-701-8797•Far:360-264-2028•email:+=nri eijc.rc(c�ad@�u•uYr. :;n * 1g. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment ADESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 • Washington State Archives Office • University of Washington Library's Map Collection & Cartographic Information Services Unit • Washington State University Online Digital Map Collection (WSU) • Evergreen State College Library(TESC) • Timberland Regional Library System • Mason County Offices(Assessor,Auditor, Health Department/Environmental Health) • Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW) • Microsoft Research Maps online Date Information Obtained Source The Property Yis depicted as part of a larger"parent parcel"owned by Rosa Beard. SR 300(aka North Shore Metsker Map of Mason County 1935 Road, State Highway 21 C)does not reviewed at the Washington State follow its current path west of the Library Property;the State Route seems to follow NE Gladwin Road northeast and east of the Property. The map depicts no indications of development on the Property. Several structures are depicted east of the Property on Lynch Cove. SR 300(aka USGS 1:62500 Scale Topographic 1938 North Shore Road, State Highway Map of the Allyn, WA Quadrangle 21 C)does not follow As current path west of the Property; the State Route seems to follow NE Gladwin Road northeast and east of the Property. No development is visible on the USGS Aerial Photograph reviewed 1939 online on the USGS Earth Explorer Property. website. hrip:hfiaaruhe;;�9 The Property is depicted as part of a larger"parent parcel"owned by Rosa Beard. SR 300(aka North Shore Metsker Map of Mason County 1941 Road, State Highway 21 C) does not reviewed at the Washington State follow its current path west of the Library Property;the State Route seems to follow NE Gladwin Road northeast and east of the Property. War Department, Army Map Service 1942 No signs of development are visible on Aerial Photograph reviewed online at the Subject Property. the Washington State Department of Ecology Coastal Atlas No development is visible on the USGS Aerial Photograph reviewed 1951 Property online at the Washington State Department of Ecology Coastal Atlas 1953 The map depicts no indications of USGS 1:62500 Scale Topographic 4 PO BOX 1009•Tenino,WA•98589 Phone:360-701-8797•Fax:360-264-2028•email:ir:Vfhe(i J!'!i'.G•i(r.^.t.i-}y[l.:i iir ° .,..u Phase I Environmental Site Assessment `RDESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 development on the Property. Map of the Belfair,WA Quadrangle is owned b Elmer Metsker Map of Mason County 1955 The Property Y reviewed at the Washington State Beard. Library USGS Aerial Photograph reviewed 1968 No development is visible on the online on the USGS Earth Explorer Property. website. I tt :i;' arthex ivrer. �scls., o+{ Metsker Map of Mason County 1969 The Property is owned by Elmer reviewed at the Washington State Beard. Library The map depicts no indications of development on the Property. Primitive roads are depicted in the USGS 1:62500 Scale Topographic 1975 approximate location of the current Map of the Tacoma,WA Quadrangle logging/access roads on the Property. The surrounding areas appear similar to historic and current conditions. Preliminary septic designs were 1976 submitted to Mason County,for a Mason County Community multifamily development of up to 46 Development, Permit File Review units on the Property No structures or other signs of development are visible on the Property. A clearing is visible in the Aerial Photograph reviewed online at 1977 approximate area of the pile of poured the Washington State Department of foundation sections observed during Ecology Coastal Atlas the site inspection portion of the investigation. An Environmental Impact Statement was submitted to Mason County for the 1977 proposed development of the Mason County Community Hideaway Townhouse Club on the Development, Permit File Review Property. A development consisting of 46 two bedroom apartments. The Mason Regional Planning Council 1977 released a staff report,findings and Mason County Community recommendations on the proposed Development, Permit File Review Hideaway Townhouse Club. Foundation permits were issued to former Property owner Weldon Thompson,for the construction of 6 four-plex foundations. These 1977 foundations are believed to have been Mason County Community poured and then subsequently piled up Development, Permit File Review in the east-central portion of the Property,where they remain currently. No further construction or development 5 PO BOX 1009•Tenino, WA•98589 Phone:360-701-8797•Fax:360-264-2028•email:y!:r,r:ne_?izC ,. ;:r_,e wu.:x;rn .A& =ADESA Phase I County Tax Pa ce#12331S32-00040 ,�w`�2° Mason is believed to have taken place on the Property after the concrete foundations were poured. No information was discovered to suggest a reason for the halt in construction. The Property is owned by W. Metsker Map of Mason County 1988 Thompson reviewed at the Washington State Library No structures or other signs of development are visible on the USGS Aerial Photograph reviewed at 1990 Property. The Property and Microsoft Research Maps online surrounding areas appear similar to (htf-i:i;; current conditions. A building permit application was submitted to Mason County by former Property owner Weldon Thompson. The application proposed the construction of a 28 unit multifamily Mason County Community 1990 residential development consisting of 2 Development, Permit File Review five-plex, 3 four-plex, and 2 tri-plex structures. The proposed development was to be named"Scenic Shores". The building permit does not appear to have ever been approved. Preliminary sewer and water availability documents filed with Mason County for the proposed Scenic Shore Mason County Community 1991 development on the Property. No Development, Permit File Review further action appears to have been taken regarding the Scenic Shores development No structures are depicted on the USGS Topographic Map reviewed at 1994 Property. Microsoft Research Maps online A pre-submission conference is submitted by the former owner Weldon Thompson,for the construction of two 2001 multifamily condominium buildings on Mason County Community the Property. The condominiums were Development, Permit File Review to have 13,896 sq.ft. of ground floor space. It appears that the proposed project was never implemented. Aerial photograph reviewed at the 2005,2006, The aerial photos depict the area much Mason County TerraScan TaxSifter 2009, 2011 as it appears today. website, : rs,le .c .„rayon •,Na.,us,'Taxs`, 6 PO BOX 7009•Tenmo,WA•98589 Phone.360-701-8797•Fax-360-264-2028•email:+t:-r�;.c<.ir,r;';t?c,:.rfra_••.e:c c r,i " Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Nj y ADESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 The property is not covered by Sanborn Maps or any city directories. The review of the historical use information above has revealed no REC. The historic references reviewed for this assessment suggest that the Subject Property has never been fully developed beyond its use as a timber/recreation property. Mason County development records suggest that several multifamily residential developments were proposed by the former owner of the Property, Weldon Thompson. Permit records suggest that a series of poured concrete building foundations were constructed on the Property in the late 1970's. During the field reconnaissance, conducted on February 25, 2013, the foundation segments were observed to be piled in the east-central portion of the Property. 3.0 INTERVIEWS ADESA contacted local government agencies to identify any current or historical information or reports of hazardous materials usage, storage, and/or releases that may have impacted the Subject Property. ADESA made reasonable efforts to contact previous property owners and conducted interviews modeled after the ASTM derived ADESA Phase I ESA User questionnaire (See Appendix C). Some previous property owners were not contacted due to the lack of usable contact information, and/or the likelihood that any information provided would be duplicative. Interviewee Information Obtained Date/Style Mr. Christensen indicates that the Subject Property Robert Christensen was acquired from the Estate of Weldon Thompson (owner), Robert in 2011. Mr. Christensen further stated that there 3/1/13 Christensen Enterprises, are no utilities or other improvements on the Environmental LLC Property, and that he is unaware of any current or Questionnaire historic land uses that could have led to detrimental environmental conditions on the Property. Kathy Soine Clerical 111, Mason Ms. Soine provided ADESA with historic property 3/12/2013 County Community permitting information for the Property. Telephone Development and Permitting Office Jess Mosley, Mr. Mosley reviewed the Mason County Environmental Health permitting/land use/general complaint database and Specialist, Mason found no information to suggest that any hazardous 3/4/2013 County Public Health, materials responses have occurred or that any Email Environmental Health recognized environmental conditions exist on the Division Subject Property. Mr. Hicks reviewed the Mason County Fire District Jeremy Hicks, Fire #2 records and found no information to suggest the 3/13/2013 Chief, Mason County use of petroleum UST/ASTs or that any hazardous Telephone Fire District#2 materials responses have occurred on the Subject Property. 7 PO BOX 1009•Tenino,rYA•98589 Phone:360-701-8797•Far:360-264-2028•emazl y Phase I Environmental Site Assessment `- ADESA �T- Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 4.0 REGULATORY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE REVIEW As part of this assessment, ADESA performed a review of pertinent Local, State and Federal databases in search of potential documented Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC) in association with the Subject Property and/or properties within a 1-mile search radius. The regulatory database search information is presented in Appendix A of this report and is consistent with that specified by ASTM Standard E 1527-05 for government records review. Further, governmental databases not identified below indicate that no sites fitting those criteria exist within the ASTM specified search radius or were otherwise determined to be of no significance to this investigation. For a full listing of the governmental databases reviewed, see Appendix A. No listings for the Property were found in the databases searched and no surrounding sites of concern were identified within the ASTM search radius, which are likely to have contributed to detrimental environmental conditions on the Subject Property. See Appendix A for supplemental information regarding regulated sites and facilities in the vicinity. 5.0 SITE INSPECTION DETAILS On February 25, 2013, Mr. William W. Rutherford (ADESA) inspected the Subject Property for signs of current/historic recognized environmental conditions. The majority of the Subject Property is forested. Access to the interior areas of the Property was provided by a historic overgrown access road. ADESA observed poured foundation segments pushed into a pile in the east-central portion of the Property. Permit records obtained from Mason County Community Development suggest that the foundation segments were poured in the early stages of a planned multifamily residential development. There were no site observations that suggest the foundation segments were completed as structures. An approximately 500-gallon heating oil above ground storage tank(AST)was discovered to the north of the foundation segments. The AST appeared to have been disconnected at another location and placed on the Property. At the time of the site inspection the AST was empty and in fair condition with some signs of corrosion and no visible holes. It is not clear what, if any, were the uses for the AST in relationship to the Property. Field assessment of the soil beneath the AST did not yield any petroleum odors or other indications of petroleum impacts. An empty, open 55-gallon drum of Nox-Crete, concrete form releasing agent, was identified near the AST location. The Nox-crete may have been used during the pouring of the concrete foundation segments in the late 1970's. It is unclear whether the Nox-Crete drum contained more than residual amounts of product when it was left on the Property. No signs of distressed vegetation, petroleum/chemical odors or other indications of a release of hazardous materials were observed in the area of the drum, Minimal dumping of household waste, furniture and several oil filters was observed on the southern portion of the Property along the boundary between the Property and the neighboring residential lots to the southwest. ADESA observed no other signs of historic development or other indicators of potential REC. PO BOX 1009•Tenino,WA-96589 Phone:360-701-8797•Far:360-264-2028•email:tii_71_h_;nnz0ad_,q_n a con? li Environmental I Environental Site Assessment ADESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 r , R (y t g ? AST and Drum 5 of O r NerwT�'EryOa; Foundation Segments ! 3 GR� Area of � , p� �vF Dumping 0P t v? e°0 Figure 3.0:Property Detail Map(Subject Property Boundary in Red) Condition or present REC Reference Sources Feature Petroleum Site Visit, Personal Interviews, Underground No No Mason Co. Environmental Health, Storage Tank(UST) WA State De artment of Ecology Petroleum Aboveground Yes No Site Visit, see explanation above. Storage Tank(AST) Vapor No REC or likely contamination Encroachment No N0 on the Subject Property or nearby Condition (VEC) sites base on environmental records review Asbestos Containing Building Materials No No Site Visit (ACM) Lead paint No No Site Visit Low lying areas along SR Drainage points 300 to the west and NE No Site Visit Gladwin Road to the east. Dumping Yes, see discussion No Site Visit above 9 PO BOX 1009•Tenn,WA•98589 Phone:360-701-8797•Fax:360-164-2028•emad.-wnirher i,iy/i,�rdu, r-�ts�.cnRr Phase I Environmental Site Assessment N , 1ADESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 Odors No No Site Visit Pools of liquids No No Site Visit Operation or management of equipment No No Site Visit potentially containing PCBs Surface stains No No Site Visit Stressed vegetation No No Site Visit Areas that are Yes, an access road has apparently filled or been historically cut graded by non- across the Property from No Site Visit natural causes the south to the north. Wells No No Site Visit, Ecology Well Log Database No, several preliminary Site Visit, information provided by septic designs have Septic, sewage, historically been planned No the current owner, Mason County and/or waste water for the Property, but never Environmental Health, Mason installed. County Community Development. 5.1 ADJACENT PROPERTY OBSERVATIONS Property Description Location Relative to REC Anticipated Subject Property (Y/N) NE Gladwin Road and beyond, Pafs Little North N Red Barn Restaurant SR 300 and beyond, Lynch Cove West N residential development NE Gladwin Road and beyond, rural single family residential structures and Hood East N Canal(Lynch Cove Lynch Cove residential development I South N Potential RECs on the neighboring properties are discussed in Section 4.0 of this report. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADESA has developed and performed this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment within the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-05, and in conformance with the Federal AAI Rules. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in this report. The Phase I Site Assessment of Mason County Tax Parcel #12331-32-00040, has revealed no evidence Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC). l0 PO BOX 1009•Tenino, WA•98589 Phone:360-701-8797•Fax:360-264-2028•email; ; Phase I Environmental Site Assessment` s !ADESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 7.0 QUALIFICATIONS, INVESTIGATION LIMITATIONS,AND USER RELIANCE 7.1 STATEMENT OF QUALIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL Mr. William Rutherford is a qualified Environmental Professional under the EPA's All Appropriate Inquiries Final Rule. Mr. Rutherford has been performing due diligence related site assessments for twelve years across the United States (Ohio, Maryland, Kentucky, West Virginia, Oregon, California, Idaho and Washington). Mr. Rutherford possesses a Master of Environmental Studies degree from an accredited college and has held multiple state and federal certifications to perform environmental investigations in Washington State for 11 years. I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR Part 312. 1 have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the Subject Property. I have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. William W. Rutherford, MES, AHERA Senior Environmental Project Manager 7.2 RELIANCE This report has been prepared for the benefit of the Envirotech Engineering and Robert Christensen Enterprises, LLC (Users). Any other party without the express written consent of the Envirotech Engineering, Robert Christensen Enterprises, LLC and ADESA may not use the information contained in this report, including all exhibits and attachments. It should be emphasized that conditions at the Subject Property can change over time. The use of this report by third parties shall be at their own risk. 7.3 INVESTIGATION LIMITATIONS ADESA`s site inspection included observations of areas that were accessible by foot and a visual inspection of surrounding and adjacent properties, including those properties identified in the environmental regulatory agency database search that were located adjacent to the Subject Property. Certain conditions may have prevented or limited access to all on-site locations. The work conducted by ADESA is limited to the services agreed to with the Envirotech Engineering (i.e. Phase I ESA per ASTM Standard E 1527-05), and no other services beyond those explicitly stated should be inferred or are implied. ADESA's Phase I ESA is limited to visual observations of site conditions on the day inspected, review of readily available and relevant data, and statements made and information provided by the client, their agents, outside parties and regulatory agencies. ADESA has exercised due diligence and customary care in the conduct of its assessment. The Phase I ESA is a limited and non-exhaustive survey that is intended to evaluate whether readily available information indicates that the historic or current use of the Subject Property resulted in contamination by hazardous substances or waste. As a result, without a comprehensive sampling and analysis I PO BOX 1009•Tenino,WA•98589 Phone:360-701-8797•Fax:360-264-2028•email:,,, J+sr,' cr2iaci.rn-:ec.c.rn f . s. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment yADESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 program or implementation of services beyond the original scope-of-work, certain conditions, including, but not limited to those summarized below, may not be revealed: A� Naturally occurring toxic substances or elements found in the subsurface soils, rocks, or water; 41 Toxic substances commonly found in current habitable environments, such as, stored household products, building materials, and consumables; Biological or infectious agents and pathogens; Contaminant plumes (liquid or gaseous) below the surface from a remote or unknown source; Contaminants or conditions that do not violate current regulatory standards, but may violate such standards in the future 41 Unknown, unreported, and not readily visible site contamination. In preparing this report, ADESA has reviewed historical records, conducted interviews with certain private and public officials, and performed an on-site visual inspection of the property. ADESA has examined and relied upon documents referenced in the report and has relied on oral statements made by certain individuals. ADESA has not conducted an independent examination of the facts contained in referenced materials and statements. ADESA has assumed the genuineness of the documents and that the information provided in documents or statements is true and accurate. ADESA has prepared this report in a professional manner, using that degree of skill and care exercised for similar projects under similar conditions by reputable and competent environmental consultants. ADESA shall not be responsible for conditions or consequences arising from relevant facts that were concealed, withheld, or not fully disclosed at the time the report was prepared. ADESA also notes that the facts and conditions referenced in this report may change over time, and the conclusions and recommendations set forth herein are applicable only to the facts and conditions as described at the time of this report and the site inspection. ADESA believes the conclusions stated herein to be factual, but no guarantee is made or implied. The following data failure/gaps were indentified in this Phase I Environmental Site: tL None PO BOX 1009•Tenino,WA•98589 Phone:360-701-8797•Fa u 360-264-2028•email: _L,;;-i.,i: ' Phase I Environmental Site Assessment kADESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 8.0 REFERENCES Other sources used in the completion of this report are cited elsewhere in the document, generally at the point of use. EPA Enviromapper. March 15, 2013. Jones, M.A. "Geologic Framework for the Puget Sound Aquifer System, Washington and British Columbia". USGS Professional Paper 1424-C. 1999. Mason County Assessors Online/Hardcopy Data. All property records for Subject Property and limited adjoining properties. March 2013. Metsker, Charles. Metsker Maps of Mason County Washington. 1935, 1941, 1955, 1969 and 1988 NRCS, USDA. Soil Survey of Mason County. March 2013. USGS Earth Explorer Aerial Photographs. 1939, 1951 and 1968. USGS Topographic Map. Allyn Quadrangle. 1938. USGS Topographic Map. Belfair Quadrangle. 1953,2011. USGS Topographic Map. Tacoma Quadrangle. 1975. War Department,Army Map Service Aerial Photograph. 1942. Washington State Department of Ecology. Aerial Photographs reviewed online at Ecology Coastal Zone Atlas n Washington State Department of Ecology. Facility/Site Atlas. I<*14p:/r`,Dr,T Wit.., ,,vac L=.i --rl:�u ite/ ie-;4�er :f; , March 15, 2013. White, Robert; Brown, Mitchell. "Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Hideaway Townhouse Club" Prepared by Mason County,WA. 13 PO BOX 1009-Tenino,FA•98589 Phone:360-701-8797-Fax:360-164-1018•email:_r;the;:'�r?f; gsn-:r _cgaz Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Y )ADESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 APPENDIX A REGULATORY DATABASE SEARCH TABLE 14 PO BOX I009•Tenino,WA•98589 Phone:360-701-8797•Fmo:360-264-2028•email':r�;ulterli:�rd£rxrda.z_r-.r✓.r:, t {; Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment r{+ ADESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 Regulatory Database Search Table Standard Environmental Record Search Distance Present within search Potential Final Database/Record Sources per ASTM 1627-06 (Miles) distance(Yes!No) REC/HREC Source* Research System Date Updated** Federal NPL site list 1.0 No No EPA EnviroMapper 3/13/2013 3/1312013 Federal Delisted NPL site list 0.5 No No EPA EnviroMapper 3/13/2013 3/13/2013 Federal CERCLIS list 0.5 No No EPA EnviroMapper 3/13/2013 3/13/2013 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0.5 No No EPA EnviroMapper 3/13/2013 3/13/2013 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 1.0 No No EPA EnviroMapper 3/13/2013 3113/2013 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Q,5 No No EPA EnviroMapper 3/13/2013 3/13/2013 facilities list Property and adjoining No No EPA EnviroMapper 3/13/2013 311312013 Federal RCRA generators list properties Federal institutional control/engineering Property only No No EPA EnviroMapper 3/13/2013 3/13/2013 control registries Federal ERNS list Property only No No EPA&Ecology 3/13/2013 3/13/2013 State-and tribal-equivalent NPL HSL 1.0 No No Ecology 3/13/2013 3/13/2013 State-and tribal-equivalent CERCLIS 3/13/2013 3/13/2013 CSCSL 0.5 No No Ecology State and tribal landfill and/or SWL 0.5 No No Ecology 3/13/2013 3/13/2013 State and tribal leaking storage tank list 0.5 No No Ecology 3/13/2013 3/13/2013 State and tribal registered storage tank Property and adjoining No No Ecology 3/13/2013 3/13/2013 list properties State and tribal institutional Property only No No Ecology 3/13/2013 3/1312013 control/engineering control registries State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0.5 No I No Ecology 3/13/2013 3/13/2013 State and tribal Brownfield sites 0,5 No I No Ecol 3/13/2013 3/13/2013 *Ecology-Washington State Department of Ecology's Integrated Site Information System(ISIS);and Facilities/Site Identification System (F/SID) "*Ecology and EPA databases were current on the date of the review, The databases searched use data from various environmental records sources,which although current, may not themselves have been updated on the date of the review. EPA Enviromapper. II^1tt. lwww f, �_gav/ernetdat�,'ef 14efwi.3crr e, March 15,2013 Washington State Department of Ecology. Facility/Site Atlas. 61tt : f a s;, c..�'_wa.c uv/uv 6_sitef(acsite/viwvVp.htro;l.., March 15, 2013. Washington State Ueparsi.mzntEcology Facility/Site: Nicholas Cox Palico 94913942 Also known as: Nicholas Cox Palico Address Decimai Coordinates 3170 NE NORTH SHORE RD Latitude:47.43195 NO 49 Longitude:-122.87604 BELFAIR WA 98528 Geographic information Ecology Region: SWRO Legislative District 35 WRIA: 15 County: Mason Congressional District:6 Tribal Land: No Ec Flogy interactions C MK — s�3,,x:3.'�_.MEm"o- I. -�r..7s��.MCC G'3C;e�';-e.' .'� State Cleanup Site TOXICS (360)407-7224 11/16/2000 A site is being cleaned up under state regulations. Regulations include Model Toxics Control Act or its predecessors. industrial codes(External Links Below) No NAICS information is available for this facility No SIC information is available for this facility site. site. Report generated on 03-15-2013 /i5P13 ti�IPF:Print Map Media:Land Single facility Facility cluster rc r 3aD " too 3 302 2 rhiles ®2013 Kcrosaft Corporation ©7010 MVTEQ _O AND www.epa.godemefrmp/printmap.html 1/1 3f15M3 EMEF:Print Map EPA Enviromapper - Raym��.ted R—ad -;Itjaaa FZDc5H]----, t i •V a a= m S Beltail• 4- C 30LI ,Tr ID6 fi 302 2-miles ©2013 Microsoft Co.poration ©2010 NAVTEO ©AND vmw.epago,iemefirapfprininW.hbTd ifi 3/1Sh3 EMEF:FrirdMap eglulilltad Twdc P.G'IaF3Sa FaCHI'doz Media:Toms Single facility Facility cluster r' 4 �M.r.4r Bei}air - e YA 1nb 1 4, w 10{• '• I Fq Z_miles ©2013 Mcrmdt Ccrpa.7 on ©2010 MVTEQQ ©AND wwuvepa.goV-vfinap/printrrW.htrd 1/1 EM EF:Print M ,.I15/13 aP ESA Env9fi ennapper- Regulated Waste HandNng/Storoya FadKNes Media-Vl,,Ae Single facility r Facility cluster •"c i s.. ;S'V 1 \•P��;Br'%3Rt4 rC i yoU s i 31 1 F 302 — r 2 miles �- 14 (T IL7 O 2013 Mcrosdt CorMution ©7010 NAVTEQ l©AND vrnm.epa.go\Yemefniap/printmep.hbTJ 1/1 EM EF:Pri nt Map a Odes giflated VVater/Discharge IF c Media:Water Single facility Facility cluster 8elfair 4'. 'r ti tOG 302 2 miles (D 2013 Mcrwoft Corporation (9 20'0 NAVFEQ (D AND W*V�,.epo,go4en-L-fmap/printm-.p.lim 1/1 31513 EPA I Enurofacts Warehouse I FII r, .://iaspub.epe.gov/e-nvirolRi_query-dtl.disp-pro9ram_facilicy U�t�4 tr+� Last updated an 3/15/2013 �� Facility Registry System (FRS) You are here EPA Home Envirobets I� Report r£ i41�.opcC Facility Detail Reuort 41 BELFAIR DRUMS ADMIRAL FRS 131 ADMIRAL DR BELFAIR,WA 98528-9299 EPA Registry Id:110005340210 c �oDnCr t.cap Legend o'S s - z A.tGapnl� Selected Facility J _ c ❑ EPA Facility of Interest lu H IdE'<�^ice N r1Fs,.� _ !D State/Tribe i Facility of Interest Vc'Sou 0! Ell d he facility locations displayed ome from the FRS Spatial oordinates tables.They are the est representative locations for EEL CAllf VkUMS AUr-l(R11. o e displayed facilities based on 4a a accuracy of the collection ethod and quality assurance -30p--NF VVA-300 ecks performed against each ocation.The North American et` Datum of 1983 is used to display o ��- = Ilcoordinates. NE F+ G Ott/ �vCo 500 yds 0][J fn®a0pm� 0M19N.AVTEO CAND Environmental Interests Information Environmental Interest ! Da:a last UodaOd Suoolamental Environmental Information System System ID [Source RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT UNSPECIFIED UNNERSE _16/2012 :I INF00.MATION SYSTEM __ I_—..SINACTIV� Additional EPA Reports: MvEnvironment Enforcement and Comoliance Site Demographics Watershed Report Standard Industrial Classification Codes(SIC) lNational Industry Classification System Codes(NAICS) No SIC Codes returned. OI a'� 'I F Description I Pr L49.4 Facility Codes and Fia s RCRAINFO'92411 DMINISTRATION OF AIR AND WATER RESOURCE _- — - -9- --• -------- - .�-�AND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS I EPA Reoion 10 -- - --�- - - - — - i _ Duns Number 118963248 Facility Mailing Addresses _- Conprossional District Number 06 -. -'` Dallvery _f� P stat I Lagislatlye District Number WA Affiliation TvoeFgl��.. Co a System --- _� __. _ . ___ _.____..__. n�� - I -e HUC Code Watershed:17110018/HOOD CANAL FACILITY MAILING ---- - - - - ------- !tS PVll OLYMPIA WA 98504 RCRAINFO g,Sy,Mexieo Border Indicator NO ADDRESS Federal Facility:NO_ - 131 NE i ,T .. OWNER i ADMIRAL DR �BELFAIR WA ,99232A RCRAINFO_ Tribal Land:.ND i. ---"- -` ---- - -- -- -- --- _. REGULATORY I CONTACT MS PVll LYMPIA WA 98504 RC RAli Alternative Names -�----- - �-� �— - � No Alternative Names returned. �~ Contacts c Informaton Atfiliadon Tvpe Full Named 1a O---- etl --- _ Ph gne_, ___ S-y d�--J .. . _' --- "--"- - -" "_'- - - -"- - - -"_--•- REGULATORY WA ECY WA (000)000- Affiliation Home main Address _CONTACT �_ECY 'i 0000 .. _RC RAINFO �--_ view---_ WA WNER --_'' w Y.'' RC RAINFO...._.. _._.._.View Query executed on:MAR-15-2013 iaspub.epa.godenuro/fii query_d.dspLlrogram—faciliiy 1!1 gry5ryg EPA I Emirofacts Warehouse i FII hi7.jlfavub.epa gov/enviro/ft_query_dtt disp_pro9ram_factlR{Lastucdated on 3/1512013 Facility Registry Systein (FPS) (U-- You are here EPA Home EnArofaeYs IBa Repv,rt Fadliiv Detail Report _.._.� KLINGEL WETLANDS RESTORATION PROJECT FRS WETLANDS NEAR 2051 N SHORE RD BELFAI R,WA 96528 EPA Reclstry Id:1100404OS442 r D I Legend ".i.kiL L, z Selected Facility 13 ❑ EPA FaclItty of Interest ID State/Trille Facility of Interest or v r 9 i` 30] N£lt A-.35: The facility locations displayed Come from the FRS Spatial �oordlnates tables.They are the KLLNISIE WETLAND_kLS'T0ftAYION PRO)EC'l ❑ est representative locations for . e displayed facilities based on he accuracy of the collection ethod and quality assurance e hecks performed against each tSa ocation.The North American c- atum of 1983 is used to display II coordinates. /W i III I 500 yd4 a]N3 Mkr®aGPndm O?r10 irAVniQ OM9 J Environmental interests Information System Informetlee Environmental 1- omu I SuoolemerKal Environmental System ID Interest Tyn? '� 5o�rea Intereetet NATIONAL POl1.UT NT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM-[ WAR012235 I ICIS-NPDES NON-MAIOR� ICIS IZ106/2012 ENFORCEMENT/COMPLIANCE (ICIS NPDESI WAS HirvGTON-FACSM E IDENTIFICATION I 3409 i STATE MASTER WA-PSIS T-WAR012235I AL NPDES SORMWATER PERMIT Additional EPA Reports: My Environment Enforcement and Compliance Site Demographics Watershed Renort Standard Industrial Classification Codes(SIC) National Industry Classification System Codes(NAICS) No SIC Codes returned. — J No NAILS Codes returned. — Facility Codes and Flags FacRity Mailing Addresses EPA Region 10 � very Point VEL State C l In nrmation _._.— — --- --- — — pyfi System Duns Number i - _ _.-.. vs ern -- -- - —•---� MAILING I WETLANDS NEAR 2051 N f�� 2iongl District Number 06 _ __— :—ADDRESS SHORE RD BELFAIR WA 98528 WA-PSIS I Legislative District Number: HDC Code/Watershed•'17110018/HOOD CANAL Contacts 113 Mexico Border Indicator NO - __.". . ..___.._---_._ ..__. No Contacts returned. Federa NO —_�.-- Tribal Land:l NO Alternative Names No Alternative Names returned. Organizations No Organizations returned. Query executed on:MAR 15-2013 iaspub.epa"goVenbro/fii_query—dtl.cisp_prcgram_facility 1/1 WISM3 EPA I Entirofacts Warehouse i FII htto./JibSpub.epa.gov/enoiroJfN_qu"_dtl dlsp_program_facility Last updated on 3,115/2013 F cifity Registry System (FRS) You are here.EPA Home Envirofacts FRS Report Facility Report 2N iD%AJP RE FRS MCLEND0f195 Fh BELFAIR,WA 98528 EPA Realstry Id:1100061,i0256 3 Legend r _ -"'a Selected Facility D EPA Facl11ty of Interest " 'Ile NF 4 ❑ StatelTn-be ° z Facility of Interest 0 a J 2 I e Facility locations displayed come from the FRS Spatial n Coordinates tables.They are the Rirl ENDMIS tIARDWARE hest re based locations for S the displayed facilities based on 1.. the accuracy of the collection ' 7R1 ❑ krlethod and quality assurance checks performed against each location.The North American LL Datum of 1983 is used to display S 611 coordinates. L z 3� w 500 yds O an)6vsOfrpvda' a1010TiAVI60 OAM Environmental Interests --------- ------- __ ..---------- _ .... . . .. ---- 1 Information System Information Environmental Interest i Data .Last Updated Suoolemental Environmental; 5vstem ID Tvoe Source Date _ _ Interests: I . __. _ __ ___. _-- ___ ' BIENNIAL REPORTERS WAH000005637 HAZARDOUS WASTE BIENNIAL I RC RAINFO 12/31/2003 1 i r f 0.EPORTER I RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT UNSPECIFIED UNIVERSE FA 02/16/2012ORMAIONSYSTEMTIVE) .__ i __AZWASTE-WAH000005637 STATE MASTER Q Y TE _ _ ----- _ _ --._ _.; Additional EPA Reports: MvEnvironment Enforcement and Compliance, Site Demograohics Watershed Report Standard Industrial Classification Codes(SIC) National Industry classification System Codes(NAICS) No SIC Codes returned. Data Sources I )YAKS Code Descriv— LEdMary RCRAINFO IOF12922 ONE HOUR PHOTOFINISHING Facility Codes and Flags •_A f515_ _ _J 812922 _ ONEHOUR PHOTOFINISHING _I EPA Renlon:,10 - DUns Number:002726870 Facility Mailing Addresses Congressional District Number 06 'I'OWNAry P �I Information _! Affflladon TVDa ;� Lmarrie State. i System _ Lealslativa District Number WA ______-_• -- ---- - HUC Code/Waters rshed F1711.0918(HOOD CANAL_ _._.OPERATOR-.____!PO BOX 415 BELFAIR� WA ! _98528_ RCRAINFO .. __. REGULATORY ' US Mexico Border IndIcAW ri NO CONTACT BOX 550 BEIFAIRI WA i 98528 RCRACNFO _ Federal Fadhty MAILING ADDRESS NE 51 HWY!BELFAIR WA 98528 I WA-PSIS 300 i FACILITY MAILING p0 BO%550;BELFAIR WA 98528 j RCRAINF0 Alternative Names f _ ADDRESS ����� - --- -- -- - --- - ---. _. OWNER lOBOX S_ BELFAIRJ 1_W A 9852 _RC RA?NFO _ Alternative Na ¢ou eeof Data B ELFAIR DRUG 1 NOTIFICATION(RCRA) ^_ Contacts anlzatlons ti Or AfFlliation Full Name I tNfiee Informaon Malting 9 _ �— _ d ss_ ! Affiliation i Information I 1 REGULATORY MC LENDONS HARDW (000)000 IFL�Qt4S1 CONTACT MCIENDONS HARDW 0000 RCRAINF-O �I y�pl OPERATOR CAROL'. RC RAINFO View fir_. 1 6 ' - --- '- OWNER SCMTT RCRAINFO View iaspub.epa.go%nNroA'ii_querydtl_ .cisp_program facility tit 1/2 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 4)DESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 APPENDIX B PHASE I ESA QUESTIONNAIRE is PO BOX 1009•Tenlno, Aril•98589 Phone:360-701-8797 Far:360-264-2028•emall:+vret(ttr f�i;=h'ii=7cle_ra-u•rr.cvnr 4ay =ADESA Environmental Investigations All Appropriate Inquiries Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Questionnaire Please answer the following questions to the best of your knowledge in as much detail as possible.. (1.) Environmental cleanup liens that are filed or recorded against the site (40 CFR 312.25). Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the property that are filed or recorded under federal,tribal, state or local law? (2.)Activity and land use limitations that are in place on the site or that have been filed or recorded in a registry(40 CFR 312.26). Are you aware of any AU[_s, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the site and/or have been filed or recorded in a i registry under federal, tribal, state or local law? I (3.) Do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business? i (4.) Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair I market value of the property? If you conclude that there is a difference, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property? ,.s .4 (5.) Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? Please answer the following as completely as possible: a) When did you acquire the property, and from whom? C;:�r � '45-4 d' sPU''�lt�GY� €�1 cryi'IP-5i'- b) Do you possess contact information for any of the previous owners? Please provide here. r� j /L� i c) Do you know the past uses of the property? V jr PO BOX 1009 •Tenino, WA.98589 ( Phone: 36G-701-8797 • Fax' 360-264-2028 • email: wrutherford(&.adesa-wa.com FADESA Environmental Investigations d) Which companies provide utilities to the property? (Water, Sewer, ! Garbage/Waste, Gas, Power) /Dd nr0 t4 l e) Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the I property? f) Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the f property? 11i,`Ll f g) Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? /L; h) Are you aware of, or do you possess any of the following documents relating to the property? Please provide copies as attachments. Environmental Site Assessments, Environmental Compliance Audits, Local State or Federal Permits (solid/hazardous waste, NPDES, wastewater), Underground Storage Tank Documentation, Material Safety Data Sheets, Safety Plans, Historical Photographs, Geotechnical Studies, Risk Assessments, Environmental Impact Statements or Environmental Assessments, etc... (6.) Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the I have answered these questions and provided site specific information to the best of my knowledge. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that"all appropriate inquiry" is not complete. t dl.',�jt7 ,' —,j Print Name Si atufe Date i I 2 PO BOX 1009 - Tenino, WA 98589 Phone: 360-701-8797 e Fax: 360-264-2028 a email: wrutherford@adesa-wa.com i Phase I Environmental Site Assessment � ADESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 APPENDIX C SITE INSPECTION PHOTOGRAPHS 16 PO BOX1009•Tenino,WA•98589 Phone:360-701-8797•Fac 360-264-2028•email:❑•r rthg or,di zrfesc- r,.c:nv Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment ADCSA Mason County Tax Parcel 9-12331-32-00040 w Looking southwest at the Property from NE Gladwin Rd Residential dumping along southwest property boundary (left) and SR 300 (right) •A ,44 i _ v .. ,�M� I� N Concrete foundation segments in the east-central portion Empty 55-gallon drum of concrete form release agent of the Property PO BOX 1009•Tenino,WA•98589 Plwne:360-701-8797-Fat:360-264-2028•emaiL -_r .zf,;'uuts..-rvuxuw Phase I Environmental Site Assessment ADESA Mason County Tax Parcel##12331-32-00040 ZWK , ,4P Approximately 500-gall heating oil AST. Empty and not Looking to the northeast down SR 300 from the north side installed of the Property i Looking northwest across SR 300 from the Property Looking at the areas east-southeast from the Property PO BOX 1009-Tenino, WA-98589 Phone:360-701-8797-Fax:360-264-2028-email:t,rruhe!lonkaruiesu-u i.canr Phase I Environmental Site Assessment ADESA Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 L# Looking southwest from the southwest boundary of the Property PO BOX 1009•Tenino,Wit•98589 Phone:360-701-8797•Fax.360-264-2028•email:L r,lrherr,rn„ 4D�ADESA Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Mason County Tax Parcel#12331-32-00040 APPENDIX D HISTORIC PROPERTY INFORMATION AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS 17 PO BOX 1009•Tenino,WA•98589 Phone:360-701-8797•Far:360-264-2028•email.-o-nrrh'r"a'ad.W.-i i7x. >m BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION MASON COUNTY P.O. Box 186 Shelton, Washington 9M4 DATE ISSUED PERMIT NO. OWNER -NAME MAILADDR V CrrY STATE DP PHONE DIRECTI NS TO JOB SITE LEGAL /� SEE ATTACHED SHEET) DESCR. � ge CONTRACTOR r^A E L ADDRESS CtTY a STATE LICENSE NO. PHONE USE OF s BUILDING Class of work: EW G AD !TI ❑ ALTERATION G REPAIR L7 MOVE Cl REMOVE Describe work_ Valuation of work: $ 3 AFC PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE : SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Mppu CATION ACCEPTED BY PLANS CHECK BY APP YED FOR I$ ANCE Type of OccupancyBY r T-�•t , Cans,_ Group 1.II��4Q Size of Bldg. No.of Mau. (Total)Sq. Ft. Stories Occ. Load i CONTRACTOR AFFIDAVIT PERMANENT SEASONAL E.D.NUMBER I certify that I am a currently registered contractor in RESIDENCE the State of Washington and I am aware of the MOBILE HOME ordinance requirements regulating the work for which the permit is issued and all done will be in Special Approvals Required Received Not Required conformance therewith. ZONING HEALTH DEPT. J F PUBLIC WORKS By - — ROAD DEPT. Li — ate OWNERS AFFIDAVIT 1 certify that I am exempt from the requirements of the N O T I C E contract or registration law RCW 18.27, and am aware of the Mason County ordinance requirements for SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIREDFOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. which this permit is issued and that all work done will in conformance therewith. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER 0 Date G' WORK IS COMMENCED. PLAN CHECK VALIDATION CK. M.O. CASH PERMIT VALIDATION CK. M.Q. CASH. MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Page 2of4 NOX-CRETE FORM COATING 450 4. First Aid Measures -Continued Inhalation If irritation, headache, nausea, or drowsiness occurs, remove to fresh air.Get medical attention if breathing becomes difficult or symptoms persist 5. Fire Fighting Measures Flash Point: > 140'F>60 °C Flash Point Method: PMCC Extinguishing Media Use CO2(Carbon Dioxide), dry chemical, or foam. Fire Fighting Instructions Firefighters should wear self-contained breathing apparatus and full protective gear.Water can be used to cool and protect exposed material. Avoid spreading burning liquid with water used for cooling purposes. 6.Accidental Release Measures Eliminate any ignition source. Dike or impound spilled material. Contain and/or absorb spill with inert material (e.g. sand, vermiculite). Collect into vapor tight containers and dispose of properly. 7. Handling And Storage Handling Precautions Keep container closed when not in use. Use only with adequate ventilation. Storage Precautions Store product in a cool, dry environment away from sources of ignition_ WorklHvgienic Practices Wash thoroughly with soap and water after handling. 8. Exposure Controls/Personal Protection Engineering Controls Use with adequate ventilation to keep product vapor concentrations below specified TLV. Eve/Face Protection Chemical goggles and/or face shields are required to prevent potential eye contact, irritation or injury. Skin Protection Wash exposed skin frequently with soap and water. Soiled clothing should be laundered before reuse. Respiratory Protection General room ventilation is normally adequate.Avoid breathing the product mist. The use of a NIOSH approved respirator is recommended whenever the airborne concentrations exceed the TLV. Ingredient(s) -Exposure Limits PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON DISTILLATE TWA 100 ppm 8 Hours SEVERELY HYDROTREATED PETROLEUM DISTILLATE 5 mg/m3 as mist 9. Physical And Chemical Properties Appearance Clear light straw color with pleasing odor. Chemical Type: Mixture Physical State: Liquid Boiling Point: 315-750 °F 157-400°C Specific Gravity: Lighter than water 1 MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Page 3of4 NOX-CRETE FORM COATING 450 9. Physical And Chemical Properties -Continued Packing Density: 7.0 Ibs per gallon 0.84 kg per liter Solubility: Negligible Evaporation Rate: Slower than ether VOC: Less than 450 grams per liter Flash Point: >140 F >60 C (PMCC) 10. Stability And Reactivity Stability: Stable Hazardous Polymerization: Will not occur Incompatible Materials Strong acids, alkalies, and oxidizing agents. Hazardous Decomposition Products Combustion may produce carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and various hydrocarbon derivatives. 11. Toxicological Information Chronic/Carcinogenicity No component of this product present at levels greater than 0.1%is identified as a carcinogen by the U.S. National Toxicology Program,the U.S.Occupational Safety and Health Act, or the International Agency on Research on Cancer (IARC). 12. Ecological Information No Data Available... 13. Disposal Considerations Care must be taken to prevent environmental contamination from the use of this material.The user of this material has the responsibility to dispose of unused material, residues and containers in compliance with all applicable local,state and federal laws and regulations regarding treatment, storage and disposal for hazardous and nonhazardous wastes. 14. Transport Information Proper Shipping Name Compounds, Mold Release, N.O.I. NMFC#50244 Freight Class 60 15. Regulatory Information SARA Section 313 Notification This product does not contain any ingredients, at or exceeding the De Minimus reporting level, regulated under Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act of 1986 or 40 CFR 372. State Regulations Proposition 65: WARNING. This product contains one or more chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and/or reproductive toxicity. l i MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Page 4of4 NOX-CRETE FORM COATING 450 NFPA HMIS HEALTH 2 FLAMMABILITY ❑Z 1 0 I� REACTIVITY u PERSONAL PROTECTION 16. Other Information Revision/Preparer Information MSDS Preparer: Nox-Crete Manufacturing This MSDS Supersedes A Previous MSDS Dated: 01/27/2011 Reference Documentation The information contained herein is based on data available to us and is believed to be correct Since this information may have been obtained in part from independent laboratories or other sources not under our direct supervision, no representation is made that the information is accurate, reliable, complete or representative and Buyer may rely thereon only at Buyers risk. We have made no effort to censor or to conceal deleterious aspects of this product. Further since we cannot anticipate or control the many different conditions under which this information or our products may be used, we make no guarantee that the health and/or safety precautions we have suggested will be adequate for all individuals and/or situations involving its handling or use. Likewise, we make no guarantee or warranty of any kind that the use or disposal of this product is in compliance with all federal,state or local laws. It is the obligation of each user of the product mentioned herein to determine and comply with the requirements of all applicable statutes. Disclaimer The information in this document is believed to be correct as of the date issued. HOWEVER, NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR ANY WARRANTY IS EXPRESSED OR IS TO BE IMPLIED REGARDING THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION OR THE PRODUCT, THE SAFETY OF THIS PRODUCT, OR THE HAZARDS RELATED TO ITS USE. This information and product are furnished on the condition that the person receiving them shall make his own determination as to the suitability of the product for his particular purpose and on the condition that he assumes the risk of this use thereof. NOX-CRETE MANUFACTURING INC Pryfl,��'„ MSbS Gen-_tafo^'2900 �—� _----- pig - l - noo v MAY 14 2013 I MASON COUNTY PETITION COMMISSIONERS We the undersigned object to the application for a Special Use Permit for the development of the Belfair Iglesia Asambles De Dios Viva Church to be built at the corner of Gladwin Beach Road and State Route 300 between the Red Barn Restaurant and Gladwin Beach Road. We disagree with the erection of a church consisting of an 8,000 square foot two story building with an added 3,000 square foot building and a large parking lot. The site is far too close to the Klingel Wetlands, Parrot Farm and the Lynch Cove Community Park making it environmentally unsafe. The ingress to the property will cause a dangerous traffic situation on North Shore Road (Hwy 300) and Gladwin Beach Road. The park on Gladwin Beach Road is a members only park, which could increase the Park Host duties to assure that is being adhered to. A Public Meeting will be held on 14 May 2013 at 1:00 p.m. at 411 North 51h Street Mason County Bldg I. For further info call 360-427-9670 ext 365. Print Name Signatu Address IY L3 n � �( Jam- L s ;� • ,., T. Ve � A 1 , trjcj — M FT ;f, Ae V 7 Z k� G� / / L/ C��� �' c r iv ,tip-- 6(164" Print Name Signature Address -AA L n 7/ 1 �1 wA- li �L 6 Cci I e—e L `► ^ r 5 0 PETITION We the undersigned object to the application for a Special Use Permit for the development of the Belfair Iglesia Asambles De Dios Viva Church to be built at the corner of Gladwin Beach Road and State Route 300 between the Red Barn Restaurant and Gladwin Beach Road. We disagree with the erection of a church consisting of an 8,000 square foot two story building with an added 3,000 square foot building and a large parking lot. The site is far too close to the Klingel Wetlands, Parrot Farm and the Lynch Cove Community Park making it environmentally unsafe. The ingress to the property will cause a dangerous traffic situation on North Shore Road (Hwy 300) and Gladwin Beach Road. The park on Gladwin Beach Road is a members only park, which could increase the Park Host duties to assure that is being adhered to. A Public Meeting will be held on 14 May 2013 at 1:00 p.m. at 411 North 5te Street Mason County Bldg I. For further info call 360-427-9670 ext 365. Print Name Si nature Address 7d -4,1 �l �^ IYI f I-/ �1 �� '- AID. PETITION We the undersigned object to the application for a Special Use Permit for the development of the Belfair Iglesia Asambles De Dios Viva Church to be built at the corner of Gladwin Beach Road and State Route 3OO between the Red Barn Restaurant and Gladwin Beach Road. We disagree with the erection of a church consisting of an 8,000 square foot two story building with an added 3,000 square foot building and a large parking lot. n el Wetlands The site is far too close to the KL g , Parrot Farm and the Lynch Cove Community Park making it environmentally unsafe. The ingress to the property will cause a dangerous traffic situation on North Shore Road (Hwy 300) and Gladwin Beach Road. The park on Gladwin Beach Road is a members only park, which could increase the Park Host duties to assure that is being adhered to. A Public Meeting will be held on 14 May 2013 at 1:00 p.m. at 411 North 5tn Street Mason County Bldg I. For further info call 360-427-9670 ext 365. Pr' t Name n e Address ,MAa��tirE A- l )20j PETITION We the undersigned object to the application for a Special Use Permit for the development of the Belfair Iglesia Asambles De Dios Viva Church to be built at the corner of Gladwin Beach Road and State Route 300 between the Red Barn Restaurant and Gladwin Beach Road. We disagree with the erection of a church consisting of an 8,060 square foot two story building with an added 3,000 square foot building and a large parking lot. i The site is far too close to the Klingel Wetlands, Parrot Farm and the Lynch Cove Community Park making it environmentally unsafe. The ingress to g the property will cause a dangerous traffic situation on North Shore Road (Hwy 300) and Gladwin Beach Road. The park on Gladwin Beach Road is a members only park, which could increase the Park Host duties to assure that is being adhered to. A Public Meeting will be held on 14 May 2013 at 1:00 p.m. at 411 North 5th Street Mason County Bldg I. For further info call 360-427-9670 ext 365. Print Name ture Address 0. r D Cs 6 fit-X r7.1 k[A- �61���9��s a cc It n, br)-x, I alr-):�id ZDAv),D !f C=C✓tom n� C`A�i �y/a pt (4 RS6 Print Name Signature Address n , I aL J 62 -oo - boo `kD PETITION We the undersigned object to the application for a Special Use Permit for the development of the Belfair Iglesia Asambles De Dios Viva Church to be built at the corner of Gladwin Beach Road and State Route 300 between the Red Barn Restaurant and Gladwin Beach Road. We disagree with the erection of a church consisting of an 8,000 square foot two story building with an added 3,000 square foot building and a large parking lot. The site is far too close to the Klingel Wetlands, Parrot Farm and the Lynch Cove Community Park making it environmentally unsafe. The ingress to the property will cause a dangerous traffic situation on North Shore Road (Hwy 300) and Gladwin Beach Road. The park on Gladwin Beach Road is a members only park, which could increase the Park Host duties to assure that is being adhered to. A Public Meeting will be held on 14 May 2013 at 1:00 p.m. at 411 North 5`h Street Mason County Bldg I. For further info call 360-427-9670 ext 365. Print Name Signature Address i 1Jc 48c) F re/4ics eb t L� ` iZ`kV kl�� 0 C) 0 PETITION We the undersigned object to the application for a Special Use Permit for the development of the Belfair Iglesia Asambles De Dios Viva Church to be built at the corner of Gladwin Beach Road and State Route 300 between the Red Barn Restaurant and Gladwin Beach Road. We disagree with the erection of a church consisting of an 8,000 square foot two story building with an added 3,000 square foot building and a large parking lot. The site is far too close to the Klingel Wetlands, Parrot Farm and the Lynch Cove Community Park making it environmentally unsafe. The ingress to the property will cause a dangerous traffic situation on North Shore Road (Hwy 300) and Gladwin Beach Road. The park on Gladwin Beach Road is a members only park, which could increase the Park Host duties to assure that is being adhered to. A Public Meeting will be held on 14 May 2013 at 1:00 p.m. at 411 North 5th Street Mason County Bldg I. For further info call 360-427-9670 ext 365. Print Name Signature Address C j �2 '�-�; - �� L.o? 3 7 17,� / /.�✓,� lord Q n 1 t- f - K'.1 KVISl1I�) L- ,t ,llA�,1J`- � I � '� � � �����'✓ii rj�✓4 i 1 C�r� i�!R 4 ��' .. '• 1 "i, ` Ott^.'. M1f'..r� d' �+ , .. ar PQPQ .i / � � _ pia /►w �' --'�"I e « N .� �eScec A,aaKblew de D105 oa \'t\ja C,P UMu \ Jb►�c 1 inch =200 feetW*.E aert A/ vteW ` 1 inch =0 miles S s i \ \` NET• �`\. ! �`�\ � ,` \�'\ / / � l AZ 1 \�---� CD uj xv T o ;1 y < N � 1 inch = 200 feet W E 1 inch = 0 miles S 'L /o, as 3 /7LIegs, ,���°� ?ECEIVED MAY 1. A 2013 14//� 426 W. CEDAR ST, r' ab13 `C' i (n 9141, `f" -urn.'20 / ead- IV1,90 CAA- ex eve 14e a- 114 � G��f�/�%�,�'1� ���if� i`r �u�,Qibn-r�-►-e.�Li-crvt�� ��a im � C�) Aep4y 360 �' -- eo 4AA7 Vzl 5 j Dw� A�& E , ol 1Vd .,04 rre-d �y) AMMS Viewer Page I of 2 NE LEYA LN._ 6 O '(4, 1 Z .4t15 YLan �`• m Q 1 r m m i LU A Z 1/ W ,p P P Q� a 0 i Residential �00 http://mapmason.co.mason.wa.us/website/smp/MapFrame.htm 5/14/2013