The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSPI2006-00191 - SPI Inspections - 10/13/2006 (2) PC�oN-STA MASON COUNTY o DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT o n� w N Planning Division o v P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 0 (360)427-9670 1864 Site Inspection October 13, 2006 KENNETH BOAD P.O. BOX 426 BELFAIR WA 98528 Case No.: SP12006-00191 Parcel No.: 123215100020 Project Description: Feasibility for new garage on lot with stream at rear. Dear Applicant: Pursuant to your application, a site pre-inspection (SPI)was performed on your property. Below you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values. In some cases, setbacks for development from shorelines, steep slopes, streams, and wetlands must be included in your specific proposal-, these setbacks are included as part of the comments listed below. This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject property. Please contact me at(360) 427-9670, ext. 365 if you have questions. Sincerely, -` Allan Borden Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department 10/13/2006 1 of 3 SP12006-00191 Site Inspection 10/13/2006 Case No.: SP12006-00191 Comments: Pre-inspection for Ken Boad on September 7, 2006: The purpose of the inspection was to evaluate the subject parcel (lot 20 in Riverhill No. 2) to identify critical areas issues related to future garage structure. The property has a residence with attached garage at about 60 feet from street, a pool with surrounding decks, and several small outbuildings at the rear of the property, including a storage building within 20 feet of a type 4 stream. About three-quarters of the distance from the rear of the house to the stream has been cleared and/or landscaped. Staff was able to identify the approximate location of the property relative to natural features on site. The property is within a Belfair Urban Growth Area R5 Medium Density Residential zone. Standard building setbacks for this zone are a 10-foot front yard setback, and 5-foot side and rear setback for accessory structures. These setbacks are measured from portions of structures 30 inches above grade such as roof overhangs, decks, stairs, balconies, heat pumps, and fuel tanks. With slopes less than 10 percent in the area of the proposed project, a geologic study is not needed for development review. If any grading / excavation is proposed in or near slopes a grading plan will be needed to show any proposed topographical changes, cuts, retaining walls, and proposed drainage. Streams: A Type 4 stream is a perennial water of fish bearing capability and falls under the jurisdiction of the Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Chapter (17.01.110) of the Mason County Resource Ordinance. These provisions establish a 100-foot vegetation buffer and a 15-foot building setback for a type 4 stream, for a total of 115 feet from the channel migration zone (CMZ) to proposed development. As stated in the Resource Ordinance, buffers are to be retained in their natural condition, but portions of established use area may be maintained. New residential development is not permitted within Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation areas or its buffers, except for as approved through a variance or reasonable use exception review process. Staff measured a 190-foot depth of this parcel on the southwest side from the street to the edge of stream channel, and a 90-foot distance from the street to the rear corner of the house on the southwest side. Due to these distances, the general location of a proposed garage on site on the southwest side of the residence would not meet the 115-foot setback / buffer requirement for the 10/13/2006 2 of 3 SP12006-00191 Site Inspection 10/13/2006 Case No.: SP12006-00191 stream corridor. Based on this field review, no area exists on the subject parcel that would not be unencumbered by the critical areas buffer and building setback. The review of a variance from the Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas chapter would be necessary to pursue the development of an accessory garage on this property. A Habitat Management Plan (HMP), prepared by a qualified biologist, would be required as part of the variance request to support the proposed development. The HMP addresses impacts to the buffer and offers measures to preserve and protect the buffer or to mitigate impacts of the development proposal. A copy of the Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas chapter, including details on the contents of an HMP and the variance public review procedure, was given to the owner. Application for a variance to these standards does not guarantee approval of the development as proposed. The existing structures, pool, septic system, and stream buffer / setbacks should be clearly identified on the project site plan submitted for the variance request and building permits. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Thank you. 10/13/2006 3 of 3 SP12006-00191 510J, afry g/ r_�ECE IVW MASON COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. PRE-INSPECTION APPLICATIOUz eq� PLEASE PRINT S 1. Owner: Vz--NNCi(_A F pcAn Applicant: ky\e- 05 Ot) ; -�VA!R OFFICE Site Address: 81') (2 J 2 1.IiU _ (_.AX Applicant Address: Owner Address: 1a* 9 2.6 City: St Zip City glP. St—DA—Zip Phone:( Phone:O9 � �y y Phone:(36o ) 2Z)S q I l evening Planner: Email Address:KcLdo cad CCAA SMP Comp.Plan Type of Use Water Body 2. Parcel No. /� 3 -_ '` 1 - 0 0 U a U Parcel No. - Legal Description:%A tt- i2 3.;t -S t- o o c,ay 0 f go o� d e,,h; (( NU V� Vu/ /U of "►�lgts , fig. of '?-.nc� 3. Purpose of Pre-Inspection _ice Liz 7 ! �r��)�!1 LZt Y �Z I1�L� tA�C_C- - — 4. Use of building: C_ n AC — \"S1:A `P 5. Do any of the following exist on or adjacent to property?: slope( ) saltwater( ) lake( river( ) pond ( wetland ) seasonal runoff ) other( ) ' stream seasonal creek(✓� Directions to Site: CAD 21 N o�Cl �� .E rvi Ll PpP-- J ryl i (c�_7 F2 f Ali 14 LaAn ft171L�1C�C1�rinl T�2� �(�,H� �(�(�o N " -) L1u�f 1z0_a0 -- �� 1 A IL -QJ I v If the information is incomplete, then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the original application. Pre-inspection reports remain valid only until development changes occur in the vicinity which affect the lot evaluated in this inspection,or the laws regulating development of the site change after the time of inspection. Applicant Signature: a -6 0 Date:�LZ Ifyou would like to be on site during inspection,please check here: Return application to: Department of Community Development,Planning Division P.O. Box 186 Shelton,WA 98584 (360)427-9670 Please include a$205.00 check or money order payable to Mason County Treasurer When completed, this form becomes part of the parcel fil 7 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Accepted by: Date: ;2,016 MORE ON BACK SIDE L•\PLANNING\PAC\PRE-INSPECTION Revised: 01/17/06 Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation to critical areas (slopes, streams, lakes,wetlands, etc.) existing improvements, as well as property lines. APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED WITHOUT ADEQUATE ILUSTRATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT. P V Q 6 Departmental Review 33AiFor Office Use Only)� Y) i Planning Department Findings: t 0 *V Alk °W I-Vr om Mt m r V a w p v i ty v 0 •L U1 � r- Li o 89e59 50" W J N 89�59' So"W `�0 1 3-7.5 I _-_ Z l 134.3 ro Ln 5 ,j J o 0 0 tf) M (D co o 0 jlr o /6 0 19 N Be 59` 50' V4 � r 139.o3 'rl _ �N.85a 59` 50"W \ 134.3� i 0�= 3 1o' 41" 'q d) Q . O _ l L.n Z8.Z S s Se 30 \,� O I Z8.7 3 o N 89° 59 50"w k e �, 0 o:to z.4 51 7 \ U= 32.T0 L=roro.34 O o.6-733/8 O W Rai N g4° 23 2-5 E 00 `�� 134.`73� �:39.44 % O o 01 ,., a 7,e� Sae 57 55 w N 00 �$39 `A 20 �9 �3� 35 3Z. E 1 14,34"R ( O O° coo oo� `� �S!3 2 _ ° 9 O a 10 3—� No. 63 /Z6l6o1' Z��8� O 00 O o 96 0 _m m zO 4 3 96.y 60 Z Ln o g'000 ,, d, lg�3 p6„ �4 N (D 21° 6 O W, Z �21 �a0.og No \ 6� /S. T I / 100 SEPTIC �� 3� 00 l Iv nj \3 �� 0c' RRo O SETBACK Ll NE —9 SSo SUtLDING ®Q o 3p + D f3 l9 W �o' ETA gC K LI N E �0.0 �. p O O� \\6 Z JtP �� Ro Q� •y SC LE I - 100, FOUND MON. 6 S. CH E F 1 SET MONUMENT 6 G>v / p l - r 0 � m In _ `y L _ _ f1� ` Vim, --m 1? �20 89.65 .y 104.SO 1 114. 2a a?� 88° 14' O0' E 437. 43 - of ° r Y t �. , i Ir 4t `•T2 1 WM a+ A i h i ANE NEWKIRK RD --- - � r 5 � I t ' d a 4L �9_ I y( y y ti gs `� 111 �m + s.c ' r +x �` t Icy �ili� k •.� •.« �. ,� �r '; ,�. �; �- _,� , -. ,wk NE RIVERHI L DR-- 4#1 r - \ 4 u 7 T'l � - �'""�� +at :ote ,� r � +^°' _ .. tit. -_'�"--' �`x`, • � f e � , .r'„«y � .. ,ri :�;�,. '" may,r � oea __•_ w n , *{ �. `�'�' ,tir SY+q r`�w. ly t Y � -•,y 1 �' r `IV•....,�,A,.,»��._v---•-- _ _=` �----_.i�, �}+P, Are ar.""'� 44tv - w \ NE RNERHILL LN-1/_ ti �� I '' a -4 f 404 "`dry a x t , s; f— i r � .� �a,'a�.�"�rr�z�+d.sue_\ I�. . _ � a.' . i' • � +9t �