HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPI2009-00016 - SPI Inspections - 3/9/2009 ' ON-STA MASON COUNTY
o P� A o N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
;I- o N Planning Division
7 N Y ti P O Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584
_IV
(360)427-9670
1864
Site Inspection
March 09, 2009
EDWARD BLAKE
8090 STATE ROUTE 3 SW
PORT ORCHARD WA 98367
Case No.: SP12009-00016
Parcel No.: 123174291002 -
Project Description: Site review to replace residence destroyed by fire.
Dear Applicant:
Pursuant to your application, a site pre-inspection (SPI)was performed on your property r,Below;
you will find comments made regarding the proposed-development and its critical values,+ 4.:;
In some cases, setbacks for development from shorelines, steep slopes, streams, and wetlands
must be included in your specific proposal; these setbacks are included as part of the comments
listed below.
This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These
regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject pteperty -:
Please contact me at (360)427-9670, ext. 365 if you have questions.
Sincerely,
r
f
C�
Allan Borden
Land Use Planner
Mason County Planning Department
3/912009 Page 1 of 3 SP12009-00016
Site Inspection
3/9/2009 Case No.: SP12009-00016
Comments:
Pre-inspection for Edward Blake on Feb. 23, 2009:
The purpose of the pre-inspection was to evaluate the proposal to
build a new home to replace a home destroyed by fire on the
subject parcel. The 3.12-acre parcel is roughly rectangular (N to :-
S) with a 330 feet width and 400 feet depth; the property has
general slopes of 5 percent and is accessed by easement from
Redfish Lane. The site has open and vegetated areas, a garage
and pole building to the north of the proposed building site near
the man-made pond, and their existing septic system on the east
side of the property. The applicant wants to know the -°-Y
development standards to follow in proposing the new residence.
These findings state regulationsin effect at the time of inspection,
unless noted otherwise,
Development Regulations standards: _
The site is in Rural Residential 5 zone. Standard building
setbacks are 25-foot front yard setback, and 20-foot side property :_. ..-.�.
line setbacks. These setbacks are measured from structures {gnfs =>- Ac
above grade such as roof overhangs, stairs, balconies, decks, cir,
heat pumps, storage buildings, and fuel tanks. - • .
Resource Ordinance Standards: ^
N_ Slope or Landslide hazards: Slopes around 5 percent are
--adjacent to or within 300 feet of a proposed{project were
observed; slumping or seepage conditions that could contribute to
-sliding was not observed. The applicant will not need a geologic ;lbr
special report during development review. -+
Wetland critical area: Planning staff confirmed that this
parcel does not contain certain wetlands, which are regulated
under Mason County's Wetlands chapter 17.01.070 of the Mason
County Resource Ordinance. The applicant will not need a
wetlands special report during development review.
Stream setbacks: Stream critical areas (recognized by
state, county, or tribal agencies)were not observed during the
inspection. The development setbacks from these features would
not apply to a proposed improvement on the subject parcel.
The man-made pond feature is a collection area of seasonal flow
resulting from seepage, well pumping, and road runoff from the
surrounding area of collection. The owner of the pond maintains
water levels for the purpose of maintaining raised fish species,
3/9/2009 - Page 2 of 3 SP12009-00016
without any hazard to the existing improvements on the area properties.
_N_ Shoreline setbacks: Shoreline setbacks: The typical shoreline designation for the
Union River is Rural Environment per the Mason County Shoreline Master Program and
setbacks would be determined by the Mason County Resource Ordinance. The setbacks
for proposed development would not apply on this property.
General process: When future site development is proposed, a permit must include a
site plan, showing all setbacks from property lines, roads, buildings, drainages and
ponds, and existing and proposed improvements.
Specific County Code standards for future development may be found at the County
website address http://www.co.mason.wa.us. If you have any questions please feel
free to call. Thank you.
' MASON COUNTY)
PLANNING DEPT. PRE-INSPECTION APPLICATKIN
PLEASE PRINT Olt �5.00 ye� tat}uir$ ��Ii�
1. Owner: F-A c.Jftb Applicant: S*w
Site Address:/k O /Vt /?617 F)S N I-At Applicant Address:
Owner Address:FE+go 57—hky 3 -S w' City: St Zip
City: )0viaT oAc-)+AAo St wA Zip ctj 3(0 7 Phone:(�� S 1 E day
Phone:(.71t),) 9-79- P4 V4, day ^
Phone:(,34 o ) 7 10 -- 7 75 7 evening Planner:
Email Address: P •a'S�`S n5N,cLM SMP o p T f Use
j Water Body
2. Parcel No. / - �� - I ��� rap
Parcel No.
Legal Description:,&: *'X / W 5k �W-R GAF SP'" `U���.� /�� oq 4 F
M-0
3. Purpose of Pre-Inspection -.
/`its L`CA L.Fy
4. Use of building: /44)VZ_KJcE-/VEX 7- d Si.vc;L t '.'LLB C
5. Do any of the following exist on or adjacent to property?: slope saltwater( lake ) river
pond W wetland( ) seasonal runoff(K) other stream ( ) seasonal creek k)
Directions to Site: /t 3 •` Al 6F 6 L oAV 01-b l3E4.ACi¢/'.e
L. ics .'vim 4&b FISH A" u N 1,. fi m
If the information is incomplete, then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the original
application. Pre-inspection reports remain valid only until development changes occur in the vicinity which affect the lot
evaluated in this inspection, or the laws regulating development of the site change after the time of inspection.
Applicant Signature: C e- �4 Date: _ off,"AI ~ (� 9
If you would like to be on site during-inspection,please check here:
Return application to: Department of Community Development, Planning Division
P.O. Box 186
Shelton, WA 98584
(360)427-9670
Please include a$255.00 check or money order payable to Mason County Treasurer 706�
When completed, this form becomes part of the parpel file.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:Accepted by: Date:0/P�9'
MORE ON BACK SIDE
LTLANNINGTACIPREJNSPECTION Revised: 1226/08
Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation to critical areas (slopes, streams, lakes, wetlands; etc.)
existing improvements, as well as property lines. APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED WITHOUT ADEQUATE
ILUSTRATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT.
� 1
i3
t
t i
j UF
� 77�
0 3
r
�i
o C
Departmental Review
(For Office Use Only)
Planning Department Findings: