The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMEP2013-00037 Wetland Delineation - MEP Permit / Conditions - 12/13/2013 STgTFO� MASON COUNTY A o N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT o N IC Planning Division N y Y P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 1864 (360)427-9670 MASON ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT December 13, 2013 STEPHEN J JOHNSON P O BOX 488 BELFAIR WA98528 TO BE KEPT IN THE Parcel Number: 123203400030 PARCEL FILE Issued: 12/13/2013 Case Number: MEP2013-00037 nn I I�'Z,20 ?� If,oX 3d Project Description: PIQ WETLAND DELINEATION FOR FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF SFR The following critical areas are present on this property: Long-Term Commercial Forest XX FWHCA Ch. 17.10.060; Ch. 17.01.110; Mineral Resource Lands XX Frequently Flooded Areas Ch. 17.01.066; Ch. 17.01.090; Inholding Lands Landslide Hazard Areas Ch. 17.01.062; Ch. 17.01.100; XX Wetlands Seismic Hazard Areas Ch. 17.01.070; Ch. 17.01.102; Critical Aquifer Recharge Erosion Hazard Areas Ch. 17.01.080; Ch. 17.01.104. This permit, with conditions, is granted pursuant to the Mason County Resource Ordinance (Chapter 17.01 MCC.) Nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, or regulations applicable to this project. This permit may be rescinded if the permitee fails to complete th roject as proposed or fails to comply with the standards of this ordinance. lej�' e) 2 / 3 �2�) r� uthorized Local Government Official Date Mason Environmental Permit 12/13/2013 Case No.: MEP2013-00037 ` Conditions: 1.) STAFF FINDINGS: Site visit made on Nov. 4, 2013 to verify wetland delineation findings: category II wetland, type S (Union River), type F streams, and floodplain area observed. Wetland/stream report document fully addresses the presence of the critical areas. Floodplain area covers about 200 feet depth from the edge of the Union River channel north to the possible building site area. Conclusion: With wetland setback of 110 ft. + 15 ft. and a type F stream setback of 150 ft. + 15 ft., the potential building area for future development is about 250 feet deep from edge of setbacks north and northeast to the edge of Timber Lane road easement. Consideration shall be made for the floodplain 200 feet depth from the edge of the Union River channel north to the possible building site area. 1 2/1 31201 3 Page 2 of 2 MEP2013-00037 THE WETLAND CORPS Wetland Delineation • Habitat Management Plans • Riparian Restoration - Mitigation - Biological Evaluation PARCEL 12320-34-00030 WETLAND DELINEATION & ANALYSIS NE Timberline Drive Belfair,Washington Mason County Prepared for: Steve Johnson Prepared by: Lee Boad and Heather Lane October 2013 This site map was created by TWC by coordinating measurements and infornndon from several sources, including the Mason County Assessor Aerial Photo 2005 and GoogleEarth aerial images and measurements. All locations are approximate 0 300' Southern Portion of Parcel �%%123203400010 Type F Stream %% 150'buffer+ 15'building I%% setback it Union River f - Type F Stream Category II Wetland 150' buffer+ 15'building 110'buffer+ 15'building setback etback I NE Timberline Drive if FIGURE 2. SITE MAP Project Name: Parcel 123203400010 Wetland Delineation Location: Belfair,Washington Project: TWC09-W331 CHen�E ETL 1 D CORPS Date: .8/09 Steve Johnson i / Timberlind Drive Extension Shop INndicates reat Dwelling CrT Wetlands Union River . o Master Bath reduced/shr only N Site Plan - Scale: 1:2400 \Spring Fall. t Summer 0 100 200 300 400 500FT Storage 14/0 x 9/0 Garage / 28/6 x 27/0 / / Office Flat / 14/0 x 14/6 Flat , � r r r � r / rated — V� cep �1 o S 15 20 25 FT Langemack"d omealtmg�wpport ee¢vicae sub ting in Great Room and Foyer; pmnt3 IIII�� i GL decorative beams @ 48"oc III01 •h to be determined........ similar to vaulted areas e section.... Job. 2012-273 9-16-13 N ' E T/Me�RC/RR / U111011 T2 R1 W RI ..........- i� I�lobeeoEye,i-cubed,USDA,USGS,AEX,Getmapping, erog�id I:GN IG swisstopo,and the GIS User Community N 1 inch = 200 feet W E 1 inch = 0 miles S 7 Z 50 ffi� � MI'• a �r �� \NC `�y ax •.L ��7/`( .7T. r.� s..- ��;��"°��'��,•�[''k ..,,,'�,%yC� ' � ,.e'�,(,.r�� ,ram �+ ay �"w u v u ,Kr xr. Y r s f�f T23 R1 20ko f •� s r AT Af AT Y �.�_-�TT� � • 1 .3. rF� i�J• A a' �•�: r� - f �S''T".. /d{f i•'2 � }y SKr ,. � r \ t • .. .. V:.� '<s K'�� iI - "�!'� She• r a j y � 'ilk .45 Ylp'o S .'�iJ".. r -,;;' _'�� Jos'' i�� ; .r:t• A` , T23 1 ,email . 2 0 uMW D oo• oo�bo �o eoo0.4 {` � . f r � � 5 I, r"� ,,.pt i 1 �.r a 1, {• .. THE WETLAND CORPS — — Wetland Delineation • Habitat Management Plans • Riparian Restoration • Mitigation - Biological Evaluation PARCEL 12320-34-00030 WETLAND DELINEATION& ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 1 GENERALSITE CONDITIONS.......................................................................................... 1 METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................. 2 BACKGROUNDINFORMATION....................................................................................... 3 WETLAND DELINEATION RESULTS ................................... ...............................4 WETLANDEVALUATION..................................................................................................6 STREAMEVALUATION ..................................................................................................... 6 SUMMARY............................................................................................................................. 7 REFERENCES........................................................................................................................ 8 Figures Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map Figure 2. Site Map Figure 3. National Wetland Inventory Map Figure 4. Pierce County Soil Survey Map Figure 5. DNR Water Resource Map Appendices Appendix A. Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms Appendix B. Soil Survey Text Appendix C. Wetland Rating Form AV.The Wetland Corp Wetland Delineation • Habitat Management Plans - Riparian Restoration - Mitigation - Biological Evaluation October, 2013 Project#TWCI3W015 Page 1 of 12 PARCEL 12320-34-00030 WETLAND DELINEATION & ANALYSIS NE Timberline Drive Belfair,Washington INTRODUCTION The Wetland Corps has been authorized by Steve and Lenny Johnson to perform a wetland delineation at the property located off of NE Timberline Drive, in Belfair, Mason County, Washington, (Tax Identification Number 12320-34-00030). The delineation was performed on October 8th, 2013 to identify wetlands and associated buffers that would be applicable to future use of the site. The subject property is located in the SE 1/4 of Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 01 West WM (Figure 1 Vicinity Map). According to the Mason County Assessor, the subject parcel is 13.78 acres in size. For the purposes of federal, Washington State, and Mason County jurisdictional oversight, this wetland delineation followed the methodology outlined in the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers May 2010. WAC 173-22-035 states delineations should be done according to this manual and supplements. The changes became effective March 14, 2011. The sections below provide: (1) an introduction to the site; (2) a description of methods used in the field delineation; and, (3)technical results. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS The property is accessed via NE Timberline Drive off of Old Belfair Highway. NE Timberline drive makes up the northern property boundary. The property is surrounded by both residential parcels and parcels utilized for timber production. The property contains no permenant buildings or structures. Topography throughout the east side of the parcel is flat, while the west side of the property contains a steep slope grading down from the west. The property contains both forested areas and herbaceous patches occupied by pasture grasses. Forested areas generally consist of Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii, FACU) and western red cedar (Thuja plicata, FAC) with an understory of himilayan blackberry (Rubus discolor, FACU), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis, FAC+) and swordfern (Polystichum munitum, FACU). Pasture areas consist of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea, FACU), canadian thistle (Canadium arvense, FACU) and tall buttercup (Ranunculus acres, FACU). A portion of one wetland was identified within the southern portion of the property, situated at the base of the easterly-facing slope. The wetland contains both PO Box 2854 Belfair,Washington 98528•Cell Phone 360-620-0618.Office Phone 360-372-2421•wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 12320-34-00030 Wetland Delineation TWC No.13 W015 October 2013 Page No.2 forested and herbaceous classes, and is characterized by hydrophytic vegetation such as slough sedge (Carex obnupta, OBL) and salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis, FAC+). Details regarding the wetland characteristics are discussed throughout this wetland evaluation. METHODOLOGY Consistent with procedures detailed in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Washington State Department of Ecology, 2011) (2011 Manual), preliminary information was gathered on the project site prior to the field review and delineation. Information sources include the Mason County GIS and the Washington Department of Natural Resources Water Resource Map, and Mason County's critical areas regulations. Field Delineation The methodology used for this wetland delineation was consistent with the technical approaches articulated in the 2011 Manual. This document is the wetland delineation manual that is used in determining wetland areas when applying state and local government regulations under the Shoreline Management Act and the Growth Management Act in Washington State. The extent and location of suspect wetlands were determined during field work performed on October 8th, 2013. Field work was conducted under sunny conditions with an ambient temperature ranging between 55 and 60 degrees Fahrenheit. The time of year and recent precipitation history were considered in assessing the extent of the suspect wetlands presumed to exist on site. Specific field methodology used in determining the extent and location of wetland areas include: 1. As part of the initial project site reconnaissance, the site was walked to determine the general extent and location of potential wetland areas; 2. Wetland and upland sample plots were established in the identified potential wetland areas and in the adjacent upland area; and 3. Wetland boundaries were delineated with flagging by noting localized topography and vegetation patterns and comparing parameters of hydrology, soil, and vegetation with data collected at the wetland and upland sample plots. The project area was investigated and data was collected at two sample plot locations. Each sample plot included a data form completed for a wetland area and a form completed for the corresponding upland area. Data collected at each sample plot was entered onto a Routine Wetland Determination Data Form (USACOE Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast- Version 2.0). PO Box 2854 Belfair,Washington 98528-Cell Phone 360-620-0618.Office Phone 360-372-2421-wetlandcorps@hotmail.com 1 Parcel 12320-34-00030 Wetland Delineation TWC No.13 W015 October 2013 Page No.3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION DNR Water Resources May The Department of Natural Resources Water Resources Map shows two streams draining in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. A type "S" (Shoreline of the State) stream is shown draining southerly along the east side of the subject property (see Figure 5. WA DNR Water Resources Map). The stream is commonly known as Union River. A tributary to Union River is shown draining within 200 feet south of the subject property. The tributary is mapped as a type "F" (fishbearing channel). Our findings regarding streams are discussed in the Stream Evaluation section below. WETLAND DELINEATION RESULTS A portion of one wetland containing both a forested/shrub and herbaceous classes was identified on the subject property. The wetland extends onto the southern portion of the property, and occupies approximately 1.4 acres within the subject parcel. Based on available aerial photos and topography information from the Mason County Mapping Viewer, the wetland appears to occupy an additional three acres, beyond what exists within the parcel. The wetland is a groundwater receptor wetland, meaning it is hydrologically supported by a fluctuating water table, in addition to receiving surface water from surrounding seasonal topography. A ditched type F channel drains through the wetland and into the Union River. The channel provides a surface water outlet for the wetland during flood events. PO Box 2854 Belfair,Washington 98528•Cell Phone 360-620-0618.Office Phone 360-372-2421-wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 12320-34-00030 Wetland Delineation TWC No.13 W015 October 2013 Page No.4 enk r- e + ..�� .! ��'�L� ln��a �'t � •* I��',ji0 � i � - f 'N 1 F 1 yam; M, Photo 1. Ditched Type F Channel draining through forested portion of wetland. ^tia r 4 h r Photo 2. Herbacous portion of wetland within parcel. PO Box 2854 Belfair, Washington 98528 t Cell Phone 360-620-0618 t Office Phone 360-372-2421•wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 12320-34-00030 Wetland Delineation TWC No.13W015 October 2013 Page No.5 The wetland boundary was identified primarily by the presence of hydrophytic vegetation such as slough sedge (Carex obnupta, OBL) subsisting in dark, silty soils with a high content of organic matter. The wetland boundary was identified by noting the presence of facultative wetland vegetation in congruence with hydric soil indicators and positive wetland hydrology indicators discussed below. Vegetation The forested portion of the consists of an overstory of red alder (Alnus rubra, FAC) and western red cedar(Thuja plicata, FAC), with an understory containing salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis, FAC+), Himilayan blackberry (Rubus discolor, FACU), creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens, FACW) and slough sedge (Carex obnupta, OBL). Wetland vegetation within the herbacous portion of the wetland, located at the northernmost point of the wetland, consists of slough sedge (Carex obnupta, OBL), soft rush (Juncus effufus, FACW) and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens, FACW). Wetland vegetation is indicated by hydrophytic vegetation FAC and FACW dominating over 50 percent of the vegetation community in wetland data plots. The areas immediately adjacent to the forested portion of the wetland consist of Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii, FACU) and western red cedar (Thuja plicata, FAC) with an understory of himilayan blackberry (Rubus discolor, FACU), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis, FAC+) and swordfern (Polystichum munitum, FACU). Upland pasture areas adjacent to the herbaceous portion of the wetland consist of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea, FACU), Canadian thistle (Canadium arvense, FACU) and tall buttercup (Ranunculus acris, FACU). Hydophytic vegetation occupies less than 50 percent of the vegetative community in upland data plots. Soils The profiles within the test pits consisted of a single layer profile consisting of silty mucky mineral soil to 12 inches deep with matrix chroma IOYR 3/1 and IOYR 2/1. A 2- centimeter layer of muck overlayed the soil profile. Wetland hydric soils are indicated silty, mucky mineral soil and the presence of muck within the upper 2 centimeters. In addition,the soil consists of a low-chroma(equaling one) in all wetland test pits. The upland test pits exhibited a two-layer soil profile. The upper layer consists of gravelly sandy loam approximately eight to ten inches deep of matrix chroma 1 OYR 4/4. The lower profile contained less gravel with a matrix chroma of 10YR 3/3. No hydric soil indicators were present in upland soil test pits. Hydrology Wetland hydrology is indicated by FAC-neutral vegetation, drainage patterns, oxidized rhizospheres among living root channels, soil saturation/free water in the test pits during the growing season. The sample plots within the wetland area revealed free water in the test pits at a four inch depth and soil saturation to the surface. PO Box 2854 Belfair, Washington 98528•Cell Phone 360-620-0618.Office Phone 360-372-2421-wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 12320-34-00030 Wetland Delineation TWC No.13W015 October 2013 Page No.6 Upland test pits showed no indicators of wetland hydrology. WETLAND EVALUATION The onsite wetland is classified as a Depressional wetland per Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (Hruby 2006). Based on functional attributes associated with the wetland including habitat, water quality, and hydrology functions, it has been rated as a Category II wetland, scoring 52 points on the state rating form. The score for water quality functions in this wetland is 10, hydrological functions scored 16, and the score for habitat functions is 26 (see Appendix C for rating form). According to Table 17.01.070 E of the Mason County Resource Ordinance, the base buffer width for Category II Wetlands scoring between 20 and 28 points in habitat function is 110 feet with an additional 15-foot building setback within parcels intended for Moderate Impact Land Use. Moderate Impact Land Use is described in Table 17.07.070 B of the Mason County Resource Ordinance as single-family residential lots, residential subdivisions with 1 unit/acre or less. STREAM EVALUATION Two streams are mapped by WA DNR Water Resources Map to occur within and within the vicinity of the subject property (see Figure 5. WA DNR Water Resource Map). The stream commonly identified as Union River is mapped draining southerly along the eastern property boundary. Union River stream is mapped as a type "S" (Shoreline of the State) channel, and was identified along the eastern side of the property. A tributary to Union River is mapped draining easterly within 200 feet south of the southern property boundary. A ditched stream channel was identified within the southern portion of the property, draining easterly through the onsite wetland and into Union River within the property (see Photo 2, above). The stream is greater than two feet in width, on average, and is situated along a gradient of less than sixteen percent with no instream obstructions to Union River. Therefore, the ditched stream channel within the property contains fishbearing habitat according to stream typing criteria described in WAC 16.222.031. According to Section 17.01.110 of the Mason County Resource Ordinance, type S channels and type F streams are each regulated with a 150-foot buffer and an additional 15-foot building setback. SUMMARY This wetland report documents the presence of a portion of a Category 11 Depressional Wetland, a type S stream (Union River) and a type F stream channel within the subject property. According to Table 17.01.070 of the Mason County Resource Ordinance, the wetland requires a 110-foot buffer with an additional 15-foot building setback. According to Table 17.01.110 of the Mason County Resource Ordinance, the type S stream (Union River) and the type F stream are each regulated with a 150-foot buffer and an additional 15-foot building setback. See Figure 2. Site Map for the approximate location of the wetland, stream and associated buffers. PO Box 2854 Belfair,Washington 98528-Cell Phone 360-620-0618.Office Phone 360-372-2421•wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 12320-34-00030 Wetland Delineation TWC No.13W015 October 2013 Page No.7 We trust this information is sufficient for you at this time. Thank you for choosing the Wetland Corps as your environmental consultant. If you have any questions, feel free to call. Respectfully submitted, The Wetland Corps Heather Lane Staff Wetland Specialist Lee Boad Senior Ecologist PO Box 2854 Belfair, Washington 98528•Cell Phone 360-620-0618.Office Phone 360-372-2421•wetlandcorps@hotmail.com REFERENCES Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet and E.T. LaRoe, 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service document FWS/OBS-79/31. 84 pp. Washington, D.C. Hitchcock, L.C. and A. Cronquist, 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press.. 730 pp. Hruby, T., 2004. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington—Revised. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication#04-06-025. Munsell Soil Color Charts, 1998. GretagMacbeth. New Windsor,New York. Pojar, J. and A. MacKinnon, 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Lone PinePublishing. 528 pp. Vancouver, British Columbia. Speare-Cooke, S., 1997. A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington and Northwestern Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society. 417 pp. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Soil Survey of Pierce County Area, Washington. September, 1977. US Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory. 1978. Washington State Department of Ecology, 1997. Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual. Ecology Publication#96-94, various pagination. Olympia, Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology, 1993. Washington State Wetlands Rating System, Western Washington Second Edition. 61 pp.Ecology Publication#93-74. Olympia, Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology, 1999. Methods for Assessing Wetland Functions for Reverine and Depressional Wetlands in the Lowlands of Western Washington. Ecology Publication#99-115. Olympia, Washington. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 1993. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands Region 9—Northwest. Resource Management Group PO Box 2854 Belfair,Washington 98528•Cell Phone 360-620-0618.Office Phone 360-372-2421•wetlandcorps@hotmail.com 19, „^✓r} l+t �''lx`Y? .r � l r�, TigorLake f ,r .T r Approximate r e i Parcel Location -�: `� � 7:i�n Lakes �• �/' jf � y � I �O Camp Pond t GSo,90 GOATR_ANCH R4__ 2�! NEF C,iktc Yboten ) m � AFORO WAy' ( i tY ' \ m D r _mil 4 ' ON Larson Lak O f S ! to to Shoe Like to yp Erdman Lake YARU.. C! �•'Tr {JC O! Or "Z.t' HE BELFAIR TAHl7 ? �1 r r' QO• Q'/ f HEN AS - y�1 `•Collins Lakc: � � WAY`. Too Lake y .0 s� � A ��,�. HoweALako ��},, Cady Lake !' -;�J-Ip—" �J 1 Lone Duck Pond The Pe o 9 ty Pickers Pond's } r �t1C� ' Op' E ALTA OR _o Gra s s Lake, { {� y,g�v- ? 17 Zoom to.... v Zoom Factor: 125% v Zoom to Point FIGURE 1. SITE VICINITY MAP Project Name: Parcel 12320-34-00030 Wetland Delineation Project Number: TWC13-020 Client: Steve Johnson Location: Belfair, WA THE WETLAND CORPS Date: 10/2013 +T088B N N N S ry Approximate Parcel Location U ,rol i�YoY�: STRE"IS F tN+ater TtTe S,F,N (Np or Ns w-hen known) 1� U-unknu"m `}( : Y.non-t3-ped per IN AC 222-16 Water Type Change TRANSPORTATION ,0^�Pared Road Unpaved Road �r s Surface L:nknonn J ,,xM Abandoned Road(not on Activity;reap) �o Orphaned Road(not on °� activity map) ' Trail Railroad FIGURE 5. WA DNR WATER RESOURCE MAP Project Name: Parcel 12320-34-00030 Wetland Delineation Project Number: TWC13-020 Client: Steve Johnson THE WETLAND CORPS Location: Belfair, WA Date: 10/2013 APPENDIX A Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Parcel 12320-34-00030 City/County: Belfair/Mason Sampling Date: 1 0/812 01 3 Applicant/Owner: Steve Johnson State: WA Sampling Point: u.D-1 Investigator(s): L.Boad Section,Township,Range: sec 20,1:23n,r1w Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): basin Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 1% Subregion(LRR): Lat: 47_46 Long: -122.8308 Datum: — Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: none Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Yes within a Wetland? ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Tree Stratum(Plot size:_� Absolute Dominant Indicator %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test Worksheet: 1. A/nus rubra 50 yes FAC Number of Dominant Species 2 (A) 2. Doua/asii menziesii 25 yts FACU That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. Thuia vlicata 25 yg-s FAC Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Across All Strata: - (B) 50%_ ,20%_ =Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species 33 (A/B) Saolina/Shrub Stratum(Plot size:—, That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1. Rubus ursinus 50 yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Polvstichum munitum 30 yes FACU Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. Rubus discolor 20Les FACU OBL species 0 x1= 4. FACW species 0 x2= 5. FAC species 33.3 x3= — 50%= 20%_ =Total Cover FACU species 66.6 x4= Herb Stratum(Plot size:_� UPL species 0 x5= — 1 Column Totals: 100(A) (B) 2. Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. ❑ 1—Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. ® 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. ❑ 3-Prevalence Index is<3.0' 7. 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 8. ❑ data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ❑ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. — 50%= 20%_ =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size: 1. — 2 Hydrophytic Vegetation Yes ❑ No 50%= 20%_ =Total Cover Present? %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 Project Site: Parcel 12320-34-00030 Wetland SOIL Sampling Point:g9-1 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks 0=8 10YR4/4 100 gra sa loam 8-18 10YR3/3 100 gra silt loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol(Al) ❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck(A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ElSandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must e present, unless disturbed or roblematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required,check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water(At) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑ High Water Table(A2) (except MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) (MLRA 1,2,4A,and 413) ❑ Saturation(A3) ❑ Salt Crust(B11) ❑ Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑ Water Marks(131) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits(132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑ Drift Deposits(B3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(136) ❑ Stunted or Stresses Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): 0 Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Parcel 12320-34-00030 City/County: Belfair/Mason Sampling Date: 1 0/812 01 3 Applicant/Owner. Steve Johnson State: WA Sampling Point: U13-_2- Investigator(s): L.Boad Section,Township,Range: sec 20.t23n.rlw Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): basin Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope Subregion(LRR): Lat: 47_46 Long: -122.8308 Datum: _ Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: none Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Yes ❑ No JZ within a WeUand? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants Tree Stratum(Plot size: Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: %Cover Species? Status 1. Alnus rubra 50 yes FAG Number of Dominant Species 2 (A) 2. Douglas/i menziesii 25 ves FACU That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. Thuia plicata 25 ves FAC Total Number of Dominant 6 (B) q. Species Across All Strata: 50%_ ,20%_ =Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species 33 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum(Plot size: That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1. Rubus ursinus 50 Yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Polvstichum munitum 30 yes FACU Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. Rubus discolor 20 y9-S FACU OBL species 0 x1= 4. FACW species 0 x2= 5. FAC species 33.3 x3= 50%= 20%_ =Total Cover FACU species 66.6 x4= Herb Stratum(Plot size: UPL species 0 x5= 1 Column Totals: 100(A) (B) 2. Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. ❑ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. ® 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. ❑ 3-Prevalence Index is<3.0' 7 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 8 ❑ data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) g. ❑ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. 50%= 20%_ =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size: 1. — 2 Hydrophytic Vegetation Yes ❑ No 50%_ ,20%_ =Total Cover Present? %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast-Version 2.0 Project Site: Parcel 12320-34-00030 Wetland SOIL Sampling Point:up-2 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0=8 10YR4/4 100 qra silt loam 8-18 10YR3/3 100 qra silt loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 21-ocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol(At) ❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck(All0) ❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must e present, unless disturbed or roblematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves(139) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑ High Water Table(A2) (except MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) (MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) ❑ Saturation(A3) ❑ Salt Crust(1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑ Water Marks(1311) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑ Drift Deposits(63) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust(64) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(66) ❑ Stunted or Stresses Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): 0 Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast-Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project Site: Parcel 12320-34-00030 City/County: Belfair/Mason Sampling Date: 10/8/2013 Applicant/Owner: Steve Johnson State: WA Sampling Point: wet-1 Investigator(s): L.Boad Section,Township,Range: sec 20.t23n.r1w Landfonn(hillslope,terrace,etc.): basin Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 3 Subregion(LRR): Lat 4746 Long: •122.8308 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Norma fine sandy loam NWI classification: none Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (if no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are*Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Tree Stratum(Plot size:—J Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: %Cover Species? Status 1. Thuia olicata 60 yes FAC Number of Dominant Species 7 (A) 2. Alnus rubra 40 yes FAC That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. Total Number of Dominant 7 (B) 4. Species Across All Strata: 50%= 20%_ =Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species 100 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum(Plot size: That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1. Rubus spectabilis 75 yes FACW Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Rubus discolor 25 yes FAC Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species 14.2 x1= — 4. FACW species 42.9 x2= _ 5. FAC species 42.9 x3= 50%= 20%_ =Total Cover FACU species 0 x4= — Herb Stratum(Plot size:_� UPL species 0 x5= 1. Carex obnuota 45 yes OBL Column Totals: 100(A) (B) 2. Juncus effufs 30 yes FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. Ranunculus reoens 25 yes FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. ❑ 1—Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. ® 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. ❑ 3-Prevalence Index is<3.0' 7 ❑ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ❑ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. _ 50%= 20%_ =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size. ) 1. _ 2 Hydrophytic Vegetation Yes ® No ❑ 50%_ 20%_ =Total Cover Present? %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 Project Site: Parcel 12320-34-00030 SOIL Sampling Point:wet-1 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 3/1 100 silt loam mucky material in sandy loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol(Al) ❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ® 2 cm Muck(A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) O Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ® Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sand Gle ed Matrix S4 ❑ Redox Depressions FS wetland hydrology must l e present, Y Y ( ) P ( ) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ® Surface Water(Al) ® Water-Stained Leaves(139) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves(69) ® High Water Table(A2) (except MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) (MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) ® Saturation(A3) ❑ Salt Crust(1311) ® Drainage Patterns(610) ❑ Water Marks(61) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates(1313) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits(132) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑ Drift Deposits(133) ® Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust(134) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑ Iron Deposits(135) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ® FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(66) ® Stunted or Stresses Plants(D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B6) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches): uo to 2, Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches): 4" Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast-Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys, and Coast Region Project Site: Parcel 12320-34-00030 City/County: Belfair/Mason Sampling Date: 10/8/2013 Applicant/Owner: Steve Johnson State: WA Sampling Point: wet-2 Investigator(s): L.Boad Section,Township,Range: sec 20.t23n.rlw Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): basin Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 3 Subregion(LRR): Lat: 47_46 Long: -122.8308 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Norma fine sandy loam NWI classification: none Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (if needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants Tree Stratum(Plot size: Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: %Cover Species? Status 1 Number of Dominant Species 3 (A) 2 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3. Total Number of Dominant 4 Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 50%_ 20%_ =Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species Sapling/Shrub Stratum(Plot size: That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100 (A/B) 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species 33.3 x1= 4. FACW species 66.6 x2= — 5. FAC species x3= _ 50%_ ,20%_ =Total Cover FACU species 0 x4= _ Herb Stratum(Plot size:_� UPL species 0 x5= — 1. Carex obnupta 50 yes OBL Column Totals: 100(A) (B) 2. Juncus effufus 30 Y@-S FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 3. Ranunculus repens 20 y9s FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. ❑ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5, ® 2-Dominance Test is>50% 6. ❑ 3-Prevalence Index is<3.0' 7. ❑ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) g. ❑ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 11. — 50%= 20%_ =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:_) 1. — 2 Hydrophytic Vegetation Yes ® No ❑ 50%= 20%_ =Total Cover Present? %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast-Version 2.0 Project Site: Parcel 12320-34-00030 SOIL Sampling Point:wet-2 Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Lo62 Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 3/1 100 silty loam mucky material in sandy loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 21-ocation:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol(Al) ❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ® 2 cm Muck(A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑ Red Parent Material(fF2) ❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) ® Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ® Surface Water(Al) ® Water-Stained Leaves(B9) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves(69) ® High Water Table(A2) (except MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) (MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) ® Saturation(A3) ❑ Salt Crust(1311) ® Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑ Water Marks(131) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates(1313) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits(62) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) ❑ Drift Deposits(63) ® Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑ Iron Deposits(B5) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ® FAC-Neutral Test(D5) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(86) ® Stunted or Stresses Plants(131)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches): up to 2, Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches): 4" Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 Appendix C Washington State Wetland Rating System Form lrt g Y Wetland name or number WETLAND RATING FORM — WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2—Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Updated Oct.2008 with the new WDFW definitions for priority habitats Name of wetland (if known):Parcel 12320-34-00030 Wetland Date of site visit: 10/8/2013 Rated by:H Trained by Ecology? Yes 0 No Q Date of training:10/06 SEC: 20 TOWNSHP: 23N RNGE: 1 W Is S/T/R in Appendix D? Yes❑ No Map of wetland unit: Figure 2 Estimated size 4.4 acres SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland: ❑ I ®II ❑ III ❑ IV Category I= Score> 70 Score for Water Quality Functions 10 Category II = Score 51 -69 Score for Hydrologic Functions 16 Category III = Score 30—50 Score for Habitat Functions 26 Category IV = Score <30 TOTAL Score for Functions 52 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTCS of Wetland ❑ I ❑ II ® Does not apply Final Category(choose the"highest" category from above") II Summary of basic information about the wetland unit. Wetland LIniY has Special Wetland$GM Class Characteristics h�,used fo -�]Ratm Estuarine ❑" De ressional Natural Heritage Wetland ❑ Riverine ❑ Bog Lake-fringe ❑ Mature Forest ❑ Sloe ❑ Old Growth Forest ❑ Flats Coastal Lagoon ❑ Freshwater Tidal ❑ Interdunal ❑ ❑ None of the above ® Check if unit has multiple ❑ HGM classes present Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland. Check List for Wetlands--that NeedAdtfi�honnl P�roteetion yE ... N0 m:additiou to the; >Fotection-vown menaed$for s,caC,e or.-. SP1. Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (TIE species)? ❑ For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the ❑ wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are categorized as Category 1 Natural Heritage Wetlands(see p. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the state? ❑ SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example,the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or ❑ in a local management plan as having special significance. To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. The hydlrogeomo►phic classification groups wetlands in to those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydliogeomotphic Class of a wed"can be detennined using the key below. See p.24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington,Version 2(7/06),updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Page ( of 12 Wetland name or number Classification of Vegetated Wetlands for Western Washington If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not;apply to thef entire unit:beingiated,you probably have,a unit,with multiple HGM classes.,In`this case,identify;wli chhyil ologic:'cracna=in g4esti6ns,1=74pply,,and go-to Question 8 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides(i.e. except during floods)? ®NO-go to 2 ❑ YES-the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt(parts per thousand)? ❑ YES-Freshwater Tidal Fringe ❑ NO-Saltwater Tidal Fringe(Estuarine) Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is a Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland Wetlands that were call estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions,and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions,the term"Estuarine"wetland is kept. Please note,however,that the characteristics that define Category I and fl estuarine wetlands have changed(see p. ). 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. ®NO-go to 3 ❑ YES-The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a"Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland meet both of the following criteria? ❑ The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water(without any vegetation on the surface)where at least 20 acres(8ha) in size; ❑At least 30%of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 (2 m)? ®NO-go to 4 ❑ YES-The wetland class is Lake-fringe(Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland meet all of the following criteria? ❑ The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual). ❑ The water flows through the wetland in one direction(unidirectional)and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. ❑ The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these types of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually<3 ft diameter and less than l foot deep). ® NO-go to 5 ❑ YES-The wetland class is Slope 5. Does the entire wetland meet all of the following criteria? ❑ The unit is in a valley or stream channel where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river. ❑ The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not.flooding.. ®NO-go to 6 ❑ YES-The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time of the year. This means that any outlet, if present is higher than the interior of the wetland. ❑ NO-go to 7 ® YES-The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. ❑ No-go to 8 ❑ YES-The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example,seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain,or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT(make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10%or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10%of the unit,classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90%of the total area. HGMCldsses"yvifhin ih�'wetlan'tl,umt l etn rated„ ':, . �, .., . 'ruts wHGM'Class to else inRatin -Slope + Riverine Riverine -Slope + Depressional Depressional -Slope+ Lake-fringe Lake-fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional -Depressional+ Lake-fringe Depressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of Treat as ESTUARINE under wetlands with special freshwater wetland characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington,Version 2(7/06),updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Page 2 of 12 Wetland name or number WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS;Indicators that wetland:functions to.improve water quality. (only I scor Per box) D 1 Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (see p:38). D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: • Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it(no outlet).....................................points=3 Figure]Z • Unit has an intermittently flowing,OR highly constricted,permanently flowing outlet...points=2 • Unit has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet(permanently flowing)..points= 1 • Unit is a"flat"depression(Q.7 on key),or in the Flats class,with permanent surface 1 outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch.....................points= 1 ❑ 1 ditch is not permanently flowingtreat unit as "intermittent! owin ' Provide photo or drawing D 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface(or duff layer)is clay or organic(use NRCS definitions) 0 YES points=4 NO points=0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation(emergent, shrub,and/or forest Cowardin class): • Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation>=95%of area.........................................points=5 Figure • Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation>= 1/2 of area...........................................points=3 • Wetland has persistent,ungrazed vegetation>= 1/10 of area......................................... points= 1 • Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation< 1/10 of area............................................points=0 5 Map of Cowardin vegetation classes D 1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation: This is the area of the wetland that is ponded for at least 2 months, but dries out sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently Figure ponded. Estimate area as the average condition S out of 10 years. • Area seasonally ponded is> 1/2 total area of wetland.....................................................points 4 17 • Area seasonally ponded is> 1/4 total area of wetland..................................................... points=2 4 • Area seasonally ponded is< 1/4 total area of wetland.....................................................points=0 Map of H dro erb I Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above 1 10 _ D 2 Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 44) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland? Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit ma have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft.of wetland A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas, farmed fields, roads,or clear-cut logging Residential,urban areas,golf courses are within 150 ft. of wetland Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen Multiplier Other ❑ YES multiplier is 2 ® NO multiplier is 1 1 ♦ TOTAL—Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from D 1 by D2;then add score to table on p. 1 HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS Indicatorsthat wetland unit:functions to reduce flooding' and stream degradation. D 3 Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? (see p.46) D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit • Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it(no outlet).....................................points=4 • Unit has an intermittently flowing,OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet.... points=2 • Unit is a"flat"depression(Q.7 on key)or in the Flats class, with permanent surface 0 outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch.....................points= 1 ❑ (If ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing') • Unit has an unconstricted or slightly constricted surface outlet (permanently flowing)........points=0 D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods. Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For units with no outlet measure from the surface of permanent water or deepest part(f dry). • Marks of ponding are 3 ft. or more above the surface or bottom of the outlet..................points=7 • The wetland is a"headwater"wetland............................................................................points=5 3 • Marks of ponding between 2 ft.to <3 ft. from surface or bottom of outlet.....................points=5 • Marks are at least 0.5 ft. to<2 ft. from surface or bottom of outlet................................points=3 • Wetland is flat(yes to Q2 or Q.7 on key)but has small depressions on the surface that trap water.points= I • Marks of pondingless than 0.5 ft....................................................................................points=0 D 3.3 Contribution of wetland unit to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. • The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit..............................................points=5 5 • The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit............................................points=3 • The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit.................................... points=0 • Entire unit is in the FLATS class....................................................................................points=5 ____ Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above __8 J Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington,Version 2(7/06),updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Page 3 of 12 Wetland name or number D 4 Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (seep. 49) Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage,or reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate,tide gate,flap valve,reservoir etc.OR you estimate that more than 90%of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems. Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or Multiplier stream that has flooding problems ❑ Other ®YES multiplier is 2 ❑ No multiplier is 1 2 ♦ TOTAL—Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D3 by D4;then add score to table on p. 1 16 Comments: Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington,Version 2(7/06),updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Page 4 of 12 Wetland name or number WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS—Indicators that wetland functions to improve water quality. (only I score per box) RI Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (see p.52) R 1.1 Area of surface depressions within the riverine wetland that can trap sediments during a flooding event: Figure II • Depressions cover>3/4 area of wetland.........................................................................points=8 ❑ • Depressions cover> 1/2 area of wetland.........................................................................points=4 (If depressions> 1/2 of area of unit draw polygons on aerial photo or map) • Depressions present but cover< 1/2 area of wetland.......................................................points=2 • No depressions resent................................................................................................... oints=0 R 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the unit(areas with>90%cover at person height): Figure Q • Trees or shrubs>2/3 area of the unit..............................................................................points=8 • Trees or shrubs> 1/3 area of the wetland .......................................................................points=6 • Ungrazed, herbaceous plants>2/3 area of unit...............................................................points=6 • Ungrazed herbaceous plants> 1/3 area of unit................:...............................................points=3 • Trees,shrubs,and ungrazed herbaceous< 1/3 area of unit..............................................points=0 Aerial photo or map showing polygons of different vegetation types Add the points in the boxes above R 2 Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 53) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft. of wetland A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas,residential areas,farmed fields, roads,or clear-cut logging ❑ Residential, urban areas,golf courses are within 150 ft. of wetland The river or stream linked to the wetland has a contributing basin where human activities have raised Multiplier levels of sediment,toxic compounds or nutrients in the river water above standards for water quality. ❑ Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 ♦ TOTAL— Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from RI by R2; then add score to table on p. 1 HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS—Indicators that wetland functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion. R 3 Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? (see p.54) R 3.1 Characteristics of the overbank storage the wetland provides: Estimate the average width of the wetland perpendicular to the direction of the flow and the width of the stream or river channel(distance between Figure[] banks). Calculate the ratio: (average width of unit)/(average width of stream between banks). • If the ratio is more than 20.............................................................................................points=9 • If the ratio is between 10—20........................................................................................ points=6 • If the ratio is 5- <10.......................................................................................................points=4 • If the ratio is 1- <5 .........................................................................................................points=2 • If the ratio is < 1 ............................................................................................................points= 1 Aerial photo or map showing average widths R 3.2 Characteristics of vegetation that slow down water velocities during floods: Treat large woody debris as `forest or shrub". Choose the points appropriate for the best description. (polygons need to have >90% Figure[] cover at person height NOT Cowardin classes): • Forest or shrub for> 1/3 area OR herbaceous plants>2/3 area......................................points=7 • Forest or shrub for> 1/10 area OR herbaceous plants> 1/3 area.....................................points=4 • Vegetation does not meet above criteria.........................................................................points=0 Aerial photo or map showing polygons of different vegetation t es __ Add the points in the boxes above I____ R 4 Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (see p.57) Answer YES if the wetland is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage,or reduction in water velocity,it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Note which of the following conditions apply. ❑There are human structures and activities downstream(roads,buildings,bridges, farms)that can be damaged by flooding. There are natural resources downstream(e.g. salmon redds)that can be damaged by flooding Other Multiplier (Answer NO if the major source of water to the wetland is controlled by a reservoir or the wetland is tidal fringe along the sides of a dike) ❑ YES multiplier is 2 ❑ NO multiplier is 1 ♦ TOTAL—Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from R3 by R4;then add score to table on p. I Comments: Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington,Version 2(7/06),updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Page 5 of 12 Wetland name or number WATER iJALITY`FUNCTIONS=.Indicatorsahaf°ihe wetland uii i fupcst o s to:im rose writer ""uali" (only iscore L 1 Does the wetland unit have the potential to improve water quality? (see p.59) per box)`! L 1.1 Average width of vegetation along the lakeshore(use polygons of Cowardin classes): • Vegetation is more than 33 ft.(10m)wide.............. points=6 Figure❑ ........................................................ • Vegetation is more than 16 ft.(5m)wide and<33 ft.......................................................points=3 • Vegetation is more than 6 ft. (2m)wide and< 16 ft........................................................points= 1 • Vegetation is less than 6 ft. wide....................................................................................points=0 Map of Cowardin classes with widths marked L 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland: Choose the appropriate description that results in the highest points,and do not include any open water in your estimate of coverage. The herbaceous plants can be either the Figure dominant form or as an understory in a shrub or forest community. These are not Cowardin classes. Area of Cover is total cover in the unit,but it can be in patches. NOTE:Herbaceous does not include aquatic bed • Cover of herbaceous plants is>90%of the vegetated area.............................................points=6 • Cover of herbaceous plants is>2/3 of the vegetated area...............................................points=4 • Cover of herbaceous plants is> 1/3 of the vegetated area.................. . .. . points=3 • Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed or herbaceous covers>2/3 of the unit...............points=3 • Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in> 1/3 vegetated area......................................points= 1 • Aquatic bed cover and open water>2/3 of the unit........................................................points=0 Map with polygons of different vegetation es Add the points in the boxes above L 2 Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (see p.61) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in the lake water,or polluted surface water flowing through the unit to the lake. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit m have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would quay as opportunity. Wetland is along the shores of a lake or reservoir that does not meet water quality standards Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft Polluted water discharges to wetland along upland edge Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft.of wetland Residential or urban areas are within 150 ft. of wetland Multiplier Parks with grassy areas that are maintained,ballfields,golf courses(all within 150 ft.of lake shore) Power boats with gasoline or diesel engines use the lake Other ❑YES multiplier is 2 ❑ NO multiplier is 1 ♦ TOTAL—Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from L1 by L2; then add score to table on . 1 HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS—Indicators`that wetland functions"fo reduce shoreline erosion. L 3 Does the wetland have the potential to reduce shoreline erosion? (see p.62) L 3 Average width and characteristics of vegetation along the lakeshore (do not include aquatic bed): (choose the highest scoring description that matches conditions in the wetland) Figure II • 3/4 of distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft. (10m)wide............................................points=6 • 3/4 of distance is shrubs or forest at least 6 ft. (2m) wide. ..............................................points=4 • 1/4 of distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft. (10m)wide............................................points=4 Vegetation is at least 6 ft. (2m)wide(any type except aquatic bed)................................points=2 Vegetation is less than 6 ft. (2m)wide(any type except aquatic bed)..............................points=0 Aerial photo or map with Cowardin vegetation classes Record the points in the boxes above L 4 Does the wetland have the opportunity,to reduce erosion? (seep. 64) Are there features along the shore that will be impacted if the shoreline erodes? Note which of the following conditions apply. ❑There are human structures and activities along the upland edge of the wetland(buildings, fields)that can be damaged by erosion. Multiplier ❑ There are undisturbed natural resources along the upland edge of the wetland(e.g. mature forests, other wetlands)that can be damaged by shoreline erosion. ❑ Other [] YES multiplier is 2 ❑ NO multiplier is 1 ♦ TOTAL—Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from L3 by L4; then add score to table on p. I Comments: Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington,Version 2(7/06),updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Page 6 of 12 Wetland name or number WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS—Indicators that wetland functions to improve water quality. (only 1 score S 1 Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? per box) see box) S 1.1 Characteristics of average slope of unit: • Slope is 1%or less(a 1%slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation for every 100fr.horizontal distance)...points=3 • Slope is 1%-2%................................................. • Slope is 2%-5%................... .points= 1 ........................................................................................ • Slope is greater than 5%.................................................................................................points=0 S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface(or duff layer)is clay,organic(Use NRCS definitions). YES =3 points ENO =0 points S 1.3 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the vegetation in the wetland. Dense vegetation means you Figure Q have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75%cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 inches. • Dense, uncut,herbaceous vegetation>90%of the wetland area.....................................points=6 • Dense,uncut, herbaceous vegetation> 1/2 of area..........................................................points=3 • Dense,woody, vegetation> 1/2 of area..:.......................................................................points=2 • Dense, uncut,herbaceous vegetation> 1/4 of area..........................................................points= 1 • Does not meet any of the criteria above for vegetation....................................................points=0 Aerial photo or map with vegetation polygins Total for S 1 .Add the points in the boxes above S 2 Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (see p. 67) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland? Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit ma have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland Multiplier Tilled fields, logging,or orchards within 150 ft. of wetland Residential, urban areas,or golf courses are within 150 ft.upslope of wetland Other ❑ YES multiplier is 2 ❑ NO multiplier is 1 ♦ TOTAL—Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from S 1 by S2; then add score to table on p. I HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS—Indicators that wetland functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion. S 3 Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? (see p.68) S 3.1 Characteristics of vegetation that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland(stems of plants should be thick enough (usually > 1/8in), or dense enough to remain erect during surface flows). • Dense,uncut, rigid vegetation covers>90%of the area of the wetland..........................points=6 • Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation> 1/2 area of wetland.......................................................points=3 • Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation> 1/4 area.......................................................................points= 1 • More than 1/4 of area is grazed, mowed tilled or vegetation is not rigid........................points=0 S 3.2 Characteristics of slope wetland that holds back small amounts of flood flows. The slope has small surface depressions that can retain water over at least 10%of its area. YES =2 points Ej NO =0 points ,add the points in the boxes above S 4 Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (see p. 70) Is the wetland in a landscape position where the reduction in water velocity it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows? Note which of the following conditions apply. Wetland has surface runoff that drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems Other (Answer NO if the major source of water is controlled by a reservoir(e.g. wetland is a seep that is on Multiplier the downstream side of a dam) ❑YES multiplier is 2 ❑ NO multiplier is 1 ♦ TOTAL—H drolo is Functions Multiply the score from S3 by S4; then add score to table on p. I Comments: Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington,Version 2(7/06),updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Page 7 of 12 I Wetland name or number HABITAT FUNCTIONS—Indicators that wetland functions to provide important habitat. (only 1 score p p per box) H 1 Does the wetland have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure (see P. 72): Check the types of vegetation classes present(as defined by Cowardin)—Size threshold for each class is Figure 114 acre or more than 10%of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. Aquatic Bed Emergent plants Scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have>30%cover) Forested(areas where trees have>30%cover) I the unit has a forested class check if: The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata(canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs,herbaceous,moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20%within the forested polygon. 2 Add the number of vegetation types that quay. I ou have: Map of Cowardin vegetation classes 4 structures or more.......points=4 3 structures .............points—2 2 structures....................Doints= 1 1 structure............... oints=0 H 1.2 Hydroperiods (see p.73): Check the types of water regimes(hydroperiods)present within the wetland. The water regime has to Figure cover more than 10%of the wetland or 114 acre to count(see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points=3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 or more types present points=2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present points= 1 Saturated only 1 type present points=0 Permanently flowing stream or river in,or adjacent to,the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in,or adjacent to,the wetland Lake-fringe wetland.....................=2 points 2 Freshwater tidal wetland.............=2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3 Richness of Plant Species (see p. 75): Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft' (different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass,purple lousastrife, Canadian Thistle. If you counted: > 19 species.......................points=2 5— 19 species....................points= 1 ] List species below if you want to: .5 species.........................points=0 H 1.4 Interspersion of Habitats (see p. 76): Decided from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation(described in H1.1),or the classes and unvegetated areas(can include open water or mudflats)is high,medium,low,or none. CDO Figure None=0 points Low=1 point Moderate=2 points [riparian braided channels] High =3 points 3 Note: If you have 4 or more classes or 3 vegetation classes and open water,the rating is always"high". Use map of Cowardin classes. H 1.5 Special Habitat Features (seep. 77): Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points ou put into the next column. Large, downed,woody debris within the wetland(>4 in. diameter and 6 ft. long) Standing snags(diameter at the bottom>4 inches) in the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft. (2m)and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft. (lm)over a stream(or ditch) in,or contiguous with the unit,for at least 33 ft. (10m) ❑ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope)OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown) ® At least 1/4 acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg-laying by amphibians) ® Invasive plants cover less than 25%of the wetland area in each stratum of plants NOTE: The 20%stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. 3 H 1 TOTAL Score—potential for providing habitat Add the points in the column above 11 Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington,Version 2(7/06),updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Page 8 of 12 Wetland name or number H 2 (only l scot, Does the wetland have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? er box s: H 2.1 Buffers(see P. 80): Figure Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of"undisturbed". ® 100m(330 ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water> 95%of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer (relatively undisturbed also means no grazing,no landscaping,no daily human use).............points=5 ❑ 100m(330 ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas, or open water> 50%circumference........................................................................................................points=4 ❑ 50m(170 ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95%circumference....................................................................................................points=4 ❑ I00m(330 ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas, or open water> 25%circumference........................................................................................................points=3 ❑ 50m(170 ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for > 50%circumference....................................................................................................points=3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above: ❑No paved areas(except paved trails)or buildings within 25m(80 ft)of wetland>95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing or lawns are OK ..........................................points=2 ❑No paved areas of buildings within 50m of wetland for>50%circumference. Light to moderate grazing or lawns are OK.............................................................................points=2 ❑ Heavy grazing in buffer.....................................................................................................points= 1 ❑ Vegetated buffers are<2m wide(6.6 ft)for more than 95%circumference (e.g.tilled fields, paving,basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland) .............................points=0 ❑ Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above...................................................................points= 1 5 Aria[photo showing buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections(seep. 81) H 2.2.1 is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor(either riparian or upland)that is at least 150 ft. wide, has at least a 30%cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie,that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (Dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads,paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). ®YES=4 points(go to H 2.3) ❑ NO=go to H 2.2.2 H. 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor(either riparian or upland)that is at least 50 ft. wide,has at least 30%cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake- fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? ❑YES=2 points(go to H 2.3) ❑ NO=go to H 2.2.3 H. 2.2.3 Is the wetland: • Within 5 mi(8km)of a brackish or salt water estuary OR • Within 3 miles of a large field or pasture(>40 acres)OR ❑YES= I point 4 • Within i mile of a lake greater than 20 acres? ❑ NO=0 points Comments: Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington,Version 2(7/06),updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Page 9 of 12 Wetland name or number H 2.3 Near or adiacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW(see p. 82): (see new and complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in the PHS report hill): ird/ir.iru.,�r huh phslistlunr) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft.(100m)of the wetland unit? NOTE:the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. ❑Aspen Stands:Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha(1 acre). ❑ Biodiversity Areas and Corridors:Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 152). ❑Herbaceous Balds:Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. ❑Old-growth/Mature forests:(Old-growth west of Cascade crest)Stands of at least 2 tree species,forming a multi- layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 20 trees/ha(8 trees/acre)>81 cm(32 in)dbh or> 200 years of age.(Mature forests)Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm(21 in)dbh;crown cover may be less that 100%;decay,decadence,numbers of snags,and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth;80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. ❑Oregon white Oak:Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158). ® Riparian:The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. ❑Westside Prairies:Herbaceous,non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161). ® Instream:The combination of physical,biological,and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. ❑Nearshore:Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats.These include Coastal Nearshore,Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore.(full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report:pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). ❑Caves:A naturally occurring cavity,recess,void,or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock,ice,or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. ❑Cliffs:Greater than 7.6 in(25 ft)high and occurring below 5000 ft. ❑Talus:Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15-2.0 in(0.5-6.5 ft),composed of basalt, andesite,and/or sedimentary rock,including riprap slides and mine,tailings.May be associated with cliffs. ❑Snags and Logs:Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavationiuse by wildlife.Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of>5 t cm(20 in)in western Washington and are>2 in(6.5 ft)in height.Priority logs are>30 cm(12 in)in diameter at the largest end,and>6 in(20 ft)long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats=4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats=3 points If wetland has 1 priority habitat=1 point No habitats=0 points 3 Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list. Nearby wetlands are addressed in question H 2.4) H 2.4 Wetland Landscape: Choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits(see p. 84) • There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1/2 mile,and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed(light grazing between wetlands OK,as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads,fill,fields,or other development....points=5 ❑ • The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within 1/2 mile................................................................................................points=5 ❑ • There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1/2 mile,BUT the connections between them are disturbed........................................................................................................................points=3 • The wetland fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within1/2 mile...............................................................................................................points=3 ❑ • There is at least 1 wetland within 1/2 mile......................................................................points—2❑ • There are no wetlands within 1/2 mile........ 3 H 2 TOTAL Score—opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2.1, H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 15 TOTAL for H I from page 8 11 ♦ Total Score for Habitat Functions Add the points for H 1 and H 2;then record the result on p. I �J Comments: Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington,Version 2(7/06),updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Page 10 of 12 Wetland name or number CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetland Type—Check off any criteria that apply,to the wetland. Circle the Category when the appropriate criteria are met. SC1 Estuarine wetlands? (see p.86) Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? ❑The dominant water regime is tidal, ❑ Vegetated, and ❑ With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. ❑ YES =Go to SC 1.1 ® NO SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge,National Park,National Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational,Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC Cat. 1 332-30-151? ❑ YES =Category I ® NO=go to SC 1.2 ❑ SC 1.2 Is the wetland at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following conditions? ❑ YES =Category I ❑ NO=Category II Cat. I ❑The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking, ditching, filling,cultivation,grazing,and has ❑ less than 10%cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp,. are only species Cat. II that cover more than 10%of the wetland,then the wetland should be given a dual rating(I/II). ❑ The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a Category 1. Do not, however,exclude the area of Spartina in Dual determining the size threshold of I acre. ❑ At least 3/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft. buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or Rating un-mowed grassland I/II ❑The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or ❑ contiguous freshwater wetlands. SC2 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered,or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a natural heritage wetland? (This question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHP/DNR.) ® S/T/R information from Appendix D ® or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site ❑YES Contact WNHP/DNR(see p. 79)and go to SC 2.2 ® NO SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as a site with state threatened Cat I or endangered plant species? ❑ ❑ YES =Category 1 ® NO not a Heritage Wetland SC3 Bogs (seep. 87) Does the wetland(or any part of the unit)meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its function. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons(i.e. layers of organic soil),either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? ❑YES=go to question 3 ®NO=go to question 2 2. Does the wetland have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? ❑YES=go to question 3 ® NO=is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70%cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the"bog"species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation(more than 30%of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? ❑YES= Is a bog for purpose of rating ❑NO=go to question 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16"deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the"bog"plant species in Table 3 are present,the wetland is a bog. 4. Is the unit forested (>30%cover)with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar,western hemlock, lodgepole pine,quaking aspen, Englemann's spruce, or western white pine. WITH any of the species(or combination of species)on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(> 30%coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? Cat. I ❑YES=Category I ❑ NO=Is not a bog for purpose of rating ❑ Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington,Version 2(7/06),updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Page I 1 of 12 f Wetland name or number SC4 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90) Does the wetland have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its function. ❑Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade Crest) Stands of at least two three species forming a multi- layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre(20 trees/hectare)that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height(dbh)of 32 inches(81 cm or more). NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and"OR"so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. ❑ Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80—200 years old OR have an average diameters(dbh)exceeding 21 inches(53 cm); crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. Cat.I ❑YES=Category I ® NO=not a forested wetland with special characteristics ❑ Wetlands in Coastal La 91 SCS Lagoons (seep. ) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? ❑The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks,gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently,rocks. ❑The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish(>0.5 ppt)during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon(needs to be measured near the bottom.) ❑ YES=Go to SC 5.1 ® NO not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions? ❑ The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching, filling, cultivation,grazing)and has less than 20%cover of invasive plant species(see list of invasive species on p. 74). ❑ At least 3/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft. buffer of shrub, forest,or un-grazed or Cat. I un-mowed grassland. ❑ ❑ The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre(4350 square ft.) Cat. II ❑ YES=Category I ® NO =Category II ❑ SC6 Interdunal Wetlands (see p. 93) Is the wetland west of the 1889 line(also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? ❑YES=Go to SC 6.1 ® NO not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula-- lands west of SR 103 • Grayland-Westport-- lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis—lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger,or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is one acre or larger? Cat. II ❑YES=Category II ® NO =go to SC 6.2 ❑ SC 6.2 Is the wetland between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 acre? Cat. III ❑YES=Category III ❑ Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics ♦ Choose the "highest"rating if wetland falls into several categories, and record on p. 1. If you answered NO for all types enter"Not Applicable"on p. 1 Comments: Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington,Version 2(7/06),updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 Page 12 of 12 1 1/2"Iran Pipe �Wslted 8116104 19 S O I300.63' 8976.08•E 2601.27' 1260.88' 3 _—_ T__— 3 NE Corner �-• �a� I ^�' NW/4 SW1/4 �b RESUL TAN 7 I e= a I e t Pdre any PARCELS ReSUIt Re & N ROger J ,669"`feg .2M� S 8970'04'E lOB6. I 114 b I I orce1 `�`� o g Alt 93.29' 106.71on toP scd L 52 E 1 S89 28:;1 SILt'49'OYW _T— _T ———_ —— ry^ I R 10 Actes I 121.80•—— — I [I en 3�l 1 6 I 50677271 L------1 124.7X I A corn 1.4� rlt 5391.198'E J S:)3 ; Res Radius ry 0 esult cepfdC• V , I Restricfiro �•'' ,. covenant per n R POr "Gros 91.97' `l fbv 1314.60' —` 1\ A.F.J/984444 2 �e t1.� 589,00Y9 E —————,——— 5897357'£ T�------__--- -------,.— ----- ---363.07--_ — �—. —————— — �) Existing woamtlan ^ ��r 'S54 d.�liyi�� 9//y S� S9E G SURVEYOR•s AVM? ��/� 3 a' 'w\`,\B 7.g6, O f, l this survey honored fhe 1 I/2•it p for the "� I r i ] ,j 01/ fL A Easement —— I quarter corner o/Sectlan?O os a fall o sur M o ,+21 40'Easement 65i per .Fj571188. I McGinnis 6/100. 8/85, 24/6 d 4 '4 g") .4'W`� err far Ingress. Egress ! \ ��t• �' \\ Irwin 9/99, 101105 57 7 �� '^ tr Utilities to bens8t Thatcher 25/201 ^ *9 V1 143' 0 ParcNs 1 tr 2 SB9'45'48 This map is!or axhi' rpo3es poly. ners how been set. 5631�Op �, ? ry 1)9.89 IQAppror. d'�as'�\\ Survey!or use-by�r/giur�aser of s only. 139.01' S� n / sB57B49'w Its I rn/s map/s at m a S(�ow all matters on.relatedn to the property ecjl� Existing �Q�• / is includin tnof/!m to ants, restrlcf/one and encroachments. I �q b R e� I 40'Easement 9� \Ye\9 Stream �y.l Pdre ^tree per A.F/571488 E rooeA rash lines a owtnershmpprop r—or sn�d s ck Icgul I (Boundary) 3 t6 a I NE Timberline Drive b s3� p P W Y 9u j^^ b o f in f se cases I �� Q�s + / I se90.91' � Approx. g wan RI I I —1— y -----�-----�------- Ile '�if7� RIPIION � 840.B1' a n q Boundary Line Adfustment recorded under Auditor's Firs No. SOUR,W k EQUIPMUT I EXIS77NO TAX NUMBERS •I$ L 12320-32-0)000 Sfandord held trarorae with Nikon 1"Total Sfotion and steel I 12320-32-02000 'ago, 2 tape. This survey meets minimum standards as set forth In 12320-34-00010 332-130_090 �Ie W.A.C. .•ertn. cnmmu by OseelopmN✓ I swCame, 81 Alt 1449Rp3 i 1 20 11 f E1/2, 5WI/4 �p ------------ —Y---------- ---------�+--- GRAPHIC SCALE 30 29 N 89:11'37'W--�— 2657.13' T 11° Cdcumted Braes cop an Iran pipe Position V'sitad 8116104 (ax►M) t fool.200 M AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE SUR4£YORS CERTIFICATE Record E Survey for, �r�}� rnls mop camecUy represents a aurwy moG by ��•. A PENINSULA TOP SOIL LLC SHT Filed for record this—�8L day of�L_,2012 mew under my direction M eanlormmce wlfh , E;OTC, {--� P.O. BOX 488 BELFAIR WA 98528 the r&Wkvwnwts of the Survey Recwding Act at ,�4. j, otM., M VoL �_of Swroya Page 140 y: fua a N� 2 PENINSULA 70P SOIL Act —at the request of the request of Pa BOX 4B6 OEIFAIR, WA 98528 _ CONSULTANTS, INC. Nw►/s SEi/4 Ar SWI/4, 5�7/4 .., Auditor'Fire No. 198gg82 Ih MAR. 2012. i a ,�kea rani ao•w,roout n eases•(9eo)tee-am &NE1/4, SW?/4 &NWI/4, OF ;fis!E",� en y ca r y SW E.O. I/4 SWI 4, M eon aunty Auditor �ZU79 oe. 5116/12 3JB6 R iW. W.M.M. 1969962 Page 2 of 2 ason oun y, 1 1/2'Iran Pipe �Vsited 8116104 1 9N We58976'OB'£ 2601.27' 162 t260.88' 67' IIJ797' NE Corner 3 NWI/4 SWl/4 O I —- _—______ EXISTING 1 PARCELS (Ce1 p1 000y Reid Z p Pa 32' �o� h" TTII/ I I ti o 12320'getd� t 8 I I W 'a�M y ,,gel %rtee oN.0 S01 T19'36'W I .� 58970'04E 490.z4' 10 I 653.81' S897004 E 65381' to 1 el 2 00 1 1 P O(`+32'o2o 501I yh� S 69712'.E S 899V0'19'F - a '(OP I SOJ'4967W--�_--T------ Orlin eMo 1 S067727 L------1 124.7.3 A 1 m D I "1 1.1975'18-E I o H I 1 S037824 E�'� 91.97 5891?0'19"E 1 ----------- -------� L------- -------- S897J SJ""£ I314.60' n C I 1 o — 36307'—— • ,� — ———————---�——— Pd( 3 �00501� A_ 9Ahh SJ ti4;gyE N;4.41j1 w 3?0 3 'fop a� 00 r jo.00. 12 ,�S LG oiE •, -- �-�-- I f3LA # 2- sI� 4.W �� Pei � z`6�, ra65a�� v+ j43p0 i r eeiu Dow$O~ I 1J9.Ot' S8578'49'W Existing INS �� `—�1 •�-.i! Per A.F. I b0 ° I^ (eoundary) ^>�o� ; I NE Timberline Drive b� S6971'37 E „h1 —1—MProx. fL Unfon Hi 481.75• h 840.81' a N887�'W 1294.83' ——————— I IQ 3 ^ 1 q O " 2 L) r 1 lq O,q L0. QFAE QsY� 1 SW Corner gi 19 20Ei/Z SWI/4 13285Y 0 GRAPHIC SCALE «� _ 61 30 29 -- N 8931'37'W --- — 2657.1J---------- Brass ca o 29 COP; P ` Calculated Iron Pipe «^+� Position Visifeo 8176104 (IN 11W 00pi 1 Ise!-M M Q14 ��`• AUUI TOR'S COMFICA IF SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE scord of INS /ot; Ihls map correc0y represents a survey made t+y ��••.., A ■T.� PENINSULA TOP SOIL LLC SHT Filed for record this_50 day ofH—,2012 me or under my dlrecticn In conformance with yF,N E 0 /—� J P.O. BOX 488 BELFAIR, WA 98528 Me requirements of the Survey Recording Act of h4-:• V i 1 1 Situate f'A 1 ateM., h Vol. -—o/Surwle, Page PENINSULA TOP SOIL LLC t'� _at the request of the request or P.O.ear 488 BELFAIR, WA 98528 CONS ULTANTS, INC. NWl N SE1/4 �'SWI/4 SE1/4 OF Auditor'Fire No. l989982. h MAR. 2012. P0.B01 RIB BLL1'®1LL e�9B9tl9 (Beoyex-e,m d1 NE1/4, SW1/4 #NWl/4, •+�9y SWl/4 !_EE 4. SWI/4, _ S'T6�ZOI Z •'•.0 ux,'�p B.J.M. S.E.O. $E`.. 2 , 2 11Metl�R..+• V�--OI. even ar t• s�76/t2 .gym"o. JJ86 RrA 1W. WM. son'County Auditor P.LS 20795 } i a. 123204290030 j4s pot,,- 123203202000 � �,; �` ',rxa • w I:." 123203400010 x i.. � I 71 � 1 1',00122 12320430012i 123203400030 k '123203100000 - 123204390130 123200060010 123204390150 123204300040 FIT 123204300020 123203400000 y 123204390110 123292100010 y 123292003000 123291',' "':0) -ource: E— ri. DigitaIG1•be, eo ye, -cu bed, l�1S -A USGS AE=X Get apping, erogrid, N, ', - s-to po, anti tt GIS U� r C,�•xi unit, N 1 inch = 200 feet W , E 1 inch = 0 miles S