The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHMP - HMP Habitat Managment Plan - 8/30/2009 THE WETLAND CORPS W"077 Wetland Delineation - Habitat Management Plans - Riparian Restoration • Mitigation • Biological Evaluation PARCEL 123203400010 HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN 210 NE Timberline Drive Belfair,Washington Mason County Prepared for: Peninsula Topsoil LLC. c/o Steve Johnson PO Box 640 Belfair,WA 98528 Prepared by: Heather Lane and Lee Boad August,2009 PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com THE WETLAND CORPS Wetland Delineation - Habitat Management Plans • Riparian Restoration - Mitigation - Biological Evaluation PARCEL 123203400010 HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................1 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ...............................................................................................2 3.0 APPLICABLE SETBACKS..................................................................................................3 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT AND SPECIES.................................................................4 5.0 ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS....................................................................................................6 6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES.................................................................................................7 7.0 MONITORING ....................................................................................................................11 8.0 SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................11 Fizzes Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map Figure 2. Site Plan Figure 3. National Wetland Inventory Map Figure 4. Mason County Soil Survey Map Figure 5. Department of Natural Resources Water Resource Map PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com THE WETLAND CORPS Wetland Delineation - Habitat Management Plans - Riparian Restoration - Mitigation - Biological Evaluation August,2009 Page 1 PARCEL 123203400010 HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN 210 NE Timberline Drive Belfair,Washington 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The details of a Habitat Management Plan for the above referenced property are discussed in full in this report. The site is found in the SW I/4 of Section 20 Township 23 North, Range 1 West along the Union River(See Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map). The purpose of this Habitat Management Plan (HMP) is to address impacts resulting from the completed bank armoring within the type S stream buffer of Union River. All type S streams in Mason County require 150 feet of undisturbed buffer with an additional 15-foot building setback. The rock wall was originally constructed to quickly and efficiently repair the damage from the December 2007 flood event, for the purpose of protecting upland portions of the property. The completed bank armor extends a lineal distance of approximately 30-feet adjacent to the stream. This report also addresses and provides mitigation for proposed additional bank armoring which will extend the completed wall an additional 10-feet downstream. The additional bank armoring is necessary to prevent the stream from eroding further to east and falling several red alders near the river. Both the completed and proposed bank armoring are necessary to protect adjacent upland property. The project is intended to prevent future flood events from substantially eroding and displacing useable upland area. The objectives of this HMP are as follows: ■ To evaluate the potential adverse effects to critical area functions as well as fish and wildlife habitat resulting from the completed and proposed bank armoring along the stream bank. Emphasis is placed on the possible loss of habitat for any listed species found to be residing in the vicinity of the parcel. ■ To identify possible mitigation measures that could be implemented to offset the adverse effects resulting from the completed and proposed bank armoring within the Type S stream buffer. PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 ceil:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 123203400010 MiP August,2009 Page 2 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The subject parcel is 23 acres in size, and bordered to the south by Timberline Drive,to the west by Union River and to the north and east by residential parcels of similar size. The Union River drains westerly into Hood Canal, located approximately one mile west of the property. The portion of the stream buffer adjacent to the project site is comprised of grasses and shrubs such as Japanese knotweed and salmonberry with a patch of mature red alder in the western area. The portion of the stream buffer that has been bank armored is located within the southernmost portion of the property. Prior to the flood event, the area that is currently occupied by the bank armoring was likely comprised of an exposed cut bank. w ' n. p VIP r Photo 1. Completed portion of rock wall. A lineal distance of approximately 30 feet. PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 123203400010 HMP August,2009 Page 3 f t Photo 2. Additional Portion of bank proposed for armoring circled in red. 3.0 APPLICABLE SETBACKS The project site is within the jurisdiction of Mason County. Ordinance 17.01.110 identifies Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas adopted by Mason County. The applicable setback for this project is as follows: Habitat Type Buffer Building Setback from Buffer Type S Stream (Union River) 150' 15' PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 123203400010 HMP August,2009 Page 4 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT AND SPECIES 4.1 Puget Sound Chinook(Oncorhynchus tshawytsha)-Threatened Listed as threatened since March 24,1999 adult Puget Sound Chinook spawn in several rivers and streams flowing into Puget Sound. The lower Union River is known to support small runs of Puget Sound Chinook. These fish are assumed to be of hatchery origin but have maintained some level of natural production over the last decade. The mainstem of the Union River is listed as a final designation in the NOAA Fisheries Northwest Region Critical Habitat Designations for West Coast Salmon and Steelhead in Washington- August 2005. The project proposal includes mitigation and tactical design intended to protect and maintain water quality of the stream as well as prevent sedimentation. Given that no displacement of important spawning habitat will be necessary, this project is not likely to impact Puget Sound Chinook. Mitigation includes the establishment of a native riparian community along an area occupied by an open grass area adjacent to the river. 4.2 Puget Sound Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss)-Threatened Listed as Threatened since May 2007, Puget Sound Steelhead spawn in several streams throughout Puget Sound. Spawning usually occurs in moderate to steep gradient sections of streams, usually in heads of riffles or the tails of pools where hydraulic conditions are conducive to intragravel flow. Side channels and the anterior portions of islands are also used. Spawn timing for summer steelhead runs typically ranges from mid May through October while winter run steelhead are present from December through May. Adequate cover from predation, water temperature, and spawning gravel are important factors for instream habitat, while little is currently known about specific marine habitat requirements. The Union River is accessible to Puget Sound Steelhead. However, no part of this project will displace important spawning or rearing habitat, therefore, no impacts are likely. The overall project described in this report is not expected to impact water quality or aquatic habitat important fish. The pool habitat which will likely result at the base of the rock wall will provide important rearing habitat for juveniles. 4.3 Hood Canal Summer Chum(Oncorhynchus keta)-Threatened Hood Canal Summer Chum spawning areas in proximity to the site include the Union River and, historically, the Tahuya River. Recovery efforts are in place to restore naturally spawning summer chum populations to the Tahuya system while the Union stock remains healthy. Summer chum adults are present from August to mid October in the lower Union River. The project area falls within the Summer Chum ESU. Chum salmon generally prefer medium size gravels that are PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetiandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 123203400010 HMP August,2009 Page 5 relatively sand and silt free. No damage to stream habitat or associated buffers has or will result from the project addressed in this plan. The proposed rip rap installation is not likely to impact Hood Canal Summer Chum as impacts will be mitigated through the restoration of riparian vegetation and continued stabilization of the stream bank. Measures are provided in this report to protect water quality and other habitat features potentially important to all fish species potentially inhabiting the stream. Measures are provided in this plan to protect water quality and aquatic habitat. Given that no modification to spawning habitat or forested riparian area are proposed, no impacts to summer chum or their habitats are likely to occur. 4.4 Bull Trout(Salvelinus malma)-Threatened Bull trout typically inhabit very cold, clear headwater streams at high elevations that are supported by snowmelt. For spawning and early rearing, bull trout require loose, clear gravel, relatively free of fine sediments. Bull trout are not documented within this stream. Given the scale of the project and mitigation proposed,the project is not likely to have any adverse impacts on bull trout. 4.5 Bald Eagle(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)-Threatened Habitat areas associated with Bald Eagle include uneven aged coniferous stands with some old- growth components. Nests are typically constructed in larger trees with dead or broken tops providing an unobstructed view of nearby water. Snags and trees with exposed lateral limbs, or dead tops are used as perches and defense stations. There are no documented Bald Eagle nesting sites in the vicinity of the project area. The completed project did not require the removal of any trees. Recommended overstory plantings recommended in Section 6.3 should improve the potential for use of the site by Bald Eagle in the future. As no important habitat features are to be removed, this project will have no adverse impacts on bald eagles. The proposed mitigation is expected to provide a net benefit. 4.6 Marbled Murrelet(Brachyramphus marmoratus)-Threatened Marbled Murrelets are typically associated with coastal habitats and nest in old-growth forests. Murrelets may fly as far as 50 miles inland to nest,however the average distance is roughly 5-miles from nest to sea. It is only during the summer breeding months that they are commonly found inland. During non-nesting seasons they live at sea. Murrelets require tall mossy trees in coniferous old growth forests with cavities on thick branches where they can construct a cup nest 20-40 meters above the forest floor. Murreletts have been documented laying eggs on rocky ground habitats only when a sufficient forest is unavailable. There are no documented nesting sites surrounding the project site. No potential nesting trees containing platform features are within the project area. This project will likely have no adverse impact on Marbled Murrelet given there are no documented nesting sites or potential nesting trees within the project area. PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell-360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 123203400010 IIW August,2009 Page 6 4.7 Northern Spotted Owl(Strix occidentalis caurina)-Threatened Spotted owls require a large amount of land for their nesting and hunting grounds; pairs may occupy up to 58 sq. km. They are territorial and do not migrate, but they may shift their ranges slightly in response to seasonal changes Suitable spotted owl habitat includes trees relatively large in diameter, multi-layered forest canopy with a moderate to high canopy closure in overstory, midstory, and understory, large, tall, live trees with cavities, broken tops, mistletoe, or platforms of branches capable of holding accumulated organic matter suitable for use as a nest. Dead standing trees and fallen decayed trees supporting abundant populations of prey species are critical to spotted owl populations. Currently there are no spotted owl nesting sites documented in proximity to the project site. As spotted owls are currently not present, and the project is of a scale that has no impact on forested areas, no impacts to spotted owl or their habitat are expected result from the completed or proposed project. 5.0 ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS The project lies within the regulated buffer of a Type S stream. Project scale in the protected area is as follows: Development Type Habitat Type Approximate Project scale Bank Armoring(completed) Type S Stream Buffer 30 lineal feet Bank Armoring(proposed) Type S Stream Buffer 10 lineal feet Total Type S Stream Buffer 40 lineal 5.1 Vegetation Disturbance The portion of the stream buffer displaced by the bank armoring is located in an area that was previously an exposed cut bank prior to the December 3`d 2007 flood event. The site was eroded toward the northwest during the flood. The area where the bank armoring is proposed is occupied by grasses and exposed soil along the existing slope, with little native shrub or overstory vegetation. No native trees or shrubs were removed or are proposed to be removed for the project. With recommended planting of native vegetation described in Section 6.3, the project will likely have a net benefit of vegetation abundance and diversity within the parcel. 5.2 Designated Critical Habitat for Salmonids Designated Critical Habitat for Salmonids is within the the project area. However, none of the completed or proposed work will displace or substantially modify Designated Critical Habitat. The stream channel will be maintained in its current location. With proposed mitigation, actions described in this plan are not expected to jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species. PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 123203400010 HIVW August,2009 Page 7 5.3 Temporary Increase in Sediment and Turbidity During Construction The proposed work has the potential to temporarily increase turbidity and suspended sediment within the project area. Best Management Practices have been recommended in Section 6.4 to avoid siltation of waters during project implementation. 5.4 Light and Glare The proposed project has not resulted in an increase in light and glare. No impacts to the use of the site by wildlife species is likely to result from light and glare associated with this project. 6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES 6.1 Preservation of Critically Important Plants No removal of critically important plants or vegetative communities has occurred or is proposed. 6.2 Minimization Mitigation The project minimizes impacts to the stream buffer by armoring only the areas damaged during the December 3rd 2007 flood event, and the areas that have high potential to be eroded during future flood events. The areas to be potentially eroded are important to the continued protection of the property. 6.3 Enhancement Recommendations The portion of the stream buffer that is proposed for bank armoring is occupied by exposed soil, with little native vegetation. To compensate for the completed and proposed bank armoring within the stream buffer, it is recommended that a ten-foot wide strip of the buffer, adjacent to the stream bank be enhanced with native vegetation. The ten-foot wide strip extends the entire length of the stream buffer adjacent to the bank armoring addressed in this plan (approximately 40 feet), and will be identified as the Enhancement Zone. The Enhancement Zone is currently occupied by flat, open grass area. A moderately dense forested and shrub community within this specified area is likely to improve water quality maintenance, upland stabilization, and wildlife utilization of the site. The area selected as the Enhancement Zone occupies approximately 400 square feet of the stream buffer. PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 123203400010 HMP August,2009 Page 8 3� Or J q r C 1 Photo 3. Representative portion of proposed enhancement zone,circled in red. Native Plantings It is recommended that the mitigation zone be enhanced with native plants. It is recommended that potted plants be used as opposed to bare root seedlings. The following plant species and potted sizes are recommended: Trees: western red cedar(Thuja plicata)-2 gallon Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii)- 2 gallon Shrubs: Oregon grape (Mahonia nervosa)- 1 gallon salal (Gaultheria shallon)— 1 gallon evergreen huckleberry(Vaccinium ovatum) - gallon nootka rose(Rosa nutkana)— 1 gallon salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis)— 1 gallon Pacific Willow(Salix lusida)— 1 gallon PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 123203400010 MV August,2009 Page 9 Hooker willow(Salix hookeriana)— 1 gallon Scouler willow(Salix scouleriana)— 1 gallon Sitka willow(Salix sitchensis)— 1 gallon beaked hazelnut(Corylus cornuta)— 1 gallon Indian plum(Oemleria cerasiformis)— 1 gallon oceanspray(Holodiscus discolor)— 1 gallon Pacific ninebark(Physocarpus capitatus)— 1 gallon California black currant(Ribes bracteosum)— 1 gallon western thimbleberry(Rubus parviflorus)— I gallon red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa)— 1 gallon Ferns: sword fern(Polystichum munitum)— 1 gallon Native Planting Guidelines It is recommended that plantings be installed within the identified mitigation zone to achieve the following densities. A minimum of 1 tree species and five shrub or fern species from the above list are recommended. trees- 10' on center shrubs- 5' on center ferns- 4'on center These densities will provide a moderately dense, structurally diverse plant community within the mitigation zone. To fulfill the above mentioned planting density recommendation, the mitigation zone will be planted with a total of 4 trees, 12 shrubs, and 9 sword fern. It is recommended that installation be done as single trees and or clusters of three shrubs, on approximate 10-foot centers. Finally, sword fem will be randomly installed throughout the planting row on average four-foot centers. Any volunteer native vegetative species may be counted toward target densities. Typically,planting should occur during winter dormancy. The optimum time for planting is during February and March, however, the need to complete the project in a timely manner may call for planting to occur outside optimum time periods. No machinery earthwork will be necessary to implement this enhancement plan; planting holes for specified vegetation will be hand dug. No additional clearing or grading should be necessary for site enhancement. All installed vegetation shall be marked with colored flagging to facilitate monitoring inspections. The monitoring program is recommended to insure project effectiveness. Invasive species such as Himalayan blackberry, reed canary grass, Japanese knotweed, and English Ivy may invade the enhancement zone. These species are stubborn competitors for light and nutrients and limit success of native plants. Invasive species should be removed from the stream buffer, and/or enhancement zone should they invade. Herbicides should not be used to achieve this due to the proximity to the stream. Persistent cutting during the growing season is sufficient to offset the rhizomes of invasive species if they become a problem. PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 123203400010 MIP August,2009 Page 10 6.4 Best Management Practices Recommended Best Management Practices for this project are as follows: • Perform excavation and site preparation work during dry weather. • Install silt fencing between exposed erodible soils and the stream when feasible and practical to prevent erosion and siltation of waters(See diagram below). • Minimize amount of erodible soils at any given time to the maximum extent feasible. • Check all equipment daily for leaks. Refueling and lubrication of equipment should occur off site. Do not store any fuel, lubricants, chemicals, or hazardous substances outside overnight within the project area. • Do not apply any chemicals when there is a possibility of rain. • Comply with all permits and requirements of governing authority. HIGH CONSTRUCTION STEEL POST FENCE �FjID1P n r' gLOA 10 Fr MAX SPACING WITH WIRE SUPPORT FENCE 6 FT MAX SPACING Y/RF1OUr WIRE SUPPORT FENCE FILTER FABRIC PONDING HT. FILTER FABRIC ATTACH SECURELY STEEL POST TO UPSTREAM SIDE OF POST. R!-UNOFF 12- MIN. ••�4"x6"TRENCH WITH COMPACTED BACKFILL Silt Fence Diagram Silt fence maintenance The presence of exposed soil in proximity to regulated waters poses a risk of erosion and siltation during storm events. It is recommended that silt fencing be installed between the work areas and the stream to avoid siltation of waters. The silt fence should be inspected and repaired if necessary after each storm event. Sediment should be removed from the fence and deposited to an area that will not contribute to regulated waters. PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618,Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail:wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 123203400010 HMI' August,2009 Page 11 7.0 MONITORING Monitoring of the site will begin the first fall following project completion and maintained on a seasonal basis. The information gathered will provide the following: 1) condition of reintroduced plant species; 2) the use of the site by wildlife species; 3) any disturbance caused by the bank armoring and its effect on the protected zone and associated aquatic habitat; 4) any occurrence of exotic species within the mitigation zone; 5) any corrective measures that may be deemed necessary to provide desired conditions. This monitoring will be in effect for the duration of three years. The information gathered will be provided in an annual report and submitted to the Director of Mason County Department of Community Development. 8.0 SUMMARY This report addresses the effects of armoring a portion of a Type S stream bank (Union River). Bank armoring has been completed along a lineal distance of 30 feet adjacent to the stream, to protect the ownership from further damage during the December 2007 flood event. This report also addressed the proposed installation of additional bank armoring along the western portion of the stream buffer, along a lineal distance of 10 feet adjacent to the stream. The purpose of the proposed bank armoring is to protect the subject property from further damage from erosion caused by future flood events. Mitigation recommendations include native plant enhancement of the area adjacent to the bank armor, which is currently maintained as open grass area. The enhancement zone occupies approximately 400 square feet. No impacts to water quality or stream habitat are expected. Best Management Practices are recommended to insure no negative impacts to the stream. Mitigation Measures, and Best Management Practices, have been identified to avoid, minimize, and mitigate for potential impacts associated with completed and proposed construction. We trust this information is sufficient for your needs at this time. Thank you for choosing The Wetland Corps as your environmental consultant. If you have any questions feel free to call. Respectfully submitted, Lee Boad Senior Ecologist Heather Lane Staff Wetland&Natural Resource Specialist PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com REFERENCES Audobon WatchList. http;//audobon2.org/webapp/watchlist/viewSpecies. Knutson, K.L., and V.L. Naef. 1997. Management recommendations for Washington's priority habitats: riparian. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia. 181 PP• Native Plants for Kitsap County. ftp://kcwppub3.co.kitsap.wa.us/pw/sw/Native Policy of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Western Washington Treaty Tribes Concerning Wild Salmonids. Adopted by Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission,1997. Washington State Department of Ecology; William Symington Lake Habitat Analysis. 1998. PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com topoione p 1 mile ,ir 14•i� Approximate Parcel ;4 ' Location j• I *G I111}C EE x • f,�,n.A Canny 't lip ,•, Via' ` � ` N It FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP Project Name: Parcel 123203400010 UMP Location: Belfair,Washington Project: TWC09-353 Client: Steve Johnson THE LAND CORDS Date: 08/09 This site map was created by TWC by coordinating measurements and information from several sources, including the Mason Parcel 123203400010 County Assessor Aerial Photo 2005 and GoogleEarth aerial images and measurements. All locations are approximate. 11 N 11 1� /I '/ Union River Type S Stream - ,� ;�: -� 15'�� 150' Buffer+ 15' building setback 150' Proposed Restoration Zone (400 sq. ft) Proposed portion// of rock wall (10') 0 500' / FIGURE 2. SITE MAP Project Name: Parcel 123204390130 HMP Location: Belfair,Washington Project: TWC09-341 T WETLAND C0RIPS Client: Steve Johnson �/�/ Date: 08/09 -s Approximate Project Location Map Legend cot.us ones t CONU5 States 104K �.. Lower iE WOtland PotygOrm y tousr.nt and M811ne 0es9watr bHus.rna and Minns YYNtand a 1 raah walar ErnarpMt WNtind i rtmnwato,Fuieated'Sbru4 VrOland f reanwate•Pond c� Qtntr Rirtr ine i 11 f N r s Figure adapted from NWI Mapper website Figure 3 National Wetland Inventory Map Section 20 Township 23N Range 01W FIGURE 3 NWI MAP Project Name: Parcel 123203400010 IEVIP Location: Belfair,Washington Project: TWC09-353 �� Client: Steve Johnson 'roLDate: 08/09 THE WETLAND CORPS �w k I� u - t • ,.x Ap{ roxin�at� Onsite Soil Conditions based on Mason County Soil Survey Subject Site Soil: Belfast sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes (Ba).-The Belfast series consists of moderately well drained, slightly to medium acid, brown alluvial soils that lie along smaller streams. Their parent material is washed mainly from surrounding areas of Vashon glacial drift. The native vegetation is a mixture of Douglas-fir, cedar, maple, willow, alder, vine maple, swordfem, shrubs, and grasses. During winter the water table is close to the surface, and some areas are flooded during high water. Soil texture and depth to underlying gravel change within short distances. Coarse sand,with or without gravel,is at depths ranging from 2 1/2 to 4 feet.Large areas of any one texture are few.The soils are in small areas,mainly in the northeastern part of the county along the many small streams. In some areas these Belfast soils differ from the Juno soils only in depth to underlying gravel. The Belfast soils differ front other alluvial soils of the county mainly in having parent material that was deposited during the Vashon glaciation. Belfast sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes (Ba):This soil is mainly along the. Tahuya and Union Rivers.It is closely associated with Belfast silt loam and with Juno soils. FIGURE 4 SOIL SURVEY Project Name: Parcel 123203400010 AAr IEMP Location: Belfair,Washington Project: TWC09-353 TA E VV 1ETL_--t_N D COR. _'� Client: Steve Johnson Date: 08/09 i A 70868 t 708,5 � 68-5 170868E r1 0 Approximate 4parcel location 20 1708660 +7080B + 866 'e k ,+ N I N ' F 170 2 7?1 28 8-54E + + + + STREAMS cOIIs Strum sti aterl-;e 1-`(.a::ade; Ht'driC SQ115 Stream T�,e Z:kmmn Fa:t::de; HizW ratable / Stra=Water Tye_-{i il'e—uda: Highly Erodi3le �l1/ i:,il CTn:t.=.z:e h :i:g�u�Ea•�dttle 117ater Type C'&mze No Dzta or Gm,,-el Pirs FIGURE 5 DNR STREAM MAP Project Name: Parcel 123203400010 HMP Location: Belfair,Washington Project: TWC09-353 T H F A`fir FTL A N D COR —'� Client: Steve Johnson Date: 08/09