Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGRD96-0024 - GRD Permit / Conditions - 8/14/1996 GARY YANDO,DIRECTOR SON.S TA Ti o A N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT u r o T z PLANNING - SOLID WASTE - UTILITIES N Y y BLDG. I • 411 N. 5TH ST. • P.O. BOX 578 of �o 1864 SHELTON,WA 98584 • (360) 427-9670 AUGUST 14, 1996 TO: Alan Tahja, Public Works FROM: .Allan Borden, Community Development /#,& RE: Review of Grading Permit (GRD96-0024) I am enclosing a copy of a grading permit for Delancey Woods on Old Belfair Highway; he is proposing to use 3000 cu. yds. of fill to create a level building site on a parcel which has wetland soils and has been ditched without a permit two years ago. Several issues need consideration: a) as a condition to the SEPA review, Mr. Woods needs to verify that a septic system can be placed on the property. For a site to be found, setbacks from the wetland must be followed (75 to 100 feet, depending on the type of septic system used); a proposed building would need to meet the 65 foot development setback from the edge of the wetlands. If a septic system is not possible, then the need for creating a building site is gone and the fill of the property should not proceed. b) if Mr. Woods fills the unpermitted ditches, water runoff on the property will still proceed to the south as it did a couple of years ago. The attached letter of comment from a neighbor expresses the concerns for resuming the runoff and for presenting a stormwater plan for Mr. Woods' property. It should be possible to arrive at a solution that allows water in the area to still flow southwesterly onto the Matijevich property. It appears that the fill may be 7 to 8 feet high to occupy 11,500 sq. ft. of area and be filled by 3000 cu. .yds. of material; I feel that the final area to be filled may need to be staked on the property so that potential problems are eliminated. The applicant will have to do some replanting of trees and shrubs cleared off the property in 1994, and this revegetation may affect the dimensions of the fill area. Please review this information and send your comments back to me. I can add any conditions that you feel are needed. I am sending the grading permit file to the Building Department for their review. e, r Recycled �' i q, �01 MASON COUNTY GRD LAND MODIFICATION PERMIT Grading, Excavation, Fill, Slopes, Drainage Department of General Services 426 W. Cedar/P.O. Box 186, Shelton, WA 98584 427-9670/1-800-562-5628 PLEASE PRINT #1 Owner /71120,Vec d, , A-,Iel lr/r2o Ds Phone If-3Go241 -o,iC2 Fire District# Site Address,/6 T,9 City St LEA Zip ? Owner Address JC S 7� City40aT7il. ' St (�t/�_zip Describe Work To C.%/,/ O,�faj/Jl ����✓ Ac�irP_ y #2 Contractor Name S&,CF Address —Exp_4Wion1HM City St Zip lae #3 Engineer's NamePhone# Address City St Zip #4 Parcel No. QG� Legal Descripti n 5nC ioc/ /P&V Gc`�rT #5 Number of cubic yards to be excavated: Number of cubic yards to be filled: Number of cubic yards to be graded: 5XA,1C #6 Will this be a balanced cut and fill entirely within the site? Yes No If No: Will fill be brought on site? Yes No Where does imported fill originate from? /�l'9iC7�s. S7,* r a'.--jYo•G !-2 /K l�e frtoM P,7TacT Does fill contain any potentially hazardous materials? RECEIVED Yes No �< J U L 0 3 1996 MASON CO. PLANNING DEfZL #7 Will excavated materials be taken off site?Yes No If Yes: Where will excavated materials be taken? #8 Briefly describe existing terrapin, vegetation, and improvements on subject site? ill f// �/ ,` ��s �"e` /.¢�T� ,�•� cf, r�/:�.� /,4,r71s, AWVV"" #9 Total size of area to be cleared a rc es/sq ft Size of area to be cleared on slopes over 10% G�e AC/SF #10 Has a soils report been completed on the subject site? If yes, include copy with application. #11 Is the subject site within 200 feet of a designated shoreline #12 Does the subject site contain any of the following features? River Lake Wetlands Saltwater Slope greater than 15% Soft compressible soils Seasonal Runoff None #13 Will the proposed land surface modification change the points where storm water or groundwater enters or exits the site? Ale #14 Will the proposed land surface modification change the quality, quantity, or velocity of storm water/groundwater? /VDU #15 What methods, if any, will be utilized to minimize erosion and possible sedimentation into nearby waters during and after construction? .�.�i�� s �G,4� sav /�� �o �i1'oS�O�✓ #16 Will this land modification result in the redirection of any surface water runoff onto adjacent properties? #17 Will surface or subsurface runoff be collected or controlled by interceptors, curtain drains, or other water collection devices once this land modification has been completed? 1p"ram #18 Will the land be replanted upon completion? I/GS If yes, with what types of plants? 5-AH'--V ,gs d7✓���eoCTY #19 Will this modification result in slopes steeper than those currently on the site? If so, how steep? 7Show following on the site plan ,i.sions Flood Zones Existing Structures Fences f/ Structure Setbacks Driveways Water Lines Shorelines Drainage Plan Topography Septic Systems Wells Proposed Improvements Easements Indicate Directional by (N, S, E, W) Name of Flanking Street in relation to plot plan Name of Fronting Street NT TO DRAW SITE PLAN BELOW 7d , 7-0 y �o r vef ✓rw.4 y f v,f yucT ef 7 -43 ll APPLICANT TO DRAW TOPOGRAPHY PROFILE BELOW Vi o ��\ r:Ae NOTICE: THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANYTIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. PROOF OF CONTINUATION OF WORK IS BY MEANS OF A PROGRESS IN- SPECTION. OWNERS AFFIDAVIT CONTRACTORS AFFIDAVIT I CERTIFY THAT I AM EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIRE- I CERTIFY THAT I AM A CURRENTLY REGISTERED MENTS OF THE CONTRACTORS REGISTRATION LAW CONTRACTOR IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON AND I RCW 18.27, AND AM AWARE OF THE MASON COUNTY AM AWARE OF THE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS REGU- ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR WHICH THIS PER- LATING THE WORK FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS ISSUED MIT IS ISSUED AND THAT ALL WORK DONE WILL BE IN AND ALL WORK DONE WILL BE IN CONFORMANCE CONFORMANCE THEREWITH. NO CHANGES SHALL BE THEREWITH. NO CHANGES SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT MADE WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING APPROVAL FROM FIRST OBTAINING APPROVAL FROM THE BUILDING THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. DEPARTMENT. X OWNER �%� �����>. X BY DATE DATE ------- --- --- FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY:Accepted by: Date: DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW Planning APP COND APP HOLD Building Environmental Other Special Conditions_ FEES -- -- Grading Permit $ Plan Review Site Inspection Violation Fee Other TOTAL FEES $ 9� �o- r 0. �v C.� ye) PURPOSE: / %tP � Q• r D�i�c.IncS �ob2 `�2s�-oYc PURPOSE: 2.- Gam i`� home DATUM IN W2� thQS 4a�$4CeN� +o Unip' ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: 0 I"_ ,4f nu�r aclFc>�Y _ OCOUNTY OF i'10.SOY1 STATE W A _pi Li Y18S APPLICATION BY OtIc"OC-Y WOO� SHEET 1 OF Z DATE Mnyth (o J1of �l L.F2 was o • . _•__ 1 - © ��o ► I(Ak. • ue�' • \ SLj' 1 — I //0 S t s ,00c.� = � (3x d-7 1 dO o-7IM) IW 9 1SclO: > ��1 6LI71 N VJ' 4 31000 oEwArro ROAD 3gs —r, 1 3 1 00050 3100040 I Iyt,�,. 3400010 (mil�7 3190060 3100070 1 4 3` � Q - I SP 172 S 12115 —� 3 r I ���✓� s 12ilso� Vv a 3490030 1 3400 020 3490080 sP 1256 �1 2 t-C O' 400090 340004119 rn k'h1 p i G ,C�340�04C fit.. , ��V S 131109 2.QZI 3400000 3303 3400e.( ax- 020 060 3490 050 0 3 ^�� 100 2 STArF o o � p O 1889� STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY P.O. Box 47600 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7600 (360) 407-6000 • TDD Only (Hearing Impaired) (360) 407-6006 June 12, 1996 Mr. Delaney Woods P. O. Box 574 Port Orchard WA 98366 Re: 954-02237-ATF, NWP 29 near Belfair, Mason County. Dear Nationwide Permit Applicant: Ecology has reviewed the Corps of Engineers' recent letter to you authorizing an after-the-fact placement of 0.264 of an acre of fill, at the above address, under a Nationwide Permit 29. Your proposed work complies with the State requirements for this Nationwide Permit, and is considered valid by the state of Washington, including the condition that the location of your project is not habitat for sensitive, threatened, or endangered species. This letter serves to verify that your project may proceed under the terms described in the letter from the Corps of Engineers; and is considered the individual 401 Water Quality Certification for this project. Due to the nature of your project, you may not need a shoreline permit; however, you must still contact the local authority to ensure you are complying with all Shoreline Management Act requirements. Please note this Letter of Verification does not exempt, and is provisional upon compliance with other statutes and codes administered by federal, state and local agencies. Sincerely, 'a Victoria Peeler Permit Coordination Unit Supervisor cc. COE, Paul Hamidi DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SEATTLE DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS _ P.O. BOX 3755 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98 1 24-225 5 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Regulatory Branch Mr. Delancy Woods 3200 Southwest Lake Flora Road Port Orchard, Washington 98366 Reference : 95-4-02237-ATF Woods, Delancy Dear Mr. Woods : I have determined that Nationwide Permit 29 authorizes the placement of 0 . 264 of an acre of fill for your project, located along Old Belfair Highway, near Belfair, Mason County, Washington. Department of the Army regulations dated July 27, 1995, authorize the discharge of dredged or fill material for a single- family home under this nationwide permit, provided all general conditions are met . The entire text of Nationwide Permit 29 and conditions are enclosed. As discussed with you during our site inspection on December 13 , 1995, you are also required to restore the unauthorized ditches in wetlands and allow the remaining 0 . 5 of an acre of wetlands that had been land cleared to revegetate (drawing enclosed) . In addition, for Nationwide Permit 29 to be valid, you must obtain approval from the State . You must obtain 401 Water Quality Certification and Coastal Zone Management Consistency Determination from the State . You may use the enclosed sample letter as your application to the State . Once you have received approval from the State, the work is authorized by Nationwide Permit 29 . This verification of a nationwide permit will be valid for a period of two years from the date of this letter or until the nationwide permit is modified, reissued, or revoked. This nationwide permit is scheduled to expire January 21, 1997, but is expected to be reissued. The verification will remain if not modified or your proposed work complies with any subsequent modification. - 2 - If additional work is contemplated in this area which involves excavation, filling, grading, or mechanized land clearing of wetlands, you should consult with our office to determine if you will be required to obtain an individual Department of the Army permit . Nothing in this letter shall be construed as excusing you from compliance with other Federal, State, and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations which may pertain to this work. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Paul Hamidi, telephone (206) 764-5531. Sincerely, Air, Donald T. Wynn Colonel, Corps of Engineers District Engineer Enclosures MASON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER Shelton, Washington 98584 DATE: August 16, 1996 INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS TO: Allan Borden, DCD - Planner Permit No. : GRD96-0024 FROM: Alan A. Tahja, P/W - Hydr. SUBJ: Grading Review Comments NAME: Delancey Woods Allan, Public Works review of the Delancey Woods grading/Land Modification Permit application, raises two issues that appear to have been overlooked, or not adequately addressed. One issue is alluded to in your cover letter regarding building and drainfield setbacks . It appears impossible to site a building on any portion of the proposed fill, and maintain a 65 foot building setback from the wetland boundary. The second issue is the siting of a building on fill material. No information is provided pertaining to the receiving soil, its competency, or that the grading (fill) is to be performed under the direction of an engineer. If the fill site is expected to support a structure, then the fill should be conducted as an engineered fill, and the proponent should be required to provide a letter from his engineer certifying the integrity of the completed grading, and its adequacy for foundation bearing purposes . Compaction testing results should also be requested to document the fill' s conformance to grading standards for structural fill . As structural fill, the proponent may need to remove some of the existing material to provide a stabile subgrade to build up from. This proposal appears to be un-doable, without some variation granted from current standards . k z 7-Ir_t I- lan A. ah 'a File: H:\WP\GRADING\D-WOODS.IDC 4-,1996 06 1 . OM LANTP1ANMAMCHANiM I LESTONER TO 713'0 2? A c; Gary Y o IDS and .,` D' r of Ca mn uecto zunity Development .•b " 426 W. C'-edar. � p Shelton, WA 98584 (360) 427-9670 RE: Delaney Woods Mr. Yando, I would like to congratulate Mr. Woods in his proj),D al for a residence r and welcome hint to our community. 'there a_e a couple of issues that have io be addressed by Mason County Community i-:,eveloprnent and the Corps of F.Jsgi neers. 1. Surface water has to be addressed. Specifically the surface rater that cascades onto my property from the ditch that the Corp.- of En-ginaers is M requiring to be filled in. There is now a "channel" in ivhiclh the surface water flows into the "wetland" on my property. The paint at which this surface water enters the "wetland" on my property is crucial to my wetland, environmental ; easement, pond and stream that terminates in the Union River on tami.iy propettc,. I am prepared to work with Mr. Woods to maintain this topographical point, as I have an ongoing project with USDA Soil Conservation Service for the t 't purfioses of fish enhancement. 2. Erosion has to be addressed. The Codas requires -ou replace the fill E r (.i.e. ditches dug in 1994) proper measures have to be put ii-i place so silt does not.flow onto my property. ` 3. In Kitsap County a surface water plan is required and the surface water must be disposed of on your own property. I was under tine i -1pression ` `that this is true also in Mason Chanty for new permits. Is this the case? ; 4. Mason County- has not :addressed storm water run off from the Old. Beliair Hvw. that also flows onto my property from Mr. Woods and other prope7-tics riot h. 5. Mason County Department of Community. development is required to inform adjacent property owners by mail-not only by public, announcement. I'm yla sure you just forgot. In any event your letter will not have been on public , . display for the required fifteen days on 8l 14I96. Thank you for the opportunity to respond, ;. •s Patrick E. Mutijevich NE 2790 OBI-I , `- Belfair, WA 985�:6 OPTIONAL FORM 99(7-90i ^, ' FAX TRANSMITTAL y - NSN TSAn-01-51>'-7386 5049-101 GEVE�4L SEP.vr ES 4LI:L•:15TRAT!?�