The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEP2013-00020 Asphalt Recycling - SEP Determinations - 4/25/2013 MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-350) SEP2013-00020 Description of Proposal: Establish a asphalt and concrete crushing operation and recycling such materials to gravel products; secure a State Sand and Gravel General Permit for that land use. Proponent: PENINSULA TOPSOIL LLC Site Address (If Assigned): 101 NE PENINSULA BLVD (CONCRETE RECYC Directions to Site: ST RT 3 TO BELFAIR, L ON PENINSULA PL, R ON PENINSULA BLVD Parcel Number: 123214200090 Legal Description: TR 9 OF W1/2 SE; S 28/106 PCL 4 BLA#03-14(R)AF#1779502 Lead Agency: Mason County The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. This information is available to the public upon request. MITIGATED MEASURES ARE ATTACHED. Please contact Allan Borden at ext. 365 with any questions. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The Lead Agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date shown below, when the determination is final. Comments must be submitted to Dept. of Community Development, P.O. Box 279, Shelton WA 98584 by 5/9/2013. Appeal of this determination must be filed within a 14-day period following this final determination date, per Mason County Code Chapter 15.11 Appeals. .,�41 4 �ke-j 4/ 2-5 Aut orized Local Government Official Date SEP2013-00020 Page 1 of 2 MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (WAC 197-11-350) SEP2013-00020 CONDITIONS OF THIS DETERMINATION 1) A Stormwater Site Plan (SSP) will be created and implemented prior to development, clearing, grading, or construction of any portion of the proposed materials crushing and recycling operation. X 2) The Applicant shall comply with the Construction Storm Water Plan prepared in coordination with the Sand and Gravel General Permit submitted to Washington Dept. of Ecology in May 2013. The applicant shall be subject to necessary on-site inspections as part of the implementation of that General Permit. X 3) Storm drainage facilities are required by the County for commerciall development projects. Facilities shall include, but not be restricted to vegetated swales, retention ponds and use of artificial or natural wetlands PROVIDED no adverse impacts to the receiving waters would occur and may be subject to Mason County approval. X SEP2013-00020 Page 2 of 2 PENINSULA TOPSOIL WNEK ENGINEERING Concrete & Asphalt Recycle Facility March 14, 2013 VICINITY MAP Mason County, Washington a[lannaFb } �Y /gyptX � 41 Q� TANUY, STATE J = f P roj ect Location RD " $ELFAIR naRn�a�O.E OaCA JI7 ,�p .. _� .. _.... ecru....--•'T� i� \: vrma v�v le ALLYN' b rr �� all b i � uaeu�o a'• 9 I 9 $El—yam-.-" �• � � v�ww[�e� .r' r` a ram. K.v-w Y ��•` �'��r �, � V �l r�?1 t V/�(r` e f . �f VICTOR TN(AAOH HESfiHTS _..� 4 IZrMw�, jig e 123212490030 123212400010 123212400000 123219999999 123217500010 123211400041 123213190011 123217500010 123213190022 123213190010 123213190012 12321310100019 23214200070 123214200060 123214290082 �� 123213190051 123213190070 123213101020 123214290083 123213190052 123213190040 g 123214290081 W 123213100031 SST " 123214290084 123213190034 123213102000 123214200090 123219999999 J'`�^� 123214100000 O 1232 3 90033 �5 Q T23NIIRTWV 12321340001C 11,44 123213400030 Y NE FE��S 0 123214300000 12321430001 123219999999 •�.°�,� 123214300130 f � ` E'4 23213- 123214400000 w. 123213490080 123214360100 123213490070 123213490050 123214300110 123218888888 123214300120 123213400000 123282190040 123282190040 123280060000 123289999999 123282100000 123280003000 N 1 inch = 300 feet W E 1 inch = 0 miles S i0� _ y �=/ ♦YltY BERM AS NECESSARY TI I I I + a• k .I� . I,}Y� :�� -•;�' �• M«- y;; '. TO ISgATE/CONiNN PROJECT STORM RUNOFF i CON 'REC NG FAq TYa0 Y • WM Yl 1 17" i�W 5 s 'ice II m M I . 4"MINUS .1 1 2 CLEAN 1-1/ / CRUSHED CRUSHED' 4_ - CONCRETE CONCRET w$m f4rs. y ,:_',. ❑ 1 i STOCKPILE STOC LE / -r-v �- -r- p a A d°L 4 -,.�"�; •u 7f Ate.. ., \ - NC vow wr ';.. ING ASPHALT 1 � _ \`� � � ✓I CRUSHER ,r,J. •s . �r � ,"�n.�'`'. AZ/ kY ;". OCI(PRE Af4 iJ ,A n 4° DEPTH GRAVEL �fi�tt:-.;{ t.«w ..r •t:�.. r7a�' � � WORKING �'--.CON ... ,. RFCY G DEMOLITION p3 1. ASPHALT 1.; 2 O CS''STOCKPI 71 DEMOLITION 00 ONCRETE Q STOCKPILE.'Ln ' B w/sPiu coMtRa RISER W B :IS'NECESSM Cast. Z TpLSfNA1E/CppAM "t m c 10 X ABSORBANT BOOM g /i�p � -.',_ � IF PLOTTED DRANING SIZE IS NOT $ Ni 2636',DRAMING SCALE MILL BE °s t o ' I� �'^ i 9. /;. ' -`� '' .• /or�� :t7',/ � DIFFERENT THAN THE SCAIf SHOMN 3" H�^1 w i O FFNERN NOTES J . 1 �- ITI/ /�; /ymay/`:i < /./ ' � ♦/ \ A K•M(1 / CIF/ /p/ '/ \a, r ALL 91E mmc 91ALL m m z U -aIC.t '•vr:7S; 1 •" j/, ,' ,,� V �. 8MP T6.10 P ESETTLIN BASIN ->Ppo/ »// �iwxGra s A2 oF➢�xT>�ni 6� J 1<i C mw�arAnorrs•nArowm (L a ' 1 r l'�Yr•n4`,}TSYh l,.1, /y / - '/ �c�unals rw xow ewolz.Axo W 7Ncp wrsrmicnmf Imol�cc} w j.CO z eu rnmw urowawn uwrrs W J To U) ¢a t +., 4 'p' ' uO151RVC11R1. PIME MARF11 ftli �yM� � � x rf �\{ ,J T,:F _ �72321— 10 �y.. '/' Darr iaurzs. -mo-Ax.-ssss>ml. J �N - � �,, x �� ..y, •}:, cONNtC1gN m „�:�.LI: \.\ ,y/Aq O U a xpi '°° �ddN` I /o`' � \ �o Bo, •t� cx CT r/5i, -EPZQ13 -- OWzo lV� SEPA CHECKLIST $385 - Single Family $630 - Non-Single Family 0 to 9.99 Acres , $755 -10 to 20 Acres lh� $945 - Over 20 Acres $2,525 + 70/hr - EIS (DS) Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. There is a fee required, for the processing of the checklist, see above for the appropriate fee. Please make your check payable to "Mason County Treasurer". A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project: CONCRETE & ASPHALT RECYCLE FACILITY 2. Name of applicant: PENINSULA TOPSOIL LLC Property owner: S & J JOHNSON LLC 3. Applicant mailing address: P.O. BOX 640, BELFAIR, WA 98528 Applicant phone numbers: (360) 275-1000 4. Date checklist prepared: 03-1 5-1 3 5. Agency requesting checklist: MASON COUNTY Mason County SEPA Checklist I 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable).- MAY 2013, NO PHASING 7. Do you have any plans for future expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared directly related to this proposal. MASON COUNTY: SEP95-0200 (SEPA& MDNS) MASON COUNTY: GRD95-0033 (LAND MODIFICATION PERMIT) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. GRANITE CONSTRUCTION (2013) SEPA& SAND AND GRAVEL GENERAL PERMIT TO OPERATE A PORTABLE ASPHALT PLANT. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SAND & GRAVEL GENERAL PERMIT (WDOE) 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) CRUSH DEMOLITION CONCRETE AND ASPHALT,AND RECYCLE TO GRAVEL PRODUCTS.THE"PROJECT"WILL OCCUR WITHIN 3 ACRES OF AN 18 ACRE'PARCEL";WHICH IS PART OF A+35 ACRE"SITE"(PERMITTED IN ITEM 8 ABOVE). IN REFERENCE TO THE ELEMENTS DISCUSSED IN THIS CHECKLIST: 'PROJECT' REFERS TO THE 3 AC.PROPOSAL "PARCEL"REFERS TO THE 18 AC.TAX PARCEL "SITE" REFERS TO THE+35 AC. ORIGINAL PERMITS 12. What-is-the location-of-the-proposal? Give sufficient information for a-person to understand the precise location of your proposed project including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. PARCEL # 12321-42-00090 T23N, R1W, SECTION 21, NW1/4SE1/4 50 NE PENINSULA BLVD. VICINITY MAP ATTACHED. Mason County SEPA Checklist 2 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other PRF\/IOI Isl Y QUiDED FI AT I JNnFR I_ANn MODIFICATION PERMIT GRD95-0033. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? ±2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. EVERETT GRAVELY LOAMY SAND. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? if so, describe. NO e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. NONE f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. YES, AN EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN WITH BE IMPLEMENTED DURING SITE DEVELOPMENT. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 100% GRAVEL SURFACE. 3 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: PROPER EROSION CONTROL BMP'S DURING SITE DEVELOPMENT, AND ACTIVE OPERATIONS. 2. Air a 18/hat tinac of amiccinnc to tha airr�nlni ilrl_raci ilt from the nrnnncal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. DUST DURING CRUSHING OPERATIONS. EXHAUST FROM MACHINERY. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: AIR PERMIT THROUGH ORCAA. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NO 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO 4 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or aversions, ive general descrip7i-67 purpu se,__ r'jd�cip T�ifTTd quantities if known. NO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so note location on the site plan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharge of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NONE ANTICIPATED. THERE IS NO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS FROM THE SITE. SEE ITEM 3.b.1) b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWL PROPOSED. STORM RUNOFF 'FLOW-CONTROL' & WATER QUALITY' FOR THE ENTIRE SITE (+35 ACRES) IS INFILTRATED IN A STORM RETENTION POND SYSTEM AT THE SOUTH END OF THE SITE; DESIGNED & CONSTRUCTED PER "PHASE-II DRAINAGE REPORT" OLYMPIC ENGINEERING, 10-27-95. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground water from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example.. domestic sewerage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...: agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NONE. 5 c. Water Runoff (including storm water)- 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (including quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. CONTAINED AND ROUTED TO A PRESETTLING BASIN FOR SETTLEMENT OF SEDIMENTS. PRIOR TO ENTERING THE PRESETTLING BASIN ALL SURFACE RUNOFF WILL BE ROUTED THROUGH A CATCH BASIN TO TRAP FLOATING OIL. ADDITIONAL TRAPPING OF FLOATING OIL CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED IN THE PRESETTLING BASIN BY EMLOYING AN OIL- ABSORBING BOOM. THE PRESETTLING BASIN WILL DISCHARGE TO THE SITE'S STORM SEWER SYSTEM, WHICH FLOWS TO THE SITE'S RETENTION POND. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so generally describe. THERE IS NO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS FROM THE SITE, ALL STORM RUNOFF IS INFILTRATED AT THE SITE'S RETENTION POND. THE PROJECT WILL CONSTRUCT WATER QUALITY BMP'S TO MEET THE WATER QUALITY DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SAND & GRAVEL GENERAL PERMIT. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: THE SAND-&-GRAVEL PERMIT WILL REQUIRE A SWPP-P AND WATER QUALITY MONITORING PLAN FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGED FROM THE PROJECT. ALL RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT WILL BE MONITORED & TESTED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SAND & GRAVEL GENERAL PERMIT PRIOR TO DISCHARGE FROM THE PROJECT. 6 THE PROPOSED PROJECT MAY CREATE STORM RUNOFF WITH A pH VALUE ABOVE ACCEPTABLE LEVELS, DUE TO CEMENT. METHODS WILL BE PROVIDED TO NEUTRALIZE THE pH IN THE PRESETTLING BASIN, WHEN NECESSARY, PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. TURBIDITY AND SEDIMENTS OF STORM RUNOFF ARE PRESETTLING BASIN WILL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY SETTLEMENT TIME. OIL & GREASE DRIPPINGS COULD BE PRESENT DUE TO MACHINERY OPERATING OR FROM RECYCLED ASPHALT. MEASURE WILL BE PROVIDED TO ADEQUATELY TRAP OILS PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: (NONE) _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs _ grass _ pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NONE c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the -- -- - site. ___ - NONE KNOWN d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NOT REQUIRED PER ZONING CODE. 7 5. Animals a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Pileated Woodpecker Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: (NONE) b. Eist any IRreafened or endangered species nown to be on or near the site. NONE KNOWN c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. NONE KNOWN d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NONE 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. DIESEL MACHINERY. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. NONE WARRANTED. 8 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire or explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. NONE PROPOSED. 1) Describe emergency services that may be required. NONE 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NONE b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may effect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? INDUSTRIAL ZONE AREA, TYPICAL EQUIPMENT OPERATING. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. CRUSHER. EQUIPMENT. TRUCKS. DAYTIME OPERATING ONLY. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NOISE LEVELS WILL BE BELOW 75dBA RANGE ALLOWED FOR CLASS C EDNA (INDUSTRIAL) PER THE MASON COUNTY NOISE ORDENANCE. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? INDUSTRIAL. 9 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO c. Describe any structures on the site. PENINSULA TOPSOIL OFFICE. d. Will any s ruc ures be demolished ? It so, w a . NO e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? GC-BI f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? UNKNOWN uvk�l er6WWt ar g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. NO i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the contemplated project? 2-3 EMPLOYEES J. _-Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NONE k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NOT WARRANTED. 10 I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. MASON COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure)s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? CRUSHER LESS THAN 15-FT TALL. STOCKPILES MAY BE +20-FT TALL. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: NONE WARRANTED. 11 11. Light and Glare a. What types of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NONE h C;nllld light or glare from the finished nrniect he a safety hazard or interfere with views? NO c. What existing off-site light sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NONE d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NONE WARRANTED. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NONE b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation including recreational opportunities to be provided by the project applicant, if any: NONE WARRANTED. 12 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NONE KNOWN S. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE KNOWN c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NONE WARRANTED. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on the site plans, if any. STATE HIGHWAY 3 (SR-3). b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? UNKNOWN c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? NO NEW PARKING REQUIRED. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NO NEW IMPROVEMENTS WARRANTED. THE SITE WENT THROUGH A DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT WITH WSDOT 13 IN 2003 TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE TURN LANES ALONG SR-3 FOR TRAFFIC MITIGATION OF THE SITE. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so generally describe. NO. THE US NAVAL RAILROAD IS ADJACENT TO PORTIONS OF THE SITE, HOWEVER IT IS NOT PROPOSED TO USE RAIL TRANSPORTATION FOR THIS PROJECT. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. N/A. TRAFFIC GENERATION FOR THIS PROJECT IS INCLUDED IN THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR THE 2003 WSDOT DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT. g. Proposed measure to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NONE WARRANTED. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so generally describe. NO b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: NONE WARRANTED. 16. Utilities a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other 14 b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity that might be needed. NO NEW UTILITY SERVICES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. C. SIGNATURE III F\IIVVVIVUgv. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: MICH L F. WNEK, P.E. PROJECT CIVIL ENGINEER Date Submitted: MARCH 14, 2013 ATTACHMENTS: VICINITY MAP CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 15 ESA LISTED SALMONIDS CHECKLIST This worksheet was designed to help project proponents, and government agencies, identify when a project needs further analysis regarding adverse effects on ESA (Endangered Species Act) listed salmonids. Salmonids are salmon, trout and chars, e.g. bull trout. For our purposes, "ESA Listed Salmonids" is defined as fish species listed as endangered, threatened or being considered for listing. If ESA listed species are present or ever were present in the watershed where your project will be located, your project has the potential for affecting them, and you need to comply with the ESA. The questions in this section will help determine if the ESA listings will impact your project. The Fish Program Manager at the appropriate Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) regional office can nrnvidP information for thQ fnllnwina two auestinns_ 1. Are ESA listed salmonids currently present in the watershed in which your project will be located? YES NO X Please describe. 2. Has there ever been an ESA listed salmonid stock present in this watershed? YES NO X Uncertain Please describe. If you answered "yes" to either of the above questions, you should complete the remainder of this checklist. PROJECT SPECIFICES: The questions in this section are specific to the project and vicinity. 1. Name of watershed: 2. Name of nearest waterbody: 3. What is the distance from this project to the nearest body of water: Often a buffer between the project and a stream can reduce the chance of a negative impact to fish. 4. What is the current land use between the project and the potentially affected water body (parking lots, farmland, etc.)? 5. Is the project above a: natural permanent barrier(waterfall) YES _ NO natural temporary barrier(beaver pond) YES _ NO_ ` man-made barrier(culvert, dam) YES_ NO • other (explain): 6. If yes, are there any resident salmonid populations above the blockage? YES NO Don't know _ 7. What percent of the project will be impervious surface (including pavement& roof area)? Mason County SEPA Checklist 16 FISH MIGRATION: The following questions will help determine if this project could interfere with migration of adult and juvenile fish. Both increases and decreases in water flows can affect fish migration. 1. Does the project require the withdrawal of: a. Surface water? YES NO Amount Name of surface water body b. Ground water? YES NO Amount From where Depth of well 2. Will any water be rerouted: YES NO If yes, will this require a channel change? 3. Will there be retention or detention ponds? YES_ NO If yes, will this be an infiltration pond or a surface discharge to either a municipal storm water system or a surface water body? If to a surface waterbody, please give the name of the waterbody. YES_ NO_ 4. Will this project require the building of new roads? YES NO Increased road mileage may affect the timing of water reaching a stream and may impact fish habitat. 5. Are culverts proposed as part of this project? YES_ NO_ 6. Will topography changes affect the duration/direction of runoff flows? YES_ NO_ If yes, describe the changes. 7. Will the project involve any reduction of the floodway or floodplain by filling or other partial blockage of flows? YES_ NO_ If yes, how will the loss of flood storage be mitigated by your project? ER-QUALITY: The following questions will help determine-if this-project could adversely impact water quality. Such impacts can cause problems for listed species. Water quality can be made worse by runoff from impervious surfaces, altering water temperature, discharging contaminants, etc. 1. Do you know of any problems with water quality, in any of the streams, within this watershed? YES_ NO _ If yes, describe. Mason County SEPA Checklist 17 2. Will your project either reduce or increase shade along or over a waterbody? YES_ NO_ If yes, describe. Removal of shading vegetation or the building of structures such as docks or floats often results in a change in shade. 3. Will the project increase nutrient loading or have the potential to increase nutrient loading or contaminants (fertilizers, other waste discharges, or runoff)to the waterbody? If yes, describe. YES _ NO 4. Will turbidity be increased because of construction of the project or during operation of the project? YES_ NO In-water or near water work will often increase turbidity. 5. Will your project require long-term maintenance, i.e. bridge cleaning, highway salting, and chemical sprays for vegetation management, clearing of parking lots? YES_ NO_ If yes, please describe. VEGETATION: The following questions are designed to determine if the project will affect riparian vegetation, thereby, adversely impacting salmon. 1. Will the project involve the removal of any vegetation from the stream banks: YES _ NO If yes, please describe the existing conditions, and the amount and type of vegetation to be removed. 2. If any vegetation is removed, do you plan to re-plant? YES _ NO_ If yes, what types of plants will you use? The above answers are true an, com I�to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its isi Applicant Signature: / Date: VVIV Mason County SEPA Checklist 18 From: Allan Borden To: Steve Johnson; mark.goodin@orcaa.org CC: Allan Borden Date: 7/16/2013 5:23 PM Subject: Re: FW: Impact Crusher Approval / sand & gravel general permit Attachments: Peninsula Topsoil Gen Permit SEP2013-00020.pdf Steve Johnson & Mark Goodin The SEPA review for SEP2013-00020 for the Peninsula Topsoil Sand & Gravel General Permit was conducted from April 25 to May 9, 2013; the determination was for Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS). The SEPA document is attached. No building permit accompanied this SEPA review, so General Permit review By Dept. of Ecology may continue towards issuance. DOE did make its standard comments regarding the General Permit, including ORCAA review, toxics cleanup, and stormwater review. Thank you for your submittal; performance will be under the approved General Permit coverage. Allan Borden Planner - Long Range & Site Inspection P.O. Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 (360) 427-9670 ext. 365 >>> "Steve Johnson" <Steve(asjinc.net> 7/16/2013 9:10 AM >>> Allan See attached email. Would you please let me know where we are at it has been long time since I I have heard anything. We are ready to begin recycling and have our ecology approval. Steve Johnson W k: 360.275.6734 Fax: 360.275.6775 SteveO)sjinc.net From: Mark Goodin [mailto:mark.goodin(a)orcaa.org] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 1:33 PM To: Steve Johnson Subject: Impact Crusher Approval Hi Mr. Johnson, I am still waiting on confirmation of Mason county's SEPA determination before proceeding with the air permit approval for your proposed impact crusher. What is the status and can I proceed? Thanks Mark V. Goodin ORCAA Senior Engineer (360) 539-7610 mark.goodin(borcaa.org Page 1 of 1 Allan Borden - FW: Impact Crusher Approval From: "Steve Johnson" <Steve@sj inc.net> To: <AHB@co.mason.wa.us> Date: 7/16/2013 9:11 AM Subject: FW: Impact Crusher Approval Allan See attached email. Would you please let me know where we are at it has been long time since I have heard anything. We are ready to begin recycling and have our ecology approval. Steve Johnson Wk: 360.275.6734 Fax: 360.275.6775 Steve@sjinc.net From: Mark Goodin [mailto:mark.goodin@orcaa.org] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 1:33 PM To: Steve Johnson Subject: Impact Crusher Approval Hi Mr.Johnson, I am still waiting on confirmation of Mason county's SEPA determination before proceeding with the air permit approval for your proposed impact crusher. What is the status and can I proceed? Thanks Mark V. Goodin ORCAA Senior Engineer (360) 539-7610 mark.goodin@orcaa.org file:///C:/Users/ahb/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/51 E50E3EMasonmail... 7/16/2013 Page 1 of 1 Allan Borden - RE: Peninsula Topsoil sand & gravel General Permit SEP2013-00020 checklist • ,.'.... ... :.. .. ':.: S3�i.%woe.n..w�lro$s,.iiv...�_J":_ 8.vo-.,�i i.J.e�..l,:.�.,L°&ffiR" 'L From: Mark Goodin<mark.goodin(a,orcaa.org> To: Allan Borden <Ahb(a,)co.mason.wa.us> Date: 5/15/2013 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Peninsula Topsoil sand & gravel General Permit SEP2013-00020 checklist CC: Robert Moody <robert.moody(borcaa.org>, Mark Goodin<mark.goodin(a orcaa.org> Allan, Sorry for the delay in my reply on this one.Approval by ORCAA prior to establishing the recycling plant is required.The statement in item#2c on page 4 of the Environmental Checklist concurs. Peninsula Topsoils can inquire with ORCAA for the correct forms. If you have any questions, please call. Mark V. Goodin ORCAA Senior Engineer (360) 539-7610 mark.goodin@orcaa.org From: Allan Borden [mailto:Ahb@co.mason.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 1:03 PM To: Gretchen Kaehler; Gloria Rogers; Margie Schirato; Aquatic Resources Division; Chris Johnson; SEPA unit; Micheal Nicolas; Randy Lumper; Darren Habel Cc: Allan Borden; Steve Johnson Subject: Peninsula Topsoil sand &gravel General Permit SEP2013-00020 checklist SEPA Reviewer: Please find the SEP2013-00020 SEPA checklist review for Peninsula Topsoil sand & gravel General Permit in Belfair WA. Cover sheet and the checklist as a PDF format document is attached. Comment Deadline is May 9, 2013. Allan Borden Planner- Long Range & Site Inspection P.O. Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 ext. 365 file:///C:/Users/ahb/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/5193 B4F2Masonmai11001626A681... 5/15/2013 �F 5`fh7•{ �p STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47775 •Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 •(360)407-6300 711 for Washington Relay Service •Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 May 9, 2013 Mr. Allan Borden Mason County Department of Community Development Planning Division PO Box 279 Shelton, WA 98584 Dear Mr. Borden: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the mitigated determination for the Peninsula Topsoil (Concrete&Asphalt Recycle Facility)project(SEP2013-00020) located at 101 Northeast Peninsula Boulevard as proposed by Peninsula Topsoil LLC. The Department of Ecology(Ecology)reviewed the environmental checklist and has the following comment(s): SAND & GRAVEL PERMIT: Chris Johnson,Manager(360)407-7194 All sites having crushing, classifying,or stockpiling activities associated with mining or processing operations (including concrete and/or asphalt recycling)must have Sand& Gravel General Permit Coverage. TOXICS CLEANUP: Joyce Mercuri(360) 407-6260 If contamination is suspected,discovered,or occurs during construction,testing of the potentially contaminated media must be conducted. If contamination of soil or groundwater is readily apparent, or is revealed by testing, Ecology must be notified. Contact the Environmental Report Tracking System Coordinator at the Southwest Regional Office at (360)407-6300. For assistance and information about subsequent cleanup and to identify the type of testing that will be required,contact Joyce Mercuri with Ecology's Toxic Cleanup Program at the phone number given above. WASTE 2 RESOURCES: Julie Robertson (360)407-6471 There is not enough information in the SEPA checklist to determine the applicability of solid waste regulations(WAC 173-350). Based on the information contained in the checklist,the asphalt and concrete crushing operation may require a solid waste piles permit,pile exemption, or recycling exemption. Therefore,Ecology recommends Joss Mosley at the Mason County Health Department be contacted to discuss the possible need for a solid waste permit or permit exemption. Also,crushing operations like these may require some type of air permit or approval from the local air authority. For Mason County this would be the Olympic Region Clean Air Agency. Therefore,the Olympic Region Clean Air Agency should also be contacted for a determination on the need for any air permit. May 9, 2013 Page 2 Ecology's comments are based upon information provided by the lead agency. As such,they may not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations that must be obtained or legal requirements that must be fulfilled in order to carry out the proposed action. If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments,please contact the appropriate reviewing staff listed above. Department of Ecology Southwest Regional Office (SM:13-2008) cc: Chris Johnson, S&G Joyce Mercuri, TCP Julie Robertson, W2R Peninsula Topsoil LLC(Proponent) S&J Johnson LLC (Owner) Page 1 of 1 Allan Borden - Re: Peninsula Topsoil sand & gravel General Permit SEP2013-00020 checklist From: "loudin7" <loudin7@wavecable.com> To: "Allan Borden" <Ahb@co.mason.wa.us>, "Ken and Peggy" <dukeof@hctc.com>, ... Date: 5/9/2013 12:51 PM Subject: Re: Peninsula Topsoil sand &gravel General Permit SEP2013-00020 checklist Allan, I know the permit is probally issued. I have just a questions about the storm water system. 1. Has this system ever been inspected ? If so, when? and is there a updated drawing? or are they still using the one we went over in your office? If there is an updated plan I would like to make a request for a copy. Thanks Pat Loudin ----- Original Message ----- From: Allan Borden To: John Gunter ; Patrick Loudin Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 1:03 PM Subject: Peninsula Topsoil sand &gravel General Permit SEP2013-00020 checklist SEPA Reviewer: Please find the SEP2013-00020 SEPA checklist review for Peninsula Topsoil sand &gravel General Permit in Belfair WA. Cover sheet and the checklist as a PDF format document is attached. Comment Deadline is May 9, 2013. Allan Borden Planner- Long Range & Site Inspection P.O. Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 ext. 365 fi le:///C:/Users/ahb/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/518B 9BE8Masomnai 11001626A6811... 5/9/2013 Page 1 of 1 Allan Borden - Re: Peninsula Topsoil sand & gravel General Permit SEP2013-00020 checklist From: "John Gunter" <john@belfair.name> To: "Allan Borden" <Ahb@co.mason.wa.us>, "Patrick Loudin" <loudin7@wavecable... Date: 4/25/2013 10:57 PM Subject: Re: Peninsula Topsoil sand &gravel General Permit SEP2013-00020 checklist Hi Allan, Thank you for taking the initiative of sending this out. That is MUCH appreciated that you anticipated we would want to see it. That makes things seem more transparent and creates an environment of less confrontation and combativeness, something I personally desire and strive for. Sincerely, John Gunter From: Allan Borden Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 1:03 PM To: John Gunter ; Patrick Loudin Subject: Peninsula Topsoil sand &gravel General Permit SEP2013-00020 checklist SEPA Reviewer: Please find the SEP2013-00020 SEPA checklist review for Peninsula Topsoil sand & gravel General Permit in Belfair WA. Cover sheet and the checklist as a PDF format document is attached. Comment Deadline is May 9, 2013. Allan Borden Planner- Long Range & Site Inspection P.O. Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 ext. 365 file:///C:/Users/ahb/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwi se/5179B4E2Masonmai11001626A681... 4/26/2013 Page 1 of 1 Allan Borden - Peninsula Topsoil sand & gravel General Permit SEP2013-00020 checklist n_1;, :: From: Allan Borden To: Chris Johnson; SEPA review list Date: 4/25/2013 1:02 PM Subject: Peninsula Topsoil sand &gravel General Permit SEP2013-00020 checklist CC: Allan Borden; Steve Johnson Attachments: Peninsula Topsoil Gen Permit SEP2013-00020.pdf SEPA Reviewer: Please find the SEP2013-00020 SEPA checklist review for Peninsula Topsoil sand &gravel General Permit in Belfair WA. Cover sheet and the checklist as a PDF format document is attached. Comment Deadline is May 9, 2013. Allan Borden Planner- Long Range & Site Inspection P.O. Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 ext. 365 file:///C:/Users/ahb/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/51792978Masomnai11001626A6811... 4/25/2013 Page 1 of 1 Allan Borden - Peninsula Topsoil sand & gravel General Permit SEP2013-00020 checklist From: Allan Borden To: "John Gunter" <john@belfair.name>; Patrick Loudin Date: 4/25/2013 1:03 PM Subject: Peninsula Topsoil sand &gravel General Permit SEP2013-00020 checklist Attachments: Peninsula Topsoil Gen Permit SEP2013-00020.pdf SEPA Reviewer: Please find the SEP2013-00020 SEPA checklist review for Peninsula Topsoil sand &gravel General Permit in Belfair WA. Cover sheet and the checklist as a PDF format document is attached. Comment Deadline is May 9, 2013. Allan Borden Planner- Long Range & Site Inspection P.O. Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 ext. 365 file:///C:/Users/ahb/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/51792986Masomnail 1001626A6811... 4/25/2013 Page 1 of 1 Subject: Peninsula Topsoil sand &gravel General Permit SEP2013-00020 checklist Created By: Ahb(cDco.mason.wa.us Scheduled Date: Creation Date: 4/25/2013 1:02 PM From: Allan Borden Recipient Action Date&Time Comment CC:Allan Borden(Ahb@co.mason.wa.us) Read 4/25/2013 1:03 PM To:Aquatic Resources Division(ARD@dnr.wa.gov) Pending To:Chris Johnson(chjo461 @ecy.wa.gov) Pending To: Darren Habel(Darren.Habel@usace.army.mil) Pending To: Gloria Rogers(Gloria.Rogers@dfw.wa.gov) Pending To:Gretchen Kaehler(gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov) Pending To: Margie Schirato(schirmms@dfw.wa.gov) Pending To: Micheal Nicolas(micheal.nicolas@orcaa.org) Pending To: Randy Lumper(dumper@Skokomish.org) Pending To: SEPA unit(sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov) Pending CC:Steve Johnson(Steve@sjinc.net) Pending file:///C:/Users/ahb/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/51792978Masomunai11001626A6811... 4/25/2013 MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division P.O. Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584 (360)427-9670 SEP2013-00020 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW and NOTICE OF APPLICATION Notice is hereby given that Peninsula Topsoil,who is the operator on the described property below, has filed an application for an environmental review for the development to: Establish a asphalt and concrete crushing operation and the recycling such materials to gravel products; secure a State Sand and Gravel General Permit for that land use. Parcel Number: 12321-42-00090 (portions of a 47-acre site) Site Address: 101 NE Peninsula Blvd., Belfair WA. Location of Project: West of State Route 3 in the Belfair Urban Growth Area; within the southeast 1/4 of Section 21,Township 23 N., Range 1 W. in Mason County Washington. Said proposed development is subject to SEPA environmental review and associated Belfair Urban Growth Area development standards. Any person desiring to express their view or to be notified of the action taken on the application should notify in writing of their interest to: MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PO BOX 279 SHELTON,WA 98584 The comment period is at least 15 days from the final date of notice given pursuant to MCC 15.07. The date of posting or mailing of notice is April 26,2013. A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on April 25, 2013 under WAC 197-11-340. Written comments or appeals regarding this determination must be received by Thursday May 9, 2013. Contact this office at(360)427-9670,ext. 365 for further information. v TO BE KEPT IN THE PARCEL FILE MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division P.O. Box 279, Shelton,WA 98584 (360) 427-9670 SEP2013-00020 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW and NOTICE OF APPLICATION Notice is hereby given that Peninsula Topsoil,who is the operator on the described property below, has filed an application for an environmental review for the development to: Establish a asphalt and concrete crushing operation and the recycling such materials to gravel products; secure a State Sand and Gravel General Permit for that land use. Parcel Number: ? ortions of a 47-acre site) AJ Site Address: 101 NE Peninsula Blvd., Belfair WA. Location of Project: West of State Route 3 in the Belfair Urban Growth Area; within the southeast 1/4 of Section 21,Township 23 N., Range 1 W. in Mason County Washington. Said proposed development is subject to SEPA environmental review and associated Belfair Urban Growth Area development standards. Any person desiring to express their view or to be notified of the action taken on the application should notify in writing of their interest to: MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PO BOX 279 SHELTON,WA 98584 The comment period is at least 15 days from the final date of notice given pursuant to MCC 15.07. The date of posting or mailing of notice is April 26, 2013. A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on April 25, 2013 under WAC 197-11-340. Written comments or appeals regarding this determination must be received by Thursday May 9, 2013. Contact this office at(360) 427-9670,ext. 365 for further information.