HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEP95-00200 Drainage Retention Ponds, Grading 220,000 cy - SEP Determinations - 9/1/1995 MASON COUNTY AHb
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Planning-Landfill-Utilities
MITIGATED
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
(WAC 197 -11-350)
Description of Proposal :
GRADING FOR SITE LEVELLING AND CREATING TWO LARGE DRAINAGE RETENTION
PONDS; 220, 000 CU. YDS. PROPOSED FOR GRADING (170, 000 CU. YDS. REGRADED
WITHIN PROPERTY BOUNDARIES, 50, 000 CU. YDS . BROUGHT IN FROM BORROW SITE) ;
WIDEN STATE HIGHWAY APPROACH; AND ESTABLISH ONE ENTRANCE TO SITE OF
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OR SUBDIVISION.
Proponent : JACK JOHNSON
Location of Proposal : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PARCEL#: 123214200090
TR 9 OF W1/2 SE
STATE HWY 3 , MILEPOST 27 . 6, JUST NORTH OF RAILROAD CROSSING AND WEST OF
HIGHWAY.
Lead Agency: MASON COUNTY
The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a
probable significant adverse impact on the environment . An Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . This
decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist and
other information on file with the Lead Agency. This information is
available to the public upon request. MITIGATION MEASURES ARE
ATTACHED.
This DNS is issued under 197-11-350 (2) , the Lead Agency will not act on
this proposal for 17 days from the date below. Comments must be
submitted by 09/18/95 .
DATE: 09/01/95
;-/- ;F!;-
SignatuV cffgesponsible official Date
Responsible Official : Gary Yando
Director of Community Development
426 W. Cedar,
PO BOX 578
Shelton, WA 98584
(360) 427 -9670
MIT—DNS, rev: 07/07/92
06
w��v C �
T
•
LAND MODIFICATION PERMIT (GRD95- 0033)
SEPA CONDITIONS (SEP95-0200)
JACK & STEVE JOHNSON - GRADING PROJECT
1) The applicant shall establish temporary sediment and erosion
control measures on site prior to commencing with the
grading approved through a Mason County Land Modification
Permit . These measures shall be effective until an approved
stormwater water quality plan is implemented. Construction
erosion and sediment control elements, detailed in the
Olympic Engineering grading plans, shall be implemented.
2) A detailed site plan and permanent stormwater water quality
plan shall be prepared in accordance with the DOE Stormwater
Manual and approved by the Mason County Dept. of Public
Works. These plans shall include the retention ponds for
treating and infiltrating surface runoff .
3) The applicant shall agree to the following conditions
concerning the borrow site (s) and source of fill materials :
a) the applicant shall notify Mason County Department of
Community Development of the location and amount of expected
fill to assure that critical areas (steep slopes, wetlands,
streams, shorelines) are not affected; and
b) source fill materials shall not contain organic debris
(tree or vegetation materials) or solid/hazardous materials
(construction or household wastes, petroleum products, or
chemicals) .
4) Future development (land uses, structures and paved/parking
areas) of this project area shall require approval by the
Mason County Dept . of Public Works for the adequacy of
stormwater facilities .
5) Future development (land divisions) of this project area
shall be subject to further SEPA public review by Mason
County Dept . of Community Development.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable.
CORBIT SITE
PHASE I & PHASE II
2. Name of applicant:
Jack & Steve Johnson
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
APPLICANT:
Jack & Steve Johnson
P.O. Box 1119
Belfair, WA 98528
(360)-275-5400 / (fax)-275-6400
AGENT:
Otto L. Burden, P.E.
Olympic Engineering
3472 NW Byron St., Suite 202
Silverdale, WA 98383
360-698-7769 / (fax)-698-6427
4. Date checklist prepared:
07/17/94
5. Agency requesting checklist:
MASON COUNTY DCD
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Phase L Clearing, Grubbing, Sedimentation & Erosion Control
(1995)
Phase II: Drainage & Retention Ponds, General Grading,
Highway Channelization (1995-1996)
Phase III: Final Build-Out, see question #7.
2
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further
activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes. Phase III build-out of this site may involve commercial,
retail, residential, or light industrial development. Some of the
questions in this checklist which pertain to final build-out are
answered on this assumption. Phase III projects may require
separate SEPA checklists, depending on the size and scope of
project.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been
prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
None
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for government
approvals or other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your
proposal? If yes, explain.
NO
10. List any applications for permits or authorizations which have been, or
will be, submitted to local, state or federal agencies for the project or project
area.
CLEARING PERMIT (submitted 06-14-95)
(MASON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS)
GRADING PERMIT (to be submitted 07-95)
(MASON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS)
WATER RIGHT APPLICATION (1993)
(WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY )
FOREST PRACTICES PERMIT (1994, submitted and approved)
(WASHINGTON STATE DNR)
LARGE LOT, SHORT PLAT, OR SUBDIVISION (possibly for
Phase III)
(MASON COUNTY DCD)
3
11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the
proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several
questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of
your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead
agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on
project description.)
35 acre parcel to be clearing, grubbed, and re-graded for future
development. See question #6 for Phases.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to
understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street
address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the
site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic
map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required
by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans
submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
Section 21,T 23 N, R1W W.M.(see attached Vicinity Map)
Milepost 27.6, State Highway 3 (One mile north of Belfair, just north of
railroad overpass.
Legal Description and Assessors Map attached
Phase I and Phase II Construction Drawings attached.
4
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep
slopes, mountainous, other
ROLLING
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
50% [2:1] EXISTING & PROPOSED
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay,
sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural
soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
Everett Gravely Loamy Sand
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the
immediate vicinity? if so, describe.
NO
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
CUT & FILL EARTHWORK FOR GENERAL SITE GRADING:
EXCAVATION = 170,000 cy
EMBANKMENT = 220,000 cy
IMPORTED FILL = 50,000 cy (Source not currently
identified, imported material will be clean, uncontaminated fill
material from other commercial construction sites.)
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
YES, SURFACE EROSION POSSIBLE DURING CLEARING
AND EARTHWORK.
5
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
10% +/- PHASE I & II
75% +/- PHASE III
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth, if any:
EROSION CONTROL FEATURES WILL BE INSTALLED TO
PREVENT ANY POSSIBLE EROSION FROM LEAVING THE
SITE (PHASE I). DURING PHASE III CONSTRUCTION, ALL
NON-PAVED AREAS WILL BE LANDSCAPED OR SODDED.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,
dust, automobile, odors, industrial/wood smoke) during construction and
when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if known.
During construction:
EXHAUST EMISSIONS - CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
DUST - DURING CLEARING AND EARTHWORK
SMOKE - CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS FIRES
After construction:
TYPICAL VEHICLE EMISSIONS.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally describe.
NO
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to
air, if any:
WATER FOR DUST CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION
AS REQUIRED.
6
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of
the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
NO.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within
200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans.
NO.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed
in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of
the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
N/A.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
NO
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so note
location on the site plan.
NO
6) Does the proposal involve any discharge of waste materials to
surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume
of discharge.
NO
7
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to
ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate
quantities if known.
GROUND WATER (VIA A WELL) MAY BE WITHDRAWN
FOR PHASE III.
STORM RUNOFF WILL BE DISCHARGED TO GROUND
WATER VIA INFILTRATION PONDS FOR ALL PHASES.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground
water from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example.. domestic
sewerage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...: agricultural;
etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
NO PUBLIC SEWER IS AVAILABLE NEAR THE PROJECT.
SEWER DISPOSAL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED FOR PHASE I
AND PHASE II. ON-SITE SEPTIC SYSTEMS FOR PHASE III
WILL BE DESIGNED BASED ON THE PROPOSED USAGE.
LOCATION OF FUTURE DRAINFIELDS IS SOUTH OF THE
RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ON A 10 ACRE PARCEL.
c. Water Runoff(including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (including quantities, if known). Where
will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,
describe.
ALL STORM WATER RUNOFF WILL BE INFILTRATED TO
GROUND WATER BY TWO CONSTRUCTED RETENTION
PONDS. STORM WATER WILL BE DIRECTED TO THE
PONDS VIA INTERCEPTOR DITCHES. RETENTION PONDS
ARE SIZED FOR THE 100 YEAR EVENT. STORM WATER
CONTROL IS DESIGNED SO THAT NO RUNOFF LEAVES
THE SITE. THE RETENTION PONDS WILL BE
CONSTRUCTED IN PHASE II BUT ARE SIZED FOR UP TO
75% IMPERVIOUS AREA FOR PHASE IIl.
8
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so
generally describe.
YES, THROUGH INFILTRATION AT THE RETENTION
PONDS.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff
water impacts, if any:
SOURCE CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PHASE III IMPROVEMENTS.
THE INTERCEPTOR DITCHES WILL BE GRASSED LINED
TO CONTROL SEDIMENTATION AND OTHER
POLLUTANTS PRIOR TO RUNOFF ENTERING RETENTION
PONDS.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
X_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
X_ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
X_ shrubs
X_ grass
pasture
_ crop or grain
_ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage,
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
THE SITE HAS RECENTLY BEEN LOGGED UNDER A DNR
FOREST PRACTICES PERMIT. REMAINING VEGETATION
WILL BE STRIPPED IN PREPARATION FOR SITE GRADING.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NONE
9
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to
preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
PHASE III DEVELOPMENTS WILL REQUIRE APPROPRIATE
LANDSCAPING CONSISTENT WITH MASON COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT POLICIES.
5. Animals
a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near
the site or are known to be on or near the site:
Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
Mammals: fir, bear, elk, beaver, other:
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: (NONE)
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the
site.
NONE
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
UNKNOWN
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
NONE REQUIRED.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will
be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it
will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
ELECTRICITY - POWER, HEAT & LIGHTING
NATURAL GAS/PROPANE - HEATING
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
NO.
10
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of
this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any.
ALL PHASE III BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WILL MEET
APPLICABLE STATE & LOCAL ENERGY CODE
REQUIREMENTS.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire or explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe.
NO
1) Describe emergency services that may be required.
NOT APPLICABLE
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health
hazards, if any:
NOT APPLICABLE
b. Noise
1) What types of noises exist in the area which may affect your project
(for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
NONE
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated
with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example:
traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would
come from the site.
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, 7:00 AM TO 5:00 PM
LONG TERM: TRAFFIC NOISE.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
NONE REQUIRED
11
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
PROJECT SITE: FOREST & RESIDENTIAL
ADJACENT PROPERTIES: COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL
(Gravel, Lumber, Landscaping)
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
NO
c. Describe any structures on the site.
TWO RESIDENTIAL HOUSES W/ MISCELLANEOUS
OUTBUILDINGS.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
YES, ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES WILL BE
DEMOLISHED.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
MASON COUNTY IS NOT ZONED.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
MASON COUNTY HAS NOT ADOPTED A COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN FOR THE AREA. (A4j-acevi "'f U Uv-6 v ReStdavfw r)
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation
of the site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, specify.
UNKNOWN
12
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the
contemplated project?
PHASE III DEVELOPMENT IS NOT CURRENTLY KNOWN;
IT IS ESTIMATED THAT APPROXIMATELY 250 PEOPLE
MAY WORK AT THE COMPLETED PROJECT.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
LESS THAN 8 PEOPLE LIVING IN THE TWO HOUSES
LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
NONE REQUIRED
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing
and projected land uses and plans, if any.
COMPLIANCE WITH MASON COUNTY DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
NONE ANTICIPATED AT THIS TIME.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
NONE
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
NONE REQUIRED.
13
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
PHASE III BUILDINGS ARE NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME.
IT IS ASSUMED THAT THEY WILL BE SINGLE STORY
BUILDINGS.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
NONE.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
NOT APPLICABLE
11. Light and Glare
a. What types of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of
day would it mainly occur?
EXTERIOR AREA & COMMERCIAL SIGN LIGHTING - P.M.
(PHASE III ONLY)
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or
interfere with views?
YES, LIGHTING FROM DEVELOPMENT (PHASE III) COULD
CREATE CONFLICTS WITH TRAFFIC ON THE STATE
HIGHWAY IF NOT PROPERLY DESIGNED.
c. What existing off-site light sources of light or glare may affect your
proposal?
NONE
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
DESIGN PHASE III SITE LIGHTING ACCORDING TO
APPLICABLE CODES AND AGENCY REGULATIONS.
14
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
NONE.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If
so, describe.
NO
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreational opportunities to be provided by the project applicant, if any:
NOT APPLICABLE
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national,
state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If
so, generally describe.
NO.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,
archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to
the site.
NONE
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
NOT APPLICABLE
15
r
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe
proposed access to the existing street system. Show on the site plans, if any.
ACCESS TO THE PROJECT IS FROM STATE HIGHWAY 3.
THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL APPROACH WILL BE
ABANDONED. A NEW "COMMERCIAL" APPROACH IS
PROPOSED AT A DIFFERENT LOCATION.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the
approximate distance to the neares�tt transit stop?
NO. UNKNOWN ley Atasem
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How
many would the project eliminate?
PARKING FOR PHASE III INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
WILL BE ACCORDING TO APPLICABLE CODE AND
REGULATIONS.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
YES. PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC CALCULATIONS SHOW
THAT CHANNELIZATION WILL NEED TO BE
CONSTRUCTED ALONG STATE HIGHWAY 3 FOR THE
PROPOSED "COMMERCIAL" APPROACH TO THE PROJECT
SITE, FOR THE PHASE III DEVELOPMENT. IT IS
PROPOSED TO CONSTRUCT HIGHWAY CHANNELIZATION
IN PHASE II OF THE WORK.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail,
or air transportation? If so generally describe.
THERE IS AN EXISTING RAILROAD GRADE ABUTTING
THE PROJECT SITE ALONG THE SOUTH. BREMERTON
AIRPORT IS 5 MILES NORTH OF THE PROJECT SITE.
PHASE I & II WILL NOT USE WATER, AIR, OR RAIL
TRANSPORTATION. PHASE III DEVELOPMENT MAY USE
RAIL AND AIR TRANSPORTATION.
16
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC CALCULATIONS FOR PHASE III
DEVELOPMENT WERE BASED ON LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT.
1,750 TRIPS PER DAY WILL BE GENERATED (See attached
"Development Traffic Summary")
ESTIMATED TURNING MOVEMENTS, AT THE PROPOSED
APPROACH, DURING PEAK HOUR OF THE HIGHWAY ARE
SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED "TURNING MOVEMENT
SUMMARY".
g. Proposed measure to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
PROVIDE CHANNELIZATION OF THE STATE HIGHWAY
AT THE NEW "COMMERCIAL" APPROACH.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so generally describe.
YES. FIRE PROTECTION, POLICE PROTECTION.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public
services, if any:
NONE
16. Utilities
a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas,
water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other (storm
sewer).
ELECTRICITY AND PHONE ARE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE
ALONG STATE HIGHWAY 3.
17
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I
understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
)AIO��QXAII-
OTTO L. BURDEN, P.E.
OLYMPIC ENGINEERING
Date Submitted: JULY 17, 1994
f:\p\93-502\document\sepa.doc
18
t ' 1/76 2400010 2�OGJUO 130f '
,
�p
. � 1400041
Vol to
•.
PG 75 SP y 1 224 S r 0/ O •�
7N4U 77 1 2490 99
2490040 I O
t 1 030 0 \a0
I I N \g�
�.
aa N
,190011 4200070 4200060
t
00020 _ .. - - - c;,
1 -- Y97 ' Slot s 5/122
51 4/2 000
1 3I?0012 3190010
390 � \ 4200060
070
3I800Dt t
3200010 1
3101 ��
3 u, 1 �' 040 63S
023 3190 SP
SP- 1 980" c sp 1421
12321
41
3190 310OC31 .
060
S 1/92 4200090
31°2 3102000
3290100 010
3100030 O /
;0030 N 4Ye9eee _
SP 1006 sP 1393 /
/ N
3400010
K� 12321 44 30000
3300020
3400 4360100
040
3490 4300
3490 060 O80 1 3400030 110
SP Z68
3490 4300120
3450070 050
O 8 3400000
gP 74 .
'� S-5/2 1 .4 1 1_
I /
g:
a.
MASON COUNTY
KITSAP COUNTY
lk
I
g•. I '{�� 'li r F X . r'a N
O u r� 3:2 •.\..
m
FF...:• A ..... ... i` m
I t F /
ol
v � Y i f 5..:•�'F�`•� FJ,.....�`. St_ `S t 3t � / ., '�
Z � I� .,•.•' '`�,; •i}''.<' .......-�.,'+.: t'�t tt r` is
A ;+ �
� I .
a� m I 6
a� o> rn
I I Tty �
� I I
q N -0c
Pn rM By. ]fJiE I•-1!!' lE4pM R YPM Peviuianu: nw�lar
�?a CLEARING & TESC 0ym��c ^� JACK & STEVE JOHNSON
CORBIT SITE Engineering a: p.-,l-., .„ ,,,
!` �� P.oq eax Ills
- STATE HIGHWAY 3 s] �^"N•r•m rtm w2 /]� auto.w 90.51!
Yawn Ceunl] We.ninpton(l!!)6!!-I]69 la.(t!e)p!-Mf> -
1
L . �
• T 23 N. R 1 W. W.M., SECTION 21
d STATE HIGHWAY 3 CHANNELlZA7/ON DESIGN:
// / C OFSINAI d RECORD REFERENL TAPER RATE-55..1 E
OELfLERA RON TAPER LENGTH 165' -
71DEWA7ER CREEK TO ON/ON RIVER CNANN£L LANE MIDIH=IL50'
Z
KHSAP d MASON COUNTIES CHANNEL MID 7H APPLIED 70 NO LADY=DO' U
I� SHEET 7 OF B CHANNELM WD APPLIED 70 SB LANE= 11.5 N
(REFERENCE ON nC 910-B°) Z
/.. x rn ROADWAY INf-55
SPEED AVERAGE LA=55 NPH O
/! f� ENS77N LANE WDIN L 11.50• APPROACH DESIGN:
fX/SRNC NORTHBOUND LANES=2 TYPE= -COMWERCIA
0
i. PREUCIED PEAK HOUR(A M) PREDICTED PEAK HQU?(P.AI / EXIS77NC SOUTHBOUND LANES=1 LrSFE E=MOw n
j BUILDINGS AND ROADS (REFERENCE OV FlG 970-�°) W
TO BE DENOUSHEO `
/ 'I / TRAFFIC DESIGN DATA
D o V t~il a
Ly I ESIGN£DAILY TRAFFIC(A07)=1. 16.pd
DESIGN HOURLY DOLUME(awV) /,J5 J51 wn t\ 48
/Mk I ACCESS CONTROL CLASS 2 COWIRO ED ACCESS FAG!!/Y M U 8
17 ,. llOOg / HIGHWAY CLASS=RURAL PR/NOPAL AR7ER/AL Q E
DESIGN CLASS-P-J Z S
Z f DESIGN L£HICLE=NO-40 (�
1,765'
PROPOSED CHANNELIZA77ON WIDENING
AFN°1C r IasIA¢LX.auN auRD Aa FM LANL nmrw AeANDnD E°511YIC
StA
N R loli/nvleErl1pV _/„-„
--�• — -- _ x 3 � 1 FM'� SaIY
1S9' ♦ ADJIT 11/W LAZE
/ LW ----4 ——————— -----1 X SIMA� (MJ �Ti7S
—1----_' ---------------- ------- Dxs. ----- --
1
— _ _ _ — ° — — — _ — _ _ _ _I I I I ♦ I
♦ / — — — — — — �L-ne-------�----------- �G e!] f---- — ------
— ---------- — — — --------
\ 71 BELFA/R SR-3W ---
/ ♦ IH� >ERSEC NQN MKE Ewsnr�c LucE or ---J TOO
BREAIERTQl s
\ / DlNLT ————————— --------- E
/ 01'
� N�o
� j�OSf
Olu a x
GENERAL NOTES.- a
1.FOR PROPOSED GRADING of PROPERTY NORIHMEST OF STATE HIGHWAY, J h
REFER TO DRAMINGS C2-0 AND C2-2. Ld
Z o;;
2.FOR DRAINAGE DESIGN NORTHMEST CF STATE HIGHWAY AND CONNECRONS Z F U
STALE HIGHWAY CUL DER7S REFER TO DRAMINCS C2-0 AND C2-2 Q m F
=O�
IF PLOTTED DRAWING SIZE S NO U L'
24'.36',DRAWING SCALE IMLL BE M
gFFERENT THAN THE SCALE SIq o:Bqp t
i N
GRAPHIC SCALE
�ODxL� �L Dro.irq Mo.
I u+RR 1 Ll�l!<F3 Dt 19 Dt Exv.DES 5 T C,2—1
1 �
I `\
I i 9
I \
00,Vp
A m I OP EL f'V 8
P O OO F�
a cFAT
\�
I S
52
PS
I
I I Qa2 �
I I I g�a
I o
I
� I
a� n
tl�
S �
Imo 8 8 8 8 8 8 c
i2
��� • 4 g 4 �y� m{� r Z n
O
N< r p Q
N
ti
Z
a 00'09 A-77-7 d01 GNOd
P .9f
a
8 s
9 00'OL it d 73 1NO1109 ONOd F=a )
Z# ONOd N0/1 Ndl-7&
k
- - - - - - —� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 77d-. _ _ _ _ _ ._ - -
�P�0�4�
a repare Pd By: Ren•bn•: epor.d for
suaa:+'-w Bcswx er: urn
N RETENTION POND GRADING Olymp(c 9R•wxe: bF" JACK & STEVE JOHNSON
I CORSIT SITE Engineering MII: 0)-+9-95 CRELxFD ec OLB PO BOX 1119
N • STATE HIGHWAY 3 '-2-Bl..s',9e.p01 9F1fuR.- 9ee9e
si�xtx—ww PIAi MiE:0]/te/9e
WSOx LWHIY WASHINGTON(906)69e-1Je9 m.(zoe)e9e-e42 (eeB)-vs-swB (m.)-ns-expo
4 r
J
z
0
L V)
z
M:
0
DATUM FJXV 10
1. 1 DATUM MX_'
80.00 maw 80.00 om IMM zm.m wo.m _M
oA
XCTM — SECTION SECTION
A A I SS',VERT.
SCALE:
Im
I L
DATUM MZV
80.00 am m m0M 3MM 1000- 11-M
SECTION
RA RA IN
ZZ. A-
TSCALE:
31
R
11.5w I, ".W V 2 PA PAl- I-- OAMMf PA59.G ONNIIi MWE ON P
(W) M) M
5.75'
...........
�v
TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION, SR-3OSED of
TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION, SR-3
�.,. sc..�T�,o(F-F
C040YR VERT.
0.00 I.M 2,W
SCALE li�- 1' VERT.SCALE: I'-1'
ePARO F ILE
H
, SCALE
100 1
1
1 llo 12.w VERT.
SCALE ,
. Arwr PAM (W)' V)
5EED*YG NOTE, z
O'WKt ADM 1.0 0
U
LLI
d
.0� L'i OF
0
A--
0 w AW w
A
TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION ILro Ins.—A— M—W
T�P IT
M A—
CLE0S:ALE 10 TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION, APPROACH
VERT.SCALE:
P If PLOTTED DRAWING SIZE IS NOT
(G I
_)_�.. .A. I 24*x36*,DRAWING SCALE WLL BE
VERT.SCALE: I' IFFOUT THAN THE SCALE SHOWN C2-3
T 23 N. R 1 W, W.M., SECTION 21
aC'=�
o
o
o
P0977W/DE90NA7ES /
jFAU 70 F#W97ED LRADE
NECAnW/ I
/ \ DESnW 7E3
CUT 70 FAV. I
' ♦ GRADE
� L L ! L L i ♦ ♦
/ L L L • .. L t //
2
�• L ! L i 4 L L L L L L L 4\ i 4 L L i i L i L Lry L L a
Qg- j L t LI I
L L t L L LI
L
% \ �. i i L L '6
L i/ s i !I s L s s 4 s L % s L L s L
REIEN770V Poo/7\ . I SEE DRAWNG C2-2 •'-
�'
�\ � �`�I♦• I L t L L 1r, '• i PAgMQ�Inr.°aauwryzA I ♦ t y'v. "�. L .. I } 0
AlW A"AFFMOA01 PA WV
�� Z--- / ~ 4 L t L L L h ♦ - ..a i � i �= I4 � I,
RZWI
—
X
R __ ---- ——————11� R
U U
GRAPHIC SCALE
/ £XCA VA TION = 95,000 c I �..". '.
�\ y EXCA VA 17ON = 75,000 cy
/ EMBANKMENT = 45,000 cy I EMBANKMENT = 175,000 cy
t tTi IF PLOTTED DRAMNC SIZE IS NOT
. m IDIFTEIDIT
',DTHM SCALE WILL BE THAN THE SCALE SHOWN
Prprp-p--
T 23 N, R 1 W, W.M., SECTION 21
POSI 77 W/DE90VA 7ES
FILL TO FINISHED CRADE
N--GA n W
DE-90VA 7ES
CUT TOnN.
GRADE
% %
'NnON POND f2
EM
% R%
SEE DRAWING C,2-2
%
% %
X,
PO %
-mupmv W
w CY-2 % N6
AND AREW APPROA af PA WNG %
%
Y:,Zr %
------s --
IZTA
--------—--
Z --------RT�' -
L----- --------
GRAPHIC SCALE
inAw W FErr)
EXCAVATION 95,000 cy EXCAVATION 75,000 cy L-j,- IW rL
EMBANKMENT = 45,000 cy EMBANKMENT = 175,000 cy IF PLOTTED DRAWING SIZE IS NOT
24'x36", DRAWING SCALE WILL BE
DIFFERENT THAN THE SCALE SHOO
GENERAL NOTES