The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHMP for MEP2011-00030 - HMP Habitat Managment Plan - 8/30/2011 • -I�VYLP FM- m cezo t i - 00030 RECEIVED AUG 0 9 2011 4 CEDAR ST. THE WETLAND CORPS Wetland Delineation • Habitat Management Plans • Riparian Restoration - Mitigation - Biological Evaluation PARCEL 12309-41-90072 HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN 82 NE Miller Road Belfair, Washington Mason County Prepared for: Mario and Linda Gomez Prepared by: Heather Lane and Lee Boad August, 2011 RECEIVED AUG 0 5 2011 426 W. CEDAR ST. PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com THE WETLAND CORPS Wetland Delineation • Habitat Management Plans • Riparian Restoration - Mitigation • On-site Septic HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................1 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION...............................................................................................2 3.0 APPLICABLE SETBACKS..................................................................................................3 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT AND SPECIES.................................................................3 5.0 ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS....................................................................................................7 6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES.................................................................................................6 7.0 MONITORING ....................................................................................................................10 8.0 SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................11 Figures Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map Figure 2. Site Plan Figure 3. National Wetland Inventory Map Figure 4. Mason County Soil Survey Map Figure 5. Department of Natural Resources Water Resource Map RECEIVED AUG 0 5 2011 426 W. CEDAR ST. PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com ITH WETLAND CO"S 7 �v Wetland Delineation • Habitat Management Plans • Riparian Restoration • Mitigation • On-site Septic August,2011 Page 1 PARCEL 12309-41-90072 HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN 82 NE Miller Road Belfair, Washington 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The details of a Habitat Management Plan for the above referenced property are discussed in full in this report. The site is found in the SW V4 of Section 20 Township 23 North, Range 1 West along the Union River See Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map). The purpose of this Habitat Management Plan (PIMP) is to address proposed bank armoring along a 50-foot portion of the right bank of the Union River, which is regulated as a type S stream. All type S streams in Mason County require 150 feet of undisturbed buffer with an additional 15-foot building setback. The proposed armoring is intended to quickly and efficiently prevent additional bank erosion towards an existing SFR located in proximity to the eroding bank. If the proposed portion of the stream bank is not stabilized, it is likely that future flood events will erode the bank and cause the course of the river to further threaten the SFR. There are two possible methods for constructing the wall depending on the landowner's final preference. This HMP is intended to address both options. The first option is that the armoring be done as two walls separated by a terrace at mid elevation. The lower wall would be constructed along the landward edge of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) and be 4' in height. The second wall will be constructed approximately 4' in height and located approximately 4' landward of the lower wall. The terrace separating the two walls would be planted with native vegetation. The walls would be constructed out of 3-4 man rock. While the first option may be the most ideal, the overall cost associated with earthwork may exceed the amount budgeted for the project. Therefore the second option would be to simply construct a single wall 6-8 feet in height and install native plants within the area landward of the wall. This would require far less earthwork and grading. The objectives of this HMP are as follows: ■ To evaluate the potential adverse effects to critical area functions as well as fish and wildlife habitat resulting from the proposed bank armoring within the Type S stream buffer. Emphasis is placed on the possible loss of habitat for any listed species found to be residing in the vicinity of the parcel. PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 12309-41-90072 HMP • August,2011 Page 2 ■ To identify possible mitigation measures that could be implemented to offset the adverse effects resulting from the proposed bank armoring within the Type S stream buffer. •. _ _ �. s ' A 4 t�� •mod r .1. I' �^• !. .r +ref `i, � � -�'* �S Photo 1.Representative portion of project area. 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The subject parcel is 2.23 acres in size, bordered to the south by a residential property of similar size, and the north by NE Miller Road and a separate residential property. The Union River flows generally from north to south along the eastern portion of the property. Approximately half of the property has been managed for residential and recreational use which includes a SFR, covered parking, vacation cabin, and landscaping. Unmanaged portions of the site are occupied by moderately dense mature stands of western red cedar, bigleaf maple, and Douglas fir, with a common understory dominated by salmon berry, sword fern, and various willow species. PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetiandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 12309-41-90072 HMP August,2011 Page 3 7. Ilk R ER RD Z G Photo 2. Subject property as shown on Mason County GIS,circled in red.House circled in yellow.Proposed bank armoring shown as dotted yellow line. 3.0 APPLICABLE SETBACKS The project site is within the jurisdiction of Mason County. Ordinance 17.01.110 identifies Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas adopted by Mason County. The applicable setback for this project is as follows: Habitat Type Buffer Building Setback from Buffer Type S Stream (Union River) 150' 15' 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT AND SPECIES 4.1 Puget Sound Chinook Oncorh nchus tsha tsha -Threatened g ( y � ) Listed as threatened since March 24,1999 adult Puget Sound Chinook spawn in several rivers and streams flowing into Puget Sound. The lower Union River is known to support small runs of Puget Sound Chinook. These fish are assumed to be of hatchery origin but have maintained some level of natural production over the last decade. PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 12309-41-90072 HMP August,2011 Page 4 The mainstem of the Union River is listed as a final designation in the NOAA Fisheries Northwest Region Critical Habitat Designations for West Coast Salmon and Steelhead in Washington-August 2005. The project proposal includes mitigation and tactical design intended to protect and maintain water quality of the stream and prevent sedimentation. Given that no displacement of important spawning habitat will be necessary, this project is not expected to impact Puget Sound Chinook. Mitigation includes the establishment of a native riparian community along an area occupied by an open grass area adjacent to the river. 4.2 Puget Sound Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss)-Threatened Listed as Threatened since May 2007, Puget Sound Steelhead spawn in several streams throughout Puget Sound. Spawning usually occurs in moderate to steep gradient sections of streams, usually in heads of riffles or the tails of pools where hydraulic conditions are conducive to intragravel flow. Side channels and the anterior portions of islands are also used. Spawn timing for summer steelhead runs typically ranges from mid May through October while winter run steelhead are present from December through May. Adequate cover from predation, water temperature, and spawning gravel are important factors for instream habitat, while little is currently known about specific marine habitat requirements. The Union River is accessible to Puget Sound Steelhead. However, no part of this project will displace important spawning habitat, therefore, no impacts are likely. The overall project described in this report is not expected to impact water quality or aquatic habitat important fish. The pool habitat which will likely result at the base of the rock wall will provide important rearing habitat for juveniles. 4.3 Hood Canal Summer Chum(Oncorhynchus keta)-Threatened Hood Canal Summer Chum spawning areas in proximity to the site include the Union River and, historically, the Tahuya River. Recovery efforts are in place to restore naturally spawning summer chum populations to the Tahuya system while the Union stock remains healthy. Summer chum adults are present from August to mid October in the lower Union River. The project area falls within the Summer Chum ESU. Chum salmon generally prefer medium size gravels that are relatively sand and silt free. No damage to stream habitat or associated buffers has or will result from the project addressed in this plan. The proposed rip rap installation is not likely to impact Hood Canal Summer Chum as impacts will be mitigated through the restoration of riparian vegetation and continued stabilization of the stream bank. Measures are provided in this report to protect water quality and other habitat features potentially important to all fish species potentially inhabiting the stream. Measures are provided in this plan to protect water quality and aquatic habitat. Given that no modification to spawning habitat or forested riparian area are proposed, no impacts to summer chum or their habitats are likely to occur. PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetiandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 12309-41-90072 HMP August,2011 Page 5 4.4 Bull Trout(Salvelinus malma)-Threatened Bull trout typically inhabit very cold, clear headwater streams at high elevations that are supported by snowmelt. For spawning and early rearing, bull trout require loose, clear gravel, relatively free of fine sediments. Bull trout are not documented within this stream. Given the scale of the project and mitigation proposed,the project is not likely to have any adverse impacts on bull trout. 4.5 Bald Eagle(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)-Threatened Habitat areas associated with Bald Eagle include uneven aged coniferous stands with some old- growth components. Nests are typically constructed in larger trees with dead or broken tops providing an unobstructed view of nearby water. Snags and trees with exposed lateral limbs, or dead tops are used as perches and defense stations. There are no documented Bald Eagle nesting sites in the vicinity of the project area. The completed project did not require the removal of any trees. Recommended overstory plantings recommended in Section 6.3 should improve the potential for use of the site by Bald Eagle in the future. As no important habitat features are to be removed, this project will have no adverse impacts on bald eagles. The proposed mitigation is expected to provide a net benefit. 4.6 Marbled Murrelet(Brachyramphus marmoratus)-Threatened Marbled Murrelets are typically associated with coastal habitats and nest in old-growth forests. Murrelets may fly as far as 50 miles inland to nest,however the average distance is roughly 5-miles from nest to sea. It is only during the summer breeding months that they are commonly found inland. During non-nesting seasons they live at sea. Murrelets require tall mossy trees in coniferous old growth forests with cavities on thick branches where they can construct a cup nest 20-40 meters above the forest floor. Murreletts have been documented laying eggs on rocky ground habitats only when a sufficient forest is unavailable. There are no documented nesting sites surrounding the project site. No potential nesting trees containing platform features are within the project area. This project will likely have no adverse impact on Marbled Murrelet given there are no documented nesting sites or potential nesting trees within the project area. 4.7 Northern Spotted Owl(Stria occidentalis caurina)-Threatened Spotted owls require a large amount of land for their nesting and hunting grounds; pairs may occupy up to 58 sq. km. They are territorial and do not migrate, but they may shift their ranges slightly in response to seasonal changes Suitable spotted owl habitat includes trees relatively large in diameter, multi-layered forest canopy with a moderate to high canopy closure in overstory, midstory, and understory, large, tall, live trees with cavities, broken tops, mistletoe, or platforms of branches capable of holding accumulated organic matter suitable for use as a nest. Dead standing trees and fallen decayed trees supporting PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 12309-41-90072 HMP August,2011 Page 6 abundant populations of prey species are critical to spotted owl populations. Currently there are no spotted owl nesting sites documented in proximity to the project site. As spotted owls are currently not present, and the project is of a scale that has no impact on forested areas, no impacts to spotted owl or their habitat are expected result from the completed or proposed project. 5.0 ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS The project lies within the regulated buffer of a Type S stream. Project scale in the protected area is as follows: Development Type Habitat Type Project scale Bank Armoring Type S Stream Bank/Buffer —50 lineal feet 5.1 Vegetation Disturbance The portion of the stream buffer proposed for bank armoring is located in an area that was previously maintained as an open grass area prior to the recent channel shifting and bank erosion. The project area is occupied by grasses with little native shrub or overstory vegetation. No overstory tree removal or significant displacement of native shrub communities is necessary for this project. With recommended planting of native vegetation described in Section 6.3, the project will likely have a net benefit of vegetation abundance and diversity within the parcel. 5.2 Designated Critical Habitat for Salmonids Designated Critical Habitat for Salmonids is within the vicinity of the project area. However, none of the proposed work will displace or substantially modify Designated Critical Habitat. The stream channel will be maintained in its current location. With proposed mitigation, actions described in this plan are not expected to jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species. 5.3 Temporary Increase in Sediment and Turbidity During Construction The proposed work has the potential to temporarily increase turbidity and suspended sediment within the project area. Best Management Practices have been recommended in Section 6.4 to avoid siltation of waters during project implementation. 5.4 Light and Glare The proposed project will not resulted in an increase in light and glare. No impacts to the use of the site by wildlife species is likely to result from light and glare associated with this project. 6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES 6.1 Preservation of Critically Important Plants No removal of critically important plants or vegetative communities outside the project area is proposed or necessary. PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 12309-41-90072 HMP August,2011 Page 7 6.2 Minimization Mitigation The project minimizes impacts to the stream buffer by armoring only the portion of the channel which is directly relevant and nearest to the SFR. This is limited to a 50-foot reach of the outer bend of the channel. 6.3 Enhancement Recommendations The portion of the stream buffer that is proposed for bank armoring is occupied by exposed soil, with little native vegetation. To compensate for the proposed bank armoring within the stream buffer, it is recommended that a ten-foot wide strip of the buffer, adjacent to the stream bank be enhanced with native vegetation. The ten-foot wide strip extends the entire length of the stream buffer adjacent to the bank armoring addressed in this plan (approximately 50 feet), and will be identified as the Enhancement Zone. The Enhancement Zone is currently occupied by flat, open grass area. A moderately dense forested and shrub community within this specified open area is likely to improve upland stabilization, and riparian habitat. The area selected as the Enhancement Zone occupies approximately 500 square feet of the stream buffer. i. - _ t.s ay , F M - e •Y 4- - Photo 3. Representative portion of proposed Enhancement Zone PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 12309-41-90072 HMP August,2011 Page 8 Native Plantings To offset impacts associated with the bank armor within the stream buffer, it is recommended that the mitigation zone be enhanced with native plants. It is recommended that potted plants be used as opposed to bare root seedlings. The following plant species and potted sizes are recommended: Trees: western red cedar(Thuja plicata)-2 gallon Douglas fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii)-2 gallon Shrubs: Oregon grape (Mahonia nervosa)- 1 gallon salal (Gaultheria shallon)— 1 gallon evergreen huckleberry(Vaccinium ovatum)-gallon nootka rose (Rosa nutkana)— 1 gallon salmonberry(Rubus spectabilis)— 1 gallon Pacific Willow(Salix lusida)— 1 gallon Hooker willow(Salix hookeriana)— 1 gallon Scouler willow(Salix scouleriana)— 1 gallon Sitka willow(Salix sitchensis)— 1 gallon beaked hazelnut(Corylus cornuta)— 1 gallon Indian plum(Oemleria cerasiformis)— 1 gallon oceanspray(Holodiscus discolor)— 1 gallon Pacific ninebark(Physocarpus capitatus)— 1 gallon California black currant(Ribes bracteosum)— 1 gallon western thimbleberry(Rubus parviflorus)— 1 gallon red elderberry(Sambucus racemosa)— 1 gallon Ferns: sword fern(Polystichum munitum)— 1 gallon Native Planting Guidelines It is recommended that plantings be installed within the identified mitigation zone to achieve the following densities. A minimum of 1 tree species and five shrub or fern species from the above list are recommended. trees- 10' on center shrubs- 5' on center These densities will provide a moderately dense, structurally diverse plant community within the mitigation zone. To fulfill the above mentioned planting density recommendation, the mitigation zone will be planted with a total of 5 trees and 15 shrubs. It is recommended that installation be done as single trees and or clusters of three shrubs, on approximate 10-foot centers. Finally, sword fern can be randomly installed as desired throughout the planting row on average four-foot centers. Any volunteer native vegetative species may be counted toward target densities. Typically, planting should occur during winter dormancy. The optimum time for planting is during February and March, however, the need to complete the project in a timely manner may call for PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 12309-41-90072 HMP August, 2011 Page 9 planting to occur outside optimum time periods. No machinery earthwork will be necessary to implement this enhancement plan; planting holes for specified vegetation can be hand dug. No additional clearing or grading should be necessary for site enhancement. All installed vegetation shall be marked with colored flagging to facilitate monitoring inspections. The monitoring program is outlined to insure project effectiveness. Invasive species such as Himalayan blackberry, reed canary grass, Japanese knotweed, and English Ivy may invade the enhancement zone. These species are stubborn competitors for light and nutrients and limit success of native plants. Invasive species should be removed from the stream buffer, and/or enhancement zone should they invade. Herbicides should not be used to achieve this due to the proximity of the stream. Persistent cutting during the growing season is sufficient to offset the rhizomes of invasive species if they become a problem. 6.4 Best Management Practices Recommended Best Management Practices for this project are as follows: • Perform excavation and site preparation work during dry weather. • During construction Install silt fencing between exposed erodible soils and the stream when feasible and practical to prevent erosion and siltation of waters (See diagram below). • Minimize amount of erodible soils at any given time to the maximum extent feasible. • Check all equipment daily for leaks. Refueling and lubrication of equipment should occur off site. Do not store any fuel, lubricants, chemicals, or hazardous substances outside overnight within the project area. • Do not apply any chemicals when there is a possibility of rain. • Comply with all permits and requirements of governing authority. PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com i Parcel 12309-41-90072 HMP August,2011 Page 10 HIGH CONSTRUCTION STEEL POST FENCE �pgplf FTAR 10 Fr mokx smvc wrIH MIRE SUPPORT FENCE 6 FT MAX SPACING WRHOUT MARE SUPPORT FENCE FILTER FABRIC PONDING HT. FILTER FABRIC STEEL POST /TO UPSTRE SECURELY AM SIDE OF POST. RUNOFF 12' MIN. 1 . ,.6"TRENCH WITH COMPACTED 114CSilt Fence Diagram Silt fence maintenance The presence of exposed soil in proximity to regulated waters poses a risk of erosion and siltation during storm events. It is recommended that silt fencing be installed between the work areas and the stream to avoid siltation of waters. The silt fence should be inspected and repaired if necessary after each storm event. Sediment should be removed from the fence and deposited to an area that will not contribute to regulated waters. 7.0 MONITORING Per Mason County Requirements, monitoring of the site will begin the first fall following project completion and be maintained on a seasonal basis. The information gathered will provide the following: 1) condition of installed plant species; 2) the use of the site by wildlife species; 3) any disturbance caused by the bank armoring and its effect on the protected zone and associated aquatic habitat; 4) any occurrence of exotic species within the enhancement zone; 5)the overall stability of the armoring; and 6) any corrective measures that may be deemed necessary to provide desired conditions. This monitoring will be in effect for the duration of three years. The information gathered will be provided in an annual report and submitted to the Director of Mason County Department of Community Development. PO Box 2854, Belfair, WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Parcel 12309-41-90072 HMP August, 2011 Page 11 8.0 SUMMARY This report addresses the proposed bank armoring necessary to prevent additional erosion towards an existing SFR. Mitigation recommendations include native plant installation adjacent to the armored bank, which is currently maintained as open grass area. The enhancement zone occupies approximately 500 square feet. Best Management Practices are outlined to insure no negative impacts to the stream. Mitigation Measures, and Best Management Practices, have been identified to avoid, minimize, and mitigate for potential impacts associated with completed and proposed construction. We trust this information is sufficient for your needs at this time. Thank you for choosing The Wetland Corps as your environmental consultant. If you have any questions feel free to call. Respectfully submitted, Lee Boad Senior Biologist �H4e�ather Lane Staff Wetland&Natural Resource Specialist PO Box 2854, Belfair,WA 98528 cell:360-620-0618, Office: 360-372-2421 e-mail: wetlandcorps@hotmail.com Site Location b a �f •'�A� a jWF ir reme RECEIVED AUG 0 5 2011 426 W. CEDAR ST. FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP Project Name: Parcel 12309-41-90072 HMP Location: Belfair, Washington Project: TWC11-W62 77 Client: Mario & Linda Gomez THE WETLAND CORPS Date: 8/11 Parcel12309-41-90072 A[ U C ort Proposed Armoring SFR ;•••• •• Type S Stream(Union River) 150, N FIGURE 2 SITE MAP Project Name: Parcel 12309-41-90072 HMP Location: Belfair, Washington Project: TWCII-W62 Client: Mario & Linda Gomez THE WETLAND CORPS Date: 8/11 Our Map Legend m -- U.S. Fish and Wildlite Service sr.•a National Wetlands Invento � � • CONUS Cidos `s ® CONUS States 100K Lower 48 Welland Polygons Previous Extent Next Extent ul Extent Toots e0uarine and Marine Oeepwatrr C'Wusrino and Marine Weiland # Freshwater Ernerpent Welland Site Location Froshwater Forested'Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond s Lake Other RlverineAL :' Aly �. Figure adapted from NWI Figure 3 National Wetland Inventory Map Mapper website Section 09 Township 23 North Range 1 West FIGURE 3 NWI MAP Project Name: Parcel 12309-41-90072 H , / Location: Belfair,Washington �" o Project: TWC11-W62 0 U Client: Mario & Linda Gomez V ca Date: 8/1 THE WETLAND CORPS 1 <c C\J • ._ � _ _. _� ___; X �_� fir. Tom.._._._._'� Approximate- - Parcel Location 400' IL it OL R, �►� R YF .♦ Fq'�. • �S !r z2�S it r ,>, . + i Onsite Soil Conditions based on Mason County Soil Survey Subject Site Soils: Everett Gravelly Sandy Loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes (Ed). The Everett series consists of somewhat excessively drained, pale-brown gravelly soils. They occur as inextensive gravel ridges on the glacial moraines or, more commonly, as fairly continuous outwash channels between ridges of Alderwood soils. They have developed upon assorted glacial till and outwash material. The rainfall is 45 to 60 inches a year. The vegetation is mainly drought-resistant madrone, manzanita, and kinnikinnick. Everett soils are droughty because the loose gravel and sandy subsoil and substratum offer little resistance to downward movement of water. The capacity of the surface soil to hold available moisture is low. Juno Loamy Sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes (Je). The Juno series consists of shallow, fairly coarse textured, brown to reddish-brown alluvial soils. They are developing mainly from glacial alluvium that washed from the Shelton soils and their associated till and outwash. The native vegetation consisted of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs. Juno soils occur along small streams that flow from surrounding glacial uplands. They differ from the Belfast soils mainly in that they are somewhat excessively drained and are more droughty and shallower to sand and gravel. In addition, Juno soils occur where there is a wider range of local climate, and they are developing from more basic parent material than the acid igneous glacial sediments of the Belfast soils. FIGURE 4 SOIL SURVEY AUG O J , Project Name: Parcel 1230941-90072 HMP 426 W. CEDAR SFt& Location: Belfair,Washington -� Project: TWC11-W62 THE _W FTL_-'%.N D CORPS Client: Mario & Linda Gomez Date: 8/11 L +180 6 1 +1800626 4180062 }1800720 418007 800724 4 r +1800726 0 18003 .' e& Gs 1, x + + 0 800 06 J+800008 +800700 J �1800T 00704 +80 a L 4 'y °i $ u �' 1 Q� N' r c 9680 + 68 9684 $ t fi +7780 J� 17 82 n9784 f d +709 `t M� k .� � '".+ter s Site Location 17 t 17�9666 709 1709762 7 4 09766 N IL 4L lb k[[ V +70964 �+Tp9817 170 8 S 170964y i1 9740 +7 1709744 170974 t r f -� f1 x 17096 Urr 09M 1T 0 62 , 170 $ 17 20 9 SOILS SIRE•VIIS H:•dric Soils TR-LNSPORTATION Stream Water I,•+e 1 =a:::ide; Highl'."Ullstabie 0~Pa x'ctl Roed Stream Type Unb.nonv(Eatt sde,• Hidly Erodible ^400 Unpaved.Road 3Zlily Unsta Ke S Stream Water T;•re:-`,:t'e:::tde; :L---!&Erodible �^��Road(Stu ace T-Waloxb71) No ata or Gravel—� D G l P ,.#%-- Abwidoned Road Stream Type t:�tuonv�;':t'e::stde; �" Cfipllvlecl Road Trail FIGURE 5 DNR STREAM MAP Project Name: Parcel 12309-41-90072 HMP Location: Belfair,Washington Project: TWC11-W62 THE 'k'\r ETL A N D CORPS Client: Mario & Linda Gomez Date: 8/11