The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOM2012-00008 Change Tenant - COM Application - 2/2/2012 .MASON COUNTY coM Zola - Dodyb CHANGE IN TENANT APPLICATION Complete the Change in Tenant Application and return with a floor plan, site plan, septic pumper's report, septic records and fee to the Mason County Permit Center, P.O. Box 186, Shelton,WA 98584. Evaluation of the Change in Tenant Application will involve staff members from the Building, Fire Marshal, Environmental Health, Planning and Public Works offices who will identify compliance requirements. This application is intended for tenant change only. If construction or remodeling is proposed or required a building permit will be necessary. Upon approval the permit will be issued to the applicant/tenant. After the permit is issued, schedule an inspection by calling(360)427-7262. Upon satisfactory inspection a Certificate of Occupancy will be issued and must be posted in a conspicuous place on the premises. PROPERTY INFORMATION Date: t 3(. 20�;7 Assessor's Parcel Number: 1;z22a - C-0 • I?o 0 1 Legal Description: ,wt-z-,l cJ dj-k : � I- K r' /0' eAe- 10 rtJ 514,rztja a o f U'a C N t-i-cy A0 T Building Site Address: 1£de-,ya E uj_� •� R1Ly ,q s 5 2 c( Method of sewage disposal: O Septic Of Sewer-name of district: hcr+4,.,j a o"i-/ S it ge Water source: AIndividual Well O Community Well O Public System, name of system: PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT Name of Applicant: L,gUer--Afer ? j &L ��y�-tot�(� �1/s?t�!-( I� XZt6L4JL . Mailing address: /'tD Cps City: q6 e yv State: ,q Zip: fig'2 Day phone:36d adr 269a Contact Person: l,,Oafl Message phone: 3Co ga - 2G Y a PROJECT INFORMATION Proposed business name: de-0 fir' dj FLa cJt� S Proposed use: i2r-TIj (L Number of employees: 2— Previous business name: Describe previous use: STRUCTURE DETAILS Check one: ef Detached single level/single tenant O Single level/multi tenant O Multi level/single tenant O Multi level/multi tenant Age of structure: Is structure currently If not occupied, how long has it been vacant? occupied? Yes No Yr. Mo. Square footage: I Basement: I First: Mezzanine: Second: Third: Is the structu reheated? Heating type: Circle Circle one: es No (-Electric j Liquid Propane Natural Gas Oil Type of h : Circle one: Furnace Heat Pu lectric baseboard or wall mount Radiant Will there be any changes to the following? Circle yes or no, if applicable: Floor lay-out: Yes Lighting: Y � Heating: Yes C00 Exterior Finishes: Yes 10P Interior Finishes: es No Parking: es No Number of restrooms provided: t Number of fix ures in each Is structure handicap accessible? Circle one es No Is the structure equipped with a fire sprinkler system? Yes o Fire alarm system? Yes No 1,11 Monitoring Station Name: Phone number: APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT: 1. Floor Plan(5 sets): • Draw the floor plan to scale 0 Use of rooms • Room Dimensions • Location of all exits and windows(include dimensions) • Location of plumbing and mechanical fixtures • Interior doors with swing radius 2. Site Plan(5 sets): Note scale used • Property lines,easements, &right of ways • Location of all existing structures&dimensions • Distance, in feet,from property line&structures 0 Landscape buffer yards • On-site sewage tanks and drain fields,& reserve • Well location • Location of fire hydrants&vehicle access roads • Parking areas number&arrangement) 3. Septic records,pumper's report or O&M report. 4. Fees will be collected at time of submittal Official Use Only Accepted b Date Ia Submittal Amount$ y •900 Receipt number Department R vie Inihals Date Comments Building --2 2— Environmental Health Fire Marshal _2, Planning Public Works Occupancy Change? (circle one) Yes No Type of construction 13 3MAIr7l ET(]ED Occupancy classification change from to Occupant load calculated: persons Existing occupant load design persons. Land Use Designation: FEB 0 2 2012 Occupancy Classification: 426 W. CEDAR ST. �- 4/24/2008 Case Activity Listing 6:02:46PM Case#: SPI2007-00110 1� Assigned Done Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Hold Disp To By Updated Updated By SPIA600 SPI Letter-Field Review 6/11/2007 None DONE AH13 6/11/2007 AHB Inspection for Jill&Larry Seymour on May 10,2007: The purpose of the pre-inspection was to evaluate issues related to replacing an existing home(a 25-foot wide by 41-foot long home and carport-storage structure to the south)on a 135-foot wide lot along the Case Inlet shoreline with an existing concrete bulkhead and access easement from State Route 3 to the west.The 5-foot high bulkhead runs along the length of the shoreline on the property which ties into a bulkhead on the adjacent properties to the south and north. The property is located on the waterward(east)side of State Route 3 in the Allyn Urban Growth Area. The property is within the Allyn Village Commercial zone. Development standards are detailed in Mason County Code Chapter 17.12 [Allyn Urban Growth Area Zoning Code],and building setbacks for this zone area 10-foot front yard setback from the road easement,and 5-foot side and rear yard setbacks. Proposed development is reviewed for allowed uses,possible land uses needing special use permit review,and other standards. These setbacks are measured from structures 30 inches above grade such as roof overhangs,decks,balconies,stairs, fuel tanks,heat pumps etc. Shoreline standards:The Mason County Shoreline Master Program and the Resource Ordinance guide development proposed within 200 feet of the ordinary high watermark along North Bay Case Inlet. The shoreline designation for this area is Urban Residential and Conunercial Environment. The property to the south is the Port of Allyn waterfront park;the property to the north is a single family residence. The default setback for commercial development is set forth by the Resource ordinance,as a 100-foot shore setback. The applicants propose replacing the existing residence(also non-conforming)that is located 25 ft.4 in.from the face of the concrete bulkhead. The Mason County Resource Ordinance does provide for such replacement,as long as the new structure occupies no more than the square footage of the existing footprint of the existing structure(s)in the buffer(and,a ten percent increase in footprint is allowed in addition)and does not intrude into the shoreline buffer any closer than the existing structure(s). A second floor area may be proposed within the existing footprint area. Staff measured the footprint area(inside the roof eaves)of the residence,garage,carport and covered patio area;the total area adds to 2,844.75 sq.ft.[roughly shown on drawing]. If proposed replacement includes commercial development,a shoreline commercial development permit must be requested to review the extent of the project. Old road easements will need to be evaluated for vacation,as new development is proposed. Consult the zoning code for the spectrum of uses allowed,and note that non-transient residential must be on the second-floor level of development. Slope or landslide hazards:The slope on site does not exceed 10 percent on the east side of State Route 3. No geologic study is needed for development on Block 11,Gross St.and the east area of Eberh art St. Proposals farther west maybe close enough to the slopes on west side of State Route 3 to merit Geotechnical Assessment review. Wetland critical area: Planning staff confirmed the parcel contains certain wetlands,which are regulated under Mason County's Wetlands chapter 17.01.070 of the Mason County Resource Ordinance. The wetlands are likely Category III wetlands with some plant diversity and extending to areas west on adjacent parcels(alley and in Block 13). As part of the proposal review,you net to have a qualified biologist prepare a wetland report that delineates the wetland edge,characterizes the wetland category,and determines the proper vegetation buffer using the information from this Wetlands chapter. Development near the wetlands shall have the determined vegetative buffer,and buildings must be set back an additional 15 feet from the outer edge of that buffer. A portion of the buffer is currently intact;the northeast and southeast areas have intact vegetation. Some tree limbs in the buffer maybe trimmed on a limited basis in accordance with the Wetland chapter standards. The biologist must confirm the proposed buffer plus setback distance determined by the tables in the Wetlands Chapter. When planning the location of all proposed improvements,consider the setback from the easement road and the buffer and setback distances from the wetland edge in that site plan.Depending upon the wetland category and buffer requirements a Mason Environmental Permit may be required to allow the proposed structure/addition.See section D and E of the enclosed Wetlands chapter of the Mason County Resource Ordinance regarding permits and buffer requirements.If the proposed structure is within the deternined wetland buffer,it may still be possible to construct it with adequate mitigation, which may include buffer restoration,etc. Page 2 of 3 CaseActivity..Tpt 4/24/2008 Case Activity Listing 6:02:46PM I FCase#: SPI2007-00110 1� Assigned Done Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Hold Disp To By Updated Updated By If the proposed project is within or clearing has occurred within the wetland and/or its requisite buffer,restoration and additional environmental permitting may be required. Based on the categorization and delineation,if there has been or will be encroachment into the buffer,have your consultant prepare a restoration plan or recommended mitigation.It is often more cost effective to have this done while the consultant is on site. General process: Future site development must include a site plan,showing all setbacks from property lines,any slopes and other buildings or improvements;this plan will be needed for building permit application submittal, in addition to the wetland report. Specific standards for future development contained in County Codes maybe found at the County website address http://www.co.mason.wa.us. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Thank you. Page 3 of 3 CaseActivity..rpt C Washington State � Department of Transportation Application for Access Connection For Department Use Only Preapplication Conceptual View? []Yes ❑N/A Nonconforming Connection? ❑Yes ❑No ❑Variance Category I - Minimum Connection Category II - Minor Connection ❑Field(Agricultural), Forest Lands, ❑Less than 1,000 AWDVTE($1,000) Utility Operation and Maintenance($50) ❑1,000 to 1,500 AWDVTE($1,500) ❑Each Residential Dwelling unit(up to 10 units) ❑Fee per additional connection point($250) utilizing a single connection point($50 each) ❑Other,with 100 AWDVTE or less($500) ❑Fee per additional connection point($50) Category III - Major Connection Category IV-Temporary Connection ❑1,500 to 2,500 AWDVTE($2,500) ❑Base Fee per connection($100) ❑Over 2,500 AWDVTE($4,000) ❑Fee per additional connection point($1,000) ❑Includes Median Opening Proposed Use State Highway Number Mile Post County 1/4 of the 1/4 Section Township Range E/W Fees in the amount of $ are paid herewith to defray the basic administrative expense incident to the processing of this application according to WAC 468-51, RCW Chapter 47.50, and/or RCW Chapter 47.32, and amendments thereto. The applicant further promises to pay additional amounts as shall be billed, if any, in reimbursement of the actual costs of the Department. The undersigned submits said application and accepts the conditions as set forth. Applicant, Owner(Print Full Name) ��aD�C� S��/�� Checks or Money Orders are to be made payable to "Washington State Department of Transportation" Address Igo it //S—'j For Consultant Use Only City / State Zip Code &fpg P S c/ Consulting Firm Telephone Number Address Applicant Author ignature d City State Zip Code Print or T Name Telephone Number Title Consultant's Representative r HerAe4F..e- �,IS ►/��}i UPS L Le Federal Tax ID No. or Soc. Sec. No. (Optional) Print or Type Name REECE Title Dated this --� 9) day of !fd V a FEB 0 2 2012 DOT Form 224-694 EF Revised 7199 426 W. CEDAR ST. Additional Information Required on Separate Sheets: A. Access Connection Permit(access, driveways, etc.): 1. Site plan showing access location and development of site (All except farm or private residence). 2. Vehicle trip generation (For commercial and multiple residence). 3. Land use restrictions or stipulations, if any, and agency involved. 4. Drainage Plan (With calculations required). 5. Landscape plan (If local agency requirement). 6. Current complete names, mailing addresses, and telephone numbers of the property owner(s), the developer(s), the applicant, the transportation and legal consultant(s) representing the applicant (if any), and the local government representative(s) responsible for processing the development's approval. Connection and roadway design documents for Category II and II permits shall bear the seal and signature of a professional engineer, registered in accordance with RCW Chapter 18.43. For Department Use Only Engineer's/Supervisor's Report Reviewed in the field this day of 6 Comments Signature Engineer/Supervisor DOT Form 224-694 EF Revised 7/99 Clear Form Hotmail Print Message Page 1 of 1 RE: test From: Sporseen,Art(SporseA@wsdot.wa.gov) Sent: Thu 12/01/11 1:32 PM To: Ijseymour (Ijseymour@msn.com) Cc: Deemer, Larry (LDeemer@wsdot.wa.gov); Severson, Dale (SeversD@wsdot.wa.gov) 1 attachment 20111201_112816.pdf(17.7 KB) I have reviewed the attached plan for SR3 Access and see no problem with this proposal. I will send you an application and access design template soon. sort Olympic Region HQ Development Review Engineer Tumwater Wa,98504-7440 360-357-2706 http://by 147w.bay 147.mail.live.com/maiI/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=05a93ada-1 c64-11 e 1... 1/31/2012 H4LSk 5 t.1�cJr ee-e OY'2 cu fu m m �f'