The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRestoration Assessment Review - BLD Engineering / Geo-tech Reports - 3/16/2005 °N.STATE MASON COUNTY �P M 0 �L o s PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER NU r ° Shelton Washington 98564 YZ N Y y lesa a° DATE: March 161h, 2005 INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS TO: Kristen French, DCD—Compliance Planner FROM: Alan A. Tahja, P/W - Co. Hydr. Engr. WO#PLG-05 SUBJ: Restoration Assessment Review NAME: Wiltz 2 110 NE Ponderosa Road . ENF2002-00279 & SPI2004-00279 Kristen, The restoration plan prepared for the Steve Wiltz/Juan Garcia property located at 110 NE Ponderosa Road. Belfair, has been received and reviewed by Public Works. The "restoration assessment letter"provides little information other than expressing the geologist's opinion that the vegetation already naturally established "is likely sufficient for erosion control". As a geotechnical document, it provides no information regarding the character or severity of the cut slope(s), or other slopes on the property. As a restoration report, it may be accepted as a notice that the current condition of the property is acceptable to the geologist, but I do not consider the instrument adequate for any activity which would normally require either a geotechnical assessment, or geotechnical report, as may be appropriate for the site. To summarize, the reviewed materials appear acceptable, and their recommendations may be accepted, but the report should not be considered adequate for any additional work proposed on the subject property. Please feel free to contact me at County extension 461 if you have any questions regarding these comments, or if you feel any features need further discussion or attention. Sincerely, 471an,4. Tahja File: H:\WP\ENF\Wiltz.doc r WORK ORDER - PUBLIC WORKS DE PT. (a) Date: 3' /q( o (E) Work Order PERMIT#: g N r a v c o a z-7 7 Number. t�L Requested by: Authorized by: ' z f— Date: Type of Work: re,'�:s.� Q".:P� ,., Thor k- ) R E C CLHU NAME M,"� � .� AQENCY/COMPANY BILLING ADDRESS MASON CO 'NiY pU I ;C 1^ ,;PHONE 5 y• Pub. orxs Person in Chasr e: �� 7 %.axa.... .:w..so..W:.:c•. ....' i� xab.:.rv.�,,...W..4;<ax..xr,:.x... (C) Project Time Line: (from-to dates) `Z TO 4 ProJeet Start date: �C�S EsUnWed Fkrlsh Dab: Appraodmate hours: ESTIMATED TOTAL.$,s: �j• - COST ESTIMATE (D) ) 4 O LAO li2m TOTAL i ! JIM EQUIPMENT USED: MATERIAL.USED: -- (F) Actual Cost = BARS: PROJ SF: GATE Enploym WORKED 10 � Notes sm FtIrm TOTAL$ EQUIPMENT USED: 4 B�L4 TOTAL t'S MATERIAL USED: --_---_ TOTAL ALL (0) BILLED DATE INV# PAID DATE REC.0 _CKO__.._ 1 N ALKAI CONSULTANTS LLC . Environmental Engineering • Geotechnical Engineering • Wetland Consulting March 1, 2005 Project No. ACL05-02-GO16 Mr. Steve Wiltz PO Box 4009 South Colby, Washington 98384 Restoration Assessment Letter Parcel # 12316-22-90082 110 NE Ponderosa Road Belfair, Washington Mr. Wiltz This letter is submitted at your request and follows site visits on January 10 and February 25, 2005, conversations with you, and review of letters from Mason County dated February 10, 2005 and December 2, 2002. The Mason County requirements for a restoration plan as outlined in the County I-oo Resource Ordinance, Section 17.01.210 were also reviewed in preparation for our assessment. On February 10, 2005, an Alkai representative performed a reconnaissance of the area we understand to be the area of concern for restoration on the slope directly ahead of the termination of Ponderosa Road. A cut slope was examined and found to be mostly vegetated by grass. The top of the cut area had some minor overhangs that appeared to be consistent with those associated with shallow root systems. The natural slope behind the cut slope (where Douglas-fir trees had been previously removed) was also examined and found to be vegetated by a substantial ground cover of shrubs such as Salal and Oregon-grape. A few minor bare areas were observed, possibly the result of foot traffic or wildlife. Based on our initial investigation, it is our opinion that the existing vegetation in the area of concern is likely sufficient for erosion control. As a precaution, we recommend the area be monitored by the property owner after periods of heavy rains to assess the condition of the area, particularly in the 9465 Provost Road NW, Suite 204B • Silverdale, Washington 98383 Phone: (360) 613-2407 Fax: (360) 613-2408 Restoration Assessment Parcel # 12316-22-90082 March 1, 2005 Project No. ACL05-02-GO16 Page 2 of 2 small bare areas to ensure they are not spreading. If significant spreading is observed in the future, Alkai may be consulted to make recommendations for corrective measures. As we believe the area in its current condition is likely adequate, we do not believe replanting is necessary. We are not specifying species of plants to plant in general, but will leave this to the property owner to suit availability of plants and individual preferences. Should you have any questions or concerns, or if we may be of additional assistance, please do not hesitate to call our office at (360) 613-2407. Sincerely, ALKAI Consultants, LLC of wash; �e �9el David Hurum, L.G. < 0 �.� Senior Staff Geologist �, 1121 sed 1 DAVID C. HURUM 3 2�0� 9465 Provost Road NW, Suite 204B • Silverdale, Washington 98383 Phone: (360) 613-2407 Fax: (360) 613-2408 MASON COUNTY Shelton (360) 427-9670 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Belfair (360) 275-4467 Planning Elma (360 Mason County Bldg. 1411 N.5th ) 482-5269 P.O.Box 279 Shelton,WA 98584 /.- g 5 1 Ia g February10 20 OS Steven and Lori Wiltz 7306 SW McCormick Woods Dr. Port Orchard, WA 98367-7476 NOTICE OF MASON COUNTY CODE VIOLATION ENFORCEMENT CASE FILE NUMBER:ENF2002-00279 PARCELNUMBER: 12316-22-90082 SITE ADDRESS: 110 NE Ponderosa Rd. TAX ASSESSOR RECORD INFORMATION: Steven and Lori Wiltz 7306 SW McCormick Woods Dr. Port Orchard, WA 98367-7476 Dear Mr. Wiltz: I understand that you are the new owner of record for tax parcel number 12316-22-90082. I had directed Allan Borden to inform you of the open enforcement case that is associated with the parcel,and from your phone message today I understand that you need information regarding compliance requirements. Because I was not able to effect service on the former owners,Juan and Ella Garcia,this case has remained opened(reference case number listed above). I have enclosed copies of two letters mailed to the Garcias,to provide you with background information and also to clarify current compliance requirements. The letter dated December 2, 2002 details the submittal requirements,which include: • Restoration Plan and$360 Review Fee • Restoration Bond based on costs associated with implementation of Restoration Plan(if any requirements are imposed). These are the only items required of you to resolve the current enforcement case. I have enclosed a copy of Resource Ordinance sections 17.01.100 and 17.01.210 for your reference. If you have plans for development activity on the site that will trigger the Geotechnical Report(see section 17.01.100)requirement,you can simply have your consultant evaluate the hillside clearing in conjunction with the Report. If you do not plan development that will trigger the Geotechnical Report requirement, our p q ,y consultant will only need to prepare a Restoration Plan(see section 17.01.210) for the hillside that meets the requirements of the Restoration Plan section. If corrective action is required,then you will need to complete the bond form in an amount based on a reasonable, formal estimate for the costs associated with implementation of the plan. Note that the funds remain in your account,they are simply frozen for three years. I hope that you find this information useful. Thank you for your interest in resolving this matter. You can reach me at(360)427-9670 ext. 593 if you have further questions. Sincerely, Kristin French Planner,Code Enforcement SENDER: • • CO MPLETE THIS SECTIONON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Signature item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. Agent X ■ Print your name and address on the reverse Addressee so that we can return the card to you. B. Receivedl�y(Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, I or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑ No d- -� �Jb (o SW I'1'lc CO,r►m,Lx w n Cl-' Y ' 3. Service Type ❑Certified Mail [3 Express Mail �� ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise 14'�CD ❑Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. i 3 (o. aa_ 9 60$0 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 7003 3110 0001 7159 2598 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 ,o KRISTIN FRENCH-PLANNING DEPT. o CERTtFIEPostal , MAILT. RECEIPT Er PO BOX 279 �s�� ru uI (Domestic rruu SHELTON WA 98584 E, � U r-q Ir I� postage $ •3/ ` Postage $ D j E3 Certified Fee 2•90 C3 Certified Fee ` C3 Postmark ❑ Postmar�� C3 Return Recept Fee 1.75 Here C3 Return Reciept Fee j (Endorsement Required) (Endorsement Required) C3 Restricted Delivery Fee C3 Restricted Delivery Fee � (Endorsement Required) (Endorsement Required) (� <D a m M Total Postage&Fees $ `^ 2 m Total Postage&Fees m l(o -aa-9 6bg� ru aa_ 166`3oL O Sent To sent To d- 11t 2 0 C3 5 v -e ms l�o r -------------------- - -U G.--- �' ---- 9---------- r� -- -- -------------------------------------- r` 3`fieet,Apt:No:j or PO Box No. R 3� lP S(,O Mt-co f n t(K (,t��l or PO Box No. 1 1 O N c ��YOS O� � (t !l City Stets.ZI City,State,ZIP+4 �r 0f LJ�.n r (,v/a q g 3�� 6-a a, 1WA gso - 9��3(f rr rr ; �: ; ILI { � v' bid -Zyj •,f,x• ,t. 1 ��, �,3 �1•.,r 1' \4 f J}, �yk f ark\ 4 1 t \ 2 4 r ' . �+t; •fit t ro`: ; ; �',`� , •'� i jy..� �' ,. 114,d \ 1 .eat! r. \ �:Z cl 3�'E� RECEIVED M�� 0 9 2005 MCCD - PLANNING 3Q-,