The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSPI2004-00352 Redevelopment of Structure - SPI Inspections - 1/21/2009 oN-STATE MASON COUNTY �P5 MC o � DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT O A cn o N Planning Division 7 N y ti P O Box 279, Shelton, WA 98584 (360)427-9670 i 1864 Site Inspection January 21, 2009 STEVE WILTZ t-� GE: KEPT iN THE 7306 MCCORMICK WOODS DR SW PORT ORCHARD WA 98367 FILE �i�I tz3 6 2-z- moo a v Case No.: SP12004-00352 Parcel No.: 123162290082 Project Description: Site review for redevelopment of existing structures. Dear Applicant: Pursuant to your application, a site pre-inspection (SPI)was performed on your property. Below you will find comments made regarding the proposed development and its critical values. In some cases, setbacks for development from shorelines, steep slopes, streams, and wetlands must be included in your specific proposal; these setbacks are included as part of the comments listed below. This information is based on County and State regulations as they exist to date. These regulations may change and may affect the requirements for development of the subject property. Please contact me at (360)427-9670, ext. 365 if you have questions. Sincerely, Allan Borden Land Use Planner Mason County Planning Department 1/21/2009 Page 1 of 4 SP12004-00352 Site Inspection 1/21/2009 Case No.: SP12004-00352 Comments: Pre-inspection for Steve Wiltz on Jan. 7, 2005: The Inspection was made to evaluate replacement of a residence and garage on a parcel located on the end of Ponderosa Rd. north of Belfair. The 0.70-acre property has a few evergreen or deciduous trees in the developed area, but much of the remainder of the property has existing native vegetation. The parcel has steep banks that are northwest and east of the buildings. A perennial stream lies more than 175 feet to the west. The proposed new buildings would be located at the proper setbacks from the bank and stream based upon this inspection. These findings state regulations in effect at inspection time, unless noted otherwise. Development Regulations standards: _Y_ The site is in Rural Residential 5 zone. Standard building setbacks are 25-foot front yard setback, and 20-foot side property line and rear yard setbacks. These setbacks are measured from structures above grade such as roof overhangs, stairs, balconies, decks, heat pumps, storage buildings, and fuel tanks. _Y_ An administrative variance may be requested to reduce these setback distances from property lines, to as low as 5 feet (side yard), if the size, shape, or features of the property constrain development from the proper setbacks. This process requires application and review at the time of the building permit submittal. Resource Ordinance Standards: _N_ Wetland critical area: Planning staff confirmed that the parcel does not contain certain wetlands, which are regulated under Mason County's Wetlands chapter 17.01.070 of the Mason County Resource Ordinance. The applicant will not need a wetlands special report during development review. _Y_ Slope or Landslide hazards: Slopes greater than 15 percent adjacent to or within 300 feet of a proposed project, that are the result of stream erosion and undercutting byroad building, were observed in the vicinity of the property. When proposing development, the applicant shall have a qualified geologist or engineering geologist visit the subject parcel and prepare a site analysis to determine whether a geologic special report is needed during development review. _Y_ Slope or Landslide hazards: If the geologist confirms the 1/21/2009 Page 2 of 4 SP12004-00352 R - Site Inspection 1/21/2009 Case No.: SP12004-00352 need for a special report when slopes are over 40 percent, a Geotechnical Report would be needed to address slope stability, site conditions, and the other requirements of the enclosed landslide hazard chapter 17.01.100 section E. 5. as required by the Mason County Resource Ordinance. The report must include all Resource Ordinance requirements and a submittal checklist noting where these requirements are found in the study document. _Y_ Slope or Landslide hazards: The prepared special report shall be specific to proposed site development (logging and site preparation) on the subject parcels by addressing clearing, grading, driveway and building location, retaining walls, and stormwater control. This special report would be submitted and evaluated at the time of building permit submittal. The study shall address the presence of the septic system on site stability conditions. _Y_ Shoreline setbacks: The shoreline designation for Union River is Rural Environment per the Mason County Shoreline Master Program and development setbacks would be determined by the Mason County Resource Ordinance. The proposed development is greater than 200 feet from the shoreline of the Union River. Stream setbacks: The setbacks from the un-named stream would be determined by the Mason County Resource Ordinance. The stream setback for a type F stream is composed of a 150-foot vegetation buffer plus a 15-foot building setback closest to the roof projection of a proposed structure. Any portion of the new structure, including decks, balconies, and rooflines, must be behind this setback line. The 15 feet toward the stream is an area that may be used for lawns, patios or landscaping (development at grade level). From that point toward the stream is considered to be a required vegetated buffer and is regulated by the Mason County Resource Ordinance Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Chapter. Within this chapter are those activities listed that can be done both with and without a Mason Environmental Permit. Staff estimated the setback from the bank of the stream to the northeast property line. The existing home is shown in the enclosed rough drawing and is close to 200 feet from the stream. In this case, the development setbacks from these features would not apply to a proposed improvement to the subject parcel. Previous un-permitted development has removed vegetation and 1/21/2009 Page 3 of 4 SP12004-00352 M Site Inspection 1/21/2009 Case No.: SP12004-00352 modified slopes in areas of the landslide hazard area. An erosion protection rockery or bulkhead along all or part of the banks may need a building permit for the new bulkhead and some review through the geologic study preparation. Revegetation of the slope area, altered by past vegetation removal, is encouraged during proposed development of the lot. Replanting with the use of native plants such as huckleberry, salal, ocean spray, rhododendron, and sword ferns is preferred in the effort to replace plants removed in the slope buffer area. You would need to confirm with the Environmental Health Department what their septic system standards are to make sure about the adequacy of supplying a septic disposal for the proposed development. General process: Future development must include a site plan, showing all setbacks from property lines, stream, road, and existing and proposed improvements; this site plan will be needed for building permit application submittal and review. Specific County Codes standards for future development may be found at the County website address http://www.co.mason.wa.us. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Thank you. 1/21/2009 Page 4 of 4 SP12004-00352 MASON COUNTYI�?) PLANNING DEPT. PRE-INSPECTION AP LICATION PLEASE PRINT / $205.00 Fee Required - 1. Owner:- °I`�' C.4-r�r** " Applicant:_-_ 5 4<we-_tA) i H_" Site Address: I 1 0ndtro Applicant Address: Owner ddreSS: I�Eb f_ 3/ �� ',City:_P1rfo r� d----St- A--Zip-4 3_1°7---- City: 0_'D_r►.►ar. ----------St—C --ZiP917_&-244V Phone:_(! q__)_ Irt-----------------daY Phone:-(-----)----------------------- -----day Phone:_(31on_)_$?4_ Tc;-:v--- ----evening 2. Parcel No. ��31l� -_a'd -_q00&� Parcel No. - -� _(� Email Ad ress: Jdb r � ° Legal Description:__FA,,4 ___4 t 2)_-_14=Z ag Planner: GBM RAM DMJ SAL TSC ------------------------- --------------------------------------------- smile,ra __ Comp. Plan_��±�� Type of Use"6_ ------------------------- Water Body-------------------I------------ 3. Purpose of Pre-Inspection :_ rt`w- _S' "'� Ks_v�`t�_h�_t��?.uL�S�e_d - �J _ ---�-`-t b•�..G-s— --s e_.e�C.,.�,►,.,u.,-- •�_ ,,,,.,✓ 'f r.�-4V re--------- - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. Use of Buildin r 5. Do any of the following exist on or adjacent to property?: slope AA saltwater ) lake ) river ( ) pond ( ) wetland ) seasonal runoff( ) other ( ) stream seasonal creek ) Directions t Site: - a_s_�-- ---------------` Ir —Q='"--Q 1 -- ----1r_ WA k.'- -- ---°� ---� lra.s �_� _ � �►_ _1� ,�-�W1�� -------------------------- If the information is incomplete, then Mason County must disclaim any errors resulting from deficiencies in the original application. Pre-inspection reports remain valid only until development changes occur in the vicinity which affect the lot evaluated in this inspection or the laws regulating development of the site change after the time of inspection. Applicant Signature:-- _ __Date:_1 ----- - --------------------------- ` - - -- If you would like to be on site during inspec please check here: (&.4' Return application to: Department of Community Development, Planning Division R E C E I V E D P.O. Box 279 Shelton, WA 98584 DEC 17 2004 (360) 427-9670 Please include a $205.00 check or money order p able to Mason County Treasurer MCCD - PLANNING When completed, this form becomes part of the y rc I file. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Accepted by: _ __Date: €[V-E-D__ Please illustrate below the proposed building site in lation to a r&property lines: SRGM'ordMtyOocuments/rypedStuf/Pre-Inspection MORE ON BACK SIDE DEC 2 0 2004 426 W. CEDAR ST: t MD hq �-1 OC �J Please illustrate below the proposed building site in relation to water and property lines: ry r, r tA IL r 0 e c Departmental Reyie.W (For Office Use Only) Planning Department Findings: -------------- — — -- — — ----- ---------------- -- --- -- - `-- --- ---------- --------------- ---- — - - s ----- --------- _ EE �5 ----- ----------------------- - -------- ------- --------------------------------------------------- Revised 12-26-2003 SRG