Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWater System Plan-New Draft - PLN General - 9/30/2007 i 2007 WATER SYSTE PLAN UPDATE tam F0 { BELFAIR WATER ST ICT NO. I 3 yy = Chandler L. 01111 . }'. � .. : --Yoe, Piivallup, V` .AS;>��f F ;� 'S3-S4n' 30 4 . = Scptenibe o07 - ;. WATER SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE for BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 Belfair Water District No. 1 Belfair Water District No. 1 NE 22451 Hwy. 3 P. O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 Prepared By: Chandler L. Odell, P.E. 5706 90t' Street Ct. E. Puyallup, WA 98371 253-845-1230 September 2007 CERMCATE OF ENGINEER The technical material and data contained in this report were prepared by, and under the supervision and direction of the undersigned, whose seall as a Professional Engineer, licensed to practice as such, is affixed below. IR iaaaa ISTEg�'9 �SSIV L EXPIRES 7/9/ Chandler L. Odell, P,E. TABLE OF CONTENTS BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 2007 WATER SYSTEM PLAN The following is a listing of the chapters contained in this updated Water System Plan. Detailed Tables of Contents are provided with each chapter. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF WATER SYSTEM......................................................................... Chapter I BASIC PLANNING DATA AND WATER DEMAND FORECASTING....................Chapter II SYSTEM ANALYSIS.................................................................................................Chapter III CONSERVATION PROGRAM, WATER RIGHT ANALYSIS, SYSTEM RELIABILITY, ANDINTERTIES .......................................................................................................Chapter IV SOURCE WATER PROTECTION...............................................................................Chapter V OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM....................................................Chapter VI DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS... Chapter VII IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.................................................................................Chapter VIII FINANCIAL PROGRAM............................................................................................Chapter IX MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENTS ............................................................................Chapter X EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVESUNIlVIARY.........................................................................................................1 Findings..................................................................................................................................1 Recommendations...................................................................................................................2 ES - i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Findings Belfair Water District No. 1 is located at the end of Hood Canal at the head of Lynch Cove and serves the local Community of Belfair. Although it is the third largest system in Mason County, the District is a small water system with approximately 520 connections serving a population equivalent of some 1,250 people. Several other smaller water systems serve portions of the areas surrounding Belfair. No interties or interlocal agency agreements for reciprocal service exist with other systems. The District presently gets its water primarily from three wells. A fourth well cannot be placed directly on line due to "sand" problems at startup. This well is held for emergencies only, and has to be operated manually. In Pressure zone No. 1 the North Tank site is located at the northerly end of the system approximately 1/2-mile uphill (east) of SR-3. The South Tank site is located on Razor Road approximately 3/4 of a mile from SR-106. Each site contains two tanks with a total storage capacity of about 127,000 gallons per site. For Pressure Zone No. 2 the there is a 1.1 MG standpipe located on the plateau to the northeast of the Belfair Community center. The distribution system contains only two small loops. The topography and existing road and street layout of the Belfair area has precluded the District from looping any more of its mains. There is a possibility for adding one more minor loop in this planning period The elevation range the District serves is from sea level to approximately 400'. The gravity system maximum hydraulic grade line (HGL) for Pressure Zone No. 1 is 272, the overflow elevation of the tanks. Two booster pump stations serve the higher elevations along Razor Road and along the easterly ridge line just north of the District's office. The HGL for Pressure Zone No. 2 is elevation 478'. A hydraulic analysis of the system indicates that a range of 2,200 to 3,200 gpm can be delivered for fireflow purposes during the peak use period of the day in Pressure Zone No. 1. These flows are system produced and not from booster pumping. The location of the two storage tanks dictates their points of connection to the main distribution system. These points of connection leave a substantial portion of the system dependent on primary flow from one tank or the other. This is particularly true for the high use commercial area located along Old Belfair Highway in the vicinity of SR-300. There is but a single point of connection from the North Tank at SR-3 and little distribution system looping. The same situation applies to the south for the connection of the South Tank at Razor Road and SR-106. Substandard pressures can be realized in the areas of the system north and south of these connecting points, respectively, from the tanks due to a lack of water getting by the fireflow extraction points. A higher fireflow rate produced by pumping could potentially produce negative pressures in those substandard areas. IThe District is critically short of storage for fireflow and subsequent continued system use in Pressure Zone No. 1. Fireflow durations of up to four(4) hours are required by the Mason County ES- 1 Fire Marshal's office. For example, a 4,250-gpm flow for a duration of four hours is required for the All Star Mini-Storage. This equates to 1,020,000 gallons of water. After a one-hour fireflow period at maximum system capacity, the North Tank is almost empty. A longer fireflow period would seriously jeopardize the Districts ability to provide service to its customers. Existing recovery capacity is low during peak hour flow periods. In 2002 the District activated one additional well, which operates at 600 gpm. This well is located up above the community center, and is for service to the new Pressure Zone No. 2. This well along with the new standpipe have not yet been connected to the District's existing Pressure Zone No. 1. District water quality is very good. Source water exceeds all Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) requirements. Completion of Lead and Copper Rule tests found that the Action Levels were not exceeded for water reaching District customers. No corrosion control treatment appears to be necessary. The Conservation Plan developed for the 1994 and follow on 2001 Water System Plans was implemented, and appears to be effective. The adoption of an increasing block rate structure appears to have had an effect on the average single-family usage, which has been declining since 1995. Recommendations A hydraulic analysis of the system revealed several deficiencies as listed above. Chapter VIII, Improvement Program, lists projects to alleviate some of the problems found. The following is a brief description of those projects. The general topography of the service area is not going to change. This will make it difficult for the District to provide for loops in the distribution in the future. New development along the Old Belfair Highway may provide some relief in that area by allowing loops in the system to be constructed along new street rights-of-way or easements. Meanwhile, the area north of North Shore Road (SR 300) and Old Belfair Highway could have substandard pressure from time to time. The present system recovery rate in Pressure zone No. 1 from a high flow period is limited to 425 gpm unless someone is available to manually activate the second well at the District's office. To alleviate this problem, the District activated a new Well No. 4 and new tank. However, a connection should be constructed between the new Pressure Zone No. 2 and the existing system in order to. alleviate future problems. This project should receive the highest priority from the District. ES- 2 � o000C� C� 00O •-- — — — -+ M �t �O [� O� O� O � M F � to In CO cd b ° mooCd0-4 tb o�Aya >, o 4 to t) 0 vAW "86WA� w 8 °�`� c, � .cis N N end r-� N en CA C.) V (3 Lei M M M r 00 0� o� '•-� ,-� •-, LIST OFTABLES LIST OF FIGS Figure 1.1 Sefir Water District No. I Organization Chart................................................... I Figure 1.2 SdfirVicrilty Map, General Area.....................................................................5 Figure tl Sew E Vicinity Map Local Area.........................................................................6 Flgure1.4 SdfE£an Uses.................. ///.......... 15 Figure 1.4A a&AE Urban Growth Area Zoning Map..................... .a........... 16 Figure 1.5 BdA@ Water District No. ISystem Map....m.. mm...... BakPokt . � \y��« !-u I. DESCRIPTION OF WATER SYSTEM 1.1 Water System Ownership and Management 1.1.1 Organization Belfair Water District No. 1 (System ID No. 053500) is a publicly owned and operated water system. The governing body for the District is the Board of Commissioners. The members of the Board of Commissioners are as follows: Louis LaDow, Chairman; John Phillips, Secretary; Irene Werdall, Treasurer. An Organization Chart for the District is presented in Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1 Belfair Water District No. 1 Organization Chart BOARD OF COAMMSIONERS Louis LaDow,Chairman John Phillips, Secretary Irene Werdall,Treasurer WO IL OUTSIDE CONTRACT SERVICES OPERATIONS David A. Tipton District Manager 1.1.2 System Operation and Control David A. Tipton, District Manager, is responsible for the day-to-day management, maintenance, operation, and quality control of the water system. His Washington State certification is Water Distribution Manager III, Certificate No. 9998. Don Cureton is a Water Utility Foreman with WDM II certification,No. 7197. Mr. Cureton is also a Cross Connection Control Specialist. I- 1 WATER FACILITIES INVENTORY (WFQ FORM Q-t-1 xw:q.st.rc�.�d uoaaiea 051MM06 vHealth �� °a0-mi Sd m mm RommOtt- RETURN TO: Smelt west Rogmal Ofice PO Box 47823 WA,9MU 1.1hs Pon $,!wFwu!!rAE 3.omwff 4_aaow . i rtw 063;"i0 0 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT 1 MASON A Carom 6 POMMOtY 00ff=WJM&rALMSPMFUI 7.ow1acwlrr<stk�xMaA00a�s $Owut wow -Q00406 '!GFUZY HUM SR MQAAGERl BELFAR WATER DISTRICT 1 BELFAR WATER DISTRICT 1 JERRY HLiKILL SR TntE OWNER CONTACT PO BOX 563 PO BOX 563 BELFAR,WA 9M BELFAR WA 98528 arlaffrAOatFaxlE O*fEMlf FiiO•AOfAE sTRMTA SiFOiFff3tG1fMMAQ0%E ATTN AnN A00aFSS NE 22451 HWY 3 Amw-ss NE 22451 HWY 3 am BELFAR sTATE WA ziP98528 My BELFAR STATE WA zr98528 >i ]1M041t > loM 40.awetacxtrAcrNPOarArwr 1pdm"c moodo.M..Pwonc (360)275-3008 omw o I l Phtems [360)275,M Pdomrce.Mdrobl"Pl6coc o.w.row wPYaoa P*m@q CmftdE.nlw bmw C360}830-M om oor r ,-Pra.0 (")83D-9008 Few: JR.. (3q 27543410 r MEN" K mx.,.M mSiD btr721 ❑ OwrdxWYamded ❑ Umm odOW O O..raor* ❑ ❑, Yy",�x"' ❑ Xd..l /8cwifees ❑yy �� owc" od m ❑yyL ..da Farr OT.�rFomWoes Mood SWMWFo Pat X LodOod (dardt fu st�ai.dc.k ❑1fiWormompoawwetkr2ormw dapper vm ❑Rm&AwM1RVPWk ❑n.oaim I]cw* ❑,Ywrlx...� �Soecalur�tiid ... ❑aw�ro.� ❑Feftw ❑ F*W ❑swu 1.354= s01�'id u>E ti } �.r��5 a ` �� Y. �l� •F' !j wig, t � f.. •.�f '}T. Wit. �.t. ,'.^'L %R t '� ✓ y{, WHLt1AHA951 X I I I IX Y X 386 150 SiIYSW 32 23N I 01W VYHLRAH4956 X X Y X 367 150 SWSYY 32 23A1 OIW WHLOAHAMMJ AMCBM X X Y X 147 300 NWNE 06 22N 01W VAELLU AMS X X Y X 566 600 NENW 25 23N O1W DOH 33V011 Mm,06A3} 8eahr OOH wswsyobm caw papa: 1 I - 2 l WATER FACILITIES INVENTORY (WFQ FORM -Continued 1,sattotrA +?_!! !!! € 4.6aottr s rnrt 063Fi0.0 BHFAR WAT6t WSlF21CT 1 MASON A corm nClttiESH� oattts£oK.n oottuat:onxt 4iMr.li,?Riiwrf�iww�iw�fw►�a h/(��r sw�/�+4 rxawel 1�7 fti GMBM .X eftYst3tiwYt/da MK'A 0 � � K:�TE� �Oaks&a m"�a Ymda dw�. 5 iridai/l!i b/rApWwK�awa.4 a4MM oawM@W M**Ml:dawww 1M� 56 mow M sartwwpi.aYAIm 0 .MQ /rQ1�OM� stagrdtFsierwtfa0fisl� A. 0 0 c--.06—MM Sdwl 001 Cm tdry s.ae a do X TOTAL SERamcammelma 531 8/4 2>t.tit}.k _ A.How mxWr uaelftwe WmdbVftsl*m MerM"6"verVON? 1200 *on MW AN 3L IrRF��iMLA *'�� A.Hm aar pwtiva 006"s.prasera sari aaarn f•,fi MMM&Ppsrmondawtupprawa7 �?lr r '. tii pCf. I�plt I16G A two mwwb liai�rs aredus hrrs�anpas. 3000 3000 300D 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 paiwft w odwaws taw across b M saw sysl.w wmw a_How auq dsys pw mor/�b annmdae b M 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Rb� U t� •=. Aa ffF�" A.gyoutwwa I I I orb bo.arsarB.e.a 825 B?fr 825 025 6?5 2 2 2 625 625 825 fi25 b yar wair stnl.oC tnw Aaq sf.drb d.tars Ada�bysa as prows w.rh mantb? IL How marV dop pof ma-A w#my prwrwa7 20 20 2D 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 27 2D t t ' ❑Update-amps ❑Updds-No Os P ❑ ❑W EIN.WOMP ❑ � ❑ 3ti_t csr*"the idormatloa st ftd m Us WR farm is cortad to the bat day btaos IDdek SIMAILW- DATE PFMT MIME TIn e OOH 331-011(Rev.O6P S@nbyDOH waMSY96-cow Pape: 2 I - 3 9.2 System Background 1.2.1 History The Community of Belfair is a small, unincorporated community located at the extreme head of Hood Canal. Belfair is in north Mason County, approximately 25 miles northeast of Shelton, the Mason County seat. Three state highways converge in the community, SR-300, SR-3, and SR- 106. Its location, approximately 10 miles southwest of Bremerton, lends itself well to being a bedroom community for those who work at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyards. Additionally, the proximity of Hood Canal means that it enjoys a fairly high tourist trade in the summer months. Figure No. 1.2 is a vicinity map showing the relationship of the Belfair Community with nearby cities and towns. Figure 1.3 is second vicinity map of Belfair,but showing the local area in more detail. The first figure is from USGS mapping software and the second was downloaded from Mason County's map on its web site. Belfair Water District No. 1 was formed as a result of an election held on February 24,1966. Prior to that time the Belfair area was served by at least four separate water companies. The four companies, Bearcat Water Company, Squire Supply, Belfair Water Company, and the North Belfair Community Water System each served small pockets of customers. The systems were not intertied. In addition, Mason County PUD. No. 3 had a flowing artesian well on its property serving only its own facilities. This well produced approximately 300 gpm. It had a shut-in pressure of 18 pounds per square inch(psi). Earliest notes on the private systems indicate that one or more were formed in the 1930's and 1940's. The four companies utilized surface water as their source of supply. Each of the headworks was in the hills lying above and generally to the east of the Belfair community area. During the period of 1963 - 1965, the Thurston-Mason Health District performed several inspections on the four community water supply systems. All four systems were found to be deficient from a water quality standpoint from time to time. Additionally, some were found deficient from a quantity standpoint, also. Several times during this period, the Health District Engineer recommended that the water systems be consolidated either by forming a public water district or'under the auspices of Mason County PUD No. 3. Consequently, on February 24, 1966 a successful election was held to form Belfair Water District No. 1. Since its formation in 1966, the District has consolidated the distribution systems, and now serves all of the general Belfair`community. The District serves about 520 customers in Belfair. There are still a number of small private and public water systems that serve the peripheral area of the Belfair Community Center. 1.2.2 Geography and Climate Belfair lies in the valley of the Union River. The recognized community center is located at the intersection of SR-3 and the Old Belfair Highway. The majority of the service area lies along SR-3 and along SR-106, which run along the southeasterly side of Hood Canal at the base of a ridgeline paralleling the Canal. A new service area was begun just northerly of where the railroad serving the US Navy base crosses SR-3. The new service area is designated as Pressure 1 -4 i j • i R �✓ j L�C1Cc. 1� IF •+ O it Go b Larson Lake i' U At �� -NE R OELFATANUYA RD IN a 44-- to A* � � 2 7 0 E ALTA DR MOOD CANAL �� O � Dovemaux Lake tUNQ DRCr d w 4 C SF LE. ,�' w is g o Figure 1.3 Belfair Vicinity Map Local Area I - 6 Zone No. 2, since it is served by a new 1.1 mg storage tack constructed in 2001. Service elevations in the lower, primary service area, range from approximately 30' to about 260'. The new pressure zone has a service elevation range of 200'to approximately 410'. The primary service area(Pressure Zone No. 1)of the District is concentrated primarily along State Highway 3. It extends north of the intersection of Old Belfair Highway and State Highway 3 to Newkirk Road. On the south it straddles State Highway 3 and SR-106 to Rose Point. The eastern boundary remains east of State Highway 3 to just north of the North Mason School District No. 403 campus. The area within the District's boundaries is about 1,900 acres, being approximately five miles long and averaging just over one-half mile in width. Figure No. 1.5 in the pocket at the back of this plan is a system map, which shows the borders of the District's Service Area. Because the District's system is located along the base of a ridge and along Hood Canal, it has been limited in how far it can expand in an east-west direction. This topography has also limited the District's ability to provide for system loops. A problem such as a broken main limits service until the leak is repaired. This situation also creates a problem with reduced pressure at the outlying areas during fire fighting periods. This is further discussed in Section III, System Analysis. The climate is of the Belfair area is predominately a mid-latitude, maritime type. Most air masses reaching Puget Sound, including Hood Canal, originate over the North Pacific Ocean. This maritime air has a moderating influence in both winter and summer. There is a well-defined dry season in the summer, and a rainy season in the winter. Because the area lies in a partial rain shadow from the Olympic Mountains, and because elevations are generally low, annual rainfall is relatively constant over the entire area,generally ranging from 45 to 60 inches per year. During the warmest summer months, typical afternoon temperatures in the Belfair area are in the 70's. Maximum temperatures reacts to 85 to 90 degrees on five to fifteen days per year, and temperatures occasionally reach into the high 90's. Dry easterly winds seldom persist longer than three to five Idays before cooler offshore air moves inland. Typical minimum temperatures in the summer are in the 50's. In the winter, afternoon temperatures range from the upper 30's to lower 40's, and minimums generally range from the mid 20's to mid 30's. Temperatures below freezing are recorded on 30 to 90 nights per year, depending on elevation, distance from water, and airflow patterns. Nighttime temperatures as low as 10 to 20 degrees are recorded on a few nights during most winters. Rainfall is generally<light in summer, increasing in fall, reaching a peak in winter, and then decreasing in spring. Rainfall amounts generally drop sharply around the first of July. During the wet season rainfall is usually of light to moderate intensity. Annual precipitation in the Belfair area generally ranges between 45 and 60 inches with extremes as low as 37 inches as in 1985 to 70 inches in 1983 According to official National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) records, the average precipitation for Wauna, eight or nine miles east southeast of Belfair, is 52.37 inches. The average is based on records from 1948 to 2006. In 1992, one of the driest years on record in the general Puget Sound area, Wauna had a total of 41.24 inches, while the previous year, 1991, was considered normal for the area at 50.83 inches. In 2005, the last full year for which records are I - 7 available, the precipitation totaled 51.14 inches, or about normal. NOAA records indicate that the area receives a bit more precipitation than the Puget Sound Basin proper, with Sea-Tac Airport averaging around 38 inches per year. The prevailing winds are from the south or southwest in winter and west or northwest in summer. The strongest winds are from the south or southwest and usually occur as the more intense Pacific winter storms move inland. Extreme winds at 30 feet above the ground can be expected to exceed 55 mph once in two years, 80 mph once in 50 years, and 90 mph once in 100 years. Occasionally in winter, the combined influence of low-pressure systems off the coast and high-pressure continental air masses spilling over the Rocky and Cascade Mountains can result in cold northerly or easterly winds over the area. In summer, winds are light and on most afternoons a northerly breeze develops over the water and lowlands. The lowlands near the southern Puget Sound, including Hood Canal, have the longest growing season in the area, 190 to 200 days. The shortest growing seasons, 145 to 175 days, are in the foothills and in valleys separated from the water bridges. Within short distances, the growing season may vary by three weeks or more. In Belfair, near the water, the average date of the first freeze in the fall is the end of October. The average date of the last freeze in spring is in mid-April. 1.2.3 Neighboring/Adjacent Purveyors There are 11 water purveyors listed by DOH in the vicinity of Belfair. They range in size from two or three connections up to 320 connections for the Beards Cove Water system located approximately one mile west of the community center of Belfair. The general location for each nearby purveyor is presented on the System Map,Figure 1.5, in the pocket at the back of this plan. 1.2.4 Ordinances/Bylaws Belfair Water District No. = 1 has adopted several Conditions-of-Service Policy statements. Included are responsibility for providing'water, fees for beginning and terminating water service, procedures for customer,notification, water shortage policies, and backflow prevention. These statements are contained in the Belfair Water District Rules and Regulations (BWD-RR). The District is;responsible for providing potable waxer and fire flow to all property owners within the District service area boundaries where water mains exist. Where reasonable from a physical and financial standpoint, the property owner must connect to existing facilities. Ownership of the system extension is transferred to the District after one year (BWD-RR4). If not, the property owner may construct -his/her own water system and deed the system to the District for operation and maintenance. This'latter condition has not occurred since the District was originally formed. A system of fees and charges for connecting to the system has been set. Presently, connection charges for a new customer range from$1,200 for a 3/4-inch meter for a single family dwelling to $2,000 for a 2-inch meter for a commercial service. Larger service sizes are determined on a case- by-case basis. Because the District straddles state highways along its entire length, an additional charge is made, as needed, for construction of highway crossings which must meet minimum DOT standards. Additionally, a System Development Fee schedule was established to fund future projects that improved the District's ability to serve future connections. This fee ranges from $2500 for a residential customer to $13,325 for a large commercial customer requiring a 2-inch I - 8 service. Policy statements BWD-RR4 through BWD-RR-11 delineate the methodologies and costs associated with connecting to District facilities. 1.3 Inventory of Existing Facilities 1.3.1 Source/Supply The District has two wells in regular service to provide water to its customers in Pressure Zone No. 1 and another well located above the community to the NNE is used for serving Pressure Zone No. 2. A fourth well, located behind the District office, is operable, but is only used in emergencies. With the formation of the District in 1966, a new source of potable water had to be found. The existing artesian well at the Mason County PUD No. 3 site was converted to community use, and another well was drilled on the site. Well No. 1, a flowing artesian well, provides water to a booster pump station situated at the top of the wellhead. There are two 25-horsepower Allis-Chalmers, 3,500-rpm booster pumps. Each pump is rated at 155 gallons per minute(gpm) at 255`total dynamic head (TDH).'Each pump will provide approximately 150 gpm to the distribution system and storage. Presently, only one booster pump operates at a time. The pumps are rotated so that each pump is rested for one operating period. Well No. 2, the second well at the site, and formerly intertied with Well No. 1 and providing water to the booster pumps, was converted to provide a separate source to the system. However, it was found after installing the new pump that it"makes sand" for the first 12-15 minutes of operation. It then clears up and is fine until it is shut down and restarted again. The District tried reducing the flow so as not to produce the sand,,but this was not completely successful. This well will produce approximately 150 gpm, but has been placed in a standby status, and only used in an emergency situation. When needed, the well is operated manually by first pumping to a bypass line, which discharges to the ground, until the water clears. The gate valve is then opened to redirect the water to the distribution system r 3.kk kM_ Both wells are located on the west i f SR-3 approximately 150'from the pavement. There are buildings within the 100'radius circle"' the wells. One is the District's office and the other is the shop building used by the District. The drainfield that serves the buildings is located approximately 300' west of the wells. Because the source of water is artesian and located below very tight, confining soils of a depth of over 380', the wells are not in jeopardy of being contaminated by surface activities. Additionally, the groundwater recharge source of the water taken from the wells is a considerable distance away from the actual wellheads. The District activated a third well on Hummingbird Lane in 1997. This well is also artesian, but not a flowing artesian. The well has the capacity of producing up to approximately 275 gpm, depending on the prevailing system hydraulics. It is used as the first back up to Well No. 1 during most of the year. This well is the predominate well during the peak use, summer season. The fourth well is a 600 gpm well drilled by a large developer and purchased by the District. Once the water rights were obtained, the District constructed a new well house and installed a new 125 1 -9 hp line shaft turbine well pump. The new well was connected to the computerized monitoring system used for the other wells and tanks. 1.3.2 Treatment In 2005 the District completed installation of new dry tablet hypochlorite disinfection facilities to serve Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3. This installation is further discussed in Chapter 3 under Water Quality Analysis. When pumps and other equipment for Well No. 4 were installed, it included a new hypochlorite generation facility. 1.3.3 Storage The District has storage tanks at two locations to serve its customers in Pressure Zone No. 1. Each location contains two tanks. Each tank is a cast-in-place concrete tank, 26' in diameter, approximately 17' high. Usable storage height in each tank is 16' for a storage capacity of approximately 63,500 gallons. Total system storage in Pressure Zone No. I is 254,622 gallons. The north tanks are located almost due east of the intersection of SR-3 and the Old Belfair Highway. The south tanks are located on Razor Road at the south end'"of the system, approximately one half mile easterly of SR-106. All tanks in both fields are at ground level at an elevation of approximately 255.5'. The overflow elevation on each tank is elevation 272'. The tanks provide "floating" storage for the system. The HGL is maintained in the system by the tanks as water is pumped into them by the well pumps and is withdrawn, as system demand requires. In 2004 the District constructed a new, 1.1 mg storage tank in conjunction with the installation of the new equipment for Well No. 4. The tank is a 40' diameter steel tank approximately 125' tall. The overflow elevation is 478.5 feet. The tank provides gravity service to Pressure Zone No. 2. 1.3.4 Distribution System The distribution system is relatively new in terms of the time it's been in the ground. All of the present system was constructed subsequent to the District's formation in 1966. The predominant material used to construct the,original system was asbestos-cement(AC). In the 1980's the District switched to Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) pipe, along with most other water systems, with the concerns raised about asbestos. In 1996 the District adopted a policy of only using ductile iron pipe. Pipe sizes in the system range from four to eight inches, with some two-inch lines serving very dead-end services. ,The primary distribution lines along State Highway 3 SR - 106 Old small, dea p mary g gh y , Belfair Highway, and Razor Road are eight inches in diameter. Smaller diameters are used for some of the branch lines. Because of the layout of the community and the topography of the area, for all intents and purposes the system is not looped. A small portion of the system lies above the storage tanks on Razor Road. Because of this location, a small booster pump station drawing its supply directly from the Razor Road tanks serves the customers. The system is pressurized via two small, variable speed pumps, which maintain a system pressure ranging from a high of about 52 psi to a low of 35 psi. This system is adequate for now, because it only serves 16 customers. An additional six lots will likely be I- 10 developed in the near future. Fireflow for this service area is not available. All platted lots have now been sold and have been built on, or are being built on. No new connections will be allowed on this system unless the pump station is totally upgraded with a sustained system pressure of about 50 psi and fireflow capability has been included. Another area that lies above the gravity portion of Pressure Zone No. 1 is a development known as Romance Hill. It has approximately 30-40 residential units, combining single family and condominiums, located in it. The homes are served by a large pump station providing both domestic and fire flow. The operating hydraulic head of this part of the system is 470' to match the HGL that will later be delivered by gravity from Pressure Zone No. 2. 1.3.5 Service Connections As of December 31, 2005 the District had a total of 516 active accounts (services). With the activation of the Hummingbird Well in 1997, a total of 844 services were approved for the District by DOH as evidenced in the WFI. No new connections have been approved for the system, since the new storage tank is not yet connected to Pressure Zone No. 1. 1.3.6 Existing Interties Belfair Water District No. 1 has no interties with any other water system. 1.4 Related Plans 1.4.1 Growth Management Belfair Water District No. 1's service area is located in unincorporated Mason County. This requires the District to depend on the County for the major planning effort insofar as land use and other growth issues are concerned. ; 1.4.2 Existing Plans and Studies There are several plans, studies, and policies of Mason County that apply to the District. First and foremost of these is the Mason County Comprehensive Plan, 2005 Edition. Particularly relevant to this water system plan are the elements of that plan addressing specific Belfair Community issues. These include the Belfair Urban Growth Area Plan 2004, the Belfair Market Analysis, and Belfair Additional Environmental Features. Other County-plans and policies that may have a bearing on the District's planning effort include 'Mason County Parks&Recreation Comprehensive Plan(Nov 2006);" "Belfair Area Stormwater Management Plans and Addenda (scheduled for adoption Oct. 2007);" 'Mason County Resource Ordinance (Dec. 2006)," and `Belfair/Lower Hood Canal Water Reclamation Facility Plan (including the 2007 Supplement.)" Other ordinances that may affect land use patterns include: 1) Environmental Policy Ordinance (SEPA), 2) Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance, 3) Parking Standards Ordinance, 4) Mobile Home and Recreational Vehicle Parks Ordinance, 5) Uniform Building Code, 6)Health Code, 7)Plats and Subdivision Ordinance, 8)Mason County Interim Fire Flow Standards, and 9)Mason County Shoreline Master Program. The Mason County Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan(Nov. 2006) sets goals, policies and action programs, including capital improvement plans for Mason County's parks, recreation, trails, and open space program. It should have little, if any, impact on the District. I- 11 The North Mason Sub-area Plan, a water quality protection plan, was adopted as part of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan. Since all of the District's wells are artesian, their recharge area is most likely a considerable distance uphill from the District's service area. The topography south and east of the community, the most likely recharge area, begins as a steep grade from Hood Canal and rises to an approximate elevation of 300'. The slope then flattens out but continues to gradually rise to a ridge line elevation ranging from 340' to 380'. This upper area could conceivably be developed in the years to come. The most important aspect of the Mason County Resource Cade relative to the District may be Section 17.01.080, Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas. This section of the codes states in part, "Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas are those areas which are determined to have an important recharging effect on aquifers used as a source for potable water and vulnerable to contamination from recharge." Subsection 17.01.080 A classifies aquifers from "Low Susceptibility" to "Extremely Susceptible." Several springs and intermittent streams surface from the hillside to the east and south of Belfair. Additionally there appear to be many wetland pockets just east of the railroad tracks east of Belfair. Devereaux Lake is located due east of the southern end of the service area, and has a surface elevation of approximately 220'. ,All of these areas likely contribute to the recharge of the aquifer used by Belfair Water District No. 1. The ordinance identifies several land uses, which require Conditional Use Permits to develop within an identified Critical Aquifer Recharge Area. Additionally, it sets development standards for all development within Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas. These include, but are not limited to, the Mason County Hazardous Waste Treatment and Storage Facilities Siting Ordinance, the State of Washington dangerous and Hazardous Waste Regulations (including RCW 70.105 and WAC 173-303), SEPA, and Mason County Health Codes. The primary impact the',BelfairlEower Hood Canal Water Reclamation Facility Plan(including the 2007 Supplement.) will have on District activities is its potential implementation in the 2009-10 time frame. When new sewers go in, the District will likely be faced with an increased level of development. Insofar as can be determined, no other water system in the immediate Belfair Community area has a water system plan. :Other water systems were contacted during the preparation of this plan, and no other system plans were found. The Twanoh Falls Beach Club water system, approximately six miles away and not contiguous, has a Small Water System Management Program, approved in 2005. The Twanoh Falls Beach Club Water System serves a development of 397 lots. Some are for permanent residents, some are seasonal, and some are undeveloped. Twanoh Falls Beach Club has no plans to expand, thus was given approval for the Small Water System Management Program. Development of this plan shows that it is compatible with existing land uses. No large single water user is planning on locating in Belfair that could compromise the District's facilities. This plan I - 12 presents a capital improvement program that will allow the District to serve expected future development. Mason County has no specific Water Resource Plan for the Belfair area at this time. Mason County has no Regional Coordinated Water System Plan in place. The County has only assigned only a part time individual to handle water system issues. In December 2000 Gray & Osborne, Inc., consulting engineers, completed the Draft Belfair / Lower Hood Canal Water Reclamation Facility Plan for Mason County. This facility plan lays out alternatives for providing future sewer service to the Belfair UGA. One of the assumed provisos of the water reclamation plan is that water service to the area will be available. Implementation of the water reclamation plan will be vital to the District insofar as being able to plan for the future growth in the Belfair area. It is estimated that the implementation of the water reclamation plan will likely take the entire six-year planning period of this Water System Plan. Robinson & Noble, Tacoma, WA developed a separate wellhead protection program concurrently with Water System Plan Update, currently in effect. Portions of it are included here as Chapter V, as well as being submitted as a separate document to DOH for approval. Belfair Water District No. 1 had a water system plan prepared and approved in 1994 with an update completed and approved in 2002. This plan will update that plan. The latest updated plan provided for system development to the year 2007 Some of the projects identified have been constructed, but many of the deficiencies identified have not. For example, the new well and standpipe were completed, but the interzone connection was not. This plan reviews all unfinished needs and includes them for future planning if they remain relevant. R. 1.5 Land Use and Zoning Mason County has one incorporated city, Shelton, and three Urban Growth Areas Shelton, Allyn and Belfair).. Belfair is the larger by area of the two unincorporated UGA's. For a community its size,it has:`a substantial amount of land devoted to land uses other than residential. Belfair lies at the confluence of three state highways; SR-3, SR-106, and SR-300. SR-3 is the main highway between SR 16 at Gorst and SR 101 at Shelton. As such, it is a main arterial route for those people living in Mason County and working at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in Bremerton. SR-106 is the highway that ties the loop around the south end of Hood Canal together. It goes from Belfair to'SR-101 just south of Potlatch. SR-300, also called the North Shore Road, leads from Belfair around the north and east sides of Hood Canal. This highway leads to the popular Belfair State Park The existence of these three highways logically leads to commercial as well as residential development. Residential development is a result of the employment opportunities within relatively close commuting distance (i.e., Bremerton and Shelton). However, some residents of the area commute to the larger cities of Seattle, Tacoma, and Olympia. Commercial development supports the permanent population as well as the transient tourist population on a seasonal basis. It is the last I - 13 large commercial center along the route of Hood Canal. There are others in Union and Hoodsport, but Belfair is larger, and tourists often see a benefit in a large commercial center. This is evidenced by the heavy, bumper-to-bumper traffic into and through Belfair in the summer tourist season. Many tourists stock up on provisions in Belfair before continuing on their trips. Additionally, many seasonal homes are located in the general area. The commercial activities of Belfair also support their needs during the summer. The commercial land uses in Belfair are varied. They are not all tourist oriented such as food stores and restaurants. Other commercial activities include a variety of small shops, realty agents, insurance agents, lawyers, auto dealers, auto repair shops, taverns, liquor store, and many, many others. In other words, Belfair is a well rounded community. Figure 1.4 shows the various land uses in the Belfair area. It is a downloaded copy of the Land Use Map from Mason County's web site. Commercial development is limited in location to strips along the three major;highways noted earlier. The heaviest development is at the point where the highways come together. The two largest commercial businesses both supermarkets are located here. However, commercial land uses line both sides of and are intermixed with residential uses SR-3 down to just south of the intersection of SR 106. North and south of these locations the land uses are generally residential. It is expected that commercial development will be confined within the existing bounds for the most part. 1.6 Future Service Area The potential future service area is depicted on Figure 1.5, Belfair Water District System Map in the pocket at the back of this document. The boundaries of the future area are in conjunction with discussions with other°public water*stems. It is understood that some of the smaller systems around Belfair Water District No. 14re having problems from time to time. Additionally, future regulations will place a heavy burden on some, or all, of them. A larger, consolidated district would better ,provide the resources to'handle"'quantity and quality problems, and meet the challenges=of the future. .Within the twenty-year planning period of this plan, the District should attempt-to consolidate with other water systems to provide a higher level of service to all water users in the.area. Future land use and zoning of the UGA have designated at this writing. Figure 1.4 A is a map of the Belfair Urban Growth Area Zoning. I- 14 Figure 1.4 BELFAIR AREA LAND USES Place Nanes f f c County Boundary(DNR) City of Shelton l / � J m x Roads et 4 .1 Highways Twin Lakes �� f W. Lakes ! NE TWIN LAKESRD NE GOAT RAN :Re!lPond 417, Rivers 8 5treams � ., CH RD _ l Puget Sound Lake Bein Eisen ti Development Areas QL � Lake bWotenMY ILI w = �� cn 2w ?� CAr '} m �Q Larson Lake LTCF � CNF �� '� oQ U r oNa w z o RAC „1 NE BEt-FAIR TANUYA R� ++� RC2 Collins Lake'' _ ,1 i` ��,�,Q RI Jy / p� �Q ( -� BELFAIR RNR RRIG JAP D P 2 \ F RR20 l Ras 'ram` QO E ALTA,DR RTCUGA Deverea ux L a ke Z CANAL ► �o Q E STERLING DR y °� W � r <l �� ALLYN11 ca ElroiEr Ric k�ke f p Lu W I - 15 Figure 1.4 A BELFAIR URBAN GROWTH AREA ZONING MAP Belfair Urban Growth Area Zoning Map Reviud December 6.2004 IJL42M it:-�. .... .!}.: L.agend Business-Industrial(B-1) P.-3 Fesiivat Retail(FR) - i—i General Commerctal(GC) Gen Canw al/Busirless-Indust(GC-BI) C=j Long Term AgiaAmW(LTA) MMlxod-Use 04U) Mini Famiy ResidenLal(R-10) j#1 Crl Single FwAy Residental(R-3) z Ra (_]Medium Dertsdy Residential(R-5) =Road Right of Way ... :' . Cerder ine 0 Proposed Beftr Bypass t i ")Belfair UGA Boundary PIS S7 '�� GC t Section c;0mer N lTn ! a s f! R-10 i■ iw � rr J jr -....... •r taW R.3 R-5 ». i `�'' �eer>ttaaletxnaltr.> + U r U..... z 0. # R.3 R-5 t r 11.6.S,b M,.Lewd— w TorsW 19 N,fYwera 1 W. On r ■ r �r1 w w R-3 mnrra�rutri=Yi�rrrrr>.e�rrannrrnri law C*M*PAft eert■we I - 16 1.7 Service Area Agreements The District does not presently have any service area agreements with any of the nearby water systems. There are no other public water systems in the vicinity of Belfair that have the capability to expand as the District does, with the possible exception of the Beards Cove Water System. 1.8 Service Area Policies Belfair Water District No. 1 does not wholesale water to any other purveyor. Neither does it wheel water through district facilities. The District has only enough source supply to meet its own needs, and no other purveyor exists in the area with a need to utilize District facilities to supply another. The Municipal Water Law requires that the District document how the system responds to requests for new water service. The following is the policy of the Belfair Water District No. 1: When a request for service is received, the District ,requires that certain information be submitted. This includes the number of services, type of service (residential, commercial, etc.), location, etc. The District will issue a Water Availability;Letter for the number of services requested. If a new water main is required, the letter is goof for 30 days. The developer is then required to submit a generalized engineering plan showing how the development is to be served. If no plan is submitted within the time frame, the availability letter is voided. Upon receiving the engineering plan, the District extends the letter to one full year. Within that time frame, the developer must submit and gain approval for a water system extension design produced by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Washington. The District maintains a record of connections and ERU's, both connected and assigned. Each new request is reviewed against this list to insure that the District does not exceed it approved 844 count. If a developer requests service for an area outside the District's boundaries, the area must be annexed to the District prior to construction of the system. The new development cannot be annexed unless it directly abuts, and is contiguous with, existing District boundaries. For this six-year planning period the District has adequate water rights to serve the DOH approved connections:. Chapter H discusses usage and demonstrates that water usage ADD has dropped by over 13% in the last six years. The District has 225 AF/Yr available for Pressure Zone No. 1. The last year of record in this document, 2005, showed a use of slightly more than 129 AF. That total also includes some in Pressure Zone No. 2, which has a permitted right of 600 AF/Yr. The District's General Manager is the responsible party for extending or voiding a Water Availability Letter. While the issue of availability is not "cut and dried" the manager has the leeway to consider extenuating circumstances. Many things are assessed when making a decision. These include progress on plans, annexation, possible bureaucratic delays in the I- 17 permitting process, as well as communication with the District. If a Letter of Availability is voided by the manager, the developer has the recourse of appealing to the Board of Commissioners. The.Board's decision is final. The District has no formal annexation policy relative to the provision of water service. Should an area contiguous with District boundaries request service, annexation into the District will be required. The Mason County Council must approve all annexations to the District. Insofar as developers being required to connect to the District's system, that only occurs when the development is within District boundaries. For developments outside district boundaries, Mason County has the lead, and could require connection to the District's system. The District would then, in turn, require annexation. Developers who install new water distribution facilities must construct them to District Specifications. This includes both the physical specifications discussed in Chapter VII and the operational and health standards set by DOH and county agencies. Fireflow standards are set by the Mason County Fire Marshal. In all cases of developer extensions, the developer is responsible for installation cost of the new facilities. However, the District's by-laws provide for Late-Comer's Agreements whereby developers who extend the system can recover some of their costs via charges collected by the District to new connections to the extension. The District has adopted a formal policy for Late- Comer Agreements. The District's by-laws allow for a surcharge on customers who are outside the District's boundaries, but connected to its:facilities. Presently, there are no services outside District boundaries connected to the system The only surcharges presently in effect are for those customers who have a service line on which the meter is more than 309 from the District's main. Such customers are charged$2.00 per month additional on the fixed portion of their rate. Utility Local Improvement Districts are formed through the offices of Mason County. While the District would cooperate with the County for the provision of water service, the formation and administration of a ULID is the responsibility of the County. Formation of a ULID for service outside existing District Service Area boundaries also requires annexation to the District. The Belfair area is one,of three (3) urban growth areas (UGA) identified by Mason County. This was done in the early-1990's. As a result, the District in a previous Water System Plan identified several projects to provide water to the newly designated UGA. To that end, a $1,100,000 loan was obtained from the Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) to construct a new 1.1 million gallon storage standpipe and a new booster pump station to move the water up from the existing system to the new service area. Additionally, a $182,000 grant was obtained from Mason County for a new well at the higher elevation. This grant precluded the need for a booster pump station, since the new well was a short distance from the new tank site. The new well and standpipe were completed in 2004. I - 18 The District has adopted a formal Cross-Connection Control Policy, which is contained in Chapter X, Miscellaneous Documents. The policy was previously approved by DOH as part of the 1994 Water system Plan. 1.9 Satellite Management The District has discussed the possibility of providing satellite management services with other, smaller water systems and developers wishing to develop in areas outside District boundaries. Formal satellite management services are not now provided, and the District has not applied for formal Satellite Management Agency status. However, the District is willing to discuss either annexation or satellite management with other systems. While the District is willing to discuss satellite management with nearby water systems, it has not adopted a formal policy for such management. It should pattern its satellite management services in a similar manner as that of Mason County PUD No. 1. Adoption of such a policy should receive a high priority. This will demonstrate the District's desire and willingness to provide the Belfair Community with good, solid water service. During the development of the Water System Plan approved in 1994, a meeting was held with several water systems in the Belfair area. Some of the systems were in the immediate vicinity of the District and others were as far away as six or seven miles. Representatives from the DOH were present and discussed the future impacts of regulations and costs. DOH also expressed the department's desire to try to consolidate smaller companies for the benefit of all concerned. Other issues discussed included the ability of individual systems to provide the proper fireflow. While no specific commitments were made regarding developing a relationship with the District, interest was raised. It is anticipated that contacts will be ongoing between the District and other water systems. Some of the smaller systems may join`with the.District to the mutual benefit of both This will take time and negotiation. Each consolidation effort will have to be tailored to the specific circumstances of the particular relationship. The preferable way for the District to operate a satellite system would be to take over complete ownership. This would clear the way for the District to eventually intertie its own system with that of the satellite. Barring immediate ownership, the District will want an agreement to the effect that at such time as the systems are intertied,the District will receive ownership of the satellite system. In order for the District to be successful in managing other water systems as satellites, additional staffing will be required. This is particularly true for those water systems that may not be contiguous to the District's existing system. With one additional staff member, the District could accommodate several other small water systems and provide better service than they probably now receive. 1.9 Conditions of Service A developer may apply for water service with the District if his/her development lies outside the District Service Area. However, District approval is conditional on the developer submitting a formal application for annexation prior to proceeding with construction. I - 19 1.10 Complaints When a complaint is received, the type of complaint characterizes the response by the District. For example, for dirty water District staff will go to the location of the complaint and verify the situation. The mains will be flushed in the immediate area to clean them of accumulated sediment, etc. If the complaint is "no water," personnel will try to determine the source of the problem. Many times the problem is in the service line, and can be readily remedied. If the customer has a leak on the house side of the meter, the meter stop is shut off until the customer can repair the problem. These are just a few examples of the types of emergencies that occur from time to time. Complaints are logged in and, a record of the specifics of the complaint is kept. This includes the name, date, location, and subject of the complaint, along with the response and remedy found by the District. re, e I-20 1.11 Comments from Agencies and Adjacent Purveyors Comments received from other agencies will be included in the section. See Section 1.12 for responses to each of the sets of comments. 1.11.1 Mason County Statement of Consistency I-21 Attachment 5: Water System Plan and Small Water System Management Program Consistency Statement Checklist This checklist is intended to ensure consistency of water system planning documents with adopted local comprehensive plans and development regulations_ Each local planning jurisdiction in which the water utility provides service will review the relevant water system planning information and provide a signed consistency statement to the utility for submittal to the Department of Health. If the local planning agency will not respond,the highest authority within the utility(chair of governing body,executive director of private companies, etc.)must sign to verify consistency of the plan information. Water System Name: Belfair Water District No. 1 PWS ID: 053500 Planning Document Title: 2007 Water System Plan Update Plan Date: June 11, 2007 Local Planning Jurisdiction: Mason County I Cams' Statement tpt—i g IStilGy P Yes— —N (W=nce Municipal Water Lair Section 5 and 8, Dock illa"It Ap amend to cbapter 90.03.396 and c 43.20 RC"W) { �' � The retail service area,and any other areas not served by a separate public water 1 system,and land use identified in the WSP is consistent with the adopted Chap_I NO comprehensive plan and adopted development regulations and policies. i For WSPs only: The growth projection used to forecast water demand for the mail service area is consistent with the adopted city/c ourity's population growth projections(and c=rrx rial development projection if applicable). If a different Chap.II l� $ growth projection was used,the alternative growth projection aW methodology proposed is acceptable based on explanation given. For WSPs only: New potential large water users(that may have a significant impact on the water system)that the city/county is aware of have been identified None Known rj in the WSP. For city-owned systems only: All policies regarding water service outside the corporate boundaries arc included in this WSP. These policies are consistent NA with the adopted comprehensive plan and development regulations When:the local planning agency is unable to sign a Consistency Statement: Provide documentation of efforts to comduia tc with local agencies III with a 60-day timeline for local agency to respond lucre:name of oomact, date,type of effort attempted,and response from local agate y. I certify that the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge and that these statements support the conclusion that the subject-planning document is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans,development regulations,and other policies. Signature D fobev f 0. f'_tik 9411nrkr /144i4gCey-' /YaSati �u�r>tcs Printed Name,Title,&Jurisdi on —T T "For any issues of inconsistency,please provide comments on how they can be resolved. "* Attachment 5 1 March 2004 Revision I -22 I� 1.12 Responses to Comments Reponses to agency comments are included as separate sub-sections on the following pages. I-23 1.12.1 Reponse to Mason County Statement of Consistency Chapter I of this WSP was originally written in July - August 2006. At that time, none of the later documents from Mason County existed. Those documents were obtained after the Statement of Consistency was issued. The Related Plans text of Chapter I has been modified to recognize and these plans and regulations and their relativity to this Water System Plan III < Y h` ill I III 1 I I-24 I . CHAPTER H TABLE OF CONTENTS II. Basic Planning Data and Water Demand Forecasting...........................................................................1 2.1 Current Population, Service Connections,Water Use,and Equivalent Residential Units............1 2.1.1 Population........................................................................................................................1 2.1.2 Service Connections..................................:......................................................................1 2.1.3 Water Use and Equivalent Residential Units.....................................................................2 2.2 Projected Land Use,Future Population,and Water Demand.....................................................3 2.2.1 Projected Land Use........................................................... .............................................3 2.2.2 Projected Population......................................................... ..............---........................---..4 2.2.3 Projected Non-Residential Water Needs................... ....... .............................................5 2.2.4 Projected Non-Revenue Water...................... .... .... ..............................6 2.2.4.1 Accounted for Non-Revenue Water........... ..... ..... ..............................6 2.2.4.2 Unaccounted for Non-Revenue Water..... ...............................- ..................................7 2.2.5 Water Rates and Rate Impacts on Water Demand.... . .................. ........ .....................7 2.2.6 Water Demand Forecasting.......................... ..............10 L LIST OF TABLES s Table 2.1 Mason County Population 1940—2000. Table 2.2 Belfair Area Population 1980, 1990& 2000.........................................................I Table 2.3 Belfair Water District No. 1 ERU Evaluation.......................................................3 Table 2.4 Belfair Area&UGA Population Projections........................................................5 Table 2.5 Belfair Water District Accounted for-Non-Revenue Water...................................6 Table 2.6 BWD No. 1 Conservation Program Water Use Data Collection Requirements... 10 Table 2.7 Belfair Water District No. 1 Future Demand Forecast........................................ I I LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 2001-2005 Monthly Average of SFR Usage....................................................................8 Figure 2.2 19954005 Monthly Average of SFR Usage....................................................................9 II-i 11. Basic Planning Data and Water Demand Forecasting 2.1 Current Population, Service Connections, Water Use, and Equivalent Residential Units 2.1.1 Population Mason County's Comprehensive Plan, which includes the Belfair Urban Growth Area Plan by reference, gives the population of Mason County, and the sub-area of Belfair. The sub-area covers a much larger area than is served by Belfair Water District No. 1. The total population of Mason County at the 2000 census was 49,405, a 28.86%increase over the 1990 census. Table 2.1 lists the decennial population of Mason County from 1940 to the present. Table 2.1 Mason County Population 1940-2000 Year Population 1940 1,1,603 1950 15,022 1960 16,251 1970 20,918 1980 31,184 1990 38,341 2000 49,405 As is shown,the County experienced a steady growth, except during the decade of the 50's. While specific population figures are not available for Belfair for the early years, indications are that the Belfair area grew at a somewhat fasts pace than the County as a whole. Population figures for the Belfair area are only available for the 1980, 1990, and 2000 census years, and are presented in Table 2.2, Table 2.2 Belfair Area Population 1980, 1990&2000 Year Population 1980 3,742 1990 4,939 2000 7,316* *Belyair UGA Market Study,page 9 2.1.2 Service Connections At the end of 2005 the District had a total of 516 connections. Of these, 395 served single family residences (SFR), five served multiple family residences (MFR), and 116 served II- 1 I commercial./industrial (CON" accounts. The total number of residences served was 455 with the five MFR connections serving 60 apartment units. 2.1.3 Water Use and Equivalent Residential Units Water sales and pumping records for the years 2001 through 2005 were examined. Each of the use components was evaluated to arrive at an initial equivalent residential unit (ERU ) of usage based on metered sales. Belfair has a relatively high commercial use factor, from 41.4% to 49.8% of total sales in a given year. Table 2.3 presents the findings of the metered usage evaluation, as well as the evaluation for determining the ERU's for Belfair Water District No. 1. For the previous planning period,the average daily usage for an SFR ranged from a low of 150 gpd in 1999 to a high of 179 gpd in 1997. With the exception of the high use average of 179 gpd in 1997, the average usage went down every year. The drop in the average daily use from 1995 and further continued through the last five years is attributed to the District's adoption of its increasing block rate structure. The rate structure was first implemented in late 1995. Usage would indicate that residents got used to the higher rate. However, when the rates were again increased in early 1998, the effect on usage was dramatic. The average usage rate went to 162 gpd in 1998 to 150 gpd in 1999. There was a slight increase to 151 gpd in 2001, but another rate increase in early 2001 immediately dropped the annual average to 142 gpd in 2001. The usage rates have been in the low to mid-130's ever since, and was 130 gpd in 2005. The new rates particularly affected the commercial sector of use for the 2001 Water System Plan Update, but new and larger commercial/industrial customers have recently connected to the system. The overall CA usage has increased substantially in the last three years. The table shows the number of Single Family Residences along with their usage. The other types of connections, Multiple Family and Commercial/Industrial evaluations are based on the SFR metered usage. In order to evaluate the Equivalent Residential Units (ERU) for Belfair Water District No. 1, the water use data was entered into a spreadsheet and the ERU's were calculated on three separate bases. First,just the actual metered values were used. :Then the average annual rainfall was used to calculate an Average Daily Demand(ADD)based on climate. For this calculation,the rainfall record for Wauna was used. It is closest official National Weather Service to Belfair. The average annual rainfall for Wauna is 52.37 inches. Finally, 246 290-221 WAC was consulted to compare the above calculated values with that specified by Washington State Regulations. Table 2.3 below shows the water usage in the customer categories and the resultant calculations of the ERU's under each scenario. As is shown, the metered value for the ADD is quite low, as are the calculated values for the MDD, and PHD. WAC 246-290421 allows for a lower MDD than 350 gpd if there are good records for at least two years. The minimum required time frame is exceeded as shown. However, discussions with DOH staff indicate that the water system must be tight with minimum unaccounted for water. Non-revenue water is discussed later in Section 2.2.4.1. Because of the potential growth in the residential sector in the latter part of this planning period, the District has opted to use the State mandated minimum MDD of 350 gpd per ERU. It is expected that residential growth will increase at a substantially higher rate after sewers are installed. New homes mean new landscaping,which will translate to a higher average SFR metered usage. The MDD of 350 gpd will be used in the computer hydraulic analysis conducted and discussed in Chapter 3,System Analysis. II-2 Table 2.3 Belfair Water District No. 1 Water Sales in Cubic Feet,2001-2005 And ERU Evaluation Ca 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 No. Sales No. Sales P387 Sales No. Sales No. Sales SFR nits 378 2,393,645 378 2,457,957 2,548,061 389 2,482,940 395 2,511,253 MFR(Units) 60 219,286 60 212,433 237,031 60 273,445 60 316,610 Comm./ind/Gov.Corm's 108 1,844,222 110 2,249,550 2,706,525 115 2,568,716 116 2,800994 TOTAL 546 4 7153 548 4 19,940 5,491,617 564 5,325,001 571 5,628,857 SFR A Use 142 133 131 130 MPR Avy,Use ) 82 72 81 93 108 Conn.Avg.Use 382 418 546 5l) 541 ERU Values(Metered) ADD(Metered) 142 133 135 131 130 MDD 294 266 260 262 261 PHD )(1v—ed) 217 205 210 207 209 No.ERTTs(Metered) SIR 378 378 387 389 395 MFR 35 33 36 43 50 Comm/Ind/Gov 291 346 449 440 481 TOTAL 704 757 872 872 926 ERU Values Ca ADD(Calculated) 353 353 353 353 353 MDD(Calculated) 706 706 706 706 706 PHD Calculated 512 515 521 528 534 No.ERU s Ca" SFR 139 143 148 144 146 MFR 13 12 14 16 18 Comrm/W./Gov. 107 131 157 149 163 TOTAL 259 286 319 3" 327 ERU Values 290-221 ADD(246-290-221) 175 175 175 175 175 MDD 246-290-221 350 350 350 350 350 PHD (246-290-221) 3 265 268 271 274 No.ERU's 46-290-221 SFR 280 288 298 291 294 MFR 26 25 28 32 37 CarmaIhAIGov. 216 263 317 301 328 TOTAL 522 576 643 624 659 2.2 Projected Land Use, Future Population, and Water Demand 2.2.1 Projected Land Use A portion of the Belfair Water District No. 1 service area has been designated as an Urban Growth Area (UGA) in Mason County's Comprehensive Plan. As such, it will have a mix of residential, commercial and light industrial land uses. No specific zoning has yet been established, however land use designations have been proposed in the Belfair Urban Growth Area Plan. The ridge area to the north and east of the community center, presently undeveloped, will be the focal point of the new development. A single owner owns most of the area. One residential area, Iron Horse Crossing is presently being considered. Another 40-acre tract is being planned for industrial development in the far northeastern corner of the Urban Growth Area. The construction II - 3 of the new bypass highway for SR-3 and new sewer installation will dictate to a considerable extent where and when additional development will occur. The route for the new bypass has been preliminarily determined, but no specific construction schedule has been set. 2.2.2 Projected Population There are no definitive population projections for the Belfair Community area in either of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan documents or from the Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM). The following is a discussion of the data available and how it is used in this water system plan. Section IV.2 of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan, 2005 Edition, discusses the population of the county and the urban growth areas (UGA's). In addition, the Belfair Urban Growth Area Plan specifically discusses the population within the Belfair UGA. However, Belfair Water District No. 1 serves an area considerably larger that the UGA. Therefore, some assumptions are made as to the projected service population for this planning period using the two named documents as a guide. The Comprehensive Plan states that growth rate for Mason County in the 1990's was 2.6% annually. There are no figures directly related to the Belfair area,except for the UGA, but no growth rates only an estimated population in 2004 of 645. This population was arrived at by multiplying the number of "residential parcels(with an improved value of more than$20,000)"by 2.5 persons per household. The Belfair Urban Growth Area Plan states in its Introduction, "...The current population within the UGA is approximately 900." Within the body of the document the Belfair UGA Plan estimated that were 294 residential units in the UGA and a population of 764 based a density of 2.6 per household in 2002. The two documents do not agree on the residential density >factor. The previous Mason County documents used for the current water system plan used 2.56. This number is a compromise between the two documents and therefore will be again used for this water system plan in calculating service populations. Historically, the Belfair service area growth has not been as robust as that of the greater Belfair area or Mason County. From January 1996 to January 2006 the growth in the residential customer base was only 14.6%or an average of 137%per year. This growth rate was used to project the District's increase to the year 2010,the estimated year for the sewer line installation. The importance of the year 2010 is that is the year that.has been estimated as.the year the sewer will be installed in the Belfair area. Once the sewer line is installed the growth rate for Belfair is expected to dramatically change. Table 2.4 lists the projected Belfair Water District No. 1 service population at the various time intervals used by Mason County and for this planning period. Since the timing elements do not coincide, both are shown here. There have been several growth rates estimated for the Belfair UGA by Mason County and OFM. In 1994 Mason County originally estimated the 2014 population for the Belfair UGA 4,000. The Belfair UGA Market Study published by ECONorthwest suggests that even using the high end of the 3-5%annual growth rate results in a 2020 population just under 2,000. For the purposes of this plan, a growth rate of 3.1%per year has been used for each year after 2010. U-4 Table 2.4 Belfair Water District Area And UGA Population Projections Year BWD Serv. Area Belfair UGA 2005 1,133 900 2010 1,230 N/A 2012 1,305 N/A 20142 1,384 4,000 2020 1,669 2,000 2025 17916 6,245 ' Population Estimate,Be#'air Urban Growth Plan 2 1994 Population Projection by Mason County. 3 2025 Population Estimate,Mason County Comprehensive Plan,2005 Edition As is seen in the table above, the estimates by others are inconsistent. Therefore, Belfair Water District No. 1 will rely on its own records and a middle of the road growth rate to plan for future water needs. h 1 be sufficient for this planning period. Toward the end of this next six year tannin That approach will p g Pen Y P g period,the sewers should be in,and the District will have a better idea for the true growth rate for the next planning period- 2.2.3 Projected Non-Residential Water Needs Although Belfair is a "bedroom" community for employment centers such as Shelton and Bremerton,the District has a substantial non-residential water use component. Over the years of 2000 through 2005, the system commercial water use has averaged 46.1%, with a high of 49.8% in 2005 to a low of 41.40/a in 2001. The low in 2001 was still lower than the average non-residential use in the last planning period.. The rise to the high of 49.8% use by commercial usage is `because the;development in Belfair over the last few years has been predominately commercial, not residential. Of substantial impact was the addition of a concrete mixing plaint, Hard Rock Concrete, mi 2004. This customer is connected to the new system comprising Pressure Zone No. 2 and Aces not impact the usage in Pressure Zone No. 1 at this writing. The two zones are not connected. The installation of the new sewer system is preliminarily scheduled to occur in the 2009-2011 time frame. The sewer will I have a dramatic impact on development in the Belfair area. The Belfair Urban Growth Plan; prepared by Makers Architecture and Urban design, Econorthwest, Heffron Transportation, and MacLeod Reckord; proposes mix of land use designations. In the presently undeveloped area to the north the plan proposes a combination of General Commercial and Business-Industrial. The non-residential water use for the area will depend on exactly what kind of commercial/industrial activities do settle in. If the general use is commercial, the water use may be low. However, if there is another "Hard Rock Concrete" or two, water use would likely be considerably higher. II-5 2.2.4 Projected Non-Revenue Water Along with water sales for the 2001-2005 period, non-revenue water was also evaluated. Total non-revenue water use ranged from a low of 7.61/6 to a high of 19.0%. Records were examined to determine if a specific reason for the discrepancies could be determined.. 2.2.4.1 Accounted for Non-Revenue Water Table 2.5 below lists the accounted for water, based on a review of District records and discussions with staff. Explanations for the various components listed follow the table. Table 2.5 Belfair Water District No. l Accounted For Non-Revenue Water Volume( allons) Usage's 2001 2002 2003 2004 - 2005 System Flushing 625,000 600,000 650,000 500,000 650,000 Construction Flushing 60,000 0 35,000 10,000 400,000 Main Breaks/Leaks 25,000 350,000 10,000 0 50,000 Local Govermnents 100,000 105,000 100,000 90,000 100,000 Hydro-seeding 25,000 30,000 30,000 15,000 35,000 Theft 0 0 10,000 0 10,000 North Tank Overflow 730,000 730,000 730,000 730,000 730,000 Meter Losses(.5% of sales) 166,241 184,006 205,386 199,155 210,519 Water Pumped 37,908,236 45,443,244 45,462,842 43,105,864 47,621,734 Water Sold 33,248113 36,801151 41,077,295 39,831,007 42,103,850 Non-Revenue Water 4,660123 8,642,093 4,385,547 3,274,857 5,517,884 Non-Revenue Water% 12.3% 19.0% 7.6% 7.6% 11.6% Accounted for Water 1,731,241 2,624,006 1,770,386 1,544,155 2,185,519 Unaccounted for Water, 2,928883 6,618,087 2,615,160 1,730,702 3,332,365 Unaccounted for Water (%of Water ) 7.73% 1 14.96% 5.75% 4.02% 7.00% *Volumes estimated As is shown in the table, the unaccounted for water portion of the total water pumped was inconsistent. After considerable review the high percentage of unaccounted for water in 2002 could not be determined_` Leaks in the system are generally a minor problem for the District. Several leaks have been found in the past and repaired, but the overall trend appears to be on the increase. A major problem in locating leaks is the general geology in the area and the location of the mains. The soil is fairly gravelly and the hillside contains many springs. The mains are located along the roadside near storm drain ditches which carry the surfacing groundwater away. This combination makes it difficult to see leaks when they occur. The District hires a private contractor to locate them whenever it suspects the location of a leak. U-6 The level in the South Tanks controls the well pumps. The well pump on/off levels had to be adjusted so that the North Tanks adequately filled without the water oscillating back and forth in the system. As a result, the North Tanks overflow approximately 2,000 gpd. This allows the South Tanks to fill completely and shut the wells down. The District replaces meters as soon as problems are found. Upon inspection, the meters are found to be reading under the actual amount. As a result of these findings, it is estimated that approximately 0.5%of the water sales is not registered on the meters. 2.2.4.2 Unaccounted for Non-Revenue Water The remaining non-revenue water is unaccounted for. The specific unaccounted for water level in 2002 cannot be readily explained. It is simply not consistent with other years. There was one known major leak at the site of a new water main construction project. The lead emptied both sets or reservoirs and both wells pumped ran for at least two hours, before the water leak was discovered and the line shut off. This was the only known leak that year. The only other plausible explanation for the discrepancy is that someone may have had access to an out-of-the-way hydrant and was using it to get non-revenue water. Although the District checks the difference between "Water Pumped" and "Water Sales" on a monthly basis, if such a theft were spread out over a long summer, the difference may not be noticeable. One of the primary problems the District has is the distribution system. Although it is only approximately 30 years old, it was constructed primarily with asbestos-cement (AC) pipe. Additionally, as discussed above.the geology of the region lends itself well to hiding all by the largest leaks. Small leaks dissipate into the ground without ever surfacing until they grow to such a size that they do eventually surface and can be found. If they do surface, many times it into roadside storm ditches that are already flowing with groundwater, even in the summer time. The District has an aggressive leak detection program, but the rate of leakage at any one point is such that the leak remains undetected until the water finally surfaces. 2.2.5 Water Rates and Rate Impacts on Water Demand Belfair Water District No. 1 adopted an increasing block rate structure in early 1995. This rate structure has had an impact on year around water usage. Figure 2.1 is a graph of SFR monthly water usage from January,2001 through December 2005. The graph also contains a 12-month moving average of water use along with a regression analysis of the trend of the average usage. It shows that the District's SFR average is dropping. Figure 2.2 is a similar graph including all the years from 1995 to 2005. This graph shows that the water usage downward trend has continued since the inception of the increasing block rate structure. II-7 FIGURE 2.1 - 2001-2005 MONTHLY AVERAGE OF SFR USAGE 250 200 --- 0 150 w a � I/ Y Y Y Y Q 100 50 — -- - 0 O� O� O� O� O� O� Off' Off' Off' Off' Off' Off' 00 00 00 00 00 00 Off` Off` Off` Off` Off` TIME Monthly Average Use —Moving Annual Average Annual Average Usage Trend II-8 FIGURE 2.2 - 1995-2005 MONTHLY AVERAGE OF SFR USAGE 400 350 300 Q 250 0 w a co 200 z 0 J J 150 u u 100 - - 50 0 0� O� o�� 0,°' Off' 00 Off` Off` Off` O� O� O� TIME Monthly Average ---Moving Average Average Trend i II-9 2.2.6 Water Demand Forecasting Water Use Data Collection is a mandatory requirement for demand forecasting in accordance with the District's water conservation efforts. Table No. 2.6 lists the data collection requirements as they specifically apply to the District as a water system with less than 1,000 connections. The results of the data collection are listed in the various elements above and below in this chapter. Table 2.6 Belfair Water District No. 1 Conservation Program Water Use Data Collection Requirements Use Data Requirement Source of Supply Meter Monthly&Annual Totals Peak Day/Peak Month Each Year's Peak Totals Non-Revenue Water Unaccounted for Water(1) Annual Total Accounted for Water Annual Total Service Meter Usage Recorded Single Family Monthly Multiple Family Monthly Commercial/Public/Industrial Monthly Agriculture/Irrigation System Monthly` Population Served Yes Economic Data N/A Conservation.Data(2) Annually (1) Unaccounted-for-water is that water that is lost through leaks,evaporation,or use that is not recorded andtor accounted for. Public use such as fire protection, system flushing and other designated uses can be estimated and should be included under Accounted-for-Water. (2) All public water systems shall record and report the type, intensity,and duration of water conservation e$brts and the date at which they were begun. The DistricE has master source meters for all wells. The District keeps records to determine peak day and peak month flow data from the source meter. All service connections are metered. The present billing software used by the District does not allow for However, the total number of non-single family customers is small enough that classification by type individual account usage"vain be totaled out of the monthly billing record. Peak day usage based on metered sales is not available. fx is available only through the source meters. Peak month flows by customer classification are only available by manually tabulating each customer type, which was done for this Planning Period. The District estimates non-revenue uses of water. These uses include water for system flushing for cleaning and construction purposes, Fire Department uses, Department of Transportation uses, and Department of Natural Resources usage District staff, based on the number of services, estimates population served using the OFM estimate of 2.6 residents per household for Mason County. II- 10 With the implementation of the adopted conservation plan, Belfair Water District No. I is required to maintain accurate records of the measures taken and results accomplished. The District gathers and keeps the required water use data. The following Water Demand Forecasts are based primarily on increased population. Commercial land uses will be discussed below as they relate to increased water demand. Table 2.3 shows the District's water sales by category from 2001 through 2005. It also calculates the number of ERU's for the particular year, based on the sales for single family residences. Table 2.4 lists the projected population for the Belfair Water District service area based on the historical growth of 1.37% per year to 2010 and 3.1%growth factor after the year 2010. This rate is estimated to be the "middle of the road" growth rate for the Belfair area. The District serves an additional area outside of the designated UGA Therefore, this plan uses the population calculations of the District's service area for growth planning purposes. Table 2.7 uses the same growth potential to project future needs. The projections are based on 2005-metered figures. The metered peak day for 2005 was 153,680 gallons. This is considerably less than two times the ADD. Therefore, the peak day use is set at twice the ADD in accordance with Equation 5-2 of DOH's Water System Design Manual, dated June 1999. These figures are NOT used for the hydraulic analysis in Chapter 3, but are shown here for conservation planning purposes. Table 2.7 Belfair Water District No.°1 Future Demand Forecast Gallons per Day Year Avg.Dem.Day Max. Dem. Day PD w/Consery 2005 l I5,353 230,706 N/A 2012 129,472 258,944 245,997 2026 188,004 376,008 357,208 Table 2.7 shows a five per cent reduction due to implemented conservation measures. This is based on the highest water usage 2005. The discussion in Chapter IV talks about future savings beyond the 130-gpcpd point. No specific improvement in usage is envisioned at this time due to conservation measure; since the increasing block rate structure has apparently been very successful to date. Iwai ddition when new homes are built from now on, they will likely require considerable landscape irrigation. This will likely increase the average daily demand(ADD). The figures in Table 2.7 reflect the current residential/commercial mix of the District's service area. It is expected that the commercial sector will increase at a higher rate early in the planning period. This is because the interest by property owners shown up to now has been primarily for commercial development. Later in the planning period once sewers are installed, more residential connections will occur as the employment base grows. � II- 11 CHAPTER III TABLE OF CONTENTS III. SYSTEM ANALYSIS............................................................................................... 1 3.1 System Design Standards..................................................................................... 1 3.1.1 Water Quality Parameters............................•-•--..................------•--.......-----....... 1 3.1.2 Average and Maximum Day Demands............................................................ 2 3.1.3 Peak Hour Demand........................................................................................ 3 3.1.4 Storage Requirements.................................................................................... 3 3.1.5 Fireflow Rate and Duration................................................. .............. 3 3.1.6 Minimum System Pressure............................................................................. 4 3.1.7 Minimum Pipe Sizes....................•---.............................................................. 4 3.1.8 Telemetry Systems..................................................... `. . .............. 4 3.1.9 Backup Power Requirements...........................................•---------....`... . ........... 4 3.1.10Valve and Hydrant Spacing................ ..................................... .................... 4 3.1.11 Looping....................................................::..... ... 5 3.2 Water Quality Analysis.......................................I................................................. 5 3.2.1 Monitoring........................................................ .. ........................................ 5 3.2.2 Monitoring Results......... .......:. ... 3.2.2.1 Bacteriological..................: ........:............................................................. 7 3.2.2.2 Lead/Copper ...... . ...... ........... ......... .;................----•-...... 7 3.2.2.3 Asbestos................................................................................................... 7 3.2.2.4 Volatile Organic Chemicals...... . . :..... ...... ...:...............•-•--.--............. 7 3.2.2.5 Herbicides and Other SOC's..................................................................... 7 3.2.2.6 Inorganic Chemicals. ................... ...............•---....------.............................. 7 3.2.2.7 Nitrate-N. ............... ......................................................•---•------......---•---- 8 3.2.2.8 Sulfates&Sulfides... ..:;:............... ... 8 3.2.2.9,Arsenic .................................................................................................... 8 3.2.2.IORadionuclides .................. ...... .............................................................. 8 3.3 System Description and Analysis.......................................................................... 8 3:3.I Source...............::.......................................................................................... 8 3 3 1.1 General Description and'Condition........................................................... 8 3.3.1.2 Source Capacity;Analysis....................................................................... 11 3.3.2 Water Treatment......`............................................••---...••-•--•--........................ 12 3.3.2.1 General Description an Condition........................................................... 12 3.3.2.2 Water Treatment Capacity Analysis........................................................ 12 3.3.3 Storage...... ................................................................................................. 13 3.3.3.1 General Description and Condition......................................................... 13 3.3.3.2 Storage Capacity Analysis...................................................................... 13 3.3.4 Distribution System...................................................................................... 13 3.3.4.1 General Description and Condition......................................................... 13 3.3.4.2 Hydraulic Capacity Analysis................................................................... 15 3.4 Summary of Deficiencies................................................................................... 18 3.4.1 Source--•............................................................................................•----..... 18 3.4.2 Water Treatment.......................................................................................... 18 III-i 3.4.3 Storage........................................................................................................ 18 3.4.4 Distribution System...................................................................................... 18 LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1 Maximum Contaminant Levels............................................................................. 1 Table 3.2 Belfair Fire Protection District Selected Fire Flow Requirements...........................3 Table 3.3 BeIfair Water District No. 1 Monitoring Requirements..........................................5 Table 3.4 Belfair Water District No. 1 Sampling Requirements.............................................6 Table 3.5 Belfair Water District No. 1 Distribution Main Sizes........................................... 14 Table 3.6 Belfair Water District No. 1 Distribution System Model Roughness Factors......... 16 Table 3.7 Belfair Water District No. 1 Time Distribution of Model Flow Factors................ 16 Table 3.8 Computer Analyses of System Fireflow Capacity................. ............................. 17 III-n 1 111. SYSTEM ANALYSIS 3.1 System Design Standards Belfair Water District No. 1 uses the Water System Design Manual, published by DOH in June 1999. Prior to this specific manual, the District followed the preceding guidance documents used by DOH. In addition, applicable American Water Works Association (AWWA) and American Public Works Association (APWA) standards were used. These standards are still used to augment and/or implement the requirements in the Water System De*n Manual as needed. The basis of all design work and/or operations and maintenance is guided by 246-290 WAC. 3.1.1 Water Quality Parameters The District complies with the provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) through adherence with the regulations contained in WAC 246-29-300 through —320 as updated in June 2004, or as currently in effect. Table 3.1 below lists the inorganic and physical characteristic water quality parameters the District is required to meet at the time of this writing. Table 3.1 Maximum Contaminant Levels INORGANIC CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS Substance Primary MCL's (mg4) Substance Secondary MCL's(mg/l) Antimony(Sb) .006 Arsenic(As) 0.010 .p Chloride(Cl) 250.0 Asbestos 7x106 fibers/1 Fluoride(F) 2.0 Barium(Ba) 2.0 Iron(Fe) 0.3 Beryllium(Be) 0.004 Manganese(Mn) 0.05 Cadmium(Cd) 0.005 Silver(Ag) 0.1 Chromium(Cr) 0.1 Sulfate(SO4) 250.0 Copper(Cu) * Zinc(Zn) 5.0 Cyanide (HCN) 0.2 Fluoride(F) 4.0 Lead(Ph) " Mercury(Hg) 0.002 Nickel(Ni) 0.1 Nitrate(as N) 10.0 Nitrite(as N) 1.0 Selenium(Se) 0.05 Sodium(Na) Thallium(Tl) 0.002 * Although the state board of health has not established MC"for copper,lead,and sodium,there is sufficient public health significance connected with copper,lead,and sodium levels to require mchmm in inorganic chemical and physical source monitoring For lead and copper,the EPA has established distribution system related levels at which a system is required to consider corrosion control- These levels,called"action levels"we 0.15 mWL for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper and are applied to the highest concentration in tea percent of all samples collected from the distribution system. The EPA has also established a recommended level of twenty mg/L for sodium as a level of concern for those consumers that may be restricted for daily sodium intake in their diets. Table 3.1 (Continued) Maximum Contaminant Levels PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Substance Secondary MCL's Color 15 Color Units Hardness None Established Specific Conductivity 700 umhos/cm Total Dissolved Solids(TDS) 500 mg/L Disinfection By-Product MCL(mg/L) Total Trihalomethanes(TTHMs) 0.080 Haloacetic acids(five)(HAAS) 0.060 Bromate 0.010 Chlorite 1.0 Radionuclides The MCLs for radium-226 and radium-228 gross alpha particle activity, beta particle activity and photon radioactivity, and uranium shall be as listed in 40 CFR 141.66 Organic Chemicals VOCs—The MCLs for VOCs shall be as listed in 40 CFR 141.61(a). SOCs—MCLs for SOCs shall be as listed in 40 CFR 141.61(c). 3.1.2 . Average and Maximum Day Demands The 4veragp,dav demand has been decreasing for the District since it adopted its first increasing block rate structure in 1995. . It is expected that the average day demand will not decrease much further, because',-,the new growth anticipated would be all brand new with landscaping that will require extensive Iffigation at least for the first year. A higher growth rate is anticipated from approximately 2010 on. A new sewer system installation is expected around 2010, which will allow for more rapid'growth. This will be particularly true for residential development even if native plants are used for landscaping. All new landscaping requires added irrigation for the first year. Three methods were evaluated to determine the Average Daily Demand, metered sales, calculation using the formula ADD=(800/ARR)+200, and 246-290-221 WAC. The ADD based on metered sales in 2005 was 130 gallons per connection per day(gpcpd). Using the calculation method based on the Average Annual Rainfall for the Wauna weather station, the ADD is 353 gpcpd. Using the minimum MDD required in 246-290-221 WAC of 350 gpcpd,the ADD is 175 gpcpd. III- 2 3.1.3 Peak Hour Demand The formula PHD = (MDD/1440XC)(N) + F) +18 is used to calculate the Peak Hour Demand (PHD). For the metered sales, the PHD is 209 gpm, and for the PHD using the calculation method based on rainfall is 534 gpm. However, the PHD calculated based on 246-290-221 WAC is 274 gpm. This latter rate is used in the computer hydraulic analysis. For this plan, the hydraulic analysis is based on the MDD required by 246-290-221 WAC. However, the well pumping rate is generally not sufficient to recover fireflow losses for Pressure Zone No. 1 in a reasonable time (<24 hours) during peak period use. Therefore, the calculated figure of 534 gpm figure based on the rainfall record is used to develop the source capacity analysis. 3.1.4 Storage Requirements Storage requirements for Belfair Water District No. 1 are based on with the requirements of Chapter 9 of the Water System Design Manual. The components of storage will be operating storage, equalizing storage, standby storage, fire suppression storage, and dead storage. For Belfair, the Mason County Fire Marshal previously approved the use of"nested" storage for fire suppression for the District's 1994 Water System Plan. This scenario continues for this plan. This is the basic reason for using the higher PHD when analyzing source capacity. 3.1.5 Fireflow Rate and Duration Mason County uses the Washington Surveying and>Rating Bureau formulae for determining fireflow requirements for individual commercial and industrial structures. Table 3.2 lists the fireflow requirements determined by use of the formula for selected businesses located in various parts of the community. Table 3.2 Belfair Fire Protection District Selected Fire Flow Requirements Building Address Fire Flow Required Duration(hrs) All Star Mini-Storage ; E. 19720 Hwy 106 4,250 4 Belfair Center NE 24092 Hwy 3 3,000 3 Belfair Elem.School NE 22900 Hwy 3 3,500 3 Belfair Truck&Paint NE 23530 Hwy 3 2,000 2 QFC Market NE 160 Hwy 300 4,500* 4 McLendon Hardware NE 51 Hwy 300 4,500* 4 Sande's Boat Works NE 23940 Hwy 3 2,250 2 Benyon Center NE 120 Hwy 300 2,250 2 Belfair Motel NE 23322 Hwy 3 3,750 3 * The QFC Supermarket and the McLendon Hardware are filly sprinkled buildings. The allowable fire flow reduction for a fully sprinklered building can be up to 75%of the required fire flow. The final accepted reduction.is subject to Fire Marshal approval III-3 3.1.6 Minimum System Pressure Belfair's Water System operates as two separate pressure zones at the time this plan is being developed. The static hydraulic grade line (HGL) for Pressure Zone No. 1 is 272 feet with 16' high concrete storage tanks. However, there are a few homes that are located near the District's south tanks at elevations above 200'. As such, they would experience pressures below the minimum of 30 psi required and normally maintained. In the case of these homes, each is outfitted with a domestic booster pump that delivers domestic flow in excess of the 30 psi minimum. There are also a few homes located above the south tanks. For these,the District operates a small booster pump station that maintains a system pressure between 35 and 50 psi. Pressure Zone No. 2 was established with the construction of the Well No. 4 improvements and a new, 1.1 mg storage tank on the ridge to the northeast of the Belfair community center. As this plan is being written, the two pressure zones are not interconnected. The District has submitted a grant request to Mason County for the funds to construct a new connection pipeline and pressure reducing station.. The static HGL for Pressure Zone No 2 is 478'. 3.1.7 Minimum Pipe Sizes The District adopted a policy to normally require a minimum pipe diameter of eight (8) inches unless the line is looped. There are a few lengths of pipe in service that are six (6) inches in diameter, but they were constructed prior to implementation of the present policy. The only exception allowed by the District is for short, dead-end lines where only a few customers are served and no fireflow is required. In that case the line size may reduced to four(4)inches. 3.1.8 Telemetry Systems All of the District's wells,tanks and pumps can be operated by remote control from the office. The telemetry system polls each of the facilities on a regular basis, around the clock. A report of the polling is printed out at the office. If the system finds a problem, an alarm is sounded. If the alarm goes off after hours;the computer contacts one or more of the staff members by telephone and automatically reports the problem orally. 3.1.9 Backup Power Requirements The District has two diesel power generators. One is permanently mounted at the office where Well Nos. 1 & 2 are located. The second generator is trailer mounted and can be towed to Well No. 3 and manually connected to the power supply for that well. However, both generators are from military surplus, and'parts are hard to come by when repairs are required. As this plan is being developed, the District is in the process of purchasing and installing a new, permanently mounted generator at its Hummingbird Well site. 3.1.10 Valve and Hydrant Spacing Valve spacing policy is such that only the minimum amount of line need be isolated to fix a problem. This is generally about 600-700'. However, this policy was adopted after the 1994 Water System Plan was approved. Prior to that time many of the valves were installed spaced at a quarter mile or more apart. III- 4 1 3.1.11 Looping The Community of Belfair's general geographic configuration has limited any significant looping up to this writing. Since the area lies between Hood Canal and a high ridge, the community has developed longitudinally along SR-3 and the other highways. The opportunities for looping are very limited in Pressure Zone No. 1. As the area on the ridge in Pressure Zone No. 2 develops and new water lines are constructed, looping of mains will be be required whenever and wherever possible. 3.2 Water Quality Analysis 3.2.1 Monitoring The Washington State Department of Health (DOH) issues a monitoring schedule annually to the District for the upcoming year that includes all monitoring requirements for that year. Table 3.3 lists the schedule the District generally is required to meet for each of the various sampling events. Table 3.3 Belfair Water District No. 1 Monitoring Requirements Monitoring Group (Test Method Sample Location Schedule/Status Asbestos ASB Distribution 1 distribution sample every 9 years Bacteriological Coli Distribution 3/month* Lead/Copper LCR Distribution Same as directed by DOH Dioxin SOC- 1613 All sources Waived through 12/2007 Endothall SOC.-549.1 All Sources EDB and other fumigants VOC—'504 S 01,S 03,& 1 sample every 3 years S 04 Gl hate Herbicides SOC—515.2 S 01,S 03,& 1 sample every 3 years S 04 Insecticides SOC 531.1 S 01,S 03,& 1 sample every 3 years S 04 Inorganic Contaminants IOC Sol, 1 sample betw. 1/02&12/10 c Contaminants IOC S 03,&S 04 1 sample every 3 years Nitrate* NIT S 01,S 03,& I sample every year S 04 General Pesticides SOC—525.2 S 01,S 03,& 1 sample every 3 years S 04 Di uat SOC—5549.1 All Sources Waived through 12/2007 VOC VOC—524.2 S 01,S 03,& 1 sample every 3 years S 04 Radionuclides* RAD All Sources 1 sample every 4 years * These contaminant monitonng groups do not have waiver options under SDWA * Based on size, the District is only required to take two bacteriological samples per month. However, with two completely separate pressure zones,it takes a third sample each month 3.2.2 Monitoring Results Table 3.4, on the following page, is a matrix of the samples required and taken over the past five years by Belfair Water District No. 1. III- 5 TABLE 3.4 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT No. 1 WATER SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS 2002-2006 CHEMICAL SAMPLE REQUIRED and TAKEN PARAMETER 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 01 02 03 SYS 01 02 03 04 SYS 01 02 03 04 SYS 01 02 03 04 SYS 01 02 03 04 SYS Bacteriological 2/mo X X X X X Lead/Copper X X Asbestos X VOC's X X X X X X TTHM's X X Haloacetic Acids X Herbicides X Gen. Pesticides X Insecticides EDB et al. Dloxin et al. IOC's X X X Arsenic X X X I I X X X X I X X X X Nitrates X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Sulfates X X X X Sulfides X X Radionuclides X X X X X I X III- 6 3.2.2.1 Bacteriological Belfair Water District No. 1 is required to take two samples per month for coliform tests. During the period of 2002-2004 the District experienced bad samples in the south end of the system along SR-106. This primarily occurred in the fall during the low use period. Several of the homes in this area are seasonal, so usage sometimes will drop off even more. To combat this problem, the District disinfected the subject mains and both of the south tanks. The system was then drained and flushed. However, this problem arose again in four months during 2004, including the spring and summer time. With these occurrences, in January 2005 the District agreed to an order from DOH to install disinfection facilities for Well Nos. 1 & 3. During the pre-installation period, the District installed a manual disinfection device at its Hummingbird Well(Well No. 3). The system was not a formal, automatic disinfection system, but served to inject disinfectant into the system as necessary. The new disinfection facilities went on line on May 17,2005. Since that time,the District has not had a single bad bacteriological sample. The new Well No. 4 includes an onsite sodium hypochlorite generation system to disinfect the water in the new tank and to service Pressure Zone No. 2. Once the two pressure zones are connected, disinfected water will also be fed to the lower pressure zone. 3.2.2.2 Lead/Copper The repeat samples for lead/copper were taken and analyzed in June 2002 and November 2005. For June 2002 half the samples came back at <(0.02) mg/l and the others ranged up from 0.03 to one at 0.15 mg/l. All 2002 lead samples were <0.002 mg/l. For November 2005 all copper samples were <(0.20), and lead came in with seven samples at <(0.002) mg/l, two at 0.003 mg/l and one at 0.022 mg/1 .All samples were well below the Action Level for both lead and copper. 3.2.2.3 Asbestos In accordance with regulations;Belfair Water District No. 1 took a sample for asbestos analysis in March 2005. The analysis of the sample indicated a count of<0.083 million fibers/liter (MFL), longer than 10 microns. This is well under the MCL of 7 MFL. 3.2.2.4 Volatile Organic Chemicals Samples were taken from Well Nos. 1, 3 & 4 in September 2003 and analyzed in accordance with EPA Test Method 524.2. In all samples, no VOC's were detected. Another sample was taken for VOC analysis under the EPA Method 524.2 from Well No. 4 in June 2004. No VOC's were detected, except the TTHM result was 3.6 µo. Well Nos. 1 and 3 were sampled for VOC's in April 2006. No VOC's were detected. 3.2.2.5 Herbicides and Other SOC's The District has been granted a waiver for monitoring these through December 2007. No samples have been taken or analyzed. 3.2.2.6 Inorganic Chemicals Inorganic chemical monitoring for the District took place in July 2003. The results of all analyses for all IOC's returned levels well below the MCL for the respective chemical. III-7 3.2.2.7 Nitrate-N The latest Nitrate-N results from June 2006 were<(0.5)mg/l, the State Reporting Level (SRL). 3.2.2.8 Sulfates& Sulfides The District tested for Sulfates and Sulfides in November October 2004, respectively. All sulfate results were<(10)mg/l, while the results for Well Nos. 1 & 3 were 3 µfl and 1 µg/l,•respectively. All well below action levels. 3.2.2.9 Arsenic Arsenic was sampled for on several occasions over the past five yeas. In 2002 the three then active wells were sampled with the results of 0.003 mg/1, 0.005 mg/1 and 0.002 mg/l respectively for Well Nos. 1, 2, & 3, respectively. In 2003 all four wells were sampled and the results were: Well No. 1 — 0.005 mg/l, Well No. 2 — 0.007 mg/l, Well No. 3 - <(0.002) mg/l , and Well No. 4 - < (0.002) mg/l. Again in 2004 all wells were sampled with the fallowing results: Well No. 1 —0.003 mg/l, Well No. 2—0.003 mg/l, Well No. 3 -<0.002 mg/l, and Well No. 4-<(0.002)mg/l. 3.2.2.10 Radionuclides Radionuclide samples were taken and analyzed in February 2003. The results for Gross Alpha were ND, or not detected for S 01, Well No. 1, and S 02, Well No. 2. A January 2004 sample was take for Well No. 4 and analyzed for Gross Alpha and Beta particles. The results were ,1.0 pCi/1 for Gross Alpha and <2.0 pCi/l for Gross Beta. In June 2004 all four sources were sampled and analyzed for Radium 228. All results were <1.0 pCi/l. Again in December 2004 Well Nos. 2, 3 and 4 were sampled for Radium 228. The results were ND for all samples The results were all well under the MCL of 15 and 50 pCi/1 for Gross Alpha and Gross Beta particles and 5 for Radium 228,respectively. 3.3 System Description and Analysis w 3.3.1 Source 3.3.1.1 General Description and Condition The District has four wells in service to provide water to its customers. With the formation of the District in 1966, anew source of potable water had to be found. The existing artesian well at the Mason County PUD No. 3 site was converted to community use. Since that time another well was drilled on the site. Both wells are flowing artesian. Both wells are located on the west side of SR-3, approximately 150'from the pavement. There are buildings within the 100'radius circle around the wells. One is the District's office and the other is the maintenancelshop building. The drain field that serves both buildings is located approximately 300' west of the wells. Because the source of water is artesian and located below very tight, confining soils, the wells are not in jeopardy of being contaminated by surface activities. Additionally, the source of the water taken from the wells is a considerable distance away from the actual wellheads. III-8 Well No. 1, the original well on the site is the District's primary source of water for Pressure Zone No. 1. There are two 25-horsepower Allis-Chalmers, 3,500 rpm booster pumps serving this well. Each pump is rated at 155 gallons per minute (gpm) at 255' total dynamic head (TDH). Each pump will provide approximately 150 gpm to the distribution system and storage. Only one booster pump operates at a time. The pumps are rotated so that each pump is rested for one operating period. When operating,the hydraulic pressure residual is 8.5 psi. Well No. 2 was disconnected from Well No. 1, and had its own submersible well pump installed. Although this well is a flowing artesian, its capacity is such that the water level drops back into the casing. This well is now held only for emergency purposes. While trying to upgrade this well to stand on its own, it was found that it "makes sand" at high, or near water right, pumping rates. Even at moderate pumping rates, it makes sand for a short time before producing clean, clear water. In order to use it, the first flush of pumping must be manually bypassed until the water is clear. It only then is directed to the system. A third well on Hummingbird Lane was placed in operation in 1995. This well is also artesian, but not a flowing artesian. The original permit granted a withdrawal water right of 350 gpm. However, when it was tested prior to activating it, it was found that the well could only sustain a 275 gpm pumping rate. A submersible well pump rated at that capacity for distribution HGL operation of 272' was installed. This well is the secondary source of supply for the District. All three wells were analyzed for their potential for long term use for the District's 1994 Water System Plan. The following discussion of the area geology is based on a review of available data and evaluation by John Noble of Robinson & Noble, Inc.`(R&N), Tacoma, Washington. The following data was used for the evaluation: 1. Belfair Well No. 1, near SW corner of Section 32. Drill log prepared by Bedell, pump test performed by John Robinson(R&N) in 1976, notes on pressure readings taken by Belfair, 1993. 2' Belfair Well No. 2,`near Well 1. Construction report by Robinson&Noble(1977). 3. Belfair "Hummingbird"well in Section 6. State log by Mathew Drilling(1987). 4. Two wells, Callow and Griffith-Lohman, in the vicinity of Hummingbird well. Data is from State Water Supply Bulletin#29(1970). The noted wells are along Lynch Cove shoreline area, separated by less than a mile. All are flowing artesian and all penetrate thick confining layers of clay. Permeable sand, or sand and gravel, is shallowest at Hummingbird (160 feet) and deepest at the Belfair field (350 feet). The base of the hydrostratigraphic system is believed to be a dense glacial till starting at 387 feet in Belfair#2. The permeable zones do not appear-to be laterally continuous,but instead are likely to be lenticular. The Belfair wells are the only ones that have been accurately pump tested. The calculated aquifer transmissivity there is about 20,000 gpd/ft which is indicative of III-9 a good aquifer. Belfair#1 has historically been a better producer than#2. Well No. 2 was screened across two zones which bracketed the zone tapped by Well 1. The intent was to construct a better well,but ironically, the unscreened Well No. 1 is the I more efficient. It is apparently open-bottomed or "bare foot." Such wells, when developed in artesian situations, can develop a cavern beneath a roof of competent clay. The sand mined out of the cavern flows out at the surface and ultimately stops passing. The result can be a very efficient well with no entrance losses. The concern with these wells is that there could be a collapse of the roof; rendering the well completely useless. Well field use in July, 1993 was reported at 610,000 cubic feet, averaging about 20,000 cf per day, or about 100 gpm. For the period August 16-24 (six days), metered use was 168,670 cf, and pump-hour total was reported at 75.2 hours. Those records indicate the actual pumping rate to be 280 gpm and the average daily use to be 210,275 gpd, or 146 gpm. A test of Well 1 in 1976 showed that well to be pumping 170 gpm. In 1976 the shut-in pressure when Well 1 was pumping was 8.5 pounds per square inch (psi), rising to 15.9 psi when the pump was turned off. In 1977 the shut-in pressure was measured at 11.7 psi. Water district records from November, 1992 through August, 1993 show pressure ranges from 14 to 9 psi. The incomplete data set does indicate that there has been no long-term depletion of artesian pressure caused by years of pumping. Well Nos. 1 and 3 are the primary sources, with Well No. 2 for emergencies only, of potable water to the District in Pressure Zone No. 1. The two primary wells appear to be capable of at least 425 gpm continuously. The long-term concern would be salt water intrusion That condition should not occur if pressure heads at the wells remain at or above land surface when measured within at least 30 minutes of the pump being off Routine monitoring of water levels or shut-in pressures should be maintained to warn of water level depletion. The condition of maintaining non-pumping water levels at or above land surface is a conservative one. Lower water levels would serve notice to study the system to avoid the possibility of salt water intrusion. The recharge area for the aquifer system is likely on the uplands to the southeast. There should be no'reasonable concern of quality deterioration of the aquifer water as long as land use on the uplands does not include landfills or industrial uses where abnormal quantities or types of pollutants would be added. Domestic wastes percolating through the complex system of soils above the aquifer will be adequately treated to prevent pathogenic organism transfer. Nitrates are not expected to ever be present because denitrification should occur within the artesian aquifer system. A new well, Well No. 4, was added to the system inventory in 2002. This well was originally dug by the previous property owner. However, the District was able to obtain water rights from the III- 10 I Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) and a grant in the amount of $182,000 from Mason County in 2001 to purchase the well. Using the Public Works Trust Fund loan originally obtained for a new tank and pump station, the District was able to install new pumping equipment as well as a new hypochlorite generation facility in conjunction with the new storage facility discussed in Section 3.3.2. Belfair s Well No. 4 is located in the NE aNWa of Section 28, T 23 R 1W W.M. It is 640 deep from a ground elevation of 434 feet. The static water level is 185' below ground surface. The well was pump tested at an average of 63 7 gpm for a period of 24 hours. The following is a direct quote from the Recommendations and Conclusions of the Well report prepared by Robinson&Noble of Tacoma, Washington: The well is capable of a long-term yield of 600 gallons per minute. For this rate, the pump inlet should be set at a depth of 50 feet, and a one-inch steel sounding tube installed for direct water level measurements. The efficiency of the well is not as great as would be expected from an aquifer with the observed characteristics, and later redevelopment utilizing physical and chemical methods are advised if mote than 600 gpm is ever required. A doubling of the well's specific capacity is not unreasonable. The well, as it now stands, would readily serve as a public supply source of 600 gpm. With further development, it is likely that 1,000 gpm would be available from this single well. A second well in the area could also be used to increase the yield. Interference between two well should be minor. 3.3.1.2 Source Capacity Analysis The District presently has three wells in Pressure Zone No. 1 from which to draw water for the lower system's needs. One of the wells, Well No' 2 is reserved strictly for emergency purposes, because of sand generation problems. While the water from this well exceeds water quality standards once it has been flushed-clean of sand, the process to clean the water is manual and somewhat time consuming. It requires a staff member to watch the flushing and test the water before it can be directed into the system. The remaining two wells can produce 425 gpm on a sustained basis. This is insufficient for the long term"growth projections cited by Mason County and in this plan. While 425 gpm will produce 612,000 gallons per day, it means that the well would have to run constantly, 24 hours per day. This is not a desirable operating scenario, nor is it realistic. The annual average use granted in the existing water-right for the three wells in Pressure Zone No. 1 is 225 AF/Yr, or 196,242 gallons per day. Therefore, the wells cannot be pumped on a 24 hour per day basis without exceeding the water right. With addition of Well No. 4 in the second pressure zone, the primary water rights have been increased by 600 gpm and 645 AFNr. This appears to be more than adequate for district supply purposes for this planning period, even possibly to the 20-year term. However, since this source is not connected to the lower zone at this plan is being prepared, it cannot contribute to the recovery of storage. The district must rely on the two active wells in Pressure Zone No.l for the time being. III- 11 The water right analysis contained in Chapter 4 shows that the District has total for up to 730 gpm existing rights for instantaneous withdrawal. However,the restrictions noted earlier for Well No. 2 limit the actual amount of water available to 425 gpm on an automatic basis (i.e_, not manually turning on Well No. 2). A fourth well was acquired by the District. It is located on the upland area to the north and east of the Belfair Community Center in the NW 1/4, NE '/4, Section 28 Township 23 N, Range 1 W, WM. It was purchased from the property owner, and the water rights to the well transferred and granted by DOE. The well was test pumped and has shown to have a sustained yield of over 600 gpm. With the addition of the 600 gpm to the 425 gpm previously held,the District now has over 1,000 gpm available. If projections hold for the anticipated growth through the Year 2012,the total ADD will be 129,472 gpd. The additional well will allow the District to maintain its storage capacity and recover fairly rapidly from any required storage use. For the Year 2026 growth projection, it is anticipated that the total ADD will be 188,004 gpd. 3.3.2 Water Treatment 3.3.2.1 General Description an Condition Since the last Water System Plan Update in 2001, Belfair Water District No. 1 has installed hypochlorite disinfection facilities on all ofits wells. The first facility was installed in conjunction with the construction of a new 1.1 mg storage tank and the new well pumping facilities for Well No. 4. It is an on site generation facility that uses salt'to generate the hypochlorite solution that is fed into the well discharge line. Over the years, the District has had a positive bacteria test from time to time. However, in April 2004 it began to have a series of problems that resulted in four bad test results. The problems were isolated being in the Rose Point area in the south end of the system. This area is not looped and has a few seasonal;residences that have resulted in inconsistent flows. The District installed a temporary chlorine injector pump in its Hummingbird Well House and used this well as its primary source. No problems were encountered when this system was in operation. The Washington State DOH issued an order, which the District agreed to, to install new disinfection facilities at all of its well sites. The District chose a dry, hypochlorite injection system sized for each of the well systems. The facilities were installed in May 2005. Since their installation, no further samples have come back bad. The District maintains 0.2 mg/l chlorine residual in all lines in its system. 3.3.2.2 Water Treatment Capacity Analysis Since all three hypochlorite facilities are sized to fit with the specific wells they serve, there is adequate capacity to meet the needs of the District. The District maintains some critical spare parts on hand in the case of an emergency. Well Nos. 1 & 3 can be turned on or off as the need arises due to a loss of disinfection facilities. III- 12 3.3.3 Storage 3.3.3.1 General Description and Condition The District presently has storage tanks at two locations to serve its customers in the lower pressure zone, Pressure Zone No. 1. Each location contains two tanks. Each tank is cast-in-place concrete, 26' in diameter, approximately 17' high. Usable storage height in each tank is 16' for a storage capacity of approximately 63,500 gallons. Total system storage is 254,622 gallons. The north tanks are located on the hillside.almost due east of the intersection of SR-3 and the Old Belfair Highway. The south tanks are located on Razor Road at the south end of the system, approximately one half mile from SR 3. All tanks in both sites are at ground level at an elevation of approximately,255.5'. The overflow elevation on each tank is elevation 272'. The tanks provide "floating" storage for the system. The HGL is maintained in the system by the tanks as water is pumped into them by the booster pumps and is withdrawn as system demand requires. In 2002 the District completed the construction of a new 1.123,258 gallon storage tank to serve the upper elevations of the District's service area. This tank (standpipe) is a total of 125' in height with a 40.0' diameter. The base elevation is358.5 and the overflow elevation in 478.5'. The static HGL elevation is 478.0.' The District intends to eventually connect this,tank to Pressure Zone No. 1 to augment the storage of the lower zone. �z v 3.3.3.2 Storage Capacity Analysis Belfair Water District No. 1 is critically short of storage capacity in Pressure Zone No. 1 when fireflow requirements are examined under the current storage tank configuration. Even using "nested storage"the District is far short of providing long term fire fighting capability in the lower pressure zone. The hydraulic analysis of the system later in this chapter indicates that the system can provide up to approximately 3,000 gpm depending on location. If a full, four-hour requirement is used,this means thatthe system will have to provide up to 720,000 gallons of water. There are only approximately 250,QM gallons available. More storage is required, and an interzone connection would idd the 1.12 mg of the standpipe to the lower portion of the system. 3.3.4 Distribution System 3.3.4.1 General Description and Condition The distribution system is relatively new in terms of the time it's been in the ground. All of the present system was constructed subsequent to the District's formation in 1966. The predominant material used to construct the system is asbestos-cement (AC). The District switched to Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) pipe, along with most other water systems, with the concerns raised about asbestos. However, in 1996,the District adopted a formal policy to use ductile iron pipe(DIP) for all new water main construction. Pipe sizes in the system range from four to eight inches, with some two-inch lines serving very small dead-end services. The main distribution lines along State Highway 3, SR 106, and Old Belfair Highway are eight inches in diameter. Smaller diameters are used for some of the branch III- 13 lists h various sizes of pipe in the system, along with their types and estimated i lines. Table 3.5 sts the p p g lengths. Table 3.5 Belfair Water District No. 1 Distribution Main Sizes Dia.of Main in. Material Est'd Length ft. 16 DIP 2,000 12 DIP 4,300` 8 DIP 12,800 6 DIP 2,200 8 PVC 5,600 6 PVC 3,200 8 AC 33,600 6 AC 3000 TOTAL 66,700 A small portion of the system lies above the storage tanks on Razor Road. Because of this location, a small booster pump station drawing its supply directly from the Razor Road tanks serves the customers. The system is pressurized via two small, variable speed pumps, which maintain a system pressure ranging from a high of about 52 psi to a low of 35 psi. This system is adequate for now, because it only serves ten customers, but additional development is expected during the six-year term of this plan. Although there are fire hydrants located in this area, fireflow is not available. Generally, the distribution system is in fairly good condition. As. discussed in Chapter 2, the District apparently.has:some leaking problems that are difficult to locate. All of the leak problems identified to date have been in the AC.mains. There are no sewers in the Belfair Community area. However, it is the intent of the District to require a minimum of a ten-foot separation horizontally between future sewers and the water mains. The District will use the Department of Ecology's Criteria for Sewage Works Design, dated December`1998, as guidance, specifically Section C 1-9,or as may be amended. Because of the layout of the community and the topography of the area, the system is not looped with the exception of a'`small area at the intersection of SR-3 and Clifton Lane. Dead-end lines are located on each of the branches of the system on Razor Road, SR-106, SR 3, SR-106, and Old Belfair Highway. As discussed in Chapter 2,leaks are a problem the District has not been able to completely resolve. The geology of the area hides most leaks until they become large enough to force the water to the surface in a fairly steady stream. The other problem is that many times when the water does surface, it goes directly to storm drain ditches which, generally have water in them on a year around basis due to seeping groundwater. This further masks a leak's location. III- 14 Leaks have found to be from joints where gaskets may have been dislodged, small leaks in customer service lines, and lines that may have been crushed by heavily loaded trucks running over am in a drainage system creek bursting and washing out them. One leak was caused b a beaverd Y � Y g g the water line nearby. Presently the District has no formal policy for distribution line replacement. The existing system was constructed subsequent to the formation of a ULID forming the District in 1966. Overall, the distribution lines are in fairly good condition. System pressures are monitored constantly by the computer as it polls,the reservoirs. Because the system is operated by gravity, the reservoir levels indicate system pressure. Each time the computer polls the reservoir or a well pump, the results are printed out in hard copy form. If someone calls in with reduced pressure, staff responds to the location to investigate. The District's distribution system is not on a computer,other than the system maps that accompany this plan. A hard copy map is maintained manually by District staff. Valves are generally located at tees and or branches where necessary. Valve spacing is usually 600-700', depending on location. Hydrant spacing is set by the Mason County Fire Marshal. 3.3.4.2 Hydraulic Capacity Analysis Belfair Water District No. 1's water system was analyzed by computer using the University of Kentucky's KYPIPE2 Hydraulic Analysis Program.' The model was run on a 24-hour, extended period simulation(EPS), basis_ The system was analyzed for three different planning time frames beginning with 2006. The analyses cover the present, six-, and twenty-year periods of this study. The results show the present and future capacity of the system to serve its customers for normal demand, seasonal demand,--and fireIIow during peak seasonal demand periods. Computer input data and basic system results are presented in Chapter 10. The computer model of the District's system includes generally the entire mainline pipe. Only small diameter pipe such as the short 2, and flinch lines servicing small dead-end customers were not modeled. One dead-end 8-inch line from Old Belfair Highway down SR-106 to the Union River was also excluded. It only has a couple of residential connections on it, and does not impact the hydraulics of the system. This line is represented by a demand at the node at that intersection. With a mixture of pipe types`the Hazen-Williams "C" factor was adjusted to match each type of pipe. Table 3.6 lists the various C factors used. III- 15 Table 3.6 Belfair Water District No. I Distribution System Model Roughness Factors Pipe T H&W "C" AC 130 PVC 150 DIP 140 Iron 100 GIP 100 The full range of pressures the system produces was investigated. The reason for this was to be able to identify where problems may exist within the system. The HGL for the lower system is at elevation 272'. Because much of the system lies at an elevation of 50' the range of pressures produced is fairly high. The primary mainline along SR-3 has a working pressure in the area of 95 psi. Additionally, maintaining this high pressure is necessary to ensure that customers on all parts of the system receive adequate service, since the distribution system is essentially not looped. However, for certain applications such as fireflow, a limiting pressure of 20 psi was used. This is the lowest residual pressure used to determine the fireflow rate the system will produce. The system was analyzed on a 24-hour basis for-the peak use day of the year, with the data from 2005 representing the present period. The total flow at the end of the peak day model run is the same as the peak day use of that year. The total used was 282,531 gallons for the current period. The flow factors used `during the 24-hour period are based on staff evaluation and a review of reservoir levels. The model was set>up to run with flow factors during the various parts of the day as shown in Table 3.7. Table 3.7 Belfair Water District No. 1 Time Distribution of Model Flow Factors Time Flow Factor 5:00 a.m. 1.9 8:00 am. 0.5 5:00 p.m. 2.1 7:00 p.m. 3 8:00 p.m. 1.9 11:00 P.M. 0.15 III- 16 For the six- and twenty-year periods, the global demand was increased by a percentage over the base flow as indicated by the increase in population. For 2012 the increase was 112.24% and for 2026 the increase was 162.98%. Additionally, for the six- and twenty-year periods, the new standpipe connected to the lower pressure zone was included in the analysis. The new tank is located near the new well along the top of the ridge just east of the US Navy RR tracks in Section 28. The model was calibrated using fireflow results from each end of the system and in the middle. The final calibration resulted in a difference in flow of—2.5% at the intersection Of SR-3 and SR- 106, -0.2% at the Timberland Library near the middle of the system, and +1.2% at the Ashford Apartments at the north end of the system. Table 3.8 lists the fireflow results of the hydraulic analysis completed on the existing system under present peak hour flow conditions. Additionally, Figure 3.2 in the back pocket shows the location of each of the 86 hydrants on the system. Table 3.8 Computer Analyses of System Fireflow Capacity Under 2006 Peak Flow Conditions Building Address' . Fire Flow Obtained IN All Star Mini-Storage E. 19720 Hwy 106 3,172 Belfair Center NE 24092 Hwy 3 2,134 Belfair Elem..School . NE 22900 Hwy 3 2,435 Belfair Track&Paint NE 23530 Hwy 3 2,565 QFC Market NE 160 Hwy 300 2,966 Ben Franklin NE 51 Hwy 300 3,030 Sande's Boat Works NE 23940 Hwy 3 3,004 Benyon Cente'r'r., NE 120 Hwy 300 2,903 Safeway Clifton Lane 2,718 A fireflow analysis was also run on Pressure Zone.No. 2. This part of the District's system has not been calibrated, because there is not enough pipe in the ground to be able to do a good calibration. However, the same criteria were used as with Pressure Zone No. 1, so the results hould be fairly accurate. The resultant fireflows were 6,325 gpm for Hard Rock Concrete and 5,419 gpm at the end of the line on Katchemak Lane. All normal service connections at elevation 200' and higher, not serviced by a booster pump station, show a substandard pressure during peak hourly flows. Maximum static pressure at 200' is only 31.2 psi. As water is withdrawn from storage and tank levels drop, working pressure is reduced. Friction losses in the system also further reduce available pressure at the connection. III- 17 Those customers along Razor Road that fit this category have individual booster pumps on their service lines to maintain adequate pressure on the premises. The only other minimum pressures indicated in the analyses are for those nodes used to indicate the various tank surface elevations and control the switches for the wells. These ranged to practically zero during fireflow analyses. All other pressures met the minimums required, except those noted above. Figure 3.1, a copy of the System Map with the pipes and nodes, is included in the pocket at the back of this Water System Plan. 3.4 Summary of Deficiencies 3.4.1 Source The District only has 425 gpm of reliable source capacity at this writing. Well No. 2, although operable, is not reliable, and must be operated manually. It must be flushed completely and the water cleared of turbidity prior to putting it into the system. The District has a new well producing 600 gpm, but it is not interconnected to the lower pressure zone at this writing. 3.4.2 Water Treatment The District treats all of its sources with sodium hypochlorite. There are no deficiencies that require correction. 3.4.3 Storage Existing storage capacity in Pressure Zone No. 1 is incapable of providing prolonged fireflow. It can only provide about one hour's worth of water at 3,000 gpm. After that time, system pressures will be well below minimum,and even negative at the higher elevations. The well pumps can only provide 425 gpm, not enough to keep up with fireflow. With the addition of an interzone connection between pressure zones as proposed in this plan, Fireflow will still empty the North Tanks, but with the continued flow from Pressure Zone No. 2, higher system pressures will be maintained. The North Tanks soon recover their capacity while Well No. 4 refills the new tank 3.4.4 Distribution'System The existing physical,:system limits the available rate for fireflow purposes. The size and configuration of the distribution system limits maximum fireflow generally availability to between 2,200 and 3,200 gpm, depending on the specific location. It cannot provide the up to 4,500 gpm required for some types of construction. The existing buildings that require this high rate of flow are"sprinkled" and therefore get a credit against that fireflow requirement. The commercial center of Belfair is located at the confluence of the three major highways. This area is the most likely to require the highest fireflow need. During all fireflow analyses, the area north of the intersection along Old Belfair Highway suffered from substandard pressure. If the fire department is required to pump additional water from the system, negative pressures in this area III- 18 could result. This condition will continue until such time as the District can provide another connection to the upper pressure zone. Although there has been some discussion about new residential development in this area, the timing for that connection is not within the foreseeable future. sra r,r- WIF h� aY .A 4. �� s III- 19 CHAPTER IV TABLE OF CONTENTS IV. CONSERVATION PROGRAM, WATER RIGHT ANALYSIS, SYSTEM RELIABILITY, ANDINTERTIES ......................................................................................................................1 4.1 Conservation Program Development and Implementation............................................1 4.1.1 Required Measures for All Systems.....................................................................1 4.1.2 Other Measures and Level of Implementation......................................................2 4.1.3 Conservation Program .........................................................................................2 4.1.3.1 Conservation Objectives ..................................................................................3 4.1.3.2 Evaluation of Conservation Measures..............................................................3 4.1.3.3 Selected Conservation Activities......................................................................4 4.1.3.4 Target Water Saving Projections......................................................................6 4.1.4 Regional Conservation Programs.........................................................................7 4.2 Source of Supply Analysis...........................................................................................7 4.2.1 Enhanced Conservation Measures........................................................................7 4.2.2 Interties................................................................................................................7 4.2.3 Artificial Recharge...............................................................................................7 4.2.4 Use of Reclaimed Water, Reuse and Other Non-Potable Sources.........................7 4.3 Water Right Evaluation............ ..................................................................................7 4.3.1 Narrative Description...........................................................................................9 4.4 Water System Reliability Analysis...,...........................................................................9 4.4.1 Summary of System Reliability Efforts................................................................9 4.4.1.1 Source Reliability ............................................................................................9 4.4.1.2 Water Right Adequacy.....................................................................................9 4.4.1.3 Facility-Reliability ...........................................................................................9 4.4.2 Water Shortage Response Planning....................................................................10 4.4.3 Monitoring Well Levels..................................................................................... 10 4.5 Interties..................................................................................................................... 10 µ� LIST OF TABLES Table 4.1 Belfair Water District No. 1 Existing Water Rights..............................................8 Table 4.2 Belfair Water District No. 1 forecasted Water Rights...........................................8 LIST OF FIGURES IV-i IV. CONSERVATION PROGRAM, WATER RIGHT ANALYSIS, SYSTEM RELIABILITY, AND INTERTIES 4.1 Conservation Program Development and Implementation The Water Efficiency Act of 1989 (RCW 43.20.230 (1)) and WAC 246-290-100 require water conservation plans be included in water system plans. Additionally, water conservation plans are required to reserve future water rights. Therefore, the following conservation plan was developed in conjunction with the previous Comprehensive Water System Plan Update for the District and included herein.. Based on the Conservation Planning Requirements, Guidelines and Requirements for Public Water Systems Regarding Water Use Reporting, Demand Forecasting Methodology,'and Conservation Programs, dated March 1994 (Guidelines), the District is required to develop its conservation plan for systems under 1,000 connections. Belfair Water District No. 1 developed a new Conservation Plan in conjunction with its 1994 Water System Plan. That conservation plan was implemented on January 1, 1995 after DOH approval of the Water System Plan on November 28, 1994. In order for the Departments of Health and Ecology to assure consistency in review, the Guidelines stipulate a specific format for the District's Conservation Plan. The three major elements are Water Use Date Collection Requirements, Water Demand Forecast, and Conservation Program. The Conservation Program is further broken into sub-elements of Conservation Objectives, Evaluation of Conservation Measures, Identification of Selected Conservation Activities, and Target Water Savings Projections. Within Identification of Selected Conservation Activities, four further sub- elements are required. They are Description (a Description of conservation measures being implemented), Schedule (when the conservation measures will be implemented), Budget (Projected budget for each selected conservation measure), and Monitoring Requirements(how the system will monitor the success of its conservation measures). The following discussion is a review of each of the elements and sub-elements of the 1994 Conservation Plan. The District's Conservation Program was approved by DOH in November 1994, along with its Water System Plan, and reaffirmed in the 2001 Water System Plan Update. 4.1.1 Required q gyred Measures for All Systems Program promotion, including publicizing the need for water conservation through media outreach and other means, is required in all water conservation programs. Source Meter is required for all sources. Additionally, if unaccounted for water exceeds 20%, the conservation program must identify implementation of a program that includes detection and repair of leaks and other measures to reduce losses. The District began a Program Promotion program in 1994. The District produces a newsletter, which is sent to all customers twice a year in the spring and again in the fall. This spring's newsletter will be a newsletter explaining the District's preparation of this Water System Plan. The IV- 1 autumn newsletter generally discusses ways to minimize freeze damage during the winter months. Previously, the District has distributed Water Saving Guidelines 1, 2, and 3 via newsletters to all customers. The District presently also has copies of Water Saving Guidelines 1, 2 and 3, on display at their customer service counter. They are free for the taking, and are also given to each new customer. The American Water Works Association (AWWA) has several brochures and pamphlets on water conservation available for a nominal fee. The District can obtain copies of those that would apply in their specific situation and mail them out with the bills. The District presently has Source Meters on all of its wells. 4.1.2 Other Measures and Level of Implementation All District customers have Service Meters installed on their service lines. The District uses them for billing purposes. As reported in Section 2.1.3, water usage per SIR has decreased from 142 gpd/SFR to 130 gpd/SFR. This average is less than would normally be expected. Because of the lower usage, a close monitoring for abnormally high use can alert the District to potential problems. Customer Assistance is presently done via-a review of monthly billings. If a customer's use indicates an abnormally high usage, the customer is contacted to try to determine the cause. This practice will continue, and possibly be expanded as-time allows to include an audit of those customers who use a large volume of water on a continuing basis. Advice on water saving techniques will be particularly important in the high use commercial sector. The expanded customer assistance role has already,been implemented. For some time the District has had:a formal School Outreach program, which includes a policy of providing,tours of District facilities for.elementary, junior and senior high school students when requested. With;the addition'of promotional-material discussed above, the District advocates its role in water conservation in the Belfair area by specifically targeting the water system for educational purposes. Approximately 10% of the students in the North Mason School District reside"in Belfair Water District No. 1, or'are served by the District's water system. With Belfair Water District No. 1 as the major water purveyor in the area, tours of facilities along with explanations of:how the water is obtained and used is a long-term benefit in preserving the District's source of potable water. The District's system is.regularly patrolled for the purpose of Leak Detection. All leaks do not result in surface flows and are not readily apparent. The District is concerned about losses through leaks, and therefore is proactive in trying to identify potential problem areas. However, it is not cost effective for the District to hire a leak detection contractor until it is fairly clear as to the vicinity in which the possible leak is located. 4.1.3 Conservation Program The following statement is taken for the Guidelines: "The policy of the State of Washington is for all water users to use water efficiently. The goal of the conservation program... ...is to ensure that IV -2 all public water systems are implementing conservation programs to a level where they are achieving benefits by 1996." Conservation measures are grouped into four categories: 1) public education 2) technical assistance 3) system measures 4) incentives/other measures The Conservation Program for Belfair Water District No. 1 is comprised of Required Measures and Recommended Measures. The Guidelines list Source Meter Installation and Program Promotion as minimums under Required Measures. Additionally, the public water system "...shall consider the benefits and costs of installing individual service meters and implementing conservation rate structures." There are several Recommended Measures listed in the Guidelines. Because the District has less than 1,000 connections, it is required to implement the small system measures. Each of the required and recommended measures evaluated is discussed below. 4.1.3.1 Conservation Objectives The primary objectives of Belfair Water District No. 1 are twofold: 1) maintain the low single and multiple family usages; and 2)reduce the water consumption in some of the higher use commercial enterprises. The goal is to reduce existing user water consumption by approximately 5%. This reduction will translate into long term savings in expenses and maximize production equipment efficiencies. 4.1.3.2 Evaluation of Conservation Measures For this conservation plan the District is required to evaluate all recommended conservation measures identified in the.Conservation Planning Requirements and implement those that are required, and those that meet the public.water system needs. Belfair Water District No. 1 has less than 1,000 connections, and therefore must implement a conservation program for Small Water Systems at a minimum However,for the purpose of this Water System Plan, all listed measures that could assist the District in its conservation planning are evaluated. There are four elements to the conservation plan. They are Public Education, Technical Assistance, Syftm Measures, and Incerrtives/Other Measures. Within each element possible conservation measures that would be applicable to Belfair Water District No. 1's waxer system are evaluated. Public Education The District has involved the North Mason School District in several field events over the past five years. The primary focus of the program has been the junior high school level. This group seems to be more receptive and understands better the need for water conservation. Other grade levels have also been involved. Technical Assistance In conjunction with the inspection of high water use, the District provides Customer Assistance to customers who request such a service, by performing an audit on them for the purpose of IV-3 il determining if there are any leaks in their system. These include dripping faucets, leaking toilet tanks and other small leaks that may otherwise go unnoticed. System Measures The District has source meters, and all customers are served through service meters. Additionally, District staff conducts a regular leak detection program in the form of a visual inspection of the distribution system. Incentives/Other Measures While Single Family/Multiple Family Kits are relatively inexpensive, the District will have to seriously consider the financial impacts of providing them to its customers. Financially, purchase of too many kits could place a burden on water system revenues. Present residential usage is below the norm of most systems. Of the 395 single family and 60 multiple family residential customers, it is estimated that 40%, or more, pay the minimum monthly user charge. Included in the minimum charge is the use of 500 cubic feet, or 3,740 gallons, of water per month. The residential population of the District as a whole, uses below average amount on a daily basis. The District investigates those residential customers who seem to have a high usage factor(greater than 1,000 cf per month). Seasonal Demand Management strategies should only be used in an emergency. Such emergencies might include reduced production capacity due to mechanical problems. This type of problem would only be temporary in nature. Outdoor water use is generally'moderate to low. Therefore, seasonal restrictions of this nature would have little impact. The primary seasonal impact is from tourism. Tourism impacts the commercial users who have only a minimal outdoor water use requirement. The District already has the power to restrict water use on an emergency basis. Present additional Recycling/Reuse opportunities are limited for the District. Many of the major commercial users, such as QFC Market,already implemented recycling measures such as recycling its cooling water for refrigeration. The District can assist with recycling and/or reuse by taking a proactive approach to solving any problems the store may have. The District adopted an increasing block rate structure in 1995. Rates were increased across the board in 1998, keeping the increasing block rate structure in place. Again in 2001, the rates were increased, maintaining the increasing block structure. As this plan is being written, the District is discussing raising the current rates. If the rates are again raised during the preparation of this Water System Plan,the District will leave the increasing rate structure in place. This rate structure has apparently had the desired effect of reducing the average daily demand over its 11-year period. The graph in Chapter 2 illustrates the decline in the ADD from 1995 through 2005. The new rate structure had a positive effect in lowering water usage, and did not adversely impact District water revenues. 4.1.3.3 Selected Conservation Activities The School Outreach program will be continued. The District can provide the schools with copies of the Water Saving Guidelines for use in class, and specifically invite various classes to tour the system. Junior high school students should be targeted. These particular students will most likely get the most out of tours of the system. District facilities are not complex, nor complicated. When IV-4 presented information on a lay basis, the younger students can easily understand the system's various functions. Program Promotion is required for all conservation plans for all public water systems. The District has implemented a full time newsletter program with a semi-annual newsletter at a minimum. The newsletter was started on a regular basis in the spring of 1994. Based on a double-sided, 8'/2" x 11" sheet of paper per newsletter, the annual cost will be an estimated $500, including labor and postage. The cost would vary somewhat, depending on whether or not original articles are written by District staff. While the District presently provides a minimal amount of technical assistance at no additional cost, an expanded role will likely take an additional 40 working hours annually to implement. The estimated annual cost is $800. The estimated cost includes the inspection/audit time and additional record keeping. The additional cost may, or may not, be in real dollars, depending if the effort takes District personnel away from other duties. If a customer requests it, the District can provide a Consumption Audit Trail. showing consumption and cost for up to the previous 12 years,`or as long as the customer has been connected if the period is less than 12 years. Source Meters are installed on all wells. Service meters are already required as a condition of connecting to the water system. A Leak Detection program is already in place. The system inspection patrol cost is built into the District's expenses. The District's existing rate structure is considered as Conservation Pricing. A new, increasing block rate structure was adopted in 1995. Rates have been increased from time to time, the last in 2001. The increasing block rate system has been maintained, and will continue. Seasonal Demand Management is kept,in reserve for use in emergency situations. Present seasonal usage does not appear to be such that restricted water use during the dry season would have a major impact on usage, but would reduce revenues slightly. The District's production capabilities are not presently strained. The aquifers used by the District appear capable of sustaining higher use. Restrictions can always be placed on usage during periods of emergencies such as area-wide power outages or immediately after a fire to recover lost storage. The Monitoring ftguuements for the above measures will vary. Not all the measures discussed will have an impact on water usage. Some such as metering and leak detection are already in place. Others such as Program Promotion and School Outreach will have only a subjective impact. The District will record the times and number of newsletters it sends out. The School Outreach Program will only be as successful as the response of the school district and its students. Therefore, the District should keep track of the number and quality of contacts with the North Mason School District. IV- 5 By keeping a daily diary, District personnel track the number and times conservation program associated Customer Assistance is performed. The diary includes measures discussed or implemented with the customer. These might include leaks discovered or water reduction kits distributed. Following the next billing cycle, each customer's use can be evaluated for program effectiveness. This same methodology is also be applied to Leak Detection measures to document system leaks found and repaired. Reduced consumption on customer meters and reduced production on the District's source meters will be the tangible results of its efforts. 4.1.3.4 Target Water Saving Projections Chapter 2 discusses projected growth for the Belfair Water District No. I Water System service area. The growth is projected to continue. Therefore, overall total water demands will not decrease, but increase. While not on a steady basis from year to year, the ERU ADD for the District decreased from 150 gpd in 1999 to 130 gpd in 2005. This is a 13.3%decrease in six years. It is estimated that the conservation measures presently in place will continue to keep overall consumption near its present ERU level or possibly decrease it slightly. With the addition of new residential facilities and their attendant landscaping, the overall ADD of 150 gpm is expected to remain relatively level for the planning period. Forecasted savings discussed below are from that production which the District has to provide to meet its present customer needs. Savings will also be in reduced production increases that would otherwise occur due to growth- The School Outreach and Prog am Promotion measures will not have a definable impact on water system usage. Their ,biggest impact will be in the long-term education of the public on conservation of water resources. There may be long term savings, but they will be subtle and not measurable. Single Family/Multiple Family Kits are not considered to be a viable element for the District. Many homes have already been.kOtrofitted, and all new homes and businesses must meet the prevailing`water saving code requirements. . Customer Assistance can possibly provide up to a two percent additional savings in water consumption. Almost all of the`savings would be in the commercial sector in the auditing of water usage, and advice on water saving techniques. Leak Detection could bring about some savings, but only if the leaks can be found. The District has a leak detection program, but it has to rely on surfacing water to detect leaks larger than about 10 gpm. It is likely that the unaccounted-for water discussed in Chapter 2 maybe due to a series of small leaks that do not surface until they become large enough to overcome the geology of the area. Metering will have no effect on water conservation. All customers are now metered, as well as all sources. If the District provides for a new billing system that shows consumption history, then the user may better understand the meaning of his or her bill. IV-6 Pricing has had the greatest effect on water usage. Since 1995 the ADD for the District has decreased from 165 gpd to 130 gpd in 2005. There was an increase in 1997, but this is attributed to a very dry July-August period. There was another small increase in 2003, but again it is attributed a dryer than normal summer period Seasonal Demand Management would not be implemented unless the District has a problem with providing water from its sources. Presently, the two wells, automatically on line, provide 425 gpm to recover the system. As is discussed later, a third well with a potential of providing 600 gpm is proposed. No previous conservation efforts will be discontinued. However, the programs discussed above will not likely improve the ADD much to the year 2012. The impact of the increasing block rates has resulted in even a higher reduction than was projected in the 1994 Water System Plan. The District will continue to monitor usage to evaluate the impacts of its conservation program. 4.1.4 Regional Conservation Programs There are no regional conservation programs in the North Mason County area 4.2 Source of Supply Analysis 4.2.1 Enhanced Conservation Measures As discussed in Section 4.1.3.3 above, the District has evaluated enhanced conservation measures, and implemented those that were feasible_ The result was a 21.2% decrease in the ADD from 1995 to 2005. It is unlikely that much additional improvement in the ADD will be seen during this planning period. 4.2.2 Interties Interties are not a possibility for Belfair Water District No. 1 during this planning period. There are no other water systems within a reasonable distance that have the resources available to help the District. It is already the largest public water system in North Mason County. 4.2.3 Artificial Recharge There are no, pportunities for the District to utilize this technology. 4.2.4 Use of Reclaimed Water, Reuse and Other Non-Potable Sources There are no opportunities for the District or its customers to utilize this technology at this time. The Sewer Plan for the'Belfair area, now in draft form, proposed using reclaimed water for forest irrigation. 4.3 Water Right Evaluation Tables 4.1 and 4.2 on the following page list the District's existing and forecasted water rights. Table 4.1 includes three certificates and one permit, one for each of the wells in service. All certificates limit the District's total annual use to 225 acre-feet. The permit is for 645 acre-feet per year. Table 4.2 lists one projected application. IV- 7 i Table 4.1 Belfair Water District No. 1 Enlisting Water Rights Permit Name of Priority Source Primary or Existing Water Rights Existing Consumption Current Water Right Status Certificate or Rightholder Date Name/ Supplemental (Excess/Deficiency) Claim# or Claimant Number Max.Inst. Maximum Max Inst, Maximum Max.htst. Maximum Flow Rate(Q) Annual Vol. Flow Rate(Q) Annual Vol. Flow Rate(Q) Annual Vol. a a a Permits/ Certificates 1.02-24044C BWD No.l 3/21/79 Sol P 155 225 150 158.0 5 2.Q2-25214C BWD No.1 6/17/80 S 02 S 300 225 0 0 300 3.G2-26962C BWD No.1 3/20/87 S 03 S 275 225 275 4.2 0 4.02-29022P BWD No.1 3/10/94 S 04 P 600 645 1 600 0 1 600 Total 1030 865 1025 162.2 305 62.8 Pending Name on Date Primary or Pending Water Rights Water Right Permit Submitted Supplemental Application Maximum Inst.Flow Rate(Qi) Maximum Annual Volume(Qa) Requested Requested NOTE: The total annual use Sur all oertiticates and peamb daIl not exceed��Ibe animal uii%p Sgutes given in the table are for IM. ' rTable 4.2 Belfair Water District No. 1 Forecasted Water Rights Permit Name of Priority Source Primary or Existing Water Rights Forecasted Water Use From Forecasted Water Right Status Certificate or Rightholder Date Name/ Supplemental Sources(20 Year Demand) (Excess/Deficiency—20 Yr Claim# or Claimant Number Demand in Water Right) Max,Inst. Maximum Max.Inst. Maximum Max.Inst. Maximum Flow Rate(Q) Annual Vol. Flow Rate(Q) Annual Vol. Flow Rate(Q) Annual Vol. a a a Permits/ Certificates 1. T13D BWD No.l 2020 Well No.5 Supplemental 1,000 1225 1,000 1 225 2. Total IV- 8 4.3.1 Narrative Description Belfair Water District No. 1 presently has four wells in service. The locations of the four wells are presented in Section 1.3.1. The fourth well is a recently acquired well located in the NE '/4 NW '/a of Section 28 township 23 N, range 1 W, W. M. All wells are used to provide domestic water supply and fireflow for the District's customers. All water is used to supply water to the District's customers located within the bounds of the District as shown on figure 1.5 in the pocket at the back of this plan. 4.4 Water System Reliability Analysis 4.4.1 Summary of System Reliability Efforts 4.4.1.1 Source Reliability As discussed in Chapter 3, Well Nos. 1 and 3 appear to be very reliable and should provide adequate amount of potable water for the foreseeable future. However, Well No. 2"makes sand" when it is first turned on. It must be operated manually, and cleared up before the water can be introduced into the system. This well has undergone considerable additional development to improve it, but to of no avail. The water from.Well No. 2 is otherwise of high quality. Well No. 4 is located to the NNE os the Belfair Community Center in pressure Zone No, 2. It has a solid 600 gpm output. The well report written by Robinson & Noble states that the well could likely produce up to 1,000ygpm with additional development. Chapter 5 presents the District's Wellhead Protection Program. 4.4.1.2 Water Right Adequacy With the addition of Well No 4 during the previous planning period, the District has 1,330 gpm of Instantaneous Withdrawal waterrights and 865-acre feet of Annual Usage. However,the 300- gpm water right for Well No. 2 is essentially unused at this time. That means that for normal operating conditions, the District has,a total of 1,030 gpm instantaneous withdrawal rights. In accordance with the discussion in Chapter III, it appears that the rights are adequate for this planning period.' Hoever, in order to take fiill advantage of the existing rights, the District may want to request a transfer of the right for Well No. 2, and drill a new well of equal capacity. This will help with a critical f reflow storage recovery problem. While a new"Well No. 2"would go far in recovering lost storage,that problem will only be finally solved when the two pressure zones are connected. 4.4.1.3 Facility Reliability The existing wells are in good mechanical condition. However, because they are mechanical, they are susceptible to breakdowns. Well No. 1 has two booster pumps, which alternate operations. This extends each pump's working life. Well No. 3 is a fairly new facility, which has been operating without incident since installation. The District has a diesel-powered generator mounted to provide power to Well Nos. 1 & 2, if necessary. There is also a trailer- IV-9 mounted generator that can be transported to Well No. 3 in case of an emergency. These two generators are from military surplus, and replacement parts are difficult to come by. The District is in the process of installing a permanent generator at its Hummingbird site. The addition of Well No. 4 and the new tank will provide considerable backup to the facilities in the lower pressure zone once an interzone connection is completed.. The well produces 600 gpm, and the tank has approximately 1.1 MG available during an emergency. All water from this system will be fed by gravity to the lower portion of the system. 4.4.2 Water Shortage Response Planning The last time the District sent out a letter alerting their customers to possible water shortages due to the dry winter rainy season was in 2001. Although groundwater supplies are not affected in the same manner as surface water, the District felt it was prudent to prepare its customers to the possibility of a water shortage. Such a letter has not been necessary since then. All of the District's sources are very deep, artesian wells. Additionally, the North Mason County area does not have a large population to dramatically draw down groundwater supplies. While a water shortage is unlikely, the District has in place a,,policy, adopted by the Board of Commissioners that implements rationing and reduced usage in such an event. 4.4.3 Monitoring Well Levels All well meters are read on a daily basis. Well No. .1, a flowing artesian, maintains a head pressure under pumping conditions. The head pressure has been approximately 8.5 psi under operating conditions for many years. This pressure is also read and recorded daily. Well Nos. 3 and 4 have weekly water level charts, which record the water level 24 hours a day. These charts show the drawdown during pumping as well as the influence of the tide on the water level. All records of readings are maintained files in the District's office. 4.5 Intertiesr, Belfair Water District No. 1 does not have any interties with any other public water system. Also, it is unlikely that there will be any possibility of such in the foreseeable future. The District'is the largest in the North Mason County area. There are two possibilities. One would be with the tity of Bremerton, which serves Bremerton National Airport. It is unclear at this writing what may transpire in the area between the airport and Mason County. For this plan, an intertie is not considered. The second could potentially be with Beard's Cove Water System. The ends of the two systems are approximately 3/4 of a mile from each other. It would be feasible in an emergency to make such a connection. The operating HGL's of the two systems are not compatible. Beard's Cove could serve the lower pressure zone in Belfair through a PRV, but a booster pump station would be required to serve Beard's Cove from Belfair. An intertie is not considered for this planning period. IV - 10 CHAPTER V TABLE OF CONTENTS V. SOURCE WATER PROTECTION....................................................................................... 1 5.1 Wellhead Protection Program...................................................................................... l 5.1.1 Overview.............................................................................................................1 5.1.2 Susceptibility Assessment....................................................................................1 Introduction...................................................... ............l StudyArea Physiography................................................................................................3 Conceptual Hydrogeologic Model...................................................................................4 5.1.3 Contaminant Source Inventory.............................................................................9 5.1.4 Notification of Findings.......................................................................................9 5.1.5 Contingency Plan............................................................................................... 11 5.1.6 Spill Response Planning..................................................................................... 11 Introduction......................................................................................................... 11 Spill Response in the Wellhead Protection Areas........................................................... 12 State and Regional Support for Local Spill Response Capability ...................................12 Spill Response Terminology..........................................................................................13 Spill Response Organizations---... '................................................................................. 13 Roles and Responsibilities............................................................................................. 15 Local Emergency Planning and Emergency Management..............................................16 Incident Response Management ....... ...........................................................................17 State Incident Command System................................. ........-----..........---....................17 Unified Command Structure..........................................................................................18 Organization and Staffing Principles of ICS ..................................................................18 Recommended Spill Response Improvements................................................................ 19 5.1.7 Regional Implementation Efforts.......................................................................19 5.1.8 Implementation Strategies..................................................................................20 Introduction...................................................................................................................20 Wellhead Protection Management Strategies.................................................................20 Lung-term Management and Cooperation......................................................................20 WHP.Land Use Strategies.............................................................................................20 WBP Regulatory Strategies...........................................................................................21 Planning`Strategies.....'..................................................................................................21 DataManagement Strategies .........................................................................................22 EducationStrategies......................................................................................................23 Wellhead Protection Implementation Tasks...................................................................23 LIST OF TABLES Table 1* Descriptions of Hydrostratigraphic Units.............................................................6 Table 5.1 Table 9* Contaminant Master List and Ranking................................................. 10 *Table number is that of the full Wellhead Protection Program LIST OF FIGURES V- i V. SOURCE WATER PROTECTION 5.1 Wellhead Protection Program Robinson & Noble, Tacoma, WA completed a Wellhead Protection Program for Belfair Water District No. 1, in March 2001. It was submitted to DOH for approval under separate cover from Water System Plan Update for 2001. The Wellhead Protection Program was approved by DOH concurrently with the 2001 WSP. The following narrative highlights the contents of the WHPP in accordance with the Water System Planning Handbook. Much of the narrative is taken directly from the WHPP. 5.1.1 Overview The Belfair Water District has developed a Wellhead Protection Plan to identify and protect the groundwater resources that supply the District's four wells at three sites. These wells, completed in two aquifer systems, currently produce an average of 53 million gallons of water per year. The plan meets the requirements of the federal Safe Drinking Water Act and conforms to the wellhead protection measures directed by Washington Department of Health. The study was divided into three primary areas of interest: 1)Wellhead Protection Area Delineation, 2)Existing and Potential Contamination Hazard Identification, and 3) Protection Strategies and Implementation Tasks. 5.1.2 Susceptibility Assessment The hydrogeologic assessment from Robinson&Nobles's WHPP is presented here directly from the original document. The figures and tables not shown herein are contained in the original document attached hereto. Introduction Purpose and Scope Belfair Water'District maintains four production wells (Wells 1, 2, 3 and 4) that currently produce an average of 145000 gallons per day (gpd). The wells, capable of a combined 1,180 gallons per minute(gpm)are,completed in two relatively deep and highly confined aquifers. The goal of this study is to develop a WE PP, based upon a strong technical understanding of the aquifers that will allow prevention of aquifer contamination and degradation at, and upgradient from, the wells. Robinson & Noble, Inc. contracted with Belfair Water District to assist in the development of the WHPP. Before a WHPP can be developed, a management zone around the protected well or wellfreld must be delineated. This zone is called the wellhead protection area (WHPA). WHPAs, as required by State guidelines, are primarily based on travel time-related capture zones. These capture zones are estimates of the region surrounding a well that contribute flow to that well. Several steps are necessary to accurately delineate the area that contributes water to a well or wellfreld. First, geologic and hydrogeologic data for the general region must be collected and analyzed. Secondly, a conceptual model of the hydrogeologic system which encompasses the well needs to be developed from the data analysis. Finally, the WHPA needs to be defined by using the data analysis and conceptual model to determine zones of contribution, travel times, and capture zones. V- 1 Several methods exist by which the capture zone of a well or wellfield can be defined. Generally, the methods are considered to be in one of four categories. From lesser to greater accuracy, these are: the calculated fixed radius method, analytical modeling, hydrogeologic mapping, and numerical modeling. The calculated fixed radius method is a non-technical approach that requires a minimum of hydrogeologic information. This method is overly simple and is not appropriate to the District's situation. The more technical methods of analytical modeling and hydrogeologic mapping vary in their accuracy, depending upon the nature of the hydrogeologic setting, the level of understanding of that setting, and the quantity and quality of available data for the study area. Numerical modeling is a rigorous process that is highly dependent on an abundance of data and a well-defined hydrogeologic setting. This method applies computer technology to "solve" a master flow equation for the domain of the model. Because of constraints of available data and the hydrogeologic conditions in the area, the numerical modeling method was not used for capture zone delineation. Instead, a combination approach, which employed both analytical modeling and hydrogeologic mapping, was used. The main drawback to solely using analytical modeling is that this method assumes constant aquifer properties and, therefore, gives poor results at distance from wells where aquifer parameters typically change (from near-well conditions). Hydrogeologic mapping can give poor results in near-well areas as it fails to define short-term pumping responses in the aquifer. Consequently, the combination approach, which uses analytical modeling methods to define pumping responses near the production sources and hydrogeologic mapping techniques to define the responses at distance, provides good capture zone definitions at both near and far distances. The explicit tools and methods employed are described in detail later in this report. Previous Studies A regional study, Water-Supply Bulletin No. 18 (Garling and others, 1965), described the water resources of the entire Kitsap Peninsula. The first study that specifically evaluated the groundwater resources of Mason County was done by Molenaar and Noble (1970). This study collected and interpreted basic data relating to the groundwater resources of southeastern Mason County. Molenaar and Noble's study area was located primarily to the south of Belfair, but does provide information on geologic units'applicable to the current study area (primarily north and east of Belfair). Site-specific investigations of several water-supply wells located in the immediate Belfair area have been conducted by Robinson & Noble, Inc. for several entities (including Belfair Water District). The most recent investigation in this area was an initial basin assessment conducted by Robinson & Noble for the Union Subarea (Robinson & Noble, 1999). This study extended the basin assessment of the Union Subarea defined in the Kitsap County Initial Basin Assessment(KPUD, 1997),to include the Mason County portion of the subarea. Hydrogeologic Data The first step of the present study was to gather existing hydrogeologic information available in the area. The data includes every known well of record in the study area (Figure 1) for which a quarter-quarter section location, or finer, was available.' In total, the database contains 300 well records collected from the Department of Ecology well database, Robinson & Noble project Not included are wells with suspect locations, some abandoned wells, or wells of record reported to the DOE later than July 2000. V- 2 files, and published reports. Well coverage throughout the study area is variable (Figure 2). Well densities range from zero to 33 wells per square mile section. Well density is high in the southwestern portion of the area and in section 21 (T23N/R1 W), and is low elsewhere. Study Area Physiography Topography and Drainage The study area covers an area of approximately 36 square miles in the southern Puget Sound region of Washington State (Figure 1). The area is situated at the southwest end of the Kitsap Peninsula and occupies portions of both Kitsap County in the northeast, and Mason County in the southwest. Specifically, the major portion of the study area is contained within the southwestern portion of Township 23 North/Range 1 West and northwestern portion of Township 22 North/Range 1 West W.M. The physiographic and topographic characteristics of the basin containing the study area is similar to much of the surrounding Puget Lowland area, consisting of remnants of a Pleistocene glacial drift plain. Upland areas are capped by low-lying, drumlin-shaped hills, which, as a result of ice movement during the Pleistocene, possess a prominent northeast-southwest orientation. During more recent times, the topography in the upland areas of the study area has been modified by tributary streams, which incised numerous steep gorges. These gorges, which have generally formed between the low-lying hills, also possess a prominent northeast-southwest trend. The uplands are predominantly recharge areas for ground water in which precipitation percolates downward to water-bearing strata and eventually migrates to discharge areas. Numerous surface water drainage features,; such as Mission Creek and the Union River, also provide internal drainage for the shallow groundwater systems that occur within the uplands. The largest drainage feature adjoining the basin is Hood Canal, which is a regional discharge area for the deeper groundwater that originates within the uplands. Much of this discharge occurs submerged below the waters of Hood Canal. Climate Mason County has a characteristic marine climate, typified by short, cool, dry summers and prolonged, mild, wet winters. The variation between seasons results from the position of the Pacific High, a high-pressure air mass that varies in position seasonally along the Pacific Coast. This high reaches its northern position during the summer months, bringing with it typically clear and sunny weather. The high recedes south during the winter, and is replaced by a low- pressure system which is associated with storms which can be several hundred miles in width. The transition between the wet and dry seasons usually occurs during early fall and again in late spring. Winter storms generally approach the Puget Lowland from the southwest. Typically, Mason County and the southern portion of Kitsap County receive relatively high winter rainfall as a result of marine storms passing through the topographic gap between the Olympic Mountains and the Black Hills. These winter storms bring 82% of the annual precipitation during the 6- month period between October and March_ V- 3 Temperatures within the southern Puget lowland are moderated by the Pacific Ocean along with local marine waters. Temperatures infrequently drop below freezing or exceed 90°F. Geologic History and Stratigraphy The geologic formations exposed in the study are entirely unconsolidated Quaternary sediments. The Quaternary sediments deposited resulted from repeated cycles of glacial and interglacial episodes. It is generally accepted that four or more glaciations have occurred in the Puget Sound lowland during the Pleistocene. The most recent advance of the Puget glacial lobe occurred approximately 13,500 to 15,000 years ago and is called the Vashon Stade of the Frasier Glaciation. The Vashon deposits cover most of the study area. While the Vashon deposits are the most important to the shallow hydrogeology of the area, earlier glaciations and interglacial periods are most important to the deep hydrogeology in the area. Because of the lack of exposure, stratigraphic correlation of pre-Vashon deposits is problematic. When the Vashon Glacier advanced into the Puget Sound region, it blocked north-flowing drainages and created a pro-glacial lake. The sediments from this lake have not been differentiated in the project area. As the glacier advanced, a coarse-grained sand and gravel outwash was deposited by meltwater from the glacier. A sand and gravel deposit found beneath the Vashon till in the study area may possibly be correlated with the Vashon advance outwash. As the glacier advanced further, it deposited a subglacial till. The Vashon till is very common throughout the Puget Sound region, including the study area. Finally, as the glacier retreated further, recessional outwash was deposited. This outwash is similar in texture to the advance outwash. These deposits are typically thin in much of the Puget lowland, but can be thicker locally. The Pleistocene stratigraphy for the area is complex. The most recent regional study in the area, the Kitsap County Basin Assessment (KPUD, 1997), did not use glacial stratigraphy for units. Instead, it used h dro eolo is units roughly based>on gross grain size and inferred depositional Y g g FAY �' P environment. Deposits were assigned alternating designations of Quaternary glacial (e.g. Qg2) and Quaternary non-glacial (e.g. Qn2) with numbers assigned as relative age designators such that Qgl;is younger than Qg2. This nomenclature was not used for the present study because it is not wholly consistent with more recent regional studies b U.S. Geological Survey Kahle Y � Y g Y ( 1997), or by Robinson & Noble and other consultants. In the present study, deposits have simplified the designations of the hydrostratigraphic units into aquifers and confining units. The units used for this report are described later. Conceptual Hydrogeologic Model A hydrogeologic conceptual model is a pictorial representation of a groundwater flow system used to simplify and organize field data so that the system can more readily be analyzed (Anderson and Woessner, 1992). Ideally, a conceptual model should be as simple as possible, yet contain every important hydrologic component necessary to recreate system behavior. Essentially, the conceptual model synthesizes information from geologic logs, cross sections, potentiometric maps, hydrographs, and other geologic and hydrologic information into a generalized representation of the geology as it affects the groundwater flow system. Once constructed, the conceptual model guides the scientific analysis of groundwater systems of an area. V-4 Well information along with previous studies in the region has served as the basis for the development of a conceptual hydrogeologic model to describe the drainage in the Belfair area and the underlying geology. The locations of the wells providing information for this study are shown on Figure 2. Figure 3 presents the conceptual model for the study drawn as a schematic cross section. The cross section contains the three major components of a conceptual model: boundaries, hydro- stratigraphic units, and a general flow system. These components are described below. The conceptual model shows there is one major source of recharge for the groundwater system: direct recharge from precipitation. Once in the groundwater system, the water flows generally westward or southwestward. The major discharge areas are wells, springs, Hood Canal, North Bay, Union River, and Coulter Creek. The ground water in the study area is contained within the unconsolidated sediments. The generally layered system consists of relatively permeable water-bearing units (aquifers) and low permeability units, which generally retard water flow (aquitards). For the purpose of simplification, aquifers and aquitards are typically generalized into regionally extensive units. In actuality, textural variability within the units may result in a more complex assemblage of inter- fingered aquifers and aquitards occurring on scales ranging from regional to local. Boundary Identification Identifying the model boundaries is typically the first step in constructing a conceptual model. Ideally, model boundaries should be natural hydrologic boundaries such as groundwater divides and large bodies of water. Two general types of hydrologic boundaries exist: physical boundaries, formed by a physical presence (or lack of presence) such as a large body of water or the aquifer being nonexistent due-to erosion; and hydraulic boundaries, such as groundwater divides. The Belfair Water District Wells<are located within a large groundwater basin of unknown extent. For the above-sea level aquifers, the boundaries are defined by topographic lows, such as along the Union River. The boundaries for below sea level aquifers in which the District's wells are completed (Sea Level and-Deep Aquifer Systems), are defined by the Hood Canal to the south and west. The north and eastern boundaries are defined by groundwater flow divides assumed to be outside the study area. Hydrostratigraphic Units Following boundary identification, the next step in conceptual model formation is the definition of hydrostratigraphic units. As mentioned earlier, the units used here are intended to be consistent with the most recent studies in Kitsap County. Hydrostratigraphic units are groupings of sediments that exhibit similar hydrogeologic properties. The units may or may not conform with stratigraphic units. Typically, hydrostratigraphic units divide sediments into aquifers and confining units. The hydrostratigraphic units used herein do not readily conform with established stratigraphic units. Sediments have been divided into seven units: the Vashon till and perched aquifers, the V - 5 shallow aquifer system, the shallow confining materials, the shallow aquifer system, the intermediate confining materials, the Sea Level Aquifer System, the deep confining materials, and the Deep Aquifer System. The units are briefly described in the following table. Table 1: Descri tions of Hydrostratigraphic Units Hydrostratigraphic Unit Unit Description Includes Vashon Till and low permeability deposits of Vashon Advance Vashon Till and Perched Aquifers outwash. Contains small perched aquifers in high permeability deposits of Vashon Till and Advance.The unit is discontinuous above the shallow aquifer system. Shallow Confining Materials Low permeability deposits of fine-grained Vashon deposits and the penultimate glaciation. Shallow Aquifer System Includes high permeability deposits above sea level and below the perched aquifers.Extent of aquifer is limited Includes low permeability deposits of pre-Vashon age. Generally encountered Intermediate Confining Materials at approximately sea level. Sea Level Aquifer System Include high permeability sediments generally encountered below sea level. Regionally extensive. Deep Confining Materials Includes all low permeability sediments below the Sea Level Aquifer System. Deep Aquifer System Includes permeable sediments within the deep confining materials.Regionally extensive. General Flow System Defining the general flow system comprises the final element of constructing a conceptual model. The flow system is defined by the analysis of precipitation and recharge data, head and hydrograph data, well:production data, and other hydrologic information. The overall groundwater flow system ultimately is recharged entirely by precipitation falling on the land surface and infiltrating into the subsurface. A portion of the total precipitation also becomes surface runoff to the area's streams, evaporation from above-ground surfaces, and transpiration from plants that intercept water infiltrating the root zone. As stated above, groundwater in the aquifer systems of the Belfair area originate entirely as locally-infiltrated rainfall. The groundwater flow is generally westerly or southwesterly and eventually emanates as spring discharge to Puget Sound (both above and below sea level) or as discharge to lakes and streams. The basin receives an average of between 56 and 60 inches of rainfall per year(based on Kitsap County Initial Basin Assessment, KPUD, 1997). Hydrostratigraphic Unit Descriptions As described earlier, the materials beneath the study area have been divided into seven hydro- stratigraphic units based upon their hydrologic characteristics. The thickness and distribution of the units are based largely upon a cross-sectional analysis of the study area. For this study, two cross-sections were constructed from geologic logs, A-A' and B-B' (Figures 4 and 5), respectively. The cross sections were located (see Figure 2) to transect the best information on the deeper formations in the area and to intersect the four District wells. Each unit is described V- 6 below. The descriptions of the shallow units are brief because they are relatively unimportant to the current study. The deep units are described in greater detail. Vashon Till and Perched Aquifers As discussed previously, the Vashon till exists throughout the upland areas within the study area. Where it exists, the till unit impedes groundwater flow both vertically and laterally. However, it does not act as a confining layer because of its discontinuous nature. Where isolated permeable sediments occur on top of till or within the till, perched aquifers occur. These aquifers are independent from each other and the shallow aquifer system. Few wells are completed in perched aquifers. Typically, these wells, found only in upland areas, are shallow and have low specific capacities and potential yields. No transmissivity or storage coefficient data is available from the wells completed in the perched aquifers. In general, the till it acts as a leaky aquitard, allowing for slow leakage of recharge to the shallow regional aquifer system. Shallow Confining Materials Shallow confining materials are encountered below the Vashon till and perched aquifers. These low permeability deposits act as a leaky aquitard, allowing for slow leakage of recharge to the Shallow Aquifer System. These materials are typically rich in clay and silt. Shallow Aquifer System ; The confined aquifer materials encountered,above sea level are part of the Shallow Aquifer System. Shallow domestic wells located in the upland area that are not completed in the perched aquifers are often completed in this:aquifer. Over the higher elevation regions of the study area, the Shallow Aquifer System forms Ithe major target aquifer for the domestic wells. The aquifer is generally discontinuous in the study area. The specific capacity range for the wells completed in the shallow system is from less than 0.2 to over 20 gpm per footof drawdown (gpm/ft). However, most of these wells are domestic wells with relatively limited specific capacities of between 1 and 2 gpm/ft. Intermediate Confining Materials Between the Shallow Aquifer System and Sea Level Aquifer System, a sequence of low permeability sediments exists. These sediments are in contact with deep confining material where the Sea Level Aquifer System is absent. These materials are typically rich in clay and silt and range in thickness between 75 and 150 feet. Sea Level Aquifer System The confined aquifer materials encountered from 75 to 200 feet below sea level are part of the Sea Level Aquifer System. Wells located in low elevation areas along the Hood Canal and deep wells, some over 500 feet deep, are generally completed in this aquifer. This regional aquifer is of low permeability or absent in portions of the study area. Belfair Water District's Well 3 is completed in this aquifer. V- 7 The specific capacity range for the wells completed in the Sea Level Aquifer System is from less than 0.1 to 10 gpm/ft. However, most of these wells are domestic wells with relatively limited specific capacities of 1 to 2 gpm/ft. In the higher permeability portions of the system, the aquifer transmissivity has been measured at between 26,000 and 41,000 gpd/ft. Potentiometric Surface Definition: The water level elevations in wells completed in the Sea Level Aquifer System were mapped for wells with reliable locations and site elevations. The water level elevations for these wells define the potentiometric surface for the aquifer system (Figure 6). Absence of water level data in the eastern portion of the study area requires that the potentiometric map be more generalized in that area based on the information in the Kitsap County Basin Assessment. Contours at 20-foot intervals were then drawn by hand. Because of the small number of wells used to construct the map, the resultant contours represent an approximate potentiometric condition. Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution: To be able to calculate travel times, the groundwater gradient and the aquifer's hydraulic conductivity must be known. The gradients can be measured from the potentiometric surface map discussed above. Hydraulic conductivity can be calculated from transmissivity values. Unfortunately, transmissivity data for the Sea Level Aquifer System is generally lacking for areas away from the Belfair area. Transmissivity data can be estimated by specific capacity data, but this method is typically unreliable, and specific capacity data is also limited for the aquifer. The estimated hydraulic conductivity for the aquifer system is shown on Figure 7. The value used near Well 3, 35 ft/d, is based upon calculated transmissivity values derived from testing at the well. The test results,,coupled with well log analyses, imply that the hydraulic conductivity is less to the northeast of the Well 3.For this project, a value of 5 ft/d was estimated for this area. Deep Confining Materials Beneath the Sea Level Aquifer System, a sequence of low permeability sediments exists. These sediments are in contact with intermediate confining material where the Sea Level Aquifer System is absent. Relatively few wells in the study area penetrate through these sediments to the Deep'Aquifer System. Below the Deep Aquifer System, or where the deep system is absent, these low permeability materials extend to depth. These materials are typically rich in clay and silt. Deep Aquifer System The confined aquifer materials encountered from 250 to 400 feet below sea level are part of the Deep Aquifer System. Most wells that target high production rates or are drilled in areas were the Sea Level Aquifer System is absent, are completed in this aquifer. This regional aquifer is highly productive in portions of the study area. Belfair Water District's Wells 1, 2, and 4 are completed in this aquifer. The specific capacity range for the wells completed in the Sea Level Aquifer System is from 0.3 to 20 gpm/ft. The areas most productive supply wells, producing up to 600 gpm, are completed in this aquifer. Transmissivity ranges from 19,000 to 116,000 gpd/ft. Storage coefficient for the aquifer system is estimated to range from 0.01 to 0.001. V - 8 Potentiometric Surface Definition: The water level elevations in wells completed in the Deep Aquifer System were mapped for wells with reliable locations and site elevations. The water level elevations for these wells define the potentiometric surface for the aquifer system (Figure 8). Absence of water level data in the eastern portion of the study area requires that the potentiometric map be more generalized in that area based on the information in the Kitsap County Basin Assessment. Contours, at 20-foot intervals, were then drawn by hand. Because of the small number of wells used to construct the map, the resultant contours represent an approximate potentiometric condition. Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution: To be able to calculate travel times, the groundwater gradient and the aquifer's hydraulic conductivity must be known. The gradients can be measured from the potentiometric surface map discussed above. Hydraulic conductivity can be calculated from transmissivity values. Unfortunately, transmissivity data for the Deep Aquifer System is generally lacking for areas away from the Belfair Water District wells. Transmissivity data can be estimated by specific capacity data, but this method is typically unreliable, and specific capacity data is also limited for the aquifer. The estimated hydraulic conductivity for the aquifer system is shown on Figure 9. The value used near the Well 1 and 2 wellfield, 25 ft/d, is based upon calculated transmissivity values derived from testing at the wellfield. The test results, coupled with well log analyses, imply that the hydraulic conductivity is greater to the east of the wellfield (estimated to be 75 ft/d). Based on the testing of Well 4, a value of 150 ft/d was estimated for the area surrounding this well. 5.1.3 Contaminant Source Inventory A contaminant source inventory was completed in association with the development of the Wellhead Protection Program. A copy of Table 9 from the WHPP is included on the following page as Table 5.1. Land uses for the Belfair area are discussed in Section 1.5 and depicted in Figures 1.1 and 1.2. Future specific land uses for the Belfair UGA have not yet been determined. 5.1.4 Notification of Findings A Notification of Findings has been developed for the WHPP, but has not been sent out at thei writing. A copy of the letter is included in Chapter 10. The following is a list of those to be notified of the WHPP. • Homeowners • Mason County Department of Health Services • Mason county Fire District No. 2, Station 21 • Bremerton-Kitsap County Health District • Kitsap County Fire District No. 7 It is anticipated that the Notification of Findings will be sent out upon approval of the WHPP by DOH. V- 9 Table 5.1 Contamination Inventory Master List and Ranking Rank Site Name Address List Decision Levels I 1 II 1 III 1 Urban Growth Area zoning 1 4 0 (See note) 2 Residential-Rural 1 4 0 (see note) 3 Light Industrial zoning 1 4 2.500 1 (orphan) 4 Bob's General Store#603 22551 NE State Hwy 3 UST 1 7 200 2(orphan) 5 M.C.Gwimont 22604 NE State Hwy 3 UST 1 7 400 6 Transportation corridors 1 8 7 Saltwater intrusion 1 9 3 8 Norseland Mobile Estates 8651 State Hwy 3 SW CERCLIS,FINDS,CSCSL 5 1 15,600 4 9 Olympic View Sanitary Landfill 10015 SW Barney White Rd 5 1 17,000 5 10 Airport Auto Wrecking 1 6504 SW Old Clfton Rd CSCSL 5 1 21,100 6 (orphan) 11 Mason County PUD#3 21341 NE State Hwy 3 UST,LUST 5 2 3,500 7 12 Leonard/Hillman/Olympic View Indust.Park(now Boxlight) 5695 Imperial Way SW UST,LUST,ICR 5 2 17,150 8 13 Humdinger Fireworks/OVIP(now Pacific Ship) 8390 SW Barney White Rd UST,LUST,ICR 5 2 18,000 9 14 Bremerton National Airport/Port of Bremerton 8850 SW State Hwy 3 SW RCRIS,FINDS,ICR,UST 5 3 14,500 10 15 Bremerton IP/Western Steel/Airport Plant/Aldrich 8430 SW Barney White Rd FINDS,ICR,UST 5 3 17,900 11 16 Kitsap County Moderate Risk Waste Collection Facilities 5551 Imperial Way SW 5 5 17,800 12 17 All Seasons Gas 22691 NE State Hwy 3 5 6 1,100 13 18 Premier,Inc. 22751 NE State Hwy 3 RCRIS-SQG,FINDS 5 6 1,200 14 19 Belfair Truck and Auto Wrecking 11177 State Hwy 3 SW 5 6 4,100 15 20 North Mason School District 403 E 50 N Mason School Rd RCRIS,UST,FINDS 5 6 4,900 16 21 Belfair Xpress Lube 23970 NE State Hwy 3 5 6 6,100 17 22 USN Issot 5650 Imperial Way SW RCRIS-SQG,FINDS 5 6 17,300 18 23 Rendova Boats Port Orchard(now CCD Recycling) 5610 Imperial Way SW RCRIS-SQG,FINDS 5 6 17,400 19 24 Bremerton Transfer&Storage Co.LTD 8900 Imperial Way SW UST 5 7 16,300 20 25 Doug Lent,Inc. 8700 State Hwy 3 SW UST 5 7 16,500 21 26 Evergreen Transfer&Storage Inc.(now Trident T&S) 5727 Imperial Way SW UST 5 7 16,600 22 (orphan) 27 Hood Canal Auto(formerly Belfair Shell Station) 23800 NE State Hwy 3 UST,LUST 6 2 4,950 23 (orphan) 28 Belfair SubWay(formerly Texaco) 23701 NE State Hwy 3 UST,LUST 6 2 5,750 24 (orphan) 29 Canal Automotive 23481 NE State Hwy 3 RCRIS-SQG 6 6 5,100 25 (orphan) 30 Kevins Auto Repair(formerly Belfair Auto Repair) 23791 NE State Hwy 3 RCRIS-SQG,FINDS 6 6 6.600 26 (orphan) 31 Randy's Short Stop(formerly Short Stop Deli) 24100 NE State Hwy 3 UST 6 7 6,700 27 (orphan) 32 1 Sandy s Deli Mart 76(formerly BP) I NE 120 St Rt 300 JUS Lf__j 7 6,950 Note: Urban Growth Area zoning is ranked higher than Residential- Rural because it affects three wells (Wells 1, 2, and 3),whereas rural zoning affects one well(Well 4). V- 10 5.1.5 Contingency Plan The District's wells are all located some distance apart, except Well Nos. 1 and 2, which are approximately 30' apart, but in different aquifers. It is unlikely that a contamination event will affect all three locations (Well No. 4 is not on line at this writing, but should be by the end of 2001.) In the event one of the District's sources becomes contaminated, it will entail significant cooperation from all agencies, including the District, Mason County, the Washington State Department of Health, and the Washington State Department of Ecology. Depending on the time frame for such an occurrence, timing for obtaining a new well site may be critical. For example, if the situation were to occur during this initial planning period of six years, time would not likely be a problem. However, should it occur some ten or more years from now and growth occurs as is projected, sustainability of a good water source could present a potential problem. Interties between Belfair Water District and nearby purveyors do not exist, nor are any new interties likely within the long term of this planning period. If a hazardous spill should impact the water quality of one of the District's well, the first choice for alternative supply would be the increasing of percentage of production from the other wells in the system. Another alternative would be treatment of the water from the affected well or wells. Should a well or wells be permanently disabled, the Belfair Water District will need to drill a new well. New well placement will depend upon the nature of the disablement. For example, if the well is disabled by a contaminant spill, the new well can be drilled upgradient of the spill. The District is proposing a new water right and well in the southern portion of its service area by the year 2020. The well would be located along the ridgeline to the east of the community center, but at the southern end of the system. This location has at least two advantages. First, it will provide the southern end of the system with a greater quantity of water along the upper reaches of the southern end of"Pressure Zone 2" than is now available. Second, drilling a well along the upper ridge area provides a much greater depth of soil between the surface and the water bearing strata to be tapped, thus providing greater protection from surface contamination. Based on the cost of Well No. 4, it is estimated that the total cost of drilling and activating the proposed Well No.5 will be approximately $200,000 in 2000 dollars. 5.1.6 Spill Response Planning The following text for"Spill Response Planning is taken directly from the WHPP prepared by Robinson&Noble. Introduction The purpose of this section is to outline and evaluate spill response procedures and capabilities for the District's WHPAs. To conduct this evaluation, major spill response organizations were identified. V - 11 Spill events can be large or small, and can exist of highly toxic or inert materials. Events can occur under conditions where the spill is easily contained or where clean-up time is plentiful, or they can occur where surface water, waterways, or ground water are under immediate threat. This range of possibilities has prompted a spill response(and emergency response) system which is nationwide in scope and can involve federal agencies, yet is designed to handle the more common, small-scale (yet potentially dangerous) spills. This assessment takes into account this range of possible spills and responses. The ability of the District to affect the protocols and procedures of the national and state response systems is limited. However, the majority of spills are small and require local response, as a minimum. Therefore, for the purposes of this effort, focus is given to local response capabilities and to the needs associated with these local response systems. Spill Response in the Wellhead Protection Areas Although the District's wells are completed in relatively deep aquifers, hazardous spills could potentially affect the groundwater supply for the defined WHPAs. Should such a spill occur, within a WHPA, a 911 call should be made immediately. The 911 operator will ask several questions concerning the location and nature of the spill and send either personnel trained in hazardous materials incidents from the nearest fire department or send directly for a full Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) team from Mason or Kitsap County. In order to inform emergency responders of the sensitive nature of the area and allow them to evaluate what hazardous spill response measures are necessary, a notification letter is being sent to the local fire department(s), neighboring fire jurisdictions, the Mason and Kitsap County Sheriffs, and the Washington State Patrol. The State Patrol is the pre-designated Incident Command Agency for all incidents occurring on state highways. Without a pre-arranged agreement with the District for HAZMAT incidents, the State Patrol must contact an agency with jurisdiction and capability (such as a local fire district) to secure a HAZMAT team response. This situation represents a potential delay, and therefore, may increase the risk to the surface and ground water quality, particularly along the Highway 3 corridor. If the District is able to secure an agreement with near-by HAZMAT teams (either directly or, through the District Fire Department), the response time may be lessened significantly. The role of the Department of Ecology will be described in detail in the remainder of the section. This agency provides an important function in spill management and cleanup. They are not generally considered 'a "first response" agency, but because of their regional offices and their environmental protection responsibilities, they are often quickly on-scene, and can provide clean-up or containment advice and services(though usually through contractors). State and Regional Support for Local Spill Response Capability Spill response planning has been underway throughout Washington State for many years. As a result, there are many response plans in existence, each focusing on a specific geographical area or type of substance. In addition, organizations involved in the storage and transportation of hazardous materials have been required to develop contingency plans. Accordingly, this assessment of spill response capability and recommendations for enhanced response is intended V - 12 to be consistent with existing spill response plans for the area and the state. An overview of the general local response system is given on Figure 18. The foundation for systems and procedures outlined in this section are described in documents such as the "Statewide Master Oil and Hazardous Substance Spill Contingency Plan" (Ecology, 1991) and the "Washington State Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan" (Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED), 1987). The Department of Ecology is continuing the development of the State Master Oil and Hazardous Substance Spill Contingency Plan. The next major phase in the effort is the production of a volume of the plan specifically focused on operational issues. This document, when completed, will provide spill responders and key agency staff with the information and procedural guidelines necessary to effectively respond to spills. These procedures will include such items as enforcement protocols and laboratory support procedures. The following are the spill response plans in effect in Washington State which cover inland (non- marine) areas such as wellhead protection areas and aquifer recharge areas2: • National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution and Contingency Plan (NCP) prepared by the EPA. • Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan for Federal Region 10 (RCP) - prepared by Region 10 of EPA. • Washington Statewide Master Oil and Hazardous Substance Spill Contingency Plan - prepared by Ecology. • Washington State Emergency Response Plan prepared by the Department CTED. • Local Emergency Response Plans- prepared by county governments. Spill Response Terminology The term contingency plan should not be confused with the water supply contingency plan developed in the following chapter. Contingency planning for the purpose of this section should be construed to mean "spill response contingency" plans. In the various contingency plans applicable to Washington State, there are repeated references to an "Incident Commander (IC)" and an "On-Scene (Site) Coordinator (OSC)." The IC is the person who is in command of an incident during its emergency phase and OSC is the person who is in charge of spill or release management and cleanup. While there is an IC in charge of the situation, the OSC takes direction from this person. After the emergency response is complete, the authority is transferred to the OSC for final cleanup. Spill Response Organizations Depending on the magnitude of the spill event, numerous organizations at all levels of government, the private sector, and some voluntary organizations, can have a role in spill response and cleanup. Each of the plans mentioned above describes the relationship and roles of 2 Portions of existing statewide documents have been condensed and modified for presentation in this section. V- 13 these organizations in terms of the particular concern. Listed below are a few of the organizations which might be, depending on the size and nature of the release, involved in a spill response in a wellhead protection area or ground water recharge area. The Ecology Spill Response Team consists of Washington State Department of Ecology regional office personnel. This team is responsible for determining the source, cause, and responsible party, as well as initiating appropriate enforcement action. Additional responsibilities include ensuring containment, cleanup, and disposal are carried out adequately. The team coordinates its actions with other state, federal, and local agencies. The Local Response Team (LRT) consists of state and local government agencies, industry personnel, academic organizations, and other private interests that may assist the OSC in pollution response and planning. The composition and level of participation in the LRT is dependent upon the area involved, the hazard posed, and the type of assistance required. Normally, the LRT will consist of the state environmental response agency and clean-up contractors. The Technical Assistance Team (TAT) is a contractor used by the EPA Region 10 office to provide technical oversight at spills and uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. Requests for the TAT are made via the EPA. Once on site, the TAT will report the situation to the EPA duty officer who then decides whether an EPA OSC needs to be on scene. Initially, the resource damage assessment program was an Ecology-led effort designed to organize the state natural resource trustee agencies into an effective resource damage assessment taskforce. The state now has a Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) team consists of representatives from Ecology, Health, CTED, the Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), the Parks and Recreation Commission, and the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). In the event of a major pollution event which damages natural resources, this committee's mission is to organize personnel, materials, and equipment necessary to conduct reconnaissance evaluations and initiate detailed assessments of natural resource damages. The Environmental Response Team (ERT), based in Edison, New Jersey, was established to advise the IOSC and Regional Response Team (RRT) on environmental issues surrounding spill containment, cleanup, and damage assessment. ERT personnel have expertise in areas such as treatment technology, biology, chemistry, hydrology, geology, and engineering. The RRT, consists of representatives from selected federal and state agencies. The RRT is the regional body responsible for planning and preparedness before spill occurs, and provides advice to the OSC following such incidents. The National Response Team (NRT) consists of representatives from the various federal agencies(such as EPA, the US Coast Guard(USCG), Fish and Wildlife Service, etc). It serves as the national body for planning and preparedness actions prior to a spill and as an emergency advisory center when a spill occurs. V- 14 Roles and Responsibilities Spill response plans stress that for spill response procedures to be effectively executed, each party must be fully aware of their specific roles and responsibilities. Moreover, there must be an understanding of the roles of other parties involved in response activities, as well as effective coordination, cooperation, and communication among responding agencies, organizations, and individuals. This section describes the specific roles and responsibilities of the key parties, including: • Responsible party or spiller • Federal and state agencies • Local government • Facility owners • Contractors The Responsible Party The primary responsibility for assessing, responding to, and containing an oil spill or discharge falls upon the individual, agency, or company responsible for the spill incident. The responsible party (RP), whether there is an approved contingency plan or not, is responsible for containment and cleanup of the spill, disposal of contaminated debris, restoration of the environment, and payment of damages. State and federal law specifically require that the removal of a discharge of oil or hazardous substance should be immediate. Environmental Protection Agency The EPA has primary responsibility for spills that occur on land and on inland U.S. waters not under USCG jurisdiction. As directed by the NCP, the EPA is pre-designated as OSC for spills occurring in these areas. Department of Ecology Ecology is the lead state agency' for environmental pollution response within the State of Washington. As such, it has pre-designated the state OSC and the IC for many spills occurring in state jurisdiction. In the event of a spill occurring on a state highway, Ecology coordinates with the Washington State Patrol, which assumes responsibility as IC, and Ecology acts as the lead agency responsible'for clean-up activities. State Patrol The State Patrol acts as the designated Incident Command agency for incidents on interstate and state highways, and other roads and jurisdictions as delegated. CTED- Emergency Management Division Washington State Emergency Management Division(EMD)is responsible for: • Developing and maintaining a State Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. • Maintaining a 24-hour capability to receive notification of incidents and request for assistance and initial notification to local, state, federal response agencies. V- 15 • Activating the State Emergency Operations Center (EOC) as needed to coordinate state resource identification and acquisition in support of Ecology response. • Providing Public Information Officer(PIO) support to the Incident Command. • Maintaining an updated list of NRDA team members submitted by participating agencies. • Maintaining and updating a notification list of local, state, and federal agencies involved in emergency response. • Coordinating the procurement of state resources for use by the OSC or as requested by local EMD or other designated local response agency or state response agencies. • Participating in the NRDA team. Department of Fish and Wildlife(DFW) The DFW is a state agency with trustee responsibilities for wildlife, game fish, food fish, non- game fish, shellfish, and their associated habitats. The agency is also responsible for state facilities (hatcheries, properties, launching ramps, and related facilities) and assorted equipment. Of special concern are high-value habitats that may be used as nursery grounds for fish or wildlife. DFW is a participant on the NRDA team. Department of Health(Health) Health has the responsibility for beach closures for human health and safety purposes, public health concerns from contaminated food supply (e.g. shellfish), and general health-related matters for the safety of the public. In addition, Health is to renderall appropriate laboratory support and services to the OSC. Health is a participant in the NRDA team_ Department of Transportation(DOT) The DOT may provide traffic control, equipment, and personnel for non-hazardous clean-up activities on state and interstate highways. The DOT may provide and mobilize equipment necessary in a major spills incident. Local Responders Local emergency response organizations such as local police, county police or sheriff, and local fire districts have a key role`to'play in most spill situations as they are the "first responders" for the majority of spills. These local entities provide for immediate protection of health, property, and the environment. It is this group of responders who determine the need for additional assistance and mobilization of the additional resources mentioned in this section. Local Emergency Planning and Emergency Management Local governments have a duty to be prepared for all disaster emergencies. Each County's EMD is charged with establishing Local Emergency Planning Districts (LEPD) and Local Emergency Planning Committees (LEPC)to facilitate planning efforts. LEPC's have the responsibility to create local emergency response plans. General requirements for local response plans are contained in Title III of the 1986 SARA. Generally, local agencies, particularly fire services and law enforcement agencies, can be activated to provide emergency response services when there is a threat to life and property. Emergency response services may V- 16 include: fire and explosion controls, investigation, and documentation, perimeter control, evacuation, traffic controls, and initial containment or even removal of materials, depending on the nature of the incident. Incident Response Management The party responsible (RP) for a spill is required by state law to notify the National Response Team (NRT) and the state EMD. The RP is also encouraged to contact the nearest appropriate regional office of Ecology. The following is a list of phone numbers for agency notification. Washington State Emergency Management Division 1-800-258-5990 Washington State Department of Ecology 24-hour Emergency Spill Response 1-360-407-6300 Southwest Office- Tumwater 1-360-407-6300 Northwest Office-Bellevue 1425-649-7000 Spills Program-Puget Sound Office 1-206-389-2431 Mason County County Sheriff(non-emergency) 275-2819 Fire Marshal 427-9670,Ext. 329 Emergency Management 427-9670, Ext. 329 Environmental Health 427-9670, Ext. 352 Public Works/Roads 427-9670, Ext. 450 Kitsap County County Sheriff(non-emergency) 1-360-337-7170 Fire Marshal 1-360-337-7181 Emergency Management 4 1-360-337-7119 Public Works/Roads 1-360-337-7121 Sewer District No. 5 a ' 1-360-871-6861 Washington State Patrol Shelton 427-2180 Fire Bureau Region 1 1-360-405-6637 Environmental Protection Agency Region 10- Seattle 1-206-553-1263 National Response Center 1-800-424-8802 In most spill response situations, the initial call is to a local emergency response agency such as the local fire department or district, local police, or others. The use of a 911 system will activate the local response. These first responders provide the initial on-scene control, and manage the scene under the Incident Command System described below. State Incident Command System The State of Washington's spill response is organized and managed under an Incident Command System (ICS). The ICS is a functional component of a larger program, the National Interagency Incident Management System (NUMS), which was developed for the interagency management of large forest fires. The ICS, although less complex than the NIIMS, is designed to allow for the day-to-day management of response efforts and resources for all oil and hazardous substance V- 17 spill responses, from the very small or routine efforts to the largest catastrophic spills involving multi-agency jurisdictions. Specifically, the system will operate in the following scenarios: • Single Jurisdiction/Single Agency • Single Jurisdiction/Multi-Agency • Multi-Jurisdiction/Multi-Agency The ICS concept is built upon teamwork coordination and cooperation between all entities involved (or potentially involved) in a spill response. Teamwork is encouraged throughout all phases of incident management including the preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery phases for spills of any type or size. Ecology has taken steps to ensure there is effective teamwork, coordination, and participation in the ICS by appropriate state and local agencies in addition to the USCG and the EPA- Unified Command Structure In Washington State, the ICS will operate using a Unified Command Structure involving representatives of the Ecology, federal government (USCG/EPA), industry, and in some circumstances local government. A Unified Command Structure is called for when the spill is multi jurisdictional in nature, e.g., when public safety and welfare, as well as environmental damage, is imminent. Under the Unified Command Structure, the three key On-Site Coordinators (OSC) -- federal, state, and industry -- will share decision-making authority in the command post and consult with each other regarding spill:response and clean-up, management issues. Participation in the Unified Command Structure does not mean that agencies such as the USCG, EPA, and Ecology, which have roles and responsibilities, set by federal and state statute, are relinquishing or surrendering their authority. Emergency situations, however, may require some actions to be taken outside of the normal permitting process. The Unified Command Structure is a consistent, systematic means of organizing a variety of agencies having jurisdictional responsibilities surrounding an incident, into one concerted effort. The concept offers uniform and traceable procedures that enable all emergency response agencies to perform their roles effectively, yet in unison. A Unified Command is located as close to the site of the spill as practicable, without interfering in the actual spill response activities. Organization and Staffing Principles of ICS The ICS organization is functionally oriented around four major areas: command, planning, logistics, and administration. The flexibility to expand this organization as situations dictate is designed within the ICS, without the need to conduct major organizational changes or a cumbersome transition into a different operational system during a spill response. For example, in a minor incident a single person may serve as the OSC and perform all functions. In a major incident, the command may consist of a united command with federal and state representatives, the RP, the OSC, a staff, and a group of sections and functional units. Participants in the Unified V- 18 Command/Command Post and the OSC's are normally pre-designated, any remaining sections or functions are assigned as needed. It is important for those parties and agencies participating in ICS to understand that the key to its effective operation is the acknowledgment that the IC is in charge of the entire operation, the OSC is in charge of spill cleanup during the incident, while the section chiefs and functional unit leaders are in charge of their units or sections. As a rule, sections should have a single individual in charge who has the authority to make decisions and to give orders. Without this authority, the system will fail. Accordingly, it is a maxim of ICS that section chiefs should be selected based on their experience and qualifications, not rank or seniority within their relative agency or organization. The staffing requirements of the ICS should be viewed as a dynamic activity, not one based upon maintaining a precisely defined level. Flexibility is a key element of ICS, allowing the command structure to be as large and sophisticated, or as small and compact, as the spill event requires. As long as common sense is used, the system can be modified to fit any incident. The size of the ICS will be determined by the IC. Recommended Spill Response Improvements Complete Mutual Aid Agreements Mutual aid agreements between Mason County Fire District 2, Kitsap County Fire District #7, and HAZMAT should be completed and routinely updated. The Fire Department should investigate agreements for direct HAZMAT response=from Mason and Kitsap Counties. Response scenarios involving other potential first responders(such as the State Patrol, the Mason and Kitsap County Sheriffs, or others) should be reviewed to assure that the response protocols are clearly understood and the response system is as streamlined as possible. Establish Responder Group As part of the implementation of this plan,: a spill responder group (consisting of local fire, police, emergency management, water districts) should be established to discuss spill response in the WHPA. Efforts should be made to communicate the extent of capture zones to the first responder organizations. This "forum for discussion of WHP issues could take the form of a sub-group of the LEPC, or could be developed independently. Discuss Wellhead Precautions Through a local "responders" group, discussion should focus not only on the locations of the WHPA zones, but also on specific protocols and procedures for response in the zones. For example, certain types of responses may be more protective than others, depending on the chemical, the location within the zones, and the tradeoffs affecting immediate public health and safety. 5.1.7 Regional Implementation Efforts Belfair Water District No. 1 is the only major purveyor in North Mason County. Therefore, its WIIPP is a lone effort on behalf of the Belfair Community. The District is not aware of any other WHPP's in the area. V- 19 5.1.8 Implementation Strategies The following is taken directly from the WHPP prepared for the District by Robinson&Noble. Introduction The completion of wellhead protection planning provides no safeguards unless effective management strategies are implemented to prevent potential contamination of ground water sources. The District does not own or control all of the land within its WHPA. Maximum effectiveness can be achieved in implementing the WHPP through a cooperative effort between the District, neighboring purveyors, and the state and local agencies which regulate potentially harmful activities within the WHPA. An important component to its management of the area will be the notification of the existence and extent of the management area to the proper agencies in Mason and Kitsap Counties, neighboring communities, and to local residents. Wellhead Protection Management Strategies The following sections detail proposed strategies developed to protect the integrity of the District's water sources. Long-term Management and Cooperation This WHP program is designed to be a continuing management activity to meet the District's future planning needs or to adapt to changes in the physical conditions of the aquifer system. As such, the management strategies and practices outlined within this study provide a general direction, but will periodically need to be refined to fit specific conditions. Additional adaptations may be needed to address future activities and regulations, or changes in current regulations that may affect the WHPAs. Strategy #1: Establish a WHP Committee: The District could establish a WHP Committee, which would meet periodically to: 1. Evaluate the implementation status of the WHP tasks 2. Review federal, state, and local programs regarding the WHP 3. Review changes in surface activities within the WHPAs 4. Meet WHP regulations and requirements The group should strive to focus on promoting existing or future water quality and quantity resource protection programs for the WHPAs. Strategy #2: Land Management Activities: The District should encourage owners or agencies responsible for large land parcels and developments to use and monitor best management practices (BMP) for control, reduction, and restriction of potential contaminants into the WHPA. WHP Land Use Strategies The Belfair Water District has no authority to directly control land use for those areas of the WHPA that are outside the service limits of the District. Therefore, the District must develop a cooperative relationship with those state and local agencies that administer land use programs. At the present time, the best strategy for the District is to seek special designations for the WHPA V-20 from pertinent agencies. The District should evaluate and seek the different designations that may be most beneficial. Strategy #3: Possible Special Protection Area Designations: • A Special Protection Area designation under the state ground water quality standards (WAC-173-200), • A Special Use Area by the Department of Agriculture, • An Environmentally Sensitive Area under various County-level programs. WHP Regulatory Strategies This WHPP is designed to use the existing statutory rules and regulations to protect ground water quality. The District, in coordination with state and local agencies having statutory authority in the area, would monitor regulated activities within the WHPA. The following regulatory strategies are recommended. Strategy #4: Well Drilling Inspections inside the WHPA: The District should encourage the delegation of well construction inspection authority be transferred from Ecology to the health departments of each county. Regardless of the responsible agency, the District should encourage more frequent well construction inspection than currently occurs. Strategy #5: Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)/Hydrogeologic Evaluations: The District should request the Mason and Kitsap Counties Department of Community Development (DCD) to require hydrogeologic evaluations that specifically address impacts to groundwater quality and quantity parameters for any development within the WHPAs which requires SEPA action'' or seeks Determination of Non- Significance (DNS) designation. Additionally, the District should enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with',the DCDs seeking District comment on the effects such development will have on the ground water system. Designation of the area as a Special Protection Area will be the first step toward gaining such an agreement. Strategy #6: Septic Tanks: The District should request Mason and Kitsap Counties to require that as-built#, drafted by a septic design professional, of new septic systems be recorded with property deeds. Additionally, the District should support the implementation of laws and regulations requiring proper inspection and maintenance of septic systems. Planning Strategies A substantial degree of future protection for the WHPA will be achieved through present-day planning and coordination. In order to accomplish the required level of future protection, the following strategies are recommended. Strategy #7: Sewers: The District, in coordination with the managers of local sewer systems (if and when they are in place), should develop emergency plans to be implemented in the advent of sewage leaks or spills. The District could encourage the appropriate County to require all industrial and commercial facilities within the WHPA to connect to sanitary sewers, if such services are reasonably available. V- 21 Strategy #8: Storm Water Management: The District should conduct or promote research on the impact of storm water discharge on water quantity and quality. Additionally, the District, in coordination with the responsible agencies, should evaluate the adequacy of storm water facilities, including proper routing, retention, and detention. A balance must be found that allows optimum recharge of storm water to groundwater systems while adequately protecting the water quality of the aquifers. Strategy #9: Emergency Response for Transportation Corridors: The District should notify the appropriate emergency response organizations of the location of the WHPA and establish formal communication protocols with the first-response emergency units. Strategy #10: Hazardous Material Transport: The District should investigate the feasibility of re-routing the transport of hazardous materials away from the WHPA one- year time of travel zone. This option may necessarily have to exclude the State Highway 3, since it represents a major transportation route. Strategy #11: Farm Planning: The District and the Conservation Districts of each County in the area should discuss how farming practices could affect ground water. The District should encourage and support the County Conservation Districts in their farm planning, such that farm plans include items specifically designed to protect ground water quality. Strategy #12: Petroleum Pipelines: The District should document the location and use of petroleum pipelines and establish emergency response plans for pipeline failure. These efforts should ;be coordinated with the pipeline companies and the federal, state, and county agencies responsible for emergency, petroleum-product spill response. Data Management.Strategies One of the principal goals of the WHPP is the development of a data collection network and analysis plan capable of providing the District with advance warning of contamination to the District's water supply. The-following data management strategies seek to establish and maintain scientific data upon which future WHPP actions can be based. Strategy#13: Groundwater Monitoring Plan: The District should actively participate in the collection and analysis of regional and local groundwater information. The development of a proper groundwater monitoring plan will be crucial to the District's capability to protect their water sources. This can be accomplished in cooperation with the Regional Water Associations of Mason and Kitsap Counties, Mason County Health Department, Bremerton-Kitsap County Health Department, State Department of Health, Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Ecology, and other entities seeking to monitor the groundwater resources of the region. Strategy #14: Abandoned Well Inventory: The District could locate and inventory decommissioned, abandoned, and unused wells. Owners of these wells could be notified V- 22 of the potential liability such wells cause and be educated on the benefits of well decommissioning. Strategy #15: Herbicide and Pesticide Survey: The District could inventory and monitor major herbicide and pesticide use within the WHPAs. This inventory may be used to guide future groundwater monitoring and WHP-related education programs. In addition, the District could encourage county, state, and private land managers to use vegetation management practices that protect groundwater quality. Strategy #16: Underground Storage Tanks Inventory: The District could inventory and locate underground storage tanks. Besides those presently identified by the current hazard inventory, this inventory should include new tanks placed after the hazard inventory was finished, and residential home heating oil UST, and/or other tanks that were not previously identified. Strategy #17: Drywell Monitoring: The District should encourage Mason and Kitsap Counties Surface Water Management to develop an evaluation and monitoring plan for drywells within the WHPAs. Education Strategies Education of the public and industrial/commercial occupants of the WHPAs concerning groundwater protection is a critical portion of the WHPP. Through proper education, the degree and potential for future contamination can be greatly reduced; therefore, the following recommendations are made_ Strategy #18: WHP Education Programs: If not already begun, the District should begin groundwater educational programs to educate the WHPA's residents, particularly on groundwater quality issues_ The WHPAs could be targeted for distribution of literature regarding septic tank maintenance, fuel oil storage tank maintenance and abandonment, residential use of herbicides and pesticides, and hazardous material use, disposal and storage. In addition to District-run programs, the District could participate in, and support, small-quantity waste disposal programs and actively work with state and local government in developing and creating public education programs concerning ground water. Wellhead Protection Implementation Tasks In order to accomplish the protection of the WHPA and follow the strategies listed above, we recommend the District adopt the WHP Implementation Tasks listed below. These tasks have been ordered in their recommended priority of implementation. The District may institute all or a portion of these tasks, depending upon available funding, time, or other concerns. Task 1: Create and host a WHP Committee.This group will: Promote adoption of the WHPA into the Comprehensive Plan of Mason County • Focus the applicable state and local programs to the area V- 23 • Review management strategies • Incorporate new data • Evaluate new requirements • Oversee educational programs • Evaluate new approaches to WHP The Committee should meet on a quarterly basis for the first three years following Plan implementation and establish an appropriate meeting schedule following the 3-year period (subject to the needs initially established by the committee). Task 2: Establish formal communication with first responders. Initial communication should be made to all emergency responders with a notification letter explaining the existence of the WHPAs (see sample letter in Appendix B). This task is more fully described in the Spill Response Section of the WHPP. Task 3: The District should also supply notification of the existence of the WHPAs to the Health and Planning/Land-Use departments of each county. The District should request that: 1) Each county health department assist small water systems with wellhead protection by initiating a small system WHP Coordination Program, and 2 Mason County P g P planning departments consider the WHPAs in their designations of critical areas regulations, susceptibility mapping, and development permitting. The District should provide susceptibility data to each county to update their maps. A sample notification letter is provided in Appendix B. Task 4: Consider seeking designation of the WHPA as a special protection area. As mentioned previously, there are numerous special designations the District may wish to seek in order to protect the WHPA.< The District should evaluate the protection offered by these designations and seek those most appropriate for the WHPA. Task 5: Create awareness of the wellhead protection area by posting metal "WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION AREA" signs at the borders of the WHPAs. Task 6: Communicate the location of the WHPAs, explain basic WHP concepts, and address specific WHIP concerns to industrial/commercial site owners and local gravel mine owners. Task 7: Increase public awareness of homeowners who are connected to the District's water system through notification letters to customers within the WHPAs. This notification letter should be given to homeowners either at the time of service hookup or as part of property V- 24 escrow. Letters could be sent to existing customers with bills, and posted at the local library. A sample notification letter to homeowners is supplied in Appendix B. The District should deliver a copy of the wellhead protection plan to the Mason County library systems. This will allow interested residents to learn more about the wellhead protection program of the water system. In addition, inform local residents of the WHPAs and the goal of protecting the water supply through a press release sent to the Shelton-Mason County Journal, Bremerton Sun, and The News Tribune for publication in each paper. Task 8: Encourage the requirement that engineering as-builts of new septic systems be recorded with property deeds. These as-builts should be drawn and submitted by septic tank designers who are registered professional designers licensed by Washington State. Support the implementation of state laws and regulations regarding septic system inspection and maintenance programs. Participate in public education programs to notify public concerning the impact of septic systems on the WHPAs. Promote and coordinate public education programs concerning proper septic tank maintenance and proper hazardous waste disposal. Task 9: Conduct groundwater monitoring for analysis of nitrate concentrations. Establish a nitrate early-warning value to allow for timely action in the event of increasing concentrations. Task 10: Work with responsible parties to assess adequacy of stormwater systems. This task should evaluate the existing stormwater detention facilities, establish priority for stormwater upgrades, and seek maximum infiltration of storm water. An evaluation of local stormwater detention, retention, and routing priorities should likewise be considered. Promote research on the impacts of stormwater discharge from residential areas. Encourage the periodic monitoring of drywells. Review water quality data generated under general National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) Storm Water Permit. Task 11: Review routine leak detection procedures for sewer lines. As a sewer system is in the planning stages, the District should request utilities use "leakproof' piping for new sewer construction. Develop emergency response procedures for sewer force main breaks within the WHPAs. Task 12: Assure that the hydrogeologic impact of surface development is adequately evaluated during the:SEPA process. Task 13: Participate in a regional groundwater data development and management ' will help assure that an adequate regional nal database is developed. This eq � P program. P Task 14: Support Mason County in seeking delegation of well drilling inspection authority. This could provide advance notice of drilling to the District and allow more frequent inspection of wells drilled within the WHPAs than currently occurs. Task 15: Document the location and use of petroleum pipelines and develop appropriate emergency procedures. V- 25 Task 16: Document the type and amount of herbicide and pesticide application. This activity should focus upon transportation corridors and recreation parcels. Work with the Washington State University (WSU) Cooperative Extension Office and both counties to modify future groundwater monitoring and WHP-related education programs. Data collected should be used to guide which water quality analyses are to be performed as monitoring progresses. Data can also be used in the education of the public on the handling and disposal of hazardous materials. Task 17: Annually review the Model Toxins Control Act (MTCA), RCRA notifiers, and LUST sites files within the WHPAs. Monitor Ecology's progress in the cleanup of MTCA and LUST Sites within the WHPAs. Encourage Ecology and county inspection of RCRA hazardous waste generator facilities. Task 18: Review the annual Superfund Amendments and Re-authorization Act (SARA) Title III reports. This would be a function of the WHP Committee in order to document and inventory the chemicals used in the WHPA. This review could be used to guide groundwater monitoring and WHP-related education programs. Task 19: Promote and coordinate the public education programs regarding household hazardous materials use, storage and disposal with each county local hazardous waste management program. Task 20: The District should develop data on the number and size of exempt underground tanks within the Zone 1 WHPAs. Promote and coordinate public education programs concerning underground tank hazards, leak detection methods, and proper removal and closure procedures. These programs should target owners of exempt underground tanks. Task 21: Seek to have Ecology prioritize the investigation of contaminated and potentially contaminated sites within the WHPAs. This could assure that those areas with existing contamination within the WHPAs, and any subsequent contamination events are given highest priority in relation to the amount and type of contamination in clean-up activities and budgets. Task 22: Investigate the need for re-routing transport of hazardous materials through the WHPA. Task 23: Encourage development and use of best management practices. This effort should focus upon large land units including large residential developments, schools, golf courses, parks, mining operations, and forest parcels. Task 24: Request County, State, and private landowners to utilize vegetation management practices to protect water quality. Task 25: Encourage thorough analysis of groundwater impacts for siting, operation and reclamation of mines. Seek to have the proper agencies require mine operators to install monitoring wells. These wells should be capable of monitoring for potential impacts from site V-26 operations for mines adjacent to the WHPAs. Seek to have the owners document the use of hazardous materials in mining activities within and near the WHPAs. Task 26: The District should inventory decommissioned, abandoned or unused wells in WHPA Zones 1 and 2. The owners of these wells should be informed about proper well decommissioning procedures. Task 27: The District could seek to have appropriate agencies require sewer hook-up for all industrial-commercial facilities within the WHPA if sewer service is reasonably available. Task 28: Encourage Farm Plans through the Mason and Kitsap Counties Conservation Districts. V- 27 CHAPTER VI TABLE OF CONTENTS VI. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM............................................................1 6.1 Water System Management and Personnel ..................................................................1 6.2 Operator Certification..................................................................................................1 6.3 System Operation and Control......_..............................................................................2 6.3.1 Identification of Major System Components....................::...................................2 6.3.2 Routine System Operation ......................................... .......... ..............................3 6.3.3 Preventative Maintenance Program........................:::...........................................3 6.3.4 Equipment, Supplies and Chemical Listing..... ......... ........ ..............4 6.4 Comprehensive Monitoring(Regulatory Compliance)Plan.........................................5 6.5 Emergency Response Program ................. ..............6 6.5.1 Water System Personnel Emergency Call-up List ...................... .........................6 6.5.2 Notification Procedures............... ...... ......................................... .......................7 6.5.3 Vulnerability Analysis................ ....... ......... ............................ ....................7 6.6 Safety Procedures........................................................................................................8 6.7 Cross Connection Control Program .............................................................................8 6.8 Customer Complaint Response Program......................................................................8 6.9 Record Keeping and Reporting.` ...... . ........................................................................8 6.10 O&M Improvements......................... ....... .................................................................9 LIST OF TABLES Table 6.1 Belfair Water District No. 1 Bacteriological Sampling Schedule..........................5 Table 6.2 Belfair Water.District No. 1 Emergency Telephone Numbers ..............................6 LIST 6#*IGURES f VI-i VI. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 6.1 Water System Management and Personnel Belfair Water District No. 1 is a fairly small public water system with approximately 500 connections. Therefore, just four people undertake the responsibilities of all day-to-day functions of the District. They are the District Manager, Secretary, and two field workers. Jerry Hukill, District Manager, is responsible for the overall day-today operation of the water system with each of the staff assigned duties as follows: District Manager Normal Day-to-Day Operations Field Engineering* Emergency Response Cross Connection Control Implementation of the Improvement Program Budget Formulation Public/Press Contact Field Staff Preventative Maintenance Water Quality Monitoring Response to Complaints Office Manager Telephone Office Assistant Billing Office Records Voucher Preparation Correspondence Accounts Receivable Complaints/Recording Board Minutes * The District does not have ati engineer on staff. Therefore, whenever engineering assistance is required, the District Manager'will contact a licensed engineer specializing in water systems. 6.2 Operator Certification David A. Tipton became Belfair Water District's new District Manager effective September 4, 2007. His Washington State certification is Water Distribution Manager III, Certificate No. 9998. The Acting Foreman is Don Cureton, who has a WDM II, certification No. 7197. Don Cureton is also a certified Cross Control Specialist. The Field Technician is Charles Hicks. He presently does not have any WDM certification, but is planning to move forward with it. VI- 1 6.3 System Operation and Control 6.3.1 Identification of Major System Components The District has three major components comprising its water system. They are the wells (source), disinfection, storage, and distribution system. Each of these is shown on the Water System Map, Figure 1.5, contained in the pocket at the rear of this plan. There are a total of four wells presently available to supply water to the system. Well No. 1 is the original well acquired from Mason County PUD No. 3 when the District was formed. This well is the primary source of water for the system. It has two booster pumps that supply water from the well to the system. Well No. 2, drilled shortly after the District's formation was formerly plumbed directly into the piping for Well No. 1. Both wells are flowing artesians located less than 50 feet apart. It supplied water to the booster pumps operating Well No. 1. The District attempted to upgrade Well No. 2 and place it directly on line in parallel with Well No. 1. However, after a new well pump was installed and the well test pumped, it was found that the well generates a high turbidity at start up. The well was further developed and re-tested. Although the level of turbidity lowered, it was not eliminated. The water clears after bypassing it and letting it run for 10-20 minutes. It meets drinking water quality at that time. Therefore, Well No. 2 is not used on a regular basis, but is only for emergency purposes. It must be operated manually and thoroughly flushed before the water can be introduced into the system. Well No. 3 was placed in operation in 1996. It is a 275 gpm well that provides water during the peak use season, or when Well No. 1 is taken out of operation for routine and/or preventative maintenance. At this writing, Well No. 4;only serves Pressure Zone No. 2 on the plateau on the top of the ridge to the north northeast of the'general Belfair area. The well, along with an onsite hypochlorite generation system for disinfection and a new 1.1 mg storage tank were completed in 2002. The District has a total of four storage tanks for service in Pressure Zone No. 1, located in pairs at each end of the system. -The South Tanks, located on Razor Road, are the control tanks for turning the well pumps on and off. The North Tanks are located at just east of the intersection of Old Belfair Highway and SR-3. The North Tanks provide the majority of the water to the commercial center of Belfair,and are drawn down faster that the South Tanks. Each of the tanks is 26 feet in diameter and hold 16 feet of water. The District has approximately 12.2 miles of pipe in the distribution system, ranging from 4 to 16 inches. The system is not well looped, because of its location along Hood Canal and the topography to the east. At the time of this plan, the higher ridgeline to the east is relatively undeveloped and does not require water service from the District. Additional looping will occur as the District grows to serve the Belfair UGA as designated by Mason County. As this plan is being prepared, Pressure Zone No. 2 is a "stand alone" system along the plateau on the northeasterly corner of the service area. The area is served by Well No. 4 and the new 1.12 MG standpipe. There are only a few customers presently on the system, but the District has VI-2 had several inquiries for commercial/industrial service. There is approximately one mile of pipe q PP Y P P serving this area now. The mains are primarily 12- & 16-inch diameter pipes. 6.3.2 Routine System Operation Each well is visually inspected daily when meter readings are taken. The wells are operated automatically using the RUGIDTM automated control system. This is a computer-operated system that continuously monitors the tank levels and well pumps and turns the system on and off as tank water levels dictates. K for some reason, the computer fails to work properly, tank water levels are checked daily and the well pumps can be turned on and off manually. The District requires its personnel to follow pertinent WISHA and OSHA safety regulations. This includes wearing of protective gear such as hard hats, safety shoes, goggles, and other equipment as appropriate. When repairs are required in the ground, sheeting of trench sides is required when the trench is over four feet in depth. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) are maintained for all potentially hazardous material used in the maintenance of the water system. First aid equipment and materials are maintained at all locations where they maybe needed, or are located on maintenance vehicles. They are inspected regularly to insure supplies are adequate. All field staff members are required to wear safety vests and hard hats at all times. Most of the District's distribution system is located along highway SR-3, SR-106, and Old Belfair Highway, all very busy highways through Belfair. It is very important that the workers be seen when working on the system. Additionally, whenever work is performed near any street or highway, safety cones are deployed in accordance with state traffic safety regulations. Source meters are read daily and the readings recorded and filed in the district's office. Service meters are read monthly for billing purposes. Two people are used to read meters for safety purposes, due to the location on most of the meters along SR-3. Hard hats, safety vests and yellow caution safety lights on the vehicle are used. The system is evaluated using the daily operation inspections during source meter readings, review of the,weekly well water level chart for Well Nos. 3 and 4, and the regular drive-by leak detection inspection tour. 6.3.3 Preventative Maintenance Program The primary focus of the'preventative maintenance program is to ensure that the wells continue to operate properly. ,As stated above, each well is inspected daily during the source meter reading. Well No. 1 is the primary source of water and is a flowing artesian well with a positive head of approximately 8.5 psi during operations. It has two booster pumps that take water from the well and pump it to the system. The pumps are cycled so each pumps for approximately the same time during a given period, of say one week. Since these pumps are older, each pump is taken out of service on a three-year cycle and rebuilt. One pump is always available for operations. VI-3 Well Nos. 2 and 3 have submersible pumps installed in them. They are both fairly new, and have not had to be pulled for maintenance at this wn ti ng. Well No. 4 has a 125 hp line shaft turbine pump. The primary source of data to evaluate the operation of these pumps is the monthly power records. The amount of power used by each is compared to the actual running time to see if the pumps are operating as they should. Additionally, for all pumps the daily source meter readings are compared to the running time meter to detect any anomalies in pumping rates. Leak detection is a major concern of the District. A daily drive-by inspection is done. A slower, more comprehensive inspection is made on a weekly basis. Due to the geology of the area, leaks of less than 5 gpm generally do not show on the surface. Some leaks as high as 10 gpm have gone unnoticed for the same reason. Therefore, the inspections concentrate on new "wet spots" to identify potential leaks. This is difficult in many areas, because of the proximity of storm drain ditches near the mains. The District is aware of this problem and uses the weekly inspections to take closer looks for potential leaks. The District has two booster pump stations. The older one is a small, variable speed pump booster system serving the upper areas of Razor Road. This station was upgraded during the last WSP planning period, and thus is muchmor reliable. The station is inspected daily. The second booster pump station is also fairly new;and will eventually serve up to approximately 50 new homes along the upper ridge area on the easterly side of the community. The station contains two varible frequency drive (VFD) domestic service pumps and a fireflow pump. It is fairly new and does require some vigilance. It:also is inspected daily. The District has not yet established a regular repair/replacement schedule for the pumps. 6.3.4 Equipment, Supplies and Chemical Listing The District's size limits its ,requirement_for a ,large inventory of equipment, supplies and materials. It has two work trucks and one small:dump truck. It also has a small backhoe for the installation of services or small pipeline maintenance projects. District personnel install small main$ and services. Supplies are generally limited to those necessary to install and repair service lines. This includes saddles, meter yokes, corporation stops, HDPE service line of various small sizes, etc. Contractors on the District's Small Works Roster generally`do new construction. The District does not stock large pipeline items such as pipes and gate valves.The District only maintains a small inventory of emergency repair material. Additionally, it has an agreement with H. D. Fowler Company to furnish non-inventory parts on an emergency basis, 24 hours a day. The District does not store chemicals, except for the sodium hypochlorite tables used for disinfecton. All other chemicals used generally have a short shelf life. Therefore, all chemicals are purchased as needed, and completely used. VI-4 6.4 Comprehensive Monitoring(Regulatory Compliance) Plan Section 3.2 discusses the District's water quality monitoring requirements and sampling results and compared them to Washington State DOH MCL's. The historical results of the District's sampling program are maintained in the District office. Each of the District's four wells is sampled in accordance with the DOH and EPA timetable. Since the District does not treat its water, except for disinfection, samples are taken directly from each individual source well. The District has applied for, and received waivers for some sampling. A copy of the DOH's Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Year 2005 is included in Chapter X. This document lists the specific sampling requirements for the District. Also included are the results of the latest sampling. Existing waivers are discussed above. It is anticipated that the District will continue to apply for and receive similar waivers for the duration of this plan, since the susceptibility of all sources are low to moderate. Belfair Water District No. 1 uses only certified laboratories for sample analyses. Included are Water Management Laboratories, Inc. of Tacoma and the Washington State Public Health Laboratory in Shoreline. The District is required by regulation to take a minimum of two bacteriological samples per month. Four samples are taken. Both the location and the time of the month when samples are taken vary. The samples are taken at 11 different locations, including repeats, if necessary. Table 6.1 is a calendar and list of locations for bacteriological'samples taken. Table 6.1 Belfair;Water District No. 1 Bacteriological Sampling Schedule WEEK NO. MONTH NO. 1 MONTH NO.2 MONTH NO.3 MONTH NO.4 WEEK 1 1' 2 5 6 3 4 7 8 9 10 9 10 Legend: 1. 643 Old Belfair highway 2. 23940 SR-3 641 Old Belfair highway(Repeat Upstream) NE 23910 SR-3(Repeat Upstream) 120 Timberline Dr.(Repeat Downstream) NE 23840 SR-3(Repeat Downstream) 3. 22871 NE SR-3 4. E. 18551 State Hwy 106 22851 NE SR-3(Repeat Upstream) E. 18451 Hwy 106(Repeat Upstream) 22721 NE SR-3(Repeat Downstream) E. 18531 Hwy 106(Repeat Downstream) 5. 21 E.Judy Lane 6. 320 NE SR-300 21611 E.SR-3.(Repeat Upstream) 310 NE SR-300(Repeat Upstream) 210 E.Judy Lane(Repeat Downstream) 340 NE SR-300(Repeat Downstream) VI - 5 Table 6.1 (Cont'd) Belfair Water District No. 1 Bacteriological Sampling Schedule 7. 381 NE Romance Hill_Dedicated Sample Station 8. 24177 NE SR-3 41 Sunlit Canyon(Repeat Upstream) 24175 NE SR-3(Repeat Upstream) 400 NE Romance Hill P S(Repeat Downstream) 24171 NE SR-3(Repeat Downstream) 9. 50 NE Peninsula Blvd 10. 420 Log Yard Rd 25021 NE SR-3(Repeat Upstream) 430 Log Yard Rd(Repeat Upstream) 124 NE Peninsula Blvd(Repeat Downstream) 25491 SR-3(Repeat Downstream) Sample stations 9 and 10 were added to the sampling sites in October 2006 upon the connection of two users in Pressure Zone No. 2. A third set of samples was added to the routine sampling program, because theis zone is not connected to the rest of the system. However, if possible, the District will revert back to the two samples per month upon the completion of the interzone connection. It is anticipated that one sample will be taken from each zone. Inorganic, Turbidity, Trihalomethane, Pesticide, Radionuclide, and Volatile Organic Chemical sampling of sources are conducted in accordance with WAC 246-290-300. If any of the sample results exceed the Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL's) listed in WAC 246-290-310, the District follows the procedures listed in WAC 246-290-320. The procedures include taking repeat samples, notifying the DOH; and notifying its customers for a primary standard violation. The cause of the exceedance is determined and corrected. If a secondary standard is violated, the District notifies the DOH, and follows department direction for correction of the problem. .; 6.5 Emergency Response Program.. 4 6.5.1 Water System Personnel Emergency Call-up List Whenev -,an emergency occurs, primary responsibility for action lies with the District Manager. Others called follow the chain.-of-command. Telephone numbers of the District office and key personnel are listed below on Table 6.2: VI-6 Table 6.2 Belfair Water District No. 1 Emergency Telephone Numbers District Office: (206)275-3008 District Staff: Manager,David Tipton (503)545-9570 Acting Foreman, Don Cureton (360)792-2800 Field Technician I, Charles Hicks (360)649-1931 Office Manager,Kathy Gadberry (360)830-5047 Office Assistant,Stacey Beckhorn (360)876-6655 Board of Commissioners: Chairman,Louis LaDow (360)275-8078 Secretary,John Phillips (360)277-3204 Treasurer,Irene Werdall (360)275-3838 Mason County Health Department Environ. Health Sp. Stephanie Kelly (360)427-9670(ext 293) Washington State Department of Health Division of Drinking Water,SWRO (360-)664-0768 Regional Engineer,Frank Meriwether (360)236-3036 WQ Specialist, Sandy Brentlinger (360)753-5090 After Hours Emergency 1-(877)481-4901 6.5.2 Notification Procedures The size and location of the Belfair Water District minimizes its choices for emergency notification of customers. It does not draw the media attention that a larger district might. If a major water quality problem occurred,the.District would notify the electronic media(TV and radio), but would rely primarily on its field staff to rapidly deliver"boil water" notices or other such notices. All customers can be contacted in this manner within a very short period of time. 6.5.3 Vulnerability Analysis The most`vulnerable portions of the District's system are the wells. With only limited storage capacity in Pressure Zone No T, the District can only provide water to the bulk of its customers for approximately one day during the peak use period of the year. During a long term power outage, the District is susceptible to problems in Pressure Zone No. I if its generators fail. The two generators on hand ate:from military surplus and parts are hard to find. As this plan is being written,the District is purchasing and installing a new,permanent standby generator at its Well No. 3. Installation should be complete prior to this plan's approval. Generally, the emergencies that do occur are not the types that are catastrophic to operations. Some are calls from customers reporting dirty water, no water, or small leaks. Distribution main failures or major leaks in the system are rare. The type of complaint characterizes the response by the District. For example, for dirty water District staff will go to the location of the complaint and verify the situation. The mains will be flushed in the immediate area to clean them of accumulated sediment, etc. If the complaint is "no water," personnel will try to determine the source of the problem. Many times the problem is in the service line, and can be readily remedied. If the VI - 7 customer has a leak on the house side of the meter, the meter stop is shut off until the customer can repair the problem. These are just a few examples of the types of emergencies that occur from time to time. If the problem is a water main leak, the leaking portion of the system is isolated, and, if possible, water is routed to maintain service to areas outside the immediate vicinity of the leak. The leak is then repaired, disinfected, flushed, and placed back in service as soon as possible. 6.6 Safety Procedures The District requires its personnel to follow pertinent WISHA and OSHA safety regulations. This includes wearing of protective gear such as hard hats, safety shoes, goggles, and other equipment as appropriate. When repairs are required in the ground, sheeting of trench sides is required when the trench is over four feet in depth. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) are maintained for all potentially hazardous material used in the maintenance of the water system. First aid equipment and materials are maintained at all locations where they may be needed, or are located on maintenance vehicles. They are inspected regularly to insure supplies are adequate. 6.7 Cross Connection Control Program In response to the need for a cross connection program in conjunction with its 1994 Water System Plan, the Board of Commissioners formally adopted the Cross Connection Control Policy contained in Chapter 10, under Resolution No. 93-8, dated December 13, 1993_ A copy of the program is included in Chapter 10,Miscellaneous Documents. Don Cureton, Belfair Water District No. 1's Cross Connection Control specialist, informs all commercial, industrial, and residential customers of what type of backflow prevention device, if any, is required. He performs backflow prevention system installations. He enforces the annual testing of the backflow preventipn tlevices by notifying all of the District's customers by letter when it is time to.perform their annual testing,as required by the Washington State Department of Health. He follows'up on all required tests until all have been completed by a DOH Certified Backflow Tester. 6.8 Customer Complaint Response Program The Office Secretary handles;most complaints, since most are related to billing problems. If the problem remains unresolved, it is forwarded to the District Manager. Complaints on service are passed to the field staff for investigation and resolution. All complaints are kept on file in the office, with written complaints filed in individual customer files. 6.9 Record Keeping and Reporting All maintenance activities are kept in a daily work logbook, which is kept in the office. Well and tank records and charts are maintained in a special file for accessibility. They are kept in the files for a minimum of five years before being placed in special file boxes for storage. Billing records are kept for a minimum of 10 years before being packed in boxes for long term storage. VI- 8 Gate valve and the flushing program records are maintained separately in files. Fire District No: 2 does the cursory inspection and maintenance on hydrants at a cost per hydrant to the District. The district performs the heavy repairs to the hydrants as needed, and maintains these activities as a separate record. 6.10 O & M Improvements A new permanently mounted generator for Well No. 1 would greatly alleviate a potential problem due to a lack of replacement parts. ~ram a A VI-9 CHAPTER VII TABLE OF CONTENTS VII. DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS............1 7.1 Project Review Procedures..........................................................................................1 7.2 Policies and Requirements for Outside Parties.............................................................1 7.3 Design Standards........................................................................................•-----...........1 7.4 Construction Standards...............••---.................................. ........................................2 7.4.1 Material...............................................................................................................2 7.4.1.1 Pipe ............................................................... ........ .................---..........2 7.4.1.2 Cast Iron Fittings .................................2 7.4.1.3 Gate Valves ............................................`•-............... ...... ............................3 7.4.1.4 Horizontal Swing Check Valves.............................................. .......................3 7.4.1.5 Valve Boxes and Covers.............................................................. ...................3 7.4.1.6 Hydrants..................................................................... ..............3 7.4.1.7 Tapping Sleeves...................................... ........................................................5 7.4.1.8 Mechanical Joint Restraint..................... . .... ..............5 7.4.1.9 T-Head Bolts..................................................... ..............................................5 7.4.1.10 Tie Rods .........................................................: ..........................................5 7.4.1.11 Concrete Work.............................................................................................5 7.4.2 Connections.........................................................................................................6 7.4.3 Installation Instructions for Push-On Joint Pipe....................................................6 7.4.4 Laying. .... ...................................... ........ ....................................................7 7.4.5 Testing: . ...... ........ `................... :........................... ................7 7.4.6 Disin .........................................................................................................8 7.4.7 Services and plea Stations....... ...:... ..............8 .................................................. 7.5 Co Q Certifies �on and Follow-up Procedures..................................................9 ,a. LIST OF TABLES a� LIST OF FIGURES VII -i VII. DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS 7.1 Project Review Pro cedures Generally, projects Y new ro'ects are submitted to the District b developers needing water service. Because the District does not have its own engineer on star an independent consulting engineer, licensed in the State of Washington reviews the plans. The plans are reviewed to ensure that they meet the District's adopted policies, Mason County ordinances, and DOH regulations. Upon completion of review, changes are made in the plans as may be required. 7.2 Policies and Requirements for Outside Parties When submitting plans for new projects to the District, developers are required to identify Mason County requirements such as fireflow rates on the plans. All construction of new system extensions must meet or exceed minimum APWA and/or AWWA specifications and requirements. While no formal agreement for plan review of proposed plats exists between the District and Mason County, as a matter of routine, new plats are sent to the District for review, comment, and approval. The District places its requirements on the plans, which are then approved by the County. If the plans include new facilities other than just distribution system piping, the plans are forwarded to DOH for review and approval. Such new facilities include booster pump stations, reservoirs, new sources, or other facilities other than mains. Developers of new plats in the Belfar Water District No. 1's service area are required to adhere to the District's specifications. -If a developer wants to connect from an area outside of the existing District boundaries,he/she is required to annex the property to the District. 7.3 Design Standards Belfair Water District No. 1 uses and adheres to the American Water Works Association(AWWA) Standards and Specifications.'; When construction of water system facilities takes place in Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT)right-of-way, all work conforms to the current "Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction," WSDOT and American Public Works Association,Washington State Chapter. Distribution main size determinations are made on the basis of minimum DOH requirements, with larger sizes installed as the need is determined. A minimum size of 6-inch diameter line is now used in all installations, except where a smaller line will provide service to an area that will not be looped. An example would be for a short cul-de-sac. The line may be as small as 2 inches, depending on the length and number of connections to be served. Hydrants are generally spaced from 300' to 600', depending on the type of development. Hydrant spacing minimums and locations are set by the Mason County Fire Marshal's office. Due to the configuration of the Community of Belfair, distribution system pressures may range up to 100 psi. The District requires those new connections that are at the pressure range areas VII- 1 over 80 psi install individual PRV's to control pressure within the customer's premises. On the other hand, those new connections lying above the 200' elevation in Pressure Zone No. 1 will need to install individual booster pumps to ensure adequate service pressure over 30 psi during extreme water use periods such as flushing or fire fighting. All new booster pump stations are required at a minimum to produce and sustain at least 30 psi at the highest point of their service area. Additionally, the stations must meet the Mason County Fire Marshal's office minimum frreflow rate at 20 psi. The actual fireflow rate will vary with the specific application for which the water system is being installed. 7.4 Construction Standards Copies of the District's Construction Standard Details are included at the end of this chapter. 7.4.1 Material All materials shall be new, free from defects, or current manufacture, and of the quality specified herein. 7.4.1.1 Pipe All distribution pipe shall be ductile iron pipe and shall conform to the latest revision of the ANSI/AWWA C151 and ANSI/AWWA C104 Specifications, except as those Specifications may be modified in the Special Provisions. Only ductile iron "Tyton Joint" pipe manufactured by U-S. Pipe and Foundry Company, Pacific States Cast Iron Pipe Company, or Griffin Pipe Company is acceptable. Special Note: All gaskets furnished with pipe shall be styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), unless specified otherwise by the District.. When deemed necessary, "Nitrile" (NBR) gaskets will be required. When NBR gaskets are required, they must be color coded and/or marked in color so as to be easily identifiable as Nitrile. All gaskets must conform to ANSI/AWWA C111-72, or the latest revision thereof. 7.4.1.2 Cast Iron Fittings All cast iron and ductile iron fittings shall conform to the latest ANSI/AWWA C110 Specifications or ANSI/AWWA C153 for Mechanical Joint Compact Ductile Iron Class 350 fittings. All fittings shall have cement-mortar lining conforming to ANSI/AWWA C104. Mechanical joint glands supplied with the above fittings shall be ductile iron in accordance with the above specifications. The mechanical joint fittings/pipe shall be installed and the bolts tightened in the sequence and to the torque specified in A Guide for the Installation of Ductile Iron Pine published by the Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association. Type of joints or other special items shall be specified in Special Provisions or on the Plans. Special Note: All gaskets furnished with fittings shall be styrene butadiene rubber(SBR), unless specified otherwise by the District. When deemed necessary, "Nitrile" (NBR) gaskets will be required. When NBR gaskets are required, they must be color coded and/or marked in color so as to be easily identifiable as Nitrile. All gaskets must conform to ANSI/AWWA C111-72, or the latest revision thereof. VIE[-2 The end flanges of flanged gate valves shall conform in dimensions and drilling to the Standard ANSI B16.1 for cast iron flanges and flanged fittings, Class 125, unless specifically provided otherwise in the Plans or supplementary specifications. The bolt holes shall straddle the vertical centerline. Gate boxes, manhole rings, and covers and special castings shall be in accordance with the Plans or as specified herein. Fire hydrants and other restrained joints will be restrained by the use of Megalugs as manufactured by EBAA iron, Inc.,or approved equal. 7.4.1.3 Gate Valves All gate valves shall conform to ANSI/AWWA Standard C500-93 or latest revision, Gate Valves for Ordinary Water Service, as manufactured by Clow, Kennedy, M & H, Mueller, or approved equal, and the following modifications. All ate valves shall be of the double disc parallel seat with bronze facing and bronze g P type, g mounted. All gate valves shall be non-rising stem, furnished with O-ring stem seals. Number, size and design shall conform to Section 3.12 of the AWWA Standards for gate valves. All gate valves shall have a square operating nut which operates left (counter clockwise)to open. 7.4.1.4 Horizontal Swing.Check Valves ; All swing check valves shall conform with the latest AWWA Standard C508 cast iron body, bronze-mounted swing check valve with stainless steel hinge pin. Check valves shall be Mueller No. A2600-20 with accessories, Clow F5385 or approved equal. 7.4.1.5 Valve Boxes and Covers Cast iron valve boxes and lids shall be as indicated in District Standard Drawings. All buried valves shall be,provided with;a valve box and lid with and extension of cast iron soil pipe, as necessary. The:Contractor shall maintain the location and provide access to all valves within the project. No valve shall remaidburied during P l g construction. 7.4.1.6 Hydrants Hydrants furnished under these Specifications shall conform to the ANSI/AWWA C502-85, Specifications for Dry-Barrel Fire Hydrants, or later revision thereof, with the following limitations and exceptions, and be installed per Belfair Water District No. 1 Specifications. Make Mueller Super Centurion 200, U.S. Pipe Metropolitan 250, Clow Medallion Waterous"Pacer 90," and M&H 929, (casting date of 1997, or later). Capacity Standard size -two hose and one-pumper nozzle. The pumper nozzle shall have a 5-inch Storz adapter. VII- 3 Size Standard size shall be 5-1/4-inch main valve with 6-inch inlet bell. All hose nozzles shall be 2-1/2 inches. Length All hydrants shall be 4.5 feet in length unless otherwise specified. Hydrant Inlet All hydrants shall be provided with a mechanical joint inlet. Operating Mechanism All moving contact surfaces shall be bronze on bronze or bronze on iron or steel as may be approved by the District. The hydrants shall have the main valve seat threaded into a bronze sub-seat n the shoe of the hydrant to permit easy removal of the main valve seat. Direction of Opening All hydrants shall open by turning the operating nut to the left (counter- clockwise). Hydrant Barrels All hydrant barrels shall have a flange located at least 2 inches above the finished grade line, and flanged extension sections shall be available in increments of six (6) inches. Operating Nuts for Stem and Nozzle Caps The.operating stem and cap nut shall be pentagonal in shape. The pentagon shall measure 1.35 inches from the point to.the flat, at the base of the nut and 1.23 inches at the top. The faces shall be tapered uniformly and the height of the nut shall not be less than 1.0 inches. The point to the flat dimension shall be measured to a the theoretical point where the faces would intersect were there no rounding off of the corners. All nozzles shall be fitted with cast Iiron threaded caps with operating nut of the same design and proportions as the stem nut. Caps shall be threaded to fit the corresponding nozzles and shall be fitted with suitable gaskets for positive water tightness. HYDRANT DIMENSIONS Hydrant connection C. I. Pipe inside dia. 6-inch Standard minimum dia:':' 6-7/8 inch Length 44,51 ft. bury,hydrant from bottom of hyd. Connection to sidewalk ring 4 feet 8 inches Valve opening minimum dia. 5 inches Hose Nozzles 2 - 2- 'h inch Number and size thread(Nat. Board Fire Underwriters) 7-1/2 per inch Outside dia. Finished 3-1/16 inch Dia. At root of thread 2.8715 inches Pattern of thread 600 V thread Total length of threaded male nipple 1 inch Steamer Nozzles-number& size 1 -4 inches Number& size thread, outside dia. Finished(with.02" cut off top.) 5.09 inch Dia. at root of thread(with .02" left in valley.) 4.74 inch VII -4 Storz Adapter 5 inch Threads 4 per inch Pattern of thread-modified 600 V thread Total length of threaded male nipple 1-1/8 inch 7.4.1.7 Tapping Sleeves Tapping sleeves shall be cast iron, mechanical joint type or the fabricated steel type. The fabricated steel sleeves shall be Model JCM 412 manufactured by JCM Industries, or approved equal, with epoxy coating and stainless steel bolts. The cast iron, mechanical joint sleeves shall be Model H-615, or H-619 manufactured by Mueller Company, or approved equal. 7.4.1.8 . Mechanical Joint Restraint Mechanical joint restraint shall be incorporated in the design of the follower gland and shall include a restraining mechanism which, when actuated, imparts multiple wedging action against the pipe, increasing its resistance as the pressure increases. Flexibility of the joint shall be maintained after burial. Glands shall be manufactured of ductile iron conforming to ASTM A 536-80. Dimensions of the gland shall be`such that it can be used with the standardized mechanical joint bell and tee-head bolts conforming to ANSI/AWWA A21.11 and ANSI/AWWA C153/A21.53 of the latest revision. Twist-off nuts, sized same as tee-head bolts, shall be used to insure proper actuating of restraining devices. The mechanical joint restraint device shall have a working pressure of at least 250 psi with`'a minimum safety factor of 2:1 and shall be EBAA Iron, Inc.,_MEGALUG, or approved equal. 7.4.1.9 T-Head Bolts Unless specified otherwise, all T-head bolts and nuts supplied for mechanical joint fittings, valves, sleeves, couplings, hydrants, tapping sleeves, etc., shall be made of high-strength, low alloy steel, conforming to ANSUAW W' A CI I I Corrosion-resistant steel ("Cor-Ten"), or ductile iron of A1TM A 536 specially alloyed and heat treated conforming to ANSI/AWWA Standard C111/A21`.11 7.4.1.10 Tie Rods Tie rods and nuts for hydrant laterals, etc., shall be made of high strength, low alloy steel conforming to ANSUAWWA C111 ("Cor-Ten"), unless specified otherwise in the Plans or Special Provisions. 7.4.1.11 Concrete Work All work shall be completely "formed" except where otherwise noted on the Plans, and all concrete shall have a strength of not less than 1,800 psi at seven days and 3,000 psi in 28 days. No concrete shall contain less than six sacks of cement per cubic yard. The size of the concrete thrust anchors will depend upon the existing soil conditions and shall be as determined by the District. Concrete for anchoring up to 8-inch pipe fittings and valves shall VII - 5 be thoroughly mixed in clean containers at the job site, or mixed at a batch plant. Concrete for anchoring fittings and valves 10 inches and larger shall be supplied from an acceptable batch plant. All thrust anchors shall be supported by bearing satisfactory to the District before any concrete is placed. 7.4.2 Connections The Contractor shall furnish temporary bracing material and incidental material as well as labor for trenching, backfilling and making connections to existing pipelines. Where the connection to an existing water main requires interruption of service to the area, the customers affected shall have a minimum of 24 hours advance notice. The Contractor and the District shall set the connection date. All fittings and materials necessary to complete the connection must be available at the job site for inspection and approval 'prior to setting the connection date. The Contractor shall have all material and equipment required on the site of the work and crews organized to carry each connection through as a continuous operation before shutting down any pipe in service. Should the Contractor cancel or fail to show for a mutual agreed upon scheduled work, he/she shall pay the District for costs incurred resulting from preparation and response for that work. In all cases, operation of.valves on mains in service and notification of customers will be done by the District. % Where connections are made to misting asbestos cement (transite) mains, pea gravel shall be placed under and around the.AL .C. main before'backfilling the trench. The connecting ductile iron pipe shall be properly supported to prevent settlement. 7.4.3 Installation Instructions for Push-On Joint Pipe Any foreign matter in the gasket seat shall be removed; the gasket shall be wiped clean, flexed and then inserted in the socket in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. As the gasket fits snugly in the gasket seat, it may be necessary to smooth out the entire circumference to remove any bulges which would interfere with the proper entry of the spigot end. A thin film of lubricant shall be applied to the surface of the gasket after it is in place, and to the spigot end of the pipe to be joined. Excess lubricant shall not be used beyond where the pipe will contact the gasket and only lubricant supplied and labeled for potable use by the pipe manufacturer shall be used. The lubricant shall be stored in a container with a tight fitting cover and shall be applied to the gasket with a small sponge or brush. The container shall be kept closed and if the lubricant becomes contaminated wit foreign material, it shall be discarded. The spigot end of the pipe shall be clearly marked to indicate the depth of the bell socket and wiped clean, lubricated and placed in approximate alignment with the bell of the pipe to which it V11 -6 is joined. The pipe shall then be inserted into the bell until the spigot end is in contact with the bottom of the bell socket. Field cut pipe may be used, however, the outside of the cut end shall be tapered back about '/4- inch at an angle of 30' with the center line of the pipe, care being taken to remove any sharp edges which might injure or roll the gasket. 7.4.4 Laying The Contractor shall provide all tools and equipment required in quantity and capacity sufficient to carry out the work promptly and safely. The interior of all pipe, fittings, valves, and hydrants shall be cleaned of all foreign matter before they are laid in place, and special attention be given to spigot ends and bells to see that no matter which will adversely affect the jointing is present. The work shall be so arranged that bells are laid in the direction of progress and on any appreciable slope, bells shall face up grade. Pipe in and out of fittings shall be at least 10 feet long unless shown otherwise on the Plans, or as required by the District. The interior of the pipe shall be protected from the entrance oftrench water at all times, maintaining pumps at the bell holes if necessary until the joints are made up. At all times when no laying is q—,progress, or other conditions warrant as determined by the District, open ends of pie and �" s shall be plugged water tight to prevent the entrance of foreign matter or water into the pi ,. - 7.4.5 Testing �. s r- As each valved section is completed, all points where pressure reaction and movement may occur shall be properly anchored, braced or shackled prior to pressure testing. The Contractor shall furnish and assemble all testing equipment including measuring devices and shall furnish all labor required for testing. The District will furnish test gages. Upon completion of construction, the line shall be fill slowly under the direction of the District. The pressure test shall be conducted a minimum of 24 hours after filling the of the pipe. The test pressure shall be 200;psi for a duration of one hour, unless specified otherwise in the Special Provisions. There shall no be an appreciable or abrupt loss in pressure during the test period. The allowable leakage shall be as specified in A Guide for the Installation of Ductile Iron Pipe published by the Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association. While under test pressure, the entire installation shall be carefully examined for defective material and joint leaks. VII-7 Local distribution pressure or test pressure shall not be applied to the newly installed water main unless District staff is present. Defective material furnished by the Contractor or furnished in good condition by the manufacturer and damaged after acceptance by the Contractor shall be replaced by the Contractor at his/her own expense. If it is necessary to replace defective material, the pressure test shall be rerun after such replacement. 7.4.6 Disinfection During the laying of distribution pipelines, care shall be taken to insure that the interior of the pipe is kept free of foreign matter or trench water. As the pipe is laid in the trench, dry calcium hypochlorite shall be placed in each length of pipe in a quantity sufficient to produce a chlorine residual of no less than 10 parts per million (ppm) in the filled line after the required 24-hour retention period. The District may require the Contractor to swab the inside of each pipe length with a chlorine solution prior to laying the pipe. This requirement will depend on the time of year, usually May through September, or condition of piping interior. Upon completion of construction, the line shall be filled slowly under the direction of the District and a pressure test conducted. The chlorinated water resulting from the initial filling shall be retained in the line for a period of not less than 24 hours, after which the Contractor will remove the chlorinated water and thoroughly flush the 'line. The first set of bacterial samples will be taken 24 hours after the initial flushing. A second set of bacterial test samples will be taken after a minimum 48 hour retention period of the water remaining in the pipe after the initial flushing. x, Should the samples not test of coliforin°bacteria, the line shall be disinfected again and re- flushed, atrhe expense`ofthe Contractor,until two successive satisfactory samples are obtained. Forty-eight hours is the minimum time required by the bacteriological laboratory to process samples. 7.4.7 Services and Sample Stations Corporation stops with copper pipe stubs shall be installed by the contractor at selected points along the mains for use as sample stations, air release, and points to apply test pressure. The sample stations shall be removed after bacterial tests and pressure tests have been completed, unless the stations can be used for new water service laterals. The Contractor shall provide the necessary excavating required for removal of all the corporations and stubs not designated for services. Where existing services are to be transferred from old to new mains, the work of the Contractor shall be so planned and coordinated with the District's work such that customers will be shut off as briefly as possible. VII- 8 7.5 Construction Certification and Follow-up Procedures District personnel inspect all new construction work during installation. Upon completion of installation, pressure tests are conducted and the line disinfected and flushed. If a developer's contractor does the construction, the District does not directly run the pressure tests or disinfect the new lines, but does directly oversee the tests. The water quality analyses reports are sent in duplicate to the District. The District requires that a good set of"red line" drawings is kept by the contractor during construction. This set of drawings is used to complete a set of record drawings, which are then given to the District. 10 st „1 y o "a. e ;5 y i h M i ' v'�xf VII-9 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAH S NOTE: CONCRETE GUARD POSTS SHALL BE INSTALLED. PAINT GUARD POST SAME N.T.S. AS FIRE HYDRANT 2, GUARD POST FIRE HYDRANT FIRE HYDRANT o e M 2' 2 `CONCRETE GUARD POSTS, a��ilcONCRETE 9" DIA. x 6' LONG WITH PLAN 5 1/2" DIA. x 5'-8" LONG,REBAR EQUALLY SPACED FIRE HYDRANT, SEE NOTES 3,,4, AND 5 SECTION m D STORZ COUPLING, BREAKAWAY FLANG SEE NOTES 3 AND 4 OR BREAKAWAY LUGS O O NEAT LINE CUTS SHALL BE Y SEALED WITH A HOT U PAVING GRADE ASPHALT 13"R AND FACE OF CUT TACKED 1 1/2" ASPHALT .c� i.f.�v ic��v EXIST. ASPHALT `2 1/2" �4 1/2" CONCRETE 17'-0" MAX. VALVE BOX, SEE 2'-0- MIN. NOTE 6 7 C.F. OF 7f8" WASHED ROCK, WRAPPED WITH HOLDING SPOOL WATER MAIN GEOTEXTIIE FABRIC SEE NOTE 8 © (FLG x MJ TEE), SEE NOTE 9 SEE NOTE 2 �- 12x12x4 SOLID CONCRETE BEARING f6" BLOCK THRUST BLOCK FABRIC 6" (AUXILIARY) GATE VALVE (FLG x MJ), SEE NOTE 7 DETAIL 1 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY OF 2 NOTES: 1. ALL MATERIALS AND FITTINGS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED OR APPROVED EQUAL. 2. WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 42" IN IMPROVED RIGHT- OF-WAY, AND A MINIMUM 48" IN UNIMPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS. SHORING IS REQUIRED FOR ALL TRENCHES OVER 48" DEEP. 3. THE FIRE HYDRANT AND CONCRETE GUARD POSTS SHALL BE PAINTED, PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE LOCAL FIRE DISTRICT. THE STORZ FITTING SHALL NOT BE PAINTED. 4. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL HAVE TWO 2 1/2" HOSE PORTS (NATIONAL STANDARD THREAD) WITH CAPS AND CHAINS AND ONE 4" PUMPER PORT (TACOMA STEAMER PORT THREAD) WITH A 5" "STORZ" COUPLING AND BLIND CAP INSTALLED ON THE STEAMER PORT, (STEAMER PORT SHALL FACE THE STREET), 1 1/4" PENTAGONAL OPERATING NUT (COUNTERCLOCKWISE OPENING), O-RING TYPE STUFFING BOX, AUTOMATIC BARREL DRAINS AND 5 114" MAIN VALVE OPENING. HYDRANTS SHALL BE DESIGNED IN A MANNER THAT WELL PREVENT BARREL BREAKAGE WHEN STRUCK BY A VEHICLE. HYDRANTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST REVISION OF AWWA SPECIFICATIONS NO. C 502-73 FOR FIRE HYDRANTS FOR ORDINARY WATER SERVICE. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL INCLUDE 714E ENTIRE ASSEMBLY COMPLETE, HYDRANT, GATE VALVE AND BOX, CONNECTING PIPING FITTINGS AND ACCESSORIES. 5. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE WATEROUS, OR AND APPROVED EQUAL. 6. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE TWO-PIECE, ADJUSTABLE, CAST IRON WITH EXTENSION PIECES (IF NECESSARY), AS MANUFACTURED BY THE VANRICH f940 SEATTLE OR APPROVED EQUAL. THE WORD "WATER" SHALL BE CAST IN RELIEF IN THE TOP. 7. GATE VALVES SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST AWWA SPECIFICATIONS FOR COLD WATER, DOUBLE-DISK GATE VALVES, 200 PSI WORKING PRESSURE. THEY SHALL BE IRON-BODIED BRONZE-MOUNTED, NON-RISING STEM, COUNTERCLOCKWISE OPENING, MECHANICAL JOINT BY FLANGED. VALVE STEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH O-RING SEALS AND SHALL BE AS MANUFACTURED BY THE MUELLER COMPANY OR APPROVED EQUAL 8. THE HOLDING SPOOL SHALL BE A MECHANICAL-JOINT (M.J.) HOLDING SPOOL, WITH THE USE OF CLASS 52 DUC77LE IRON PIPE AS MANUFACTURED BY PACIFIC WATER WORKS OR AN APPROVED EQUAL, OR THE USE OF MEGA-LUG CONNECTORS WITH CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE A 6 OZ. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AROUND THE WASHED ROCK AREA. 10. A FLUORESCENT ORANGE BAG MUST COVER AND BE SECURED TO THE FIRE HYDRANT UNTIL APPROVED FOR USE BY FIRE MARSHAL 2 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY OF NOTES 2 BUFM INTER OtSVWT NM i WATER MAIN DOUBLE STRAP BRASS 6" SADDLE W/2" TAP & 3" LONG EDGE OF PAVEMENT BRASS NIPPLE TO VALVE z toIII frill ? a M BLIND FLANGE METER BOX V . (B-10 FOG TITE. STEEL SHIM PLATE WITH BLACK COATED PLACE 2-16x8x4 SOLID ALUMINUM LID.) CONC. BLOCKS UNDER CONC. THRUST BLOCK K.'m METER BOX, ONE EACH AGAINST UNDISTURBED EARTH SIDE (THRUST BLOCK AS REQUIRED) PLAN INSTALL 2" BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN WITH CENTERLINE GROUND LINE OF METER BOX VALVE BOX SEE NOTE 3 PLACE CONC. AROUND VALVE BOX PER APWA MAINGUARD 2" BLOW-OFF HYDRANT CAST IRON VALVE BOX 2" GATE VALVE W/OPERATING NUT UNDISTURBED EARTH OR THRUST ROCK WATER MAIN WASHED ROCK " t' 2" POLYPIPE O 2 CU. FT. 1 1/2" PACK JOINT WASHED ROCK COUPLING ELEVATION NOTES: 1. BLOW-OFF HYDRANTS SHALL BE NONFREEZING, SELF-DRAINING TYPE, WITH AN OVERALL LENGTH OF 3.5'. 2. SET UNDERGROUND IN A B-G-T METER BOX, THESE HYDRANTS WILL BE FURNISHED WITH A 2" FIP INLET, A NON-TURNING OPERATING ROD, AND SHALL OPEN TO THE DESIGN, AND BE SERVICEABLE FROM ABOVE GRADE WITH NO DIGGING. 3. THE OUTLET SHALL ALSO BE BRONZE AND BE 2-112" NST. 4. HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCKABLE TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED USE AS MANUFACTURED BY KUPFERLE FOUNDRY CO., ST. LOUIS, MO., OR APPROVED EQUAL. 1 BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY OF � 1 BQFAR WATM 015ONCT N0.I 1 112' COMPACTED THICKNESS ASPHALT CONCRETE CLASS 'B' EXISTING ASPHALT 13' R CLEAN AND TACK EDGES WITH N SEALER CSSI AND SEAL JOINTS i WITH HOT ASPHALT CEMENT CAR4000W> 4 1/2" .o v CONCRETE COLLAR VALVE BOX TOP SECTION, SEE NOTE 3 VALVE EXTENSION PIECE SHALL VALVE OPERATING NUT BE USED AS REQUIRED, SEE NOTE 3 EXTENSION, SEE DETAIL, OPERATING NUT SHALL BE WITHIN 3' OF FINISHED VALVE BOX BOTTOM — GRADE SECTION, SEE NOTE 3 WATER LINE VALVE, SEE •- SEE NOTE 6 NOTE 7 — � III III 1/3 TOTAL LENGTH 2" SQUARE OPERATING NUT t4 1/2" DIA., 1/8" MIN THICKNESS \—l" METAL STOCK 3/8" SET STOCK 1/8" MIN. THICKNESS, 2 1/4" INSIDE MEASUREMENT, 2 1/4" DEPTH VALVE OPERATING NUT EXTENSION 1 GATE VALVE OF 3 ORF,W UUM DISIRCT NM I MARKED WITH THE LETTER "V" INSET "V" TO BE PAINTED BLACK VALVE SIZE TO BE PAINTED ON FRONT 4'1f OF MARKER IN BLACK PAINT "X" DISTANCE PAINTED Z ON BACK OF POST a 2' w 90? 3 42 \ 38, > - "X" DISTANCE FROM MARKER POST TO MAIN 6' PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE POST NOTES: 1. PRECAST REINFORCED POST TO BE PAINTED A FLAT MEDIUM BLUE OR APPROVED EQUAL PER THE ENGINEER, OR THE DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTANCE FROM THE MARKER POST TO THE WATER MAIN & SIZE OF GATE VALVE SHALL BE PAINTED ON THE FRONTSIDE OF THE MARKER POST IN BLACK WITH A 2" HIGH NUMBER. 3. VALVE MARKER POST SHALL BE REQUIRED WHENEVER THE WATER VALVE IS LOCATED IN AN UNPAVED AREA. 4. THE POST WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED FOR BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLIES 1N THE SAME CONDITION AS WATER VALVES. 5. LOCATION OF VALVE MARKER POSTS SHALL BE OFFSET AT RIGHT ANGLES TO EACH LINE VAL VE. VALVE MARKER 2 GATE VALVE OF 3 BELFM WATER DISnWT MQ 1 NOTES: 1 VALVE OPERATING NUT EXTENSIONS ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE VALVE NUT IS MORE THAN THREE (3) FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. EXTENSIONS ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) FOOT LONG, ONLY ONE EXTENSION TO BE USED PER VALVE 2 ALL VALVE OPERATING NUT EXTENSIONS ARE TO BE MADE OF STEEL, SIZED AS NOTED, AND PAINTED WITH TWO COATS OF METAL PAINT. 3 VALVE BOXES SHALL BE TWO-PIECE, ADJUSTABLE, CAST IRON WITH EXTENSION PIECES OF NECESSARY), AS MANUFACTURED BY THE VANRICH #940 SEATTLE OR APPROVED EQUAL THE WORD "WATER" SHALL BE CAST IN RELIEF IN THE TOP. 4. NEAT LINE CUTS SHALL BE SEALED WITH A HOT PAWNG GRADE ASPHALT AND FACE OF CUT TACKED. 5. WATER MAINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIVISION 7 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 6. SECTION 7-09.2 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE SUPPLEMENTED BY THE FOLLOWING: I A. JOINTS SHALL BE TYTON PUSH-ON JOINTS, OR APPROVED EQUAL, OR MECHANICAL JOINT TYPE PER AWWA C III EXCEPT WHERE FLANGED JOINTS ARE REQUIRED TO CONNECT TO VALVES OR OTHER EQUIPMENT. B. BOLTS AND NUTS FOR BURIED FLANGES LOCATED OUTDOORS ABOVE GROUND OR IN OPEN VAULTS IN STRUCTURES SHALL BE TYPE 316 STAINLESS STEEL CONFORMING TO ASTM A 193, GRADE 88M FOR BOLTS, AND ASTM A 194, GRADE 8M FOR NUTS. BOLTS AND NUTS LARGER THAN ONE AND ONE-QUARTER (1-114) INCHES SHALL BE STEEL, ASTM A 307, GRADE 8, tWTH CADMIUM PLATTING, ASTM A 165, TYPE NS. C. BOLTS USED IN FLANGE INSTALLATION SETS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM B 193, GRADE 87. NUTS SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM A 194, GRADE 2H. D. PROVIDED WASHER FOR EACH NUT. WASHERS SHALL BE OF THE SAME MATERIAL AS THE NUTS. E ALL FITTMGS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C 110 AND AWWA C 111. 7. SECTION 7-12.2 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE SUPPLEMENTED BY THE FOLLOWING: A. GATE VALVES SHALL BE USED FOR EIGHT (8) INCH MAINS AND SMALLER. BUTTERFLY VALVES SHALL BE USED FOR MAINS GREATER THAN EIGHT 8) INCHES. 1) GATE VALVES: GATE VALVES SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST AWWA SPECIFICATIONS FOR COLD WATER, RESILIENT SEAT GATE VALVES, 200 PSI WORKING PRESSURE. THEY SHALL BE IRON-BODIED, BRONZE- MOUNTED, NON-RISING STEM, COUNTERCLOCKWISE OPENING, MECHANICAL JOINT ENDS (EXCEPT 6" VALVES ON FIRE HYDRANT LINES WHICH SHALL BE MECHANICAL JOINTS BY FLANGED). VALVE STEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH O-RING SEALS AND SHALL BE AS MANUFACTURED BY THE MUELLER COMPANY OR APPROVED EQUAL 2) BUTTERFLY VALVES: BUTTERFLY VALVES CONFORMING WTH AWWA C 504, CLASS 150 AND SHALL HAVE STANDARD AWWA TWO (2) INCH SQUARE NUT. 8. VALVE LOCATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED ONLY BY THE DISTRICT OR ITS ENGINEER. 3 K46 GATE VALVE OF NOTES 3 BUFM WARR CISW,Na 7 FINISHED GRADE Z a ` METER BOX FOG-TITE #B9T 3/4"/l TR/RL SOLID CONCRETE o METER: ROCKWELL SR2 TR/PL IN BLOCK, TYPICAL CUBIC FEET (C.F.), TR/RL EACH SIDE OF BOX • RUN 1" PLASTIC 10' =- PAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE METALLIC (DETECTABLE MARKING) & PLACE PVC PLUG INTO TAPE AND WIRE, SEE NOTE 5 END OF LINE & EXTEND 2' COPPER SETTER FORD #VH172-18W ABOVE THE GROUND MUELLER INSTA-TITE COUPLINGS #15408 12" CORPORATION STOP FORD F500 1" DRISCOPIPE 5100 ULTRA-LINE PIPE OR APPROVED EQUAL, MEETING ASTM D2239-SDR7 PE 3408 WATER MAIN CATEGORY 5, GRADE P34, CLASS C. 200 PSI MIN. SINGLE STRAP SADDLE, FORD F101 OR APPROVED EQUAL NOTES: 1. ALL MATERIAL AND FITTINGS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED OR AN APPROVE EQUAL. 2. THE WATER METER SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENT LINE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. ALL COUPLINGS SHALL USE PIPE INSERT STIFFENER. 4. THE WATER SERVICE LINE SHALL HAVE 36" OF COVER BELOW FINISHED GRADE WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. 5. METALLIC (DETECTABLE MARKING) TAPE SHALL BE COLOR CODE BLUE AND SHALL BE IMPRINTED CONTINUOUSLY OVER ITS ENTIRE LENGTH IN PERMANENT BLACK INK THE MESSAGE "WATER LINE BURIED BELOW" AND THE WORD 'CAUTION' PROMINENTLY SHOWN, TAPE SHALL BE A 2" MIN. WIDTH AND 14 GA. PLASTIC COATED WIRE. 6. WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 42" IN IMPROVED RIGHT- OF-WAY, AND A MINIMUM OF 48" IN UNIMPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS. 7. ANY INCREASE 1N SIZE FROM 518" METERS AND 314" SERVICE SHALL HAVE PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE DISTRICT MANAGER, AND WILL BE PAID BY THE CUSTOMER. 1 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION OF 3 BEIFAR%%TM OLSIFWT MO. I DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY,SEE DETAIL, PLAN S E C TI ON (TYPICAL) 1' SERVICE TEE 314" POLYETHYLENE SERVICE TO METERS WATER METER,SEE METALLIC DETECTABLE MARKING) (TYPICAL)IL (TAPE AND WIRE, SEE NOTE 5 MULLER INSTA-TITE COUPLINGS #15408 CORPORATION STOP FORD F500. OR APPROVED EQUAL PROPERTY LINE OR EASEMENT LINE 6 (TYPICAL) WATER MAIN 1" DRISCOPIPE 5100 ULTRA-LINE PIPE OR APPROVED EQUAL, MEETING ASTM D2239-SDR7 PE 3408 DOUBLE STRAP SADDLE, CATEGORY 5, GRADE P34, CLASS C, 200 PSI MIN. FORD F202 OR APPROVED EQUAL NOTES: 1. ALL MATERIAL AND FITTINGS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED OR AN APPROVE EQUAL. 2. THE WATER METERS SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENT LINE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. ALL COUPLINGS SHALL USE PIPE INSERT STIFFENER, 4. THE WATER SERVICE LINE SHALL HAVE 36' OF COVER BELOW FINISHED GRADE WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. 5. METALLIC (DETECTABLE MARKING) TAPE SHALL BE COLOR CODE BLUE AND SHALL BE IMPRINTED CON71NUOUSLY OVER ITS ENTIRE LENGTH IN PERMANENT BLACK INK THE MESSAGE "WATER LINE BURIED BELOW" AND THE WORD 'CAU71ON' PROMINENTLY SHOWN, TAPE SHALL BE A 2" MIN. WIDTH AND 14 GA. PLASTIC COATED WIRE. 6. WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 42" IN IMPROVED RIGHT- OF-WAY, AND A MINIMUM OF 48" IN UNIMPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS. 7. METER INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER WATER SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL SHOWN IN THE PLANS. 8, ANY INCREASE IN SIZE FROM 5/8" METERS AND 314" SERVICE SHALL HAVE PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE DISTRICT MANAGER AND WILL BE PAID BY THE CUSTOMER. 2 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION OF 3 BQFM VATER DISTRICT IIQ t METER BOX, SEE NOTE 3 FINISHED GRADE TEST COCK 6" TO 8" ONE UNION AS APPROVED BY BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 2" MAX. 3" MIN. CLEARANCE 1f 6" WASHED ROCK OR SOLID GRAVEL CONCRETE BLOCK, SEE (_�I NOTE 4 1" MIN 1i1- I I kEl I I . . SECTION VIEW METER BOX, SEE NOTE 3 6" MIN. fUNION 6" MIN. SOLID CONCRETE 1 BLOCK, SEE NOTE 4 PLAN VIEW NOTES: 1. DCVA IS TO BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY DOWNSTREAM OF WATER METER. 2. DCVA IS TO BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING. 3. METER BOX SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ALLOW THE MINIMUM SET BACKS ILLUSTRATED ABOVE. METER BOX LID SHALL BE A TRAFFIC METER READER LID. H-20 LOADING. 4. METER BOX SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY FOUR 16"x8"x4" SOLID CONCRETE BLOCKS 5. DCVA SHALL BE TESTED, UPON INSTALLATION OR CUSTOMER CONNECTION, BY A WASHINGTON STATE CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER, AND THE REPORT FORM SHALL BE RECEIVED BY THE WATER COMPANY PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. 3 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION OF DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY 3 BEIFAR WAWR USrwCT NO. t BACKFILL MATERIAL SEE NOTE 3 PIPE 6" MIN BEDDING MATERIAL, 1/2 Q.D. SEE NOTE 2 112 O.D. 4" MIN. UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SUB-GRADE 4" M1N L0. t 18" NOTES: 1. TRENCHING SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 7-10.3(7) OF THE WSDOT SPECIFICATIONS. 2. BEDDING MATERIAL FOR DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE NATIVE MATERIAL AS APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT, TAMPED AT ALL JOINT INSTALLATION. BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED IN 6" MAXIMUM LIFTS TO 90% MIN. DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY ASTM D1557. 3. GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR ABOVE BEDDING SHALL CONSIST OF CRUSHED, PROCESSED, OR NATURALLY OCCURRING GRANULAR MATERIAL IT SHALL BE ESSENTIALLY FREE FROM VARIOUS TYPES OF WOOD WASTE OR OTHER EXTRANEOUS OR OBJECTIONABLE MATERIALS. BANK RUN BACKFILL SHALL NOT EXCEED 59 CLAY FOR ANY ROAD OR DRIVEWAY CROSSING. TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 90% MIN AS DETERMINED BY ASTM 01557. TRENCH BEDDING 1 PIPE TRENCH DETAIL OF � 1 BEIFAIR WATER DISTRICT NM 1 X \ ` IN \% PLUGGED CROSS HORIZONTAL ELBOW (TEE) HORIZONTAL BENT y�\yam\y �\``�• =�= \��\ I" DIA. REBAR OR LARGER TEE �� VERTICAL BEND NOTES: 1. CONCRETE BLOCKING: ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE LOW-SLUMP AND SHALL BE PLACED BY HAND WITH WOOD FORMS AND/OR PLASTIC SHEETING TO PREVENT BONDING AND HOOKING AROUND FITTINGS AND JOINTS. SOCKET WRENCH CLEARANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE CONCRETE AND ALL MECHANICAL JOINT AND FLANGE BOLTS. FULL CLEARANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND ALL PLUGGED BELLS TO ALLOW FUTURE REMOVAL AND LINE EXTENSION. ALL BLOCKING SHALL BE INSPECTED AND MEASURED BY THE ENGINEER, OR HIS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, BEFORE BACKFILL. 2. CAST IRON FITTINGS AND REPAIR COUPLINGS. ALL CAST IRON FITTINGS SHALL BE FLANGED OR MECHANICAL JOINT 1251 AWWA APPROVED OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFICED ON PROJECT PLANS. ALL COMPRESSION COUPLINGS SHALL BE ROMAC 4501, OR EQUAL, 7" MIN. LENGTH WITH DUCTILE BODY AND END RINGS, OR EQUAL. 3. RESTRAINED JOINTS MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING, IF APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. RESTRAINED JOINTS SHALL BE EBAA IRON SALES "MEGALUG", OR APPROVED EQUAL THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF RESTRAINT SHALL BE AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 1 CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING OF � 1 BELFAR WATER DSLWCT NO-1 CHAPTER VIII TABLE OF CONTENTS VIH. IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM..........................................................................................1 8.1 Prioritizing Improvements ............................................................................................1 8.1.1 Identification of System Improvements..................................................................1 8.1.1.1 Source Supply ...........................................................::._.................................1 8.1.1.2 Storage.................................................................. ..............................2 8.1.1.3 Treatment........................................................_..............................................2 8.1.1.4 Distribution System................................... ......... ........................................2 8.1.2 Assessment of Alternatives............................... ....... ......... ..............................4 8.1.2.1 Source/Supply................................. ....... ........................::..........................4 8.1.2.2 Storage.......................................... ;...........------..............................................4 8.1.2.3 Treatment......................................._............:...................... :....::.............5 8.1.2.4 Distribution System............... ....... ...............................................................5 8.1.3 Selection of Alternatives...........................: :.:....................................................6 8.1.3.1 Source/Supply..........................................: 8.1.3.2 Storage............................................................ .:..............................................6 8.1.3.3 Treatment........................................................................................................6 8.1.3.4 Distribution System............................................'...:.......................................6 8.2 Improvement Schedule ...................::............................... ...........--------------...------.........7 LIST OF TABLES Table 8.1 Belfair Water Ihstrict 14 I.Recommended Water System Improvements...........8 LIST OF FIGURES VIII- i VIII. IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 8.1 Prioritizing Improvements 8.1.1 Identification of System Improvements 8.1.1.1 Source Supply Belfair Water District No. 1 has a total of three active wells in Pressure Zone No. 1. Two wells are located at the District's office. Each of these.wells has the capability of producing approximately 150 gpm for a total production capacity of 300 gpm. Both wells and booster pumps operate from the same power source. There is an additional well on Hummingbird Lane. It is capable of producing up to 275 gpm, depending on system working'pressure. All three wells are artesian, with Well Nos. 1 &2 being flowing artesians. While there are three wells, only two of them are capable of providing"regular" service. Well No. 2, was isolated and upgraded from Well No. 1 in 1998. However, it was found that when this well is operated, it produces sand for the first 15 minutes or so. In order for its water to be used in the system,the water must be first discharged to the outside until it clears, and then it can be put to use. Therefore, this well is held in reserve and used only in emergency cases. This leaves only approximately 425 gpm available to Pressure Zone No.:l on a regular basis. A new well was placed in service during this past planning period. Well No. 4 is located on the ridge line to the north and east ofthe Belfair community center. The well has a permitted right and a capacity to pump 600 gpm. It is a strong well with excellent recovery. Robinson& Noble has stated that the well can be further developed and could probably produce up to 1,000 gpm. This well is not currently connected to the lower pressure zone, but only serves the plateau area upland of Belfair. Under the current operating scenario there is insufficient capacity to properly serve the District's Pressure" ne No. 1 needs in the long term, based on the projected growth. Well No. 4 should be to be connected to the lower pressure zone. The population growth shown in Chapter II, along with the PHD calculated using WAC minimum MDD's shows the demand forecast over this planning period and for the next 20 years. A total of approximately 950 gpm will be needed by the year 2026. However, with Well No. 4 the District has a total pumping capacity of 1,030 gpm. Based on the data developed for the 2001 Water System Plan, this is a reduction in the pumping requirement for 20 years into the future. The change from the 2001 Water System Plan is predicated on the reduced ADD the District now has. The data available today for this plan suggest that a new water source will not be required. However, the District is cautioned to be prepared to review this need during this next six year planning period. The installation of the proposed sewer system to serve the Belfair community could dramatically change source requirements. VIII- 1 The District presently has two generators to provide auxiliary power during outages. One is permanently installed to serve Well No. 1, and the second is a trailer mounted unit that can be towed and connected to Well No. 3. Both of these generators are military surplus. Parts for repair are very difficult to find. As this plan is being written, the District is in the process of purchasing and installing a permanent 47 KW generator at Well No. 3. The District should investigate replacing the generator at Well No. 1 as well. 8.1.1.2 Storage There are presently five tanks with a total storage capacity of 1,354,622 gallons in place. Two tanks each are located at the North Tank site and the South Tank site in Pressure Zone No. 1. The fifth tank is located in Pressure Zone No. 2 on the ridge above the community near Well No. 4. With the projected growth given in this plan, the District has sufficient storage to provide both equalizing storage and standby storage, but the large steel standpipe must be connected to the lower pressure zone to accomplish this. This does not obviate the need to review future storage needs within the total 20 year planning period. This requirement will have to be examined closely after sewers are installed in the Belfair area. 8.1.1.3 Treatment The District has installed disinfection facilities at all of its sources. No new or additional treatment facilities are required during this six- or 20-year planning period, except as may be required for a new source placed into operation. Belfair Water district No. 1 is not otherwise required to treat its water. Only a change in regulations for treatment of underground sources would require additional treatment facilities. 8.1.1.4 Distribution System The present distribution system although fairly new, is primarily comprised of asbestos cement (AC) pipe. .It appears to be in good physical condition, but the results of the audit to identify unaccounted`for water,indicates that there may be undetected leaks in various parts of the system. The hydraulic analyses in Chapter 3 identified some major distribution system problems. While the existing`system can provide'proper'service under normal and seasonal flow conditions,the lack of loops places several areas of the system in jeopardy under fireflow conditions. Connections at higher elevations.and outside of the core area between the tanks will suffer from substandard pressures. If the fire department withdraws more than the system can naturally deliver, negative pressures could result at extreme ends and elevations. The fire department has been admonished to never withdraw more than the system can naturally produce under gravity conditions under any circumstances until certain loops are added to the system. That flow restriction is 2,200 to 3,000 gpm, depending on location, and as indicated in Chapter III. The geography and topography of the District's service area serves to restrict its ability to provide for distribution system looping. The southern part of the service area lies along the hillside with no defined rights-of-way. Any future development up hill from the highway will likely be isolated with a single access from the highway. Traffic patterns(private roads and utility easements)in the VIII- 2 that zone. The existing main along the westerly side of SR-3 was extended north. Crossing SR-3 and tying into the older existing main would improve circulation and service capability in the Belfair Community Center area. The other is the replacement of a 27' deep section of main near All Star Mini-Storage near the intersection of SR-3 and SR-106. While not necessarily improving service, the newly relocated main would dramatically improve maintenance capabilities for this part of the system should something happen to the existing line. The Belfair Area Chamber of Commerce, Mason County, and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) have been discussing the future widening of SR-3 though much of Belfair in conjunction with the county's comprehensive plan. The discussions have been about widening up to 1.5 miles of SR-3. If this project goes through, the District will be required by WSDOT to relocate its existing main along the entire project. If the District is so required, the main size should be upgraded to 12 inches in order to better serve the customers through out the district in terms of both domestic and fireflow. For the 2001 Water System Plan, DOH comments, included a suggestion for a regular main replacement program. The response at that time was that such a program was not financially feasible. That answer stands true for this plan. With only about 520 customers, the District does not generate enough revenue to undertake such a program at this time. 8.1.2 Assessment of Alternatives 8.1.2.1 Source/Supply Section 8.1.1.1, Identification of Source✓Supply Improvements,''did not list any specific projects. The section only alluded Ito reviewing the need for additional supply sources based on new information gathered and developed as growth continues and a new sewer system is installed to serve the Belfair area. Depending on where growth;occurs and /or the sewers are installed, the District should study the need far a new source, or possibly further developing Well No. 4 as suggested possiole by Robinson&Noble. A new,generator for Well No. 1 would enhance the District's ability to provide long term service during a prolonged power outage. While most outages, and particularly prolonged ones, occur during low water use periods,'-such occurrences are not unheard of during the peak use season. The new generator would provide the redundancy needed to weather such a time, or provide back up to the generator at Well No 3 8.1.2.2 Storage ,, , No specific new storage needs have been identified for this planning period. However, as part of the ensuing six-year planning period, the District should review its storage requirements, based on the then census and usage data available. Again, as with sourcetsupply, the installation of sewers as estimated by Mason County for the 2009-2010 time frame may have a significant impact on the potential need for storage. The study for the need for more storage should include a review for location to provide the best long term service to District customers. VIR-4 8.1.2.3 Treatment Unless there is a change in regulations regarding treatment of underground sources, or a new source is added, no new treatment facilities will be required. 8.1.2.4 Distribution System The major improvement(s) for the distribution system will be the interzone connection(s) between pressure zones. This will alleviate problems due to fireflow by providing a source of water for prolonged firefighting situations. It will also provide for a much longer supply of water during a long term power outage. The latter will offset long term generator usage on the District's wells. There are two distribution system projects that will have a major impact on District service. These are the interzone connections from Pressure Zone No. 2 to Pressure Zone No. 1. Both connections will provide the District with a vastly improved fireflow capability in terms of both rate and quantity. In addition, the Old Belfair Highway connection will eliminate the substandard pressure area during fireflow events. The higher priority connection is the 12-inch line and its connection near the US Post Office. Major looping of the existing distribution system serving the central Belfair community is not available. Based on the configuration of the existing distribution and rights-of way, there appears to be only one viable alternative for minor looping at this time. The new crossing of SR-3 at the northerly end of Pressure Zone No. 1 will increase circulation of water in and around the Belfair Community Center area It adds a loop to the system and will allow the District to continue to provide service to much of the area should an interruption occur on certain parts of the system. The District will have to:evaluate looping possibilities as new development projects are presented. In the meantime, the storage facilities from Pressure Zone No. 2 after would provide some relief from flow and pressure problems when a connection is:constructed. Because a fairly,large,,area has been designated as`an Urban Growth Area(UGA) in Belfair, future water system distribution lines will be required. The specific location for each new line cannot be identified at this time. However, it is known that the major transmission system lines will be along the SR I light-of-way and the future Belfair Bypass for SR 3. These transmission lines will be twelve inches;in diameter, ot;greater, as the specific needs of the property owners are identified. For the purposes.of this plan, a transmission main diameter of 12 inches is the default size. To preclude potential disruption of service on SR-3, south of its intersection with SR 106, a short section of line could be added from one of the existing on-site system lines on the All Star Mini- Storage property. It could be left open or remain closed for normal operations. While this pipe would not provide a true system loop, it would preserve continuity of service if something should happen to the 27'deep AC line. It would also provide a small incremental increase in pressure and flow along SR-3 south. An easement from All Star Mini-Storage would be required for District ownership. The upsizing and relocation of 1-1.5 miles of water main along SR-3 would provide a tremendous increase in service to the District's customers. This applies to both potable water service and fireflow. However, it is estimated that the total cost of such a project would exceed $2,000,000. VIR- 5 With a customer base of only about 520 at this writing, the District is not in a position to fund the project. Even a low interest loan from the Public Works Trust Fund would cost the District an annual Debt Service of approximately $110,000. Since System Development Fees(SDF) are used primarily for new system facilities and Debt Service for system enhancements, they could be used to pay towards the new, higher Debt Service costs. The District presently has an annual debt service cost of approximately $87,000. The new Debt Service would be almost $200,000 annually. The highest SDF income has been approximately $30,000. Therefore, the entire new debt service cost would have to be paid from water sales. That would add almost $18.00 per month to each customer's bill. Therefore, the only feasible way for the District to construct these facilities is via an outright grant of funds. 8.1.3 Selection of Alternatives 8.1.3.1 Source/Supply No specific improvements have been identified for the primary six-year period of this plan. However, the District should undertake and evaluation of sourcetsupply needs near the end of this six-year period for the possibility of such and improvement for the ensuing six-year planning period. There will be no financial burden on the District except for the study's inclusion in the next Water System Plan. 8.1.3.2 Storage As with Source/Supply, no specific storage improvements have been identified. This need should also be evaluated and the result, both for size and location, included in the next Water System Plan 8.1.3.3 Treatment No treatment improvements.are foreseen during either the near term or long term periods of this Water System Plan. 8.1.3.4 Distribution System , This plan identifies several distribution system improvements. All will provide increased benefits to the Districts customers in terms of potable and fireflow service. The number one priority improvement project is the interzone connection from Well No. 4 to Pressure Zone No. l.near the US Post Office. The connection would include a 12-inch DIP line and an 8-inch Pressure Reducing Station with a 3-inch bypass. This connection alone will add approximately 1,000 gpm to fireflow rates, depending on location, as well as providing sustained quantities of water during fireflow events. The connection will also improve overall potable water service by maintaining a higher HGL in Pressure Zone No. 1 during peak use periods. The second highest priority is another interzone connection to Pressure Zone No. 1 along Old Belfair Highway (OBH). The area along OBH north of the intersection with SR-300 suffers low pressure during peak use periods and fireflow events. This connection would eliminate those problems. VUI-6 The proposed crossing of SR-3 at the northerly end of Pressure Zone No. 1 will aid the circulation of water in the Belfair Community Center area. It would also provide an alternative rout for water should a part of the system have to be taken out of service temporarily. The installation of a parallel line to bypass the 27' deep line near All Star Mini Storage is a safety factor. It could be used to augment the flow of the deep line, and replace that line should it collapse. The District has chosen not to include the 1 — 1.5 mile relocation and upgrade of the line along SR 3. The District has informed both Mason County and WSDOT that it cannot fund the relocation project. The overall costs are just too much for the District to bear. The same reasoning applies to an annual replacement program. It is estimated that the costs will run$250-300 per foot for main replacement and upgrade. The cost includes the main, new casings for crossings, and replacing and upgrading all service connections. 8.2 Improvement Schedule The projects listed are all vital to raise the District's existing:service level to current standards and to assure continuity of water service during all situations. All of the projects listed in the table and discussed above have been assigned a time frame. The timing of any of the projects could move up or down depending on available financing. Should grant or loan.funds become available, the District should move forward as soon as possible with as many projects as it can. Table 8.1 lists the various improvements recommended for this plan. Each improvement is presented within the subject area as discussed above. Figure'3.1 in the pocket at the end of this report indicates the projects for the water system listed in the table. VIII-7 8 -IIIA zW sM y sly MOT raeoa of iloua of pappa aq pings%OE 30 mnuRullu d JD` ! l`ao d.;apnlou!you op saR pap pmm4suoo wf sysoo msm =3LON �d g1^so�J saar-I IOCWWI$ mp aAm of p-nbag aq A— wa7s,CS uo!ssmUsM,L L-LOOZ jadolanaQ 5-MA ss saurl nasff!msuu.L tAaN aognqupla snoueA 90I-ZIS aml xu-w S aun I I OZ sanwna-d malsAS 000`o6S L-HIA dxV.LZ of aml lall—d lrqmq uoPn9!4!Q Iallmd 901-2IS I#Zd S OIOZ ---a mays4S OOObSS L-MA 3o Pua.Ciia p—@£-CIS—a uo!a►qLqs.tu Su!ssojz)E-HS AvmqWTH ns;lag PIO ayl Pus Z auoZ ammJd walsxS uo!loauaoO 600Z JadolaAoa to W-D 000`OSZS 9-MA' u""N uogaauu03 lannsuoa uollnq!AsrQ auoZ asnssald -Waz) aql Pug Z auoZ amssaJd wals,CS uolpmmoz) 80OZ radolaeaQ Jo WMD 000`I££S 9-MA uaaegaq uo!Wuwo pngsuoa U04NUPIG aaoZ amssam s O,d mats S lsoJ WcZ angn3 ZI-Ol0Z uolisj Jd dSM I�PPV ON S-HIA -i Al+adoid aat-S Pw Pul3 02-M APMS 29-o►S sanuanag—ImrS ;-a ZI-OI OZ °O1I-MbJd dSM I.PPV ON IrIIIA sAft-WM Isu°!1!PPb' AIddnsr-moS fpm S'oN IIaM I'oN HaM 800Z sanuoAmd wals[S 000`m L-MA Is Jolssa OD MON llslsul f4ddnsr--S uaO—x Pa'I�PI PaaN a;guags3 a�agM Iuama°oxktq peat aamoS 8a!oag A 000 aFed uondumU ;o ad�y OW2Iaafoid (S LWZ)syuamaewdmi ways,Cs.taysb papuammoaag I*ON PRISM JMBA%IMPH IS alg9jL a scum I.►I 30 ZSPI 4, g............... L-I OOZ `saga luawdolanaQ uialsXS 9.6 OIV L g..................................•.•. ....................... .....G'I OOZ `saSn�I uoi uuq�aaimaS S'6 alqu,L L................................suialsAS lalOM luaaefOV qj!m uosueduio�al�2l I luapisag 17 6 alq�y 9......... ...... L-TOOZ ` OWU iOIRmi-�luluO]K £'6 alciu L b""•',"'•900Z - OOOZ ioj kmwtunS asuadxg paloafoid I -ON"ulslQ.raPm-ITJIQg Z'6 algg.L I.....................•............•--•...... .................... ............. ............. SOOZ-000Z Alililfl lalrM aql loj sluawavIS asuadxa It'nuuV I 'ON PulsiQ Ja AA J!v3la9 I'6 ORRI s3rinvZ g0 ZSYI g.........................................:.......: .....:.....:.,..................saad luawdolanaQ malsAS £'9-6 ............. ................................:.;............: ...;............ sa!Rwg3 uotpauuoD aainiaS Z'S•6 5........................._.. ...............................:...................."'I.............sal VX AA T'S'6 ialE ----- ....................................5....................... . sisx lidamwn.a S 31U2I S'6 S....................... .....::.. ..........sisAIUW auioaul PlogasnoH uvtp W ti•17'6 .................................. ................... ........v............aniasag AOu39iauig £ 7'6 ........ .--••-....... : .... .......................................anlasag gsuj Suptlmdp Z ti 6 £...................... .......... .......kmununS la9png Suilt'iad0 T ti'6 -----..:.:.............................................................. £• isay,?4iliqViA It"auBui3 b'6 Z.................................................................................Suiauruld UMJ20id luauianoidwI £-6 I........••........................... ..•-- .......................................:.......:......SMMS IRIMBUi3ISM Z'6 T.................................................................................sluawaimba2l urei5w Iviau�u►3 T 6 T....................................................................................................Y�tV2I1J02Id'IdI�I�I�'I�II3 'XI S.LAI UNOD 30 gZgvZ XI 2Ig.Ld�H� IX. FINANCIAL PROGRAM 9.1 Financial Program Requirements Belfair Water District No. 1 has less than 1,000 connections, and as a Public Water District, is not regulated by the Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC). Therefore, the Financial Program for this water system plan is provided in accordance with Chapter 9, Section 2 of DOH's Water System Planning Handbook. 9.2 Past Financial Status Historically, Belfair Water District No. 1 has maintained a system of rates and charges to properly fund the operation, maintenance, and capital improvements for the District's water system. Table 9.1 is a historical listing of the water utility's expenses from 2000 through 2005 Table 9.1 Belfair Water District No. 1 Annual Expense Statements for the Water Utility,2000-2005 Budget Category 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 REVENUE Begirt Cash Balance %,128 123,106 178,410 248,538 199,150 Water Sales 278,863 301,346 321,719 381,905 354,789 381,115 Surcharges Sprinklers System Dev.Fee 33,625 16,325 14,175 11,425 30,952 35,125 Application Fee 1,175 1,225 Connection Charges Miscellaneous 1,297 517 Other(Non-Op,Loans,etc) TOTAL REVENUE 312,488 407,7W 461,462 573,482 634,279 615,390 EXPENSES M&O 111,938 122,965 94,599 90,698 165,343 131,944 G&A 107,883 120,728 135,020 143,262 156,303 167,599 Debt Service 12,820 88,225 88,493 87,700 Capital Improvements 2,539 41,000 40,613 2,759 25,000 0 Operating Reserve(1/8 M&O) TOTAL EXPENSES 222,360 284,693 283,052 324,944 435,129 387,243 CASH BALANCE 90,128 123,106 178,410 248,538 199,150 228,147 ix - I 9.3 Improvement Program Financing Potential financing of the projects discussed in Section VIII will vary from operations' revenue to loans to outright grants, depending on the need and timing of the project. The District will have to investigate the various possibilities for outside financing as each project comes to the fore in the plan. Not every project or portion thereof will be eligible for outside financing, or outside financing that is affordable to the District. Therefore, to accomplish these projects, it is imperative that the District set aside money for at least part of a project in its operations' budget for the planned year. If outside financing is available, the District can maximize its budget. If not, that portion of the project that can be constructed from the budget should be completed. In this way, progress towards upgrading the system will be accomplished. Belfair Water District No. 1 has several sources of potential revenue for projects outlined in this plan. The most consistent is the monthly operating revenue derived from water rates charged for the provision of water service to its customers. Other sources include connection charges, system development fees, revenue bonds, Utility Local Improvement District assessments, and loans and grants from various state agencies. Each will be described in some detail below. Local funding options include Water Sales, Revenue Bonds. Developer Extensions, and Utili Local Improvement Districts. Excess water sales revenue could potentially be used to fund one or more of the smaller projects. Revenue bonds are secured solelyby the revenue developed by the water system. Financially sound publicly owned water systems can sell revenue bonds with interest rates often as low as general obligation bonds. Additionally, a vote of the residents of the District is not required to sell these bonds. Instead these bonds are created and sold through the passage of a resolution by the Board of Commissioners. When new subdivisions within the District's service area require water service, a developer`extension, according to plans and specifications approved by the District, may be constructed. The improvements are then deeded to the District for operation and maintenance. Utility Local Improvement Districts (ULID's) are local, limited area taxing districts established by Mason County on behalf of the District for the purpose of making utility improvements"in a certain area_ Taxes are assessed against properties, which are benefited"by the improvement. Assessments are usually based on a formula, which takes into account the frontage of the property and its area. The State"'of Washington ;has several financial programs that are available for municipal infrastructure improvements. The most notable of these for water system improvements are the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program, the Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF), and Community Economic Revitalization Board (CERB) Constriction Program. Community Development Block Grants are federal grants administered by the states and are available to counties and cities to-serve the needs of low and moderate income residents. Non-entitlement cities and counties are eligible. As a last resort and other outside financing is not available, if the District is critically low in funds, it can apply for a commercial bank loan. It would face the same loan requirements as a normal commercial enterprise. Chapter VIH listed certain capital improvements to the water system. The following is a discussion of the funding source for each of the listed improvements. IX-2 New Generator: A new generator to replace the existing one at Well No. 1 is well within the District's ability to fund from System Revenues. The funds could come from either water sales or a combination of Water Sales and System Development Fees. Well No. 5 Studv: Since current data do not specifically point to a new source requirement, the District should include the study in the development of the next Water System Plan. By that time, new sewers should be in place and new census and growth information will be available. Funding will be from System Revenues as part of the funding for the Water System Plan. Storage Study: As with the study for a new source, the District will require the study for new storage be a part of the new Water System Plan. Funding will be as with the source study requirement. Pressure Zone Connection: The two interzone connection projects listed in,Chapter VIII are vital to upgrading service to the District's customers. The District has been in contact with developers who anticipate substantial residential development in Pressure Zone No. 2 in the area of each potential connection. These developers have been informed of the District's requirement that the lines serving their developments be connect to Pressure Zone No. 1. The district will enter into a "Payback Agreement" to reimburse the developer for the additional cost of tying the two areas together. An alternative possibility for financing may be a CERB grant for development of economic opportunities in the new Belfair UGA. SR-3 Crossing: The cost of this improvement is estimated to be $50,000. This project can be funded from System Revenges,including Water Sales and System Development Fees. SR-106 Parallel Line: With an estimated cost of$451000, this project is well within the District's ability to fund it through System Revenues. Transmission Lines: :Transmission lines will be required to serve the new pressure zone within the UGA,'as well as other>`areas within_the,District's service area that may develop. As with the pressure zone interconnections, it will be"up to the individual developers to construct the various transmission lines to serve their properties. The District will enter into a"Pay back" agreement to reimburse the 4eveloper for the added costs, if required, from revenues derived from others who do not have to extend the lines. 9.4 Financial Wability'TeW Since Belfair Water District No. 1 has less than 1,000 connections, the District must pass the Financial Viability Test UNT)to obtain approval for this Water System Plan. The FVT consists of four parts; Operating Budget summary, Operating Cash Reserve, Emergency Reserve, and Median Household Income Analysis. Each component is discussed below. 9.4.1 Operating Budget Summary Table 9.2 presents the estimated District Revenue and Expense Summary for the planning years of this document. IX-3 Table 9.2 Belfair Water District No. 1 Projected District Expense Summary for 2007-2012 Budget Category 2007 2009 2009 2010 2011 2012 REVENUE Begun.Cash Balance 219,500 89,799 26,945 26,490 11,521 12,770 Water Sales 425,956 467,060 524,042 534,523 551,093 568,177 Surcharges 13,994 14,274 14,559 14,851 15,148 15,451 Sprinklers M39 8,795 9,059 9,331 9,611 9,899 System Dev.Fee 30,000 30,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Application Fee 1,545 1,591 1,639 1,688 1,739 1,791 Connection Charges 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 Miscellaneous 500 500 500 500 500 500 Other(Non-Op,Loans,etc.) TOTAL REVENUE 706,034 620,009 616,744 634,372 638,611 659,597 EXPENSES M&O 150,252 154,760 159,402 164,194 169,110 174,183 G&As• 223,180 229,875 236,772 243,975 251,191 258,727 Debt Service 86,04 85,351 84,568 83,785 83,002 82,219 Capital hnprovemetrts 110,000 75,000 60,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 Operating Reserve 46,679 48,079 49,522 51,007 52,538 54,114 TOTAL EXPENSES 6161,2451 593,065 590,264 622,851 625,841 629,243 CASH BALAWE 89,789 26,945 26,480 11,521 12,770 30,344 fi u The Maintenance and Operation portion of the expenses was escalated at 5/o per year,based on the 2006 budget 9.4.2 Operating Cash Reserve The district generally budgets an amount equal to 1/8 of the total of the M&O and G&A budgets combined. Table 9.2 indicates the level of budgeting over the next six years. 9.4.3 Emergency Reserve Belfair Water District No. 1 sets up an annual Capital Improvement Fund of approximately $60,000. This fund serves as the District's Emergency Reserve Fund. The most vulnerable system component is the water source, or wells_ While the District has four operable wells, only three serve the bulk of the District's customers located in the lower pressure zone. The long-term loss (more than a few days) of any one of these three could potentially adversely impact operations IX-4 during the peak use period of the year. The addition of an interzone connection from Well No. 4 and the tank serving Pressure Zone No. 2 will greatly alleviate this potential problem. Conversely, although the distribution system is not well looped, the District has two separate storage facilities, one at each end of the system. If a main break occurs between the two areas, water can still be delivered, albeit at a lower quantity rate during the short time it takes to repair the main. Therefore,the distribution system is not the most vulnerable part of the system. 9.4.4 Median Household Income Analysis A household income survey was conducted for a feasibility study for constructing a new sewer system in the Belfair area. The survey, completed in November 1999,found the median household income (1vII M for the feasibility study was $25,751. While the survey did not cover the entire area served by Belfair Water District No. 1, it did serve the purpose of establishing an income level benchmark for Belfair in general. No known MHHI survey has been conducted recently. Since there is no known recent M1*11 for the Belfair area, the Washington State Office of Financial Management was contacted. OFM does an evaluation at the county level each year. The latest evaluation of Mason County's MIUR for 1999 to 2005 shows an 11.26 % increase. This value was applied to the 1999 MHFII for Belfair to calculate a comparable number just for the Belfair area. The resultant number is an M11 II of $28,652. At 1.5% the excessive, or unaffordable, rate value would be $430.00.per year, or $35.83 per month. Belfair's base rate of $21.56 per month is considerably less than that which would be considered unaffordable. 9.5 Rate Structure Analysis 9.5.1 Water Rates Belfair Water District No. l charges each of its water customers a fixed monthly fee, plus a charge for the amount of water each customer uses. The basic charge includes 500 cubic feet (cf), or approximately 3,700 gallons, each"month The-water rates charged by the District are listed in Table 9.3. The District is contemplating;a 7.5%u increase in the rates for the autumn of 2007. It is expected that his rate,will take effect�fo%;October. The revenues shown in Table 9.2 include that increase at that time. In addition, based:on the capital improvements listed in Chapter VIII, the District will again need to raise rates by 100/0 in 2009. This increase is also included in Table 9.2. The last increase should take the District through the final planning year of this Water System Plan, 2012. Only the rates for Water Sales have been increased for Table 9.2. The District should evaluate the System Development Fee and Connection Charge rates at the same time in order to evaluate the impacts on existing customers. Changes in the latter rates may have a significant affect on water sales rates, depending on the actual growth rate at the time. While the District has contemplated raising rates on a specific schedule here, it will be a year-by- year decision by the District as to whether or not to raise water sales rates, and by how much. IX-5 Table 9.3 Monthly Water Rates Belfair Water District No. 1— as of April 2001 Inside District Limits(Res. &Comm.l Minimum Rate Residential $21.56 Commercial $25.75 The minimum charge listed above includes the first 500 cubic feet(approximately 3,700 gallons)of water. Rates for Additional Water Used in Excess of 500 cf 0-500 cf Included 501- 3,000 cf $0.05100/cf 3,0014,000 cf $0.06000%f 4,001-5,000 cf $0.06900/cf 5,001 cf and over $0.08600/cf Outside District Limits Residential customers outside the District limits are charged at the rate of$6.90 per month per unit m.addition to the charges listed above, and commercial customers outside the District are charged an additional$12.50. Several adjacent water systems were contacted to obtain their rates. Table 9.4 is a listing of rates for nearby systems. The purpose of showing the adjacent system rates is not to show that Belfair is higher, but to demonstrate the District's commitment to providing its customers with high quality service. .The District recognizes that this effort will be fairly costly in terms of individual customer charges However, the result'is a sufficient quantity of good quality water, delivered under good system pressure. The District also recognizes that it cannot make improvements to the system to keep up with growth without having the revenues to fund the projects. IX-6 Table 9.4 Residential Rate Comparison With Adjacent Water Systems (2006) System Name Connection Fee Monthly Excess Belfair Water Dist.No. 1* $1,200 $21.56 $0.051/cf&up>500 cf Belfair Water Dist.No. 1*(2007) $1,200 $23.18 $0.055/cf&up>500 cf Beards Cove $800 $27.00` N/A Rustlewood $1,000 $20.00 N/A Hartstene $360 $21.50 N/A Lakewood Heights(PUD 1) $2,525.81 $24.10 $1.14/ccffor 401-1,001 cf $350.00 Meter Set $1.43/ccf>1,002 cf View Ridge(PUD 1) $2,477.82 $24.10 $1.14/ccf for 401-1,001 cf $350.00 Meter Set $1.43/ccf>1,002 cf Twanoh Falls Beach Club $1,200 k Pens► $280.00/yr N/A . Seasonal.$215.001yr Undev.$160.00/yr Washington Water Service $543.605'$15.04 $1.40%cf for 0-400 cf Outside Dist Meter Set $2,272.00 $1.55/ccf for 401-1000 cf $1.70>1,401 cf Sunset Beach $500f8.00 N/A Riverhilt ,000 $12.50 $31.25 Collins Lakes $2;400 $30.00 N/A *,See detailed rates"$ 6 in this matron 9.5.2 Service Connectidt. Charges Service connection charges are`charges the District makes on new customers for bringing a water service connection from the distribution system main to the property line. The charge includes tapping the main, installation` of the service line, and meter installation. These charges are in addition to any other charges required for the construction of the distribution main to serve the property. Table 9.5 list's the Service Connection Charges for the various water service sizes. IX-7 Table 9.5 Service Connection Charges Belfair Water District No. 1 —2001-? Service Meter Size Charge 3/4" $1,200 1" $1,400 $1,600 2'f $2,000 >2" to be determined W. „ 9.5.3 System Development Fees The District adopted a system of fees to fund future development. The System Development Fee revenues are used for projects that both expand the existing.system and enhance existing facilities to better serve District customers. The system of fees is based on the meter size requested by the property owner. The meter size is a function of the demand placed on the system by the new facility to be developed. Table 9.6 lists the canrent System Development Fees as adopted for the 2001 Rate Structure. Table 9 6'~ d System Development Fees Bel fair Water District,No. 1—2001-? . . � 'Service Metes Charge Igt:,; $2 500 $4,175 $8,325 $13,325 52" to be determined As discussed above, these rates will likely need to be raised to accommodate possible debt service payment created by funding one or more of the larger projects listed in Chapter VUL The exact increase will have to be determined by the District based on the growth that is occurring and that which is foreseen in the near term. The District will be obligated to retire the existing PWTF debt within the time frame. It should be incumbent on developers to pay for the new facilities, since the new facilities are the reason development will even be able to occur. IX- 8 CHAPTER X TABLE OF CONTENTS X. MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENTS 10.1 SEPA Checklist 10.2 Water Rights Permits/Certificates 10.3 Cross Connection Control Policy 10.4 Computer Analyses Input/Output Data 10.5 Sampling Waivers and Analyses 10.6 Letters to and Comments on WSP from Adjacent Utilities 10.7 Belfair Water District No. 1 Letter to Fire District No. 2 10.8 Belfair Water District No. 1 Water Shortage Response Plan 10.9 Municipal Water Law Attachment 2 10.10 Public Hearing Minutes �E t Ar 61 v 5v : u Fes. . �. Cl) . �. . y . 10.1 SEPA Checklist In discussions with the Washington State Department of Health(DOH) Southwest Drinking Water Section staff, it was learned that DOH does not require an Environmental Checklist for Water System Plans for water districts with less than 1,000 connections. Therefore, in accordance with that policy, and because Belfair Water District No. 1 has approximately 500 connections and will not have 1,000 connections during the planning period, a checklist was not prepared for this plan. a A "Oft ]*16" Ui k s. Aft r� µ b's 10.2 Water Rights Permits✓CertifiCates �s x� r 5 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY REPORT OFE—4AIMTION TO APPROPRIATE PUBLIC WATERS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ❑ Surface Water ( �,.ee��rtpdaimefd Dc"—ofF"�1*#y) ® Ground Water ,.pn era�.' � Rx w.s,.m PR1ORrrY GATE APMJCATUNA NIMMM FBRABr NUM ER CERTIFICATE NLQM" March 10 1994 G2 29022 HAW Belfair Water District ADDRESS(ST"F T) ( (STATE) (Zw Cow PO box 563 Belfair Washington 98528 PUBLIC WATERS TO BE APPROPRIATED Well TR®(JTART Of(�SllFACB MATHS) • hL"M A CUNC FEET FM 5MIRW MAXBBAI OAIIDNS PER Mftf= MAX@RItA ACRE FEET PER YEAR 600 645 QUANrrTY•TYPE OF UTA MR=OF usE• Municipal supply Year-round,as needed 645 Acre-feet per year Pa PP Y LOCATION OF DIVERSIONIWITHDRAWAL APPROXDAATE LOCATION OF DIVERIM-WNDRAIVAL 400 feet South and 400 feet West of a North quarter comer of Section 28. LOCATED V4TW(SMALLM AL smorASION) SECTION T'uw-N. RANGE-(E.OR W.)W.M. W.R.I.A. CODNTV NE'/.NW'/. 28 23 I W 15 Mason RECORDED PLATTED PROPERTY Ir>t BLOCK OF(GIVE-OF PLAT OR ADUITRJN) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ON WHICH WATER IS TO BE USED Area served by the Belfair Water District 01,as described on their 2000 Water System Plan as approved by the Washington Departmew of Health. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORKS Overton Well DEVEWPMENT SCHEDULE eeMMO113CTSYTF1SDA1R WMr8f817lQ�CTSy Tills DAM r - FurTO-FULL UsE By TM DATE Started Jarurary 1,2002 January 1,2020 REPORT BACKGROUND: On March 10,1994,Overton and Associates applied to the Department of Ecology(Ecology)for a permit to appropriate public ground water from two wells at a rate of 1000 gallons per minute(gpm)for municipal and industrial supply. The applicatio..was subsequently assigned to the Belfair Water District,the municipal water purveyor for this area. The site is located within the Kitsap Peninsula Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA 15)�in the Union River sub-basin. The application number is G2-29022. A legal notice of the proposed appropriation was published. In response to the public notice a letter of protest was received by Mrs.VJ Cokelet,who indicated her concern that withdrawals from this project could impair her use of a spring located down gradient of the well(s)site. Based on my investigation,and the provisions of Chapters 90.03 and 90.44 RCW,1 recommend the issuance of a water right permit. INVESTIGATION: Project Site aW Descfintion Belfair Water District No.I's service area is located at the end of Hood Canal and serves the local community of Belfair. The District currently has 452 connections and services a population of approximately 1,130 people. Belfair Water District No.I's service area is located in unincorporated Mason County. The area is developing rapidly due to its proxiv to both Shelton and Breton,and is am of the more urbanized areas in the county. The boundaries of the Belfair Water District's service area are described by their Match 1994 Water System Plan,and will remain the same for the year 2000 plant that is currently be drafted. The project site is located within the Union River sub-basin,approximately one-mile northeast of the town of Belfair in northeastern Mason County. The original applicant,Overton and Associates,ovens approximately 6,000 acres in southern Kitsap and northern Mason Counties—mu of which is located within the Belfak Water District's service area ne property has primarily been used for forestry,and significant amounts are currently covered with second growth timber. The original applicant intended to develop portions of the property into a mixture of residential,commercial and industrial tints. This well will be intertied with the rest of the Belfair Water District's system. it is expected that the well will supply water to a mixtui multiple domestic,commercial,and light industrial customers. Union Sub-Basin The Union sub-basin is one of 18+sub-basins identified within Water Resource invento,y Area(WRIA)15(Kitsap). It covers an arm approximately 39 square miles in portions of both Kitsap and Mason Counties. The Union sub-basin's boundaries generally include d southern portion of Township 24 North,Range 1 West,and all of Township 23 North,Range 1 West,W.M. The geological characteristics of the sub-basin are similar too much of the surrounding Puget Lowland. The majority of the land surfs within the sub-basin is comprised of a relatively broad,upland area(interpreted to be a Pleistocene glacial drift plain). Tye upland is bisected by a large remnant glacial outwash channel through which the Union River now flows. Tye Overton's property generally includes lands located east of the Union River. The uplands of the sub-basin are recharge areas for ground water. Recharge occurs primarily from precipitation falling on the land surfWr_ The portion of preeipitatioa that doesn't run oil,evaporate,or transpire.percolates downward to saturate underlying water- bearing sttara Surface water bodies such as Mission Creek and the Union River receive discharge from shallow ground water system: that occur within the uplands. Mitch of the deeper ground water discharge is to Hood Canal. The town of Belfair is the largest population canter in the sub win. In general,the sub-basin is characterized by scattered,small communities,small hobby farms,large lot oral tracts,and undeveloped forestland. Residential development is concentrated along th4 shoreline of Hood Canal. Surface Water The Union sub-basin contains a total of 12 recognized creeks and rivers,which have a combined drainage area of approxi mately 38.3 square miles. The largest streams within the sty basin are the Union River and Mission Crook Larger lakes include Tiger and Missir Lakes. Within the stub-basin the only large sutrface water diversion is the City of Bremexton's Casad Dam,located at McKenna Falls i the upper reaches of the Union River(River Mile 6.7). The City holds rights to 10 cfs,and the Union River diversion provides approximately 60 percent of the City's water. The lower Union River occupies a relatively broad valley that is developed with residential areas and farms. Mission Creek is locatec roughly fcwr miles west of the Union River. Its drainage parallels that of the Union River,but the lower part of the creek has a much narrower valley than that of the Union River. Under the provisions of Chapta 173-515 WAC,instream flow regulations have been established for 19 locations within WRIA 15. F the Union River,bi-weekly instream flows were initially established at River Mile 2.0. However,the river has subsequently been clo year-round to additional consumptive appropriations,from McKenna Falls to the mouth. There has been no active gauge at the site si Wig Circe 1956_flow in the Union Rive-has been restricted by the City of Bremerton's Casad Dam and reservoir. .�og,>Btlostp io�em g Lnog soI!w oMt+llg2noi pmaol tun Stu 'NW!nbe us se SM AH--A tp!gm'(0661`algoN )M agl'piltLL •swaisds xt!nbs u=mpq Aj!^l-and 311 g)• l p�noM a)gagitu�t2otogl!1 ptle'notiv�ala`�owla!q)n! uMotq . uosu!go'l;o Cub i!u(1)nopetuio3 dtis7!A og);o VW aq.(Iq wW pIn u� � nn aq tazj lou sl-Ael Am s!q);o)um-Pii M aqi o—piv v-o!—usaw Molaq pa; oo Poa aaoge�n!)vJ ao+e)itis Pun° ! still(Wcg+00Z)-kgl dvlo !tA a`PooaaS waists r.)!mp xtd!Iu g!it g n!t-o l-v os Zb£tiaaMlaq 2ui11!iP 2uunp 'nOa"o o-p -.do)�N�to�l!(u"s!y 7sa)anal vogs st iI*m aql`Isi!3 s{laM Moneys w 1aIgM ads;o siasn Cgisan itedtm n!""I AA 3 0 -,mbe s.IlaM asp 3u!mP P "quow ian!)e{ai s ip!M paiaadxa oq)ou PInoM slip g2noq►la'pM-PP Sm o2lsq-- N still Demos s!q L wats�Cs»nrll tto!n{i xp o)w wals&xymbe saddn n c»w;3m&stps!p s9u"&Aq pa;s►weans s.rM*-o3 atll, satieitq!n pa;-2uuds'ilen+s—po s)!;o awns Pue;lose—tS uo!un atp uo sig2u jum aoepns iagio Ieionas are wOU -('IN•M''� I.-`-N EZ'.L`oZ uon_S tn)i1—ogi}o IsaMtpetos)oo;OOS'f tta�jum oil pa)eool ^no s,uex>gotlddg s!qy as Pa;-2uu -- ds z Lou1 Lb om!jp=mn—Wei-1op-1 sp 01'0 m sul2u`P[og y'lo!oJ'9'A sty�I`)norm"'. •pans! !uuad sip aauo uMteipyi!M oq 11!M uo!lrio!ldde uosugoj atH 'wois is>!ats-oil fj a+It_ 0>�aq P� >P-PUUq lP J ;eq peB Ptw.0 i! o=m aouuas otp ttlgi!M popool osis sl sositgot'1YI '[Fall tldg )tM )saol aq otjlaM pa Isodaid a io;Pat3 000q saq olsp AWoud E661`8 znw-oN a qpm QOS°goi�paf+oJ(9Z68Z-ZJ)UO!�!i pond a'»naMoH pall nip;o snrpw oi!w 314q a mq"Pons ua'q anq P qm l W" °tl 'Sb61 ioP pa)¢u!2uo igq)s{{all m idwoxo ImIuosaidai,(itioftltn MA oq)On"awes s!ep u!gi!M paM uaaq aneq sw!elo i 6Z 3o Mm V 'om;o sasodmd uowwoo Isar yi we uo!ie2!11!pue/Clddns a!) oP`laiat»2 ul -sr a;!IpLm PUT"anndumsuoa-uou`asM we ga!gM3o Iaqum a`�O� o Aoi Mn a Jul s¢ax Jad)aa;-aiae 69L'I Pie'wd2 EE9`L*1-11g 140P-121—a Ap Voengwoo u!sgq-qns no!nfl atp3o no!vod�wao'J N Punof�ZZ TOP ai�! otp io;ponM«aaq oeeq s2"j!vao swm 96 Puv'(sum'd io)s�;nm"vm g s s.�otv5i§ P iea i tlaga san.d noun atp;o saI!w oM)nMol o iw —of ag1 u! uotsse sal. S t ianu s m ` = .ill) 1 o)snmjw osis iioou!go;o oni news V ran!lI uo!nn alp ao L 9 al!w >B IIvJ og) on• Dig snnu grog •uowlgs tmiela�ptie Delon of atDOuo g on�D°O!ss!Y'i!wa 10^!l1 oo!nn sell. ds uowles wngn 'sateaM ogee naitpoid stuaigoid io imu!�alu►!'stool;»-tuns Mol Tumoog lauoseos apnlau!aa)anpOA qsy io;sio)as;2up!"I !Ienb ta)gM pue sutep ianeaq sugap aie uais step 2u!u!sip sweoiis otp o !S fu ums aqi nt puow iawwns Aip mp 2tninp Mmol ais shop'ne;u!ei uo)uapuadap(Iamuo u monupoo op!noid of red Mous pug st2!3vl2){as{Pug sll!gioo3 uo!Ienafo xiMol to aiem8tm Its alttstsmd dgs)rA agi3o smtians atlL .. ! 'tgueo pooH of A121 eI a8•tsgas!P—J!Rbe radaaP Pug nxl sa$atp al!yM'sail Pus stuttalls o)a21ee{as!p sia;!ttbe-ddu vm or-!P-Awnco desl!�13o smsgg'gns�m P*PnPuoo sa!PmS . •FensJ POOH PAMo)M-gwos-ginos n! X"M PM-d iv!)ua)od a n 25M U!eq qns ialui nalawS pnMm)saMgvou-gvou iatp!a sane-JX M Pmeofd M-0a gSiRlI be ap! P ids jmm panoi8 radaap uo!u fl atp of say xiq nom-Ilan spMMoi AllvianaS s!Mop 1oMgM punoi8'(sra;inbe xtdaap Pua[ >7 goS) _ aqi io3 •sAalt"means pnmoi seam purldn tuag oq p1noM%M'u!ssq-gns ewtun aqi oRW.M� a ol t�� H is2uo8 s!tool{"jam PunoA Mollggsy'1M `dE)alp io;podolanaP e>*rJa"MM PWWA alp;o mseq cPts aqi u!q)U+swa)sds ma sJh—Jc4M aua2"qm-waists rijmbs mbu iadaap Iwooslg an magi• 'Tana!tras usaw Mojaq Ian;DOE pURmq`anoga 3aa}OOI Mtaq sttotwnuoastp f11-191 Pos Cana{vaS aqi"I waisAs is;!nbe pagaiad ay)q)eaea9 wa)xa teta)e1 n!sal!-Isianas ais awes d n *qLpto— tn tM m tnln>sowsaddn oRl '1eI!w!s s!(elde>$!1s�Lg !Noel Paiap!snoa All —11-sn;!nbg pagaiad apnlau!uts6q-qns nwun oq1 ep. 3. ;iu 2gmmy�I nWA&P--9 mu22 aqi`1anaMoH 'utseg-gns uo!un otp cite!ptialxa`(166t`'Ia `S8�11 tma��-d sndaHn 10 SBoloa2oiptq aq1 noo dtlsi!)1 aq1 u!Pa9!)noP!sta;!nbe tvd!ouud 8Z agi;o*wt4 '(!a3aP pot ate atian Fig Vogioq o)e puod M mwq-qns oq)u!gi!m x+IuM ptmoi9;o s►oanpad mfinn aq o1 atom{ o uo!mI oy1 u!Pasodxa 9 NT(Plc Shall ieianas aig=I L -sPUgg2!q u!qunoyy Plo'J Pua QowD alp tH u!sagL i j oo oq1; ;lead uognut SS�S)ate itie!vay;o aae;itis 3Iooipaq.Mpfl a us.MAO 1�Catll 1aa3 000'£»no o)olaz wai3 ip!g1 P�o Pa1gP!losuoxm asogl -ease alp tpg'mwq sivaw!pas Po)aP!tostwatm;o aotnnbas xaldtum d»n a paleaio ��tLV spiei!nbs Isto»l2-nou;o spouad 2uol dq pa)medos`muw-o fguo!)!so(oP lwg Pm. -I pras}2;o dxns!g s!4L 'Puai o01 ws o)dfl pus sin;robe snoioumu pagan OAvq smmA suogl!w 9'1 wed aq1»rw oo!> aP laloal H P°f[8! 3 sPo!� '(L661 iagoloo`la» p► is fmgn o!IW dwnoz)dM.)I)b0-L6 •oN vodag Igo!m{oa,L ol!3 uodo'immn -V pogsio0 Ia!i!oI�detst!�I alp;o»otrnalx7 ue to a!sBq g►cs uo!un ag1)o�a oU mm ie{n*md sttp 01 smgvad WM 7110M sno!natd;o svoevod asogt amsgautmts M san!m'pwmv$rV tQ S stun imM 1°a igM polls))tioot)tgdad ggaoH moo aatald-8moog,L papq)todat altlotl?8 nosu!go116661 gYt ag L IZ661`dui`N(�Nf31sP o !n oq1 Pug'(Z861`Isoip) q)io3 Patedwd i a S v L uvldlx� '(0861`T `oalo9 M oda t uado S�JSfl u! I P P n - g ia'Sw '_OI 18 v 2101.3 Me M �'(5961''t �`�) f V`uostt¢tl)9811-o8 I.todoll a1!3 undo S�JSfI o •use sn! 0 2tnpnlaut 8l ON u!ra!tn9 d{ddnS rngM soon s pV u! aJ P pq aoss�y P�dssltx;o d8o{oa2tupdy M d2oiw2 sell 'suopsollgnd;o-geunu s w pagtsasop ooaq-9 t )' (Pe Pus •»nlll uo!un om n!tp!M 1aIam aaeyns;o Mon cep i!gdtnt iou 11!M unto s!ti1 euoi;SlsM-"!M IM Pal -q Uop"Idde spp;o MalAal eytl walsds xggM aosims pa)uln2oi as!Mrr'i0 JO Prieto g i!vdtm 1t!M somtu»)ap)!Jum sno!Igo!Idds xn—Pono�n wn d2 puO33 'saamos UIVIS'oejms Peseta u► o) *PPVW MU tmo;innm I�Oe sa!ldde ospi su pupdoidde ndmnsnoa isuo!upps srgg�P p!M dilnu!)—o!inaipdq isalo oq P panupu°D i.lodag Report Continued Well Construction/Aauifer Test The subject well was constructed by Hokkaido Drilling in August and September of 1994. The well site is located approximately 350 fee above mean sea level. The Union River flows though a steep ravine just over one mile to.,'-e west. The elevation of the Union River bed at this point is approximately 20 feet above mean sea level. The well was dolled to a total depth of 640 feet below ground surface(290 feet below mean sea keel and 300 feet below the bed of the Union Rivers It was screened in a coarse gravel and sand unit between 596 and 630 feet below ground surface(236-280 feet below meal sea level). The unit is believed to be correlative with the Double Bluff Drift and Sea Level aquifer. Pertinent information is contained in a eompktioa repot prepared by Robinson&Noble,titled,�rdlyw and Tatinr f Pder Over on Test/Production Wel Mason CQ>.nty November 1994. In October 1994,a 24-hour pumping Lest was performed on the well. A variable-rate step test was first performed to determine specific capacity and the optimal pumping rate. During the actual 24-hour test,the discharge rate was 637 gpm. Pre-test static water level was 188.0 feet below top of casing. Pumping water level was 294.6 feet below top of casing—a difference of 96.6 feet. Drawdown stabilize( after 10 minutes of pumping. Raw aquifer test data was not provided by the applicant_ During the test,two nearby wells and a spring-fed creek were monitored for potential impacts related to operation of the production well. Neither monitoring well had well logs available. However,the fast well,located about 800 hundred feet to the northwest at the adjacent Fkual Greens warehouse,had a stack water level of 108 feet below the top of the casing. Based on the static water level,Robinson& Noble(1994)believed that the well was completed in the upper aquifer. The second well,owned by Peter Overton,was drilled in the 1940s. It is located about a half mite to the northeast almg Highway 14 and is estimated to be 435 feet deep. it had a static water level o 179.1 feet below the top of the casing. Robinson&Noble(1994)felt confident that the second well shared the same aquifer with the subject well because the static water levels were similar. The spring-fed creek,known locally as Cokelet Spring,is located approximatel 2/3 of a mile south of the site. During the test,no change in water level or flow was detected at any of the three monitoring points. After the pomp was shut down,the water level returned to 3.3 feet below static within two hours(96.6 percent recover ad 0.35 feet after 27 bolus(99.9 percent recovcry� Based on the fast two hours of recovery data,aquifer transmissivity was estimated at 116,000 gales per day(gpd)per Coot(Jacob method). Ibis is an approximate estimation,since o.,=vation wells were not used to determine aquifer characteristics. The specific capacity(well yield divided by maximum drawdown)was calculated at 6.0 gpm/ft of drawdown. Based on the estimated transmissivity of 116.000 gpd/ft,specific capacity in a 100 percent efficient well should be 50 gpm/f- This indicates that the well is only 12 percent efficient. Robinson&.Noble(1994)cite several reasons for this and state that further development would be necessary if production limits were ever increased. The well was rated for a long-tern yield of 600 gpm. For this rate,Robinson&Noble(1994)recommended that the pump inlet be set at a depth of 350 feet below ground surface. Sea-water intrusion Because WRIA 15's numerous peninsulas are surrounded by Puget Sound and Hood Canal,most of the region lies within two miles of a marine shoreline. Therefore,seawater intrusion resulting from ground water extraction is a potential concern for a large portion of this region. For those wells completed below sea level,pumping could increase the risk of seawater intrusion to those wells and to deeper neighboring wells. Pumping could also have a small effect on deeper wells within a broader radius of the site,slightly increasing the risl of seawater intrusion. The surface elevation at the well site is roughly 350 feet above mean sea level. The well is screened between 236 and 290 feet below mean sea level. During the 24 hour pumping test,the water level was maintained at 65.4 feet above mean sea level. While there have been no previous reports of elevated chloride levels in the immediate vicinity,regular water quality testing will be required to ensure that levels do not increase(August of each year). Additionally,the pumping water level in the well shall be maintaine above mean sea level. Belfair Water District's Existing Water Rivhts Belfair's water is currently taken from two wells that are located along SR-3. The District holds primary rights to 225 acre-feet per year. ➢ Certificate G2-24044 authorizes the withdrawal of 155 gpm,and 225 acre feet per year from Well 1 A. ➢ Certificate G2-25214 allows the withdrawal of 300 gpm,and 225 acre-feet per year from Well I B,supplemental to previously issue( water rights. ➢ Permit G2-24043 allowed the development of rights to withdraw 200 gpm,160 acre-feet per year of ground water from what is calle the"old Hummingbird"well. Ile permit was cancelled once Belfair Water District was able to bring the"new Hummingbird"well into production. ➢ Permit G2-26962 allows for the development of the new Hummingbird Well. This permit was issued in the amounts of 350 gpm,ar 225 acre-feet per year,again,supplemental to existing rights. While the water rights currently allocated to the Belfair Water District are adequate to meet current and short-term future demand of the population,the system has problems with fire flow and pressure. The acquisition of this well,which is located at a higher elevation than the rest of the community(352 feet above sea-level),and the construction of related storage,will vastly improve the pressure and distribution of water in the system. it is the intent of the Belfair Water District No.1 to supply water to proposed developments within the fast growing Belfair Urban Growl Area This includes property owned by the Overton,who wish to have water available to supply a variety of light industrial,commercia and residential projects. Demand Forecasting Belfair Water District No.i currently has approximately 450 service connections or 670 Equivalent Residential Units(ERU's)located it its existing service area The District's future service area however,includes large tracts(`land that are located within the Urban Growt Area that are proposed for a mixture of commercial,industrial,and residential use. Report Continued It is anticipated that the bulk of the District's f store water use will be in the new UGA to»ire north and east of Belfair,however it is difficult to calculate exactly how fast that development will occur.Estimates of growth potential for this area have been calculated by thr District's consultant,Chandler Odell ofConsoer Townsend Engineers,to be as high as 2,130 ERU by 2014. Based on the Diauict's1999 records,an average of I50 gallons per day per ERU was actually used(Total system sales/670 ERU's).Give this current level of demand,Reif tir Water District No.1 will need to secure rights to a total of 388 acre-feet per year to meet 2014 demand,and by 2020 could require 994 acre-feet per year. The subject well has been rated to produce 600 gprq and based on a reasonable production schedttle of approximateIY 16 hots of operation per day should be capable of producing 645 atxe-feet per year. As the District already holds primary rights to 225 ace-feet pe year,I recommend the allocation of an additional 645 acre-feet per year to meet future demand. With this allocation the District's rights amount to 870 aaafeet per year. This water is intended to be made avail3ble for the entire proposed service area of the Belfair Water District as desaified in their approved year 2000 water system plan. Cotiservation Protoam Under RCW 90.03.005 and 90.54A20(4 the Department of Ecology must emphasize conservation and water-use etficim in management the stae,�s water resources,and must reduce the waste of wain as far as prateable. The Belfaa water Distrid No.1 bar :�atservatioth pWam that win be reviewed by both the Department of Ecology and die Departirtmaa of Health as part of their water system plat update. Issuance of this permit will require fulfillment of any conditions specified by DOH for approval of the plan,mW will require implementation the approved program. RCW 90.54.030 directs the Department of Ecology to be informed with regard to all phases of water resources of the state,in order to make sound resource management decisions. This permit will include provisions for the collection and submittal of water production data. CONCLUSION: in accordance with Chapters 90.03 and 90.44 RCW,1 find there is water available for appropriation from the source in question,that the appropriation as recommended is a Wneficial use,and should not impair existing rights or be detrimental to public welfare. RECOMMENDATION: i recommend that this application be approved and a permit be issued to allow appropriation of 600 gallons per minute from a well,64! acre-feet per year,for multiple domestic supply,and commercialCmdustrial purposes. The period of use is year-round,as needed This permit is subject to the following provisions. PROVISIONS; The water appropriated under this application will be used for public water supply. The State Board of Health rules require public wat supply owners to obtain written approval from the Office of Water Supply,Department of Health, 1112 SE Quince Street,PO Box 47E Olympia,Washington 98504-7890,prior to any new construction or alterations of a public water supply system. An approved metering device shall be installed and maintained in accordance with RCW 90.03.360,90.44.450 and R 508 64-020 through-040,and WAC 508-12-030. Meter readings shall be recorded at least monthly. Installation and maintenance of an access port as described in Chapter 173-160 is required. An air line and gauge may be installed w addition to the access port. The oplican is advised that notice of proof of A of water(trader which the final certificate of water right is issued)shouk trot be filed until the permanent distribution system has been constructed and that quantity of water allocated by the permit to the exten water is required,has been pea to full beneficial use, A proof inspection will be conducted prior to final==fide issuance The aiti5cate will refieci the extent of the project perfected `{ within the limitations of the permit. Aspects will include as appropriate the sourre(s),system instantaneous capacity,beneficial uses) s annual quantity,home services designed,plate of use,and utisf kaian of provisions. Water-pumpage,well-monnoring,and static-w4w4evel data,along with a summary and analysis of the data,shall be submitted annul or more frequently upon request,to Ecology's Southwest Regional Office Water Resources Program. The data shall be submitted in digital format(ASCi)and shall include the following elements: For Water Use 'net: I. Measurement method(totaling meter,acoustic meter,etc.)for each well 2. Total volume pumped from each well by month in thousands or millions of gallons 3. Unique Well ID number For Water Level Rem 1. Unique Well ID Number 2. Measurement date and time 3. Measurement method(air lion,electric tape,ptes—.raavducer,etc.) 4. Weil stouts(pumpin&recently pumped,etc,) 5. Water level acamacy(to nearest foot,tenth of foot,etc.) ion of the point of casing.sounding tube.etc.) 6. B (top Description Po •m 4ram ri. mint A-vat;nn atwive or below land MwfaCe to the nearest 0.1 foot Report Continued 9. Static water level below measuring point to the nearest 0.1 foot. For Water Ouality Monitoring; 1. Unique Well ID Number 2. Sampling date and time 3. ChkwW concentration(mg/L) 4. Submit papa copy of t-Y-Port I�of this water right is subjeet to the implementation of the minimum requirements established in the Planning R20k..MM Guideline ad RcaukonmU for Publie Water Syswm Regarding Water Use Reoortutu.Demand FoMatsts a Methodoloey,and Conscr Mica Pms•rar�,July 1994,and as revised. Under RCW 90.01005 and 90.54.020(4 conservation and improved water use efficiency must be emphasized in the management of the states water resources,and must be considered as a potential new source of water. Accordingly.;s part of the terms of this water right,the applicant shall prepare and intplcment a water conservation plan approved by Department of Heal& The standards for such a purr may be obtained from either the Department of Health or the Department of Ecology. REPORTED By -- Vl� Date: March 12, 2001 The statutory permit�fee effor this application is$20.00. FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Upon reviewing the above report,I find all fhcts,relevant and material to the subject application,have been thoroughly investigated. Furthermore,I find water is available for appropriation and the appropriation as recommended is a beneficial use and will not he detrimental to existing rights or the public welfare. Therefore,I ORDER a permit be issued under Ground Water Application Number G2-29022,subject to existing rights and indicated provisions,to allow appropriation of public ground water for the amount and uses specified in the foregoing report. at Olympia,Washington,this 12th day of March 2001. Mite Harris Water Resataras Supervisor Southwest Regional Office 358689 STATE OF WASHINGTOH I�9 n L r DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY L'� ` r. ,f CERTIFICATE OF WATER RIGHTFvt N El �/�7 Surface Water (Issued In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 117.Laws of WashhVton for 1917,and amendments thereto,end the"W%and regulations of the Department of Ecology.) ® Ground Water (Issued In accordance with-the provisions of Chapter 283.Laws of Washington for 1946,and amendments thereto,and the rules and regulations of the Deparonent of Ecology.) PRIORITY DATE APPLICATION NUMBER PERMIT NUMBER CERTIFICATE NUMBER January 13 1976 G 2-24044 G 2-24044 P G 2-24044 C NAME BLLFAIR WATER DISTRICT #1 ADDRESS (STREET) (CITY) (STATE) (ZIP CODE) P.O. Box 563 Belfair, Washington 98528 This is to certify that the herein named applicant has made proof to the satisfaction of the Department of Ecology of a right to the use of the public waters of the State of Washington as herein defined,and under and specifically subject to the provisions contained in the Permit issued by the Department of Ecology,and that said right to the use of said waters has been perfected m accordance with the laws of the State of Washington, and is hereby con- firmed by the Department of Ecology and entered of record as shown. PUBLIC WATER TO BE APPROPRIATED SOURCE Well TRIBUTARY OF(IF SURFACE WATERSI MAXIMUM CUBIC FEET PER SECOND MAXIMUM GALLONS PER MINUTE MAXIMUM ACRE-FEET PER YEAR 155 225 QUANTITY.TYPE OF USE,PERIOD OF USE 225 acre-feet per year municipal supply continuously LOCATION OF DIVERSION/WITHDRAWAL APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DIVERSION—WITHDRAWAL 650 feet North and 840 feet East of SW corner of Section 32. LOCATED WITHIN(SMALLEST LEGAL SUBDIVISION) SECTION TOWNSHIP N.I RANGE,(E.OR W.)W.M.I W.R.I.A. COUNTY _SASFP4 1 32 23 1 W 15 Mason RECORDED PLATTED PROPERTY LOT B (GIVE N LOCK OF AME OF PLAT OR ADDITION) TRALT 46 I Sam Theler Home and Garden Tracts LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ON WHICH WATER IS TO BE USED Area served by Belfair Water District #1. Indesed RecorhZ...... Conpeted '-`� PROVISIONS RI£I.I10 FN 52 "Provided that the total annual quantity under this certificate and all others does not exceed 225 acre-feet at full development as predicted in the Harstad Associates report.' A suitable measuring device shall be installed and maintained in accordance with WAC 50£ 64-020 through WAC 508-64-040. The access port as required on your permit shall be maintained at all times. 579 te,R 26 AM REEOU�ES f/(O.�F� I yes-�£s The right to the use of the water aforesaid hereby confirmed is restricted to the lands or place of use! described,except as provided in RCW 90.03.380,90.03.390,and 90.44.02a This certiIIcate of water right Is specifically subject to relinquishment for nonuse of water as provided in RCW 90.14.180. Given under my hand and the seal of this office at Olympia Washington,this....21st of ........Match............................... 19...�y........ WILBUR G. HALLAUER, DIRECTOR Department of Ecology ENanf68Qlti(i PATA.',-` / oR.. Y��....... by ........._ E.W. ASSEISTINE, Regional Manager FOR COUNTY USE ONLY i ii �Q J 1�a) STATE OF WAStUNGTON FIEF t(2144 [F �0O DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY J.'Wpy CERTIFICATE OF WATER RIGHT Surface Water (l+suad in accordwme with tha Provkioru of Chapter 117.Laws of Washington for 1917,and wTwK mnu dw"no,wId tha.rulat sod ragulatioM of the Dsparurwnt of dopy.) ® Ground Water (sawed in award nn wirb tM fNovis(oRs d CAspsar 2ff3,Laws of Washagtae fa 1945.and % aroars6tranb tfssrvto,esd 1M runts aid rapsktfons of tM O�arYnntt d Esaloylr.) PRIORITY OATS'- , _ APPI(CATION NI�AHER PERMIT--sER RTIFICATE HUMBER April 20, 1979 ra' G 2-25214 G 2-25214 P G 2-25214 C fiP�✓NAME BL-LFAIR WATER DISTRICT ADDRESS (STREET� (CITY1 (STATE) LZIP CODE) P. 0. Boa N3 Belfair Washington 98528 This is to certify that the herein named applicant has made proof to the satisfaction of the Department of Ecology of a right to the use of the public haters of the State of Washington as herein defined,and under and specifically subject to the provhdons contained in the Permit issued by the Department of Ecology, and that said right to the use of said waters has been perfected in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington, and is hereby con- fumed by the Department of Ecology and entered"of record as shown. PUBIC WATER TO BE APPROPRIATED SOURCE Well Number 1B TRIBUTARY OF IIF SURFACE WATERS) MAXIMUM ctauc rut SECOND MAXIIIAN GALLONS PER MINUTE MAXIMUM ACRE-FEET PER YEAR 300 ! 225 QUANTITY.TYPE OF USE.PERIOD OF USE 225 Acre—feet per year Municipal Supply Continuously LOCATION OF DIVERSION/WITHDRAWAL APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DIVERSION—WITHDRAWAL 700 feet North and 700 feet East from the Southwest corner of Section 32. LOCATED WITHIN 6MAL.LEST LEGAL SUSOIVISLONI SECTION ITOWNSHIP N. RANGE.IF.OR w.)wAL w.Ri.A. COUNTY SiAIFSA 32 23 1 W. 15 Mason RECORDED PLATTED PROPERTY LOT rLOCK OF'IGIW NAME OF PLAT OR ADDITION) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ON WHICH WATER IS TO BE USED Area served by Belfair Water District. i,_;';I, FILED__._. REEI'A -FRAHE�--yr A0911OR tiASOR CUR" PEEGGI LLEV'ELAND 80 jo 19 Am 6 : N REOUESTOF PROVISIONS hE«244 r li 291 The total annual quantity under all rights shall not exceed 225 acre-feet per year for municipal supply. Issued for municipal use for 300 gallons per minute and 225 acre-feet per year; as supple- mental right to Certificate G 2-24044 C for municipal supply. Installation and maintenance of an access port as described in Ground Water Bulletin No. 1 is required. An air line and gauge may be installed in addition to the access port. Owing to the proximity of neighboring wells, the certificate holder is reminded of his responsibility towards same and advised that he may be required to regulate his withdrawal pumping rate if existing rights are injuriously affected. The right to the use of the water aforesaid hereby confirmed is restricted to the lands or place of use herein described,except as provided in RCW 90.03.380,90.03.390,and 90.44.020, This certificate of water right is specifically subject to relinquishment for nonuse of water as provided in RCW 90.14.190. Given under my hand and the seal of this office at Olympia Washington,this... 7tU day of. ..a'6L ..... :.............I9.8p......... ♦• :,yam ;"'�i n WILBUR G. HALLAM, DIRECTOR Department of Ecology ENGiN OK 8D . by.. ............................... r t .. <. .. (ril80 E.W. ASSEISTINE; Regional Manager FOR COUNTY USE ONLY • STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PERMIT TO APPROPRIATE PUBLIC WATERS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTOn9N ion for Surface Water (issued in her to o.and the.rules andons of Chapter l 17.Laws of d regulations of the Department of Ecology.)1917,and ® Ground Water (h*led m smordmce With the prowwons of Chapter 263.Laws of Wash on for 1945,and amendments thereto.and the rules and regulations Of"Depareme"t Of " P ORITY O APPLICATION NUMBER PERMIT NUMBER ERTIFICATE NUMBER I�ugust ITT, 1986 G 2-26962 G 2-26962 P 1'Mfair Water District I I ISTATEI tZIP CODE) IC IP.DI: RU963 �elfair Washington 98528 The applicant is,pursuant to the Report of Examination which has been accepted by the applicant, hereby grante a permit to appropriate the follosving described public waters of the State of IVashingtou,subject to existing righ and to the limitations and provisions set out herein. PUBLIC WATER TO BE APPROPRIATED SDDANell (Hummingbird well) TRIBUTARY OF(IF SURFACE WATERS) /AAIInAUM CUBIC FEET PER SECOND MAKIWIM GALLONS PER MINUTE CRE-FEET PER YEAR TMTff e'f e r community domestic supply as needed LOCATION OF DPIERSION/WITHDRAWAL APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DIVERSION—WITHDRAWAL 2100 feet West and 1100 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section 6. LOCATED WRMIN(SMALLEST LEGAL SUBDIVISION) SECTION TVWNSHtP N. RANGE,(E.OR W.1 W.M. W.R.I.A. COUNTY Gov't Lot 2 (NWINEI) 1 6 RECORDED PLATTED PROPERTY LOT BLOCK QF(GIVE NAME OF PLAT OR ADDITION) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ON WHICH WATER IS TO BE USED Area served by Belfair Water District. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORKS Applicant proposes to drill an 8 inch diameter well having an approximate depth of 260 feet below land surface. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE BEGIN PROJECT BY THIS DATEi COMPLETE PROJECT BY THIS DATE: WATER PUT TO FULL USE BY THIS DATE: January 1, 1989 January 1, 1991 January 1, 1992 PROVISIONS Installation and maintenance of an access port as described in Ground Water Bulletin No, l is required. An air line and gauge may be installed in addition to the access port. All water wells constructed within the state shall meet the minimum standards for construction and maintenance as provided under RCW 18.104 (Washington Water Well Construction Act of 1971) and Chapter 173-160 WAC (Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Water Wells.) A well log of the completed well shall be submitted by the driller to the Department of Ecology within thirty (30) days of completion of this well. This well log shall be complete and all information concerning the static water level in the completed well, in addition to any pump test data, shall be submitted as it is obtained. "The total annual quantity under all rights shall not exceed 225 acre-feet per year for community domestic supply." "Prior to issuance of the final water right certificate resulting from this permit, the permittee shall initiate all action necessary to cancel permit G 2-4043 P for the old Hummingbird well." This permit shall be subject to cancellation should the permittee fail to comply with the above development schedule and/or fail to give notice to the Department of Ecology on forms provided by that Department documenting such compliance. Given under my hand and the seal of this office at Olympia, Washington, this...20th.........day Of...................March......................19..8T......... AND BEA y RIHIKER, Director Dc fitof E ogy ENGINEERING DATA by.................. .......................... . Clark Haberman, Regional Manager 4'STLak O Al 1Llo P Y STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY P.O. Box 47775 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 • (360) 407-6300 March 12, 2001 CERTIFIED MAIL , Belfair Water District PO Box 563 Belfair WA 98528 Dear Sir or Madame: Re: Ground Water Application No.G2-29022 The Department of Ecology has reviewed your request for a permit of water rights,and your request has been approved. A copy of our Report of Examination is enclosed. This report constitutes our determination and order regarding the above referenced application. Please read this report carefully. A permit will be issued in accordance with the enclosed Report of Examination and your fee of$20.00. Make your check payable to the Department of Ecology. This order may be appealed. Your appeal must be filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board,PO Box 40903,Olympia,WA 98504-0903 within thirty(30)days of the date this decision was mailed. At the same time your appeal must be sent to the Department of Ecology c%Appeal Coordinator,PO Box 47600,Olympia,WA 98504-7600. Your appeal alone will not stay the effectiveness of the Order. These procedures are consistent with Chapter 43.21B RCW. Sincerely, J.Mike Harris Water Resources Supervisor Southwest Regional Office JMH:th(exam2) Enclosure AM STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY REPORT OF EXAMINATION TO APPROPRIATE PUBLIC WATERS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ❑ Surface Watet (�V•�w.i+.NbiY. ddupr l�7,LnndWWinpaa k.l9lT.rd ...dmc.0 Ke.ew.ed tle eda rt u rims Daum m dF.cdgf-3 ® CFtTxmd Water ��emM�cR�MYwfyle�Mw d��jai MMVS,r , FgORMTIf MMTE AFMtrwTFON NMs®a rauMrr Nu�ea CEVTTFTGTB MMA" March 10,1994 t G2 29M NAAW Belfair Water District (TrAM ow CODE) ADDRESS(hIIU E1) (crmWashington 98528 PO box 563 Belfa(r PUBLIC WATERS TO I)E APPROPRIATED sotAicE Well 'nt18m"OF(a SWAM wAT em yA70.98M cuwcFwTr KNK;UM 600 600 OAU10MMMIMMUa MAXO®lI Ai71a FEETfl3tTUR 645 Tymor 64a��TYA(�-fed per year, °F`� Municipal supply Year-round,as needed LOCATION OF DIVERSIONIWITHDRAWAL APPROIW"To LocAmN oP W[IT®Al. 'LL 400 feet South and 400 feet West of tgP North quarter corFNx of Section 28. wcATF�wmm+(EMALLBSTEFAALAIBO a"4 + rowr$'iflti`x aAN68.(B OR w.)wx 15 oOso NE''A NW/428 23 1 W 15 Mason RECORDED PLATTED PROPERTY wr BIACK OF lG1vE NAME OF PLAT OA ADD�TtON) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ON WHICH WATER IS TO BE USED Area served by the Belfair Water District#1,as described on their 2000 Water System Plan as approved by the Washington Departmen of Health. 1)ESCR1nmo14 OF PROPOSED WORKS Overton wen DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE ra![lN W IM DAIS PROMBCr BY TM DATE NAiHt M TO riai 1A6 6Y IraS DATE January 12002 January 1,2020 Started REPORT IdACKGROUPiA: On Match 10,1994.Overton and Associates applied to the Department of Ecology(Ecology)for a permit to appropriate public ground water from two wells at a rate of 1000 gallons per minute(gpm)for municipal and industrial supply. The application was subsequently assigned to the Belfav Wad District,the municipal water purveyor for this area. The site is Located with the Kitsap Peninsula Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA I51 in the Union River sub-basin. The%A.iication number is G2-29022. A legal notice of the proposed appropriation was published. in response to the public notice a letter of protest was received by Mrs.V. Cokelet,who indicated her concern that withdrawals from this project could impair her use of a spring located down gradient of the well(s)site. Based on my investigation,and the provisions of Chapters 90.03 and 90.44 RCW,I recommend the issuance of a water right permit. INVESTIGATION: Projct Site and Deaa_iption Belfair Water District No.1's service area is located at the end of Hood Canal and serves the local community of Belfair. The District currently has 452 connections and services a population of approximately 1,130 people. Belfair Water District No,is servicb area is located in unincorporated Mason County. The area its developing rapidly due to its proxi: to both Shelton and Bremerton,and is one of the more urbanized areas in the county. The boundaries of the Belfair Water District's service area are described by their March 1994 Water System Plan,and will remain the same for the year 2000 plan that is currently Ix drafted. The project site is located within the Union River sub-basin,approximately one-mile northeast of the town of Belfair in northeastern Mason County. The original applicant,Overton and Associates,owns approximately 6,000 acts to southern Kitsap and northern Mason Counties—in of which is located within the Betfaw Water District's service area. The property has primarily been used for forestry,and significant amounts arc currently covered with second growth timber. The original applicant intended to develop portions of the property into a mixture of residential,commercial and industrial tracts. This well will be inter icd with the rest of the Belfair Water District's:ustem. It is expected that the well will supply water to a mixtu multiple domestic,commercial,and light industrial customers. Union Sub-Basin The Union sub-basin is one of I S+sub-basins identified within Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA)15(Kitsap). It covers an are approximately 39 square miles in portions of both Kitsap and Mason Counties. The Union sub-basin's boundaries generally include i southern portion of Township 24 North,Range i West,and all of Township 23 North,Range i West,W.M. The geological charms of the sub basin are similar too much of the surrounding Puget Lowland. The majority of the land surf within the su&-basin is comprised of a relatively broad,upland area(Interpreted to be a Pleistocene glacial drift plain). The upland is bisected by a large reumaut glacial outwash channel through which the Union River now flows. The Overton's property generally includes lands located east of the Union River. The uplands of the stub-ice am recharge areas for ground water. Recharge occurs priman from precipitation falling on the land surface. The portion of precipitation that doesn't run oil;evaporate,or transpire,percolates downward to saturate underlying water- hearing strata. Sm*=water bodies such as Mission Credo and the Union River receive discharge from shallow ground water systen that occur within the uplands. Much of the deeper ground water discharge is to Hood Canal. The town of BCW&is the largest population center in the sub-basin In general,the sub-basin is characterized by scattered,small communities,small hobby farms,large lot rural tracts,and undeveloped forestland. Residential development is concentrated along it shoreline of Hood Canal. Surface Water The Union sub-basin coutaires a total of 12 recognized creeks and rivers,which have a combined drainage area of approximately 38- square miles. The largest streams within the sub-basin are the Umon River and Mission Creek. Larger lakes include Tiger and Miss Lakes. Within the sub-basin the only mwface water diversion is the City of Bremerton Cssad Dam,located at Wu large McKenna Falls the upper reaches of the Union River(River Mile 6.4 The City holds rights to 10 cfs,and the Union River diversion provides approximately 60 patent of the City's water. The lower Union River occupies a relatively broad valley that is developed with residential areas and farms. Mission Creek is locale roughly four miles west of the Union River. its drainage parallels tha�-if the Union River,but the lower part of the creek hasis nituct, narrower valley than that of the Union River. Under the provision of Chapter I73-515 WAC,instrzam flow regulations have been established for 18 locations within WRIA 15. the Union River,bi-weeny htstream flows were initially established at River Mile 2.0. However,the river has subsequently been cN year-round to additional consumptive appropriations,from McKenna Fahs to the mouth. There has been no active gauge at the site: 1959. Since 1956,flow in the Union River has been restricted by the City of Bremerton's Casad Dam and reservoir. Report Continued � that it o dies to ground water found to be in clear hydraulic continuity wit] This restricted status on additional consumptive Kopr water applications determines will impair a closed or otherwise regulated closed surface water sources- Ec t will deny Wound has determined that withdrawals from this well will not impair the flow of surface surface water system. My review of this application water within the Union River. and Mason Counties and adjacent areas has been dcscribed in a number of publications, The geology,end hydrageobgy of Kitsap Adiacerit s USGS Water Supply But No.Ill including ° �, ,M2 Perri la WaahinM USGS Open Fite Report 80-1186(Hansom,Ai (Gadintg,et al-,1965); Avail lily on the R' USGS Open File Report 81-10: and Bolke,E.L.,080x .,..,..,M iva-tv�tiom Re�2R.p forth and doe t" f' 'or -�i*nula G end Water Manaeaner�t Plan Tam 5 tl;,� _ loci^E (Drost,1982); CON,Inc.,1992). The March 1999 Robinson&Noble report titled, Tacoma-Flare County Health Dep uncut(5w � tions of previous work that pertains to this particular area. The Uruon Subarea Initial Basiiu.lstessis an�strives n of K is Initial Watershed Assessment,Open File Technical Report No. asessmeut of the Union sob-basin is e��1OD of the Kitsap County' 97-04(Kitsap County Public Utility District,et al.October 1997) over the past 1.6 mitliocns Year's have created numerous aquifers and UP m six aganatmg periods of glacial end and !events,separated by long periods of non-glad ni aguitards within the Puget Lowland This history g�� rnsional of unconsolidated sediments Meth the area These tmconsotidated erosion and deposition,has created a very complex cover an irregular bedrock surface of Tetiary age(50-55 million year sediments range in thicknessno from zoo to over a Union feet• 'Ibex highlands. There are several wells old)that is exposed lo the t portion of the Union sub-basin lo the Green and Gold Mountain r. � of grcwnd water. within the sub-basin that penetrate bedrock,but none are(mown to be major producers The hydrugeology of the Union sub-basin has not been studied in detail. None of the 28 principal aquifers identified in the Kitsap Cou Plan(GWMP),Volumes I and 11(EES,et al.,1991),extend into the Union sub-basin. However,the gene Ground Water Management within the Union sub-basin include perched aquifers-generally considered Iota{ hydrostratigaphy is similar. The aquifersBeath the p aquifer system lies the Sea Level and laterally discontinuous—although some are several miles in lateral extent. en aquifer system,which generally occ+Ys between too feet above,and 200 feet below mean sea level There are also several deeper aqu systems within the sub-basin- •f--ve1 for the GWMP,shallow ground water flow is genera Based on the potcrawmetru;surface�of the Wound wets system am valle For the from topographic highs to lowland areas.Within the Union srtb basin,this would be from upland areas toward stream alldeepeeys, ground water systems(Sea Level and deeper equifas},ground water flow is generally towards salt-water bodies. In the Union = sub-basin,there is a potential ground water divide from which deeper ground water moves either north-northwest toward Sinclair Inle ' south-southwest toward Hood Canal. mother sub basin(of Kitsap County indicate that upper aquifers discharge to streams and lakes,while the Sea u� Studies conducted el to Hood Canal. and deeper aquifers discharge tang Y Habitill 4 a in tows elevation foothiifs and lack glaciers and snow pack to provide continuous u The streams of the Kitsap Peninsula all originate co rainfall,Flows are lowest during the dry surnmer mond in the summer. Since the streams draining this area arc entirely °t water qual Limiting factors for fish production include seasonal flooding.low summer flows,intermittent debris or beaver dams and problems. The Union River and Mission Creek are home to coho and chum salmon. Both rivers are productive into streams. Chum salmon s{ in the lower 1.5 miles of Mission Creek,and to the falls at river mile 6.7 on the Union River. A small run of Chinook also returns to lower two miles of the Union River each year. Fj§fwg wata Rir water certificates have been issued for the i` (a permits),and 95 surface for a variety u 22 ground water feet that 769 acre- per Y� Ecology s records indicate as ali°eate 7,633 gpm,and 1, re th ' Combined.these water tights and irrigation a County portion of the Upon sub balm ve fish and wildlife projects. In general,domestic supply Purposes,a number of which are large,nun cow Fri the vast majority representing exemptu most Common proposes of tree. A total of 241 claims have been feted within this same ace, re cnttng welts that originated after 1945. gbae are no ground-weer right certificates or permits that have been issued within a half-mile radius of the well. However,a panel 1993 on date has been filed for a proposed well to be located wit application(G2-2MQ for Jade}ohnson with a November 8, ! tY well. Mr.Johnson is also located °the service area of the Belf&r Water District and ha few hundred feet north of the Overton The Johnson spoiQui)n will be withdrawn once this perms indicated that he would be wilting to receive service from their system. T issued n fed st Mrs V E Cokckt.holds rights m 0.10 cfs under surface water certificate 2347 for a spring g- This application's etc prsocrthwest of the well(in Section 20,T.23 N.,R.1 y..W-M.). There are several other surface suer located approxenatdY ,500 fed tributaries. rights on the Union River itself and some of its other small,fixing- was The Cokelet's streaat is God by from the upper aquifer system into the t inion River system. This source native was ddeuxed,etthough��would not be expected Burin the well's aquifer tat No ch°°ge®dtseharJ�e water or abalbw yells. First due well L sour-OCR g of the well will hapaic nearby usae�$ nth� drilling,between 342 u short-term test It is unlikely that operation Second,a thick clay layer(200+ lateral extent of this clay layer is en ng completed in a munch deeper iaquifert W above and 214 fed bcbw ttneart sea level) Although of Robium feet below ground scsfate( lithobgy irtdcax that h could possibly, pert of the Kitsap Formation�m�,�K the w !mown.its thickness.elovOO+ aquitard. The would limit hydraulic connectivity between aquifer Noble,I990) which gelesfi ma��e� located roughly two miles fr°m I .Iwp!sot pue'leulsnpw`Ig mmmuoa jo axwm a joj pasodosd on IMP"JV MOLD uegjn aqt u!gnA%paumool m ley(lJusl>n SrAA oRM saptgaul'jaAamoq eam aol m wn"y s.xlwsltl ally sours aamajas 8upslxa s1! I pWool(s.fIMM Slufl MM2plsa'l lualeAlu�OL9 suollaautmoa oameM OSb Alaiuuyxoddn snq�Cplqunta I'ON Pt.w.a"PtA J1e31a8 ,ffullm*jo:l 6u#Md •sloafwd lenuappw pus lajawwoa`lt:l gsnpw igBtl jo,Cppm u dtddns of olqupwi jaium aaeq of gslm ogm'suouano alp Aq paumo kiadoid sapnlaut siU •eaJy ea-9 uegjn ng3la8 9-01A xq aw umm nuapdol"P of imm xpkbw of 1•ot11o!>M 2mm 4wo aT jo loam!MR S!11 matsds amp!sates+je"mqums!p pun amssald atp anwdm!,tpwn ll!m'aSwois palelaj jo uop*"m a alp Pus`(tarsal-eas anogo l0aj ZSE)Altunwwoo otp jo I=amp mnyl uonnnalo mayBmq a le palsool SI yammiM glom Sttp jo uolllslnbae aqy •ams=d pus mop on3 gl!m swalgaud seq watsds agt'noltatndod amp3o puewap ammj uu'1-uogs lure luanno)wtu of mwftpe ale pu rl(l maM j1n31aH agl 01 Pwoolls 6linaum sig$P Salem agi at!gM •slgalJ 8mtslxa of teteawalddns'masts'jea t jad laaj ajae SZZ 1'md8 OS£jo stenom agl m pans sum mu»d s!q.L 11aM pngBenuwnH mau a11130 ttnwdolanap ap mV smotto Z969Z-ZD 1!uJnd Q •umionpwd otm lam,.MgBlwwnH mau„aym BulJq 01 atqu-A%JOPM-Q joleM jtejlag aouo patlaauaa sem i!uuod aqL •11am,.pggltqmutnH pro„atp lteo s!tegam woJJ Jatem punt$jo j-A Jed taaj—091'wdB OOZ mejptplm of siggp jo iu-Acn-OP agt PamotP£btWZ-ZD P wad Q •sulBu rate! anssl,gsnolnajd of tatuowolddns`8 t ila/A wojj m;A jod taajas,e SZZ pue'mKM oo£3o IeMuVtpl+all smotls 6IZSZ'ZD W399Ja'J Q 'td I 11aM wag jr..(jod 1aa3-alas SZZ puu'uuO SS 13o Ism-M!m amp muotP-b606Z-ZD a1-00D Q meat sad urea;-auras SZZ of sltl8u kUtuud sploq tautslQ aqt 'E-21S Beote pateaol aje imnR alma!omm mag ua�let,Cpuasma St jots!s,Jtej128 •heal eas ueaw anoge utem!uw oq pugs(lam atp ut heal jalnm Bulduwd agi',(Ileuo!pppy '(jea,C yoea jo IsnBny)asw=tn 1ou op Staaal rink ant=01 Pannbau oq II!m Buusw k!l-b Jaiem-In2w',(i tq.!n ala!pawun ayt!atonal apuolyo patenata jo suodas taalnad ou tmq aneq asap al!gM •lanai eas gnaw aaoge taa3 t1'59 In pouleluptu sem(anal Jalem atp'tsol Bumdwnd moq t,Z amp Buun(l 'tarsal was eeatu molaq iaoj OSZ Pun 9£Z uaamiaq pau=m sl llom aqL •taaat eas ueaw anoge laaj OS£AWnoj Sl ails 110m MV ie eotlenap Jim atLL •uwsnn!jatemuas jo su aqt 9lstsajotn cP4B!Is`sus ayl jo snipes jape"u mtplm alto!sadaap tto tootle flews a anaq Osp 1>t'w Btt!dwnd M!>b jadoap of pus sham asotp of uolsm ut Jalemeas;o tls!j alp anw m pinoa Buldwnd'lawal eas moloq palaldwoo sgam asap jo3 -uotslaJ sltp jo uo!uod o2ml a joj un mtoa pnmaiod a st uonmuvma xwm pun oa ung$Rinse;uasnum xt*sun asojangL atltaJogs auuem 1;o saltw omi mgl!�+salt uo!ft ag13o isoID'laaD POOH p!s punoS end.(q an=pmulmd a wm—s,t t y[7dM as�s13a8 1 •aosyns punwS WIN laa3 oS£.lo WdaP s to tas aq mlu!dumd aqt may►PaPm-W=(MI)OWN$uosmgvtl`vi- !gl-i 'wrist oo93o pi*iA wut-&m 8 Joj Paw—Ilan aqL T*—t--—sit®1 uo.u-pod jl,tjessaiaa aq pinom lmmdg*AZP japsnj legt ores pun slgl-j sU--IeJanas airs(KAI)algoN oP uoslgog War.-WO t>**jad ZI ApW St 11—aP OW-am-Pu! s!qL 'I1/utd9 OS oq ptnoqS Item tualog;a W*-od 001 u u!R$ouduo 09!30&'4A)M OW91 I J9 di!elss!wsaeu Powumsa ayl uo pass umoPmejP3o l;/md8 O g is PalslTMjleo slam(umopvnump wntetYew dq PaP!n!p Play Ilan) 2q1 jajinbe awwjalap our pasn too anm sham tw9— 0 aau!s`uoltewltsa atuunxtudde OR st stq j (Poglam goauf)tors;Jed(Pdg)fxp suWleB 000`9 t t to palewllsa sBm,tilnisslwsaen jambe`emep ltnnoaaj3o smog oMt 109 all uo PM9 {.tianeooj tmamad 6766)smog LZ»Ue tea S£'o Pus(AJ-O=le231ad 9'96)smoq oml u.Wm a1181s mgaq taaj 1-£w Pasnow tarsal "m alp`omop 8►p tam damd amp sally -slu!od twol!uow oaxp aqt jo Aue is PoloaPP seam MOU jo(anal jatsM u!a mV ou Im ayt BuunQ at!s alp jO glmros al e3o£(Z alatum-dde pateaW s!1updS talaJluJ-AIlmol um-q 14-a pa3-Buuds amLL _m mmis ajam spear ptem MP asnmg tlam to q� ayl gtlm jj!nbe auras aql pajegs Ilan+puoxs aqt MP)eapguw lla3(KA I)algOK V uoslgoy •8ulseo aql jo riot alp mopq V I' t (anal]aina►a.=a paq 11 •deep laaj S£6 aq of popu111sa s!puw Yl A—ql!1"m-plou aql w atnu31eg a> pmm s!11 'so661 ayt u!mlup sea+`uwnno-Pd Aq Paun`o`(tam puoaas KL •+prim—Mn aqt ul patatdum s1m Item ap PM panallaq(t+661)*MH V uoswgo�l'lanai MOM oguis mp uo passg •Su!sea ag13o dw agt—pq laaj So13o tarsal-pm*pm1 peq'amogaum sty RJW3 ,aaaefps n m lsamquou alp w laa3 poV-q 00S mogv pmgoq'INm 3-9 agl'jaaamoH 'alg pup slot 112m Peg 1pm Stnswnmw JMP!aH Ilan+ +Pod aqt jo uomuado w Palates we&-le! d 103 paJollu+>m aa'+">f»Ja Paj-9tnsds 1 prat Rpm Agwatt oM4`(gal all Sw"a 7uealldds ayt Cq PaPlrswd We see+slap(sal ja31nbs m1y -Smdamd jo s.►ismmm of»ge azlltgns umopmwu 'iaa3 9'96 jo aouanjj!P e—Burm jo dw mWaq lea$9't+SZ sm WM im-2mdumd 3ulsea Po (Wag laa3 O'B81 sem larval nMm o!MS Isai-wd 'wdS L£9 sera ate;32Jugog!P MD`(sat mog-6Z PnPv alp Bum coo -Mm SmdMW MU"do mp put ag!oads au!aualap of p w of and tsu3 swA!sal dais alsj-oigmm y *Ham aril no pmnmjnd sum(sat Seldmnd jmq-yZ 14661 JaqO300 u1 b66i Jagwanoty `Pall!1`algoH v usRWH Aq PamdaA mmdaj uul1W 1 j!pm.mum st mn u xgu!muaUP"d •»jwbe 1-wl eaS pue l uajjnl8 Wl M otp qum anllutasmw aq of panallaq sc tl®aqt, 'Ebel eas saw mWaq raj ORE-9£Z)aagg ms punoA mgoq taaj O£9 PUS 995 uaamlaq VUU pUaS PON 12A*a asseoo 1 m p===sem n Y1iAm"an alp jo poq aP mWaq laaj OK pug tarsal tas uumu moiaq»a3 06Z)aayats MNOA!Wag lea}MJO gldap[am*4M MW stm Ipm all. •heal sas eeaw aaoge taaj oZ Ai mewm oift Sm(mod s!tp me nq_Atli uolun aqt;o uo!teaala at}y •Isom a.;•of ol!w auo jaao lmf*ulna;deals a ttBnot{1 scoop Jarsfli nolun OU •lanai lag Ueaw anoqu a3 OS£dplaunxwdde pam ool 510115 pour aqy '1,6613o JagwatdaS pue miSny!BmilPa oplujptoH Aq sum Rom taafgtts aq L o O I ponupuoo ljodnd 1001 1-0 I=mu agl of aa4ms Pori Auslag ro MOW uo!1eAap la-d 8uunmyq L (•ap'own gu!Pmios'8mso3o dol)>g4od Sutat-am ag110 gri p '9 (-jp'>4.10 WM`loq Won=m)kWjWM petal=VM •S (-jp`padmnd,S{yv-w lmd und)SMM 1pt1A p (,op, amssaw`a a!>laolo`am!JI*)Pow=Imwamseayy E amg Ptm alsp wzmomsaaW Z xnmw Ul noM awn I "gwnu UI IIaA%anblun '£ mglug jo suoyl!w jo spussnoyl u!gpuow,tq IIom pro wog podwnd ownloA Islo.L Z Ham qmm ioj(•o1a'ralaw opsnoos'maw Suipllm)pog3am wourmmN I :sluawalo Smmollo3 aql ojmlow hags Pm(11JSV)leuuo;M!2!p ul pau!wgns oq Ilegs vP aq.L •wedl-d saomosax ja1aM a3WO I9uo18011 M/Atpnog s,d8olo3g m'lsanbaa uodn Rlpanbag wmu jo nu-pau!wgns oq llegs"P agl;o sls.(F-Pm k-u ms s gllm Suole`elap ianai-m"-opm Pua'SuuoM=u-IIaM'*Vadmnd-imA% suo!suoid to uo!los}s m pus'asn;o aoeld'pau2lsop saa!aim awoq',Uuuenb p3nutm 's).sn Ie!oyauoq'k!aedea snmuelumsm wals,Cs'(s)aamos ag1 alaudoidds so apnlom p!m sloadsV uuuad agi)o suo!M!.gl aql uMA% !- fold a o as 41 �m also aouenss!alsoguiao(eug m�o!sd ag t[Im oo!padgm,lowd V ' Pa1ao3�loa, y1; 7 1xa a loaga]Il. yuiao aqy ' asn P 3auaq IR4 m and uaaq ssq Vo—bal st mgti► nlxa oql m 1luuad mp Aq p=Ml$jalsm jo dl!penb leg[PR pap-asuoa uaaq mR mais6s uounq vstp mauwm=d aql 1!Iw►Pai9 aq we Imps(Paim sl lq$u ralam;o aMgu Pw9 Mp qO!qM ) 30 30 No Paq!AM si aq,L -vod ssaaos aql of aoll!ppe u!palpnsm aq A—a&wS pus au!1 srg UV •pannbai sl 091-ELl mdegJ u!poquosap sa uod ssaaog us,lO aougualulgw Pug u011e11" ,Clgluow Il 1E paP�oq llsgs s8mpew ralayy '0£0V-80S DVM Pm'Ob0 gSnonll sea OZO-69-805 OVM Pm OSb'"'06'09£'£0'06 MJ11 q1!m aaue^•oxg InPoolmo!m pov Pailglsm aq[legs aa!A�Suualam paeo a uV •wMsds,Clddns ialem o!lgnd a3o suouualls jo uoryonrlsuoo mau cue o1�oud'068L 60586 uol8utyseM'e!dw,C!O .LI,xou Od loanS omgnb 3S ZI I I'yllgaH;o luawuedaU',ClddnS jaleM3o oaydp agl way lenoiddu ualluM ulelgo of saaumo tlddns yam o!lgnd annboi salcu gAsoH3o pnou oms ou •diddns ramm opgnd ro3 Pas"oq illm uolm!1ddo q.W jopm p*nudojdde Imm ag,L SROISIAOUd suo!s!Aoul Suu+ollo;agl of pafgns st uwiad s.q.L papaau se'puns-ntaC s!asn 3o pmaad ayy sasodmd le!gsnpu!Av!wowwoo pus',Clddns onsawop oldulnw jo;'tea,C lad mj-aloe 49`11am a uwi3 alnu!w rod suolta OOg;o uousudoidds molle of panwq ag lniuod g pm panold&oq uo!iea!Id&s!ql rM pmwuw--I 'NO Y 3 OJ8 -ali�jlam o!lgnd of lsluowulap oq io slgSu$uus!xo nedw!1ou pinogs pug'asn le!oyaupq a s!papnowwoow se uousudoidda ql l8yl'uousanb w aomos agl wog uolleudoadde joj algel!gne]aigm s!*Imp Pw.1 I'MOd W06 Pm EO.06 asrAwo qp A aouvpmoas ul No(s[�i .Inep uouanpad jalem•!o len!wgns pug uouoalloo ayl jol suolstnad opnlou!ll!m I!uLM s!yL •suolsloap luawagenguL*wrKm aJ puns a)lew of japlo w'aluls og1;o saowosai ralum jo sasogd Itu m Pm8a1 gl!A paUolu!aq d8oloo33o Wa+uvgdaU oql alaagp O£0-K-06 MJ11 •wedloid panoxdde mp umleluawaldw!annb-IPm pw'agd-pjo I-O'ktg ro3 HO(I Aq pag!oads s-wpuoa i-JO loaug)gM as!W-Il!m 1!► and slgl,lo aouenssl -xpdn ueld maxa m-Ao8l0 Ind sg W-H 3o P U agi Pug ASolooq jo aQ agl gloq kq Pamau+ai oq W-"meigoid uogennstwo 9 seq 1•opl"'=.(I=effi avJlou aq•L 'a[PMPRW se j3 ss="ajo m m mg soups[m m pua's=mo=Salem%MF agl luaaa78eaew a!,Coua!oga my-xgem pus —qd—_=mofo'3.10 U a9►lg)oMK06 Pm Soo'CO'06 MJ1-Pun mm26vwffffxffa63 veld w isAs rn—o00Z J-4 P--Wg nag[ul PO%uosap sa ljMmU meM 11eAau agl;o ease—A=pasodoA anpn ayl my olggllwx Wow oq of PaPualu!s!xmm RU 'raaC rad pa;-alas OL8 0l lunowe gg8u s.lal.gs!U aql-quoope sup qu-M 'Puemap amen}last"m resat»d pa;-wm s49[snub mJo uou-ollg agl pmmluora�1'yea C A pajama SZZ m slgSuiem Aud snoq Aajle louls!U mp sV --aC and paj-area SY9 2u-q-ld•lo algedea oq pinogs,Cep»d uollg'ad0 jo smoq 91,{Nisntnmsd k jo aln olgmo-w a uo paseq pme`-a 009 oaf of Pow maq seq paa agy •nod lad loaf-one 1,66 annbw pins OZOZ Aq Pm'Pue=P o l oz laaw o1 read iad pa3aae 88£.Io Ieiol g of slg8u amass of paw pun I •otg lauls!U'MM M. *g'PmmaPdo lo"ol luw=stye IA!D'(s.n113 OL9/gales walsAs pao.I)Pagn,Cllsolag Sam n113»d,Cep gad soon OS 1 JO 09-2 ul'spuoow 66612.13" !U ogl uo P-Ru '410Z Aq n113 OE 1'Z se qe!q se aq m'—!Su3 p-01--OJ3o IIaPO ralPm"D'luellnsum s,lows?U orb 0 'moat p-rdol-V TM WV-oq Apo-*alglnopto of 31-OP ql Aq palelnol-uaaq o-q eam s?g1 H3 Mlr»d giA+ 3 wlew>ls IM+ s!11 sanamoq`MR.1laHdo lseo pne goon a�"m VOn mau a p ul aq lllm am rslem amltg q.pliq!U mpjo finq o►N 1Qgl pale4a!1m s!11 Panuuun'J uod2I Report Continued 9. Static water level below measuring point to the nearest 0.1 foot. For Water OmMily Monitorinz I. Unique Well ID Number 2. Sampling date and time 3. Chloride concentration(mg/L) 4. Submit paper copy of laboratory report Issuance of this water right is subject to the implementation of the tninim1w.requirements established in the Cmcrvation Planning Regyjpetttts Gui ii"�0.ti Rr. ref Public Water$vstems Regarding Water Use Rrting Demand Forecestine Methodology,and Conservation Programs July 1994,and as revised. Under RCW 90.03.005 and 90,54.020ft 000sesvation and improved water use efficiency must be emphasized in the management of the states water resources,and must be considered as a potential new source of wa". Accordingly.Ys part of the terms of this water right,the applicant shalt prepare and implement a water conservation plan approved by Department of Health. The standards for such a plan may be obtained from either the Department of Health or the Department of Ecology. REPORTED BY: ��f�,V1/o�4�--- Date: March 12, 2001 Tho statutory permit fee for this application is$20.00. FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Upon reviewing the above report,I find all facts,relevant and material to the subject application,have been thoroughly investigated. Furthermore,I find water is available for appropriation and the appropriation as recommended is a beneficial use and will not be detrimental to existing rights or the public welfare. Therefore,I ORDER a permit be issued under Ground Water Application Number G2-29022,subject to existing rights and indicated provisions,to allow appropriation of public ground water for the amount and uses specified in the foregoing report. Signed at Olympia,Washingten,this 12th day of March 2001. Mike Harris Water Resources Supervisor Southwest Regional Office 10 J Cross Connection Control Policy �« V1 , \ � N y . . . . \ \ . � . . � f BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL POLICY Section 1 - Compliance Required Any customer now receiving water from Belfair Water District No. 1 (the "District") , or will in the future receive water from the District, shall comply with the rules and regulations contained in this manual . Section 2 - Customer Defined For the purpose of this manual, "customer is any person, family, business, corporation, partnership, or firm connected to the District supply. Section 3 - Compliance by District or Organization Required In addition, any water purveyor, water district, or other organization which is connected to the District ' s supply for water and/or which is furnished to people or members within said district or organization as well as the district or organization itself shall comply with the rules and regulations contained in this manual . Section 4 - Regulations Interpretation These regulations are to be reasonably interpreted. It is their intent to recognize the varying degree of hazard and to apply the principle that the degree of protection should be commensurate with the degree of hazard. Section 5 - Definitions As used with this manual, unless the context states otherwise, the following definitions shall apply: A. "Air Gap Separation" means the unobstructed vertical distance through the free atmosphere between the lowest opening from any pipe or faucet supplying water to a tank, plumbing fixture, or other device and the flood level rim of the receptacle, and shall be at least double the diameter of the supply pipe measured vertically above the flood level rim of the vessel. In no case shall the gap be less than one inch. B. "Auxiliary Supply" means any water source or system, other than the District's water supply, that may be available to the building or premise. C. "Back Flow" means the flow other than the intended direction of flow, of any foreign liquids, gases, or substances into the distribution system of a public water supply. 1 . "Back Pressure" means back flow caused by a pump, elevated tank, boiler, or other means that could create pressure within the system greater that the supply pressure. 1 2 . "Back Siphonage" means a form of back flow due to a negative or sub-atmospheric pressure within the water system. D. "Back Flow Prevention Device" means a device to counteract back pressure or prevent back siphonage. E. "Cross-Connection" means any physical arrangement whereby the District' s water supply is connected, directly or indirectly with any other water supply system, sewer, drain, conduit, pool, storage reservoir, plumbing fixture, or other device which contains, or may contain, contaminate water, sewage, or other waste or liquid of unknown or unsafe quality which may be acceptable of imparting contamination to the District' s water supply as a result of back flow, bypass arrangements, jumper connections, removable sections, swivel or change-over devices and other temporary or permanent devices through which, or because of which, back flow could occur are considered to be cross-connections. F. "Double Check Valve Assembly" means an assembly composed of two single, independently acting check valves; including tightly closing shutoff valves located at each end of the assembly and suitable connections for testing the water tightness of each check valve . G. "Reduce Pressure Principle Back Flow Prevention Device" means a device incorporating two or more check valves and an automatically operating differential relief valve located between the two checks, two shutoff valves, and equipped with necessary appurtenance for testing. The device shall operate to maintain the pressure in the zone between the two check valves, less than the pressure on the public water supply side of the device. At cessation of normal flow, the pressure between the check valves shall be less that the supply pressure. In case of leakage of either check valve, the differential relief valve shall operate to maintain this reduced pressure by discharging to the atmosphere. When the inlet pressure is two pounds per square inch or less, the relief valve shall open to the atmosphere thereby providing an air-gap in the device. Section 6 - Cross Connections Prohibited A. Except as provided in Section 7, all cross-connections as above defined, whether or not such cross-connections are controlled by automatic devices, such as check valves or by hand operated mechanisms such as gate valves or stop cocks, are prohibited. B. Failure on the part of persons, firms or corporations to discontinue the use of any and all cross-connections and to 2 physically separate such cross-connections will be sufficient cause for the discontinuance of water service to the premise on which the cross-connection exists. C. The District shall, in cooperation with the health officer or the local plumbing inspection authority, make periodic inspections of premises served by the District ' s water supply to check for the presence cross-connections. Any cross-connections found in such inspection shall be ordered removed by the responsible agency. If any immediate hazard to health is caused by the cross-connection, water service to the premises shall be discontinued until it is verified that the cross-connection has been removed. Section 7 - Use of Back Flow Prevention Devices A. Back flow prevention devices shall be installed at the service connection or within any premises where in the judgement of the District the nature and extent of activities on the premises, or the materials used in connection with the activities, or materials stored on the premises would present an immediate and dangerous hazard to health should a cross-connection occur, even though such cross-connection does not exist at the time the back flow prevention device is required to be installed. This shall include, but not be limited to the following situations : 1 . Premises having an auxiliary water supply, unless the quality of the auxiliary supply is in compliance with WAC 246-290-490 of the Drinking Water Regulations of the State Board of Health 2. Premises having internal cross-connections that are not correctable, or intricate plumbing arrangements which make it impracticable to ascertain whether or not cross-connections exist. 3. Premises where entry is restricted so that inspections for cross-connections cannot be made with sufficient frequency or at sufficiently short notice to assure that cross-connections do not exist. 4 . Premises having a repeated history of cross-connections being established or re-established. 5. Premises on which any substance is handled under pressure so as to permit entry into the District's water supply, or where a cross-connection could reasonably be expected to occur. This shall include the handling of process waters and cooling waters. 6. Premises where materials of a toxic or hazardous nature are handled such that if back siphonage should occur, a serious health hazard may result. 3 7 . The following types of facilities shall fall into the above categories where a back flow prevention device is required to protect the District ' s water supply. A back flow prevention device shall be installed at these facilities as set forth herein unless the District determines no hazard exists. a. Hospitals, mortuaries, clinics b. Laboratories C. Piers and docks d. Sewage treatment and pumping plants e. food or beverage processing plants f. Chemical plants using a water process g. Metal plating plants h. Petroleum processing plants i . Radioactive material processing plants or nuclear reactors j . Others as specified by the District B. The type of protective device required herein shall depend on the degree of hazard which exists as follows: 1 . An air-gap separation or a reduced pressure principle back flow prevention device shall be installed where the water supply may be contaminated with sewage, industrial waste or a toxic nature or other contaminant which would cause a health or system hazard. 2 . In the case of a substance which may be objectionable, but not hazardous to health, a double check valve assembly, air-gap separation or a reduced pressure principle back flow prevention device shall be installed. 3 . Back flow prevention devices required in this section shall be installed at the meter, at the property line of the premises when meters are not used, or at a location designated by the District. The device shall be located so as to be readily accessible for maintenance and testing, and where no part of the device will be submerged. C. Back flow prevention devices required in this section shall be installed under the supervision of, and with the approval of, the District. D. Any protective device required in this section shall be a model approved by the District. A double check valve assembly or reduced pressure principle back flow prevention device will be approved if it has successfully passed performance tests of the University of Southern California Engineering Center or other testing laboratories satisfactory to the District. 4 E. Back flow prevention devices installed under this section shall be inspected and tested annually, or more often where successive inspections indicate repeated failure. The devices shall be repaired, overhauled, or replaced whenever they are found to be defective. Inspections, test and repairs and records thereof shall be done under the District' s supervision. Section 8 - Failure to Cooperate Failure of any customer or organization using the District ' s water supply to cooperate in the installation, maintenance, testing, of back flow prevention devices or the requirements of an air-gap separation shall be grounds for the termination of the water services at a point where such flow, which is to be terminated by the District, would best prevent possible contamination of the public water supply. 5 10.4 Computer Analyses Input/Output Data File 2006-1 Analysis for the current year File 2012-1 Analysis for 6-Year period without interzone connections File 2012-2 Analysis for 6-Year period with one interzone connection File 2012-2 Analysis for 6-Year period with two interzone connections File 2026-3A Analysis for 20-Year period with two interzone connections BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT No. 1 CURRENT YEAR COMPUTER ANALYSIS * * * * * * * * * * K Y P I P E 2 * * * * + * University of Kentucky Hydraulic Analysis Program * Distribution of Pressure and Flows in Piping Networks * 1000 PIPE VERSION - 1.20 (05/12/93) DATE: 3/ 9/2007 TIME: 14: 0:32 INPUT DATA FILENAME -------------- c:\kypipe2\data\2006-1.DAT TABULATED OUTPUT FILENAME -------- c:\kypipe2\data\2006-1.OUT POSTPROCESSOR RESULTS FILENAME --- c:\kypipe2\data\2006-1.RES ++++++++++++++++++*+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ S U M M A R Y O F O R I G I N A L D A T A U N I T S S P E C I F I E D FLOWRATE = gallons/minute HEAD (HGL) . . . . . .. . . . = feet PRESSURE = psig METERED FLOW . . . .. . . . = gallons REGULATING VALVE DATA VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE TYPE JUNCTION PIPE SETTING (ft or gpm) -------------------------------------------- PRV-1 108 117 570.00 PRV-1 109 118 570.00 PRV-1 120 135 369.00 PRV-1 121 137 370.00 P I P E L I N E D A T A STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE PIPE NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS FGN-HGL NUMBER #1 #2 (ft) (in) COEFF. COEFF. (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 2 560.0 8.0 130.00 .00 2 2 3 1380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 3 3 4 190.0 8.0 130.00 .00 4 4 5 200.0 8.0 130.00 .00 5 5 6 200.0 8.0 130.00 .00 6 6 7 200.0 8.0 130.00 .00 7 7 8 860.0 8.0 130.00 .00 8 8 9 120.0 8.0 130.00 .00 9 9 10 660.0 8.0 130.00 .00 2006-1 Analysis Output Page 1 of 128 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT No. 1 CURRENT YEAR COMPUTER ANALYSIS 10 10 11 660.0 8.0 130.00 .00 11 11 12 1880.0 8.0 130.00 .00 12 12 13 440.0 8.0 130.00 .00 13 13 14 800.0 8.0 130.00 .00 14 14 15 320.0 8.0 130.00 .00 15 15 16 2020.0 8.0 130.00 .00 16 16 17 760.0 8.0 130.00 .00 17 17 18 60.0 8.0 150.00 .00 18 18 19 630.0 8.0 150.00 .00 19 19 20 60.0 8.0 150.00 .00 20 20 21 420.0 8.0 130.00 .00 21 21 22 440.0 8.0 130.00 .00 22 13 23 280.0 6.0 150.00 .00 23 23 24 340..0 4.0 150.00 .00 24 24 25 300.0 4.0 150.00 .00 25 25 26 500.0 4.0 150.00 .00 26 8 27 540.0 8.0 130.00 .00 27 27 28 360.0 8.0 130.00 .00 28 28 29 380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 29 29 30 300.0 8.0 130.00 .00 30 30 31 180.0 8.0 130.00 .00 31 31 32 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 32 32 33 520.0 8.0 130.00 .00 33 33 34 50.0 8.0 130.00 .00 34 34 97 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 35-FG 97 0 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 371.95 36-XXPU 34 99 50.0 2.0 150.00 .00 37 35 36 200.0 6.0 150.00 .00 38 36 37 300.0 6.0 150.00 .00 39 37 38 100.0 6.0 150.00 .00 40 5 39 500.0 8.0 130.00 .00 41 39 40 500.0 8.0 130.00 .00 42 40 41 820.0 8.0 130.00 .00 43 41 42 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 44 42 43 220.0 8.0 130.00 .00 45 43 44 760.0 8.0 130.00 .00 46 40 45 350.0 6.0 130.00 .00 47 42 46 200.0 4.0 150.00 .00 48 11 47 400.0 3.0 150.00 .00 49 47 48 100.0 3.0 150.00 .00 50 1 49 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 51 49 50 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 52 50 51 1400.0 8.0 130.00 .00 53 51 52 600.0 6.0 150.00 .00 54 52 53 450.0 4.0 150.00 .00 55 51 106 2530.0 8.0 130.00 .00 56 54 55 440.0 8.0 130.00 .00 57 55 56 750.0 4.0 130.00 .00 58 55 57 520.0 8.0 130.00 .00 59 57 58 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 60 58 59 2880.0 8.0 130.00 .00 61 59 60 700.0 8.0 130.00 .00 62 60 61 380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 63 58 62 380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 64 62 63 540.0 8.0 130.00 .00 65 63 64 560..0 8.0 130.00 .00 66 59 65 250.0 4.0 150.00 .00 67 60 66 380.0 6.0 150.00 .00 68 66 67 300.0 2.0 150.00 .00 69 67 68 160.0 2.0 150.00 .00 70 57 69 60.0 8.0 130.00 .00 71 69 70 120.0 8.0 130.00 .00 72 70 71 330.0 8.0 150.00 .00 2006-1 Analysis Output Page 2 of 128 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT No. 1 CURRENT YEAR COMPUTER ANALYSIS 73 71 72 80.0 8.0 130.00 .00 74 72 73 300.0 8.0 130.00 .00 75 73 74 120.0 8.0 130.00 .00 76 74 75 270.0 8.0 130.00 .00 77 73 76 150.0 8.0 130.00 .00 78-PU 76 113 63.0 8.0 140.00 .00 79 77 78 400.0 8.0 140.00 .00 80 76 79 60.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 81 79 80 600.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 82 80 81 570.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 83 81 82 170.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 84 82 83 150.0 8.0 130.00 .00 85 79 84 700.0 8.0 130.00 .00 86 84 85 340.0 8.0 130.00 .00 87 85 86 360.0 8.0 130.00 .00 88 86 87 300.0 8.0 130.00 .00 89 87 98 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 90-FG 98 0 50.0 8.0 130.00 .00 371.95 91 79 88 350.0 6.0 130.00 .00 92 88 89 400.0 6.0 130.00 .00 93 89 90 350.0 6.0 130.00 .00 94 90 91 420.0 6.0 130.00 .00 95-XXPU 0 1 120.0 4.0 140.00 2.00 96.00 96-FGCV 0 92 8.0 3.0 110.00 4.00 159.00 97-XXPU 92 93 10.0 3.0 110.00 2.00 98 81 104 350.0 8.0 140.00 .30 99 93 94 8.0 4.0 150.00 .00 100 94 1 100.0 8.0 130.00 .00 101 43 95 400.0 4.0 130.00 .00 102 9 96 420.0 6.0 130.00 .00 103 99 35 15.0 2.0 150.00 .00 104-FG 0 99 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 475.95 105-XXPU 0 100 170.0 4.0 130.00 .00 53.00 106 100 96 280.0 6.0 150.00 .00 107 101 54 840.0 8.0 130.00 .00 108 101 102 53.0 8.0 140.00 .50 109 102 103 530.0 8.0 140.00 .50 110 82 105 350.0 8.0 140.00 .30 111 104 105 200.0 8.0 140.00 .30 112 106 101 250.0 8.0 130.00 .00 113 106 107 997.0 8.0 140.00 .90 114-PU 107 108 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 115-XXPU 107 109 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 116-XXPU 107 110 10.0 6.0 140.00 .00 117-RV 108 111 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 118-RV 109 111 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 119 110 111 10.0 6.0 140.00 .00 120 111 112 1400.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 121-FG 108 0 10000.0 1.0 100.00 .00 1800.00 122-FG 109 0 10000.0 1.0 100.00 .00 3000.00 123-XXFG 58 0 20.0 6.0 100.00 .00 194.20 124 113 77 580.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 125 113 114 581.0 8.0 140.00 .50 126 114 58 465.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 127 114 115 393.0 8.0 140.00 .50 128 115 116 372.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 129 116 77 328.0 8.0 140.00 .50 130-XXPU 0 117 350.0 6.0 120.00 1.00 90.00 131-FG 117 0 500.0 16.0 140.00 2.00 569.90 132 117 118 700.0 12.0 140.00 2.00 133 117 119 3600.0 12.0 140.00 3.00 134 119 120 5.0 12.0 140.00 1.00 135-RV 120 122 5.0 12.0 140.00 1.00 2006-1 Analysis Output Page 3 of 128 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT No. 1 CURRENT YEAR COMPUTER ANALYSIS 136 119 121 5.0 3.0 100.00 1.00 137-RV 121 122 5.0 3.0 100.00 1.00 138-XX 122 105 440.0 12.0 140.00 2.00 139 118 123 102.0 16.0 140.00 .00 140 123 124 760.0 16.0 140.00 .00 141 124 125 12.0 16.0 140.00 .00 142 125 126 839.0 16.0 140.00 .00 143 126 127 555.0 16.0 140.00 .00 144 127 128 1828.0 16.0 140.00 .00 145 124 129 700.0 8.0 140.00 .00 146 19 130 2025.0 8.0 140.00 .00 PUMP DATA THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 36 - USEFUL POWER = .25 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 78 - USEFUL POWER = 1.00 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 95 - USEFUL POWER = 8.90 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 97 - USEFUL POWER = 8.10 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 105 - USEFUL POWER = 23.90 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 114 - USEFUL POWER = 2.70 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 115 - USEFUL POWER = 5.40 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 116 - USEFUL POWER = 41.00 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 130 - USEFUL POWER = 73.00 J U N C T I O N N 0 D E D A T A *** GEOMETRIC VERIFICATION (*3*) SUCCESSFUL *** JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL JUNCTION NUMBER TITLE DEMAND ELEVATION CONNECTING PIPES (gpm) (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 .97 144.00 1 50 95 100 2 1.22 142.00 1 2 3 1.22 140.00 2 3 4 .97 132.00 3 4 5 1.22 130.00 4 5 40 6 1.22 130.00 5 6 7 1.46 130.00 6 7 8 .97 118.00 7 8 26 9 .00 118.00 8 9 102 10 2.19 124.00 9 10 11 .49 122.00 10 11 48 12 .97 135.00 11 12 13 1.46 200.00 12 13 22 14 1.46 220.00 13 14 15 1.46 140.00 14 15 16 1.94 140.00 15 16 17 2.43 144.00 16 17 18 .00 144.00 17 18 19 .00 145.00 18 19 146 20 .97 145.00 19 20 21 2.43 150.00 20 21 22 1.70 150.00 21 23 .00 220.00 22 23 24 .00 160.00 23 24 25 .00 290.00 24 25 26 .00 290.00 25 2006-1 Analysis OuW Page 4 of 128 I _ BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT No. 1 CURRENT YEAR COMPUTER ANALYSIS 27 .49 180.00 26 27 28 .49 220.00 27 28 29 .49 250.00 28 29 30 .49 270.00 29 30 31 .49 280.00 30 31 32 .24 330.00 31 32 33 .00 355.00 32 33 34 .00 355.00 33 34 36 35 .00 355.00 37 103 36 .97 355.00 37 38 37 .97 365.00 38 39 38 .97 365.00 39 39 .24 180.00 40 41 40 .49 210.00 41 42 46 41 .24 265.00 42 43 42 .49 280.00 43 44 47 43 1.22 285.00 44 45 101 44 .73 282.00 45 45 .00 200.00 46 46 .49 200.00 47 47 .24 200.00 48 49 48 .49 220.00 49 49 1.94 144.00 50 51 50 2.92 148.00 51 52 51 3.65 155.00 52 53 55 52 2.43 124.00 53 54 53 2.43 115.00 54 54 2.92 140.00 56 107 55 2.43 144.00 56 57 58 56 1.94 125.00 57 57 2.43 150.00 58 59 70 58 4.86 148.00 59 60 63 123 126 59 4.86 150.00 60 61 66 60 2.43 145.00 61 62 67 61 2.43 145.00 62 62 1.94 146.00 63 64 63 1.94 135.00 64 65 64 1.46 125.00 65 65 1.22 150.00 66 66 .97 140.00 67 68 67 .97 140.00 68 69 68 .97 140.00 69 69 1.94 150.00 70 71 70 2.19 151.00 71 72 71 1.46 152.00 72 73 72 1.94 153.00 73 74 73 1.94 155.00 74 75 77 74 2.67 154.00 75 76 75 3.16 154.00 76 76 2.43 160.00 77 78 80 77 1.94 195.00 79 124 129 78 2.92 215.00 79 79 1.94 160.00 80 81 85 91 80 3.40 195.00 81 82 81 .49 225.00 82 83 98 82 4.86 240.00 83 84 110 83 2.43 225.00 84 84 .00 240.00 85 86 85 .00 270.00 86 87 86 .00 320.00 87 88 87 .00 355.00 88 89 88 1.94 158.00 91 92 89 1.94 153.00 92 93 2006-1 Analysis Output Page 5 of 128 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT No. 1 CURRENT YEAR COMPUTER ANALYSIS 90 1.94 150.00 93 94 91 1.94 140.00 94 92 .00 136.00 96 97 93 .00 136.00 97 99 94 .00 136.00 99 100 95 .97 245.00 101 96 1.22 115.00 102 106 97 .00 355.00 34 35 98 .00 355.00 89 90 99 .00 355.00 36 103 104 100 .00 135.00 105 106 101 4.86 145.00 107 108 112 102 5.10 145.00 108 109 103 2.43 140.00 109 104 2.43 250.00 98 ill 105 .49 265.00 110 111 138 106 2.43 157.00 55 112 113 107 .00 310.00 113 114 115 116 108 .00 310.00 114 117 121 109 .00 310.00 115 118 122 110 .00 310.00 116 119 111 .00 310.00 117 118 119 120 112 53.00 425.00 120 113 1.94 160.00 78 124 125 114 1.94 158.00 125 126 127 115 1.94 160.00 127 128 116 1.94 166.00 128 129 117 .00 440.00 130 131 132 133 118 .24 420.00 132 139 119 .00 300.00 133 134 136 120 .00 300.00 134 135 121 .00 300.00 136 137 122 .00 300.00 135 137 138 123 .00 400.00 139 140 124 .24 400.00 140 141 145 125 .00 400.00 141 142 126 .00 400.00 142 143 127 .00 400.00 143 144 128 .00 400.00 144 129 .00 400.00 145 130 .00 150.00 146 O U T P U T O P T I O N D A T A OUTPUT SELECTION: THE FOLLOWING RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT ALL CLOSED PIPES ARE NOTED, ALL PIPES WITH PUMPS FOLLOWING PIPES 8 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 102 105 106 FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES 22 34 87 61 57 38 112 MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM PRESSURES = 10 E P S D A T A TOTAL TIME FOR SIMULATION = 24.000 NORMAL TIME PERIOD = 1.000 2006-1 Analysis OuW Page 6 of 128 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT No. 1 CURRENT YEAR COMPUTER ANALYSIS VARIABLE HEAD TANK DATA TANK PIPE MAXIMUM MINIMUM TANK INITIAL EXTERNAL NUMBER NUMBER ELEVATION ELEVATION CAPACITY VOLUME FLOW (*) (ft) (ft) (gal) (gal) (gPm) 1-1 35 372.00 356.00 127311. 126913. .00 2-1 90 372.00 356.00 127311. 126913. .00 3-1 104 476.00 356.00 2820. 2819. .00 4-1 131 578.00 458.50 1123410. 1047263. .00 * TANK TYPE: 1 - CONSTANT DIAMETER 2 - VARIABLE AREA F L O W M E T E R S U M M A R Y THE FOLLOWING PIPES CONTAIN FLOW METERS: 99 106 95 130 P R E S S U R E S W I T C H D A T A REFERENCE REFERENCE SWITCHING PIPE NODE GRADES (ft) ---------------------------------------------- 97 87 371.00 & 372.00 36 35 436.00 & 476.00 105 87 370.00 & 372.00 115 112 568.00 & 570.00 130 117 565.00 & 570.00 S Y S T E M C O N F I G U R A T I O N NUMBER OF PIPES . . . .. .. .. .... .. . . .. (P) = 146 NUMBER OF JUNCTION NODES .... .. . . .. (j) = 130 NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS . . ... . . . . . . (1) = 6 NUMBER OF FIXED GRADE NODES . .. .. .. (f) = 11 NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES .. .... .. . . .. W = 1 2006-1 Analysis output Page 7 of 128 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT No. 1 CURRENT YEAR COMPUTER ANALYSIS D A T A C H A N G E S F O R N E X T S I M U L A T I O N D E M A N D C H A N G E S DEMAND TYPE = 1 - GDF = 3.000 S I M U L A T I O N R E S U L T S TIME FROM INITIATION OF EPS = 14.0000 HOURS THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 5 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00448 S I M U L A T I O N D E S C R I P T I O N (L A B E L) Peak Hour usage from 7:00 pm to 8:00 pm. P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TK -STORAGE TANK PIPE NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/ NUMBER #1 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELD. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 8 9 -222.33 .10 .00 .00 1.42 .87 26 8 27 20.08 .01 .00 .00 .13 .01 27 27 28 18.61 .00 .00 .00 .12 .01 28 28 29 17.14 .00 .00 .00 .11 .01 29 29 30 15.67 .00 .00 .00 .10 .01 30 30 31 14.20 .00 .00 .00 .09 .01 31 31 32 12.73 .00 .00 .00 .08 .00 32 32 33 12.01 .00 .00 .00 .08 .00 33 33 34 12.01 .00 .00 .00 .08 .00 34 34 97 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 35-XXTK 97 0 36-PU 34 99 12.01 .13 82.33 .00 1.23 2.57 78-PU 76 113 523.75 .23 7.55 .00 3.34 3.71 97-PU 92 93 143.18 .62 223.81 1.31 6.50 62.35 102 9 96 -277.02 2.23 .00 .00 3.14 5.31 105-FGPU 0 100 280.68 6.67 336.88 .00 7.17 39.21 106 100 96 280.68 1.17 .00 .00 3.11 4.18 114-PU 107 108 44.66 .05 239.19 .00 2.03 4.61 115-PU 107 109 88.93 .17 240.24 .00 4.04 16.51 FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED 95 116 123 130 135 138 2006-1 Analysis Output Page 80 of 128 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT No. 1 CURRENT YEAR COMPUTER ANALYSIS J U N C T I O N N 0 D E R E S U L T S JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC JUNCTION PRESSURE JUNCTION NUMBER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22 5.10 379.55 150.00 229.55 99.47 34 .00 379.69 355.00 24.69 10.70 38 2.91 461.87 365.00 96.87 41.98 57 7.29 370.55 150.00 220.55 95.57 61 7.29 372.08 145.00 227.08 98.40 87 .00 368.46 355.00 13.46 5.83 112 159.00 569.19 425.00 144.19 62.48 MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VALUES P R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES (psi) (psi) --------------------- --------------------- 109 128.24 87 5.83 119 116.94 98 5.84 120 116.94 92 8.61 121 116.94 107 8.85 96 115.72 34 10.70 9 113.45 97 10.70 8 113.41 33 10.70 110 112.57 86 20.93 111 112.57 32 21.53 108 112.48 122 30.33 R E G U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH TYPE NODE PIPE SETTING STATUS GRADE GRADE FLOW (ft or gpm) (ft) (ft) (gpm) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRV-1 108 117 570.00 WIDE OPEN 569.56 569.78 55.13 PRV-1 109 118 570.00 THROTTLED 605.93 569.78 103.87 PRV-1 120 135 369.00 CLOSED 569.86 370.00 .00 PRV-1 121 137 370.00 THROTTLED 569.86 370.00 .00 2006-1 Analysis Ouf4xd Page 81 of 128 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT No. 1 CURRENT YEAR COMPUTER ANALYSIS S U M M A R Y O F I N F L 0 W S A N D O U T F L O W S (+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES III (-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES PIPE FLOWRATE NUMBER (gpm) -------------------- 90 178.85 96 143.18 104 -3.28 105 280.68 121 10.45 122 14.98 131 1.44 NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 629.58 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = -3.28 NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 626.28 T A N K S T A T U S R E P O R T (time = 14.0000 hours) TANK PIPE NET WATER TANK TANK TANK TANK PROJECTED NUMBER NUMBER FLOW ELEVATION DEPTH VOLUME VOLUME STATUS DEPTH (*) (gpm) (ft) (ft) (gal) (%) (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-1 35 .00 372.00 16.00 127311. 100.0 FULL 16.00 2-1 90 -178.85 368.50 12.50 99479. 78.1 DRAINING 11.15 3-1 104 3.28 461.89 105.89 2489. 88.2 FILLING 114.28 4-1 131 -1.44 569.86 111.36 1046849. 93.2 DRAINING 111.35 * TANK TYPE: 1 - CONSTANT DIAMETER 2 - VARIABLE AREA F L O W M E T E R R E P O R T (time = 14.0000 hours) PIPE NODE METERED NUMBER NUMBERS FLOW #1 #2 (gal) ---------------------------------------- 99 93 94 75339. 106 100 96 65408. 95 0 1 0. 130 0 117 0. 2006-1 Analysis Output Page 82 of 128 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT No. 1 CURRENT YEAR COMPUTER ANALYSIS S I M U L A T I O N R E S U L T S TIME FROM INITIATION OF EPS = 24.0000 HOURS THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 1 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00145 P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TK -STORAGE TANK PIPE NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/ NUMBER #1 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELD. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) -------------------------------------- 8 8 9 2.92 .00 .00 .00 .02 .00 26 8 27 .40 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 27 27 28 .33 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 28 28 29 .26 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 29 29 30 .18 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 30 30 31 .11 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 31 31 32 .04 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 32 32 33 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 33 33 34 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 34 34 97 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 35-XXTK 97 0 78-PU 76 113 448.57 .18 8.82 .00 2.86 2.79 97-PU 92 93 142.34 .62 225.13 1.30 6.46 61.67 102 9 96 .18 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 105-XXPU 0 100 106 100 96 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 114-PU 107 108 6.92 .00 1543.35 .00 .31 .15 115-PU 107 109 7.64 .00 2796.19 .00 .35 .18 FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED : 36 95 116 123 130 135 138 J U N C T I O N N 0 D E R E S U L T S JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC JUNCTION PRESSURE JUNCTION NUMBER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22 .26 379.02 150.00 229.02 99.24 34 .00 379.02 355.00 24.02 10.41 38 .15 473.80 365.00 108.80 47.15 57 .36 376.68 150.00 226.68 98.23 61 .36 378.56 145.00 233.56 101.21 87 .00 371.67 355.00 16.67 7.22 112 7.95 570.00 425.00 145.00 62.83 2006-1 Analysis Output Page 126 of 128 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT No. 1 CURRENT YEAR COMPUTER ANALYSIS MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VALUES P R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES (Psi) (Psi) - --------------------- -------------------- 109 1240.81 98 7.22 108 697.92 87 7.22 120 116.92 92 8.63 121 116.92 33 10.41 119 116.92 34 10.41 96 114.41 97 10.41 53 114.01 32 21.24 8 113.11 86 22.42 9 113.11 107 29.13 110 112.67 122 30.33 R E G U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH TYPE NODE PIPE SETTING STATUS GRADE GRADE FLOW (ft or gpm) (ft) (ft) (gpm) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRV-1 108 117 570.00 THROTTLED 1920.58 570.00 3.94 PRV-1 109 118 570.00 THROTTLED 3173.41 570.00 4.01 PRV-1 120 135 369.00 CLOSED 569.83 370.00 .00 PRV-1 121 137 370.00 THROTTLED 569.83 370.00 .00 S U M M A R Y O F I N FLOW S A N D O U T F L O W S {+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES (-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES PIPE FLOWRATE NUMBER (gpm) -- --90 -------104.92 96 142.34 104 .44 121 -2.98 122 -3.63 131 .07 NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 142.85 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = -111.54 NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 31.31 I 2006_1 Analysis output Page 127 of 128 I BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT No. 1 CURRENT YEAR COMPUTER ANALYSIS T A N K S T A T U S R E P O R T (time = 24.0000 hours) TANK PIPE NET WATER TANK TANK TANK TANK PROJECTED NUMBER NUMBER FLOW ELEVATION DEPTH VOLUME VOLUME STATUS DEPTH (*) (gpm) (ft) (ft) (gal) M (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-1 35 .00 372.00 16.00 127311. 100.0 FULL 16.00 2-1 90 104.92 371.65 15.65 124558. 97.8 FILLING 16.00 3-1 104 -.44 473.80 117.80 2769. 98.2 DRAINING 117.31 4-1 131 -.07 569.83 111.33 1046572. 93.2 DRAINING 111.33 * TANK TYPE: 1 - CONSTANT DIAMETER 2 - VARIABLE AREA F L O W M E T E R R E P O R T (time = 24.0000 hours) PIPE NODE METERED NUMBER NUMBERS FLOW #1 #2 (gal) ---------------------------------------- 99 93 94 128653. 106 100 96 153878. 95 0 1 0. 130 0 117 0. **** KYPIPE SIMULATION COMPLETED **** DATE: 3/ 9/2007 TIME: 14: 0:33 2006-1 Analysis output Page 128 of 128 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS * * * * * * * * * * K Y P I P E 2 * University of Kentucky Hydraulic Analysis Program * Distribution of Pressure and Flows in Piping Networks * 1000 PIPE VERSION - 1.20 (05/12/93) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DATE: 3/ 9/2007 TIME: 14: 1:32 INPUT DATA FILENAME -------------- c:\kypipe2\data\2012-1.DAT TABULATED OUTPUT FILENAME -------- c:\kypipe2\data\2012-1.OUT POSTPROCESSOR RESULTS FILENAME --- c:\kypipe2\data\2012-1.RES ************************************************ S U M M A R Y O F O R I G I N A L D A T A ************************************************ U N I T S S P E C I F I E D FLOWRATE . .... .. .. .. . = gallons/minute HEAD (HGL) . . . .. .. . . . = feet PRESSURE ..... .. .. .. . = psig METERED FLOW . . . .. . . . = gallons REGULATING VALVE DATA VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE TYPE JUNCTION PIPE SETTING (ft or gpm) -------------------------------------------- PRV-1 108 117 570.00 PRV-1 109 118 570.00 PRV-1 120 135 369.00 PRV-1 121 137 370.00 P I P E L I N E D A T A STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE PIPE NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS FGN-HGL NUMBER #1 #2 (ft) (in) COEFF. COEFF. (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 2 560.0 8.0 130.00 .00 2 2 3 1380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 3 3 4 190.0 8.0 130.00 .00 4 4 5 200.0 8.0 130.00 .00 5 5 6 200.0 8.0 130.00 .00 6 6 7 200.0 8.0 130.00 .00 7 7 8 860.0 8.0 130.00 .00 8 8 9 120.0 8.0 130.00 .00 9 9 10 660.0 8.0 130.00 .00 2012-1 Anaysis Output Page 1 of 122 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS 10 10 11 660.0 8.0 130.00 .00 11 11 12 1880.0 8.0 130.00 .00 12 12 13 440.0 8.0 130.00 .00 13 13 14 800.0 8.0 130.00 .00 14 14 15 320.0 8.0 130.00 .00 15 15 16 2020.0 8.0 130.00 .00 16 16 17 760.0 8.0 130.00 .00 17 17 18 60.0 8.0 150.00 .00 18 18 19 630.0 8.0 150.00 .00 19 19 20 60.0 8.0 150.00 .00 20 20 21 420.0 8.0 130.00 .00 21 21 22 440.0 8.0 130.00 .00 22 13 23 280.0 6.0 150.00 .00 23 23 24 340.0 4.0 150.00 .00 24 24 25 300.0 4.0 150.00 .00 25 25 26 500.0 4.0 150.00 .00 26 8 27 540.0 8.0 130.00 .00 27 27 28 360.0 8.0 130.00 .00 28 28 29 380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 29 29 30 300.0 8.0 130.00 .00 30 30 31 180.0 8.0 130.00 .00 31 31 32 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 32 32 33 520.0 8.0 130.00 .00 33 33 34 50.0 8.0 130.00 .00 34 34 97 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 35-FG 97 0 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 371.95 36-XXPU 34 99 50.0 2.0 150.00 .00 37 35 36 200.0 6.0 150.00 .00 38 36 37 300.0 6.0 150.00 .00 39 37 38 100.0 6.0 150.00 .00 40 5 39 500.0 8.0 130.00 .00 41 39 40 500.0 8.0 130.00 .00 42 40 41 820.0 8.0 130.00 .00 43 41 42 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 44 42 43 220.0 8.0 130.00 .00 45 43 44 760.0 8.0 130.00 .00 46 40 45 350.0 6.0 130.00 .00 47 42 46 200.0 4.0 150.00 .00 48 11 47 400.0 3.0 150.00 .00 49 47 48 100.0 3.0 150.00 .00 50 1 49 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 51 49 50 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 52 50 51 1400.0 8.0 130.00 .00 53 51 52 600.0 6.0 150.00 .00 54 52 53 450.0 4.0 150.00 .00 55 51 106 2530.0 8.0 130.00 .00 56 54 55 440.0 8.0 130.00 .00 57 55 56 750.0 4.0 130.00 .00 58 55 57 520.0 8.0 130.00 .00 59 57 58 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 60 58 59 2880.0 8.0 130.00 .00 61 59 60 700.0 8.0 130.00 .00 62 60 61 380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 63 58 62 380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 64 62 63 540.0 8.0 130.00 .00 65 63 64 560.0 8.0 130.00 .00 66 59 65 250.0 4.0 150.00 .00 67 60 66 380.0 6.0 150.00 .00 68 66 67 300.0 2.0 150.00 .00 69 67 68 160.0 2.0 150.00 .00 70 57 69 60.0 8.0 130.00 .00 71 69 70 120.0 8.0 130.00 .00 72 70 71 330.0 8.0 150.00 .00 2012-1 Anaysis Output Page 2 of 122 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS 73 71 72 80.0 8.0 130.00 .00 74 72 73 300.0 8.0 130.00 .00 75 73 74 120.0 8.0 130.00 .00 76 74 75 270.0 8.0 130.00 .00 77 73 76 150.0 8.0 130.00 .00 78-PU 76 113 63.0 8.0 140.00 .00 79 77 78 400.0 8.0 140.00 .00 80 76 79 60.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 81 79 80 600.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 82 80 81 570.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 83 81 82 170.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 84 82 83 150.0 8.0 130.00 .00 85 79 84 700.0 8.0 130.00 .00 86 84 85 340.0 8.0 130.00 .00 87 85 86 360.0 8.0 130.00 .00 88 86 87 300.0 8.0 130.00 .00 89 87 98 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 90-FG 98 0 50.0 8.0 130.00 .00 371.95 91 79 88 350.0 6.0 130.00 .00 92 88 89 400.0 6.0 130.00 .00 93 89 90 350.0 6.0 130.00 .00 94 90 91 420.0 6.0 130.00 .00 95-XXPU 0 1 120.0 4.0 140.00 2.00 96.00 96-FGCV 0 92 8.0 3.0 110.00 4.00 159.00 97-XXPU 92 93 10.0 3.0 110.00 2.00 98 81 104 350.0 8.0 140.00 .30 99 93 94 8.0 4.0 150.00 .00 100 94 1 100.0 8.0 130.00 .00 101 43 95 400.0 4.0 130.00 .00 102 9 96 420.0 6.0 130.00 .00 103 99 35 15.0 2.0 150.00 .00 104-FG 0 99 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 475.95 105-XXPU 0 100 170.0 4.0 130.00 .00 53.00 106 100 96 280.0 6.0 150.00 .00 107 101 54 840.0 8.0 130.00 .00 108 101 102 53.0 8.0 140.00 .50 109 102 103 530.0 8.0 140.00 .50 110 82 105 350.0 8.0 140.00 .30 ill 104 105 200.0 8.0 140.00 .30 112 106 101 250.0 8.0 130.00 .00 113 106 107 997.0 8.0 140.00 .90 114-PU 107 108 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 115-XXPU 107 109 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 116-XXPU 107 110 10.0 6.0 140.00 .00 117-RV 108 ill 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 118-RV 109 ill 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 119 110 ill 10.0 6.0 140.00 .00 120 ill 112 1400.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 121-FG 108 0 10000.0 1.0 100.00 .00 1800.00 122-FG 109 0 10000.0 1.0 100.00 .00 3000.00 123-XXFG 58 0 20.0 6.0 100.00 .00 194.20 124 113 77 580.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 125 113 114 581.0 8.0 140.00 .50 126 114 58 465.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 127 114 115 393.0 8.0 140.00 .50 128 115 116 372.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 129 116 77 328.0 8.0 140.00 .50 130-XXPU 0 117 350.0 6.0 120.00 1.00 90.00 131-FG 117 0 500.0 16.0 140.00 2.00 569.90 132 117 118 700.0 12.0 •140.00 2.00 133 117 119 3600.0 12.0 140.00 3.00 134 119 120 5.0 12.0 140.00 1.00 135-RV 120 122 5.0 12.0 140.00 1.00 2012-1 Anaysis Output Page 3 of 122 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS 136 119 121 5.0 3.0 100.00 1.00 137-RV 121 122 5.0 3.0 100.00 1.00 138 122 105 440.0 12.0 140.00 2.00 139 118 123 102.0 16.0 140.00 .00 140 123 124 760.0 16.0 140.00 .00 141 124 125 12.0 16.0 140.00 .00 142 125 126 839.0 16.0 140.00 .00 143 126 127 555.0 16.0 140.00 .00 144 127 128 1828.0 16.0 140.00 .00 145 124 129 700.0 8.0 140.00 .00 146 19 130 2025.0 8.0 140.00 .00 P U M P D A T A THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 36 - USEFUL POWER = .25 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 78 - USEFUL POWER = 1.00 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 95 - USEFUL POWER = 8.90 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 97 - USEFUL POWER = 8.10 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 105 - USEFUL POWER = 23.90 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 114 - USEFUL POWER = 2.70 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 115 - USEFUL POWER = 5.40 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 116 - USEFUL POWER = 41.00 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 130 - USEFUL POWER = 73.00 J U N C T I O N N O D E D A T A *** GEOMETRIC VERIFICATION (*3*) SUCCESSFUL *** JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL JUNCTION NUMBER TITLE DEMAND ELEVATION CONNECTING PIPES (gpm) (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 .97 144.00 1 50 95 100 2 1.22 142.00 1 2 3 1.22 140.00 2 3 4 .97 132.00 3 4 5 1.22 130.00 4 5 40 6 1.22 130.00 5 6 7 1.46 130.00 6 7 8 .97 118.00 7 8 26 9 .00 118.00 8 9 102 10 2.19 124.00 9 10 11 .49 122.00 10 11 48 12 .97 135.00 11 12 13 1.46 200.00 12 13 22 14 1.46 220.00 13 14 15 1.46 140.00 14 15 16 1.94 140.00 15 16 17 2.43 144.00 16 17 18 .00 144.00 17 18 19 .00 145.00 18 19 146 20 .97 145.00 19 20 21 2.43 150.00 20 21 22 1.70 150.00 21 23 .00 220.00 22 23 24 .00 160.00 23 24 25 .00 290.00 24 25 26 .00 290.00 25 2012-1 Anaysis Output Page 4 of 122 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS 27 .49 180.00 26 27 28 .49 220.00 27 28 29 .49 250.00 28 29 30 .49 270.00 29 30 31 .49 280.00 30 31 32 .24 330.00 31 32 33 .00 355.00 32 33 34 .00 355.00 33 34 36 35 .00 355.00 37 103 36 .97 355.00 37 38 37 .97 365.00 38 39 38 .97 365.00 39 39 .24 180.00 40 41 40 .49 210.00 41 42 46 41 .24 265.00 42 43 42 .49 280.00 43 44 47 43 1.22 285.00 44 45 101 44 .73 282.00 45 45 .00 200.00 46 46 .49 200.00 47 47 .24 200.00 48 49 48 .49 220.00 49 49 1.94 144.00 50 51 50 2.92 148.00 51 52 51 3.65 155.00 52 53 55 52 2.43 124.00 5.3 54 53 2.43 115.00 54 54 2.92 140.00 56 107 55 2.43 144.00 56 57 58 56 1.94 125.00 57 57 2.43 150.00 58 59 70 58 4.86 148.00 59 60 63 123 126 59 4.86 150.00 60 61 66 60 2.43 145.00 61 62 67 61 2.43 145.00 62 62 1.94 146.00 63 64 63 1.94 135.00 64 65 64 1.46 125.00 65 65 1.22 150.00 66 66 .97 140.00 67 68 67 .97 140.00 68 69 68 .97 140.00 69 69 1.94 150.00 70 71 70 2.19 151.00 71 72 71 1.46 152.00 72 73 72 1.94 153.00 73 74 73 1.94 155.00 74 75 77 74 2.67 154.00 75 76 75 3.16 154.00 76 76 2.43 160.00 77 78 80 77 1.94 195.00 79 124 129 78 2.92 215.00 79 79 1.94 160.00 80 81 85 91 80 3.40 195.00 81 82 81 .49 225.00 82 83 98 82 4.86 240.00 83 84 110 83 2.43 225.00 84 84 .00 240.00 85 86 85 .00 270.00 86 87 86 .00 320.00 87 88 87 .00 355.00 88 89 88 1.94 158.00 91 92 I 89 1.94 153.00 92 93 2012-1 Anaysis Output Page 5 of 122 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS 90 1.94 150.00 93 94 91 1.94 140.00 94 92 .00 136.00 96 97 93 .00 136.00 97 99 94 .00 136.00 99 100 95 .97 245.00 101 96 1.22 115.00 102 106 97 .00 355.00 34 35 98 .00 355.00 89 90 99 .00 355.00 36 103 104 100 .00 135.00 105 106 101 4.86 145.00 107 108 112 102 5.10 145.00 108 109 103 2.43 140.00 109 104 2.43 250.00 98 111 105 .49 265.00 110 111 138 106 2.43 157.00 55 112 113 107 .00 310.00 113 114 115 116 108 .00 310.00 114 117 121 109 .00 310.00 115 118 12'2 110 .00 310.00 116 119 111 .00 310.00 117 118 119 120 112 53.00 425.00 120 113 1.94 160.00 78 124 125 114 1.94 158.00 125 126 127 115 1.94 160.00 127 128 116 1.94 166.00 128 129 117 .00 440.00 130 131 132 133 118 .24 420.00 132 139 119 .00 300.00 133 134 136 120 .00 300.00 134 135 121 .00 300.00 136 137 122 .00 300.00 135 137 138 123 .00 400.00 139 140 124 .24 400.00 140 141 145 125 .00 400.00 141 142 126 .00 400.00 142 143 127 .00 400.00 143 144 128 .00 400.00 144 129 .00 400.00 145 130 .00 150.00 146 O U T P U T O P T I O N D A T A OUTPUT SELECTION: THE FOLLOWING RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT ALL CLOSED PIPES ARE NOTED ALL PIPES WITH PUMPS FOLLOWING PIPES 8 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 102 105 106 FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES 22 34 87 61 57 38 112 MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM PRESSURES = 10 E P S D A T A TOTAL TIME FOR SIMULATION = 24.000 NORMAL TIME PERIOD - 1.000 2012-1 Anaysis Output Page 6 of 122 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS VARIABLE HEAD TANK DATA TANK PIPE MAXIMUM MINIMUM TANK INITIAL EXTERNAL NUMBER NUMBER ELEVATION ELEVATION CAPACITY VOLUME FLOW (*) (ft) (ft) (gal) (gal) (gpm) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1-1 35 372.00 356.00 127311. 126913. .00 2-1 90 372.00 356.00 127311. 126913. .00 3-1 104 476.00 356.00 2820. 2819. .00 4-1 131 578.00 458.50 1123410. 1047263. .00 * TANK TYPE: 1 - CONSTANT DIAMETER 2 - VARIABLE AREA F L O W M E T E R S U M M A R Y THE FOLLOWING PIPES CONTAIN FLOW METERS: 99 106 95 130 P R E S S U R E S W I T C H D A T A REFERENCE REFERENCE SWITCHING PIPE NODE GRADES (ft) ---------------------------------------------- 97 87 371.00 & 372.00 36 35 436.00 & 476.00 105 87 370.00 & 372.00 115 112 568.00 & 570.00 130 117 565.00 & 570.00 S Y S T E M C O N F I G U R A T I O N NUMBER OF PIPES . .. .. .. .. . . .... .. .. (p) = 146 NUMBER OF JUNCTION NODES .. .. .. .... (j) = 130 NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS . .. . . .. . . . . (1) = 6 NUMBER OF FIXED GRADE NODES ... .. .. (f) = 11 NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES .. .. ... . .. .. (z) = 1 �I 2012-1 Anaysis output Page 7 of 122 I BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS D A T A C H A N G E S F O R N E X T S I M U L A T I O N D E M A N D C H A N G E S DEMAND TYPE = 1 - GDF = 3.370 S I M U L A T I O N R E S U L T S TIME FROM INITIATION OF EPS = 14.0000 HOURS THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 7 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00445 S I M U L A T I O N D E S C R I P T I O N (L A B E L) Peak Hour usage from 7:00 pm to 8:00 pm. P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TK -STORAGE TANK PIPE NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/ NUMBER #1 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELO. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 8 9 -215.58 .10 .00 .00 1.38 .82 26 8 27 22.61 .01 .00 .00 .14 .01 27 27 28 20.96 .00 .00 .00 .13 .01 28 28 29 19.31 .00 .00 .00 .12 .01 29 29 30 17.66 .00 .00 .00 .11 .01 30 30 31 16.00 .00 .00 .00 .10 .01 31 31 32 14.35 .00 .00 .00 .09 .01 32 32 33 13.54 .00 .00 .00 .09 .00 33 33 34 13.54 .00 .00 .00 .09 .00 34 34 97 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 35-XXTK 97 0 36-PU 34 99 13.54 .16 73.02 .00 1.38 3.21 78-PU 76 113 544.49 .25 7.27 .00 3.48 3.99 97-PU 92 93 143.37 .62 223.52 1.31 6.51 62.50 102 9 96 -277.01 2.23 .00 .00 3.14 5.31 105-FGPU 0 100 281.12 6.68 336.35 .00 7.18 39.32 106 100 96 281.12 1.17 .00 .00 3.19 4.19 114-PU 107 108 46.36 .05 230.43 .00 2.10 4.94 115-PU 107 109 106.69 .23 200.23 .00 4.84 23.13 FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED 95 116 123 130 135 2012-1 Anaysis Output Page 76 of 122 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS J U N C T I O N N 0 D E R E S U L T S JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC JUNCTION PRESSURE JUNCTION NUMBER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22 5.73 378.93 150.00 228.93 99.20 34 .00 379.13 355.00 24.13 10.46 38 3.27 451.97 365.00 86.97 37.69 57 8.19 371.22 150.00 221.22 95.86 61 8.19 372.77 145.00 227.77 98.70 87 .00 369.15 355.00 14.15 6.13 112 178.61 567.74 425.00 142.74 61.85 MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VALUES P R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES (psi) (psi) --------------------- --------------------- 119 115.91 87 6.13 120 115.91 98 6.13 121 115.49 92 8.61 96 115.48 34 10.46 9 113.21 97 10.46 8 113.17 33 10.46 53 112.18 107 11.91 109 112.11 86 21.27 110 112.00 32 21.29 ill 112.00 122 29.91 R E G U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH TYPE NODE PIPE SETTING STATUS GRADE GRADE FLOW (ft or ------------------------ ----� , (ft) (ft) (- ------------- ------- ------ -- PRV-1 108 117 570.00 WIDE OPEN 567.87 568.46 56.82 PRV-1 109 118 570.00 WIDE OPEN 568.72 568.46 121.79 PRV-1 120 135 369.00 CLOSED 567.49 369.02 .00 PRV-1 121 137 370.00 THROTTLED 566.51 369.02 139.82 2012-1 Anaysis Output Page 77 of 122 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS S U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S (+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES (-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES PIPE FLOWRATE NUMBER (gpm) -------------------- 90 115.79 96 143.37 104 -3.74 105 281.12 121 10.46 122 15.10 131 141.43 NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 707.27 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = -3.74 NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 703.52 T A N K S T A T U S R E P O R T (time = 14.0000 hours) TANK PIPE NET WATER TANK TANK TANK TANK PROJECTED NUMBER NUMBER FLOW ELEVATION DEPTH VOLUME VOLUME STATUS DEPTH (*) (gpm) (ft) (ft) (gal) (%) (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-1 35 .00 372.00 16.00 127311. 100.0 FULL 16.00 2-1 90 -115.79 369.17 13.17 104790. 82.3 DRAINING 12.30 3-1 104 3.74 452.00 96.00 2256. 80.0 FILLING 105.54 4-1 131 -141.43 567.67 109.17 1026260. 91.4 DRAINING 108.26 * TANK TYPE: 1 - CONSTANT DIAMETER 2 - VARIABLE AREA F L 0 W M E T E R R E P O R T (time = 14.0000 hours) PIPE NODE METERED NUMBER NUMBERS FLOW #1 #2 (gal) ---------------------------------------- 99 93 94 81107. 106 100 96 64874. 95 0 1 0. 130 0 117 0. 2012-1 Anaysis Output Page 78 of 122 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS S I M U L A T I O N R E S U L T S TIME FROM INITIATION OF EPS = 24.0000 HOURS THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 2 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00379 P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TK -STORAGE TANK PIPE NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/ NUMBER #1 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELO. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/3) (ft/ft) ---- --------- ------ ---------- 8 8 9 3.31 .00 .00 .00 .02 .00 26 8 27 10.64 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 27 27 28 10.56 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 28 28 29 10.47 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 29 29 30 10.39 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 30 30 31 10.31 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 31 31 32 10.22 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 32 32 33 10.18 .00 .00 .00 .06 .00 33 33 34 10.18 .00 .00 .00 .06 .00 34 34 97 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 35-XXTK 97 0 36-PU 34 99 10.18 .09 97.14 .00 1.04 1.89 78-PU 76 113 492.02 .21 8.04 .00 3.14 3.31 102 9 96 .21 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 105-XXPU 0 100 106 100 96 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 114-PU 107 108 7.05 .00 1515.32 .00 .32 .15 115-PU 107 109 7.73 .00 2764.42 .00 .35 .18 FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED : 95 97 116 123 130 135 137 J U N C T I O N N O D E R E S U L T S JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC JUNCTION PRESSURE JUNCTION NUMBER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22 .29 374.58 150.00 224.58 97.32 34 .00 374.57 355.00 19.57 8.48 38 .16 471.23 365.00 106.23 46.03 57 .41 374.70 150.00 224.70 97.37 61 .41 376.93 145.00 231.93 100.50 87 .00 371.75 355.00 16.75 7.26 112 9.01 570.00 425.00 145.00 62.83 2012-1 Anaysis Output Page 120 of 122 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VALUES P R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES (psi) (psi) --------------------- --------------------- 109 1225.93 87 7.26 108 684.65 98 7.26 119 114.89 34 8.48 120 114.89 97 8.48 121 114.89 33 8.48 110 112.67 92 9.97 111 112.67 32 19.31 53 112.50 86 22.42 96 112.48 107 28.01 8 111.18 122 31.05 R E G U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH TYPE NODE PIPE SETTING STATUS GRADE GRADE FLOW (ft or gpm) (ft) (ft) (gpm) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRV-1 108 117 570.00 THROTTLED 1889.96 570.00 4.50 PRV-1 109 118 570.00 THROTTLED 3139.06 570.00 4.51 PRV-1 120 135 369.00 CLOSED 565.14 371.65 .00 PRV-1 121 137 370.00 CLOSED 565.14 371.65 .00 S U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S (+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES (-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES PIPE FLOWRATE NUMBER (gpm) -------------------- 90 50.86 96 .00 104 -9.69 121 -2.55 122 -3.22 131 .08 NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 50.94 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = -15.45 NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 35.49 2012-1 Anaysis Output Page 121 of 122 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS T A N K S T A T U S R E P O R T (time = 24.0000 hours) TANK PIPE NET WATER TANK TANK TANK TANK PROJECTED NUMBER NUMBER FLOW ELEVATION DEPTH VOLUME VOLUME STATUS DEPTH (*) (gpm) (ft) (ft) (gal) (%) (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-1 35 .00 372.00 16.00 127311. 100.0 FULL 16.00 2-1 90 -50.86 371.75 15.75 125324. 98.4 DRAINING 15.68 3-1 104 9.69 471.23 115.23 2708. 96.0 FILLING 120.00 4-1 131 -.08 565.14 106.64 1002527. 89.2 DRAINING 106.64 * TANK TYPE: 1 - CONSTANT DIAMETER 2 - VARIABLE AREA F L O W M E T E R R E P O R T (time = 24.0000 hours) PIPE NODE METERED NUMBER NUMBERS FLOW #1 #2 (gal) ---------------------------------------- 99 93 94 132133. 106 100 96 142296. 95 0 1 0. 130 0 117 0. **** KYPIPE SIMULATION COMPLETED **** DATE: 3/ 9/2007 TIME: 14: 1:32 2012-1 Anaysis Output Page 122 of 122 BELFAIR WQTER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS WADDED CONNECTIONS + + + + + + + + + + K Y P I P E 2 + + + + + + + + + + * University of Kentucky Hydraulic Analysis Program * Distribution of Pressure and Flows in Piping Networks * 1000 PIPE VERSION - 1.20 (05/12/93) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + DATE: 3 10/2007 TIME: 12: 0:10 INPUT DATA FILENAME -------------- c:\kypipe2\data\2012-2.DAT TABULATED OUTPUT FILENAME -------- c:\kypipe2\data\2012-2.OUT POSTPROCESSOR RESULTS FILENAME --- c:\kypipe2\data\2012-2.RES ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ S U M M A R Y O F O R I G I N A L D A T A U N I T S S P E C I F I E D FLOWRATE . .. .. .. ..... = gallons/minute HEAD (HGL) . . . . . .. . . . = feet PRESSURE ... .. .. . .... = psig METERED FLOW . . . . . . . . = gallons REGULATING VALVE DATA VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE TYPE JUNCTION PIPE SETTING (ft or gpm) -------------------------------------------- PRV-1 108 117 570.00 PRV-1 109 118 570.00 PRV-1 120 135 369.00 PRV-1 121 137 370.00 P I P E L I N E D A T A STATUS CODE: XX -CLO$ED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV' -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE PIPE NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS FGN-HGL NUMBER #1 #2 (ft) (in) COEFF. COEFF. (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 2 560.0 8.0 130.00 .00 2 2 3 1380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 3 3 4 190.0 8.0 130.00 .00 4 4 5 200.0 8.0 130.00 .00 5 5 6 200.0 8.0 130.00 .00 6 6 7 200.0 8.0 130.00 .00 7 7 8 860.0 8.0 130.00 .00 8 8 9 120.0 8.0 130.00 .00 2012-2 Anaysis Output Page 1 of 125 BELFAIR WQTER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS WADDED CONNECTIONS 9 9 10 660.0 8.0 130.00 .00 10 10 11 660.0 8.0 130.00 .00 11 11 12 1880.0 8.0 130.00 .00 12 12 13 440.0 8.0 130.00 .00 13 13 14 800.0 8.0 130.00 .00 14 14 15 320.0 8.0 130.00 .00 15 15 16 2020.0 8.0 130.00 .00 16 16 17 760.0 8.0 130.00 .00 17 17 18 60.0 8.0 150.00 .00 18 18 19 630.0 8.0 150.00 .00 19 19 20 60.0 8.0 150.00 .00 20 20 21 420.0 8.0 130.00 .00 21 21 22 440.0 8.0 130.00 .00 22 13 23 280.0 6.0 150.00 .00 23 23 24 340.0 4.0 150.00 .00 24 24 25 300.0 4.0 150.00 .00 25 25 26 500.0 4.0 150.00 .00 26 8 27 540.0 8.0 130.00 .00 27 27 28 360.0 8.0 130.00 .00 28 28 29 380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 29 29 30 300.0 8.0 130.00 .00 30 30 31 180.0 8.0 130.00 .00 31 31 32 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 32 32 33 520.0 8.0 130.00 .00 33 33 34 50.0 8.0 130.00 .00 34 34 97 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 35-FG 97 0 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 371.95 36-XXPU 34 99 50.0 2.0 150.00 .00 37 35 36 200.0 6.0 150.00 .00 38 36 37 300.0 6.0 150.00 .00 39 37 38 100.0 6.0 150.00 .00 40 5 39 500.0 8.0 130.00 .00 41 39 40 500.0 8.0 130.00 .00 42 40 41 820.0 8.0 130.00 .00 43 41 42 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 44 42 43 220.0 8.0 130.00 .00 45 43 44 760.0 8.0 130.00 .00 46 40 45 350.0 6.0 130.00 .00 47 42 46 200.0 4.0 150.00 .00 48 11 47 400.0 3.0 150.00 .00 49 47 48 100.0 3.0 150.00 .00 50 1 49 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 51 49 50 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 52 50 51 1400.0 8.0 130.00 .00 53 51 52 600.0 6.0 150.00 .00 54 52 53 450.0 4.0 150.00 .00 55 51 106 2530.0 8.0 130.00 .00 56 54 55 440.0 8.0 130.00 .00 57 55 56 750.0 4.0 130.00 .00 58 55 57 520.0 8.0 130.00 .00 59 57 58 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 60 58 59 2880.0 8.0 130.00 .00 61 59 60 700.0 8.0 130.00 .00 62 60 61 380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 63 58 62 380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 64 62 63 540.0 8.0 130.00 .00 65 63 64 560.0 8.0 130.00 .00 66 59 65 250.0 4.0 150.00 .00 67 60 66 380.0 6.0 150.00 .00 68 66 67 300.0 2.0 150.00 .00 69 67 68 160.0 2.0 150.00 .00 70 57 69 60.0 8.0 130.00 .00 2012-2 Anaysis Output Page 2 of 125 BELFAIR WQTER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS WADDED CONNECTIONS 71 69 70 120.0 8.0 130.00 .00 72 70 71 330.0 8.0 150.00 .00 73 71 72 80.0 8.0 130.00 .00 74 72 73 300.0 8.0 130.00 .00 75 73 74 120.0 8.0 130.00 .00 76 74 75 270.0 8.0 130.00 .00 77 73 76 150.0 8.0 130.00 .00 78-PU 76 113 63.0 8.0 140.00 .00 79 77 78 400.0 8.0 140.00 .00 80 76 79 60.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 81 79 80 600.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 82 80 81 570.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 83 81 82 170.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 84 82 83 150.0 8.0 130.00 .00 85 79 84 700.0 8.0 130.00 .00 86 84 85 340.0 8.0 130.00 .00 87 85 86 360.0 8.0 130.00 .00 88 86 87 300.0 8.0 130.00 .00 89 87 98 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 90-FG 98 0 50.0 8.0 130.00 .00 371.95 91 79 88 350.0 6.0 130.00 .00 92 88 89 400.0 6.0 130.00 .00 93 89 90 350.0 6.0 130.00 .00 94 90 91 420.0 6.0 130.00 .00 95-XXPU 0 1 120.0 4.0 140.00 2.00 96.00 96-FGCV 0 92 8.0 3.0 110.00 4.00 159.00 97-XXPU 92 93 10.0 3.0 110.00 2.00 98 81 104 350.0 8.0 140.00 .30 99 93 94 8.0 4.0 150.00 .00 100 94 1 100.0 8.0 130.00 .00 101 43 95 400.0 4.0 130.00 .00 102 9 96 420.0 6.0 130.00 .00 103 99 35 15.0 2.0 150.00 .00 104-FG 0 99 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 475.95 105-XXPU 0 100 170.0 4.0 130.00 .00 53.00 106 100 96 280.0 6.0 150.00 .00 107 101 54 840.0 8.0 130.00 .00 108 101 102 53.0 8.0 140.00 .50 109 102 103 530.0 8.0 140.00 .50 110 82 105 350.0 8.0 140.00 .30 ill 104 105 200.0 8.0 140.00 .30 112 106 101 250.0 8.0 130.00 .00 113 106 107 997.0 8.0 140.00 .90 114-PU 107 108 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 115-XXPU 107 109 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 116-XXPU 107 110 10.0 6.0 140.00 .00 117-RV 108 ill 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 118-RV 109 ill 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 119 110 ill 10.0 6.0 140.00 .00 120 ill 112 1400.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 121-FG 108 0 10000.0 1.0 100.00 .00 1800.00 122-FG 109 0 10000.0 1.0 100.00 .00 3000.00 123-XXFG 58 0 20.0 6.0 100.00 .00 194.20 124 113 77 580.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 125 113 114 581.0 8.0 140.00 .50 126 114 58 465.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 127 114 115 393.0 8.0 140.00 .50 128 115 116 372.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 129 116 77 328.0 8.0 140.00 .50 130-XXPU 0 117 350.0 6.0 120.00 1.00 90.00 131-FG 117 0 500.0 16.0 140.00 2.00 569.90 132 117 118 700.0 12.0 140.00 2.00 2012-2 Anaysis Output Page 3 of 125 BELFAIR WQTER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS WADDED CONNECTIONS 133 117 119 3600.0 12.0 140.00 3.00 134 119 120 5.0 12.0 140.00 1.00 135-RV 120 122 5.0 12.0 140.00 1.00 136 119 121 5.0 3.0 100.00 1.00 137-RV 121 122 5.0 3.0 100.00 1.00 138 122 105 440.0 12.0 140.00 2.00 139 118 123 102.0 16.0 140.00 .00 140. 123 124 760.0 16.0 140.00 .00 141 124 125 12.0 16.0 140.00 .00 142 125 126 839.0 16.0 140.00 .00 143 126 127 555.0 16.0 140.00 .00 144 127 128 1828.0 16.0 140.00 .00 145 124 129 700.0 8.0 140.00 .00 146 19 130 2025.0 8.0 140.00 .00 P U M P D A T A THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 36 - USEFUL POWER = .25 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 78 - USEFUL POWER = 1.00 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 95 - USEFUL POWER = 8.90 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 97 - USEFUL POWER = 8.10 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 105 - USEFUL POWER = 23.90 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 114 - USEFUL POWER = 2.70 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 115 - USEFUL POWER = 5.40 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 116 - USEFUL POWER = 41.00 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 130 - USEFUL POWER = 73.00 J U N C T I O N N O D E D A T A *** GEOMETRIC VERIFICATION (*3*) SUCCESSFUL *** JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL JUNCTION NUMBER TITLE DEMAND ELEVATION CONNECTING PIPES -------------------------------- --------- -- ------------------------------- 1 .97 144.00 1 50 95 100 2 1.22 142.00 1 2 3 1.22 140.00 2 3 4 .97 132.00 3 4 5 1.22 130.00 4 5 40 6 1.22 130.00 5 6 7 1.46 130.00 6 7 8 .97 118.00 7 8 26 9 .00 118.00 8 9 102 10 2.19 124.00 9 10 11 .49 122.00 10 11 48 12 .97 135.00 11 12 13 1.46 200.00 12 13 22 14 1.46 220.00 13 14 15 1.46 140.00 14 15 16 1.94 140.00 15 16 17 2.43 144.00 16 17 18 .00 144.00 17 18 19 .00 145.00 18 19 146 20 .97 145.00 19 20 21 2.43 150.00 20 21 22 1.70 150.00 21 2012-2 Anaysis Output Page 4 of 125 BELFAIR WQTER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS WADDED CONNECTIONS 23 .00 220.00 22 23 24 .00 160.00 23 24 25 .00 290.00 24 25 26 .00 290.00 25 27 .49 180.00 26 27 28 .49 220.00 27 28 29 .49 250.00 28 29 30 .49 270.00 29 30 31 .49 280.00 30 31 32 .24 330.00 31 32 33 .00 355.00 32 33 34 .00 355.00 33 34 36 35 .00 355.00 37 103 36 .97 355.00 37 38 37 .97 365.00 38 39 38 .97 365.00 39 39 .24 180.00 40 41 40 .49 210.00 41 42 46 41 .24 265.00 42 43 42 .49 280.00 43 44 47 43 1.22 285.00 44 45 101 44 .73 282.00 45 45 .00 200.00 46 46 .49 200.00 47 47 .24 200.00 48 49 48 .49 220.00 49 49 1.94 144.00 50 51 50 2.92 148.00 51 52 51 3.65 155.00 52 53 55 52 2.43 124.00 53 54 53 2.43 115.00 54 54 2.92 140.00 56 107 55 2.43 144.00 56 57 58 56 1.94 125.00 57 57 2.43 150.00 58 59 70 58 4.86 148.00 59 60 63 123 126 59 4.86 150.00 60 61 66 60 2.43 145.00 61 62 67 61 2.43 145.00 62 62 1.94 146.00 63 64 63 1.94 135.00 64 65 64 1.46 125.00 65 65 1.22 150.00 66 66 .97 140.00 67 68 67 .97 140.00 68 69 68 .97 140.00 69 69 1.94 150.00 70 71 70 2.19 151.00 71 72 71 1.46 152.00 72 73 72 1.94 153.00 73 74 73 1.94 155.00 74 75 77 74 2.67 154.00 75 76 75 3.16 154.00 76 76 2.43 160.00 77 78 80 77 1.94 195.00 79 124 129 78 2.92 215.00 79 79 1.94 160.00 80 81 85 91 80 3.40 195.00 81 82 81 .49 225.00 82 83 98 82 4.86 240.00 83 84 110 83 2.43 225.00 84 84 .00 240.00 85 86 2012-2 Anaysis Output Page 5 of 125 BELFAIR WQTER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS WADDED CONNECTIONS 85 .00 270.00 86 87 86 .00 320.00 87 88 87 .00 355.00 88 89 88 1.94 158.00 91 92 89 1.94 153.00 92 93 90 1.94 150.00 93 94 91 1.94 140.00 94 92 .00 136.00 96 97 93 .00 136.00 97 99 94 .00 136.00 99 100 95 .97 245.00 101 96 1.22 115.00 102 106 97 .00 355.00 34 35 98 .00 355.00 89 90 99 .00 355.00 36 103 104 100 .00 135.00 105 106 101 4.86 145.00 107 108 112 102 5.10 145.00 108 109 103 2.43 140.00 109 104 2.43 250.00 98 111 105 .49 265.00 110 111 138 106 2.43 157.00 55 112 113 107 .00 310.00 113 114 115 116 108 .00 310.00 114 117 121 109 .00 310.00 115 118 122 110 .00 310.00 116 119 111 .00 310.00 117 118 119 120 112 53.00 425.00 120 113 1.94 160.00 78 124 125 114 1.94 158.00 125 126 127 115 1.94 160.00 127 128 116 1.94 166.00 128 129 117 .00 440.00 130 131 132 133 118 .24 420.00 132 139 119 .00 300.00 133 134 136 120 .00 300.00 134 135 121 .00 300.00 136 137 122 .00 300.00 135 137 138 123 3.00 400.00 139 140 124 6.00 400.00 140 141 145 125 6.00 400.00 141 142 126 2.00 400.00 142 143 127 3.00 400.00 143 144 128 10.00 400.00 144 129 20.00 400.00 145 130 .00 150.00 146 O U T P U T O P T I O N D A T A OUTPUT SELECTION: THE FOLLOWING RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT ALL CLOSED PIPES ARE NOTED ALL PIPES WITH PUMPS FOLLOWING PIPES 8 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 102 105 106 FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES 22 34 87 61 57 38 112 MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM PRESSURES 10 2012-2 Anaysis Output Page 6 of 125 BELFAIR WQTER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS WADDED CONNECTIONS E P S D A T A TOTAL TIME FOR SIMULATION = 24.000 NORMAL TIME PERIOD = 1.000 VARIABLE HEAD TANK DATA TANK PIPE MAXIMUM MINIMUM TANK INITIAL EXTERNAL NUMBER NUMBER ELEVATION ELEVATION CAPACITY VOLUME FLOW (*) (ft) (ft) (gal) (gal) (gpm) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1-1 35 372.00 356.00 127311. 126913. .00 2-1 90 372.00 356.00 127311. 126913. .00 3-1 104 476.00 356.00 2820. 2619. .00 4-1 131 578.00 458.50 1123410. 1047263. .00 * TANK TYPE: 1 - CONSTANT DIAMETER 2 - VARIABLE AREA F L O W M E T E R S U M M A R Y THE FOLLOWING PIPES CONTAIN FLOW METERS: 99 106 95 130 P R E S S U R E S W I T C H D A T A REFERENCE REFERENCE SWITCHING PIPE NODE GRADES (ft) ---------------------------------------------- 97 87 371.00 & 372.00 36 35 436.00 & 476.00 105 87 370.00 & 372.00 115 112 568.00 & 570.00 130 117 565.00 & 570.00 S Y S T E M C O N F I G U R A T I O N NUMBER OF PIPES . .... . . .. .... .. .. . . (P) = 146 NUMBER OF JUNCTION NODES .... .. .. .. (j) = 130 NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS . . ... .. .. .. (1) = 6 NUMBER OF FIXED GRADE NODES . ...... (f) = 11 NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES .. . ... .... .. W = 1 2012-2 Anaysis Output Page 7 of 125 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS WADDED CONNECTIONS D A T A C H A N G E S F O R N E X T S I M U L A T I O N D E M A N D C H A N G E S DEMAND TYPE = 1 - GDF = 3.370 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ S I M U L A T I O N R E S U L T S +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ TIME FROM INITIATION OF EPS = 14.0000 HOURS THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 7 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00397 S I M U L A T I O N D E S C R I P T I O N (L A B E L) Peak Hour usage from 7:00 pm to 8:00 pm. P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TK -STORAGE TANK PIPE NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/ NUMBER #1 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELO. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 8 9 -215.58 .10 .00 .00 1.38 .82 26 8 27 22.61 .01 .00 .00 .14 .01 27 27 28 20.96 .00 .00 .00 .13 .01 28 28 29 19.31 .00 .00 .00 .12 .01 29 29 30 17.66 .00 .00 .00 .11 .01 30 30 31 16.00 .00 .00 .00 .10 .01 31 31 32 14.35 .00 .00 .00 .09 .01 32 32 33 13.54 .00 .00 .00 .09 .00 33 33 34 13.54 .00 .00 .00 .09 .00 34 34 97 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 35-XXTK 97 0 36-PU 34 99 13.54 .16 73.02 .00 1.38 3.21 78-PU 76 113 544.49 .25 7.27 .00 3.48 3.99 97-PU 92 93 143.37 .62 223.52 1.31 6.51 62.50 102 9 96 -277.01 2.23 .00 .00 3.14 5.31 105-FGPU 0 100 281.12 6.68 336.35 .00 7.18 39.32 106 100 96 281.12 1.17 .00 .00 3.19 4.19 114-PU 107 108 46.36 .05 230.43 .00 2.10 4.94 115-PU 107 109 106.69 .23 200.23 .00 4.84 23.13 130-FGPU 0 117 594.32 8.86 485.94 .71 6.74 25.33 FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED 95 116 123 135 Out Put Pa a 77 of 125 2012-2 Anays�s P 9 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS WADDED CONNECTIONS J U N C T I O N N O D E R E S U L T S JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC JUNCTION PRESSURE JUNCTION NUMBER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22 5.73 378.93 150.00 228.93 99.20 34 .00 379.13 355.00 24.13 10.46 38 3.27 451.97 365.00 86.97 37.69 57 8.19 371.22 150.00 221.22 95.86 61 8.19 372.77 145.00 227.77 98.70 87 .00 369.15 355.00 14.15 6.13 112 178.61 567.74 425.00 142.74 61.85 MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VALUES P R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES (psi) (psi) --------------------- --------------------- 96 115.48 87 6.13 119 115.35 98 6.13 120 115.35 92 8.61 121 114.93 34 10.46 9 113.21 97 10.46 8 113.17 33 10.46 53 112.18 107 11.91 109 112.11 86 21.27 110 112.00 32 21.29 ill 112.00 122 29.91 R E G U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH TYPE NODE PIPE SETTING STATUS GRADE GRADE FLOW (ft or gpm) (ft) (ft) (gpm) ----------------------------------- PRV-1 108 117 570.00 WIDE OPEN 567.87• 568.46 56.82 PRV-1 109 118 570.00 WIDE OPEN 568.72 568.46 121.79 PRV-1 120 135 369.00 CLOSED 566.20 369.02 .00 PRV-1 121 137 370.00 THROTTLED 565.22 369.02 139.81 2012-2 Anaysis Output Page 78 of 125 i BELFAIR WQTER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS WADDED CONNECTIONS S U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S (+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES (-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES PIPE FLOWRATE NUMBER (gpm) -------------------- 90 115.78 96 143.37 104 -3.74 105 281.12 121 10.46 122 15.10 130 594.32 131 -285.20 NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 1160.15 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = -288.94 NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 871.21 T A N K S T A T U S R E P O R T (time = 14.0000 hours) TANK PIPE NET WATER TANK TANK TANK TANK PROJECTED NUMBER NUMBER FLOW ELEVATION DEPTH VOLUME VOLUME STATUS DEPTH {*) (gpm) (ft) (ft) (gal) (%) (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-1 35 .00 372.00 16.00 127311. 100.0 FULL 16.00 2-1 90 -115.78 369.17 13.17 104790. 82.3 DRAINING 12.30 3-1 104 3.74 452.00 96.00 2256. 80.0 FILLING 105.54 4-1 131 285.20 566.34 107.84 1013836. 90.2 FILLING 109.66 * TANK TYPE: 1 - CONSTANT DIAMETER 2 - VARIABLE AREA F L O W M E T E R R E P O R T (time = 14.0000 hours) PIPE NODE METERED NUMBER NUMBERS FLOW #1 #2 (gal) ---------------------------------------- 99 93 94 81107. 106 100 96 64874. 95 0 1 0. 130 0 117 35794. 2012-2 Anaysis Output Page 79 of 125 BELFAIR WQTER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS WADDED CONNECTIONS S I M. 0 L A T I O N R E S U L T S TIME FROM INITIATION OF BPS = 24.0000 HOURS THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 2 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00376 P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TK -STORAGE TANK PIPE NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/ NUMBER #1 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELD. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ---- --------- ------ -------- 8 8 9 3.31 .00 .00 .00 .02 .00 26 8 27 10.64 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 27 27 28 10.56 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 28 28 29 10.47 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 29 29 30 10.39 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 30 30 31 10.31 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 31 31 32 10.22 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 32 32 33 10.18 .00 .00 .00 .06 .00 33 33 34 10.18 .00 .00 .00 .06 .00 34 34 97 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 35-XXTK 97 0 36-PU 34 99 10.18 .09 97.14 .00 1.04 1.89 78-PU 76 113 492.02 .21 8.04 .00 3.14 3.31 102 9 96 .21 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 105-XXPU 0 100 106 100 96 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 114-PU 107 108 7.05 .00 1515.32 .00 .32 .15 115-PU 107 109 7.73 .00 2764.42 .00 .35 .18 FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED : 95 97 116 123 130 135 137 J U N C T I O N N O D E R E S U L T S JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC JUNCTION PRESSURE JUNCTION NUMBER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpn) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22 .29 374.58 150.00 224.58 97.32 34 .00 374.57 355.00 19.57 8.48 38 .16 471.23 365.00 106.23 46.03 57 .41 374.70 150.00 224.70 97.37 61 .41 376.93 145.00 231.93 100.50 87 .00 371.75 355.00 16.75 7.26 112 9.01 570.00 425.00 145.00 62.83 2012-2 Anaysis Output Page 123 of 125 BELFAIR WQTER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS WADDED CONNECTIONS MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VALUES P R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES (psi) (psi) --------------------- --------------------- 109 1225.93 87 7.26 108 684.65 98 7.26 121 115.86 34 8.48 119 115.86 97 8.48 120 115.86 33 8.48 110 112.67 92 9.97 111 112.67 32 19.31 53 112.50 86 22.42 96 112.48 107 28.01 8 111.18 122 31.05 REGULATING VALVE REPORT VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH TYPE NODE PIPE SETTING STATUS GRADE GRADE FLOW (ft or gpm) (ft) (ft) (gpm) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRV-1 108 117 570.00 THROTTLED 1889.96 570.00 4.50 PRV-1 109 118 570.00 THROTTLED 3139.06 570.00 4.51 PRV-1 120 135 369.00 CLOSED 567.38 371.65 .00 PRV-1 121 137 370.00 CLOSED 567.38 371.65 .00 S U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S (+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES (-J OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES PIPE FLOWRATE NUMBER (gpm) -------------------- 90 50.86 96 .00 104 -9.69 121 -2.55 122 -3.22 131 8.54 NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 59.40 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = -15.45 NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 43.95 2012-2 Anaysis Output Page 124 of 125 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS WADDED CONNECTIONS T A N K S T A T U S R E P 0 R T (time = 24.0000 hours) TANK PIPE NET WATER TANK TANK TANK TANK PROJECTED NUMBER NUMBER FLOW ELEVATION DEPTH VOLUME VOLUME STATUS DEPTH (*) (gPm) (ft) (ft) (gal) (%) (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-1 35 .00 372.00 16.00 127311. 100.0 FULL 16.00 2-1 90 -50.86 371.75 15.75 125324. 98.4 DRAINING 15.68 3-1 104 9.69 471.23 115.23 2708. 96.0 FILLING 120.00 4-1 131 -8.54 567.38 108.88 1023548. 91.1 DRAINING 108.87 * TANK TYPE: 1 - CONSTANT DIAMETER 2 - VARIABLE AREA F L O W M E T E R R E P O R T (time = 24.0000 hours) PIPE NODE METERED NUMBER NUMBERS FLOW #1 #2 (gal) ---------------------------------------- 99 93 94 132133. 106 100 96 142296. 95 0 1 0. 130 0 117 101422. **** KYPIPE SIMULATION COMPLETED **** DATE: 3/10/2007 TIME: 12: 0:11 2012-2 Anaysis Output Page 125 of 125 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING PERIOD COMPUTER ANALYSIS 7 7 8 860.0 8.0 130.00 .00 8 8 9 120.0 8.0 130.00 .00 9 9 10 660.0 8.0 130.00 .00 10 10 11 660.0 8.0 130.00 .00 11 11 12 1880.0 8.0 130.00 .00 12 12 13 440.0 8.0 130.00 .00 13 13 14 800.0 8.0 130.00 .00 14 14 15 320.0 8.0 130.00 .00 15 15 16 2020.0 8.0 130.00 .00 16 16 17 760.0 8.0 130.00 .00 17 17 18 60.0 8.0 150.00 .00 18 18 19 630.0 8.0 150.00 .00 19 19 20 60.0 8.0 150.00 .00 20 20 21 420.0 8.0 130.00 .00 21 21 22 440.0 8.0 130.00 .00 22 13 23 280.0 6.0 150.00 .00 23 23 24 340.0 4.0 150.00 .00 24 24 25 300.0 4.0 150.00 .00 25 25 26 500.0 4.0 150.00 .00 26 8 27 540.0 8.0 130.00 .00 27 27 28 360.0 8.0 130.00 .00 28 28 29 380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 29 29 30 300.0 8.0 130.00 .00 30 30 31 180.0 8.0 130.00 .00 31 31 32 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 32 32 33 520.0 8.0 130.00 .00 33 33 34 50.0 8.0 130.00 .00 34 34 97 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 35-FG 97 0 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 371.95 36-XXPU 34 99 50.0 2.0 150.00 .00 37 35 36 200.0 6.0 150.00 .00 38 36 37 .300.0 6.0 150.00 .00 39 37 38 100.0 6.0 150.00 .00 40 5 39 500.0 8.0 130.00 .00 41 39 40 500.0 8.0 130.00 .00 42 40 41 820.0 8.0 130.00 .00 43 41 42 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 44 42 43 220.0 8.0 130.00 .00 45 43 44 760.0 8.0 130.00 .00 46 40 45 350.0 6.0 130.00 .00 47 42 46 200.0 4.0 150.00 .00 48 11 47 400.0 3.0 150.00 .00 49 47 48 100.0 3.0 150.00 .00 50 1 49 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 51 49 50 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 52 50 51 1400.0 8.0 130.00 .00 53 51 52 600.0 6.0 150.00 .00 54 52 53 450.0 4.0 150.00 .00 55 51 106 2530.0 8.0 130.00 .00 56 54 55 440.0 8.0 130.00 .00 57 55 56 750.0 4.0 130.00 .00 58 55 57 520.0 8.0 130.00 .00 59 57 58 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 60 58 59 2880.0 8.0 130.00 .00 61 59 60 700.0 8.0 130.00 .00 62 60 61 380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 63 58 62 380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 64 62 63 540.0 8.0 130.00 .00 65 63 64 560.0 8.0 130.00 .00 66 59 65 250.0 4.0 150.00 .00 67 60 66 380.0 6.0 150.00 .00 68 66 67 300.0 2.0 150.00 .00 20123 Ma sis�� Page 2of 135 Y BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING PERIOD COMPUTER ANALYSIS * * * * * * * * * * K Y P I P E 2 * University of Kentucky Hydraulic Analysis Program * Distribution of Pressure and Flows in Piping Networks * 1000 PIPE VERSION - 1.20 (05/12/93) DATE: 3/11/2007 TIME: 15:26:21 INPUT DATA FILENAME -------------- c:\kypipe2\data\2012-3.DAT TABULATED OUTPUT FILENAME -------- c:\kypipe2\data\2012-3.OUT POSTPROCESSOR RESULTS FILENAME --- c:\kypipe2\data\2012-3.RES ************************************************ S U M M A R Y O F O R I G I N A L D A T A ************************************************ U N I T S S P E C I F I E D FLOWRATE . .. ......... = gallons/minute HEAD (HGL) . .. .. . . ... = feet PRESSURE . .. .. .. ..... = psig METERED FLOW . .. .. ... = gallons REGULATING VALVE DATA VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE TYPE JUNCTION PIPE SETTING (ft or gpm) -------------------------------------------- PRV-1 108 117 570.00 PRV-1 109 118 570.00 PRV-1 120 135 368.00 PRV-1 121 137 370.00 PRV-1 134 151 368.00 PRV-1 135 153 370.00 P I P E L I N E D A T A STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE PIPE NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS FGN-HGL NUMBER #1 #2 (ft) (in) COEFF. COEFF. (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 2 560.0 8.0 130.00 .00 2 2 3 1380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 3 3 4 190.0 8.0 130.00 .00 4 4 5 200.0 8.0 130.00 .00 5 5 6 200.0 8.0 130.00 .00 6 6 7 200.0 8.0 130.00 .00 2012-3 Anaysis Output Page 1 of 135 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING PERIOD COMPUTER ANALYSIS 69 67 68 160.0 2.0 150.00 .00 70 57 69 60.0 8.0 130.00 .00 71 69 70 120.0 8.0 130.00 .00 72 70 71 330.0 8.0 150.00 .00 73 71 72 80.0 8.0 130.00 .00 74 72 73 300.0 8.0 130.00 .00 75 73 74 120.0 8.0 130.00 .00 76 74 75 270.0 8.0 130.00 .00 77 73 76 150.0 8.0 130.00 .00 78-PU 76 113 63.0 8.0 140.00 .00 79 77 78 400.0 8.0 140.00 .00 80 76 79 60.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 81 79 80 600.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 82 80 81 570.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 83 81 82 170.0 8.0 130.00 1.50 84 82 83 150.0 8.0 130.00 .00 85 79 84 700.0 8.0 130.00 .00 86 84 85 340.0 8.0 130.00 .00 87 85 86 360.0 8.0 130.00 .00 88 86 87 300.0 8.0 130.00 .00 89 87 98 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 90-FG 98 0 50.0 8.0 130.00 .00 371.95 91 79 88 350.0 6.0 130.00 .00 92 88 89 400.0 6.0 130.00 .00 93 89 90 350.0 6.0 130.00 .00 94 90 91 420.0 6.0 130.00 .00 95-XXPU 0 1 120.0 4.0 140.00 2.00 96.00 96-FGCV 0 92 8.0 3.0 110.00 4.00 159.00 97-XXPU 92 93 10.0 3.0 110.00 2.00 98 81 104 350.0 8.0 140.00 .30 99 93 94 8.0 4.0 150.00 .00 100 94 1 100.0 8.0 130.00 .00 101 43 95 400.0 4.0 130.00 .00 102 9 96 420.0 6.0 130.00 .00 103 99 35 15.0 2.0 150.00 .00 104-FG 0 99 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 475.95 105-XXPU 0 100 170.0 4.0 130.00 .00 53.00 106 100 96 280.0 6.0 150.00 .00 107 101 54 840.0 8.0 130.00 .00 108 101 102 53.0 8.0 140.00 .50 109 102 103 530.0 8.0 140.00 .50 110 82 105 350.0 8.0 140.00 .30 ill 104 105 200.0 8.0 140.00 .30 112 106 101 250.0 8.0 130.00 .00 113 106 107 997.0 8.0 140.00 .90 114-PU 107 108 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 115-XXPU 107 109 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 116-XXPU 107 110 10.0 6.0 140.00 .00 117-RV 108 ill 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 118-RV 109 ill 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 119 110 ill 10.0 6.0 140.00 .00 120 111 112 1400.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 121-FG 108 0 10000.0 1.0 100.00 .00 1800.00 122-FG 109 0 10000.0 1.0 100.00 .00 3000.00 123-XXFG 58 0 20.0 6.0 100.00 .00 194.20 124 113 77 580.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 125 113 114 581.0 8.0 140.00 .50 126 114 58 465.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 127 114 115 393.0 8.0 140.00 .50 128 115 116 372.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 129 116 77 328.0 8.0 140.00 .50 130-XXPU 0 117 350.0 6.0 120.00 1.00 90.00 2012-3 Anaysis output Page 3of 135 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING PERIOD COMPUTER ANALYSIS 131-FG 117 0 500.0 16.0 140.00 2.00 577.90 132 117 118 700.0 12.0 140.00 2.00 133 117 119 3600.0 12.0 140.00 3.00 134 119 120 5.0 12.0 140.00 1.00 135-RV 120 122 5.0 12.0 140.00 1.00 136 119 121 5.0 3.0 100.00 1.00 137-RV 121 122 5.0 3.0 100.00 1.00 138 122 105 440.0 12.0 140.00 2.00 139 118 123 102.0 16.0 140.00 .00 140 123 124 760.0 16.0 140.00 .00 141 124 125 12.0 16.0 140.00 .00 142 125 126 839.0 16.0 140.00 .00 143 126 127 555.0 16.0 140.00 .00 144 127 128 1828.0 16.0 140.00 .00 145 124 129 700.0 8.0 140.00 .00 146 19 130 2025.0 8.0 140.00 .00 147 129 131 700.0 8.0 140.00 .00 148 131 132 2000.0 8.0 140.00 .00 149 131 133 800.0 8.0 140.00 .00 150 133 134 5.0 6.0 140.00 .00 151-RV 134 136 5.0 6.0 140.00 .00 152 133 135 5.0 2.0 110.00 .00 153-RV 135 136 2.0 2.0 110.00 .00 154 136 137 500.0 8.0 140.�00 .00 155 137 138 600.0 8.0 140.00 .00 156 137 59 800.0 8.0 140.00 .00 P U M P D A T A THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 36 - USEFUL POWER = .25 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 78 - USEFUL POWER = 1.00 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 95 - USEFUL POWER = 8.90 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 97 - USEFUL POWER = 8.10 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 105 - USEFUL POWER = 23.90 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 114 - USEFUL POWER = 2.70 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 115 - USEFUL POWER = 5.40 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 116 - USEFUL POWER = 41.00 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 130 - USEFUL POWER = 73.00 J U N C T I O N N O D E D A T A *** GEOMETRIC VERIFICATION (*3*) SUCCESSFUL *** JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL JUNCTION NUMBER TITLE DEMAND ELEVATION CONNECTING PIPES (gpm) (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 .97 144.00 1 50 95 100 2 1.22 142.00 1 2 3 1.22 140.00 2 3 4 .97 132.00 3 4 5 1.22 130.00 4 5 40 6 1.22 130.00 5 6 7 1.46 130.00 6 7 8 .97 118.00 7 8 26 9 .00 118.00 8 9 102 10 2.19 124.00 9 10 2012-3 Anaysis OuW Page 4of 135 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING PERIOD COMPUTER ANALYSIS 11 .49 122.00 10 11 48 12 .97 135.00 11 12 13 1.46 200.00 12 13 22 14 1.46 220.00 13 14 15 1.46 140.00 14 15 16 1.94 140.00 15 16 17 2.43 144.00 16 17 18 .00 144.00 17 18 19 .00 145.00 18 19 146 20 .97 145.00 19 20 21 2.43 150.00 20 21 22 1.70 150.00 21 23 .00 220.00 22 23 24 .00 160.00 23 24 25 .00 290.00 24 25 26 .00 290.00 25 27 .49 180.00 26 27 28 .49 220.00 27 28 29 .49 250.00 28 29 30 .49 270.00 29 30 31 .49 280.00 30 31 32 .24 330.00 31 32 33 .00 355.00 32 33 34 .00 355.00 33 34 36 35 .00 355.00 37 103 36 .97 355.00 37 38 37 .97 365.00 38 39 38 .97 365.00 39 39 .24 180.00 40 41 40 .49 210.00 41 42 46 41 .24 265.00 42 43 . 42 .49 280.00 43 44 47 43 1.22 285.00 44 45 101 44 .73 282.00 45 45 .00 200.00 46 46 .49 200.00 47 47 .24 200.00 48 49 48 .49 220.00 49 49 1.94 144.00 50 51 50 2.92 148.00 51 52 51 3.65 155.00 52 53 55 52 2.43 124.00 53 54 53 2.43 115.00 54 54 2.92 140.00 56 107 55 2.43 144.00 56 57 58 56 1.94 125.00 57 57 2.43 150.00 58 59 70 58 4.86 148.00 59 60 63 123 126 59 4.86 150.00 60 61 66 156 60 2.43 145.00 61 62 67 61 2.43 145.00 62 62 1.94 146.00 63 64 63 1.94 135.00 64 65 64 1.46 125.00 65 65 1.22 150.00 66 66 .97 140.00 67 68 67 .97 140.00 68 69 68 .97 140.00 69 69 1.94 150.00 70 71 70 2.19 151.00 71 72 71 1.46 152.00 72 73 72 1.94 153.00 73 74 2012-3 Anaysis Output Page 5of 135 J N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N W W W W WNNNNNNNNNNrrrrrrrrrrOOOOOOOOOO101010tiOlOtOtOtfliOlOmmmmm . w N)m JJJJJJ Nr010 mJ mto .A W Nr O10m J01 In .P WNr01Dm J01 �n .a WNrOl0mJ01 Ui .AW Nr 010mJ01 Cn p. W NF-+ OlDmJ01 Cn .p W a W r cn W rn Cn r r r r r r r N r r r r W N N N cn A r rrrr N A WrNr N W N r OO (nON .A 10 T .ANN OOOOONr 10101010OOOOOO .O. .A .P .prmO000N10OOO10101010OOOO .P m .C. .G l01010 .o. r O\ 10 x N OO 10ON0 C. - (n N N N 0 O O O O .p (n .A .p .p .AOOOOOO W t0 W W OO� OOOONJOOO .A .A .A .AOOOO W 0110 O .ta N .A W 10 fD CAD �, ml (� N N W W f.+ ,p .p ,p ,A .A .fa .p W W W W .A .A r r r r .A W W W W W r N N r r r r W W W r N r r r r r r r W W N N N N N r r N r r r r r Z U1 OOOOtnOOOOOOOOO O O Na0101 cn 01Nrrrrrtn 0l Cn .a .P .PW Ncn cnra W W Warn cn to CnNJ .0 N .aNlprnr10 O1 cn to cn Dzp OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0001OmO (nOOOOOJ (nOOCn (nlnNtn (n (nCn010101O0 W m (nOOOClnOCn (nO (nCnO .A . 0 ZZN 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 <.0 (Arn0 zZ mm mJJJJ n O W W W rr rr r n r mOp O OOWOmO Or 10W 00 GmJmoW Nr00Cn 01 " WN Om JCnmOJ woo JpNJ J r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r rrrr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r W WNNNN rrrrrrrr OOOOl0WO 01010 10 ,010mmmm mmmm NJ JJ rO m J .� W NrOJJCn .t+ lprl0mdt .P m10mJ .DNrr 10m01woom O10J .A W N1pmJOl .p W Nr .Am O1cn r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r (n A. r10 OD OD J N l0 Cn m 01 N J cn 1p N r (n W C. .p O m Cn t0 O J r r r W N r 1-0 W O M r BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING PERIOD COMPUTER ANALYSIS 135 .00 200.00 152 ' 153 136 .00 200.00 151 153 154 137 .00 150.00 154 155 156 138 5.59 150.00 155 O U T P U T O P T I O N D A T A OUTPUT SELECTION: THE FOLLOWING RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT ALL CLOSED PIPES ARE NOTED ALL PIPES WITH PUMPS FOLLOWING PIPES 8 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 102 105 106 FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES 22 34 87 61 57 38 112 MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM PRESSURES = 10 E P S D A T A TOTAL TIME FOR SIMULATION = 24.000 NORMAL TIME PERIOD = 1.000 VARIABLE HEAD TANK DATA TANK PIPE MAXIMUM MINIMUM TANK INITIAL EXTERNAL NUMBER NUMBER ELEVATION ELEVATION CAPACITY VOLUME FLOW (*) (ft) (ft) (gal) (gal) (gpm) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1-1 35 372.00 356.00 127311. 126913. .00 2-1 90 372.00 356.00 127311. 126913. .00 3-1 104 476.00 356.00 2820. 2819. .00 4-1 131 578.00 458.50 1123410. 1122471. .00 * TANK TYPE: 1 - CONSTANT DIAMETER 2 - VARIABLE AREA F L O W M E T E R S U M M A R Y THE FOLLOWING PIPES CONTAIN FLOW METERS: 99 106 95 130 P R E S S U R E S W I T C H D A T A REFERENCE REFERENCE SWITCHING PIPE NODE GRADES (ft) ---------------------------------------------- 97 87 371.00 & 372.00 36 35 436.00 & 476.00 105 87 370.00 & 372.00 115 112 568.00 & 570.00 130 117 570.00 & 578.00 2012-3 Anaysis Output Page 7of 135 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING PERIOD COMPUTER ANALYSIS S Y S T E M C O N F I G U R A T I O N NUMBER OF PIPES . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . (P) = 156 NUMBER OF JUNCTION NODES .. . . . . . . . . (j) = 138 NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS . .. . . . . . . . . (1) = 8 NUMBER OF FIXED GRADE NODES . . . . . . . (f) = 11 NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES . . . . . . . . . . . . (z) = 1 2012-3 Anaysis Output Page 8of 135 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING PERIOD COMPUTER ANALYSIS D A T A C H A N G E S F O R N E X T S I M U L A T I O N D E M A N D C H A N G E S DEMAND TYPE = 1 - GDF = 3.000 S I M U L A T I O N R E S U L T S TIME FROM INITIATION OF EPS = 14.0000 HOURS THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 6 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00425 S I M U L A T I O N D E S C R I P T I O N (L A B E L) Peak Hour usage from 7:00 pm to 8:00 pm. P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TK -STORAGE TANK PIPE NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/ NUMBER #1 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELO. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 8 9 -217.57 .10 .00 .00 1.39 .84 26 8 27 19.77 .01 .00 .00 .13 .01 27 27 28 18.30 .00 .00 .00 .12 .01 28 28 29 16.83 .00 .00 .00 .11 .01 29 29 30 15.36 .00 .00 .00 .10 .01 30 30 31 13.89 .00 .00 .00 .09 .01 31 31 32 12.42 .00 .00 .00 .08 .00 32 32 33 11.70 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 33 33 34 11.70 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 34 34 97 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 35-XXTK 97 0 36-PU 34 99 11.70 .12 84.56 .00 1.19 2.44 78-PU 76 113 532.72 .24 7.43 .00 3.40 3.83 97-PU 92 93 142.28 .62 225.24 1.29 6.46 61.62 102 9 96 -275.92 2.21 .00 .00 3.13 5.27 105-FGPU 0 100 279.58 6.62 338.20 .00 7.14 38.92 106 100 96 279.58 1.16 .00 .00 3.17 4.15 114-PU 107 108 45.94 .05 232.54 .00 2.08 4.86 115-PU 107 109 87.65 .16 243.73 .00 3.98 16.07 FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED : 95 116 123 130 135 151 153 2012-3 Anaysis Output Page 83of 135 1 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING PERIOD COMPUTER ANALYSIS J U N C T I O N N O D E R E S U L T S JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC JUNCTION PRESSURE JUNCTION NUMBER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22 5.10 380.90 150.00 230.90 100.06 34 .00 381.09 355.00 26.09 11.31 38 2.91 465.50 365.00 100.50 43.55 57 7.29 372.31 150.00 222.31 96.34 61 7.29 373.69 145.00 228.69 99.10 87 .00 369.79 355.00 14.79 6.41 112 159.00 569.20 425.00 144.20 62.49 MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VALUES P R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES (psi) (psi) --------------------- --------------------- 133 162.06 87 6.41 134 162.06 98 6.41 135 162.06 92 8.63 109 130.49 34 11.31 131 118.73 97 11.31 132 118.73 33 11.31 119 118.70 107 11.74 120 118.70 86 21.55 121 118.50 32 22.14 96 116.32 122 30.13 R E G U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH TYPE NODE PIPE SETTING STATUS GRADE GRADE FLOW (ft or gpm) (ft) (ft) (gpm) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRV-1 108 117 570.00 WIDE OPEN 569.59 569.78 56.39 PRV-1 109 118 570.00 THROTTLED 611.12 569.78 102.61 PRV-1 120 135 368.00 CLOSED 573.93 369.54 .00 PRV-1 121 137 370.00 THROTTLED 573.47 369.54 94.87 PRV-1 134 151 368.00 CLOSED 574.00 373.69 .00 PRV-1 135 153 370.00 CLOSED 574.00 373.69 .00 2012.3 Anaysis Output Page 84of 135 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING PERIOD COMPUTER ANALYSIS S U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S (+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES (-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES PIPE FLOWRATE NUMBER (gpm) -------------------- 90 106.10 96 142.28 104 -2.97 105 279.58 121 10.45 122 14.96 131 174.37 NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 727.74 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = -2.97 NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 724.77 T A N K S T A T U S R E P O R T (time = 14.0000 hours) TANK PIPE NET WATER TANK TANK TANK TANK PROJECTED NUMBER NUMBER FLOW ELEVATION DEPTH VOLUME VOLUME STATUS DEPTH (*) (gpm) (ft) (ft) (gal) (%) (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-1 35 .00 372.00 16.00 127311. 100.0 FULL 16.00 2-1 90 -106.10 369.81 13.81 109669. 86.3 DRAINING 13.01 3-1 104 2.97 465.53 109.53 2574. 91.3 FILLING 117.10 4-1 131 -174.37 574.02 115.52 1086023. 96.7 DRAINING 114.41 * TANK TYPE: 1 - CONSTANT DIAMETER 2 - VARIABLE AREA F L O W M E T E R R E P O R T (time = 14.0000 hours) PIPE NODE METERED NUMBER NUMBERS FLOW #1 #2 (gal) ------99-------93----94 80342. -------- -- 106 100 96 63215. 95 0 1 0. 130 0 117 0. 2012-3 Anaysis Output Page 85of 135 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING PERIOD COMPUTER ANALYSIS +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ S I M U L A T I O N R E S U L T S TIME FROM INITIATION OF EPS = 24.0000 HOURS THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 1 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00000 P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TK -STORAGE TANK PIPE NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/ NUMBER #1 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELO. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/5) (ft/ft) ------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- 8 8 9 3.10 .00 .00 .00 .02 .00 26 8 27 .40 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 27 27 28 .33 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 28 28 29 .26 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 29 29 30 .18 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 30 30 31 .11 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 31 31 32 .04 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 32 32 33 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 33 33 34 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 34 34 97 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 35-XXTK 97 0 78-PU 76 113 488.88 .21 8.09 .00 3.12 3.27 102 9 96 .18 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 105-XXPU 0 100 106 100 96 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 114-PU 107 108 6.91 .00 1545.09 .00 .31 .15 115-PU 107 109 7.64 .00 2798.06 .00 .35 .18 FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL, PIPES ARE CLOSED 36 95 97 116 123 130 135 137 151 153 J U N C T I O N N 0 D E R E S U L T S JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC JUNCTION PRESSURE JUNCTION NUMBER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22 .26 374.90 150.00 224.90 97.46 34 .00 374.90 355.00 19.90 8.62 38 .15 471.23 365.00 106.23 46.03 57 .36 374.94 150.00 224.94 97.47 61 .36 377.13 145.00 232.13 100.59 87 .00 371.83 355.00 16.83 7.29 112 7.95 570.00 425.00 145.00 62.83 2012-3 Anaysis Output Page 133of 135 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING PERIOD COMPUTER ANALYSIS MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VALUES P R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES (psi) (psi) --------------------- --------------------- 109 1240.62 87 7.29 108 697.67 98 7.29 133 160.83 33 8.62 134 160.83 34 8.62 135 160.83 97 8.62 119 117.49 92 9.97 120 117.49 32 19.46 121 117.49 86 22.46 131 117.49 107 28.13 132 117.49 122 31.10 R E G U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH TYPE NODE PIPE SETTING STATUS GRADE GRADE FLOW (ft or gpm) (ft) (ft) (gpm) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRV-1 108 117 570.00 THROTTLED 1920.00 570.00 3.94 PRV-1 109 118 570.00 THROTTLED 3172.96 570.00 4.01 PRV-1 120 135 368.00 CLOSED 571.14 371.77 .00 PRV-1 121 137 370.00 CLOSED 571.14 371.77 .00 PRV-1 134 151 368.00 CLOSED 571.14 377.13 .00 PRV-1 135 153 370.00 CLOSED 571.14 377.13 .00 S U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S {+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES (-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES PIPE FLOWRATE NUMBER (gpm) -------------------- 90 38.43 96 .00 104 .44 121 -2.97 122 -3.62 131 3.97 NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 42.84 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = -6.60 NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 36.24 i 2012-3 Anaysis Output Page 134of 135 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO.1 SIX-YEAR PLANNING PERIOD COMPUTER ANALYSIS T A N K S T A T U S R E P O R T (time = 24.0000 hours) TANK PIPE NET WATER TANK TANK TANK TANK PROJECTED NUMBER NUMBER FLOW ELEVATION DEPTH VOLUME VOLUME STATUS DEPTH ---(*,------------(9Pm) (-- (ft) (gal) 35 .00 372.00 16.00 127311. 100.0 FULL 16.00 2-1 90 -38.43 371.83 15.83 125993. 99.0 DRAINING 15.54 3-1 104 -.44 471.23 115.23 2708. 96.0 DRAINING 114.12. 4-1 131 -3.97 571.14 112.64 1058907. 94.3 DRAINING 112.61 * TANK TYPE: 1 - CONSTANT DIAMETER 2 - VARIABLE AREA F L 0 W M E T E R R E P O =R T (time 29.0000 hours) PIPE NODE METERED NUMBER NUMBERS FLOW #1 #2 (gal) ---------------------------------------- 99 93 94 130374. 106 100 96 137984. 95 0 1 0. 130 0 117 0. **** KYPIPE SIMULATION COMPLETED **** DATE: 3/11/2007 TIME: 15:26:22 2012-3 Anaysis Output Page 135of 135 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 20-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS * * * * * * * * * * K Y P I P E 2 * University of Kentucky Hydraulic Analysis Program * Distribution of Pressure and Flows in Piping Networks * 1000 PIPE VERSION - 1.20 (05/12/93) DATE: 6/ 6/2007 TIME: 11:18:53 INPUT DATA FILENAME -------------- c:\kypipe2\data\2026-3A.DAT TABULATED OUTPUT FILENAME -------- c:\kypipe2\data\2026-3A.OUT POSTPROCESSOR RESULTS FILENAME --- c:\kypipe2\data\2026-3A.RES ************************************************ S U M M A R Y O F O R I G I N A L D A T A ************************************************ U N I T S S P E C I F I E D FLOWRATE . . . . . . . . . . . . = gallons/minute HEAD (HGL) . . . . . . . . . . = feet PRESSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . = psig METERED FLOW . . . . . . . . = gallons R E G U L A T I N G V A L V E D A T A VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE TYPE JUNCTION PIPE SETTING (ft or gpm) -------------------------------------------- PRV-1 108 117 570.00 PRV-1 109 118 570.00 PRV-1 120 135 368.00 PRV-1 121 137 370.00 PRV-1 134 151 368.00 PRV-1 135 153 370.00 P I P E L I N E D A T A STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE PIPE NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS FGN-HGL NUMBER #1 #2 (ft) (in) COEFF. COEFF. (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 2 560.0 8.0 130.00 .00 2026-3A Analysis Output Page 1 of 143 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 20-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS 2 2 3 1380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 3 3 4 190.0 8.0 130.00 .00 4 4 5 200.0 8.0 130.00 .00 5 5 6 200.0 8.0 130.00 .00 6 6 7 200.0 8.0 130.00 .00 7 7 8 860.0 8.0 130.00 .00 8 8 9 120.0 8.0 130.00 .00 9 9 10 660.0 8.0 130.00 .00 10 10 11 660.0 8.0 130.00 .00 11 11 12 1880.0 8.0 130.00 .00 12 12 13 440.0 8.0 130.00 .00 13 13 14 800.0 8.0 130.00 .00 14 14 15 320.0 8.0 130.00 .00 15 15 16 2020.0 8.0 130.00 .00 16 16 17 760.0 8.0 130.00 .00 17 17 18 60.0 8.0 150.00 .00 18 18 19 630.0 8.0 150.00 .00 19 19 20 60.0 8.0 150.00 .00 20 20 21 420.0 8.0 130.00 .00 21 21 22 440.0 8.0 130.00 .00 22 13 23 280.0 6.0 150.00 .00 23 23 24 340.0 4.0 150.00 .00 24 24 25 300.0 4.0 150.00 .00 25 25 26 500.0 4.0 150.00 .00 26 8 27 540.0 8.0 130.00 .00 27 27 28 360.0 8.0 130.00 .00 28 28 29 380.0 8.0 130.00 .00 29 29 30 300.0 8.0 130.00 .00 30 30 31 180.0 8.0 130.00 .00 31 31 32 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 32 32 33 520.0 8.0 130.00 .00 33 33 34 50.0 8.0 130.00 .00 34 34 97 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 35-FG 97 0 15.0 8.0 130.00 .00 371.95 36-XXPU 34 99 50.0 2.0 150.00 .00 37 35 36 200.0 6.0 150.00 .00 38 36 37 300.0 6.0 150.00 .00 39 37 38 100.0 6.0 150.00 .00 40 5 . 39 500.0 8.0 130.00 .00 41 39 40 500.0 8.0 130.00 .00 42 40 41 820.0 8.0 130.00 .00 43 41 42 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 44 42 43 220.0 8.0 130.00 .00 45 43 44 760.0 8.0 130.00 .00 46 40 45 350.0 6.0 130.00 .00 47 42 46 200.0 4.0 150.00 .00 48 11 47 400.0 3.0 150.00 .00 49 47 48 100.0 3.0 150.00 .00 50 1 49 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 51 49 50 600.0 8.0 130.00 .00 52 50 51 1400.0 8.0 130.00 .00 53 51 52 600.0 6.0 150.00 .00 54 52 53 450.0 4.0 150.00 .00 55 51 106 2530.0 8.0 130.00 .00 56 54 55 440.0 8.0 130.00 .00 57 55 56 750.0 4.0 130.00 .00 58 55 57 520.0 8.0 130.00 .00 2026-3A Analysis Output Page 2 of 143 £ti l JO£aBBd MHO s!sAleub Vt-9ZOZ 00' 00'06T 0'£ O'OT 60T LOT f1dXX—STT 00' 00'06T 0'£ O'OT 80T LOT fld—tTT 06' 00'06T 0'8 O'L66 LOT 90T £TT 00' 00'0£T 0'8 O'OSZ TOT 90T ZTT 0£' 00'0bT 018 O'OOZ SOT 60T TTT 0£' 00'ObT 018 O'OSE SOT Z8 OTT OS' 00'0bT 018 010£9 COT ZOT 60T OS' 00'0bT 0'8 0'£9 ZOT TOT SOT 00' 00'OET 0'8 O'058 bS TOT LOT 00' 00'09T 0'9 0108Z 96 OOT 90T 00'ES 00' 00'0£T 0'b VOLT OOT 0 IIdXX—SOT 96'SLt, OO' 00'0£T 0'8 O'ST 66 0 93—tOT 00' 00'09T 01Z O'ST SE 66 COT 00' 00'0£T 0'9 O'OZ6 96 6 ZOT 00' 00'OET 01b 0'00t 96 Ek TOT 00' 00'OET 0'8 O'OOT T b6 OOT 00' 00109T 0'b 0'8 V6 £6 66 0£' 00'0bT 0'8 0'09£ bOT T8 86 00'Z 00'OTT 0'£ O'OT £6 Z6 f1dXX—L6 00'69T 00'b 00'OTT 0'E 0'8 Z6 0 AD93-96 00'96 001Z 00'ODT 0'b O'OZT T 0 nciXX-96 00' 00'OET 019 O'OZb T6 06 b6 00' 00'0£T 0'9 0'OS£ 06 68 £6 00' 00'0£T 0'9 O'OOb 68 Be Z6 00' 00'0£T 0'9 0'09£ 88 6L T6 96'TLE 00' 00'OET 018 0'09 0 86 93-06 00' 00'OET 0'8 0'9T 86 L8 68 00' 00'0£T 018 O'00£ L8 98 Be 00' 00'OET 0'8 0109E 98 SS L8 00' 00'OET 0'8 0'0P£ 98 b8 98 00' 00'OET 018 O'OOL 58 6L 98 00' 00'0£T 0'8 O'OST E8 Z8 b8 OS'T 00'OET 0'8 O'OLT Z8 T8 £8 OS'T 00'0£T 0'8 O'OLS T8 08 Z8 OS'T 00'0£T 0'8 0'009 08 6L T8 OS'T 00'0£T 0'8 0109 6L 9L 08 00' 00'06T 018 O'OOb 8L LL 6L 00' 00'0tT 0 '8 0'E9 £TT 9L fld-8L 00' 00'OET 0'8 O'OST 9L EL LL 00' 00'0£T 0 '8 O'OLZ SL bL 9L 00' 00'OET 0'8 O'OZT DL EL SL 00' 00'OET 0'8 0100E £L ZL bL 00' 00'OET 018 0'09 ZL TL £L 00' 00'09T 018 0'0£E TL OL ZL 00' 00'0£T 0'8 O'OZT OL 69 TL 00' 00'0£T 0'8 0109 69 LS OL OO' 00'OST 0'Z O'09T 89 L9 69 00' 00'09T O'Z 0100E L9 99 89 00' 00'09T 0'9 0'08£ 99 09 L9 00' 00'09T O 'b O'OSZ 99 69 99 00' 00'0£T O'8 0'099 b9 E9 99 00' 00'0£T 0'8 O'ObS E9 Z9 b9 00' 00'0£T 0'8 0108E Z9 89 £9 00' 00'0£T 0'8 O'08E T9 09 Z9 00' 00'0£T 0'8 O'OOL 09 69 T9 00' 00'0£T O'8 01088Z 69 89 09 00' 00'OET 0'9 0'009 89 LS 69 SISAIVNV u3indWOO JNINNVId HV3A-OZ 6 'ON loIblSla 2131VM NIVA138 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 20-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS 116-XXPU 107 110 10.0 6.0 140.00 .00 117-RV 108 111 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 118-RV 109 111 10.0 3.0 140.00 .00 119 110 ill 10.0 6.0 140.00 .00 120 111 112 1400.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 121-FG 108 0 10000.0 1.0 100.00 .00 1800.00 122-FG 109 0 10000.0 1.0 100.00 .00 3000.00 123-XXFG 58 0 20.0 6.0 100.00 .00 194.20 124 113 77 580.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 125 113 114 581.0 8.0 140.00 .50 126 114 58 465.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 127 114 115 393.0 8.0 140.00 .50 128 115 116 372.0 8.0 140.00 1.00 129 116 77 328.0 8.0 140.00 .50 130-XXPU 0 117 350.0 6.0 120.00 1.00 90.00 131-FG 117 0 500.0 16.0 140.00 2.00 577.90 132 117 118 700.0 12.0 140.00 2.00 133 117 119 3600.0 12.0 140.00 3.00 134 119 120 5.0 12.0 140.00 1.00 135-RV 120 122 5.0 12.0 140.00 1.00 136 119 121 5.0 3.0 100.00 1.00 137-RV 121 122 5.0 3.0 100.00 1.00 138 122 105 440.0 12.0 140.00 2.00 139 118 123 102.0 16.0 140.00 .00 140 123 124 760.0 16.0 140.00 .00 141 124 125 12.0 16.0 140.00 .00 142 125 126 839.0 16.0 140.00 .00 143 126 127 555.0 16.0 140.00 .00 144 127 128 1828.0 16.0 140.00 .00 145 124 129 700.0 8.0 140.00 .00 146 19 130 2025.0 8.0 140.00 .00 147 129 131 700.0 8.0 140.00 .00 148 131 132 2000.0 8.0 140.00 .00 149 131 133 800.0 8.0 140.00 .00 150 133 134 5.0 6.0 140.00 .00 151-RV 134 136 5.0 6.0 140.00 .00 152 133 135 5.0 2.0 110.00 .00 153-RV 135 136 2.0 2.0 110.00 .00 154 136 137 500.0 8.0 140.00 .00 155 137 138 600.0 8.0 140.00 .00 156 137 59 800.0 8.0 140.00 .00 P U M P D A T A THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 36 - USEFUL POWER = .25 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 7.8 - USEFUL POWER = 1.00 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 95 - USEFUL POWER = 8.90 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 97 - USEFUL POWER = 8.10 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 105 - USEFUL POWER = 23.90 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 114 - USEFUL POWER = 2.70 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 115 - USEFUL POWER = 5.40 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 116 - USEFUL POWER = 41.00 THERE IS A PUMP IN LINE 130 - USEFUL POWER = 73.00 2026-3A Analysis Output Page 4 of 143 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 20-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS J U N C T I O N N O D E D A T A *** GEOMETRIC VERIFICATION (*3*) SUCCESSFUL *** JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL JUNCTION NUMBER TITLE DEMAND ELEVATION CONNECTING PIPES (gpm) (ft) ------------------------------------------7----------------------------------- 1 .97 144.00 1 50 95 100 2 1.22 142.00 1 2 3 1.22 140.00 2 3 4 .97 132.00 3 4 5 1.22 130.00 4 5 40 6 1.22 130.00 5 6 7 1.46 130.00 6 7 8 .97 118.00 7 8 26 9 .00 118.00 8 9 102 10 2.19 124.00 9 10 11 .49 122.00 10 11 48 12 .97 135.00 11 12 13 1.46 200.00 12 13 22 14 1.46 220.00 13 14 15 1.46 140.00 14 15 16 1.94 140.00 15 16 17 2.43 144.00 16 17 18 .00 144.00 17 18 19 .00 145.00 18 19 146 20 .97 145.00 19 20 21 2.43 150.00 20 21 22 1.70 150.00 21 23 .00 220.00 22 23 24 .00 160.00 23 24 25 .00 290.00 24 25 26 .00 290.00 25 27 .49 180.00 26 27 28 .49 220.00 27 28 29 .49 250.00 28 29 30 .49 270.00 29 30 31 .49 280.00 30 31 32 .24 330.00 31 32 33 .00 355.00 32 33 34 .00 355.00 33 34 36 35 .00 355.00 37 103 36 .97 355.00 37 38 37 .97 365.00 38 39 38 .97 365.00 39 39 .24 180.00 40 41 40 .49 210.00 41 42 46 41 .24 265.00 42 43 42 .49 280.00 43 44 47 43 1.22 285.00 44 45 101 44 .73 282.00 45 45 .00 200.00 46 46 .49 200.00 47 47 .24 200.00 48 49 2026-3A Analysis Output Page 5 of 143 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 20-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS 48 .49 220.00 49 49 1.94 144.00 50 51 50 2.92 148.00 51 52 51 3.65 155.00 52 53 55 52 2.43 124.00 53 54 53 2.43 115.00 54 54 2.92 140.00 56 107 55 2.43 144.00 56 57 58 56 1.94 125.00 57 57 2.43 150.00 58 59 70 58 4.86 148.00 59 60 63 123 126 59 4.86 150.00 60 61 66 156 60 2.43 145.00 61 62 67 61 2.43 145.00 62 62 1.94 146.00 63 64 63 1.94 135.00 64 65 64 1.46 125.00 65 65 1.22 150.00 66 66 .97 140.00 67 68 67 .97 140.00 68 69 68 .97 140.00 69 69 1.94 150.00 70 71 70 2.19 151.00 71 72 71 1.46 152.00 72 73 72 1.94 153.00 73 74 73 1.94 155.00 74 75 77 74 2.67 154.00 75 76 75 3.16 154.00 76 76 2.43 160.00 77 78 80 77 1.94 195.00 79 124 129 78 2.92 215.00 79 79 1.94 160.00 80 81 85 91 80 3.40 195.00 81 82 81 .49 225.00 82 83 98 82 4.86 240.00 83 84 110 83 2.43 225.00 84 84 .00 240.00 85 86 85 .00 270.00 86 87 86 .00 320.00 87 88 87 .00 355.00 88 89 88 1.94 158.00 91 92 89 1.94 153.00 92 93 90 1.94 150.00 93 94 91 1.94 140.00 94 92 .00 136.00 .96 97 93 .00 136.00 97 99 94 .00 136.00 99 100 95 .97 245.00 101 96 1.22 115.00 102 106 97 .00 355.00 34 35 98 .00 355.00 89 90 99 .00 355.00 36 103 104 100 .00 135.00 105 106 101 4.86 145.00 107 108 112 102 5.10 145.00 108 109 103 2.43 140.00 109 104 2.43 250.00 98 111 2026-3A Analysis Output Page 6 of 143 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 20-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS 105 .49 265.00 110 111 138 106 2.43 157.00 55 112 113 107 .00 310.00 113 114 115 116 108 .00 310.00 114 117 121 109 .00 310.00 115 118 122 110 .00 310.00 116 119 111 .00 310.00 117 118 119 120 112 53.00 425.00 120 113 1.94 160.00 78 124 125 114 1.94 158.00 125 126 127 115 1.94 160.00 127 128 116 1.94 166.00 128 129 117 12.15 440.00 130 131 132 133 118 .24 420.00 132 139 119 .00 300.00 133 134 136 120 .00 300.00 134 135 121 .00 300.00 136 137 122 .00 300.00 135 137 138 123 .00 400.00 139 140 124 1.22 400.00 140 141 145 125 1.22 400.00 141 142 126 1.22 400.00 142 143 127 1.46 400.00 143 144 128 1.94 400.00 144 129 1.46 400.00 145 147 130 1.22 150.00 146 131 .00 300.00 147 148 149 132 5.59 300.00 148 133 .00 200.00 149 150 152 134 .00 200.00 150 151 135 .00 200.00 152 153 136 .00 200.00 151 153 154 137 .00 150.00 154 155 156 138 5.59 150.00 155 O U T P U T O P T I O N D A T A OUTPUT SELECTION: THE FOLLOWING RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT ALL CLOSED PIPES ARE NOTED ALL PIPES WITH PUMPS FOLLOWING PIPES 8 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 102 105 106 FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES 22 34 87 61 57 38 112 MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM PRESSURES = 10 E P S D A T A TOTAL TIME FOR SIMULATION = 24.000 NORMAL TIME PERIOD = 1.000 2026-3A Analysis Output Page 7 of 143 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 20-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS V A R I A B L E H E A D T A N K D A T A TANK PIPE MAXIMUM MINIMUM TANK INITIAL EXTERNAL NUMBER NUMBER ELEVATION ELEVATION CAPACITY VOLUME FLOW (*) (ft) (ft) (gal) (gal) (gpm) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1-1 35 372.00 356.00 127311. 126913. .00 2-1 90 372.00 356.00 127311. 126913. .00 3-1 104 476.00 356.00 2820. 2819. .00 4-1 131 578.00 458.50 1123410. 1122471. .00 * TANK TYPE: 1 - CONSTANT DIAMETER 2 - VARIABLE AREA F L O W M E T E R S U M M A R Y THE FOLLOWING PIPES CONTAIN FLOW METERS: 99 106 95 130 P R E S S U R E S W I T C H D A T A REFERENCE REFERENCE SWITCHING PIPE NODE GRADES (ft) ---------------------------------------------- 97 87 371.00 & 372.00 36 35 436.00 & 476.00 105 87 370.00 & 372.00 115 112 568.00 & 570.00 130 117 570.00 & 578.00 S Y S T E M C O N F I G U R A T I O N NUMBER OF PIPES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (p) = 156 NUMBER OF JUNCTION NODES . . . . . . . . . . (j) = 138 NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS . . . . . . . . . . . (1) = 8 NUMBER OF FIXED GRADE NODES . . . . . . . (f) = 11 NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES . . . . . .. . . . . . (z) = 1 2026-3A Analysis Output Page 8 of 143 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 20-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS ************************************* S I M U L A T I O N R E S U L T S TIME FROM INITIATION OF EPS = 14.0000 HOURS THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 3 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00178 P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TK -STORAGE TANK PIPE NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/ NUMBER #1 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELO. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 8 9 -186.12 .08 .00 .00 1.19 .63 26 8 27 18.00 .00 .00 .00 .11 .01 27 27 28 15.61 .00 .00 .00 .10 .01 28 28 29 13.21 .00 .00 .00 .08 .00 29 29 30 10.82 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 30 30 31 8.42 .00 .00 .00 .05 .00 31 31 32 6.02 .00 .00 .00 .04 .00 32 32 33 4.85 .00 .00 .00 .03 .00 33 33 34 4.85 .00 .00 .00 .03 .00 34 34 97 -5.16 .00 .00 .00 .03 .00 35-TK 97 0 -5.16 .00 .00 .00 .03 .00 36-PU 34 99 10.01 .09 98.82 .00 1.02 1.83 78-PU 76 113 588.42 .29 6.72 .00 3.76 4.60 97-PU 92 93 147.66 .66 217.03 1.39 6.70 66.00 102 � 9 96 -281.23 2.29 .00 .00 3.19 5.46 105-FGPU 0 100 287.20 6.95 329.23 .00 7.33 40.91 106 100 96 287.20 1.22 .00 .00 3.26 4.36 114-PU 107 108 77.97 .13 137.00 .00 3.54 12.94 115-PU 107 109 155.12 .46 137.72 .00 7.04 46.27 130-FGPU 0 117 591.38 8.78 488.36 .70 6.71 25.10 FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED 95 116 123 151 2026-3A Analysis Output Page 89 of 143 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 20-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS J U N C T I O N N O D E R E S U L T S JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC JUNCTION PRESSURE JUNCTION NUMBER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22 8.31 370.99 150.00 220.99 95.76 34 .00 371.68 355.00 16.68 7.23 38 4.74 470.35 365.00 105.35 45.65 57 11.88 367.26 150.00 217.26 94.14 61 11.88 369.39 145.00 224.39 97.24 87 .00 367.19 355.00 12.19 5.28 112 259.17 500.98 425.00 75.98 32.92 M A X I M U M A N D M I N I M U M V A L U E S P R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES (psi) (psi) --------------------- --------------------- 133 159.47 87 5.28 134 159.47 98 5.29 135 159.00 34 7.23 131 116.19 97 7.23 132 116.17 33 7.23 119 116.05 92 8.53 120 116.05 32 18.06 121 115.19 86 20.38 96 112.26 107 24.15 9 109.96 122 29.47 R E G U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE PO SITION CONTROLLED VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH TYPE NODE PIPE SETTING STATUS GRADE GRADE FLOW (ft or gpm) (ft) (ft) (gpm) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRV-1 108 117 570.00 WIDE OPEN 502.60 502.43 88.73 PRV-1 109 118 570.00 WIDE OPEN 502.97 502.43 170.44 PRV-1 120 135 368.00 THROTTLED 567.81 368.00 111.49 PRV-1 121 137 370.00 THROTTLED 565.81 368.00 201.65 PRV-1 134 151 368.00 CLOSED 568.00 369.57 .00 PRV-1 135 153 370.00 THROTTLED 566.92 369.57 96.52 20264A Analysis Output Page 90 of 143 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 20-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS S U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S (+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES (-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES PIPE FLOWRATE NUMBER (gpm) -------------------- 35 5.16 90 171.83 96 147.66 104 4.22 105 287.20 121 10.76 122 15.32 130 591.38 131 -52.14 NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 1233.52 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = -52.14 NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 1181.37 T A N K S T A T U S R E P 0 R T (time = 14.0000 hours) TANK PIPE NET WATER TANK TANK TANK TANK PROJECTED NUMBER NUMBER FLOW ELEVATION DEPTH VOLUME VOLUME STATUS DEPTH {*) (gpm) (ft) (ft) (gal) (%) (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-1 35 -5.16 371.68 15.68 124747. 98.0 DRAINING 15.64 2-1 90 -171.83 367.23 11.23 89331. 70.2 DRAINING 9.93 3-1 104 -4.22 470.41 114.41 2689. 95.3 DRAINING 103.63 4-1 131 52.14 568.57 110.07 1034738. 92.1 FILLING 110.40 * TANK TYPE: 1 - CONSTANT DIAMETER 2 - VARIABLE AREA F L 0 W M E T E R R E P O R T (time = 14.0000 hours) PIPE NODE METERED NUMBER NUMBERS FLOW #1 #2 (gal) ---------------------------------------- 99 93 94 88875. 106 100 96 106633. 95 0 1 0. 130 0 117 0. 2026-3A Analysis Output Page 91 of 143 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 20-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS S I M U L A T I O N R E S U L T S TIME FROM INITIATION OF EPS = 24.0000 HOURS THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 1 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00125 P I P E -L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TK -STORAGE TANK PIPE NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/ NUMBER #1 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELD. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- 8 8 9 4.96 .00 .00 .00 .03 .00 26 8 27 .65 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 27 27 28 .53 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 28 28 29 .41 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 29 29 30 .29 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 30 30 31 .18 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 31 31 32 .06 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 32 32 33 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 33 33 34 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 34 34 97 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 35-XXTK 97 0 78-PU 76 113 453.13 .18 8.73 .00 2.89 2.84 97-PU 92 93 142.71 .62 224.56 1.30 6.48 61.96 102 9 96 .29 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 105-XXPU 0 100 106 100 96 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 114-PU 107 108 7.41 .00 1441.46 .00 .34 .17 115-PU 107 109 8.02 .00 2663.07 .00 .36 .19 FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL PIPES ARE CLOSED 36 95 116 123 130 135 137 151 153 J U N C T I O N N O D E R E S U L T S JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC JUNCTION PRESSURE JUNCTION NUMBER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22 .41 378.41 150.00 228.41 98.98 34 .00 378.42 355.00 23.42 10.15 38 .23 465.33 365.00 100.33 43.48 57 .58 376.23 150.00 226.23 98.03 61 .58 378.10 145.00 233.10 101.01 87 .00 371.44 355.00 16.44 7.13 112 12.72 569.99 425.00 144.99 62.83 2026-3A Analysis Output Page 141 of 143 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 20-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS M A X I M U M A N D M I N I M U M V A L U E S P R E S S U R E S JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES (psi) (psi) --------------------- --------------------- 109 1182.91 98 7.12 108 653.54 87 7.13 133 163.72 92 8.62 134 163.72 33 10.15 135 163.72 34 10.15 120 120.38 97 10.15 121 120.38 32 20.98 119 120.38 86 22.31 131 120.38 107 28.91 132 120.38 122 31.08 R E G U L A T I N G V A L V E R E P O R T VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH TYPE NODE PIPE SETTING STATUS GRADE GRADE FLOW (ft or gpm) (ft) (ft) (gpm) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRV-1 108 117 570.00 THROTTLED 1818.18 570.00 6.34 PRV-1 109 118 570.00 THROTTLED 3039.79 570.00 6.38 PRV-1 120 135 368.00 CLOSED 577.81 371.71 .00 PRV-1 121 137 370.00 CLOSED 577.81 371.71 .00 PRV-1 134 151 368.00 CLOSED 577.81 378.10 .00 PRV-1 135 153 370.00 CLOSED 577.81 378.10 .00 S U M M A R Y O F I N F L O W S A N D O U T F L O W S (+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES (-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES PIPE FLOWRATE NUMBER (gpm) -------------------- 90 -89.07 96 142.71 104 .70 121 -1.07 122 -1.64 131 6.36 NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 149.77 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = -91.78 NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 57.98 2026-3A Analysis Output Page 142 of 143 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 20-YEAR PLANNING COMPUTER ANALYSIS T A N K S T A T U S R E P 0 R T (time = 24.0000 hours) TANK PIPE NET WATER TANK TANK TANK TANK PROJECTED NUMBER NUMBER FLOW ELEVATION DEPTH VOLUME VOLUME STATUS DEPTH (*) (gPm) (ft) (ft) (gal) (%) (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-1 35 .00 372.00 16.00 127311. 100.0 FULL 16.00 2-1 90 89.07 371.43 15.43 122797. 96.5 FILLING 16.00 3-1 104 -.70 465.33 109.33 2570. 91.1 DRAINING 107.82 4-1 131 -6.36 577.81 119.31 1121606. 99.8 DRAINING 119.27 * TANK TYPE: 1 - CONSTANT DIAMETER 2 - VARIABLE AREA F L O W M E T E R R E P O R T (time = 24.0000 hours) PIPE NODE METERED NUMBER NUMBERS FLOW #1 #2 (gal) ---------------------------------------- 99 93 94 147672. 106 100 96 205425. 95 0 1 0. 130 0 117 186593. **** KYPIPE SIMULATION COMPLETED **** DATE: 6/ 8/2007 TIME: 11:18:54 2026-3A Analysis Output Page 143 of 143 10.5 Sampling Waivers and Analyses TI F w F i AW ..� l t au c ss SW Do,,-„4 Page 1 of 4 Health 053500 Cgxr.�jfXrrliuy N41.r Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Year 2007 System: BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT 1 PWSID:05350 0 Report Date: 02/21/2007 Contact:JERRY HUKILL SR Group:A-Comm County: MASON Region: SOUTHWEST Part 1• List of Active Sources with Water Quality Monitoring Requirements DOH Name Type Use Susceptibility Treated? Source# Rating Sol WELL#1 AHA954 Well Permanent Moderate y S03 WELL#3 AHA956 HUMMINGBIRD I Well Permanent Moderate y Soo WELL#4 ABA656 Well Permanent Low 1' Part 2• Sampling Schedule for the Year 2007 Coliform Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Sampling (Routine) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 •Indicates the requirement is an exception from WAC 246-290. - If the coliform(bacteriological)sampling schedule listed at the bottom of the current Water Facilities Inventory(WFI)form for your system is different from the schedule listed above,follow the schedule on the current WFI. - Samples must be collected from representative points within the distribution system. - Repeat samples are required following an unsatisfactory sample. - A minimum of 5 routine samples are required the month following one or more unsatisfactory samples in accordance with your systems Coliform Monitoring Plan. Lead and Copper Distribution Sampling - Lead and copper samples must be collected from indoor faucets within the distribution system after the water has sat unused in the pipes for at least 6 hours but no more than 12 hours. - Sample faucets should be flushed with cold water the evening prior to collecting the sample. - Part 2 indicates the month in which samples should be collected. Part 4 indicates the total number of samples required. Chlorine Residual Sampling - Systems that use continuous chlorination must take chlorine residual measurements daily(or at a reduced frequency approved the by the department),and at the same time and location as routine and repeat coliform samples. Disinfection Byproducts Sampling Systems that use continuous chlorination must collect a sample for total trihalomethanes(TTHM)and a sample for haloacetic acids(HAA5)for each chlorination treatment facility identified in your individual disinfection byproducts(DBP)monitoring plan. Collect the samples from the distribution system at the frequency and locations identified in your DBP monitoring plan. Sentry DOH itr.%*D4W6-+d Page 3 of4 *Health 053500 .U.osic.q[:rw.axRnW lir.�i G�9Sv.�M:l.a;:M'sMr Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Year 2007 June SO4 VOLATILE ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS VOC-524.2 July No source chemical sampling required this month August No source chemical sampling required this month September No source chemical sampling required this month October SO4 IOC IOC November No source chemical sampling required this month December No source chemical sampling required this month Part 3: State Waivers - Automatically granted to all sources based on DOH assessment of conditions within the state. - No source-specific assessment,waiver application,or fee required. - State waivers granted for the 2005-2007 compliance period are listed in Part 4. Part 4: Water Quality Monitoring Frequency - Although waivers may be granted for your system,there may be some monitoring required as a condition of the waiver your system was granted. Monitoring Group Test Panel/Method Sample Location Schedule/Status Asbestos ASB Distribution Collect I Asbestos sample in 2008 Bacteriological Coli Distribution See routine sample schedule in part 2 Dioxin SOC-1613 All sources State Waiver Thru Dec 2007 Endothall SOC-548.1 All sources State Waiver Thru Dec 2007 EDB and other soil fumigants SOC-504 Sol State Waiver Thru Dec 2007 EDB and other soil fumigants SOC-504 S03 State Waiver Thru Dec 2007 EDB and other soil fumigants SOC-504 SO4 State Waiver Thru Dec 2007 Glyphosphate SOC-547.1 All sources State Waiver Thru Dec 2007 Herbicides SOC-515.2 Sol Waiver granted-No sampling required thru Dec 2007 Herbicides SOC-515.2 S03 Waiver granted-No sampling required thru Dec 2007 Herbicides SOC-515.2 SO4 Waiver granted-No sampling required thru Dec 2007 Insecticides SOC-531.1 Sol Waiver granted-No sampling required thru Dec 2007 Insecticides SOC-531.1 S03 Waiver granted-No sampling required thru Dec 2007 Insecticides SOC-531.1 SO4 Waiver granted-No sampling required thru Dec 2007 Inorganic Contaminants IOC Sol 1 complete IOC sample between Jan 2002-Dec 2010 Inorganic Contaminants IOC S03 I complete IOC sample between Jan 2002-Dec 2010 Inorganic Contaminants IOC SO4 1 sample(s)every 3 years Lead/Copper• LCR Distribution LCR 1 Set of 10 samples between Jan 2006-Dec 2008 Nitrate• NIT Sol Collect I Nitrate sample(s)in 2007 Nitrate• NIT S03 Collect 1 Nitrate sample(s)in 2007 Sentry DOH Washington Sta"Deparhner0 WAIVER STATUS SUMMARY & INVOICE Monitoring Period 2002-2004 053500 WVR-02330 Health Division of Dnnking Water "'""""` System Information System: BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT 1 PWSID: 053502 Invoice Date:10/01/2002 Contact: JERRY RUKILL SR Group: A- COMM County:MASON Region: SW Waiver Fee Calculation Summarized by waiver type below are the waiver options you have selected. An invoice for these waivers has been provided at the bottom of the page. The summary on this page is provided for your records and detailed information is on the reverse side. Invoice No. Invoice Date Waiver Type Unit Price Qty Cost Inorganic Waiver $113.00 2 $226.00 ' WVR-02330 10/24/2000 g WVR-02330 10/24/2000 Organic Waiver Renewal $123.00 3 $369.00 Total Waiver Cost S$ 95.00 Invoice: Below is a bill. (Detach) PwsID: 053500 Make check/money order payable to Department of Health and mail in enclosed envelope. If envelope is missing, mail to address below: Department of Health PO Box 1099 Olympia WA 98507-1099 . Invoice Number: WVR-02330 Please pay this amount: $595.00 6WVA10520240300 DW00053500010010200059500 Page 4 ' w�0smuawrwmt� Complete and return to: �Hea l th Dept.Of Health Public Water System Attn:Trace Warner Division o/Dunking Water PO Box 47822 Monitoring Waiver Response Form Olympia,WA 98504-7822 NOTE: You must complete the shaded areas on the form and provide the information requested at the bottom of the page. Return this form to DOH by June 22, 2001 to the address in the upper right corner. DO NOT SEND MONEY! If you request a waiver,you will receive an updated Water Quality Montoring Report and an invoice for the waiver in a separate mailing. SYSTEM INFORMATION System: BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT 1 PWSID: 05350 Packet Date: 7/2002 Contact: JERRY HUKILL SR Group: A- COMM County:MASON Region: SW Has your source susceptibility changed? Have there been any if"yes",please describe below. Examples changes to this source would include:a new VOC detection or other which may affect the contaminant presence,nitrate levels have increased Susceptibility rating? to over 5 ppm,or changes in well construction or in DOH (Please Check One) adjacent land use. Provide comments at the bottom Source# Source Name Susceptibility Yes No of the page,if needed. Sol WELL# 1 Moderate ✓ ___ S02 WELL#2 Low S03 ELL#3 HUMMINGBIRq Moderate Waiver Eligibility Summary For Monitoring Period 1999-2001 Request Request DOH Waiver? Waiver? Source# Organic Waiver Fee Yes No Inorganic Waiver Fee Yes No Sol Organic Waiver Renewal $123.00 Inorganic Waiver $113.00 $123.00 - Inorganic Waiver $113.00 S02 Organic Waiver Renewal S 03 Organic Waiver Renewal $123.00 No Waiver Option $0.00 X Signature of person completing form: Date: Name of person completing form (prin . Title: b %1 r-,C-1 i",n Phone Number: /r7 c� i P7S—3 ao R' (water system owner,maQer,etc.) Comments: Page 1 sb ��l arftw 05350 KigtmS!q Hea l th Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Year 2002 Division of Drinking Water System: BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT I PWSID: 05350 0 Report Date: 1/31/2002 Contact: JERKY HUKILL SR Group: A- COMM County:MASON Region: SW Part 1: List of Active Sources with Water Quality Monitorincl Requirements DOH Name Type Use Susceptibility Treated? Source# Rating Sol WELL# 1 Well Permanent Moderate No S 02 WELL#2 Well Permanent Low No S 03 WELL#3 HUMMINGBIRD Well Permanent Moderate No Part 2: Sampling Schedule for the Year 2002 Coliform Sampling(routine) #of Routine Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Samples Per e Month 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 -Samples must be collected from representative points within the distribution system -Repeat samples are required following an unsatisfactory sample. -A minimum of 5 routine samples are required the month following one or more unsatisfactory samples i accordance with your system's Colifonm Monitoring Plan. Lead/Copper Sampling -We will notify you in 2002 only if your system has lead/copper sampling requirements during 2002. Source Water Chemical Sampling Month Source Monitoring Group Test Method January No source water chemical sampling required this month. February No source water chemical sampling required this month. 'March No source water chemical sampling required this month. April IS 01 Nitrates ca'nAnA4NIT S 02 Nitrates &Xr4 ?00 Z. NIT S 03 Nitrates jNIT ' May No source water chemical sampling required this month. June No source water chemical sampling required this month. July No source water chemical sampling required this month. August No source water chemical sampling required this month. ,September, No source water chemical sampling required this month. Octobef No source water chemical sampling required this month. November No source water chemical sampling required this month. December No source water chemical sampling required this month. -Source water chemical samples must be taken from a location as near to the source as possible,after any treatment. -Nitrate and nitrite are included as part of a complete IOC. ! Page 2 N'�unglonSt�ltDrynrtmenfof 05350 1-hHeolth 02 Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Year 20 Division of Drinking Water Part 3: Water Quality Monitoring Waivers: Organic And Inorganic Chemical Monitoring Waiver -DOH will inform you of your waiver options for the 2002-2004 compliance period,during the spring of 2002. State Waivers -Automatically granted to all sources based on DOH assessment of conditions within the state. -No source-specific assessment,waiver application,or fee required. -State waivers granted for the 2002-2004 compliance period are listed in Part 4. Part 4: Water Quality Monitoring Frequency Monitoring Group (Test Method) Sample Location Schedule/Status Bacteriological Coli Distribution See routine sample schedule in part 2 Lead/Copper* LCR Distribution Sample as directed by DOH. Asbestos ASB Distribution 1 distribution sample every 9 years Volatile Organic Contaminants VOC-524.2 Sol 1 sample every 3 years S 02 No sample required until 2005 S 03 1 sample every 3 years Herbicides SOC-515.1 Sol I sample every 3 years S 02 I sample every 3 years S 03 1 sample every 3 years General Pesticides SOC-525.1 Sol 1 sample every 3 years S 02 1 sample every 3 years S 03 1 sample every 3 years Insecticides SOC-531.1 Sol I sample every 3 years S 02 1 sample every 3 years S 03 1 sample every 3 years EDB and other soil fumigants SOC-504 Sol State Waiver through 12/2004 S 02 State Waiver through 12/2004 S 03 State Waiver through 12/2004 Dioxin,Endothall,Diquat, SOCs- 1613, 547.1, All sources State Waiver through 12/2004 IGlyphosphate 548.1, and 549.1 'Inorganic Contaminants IOC Sol 1 sample every 3 years 1 S 02 1 sample every 3 years S 03 1 sample every 3 years Nitrate* NIT Sol 1 sample collected annually S 02 1 sample collected annually S 03 1 sample collected annually Radionuclides* RAD Sol I sample every 3 years S 02 1 sample every 3 years S 03 1 sample every 3 years *These contaminant monitoring groups do not have waiver options under the SDWA. Page 3 W,higw SfahDcyotmenl d 05350 iiHealth water Quality Monitoring Report for the Year 2002 Division of Drinking Water Part 5: Regional Water Quality Monitoring Contact- Southwest Regional Office For further information call the Southwest Regional Office Phone: 360-586-5179 Special Note For Group A Community Systems Only: Your Consumer Confidence Report,summarizing the results of your 2001 water quality monitoring requirements is due before July 1,2002. For further information visit www.doh.wa.gov/ehp/dw/Our Main Pages/consunter.him or contact the CCR Coordinator at your Regional Ofjice. WATER MANAGEMENT 1515 St. ,.ITacomaa,, 9 WA 8404 LABORATORIES INC. (253)531-3121 1 � INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT FOR NITRATES System ID No: System Name: ,r Lab/Sample No: Qg �-2/ Date Collected: r7 DOA Source No: So Multiple Source Nos: Sample Type: Sample Purpose: Date Received: , _ Date Reported: —Q Supervisor: Date Analyzed: Analyst: LAIL County: Group: A B Other Sample Location: "ram a w L Send Report To:'^ � �� ` Bill To: ?la pox 51�3 DOH# ANALYTES RESULTS I UNITS SRL I TRIGGER MCL EXCEEDS Method/Analyst EPA REGULATED Trigger? MCL? 114 Nitrite-N mg/1 0.5 0.5 1 4110B 20 Nitrate-N mg/1 0.5 5.0 10 NQ tp 4110B (,f/ 161 Total Nitrate/Nitrite mg/1 0.5 5.0 10 4110B NOTES: SRL(State Reporting Level):indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health(DOH). Trigger Level:DOH Drinking Water response level.Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples.Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL(maximum contaminent level):If the contaminent amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA(Not Analyzed):in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND(Not Detected):in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL. <(0.001):indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. COMMENTS: ,WTER "*- MANAGEMENT Tacoma, , St. E. � Tacomaa, WA 98404 � LABORATORIES INC. (253)531-3121 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT FOR NITRATES System ID No: System Name: f �- Lab/Sample No: y✓l) Date Collected: DOH Source No: Z Multiple Source Nos: Sample Type: Sample Purpose: C Date Received: _ ,. 02 Date Reported: 7 !q—02— Supervisor: L-f x #1 Date Analyzed: Analyst: t' County: Group: 0::B Other Sample Location: Send Report To: �a\r �� JDp p} Bill To: DOH# ANALYTES RESULTS I UNITS SRL TRIGGER MCL EXCEEDS Method/Analyst EPA REGULATED Trigger? MCL? 114 Nitrite-N mg/1 0.5 0.5 1 4110B 20 Nitrate-N Q mg/l 0.5 5.0 10 4110B 161 Total Nitrate/Nitrite mg/1 0.5 5.0 10 4110B NOTES: SRL(State Reporting Level):indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health(DOH). Trigger Level:DOH Drinking Water response level.Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples.Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL(maximum contaminent level):If the contaminent amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA(Not Analyzed):in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND(Not Detected):in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL. <(0.001):indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. COMMENTS: k Please Print Plainl c , 1515 80th St.E. SEE BACK Y ;WATER USE HEAVY PEN .1 MANAGEMENT Tacoma,WA 98404 FOR INSTRUCTION DO NO�( 1713 IN SHADED AREAS LABORATORIES wc. (;53)531-3121 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT System ID No: System Name: Lab/Sample No: Date Collected: _ DOH Source No: S 0 a. Multiple Source Nos: N (� Sample Type: Sample Purpose: C Date Received: cb_ _ Date Reported: ip? Supervisor: Az County., m A Date Digested: N/7 Group: B Other Sample Location: Send Results& Bill To: Remarks: Q e7)pX ln3 e q$�a DOH# ANALYTES RESULTS UNITS SRL TRIGGER MCL EXCEEDS Method/Analyst EPA REGULATED Trigger? MCL? 4 Arsenic D mg/1 01VD L 0.05 0.05 Q ,!/Q 3113BWV 5 Barium m l 0.1 2 2 3113B 6 Cadmium mg/1 0.002 0.005 0.005 3113B 7 Chromium mg/1 0.01 0.1 0.1 3113B 11 Mercu mg/1 0.0005 0.002 0.002 3112B 12 Selenium mg/1 0.005 0.05 0.05 3113B 110 Be ilium mg/1 0.003 0.004 0.004 3113B 111 Nickel m l 0.04 0.1 0.1 3111B 112 Antimony m /1 0.005 0.006 0.006 3113B 113 Thallium m /1 0.002 0.002 0.002 3113B 116 C anide m /1 0.05 0.2 0.2 4500-CNF 19 Fluoride m /l 0.2 2 4 4110B 114 Nitrite-N m /1 0.5 0.5 1 4110B 20 Nitrate-N m /1 0.5 5 10 4110B 161 Total Nitrate/Nitrite mg/1 0.5 5 10 4110B EPA REGULATED(Secondary) 8 Iron MR/1 0.1 0.3 0.3 3111B 10 Manganese Mg/1 0.01 0.05 0.05 3111B 13 Silver Mg/1 0.01 0.1 0.1 3111B 21 Chloride mg/1 20 250 250 4110B 22 Sulfate mg/1 10 250 250 4110B 24 Zinc mg/1 1 0.2 1 . 5 5 3111B STATE REGULATED 14 Sodium m /l 5 j3111B 15 Hardness m /1 10 0C 16 Conductivity umhos/cm 10 700 700 2510B 17 Turbidity NTU 0.1 1 2130B 18 Color color units 5 15 15 2120B 26 Total Dissolved Solids 4-- m /1 150 500 500 2540C STATE UNREGULATED 9 Lead m /1 0.002 3113B 23 Copper mg/1 0.2 3111B COMMENTS: OrSF_�N� 1986'PROPERTY OF WATER MANAGEMENT LABORATORIES.INC. 'lease Print Plainly WATER 1515 80th St. E. SEE BACK USE HE VV441Z�l Z. MANAGEMENT Tacoma, WA 98404 FOR INSTRUCTIONS DO NOT WRITE IN SHADED AREAS LABORATORIES INC. (253)531-3121 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT System ID No: System Name: be Lab/Sample No: 9 Date Collected: DOH Source No: so?) Multiple Source Nos: Sample Type: E Sample Purpose: Date Received: _ _ Date Reported: - �� Supervisor: County: ; 4 M Date Digested: � Group: � B Other Sample Location: W •NCi \ Send Results& Bill To: D 1 Remarks: Po aox 5t� 3 A 9v6a% DOH# ANALYTES RESULTS I UNITS I SRL TRIGGER MCL EXCEEDS Method/Analyst EPA REGULATED Trigger? MCL? 4 Arsenic m /1 OW9L 0.05 0.05 3113B 5 Barium AIA m l 0.1 2 2 3113B 6 Cadmium m 1 0.002 0.005 0.005 3113E 7 Chromium mg/1 0.01 0.1 0.1 3113E 11 Mercu m 1 0.0005 0.002 0.002 3112B 12 Selenium mgl 1 0.005 0.05 0.05 3113B 110 Be Ilium m l 0.003 0.004 0.004 3113B ill Nickel m 1 .0.04 0.1 0.1 3111B 112 Antimony m /1 0.005 0.006 0.006 3113B 113 Thallium m /l 0.002 0.002 0.002 3113E 116 Cyanide m di 0.05 0.2 0.2 4500-CNF 19 Fluoride m 0.2 2 4 4110B 114 rNitrite-N m 0.5 0.5 1 4110B 20 e-N m 0.5 5 10 4110B 161 Nitrate/Nitrite m / 0.5 5 10 4110B EPA REGULATED(Secondary) 8 Iron AA m l 0.1 0.3 0.3 3111B 10 Manganese Mg/1 0.01 0.05 0.05 3111B 13 Silver m /l 0.01 0.1 0.1 3111B 21 Chloride mg/1 20 250 250 4110B 22 1 Sulfate I mg/1 10 250 250 4110B 24 Zinc mg/1 0.2 5 5 3111B STATE REGULATED 14 Sodium Mg/1 5 3111B 15 Hardness m /1 10 2340C 16 Conductivity umhos/crn 10 700 700 2510B 17 Turbidity NTU 0.1 1 2130B 18 Color color units 5 15 15 2120B 26 Total Dissolved Solids m /1 1 150 500 500 , 2540C STATE UNREGULATED 9 JLead IVA I m /1 1 0.002 3113B 23 1 Copper Nh mg/9 1 0.2 3111B COMMENTS: ox-'e n;I^ 1986'PROPERTY OF WATER MANAGEMENT LABORATORIES,INC. .WATER :L. MANAGEMENT 1515 80th St. E. Tacoma, WA 98404 A' LABORATORIES INC. (253) 531-3121 NEW INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOC's) REPORT For LEAD & COPPER System ID No. : 53 5 QO System Name- a ELF W T ti.R \S-TT?,1 # DOH Source No: S93 (LCR) Sample Type: Sample Purpose: Date Received: —Q Date Reported: Supervisor: ' Date Analyzed: -Q Z Analyst: Group: B Other County M As .j Sample Location: (see table below) Send To: (3VELFA tP) W J -r E 2 D 1�Tfq�CT' 1 Bill To P 0 80K SS3 aC-1-FAIR w A C�g SQ8 DOH # 23 (Copper) 9 (Lead) State Reporting Level (SRL) 0.02 mg/L 0.002 mg/L Action Level (AL) 1.3 mg/L 0.015 mg/L Test Method 3111 B 3113B Lab Sample # Date Collected Site/Location Copper (mg/L) Lead (mg/L) 089 a A)E )4S i w`� (30 <G_� <O--OP7 089 718 - -per NE 1`&c KtiNGI O1Z ��-Gc� _ 081--�� - o - a NwY330 089L 71_9Y_ -$ - 2- 011 r 31 N4w� 300 - 089 .� 7 E p - S -oa- 1-1 1iW j _D_/ _Co-avZ 089_7 N (E 18�LfA I R S_T" o$�_ 92 - S�b a- N 531 o I-D 8 LF 8 0 D-�O Z 089_ 1 - 5-Di_ I WY J -PG -Ca Op 089 L T 5'f�a NE � aS ) Y ( t 084 e89 089 089 089 NOTES: 1 mg/L is equivalent to 1 ppM AL (Federal Action Levels): are 0.015 mg/L for Lead and 1.3 mg/L for Copper.If the concentrations exceed these levels, contact your regionai DOH office for further information. SRL (State Reporting Level): Indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). NA(Not Analyzed): In the RESULTS column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis, ND (Not Detected): In the RESULTS column indicates this compound was analyzed and level to the SRL. ) not detected at a le a realer than ore equal L P Y 9 q < : Indicates less than. Comments : WATER MANAGEMENT 1515 80th St.E. Tacoma,WA 98404 LABORATORIES INC. (253)531-3121 a� INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT FOR NITRATES System ID No: I System Name: �C - Lab/Sajnple No: Cf67505M Date Collected: - 2_ DOF1 Source No: Multiple Source Nos: N Sample Type: Sample Purpose: Date Received: ,- _ Date Reported: — -02 Supervisor: LJ✓pl' Date Analyzed: _ g—�2 Analyst: [fl(-- County: Group: A B Other Sample Location: Send Report To: � � � rj�p�y� l Bill To: /o E b �85Z� DOH# ANALYTES RESULTS I UNITS I SRL I TRIGGER MCL EXCEEDS Method Analyst EPA REGULATED Trigger? MCL? 114 Nitrite-N mg/I 0.5 0.5 1 4110B 20 Nitrate-N 0' . mg/I 0.5 5.0 10 4110B (L 161 Total Nitrate/Nitrite mg/1 0.5 5.0 10 4110B NOTES: SRL(State Reporting Level):indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health(DOH). Trigger Level:DOH Drinking Water response level.Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples.Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL(maximum contaminent level):If the contaminent amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA(Not Analyzed):in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND(Not Detected):in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL. <(0.001):indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. COMMENTS: - �� Well Please Print Plainly��r TER 1515 80th St.E. SEE BACK USE .v Y Y N MANAGEMENT Tacoma,WA 98404 FOR INSTRUCTION DO NOT WRITE IN SHADED AREAS LABORATORIES mc. (253)531-3121 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT System ID No: System Name: `lC�- Lab/Sample No: Date Collected: DOH Source No: Multiple Source Nos: N P1 Sample Type: Sample Purpose: Date Received: --7- 'Z Date Reported: Supervisor: County: Date Digested: �/� Group: A B Other Sample Location: Send Results&Bill To: �S1L� -it- Remarks: kc Flo Brx' r-)Ly v3N DOH# ANALYTES RESULTS UNITS I SRL TRIGGER MCL EXCEEDS Method Analyst EPA REGULATED Trigger? MCL? 4 Arsenic mg/1 OJW2 0.05 0.05 V 3113B 5 Barium m l 0.1 2 2 3113B 6 Cadmium -Mg/1 0.002 0.005 0.005 3113B 7 Chromium Mg/1 0.01 0.1 0.1 3113B 11 Mercury m 1 0.0005 0.002 0.002 3112B 12 Selenium m 1 0.005 0.05 0.05 3113B 110 Be Ilium mg/1 0.003 0.004 0.004 3113B ill Nickel mg/1 0.04 0.1 0.1 3111B 112 Antimony m /1 0.005 0.006 0.006 3113B 113 Thallium m /1 0.002 0.002 0.002 3113B 116 C anide mg/1 0.05 0.2 0.2 4500-CNF 19 Fluoride m /I 0.2 2 4 4110B 114 Nitrite-N m /1 0.5 0.5 1 4110B 20 Nitrate-N m /1 1 0.5 5 10 4110B 161 Total Nitrate/Nitrite m /1 0.5 5 10 4110B EPA REGULATED(Secondary) 8 Iron A4 mg/1 0.1 0.3 0.3 3111B 10 Manganese Mg/1 0.01 0.05 0.05 3111B 13 Silver mg/1 0.01 0.1 0.1 3111B 21 Chloride mg/1 20 250 250 4110B 22 1 Sulfate m /1 10 250 250 4110B 24 Zinc m /1 0.2 5 5 3111B STATE REGULATED J 14 Sodium Al m /1 5 3111B 15 Hardness m /1 10 2340C 16 Conductivity umhos/cm 10 700 700 2510B 17 Turbidity NTU 0.1 1 2130B 18 Color color unitsl 5 15 15 2120B 26 Total Dissolved Solids I m /1 150 1 500 1 500 2540C STATE UNREGULATED 9 ILead Al m /1 0.002 3113B 23 Copper i(/ mg 1 0.2 3111B COMMENTS: �'1 1 C� � 1 = el 1986 PROPERTY OF WATER MANAGEMENT LABORATORIES,INC. - Page 1 W-�mpA&D 05350 ioHealth . Water QualityMonitoring Report for the Year 2003 o/Dunkin Watai ~Division g System: BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT 1 PWSID: 053500 Report Date: 1/14/2003 Contact: JERRY HUKILL SR Group: A- COMM County:MASON Region: SW Part 1: List of Active Sources with Water Quality Monitoring Requirements DOH Source Name Source Type Source Use Susceptibility Treated? Source# Rating Sol WELL# 1 Well Permanent Moderate No S 02 WELL#2 Well Permanent Low No S 03 WELL#3 HUMMINGBIRD Well Permanent Moderate No Part 2: Sampling Schedule for the Year 2003 Coliform Sampling(routine) # of Routine Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Samples Per Month 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 -If the Coliform(bacteriological)sampling schedule listed at the bottom of the current Water Facilities Inventory (WFI)form for your system is different from the schedule listed above,follow the schedule on the current WFI. -Samples should be collected from representative points within the distribution system -Repeat samples are required following a positive routine sample -A minimum of 5 routine samples are required the month following one or more positive samples in accordance with your systerds Coliform Monitoring Plan Lead/Copper Sampling -We will notify you in 2003 only if your system has lead/copper sampling requirements during 2003. Source Water Chemical Sampling Month Sample onitoring Group Test Method Lo tion January No source water chemical sampling required this month. February S 01 Radionuclides GROSS ALPHA S 02 Radionuclides GROSS ALPHA March No source water chemical sampling required this month. April No source water chemical sampling required this month. May No source water chemical sampling required this month. June S 01 Inorganic Contaminants ARSENIC S 02 Inorganic Contaminants ARSENIC July S 01 Nitrates NIT S 02 Nitrates NIT S 03 Inorganic Contaminants IOC August No source water chemical sampling required this month. September S 01 Volatile Organic Contaminants VOC-524.2 S 03 Volatile Organic Contaminants VOC-524.2 October No source water chemical sampling required this month. November o source water chemical sampling required this month. TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS)REPORT FOR NITRATES System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 � T - i Lab/Sample No: 01092164 Date Collected: 7/16/03 DOH Source No: SO Multiple Sources Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C Date Received. 7/17/03 Date Reported: 7/22/03 Supervisor: ST Date Analyzed: 7/18/03 Analyst: NIA County. Mason Group: A Sample Location: Well Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O.Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 j DOH# Analytes Results I Units 1 SRL Trigg Analyst r MCL 1 _ Exceeds Method/ 5' Trigger? A'tCL'' 77 ; ---- -----..._ a <, 20 i Nitrate mg/L 0.5 5 10 SM4500-NO3 F NP -- - ---- - - -- - - - --- - - - 1 - -- - ---- Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 43147 Page 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES,INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS)REPORT FOR NITRATES - System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Lab/Sample No: 01092165 Date Collected: 7/16/03 DOH Source No: S02 Multiple Sources: Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 7/17/03 Date Reported: 7/22/03 Supervisor: ST Date Analyzed: 7/18/03 Analyst: NP County: Mason Group: A Sample Location: Well------ _-- -- -- ----- -- ------.- - - - — - - - P Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 r� l_- ea k.. L Trigger'Exceeds )DOH#1 Anal tes Results Units SRL Trt er MCL _ eeds I Method/Analyst --, � � Y gg � T--- I �A�F, k MCL �- a I z, 20 Nitrate <(0.1) - mg/L 5 0.5 10 SM4500-NO3 F NP - - - -- -i- --.-- 1------ - ---- -- , Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 43147 Page 1 Please Print Plainly �.,� 1515 80th St. E. SEE BACK ;WATER FOR INSTRUCTION USE HEAVY PEN _ MANAGEMENT Tacoma,WA 98404 DO NOT� t IN SHADED AREAS [ABORATORrES mc. (253)531-3121 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT System ID No: System Name: Lab/Sample No: 8g6Z Date Collected: U DOH Source No: Multiple Source Nos: JqN I Sample Type: Sample Purpose: Date Received: Date Reported: -� 9_p Supervisor: County: Date Digested: N1/} Group: ® B Other Sample Location: Send Results& Bill To: !a Remarks: n SOX 3 - q$�Q% DOH# ANALYTES RESULTS I UNITS I SRL TRIGGER MCL EXCEEDS Method/Analyst EPA REGULATED Trigger? MCL? 4 Arsenic 40 6 0 Mg/1 oppL 0.05 0.05 f,10 A)O 3113B 5 Barium All 1+ m l 0.1 2 2 3113B 6 Cadmium mg/1 0.002 0.005 0.005 3113B 7 Chromium mg/1 0.01 0.1 0.1 3113B 11 Mercu mg/1 0.0005 0.002 0.002 3112B 12 Selenium m 1 0.005 0.05 0.05 3113B 110 Beryllium mg/1 0.003 0.004 0.004 3113B 111 Nickel m /l 0.04 0.1 0.1 3111B 112 Antimony m /1 0.005 0.006 0.006 3113B 113 Thallium m /l 0.002 0.002 0.002 3113B 116 C anide mg/1 0.05 0.2 0.2 4500-CNF 19 Fluoride mg/1 0.2 2 4 4110B 114 Nitrite-N m /1 0.5 0.5 1 4110B 20 Nitrate-N m /1 0.5 5 10 4110B 161 Total Nitrate/Nitrite m /l 0.5 5 10 4110B EPA REGULATED(Secondary) 8 Iron /✓ mg/1 0.1 0.3 0.3 3111B 10 Manganese mg/1 0.01 0.05 0.05 3111B 13 Silver m /1 0.01 0.1 0.1 3111B 21 Chloride m /1 20 250 250 4110B 22 Sulfate mg/1 10 250 250 4110B 24 1 Zinc lu I mg/1 1 0.2 1 5 5 3111B STATE REGULATED 14 Sodium -'v i}- m /l 5 3111B 15 Hardness m /1 10 2340C 16 Conductivity umhos/cm 10 700 700 2510B 17 Turbidity NTU 0.1 1 2130B 18 Color color units 5 15 15 2120B 26 Total Dissolved Solids m /1 1 150 500 500 2540C STATE UNREGULATED 9 Lead N k m /1 0.0 12 3113B 23 Copper mg/1 1 0.2 3111B COMMENTS: 0 Y111cll e -- .� ak 1986'PROPERTY OF WATER MANAGEMENT LABORATORIES,INC. lease Print Plainly WATER 1515 80th St. E. SEE BACK USE HEAVY PEN .1 MANAGEMENT Tacoma,WA 98404 FOR INSTRUCTIONS DO NOT WPJW<IN SHADED AREAS LABORATORIES INC. (253)531-3121 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT System ID No: System Name: Lab/Sample No: Date Collected: _ _ DOH Source No: 5 Multiple Source Nos: Sample Type: Sample Purpose: C Date Received: _ Date Reported: �_ 19_Q Supervisor: County: Date Digested: A/ � Group: A B Other Sample Location: M Send Results&Bill To: gP1�Q�r V �e� �I�rl e� ' Remarks: yP0 6LD b Wair LON W5 DOH# ANALYTES RESULTS UNITS I SRL TRIGGER MCL EXCEEDS Method Analyst EPA REGULATED Trigger? MCL? 4 Arsenic 0 0-4- m /1 0&ft 0.05 0.05 A10 go 311313 5 Barium AZ A m l 0.1 2 2 3113B 6 Cadmium m 1 0.002 0.005 0.005 3113B 7 Chromium m l 0.01 0.1 0.1 3113B 11 Mercu Mg/1 0.0005 0.002 0.002 3112B 12 Selenium I m I 0.005 1 0.05 0.05 3113B 110 Be Ilium Mg/1 0.003 0.004 0.004 3113B 111 Nickel m /1 0.04 0.1 0.1 3111B 112 Antimony m /1 0.005 0.006 0.006 3113B 113 Thallium m /1 0.002 0.002 0.002 3113B 116 Cyanide m /1 0.05 0.2 0.2 4500-CNF 19 Fluoride m /1 0.2 2 4 4110B 114 Nitrite-N m /1 0.5 0.5 1 4110B 20 Nitrate-N m -/1 0.5 5 10 4110B 161 Total Nitrate/Nitrite m /1 0.5 5 10 4110B EPA REGULATED(Secondary) 8 Iron N fi m I 0.1 0.3 0.3 3111B 10 Manganese Mg/1 0.01 0.05 0.05 3111B 13 Silver m /I 0.01 0.1 0.1 3111B 21 Chloride MR/1 20 250 250 4110B 22 1 Sulfate m /1 10 250 250 4110B 24 Zinc m /1 0.2 5 5 3111B STATE REGULATED 14 Sodium iv Mg/1 5 3111B 15 Hardness m /1 10 2340C 16 Conductivity umhos/cni 10 700 700 2510B 17 Turbidity NTU 0.1 1 2130B 18 Color color um*tsl 5 15 15 2120B 26 Total Dissolved Solids m /1 1 150 500 500 2540C STATE UNREGULATED 9 Lead m /1 1 0.002 3113B 23 1 Copper mg/1 1 0.2 3111B COMMENTS: Y�)Eo IC dQ Z+Z. 1986'PROPERTY OF WATER MANAGEMENT LABORATORIES,INC. Washington State Public Health Laboratory 161ONE 150th Street, Shoreline WA. 98155-9701 Phone(206)361-2896 FAX(206)361-2899 RADIONUCLIDE ANALYSES REPORT System ID No.: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Lab/Sample No: 02369849 Date Collected: 2/25/03 10:00 DOH Source No: SO Multiple Source Nos: I Sample Type: B Sample Pyrpose: C Date Received: 2/26/03 Date Reported: _/ /I/P S Supervisor: 1 Date Analyzed: 03/18/03 Analyst: AXS County: Mason Group: A Sample Location: Well house tap Well house#1 Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: Belfair Water District#1 P.O.Box 563 P.O. Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 Belfair,WA 98528 DOH # ANALYTES LAB MDA RESULTS UNITS DATE MCL ANALYST/METHOD ANALYZED EPA REGULATED:.� 39 Radium 226 pCi/l 3 40 Radium 226+228 pCi/I 5 41 Gross Alpha 1 ND pCi/l 03/18/03 15* AXS/EPA 900.0 42 Gross Beta pCi/I 50 43 Tritium pCi/I 20000 44 Strontium 90 pCi/I 8 107 Cesium 134 pCi/I ** 108 Iodine 131 pCi/I ** EPA UNREGULATED 105 jUranium pCi/I 109 IRadon pCul NOTES. MCL: Maximum Contaminant Level. If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL, immediately contact your regional DOH office. MDA: Minimum Detectable Amount. NA(Not Analyzed)indicates this analyte was not included in the current analysis. ND (Not Detected) indicates this analyte was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the MDA. * Excluding Uranium **The MCL for beta particle and photon radioactivity from man-made radionuclides is the average annual concentration which shall not produce an annual dose equivalent to the total body or any internal organ greater than four milli-rem/yr. Comments Charge Amount: $57.00 Washington State Public Health Laboratory 1610 ONE 150th Street, Shoreline WA. 98155-9701 Phone(206)361-2896 FAX(206)361-2899 RADIONUCLIDE ANALYSES REPORT System ID No.: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Lab/Sample No: 02369848 Date Collected: 2/25/03 10:05 DOH Source No: S02 Multiple Source Nos: Sample Type: B Sample P ose: C Date Received: 2/26/03 Date Reported: Gay j y p j Supervisor: M, 1t . + { Date Analyzed: 03/18/03 Analyst: AXS County: Mason Group: A Sample Location: Well house tap Well house#2 Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: Belfair Water District#1 P.O. Box 563 P.O. Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 Belfair,WA 98528 DOH # ANALYTES LAB MDA RESULTS UNITS DATE MCL ANALYST/METHOD ANALYZED EPA REGULATED 39 Radium 226 pCi/I 3 40 Radium 226+228 pCi/I 5 41 Gross Alpha 1 ND pCi/I 03/18/03 15* AXS/EPA 900.0 42 Gross Beta pCi/I 50 43 Tritium pCi/I 20000 44 Strontium 90 pCi/I 8 107 Cesium 134 pCi/I ** 108 Iodine 131 pCi/I ** EPA UNREGULATED" 105 Uranium pCi/I 109 Radon pCi/I NOTES: MCL:Maximum Contaminant Level. If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. MDA:Minimum Detectable Amount. NA(Not Analyzed)indicates this analyte was not included in the current analysis. ND(Not Detected) indicates this analyte was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the MDA. * Excluding Uranium **The MCL for beta particle and photon radioactivity from man-made radionuclides is the average annual concentration which shall not produce an annual dose equivalent to the total body or any internal organ greater than four milli-rem/yr. Comments Charge Amount: $57.00 11525 Knudson Rd. n. Burlington,WA 98233 (800)755-9295 _� 360 757-1400-FAX 360 757-1402 Page 1 of 2 ANALYTICAL ( ) ( ) 9 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) REPORT Client Name: Twiss Analytical Laboratories Reference Number: 03-5699 26280 Twelve Trees Lane Ste C Poulsbo, WA 98370 Project: 01095185/01095186 System Name: BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT#1 Field ID: 4441901 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number: 04610695 DOH Source Number: 01 Date Collected: 9/15/2003 Multiple Sources: Date Extracted: 524_030922 Sample Type: B Date Analyzed: 9/22/2003 Sample Purpose: C Report Date: 9/30/2003 Sample Location: water tap in wellhouse Analyst: - County: Mason Supervisor: - - -EPA_ Method 524.2 For State Di - - - - king Water TC is ---- - Drinking DOH# COMPOUNDS I'RESULTS Units SR 99ef L MCL (COMMENT i i 11,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE ND i ug/L 0.2 j ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE(EDB) ND ug/L 0.05 1 45 VINYL CHLORIDE � ND I ug/L 0.5 ; 0.5 ! 2 i 46 j 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE ND U911 0.5 0.5 7 47 I1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 i 0.5 200 48 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND i U91 0.5 ! 0.5 I 5 i 49 BENZENE ! ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 50 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 i 51 TRICHLOROETHYLENE NID Ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 52 P-DICHLOROBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 1 0.5 1 75 56 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 57 T-1.2-DICHLOROETHYLENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 100 60 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE ND Ug/L 0.5 0.5 70 63 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND ug/L ! 0.5 0.5 5 66 TOLUENE j ND ug/L 0.5 i 0.5 1000 (III 67 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND !ug/L 0.5 10.5 5 68 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE ND Ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 71 CHLOROBENZENE ND j Ug/L 0.5 0.5 100 73 ETHYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 i 0.5 700 76 STYRENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 100 84 O-DICHLOROBENZENE ND Ug/L 0.5 0.5 _ 600 95 1,2,4,-TRICHLOROBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 70 158 WP-XYLENE ND j ug/L 0.5 i 0.5 159 O-XYLENE NDI ug/L 0.5 0.5 160 TOTAL XYLENES ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 10000 i � I 1 i EPA Unregulated Monitoring Required I i 1 53 CHLOROMETHANE ND U9lL 0.5 0.5 1 54 BROMOMETHANE ND !Ug/L 10.5 10.5 55 CHLOROETHANE ND I ug/L 0.5 1 0.5 - --- 1 I----�- - - A Result of WEr in 6tes that tlro compound was not detected above the Lab's McMod Detection Lima-MDL. Maxiraae contaminant Level,maximum permissible level of a contaminant in water established by EPA,NPDWR. State Advisory Level(SAL)for Unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL value Indicates a level Is not currently established. If a compound Is detected>or-to Me Stab Repor*V Level.SRL,specified increased monitoring frequencies may occur per DOH. Metlgd Dabdion Limit is the lab's minimum concentration a compound can be measured and reported with 99%confidence that the compound concentration is greater than zero. J-Eatlmabd value. FORM:VOC ST Reference Number. 0 9 Page 2 of 2 Lab Number: 046104610695 ANAL N-T 1 C A L Report Date: 9/30/2003 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) REPORT DOH# COMPOUNDS RESULTS Units SRL Trigger j MCL COMMENT 58 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 59 j 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 62 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 i 64 DIBROMOMETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 65 CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 69 iTRANS-I,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 70 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 72 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 78 BROMOBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 79 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 80 I,1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 81 0-CHLOROTOLUENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 i 82 P-CHLOROTOLUENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 I { 83 M-DICHLOROBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 II 85 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 86BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 j 87 ;ISOPROPYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 88 i N-PROPYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 891,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 1 j i 90 1 TERT-BUTYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 91 1,2.4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 1 ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 92 SEC-BUTYLBENZENE I ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 93iP-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE i ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 94 N-BUTYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 96 NAPHTHALENE I ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 1 97 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE i ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 98 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 162 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 i 0.5 I EPA Regulated-Under Trihalomethanes Program 27 CHLOROFORM ND ug/L 28 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND ug/L 29 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE ND ug/L i I 30 BROMOFORM ND I ug/L { i 31 TOTAL TRIHALOMETHANE ND ug/L i { 80 State Unregulated-Other �' I l 0 METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER ND ug/L - A Re"of'ND-Indicates that the compound was not detected above the Lab's Method Detection Limit-MDL. Maxknum Contanmam Level,maximum ponwssibie level of a contaminant in water established by EPA,NPDWR Stale Advisory Level(SAL)for Unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL value indicates a level is not currently established. tl a compound is detected>or-to the State Reponirg Level.SRL.specilied kweased nicnitorirg Sequencies may occur Per DOH. Method Detection Unit is the lab's minimum concentration a compound can be msaswed and reported with 99%confidence that Me compound concenhation is grsaw than zero. J-Estimated vakis. FORM:VOC ST FOR LAB USE ONLY TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. (360) 779-5141 A. Lab Sample Number (1) _ Rejected on_/_/_ Reason Rejected: (1) _ Air Bubble at time am/pm (2) — Too Warm (3) _ Bottle Broken METHOD: 502.2_ (2) _ Accepted By: (4) — Other 524.2 _ Required Monitoring SAMPLE PRESERVATION B. Sample Submitted For: _ Follow-up of Lab Sample Number _ 40C C. Last Date to Analyze _ Verification or_ Confirmation _ pH 2 —/—/— Sodium Thiosulfate UTILITY - Complete Item 1 through 14 (Please Print) WATER SAMPLE INFORMATION FOR VOC ANALYSIS - THIS MUST BE COMPLETED 1.0-53_5DO 2,&//j'xlr 1,lnf�r l�:�frict i4f/' 3. ZM2 snrr C A_S,s System ID Number System Name County Class A or B 4. Source Type(Circle one) SURFACE WELL WELL-FIELD PURCHASED SPRING DISTRIBUTION 5. DOH Source Number(enter the numbers exactly as S�A 6. Utility's Name for this source e,oell �! shown on WFI item 17, such as SO I, S02........S10, etc.) 7. Specific Location Where Sample Taken: (Which tap, address, sample site , etc.) 'n �L;cyj,Aae.s e_. 8. Indicate treatment type: (a) _ Chlorination (d) _ Aeration (check all that apply) (b) _ Filtration (e) _ All other A,obe_ (c) _ Fluoridation (specify) 9. Date Collected / / 10. Time Collected , 11e Collected By: - (N e) (Phone) 12. COMPOSITE INFORMATION (Optional - Applies to multiple source systems only): Only if you want the lab to composite this sample with other samples from your system, sign and enclose the COMPOSITE WAIVER FORM. Enter the DOH source numbers of the sample(s) to be composited with this sample. 1. --- 2.--- 3.--- 4'--- 13. Charges to be paid by: 14. Report results to: .. ��c�..i�'--��,z�t►"' 1�%�,�';c7'�""�/` ,.�PL��;r c,�'Q�rr �i c7�r:c f '54-4 11525 Knudson Rd. anirms Burlington,WA 98233 ��- (800)755-9295 A N A L Y "T I C A I__- (360)757-1400-FAX(360)757-1402 Pagel of 2 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) REPORT Client Name: Twiss Analytical Laboratories Reference Number: 03-5699 26280 Twelve Trees Lane Ste C Poulsbo, WA 98370 Project: 01095185/01095186 System Name: BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT#1 Field ID: 4441902 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number: 04610696 DOH Source Number: 03 Date Collected: 9/15/2003 Multiple Sources: Date Extracted: 524_030922 Sample Type: B Date Analyzed: 9/22/2003 Sample Purpose: C Report Date: 9/30/2003 //11 Sample Location: water tap in wellhouse Analyst: County: Mason Supervisor: - - - I-- EPA Method 524.2 For State Drinking Water. . - - - 9 Compliance- ---i-- - ----- - - DOH#COMPOUNDS RESULTS Units SRL Trigger MCL COMMENT _ I 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE NO ug/L 0.2 ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE(EDB) I NO ug/L 0.05 ' 45 VINYL CHLORIDE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 2 46 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 7 I 47 �1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE NO ug/L 1 0.5 1 0.5 200 48 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE I ND w/L 0.5 0.5 ; 5 49 BENZENE ND j ug/L 0.5 0.5 I 5 50 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE NO lt4L 0.5 0.5 5 51 TRICHLOROETHYLENE ND 1 ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 52 P-DICHLOROBENZENE ND I ug/L 0.5 i 0.5, i 75 56 METHYLENE CHLORIDE NO I ug/L j 0.5 0.5 i 5 57 T-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE NO ';ug/L 0.5 0.5 100 60 CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHYLENE NO tg/L 0.5 ! 0.5 i 70 63 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE NO ug/L 10.5 0.5 5 66 TOLUENE i NO I ug/L 0.5 0.5 i 1000 67 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE NO iug/L 10.5 0.5 5 68 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE NO uglL 0.5 0.5 5 71 CHLOROBENZENE NO I U91L 0.5 0.5 100 73 ETHYLBENZENE NO i ug/L 10.5 0.5 700 76 STYRENE ND tgll 0.5 0.5 1 100 84 0-DICHLOROBENZENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 - '1 600 95 1,2,4,-TRICHLOROBENZENE NO U91L 10.5 10.5 70 158 WP-XYLENE i NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 159 O-XYLENE NO I ug/L 0.5 0.5 160 TOTAL XYLENES NO ugA. i 0.5 i 0.5 i 10000 I EPA Unregulated Monitoring Required 53 CHLOROMETHANE NO I ug/L 1 0.5 ; 0.5 54 BROMOMETHANE NO ;ug/L 10.5 i 0.5 55 CHLOROETHANE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 A Result WNW indicates that the compound was not detected above the Lab's Method Detection limit-MOL. Maximum Contaminant Level,maxinwm permissible level of a contaminant in water established by EPA,NPDWR. State Advisory Level(SAL)for Unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL value indicates a level is not currently established. If a compound Is detected>or=to the State Reporting Level,SRL,specified increased monitoring frequencies may occur per DOH. Method Detection Limit is the lab's minimum concentration a compound can be measured and reported with 997E confidence that the compound concentration is greater man zero. J-Estimated value. FORM:VOC ST Reference Number: 03-5699 Page 2 of 2 Lab Number: 04610696 A N A L Y T I C A L Report Date: 9/30/2003 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) REPORT DOH# COMPOUNDS RESULTS Units SRL Trigger MCL COMMENT 58 '.1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 59 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 62 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 64 1 DIBROMOMETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 65 CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 j 69 TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 70 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 72 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 78 1 BROMOBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 79 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 80 i1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 81 0-CHLOROTOLUENE ND ug/L . 0.5 0.5 82 P-CHLOROTOLUENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 83 M-DICHLOROBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 85 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 86 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 87 ISOPROPYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 88 N-PROPYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 89 1.3.5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 j 90 TERT-BUTYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 91 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE ND i ug/L 0.5 0.5 92 SEC-BUTYLBENZENE ND 1 ug/L 0.5 0.5 ! 93 P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 94 I N-13UTYLBENZENE ND 1 ug/L 0.5 1 0.5 96 NAPHTHALENE ND ug/L 0.5 . ! 0.5 97 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 98 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 162 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 EPA Regulated-Under Trihalomethanes Program i 27 CHLOROFORM 1 ND ug/L I � I ! 28 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND ug/L 29 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE ND ug/L 30 BROMOFORM ND i ug/L 31 TOTAL TRIHALOMETHANE j ND ug/L i 80 !State Unregulated-Other I j 0 METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER ; ND tglL I A Result of Ncr indicates that the compound was not detected above the Lab's Memod Detection Limit-MDL. Maximum Contaminant Level,maximum permissible level of a contaminant in water established by EPA,NPDWR, State Advisory Level(SAL)for Unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL value indicates a level is not currently established. lt a compound is detected>or-to the State Reporting Level,SRL,specified increased monitoring frequencies may occur per DOH. Mednod Detection Unit Is tM lab's mimmurn concentration a compound can be measured and reported with 99%confidence that the compound concentration is greater than zero. J-Estimated value. FORM:VOC ST FOR LAB USE ONLY TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. (360) 779-5141 A. Lab Sample Number (1) —Rejected on_/_/_ Reason Rejected: (1) Air Bubble at time _ — am/pm (2) Too Warm (3) _ Bottle Broken METHOD: 502.2— (2) — Accepted By: (4) — Other 4� 524.2 — Required Monitoring SAMPLE PRESERVATION B. Sample Submitted For: _ Follow-up of Lab Sample Number _ 40C C. Last Date to Analyze _ Verification or _ Confirmation _ pH 2 /—/— Sodium Thiosulfate UTILITY - Complete Item 1 through 14 (Please Print) WATER SAMPLE INFORMATION FOR VOC ANALYSIS -THIS MUST BE COMPLETED 3. .a�� e-1%ass oil System ID Number System tame County Class A or B 4. Source Type(Circle one) SURFACE WELL WELL-FIELD PURCHASED SPRING DISTRIBUTION 5. DOH Source Number (enter the numbers exacly as S 6. Utility's Name for this source Aejl,,_1.I shown on WFI item 17, such as SO I, S02........S10, etc.) 7. Specific Location Where Sample Taken: (Which tap, address, sample site ry, etc.) ti 7,2 4 j 2 ;n L,,sriiAt. co C_ 8. Indicate treatment type: (a) _ Chlonnabon (d) _ Aeration (check all that apply) (b) _ Filtration (e) _ All other (c) _ Fluoridation (specify) 9. Date Collected _`�l / 10. Time Collected am/pm 11: Collected By: /Z7/21 �rdss<JAI r� r,,2'7S— (Name) (Phone) 12. COMPOSITE INFORMATION (Optional - Applies to multiple source systems only): Only if you want the lab to composite this sample with other samples from your system, sign and enclose the COMPOSITE WAIVER FORA. Enter the DOH source numbers of the sample(s) to be composited with this sample. 13. Charges to be paid bv: 14. Report results to: .�c� fica.�tcl��•r L7r't-fr;r�' "� / �t/�4air t,�:)Ge.frr 1�;s7�r•�c7`'�/ - I-A ;!' Mtn 9BS12R 11525 Knudson Rd. Burlington,WA 98233 anewf (.00)755-9295 A N A L 1CAL (360)757-1400-FAX(360)757-1402 Page 1 of 2 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) REPORT Client Name: Twiss Analytical Laboratories Reference Number: 03-7802 26280 Twelve Trees Lane Ste C Poulsbo, WA 98370 Project: 01099926 System Name: BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT#1 Field ID: 46239 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number: 04615217 DOH Source Number: 04 Date Collected: 12/15/2003 Multiple Sources: Date Extracted: 524_031223 Sample Type: B Date Analyzed: 12/23/2003 Sample Purpose: C Report Date: 12/31/2003 Sample Location: spigot in well house Analyst: County: Mason Supervisor: EPA Method 524.2 For State Drinking Water Compliance DOH# COMPOUNDS RESULTS Units SRL l Trigger MCL COMMENT - - -- - -- I 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE NO ug/L 0.2 ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE(EDB) NO ug/L 0.05 45 VINYL CHLORIDE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 2 46 1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 7 47 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE NO U911- 0.5 0.5 200 48 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 49 BENZENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 50 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 51 TRICHLOROETHYLENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 52 P-DICHLOROBENZENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 75 56 METHYLENE CHLORIDE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 57 T-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE NO tg/L 0.5 0.5 100 60 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 70 63 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 66 TOLUENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 1000 67 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 68 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 71 CHLOROBENZENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 100 73 ETHYLBENZENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 700 76 STYRENE NO u91L 0.5 0.5 _ 100 84 O-DICHLOROBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 600 95 1.2.4.-TRICHLOROBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 70 158 WP-XYLENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 159 O-XYLENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 160 TOTAL XYLENES ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 10000 EPA Unregulated Monitoring Required 53 CHLOROMETHANE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 A Result of Wr kdicates flat the compound was not detected above the Labs Method Detection Limit-MDL. MaKM"Cantamirwq Level,mwtxknum penmssibb level of a contarninem in water established by EPA.NPDWR. State Advisory Level(SAL)for Unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL value Indicates a level is not cumantty established. lt a compound is detected>or=to the State Reporting Level.SRL.specified increased monitoring frequencies may occur per DOH. Method Detection limit is the labs nw*y xn concentration a compound can be measured and reported with 9M confidence that the compound concentration is greater than zero. J-Estimated value. FORM:VOC ST Aoqft Reference Number. 0 Page 2 of 2 Lab Number: 0461524615217 AT3�C L V 7!I C AZ Report Date: 12/31/2003 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) REPORT DOH# COMPOUNDS RESULTS Units I SRL Trigger MCL COMMENT 54 BROMOMETHANE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 I 55 CHLOROETHANE NO ug/L i 0.5 0.5 58 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 59 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 62 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE NO I ug/L i 0.5 0.5 64 DIBROMOMETHANE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 65 CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE NO ug/L 10.5 i 0.5 69 TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE NO ug/L 10.5 1 0.5 70 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE NO ug/L 10.5 0.5 72 1.1.1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE NO ug/L 10.5 0.5 78 BROMOBENZENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 79 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE NO ug/L 0.5 10.5 80 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 81 O-CHLOROTOLUENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 82 P-CHLOROTOLUENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 83 M-DICHLOROBENZENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 85 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 86 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 87 ISOPROPYLBENZENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 88 N-PROPYLBENZENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 89 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 90 TERT-BUTYLBENZENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 91 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 92 SEC-BUTYLBENZENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 93 P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 94 N-BUTYLBENZENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 96 NAPHTHALENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 97 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 98 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 162 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE NO ug/L 0.5 0.5 EPA Regulated-Under Trihalornethanes Pro ram 27 CHLOROFORM NO ug/L 28 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE NO ug/L 29 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE NO ug/L 30 BROMOFORM NO ug/L _ 31 TOTAL TRIHALOMETHANE NO ug/L 80 State Unregulated -Other 0 METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER NO ug/L A Result of Nir mdkatas that the compound was not detected above the Lab's Method Detection Unt-MOL. Marwrrm Cwtaminard Level,nuuu um penNssible level of a cantammm in water established by EPA,NPDWR State Advisory Level(SAL)for Unregulated comparmds. A blank MCL or SAL value indicates a level is not c rrendy established. tf a compound is detected>or-to the State Repor"Level.SRL,specified increased ffavtontrmg hequencies may occur per ODH. Meddd Detection Limit a the lab's nw mum concentration a compound can be measured and reported with 99%co d fence that the compound concentration Is greater than zero. J-Estimated value. FORM:VOC ST TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS(IOCS)REPORT System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 1 Lab/Sample No 01092163 Date Collected: 7/16/03 i DOH Source No: S03 Multiple Sources: -- Sample Type: A Sample Purpose._-C I Date Received: 7/17/03 Date Reported: 7/30/03 Supervisor: ST Date Prepared: - _ 1 -Date Analyzed 7/17/03 Analyst: MP County: MasonGroup:,.- - -- _ -- -- --- -- -- I_.. Group: Sample Location: Well#3 Tap in well house I Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: I P.O.Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 j DOH# Aaalytes Results 1 Units SRL Trigger i MCL I Exceeds Method/Anal st *,. , TJLATED Trigger? MCL' 4 Arsenic <(0.002) mg/L j 0.01 ! 0.05 j 0.05 j EPA 200.9 NP 5 Barium <(0.1) ! mg/L ( 0.1 2 1 2 EPA 200.7 1 NP 6 Cadmium <(0.001) i mg/L 0.01 0.605 .0.005 EPA 200.7 NP 1. 7 jChromium <(0 01) mg/L 0.01 0.1 0.1 EPA 200.7 NPi ' I 1 Mercury I <(0.0005) ! mg/L j 0.002 0.002 0.002 SM 3112 B I NP 12 1 Selenium <(0.005) mg/L 0.005 I 0.05 0.05 EPA 200.9 NP 110 tBeryllium <(0.003 mg/L I 0.003 I 0.004 I 0.004 EPA 200.7 ! NP III i Nickel <(O.04) I mg/L1 0.04 ; 0.1 0.1 i EPA 200.7 NP 112 Antimony <(0.005) i mg/L 0.005 i 0.006 0.006 EPA 200.9 ! NP 113 Thallium <(0.002) mg/L ! 0.002 0.002 I 0.002 EPA 200.9 NP 116 Cyanide <(0.05) i mg/L 0.05 0.2 0.2 SM 4500-CN F NP j 19 Fluoride <(0.2) mg/L ! 0.2 i 2 4 SM 4500-F C , NP 114 Nitrite <(0.01) I mg/L 0.5 0.5 1 SM 4500-NO2 B ! NP ! 20 __ Nitrate <(0.1) I mg/L 0.5 5 10 i SM 4500-NO3 F , NP I - _ --- - NP (0 1�I , 'ED,.(Secondary)0.5 5 I 10 I Trigger? MCL? SM 4500 NO3 D Total Nitrate(Nitnte < 1 8 Iron Q0.1) mg/L 0.1 T 0.3 0.3 EPA 200.7 NP"_- 10 Manganese g <(0.01) * mg/L ! 0.01 0.05 0.05 i EPA 200.7 NP j 13 Silver <(0.01) mg/L ! 0.01 0.1 0.1 t EPA 200.7 NP 21 Chloride <(5.0) t mg/L 20 250 250 SM 4500-CI B MP 24 Zinc -(0.2) I 2 P - �`- �,r rya `...�- Y •;< _- sa mg/L 0 5 5 EPA 200 7 N x" x .. JEG7 :ATED _ ,,�A: �'>r,r w.' Trigger? MCL? 4- 14 Sodium 8.58 i mg/L 5 I EPA 200.75 NP 15 Hardness 64 mg/L 10 SM 2340 B NP 16 J&onductivity 163 j uS/cm 10 ; 700 700 { SM 2510 B j NP 17 Turbidity 0.12 NTU 0.1 I 1 1 EPA 180.1 I NP 18 Color 7 . !Color Units 1 5 15 15 SM 2120 B NP { . ..',.d `� oy� R` >> Trigger? MCL �Ysr 9 Lead -- <( .002) mg/L 0.002 i I EPA 200.9 NP -- ! 23 I Copper <0.2 L 0.2 PPe ! ( ) m EPA 200.7 NP Twiss Laboratory Number: 43146 Page 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Lab/Sample No: 01092163 Date Collected: 7/16/03 DOH Source No: S03 Multiple Sources: Sample Type: A Sample Purpose: C_ Date Received: 7/17/03 Date Reported: 7/30/03 Supervisor: ST Date Prepared: - - Date Analyzed. 7/17/03 Analyst: M County: Mason Group: A I Sample Location: Well#3 Tap in well house Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 DOH# Anal tes Results Units SRL Trigger y � MCL Exceeds I Method!Analyst Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 43146 Page 2 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT System ID No: 053500 System Name_ Belfair Water District#1 Lab/Sample No: 01099892 Date Collected: 12/15/03 DOH Source No: SO4 Multiple Sources:- - --_ Sample Type: B Sample Purpose_ C - -_ Date Received: 12/16/03 Date Reported 12/24/03 - - Supervisor._ - ST Date Pfepared: 1 Date Analyzed: 12/18/03 Analyst: NP _Counry_-- - Mason -- ---- ---- ---------- - p' ---- --- , Sample Location: Spigot in Well House Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: j P.O.Box 563 I Belfair,WA 98528 l DOH#j Analytes Results Units SRL Trigger r MCL r-- -Exceeds - Method/Analyst Trigger? MCL? - c 4 Arsenic <(0.002) mg/L 0.01 0.05 0.05 EPA 200.9 NP { 5 Barium <(0.1) mg/L 0.1 2 2 - - - --EPA 200.7 1 NP j 6 Cadmium <(0.001) mg/L 0.01 0.005 0.005 EPA 200.7 NP 7 Chromium <(0.01) mg/L 0.01 0.1 0.1 EPA 200.7 NP 11 Mercury <(0.0005) mg/L 0.002 1 0.002 0.002 SM 3112 B NP 12 Selenium <(0.005) mg/L 0.005 0.05 0.05 EPA 200.9 NP 110 Beryllium <(0.003) mg/L 0.003 0.004 0.004 EPA 200.7 NP 111 Nickel <(0.04) mg/L 0.04 0.1 0.1 I EPA 200.7 I NP 112 Antimony <(0.005) mg/L 0.005 0.006 0.006 EPA 200.9 NP 113 Thallium <(0.002) mg/L 0.002 0.002 0.002 EPA 200.9 + NP I 116 Cyanide <(0.05) mg/L 0.05 0.2 0.2 SM 4500-CN F NP 19 I Fluoride <(0.2) mg/L 0.2 2 4 I 1 SM 4500-F C AT i 1 44 I Nitrite <(0.01) mg/L 0.5 0.5 I SM 4500-NO2 B AT Nitrate <(0.1) mg/L 0.5 5 10 SM 4500-NO3 F AT -- 20 i F ---- --- --- - --- - --- 161 Total Nitrate/Nitrite <(0.1) mg/L 0.5 5 10 SM 4500 NO3 D AT Trigger? MCL? 8 Iron 0.2 mg/L 0.1 0.3 0.3 EPA 200.7 NP 10 Manganese <(0.01) mg/L 0.01 0.05 0.05 EPA 200.7 NP ! 1 13 Silver <(0.01) mg/L 0.01 0.1 0.1 EPA 200.7 1 NP 21 Chloride <(5.0) mg/L 20 250 250 SM 4500-CI B AT 24 I Zinc <(0 2) mg/L 0.2 5 5 00. P Trigger? MCL? 7 ah EPA 2 T er" ..p i 141x Sodium <(;.0) mg/L 5s EPA 200.7 NP I5 :Hardness 44 mg/L 10 SM 2340 B AT i 16 j Conductivity 101 us/cm 10 700 1 700 SM 2510 B NP 17 Turbidity 2.4 NTU 0.1 1 1 Yes Yes EPA 180.t NP 18 Color -13 Color Units 5 I5 15 SM 2120 B AT r a Trigger. MCL' 9 Lead <(0.002) mg/L 0.002 i--- EPA 200.9 NP 23 Copper <(0.2) mg/L 0.2 �-- - EPA 200.7 NP I Twiss Laboratory Number: 46232 Page 1 FOR LAB USE ONLY TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. (360) 779-5141 A. Lab Sample Numbe (1) _ Rejected on _/_I_ Reason Rejected: (1) — Air Bubble ' 15, Y-e, Z3 y at time am/pm (2) — Too Warm D/D gg9a6 (3) — Bottle Broken METHOD: 502.2_ (2) — Accepted By: (4) _ Other 524.2_ _ Required Monitoring SAMPLE PRESERVATION B. Sample Submitted For:C. Last Date to Analyze _ Follow-up of Lab Sample Number _ _ 40C _ Verification or _ Confirmation _ pH 2 /—/— Sodium Thiosulfate UTILITY - Complete Item 1 through 14 (Please Print) WATER SAMPLE INFORMATION FOR VOC ANALYSIS -THIS MUST BE COMPLETED 1. I53_,�n[9 2•��/Tck'1r (A)aj:tr D,.strlC / 3. MrzSoi? C,Ia,5.5 /9 System ID Number System Name County Class A or B 4. Source Type (Circle one) SURFACE ' WELL WELL-FIELD PURCHASED SPRING DISTRIBUTION 5. DOH Source Number(enter the numbers exactly as S Q_q 6. Utility's Name for this source(,,) shown on WFI item 17, such as SO 1, S02........S10, etc.) 7. Specific Location Where Sample Taken: (Which tap, address, sample site H, etc.) — j2 L-tZNl/- �e tcS f 8. Indicate treatment type: (a) _ Chlorination (d) _ Aeration (check all that apply) (b) _ Filtration (e) _ All other , N (0 Fluoridation (specify) 9. Date Collected //�� / 10. Time Collected : am pm) 11. Collected By: _ 'Je rrY tilic// 3�e, ~,J75 (Mame) (Phone) 12. COMPOSITE INFORMATION (Optional- Applies to multiple source systems only): Only if you want the lab to composite this sample with other samples from your system, sign and enclose the COMPOSITE WAIVER FORM. Enter the DOH source numbers of the samples) to be composited with this sample. 1. --- 2'--- 3'--- 4'--- 13. Charges to be paid by: 14. Report results to: PaS ric �cl�y.l; !'w?r, iit't % LiC1r___J7 / -3r/ 6ki r cr_ 9f�'Sd3' 1n� r TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES,INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS(IOCS) REPORT System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Lab/Sample No: 01099892 Date Collected: 12/15/03 DOH Source No: SO4 Multiple Sources: Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 12/16/03 Date Reported: 12/24/03 Supervisor: ST j Date Prepared: - -------- - -_-- - Date Analyzed: -12/18/03- --— Analyst: NP ......— ; -- - --- -----------._ ---- County: Mason Group__ A i Sample Location: Spigot in Well House i Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: i P.O.Box 563 ' Belfair,WA 98528 DOH# Analytes Results Units S1tL Trigger MCL Exceeds ; Method/Analyst _-- - -- I L--�- -5=--------- -- - _ __ _ . Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 46232 Page 2 ENERGY LASORATOR/ES, PVC. •2393 Salt Creek Highway(82601) •P.O. Box 3258 - Caspef WY 82602 Toll Free 988.235.0515 307.235 0515 • Fax 307..234.1639 • casper@eneigylab.com -www energylab.com LABORATORY ANALYSIS REYOWI' Client:TWIS.S ANALYTICAL INC System ID#:OS3500 Sample Matrix: Liquid,water System Name; Belfair Water District Xl DOH Source#: SO4 Group: A Sample Location: Spigot in Well House County: Mason Report Date:January 6,2004 Sample Type:Before Treatment ELI Certitication N: C336 Sample Reason: Compliance Gross AI Alpha Max gxutn BeG►' Marimum Lalwratory IA Sample Mit/1"we Collected BYA aam Sumi,le_D PCu vrcei ion Costa-hunt Gross Sets, Aecwou Contanrinant Level MCL Level CL C03120867-001 12/15/2003 14:10 Jerry Hukill/360.275.3008 010 99925 <1.0 NA 15 <2.0 NA 50 TRACKING RG. PAGE NO. cjc:r:Uwau2003Vwiss_andlyua\liquK6%W312OM7.xls 120867R0001 BE,LFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 WATER SHORTAGE RESPONSE PLAN WORKSHEETS CURRENT WATER CONSUMPTION(2006) in Feb Mat A0tll May( June July Au_B Sept 22 Nov Dec TOTAL Cons.(Of) 385,361 470,679 381,070 383,004 433,804 458,810 521,028 624,668 636,911 499,175 420,433 413,914 5,628,857 Cons.(gal) 2,882,600 3,520,679 2,850,404 2,864,870 3,244,854 3,431,899 3,897,289 4,672,517 4,764,094 3,733,829 3,144,839 3,096,077 42,103,850 Av Cons/day 92,984 113,570 101,800 92,415 108,162 110,706 129,910 150,726 153,680 124,461 101,446 103,203 115,255 PD=2xAv 185,968 227,140 203,600 184,630 216,324 221,412 259,820 301,452 307,360 248,922 202,892 206,406 230,511 WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS-2007 to 2012 2007 Jon Feb Mat 6w ME June fah( 692 �Aw 921 NO 922 TOTAL AVO ADD 95,649 116,703 104,608 94,985 111,146 113,760 133,494 154,884 157,920 127,895 104,245 106,050 118,435 POD 191,098 233,406 209,218 189,930 222,292 227,520 266,988 309,768 315,840 255,790 208,490 212,100 236.870 2008 Jan Fgp tit 6P0 ma June "IY &a 9QM 4s1 M4Y pN TOTAL AVG 96,858 118,302 106,041 96,266 112,669 115,319 135,323 157,006 160,084 129.647 105,673 107,503 120,058 PDD 193,716 236,604 212,082 192,532 225,338 230,638 270,646 314,012 320,168 259,294 211,346 215,006 240,115 2009 "n Felt MK 62111 May Jim m w Qt NO pm TOTAL AVO ADD 98,185 119,923 107,494 97,585 114,213 116,899 137,177 159,157 162,277 131,423 107,121 108,976 121,703 POD 196,370 239,846 214,988 195,170 228,426 233,798 274,354 318,314 324,554 262,848 214,242 217,952 243,405 2010 AU Feb Mat 62di ME "nA .43 ul 6w a@PA Q21 No 999 TOTAL AVO ADD 99,530 121,566 108,967 98,922 115,778 118,501 139,056 161,337 164,500 133,223 108,589 110,469 123,370 POD 199,060 243,132 217,934 197,844 231,556 237,002 278,112 322,874 329,000 266,446 217,178 220,938 245,740 2011 ,Ignr Feb Mat ApcU me "08 "-[Y Aya �&A Oct Nov Dec TOTAL AVG ADD 102,615 125,335 112,346 101,989 119,367 122,175 143,367 166,338 169,600 137,363 111,955 113,894 127,194 POD 205,230 250,670 224,690 203,978 238,734 244,350 286,734 332,676 339,2D0 274,706 223,910 227,788 254.389 2012 an Feb Mat AB.Ill ME Lm )IJN A-Q a§j,2 Q!2 Nov QN TOTAL AVO ADD 106,796 129,220 115,828 105.151 123,067 125,962 147,811 171,494 174,858 141,611 115,426 117,425 131,137 POD 211,592 258,440 231,656 210,302 246,134 251,924 295,622 342,988 349,716 283,222 230,852 234,850 262,275 Water Use Data for 2007 WSP-WSRP WORK-6/8/2007-12:47 PM 1 of 2 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 WATER SHORTAGE RESPONSE PLAN WORKSHEETS DEMAND&SUPPLY COMPARISON-2007 to 2012 2007 Jan Fab mar Aetll may Lu �Lul Aug Sept Opt Nov Dec PDD 191,098 233,406 209,216 189,930 222,292 227,620 266,988 309,768 315,840 255,790 208,490 212,100 AVAIL.SUPP. 612,000 612,000 612,000 512,000 612,000 612,000 612,000 612,000 612,000 612,000 612,000 612,000 EXCESS/(DEF) 420,902 378,594 402,784 422,070 389,708 384,480 345,012 302,232 296,160 356,210 403,510 399,900 2008 im Feb mar April may 4u-rle Lly Aug Sept Oct Nov DOQ PDD 193,716 236,604 212,082 192,532 225,338 230,638 270,648 314,012 320,168 259,294 211,346 215,006 AVAIL,SUPP. 612,000 612,000 612,000 612,000 612,000 612,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 EXCESS/(DEF) 418,284 375,396 399,918 419,468 386,662 381,362 1,205,354 1,161,988 1,155,832 1,216,706 1,264,654 1,260,994 2009 ,n F6� MK AI?tll me June L t Ault $w Os2 N�v pm PDD 196,370 239,846 214,988 195,170 228,426 233,798 274,354 318,314 324,554 262,846 214,242 217,952 AVAIL.SUPP. 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 EXCESS/(DEF) 1,279,630 1,236,154 1,261,012 1,280,830 1,247,574 1,242,202 1,201,646 1,157,686 1,151,446 1,213,154 1,261,758 1,258,048 2010 44a E2h MK Aarll me jkm jlll 692 aw 4QI NO tM PDD 199,060 243,132 217,934 197,844 231,556 237,002 278,112 322,874 329,000 266.446 217,178 220,938 AVAIL.SUPP. 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 EXCESS/(DEF) 1,276,940 1,232,868 1,258,066 1,278,166 1,244,444 1,238,998 1,197,888 1,153,326 1,147,000 1,209,564 1,258,822 1,255,062 2011 Jan Fmk Mf[ A&11 may June July Aug Sett 49-t Nov QAQ PDD 205,230 260,670 224,690 203,978 238,734 244,350 286,734 332,676 339,200 274,708 223,910 227,788 AVAIL. SUPP. 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476.000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 EXCESS/(DEF) 1,270,770 1,225,330 1,251,310 1,272,022 1,237,266 1,231,650 1,189,266 1,143,324 1.136,800 1,201,294 1,252,090 1,248,212 2012 ,kn Feb Imo[ 62LU ►mgy "22 "Jy 6m2 $§m Oct NO Dec PDD 211,592 258,440 231,658 210,302 246,134 251,924 295,622 342,988 349,716 283,222 230,852 234,850 AVAIL.SUPP. 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 EXCESS/(DEF) 1,264,408 1,217,560 1,244,344 1,265,698 1,229,866 1,224,076 1,180,378 1,133,012 1,126,284 1,192,778 1,245,148 1,241,150 Water Use Date for 2007 WSP-WSRP WORK-6/8/2007-12:47 PM 2 of 2 Page 1 of *Health 05350 Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Year 2004 System: BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT 1 WS PWSID: 05350 0 Report Date: 04/06/2004 Contact: JERRY HUKILL SR Group: A-Comm County: MASON Region: SOUTHWES' Part 1: List of Active Sources with Water Quality Monitoring Requirements DOH Name Type Use Susceptibility Treated? Source# Rating Sol WELL#I Well Permanent Moderate N S02 WELL#2 Well Permanent Low N S03 WELL#3 HUMMINGBIRD Well Permanent Moderate N SO4 WELL#4 ABA656 Well Permanent Low Y Part 2: Sampling Schedule for the Year 2004 Coliform Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Sampling Routine 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 If the coliform(bacteriological)sampling schedule listed at the bottom of the current Water Facilities Inventory(WFI)form for your system is different from the schedule listed above, follow the schedule on the current WFI. Samples must be collected from representative points within the distribution system. Repeat samples are required following an unsatisfactory sample. A minimum of 5 routine samples are required the month following one or more unsatisfactory samples in accordance with your systems Coliform Monitoring Plan. Chlorine Residual Sampling Systems that use continuous chlorination must take chlorine residual measurements at the same time and location as routine and repeat colifonn samples. Disinfection Byproducts Sampling - Systems that use continuous chlorination must collect a sample for total trihalomethanes(TTHM)and a sample for haloacetic acids(HAA5)for each chlorination treatment facility identified in your individual-disinfection byproducts(DBP)monitoring plan. Collect the samples at the frequency and locations identified in your DBP monitoring plan. Chemical Sampling Requirements - Source water chemical samples must be taken from a location as near to the source as possible,after any treatment. - Nitrate and nitrite are included as part of a complete IOC. Month Source Monitoring Group Test Method January No chemical sampling required this month February No chemical sampling required this month March S03 4QC;- KITRA-ff-: —hl oS-0s-o4 IOC March SO4 HERBICIDES SOC-515.2 March SO4 INSECTICIDES SOC-531.1 Page 2 of 4 # O Health 053500 .'Kl.r W iL,tiu NLr.. Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Year 2004 March SO4 GENERAL PESTICIDES SOC - 525.2 March SO4 VOLATILE ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS VOC-524.2 April Sol RADIUM 228 RAD May S02 RADIUM 228 RAD June S03 RADIUM 228 RAD t/ HERRICIDES -------- ------- —- — --SOG-15. ICIDES June— --- --SO4— N -RAL PhS-T-ICflDBS-------___ AT --GNTAMINANTS --- _-____----- VOC---524:2--✓ Jul Sol NITRATE-N IOC ✓ July S02 NITRATE-N IOC July SO4 �6e' Jy� b - ty vsr os-og-oq IOC July SO4 RADIUM 228 RAD >� August No chemical sampling required this month S FICGSE-S.-_---- --SOC515,2 ---- -— ----- SOC-53-1 -1--, S em r 'S -2- Se �rrttier ----SO4 --VOLATILE ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS - -V October Sol RADIUM 228 RAD Oct -- -_ OC=li-5.2 O C--534 I OC----52&2---- er NIC CO - S_ .2, November S02 RADIUM 228 RAD December S03 504- RADIUM 228 -vF os-o s—O'y- RAD PtP J)I C ALL Part 3: Water Quality Monitoring Waivers: State Waivers - Automatically granted to all sources based on DOH assessment of conditions within the state. - No source-specific assessment,waiver application,or fee required. - State waivers granted for the 2002-2004 compliance period are listed in Part 4. Part 4: Water Quality Monitoring frequency - Although waivers may be granted for your system,there may be some monitoring required as a condition of the waiver your system was granted. Monitoring GroupTest Method Sample Location Schedule/Status Asbestos ASB Distribution 1 sample(s)every 9 years 1 Page 3 of 4 !fh Health 053500 lLr.w.�lru.:.�rr 'll.alt< Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Year 2004 Monitoring Group Test Method Sample Location Schedule/Status Bacteriological Coli Distribution See routine sample schedule in part 2 Dioxin SOC- 1613 All sources State Waiver Thru Dec 2904 Endothall SOC-548.1 All sources State Waiver Thru Dec.2004 EDB and other soil fumigants SOC-504 S01 State Waiver Thru Dec 2004 EDB and other soil fumigants SOC-504 S02 State Waiver Thru Dec 2004 EDB and other soil fumigants SOC-504 S03 State Waiver Thru Dec 2004 EDB and other soil fumigants SOC-504 SO4 State Waiver Thru Dec 2004 Glyphosphate SOC-547.1 Sol State Waiver Thru Dec 2004 Glyphosphate SOC-547.1 S02 State Waiver Thru Dec 2004 Glyphosphate SOC-547.1 S03 State Waiver Thru Dec 2004 Glyphosphate SOC-547.1 SO4 State Waiver Thru Dec 2004 Herbicides SOC-515.2 Sol Waiver granted-No sampling required Herbicides SOC-515.2 S02 Waiver granted-No sampling required Herbicides SOC-515.2 S03 Waiver granted-No sampling required Herbicides SOC-515.2 SO4 1 sample(s)every 3 months Insecticides SOC-531.1 Sol Waiver granted-No sampling required Insecticides SOC-531.1 S02 Waiver granted-No sampling required Insecticides SOC-531.1 S03 Waiver granted-No sampling required Insecticides SOC-531.1 SO4 I sample(s)every 3 months Inorganic Contaminants IOC Sol I complete IOC sample between Jan 2002-Dec 2010 Inorganic Contaminants IOC S02 1 complete IOC sample between Jan 2002-Dec 2010 Inorganic Contaminants IOC S03 1 sample(s)every 3 years Inorganic Contaminants IOC SO4 1 sample(s)every 3 years Nitrate• NIT S01 1 sample(s)every 1 year Nitrate• NIT S02 ✓ I sample(s)every 1 year Nitrate' NIT S03 �/ 1 sample(s)every I year Nitrate' NIT SO4 1 sample(s)every 1 year General Pesticides SOC-525.2 Sol Waiver granted-No sampling required General Pesticides SOC-525.2 S02 Waiver granted-No sampling required General Pesticides SOC-525.2 S03 Waiver granted-No sampling required General Pesticides SOC-525.2 SO4 I sample(s)every 3 months Diquat SOC-549.1 All sources State Waiver Thru Dec 2004 Radium 228 RAD 228 Sol 2 sample(s)every 10 months Radium 228 RAD 228 S02 2 sample(s)every 10 months Radium 228 RAD 228 S03 2 sample(s)every 10 months Radium 228 RAD 228 SO4 2 sample(s)every 10 months 5W09wo-d't Page 4 of 4 �WAHealth 053500 (N�W L1ri.a Y N'wy. Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Year 2004 Monitoring Group Test Method Sample Location Schedule/Status Volatile Organic Contaminants VOC-524.2 Sol Waiver granted- l samples(s)every 3 years Volatile Organic Contaminants VOC-524.2 S02 Waiver granted-No sampling required Volatile Organic Contaminants VOC-524.2 S03 Waiver granted- I samples(s)every 3 years Volatile Organic Contaminants VOC-524.2 SO4 1 sample(s)every 3 months • These contaminant monitoring groups do not have waiver options under the SDWA. 3art 5• Regional Water Quality Monitoring Contact Southwest Regional Office ?or Further information call the Southwest Regional Office(Belle Fuchs/Donna Freier) Phone:(360) 586-5179 Special Note For Group A Community Systems Only: Your Consumer Confidence Report,summarizing the results of your 2004 vater quality monitoring requirements is due before July 1,2004. For further information visit vww.doh.wagov/ehp/dw/Our Main Pages/consumer.htm or contact the CCR Coordinator at your Regional Office. 1 1 a d cc i TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT FOR NITRATES System ID No: 053500 System-Name: Belfair Water District#1 r _ - -- - --- - _.- -- - -- -._ . -_ Lab/Sample No: 010 09817 Date Collected: 6/28/04 DOH Source No: S01 Multiple Sources: Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C j Date Received: 6/30/04 Date Reported. 7/6/04 Supervisor: ST Date Analyzed: 7/1/04 Analyst: AT - - - County: Mason Group: A Sample Location: Water Tap Well House 1 Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To- P.O. Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 DOH# Analytes Results Units SRL 1 Trigger MCL _ Exceeds Method/Analyst Trigger? MCL+ - 20 Nitrate <(0.1) mg/L 0.5 5 10 SM4500-NO3 F AT Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.00 t): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 50190 Page 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES,INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT FOR NITRATES t System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Lab/Sample No: 010 09818 Date Collected: 6/28/04 I DOH Source No: S02 Multiple Sources Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 6/30/04 Date Reported 7/6/04 Supervisor: ST Date Analyzed: 7/1/04 Analyst: AT County: -----Mason _— - -- ---- ---- ---- --- -� Group. . -- - A Sample Location: Water Tap Pumphouse 2 - ..-- P ----------------- - --- .. - ------ ----------------- -- - _ - Send Re ort Water District#1 Bill To: To: Belfair P.O. Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 T Units MCAnalytes DOH# Exceeds Method/Analyst Trigger? MCL7 20 ,^fNitrate- ------- —<(0.1) j mg/L 0.5- 1 5 r r„10 - - l SM4500-NO3 F �AT i Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: I Twiss Laboratory Number: 50190 Page 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT FOR NITRATES System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#I Lab/Sample No: 010 09819 Date Collected: 6128/04 DOH Source No: S03 Multiple Sources: Sample Type: B _ Sample Purpose: C Date Received 6/30/04 Date Reported: 7/6/04 Supervisor: ST gL Date Analyzed: 7/1/04 Analyst: AT County: Mason Group: A I Sample Location: Water Tap Pumphouse 3 j Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O.Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 DOH# Analytes Results Units SRL Trigger MCL Exceeds Method/Analyst _ e : Mai Trigger MCL 1ij.: fi '.yir"3In 513` .fMh!iv. Yit, 20 Nitrate <0.1) g m /L 0.5 5 10 I SM4500-NO3 F i AT . .. — ( Notts: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 50190 Page 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT FOR NITRATES System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Lab/Sample No: 010 09820 Date Collected: 6/28/04 - -DOH Source No: SO4 Multiple Sources Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 6/30/04 Date Reported: 7/6/04 I Supervisor: ST > ` �� 4` Date Analyzed: 7/1/04 Analyst: AT _ County: Mason Group: A - -- - -- — - Sample Location: Sample Station Well#4 Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O.Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 IDOH# Analytes Results Units SRL Trigger MCL Exceeds _ Method/Analyst r Trigger? f�. 20 Nitrate <(0.1) mg/L 0.5 5 10 1 SM4500-NO3 F AT Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 50190 Page 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES,INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS(IOCS)REPORT System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Lab/Sample No: 010 18284 Date Collected: 11/15/2004 DOH Source No: S01— — Multiple Sources: Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C_ -- y Date Received: 11/16/2004 Date Reported: 11/17/2004 Supervisor: ST Date Prepared: Date Analyzed: 11/16/2004 Analyst: A County: Mason Group: A Sample Location: Water tap in Wellhouse Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 �--��F---- _y EPA REGULATE$e 10(Secondary)'--� �� T x.'I TrlggerT MCL? T DOH# Anal tes Results Units SRL Trigger MCL Exceeds Method/Analyst ( Y 22 Sulfate <(10) mg/L 250 250 EPA 375.4 AT Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 53521 Page 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES,INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS)REPORT System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Lab/Sample No: 010 18285 Date Collected: 11/15/2004 DOH Source No: S02 Multiple Sources: Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 11/16/2004 Date Reported: 11/17/2004 Supervisor: ST Date Prepared: Date Analyzed: 11/16/2004 Analyst: AT County: Mason Group: A Sample Location: Water tap in Wei lhouse Send Report To: Belfair Water District#I Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 DOH #1 Analytes Results ! Units SRL Trigger-7 CL Exceeds Method/Analyst EPA REGULATED(Secondary) Trigger? MCL' 22 Sulfate <(10) mg/L 10 250 250 EPA375.4 AT Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.00I): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 53521 Page 1 - JL�ir r t' TWISS ANALYTICAL!LABORATORIES, INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT System ID No: 053500 System Name Belfair Water-District#1 - --- - --- --------------- ------ Lab/Sample No: 010 18285 Date Collected. 11/15/2004 DOH Source No: S02 Multiple Sources.' Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 11/16/2004 Date Reported: 1 1/17/2004 Su ervisor: Date Prepared: Date Analyzed 1 1/16/2004 Analyst: _--__AT _— County: Mason Group: —_ ---A Sample Location: Water tap in Wellhouse Send Report To: Belfair Water District#I Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 DOH# Analytes Results Units SRL Trigger MCL Exceeds Method/Analyst : � ..P ' iJLATD;(SecopdaryX ... :' Trigger? MCLY _',. 22 Sulfate <(10) mg/L 10 250 250 EPA 375.4 AT Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),if the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Page I Twiss Laboratory Number: 53521 ISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. TW , 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS)REPORT System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Lab/Sample No: 010 18286 Date Collected: 11/15/2004 DOH Source No: S03 Multiple Sources: Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 11/16/2004 Date Reported: 11/17/2004 Supervisor: ST Date Prepared: Date Analyzed: 11/16/2004 Analyst: AT County: Mason _ Group: A I Sample Location: Water tap in Wellhouse _ Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 DOH# Analytes Results Units SRL Trigger MCL Exceeds Method/Analyst Trigger? MCL? R � v 22 Sulfate <(10) mg/L 10 250 250 EPA 375.4 AT Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),if the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: I I Twiss Laboratory Number: 53521 Page 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS(IOCS) REPORT FSystem ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Lab/Sample No: 010 18287 Date Collected: 11/15/2004 DOH Source No: SO4 I Multiple Sources: Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 11/16/2004 Date Reported: 1 ltl7/2004 Supervisor: ST Date Prepared: Date Analyzed: 11/16/2004 Analyst: AT County: Mason Group: A Sample Location: Water tap in Wellhouse _ Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 DOH# Analytes Results Units SRL Trigger MCL Exceeds Method/Analyst Trigger'! MCL? _,ra� : 22 Sulfate <(10) mg/L 10 250 250 EPA 375.4 AT IN Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 53521 Page 1 ,y6� r /ey TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT System ID No 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Lab/Sample No: 010 18287 Date Collected: 1 1/15/2004 DOH Source No: SO4 Multiple Sources: Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 11/16/2004 Date Reported 11/17/2004 Supervisor_ ST Date Prepared: Date Analyzed. 11/16/2004 Analyst: AT n: Group: A County: Mason ------------ - --- --- -- — Sample Location: Water tap in Wellhouse Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 DOH# Analytes Results Units SRL Trigger MCL Exceeds Method/Analyst u �` Trigger? MCL? G LA'S A(Secgn- dory). :, h r _ 22 Sulfate <(10) mg/L 10 250 250 __ — EPA 375.4 AT Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Page I Twiss Laboratory Number: 53521 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC. i 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS(IOCS) REPORT System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water Lab/Sample No: 010:16177 Date Collected: 10/11/2004 DOH Source No: SO I Multiple Sources: Sample Type: B Sample Purpose:_%STI - Date Received: 10/12/2004 _Date Reported: 10/19/2004 _ _ Supervisor: Date Prepared. Date Analyzed: 10/18/2004 Analyst: NP County: Mason --- -- --— - -- Group: Sample Location: Well#1 Send Report To: Belfair Water District#I Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 DOH# Analytes Results Units SRL Trigger MCL Exceeds Method/Analyst Trigger? MCL? 4 Arsenic 0.003 mg/L� - 0.01 0.05 0.05 EPA 200.9 NP Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 52660 Page 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES,INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS(IOCS) REPORT System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 j Lab/Sample No: 010 16565 Date Collected: 10/18/2004 _ DOH Source No: S02 Multiple Sources: Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 10/19/2004 _ Date Reported: 10/28/2004 Supervisor: ST Date Prepared: Date Analyzed: 10/27/2004 Analyst: N County: Mason Group: Sample Location: Well#2 Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 DOH# Analytes Results Units SRL Trigger MCL Exceeds Method/Analyst EP n Trigger? MCL? .. WO Rai j 4 Arsenic v � 0.003 mg/L 0.01 0.05 0.05 EPA 200.9 NP Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 52815 Page 1 - 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES,INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsho,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS(IOCS) REPORT System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water Lab/Sample No: 010 16178 Date Collected: 10/11/2004 DOH Source No: S03 Multiple Sources: _ Sample Type: _B _ Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 1 0/1 212004 Date Reported: 10/19/2004 Supervisor: ST Date Prepared: Date Analyzed 10/18/2004 Analyst: N County: Mason _ _ Group: _ Sample Location: Well#3 Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 DOH# Analytes Results Units SRL Trigger- —MCL Exceeds Method!Analyst :,. Trigger? MCL' ` 4 Arsenic 0.002 mg/L 0.01 0.05 0.05 EPA 200.9 NP Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 52660 Page I TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water _ Lab/Sample No: 010 16979 Date Collected: 10/25/2004 DOH Source No: SO4 i Multiple Sources: Sample Type B Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 10/26/2004 Date Reported: 10/28/2004 Supervisor: ST Date Prepared: Date Analyzed:. 10/27/2004 Analyst: NP County: Mason Group: A Sample Location: Well _ Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 DOH# Analytes Results Units . SRL Trigger MCI. Exceeds Method/Analyst Trigger? MCL? z 4 Arsenic <(0.002) mg/L 0.01 0.05 0.05 EPA 200.9 NP Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 52983 Page 1 1 AL 4 AST IS S 7` AN TI ALYCAL,INC. ENVIROSTARS October 27,2004 Inorganic Chemical Report Belfair Water District#1 P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 Page IofI System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Field ID: 52978 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number: 010 16969 DOH Source Number: SO1 Date Collected: 10/25/04 Sample Type: D Date Analyzed: 10/26/04 Sample Purpose: C Date Reported: 10/27/04 Sample Location: S03 Analyst: AT County: Mason Supervisor: ST Parameter Method Result Unit Date Analyzed Sulfide EPA 376.2 _ 3 µg/L 10/26/04 This report is issued solely for the person or company to whom it is addressed. This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysis according to industry accepted practice. Twiss Analytical Laboratories,Inc. or its employees are not responsible for consequential damages in any kind or in any amount. 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C A Poulsbo,WA 98370 A (360)779-5141 A Fax:(360)779-5150 www.twisslabs.corn r. -11� 4 , rw ANALYTICAL,INC. ENVIROSTARS October 27,2004 Inorganic Chemical Report Belfair Water District#1 P.O. Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 Page 1 of 1 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Field ID: 52978 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number: 010 16970 DOH Source Number: S03 Date Collected: 10/25/04 Sample Type: D Date Analyzed: 10/26/04 Sample Purpose: C Date Reported: 10/27/04 Sample Location: SO1 Analyst: AT County: Mason Supervisor: ST Parameter Method Result Unit Date Analyzed Sulfide EPA 376.2 1 µg/L 10/26/04 This report is issued solely for the person or company to whom it is addressed. This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysis according to industry accepted practice. Twiss Analytical Laboratories,Inc. or its employees are not responsible for consequential damages in any kind or in any amount. 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C A Poulsbo,WA 98370 A, (360)779-5141 A Fax:(360)779-5150 www.twisslabs.com 11525 Knudson Rd. C min C Burlington,WA 9233 (800)755-9295 'I he lute you orm trust (360)757-1400-FAX(360)757-1402 Pagel of 2 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) REPORT Client Name: Twiss Analytical Laboratories Reference Number: 04-5327 26280 Twelve Trees Lane Ste C Poulsbo, WA 98370 Project: 01009838 System Name: BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT#1 Field ID: 01009838-50198 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number: 04610642 DOH Source Number: 04 Date Collected: 6/28/2004 Multiple Sources: Date Extracted: 524_040705 Sample Type: D-Drinking Water Date Analyzed: 7/5/2004 Sample Purpose: C-Compliance Report Date: 7/16/2004 Sample Location: water tap wellhouse Analyst: COT J n, County: Mason Supervisor:V�. J�(T(� EPA Method 524.2 For State Drin inq Water Comroliance DOH# COMPOUNDS RESULTS Units SRL Trigger MCL COMMENT 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE ND ug/L 0.2 ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE(EDB) ND ug/L 0.05 45 VINYL CHLORIDE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 2 46 1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 7 47 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 200 48 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 49 BENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 50 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 51 TRICHLOROETHYLENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 52 P-DICHLOROBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 75 56 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 57 T-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 100 60 CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHYLENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 70 63 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 66 TOLUENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 1000 67 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 68 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 5 71 CHLOROBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 100 73 ETHYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 700 76 STYRENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 100 84 0-DICHLOROBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 600 95 1,2,4,-TRICHLOROBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 70 158 WP-XYLENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 159 O-XYLENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 160 TOTAL XYLENES ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 10000 EPA Unregulated Monitoring R quired 53 CHLOROMETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 54 BROMOMETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 A Revell of"ND'indicases that the compound was not detected above the Lab's Method Detection Low-MOL. Maximum CotNaminrd Level,maximum pemwssiDN level of a contamirwtt in water established by EPA,NPDWR. State Advisory Level(SAL)for Unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL value indicates a level is not uxrendy established. t a compound is detected>or=to the State Reporting Level,SRL,specfied increased monitoring frequencies may occur per DOH. Method Detection Limit is the lab's minimum cencenuabon a compound can be measured and reported with 99%confidence that the compound concentration is weater than zero. J-Estimated value. FORM:VCC ST Reference Number: 04-5327 Page 2 of 2 F _ _ __ Lab Number: 04610642 A� A- Report Date: 7/16/2004 Ilk'kd,1)...rrut vunP VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) REPORT DOH# COMPOUNDS RESULTS Units SRL Trigger MCL COMMENT 55 CHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 58 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 59 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 62 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 64 DIBROMOMETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 65 CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 69 TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 70 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE ND ug/L 0:5 0.5 72 1.1.1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 78 BROMOBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 79 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 80 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 81 O-CHLOROTOLUENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 82 P-CHLOROTOLUENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 83 M-DICHLOROBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 85 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 86 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 87 ISOPROPYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 88 N-PROPYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 89 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 90 TERT-BUTYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 91 1.2.4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 92 SEC-BUTYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 93 P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 94 N-BUTYLBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 96 NAPHTHALENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 97 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 98 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 162 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ND ug/L 0.5 0.5 EPA Regulated-Under Trihalo ethanes;Pro ram 27 CHLOROFORM 1.7 ug/L 28 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 0.7 ug/L 29 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 0.8 ug/L 30 BROMOFORM 0.4J ug/L 31 TOTAL TRIHALOMETHANE 3.6 ug/L 60 60 80 State Unregulated-Other 0 METHYL TERT-BUM ETHER ND ug/L A Result of-NO'indicates Nat the compound was not detected above the Lab's Method Detection Limit-MDL Madnxrm Contanwnt I".maximum permissible level of a conumnam in water established by EPA,NPDWR. State Advisory Level(SAL)for Unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL valve indicates a level is not currently established. If a cortpaaW is detected>or=to the State Reporting Level,SRL,specified increased monitoring ft"uerries may occur per DOH. Method Detection Lint is the lab's minimum concentration a compound can be measured and reported with 99%confidence that the compound concentration is Wealar than zero. J-Estimated value. FORM:VOC ST ' FOR LAB USE ONLY TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. (360) 779-5141 A. Lab Sample Number (1) —Rejected on_/_/_ Reason Rejected: (1) Air Bubble NO C��3 at time_ _am/pm (2) Too Warm METHOD: 02 2 Accepted (3) Bottle Broken ( ) — cepted By: (4) Other 524.2 X , Required Monitoring SAMPLE PRESERVATION B. Sample Submitted For: _ Follow-up of Lab Sample Number _ 40C C. Last Date to Analyze Verification or Confirmation pH 2 — _ — — Sodium Thiosulfate UTILITY- Complete Item 1 through 14(Please Print) WATER SAMPLE INFORMATION FOR VOC ANALYSIS -THIS MUST BE COMPLETED 1. 0_4.�SUQ 2•�5r'/trill L_� ��r per! i! C'f f 3. S4/1 /Q ✓S /T System ID Number System Name County Class A or B 4. Source Type(Circle one) SURFACE WEL WELL-FIELD PURCHASED SPRING DISTRIBUTION 5. DOH Source Number(enter the numbers exactly as So 6. Utility's Name for this source shown on WFI item 17, such as SO 1, S02........S10, etc.) 7. Specific Location Where Sample Taken: (Which tap, address, sample site#, etc.) plc,•f e r 8. Indicate treatment type: (a) ►'Chlorination (d) _ Aeration (check all that apply) (b) _ Filtration _ (e) All other (c) — Fluoridation (specify) 9. Date Collected A_IeIL9/ 10. Time Collected : pm 11. Collected By: �N c►e K /l�'ct !1 36o, 7 5-•3oc�8" (Name) (Phone) 12. COMPOSITE INFORMATION (Optional-Applies to multiple source systems only): Only if you want the lab to composite this sample with other samples from your system, sign and enclose the COMPOSITE WAIVER FORM. Enter the DOH source numbers of the sample(s)to be composited with this sample. 1. --- 2'--- 3. 4. 13. Charges to be paid by: r6 14. Report results to: ., eZirni — "/cr'-Tqr'!' 0 t74.ri _ , ,/-ro. , r- ci!e:'�e,e .0 s fr C-1 / L ..l ENERGYLABORATOR/ES, INC. •2393 Salt Creek Highway(82601)•P 0.Box 3258 • Casper, WY82602 Toll Free 888 235 0515 307.235.0515 • Fax 307.234.>639 casper@energy/ab.com•www energylab.com LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT Client: TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC System IV#.053500 Sample Matrix., Liquid,water System Name:.Belfair Water District X1 DOH Source N: S01 Group: A' Sample Location:Top Well&Well house County: Mason Report Date:July 19,2004 Sample Type: Before Treatment ELI Certification X: 142 67002 Sample Purpose: Compliance Maximum Radium 228 Radium228 Reporting Laboratory ID Sample Date/Time Collected By/Phone N Sample ID Contaminant Method pCi/L Precision * Limit Level(MCL) C04070167-002 06/28/2004 13:44 Jack Heath 1360.275.30081 010 09840 1 <1.0 1 NA 1 5 1 1.0 E904.0 cjc:r:\clients2004\twins_analytical_lab\liquids\c04070167-002.xls Track# C04070167 Page 3 ENERGYLABORATOR/ES,INC. •2393 Salt Creek Highway(82601) •P.O.Box 3258 • Casper WY82602 Toll Free 888 235 0515 • 307 235 0515 • Fax 307.234.1639 • casper@energy/ab.com •www energylab com irrielfrifirefZ411 LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT Client:TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC System ID#:0535W Sample Matrix: Liquid,water System Name: Belfair Water District#1 DOH Source#: S02 s Group: A Sample Location: Water Tap-Well house 2 County: Mason Report Date:July 19,2004 Sample Type: Before Treatment ELI Certification#: 142 67003 Sample Purpose: Compliance I�, . .Radium 228 Radium 228 Maximum FReporting Laboratory ID Sample Date/Time Collected By/Phone# Sample ID Contaminant Method pCi/L Precision Level,(MCL) Limif 004070167-003 06/28/2004 13:44 Jack Heath/360.275.30081 010 09841 <1.0 NA 5 1.0 E904.0 cjc:r:klicnts2004\twiss_analytical_lab\liquids\c04070167-003.xis Tray kt< r n4n7 R7 P,,;)aP ENERGYLABORATOR/ES,INC. •2393 Salt Creek Highway(82601)•P.O.Box 3258 • Casper, WY82602 Toll Free 888.235.0515 • 307.235 0515 • Fax 307.234.1639 • casoor@anergylab.com•www.energylab.com LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT Client: TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC System ID#:053500 Sample Matrix: Liquid,water System'Name: Belfair Water District N1 DOH Source/!: S03 Group: A Sample LpcaGbn: Water-Tap-rWeil-house 3 County: Mason Report Date July 19;2004 Sample Type: Before Treatment ELI Certification N. 142 67004 Sample Purpose: Compliance Maximum Radium 228 Radium 228 Reporting Laboratory ID Sample Date/Time Collected By/Phone A Sample ID Contaminant Method pCi/L PrecWon Limit Level(MCL) C04070167-004 06/28/2004 14:02 Jack Heath!360.275.3008 010 09842 <1.0 NA 5 1.0 E904.0 cjc:r:\clients2004\twiss_malytical_lab\liquids\cG4O7Ol67-004.xis 7rack# ('0407n1r�7 P,) I ENERGY LABORATORIES,INC. •2393 Salt Creek Highway(82601)•P.O. Box 3258 • Caspei WY82602 Toll Free 888 235 0515 • 307235 0515 • Fax 307.234.1639 • casper@energylab.com•www energylab.com LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT Client:TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES INC System ID#, 053500 Sample Matrix: Liquid,water System Name: Belfair Water District#1 DOH Source H:SO4 Group: A Sample Location: Water Tap-Well house 4 County: Mason Report Date:July I9,2004 Sample Type: Before Treatment ELI Certification#: 142 67005 Sample Purpose: Compliance -- - — Maximum ----- ----- Radium 228 Radium 228 m Reporting Laboratory lD Sample Date/,Time Collected By/Phone N Sample H) Contaminant Method pCi/L Precision t T.evel'{MCL) Limit _.... . C04070167-005 06/28/2004 14:31 NP/360.275.3008 010 09843 <1.0 NA 5 1.0 E904.0 cjc:r:\clients2004\twiss_analytical_lab\liquids\c04070167-005.z1s Tr ack# CO4070167 Page 9 ENERGY LABORATOR/ES,INC. •2393 Salt Creek Highway(82601)•P.O.Box 3258 • CaspeI, WY82602 Toll Free 888.235.0515 • 307.235.0515 • Fax 307.234.1639 casperOenergylab.com•www.energylab.com son c. LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT Caent:TWiss ANAIYTICAL lNC system ll)q 053500 Sample Matnx:liquid,water System Name:Belfair Water District A DOH Source# M. Group A Sample Location:Spigot in Well house County:Mason Report Date Tanuary!,, Sample Type:Before Treatment ELI CertitIcation A:C336 Sample Reason: CompUnum Alpha Maun,nm Beta Maximum LaLyratory TD $e+npie l�a[e I Tu�aC Co:>Eued B}T:sue: 5 r =D Gross ipba, preckion Coac atnwGt Gross Beta Precb cn Cwuf inane Level MCIpci/L Level CL C03120967-001 12/15/2003 14:10 Jerry Hukill/360.275.3008 010 99925 <1.0 NA 15 <2.0 NA 50 cjc:r:lcli=m2W3Vwiss_uWydcw\liqui&\c03l2OM7.xls TRACKING NO. P,A G E NO. 120867R0001 ENERGYLABORATOR/ES,INC. •2393 Salt Creek Highway(82601)•P.O.Box 3258 • Casper, WY82602 Toll Free 888.235 0515 • 307 235 0515 • Fax 307.234.1639 • caspergenergy/ab.com•www energy/ab.corn RADIONUCLIDE ANALYSIS REPORT System ID No.:053500 System Name: Belfair Water Dist#1 Lab/Sample No: 142-70003 Date Collected: 12/06/04 DOH Source No: SO4 Multiple Source Nos: I Sample Type:Before Treatment Sample Purpose: Compliance Date Received: 12/10/04 Date Reported: 12/28/04 Supervisor: Roger Garling Date Analyzed: 12/15/04 Analyst: Pegi Jacobs County: Mason Group : A Sample Location: Well#4 Send Report To: Twiss Analytical,Inc. "11 Bill To: Twiss Analytical,Inc. 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Poulsbo,WA 98370 ALYTE LAB RESULTS UNITS DATE MCL ANALYST'S INITIALS DOH # AN S ( ) � MDA ewer.V7.Fn i &METHOD USED EPA/STATE REGULATED (These analyses should be performed in order as listed) 165 Gross Alpha 1= I PCi/L I I -- 166 JRadium228 1.0 1 - ND pCi/L 1 12/15/04 1 5 PJ/E904.0 Determine Radium 226 activity i Gross Alpha is greater than 5.0 pQ1L 39 Radium 226* pCi/L -- Determine Uranium activity if Gross Alpha is greater than 15.0 p 105 Uranium**(mass) ug/L 30 105 Uranium**(activity) pCi/L 1 1 20** Depending on theforegoing data determine the following must be corn leted if data is available : 40 Radium 226+228 pCi/L 5 40 Gross Alpha***+Radium 228 pCi/L 5 41 Gross Alpha minus Uranium pCi/L 15 Do the following only if s eci icall>>requested by the client or the state 42 Gross Beta**** pCi/L 50 43 Tritium**** pCi/L 20,000 44 Strontium 90**** pCi/L 8 107 Cesium 134**** pCi/L 108 11odine 131**** pCi/L *** NOTES: MCL(Maximum Contaminant Level): If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. MDA: Minimum Detectable Amount. NA(Not Analyzed): use in the results column for compounds not included in the current analysis. ND(Not Detected): use in the results column for compounds analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the MDA. * If Gross Alpha is less than,or equal to,5 pCi/L, it may be assumed that the Alpha activity is entirely due to Radium 226(i.e.,Radium 226 would not need to be run).The Alpha activity is then added to the Radium 228 activity(i.e..,Beta activity)for MCL determinations. If the sum of the Alpha activity plus the Radium 228 activity is greater than 5 pCi/L, Radium 226 activity must then be determined for water system compliance purposes(i.e., Radium 226+Radium 228 activity) **Uranium's MCL is given in mass terms(µg/L). When Uranium is determined by mass methods,it must be converted to activity levels(pCi/L)for calculation of the MCL(Gross Alpha less Uranium). A conversion factor of 0.67 pCi/1 per µg/L should be used. Uranium needs to be determined only when the Gross Alpha exceeds 15 pCi/L. *** Use Gross Alpha in lieu of Radium 226 when the Gross Alpha is less than,or equal to,5.0 pCi/L ****The MCL for beta particle and photon radioactivity from man-made radionuclides is the average annual concentration which shall not produce an annual dose equivalent to the total body or any internal organ greater than four millirem/yr. Comments: Use back of page for comments TraCk# C04012.047ORI Page i ENERGYL4BORATOR/ES,INC. •2393 Salt Creek Highway(82601)•P.O.Box 3258 • Casper, WY82602 Toll Flee 888 235 0515 • 307 235 0515 • Fax 307.234.1639 • casperQenergy/ab.com•www.energylab.Coln Kingrelzalfilwff RADIONUCLIDE ANALYSIS REPORT System ID No.:053500 System Name: Belfair Water District 1 Lab/Sample No: 142-28003 Date Collected: 10/25/04 DOH Source No: S01 Multiple Source Nos: Sample Type:Before Treatment I Sample Purpose: Co liance Date Received: 10/29/04 Date Reported: 11/18/04 Supervisor: Roger Garling IZ' t } Date Analyzed: 11/04/04 Analyst: Pegi Jacobs IF County: Mason Group : A Sample Location: Send Report To:Twiss Analytical,Inc. Bill To:Twiss Analytical,Inc. 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Poulsbo,WA 98370 DOH #1 ANALYTES LAB RESULTS UNITS DATE MCL (ANALYST'S INITIALS) MDA A N A i.V7Fn &METHOD USED EPA/STATE REGULATED (These analyses should be performed in order as listed) 165 1 Gross Alpha I I I pci/L I I -- 166 IRadium228 1 1.0 1 ND I pCi/L 1 11/04/04 1 5 1 PJ/E904.0 Determine Radium 226 activity! Gross AI ha is greater than 5.0 p01L 1 39 Radium 226* 1 1 1 pCi/L -- Determine Uranium activity if Gross AI ha is reater than 15.0 pCilL 105 Uranium**(mass) /tg/L 30 105 Uranium**(activity) pCi/L 20** Depending on the ore oin data determine the ollowin must be corn leted if data is available : 40 Radium 226+228 pCi/L 1 5 40 Gross Alpha***+Radium 228 pci/L 5 41 Gross Alpha minus Uranium pCi/L 15 Do the ullu wing onl•ifs ece- Ily requested by the client or the state F Gross Beta**** pCi/L 50 Tritium**** pCi/L 20,000 Strontium 90**** pCi/L 8 Cesium 134**** pCi/L Iodine 131**** pCi/L *** NOTES. MCL(Maximum Contaminant Level): If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. MDA: Minimum Detectable Amount. NA(Not Analyzed): use in the results column for compounds not included in the current analysis. ND(Not Detected): use in the results column for compounds analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the MDA. * If Gross Alpha is less than,or equal to,5 pCi/L, it may be assumed that the Alpha activity is entirely due to Radium 226(i.e.,Radium 226 would not need to be run).The Alpha activity.is then added to the Radium 228 activity(i.e.,Beta activity)for MCL detemunations. If the sum of the Alpha activity plus the Radium 228 activity is greater than 5 pCi/L, Radium 226 activity must then be determined for water system compliance purposes(i.e., Radium 226+Radium 228 activity) **Uranium's MCL is given in mass terms(µg/L). When Uranium is detemuned by mass methods,it must be converted to activity levels(pCi/L)for calculation of the MCL(Gross Alpha less Uranium). A conversion factor of 0.67 pCi/1 per µg/L should be used. Uranium needs to be determined only when the Gross Alpha exceeds 15 pCi/L. *** Use Gross Alpha in lieu of Radium 226 when the Gross Alpha is less than,or equal to,5.0 pCi/L ****The MCL for beta particle and photon radioactivity from man-made radionuclides is the average annual concentration which shall not produce an annual dose equivalent to the total body or any internal organ greater than four millirem/yr. Comments: Use back of yaQe for comments Trark#t r'n41n13?R P, a ENERCYL4SORATORIES, INC. •2393 Salt Creek Highway(82601)•P.O.Box 3258 • Casper, WY82602 Toll Free 888 235 0515 • 307 235 0515 • Fax 307.234.1639 • casper@energylab.com•www.energylab.com c• RADIONUCLIDE ANALYSIS REPORT System ID No.:053500 System Name: Belfair Water District 1 Lab/Sample No: 142-28004 Date Collected: 10/25/04 DOH Source No:S02 Multiple Source Nos: I Sample Type:Before Treatment Sample Purpose: Compliance Date Received: 10/29/04 Date Reported: 11/18/04 Supervisor: Roger Garling ImMmlt : Date Analyzed: 11/04/04 Analyst: Pegi Jacobs County: Mason Group A Sample Location: Send Report To: Twiss Analytical,Inc. Bill To: Twiss Analytical,Inc. 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Poulsbo,WA 98370 DOH # ANALYTES LAB I RESULTS I UNITS DATE MCL I (ANALYST'S INITIALS) MDA A N A r.W.F." &METHOD USED EPA/STATE REGULATED (These analyses should be performed in order as listed) 165 Gross Al h I I pCi/L I I -- 166 Radium 228 1.0 1 ND I pCi/L 11/04/04 5 PJ/E904.0 Determine Radium 226 activity i Gross AI ha is greater than 5.0 pCilL 39 Radium 226* 1 1 1 pCi/L -- Determine Uranium activity i Gross Al ha is greater than 15.0pCi/L ** 105 Uranium**(mass) ug/L 30 105 Uranium**(activity) pCi/L 20** Depending on theforegoing data determine the followingmust be co m leted if data is available : 40 Radium 226+228 pCi/L 5 40 Gross Alpha***+Radium 228 pCi/L 5 41 Gross Alpha minus Uranium pCi/L 15 Do thefoilowing only if s eci i Ily requested by the client or the state 42 Gross Beta**** pCi/L 50 43 Tritium**** pCi/L 20,000 44 Strontium 90**** pCi/L 8 107 Cesium 134**** 1 pCi/L I *** 108 1 Iodine 131**** 1 1 pCi/L *** NOTES.- MCL(Maximum Contaminant Level): If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. MDA: Minimum Detectable Amount. NA(Not Analyzed): use in the results column for compounds not included in the current analysis. ND(Not Detected): use in the results column for compounds analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the MDA. *If Gross Alpha is less than,or equal to,5 pCi/L, it may be assumed that the Alpha activity is entirely due to Radium 226(i.e.,Radium 226 would not need to be run).The Alpha activity is then added to the Radium 228 activity(i.e.,Beta activity)for MCL determinations. If the sum of the Alpha activity plus the Radium 228 activity is greater than 5 pCi/L, Radium 226 activity must then be determined for water system compliance purposes(i.e., Radium 226+Radium 228 activity) **Uranium's MCL is given in mass terms(µg/L). When Uranium is determined by mass methods,it must be converted to activity levels(pCi/L)for calculation of the MCL(Gross Alpha less Uranium). A conversion factor of 0.67 pCi/1 per µg/L should be used. Uranium needs to be determined only when the Gross Alpha exceeds 15 pCi/L. *** Use Gross Alpha in lieu of Radium 226 when the Gross Alpha is less than,or equal to,5.0 pCi/L ****The MCL for beta particle and photon radioactivity from man-made radionuclides is the average annual concentration which shall not produce an annual dose equivalent to the total body or any internal organ greater than four millirem/yr. Comments: Use back of parse for comments T ktt !- n4 1 n 1 ? 1 �� veR 67�� Page 1 of 4 053500 Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Year 2005 ystem: BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT 1 WS PWSID: 05350 0 Report Date: 03/22/2005 ontact: JERRY HUKILL SR Group: A -Comm County: MASON Region: SOUTHWEST 3art 1• List of Active Sources with Water Quality Monitoring Requirements DOH Name Type Use Susceptibility Treated? Source# Rating 301 WELL#1 AHA954 Well Permanent Moderate N S03 WELL #3 AHA956 HUMMINGBIRD Well Permanent Moderate Y iO4 WELL #4 ABA656 Well Permanent Low Y art 2: Sampling Schedule for the Year 2005 Coliform Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec ampling 2 2 2 12 1 2 12 12 12 12 12 12 2 4 Indicates the requirement is an exception from WAC 246-290. - If the coliform(bacteriological)sampling schedule listed at the bottom of the current Water Facilities Inventory(WFI)form for your system is different from the schedule listed above,follow the schedule on the current WFI. - Samples must be collected from representative points within the distribution system. - Repeat samples are required following an unsatisfactory sample. - A minimum of 5 routine samples are required the month following one or more unsatisfactory samples in accordance with your system's Colifotm Monitoring Plan. ead and Copper Distribution Sampling - We will notify you in 2005 only if your system is required to collect lead/copper distribution samples during 2005. 'hlorine Residual Sampling - Systems that use continuous chlorination must take chlorine residual measurements daily(or at a reduced frequency approved the by the department),and at the same time and location as routine and repeat coliform samples. lisinfection Byproducts Sampling - Systems that use continuous chlorination must collect a sample for total trihalomethanes(TTHM)and a sample for haloacetic acids(HAA5)for each chlorination treatment facility identified in your individual disinfection byproducts(DBP)monitoring plan. Collect the samples from the distribution system at the frequency and locations identified in your DBP monitoring plan. - If your initial sample results in 2004 averaged 20 microgram/L or less for TTHM and 15 microgram/L or less for HAA5,your next TTHM and HAA5 samples are due in 2007. Otherwise,another set of samples is due this year. heroical Sampling Requirements - Source water chemical samples must be taken from a location as hear to the source as possible,after any treatment. - Nitrate and nitrite are included as part of a complete IOC. NOTE:One or more of your sources may be scheduled to sample quarterly for SOCs in 2005. These samples may be waived if you have submitted to our office a completed Susceptibility Assessment Survey form for the source(s). We will notify you during the summer of 2005 if your sources are eligible for sampling waivers. Sentry DOH /� Page 2 of Oe'Health ...... ...................... 053506. Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Year 2005 Month Source Monitoring Group Test Method January No source chemical sampling required this month February No source chemical sampling required this month March No source chemical sampling required this month April No source chemical sampling required this month May No source chemical sampling required this month June S01 NITRATE-N IOC June S03 NITRATE-N IOC June SO4 NITRATE-N IOC July No source chemical sampling required this month August No source chemical sampling required this month September No source chemical sampling required this month October No source chemical sampling required this month November No source chemical sampling required this month December No source chemical sampling required this month Part 3: Water Quality Monitoring Waivers: State Waivers - Automatically granted to all sources based on DOH assessment of conditions within the state. - No source-specific assessment, waiver application,or fee required. - State waivers granted for the 2005 - 2007 compliance period are listed in Part 4. Part 4: Water Quality Monitoring Frequency - Although waivers may be granted for your system, there may be some monitoring required as a condition of the waiver your system was granted. Monitoring Group Test Method Sample Location Schedule/Status Asbestos ASB Distribution I sample(s)every 9 years Bacteriological Coli Distribution See routine sample schedule in part 2 Dioxin SOC- 1613 All sources State Waiver Thru Dec 2007 Endothall SOC-548.1 All sources State Waiver Thru Dec 2007 EDB and other soil fumigants SOC-504 Sol State Waiver Thru Dec 2007 EDB and other soil fumigants SOC-504 S03 State Waiver Thru Dec 2007 EDB and other soil fumigants SOC-504 SO4 State Waiver Thru Dec 2007 Glyphosphate SOC-547.1 All sources State Waiver Thru Dec 2007 Herbicides SOC-515.2 S01 I sample(s)every 3 years Herbicides SOC-515.2 S03 1 sample(s)every 3 years Sentry DOII - - 1 wfth-sM Sow pr„W,,,4 Page 3 of 'i1�Health o5350 0 Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Year 2005 Monitoring Group Test Method Sam le Location Schedule/Status Herbicides SOC-515.2 SO4 I sample(s)every 3 years Insecticides SOC-531.1 Sol 1 sample(s)every 3 years Insecticides SOC-531.1 S03 I sample(s)every 3 years Insecticides SOC-531.1 SO4 I sample(s)every 3 years Inorganic Contaminants IOC Sol t complete IOC sample between Jan 2002-Dec 2010 Inorganic Contaminants IOC S03 1 sample(s)every 3 years Inorganic Contaminants IOC SO4 1 sample(s)every 3 years Nitrate* NIT Sol 1 sample(s)every 1 year Nitrate* NIT S03 I sample(s)every 1 year Nitrate* NIT SO4 I sample(s)every 1 year General Pesticides SOC-525.2 Sol I sample(s)every 3 years General Pesticides SOC-525.2 S03 1 sample(s)every 3 years General Pesticides SOC-525.2 SO4 1 sample(s)every 3 years Diquat SOC-549.1 All sources State Waiver Thru Dec 2007 Volatile Organic Contaminants VOC-524.2 Sol I sample(s)every 3 years Volatile Organic Contaminants VOC-524.2 S03 1 sample(s)every 3 years Volatile Organic Contaminants VOC-524.2 SO4 I sample(s)every,3 years * These contaminant monitoring groups do not have waiver options under the SD WA. Part 5• Regional Water Quality Monitoring Contact Southwest Regional Office For Further information call the Southwest Regional Office(Belle Fuchs/Donna Freier) Phone:(360)586-5179 For questions regarding Disinfection ByProducts(DBP) monitoring,contact:Jim McCauley(360)664-8734 Special Note For Croup A Community Systems Only: Your Consumer Confidence Report,summarizing the results of your 2004 water quality monitoring requirements is due before July 1,2005. For further information visit www.doh.wa.gov/ehp/dw/Our Main Pages/consumer.htm or contact the CCR Coordinator at your Regional Office. Sentry DOH TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS(IOCS) REPORT FOR NITRATES System ID No: 053500 _ System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Lab/Sample No: 010 29650 Date Collected: 6/6/2005 DOH Source No: 01 Multiple Sources: Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C Date Received 6/7/2005 Date Reported: 6/8/2005 Supervisor: ST '8Il , a' Date Analyzed: 6/7/2005 Analyst: AT County: Mason --- - -_ — Group: — - A Sample Location: Well#1 -- - --- Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 DOH# Analytes Results Units SRL ITrigger MCL I Exceeds Method/Analyst 04 ; �, Trigger? MCL? q Nitrate1 <(0.5) mg/L 0.5 5 10 SM4500-NO3 F AT Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 58143 Page 1 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES,INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS)REPORT FOR NITRATES System ID No: . 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 — Lab/Sample No: 010 29651 _ Date Collected: 6/6/2005 _ DOH Source No: 03 Multiple Sources: Sample Type: A Sample Purpose: C _ Date Received: 6/7/2005 Date Reported: 6/8/2005 Supervisor: ST Date Analyzed: 6/7/2005 Analyst: AT County: Mason Group: A — Sample Location: Hummingbird Well#3 Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 DO #H Analytes ResultsT Units SRL Trigger MCL Exceeds Method/Analyst Trigger? MCL? 20 1 Nitrate <(0.5) mg/L 0.5 5 10 SM4500-NO3 F AT Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 58143 Page 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES,INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMIC (IO S CHEMICALS REPORT FOR NITRATES C ) System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Lab/Sample No: 010 29652 Date Collected: 6/6/2005 DOH Source No: 04 Multiple Sources: Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 6/7/2005 Date Reported: 6/8/2005 Supervisor: ST 3, ,;° „ :;i, Date Analyzed_ 6/7/2005 --- Analyst: AT County: Mason Group: A Sample Location: Belfair Tower Well#4 Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 DOH# Analytes Results Units —j SRL Trigger MCL Exceeds Method Analyst -- ;. EPA REGULATED -- Trigger? MCL? �' 20 1 Nitrate L_(0.5) mg/L 0.5 5 f 10 SM4500-NO3 F AT Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 58143 Page 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS(IOCS) REPORT FOR LEAD AND COPPER System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#I DOH Source No: 93 Sample Type: D Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 11/8/2005 Date Reported: 11/18/2005 Supervisor: ST Date Analyzed: Analyst: Group: A County: Mason Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 DOH# 23-(Copp�r 9(Lead) State Reporting1e,yel(SRL) i P 0,2 mgit, i 0,002 mglL Action Level(AL) i 1.3 mg/L i 0.015,mgft Test Method LL EPA 2007 EPA 200.9 I�h Co n1p ii:' na e." I Copper m—., Lead mR11 01038915 ll/l/2005 NE 90 McKnight Rd <(0.20) <(0.002) 010 38916 11/2/2005 19020 Hwy 106 <(0.20) <(0.002) 010 38917 11/2/2005 NE 531 Old Belfair Hwy <(0.20) <(0.002) 010 38918 11/2/2005 E 21651 Hwy 3 <(0.20) <(0.002) 010 38919 11/2/2005 E 21660 Hwy 3 <(0.20) <(0.002) 010 38920 11/2/2005 NE 31 Hwy 300 <(0.20) <(0.002) 010 38921 11/2/2005 NE 431 Hwy 300 <(0.20) 0.003 010 38922 11/2/2005 NE 380 Hwy 300 A0.20) <(0.002) 010 38923 11/2/2005 NE 22551 1/2 Hwy 3 <(0.20) 0.003 010'38924 11/2/2005 NE 61 Belfair St <(0.20) 0.022 Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (130H). FAL: (Federal Action Levels),are 0.015 mg(L for Lead and 1.3 mg/L for Copper. If the concentrations exceed these levels,contact your regional DOH offs for further information. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: ki 0 Ix h Twiss Laboratory Number: 61842 Page 1 Lab/Cor, Inc. Q A Professional Service Corporation in the Northwest INORGANIC CHEMICALS (IOCS) REPORT FOR ASBESTOS EPA TEST METHOD- 100.1/100.2 System ID No: p c5 -, > System Name: - c ZY Lab Sample No: I( C1 - 9 5 Z— Date Collected: DOH Source No: * 5 Multiple Source Nos: Sample Type: Sample Purpose: C, Date Received: U ;5 16 O S Date Reported: - -OS Supervisor. Date Analyzed: - -0'5 Analyst: County: C 4 Group:(A) B Other Sample Location: 0 Nc &LII ` 300 �c /K 5Z-,5' Send Report To: !! Bill To: /�� o„ - i-� c e r- 4D'S r-"C/ 461 /�',/.�' t r. (�•��i..�r F7 c $ �•!-r C.'f'tif" J Jc> *Most ground water&spring sources will need to take a distribution sample for SD WA compliance. For these samples the source number "92"should be used and a sample location(address)must be included. Surface waters maybe taken either as a distribution sample("92")or an individual source sample. DOH# I ANALYTES RESULTS UNITS SRL TRIGGER MCL EXCEiEj EPA REGULATED Trigger? l 19 ASBESTOS .t�8 MFL 7 7 7 U NOTES: SRL(State Reporting Level): Indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health(DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level.Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples.Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL(Maximum Contaminant Level):If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA(Not Analyzed):In the results column,indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND(Not Detected):In the results column,indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL. <0.001:Indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. TELPHONE NUMBERS FOR ASSISTANCE Questions regarding drinking water regulations,system monitoring requirements, and sampling information as to location,source type and method: A.Belie Fuchs SW Regional Office(360)586-5179 B.Steve Hulsman NW Regional Office(253)395-6750 C.Scott Fink Eastern Regional Offece(509)456-2475 Comments: Phone: Fax: 7619 6th Avenue NW. Seattle WA 98117 phone(206) 781-0155 phone(888)522-1278 fax(206) 789-8424 www.labcor.net i 11525 Knudson • Burlington,WA 98 98233 (800)755-9295 The lub you can Iru.Srl" (360)757-1400-FAX(360)757-1402 Page 1 of 1 DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCT COMPOUNDS REPORT Client Name: Twiss Analytical Laboratories Reference Number: 05-09125 26276 Twelve Trees Lane Ste C Poulsbo, WA 98370 Project: 59515 System Name: BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT#1 Field ID. 59515-01 S01 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number: 04619808 DOH Source Number: 92 Date Collected: 8/2/2005 Multiple Sources: Date Extracted: TTHM_050809 Sample Type: A-After treatment Date Analyzed: 8/9/2005 Sample Purpose: C-Compliance Report Date: 8/12/2005 Sample Location: E 22871 Hwy 3 sample station Analyst: CO County: Mason Supervisor: EPA Method 524.2 DOH# COMPOUNDS RESULTS Units SRL Trigger MCL COMMENT EPA Regulated-Under Trihalomethanes Program 27 CHLOROFORM ND ug/L 0.4 28 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND ug/L 0.4 29 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE ND ug/L 0.4 30 BROMOFORM ND ug/L 0.4 31 TOTAL TRIHALOMETHANE ND ug/L 0.4 60 80 A Result of'ND'indicates tlhat the compound was not detected above Me Lab's Method Detection Limit-MDL. Maximum contaminant Level,maximum permissible level of a contaminant In water established by EPA,NPDWR. Slue Advisory Level(SAL)for unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL value indicates a level is not currently established. If a compound is detected>or.to 1M State Reporting Level,SRL,specified increased monitoring frequencies may occur per DOM. McMod Detection Limit is tM We minimum concentration a compound an be measured and reported with 99%confidence that the compound concentration is greater than zero. J-Estmated value. FORM:ODBP NEW FEATURES OF THE 2005 WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT For Sources with Continuous Chlorination or Ozonation Monitoring Requirements for Disinfection Byproducts in 2005 In 2004, all systems with permanent or seasonal source(s) that were treated with continuous chlorination or ozonation were required to monitor for disinfection byproducts from the distribution system. However, during 2005, some systems may be able to reduce or eliminate this monitoring depending upon the sample results from 2004. Please see Part 2 of the WQMR to see if the monitoring requirements apply to your system, or refer to the DBP Monitoring Plan for your system. NOTE: Although this sampling requirement is not listed on this year's Water Quality Monitoring Report(WQMR), it is still required unless your system qualifies for a reduction or elimination of this sampling. Radionuclides The Environmental Protection Agency recently revised the federal rule regarding monitoring for Radionuclides in public drinking water sources. All Group A community water systems are subject to the initial monitoring requirements of the rule beginning in 2004 and ending in 2007. If a sample for Gross Alpha was collected from your system's source(s) between June 1, 2000, and December 31, 2003, your system may have qualified for a grandfathering provision of the rule which allows the initial monitoring requirements to consist of sampling for Radium 228 only. Systems that did not have a Gross Alpha sample collected between June 1, 2000, and December 31, 2003, are required to monitor for Gross Alpha and Radium 228 in order to satisfy initial monitoring requirements of the federal Radionuclide Rule. If Radionuclide sample(s) are not scheduled in Part 2 of your WQMR, then Radionuclide samples are not required in 2005. The laboratories certified to perform Radionuclide analyses for Washington State water systems are: Washington State Severn-Trent Laboratories Energy Laboratories Inc. Public Health Laboratory 2800 George Washington Way 2393 Salt Creek Highway 1610 NE 150' Street Richland, WA 99352 Casper,WY 82602 Shoreline, WA 98155 (509) 375- 3131 (888) 235-0515 (206) 361-2909 11525 Knudson Rd. �— • Burlington,WA 98233 sill (800)755-9295 71it,/tab yrar can trust! (360)757-1400-FAX(360)757-1402 Page 1 of 1 DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCT COMPOUNDS REPORT Client Name: Twiss Analytical Laboratories Reference Number: 05-09125 26276 Twelve Trees Lane Ste C Poulsbo, WA 98370 Project 59515 System Name: BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT#1 Field ID: 59515-03 S03 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number: 04619809 DOH Source Number: 92 Date Collected: 8/2/2005 Multiple Sources: Date Extracted: TTHM_050809 Sample Type: A-After treatment Date Analyzed: 8/9/2005 Sample Purpose: C-Compliance Report Date: 8/12/2005 Sample Location: E18551 Hwy 106 sample station Analyst: CO County: Mason Supervisor EPA Method 524.2 ,,,, DOH# COMPOUNDS RESULTS Units SRL Trigger MCL COMMENT EPA Regulated-Under Trihalomethanes Program 27 CHLOROFORM 0.2J ug/L 0.4 28 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 0.3.1 ug/L 0.4 29 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE 0.4 ug/L 0.4 30 BROMOFORM 0.3J ug/L 0.4 31 TOTAL TRIHALOMETHANE 1.2 ug/L 0.4 60 80 A Result of'ND'indicates that the compound was not detected above the Lab's Method Detection Limit-MDL Maximum Contamiunt Level,mawnum permissible level of a contaminant in water established by EPA,NPDWR.State Advisory Level(SAL)for UnreVisted compounds. A blank MCL or SAL valve indicates a level is not currently established. it a compound is detected>or-to On Stab Reporting Level,SRL,speed increased nwnitorip frequencies may occur per DOH. Method Detection Limit Is the lob's minimum concentration a compound an be measured end reported with rig%confidence that the compound concentration is grsaMr Man zero. J-Estimated value. FORM:OD8P r-- AL 4 iT NALYTICAL,INC. ENVIROSTARS k August 31,2005 DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCT COMPOUNDS REPORT Haloacetic Acids (HAA) Belfair Water District#1 P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 Page 1 of 1 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Field ID: 59515 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number: 01032993 DOH Source Number: 92 Date Collected: 8/2/05 8:15am Multiple Sources: Date Extracted: 8/18/05 Sample Type: A Date Analyzed: 8/19/05 Sample Purpose: C Date Reported: 8/24/05 Sample Location: E 18551 Hwy 106 Sample Station Analyst: TM County: Mason Supervisor: ST r i EPA Method 552.1 For State Drinking Water Compliance DOH# COMPOUNDS RESULTS UNITS SRL TRIGGER MCL COMMENTS Halo-Acetic Acids CHLOROACETIC ACID ND(3.75) µg/L 2 DICHLOROACETIC ACID ND(1.25) µg/L 1 TRICHLOROACETIC ACID ND(0.94) µg/L t BROMOACETIC ACID ND(0.94) µg/L 1 DIBROMOACETIC ACID ND(0.94) µg/L I BROMOCHLOROACETIC ACID I ND(1.25) L 1 HAA 6 ND V 1 48 60 A result of"ND"indicates that the compound was not detected above the Lab's Method Detection Limit—MDL Maximum Contaminant Level,maximum permissible level of a contaminant in water established by EPA,NPDWR,State Advisory Level(SAL)for unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL value indicated a level is not currently established. If a compound is detected>or=to the State Reporting Level(SRL),specified increased monitoring frequencies may occur per DOH. Method Detection Limit is the lab's minimum concentration a compound can be measured and reported with 99%confidence that the compound is greater than zero. J—Estimated value. 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C A Poulsbo,WA 98370 A (360)779-5141 A Fax:(360)779-5150 www.twisslabs.com 1 • f' 4 kiT NALYTICAL,INC. ENVIROSTARS August 31,2005 DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCT COMPOUNDS REPORT Haloacetic Acids (HAA) Belfair Water District#1 P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 Page 1 of I System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Field ID: 59515 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number:01032991 DOH Source Number: 92 Date Collected: 8/2/05 8:30am Multiple Sources: Date Extracted: 8/18/05 Sample Type: A Date Analyzed: 8/19/05 Sample Purpose: C Date Reported: 8/24/05 Sample Location: E 22871 Hwy 3 Sample Station Analyst: TM County: Mason Supervisor: ST EPA Method 552.1 For State Drinking Water Compliance ✓/ DOH# COMPOUNDS RESULTS UNITS SRL TRIGGER MCL COMMENTS Halo-Acetic Acids CHLOROACETIC ACID ND(3.75) µg/L 2 DICHLOROACETIC ACID ND(1.25) µg/L I TRICHLOROACETIC ACID ND(0.94) µg/L 1 BROMOACETIC ACID ND(0.94) µg/L I DIBROMOACETIC ACID ND(0.94) µg/L I BROMOCHLOROACETIC ACID I ND(1.25) L I I HAA(6) ND 1 48 60 A result of"ND"indicates that the compound was not detected above the Lab's Method Detection Limit—MDL Maximum Contaminant Level,maximum permissible level of a contaminant in water established by EPA,NPDWR,State Advisory Level(SAL)for unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL value indicated a level is not currently established. If a compound is detected>or=to the State Reporting Level(SRL),specified increased monitoring frequencies may occur per DOH. Method Detection Limit is the lab's minimum concentration a compound can be measured and reported with 99%confidence that the compound is greater than zero. J—Estimated value. 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C A Poulsbo, WA 98370 A (360)779-5141 A Fax:(360)779-5150 www.twisslabs.com 1 /4 'HeQl t!6 Page I of 4 053500 Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Year 2006 System: BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT I PWSID: 05350 0 Report Date: 04/04/2006 Contact: JERRY HUKILL SR Group: A -Comm County: MASON Region: SOUTHWEST Part 1: List of Active Sources with Water Quality Monitoring Requirements DOH Name Type Use Susceptibility Treated? Source# Rating Sol WELL #1 AHA954 Well Permanent Moderate Y S03 WELL#3 AHA956 HUMMINGBIRD Well Permanent Moderate Y SO4 I WELL #4 ABA656 Well Permanent t Low Y Part 2: Sampling Schedule for the Year 2006 Coliform Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Sampling 2 12 12 12 1 2 12 12 12 2 2 2 12 + Indicates the requirement is an exception from WAC 246-290. - If the coliform(bacteriological)sampling schedule listed at the bottom of the current Water Facilities Inventory(WFI)form for your system is different from the schedule listed above, follow the schedule on the current WFI. - Samples must be collected from representative points within the distribution system. - Repeat samples are required following an unsatisfactory sample. - A minimum of 5 routine samples are required the month following one or more unsatisfactory samples in accordance with your system's Coliform Monitoring Plan. Lead and Copper Distribution Sampling - Lead and copper samples must be collected from indoor faucets within the distribution system after the water has sat unused in the pipes for at least 6 hours but no more than 12 hours. - Sample faucets should be flushed with cold water the evening prior to collecting the sample. - Part 2 indicates the month in which samples should be collected. Part 4 indicates the total number of samples required. Chlorine Residual Sampling - - Systems that use continuous chlorination must take chlorine residual measurements daily(or at a reduced frequency approved the by the department),and at the same time and location as routine and repeat coliform samples. Disinfection Byproducts Sampling Systems that use continuous chlorination must collect a sample for total trihalomethanes(TTHM)and a sample for haloacetic acids(HAA5)for each chlorination treatment facility identified in your individual disinfection byproducts(DBP)monitoring plan. Collect the samples from the distribution system at the frequency and locations identified in your DBP monitoring plan. Sentry DOH W P Health Page 2 of 4 053500 Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Year 2006 If your initial sample results in 2004 averaged 20 µg/L or less for TTHM and 15 µg/L or less for HAAS and all of the samples were taken during the month of warmest water temperature,your next TTHM and HAAS samples are due in 2007. If your initial sample results in 2004 were above these levels,but your sample results for 2004 and 2005 averaged 40 µg/L or less for TTHM and 30 µg/L or less for HAAS and all of the samples were taken during the month of warmest water temperature,your next TTHM and HAAS samples are due in 2008.Otherwise,another set of samples is due this year and must be collected during the month of warmest water temperature. If any of your TTHM or HAAS compliance samples were not collected during the month of warmest water temperature,even if your TTHM and HAAS results meet the above criteria,another set of samples is due this year. Chemical Sampling Requirements - Source water chemical samples must be taken from a location as near to the source as possible,after any treatment. - Nitrate and nitrite are included as part of a complete IOC. Month Source Monitoring Group Test Method January No source chemical sampling required this month February S03 VOLATILE ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS VOC - 524.2 March Sol VOLATILE ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS VOC - 524.2 April No source chemical sampling required this month May No source chemical sampling required this month June - Sol NITRATE-N IOC June S03 NITRATE-N IOC June SO4 NITRATE-N IOC July No source chemical sampling required this month August No source chemical sampling required this month September No source chemical sampling required this month October No source chemical sampling required this month November No source chemical sampling required this month December _T No source chemical sampling required this month Part 3: Water Quality Monitorinq Waivers: State Waivers - Automatically granted to all sources based on DOH assessment of conditions within the state. - No source-specific assessment,waiver application,or fee required. - State waivers granted for the 2005-2007 compliance period are listed in Part 4. Part 4: Water Quality Monitoring Frequencv - Although waivers may be granted for your system,there may be some monitoring required as a condition of the waiver your system was granted. Monitoring Group Test Method Sample Location Schedule/Status Asbestos ASB Distribution I sample(s)every 9 years Bacteriological Coli Distribution See routine sample schedule in part 2 Dioxin SOC- 1613 All sources State Waiver Thru Dec 2007 Sentry DOH 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES,INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS(IOCS)REPORT FOR NITRATES System ID No: 053500- — - System Name Belfair Water District#1 ' Lab/Sample No: 010 56295 Date Collected 6/19/2006 DOH_Source No: S01 Multiple Sources: I Sample Type B Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 6/20/2006 Date Reported 6/21/2006 Supervisor: ST I Date Analyzed 6/20/2006 Analyst: KW County: Mason — --- - - - - - _..... - Group: ---- — A- - ------ Sample Location: Water tap Well house#1 Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 IDOH#1 Aaalytes If—Results Units SRL Trigger MCL Exceeds Method/Analyst PA'REGULATED Trigger? MCL? , . -_ — 10 SM4500 NO3 F KW 20 Nitrate-N ------ <(0.5) 1 mg L 0.5 5 --- ---— --- —1 Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),if the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 67665 Page 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES,INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS(IOCS) REPORT FOR NITRATES System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 LWSample No: 010 56296 Date Collected: 6/19/2006 DOH Source No: S03 Multiple Sources: Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 6/20/2006 Date Reported: 6/21/2006 Supervisor: ST Date Analyzed: 6/20/2006 ---------Analyst: — _ KW ------ - County: Mason Group:---_ A Sample Location: Water tap Well house Humming Bird Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 rDOH# Analytes Results RL ' Tri Units Sgger MCL Exceeds Method/Analyst EPA REGULATED Trigger? MCL? 20 Nitrate-N <(0.5) mg/l, 0.5 5 10 SM4500-NO3 F KW Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 67665 Page 1 1 TWISS ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES,INC. 26280 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C Poulsbo,WA 98370 "Telephone(360)779-5141 FAX(360)779-5150 INORGANIC CHEMICALS(IOCS)REPORT FOR NITRATES System ID No: 053500 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 — — Lab/Sample No: 010 56297 Date Collected: 6/19/2006 _ DOH Source No: SO4 —_ Multiple Sources: Sample Type: B Sample Purpose: C Date Received: 6/20/2006 Date Reported_ 6/21/2006 Supervisor__ -ST t1 Date Analyzed: 6/20/2006 Analyst: _- KW r County: Mason Group: A Sample Location: Belfair Tower Well house Send Report To: Belfair Water District#1 i Bill To: P.O. Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 DOH# Analytes Results Units SRL Trigger r MCL Exceeds Method/Analyst EPA REGULATED Trigger? MCL? -.-fi - 20 Nitrate-N A0.5) mg/L 0.5 5 ]0 SM4500-NO3 F KW Notes: SRL: (State Reporting Level),indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington Department of Health (DOH). Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water response level. Systems with compounds detected at concentrations in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office for further information. MCL: (Maximum Contaminant Level),If the contaminant amount exceeds the MCL,immediately contact your regional DOH office. NA: (Not Analyzed),in the results column indicates this compound was not included in the current analysis. ND: (Not Detected),in the results column indicates this compound was analyzed and not detected at a level greater than or equal to the SRL <(0.001): indicates the compound was not detected in the sample at or above the concentration indicated. Comments: Twiss Laboratory Number: 67665 Page 1 �G�1 S S E�ROSTARS ANALYTICAL, IN�C-Voc1 1 ' VOC-VOC1 by Various EPA Approved Methods Group: A Date Collected: 4/17/2006 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Water System ID Number: 053500 County: Mason Lab Sample Number: 01050611 DOH Source No: S01 Sample Location: Well#1 Date Received: 4/18/2006 Sample Purpose: C-Compliance Date Analyzed: 4/20/2006 Sample Composition: Date Reported: 4/26/2006 Sample Type: A-After Treatment Send Report to: Sample Collected by(name): Jack Heath Belfair Water District#1 Phone Number: 360-275-3008 P.O.Box 563 /L Belfair,WA 98528 DOH# ANALYTES RESULTS UNITS SRL Trigger MCL Analyst METHOD COMMENT 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.2 TM 524.2 ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE(EDB) ND pg/L 0.4 0.05 TM 524.2 160 TOTAL XYLENES NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 10000 TM 524.2 57 T-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 100 TM 524.2 60 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE ND pg/L 0A 0.5 70 TM 524.2 47 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 200 TM 524.2 48 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 5 TM 524.2 49 BENZENE ND pg/L 0A 0.5 5 TM 524.2 501.2-DICHLOROETHANE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 5 TM 524.2 51 TRICHLOROETHYLENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 5 TM 524.2 63 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 5 TM 524.2 66 TOLUENE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 1000 TM 524.2 671,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 5 TM 524.2 68 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 5 TM 524.2 71 CHLOROBENZENE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 100 TM 524.2 73 ETHYLBENZENE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 700 TM 524.2 158 M/P-XYLENE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 45 VINYL CHLORIDE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 2 TM 524.2 159 O-XYLENE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 76 STRYENE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 100 TM 524.2 52 P-OICHI OROBENZENF NO L19/1- n 4 0.5 75 TM 524.2 84 O-DICHLOROBENZENE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 600 TM 524.2 95 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 70 TM 524.2 461.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 7 TM 524.2 56 METHYLENE CHLORIDE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 .5 TM 524.2 EPA Unregulated Monitoring Required 58 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE NO pg/L CA 0.5 TM 524.2 59 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 86 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 62 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 162 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 64 DIBROMOMETHANE NO pg/L 0A 0.5 TM 524.2 65 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 69 TRANS-11,3-DICHLOROPROPENE NO pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 531 CHLOROM ETHANE NO pg/L 1 0.4 0.5 1 TM 1 524.2 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C A Poulsbo, WA 98370 A (360)779-5141 A Fax: (360) 779-5150 www.twisslabs.com TN,A,LYTIE�ROSTARS CAL, IN�C-Voc1 4 kiVOC-VOC1 by Various EPA Approved Methods Group: A Date Collected: 4/17/2006 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Water System ID Number: 053500 County: Mason Lab Sample Number: 01050611 DOH Source No: S01 Sample Location: Well#1 Date Received: 4/18/2006 Sample Purpose: C-Compliance Date Analyzed: 4/20/2006 Sample Composition: Date Reported: 4/26/2006 Sample Type: A-After Treatment Send Report to: Sample Collected by(name): Jack Heath Belfair Water District#1 Phone Number: 360-275-3008 P.O.Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 DOH# ANALYTES RESULTS UNITS SRL Trigger MCL Analyst METHOD COMMENT 701,3-DICHLOROPROPANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 72 1,1,1,2-TETRAC;HLOROETHANE ND ug/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 871SOPROPYLBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 79 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 78 BROMOBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 801,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 81 O-CHLOROTOLUENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 88 N-PROPYLBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 891,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 54 BROMOMETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 82 P-CHLOROTOLUENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 90 TERT-BUTYLBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 91 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 92 SEC-BUTYLBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 83 M-DICHLOROBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 93 P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 94 N-BUTYLBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 55 CHLOROETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 97 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 96 NAPTHALENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 98 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ND 1)9/1- 0.4 0.5 TM 5242 85 TRICHLOROFLUORMETHANE I ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 EPA-Regulated-Under Trihalomethanes Program 31 TOTAL TRIHALOMETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 80 TM 524.2 27 CHLOROFORM ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 28 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 29 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 30 BROMOFORM ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 State Unregulated-Other 0 METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER ND pg/L 1 0.4 1 0.5 TM 1 524.2 Notes.- SRL(State Reporting Limit): Indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington State Dept.of Health MCL(Maximum Contaminant level): maximum permissable level of a contaminant in water established by EPA Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water Response Level. Systems with compounds detected in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office. NO(Not Detected): Indicates tha the parameter was not detected above the Specified Reporting Limit(SRL) NA(Not Analyzed): Indicates that this parameter was not analyzed for. 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C A, Poulsbo, WA 98370 A (360) 779-5141 A Fax: (360) 779-5150 www.twisslabs.com „sue 1G^T 1 S S Ak ENVIRO�STARS ANALYTICAL, IN�e-Voc1 VOC-VOC1 by Various EPA Approved Methods Group: A Date Collected: 4/17/2006 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Water System ID Number: 053500 County: Mason Lab Sample Number: 01050612 DON Source No: S03 Sample Location: Well#3 Hummingbird Lane Date Received: 4/18/2006 Sample Purpose: C-Compliance Date Analyzed: 4/20/2006 Sample Composition: Date Reported: 4/26/2006 Sample Type: A-After Treatment Send Report to: Sample Collected by(name): Jason Pomeoy Belfair Water District#1 Phone Number: 360-275-3008 P.O.Box 563 1 Belfair,WA 98528 i tom' DOH# ANALYTES RESULTS UNITS SRL Trigger MCL Analyst METHOD COMMENT 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.2 TM 524.2 ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE(EDB) ND pg/L 0.4 0.05 TM 524.2 160 TOTAL XYLENES ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 10000 TM 524.2 57 T-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 100 TM 524.2 60 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 70 TM 524.2 471,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 200 TM 524.2 48 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 5 TM 524.2 49 BENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 5 TM 524.2 501,2-DICHLOROETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 5 TM 524.2 51 TRICHLOROETHYLENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 5 TM 524.2 631,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 5 TM 524.2 66 TOLUENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 1000 TM 524.2 671,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 5 TM 524.2 68 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 5 TM 524.2 71 CHLOROBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 100 TM 524.2 73 ETHYLBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 700 TM 524.2 158 M/P-XYLENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 45 VINYL CHLORIDE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 2 TM 524.2 159 O-XYLENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 76 STRYENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 100 TM 524.2 52 P-DICHLOROBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 75 TM 524.2 84 O-DICHLOROBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 600 TM 524.2 951,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 70 TM 524.2 461.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 7 TM 524.2 56 METHYLENE CHLORIDE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 .5 TM 524.2 EPA Unregulated Monitoring Required 581,1-DICHLOROETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 59 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 86 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 621,1-DICHLOROPROPENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 162 DICHLORODIFLUOROM ETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 64 DIBROMOMETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 65 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 69 TRANS-I,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 53 CHLOROMETHANE ND I pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C A Poulsbo, WA 98370 A (360) 779-5141 A Fax: (360) 779-5150 www.twisslabs.com r 4 ENVIROSTARS NALYTICAL, IN Iioc-Voc1 kT VOC-VOC1 by Various EPA Approved Methods Group: A Date Collected: 4/17/2006 System Name: Belfair Water District#1 Water System ID Number: 053500 County: Mason Lab Sample Number: 01050612 DOH Source No: S03 Sample Location: Well#3 Hummingbird Lane Date Received: 4/18/2006 Sample Purpose: C-Compliance Date Analyzed: 4/20/2006 Sample Composition: Date Reported: 4/26/2006 Sample Type: A-After Treatment Send Report to: Sample Collected by(name): Jason Pomeoy Belfair Water District#1 Phone Number: 360-275-3008 P.O.Box 563 1 Belfair,WA 98528 DOH# ANALYTES RESULTS UNITS SRL Trigger MCL Analyst METHOD COMMENT 701,3-DICHLOROPROPANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 721,1,1,2-TETP.ACHLOROETHANE ND pg/L 04 0.5 TM 524.2 871SOPROPYLBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 791,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 78 BROMOBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 801,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 81 O-CHLOROTOLUENE ND pg/L 0A 0.5 TM 524.2 88 N-PROPYLBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 624.2 89 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 54 BROMOMETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 82 P-CHLOROTOLUENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 90 TERT-BUTYLBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 91 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 92 SEC-BUTYLBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 83 M-DICHLOROBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 93 P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 94 N-BUTYLBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 55 CHLOROETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 97 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 ' 96 NAPTHALENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 981,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 85 TRICHLOROFLUORMETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 ' EPA-Regulated-Under Trihaiomethanes Program 31 TOTAL TRIHALOMETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 80 TM 524.2 27 CHLOROFORM ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 28 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 ' 29 CHLORODIBROMOM ETHANE ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 30 BROMOFORM ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 524.2 State Unregulated-Other 0 METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER ND pg/L 0.4 0.5 TM 1 524.2 Notes: SRL(State Reporting Limit): Indicates the minimum reporting level required by the Washington State Dept.of Health ' MCL(Maximum Contaminant level): maximum permissable level of a contaminant in water established by EPA Trigger Level: DOH Drinking Water Response Level. Systems with compounds detected in excess of this level are required to take additional samples. Contact your regional DOH office. ND(Not Detected): Indicates tha the parameter was not detected above the Specified Reporting Limit(SRL) NA(Not Analyzed): Indicates that this parameter was not analyzed for. ' 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C A Poulsbo, WA 98370 A (360) 779-5141 A Fax: (360) 779-5150 www.twisslabs.com AL ENVIROSTARS A4 1 NALYTICAL, INC. August 31,2006 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) REPORT Total Trihalomethane (THM) Belfair Water District P.O.Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 Page 1 of I System Name: Belfair Water District Field ID: 69526-01 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number:01062196 DOH Source Number: 92 Date Collected: 8/14/06 Sample Type: A Date Analyzed: 8/17/06 Sample Purpose: C Date Reported: 8/31/06 Sample Location Sample Point 643 Old Belfair Hwy Analyst: TM County: Mason Supervisor: ST EPA Method 524.2 For State Drinking Water Compliance DON# COMPOUNDS I RESULTS UNITS SRL TRIGGER MCL COMMENTS EPA Regulated Under Trihalomethanes Program 27 CHLOROFORM ND(0.35) µg/L Blk ND 28 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 0.70 µg/L Dup 0.68 Blk ND 29 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 0.92 µg/L Dup 0.91 30 BROMOFORM ND(0.33) µg/L 31 TOTAL TRIHALOMETHANE 1.61 µg/L 80 1.59 A result of"ND"indicates that the compound was not detected above the Lab's Method Detection Limit—MDL Maximum Contaminant Level,maximum permissible level of a contaminant in water established by EPA,NPDWR,State Advisory Level(SAL)for unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL value indicated a level is not currently,established. If a compound is detected or to the State Reporting Level(SRL),specified increased monitoring frequencies may occur per DOH. ' Method Detection Limit is the lab's minimum concentration a compound can be measured and reported with 99%confidence that the compound is greater than zero. J—Estimated value. 1 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C A Poulsbo, WA 98370 A (360) 779-5141 A Fax: (360) 779-5150 ' www.twisslabs.com 4 kiT ENVIROSTARS NALYTICAL, INC. August 31,2006 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS WOO REPORT Total Trihalomethane (THM) Belfair Water District P.O. Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 Page I of 1 System Name: Belfair Water District Field ID: 69526-05 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number:01062200 DOH Source Number: 92 Date Collected: 8/14/06 Sample Type: A Date Analyzed: 8/17/06 Sample Purpose: C Date Reported: 8/31/06 Sample Location Sample Point 22871 Hwy 3 Analyst: TM County: Mason Supervisor: ST EPA Method 524.2 For State Drinking Water Compliance DOH# COMPOUNDS I RESULTS UNITS SRL TRIGGER MCL COMMENTS EPA Regulated Under Trihalomethanes Program 27 CHLOROFORM ND(0.35) µg/L 28 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ND(0.29) µg/L 29 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ND(0.27) µg/L 30 BROMOFORM ND(0.33) µg/L 31 TOTAL TRIHALOMETHANE ND µg/L 80 A result of"ND"indicates that the compound was not detected above the Lab's Method Detection Limit—MDL Maximum Contaminant Level,maximum permissible level of a contaminant in water established by EPA,NPDWR,State Advisory Level(SAL)for unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL value indicated a level is not currently-established. If a compound is detected or to the State Reporting Level(SRL),specified increased monitoring frequencies may occur per DOH. Method Detection Limit is the lab's minimum concentration a compound can be measured and reported with 99%confidence that the compound is greater than zero. J—Estimated value. 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C A Poulsbo, WA 98370 A (360) 779-5141 A Fax: (360) 779-5150 www.twisslabs.com ENVIROSTARS A4 , NALYTICAL, INC. ,t August 31,2006 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) REPORT Total Trihalomethane (THM) Belfair Water District P.O. Box 563 Belfair,WA 98528 Page I of 1 System Name: Belfair Water District Field ID: 69526-03 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number: 01062198 DOH Source Number: 92 Date Collected: 8/14/06 Sample Type: A Date Analyzed: 8/17/06 Sample Purpose: C Date Reported: 8/31/06 Sample Location Sample Point 12551 Hwy 106 Analyst: TM County: Mason Supervisor: ST EPA Method 524.2 For State Drinking Water Compliance DOH# COMPOUNDS I RESULTS UNITS SRL TRIGGER MCL COMMENTS EPA Regulated Under Trihalomethanes Program 27 CHLOROFORM ND(0.35) µg/L Blk ND 28 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 0.48 µg/L Dup 0.46 Blk ND 29 DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 0.70 µg/L Dup 64 30 BROMOFORM ND(0.33) µg/L 31 TOTAL TRIHALOMETHANE 1.17 µg/L 80 1.09 A result of"ND"indicates that the compound was not detected above the Lab's Method Detection Limit—MDL Maximum Contaminant Level,maximum permissible level of a contaminant in water established by EPA,NPDWR,State Advisory Level(SAL)for unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL value indicated a level is not currently established. If a compound is detected or to the State Reporting Level(SRL),specified increased monitoring frequencies may occur per DOH. Method Detection Limit is the lab's minimum concentration a compound can be measured and reported with 99%confidence that the compound is greater than zero. J—Estimated value. 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C A Poulsbo,WA 98370 A (360) 779-5141 A Fax: (360) 779-5150 www.twisslabs.com L 4 ENVIROSTARS A NALYTICAL, INC. August 31,2006 DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCT COMPOUNDS REPORT Haloacetic Acids (HAA) Belfair Water District P.O.Box 563 Bt�lfair, WA 98528 Page I of I System Name: Belfair Water District Field ID: 69526-02 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number:01062197 DOH Source Number: 92 Date Collected: 8/14/06 Multiple Sources: Date Extracted: 8/25/06 Sample Type: A Date Analyzed: 8/29/06 Sample Purpose: C Date Reported: 8/31/06 Sample Location: Sample Point 643 Old Belfair Hwy Analyst: TM County: Clallam Supervisor: ST EPA Method 552.1 For State Drinking Water Compliance DOH# COMPOUNDS RESULTS UNITS SRL TRIGGER MCL COMMENTS Halo-Acetic Acids CHLOROACETIC ACID ND(1.25) µg/L 2 DICHLOROACETIC ACID ND(0.42) µg/L I TRICHLOROACETIC ACID ND(0.31) µg/L 1 DIBROMOACETIC ACID ND(0.31) µg/L 1 BROMOCHLOROACETIC ACID ND(0.42) e/L 1 HAA 5 ND 1 48 60 A result of"ND"indicates that the compound was not detected above the Lab's Method Detection Limit—MDL Maximum Contaminant Level,maximum permissible level of a contaminant in water established by EPA,NPDWR,State Advisory Level(SAL)for unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL value indicated a level is not currently established. If a compound is detected>or=to the State Reporting Level(SRL),specified increased monitoring frequencies may occur per DOH. Method Detection Limit is the lab's minimum concentration a compound can be measured and reported with 990%confidence that the compound is greater than zero. J—Estimated value. 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C A Poulsbo,WA 98370 A (360) 779-5141 A Fax: (360) 779-5150 www.twisslabs.com 4 ENVIROSTARS ANALYTICAL, INC. August 31,2006 DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCT COMPOUNDS REPORT Haloacetic Acids (HAA) Belfair Water District P.O.Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 Page 1 of l System Name: Belfair Water District Field ID: 69526-06 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number: 01062201 DOH Source Number: 92 Date Collected: 8/14/06 Multiple Sources: Date Extracted: 8/25/06 Sample Type: A Date Analyzed: 8/29/06 Sample Purpose: C Date Reported: 8/31/06 Sample Location: Sample Point 22871 Hwy 3 Analyst: TM County: Clallam Supervisor: ST EPA Method 552.1 For State Drinking Water Compliance , DOH N COMPOUNDS RESULTS UNITS SRL TRIGGER MCL COMMENTS Halo-Acetic Acids CHLOROACETIC ACID ND(1.25) µg/L 2 DICHLOROACETIC ACID ND(0.42) µg/L 1 TRICHLOROACETIC ACID ND(0.31) µg/L 1 DIBROMOACETIC ACID ND(0.31) µg/L 1 BROMOCHLOROACETIC ACID ND(0.42) L I HAA 5) ND 1 48 60 A result of"ND"indicates that the compound was not detected above the Lab's Method Detection Limit—MDL Maximum Contaminant Level,maximum permissible level of a contaminant in water established by EPA,NPDWR,State Advisory Level(SAL)for unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL value indicated a level is not currently established. If a compound is detected>or=to the State Reporting Level(SRL),specified increased monitoring frequencies may occur per DOH. Method Detection Limit is the lab's minimum concentration a compound can be measured and reported with 99%confidence that the compound is greater than zero. J—Estimated value. 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C A Poulsbo, WA 98370 A (360) 779-5141 A Fax: (360) 779-5150 www.twisslabs.com VV IL S S ENVIROSTARS A4 NALYTICAL, INC. August 31,2006 DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCT COMPOUNDS REPORT Haloacetic Acids (HAA) Belfair Water District P.O.Box 563 Belfair, WA 98528 Page 1 of I System Name: Belfair Water District Field ID: 69526-04 System ID Number: 053500 Lab Number:01062199 DOH Source Number: 92 Date Collected: 8/14/06 Multiple Sources: Date Extracted: 8/25/06 Sample Type: A Date Analyzed: 8/29/06 Sample Purpose: C Date Reported: 8/31/06 Sample Location: Sample Point 12551 Hwy 106 Analyst: TM County: Clallam Supervisor: ST EPA Method 552.1 For State Drinking Water Compliance /e DOH# COMPOUNDS RESULTS UNITS SRL TRIGGER MCL COMMENTS Halo-Acetic Acids CHLOROACETIC ACID ND(1.25) µg/L 2 DICHLOROACETIC ACID ND(0.42) µg/L 1 TRICHLOROACETIC ACID ND(0.31) µg/L 1 DIBROMOACETIC ACID ND(0.31) µg/L 1 BROMOCHLOROACETIC ACID ND(0.42) L I HAA 5 ND 1 48 60 A result of"ND"indicates that the compound was not detected above the Lab's Method Detection Limit—MDL Maximum Contaminant Level,maximum permissible level of a contaminant in water established by EIrA,NPDWR,State Advisory Level(SAL)for unregulated compounds. A blank MCL or SAL value indicated a level is not currently established. If a compound is detected>or=to the State Reporting Level(SRL),specified increased monitoring frequencies may occur per DOH. Method Detection Limit is the lab's minimum concentration a compound can be measured and reported with 99%confidence that the compound is greater than zero. J—Estimated value. 26276 Twelve Trees Lane,Suite C A Poulsbo, WA 98370 A (360) 779-5141 A Fax: (360) 779-5150 www.twisslabs.com 10.6 Letters to and Comments on WSP from Adjacent Utilities 10.6.1 Mason County Public Works (Beards Cove) 10.6.2 Riverhill HOA Water System Chandler L. Odell, P.E. 5706 90th Street Court East Puyallup,WA 98371-7122 Telephone: 253-845-1230 September 18, 2007 Mason County Public Works 415 N. 6" St. P.O. Box 1850 Shelton, WA 98584 Subject: Draft Water System Plan Update for Belfair Water District No. 1 Dear Sir or Madame: Transmitted herewith on behalf of Belfair Water District No. 1 is a copy of the Draft Water System Plan Update. It is sent to you for review as the county public works department and on behalf of Beards Cove Water System. Both the District and I would appreciate any comments you may have. If you have any questions, please contact Dave Tipton, District Manager, or me at your convenience. The District's phone number is 360-275-3008. I may be reached at 253-845-1230 or via e-mail at chanodell@comcast.net. Very Truly Yours, Chandler L. Odell, P.E. Enclosures: Copy of WSP Update cc: Dave Tipton Chandler L. Odell, P.E. 5706 90th Street Court East Puyallup,WA 98371-7122 Telephone: 253-845-1230 September 18, 2007 Ken Loomis Riverhill HOA Water System PO Box 86 Belfair, WA 98528 Subject: Draft Water System Plan Update for Belfair Water District No. 1 Dear Mr. Loomis: Transmitted herewith on behalf of Belfair Water District No. 1 is a copy of the Draft Water System Plan Update. Both the District and I would appreciate any comments you may have. If you have any questions, please contact Dave Tipton, District Manager, or me at your convenience. The District's phone number is 360-275-3008. I may be reached at 253-845-1230 or via e-mail at chanodell@comcast.net. Very Truly Yours, —�3, (ez&e Chandler L. Odell, P.E. Enclosures: Copy of WSP Update cc: Dave Tipton 10.7 Belfair Water District No. 1 Letter to Fire District No. 2 k Bdl*VAMBISM#1 N.E.22461 Hyw.3 P.O.Box 563 Beffair Washington 98528 Phone(360)275-3008 Fax(360)275-6410 November 20,2001 Jerry A-Hukill Sr. Belfair Water District Manager Belfair,WA 98528 Mike Greene Belfair Fire District#2 Belfair,WA. 98528 RE:Fireflow Dear Sir, As you are probably aware, the Belfair Water District is in the process of updating our comprehensive water system plan. I feel the need to reiterate my concern on fireflow. Because of the lack of loops in the system and not having the amount of water storage we need for proper fire protection. I request that you pump no more than two thousand gallons a minute through your trucks. If more water is pumped it could possibly collapse the water main the water is being drawn from. I thank you for your attention to this matter.I would also request that you still keep track of the water used by your Fire Department.This will aid us at the end of each year for total water loss. I thank you for your help. If you have any questions please call me at 275-3008. merely, Jerry ukiU Sr. Belfair Water District Manager WDM-3 10.8 Belfair Water District No. 1 Water Shortage Response Plan ON f { ti's 1 Belfair 'Water District No. 1 WATER SHORTAGE RESPONSE PLAN MAY 2007 CHAPTERI PROBLEM ASSESSMENT 1.0 Demand Analysis 1.1 Demand Analysis To begin the demand analysis, current annual flows were used. These are the latest full, annual flows available that are concurrent with the data used in the Water System Plan. The Guidance Document Water Shortage Response Plans indicates that using source and service meters for supply and demand analysis is best in Section 2. Evaluate supply and Demand. Therefore, the 2005 annual usage is used for this document. The annual customer metered consumption was 4,748,020 cubic feet, or 35,500,230 gallons. The annual average daily usage was 115,255 gallons for all users. The monthly daily average use varied from a low of 92,415 gallons in April 2005 to a high of 153,680 gallons in September. See the Worksheet included in the appendix at the back of this document. Since daily flows are not available on customer metered services, the multiplier of two (2) was used to calculate the peak day demand at 230,511 gallons. This is a considerable reduction from that used for the 2001 Water system Plan. Basically, there are three consumer groups on the Belfair Water District system. They are Single Family Residences, Multiple Family Residences, and Commercial/Industrial. The latter group does include some minor governmental agencies such as PUD No. 3, a small Mason County office, and Fire District No. 2. Single Family Residences make up 44.6% of the customer usage, Multiple Family Residences are 5.6%, and Commercial/Industrial users comprise 49.8%_ The largest users are two supermarkets. There is one industrial customer, Hard Rock Concrete, on the system at this time. The Mason County Comprehensive Plan calls for a growth factor of 1.37% for its planning period. With the designation of the Belfair area as an Urban Growth Area (UGA), it is anticipated that this figure will likely hold true. Actual growth will greatly depend on construction of a new sewer system. Mason county anticipates construction of the new sewers to be in the 2009-2010 time frame. The District has constructed a new 1.1 MG standpipe and the installation of a new well pump, disinfection facilities, and a reservoir management system for Well No. 4. These new facilities are now on line and serve a few customers in Pressure Zone No. 2. It is unclear as to exactly when construction of the interzone connection will be completed. One of the segments in the worksheet in the appendix is a projection of demand factors through the period of the District's Water System Plan, 2012. The growth factor of 1.37% was used to 2010 and then 3.1% to 2012. On top of that a drought factor of 5% was used for each month. While there is little likelihood of a drought being in effect during the wet weather months, it was still applied to accentuate the overall annual average usage. Table 1.1 lists the demand projections for the years 2001-2006. 1 Table 1.1 Belfair Water District No. 1 Demand Projections Year Average Day Demand Peak Day Demand ons) ( ons) 2007 118,435 236,870 2008 120,058 240,115 2009 121,703 243,405 2010 123,370 246,740 2011 127,194 254,389 2012 131,137 262,275 1.2 Supply Analysis Belfair Water District No.1 has four active wells. Well Nos. 1 and 2 are flowing artesians. Well No. 1 can be pumped at 150 gpm according to the District's water rights. It has a "shut-in" head of approximately 13#. When pumped at 150 gpm, the residual head is approximately 8.5# Well No. 2 has water rights for withdrawal of 300 gpm. However, this well has degenerated and is only capable of approximately 150 gpm. In addition, it "makes sand" upon initial start up. It must be manually operated to clear the sand before it can be connected to the system. It is held strictly for emergency purposes. It has a "shut in" head of approximately 8#, but the water level quickly drops into the casing when pumped. Well No. 3 (Hummingbird) is also an artesian, but not flowing. Its static water level rises to approximate three feet below the ground surface, depending on tide conditions. When pumped at 275 gpm (water right limit), it drops approximately 70 feet to a stabile level. Well No. 4 is the new well, with permitted water rights for 600-gpm instantaneous withdrawal rate and 645 acre-feet annual usage. The well is approximately 630' deep. The static water level is at an elevation of 192 feet above sea level. The ground surface is at 334'. At 600 gpm, the working water level will be at elevation 52'. In all cases above, there has been no deterioration of either static or pumping levels over the history of the wells. All of the wells get their supply from confined aquifers with an apparently significant recharge area. Based on the above Supply Analysis, the District has an immediate supply of 425 gpm from two wells (Nos. 1 & 3), with another 150 gpm from Well No. 2 for emergency purposes. Well No. 4 supplies 600 gpm. This well has not yet been connected to the existing system, but is expected to be connected by the end of 2007, or mid-2008. 1.3 Supply and Demand Comparison Based on the data in worksheet in the appendix, it appears that if all wells are functioning, there will be no deficit in supply for the projected demand from 2007 through 20012. There are potentially several factors that will affect supply; 1) electrical failure, 2) mechanical failure, and 3) catastrophic failure. 2 An electrical failure is the "most likely" scenario for a supply shortage. Generally, electrical failures occur during the wet weather months during storms, and when demand is the lowest. The District has a fixed based generator connected to Well No. 1, which can be turned on and used to keep this well operable. In addition, there is a portable generator that can be taken to Well No. 3 to keep it operating. However, both of these generators are military surplus with replacement parts almost impossible to find. The District is in the process of installing a permanent generator for Well No. 3, and the Water System Plan identifies a project to replace the generator at Well No. 1. If necessary, Well No. 1 can pump 216,000 gpd. This well alone can almost pump the peak day demand load. Therefore, an electrical outage is not considered as an insurmountable situation. During the first two years of the Water System Plan planning period, the most reasonable "worst case" scenario that could occur would be for a mechanical breakdown of Well No. 3 in a peak day demand situation. Since this well is used from May through September, its loss during this time frame, could present some supply problems for the District. As stated above, Well No. 1 can pump 216,000 gpd. If Well No. 3 does go down, Well No. 2 can be activated and provide another 150 gpm, or 216,000 gpd. This will meet the projected peak day demand in Pressure zone No. 1 for all years until 2012. However, once Well No. 4 is connected to the existing system, Well No. 3 problems become a non-issue. Well No. 4 primarily serves Pressure Zone No. 2 in the northeast quarter of the District's service area. If it suffers a mechanical breakdown, there will be no way for the water from Pressure Zone No. 1 (present system) to feed water up the hill. There is a 1.1 MG standpipe in place to serve the upper zone. During the early years of its operation, most of the water will be used in the lower zone. Therefore, as upper zone growth occurs attention will have to be paid to how the water is used and where. If a breakdown occurs, the lower zone will have to be isolated until the problem is repaired. Presently it is not financially feasible to install on-site generation for this well. Additionally, the standpipe should be able to serve the upper zone growth well past the six-year term of the new Water System Plan. While no specific month can be identified as the most likely for a shortage, based on the analysis, the month of August has historically been the highest peak use period for Belfair, even though September was the high month for 2005. If one of the occurrences above happens, the District is prepared to handle the problem in a timely manner. 3 CHAPTER II OPTIONS FOR DEALING WITH A WATER SHORTAGE 2.1 Resource Policies Belfair Water District No. 1 does not have specific, officially adopted resource policies regarding demand reduction for water shortage events. All water shortages to date have been short term, generally 24 hours, or less. There have been times when a power failure has curtailed production of supply, but only for a short term. During these periods, water use generally drops off dramatically. No customers have been out of water due to the production stoppage. In addition, the District has now installed a generator for Well No. 1. This generator is capable of keeping the system operational during power outages. The District constructed a new standpipe, which will store approximately 1.1 MG in 2002. At the same time Well No. 4 and a new Well House/Control Building were placed in operation. While the primary_ purpose of these facilities will be to serve the new Pressure Zone No. 2, connection to the existing system will enhance water supply reliability for the entire District system. The District will not have to curtail growth due to a water shortage. A higher growth rate in accordance with Mason County's designation of the Belfair area as a UGA has been enabled by the construction the new standpipe and Well No. 4. Any water shortage experienced by the District will likely be of a short-term nature_ Even the reasonable worst-case scenario of a mechanical failure should be no longer than a week. As discussed below, demand reduction for short-term water shortages will likely be confined to irrigation restrictions with the curtailment of home vehicle washing as a possible follow on. In these instances, the burden of a demand reduction will likely be more on the residential class, rather than the commercial class. Some of the larger commercial customers do have separate irrigation systems, and others have small landscape plots, but by far a reduction of irrigation will be felt more by the residential class of customers. At the time of this writing, there does not appear to be a financial burden associated with such a demand reduction. In 1995, Belfair Water District No. 1 adopted an increasing block rate structure. This rate structure has been instrumental in reducing the annual ADD to 130 gpd in 2005. The District has maintained the rate policy ever since, with an across-the-board 25% increase in October 2001. A new rate increase is being discussed for autumn 2007. It will continue the increasing block rate structure. This rate increase in 2001 was adopted to assist in paying off the one percent loan received from the Public Works Trust Fund for the new facilities. In addition, a "System Development Fee" is paid by all new connections to the system. It is anticipated that this new fee will pay the bulk of the principle and interest cost of the loan once growth begins in the new pressure zone. 2.2 Demand Reduction Options Because the District's water supply is from a series of deep, underground aquifers, it does not suffer from an actual water shortage, as such. Groundwater is not affected in same way as surface water supplies, which can be severely impacted by a short-term drought condition. Groundwater supplies react much more slowly to these conditions, and the impacts are less severe. Water shortages for the District are the result of some type of system failure. 4 As stated above, historically the District has not had to impose a demand reduction requirement on any of its customers. That does not mean that such actions should not be considered. Any demand reduction imposed by the District will be a direct result of the situation at the time of a water shortage. For example, if an electrical failure occurs during the wintertime, a demand reduction is not likely to be imposed. If, however, such a failure occurs in August during the peak use period, it is likely that a dramatic reduction will be called for. If the outage is longer than 12 hours, specific orders to cease landscape irrigation will be issued. Additionally, the District can require no home car or vehicle washing. If the problem were a mechanical failure, again there would likely be no reduction in demand required during the wintertime. If this were to occur in August, it would depend on which well was affected. A failure of the pump at Well No. 1 would require no reduction. However, a similar incident at Well No. 3 would require curtailment of landscaping irrigation for the duration of the problem. The District has an ongoing public information program. It has distributed all but the latest water DOH conservation guidelines to all of its customers. The guidelines are kept in plain sight at the District's customer service counter, and new customers are given copies when they sign up for service. In addition, the District inserts a newsletter in its bills twice a year. The only governmental user that could effectively impact overall usage is Fire District No. 2. Imposition of restrictions would not be imposed for fire fighting, but they could be imposed on training activities. While the District could also considered a government agency, any action taken against the fire district for water use for training would also apply to the District for main flushing activities. Board of Commissioner Policy No. 12-01 allows the District Manager to impose user restrictions on customers as he/she determines as necessary during a water supply shortage situation. The District has had an increasing block rate structure in place since 1995. Board of Commissioner PolicyNo. BWD-RR-16 allows the District to impose penalties or P disconnect users for violations of District policies or rules. DOH has listed three stages of a water shortage situation. The District has defined the various shortage situations based on its owns stem. The are as follows: 9 Y Y Stage 1 Minor Shortage - defined as an electrical outage of more than 24 hours, but less than 36 hours in duration- Voluntary Measures Stage 2 Moderate Shortage — defined as an electrical or mechanical failure more than 36 hours in duration - Mandatory Measures Stage 3 Severe Shortage — defined as a complete loss of two or more of the District's supply sources- Rationing Program Based on the discussion above, the following options are adopted by Belfair Water District No. 1 for use in water shortage situations above: 5 1 Public Information Program — Prepare and distribute conservation materials — estimated savings, 5%; (1), (2), (3) Government Actions — Restrict fire department use of hydrants for training, eliminate all but emergency main flushing, and prohibit public water uses not required for public health and safety—estimated savings, 15%; (2), (3) User Restrictions — Implement voluntary water use reductions, implement landscaping irrigation restrictions, and implement home vehicle washing restrictions — estimated savings, 20%; (1), (2), (3) Penalties— Disconnect water service, fines— estimated savings, 10%; (2), (3) 2.3 Triggering Criteria A drought, unless it is a very long one, will not likely be the trigger for implementing any of the demand reduction actions listed in this plan. Belfair's groundwater sources are deep and are not easily impacted by a short-term drought, as recent droughts since 1977 have demonstrated. That notwithstanding, the District monitors its well water levels on a daily basis. Well Nos. 1&2 are flowing artesians. Both static and pumping residual pressures are recorded. Well Nos. 3 & 4 have circular, 7-day charts that constantly record the water level in the well casing. The most likely scenario for a water shortage will be the lack of power to the well pumps. A prolonged power outage to, or mechanical breakdown of Well No. 3 during the peak use season will create a potential shortage of supply, at least until Well No. 4 and its attendant storage tank are connected to the rest of the system. In that instance, the District will be notified automatically if existing storage capacity is compromised. 2.4 Supply Augmentation Belfair Water District No. 1 can augment the supply in Pressure Zone No. 1 by connecting the two zones together. This will add 600 gpm and 645 acre-feet per year. The tank stores approximately 1.1 MG. Evaluation of the system under the new supply conditions, indicates that additional supplies will not be required at least for the next ten or more years, based on present growth projections. 2.5 Evaluation and Selection of a Course of Action All of the options listed above are viable for Belfair Water District No. 1. The size of the system, along with the limited range of customer types, restricts what the District can accomplish during a water shortage. 6 I CHAPTER III PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 3.1 Schedule Based on the types of scenarios under which a water shortage will occur for the District, scheduling for implementation of any of the demand reduction options will depend on the type of problem occurs. For example, an area wide storm in the middle of winter that knocks out power to the system will have little impact on the water supply. The District will simply start the generator for Well No. 1, which will be able to supply all of the water necessary to serve the customers. If, however, such an occurrence should happen during the summer, Well No. 1 will only be able to sustain the supply for approximately 12 hours. This will require the District Manager to closely monitor the power situation to determine if any of the demand reduction options are to be implemented. Probably the most serious type of problem for the District will be a mechanical failure at Well No. 3. A mechanical failure will entail pulling the well pump, evaluating what is wrong, and either fix the problem or replace the pump and/or motor. This will take a longer period of time. Under this circumstance, the District Manager will have immediate knowledge and will be able to implement the necessary demand options. The District is a small system, with approximately 520 customers. It is cost effective to prepare the appropriate notices detailing the options being implemented and have the staff hand-deliver them to the customers. This can be accomplished in less than a single day, whereas preparing a news release and having it published will take at least two days, and then it is not guaranteed that all customers will see it. 3.2 Financial Program The types of water supply shortages the District is likely to incur will not have a significant effect on its budget. The District budgets for an emergency situation such as this. Funds are available on a year-around basis for pump repair or replacement. 3.3 Monitoring Program The District presently monitors well levels, both static and working, on a regular basis. Historically, there has been no change in water levels in the wells since the District began operations. Since a water shortage situation will most likely be the result of an electrical or mechanical problem, The District must cant' out a regular maintenance program for its well pumps. An electrical problem such as brought on by a storm cannot be easily foreseen. Therefore, the best way to minimize water shortage problems is to be sure that all pumps and other operating equipment is scrupulously maintained and in good working order. 7 XIaN3dd`d -7 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 WATER SHORTAGE RESPONSE PLAN WORKSHEETS CURRENT WATER CONSUMPTION(2006) Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TOTAL Cons.(cf) 385,361 470,679 381,070 383,004 433,804 458,810 521,028 624,668 636,911 499,175 420,433 413,914 5,628,857 Cons. (gal) 2,882,500 3,520,679 2,850,404 2,864,870 3,244,854 3,431.899 3.897,289 4,672,517 4,764,094 3,733,829 3,144,839 3,096,077 42,103,850 Av Cons/day 92,984 113,570 101,800 92,415 108,162 110,706 129,910 150,726 153,680 124,461 101,446 103,203 115,255 PD=2xAv 185,968 227,140 203,600 184.830 216,324 221,412 259,820 301,452 307,360 248,922 202,892 206,406 230,511 WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS-2007 to 2012 2007 Jan Feb Mar April Mgy June July Aug Sept Qp-t Nov Dec TOTAL AVG ADD 95,549 116,703 104.608 94,965 111,146 113,760 133,494 154,884 157,920 127,895 104,245 106,050 118,435 PDD 191,098 233,406 209.216 189,930 222,292 227,520 266,988 309,768 315.840 255,790 208,490 212,100 236,870 2008 Jan Feb Mal April may 40-e July Aug aQpt Qpj No QN TOTALAVG 96,858 118,302 106,041 96,266 112,669 115,319 135,323 157,006 160,084 129,647 105,673 107,503 120,058 PDD 193,716 236,604 212,082 192,532 225,338 230,638 270,646 314,012 320,168 259,294 211,346 215,006 240,115 2009 Jar FFte Mar April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dgc TOTAL AVG ADD 98,185 119,923 107,494 97,585 114,213 116,899 137,177 159,157 162,277 131,423 107,121 108,976 121,703 PDD 196,370 239,846 214,988 195,170 228,426 233,798 274,354 318,314 324,554 262,846 214,242 217,952 243,405 2010 Jan Feb Mai April may June July Aug Sept O1cNov Dec TOTAL AVG ADD 99,530 121,566 108.967 98,922 115,778 118,501 139,056 161,337 164,500 133,223 108,589 110.469 123,370 PDD 199,060 243,132 217,934 197,844 231,556 237,002 278,112 322.674 329,000 266,446 217,178 220,938 246,740 2011 Jar Feb mar ApJi May June July Aug Sept ct Nov Dec TOTAL AVG ADD 102,615 125,335 112,345 101,989 119,367 122,175 143,367 166,338 169,600 137,353 111,955 113,894 127,194 PDD 205,230 250,670 224,690 203,978 238,734 244,350 286,734 332,676 339,200 274.706 223,910 227,788 254,389 2012 Jan Feb M1 Pg1 May June July Aug Sept Qcl Nov Der TOTAL AVG ADD 105,796 129,220 115,828 105,151 123,067 125,962 147,811 171,494 174,858 141.611 115,426 117,425 131,137 PDD 211,592 258,440 231,656 210,302 246,134 251,924 295,622 342,988 349,716 283,222 230,852 234,850 262,275 Water Use Data for 2007 WSP-WSRP WORK-9/19/2007-3:57 PM 1 of 2 BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT NO. 1 WATER SHORTAGE RESPONSE PLAN WORKSHEETS DEMAND&SUPPLY COMPARISON-2007 to 2012 2007 Jan Feb Mar Agdl May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec PDD 191.098 233,406 209.216 189,930 222,292 227,520 266,988 309,768 :315,840 255.790 208,490 212,100 AVAIL.SUPP. 612,000 612,000 612,000 612.000 612,000 612,000 612,000 612,D00 612,000 612,000 612,000 612,000 EXCESS/(DEF) 420,902 378,594 402,784 422,070 389,708 384,480 345,012 302,232 296,160 356,210 403,510 399,900 2008 Jan Eqb mar 6pw may June Attl 6119 �ePt 4Ct IL4Y PAS PDD 193,716 236,604 212,082 192,532 225,338 230,638 270,646 314,012 320,168 259,294 211,346 215,006 AVAIL.SUPP, 612,000 612.000 612,000 612,000 612,000 612,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476.000 1,476,000 1,476,000 EXCESS/(DEF) 418,284 375,396 399,918 419,468 386,662 381,362 1,205,354 1.161,988 1,155,a32 1,216.706 1,264,654 1,260,994 2009 Jan Feb mar April May JJ+ne JUN Aug Sept 9QS Nov Pm PDD 196.370 239,846 214,968 195,170 228.426 233,798 274,364 318,314 324.554 262,846 214,242 217,952 AVAIL.SUPP. 1.476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476.000 1,476,000 1,476,000 EXCESS/(DEF) 1,279,630 1,236.154 1,261.012 1,280,830 1,247,574 1,242.202 1,201,646 1,157,686 1,151.446 1,213,154 1,261.758 1,258,048 2010 Jan EQb Ikr 6RW ME June July &9 ,wept 9.q! NOV POO PDD 199,060 243,132 217,934 197,844 231,556 237,002 278,112 322,674 329,000 266,446 217,178 220,938 AVAIL.SUPP. 1,476.000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476.000 1,476,000 1,476,000 EXCESS/(DEF) 1,276,940 1,232,868 1,258,066 1,278,156 1,244,444 1,238,998 1,197,a88 1,153,326 1,147,000 1,209,554 1,258,822 1,255,062 2011 Jan FebMgr April MAY June July AugSgw 00t Nov Dec PDD 205,230 250,670 224,690 203,978 238,734 244,350 286,734 332,676 339,200 274,7D6 223,910 227,788 AVAIL. SUPP. 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476.000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1.478,000 1,476,000 EXCESS/(DEF) 1,270,770 1.225,330 1,251,310 1,272,022 1,237,266 1,231,650 1,189,266 1,143.324 1,136,800 1,201,294 1,252,090 1,248,212 2012 Jan Foie Mar April MR June July Aug Sept 9-01 rNv Dec PDD 211,592 258,440 231.656 210,302 246,134 251,924 295,622 342,988 349,716 283,222 230,852 234,850 AVAIL.SUPP. 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476.000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 1,476,000 EXCESS/(DEF) 1,264,408 1,217,560 1,244,344 1,265,698 1,229,866 1,224,076 1,180,378 1,133.012 1.126.284 1.192,778 1,245.148 1,241,150 Water Use Data for 2007 WSP-WSRP WORK-9/19/2007-3:57 PM 2 of 2 1 10.9 Municipal Water Law Attachment 2 Attachment 2: Municipal Water Law Water System Plan/Small Water System Management Program General Approval Checklist For each element, please identify where in your Water System Plan (WSP) or Small Water System Management Program (SWSMP) submittal the requirements of the Municipal Water Law identified in the column labeled "Element" are addressed. The "Application" column identifies the type of plan (WSP or SWSMP) and the size of system the element applies to. Addressed In plan on Documentation Application Element pages Attached indicated Water rights ands stem capacity The water rights self-assessment you have included in your WSP and SWSMP must be complete and must r right status.Please review our self-assessment for completeness, accuracy and adequately reflect our waleY WSP and SWSMP adeq Y Page(s) IV-8 consistency with your water rights. All size systems If there are factors(Le. supplemental, seasonal,etc.)to your water right that are not addressed in the self- assessment format,provide additional statements on how those factors affect your self-assessment. The system capacity analysis must incorporate the water right quantity parameters(QaQi)found in your water WSP and SWSMP rights self-assessment. Identify the number of connections,population served, and/or Equivalent Residential Units Page(s) II-11 All size systems (ERUs)that you are currently serving and identify your current instantaneous and annual water usage. Water use & III-1 l demand should not exceed existing water right QaQi. The system capacity analysis must incorporate the water right quantity parameters(QaQi)found in your water WSP rights self-assessment. For a 6-year planning horizon,evaluate the number of connections,population served, Page(s) II-3- All size systems and/or Equivalent Residential Units(ERUs)that you are planning on serving,utilizing historical water usage and 10 future population projections. Water use demand projections should not exceed existing water right QaQi. Service Area Delineation WSP and SWSMP Provide a map and description of the water system service area. The map must delineate your retail service area All size systems (existing and future)as well any other service area(existing and future)you wish to include in your water right Pocket at Back place of use. Provide clear differentiation between the two boundaries. WSP and SWSMP provide a copy of the land use map(s)for jurisdictions served by your system. Page(s) 1-15 All size systems Attachment 2 1 March 2004 Interim I Addressed In Application Element p n ion ages Documentation indicated Conservation New language has been added to RCW 70,119A,which states,"..,municipal water suppliers shall continue to meet the existing conservation requirements of the department and shall continue to implement their current water WSP and SWSMP conservation programs." Page(s) IV-1- All size systems Describe what,if any,previous efforts will be discontinued. For discontinued efforts, identify why continuation of 7 these efforts would be ineffective or provide documentation that the discontinued program had a prescribed end date or savings level. WSP Must meet current conservation requirements, Please review the requirements(attached)and provide identification Page(s) IV-1- All size systems of where in your current WSP each of the elements is included. 7 SWSMP Provide a completed Water Conservation Program(Element 14 of the SWSMP). Page(s) IV-1- All size systems 7 WSP Describe the projects, technologies,and other cost-effective measures that comprise your water conservation Systems serving program. Must 1000 or more attached N/A connections WSP Describe the improvements in the efficiency of water system use resulting from implementation of your water Systems serving conservation program over the last six years. Page(s) IV-1- 1000 or more 7 connections WSP Provide a demand forecast for the next 6-years based on the water savings expected from the planned conservation Systems with measures. inchoate water Page(s) II-11 rights serving 1000 or more connections WSP Provide a demand forecast for the next 6-years based on the water savings expected if implementing additional Systems with conservation measures that were considered cost-effective, including those that were not chosen to be implemented inchoate water at this time. Must be N/A attached rights serving 1000 or more connections Attachment 2 2 March 2004 Interim Addressed Application Element in plan on Documentation pages Attached indicated Reclaimed Water WSP Exploring opportunities for water reclamation is an element of the Municipal Water Law that must be addressed in Systems with this plan Page(s) N/A greater than 1000 Systems> 1000 Connections must complete Attachment 9: Water Reclamation Checklist for Systems with 1,000 connections or more Connections or provide comparable documentation. Duty to Serve Describe how your system responds to requests for new water service by providing: 1. The process for service requests,including timeframes 2. How you determine that your system's capacity is adequate to provide new water service(including Included in WSP sufficient water rights) Must be Chapter I on Page All size systems 3. Conditions of a non-technical nature that may affect your ability to provide new water service attached 16. (annexation procedures, water rights issues, local ordinances,etc.) 4. Your system's procedures for granting or requesting extensions of time during a water service related project, and describe your procedure for handling disputes and appeals when water service requests are denied Local Government Consistency WSP or SWSMP Consistency with applicable adopted local plans, regulations and policies must be determined Must be prior to plan submittal. For each appropriate planning agency provide a completed I-22 All size systems attached "Consistency Statement Checklist"or analogous documentation. Watershed Coordination WSP or SWSMP If our stem is located in an area developing a watershed plan per RCW 90.82,describe your efforts to y system P g All size systems coordinate with the local planning unit. We have attached a list of Water Resource Inventory Areas(WRIA) May need to In Watershed y N/A contact names for each area. where watershed Tans are currently in development along with c to e attached. Planning Process P y P g be atta r RCW 90.82 Attachment 2 3 March 2004 Interim 1010 P§a■C Hearing Minutes BkAR Water District No ! Pubic Meeting Minutes \T k� . z �x \ ^ . ?§ y . . . \ ^ «\� � § �\ v BELFAIR WATER DISTRICT# 1 WATER SYSTEM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MINUTES 20 June 2007 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT VISITORS Lou LaDow Jerry Hukill Chan Odell Irene Werdall Kathy Gadberry Harry Hatlem John Phillips Chairman LaDow called the meeting to order. Chairman LaDow asked for a motion to reopen the meeting at the Belfair Water District office. Commissioner Werdall made the motion to reopen the meeting, Commissioner Phillips seconded. Chairman LaDow stated this meeting is now reopened at 2:00 P.M. Chairman LaDow asked if Commissioner Werdall and Commissioner Phillips had a chance to review the agenda. Commissioner Werdall made the motion to approve the agenda and Commissioner Phillips seconded. Chairman LaDow stated the agenda is approved. Chairman LaDow stated that this meeting is for the Water System Comprehensive Plan which is only the item on the agenda. Chairman LaDow asked the District's Engineer Chan Odell to take the floor. Chan Odell readdressed the issue that the District needs to update the Water Systems Comprehensive Plan every 6 years.The Board of Commissioners for the Belfair Water District retained Chan Odell's services to update the W.S.C.P. (Water System Comprehensive Plan)in July of 2006. He explained to the Commissioners about the new regulations and laws affecting how plans are reviewed and submitted for approval, under the municipal water laws. One of the regulations adopted by Department of Health is that the public water system has a purpose hearing on the W.S.C.P. prior to its submittal for comment and approval. Which is what this meeting is all about, to this point what is also required is the local Planning Agency which is Mason County, has to sign a document stating that our W.S.C.P. is consistent with local planning policy.To that end he printed two books, one for Jery's office the other for Mason County Planning Department for comment and review. This document is basically complete for the first draft This meeting and the response from Mason County Planning will constitute our actions that need to be taken prior to the submittal to the Departrnent of Health for review and comment At that time there will also be printed and disseminated for public review throughout the system. Several copies will go to the Mason County Planning, Mason County Fire Marshall,Timberland Library and several here at the office for public review. One of the reasons Chan Odell printed only two copies, is because the cost for printing is quite expensive. If you are going to spend that kind of money you want to do it right the first time. Mr. Odell spoke extensively about the many possibilities of changes to the System that could be required. The Chairman asked for a motion to close this meeting.Commissioner Werdall made a motion Commissioner Phillips seconded.This special meeting for the Water System Comprehensive Water Plan is now closed.Chairman LaDow stated this meeting is now closed at 3:00 P.M.