HomeMy WebLinkAboutSHR96-0008 - SHR Permit / Conditions - 5/30/1996 srArF 0
o �
�p '30 , Ic: CEIVED
STATE OF WASHINGTON J U N 0 3 1996
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY MASON CO.PLANNING DUL
P.O. Box 47775 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 • (360) 407-6300
May 30, 1996
I certify that I mailed a copy of this
document to the persons and addresses listed
Mr. Gary Yando thereon, postage prepaid, in a receptacle for
Mason Cowlitz County Department United States mail in Lacey,Washington on
of Community Development
P.O. Box 186 Maxc 31 1,996.
Shelton WA. 095S4 - �—
Mr. Victor Seamans
3706 Kennedy Drive
Bremerton, WA 98312
Dear Mr. Yando and Mr. Seamans:
Re: Mason County Permit#SHR96-0008
Victor Seamans Applicant
Shoreline Substantial Development/Conditional Use Permit 1996-SW-00511
The Department of Ecology has reviewed the above referenced Conditional Use permit to construct a bridge
across the Union River.
We concur that the proposal, as conditioned by the county meets the intent of the master program and the criteria
set forth in WAC 173-14-140 for granting a Conditional Use permit. The permit is hereby approved.
This approval.is given pursuant to requirements of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. Other federal, state,
or local approvals may be required.
Those developments and activities authorized by the subject permit may not begin until twenty-one days from the
transmittal date of this approval letter, or until conclusion of any review proceeding(appeal)initiated within the
twenty-one day period. You will be notified in writing if this permit is appealed. C Jail
2 t L t qq O
/ \
If you have any questions on the above action, please contact Bill Young at 360 407-6399. /)
Sincerely,
Gale Blomstrom
Section Supervisor
Shorelands and Water
Resources Program
GB/BY:cl
APPRCUP.WP
Enclosure
MASON COUNTY
L� ? r�ti
DEPARTMEN.T.OF. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971
PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT
Type of Action(s) Case #: SHR96-0008
(*) Substantial Development Permit Agency: MASOTID-7
CO
(*) Conditional Use Permit Issued: 0
( ) Variance Permit Expire: D 00
Pursuant to RCW 90 .98, A permit is hereby grante /denied to:
VICTOR SEAMANS 3706 KENNEDY DR. 1 BREMER 98312
to undertake the following development: PLACEMENT OF A 48 FT. CONCRETE SLAB -
STEEL BEAM BRIDGE AND 70 FT. FLATCAR WITH WOOD DECK ON CONCRETE ABUTMENT ON
ONE BANK AND CONCRETE PIER ON OTHER BANK ACROSS THE UNION RIVER TO ACCESS
UPPER 10 ACRES OF LAND; SOUTH OF RIVER MILE 4 ON UNION RIVER.
upon the following address :
PARCEL# : 123165000007
ADDRESS : NE 2700 OLD BELFAIR HWY BELFAIR
LEGAL: ELLIS BANCROFT TRACTS TR 7 NE 2700 OLD BELFAIR HWY
Within UNION RIVER and/or its associated wetlands.
The project will not be within shorelines of state-wide significance
(RCW 90 . 58 . 030) .
The project will be located with an urban designation.
MASTER PROGRAM PROVISIONS & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and
nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any
other federal, state or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable
to this project,but not inconsistent with the Shorline Management Act
(Chapter 90 .58 RCW) .
This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90 .58 . 140 (7) in the event the
permittee fails to comply with the terms of conditions hereof .
CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED
UNTIL THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING THE FINAL ORDER OF THE LOCAL
GOVERNMENT WITH THE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN THIRTY
(30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED.No permit authorizing construction shall extend for a term of more than five
(5) years . If actual construction of a development for which a permit has
been granted has not begun within two years after the approval of the permit
by the Board of Commissioners, the Board shall, at the expiration of the
two-year period, review the permit, and upon a showing of good cause, extend
the permit for one year. Otherwise, the permit terminates: provided that no
permit shall be extended unless the applicant has requested such review
and extension prior to the last regular meeting of the Board coming before
the permit expiration date.
DATE Auth i d tocaL.,Moverninent Official
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL
USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT.
Date received by Department of Ecology 51a\01q(o
Approved K Denied
This Substantial Development Permit with Conditional Use/Variance is
approved by the Department of Ecology pursuant to Chapter 90 .58 RCW.
Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms
and conditions :
Date horized Dept . of Ecology Official
SHR_PRMT, rev: 03/24/92
I
CONDITIONS FOR SBR96-0008
VICTOR SEAMANS
STEEL BEAM/CONCRETE SLAB AND RAILROAD CAR BRIDGE
OVER THE UNION RIVER
1) Excess construction materials shall be removed from the shoreline area.
2) All excavation materials and soils exposed to erosion by all phases of construction shall
be stabilized and protected by seeding, mulching or other effective means, both during and
after construction.
3) Storm water runoff shall be controlled to reduce suspended solids and other pollutants
before entering the creek.
4) Existing in-stream crossing to the north shall be removed from the site.
5) No further bank stabilization, such as rock, be installed on the site unless appropriate
permits are obtained.
6) The bridge must be high enough (minimum of three feet above the 100-year flood
elevation) to pass all expected debris and anticipated high water flows from a 100-year flood.
7) The applicant shall comply with the specifications of the Hydraulic Project Approval as
finalized by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Habitat Specialist.
S) If the property is proposed for future subdivision by the applicant or owner, the bridge
crossing would need to be reviewed for adequacy as part of that proposal.